Error Analysis and Least Squares

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    1/119

    Error Analysis and Least SquaresCPSD # G100398

    Presented by

    The Office of Land Surveys

    Division of Right of Way and Land Surveys

    Developed By:

    Jeremy Evans, PLS

    Psomas, Inc.

    And the Office of Land Surveys

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    2/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    3/119

    MEASUREMENT ANALYSISAND ADJUSTMENT

    Capital Project Skill Development Class(CPSD)

    GRW117

    By Jeremy Evans,By Jeremy Evans,P.L.S.P.L.S. PsomasPsomas

    Supplemented bySupplemented byCaltrans StaffCaltrans Staff

    Introduce Instructor

    The purpose of this class is to give Caltrans surveyors a clearunderstanding of error analysis. This is so the typical surveyor in thefield or office knows how to determine the precision and accuracyneeded to perform a task. This applies not just to control work, butthroughout the lifetime of a project.

    Understand that there are three values for any measurement: themeasured value, the adjusted value, and the true value. The truevalue can never be known, but a surveyor should know how tocombine proper techniques, strength of figure, and adjustments sothat they are confident that the measured and adjusted values areclose to the true value

    Areas of interest - boundary, control and adjustments, designmapping.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    4/119

    Introduction

    The dark side of surveying is thebelief that surveying is aboutmeasurements, precisions and

    adjustments. It is not and neverwill be.

    Dennis Mouland

    P.O.B. Magazine

    July, 2002

    All measurements, no matter how accurate, are still subject to Boundary Laws and

    common sense.

    I once saw a Record of Survey that called 13 monuments out of position, and never

    held a single one as good.

    Surveying is the ART and Science of measurement! Over-reliance on numbers leadsto the Dark Side, it does.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    5/119

    Introduction

    Much has been written lately about leastsquares adjustment and the advantages itbrings to the land surveyor. To take fulladvantage of a least squares adjustmentpackage, the surveyor must have a basicunderstanding of the nature ofmeasurements, the equipment he uses, themethods he employs, and the environment

    he works in.

    Measurement analysis is the first part of this presentation.

    Surveyors should have the ability to evaluate the amount of error in theirmeasurements and / or control the errors in their measurements

    An understanding of measurements gives the surveyor this control

    This course will present the Least Squares adjustment LAST,because a surveyor must understand a lot more about errors beforethey accept a least squares adjustment.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    6/119

    Introduction

    Measurements and Adjustments:War Stories

    Discuss projects/situations where misunderstanding of measurements hascaused problems

    A level run between benchmarks has an error of 0.25 feet in threemiles. Is that caused by random error that can be adjusted? Or by asingle bad reading that leaves a 0.30 jump in elevation betweentwo TBMs?

    The 100 Hubble Space telescope was ground and polished to thesmoothest finish of any large mirror ever built. Was it any good?

    Answer: The mirror was ground to the wrong prescription! Twoshuttle space flights were needed to add corrective lenses.

    The surveyors understanding of measurements and datums iscritical to the success of any project.

    Especially as projects get bigger in geographical terms. In the firstexample above, a bust can be hidden by the relative size of the

    project. How do you know when to accept a weak adjustment, andwhen to re-measure?

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    7/119

    Class Outline

    Survey Measurement Basics - A ReviewMeasurement Analysis

    Error Propagation

    Introduction to Weighted and LeastSquares Adjustments

    Least Squares Adjustment Software

    Sample Network Adjustments

    Star*Net is one of many least squares adjustment software on the market

    Terramodel

    Intergraph Survey Select Cad

    Trimnet or TGO

    All of these softwares deliver correct results, however star*net was thefirst I used, speaks surveyor, has the greatest flexibility, etc.

    The Department is moving to Trimnet from Star*net

    Caltrans owns 120 Star*net licenses, so easiest to use as anexample

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    8/119

    Measure First,Adjustment Last

    Adjustment programs assume that: Instruments are calibrated

    Measurements are carefully made

    Networks are stronger if: They include Redundancy

    They have Strength of Figure

    Adjust only after you have followed

    proper procedures!

    Leica 1103 should be turned in for servicing every 18 months. HQ has received

    broken units that havent be serviced ever! Thats FOUR years!

    Its not only good practice to regularly service the equipment, but cheaper in the long

    run.

    Are your tribrachs adjusted? Did you check the plummet and level before youpicked up a sight?

    Have you cross-tied any control monuments?

