Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
mississauga transit
2013-2016� Business Plan
City of Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
morE than 3,6�50 BuS StoPS.
3rd largESt municiPal tranSit SyStEm in ontario.
93 tranSit routES, 1.3 million hourS oF SErvicE.
Fully accESSiBlE 458 BuS FlEEt.
F-2 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
Table of Contents
Existing Core Services ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3
1.0 Vision and Mission ............................................................................................................................................................... 3
2.0 Service Delivery Model ........................................................................................................................................................ 4
3.0 Past Achievements .............................................................................................................................................................. 5
4.0 Current Service Levels ......................................................................................................................................................... 8
5.0 Opportunities and Challenges ............................................................................................................................................ 12
6.0 Looking Ahead ................................................................................................................................................................... 14
7.0 Engaging our Customers ................................................................................................................................................... 16
Required Resources ........................................................................................................................................................................ 18
8.0 Human Resources ............................................................................................................................................................. 18
9.0 Technology ......................................................................................................................................................................... 19
10.0 Facilities ............................................................................................................................................................................. 21
Proposed Budget ............................................................................................................................................................................. 23
11.0 Changes to Maintain Current Service Levels and Operationalize Prior Decisions ............................................................ 26
12.0 Proposed New Initiatives and New Revenues ................................................................................................................... 28
13.0 Highlights of Proposed Capital Program Budget ............................................................................................................... 30
14.0 Capital Program ................................................................................................................................................................. 31
Performance Measures .................................................................................................................................................................... 32
15.0 Balanced Scorecard ........................................................................................................................................................... 32
Appendices ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 34
Appendix 1: Details of Changes to Maintain Current Service Levels and Operationalize Prior Decisions.................................... 34
Appendix 2: Budget Requests........................................................................................................................................................ 37
Appendix 3A: Proposed 2013 Capital Program ($000’s) ............................................................................................................... 44
Appendix 3B: Proposed 2014-2016 Capital Program ($000’s) ...................................................................................................... 46
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-3
Existing Core Services
1.0 Vision and Mission
MiWay operates conventional, fixed route transit service
within the boundaries of the City of Mississauga. As part of
the Greater Toronto Area, MiWay connects to commuter rail
and regional bus service provided by GO Transit, and
integrates service with neighbouring municipalities. The
system connects with Brampton Transit to the north,
Oakville Transit to the west, and the Toronto Transit
Commission (TTC) to the east, with direct connections to the
Islington and Kipling Subway Stations.
Vision
MiWay: A lifestyle choice to your destination.
Mission
To provide a customer-focused transit service that offers
safe, accessible, and efficient transportation options for all
citizens.
.
MiWay - The new Mississauga Transit
Business Development
Transit Operations
Business Systems
Maintenance
Rapid Transit (BRT/LRT)
F-4 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
2.0 Service Delivery Model
Delivering effective and efficient transit services that meet
the needs of customers is a multifaceted business that, due
to the nature of the operational environment, faces
continuous change and complexity.
Effective delivery of service is interdependent on
involvement and participation from each of the staff transit
groups and their service responsibilities.
MiWay’s service delivery model has evolved to create the
conditions in which good customer service, safety and clean
buses guide decisions and daily activities. Good employee
relationships and sound financial management play an
equally important role in the effective delivery of service.
At the centre of our service is our existing and potential
customers of MiWay. Our service goal is to deliver excellent
customer service through safe, flexible, integrated transit
services that meet the needs of an increasingly diverse
community.
MiWay strives to consistently accomplish two service
delivery outcomes that satisfy customers’ needs:
Develop a service plan that will assign the right capacity
at the right time, based on customer travel patterns,
dependent on time of day and day of the week; and
Meet the service plan by having the right bus at the
right time at each bus stop and terminal, consistently
throughout the day, every day of the week.
The Service Development section constantly reviews
ridership data, origin and destination surveys, customer
feedback, and operator and customer input to model and
determine the best possible allocation of buses to meet the
needs of customers.
The Operations and Maintenance sections work on having
the required amount of operators and buses fit for service
every hour of every day.
Bus Operations at the City Centre Transit Terminal
Customers’ needs
Balance
Capacity
(Buses + Operators)
Service Plan
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-5
3.0 Past Achievements
MiWay has achieved much in the recent past beginning with
the successful implementation of the new MiWay brand.
As MiWay continues to grow and transition into an urban
service provider, a number of significant milestones have
been achieved:
Service Levels
MiWay achieved record ridership in 2011 at 33.4 million
revenue rides (an increase of 7.6 percent from 2010);
Reached 49.3 million boardings in 2011 and is expected
to reach over 50 million boardings by the end of 2012;
Number of weeks with a total of over one million
boardings has drastically increased since 2011 and is
forecasted to reach over 15 weeks by the end of 2012.
Accessibility Improvements
All MiWay buses are now fully accessible buses;
In 2012, MiWay achieved 100 percent route accessibility
and added another 340 accessible stops; and
MiWay is compliant with the new Integrated Accessibility
Standards Regulation (IASR) in 2012 and has
accomplished much in relation to accessibility
improvements within our facilities, policies, and services.
Information Technology
All MiWay buses are equipped with Audio & Visual Stop
Announcement Systems and Automated Vehicle
Location (AVL); and
Launched an award winning mobile site (m.miway.ca)
and an iPhone App (www.miway.ca/app). Both enable
transit riders to view scheduled bus departure times.
MiWay’s Audio & Visual Stop Announcement Systems
PRESTO
In 2011, PRESTO automated fare card system devices
were installed on all MiWay buses;
Since then, MiWay has sold over 9,000 cards and over
2.4 million trips have been taken by customers who
have chosen PRESTO;
In May of 2012, MiWay launched a loyalty program that
rewards PRESTO cardholders who frequently travel on
MiWay (after 12 full fare trips, they ride for free the rest
of the week); and
MiWay is the only fixed route municipal transit provider
to also offer reduced concession fares to full-time
university or college students.
F-6 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)/Light Rail Transit (LRT)
BRT Construction has begun along the dedicated right-
of-way from Hurontario Street/Rathburn Road to
Eastgate Parkway/Fieldgate Drive, covering four
stations (Central Parkway East, Cawthra, Tomken and
Dixie). Completion date for this section is fall of 2013;
In anticipation of LRT, service integration along the
Hurontario Corridor was improved with express service
being provided by MiWay and Brampton Transit (Züm);
Awarded the contract to complete the Preliminary
Design and Transit Project Assessment Process for
Light Rail Transit on Hurontario/Main Street in
partnership with the City of Brampton and Metrolinx; and
The anticipated completion for the Preliminary Design
and Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) is
planned for late 2013.
Customer Focused
Completed the Summer U-Pass for University of Toronto
Mississauga (UTM) for both full-time and part-time
students in 2012;
Completed the first benchmark Customer Satisfaction
Survey for customers of MiWay; and
Achieved an excellent overall customer satisfaction
rating of 82 percent for MiWay services.
Awards
Association of Municipalities in Ontario (AMO) Gas Tax
Award - City of Mississauga received the AMO Gas Tax
Award in 2012 for using Federal Gas Tax dollars to buy
accessible transit buses, providing the community with
the benefits of accessible transit, cleaner air, and
reduced Green House Gases (GHG) emissions.
City of Mississauga receives AMO Gas Tax Award
Source: Association of Ontario Municipalities
Hurontario/Main Street Corridor Master Plan – Recipient
of the 2011 Award for Planning Excellence from the
Canadian Institute of Planners (CIP);
The MiWay Brand Implementation – Recipient of the
Corporate Exceptional Performance/Outstanding
Achievement Award from the Canadian Urban Transit
Association (CUTA);
The MiWay Student Ambassador Program - won the
City’s 2011 Corporate Award for Excellence (CAFE)
Partnership Award;
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-7
The MiWay Mobile Site earned multiple awards in 2011
including;
2011 Excellence in Municipal Systems Award from
the Municipal Information Systems Association
(MISA);
Certificate of Merit as part of the 2011 Willis Award
for Innovation from the Canadian Association of
Municipal Administrators (CAMA);
2011 Peter J. Marshall Municipal Innovation Award
from the Association of Municipalities of Ontario
(AMO);
MiWay receives CAMA Certificate of Merit
2011 GTEC Distinction Award Honouree for
Excellence in Public Service Delivery (Municipal
Category) from Canada’s Government Technology
Event (GTEC); and
The City's Continuous Improvement Award of
Excellence (2010) as part of the Corporate Award
for Excellence (CAFE) Award Program.
F-8 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
4.0 Current Service Levels
MiWay serves a growing population of 741,000 in an area
close to 179 square kilometres (about 70 square miles) in
Mississauga.
