ESL 101 201 2/1/2016Ray MeredithHaosen LiuHere I choose the
argument #1 to analysis. The Purpose of this short argument is to
suggest the vice president hiring their Appian Roadways. I think
the Appian Roadways maybe is competing with the Good Intentions
Roadways for the project of the access roads for shopping mall. In
the text, he contrasted the road built by Good Intentions Roadways
and their company in the same year as the evidence to show their
quality is much better than Good Intentions Roadways. Whats more,
he also indicated that they hired a new quality-control manager and
bought new paving machinery. As far as I can see, I think his
argument is clearly expounded their companys advantages and the
reason why we choose them as the builder of road. My only confusion
about his argument is the environment of those two roads. Just like
how many cars pass a day, weather and so on. Quality is not the
only thing that decide the life of road.