    Did you turn more sets when you had a weak control scheme, such as straight along

    a RR?

    Did you avoid as many 180 degree turns as possible?

    Every Caltrans Surveyor should know Figure 5.1 !

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    9/119

    Survey Measurement Basics

    A Review of Plumb Bob 101

    Introduce books

    Adjustment Computation by Wolf and Ghilani- more readable than most

    star*net manual, good basics of adjustment theory and star*net

    Random Errors chapter of Moffitt. Also the adjustment chapter has a goodsection on weighted means

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    10/119

    Surveying (Geospatial Services?)

    Surveying That discipline whichencompasses all methods for measuring,processing, and disseminating informationabout the physical earth and ourenvironment. Brinker & Wolf

    Surveyor - An expert in measuring,processing, and disseminating informationabout the physical earth and our

    environment.

    If surveyors want to be considered professionals, we need to know the theory

    behind our procedures.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    11/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    12/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    13/119

    This is a typical brochure of a modern total station.

    Before you accept any of the statements as gospel, you must understand exactly

    what the manufacturer is telling you.

    DIN 18723 is the international testing standards for survey instrumentaccuracy. Other DINs may cover such things as food safety or strength offishing line.

    DIN 18723 sets exact parameters for testing; such as temperature rangeduring testing, rigidity of setups, and other parameters that can only beeasily performed at the factory. None of theses tests are done while sightingover AC pavement in 100 weather.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    14/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    15/119

    Instrument Specifications

    The 5602, 5603, and 5605 are all essentially the same instrument! Aftermanufacture, all instruments are the tested for accuracy (DIN 18723).

    Those instruments that have a standard deviation of less than 2 are labeled5602.

    Those that have a standard deviation of more than 2 but less than 3 are5603s.

    The 5605 is built to the same manufacturing tolerances as the 5602, butjust didnt test as well when checked at the factory.

    Note: The instrument companies always try to build their equipment to thehigher standard. If you tried to order a 5605 from Trimble, they might tellyou that they dont have any available right now, and arent making any dueto the high demand for the 5602s.

    What they really mean is that the factory is doing a great job, and allinstruments are passing the 2 standard.

    Use (3mm + 3ppm) value (far right)

    Is the ppm value here the same as the ppm value that is dialed into theinstrument dealing with temperature and pressure?

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    16/119

    Instrument Specifications

    Distance Measurement

    z m = (0.01 + 3ppm x D)

    z What is the error in a 3500 footmeasurement?

    z m= (0.01+(3/1,000,000 x 3500)) = 0.021

    Discuss setting PPM . If you are on the beach in So Cal, you might get awaywith setting the PPM to zero. If you arent at sea level and 72, startcalibrating.

    Sigma (lower case) denotes standard deviation

    m is Standard deviation of the mean, a measurement of accuracy. More on thatlater.

    Apply the standards for a 5605.

    3 mm x 10,000 = 30m

    So a single measurement less that 30m (100ft) will have an precision ration less

    than 1/10,000.

    Thats why we tie monuments twice!

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    17/119

    Calibration or Dont shootyourself in the foot.

    Leica instruments should be servicedevery 18 months.

    EDMs should be calibrated every sixmonths

    Tribrachs should be adjusted every sixmonths, or more often as needed.

    Levels pegged every 90 days

    The service contract with the Leica suppliers call for 18 mos. service intervals.

    Servicing doesnt cost anything, but blunders do!

    more often as needed means before a control survey, after being dropped,

    or any rainy equipment day.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    18/119

    Using SECO Tribrach Adjusters Tech Tip Number: 12Created: January 1, 2001

    Opt ical Plummet Adjustment Using: Tribrach Adjust ing Cylinder #2001 orTribrach Adjuster #2002 (see il lust rat ion 1)

    EQUIPMENT NEEDED: Tribrach Adj ust ing Cyli nder #2001 or Tribrach Adj uster #2002, Tripod orinstrument stand, 2 tribrachs, target

    1. Place the tr ibrach on the tripod. Put the adjuster in t he tribrach. Place the tr ibrach to beadjusted on top of t he adj uster so that i t is upsidedown looking at t he target on the ceili ng.

    The distance between the t ribrach and target should be between 4 and 5 feet.

    2. Using the leveling screws of the bottom tribrach, point the crosshair of the tribrach being

    tested to coincide with the target .

    3. Rotate t he t ribrach being tested 180 degrees on t he adjuster. Crosshairs wil l stay on thetarget of an adj usted tr ibrach.