MiWay is building a family of transit services designed to
meet our customer travel needs. These include:
Current Services
MiExpress Express limited stop service
MiLocal Local service, serving all stops
MiGO Rush hour shuttle service to Milton GO Line Stations
MiSchool Rush hour service to secondary schools
Service Profile
MiWay operates conventional, fixed route transit service
within the boundaries of the City of Mississauga, with
service integration into neighbouring municipalities, including
City of Brampton, Town of Oakville and City of Toronto.
Currently, MiWay operates a total of 93 routes servicing the
City and surrounding areas:
62 Regular Routes
Five Express Routes
25 School Routes
One Seasonal Route
MiWay has 885 transit operators and has a transit fleet of
458 buses (15 of which are hybrid-electric buses).
All buses within MiWay’s fleet are fully accessible – that is,
all buses are low floor, kneeling buses equipped with ramps
that allow passengers to board and exit the bus with ease.
The fleet travels almost 30 million kilometres a year in which
it delivers over 1.3 million service hours annually.
Service Type 2011 2012
Hours % Hours %
Weekday 1,139,200 86.3 1,164,600 86.9
Saturday 110,400 8.4 108,800 8.1
Sunday/Holiday 71,000 5.4 66,900 5.0
Total 1,320,600 100 1,340,300 100
Comparison between 2011 & 2012 MiWay Service Hours
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-9
There are more than 3,650 bus stops and 23 terminals. Bus
stops are serviced by routes at various frequencies
throughout the day.
Service Frequencies:
AM & PM Peak Periods:
During morning peak periods, four routes operate under
10 minute service, 11 routes operate at 11-15 minute
service; and
The remaining 44 routes operate over 16 minute service
during the peak periods.
Off Peak Periods:
During midday off-peak times three routes operate
under 15 minutes and the remaining 40 routes are
greater than 15 minutes, with 12 routes over 30 minutes.
Ridership
Customers boarded a MiWay bus over 49 million times in
2011, which amounts to approximately 166,000 average
daily weekday boardings.
Annual revenue ridership levels continue to climb on MiWay.
MiWay achieved record riders in 2011 at 33.4 million (an
increase of 7.6 percent from 2010), and is expected to reach
34.5 million by the end of 2012 (an increase of 3.2 percent
from 2011).
It is forecasted that MiWay’s annual boardings will set a
record of 50 million in 2012.
Fleet and Transit Infrastructure
MiWay has a comprehensive on-going bus and service
vehicle maintenance program that complies with Ministry of
Transportation (MTO) standards and reflects the City’s
commitment to the safety of customers and transit
operators.
Drivers complete MTO circle checks daily and all other
vehicle components are subject to regular preventive
maintenance programs.
An important element of maintaining MiWay’s infrastructure
is its bus replacement program, which ensures the overall
F-10 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
maintenance costs are efficient in relation to the value of
vehicles and their expected service-life.
MiWay has a young bus fleet with the average bus age
being 4.8 years. Currently, the bus fleet is composed of 458
buses, with a replacement value of $215 million.
Additionally, MiWay looks after 23 terminals and 3,650 bus
stops across the City. Currently all routes are accessible,
however MiWay continues with its program to make all stops
accessible. As sidewalks are installed, MiWay continues to
ensure pedestrian linkages are provided that allow
customers to safely access transit service. As well, work is
ongoing to ensure all stops have a concrete passenger
landing pad that extends to the rear doors of all buses.
The planned BRT terminals and the deployment of next bus
signage will add to MiWay’s infrastructure maintenance
schedule in 2013.
Future Services
The Bus Rapid Transitway (BRT) is a high-efficiency
transit corridor running east-west across the City, providing
express bus service through Mississauga and the GTA.
The BRT West, from Winston Churchill Boulevard to Erin
Mills Parkway, will be the responsibility of GO Transit. BRT
Stations with Park and Ride lots will be built at Winston
Churchill Boulevard and Erin Mills Parkway. The City of
Mississauga is responsible for the construction of the BRT
East from the City Centre to Renforth Station.
BRT stations with Park and Ride lots will be built at Cawthra
Road and Dixie Road. Additional BRT stations will be
constructed at Tomken Road, Tahoe Boulevard, Etobicoke
Creek, Spectrum Way and Orbitor Drive.
MiWay service on the transitway
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-11
When the BRT is completed in 2015, it will support extensive
bus service along this route for thousands of riders per day,
making it faster and easier for them to travel to, from, and
through Mississauga and the Greater Toronto Area (GTA).
MiExpress and MiLocal buses will utilize the exclusive
transitway to bypass the adjacent road network. The
transitway will provide increased service reliability as well as
reduce travel times drastically.
With this new transit corridor, MiWay can move significantly
more people and consequently divert thousands of people
every day from private automobiles to higher-order transit.
BRT Roadway west of the newly constructed Hwy. 403 ramp
underpass bridge
BRT construction is well underway. The opening from the
City Centre to Dixie Station is planned for the fall of
2013. The remainder will be in the spring of 2015 (Winston
Churchill Boulevard to Renforth Drive).
Central Parkway underpass and Station
Light Rail Transit (LRT) service is planned along the
Hurontario/Main Street corridor between Brampton and Port
Credit in Mississauga.
This project will initiate the transformation of Hurontario
Street into the 21st Century with an integrated higher-order
transit system supported by an appropriate land use and
built form framework.
Work is underway to complete the Transit Project
Assessment Process (EA) and produce 30 percent design
drawings for the Hurontario LRT. Once funding is obtained,
the system would operate between Port Credit and the
Brampton GO Station along Hurontario Street.
The LRT will replace the limited stop express bus service
currently operating along Hurontario Street and service the
Lakeshore, Milton and Georgetown GO lines as well as the
Mississauga City Centre.
LRT System along the Hurontario/Main Street Corridor
F-12 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
5.0 Opportunities and Challenges
As the rate of growth in the City’s population has slowed
down to less than one percent per year, continued reliance
on the captive rider market (those without access to a car)
will be insufficient to achieve the doubling of the
transit/active transportation modal split set out in the City’s
Strategic Plan.
Future growth, with a balance between costs and fare
revenues, relies upon the choice rider (those with ready
access to a car). Fortunately, the high levels of car
ownership due to land use patterns (1.7 cars per family and
1.1 passengers per car) provide a large market from which
to capture ridership.
However, attracting new transit riders is no easy task,
especially during off-peak travel when the roads are free-
flowing, free parking is available, and MiWay’s service levels
do not provide the fast, frequent connections that are
available during peak hours.
To capture the choice rider market there is a need to focus
on improving service (more capacity and higher frequency)
during peak travel times when the road network is at
capacity. This provides the greatest environmental and
economic benefits by reducing congestion and freeing up
road capacity. A focus on improving peak travel time service
will target the largest market segment with the best revenue
opportunities. Additionally, such an approach would maintain
our revenue/cost ratio.
Choice riders (those who have access to a vehicle but can
choose to ride transit) insist on safe, clean, and comfortable
buses and want competitive travel times. The network will
need good frequencies and connections in order to be
considered a viable transportation option.
Framed as opportunities and challenges, the following
external and organizational factors have been taken into
account in the formulation of operational plans, and for the
information technology and organizational development
programs.
Opportunities
MOVE - developing a transit oriented city is one of the
City’s strategic pillars;
Proven environmental and health benefits by using
public transit as a personal mode of transportation;
Growing student ridership through ongoing transit
education and promotion to students;
Building partnerships with businesses interested in
MiWay to promote transit;
Improved awareness and perceptions about MiWay
through education and outreach;
Using technology to provide products that make the
transit experience better for customers;
Increased traffic congestion overall in the City entices
people to consider options such as transit;
Launching the BRT will mean faster, more efficient
service for customers;
Increasing support for LRT along the Hurontario
Corridor;
New and better storage and maintenance facilities; and
Increasing amount of paid parking within the City’s
downtown will encourage residents to use public transit
instead of their cars.
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-13
Challenges
Funding from higher levels of government is not
increasing without any clear replacement strategy;
Funding from higher levels of government often focuses
on inter-regional integration and is inadequate to
address City needs;
No identified funding sources for municipal transit
infrastructure improvements, coupled with steadily
declining development charges as the City approaches
build out;
Senior government debt, i.e. less likelihood of support
for municipal service providers;
Ability to sustain a long term financial plan to develop
and operate a world class transit system, as envisioned
by the City’s strategic plan;
Continued global economic uncertainty;
Keeping a balance between transit as a social service
and a financially sustainable transportation service;
Ridership growth exceeding service growth;
Price and volatility of fuel prices;
Labour costs; and
Increased traffic congestion has diminished operating
speeds along several major transit corridors.
