Upload
gareth-kaufman
View
19
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Establishing the Student – Teacher Connection. How Hard Can It Be?. Enterprise Data Architect: Dr. Alex Jones Project Manager(s): David Plouff Program Manager: Mark Svorinic IT Programs and Projects Dept. Arizona Department of Education 1535 West Jefferson Street, Phoenix, AZ 85007. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Establishing the Student – Teacher Connection
How Hard Can It Be?
ADE Information Technology Division 1
Enterprise Data Architect: Dr. Alex JonesProject Manager(s): David PlouffProgram Manager: Mark Svorinic
IT Programs and Projects Dept. Arizona Department of Education
1535 West Jefferson Street, Phoenix, AZ 85007
IT Programs and Projects Dept. Arizona Department of Education
2
Overview
Why it is hard to get the Student - Teacher connectionThe Work Effort InvolvedPossible Constraints at School Districts (Lessons Learned)Next steps
Establishing the Student – Teacher ConnectionHow Hard Can It Be?
To establish a teacher’s accountability with respect to his or her students’ academic achievement and progress in one or more content areas.
ADE Information Technology Division 3
Objective:
4
Math Reading
WritingScience
Algebra
World History
Mrs. Sanchez’ Homeroom
Mrs. Parker’s and Mr. Johnson’s 3rd Grade Class
?
Establishing the Student – Teacher ConnectionHow Hard Can It Be?
?
Biology
Establishing the Student – Teacher ConnectionHow Hard Can It Be?
Making it Easier
ADE Information Technology Division 5
Adopt statewide common course codes that map each course to the appropriate assessment content area.
Choose and use SMS software that accurately reflects the assignment of resources in today’s dynamic classroom.
Adopt a common characterization of elementary school classes to include courses taught.
ResourcesMarch 28th -
May 31st 2011 June Jul Aug Sep TotalData Architect 3,200$ 6,720$ 800$ 800$ 3,440$ 14,960$ Data Analyst 27,200$ -$ -$ 27,200$ Value-added Analyst ++ -$ TBD TBD TBD TBD -$ Business Analyst 9,440$ 4,400$ 1,100$ 1,100$ 2,200$ 18,240$ Project Manager 9,440$ 9,912$ 10,384$ 10,384$ 9,912$ 50,032$ Consultant: Guru & Associates 16,500$ 16,500$ 16,500$ 16,500$ 16,500$ 82,500$ Programmer #1 6,290$ 7,480$ 7,480$ 3,400$ 24,650$ Sr. Programmer #2 3,720$ 3,720$ -$ -$ 7,440$
Osborn Pilot Total Costs 65,780$ 47,542$ 39,984$ 36,264$ 35,452$ 225,022$
SFSF Budget 956,000$
Osborn Cost 275,022$
Budget 680,978$ Vendor: ESP Solutions Coursemapping Osborn Only One-Time 16,000$ PS Costs 222,278$ 15 Partner Districts training and support for Coursewalk mapping One-Time 4,000$ SFSF Budget Remaining 458,700$
Vendor Total 20,000$
Osborn Pilot Grand Total w/ Vendor Costs 245,022$
Per District Cost (based on Osborn Pilot) Per district 225,022$ Vendor: ESP Solutions Coursemapping Per district ($16,000)Source to Landing One-time 66,000$ Source Automation (if required) Per district TBDSource Resource Funding Per district TBD
Total (excluding TBD source costs) 275,022$
Osborn Pilot Implementation Resource Cost (w/ Data Portal Automation)
Cost Type
Fig. 14.1
Resources, Vendors, Software Actual Cost
Cost TypeFig 14.3 Osborn Automation State Deployment Scaling Costs per District
Software
RE
PE
AT
AB
LE Fig 14. 2 Vendor CostsActual Cost
Costing for Deployment Strategy
IT Programs and Projects Dept. Arizona Department of Education
7
Course Code Classification System (ISA Gov. Office #OER-11-ISA-GS-232)
One-Time Fixed 52,000$
Source to Landing ** @ One-Time Fixed 450,000$
Maintain District Course Data ## Annual 800$ AZCourseMapping Tool Development One-Time
Fixed 50,000$ Fixed cost for Maintain AZCourseMapping Tool(Kansas Tool) (Per year) Annual 1,000$
2 ESP Coursewalk Per District 1,525$
Fixed Cost Option #1 (Excluding Annual Maint.) 828,822$ Fixed Cost Option #2 @ 328,547$
** Note: Based on data quality walk-through with each District (10 hrs assumed at blended rate $75/hr x 600 districts)++ Value-added time effort undefined by ASU project- no cost estimates currently available## Annual cost per district/ per year is $800 - second year $480k would be added to fixed costs@ For Option #2 - Is Source to Landing Required?
Balance of State Grand Total (w/ Resources, Vendor, Automation, Fixed Costs)
Fig. 14.4 Balance of State Deployment ADDITIONAL Fixed Costs
1
Softw
are
Opt
ions
Software Actual Cost
Cost Type
Fig. 14.5
Cost Estimates Cont.
IT Programs and Projects Dept. Arizona Department of Education
8
Possible constraints faced by each school district:
• District administrative staff schedules
– Assistant Superintendant
– Curriculum Specialist
– HR administrator
– Data Manager for SIS / HR systems
• District IT staff schedules
– Technical staff for SIS/HR systems
• Staff and IT skill sets
• Engagement with the partner districts
– Engagement with the staff to determine their skill levels
• Districts level of technology
– Do they utilize a SIS system (statewide scale)
IT Programs and Projects Dept. Arizona Department of Education
AZ-SLDS ASU Next Phase 1 Milestones/Deliverables
9
March 28th 2011- Osborn Pilot Engaged by ADE IT
April 22nd 2011 - Osborn Logical Model Completed
April 29th 2011 - Osborn Deployment Strategy Delivered to ASU
May 20th 2011 - Osborn/ESP/ADE/ASU Approve Final Osborn Course Mapping Report
June 1st 2011 - Round 2 of Deployment Strategy Model released to ASU
IT Programs and Projects Dept. Arizona Department of Education
10
Short-Term - Next Steps:
•Course Mapping Strategy for Statewide needs to be defined-Develop, maintain, support of Internal “AZ Course Mapping” Tool-Contract with 3rd party vendor for Course Mapping best practices
•Define data to be extracted from the LEA-Storage of data
-Where, who-Security of data-Data Policy as related to access, term of storage, SLA’s-Data Governance-Discussions on evaluations: teacher, principal etc on maintained at ADE
•State-wide common dashboard-Purpose of dashboards-Access-BI layers based on access and roles
•ADE IT Platform for Infrastructure and Software to support AZ-SLDS
IT Programs and Projects Dept. Arizona Department of Education
11
Questions?