    4. Aft er 180 degree turn if the crosshair does not stay on the target , half the error should becorrected with the adjust ing screws provided by the manufacturer of t he tri brach. The

    remainder should be corrected with the leveling screws of the bottom tribrach.

    5. Repeat steps 2, 3 & 4 unti l the crosshair stays on target at all posit ions.

    Tribrach Circular Vial Adjustment Using: Tribrach Adjuster #2002 (seeil lust ration 2)

    EQUIPMENT NEEDED: Tripod or instrument stand, Tribrach Adjuster #2002 and adjusting pins.

    1. Place the tribrach on the tripod and fasten to the tripod.

    2. Place the #2002 in the t ribrach and level t he tr ibrach using the vial on the #2002. Ignore the

    circular vial on the t ribrach.

    3. To level the #2002: Point one end of the #2002 vial to any leveling screw and using thatscrew bring the vial to center.

    4. Now turn t he #2002 90 degrees so that each end of t he vial is as close as possibl e to theother two leveli ng screws. Using these two leveli ng screws, center the vial.

    5. Turn the vial 90 degrees back to the original leveling screw and level again if necessary.

    6. Repeat 1,2 & 3 unti l the vial remains centered at both posit ions.

    7. To test t he adjustment of the #2002 vial at any centered posit ion, rotate t he #2002 180degrees. The vial should stay centered within one graduat ion. If not , take half the error back

    to the center with the vial mounting screw that is on the high side. 8. If the circular vial on thet ribrach is not centered, use the adjust ing screws and bring to center.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    19/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    20/119

    Is It a Mistake or an Error?

    Mistake - Blunder in reading, recording orcalculating a value.

    Error - The difference between a measuredor calculated value and the true value.

    Discuss true value. For a traverse, there is the measured value, adjustedvalue, and true value.

    True Value does exist but cannot be measured or known

    The best that anyone can do is a mean value or most probable value

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    21/119

    Blunder

    a gross error or mistake resulting usually from

    stupidity, ignorance, or carelessness.

    Most blunders are caused by human error. If you are lucky, its someone elses error,

    not yours. This is why we have specific field techniques, such as double tying

    monuments, measuring all HIs, and closing traverses. If all of the procedures are

    done properly, then blunders can be isolated and dealt with.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    22/119

    Setup over wrong point Bad H.I.

    Incorrect settings in equipment

    Blunder

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    23/119

    Types of Errors

    Systematic

    Random

    Error is the difference between the measured value and the true value.

    Its the job of a surveyor to reduce errors to a minimum. But always accept that

    there will be minor errors, and not try to fix data that is within tolerance.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    24/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    25/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    26/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    27/119

    Random

    Poorly adjusted tribrach

    Inexperienced Instrument

    operator

    Inaccuracy in equipment

    Many tribrachs have a centering error of +/- 2mm. They dont have to be poorly

    adjusted to introduce error. A poorly adjusted tribrach creates systematic error, a

    properly adjusted one will still be a source of random error.

    All equipment has inherent inaccuracy. Therefore, all measurements will containrandom error.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    28/119

    Nature of Random Errors

    A plus or minus error will occur with thesame frequency

    Minor errors will occur more often thanlarge ones

    Very large errors will rarely occur (seemistake)

    A Normal Distribution Curve has all of these attributes:

    1. It is symmetrical about the mean

    2. More data is close to the mean that farther away

    3. Very little data is found at the fringe

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    29/119

    Normal Distribution Curve #1

    A plus or minus error will occur with the samefrequency, so

    Area within curve is equal on either side of the mean

    The Normal Distribution curve is also known as the Bell Curve due to its shape.

    Its was developed by an 18th century German mathematician and astronomer named

    Karl Gauss.

    If this was a chart of coin tosses, the chance of a coin land on heads is equal to the

    number of coins landing tails. And the number of coins landing heads 6 out of 10

    times is equal to the number of coins landing tails 6 out of 10 times, etc.

    This is a Normal Curve! In real life, the data is often skewed.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    30/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    31/119

    Normal Distribution Curve #3

    Very large errors will rarely occur, so

    The total area within 2 of the mean is 95%of the sample population

    In the previous slide we mentioned that a small number of data wont result in a

    smooth curve.

    In a random sampling of a general population, it usually takes a minimum of sample

    of about 30 to see a true curve start to form.