The graph below shows the changes in average peak
speeds along six of the most relevant corridors within the
City of Mississauga.
F-14 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
6.0 Looking Ahead
During the next four years MiWay will continue to move
forward with various initiatives that were implemented in the
last planning cycle.
This plan and its service goals rely on continued investment
from both the City and from higher levels of government and
results in an increase of 215,300 hours by 2016.
Conventional Transit:
With the planned opening of the transitway from the City
Centre to Dixie Station in the fall of 2013, frequencies on
the express network will need to be improved to reduce
travel times and enhance connections - an important
course of action to attract and retain choice riders;
Improvements are required along the express network
during the midday, early evenings, and eventually
weekends. MiWay’s Routes 107-Malton Express and
109-Meadowvale Express will utilize the transitway
when the first phase is completed in 2013. As such,
these improvements in service will require an increase
of 27,800 hours annually starting in October 2013. An
increase of 21,900 hours annually will be added starting
in January 2015 upon full completion of the transitway;
Incidences of overcrowding continue to occur throughout
the system. Even with the requested two percent
increase in service hours (which would add 26,800
additional service hours in 2013, 27,300 in 2014, 27,900
in 2015, and 28,400 in 2016), the supply/demand gap
will be widened from the 6.2% gap projected for 2012 to
11.6% by the end of 2016;
An additional one percent in annual service hours is
requested (which translates into 13,400 hours in 2013,
13,700 in 2014, 13,900 in 2015 and 14,200 in 2016) to
improve peak hour and midday frequencies, bring them
in line with customer expectations, and reduce the
above mentioned gap;
With the phased opening of the transitway, modifications
to the current transit network will be required. This
includes route redesigns and the addition of new local
services to streamline existing service and take
advantage of the savings in travel time and
In spite of the requested service hours and the
improvements that these hours will permit, additional
funding is required to expand the express network and
create other limited stop express services along major
transit corridors, such as Dixie Road and Derry Road.
Bus Rapid Transitway (BRT):
Complete construction of the BRT, and identify and
implement the necessary network changes in
preparation for the opening of the first segment of the
BRT in 2013 and reconfigure the existing transit network
to support the BRT;
Open a successful BRT service that encourages new
riders to MiWay in a phased approach; and
Plan for the implementation of transit priority on transit
corridors connecting with the BRT to improve trip times
and service reliability.
Hurontario/Main Street Study
After completing the Hurontario-Main Street Study in
2010 and the Metrolinx Benefits Case Assessment
(BCA) review, the next phases will require undertaking
the preliminary design for LRT and completing the
Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP);
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-15
Successful completion and approval of the Hurontario-
Main Street LRT Preliminary Design and Transit Project
Assessment Process (TPAP); and
Additional studies will be required on specific issues
relating to LRT implementation such as noise, vibration,
assessing the various road/transit related alternatives
surrounding the Highway 403 interchange crossing, etc.
PRESTO:
Moving forward, staff efforts will be focused on
confirming system stability and development of version
2.1, which is currently being implemented at OC
Transpo for the City of Ottawa;
MiWay will be participating in the development of new
customer functionality of PRESTO and system reporting
to support revenue and audit requirements;
Leverage the PRESTO and co-fare agreement with GO
Transit to increase, by 10 percent in three years, the
number of riders that are brought to and from GO rail
and GO bus stations by MiWay’s service; and
Through customer outreach and the Student
Ambassador Program migrate students from cash,
tickets, and passes to Presto (70 percent in two years)
iBus:
iBus is MiWay’s Intelligent Transportations System (ITS)
that utilizes advanced technology to enable MiWay and
our customers to be better informed, make safer, more
coordinated, and smarter use of transit routes and
schedules. Currently MiWay’s iBus technology includes
such components as Automated Vehicle Location (AVL)
and Automated Stop Announcements.
Through new iBus technology capabilities, additional
service improvements are planned including:
• Bus equipment: Automatic Passenger Counters and
Garage Management Program, Replacement of Bus
Radio System, Transit Signal Priority;
• Applications: Fleet Management System, Customer
Relationship Management System, Runtime and
Ridership analytic modules; and
• System Integration: Radio System with iBus
Computer Aided Dispatch Systems, Fleet
Management with iBus, Fleet Management with
Fuel Management, iBus with Garage Management,
and iBus with Hastus (software solution for transit
scheduling, operations, and passenger information).
Customer Focused:
Grow student ridership and continue education and
promoting to students and Encourage businesses to
build partnerships with MiWay to promote transit; and
Targeted customer outreach program to promote the
economic and environmental benefits of transit.
Infrastructure:
The requirements for additional transit terminals and
priority access in and out of the City Centre core will
need to be identified. Preliminary work on these
equirements, in conjunction with the Downtown21
initiative, is planned in 2013.
Fare Strategy:
Coordinate with adjacent transit systems (Brampton and
Oakville) on the development and implementation of a
Sheridan College universal bus pass (u-pass).
F-16 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
7.0 Engaging our Customers
Public Education and Customer Engagement
To encourage lifelong transit use, MiWay must continue to
acquire and retain new customers while finding ways to
reward existing customer loyalty.
Key customer groups include students (three in 10 riders on
MiWay are students), business commuters (work-related
trips within Mississauga and across city borders) as well as
GO Bus and Rail commuters (who can choose to connect
with MiWay service when it’s easier or more convenient).
Community Outreach
MiWay’s community outreach program helps to build and
maintain excitement around, and a commitment to, the
MiWay brand at a grass-roots level during ongoing Bus
Rapid Transit (BRT) Project construction. The first section of
the transitway - from the City Centre to Dixie Station - is
expected to open in the fall of 2013, and includes four new
stations.
MiWay staff participates in more than 100 events annually to
educate residents about local transit service. These
outreach initiatives reach students, businesses and older
adults, as well as other residents who can benefit from
ongoing transit service improvements.
An online calendar (www.miway.ca/events) lists MiWay’s
participation at various events year-round.
MiWay’s 2012 Customer Appreciation Day
MiWay also runs an award-winning Ambassador Program to
encourage students to educate their school communities
about MiWay (www.miway.ca/ambassador).
MiWay’s 2011-2012 Ambassador Program Winners
Continuing to build MiWay brand momentum in the
community is critical to influencing perceptions about transit
service and encouraging new customers to try the system.
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-17
Digital Media
The MiWay website (www.miway.ca), award-winning Mobile
Site (m.miway.ca) and iPhone App (www.miway.ca/app) are
available to help meet customers’ transit information needs.
MiWay also offers CityLink (905-615-4287), a 24-hour
automated information system.
More digital and social media opportunities exist to engage
customers in conversations about the benefits of transit,
strengthen the partnership between MiWay and the
community, and to enhance MiWay’s focus on providing
excellent customer service. Promoting two-way
conversations about MiWay service helps educate the public
about the value that MiWay delivers to the community by
creating economic, social and environmental benefits in
Mississauga.
Market Research
To build customer relationships, MiWay must continue to
listen to and respond to customer feedback. Annual market
research provides insights into MiWay brand perceptions as
well as perceived attractors and barriers to using transit.
The findings help identify relevant service improvement
opportunities, guide future planning, and monitor and
enhance levels of customer satisfaction.
The Service Experience
MiWay’s Transit Operators represent the brand’s biggest
opportunity and its greatest advantage. Customers see the
bus driver as the “face” of MiWay, and the experience they
receive with the driver significantly impacts their overall
satisfaction with the service.
MiWay Transit Operators
According to a 2011 market research study, MiWay received
relatively high satisfaction ratings in relation to drivers:
“Drivers drive safely” (86 percent) and “Drivers are
knowledgeable about the overall system” (85 percent).
MiWay also achieved a high overall satisfaction score of 82
percent.
In addition, Customer Service Representatives who provide
MiWay information and receive customer feedback
represent the voice and face of MiWay through the call
centre and the customer information booth. Customers rely
extensively on Customer Service Representatives to provide
them with accurate information; thus, giving them added
confidence to travel on MiWay.
Focusing on creating a consistently positive service
experience for customers who choose to ride transit will help
to build MiWay brand loyalty and enhance the organization’s
community presence.
F-18 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
Required Resources
8.0 Human Resources
MiWay faces similar challenges to those experienced by
large operational environments. MiWay also faces the
traditional issues of attracting and retaining talent to address
growth needs and managing the impending retirements and
competition for skilled staff.
MiWay’s organizational structure is evolving to address gaps
created by the expansion of service, technology, equipment,
and facilities. While on-street service, the number of
operators bidding for work and the number of buses has
increased significantly, the administrative and support
structure has remained almost the same. Additionally, many
initiatives are either being completed or in the process of
being developed, which adds to the already full workload of
MiWay staff.
