25
ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra- rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems Research Unit University of Strathclyde, UK www.esru.strath.ac.uk

ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

  • View
    215

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

ESRU

Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating

Marine Turbine (CoRMaT)

Cameron JohnstoneDirector: Energy Systems Research Unit

University of Strathclyde, UKwww.esru.strath.ac.uk

Page 2: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

Technology: Next Generation Tidal Turbine• The novel idea behind the contra-rotating turbine concept is to use

two closely spaced dissimilar rotors, moving in opposite directions

• This has several technical and cost advantages over single rotor designs:

– Increases relative shaft output speed– Increases the efficiency of energy capture– Eliminates complex blade pitch control– Reduces turbulent flow downstream of the rotors– Minimises reactive torque, thus promising a single point mooring

possibility– Increases the dynamic stability of the turbine in the tidal flow

• Electrical power take off is possible via direct drive of a contra-rotating generator, or by separate generators

ESRU

Page 3: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

Concept Development

Hub

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

2 4 6 8 10 12

Tip speed ratio

Po

wer

co

eff

icie

nt

nominal plus2deg plus4deg

Poly. (nominal) Poly. (plus2deg) Poly. (plus4deg)

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 20 40 60 80 100

Time (seconds)

Vgen (V)

Pitch (deg)

Roll (deg)

Phase 1: Tank Testing Phase 2: Rotor Testing Phase 3: System Testing

ESRU

Page 4: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

Phase 1: 1/30th Scale Turbine Tow-Tank Tests

Hub

– Rotor performance:• Torque/ speed characteristics (power out).• Changes in blade pitch angle and rotor spacing.• Interaction between rotors.

– Structural/ mooring system• Dynamic loading due to reactive torque.

ESRU

Page 5: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

1/30th Scale Turbine Tow Tank Testing

Hub

ESRU

Page 6: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

1/30th Scale Turbine Performance ( )

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

2 4 6 8 10 12

Tip speed ratio

Po

wer

co

eff

icie

nt

nominal plus2deg plus4deg

Poly. (nominal) Poly. (plus2deg) Poly. (plus4deg)

ESRU

Page 7: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

Phase 2: 1/7th Scale 2.5m Blades – FEM DesignESRU

Page 8: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

1/7th Scale CoRMaT alongside MV St Hilda

Miller Fifer 36’

ESRU

Page 9: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

1/7th Scale CoRMaT Operating

Miller Fifer 36’

ESRU

Page 10: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

1/7th Scale Turbine Performance

• Results are as predicted - within test series.

Rotor Dynamics Recorded

ESRU

Page 11: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

Phase 3 Objectives (2008/ 09)

• To take the proven power capture, wake minimisation and torque cancelling properties of CoRMaT and integrate them into a standalone system that:

– Can easily be deployed, maintained, and recovered

– Generates electricity from a direct drive alternator

– Proves the proposed single-point mooring system

• Complete financial appraisal of scaling to a full scale system and development of the commercialisation plan.

ESRU

Page 12: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

Phase 3 CRT-2 Schematic

Axial Flux Generator

Contra-rotating Blades

Rear Buoyancy

Front Buoyancy

To Tether

ESRU

Page 13: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

Direct Drive, Open-to-sea Generator• Advantages:

– Ease of construction– Nacelle & casing leaks not an issue– Natural cooling– No complex sealing requirement– No large diameter seal friction

• Disadvantages:– Hydrodynamic effects of rotating

generator parts (negligible)– Marine growth potential

• Axial flux • Permanent magnet Ne-Fe-B• Rectified 3-phase output

ESRU

SpineRotors

Ne-Fe-B Magnets

Stator

Prime Mover 1

Shaft Prime Mover 2

Shaft

Page 14: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

CoRMaT Test-tank Video ESRU

Page 15: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

CoRMaT Mooring

• Single point tether from either a seabed gravity base or anchors:

– ease of installation and retrieval,

– low cost,– available proven

components,– flexible configuration, tuned

for differing depths, tidal climates and seabed composition.

– tracking of tidal diamond

ESRU

Page 16: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

CoRMaT System Test Locations

1) Kyles of Bute

2) Sound of Islay

ESRU

Page 17: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

CoRMaT System Test Location 1

Test SiteKyles of Bute

Site chosen as:– sheltered,– 2.6 knot tide,– easy access,– range of

shallow water depths (6 – 10m).

ESRU

Page 18: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

CoRMaT System Testing

Installed miniCoRMaT system at slack water

Submerged Turbine

ESRU

Page 19: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

Turbine Performance – Stability KoB

• Stability of device is good – improves under greater loading

-2-1.5

-1-0.5

00.5

11.5

22.5

33.5

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Time (seconds)

Deg

rees

Turb Pitch (deg)

Turb Roll (deg)

ESRU

Page 20: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

Sound of Islay (Visual Impact!)

Turbine buoy

ESRU

Site chosen as:– more

energetic,– 5.2 knot tide,– water depths

(12– 42 m).

Page 21: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

FFT Analysis of CoRMaT pitch data showing dominant frequencies at Islay

Pitch Fn F1 F2 F3

Hz 0.597 1.792 3.885 8.167

Source Oversize nacelle

Fundamental rotor 1 speed

Combined rotor speed

Karman vortex

shedding

F2

FnF1 F3

ESRU

Page 22: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

FFT Analysis of CoRMaT roll data showing dominant frequencies at Islay

ESRU

F3

F5 F6F4

F1

Roll F1 F4 F5 F6

Hz 1.859 9.362 35.657 47.742

Source Fundamental rotor 1 speed

5*F1 PMG stator non

uniformities (9*F2)

Blade- blade interactions

(12*F2)

Page 23: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

CoRMaT Islay Deployment Video at ‘Slack Water !!!’

ESRU

Page 24: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

CoRMaT: Next Phase, 2010 - University Spin-out Company- Marine Renewables Development

Deploy (X) x 250 kW turbines

Operate for 1 year and monitor deviceperformance and interactions

Option C chosen due to ‘off-the-shelf’ component availability

Direct drive 2 x 125 kW gen-sets per device

Development and Up-scaling of contra-rotating generator for next phase of deployment (Option D). Now being implemented

ESRU

G Gearbox GGearbox

A)

GDiff.

Gearbox

B)

G G

C)

D)G

Power Take-off Options

Page 25: ESRU Development and In-Sea Testing of a Single Point Mooring Supported Contra-rotating Marine Turbine (CoRMaT) Cameron Johnstone Director: Energy Systems

Conclusion• Contra-rotation can produce zero reactive torque, eliminate

the need for a gearbox and enable direct drive of a contra-rotating generator.

• Low cost single point mooring provides station keeping in different tidal stream conditions, without impacting on device performance.

• Simplified single point mooring system enables quick and easy deployment/ recovery.

• Considerably reduced system, installation and operational costs attained

• All IPR belongs solely to the University of Strathclyde with a sole license agreement to the University spinout company.

• UK (GB2005/161492) and International patents.

ESRU