    With numbers less than thirty, its possible that there wont be any measurementsoutside of two standard deviations.

    Since surveyors only measure a sample of thirty or more with GPS equipment, ALL

    conventional field measurements should fall within that limit.

    If we go back to the example of the curve representing 10 coin tosses, the chance of

    any person tossing 4 heads in a row is 24 (16:1) or 6.25%

    The odds of 5 in a row is 32:1, or 3.125%.

    So while it is possible to toss heads 10 times in a row (1024:1, or 0.1%),

    measurements outside of 2 sigma of the mean arent usually relevant. For

    measurement data, that means flawed.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    32/119

    Histograms, Sigma, & Outliers

    4.00.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5-0.5-1.0-1.5-2.0-2.5-3.0-3.5-4.0

    Residuals

    1 1

    Outlier

    \

    MEA

    N

    2 2

    Histogram: Plot of the Residuals

    \

    1 : 68% of residualsmust fall inside area

    2 95 % of residualsmust fall inside area

    Bell shaped curve

    /

    This data shows the precision of a set of turned angles.

    A residual is the difference between the measured value and the most likely value

    (usually the mean). Thats different from the definition of error, which is the

    difference between measured and true. Since the true value isnt known, you cant

    calculate error. But a residual is a value that can be calculated and used for

    mathematical adjustments.

    Notice the Outlier. A bell curve should help identify data that should be excluded

    (Blunders)

    All data within 2 sigma is significant data, even if it isnt precise.

    It still has statistical value, and isnt weak data

    In this example, measurements within 1.75 seconds of the mean will happen 68% of

    the time. So even very good measurements have a measure of uncertainty.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    33/119

    Measurement Components

    All measurements consist of twocomponents: the measurement andthe uncertainty statement.

    1,320.55 0.05

    The uncertainty statement is not aguess, but is based on testing ofequipment and methods.

    Uncertainty statement is usually a statement of accuracy

    In the last slide, the measurement of one standard deviation was +/- 1.75. That was

    the uncertainty statement

    The second bullet originally read The uncertainty statement is not a guess, but is

    based on testing of equipment, personnel, methods and the surveyors judgment.Whats the difference between the two?

    Answer: All properly adjusted equipment, used correctly, has random errors. The

    human factors (personnel and judgment) introduce blunders and systematic errors.

    The published instrument uncertainty statements (2.0 mm +/- 2 ppm) are the

    expected instrument error. The actual field measurements include the systematic

    errors beyond the manufacturers control.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    34/119

    Accuracy Vs. Precision

    Precision - agreement among readings of thesame value (measurement). A measure ofmethods.

    Accuracy - agreement of observed valueswith the true value. A measure of results.

    Bullseye example

    Bullseye is not a very good example in surveying. A tightly grouped set ofmeasurements (precision) that misses the Bullseye (accuracy) doesnt helpthe surveyor.

    Q. If several tightly grouped measurements miss the bullseye, how wouldyou know?

    A. See Standard Deviation of the Mean

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    35/119

    Measurement Analysis

    Determining Measurement Uncertainties

    Now well take a data sample and show how the Bell curve applies to

    measurements.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    36/119

    Determining Uncertainty

    Uncertainty - the positive and negative rangeof values expected for a recorded orcalculated value, i.e. the value (the secondcomponent of measurements).

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    37/119

    Your Assignment

    Measure a line that is very close to 1000 feetlong and determine the accuracy of yourmeasurement.

    Equipment: 100 tape and two plumb bobs.

    Terrain: Basically level with 2 high brush.

    Environment: Sunny and warm.

    Personnel: You and me.

    If the instructor wishes to have the class perform this exercise, see the sample

    instructions in the student work book.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    38/119

    Chaining Test Data Exercise

    Equipment: 100 steel chain, 2 nails, 2 plumb bobs.

    Setup: On level ground lay the chain out flat, and place two nails approximately 100 feet

    apart. The site can be on grass, dirt, or pavement, as long as it is level.

    Procedure: Have the class form 2-person teams, with each team making a single

    measurement of the distance. Both chainmen should use a plumb bob, with the head

    chainman holding the chain no more than waist high. If time permits, the trainees can use

    a spring balance and thermometer, and adjust for sag and temperature. The tape

    corrections would be part of eliminating systematic errors. If corrections for sag or

    temperature arent made, students should still be aware of the correction procedures. You

    can still use uncorrected measurements for the classroom exercise.