The addition of the Bus Rapid Transitway (BRT) beginning
in 2014 will require new staff, including Transit Operators,
Transit Supervisors, Maintenance, Enforcement and
Facilities staff.
As a result of the additional transit technologies such as
iBus, PRESTO, Hastus, Automated Vehicle Location
Systems (AVL) and real-time customer information, there
will be a requirement to add skilled staff resources to
manage, implement and support the transit technologies in
place.
MiWay has a strong training program to ensure the driving
credentials of over 900 transit operators remain up-to-date,
and that customer service training is provided. 10 courses
form the core of the training program and are delivered
continuously throughout the year, in addition to the
orientation and preparation for new recruits. As a result over
10,000 hours of formal training are delivered on a consistent
basis by a dedicated team of trainers.
Proposed Full Time Equivalent Staffing Distribution by Program
Program 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Business Development 53.9 52.9 52.9 52.9 52.9
Business Systems 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0
Maintenance 187.2 185.2 185.2 185.2 185.2
Director's Office 4.7 6.7 7.7 8.7 8.7
Operations 978.8 1,021.8 1,048.8 1,090.8 1,118.8
Transportation Project Office 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Total Service Distribution 1,247.6 1,289.6 1,317.6 1,360.6 1,388.6
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-19
9.0 Technology
MiWay has launched several technology improvements as
part of its commitment to providing customer-driven, quality
transit services to the travelling public in a safe, reliable,
clean and cost-effective manner. These improvements
include:
Automated next stop announcement technology on all
buses;
PRESTO card readers on all buses to enable electronic
payments;
Video surveillance systems on all buses to enhance
passenger and driver safety and security; and
Improving service reliability by using new operational
data to evaluate posted transit schedules against actual
bus arrival times which can differ due to traffic
congestion and bad weather conditions.
However, recent market research findings indicate there is
demand for further technology improvements, such as
providing real-time schedule information.
MiWay is committed to delivering value to the community
and through its new technology capabilities, additional
service improvements will be implemented - including new
signage at BRT stations that will display 'next bus' arrival
times.
Execution of MiWay’s I.T. framework remains relevant. Work
continues on several major initiatives including the
replacement of the workforce management legacy system,
the addition of new Information Transportation Systems
(ITS), vehicle diagnostics, automated fuel management and
fare card technology.
MiWay’s plan consists of five phases:
Databases: In this phase, every major process is
matched with a database that is meant to capture every
relevant data point required to measure and model
performance for process and costing purposes;
Daily Information Requirements: This phase will, in a
timely basis, give access to necessary information to
assist front line staff in the performance of their daily
duties. Additionally, since the supporting application
mirrors the steps of every activity, this will help enforce
consistency through operational scripts and aid front line
decision-making, the standards of data input and
processing which must be followed to maintain data
quality and integrity;
Dashboard: This phase will facilitate the combination of
information from the various databases and present
data in meaningful and timely performance metrics that
can be acted upon;
Modeling: This phase is concerned with data analysis,
risk management and forecasts, from financial
statements to standard costs measures to
comprehensive transit models for scheduling purposes;
and
Analysis and decision-making support: The fifth and last
phase provides ad-hoc information support, constant
monitoring of processes and their alignment with
information systems, market segmentation and
research, and continuous improvement metrics (i.e.
identification of variances and bottle necks).
All activities and decision-making points have been
thoroughly documented and validated. They are the
F-20 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
foundation of the technical specifications used to configure
the applications.
The next two years (in tandem with roll out of the new
workforce management and on-street applications) will
involve an assertive change management effort to transition
from the current approach based on individuals to a system
with centralized governance and performance management.
Schedule Adherence
(real time information)
Data warehouse
Processes
• job descriptions
• roles and responsibilities
Hastus Ops
Data warehouse
Hastus Plan
iBus Fleet Mgmt
Customer
MgmtPresto
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-21
10.0 Facilities
MiWay has two main storage and maintenance facilities and
one central administrative office:
Central Parkway Transit Campus: Located at 975
Central Parkway, the Transit Campus has been
thoroughly renovated and expanded with a new body
shop and new maintenance facilities. The Campus
consists of two garages: Central Parkway Garage (CPY)
– with a storage capacity of 270 40 feet buses, and
Annex Garage (CX) – which has a storage capacity of
120 40 feet buses;
Central Parkway Transit Campus
Source: Aerial image courtesy of Google Maps
MiWay Administrative Offices: Located at 3484
Semenyk Court (across the street from 975 Central
Parkway), the MiWay Administrative offices include
MiWay’s Customer Service, Business Development,
Business Systems, Transit Enforcement, and
Transportation and Works I.T. Services; and
Malton Satellite Campus: Located at 6780
Professional Court, this facility services the north-east
end of the City. It was renovated by expanding the
maintenance infrastructure and expanding staff facilities
to realise the design capacity of 93 buses.
Malton Satellite Campus
Source: Aerial image courtesy of Google Maps
F-22 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
Additionally, there are over 3,650 stops and 23 Transit terminals across the city:
1. City Centre Transit Terminal
2. Clarkson GO Station
3. Cooksville GO Station
4. Dixie Outlet Mall Terminal
5. Erin Mills Town Centre
6. Islington Subway Station
7. Lisgar GO Station
8. Long Branch GO Station
9. Meadowvale GO Station
10. Meadowvale Town Centre
11. Dundas/ESR/Glengarry
12. Hurontario/407 Park & Ride
13. Port Credit GO Station
14. Skymark Hub
15. Sheridan College
16. Shoppers World Terminal
17. South Common Centre
18. Streetsville GO Station
19. University of Toronto (Mississauga Campus)
20. Westwood Mall Terminal
21. Woodbine Centre
22. Airport Monorail LINK Station
23. Sheridan Centre
By the fall of 2013, four additional terminals will be added
with the completion of BRT Stations at:
Central Parkway Station,
Cawthra Station,
Tomken Station, and
Dixie Station.
MiWay’s City Centre Transit Terminal
Source: Aerial image courtesy of Bing Maps
As MiWay continues to grow service, an additional facility will need to be considered.
Placeholder funding is planned in 2016 for an additional
downtown transit facility;
Expansion of the Malton Satellite Campus Facility is
required in 2015;
A third storage/maintenance facility is deferred until
2018;
13-14 bus shelters will be installed at new locations
annually;
200 stops (signage) per year; and
In 2013, next bus displays will be installed at terminals
and at new Transitway stations (Central Parkway,
Cawthra, Tomken and Dixie Stations). Next bus displays
will also be installed at key high volume intersections
starting 2015.
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-23
Proposed Budget This part of the Business plan sets out the financial
resources required to deliver the proposed 2013-2016
Business Plan. Information is provided by major expenditure
and revenue category as well as by program. The costs to
maintain existing service levels and operationalize prior
decisions are identified separately from proposed changes.
The prior year budget for 2012 was $51,830,900 and the
proposed budget for 2013 is $56,983,000.
Total Changes to Maintain Current Service Levels
The following budget changes are proposed to maintain the
current service levels in Transit:
Operational Increase totalling $2.1 million mainly attributed
to the following:
$830,000 increase for VCOMM/CAD/AVL
maintenance/support costs;
$550,000 increase for maintenance cost (rust proofing,
parts, fluids);
$400,000 one-time increase for MiWay Transit uniforms
and miscellaneous other items; and
$300,000 increase for diesel fuel volume.
Efficiencies and Cost Savings totalling $1.4 million
consisting of the following:
$300,000 decrease to various maintenance costs;
$330,000 labour reduction for various positions;
$200,000 decrease related to route rationalization;
$250,000 reduction in iBus communication costs and
marketing; and
$292,000 various other efficiencies due to newer fleet.
Revenue increase of $2.9 million mainly consisting of the
following:
$5,900,000 increase for 2012 forecasted fare box
surplus carry over, 2013 fare increase and ridership
growth of 2%;
$3,500,000 reduction in the draw from the Provincial
Gas Tax Reserve Fund;
$400,000 increase in advertising revenue;and
$144,000 increase in the transit discount program.
Total Changes to Operationalize Prior Decisions
$600,000 for 2012 service improvements (20 operators,
four staff); and
$300,000 for diesel fuel and other maintenance items.