    Measurements: At least 10 measurements should be made. If the class has fewer than

    20 students (10 teams), then teams may switch off head and rear chainmen until a total of

    10 measurements are obtained. There may be more measurements, but for simplicity it

    shouldnt be much more than 10, and should be an even number. Each chaining team

    should not reveal their results until all measurements have been made.

    Calculations: After all measurements have been collected, the student will return to the

    classroom, and use the data as shown in the PowerPoint to obtain mean, standard

    deviation, and standard deviation of the mean

    NOTE: After completing the exercise, DONT try to measure the distance using EDM

    equipment! Students should be aware that they will never know the true value. There

    are measurements that are close to the mean value, but there is no right answer. Even a

    distance measured by modern equipment has its own random errors, and is not the true

    value.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    39/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    40/119

    Test Data Set

    Measured distances:

    99.96 100.02

    100.04 100.00

    100.00 99.98

    100.02 100.00

    99.98 100.00

    Need to measure between two points approximately 1000 apart and needthe accuracy of the measurement

    Discuss how measurements were made (chain, bobing up to waist high,etc.)

    Objective is to determine error per chain length by testing, then determinethe error in the 1000 distance.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    41/119

    Averages

    Measures of Central Tendency The value within a data set that tends to exist at

    the center.

    Arithmetic Mean

    Median

    Mode

    Measures of Central Tendency is a corollary to the Nature of Random Errors #2.

    Mean is the sum of measurements divided by the number of observations.

    Median is the midpoint of the observations (half are less, half are greater).

    Mode is the most common value.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    42/119

    Averages

    Most commonly used is Arithmetic Mean

    Considered the most probable value

    n = number of observations

    Mean = 1000 / 10

    Mean = 100.00

    nmean

    meas.=

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    43/119

    Residuals

    The difference between an individual readingin a set of repeated measurements and themean

    Residual () = reading - mean

    Sum of the residuals squared (2) is used infuture calculations

    Residuals are also called variations. Thats why v is used in the formula

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    44/119

    Residuals

    Calculating Residuals (mean = 100.00):Readings residual residual2

    99.96 -0.04 0.0016

    100.02 +0.02 0.0004

    100.04 +0.04 0.0016

    100.00 0 0

    100.00 0 0

    99.98 -0.02 0.0004

    100.02 +0.02 0.0004

    100.00 0 0

    99.98 -0.02 0.0004100.00 0 0

    2 = 0.0048

    The determination of mean and the resulting residuals are the beginningof a least squares adjustment. The sum of the residuals squared should besmallest where the mean was properly calculated.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    45/119

    Standard Deviation

    The Standard Deviation is the rangewithin which 68.3% of the residuals will fallor

    Each residual has a 68.3% probability offalling within the Standard Deviation rangeor

    If another measurement is made, theresulting residual has a 68.3% chance offalling within the Standard Deviation range.

    Standard Deviation is sometimes referred to as standard error.

    Dont get the cart before the the horse, the slide makes it sound like thedefinition of deviation is 68.3%.

    In reality, the formula for Standard Deviation results in a 68.3%

    probability, not the other way around.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    46/119

    Standard Deviation Formula

    ( )1n

    deviationStandard2

    =

    '023.09

    0048.0==

    Sigma (lower case) denotes standard deviation

    Sigma (upper case) denotes Summation

    Vee (italics) denotes residual, the difference between individual measurements and

    mean

    n denotes number of measurements

    The pure formula for standard deviation would have just n in the denominator,

    not n-1

    But you cant have a standard deviation from just one measurement. So n-1

    represents the number ofredundant measurements,

    You can make only a single measurement if you wanted to. But you wouldnt be

    able to calculate a standard deviation from a single measurement.

    Note that the more redundant measurements (n-1) you have, the closer n-1

    approaches n.

    That is, if n=2, then n-1 is of n. But if n=100, then n-1 is 99% of n.The more redundant measurements, the more accurate the standard deviation

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    47/119

    Standard Deviation

    Standard Deviation is a comparison of theindividual readings (measurements) to themean of the readings, therefore

    Standard Deviation is a measure of.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    48/119

    Standard Deviation

    Standard Deviation is a comparison of theindividual readings (measurements) to themean of the readings, therefore

    Standard Deviation is a measure of.

    PRECISION!PRECISION!

    Draw a Bell Curve that is very tall and steep, and compare it to a very low and flat

    curve.

    Which curve represents a higher precision?

    The closer the data are to the mean, the higher precision.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    49/119

    Standard Deviation of theMean

    This is an uncertainty statement regarding the meanand not a randomly selected individual reading as isthe case with standard deviation.

    Since the individual measurements that make up themean have error, the mean also has an associatederror.

    The Standard Deviation of the Mean is the rangewithin which the mean falls when compared to thetrue value, therefore the Standard Deviation of theMean is a measure of .

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    50/119

    Standard Deviation of theMean

    This is an uncertainty statement regardingthe mean and not a randomly selectedindividual reading as is the case withstandard deviation.

    Since the individual measurements thatmake up the mean have error, the meanalso has an associated error.

    The Standard Error of the Mean is the range within which the mean falls when

    compared to the true value, therefore theStandard Deviation of the Mean is ameasure of .

    ACCURACY!

    Draw a Bell Curve that is skewed, with one steep side and one gentle slope.

    Is this more accurate than a symmetrical data set?

    Q. What happens if you turn three sets of angles instead of two or four?

    SEE EXERCISE FOR STANDARD DEVIATION OF THE MEAN

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    51/119

    Exercise for StandardDeviation of the MeanSlide #39An instrument man measures an angle

    three times.

    He gets the following results:

    504538

    504544

    504538

    Calculate the Standard Deviation andStandard Deviation of the Mean for this

    of three angles.

    (Hint: just use the seconds as wholenumbers)

    ( )1n

    deviationStandard2

    =

    n

    m

    =)(MeantheofDeviationStandard

    Not satisfied with the spread of the

    measurements, the instrument man then

    turns another set of angles:

    504544

    504538

    504542

    504536

    Calculate the Standard Deviation andStandard Deviation of the Mean for theset of four angles.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    52/119

    Calculation of Standard Deviation

    Meas.# Angle Residual V2

    1 44 4 16

    2 38 -2 4

    3 38 -2 4

    SUM 24

    1 44 4 16

    2 38 -2 4

    3 42 2 4

    4 36 -4 16

    SUM 40

    Calc Standard Deviation for set #1

    alc Stand. Dev. of the Mean for set #1C

    Calc Standard Deviation for set #2

    Calc Stand. Dev. of the Mean for set #2

    Note that:

    1. Both data sets have the same mean 40

    2. The first set has a smaller spread thanthe second 6 vs. 8, but isnt

    symmetrical about the mean

    3. The first asymmetrical set has a

    smaller standard deviation (precision)( ) 46.3224

    #1set ==

    4. The second symmetrical set has a

    smaller standard deviation of the mean

    (accuracy)

    If your observations arent symmetrical,

    it is better to take more observationsthan guess which ones are better

    When turning sets with a total station,

    always turn an even number!

    0.2)(#1 ==

    ( )

    3m

    46.3set

    65.33

    40#2set ==

    82.14

    65.3)(#2set ==m

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    53/119

    Standard Deviation of theMean

    Distance = 100.000.007(1 Confidence level)

    n)(MeantheofErrorStandard m =

    '007.010

    023.0m ==

    Back to the chaining example.

    For every measurement that you make, there are three values.

    The first value is the measured value (in this example, each of the 10measurements)

    The second value is the adjusted value; i.e. the mean.The third value is the True Value.

    The Standard Deviation of the Mean is your confidence in the adjustedvalue.

    This calculation states I am confident that the true value lies within 0.007of the adjusted value.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    54/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    55/119

    90% & 95% Probable Error

    A 50% level of certainty for a measure ofprecision or accuracy is usually unacceptable.

    90% or 95% level of certainty is normal forsurveying applications

    )6449.1(E90 = )96.1(95 =E

    n

    E

    E

    90m90

    = n

    EE

    95m95 =

    Must calculate E90 or E95 before calculating E90m or E95m

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    56/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    57/119

    Meaning of E95

    If a measurement falls outsideof two standard deviations, it

    isnt a random error, its amistake!

    Francis H. Moffitt

    Were Surveyors, not statisticians. Random Errors that fall outside of E95 arent

    random errors.

    Time to re-check you measurements and equipment.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    58/119

    How Errors Propagate

    Error in a Series

    Errors in a Sum

    Error in RedundantMeasurement

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    59/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    60/119

    Error in a Sum

    Esum is the square root of the sum of each ofthe individual measurements squared

    It is used when there are several

    measurements with differing standard errors

    2222n321sum E...EEEE ++++=

    Error in a series and error in a sum are basically the same.