Total New Initiatives and Revenues
Three initiatives are proposed in the 2013 budget. Below is a
summary of each initiative:
BR #27 - BRT Operations and Maintenance: BRT
construction is well underway with the planned opening from
the City Centre to Dixie Station in the fall of 2013. (The
remainder of the corridor will be operational in spring 2015,
i.e. from Winston Churchill to Renforth Drive). Once
operational in 2013, MiWay’s Route 107-Malton Express
and Route 109-Meadowvale Express will utilize the
transitway. An increase of 27,800 hours annually starting in
2013 will extend midday and weekend service along these
routes. An increase of 21,900 hours annually starting in
2015 will increase frequency on Routes 109 and 107.
F-24 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
BR #42 - Congestion and Overcrowding: As a result of
higher ridership levels, incidences of reported overcrowding
continue to be logged at the same pace as in previous
years. In addition, speed of travel has been steadily
deteriorating over the years as the City reaches almost full
development. Indicators point to a sustained surge in
demand for transit service in our City. The 6.2 percent
demand/supply gap projected for 2012 must be managed by
adding additional services hours. Even with the requested
two percent increase in service hours, the supply/demand
gap will widen to 11.6 percent by the end of 2016.
BR #160 – Additional One Percent Service Growth: BR
#42 proposed measures to moderate the negative effect of
increased traffic congestion and overcrowding arising from
increased ridership, but did nothing to reduce the gap
between demand and supply. However it does not reduce
the gap between demand and supply. Additional funding is
required to allow MiWay to improve peak hour and midday
frequencies in line with customer expectations. The
requested one percent will also support feeding the
transitway, which, by the end of the 2013-2016 Business
planning cycle will be fully implemented.
Service Area Description
BR#
Proposed Initiative Total Year 1 Budget
Total Year 2 Budget
Total Year 3 Budget
Total Year 4 Budget
MiWay
27 BRT Operations and Maintenance
$1,046,741 $2,899,372 $4,789,712 $4,473,983
42 Service Congestion and Overcrowding
$1,043,221 $2,546,320 $4,464,584 $6,423,226
160 Service Growth - 1%
$405,862 $1,274,580 $2,215,505 $3,176,529
Total $2,495,825 $6,720,273 $11,469,800 $14,073,737
Note: Gross costs, no associated revenues.
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-25
The following table separates the financial requirements into those required to maintain existing services; to operationalize past
decisions; and proposed new initiatives and revenues. The details on the changes to each category are provided in Sections 11
through 12.
Description ($000's)
2013
Proposed
Budget
($000's)
2014
Forecast
($000's)
2015
Forecast
($000's)
2016
Forecast
($000's)
Prior Year Budget 51,831 56,983 63,973 69,901
Labour and Benefits 4,209 2,332 2,624 2,670
Other Cost Increases 2,088 2,466 1,713 2,394
Efficiencies and Cost Savings (1,372) (1,319) (1,319) (1,319)
Current Revenue Changes (2,944) (973) (1,956) (2,601)
Total Changes to Maintain Current Service Levels 1,981 2,506 1,062 1,144
Annualization of Previous Years Budget Decisions 868 0 0 0
Operating Impact of New Capital Projects 0 0 0 0
Total Changes to Operationalize Prior Decisions 868 0 0 0
Total Cost to Maintain Current Services Levels and
Operationalize Prior Decisions 54,680 59,490 65,035 71,045
Total Proposed New Initiatives 2,304 4,483 4,866 2,683
Total Proposed New Revenues 0 0 0 0
Total New Initiatives and New Revenues 2,304 4,483 4,866 2,683
Proposed Budget 56,983 63,973 69,901 73,728
Note: Numbers may not balance due to rounding.
Increases/(Decreases) to Maintain Current Service Levels
Increases/(Decreases) to Operationalize Prior Decisions
New Initiatives and New Revenues
F-26 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
11.0 Changes to Maintain Current Service Levels and Operationalize Prior Decisions
The following two tables identify the major changes in the costs to maintain existing service levels and the costs increases arising
from prior decisions. Detailed explanations of changes to 2013 can be found in Appendix 1.
Proposed Changes to Maintain Current Service Levels
Description ($000's) FTE
2013
Proposed
Budget
($000's)
2014
Forecast
($000's)
2015
Forecast
($000's)
2016
Forecast
($000's)
Total Labour and Benefits 0.0 4,209 2,332 2,624 2,670
Other Cost Increases
VCOMM/CAD/AVL maintenance support costs 0.0 830 250 (570) 0
Various maintenance cost increases (rustproofing, parts, fluids) 0.0 550 80 100 100
Transit uniforms and miscellaneous other items 0.0 400 0 0 0
Diesel fuel price increase ($0.10/litre) 0.0 0 1,700 1,800 1,900
Diesel fuel volume adjustment 0.0 300 0 0 0
Utilities/allocations 0.0 (135) 210 255 265
Other Changes 0.0 143 226 128 129
Total Other Cost Increases 0.0 2,088 2,466 1,713 2,394
Efficiencies and Cost Savings
Labour savings (5.0) (330) 0 0 0
Various maintenance costs 0.0 (300) 0 0 0
Route rationalization 0.0 (200) 0 0 0
iBus communication costs 0.0 (150) 0 0 0
Marketing 0.0 (100) 0 0 0
Other Changes 0.0 (292) (1,319) (1,319) (1,319)
Total Efficiencies and Cost Savings (5.0) (1,372) (1,319) (1,319) (1,319)
Current Revenue Changes
Increase for 2012 forecasted fare box surplus carryover, 2013
fare increase and ridership growth of 2% 0.0 (5,900) (1,900) (2,900) (2,300)
Reduction in draw from the Provincial Gas Tax Reserve Fund 0.0 3,500 1,500 1,100 0
Advertising contract increases 0.0 (400) (50) (63) (217)
Other Changes 0.0 (144) (523) (93) (84)
Total Current Revenue Changes 0.0 (2,944) (973) (1,956) (2,601)
Total Changes to Maintain Current Service Levels (5.0) 1,981 2,506 1,062 1,144
Note: Numbers may not balance due to rounding.
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-27
Proposed Changes to Operationalize Prior Decisions
Description ($ 000's) FTE
2013
Proposed
Budget
($000's)
2014
Forecast
($000's)
2015
Forecast
($000's)
2016
Forecast
($000's)
Annualize 2012 service improvements (20 operators, 4 staff) 0.0 550 0 0 0
Diesel fuel and minor maintenance items 0.0 300 0 0 0
Other Changes 0.0 18 0 0 0
Total Annualization of Prior Years Operating Cost
Decisions 0.0 868 0 0 0
N/A 0.0 0 0 0 0
Total Operating Impact of New Capital 0.0 0 0 0 0
Total Changes to Operationalize Prior Decisions 0.0 868 0 0 0
Note: Numbers may not balance due to rounding.
Annualization of Prior Years Operating Cost Decisions
Operating Impact of New Capital Projects
F-28 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
12.0 Proposed New Initiatives and New Revenues
The following table presents the costs by budget request for proposed new initiatives and proposed new revenues. Detailed
descriptions of each budget request can be found in Appendix 2 on pages 37 to 43.
Proposed New Initiatives and New Revenues
Description ($ 000's) BR # FTE
2013
Proposed
Budget
($000's)
2014
Forecast
($000's)
2015
Forecast
($000's)
2016
Forecast
($000's)
2013 to
2016
Capital
($000's)
BRT Operations and Maintenance 27 20.0 811 2,037 1,923 (322) 39,865
Congestion and Overcrowding 42 18.0 1,075 1,551 1,973 2,016 6,740
Additional 1% Service Growth 160 9.0 418 895 969 989 0
Total New Initiatives 47.0 2,304 4,483 4,866 2,683 46,605
N/A 0.0 0 0 0 0 0
Total New Revenues 0.0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Changes to New Initiatives
and New Revenues 47.0 2,304 4,483 4,866 2,683 46,605
Note: Numbers may not balance due to rounding.
New Initiatives
New Revenues
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-29
The following table sets out the proposed 2013 Budget and Forecasts for the remaining three years, by major expense and
revenue categories.
Proposed Budget by Category
Description ($000's)
2011
Actuals
($000's)
2012
Budget
($000's)
2013
Proposed
Budget
($000's)
2014
Forecast
($000's)
2015
Forecast
($000's)
2016
Forecast
($000's)
Labour Costs 102,445 110,872 117,005 122,182 128,120 133,081
Other Operating Expenses 31,105 30,991 32,717 35,840 38,559 40,845
Total Revenues (89,901) (92,589) (95,338) (96,775) (99,608) (103,135)
Total Net Cost before Administrative
and Support Costs 43,649 49,274 54,384 61,247 67,071 70,792
Administrative and Support Costs 2,429 2,557 2,599 2,726 2,831 2,938
Total Net Budget 46,078 51,831 56,983 63,973 69,902 73,730
Note: Numbers may not balance due to rounding.
Net Costs before Administrative and Support Costs
The following table identifies the financial requirements for 2013 to 2016 by major program within the service area.
Proposed Budget by Program
Program Expenditures ($000's)
2011
Actuals
($000's)
2012
Budget
($000's)
2013
Proposed
Budget
($000's)
2014
Forecast
($000's)
2015
Forecast
($000's)
2016
Forecast
($000's)
Business Development 4,751 6,159 6,240 6,223 6,216 6,211
Business Systems 1,549 3,084 3,878 4,449 3,793 3,709
Maintenance 41,833 42,560 44,191 47,013 50,152 52,988
Director's Office (84,951) (88,809) (92,084) (93,183) (95,825) (99,235)
Operations 82,360 88,339 94,301 98,959 105,033 109,503
Transportation Project Office 537 497 456 513 533 554
Total Net Budget 46,078 51,831 56,983 63,973 69,902 73,730
Note: Numbers may not balance due to rounding.
F-30 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
13.0 Highlights of Proposed Capital Program Budget
2013 Capital Budget Highlights include the following:
• $13.9 million to replace 24 buses (10 – 60 foot buses, 14 – 40 foot buses);
• $1.9 million for capital bus maintenance (i.e, engines, transmissions);
• $1.5 million for transit terminal departure displays; and
• $800,000 for the replacement of bus signs/mini terminals/bus stops and pads.
2014 to 2022 Capital Forecast Highlights include the following:
• $167.3 million to replace 321 buses;
• $16.8 million to purchase 30 growth buses;
• $21.1 million for capital bus maintenance (i.e. engines, transmissions);
• $19 million for the construction of a second downtown bus terminal;
• $5.5 million for the construction of a Kipling Subway Inter-regional Terminal;
• $5 million to replace fare boxes in all buses;
• $3.3 million for the replacement of bus stops/signs/pads and mini terminals;
• $3 million for the design of a third bus storage/maintenance facility;
• $3 million for the Malton storage/maintenance facility expansion and improvement;
• $39.8 million for BRT construction;
• $3 million for the Dundas corridor study; and
• $1.8 million for the bridge rehabilitation at the Cooksville GO Station.
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-31
14.0 Capital Program
This section summarizes the forecast ten year capital requirements for this service. The following table presents the forecast by
major program. The next table summarizes the sources of financing for the capital forecast. A detailed listing of 2013 to 2016
projects is contained in Appendix 3A & 3B on pages 44 to 47.
Proposed Capital Program
Program Expenditures
($000's)
2013
Proposed
Budget
($000's)
2014
Forecast
($000's)
2015
Forecast
($000's)
2016
Forecast
($000's)
2017 -2022
Forecast
($000's)
Total
2013-2022
($000's)
Buildings 40 640 13,840 13,140 3,240 30,900
Buses 17,292 5,470 7,100 15,701 181,941 227,504
On-street Facilities 775 640 640 290 2,010 4,355
Other Transit 670 0 2,250 2,500 750 6,170
Transitway 0 34,565 10,000 0 0 44,565
Vehicles and Equipment 505 325 555 895 2,425 4,705
Total Expenditures 19,282 41,640 34,385 32,526 190,366 318,199
Note: Numbers may not balance due to rounding.
Program Funding ($000's)
2013
Proposed
Budget
($000's)
2014
Forecast
($000's)
2015
Forecast
($000's)
2016
Forecast
($000's)
2017 -2022
Forecast
($000's)
Total
2013-2022
($000's)
Subsidies and Recoveries 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gas Tax 19,116 23,935 24,070 27,436 182,067 276,624
Cash In Lieu 0 0 0 0 0 0
Development Charges 167 2,705 315 5,090 8,299 16,576
Tax 0 15,000 10,000 0 0 25,000
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Debt 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding 19,282 41,640 34,385 32,526 190,366 318,199
Note: Numbers may not balance due to rounding.
F-32 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
Performance Measures
15.0 Balanced Scorecard
A Balanced Scorecard identifies and measures four key
areas of an organization’s performances; Financial,
Customers, Employees, and Business processes.
By paying attention to all four areas, an organization can
retain balance in its performance and ensure that it is moving
towards the attainment of its goals.
About the Measures for MiWay:
Financial Measures
Ridership is the total number of paid trips. The emphasis on
paid trips is to differentiate between all trips taken by
customers (called boarding and includes transfers) and trips
for which a fare is paid; with every paid fare customers are
entitled to travel for two hours within Mississauga and
neighbouring systems.
Municipal operating contribution per capita is the amount that
the City contributes to MiWay per City of Mississauga
resident.
Revenue to cost (R/C) ratio is the percentage of cost
recovered through the fare box.
Customer Measures
Information requests are trip planning requests resolved
through MiWay call centre.
Self-service options include CityLink which is an interactive
phone service that provides next bus information, and Click
n’ Ride which is an on-line trip planning service.
Resolution rate is the rate of success in which customers’
inquiries received are handled within standard response
time.
Employee Measures
Employee engagement is measured through the bi-annual
employee engagement survey which is a proxy to employee
engagement and level of job satisfaction.
Preventable accidents /100,000 kilometres measures on-
street accidents by 100,000 kilometres; MiWay bus
operators drive about 30 million kilometres a year.
Percent of incidents with no injury records the percentage of
incidents that resulted in no injury for the affected party.
Incidents with no injury are considered an important source
of lessons to improve safety protocols. Incidents with no
injury are deemed a proxy to the success of prevention
efforts.
Business Process Measures
Schedule adherence refers to the percentage buses are on
time within a range of three minutes ahead or up to seven
minutes late from posted schedule. This is MiWay’s first on-
street performance indicator made possible by the iBus
program.
Fleet availability is a ratio that tracks if the buses required to
comply with plan service to the public were available. A
large ratio would mean excess capacity and a ratio too close
to one would mean a high risk of service interruption due to
mechanical and bus availability issues.
Boarding per trip measures the number of times a customer
needs to board a bus to reach their destination; for example,
a ratio equal to one means customers need to board only
one bus to reach their destination.
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-33
Measures for Mississauga
Transit
2010
(Actual)
2011
(Actual)
2012
(Actual)
2013
(Planned)
2014
(Planned)
2015
(Planned)
2016
(Planned)
Financial:
Ridership 31,083,088 33,448,838 34,452,303 35,141,349 35,844,176 36,561,060 37,292,281
Municipal Operating Contribution per Capita
$69 $81 $81 $85 $90 $90 $95
Revenue to Cost Ratio 47% 46% 45% 45% 46% 46% 47%
Customer:
Information Requests 718,710 788,614 753,662 826,966 907,399 955,655 1,092,496
Self-Service Option 6,298,216 5,361,114 5,770,497 6,331,754 6,947,600 7,623,345 8,364,816
Resolution Rate 96% 84% 88% 90% 90% 92% 95%
Employees/Innovation:
Employee Engagement 64% 64% 67% 67% 70% 70% 72%
Preventable Accidents/100,000 kms. 0.29 0.24 0.24 0.28 0.25 0.25 0.23
Percent of Incidents with No Injury 21% 19% 20% 25% 30% 35% 35%
Internal Business Process:
Schedule Adherence (+3) min. / ( - ) 7 minutes
N/A N/A 87% 90% 90% 95% 95%
Fleet Availability [above daily requirements]
N/A 1.13 1.16 1.13 1.12 1.10 1.08
Boardings per Trip 1.47 1.47 1.48 1.47 1.46 1.45 1.45
Appendices
F-34 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
Appendix 1: Details of Changes to Maintain Current Service Levels and Operationalize Prior Decisions
Changes to Maintain Current Service Levels
Description ($000's)
2012
Budget
($000's)
2013
Proposed
Budget
($000's)
Change
($000's)Details
Labour and Benefits 110,872 115,081 4,209
Increase reflects negotiated union agreements,
economic adjustment increases, labour adjustments
and other fringe benefit changes.