    If the variable E is the same for each of the measurements, then the result is the

    Error of a Series formula.

    If they arent the same value, then you use the Errors of a Sum formula.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    61/119

    Exercise for Errors in a Sum

    Assume a typical single point occupation. Theinstrument is occupying one point, with tripodsoccupying the backsight and foresight.

    How many sources of random error are there in thisscenario?

    Hint: First look at errors that would affect distance, then errors that would affect the

    angle.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    62/119

    Exercise for Errors in a Sum

    There are three tribrachs, each with its owncentering error that affects angle and distance

    Each of the two distance measurements have errors

    The angle turned by the instrument has severalsources of error, including poor leveling and parallax

    The combination of all of the possible random errors exceeds the amount of error

    we normally associate with a single measurement

    For someone to say this is a half-second gun, or The EDM is accurate to 2mm

    ignores all of the other possible error sources

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    63/119

    Error in RedundantMeasurements

    If a measurement is repeated multipletimes, the accuracy increases, even ifthe measurements have the same value

    n

    EE .meas.red =

    If sigma= one (1), and n=1,then one over the square root of 1 = 1

    If sigma= one (1), and n=2, then one over the square root of 2 = 0.707

    If sigma= one (1), and n=2, then one over the square root of 4 = 0.5

    What is error in 1000 distance using error value determined before

    =0.015 (10) =0.047 = 0.05

    Error in redundant measurement is used when a value is measured morethan one time

    What is error value when 1000 distance is measured 4 times.

    =0.047 4 = 0.024 = 0.02

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    64/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    65/119

    Eternal Battle of Good Vs. Evil

    With Errors of a Sum (or Series), eachadditional variable increasesthe totalerror of the network

    With Errors of RedundantMeasurement, each redundantmeasurement decreasesthe error ofthe network.

    This may be the single most im portant statement i n thi s entir ecourse.

    As networks become more complex, there is is a greater chance of error.

    Also, a blunder can hide in a complex network, by having the error spread

    out to more points. At the beginning we had the example of a level networkwith 0.10 closure per mile (0.25 in three miles). A single three mile levelrun cant isolate a bust. But three one mile loops will show whether youhave poor measurements or poor control.

    Always think of redundancy when planning a network.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    66/119

    Sum vs. Redundancy

    Therefore, as the network becomesmore complicated, accuracy can bemaintained by increasing the number ofredundant measurements

    .

    Redundancy can mean:

    1. Turning more sets of angles with a Total Station. This is very easy with servo

    instruments turning rounds in auto mode.

    2. Traverses with cross-ties and double stubbing

    3. Longer occupations using GPS

    4. Multiple occupations of GPS points using different configurations

    5. Level runs that use several loops, instead of a single long run between two known

    points.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    67/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    68/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    69/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    70/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    71/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    72/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    73/119

    Coordinate StandardDeviations and Error Ellipses

    Coordinate Standard Deviations and Error Ellipses:

    Point Northing Easting N SDev E SDev

    12 583,511.320 2,068,582.469 0.021 0.017

    Northing Standard Deviation{}

    Easting Standard Deviation

    This is why the standard errors have only a 39.4% chance of falling within the error

    ellipse.

    The standard deviations arent oriented the same as the ellipse.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    74/119

    Positional Accuracy vs.Precision Ratio

    Or, How good is one error ellipsecompared to all those others?

    Older surveys use closure as a measure of accuracy. Newer adjustments dont. How

    do you compare the two?

    Or to put it another way, How close together can two error elipses be and still have

    an accurate survey?

    See Attached Document

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    75/119

    Positional Accuracy vs. Precision Ratio

    Traditional compass rule adjustments were analyzed using precision ratios.

    The length of a traverse is divided by the error in closure. The result is the precision ratio.

    The standard for a control traverse run to second order accuracy is 1:20,000.The standard for a landnet traverse run to third order accuracy is 1:10,000.(See Chapter 5 Surveys Manual)

    0.01 ft x 10,000 = 100.00

    Therefore, any single distance measured to an accuracy of less that 0.01 per 100 ft cannot

    meet the 1:10,000 ratio. This is one reason why all landnet points are double-tied.

    RTK.

    RTK only measures baselines between the base station and the rover. Each measurementto a monument is independent of measurements to other monuments. The vector between

    two unknown stations is never measured. Each is independently measured to a known

    base station. This is one reason why RTK can only be used for surveys of third order or

    less.