VCOMM/CAD/AVL maintenance
support costs 1,253 2,083 830
Communication and "smart" bus related
support/maintenance cost increases for various
MiWay IT systems
Various maintenance cost increases
(rustproofing, parts, fluids) 6,550 7,100 550 Inflationary/usage increases based on historical use
Transit uniforms and miscellaneous
other items 612 1,012 400
Replace operators uniforms with new MiWay brand
uniforms - funded via provincial gas tax
Diesel fuel 15,557 15,857 300
Adjustment based on volume increase in diesel fuel
consumption
Utilities/allocations 5,760 5,625 (135) Decrease in natural gas rates
Other Changes 2,619 2,762 143 Other minor increases
Total Other Cost Increases 32,351 34,439 2,088
Labour savings* 0 (330) (330)
Wages/Salaries/Fringe benefit reductions for 1
General Service Person, 1 Subway Cashier, 1
Mechanic, 1 Route Supervisor
Various maintenance costs* 0 (300) (300)
Reductions in various maintenance budgets due to
efficiencies, newer fleet
Route rationalization* 0 (200) (200) Reductions related to reduced/cancelled service
iBus communication costs* 0 (150) (150)
Budget reduction to communication costs for the
iBus technology
Marketing 893 793 (100) Reduction of MiWay related marketing budget
Other Changes 0 (292) (292) Other minor changes
Total Efficiencies and Cost Savings 893 (479) (1,372)
Other Cost Increases
Efficiencies and Cost Savings
Table continued on next page.
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-35
Continued Appendix 1: Changes to Maintain Current Service Levels
Description ($000's)
2012
Budget
($000's)
2013
Proposed
Budget
($000's)
Change
($000's)Details
Reduction in draw from the Provincial Gas
Tax Reserve Fund (21,315) (17,815) 3,500
Reduced draw related to planned reduction in
Provincial Gas Tax Reserve Fund reliance
Farebox revenue increases (65,789) (71,689) (5,900)
Includes 2% revenue increase for ridership
growth, 2013 fare increase, annualization of 2012
fare increase, 2012 forecasted revenue surplus
carryover
Advertising contract increases (4,580) (4,980) (400)
Bus/shelter advertising contract revenue
increases
Other Changes (906) (1,050) (144) Increase for transit discount program
Total Current Revenue Changes (92,589) (95,533) (2,944)
Total Changes to Maintain Current
Service Levels 51,526 53,507 1,981
Note: Numbers may not balance due to rounding.
*Budget is included in total - under a prior category.
Current Revenue Changes
F-36 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
Changes to Operationalize Past Decisions
Description ($000's)
2012
Budget
($000's)
2013
Proposed
Budget
($000's)
Change
($000's)Details
Annualize 2012 service improvements (20
operators, 4 staff)* 0 550 550
20 Operators, 1 Route Supervisor, 1
Operations Supervisor, 1 Bus Equipment
Technician, 1 Mechanic
Diesel fuel and minor maintenance items* 0 300 300 Annualize 2012 service improvements
Other Base Changes 305 323 18 Other minor changes
Total Annualization of Previous Years
Operating Cost Decisions 305 1,173 868
N/A 0 0 0
Total Operating Impact of New Capital
Projects 0 0 0
Total Changes to Operationalize Prior
Decisions 305 1,173 868
Total Cost to Maintain Current Services
Levels and Operationalize Prior
Decisions 51,831 54,680 2,849
Note: Numbers may not balance due to rounding.
*Budget is included in total - under a prior category.
Annualization of Previous Years Operating Cost Decisions
Operating Impact of New Capital Projects
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-37
Appendix 2: Budget Requests
Proposed 2013-2016 New Initiatives and new Revenues (Budget Requests)
Please see the Budget Requests for the 2013-2016 Business Planning Cycle with details to follow.
Description BR # Year
BRT Operations and Maintenance 27 2013
Congestion and Overcrowding 42 2013
Additional 1% Service Growth 160 2013
New Initiatives
F-38 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
Budget Request #: 27
Proposed Initiative
Department
Service Area
BRT Operations and Maintenance (Recommended Option)
Transportation & Works Department
Mississauga Transit
Required Operating Investment
Impacts ($000s) 2013 2014 2015 2016
Gross Expenditures 863.8 3,101.8 5,584.2 5,863.8
Reserves & Reserve Funds 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User Fees & Other Revenues 53.0 254.0 813.0 1,415.0
Tax Levy Requirements 810.8 2,847.8 4,771.2 4,448.8
* Net Change in $ 2,037.0 1,923.4 (322.3)
FTEs 20.0 21.0 37.0 37.0
* Any net change that is negative, (in brackets), is a good thing. It means a reduction in expenditure or an increase in revenue.
Required Capital Investment
Impacts ($000s) 2012 & Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 & Beyond
Gross Expenditures 0.0 100.0 88.0 35.0 0.0
Non Tax Supported Funding Sources 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Net Tax Supported Funding Required 0.0 100.0 88.0 35.0 0.0
FTEs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Why Staff Recommend this Initiative
The BRT will be opening in phases starting in 2013. There is a lot of infrastructure and projected increase in operations so a
solid maintenance and operations program is needed to ensure the success of the BRT. The Mississauga BRT Project is a
partnership between Canada, Ontario, Metrolinx and the City of Mississauga.
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-39
Budget Request #: 27
Details of Service Change
Customers: BRT project will see the creation of a dedicated east-west transit corridor (busway) across
Mississauga which will run along the Highway 403, Eastgate Parkway and Eglinton Avenue corridors connecting Winston
Churchill Boulevard to Highway 427. Once operational, busway services will complement and connect with local bus service,
inter-regional transit service and the TTC.
Construction is underway with the first segment operational in late 2013. The full busway will be operational in 2015. The new
busway will be 12 kilometres in length, with 11 BRT stations and 23 new bridge/culvert structures. The City is responsible for
funding seven kilometres of busway as well as nine BRT stations. GO Transit, a division of Metrolinx, is responsible for 2.5
kilometres of busway and two BRT Stations.15 buses will be acquired as part of the BRT Project to support MiWay operations.
Recommended Options: One: Re-route #107 and #109; Two: Increase of 27,800 hours annually starting in October 2013; Three:
Increase of 21,900 hours annually starting in January 2015. Risk Management: The Mississauga BRT project is utilizing a
comprehensive risk management program throughout the design and construction phase of the project. A commissioning phase
for the busway will be developed for all users (transit service providers, maintenance staff, enforcement and emergency service
providers) of the busway to mitigate risks of busway operations.
Service Impact
Future Maintenance & Operating Costs of the busway will be influenced by the following: Maintenance of BRT East - 9.5
kilometres, of which a cost arrangement is to be made with GO Transit for their 2.5 kilometres.; Parking lots for BRT East –
350 spaces; Maintenance and operating costs for nine BRT East stations; Enforcement and Security Officers which includes
vehicles and related equipment – complement of four full time equivalents (FTEs); Transit Operations labour which includes Bus
Operators (33 FTE); and Commissioning which includes one time training cost for transit operators.
Future Capital Costs of the busway will be influenced by the following: Presto support which includes acquisition of Presto units
for BRT Stations; Asset Management which includes bridge condition surveys, and associated capital costs for vehicles for
Enforcement and Security Officers.
Future Revenue from the busway will be influenced by the following: Fare box revenue from new ridership (Advertising revenue
from BRT station advertising not included at this time).
F-40 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
Budget Request #: 42
Proposed Initiative
Department
Service Area
Service Congestion and Overcrowding
Transportation & Works Department
Mississauga Transit
Required Operating Investment
Impacts ($000s) 2013 2014 2015 2016
Gross Expenditures 1,190.5 2,908.5 5,095.1 7,328.7
Reserves & Reserve Funds 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User Fees & Other Revenues 115.9 282.9 496.1 713.7
Tax Levy Requirements 1,074.6 2,625.6 4,599.0 6,615.0
* Net Change in $ 1,551.0 1,973.4 2,016.0
FTEs 18.0 36.0 54.0 73.0
* Any net change that is negative, (in brackets), is a good thing. It means a reduction in expenditure or an increase in revenue.
Required Capital Investment
Impacts ($000s) 2012 & Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 & Beyond
Gross Expenditures 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Non Tax Supported Funding Sources 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Net Tax Supported Funding Required 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FTEs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Why Staff Recommend this Initiative
Denial of service caused by overcrowding continues to erode our network’s reliability on a daily basis. Changes in travel patterns and increased overall ridership levels are exerting added pressures on a system without the resources to respond appropriately and in a timely manner.
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-41
Budget Request #: 42
Details of Service Change
Indicators point to a sustained surge in demand for transit service in our City. The 6.2 percent gap projected for 2012 must be
managed by adding additional service hours. Even with the requested two percent increase in service hours, the
supply/demand gap will be widened to 11.6 percent by the end of 2016.
The two percent adjustment would add 26,800 additional service hours in 2013, 27,300 in 2014, 27,900 in 2015, and 28,400 in
2016.
Service Impact
This request does not address true service growth, which would only be possible through the progressive launch of BRT
Operations supported by dedicated service improvement funding (both aspects are the subject of a separate BR).
Failure to smooth the projected gap between demand and supply will result in a severe loss of service quality, causing
unmanageable overcrowding pressures on our system, discouraging residents from considering transit as a viable –reasonable-
transportation alternative and effectively contributing to further traffic congestion.
o further traffic congestion.
F-42 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
Budget Request #: 160
Proposed Initiative
Department
Service Area
Service Growth - 1%
Transportation & Works Department
Mississauga Transit
Required Operating Investment
Impacts ($000s) 2013 2014 2015 2016
Gross Expenditures 463.2 1,454.7 2,528.4 3,624.3
Reserves & Reserve Funds 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User Fees & Other Revenues 45.1 141.6 246.2 352.9
Tax Levy Requirements 418.1 1,313.1 2,282.2 3,271.4
* Net Change in $ 894.9 969.1 989.2
FTEs 9.0 18.0 27.0 36.0
* Any net change that is negative, (in brackets), is a good thing. It means a reduction in expenditure or an increase in revenue.
Required Capital Investment
Impacts ($000s) 2012 & Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 & Beyond
Gross Expenditures 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Non Tax Supported Funding Sources 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Net Tax Supported Funding Required 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FTEs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Why Staff Recommend this Initiative
To reduce the gap of 11.6 percent between demand and supply to 7.2 percent, an additional one percent in transit service hours
will provide MiWay a minimum ability to enhance peak hour and midday frequencies and bring them a bit more in line with
customer expectations (expressed through the Customer Contact Systems records and in the latest Customer Satisfaction
Survey). The requested one percent will also support feeding the BRT which, by end of the 2013-2016 Business Planning Cycle,
will be fully implemented. will be fully implemented.
will be fully implemented.
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-43
Budget Request #: 160
Details of Service Change
BR#42 proposed measures to moderate the negative effect of increased traffic congestion and overcrowding arising from
increased ridership, but did nothing to reduce the gap between demand and supply.
Additional funding would be required to provide MiWay a minimum ability to enhance peak hour and midday frequencies and not
only bring them just a bit more in line with clear customer expectations (expressed through the Customer Contact Systems
records and in the latest Customer Satisfaction Survey), but also to fully support the massive investment in the BRT which, by
the end of the 2013-2016 business planning cycle should be fully implemented.
An additional 1 percent annual increase in transit service hours would translate into 13,400 hours in 2013, 13,700 in 2014,
13,900 in 2015 and 14,200 in 2016.
Service Impact
The 13,400 additional service hours identified for 2013 are equivalent to 53 daily hours, all of them addressing weekday
pressures, with no allocation reserved for weekend service considerations. This number of additional hours would allow MiWay
to address current peak hour frequency pressures for up to two routes per year during the next business planning cycle. This is
not enough to take care of the needs identified.
There is an expectation, though, that through ongoing service rationalization efforts on one hand, and through route realignments
both pre and post BRT implementation those needs could be mitigated, if not completely met. Failure to palliate the projected
gap between demand and supply will result in a severe loss of service quality, causing unmanageable overcrowding pressures
on our local system, discouraging residents from considering transit as a viable –reasonable- transportation alternative and
effectively contributing to further traffic congestion, and leaving the BRT infrastructure without adequate support to reap the full
ROI on that massive investment.
transportation alternative and effectively contributing to further traffic congestion, and leaving the BRT infrastructure without
adequate support to reap the full ROI on that massive investment.
F-44 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
Appendix 3A: Proposed 2013 Capital Program ($000’s)
Program: Buildings
Project
NumberProject Name
Gross Cost
(000's)
Recovery
(000's)
Net Cost
(000's)Funding Sources
13234 Transit Facility Repairs (Minor) 40 0 40 Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund
40 0 40Subtotal
Program: Buses
Project
NumberProject Name
Gross Cost
(000's)
Recovery
(000's)
Net Cost
(000's)Funding Sources
13203
Transit Capital Bus Maintenance-
Rehabilitation/Replacement 1,900 0 1,900 Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund
13214 Transit Terminal Departure Displays 1,500 0 1,500 Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund
13219 Transit Bus Acquisitions-Replacement 13,892 0 13,892
Provincial Gas Tax Reserve
Fund/Federal Gas Tax Reserve
Fund
17,292 0 17,292Subtotal
Program: On-Street Facilities
Project
NumberProject Name
Gross Cost
(000's)
Recovery
(000's)
Net Cost
(000's)Funding Sources
13215 Transit Bus Signs 400 0 400 Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund
13224 Transit Bus Stops/Pads/Signs - Growth 135 0 135
Transit Development Charges
Reserve Fund/Federal Gas Tax
Reserve Fund
13225
Transit Bus Stops/Pads/Signs -
Replacement 140 0 140 Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund
13227
Transit Mini Terminals/Bays/Bus Loops -
Replacement 100 0 100 Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund
775 0 775Subtotal
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-45
Program: Other Transit
Project
NumberProject Name
Gross Cost
(000's)
Recovery
(000's)
Net Cost
(000's)Funding Sources
13230
Transit Hastus Module - Customer
System 70 0 70 Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund
13231 Transit 5 Year Service Plan 350 0 350 Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund
13232 Transit Customer Satisfaction Survey 250 0 250 Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund
670 0 670Subtotal
Program: Vehicles & Equipment
Project
NumberProject Name
Gross Cost
(000's)
Recovery
(000's)
Net Cost
(000's)Funding Sources
13206
Transit Route Supervisor Vehicles
Acquisition - Replacement 315 0 315 Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund
13210
Transit Maintenance Vehicle
Acquisition - Replacement 40 0 40 Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund
13211
Transit Security Vehicle & Equipment -
Growth 50 0 50
Transit Development Charges
Reserve Fund/Federal Gas Tax
Reserve Fund
13212
Transit Security Vehicles & Equipment -
Replacement 100 0 100 Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund
505 0 505
19,282 0 19,282
Subtotal
Total Expenditure
F-46 2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget
Appendix 3B: Proposed 2014-2016 Capital Program ($000’s)
Program: Buildings
Project Name2014 Forecast
($000's)
2015 Forecast
($000's)
2016 Forecast
($000's)
Transit Facility Repairs (Minor) 40 40 40
Transit Downtown Terminal #2 600 8,000 10,400
Transit Kipling Subway Inter-Regional Terminal 0 5,500 0
Transit Malton Facility - Expansion & Improvements 0 300 2,700
Subtotal 640 13,840 13,140
Program: Buses
Project Name2014 Forecast
($000's)
2015 Forecast
($000's)
2016 Forecast
($000's)
Transit Bus Acquisitions - Growth 3,370 0 3,370
Transit Bus Acquisitions - Replacement 0 0 10,131
Transit Capital Bus Maintenance - Major Component
Rehabilitation/Replacement 2,100 2,100 2,200
Transit Farebox Acquisitions - Replacement 0 5,000 0
Subtotal 5,470 7,100 15,701
Program: Transitway
Project Name2014 Forecast
($000's)
2015 Forecast
($000's)
2016 Forecast
($000's)
Transit BRT - Construction 15,000 10,000 0
Transit Priority Infrastructure 14,765 0 0
Transit Dundas Corridor Study 3,000 0 0
Bridge & Structure Rehabilitation - Cooksville GO Overpass 1,800 0 0
Subtotal 34,565 10,000 0
2013-2016 Business Plan & 2013 Budget F-47
Program: On-Street Facilities
Project Name2014 Forecast
($000's)
2015 Forecast
($000's)
2016 Forecast
($000's)
Transit Bus Stops/Pads/Signs - Replacement 140 140 140
Transit Bus Signs 400 400 50
Transit Mini Terminals/Bays/Bus Loops - Replacement 100 100 100
Subtotal 640 640 290
Program: Other Transit
Project Name2014 Forecast
($000's)
2015 Forecast
($000's)
2016 Forecast
($000's)
Transit Maintenance Information System 0 2,000 0
Transit Customer Satisfaction Survey 0 250 0
Transit Terminals Next Bus Announcement Equipment 0 0 1,500
Transit Performance Metrics Monitor 0 0 1,000
Subtotal 0 2,250 2,500
Program: Vehicles & Equipment
Project Name2014 Forecast
($000's)
2015 Forecast
($000's)
2016 Forecast
($000's)
Transit Capital Equipment Acquisition - Maintenance
Section 145 145 145
Transit Maintenance Vehicle Acquisitions - Replacement 60 70 210
Transit Change-Off Vehicle Acquisitions - Replacement 0 0 400
Transit Route Supervisor Vehicle Acquisitions -
Replacement 70 140 140
Transit Security Vehicles & Equipment - Growth - BRT 50 50 0
Transit Security Vehicles & Equipment - Replacement 0 100 0
Transit Coin Room Equipment - Replacement 0 50 0
Subtotal 325 555 895
Total Expenditures 41,640 34,385 32,526