    Positional Accuracy

    Least square adjustments dont publish precision ratios. Instead, each point is given aposition and an error ellipse, defining the most likely position of the point. A position can

    also be defined as the circle in which the true position has a 95% chance of being located.

    (E95). The question then becomes How do you determine the precision ratio of ameasurement that doesnt have a traverse closure?

    The simple way to check for precision ration is to divide the distance between two pointsby the sum of the standard errors of the two points.

    Errors in a Sum

    The Standard Error of the sum of two quantities is equal to the square root of the sum of

    the squares of the standard errors of the individual quantities .The concept can be

    extended to the sum of any number of quantities that are not correlated.

    -Moffitt/ Bouchard

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    76/119

    To determine the precision ratio between to monuments:

    The ratio between the length of the line and the sum of the errors of the two point.

    Y = (Distance)(A + B)Where A is the positional accuracy at the first station and B is the

    positional accuracy at the second station.

    1:Y is the resultant precision ratio, where Y shall be greater than or

    equal to 10,000 to achieve third order accuracy.

    Assume that you locate two monuments using RTK that are approximately 140 m apart.

    Each has a positional accuracy of 10mm. What is the precision ratio of the measureddistance between the two monuments?

    Y = (140.00)(0.010) + (0.010)

    Y = (140.00)0.0002

    Y = 140.00 0.014Y = 10,000 and 1:Y = 1:10,000

    OR

    Given two RTK monuments at E95 of 10mm,The minimum distance between the two monuments that would

    achieve a 1: 10,000 ratio would be 140 meters (460 ft.)

    Monuments found at distances less than 140 meters (460 ft) apart must be tied using

    conventional total station methods to achieve third order standards. Monuments

    between 140 and 200 meters apart should be checked for positional error before

    being accepted.

    The 140 meter standard applies when each monument has been occupied according tostandards (occupied twice for minimum of 15 epochs) and are within a properly boxed

    control net. See Surveys Manual Chapter 6

    Exercise #2

    An EDM with an accuracy () of 2 mm 2.0 ppm is used to measure a distance of 40meters. The instrument and foresight are on tribrachs with an accuracy of 1.5 mm.Using the Errors of a Sum formula, calculate the total measurement error. Then calculate

    the shortest distance that such a setup could measure a 1: 10,000 precision ratio (land

    net), and a 1: 50,000 ratio (project control)

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    77/119

    Introduction to Adjustments

    Adjustment - A process designed to removeinconsistencies in measured or computedquantities by applying derived corrections tocompensate for random, or accidental errors,such errors not being subject to systematiccorrections.

    Definitions of Surveying and

    Associated Terms,1989 Reprint

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    78/119

    Introduction to Adjustments

    Common Adjustment methods:

    Compass Rule

    Transit Rule

    Crandall's Rule

    Rotation and Scale (Grant Line Adjustment)

    Least Squares Adjustment

    Compass rule assumes that both angles and distances are measured with equal

    precision. The most common way of adjusting metes and bounds descriptions.

    The Compass Rule can only solve a traverse, not redundant measurements.

    Transit Rule assumes angles are more accurate than distances, but the formula

    results in different corrections depending on the orientation of a figure (if you havea closed traverse, and then rotate it 45 degrees, the adjustment for each leg will

    change)

    Crandalls rule again assumes angles superior than distances, but is more

    complicated than Transit Rule

    Rotation and scale holds interior angles as fixed, and adjusts distances. This is the

    same as the BLM Grant line Adjustment.

    Least Squares simultaneously adjusts the angular and linear measurements to make

    the sum of the squares of the residuals a minimum.

    If there are no redundant measurements, the results are the same as a Compass Rule.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    79/119

    Weighted Adjustments

    Weight - The relative reliability (or worth) ofa quantity as compared with other values ofthe same quantity.

    Definitions of Surveying and

    Associated Terms,

    1989 Reprint

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    80/119

    Weighted Adjustments

    The concept of weighting measurements toaccount for different error sources, etc. isfundamental to a least squares adjustment.

    Weighting can be based on error sources, ifthe error of each measurement is different, orthe quantity of readings that make up areading, if the error sources are equal.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    81/119

    Weighted Adjustments

    Formulas:W (1 E2) (Error Sources)

    C (1 W) (Correction)

    W n (repeated measurements ofthe same value)

    W (1 n) (a series ofmeasurements)

    Symbol means proportional

    Weights are inversely proportional to the residuals. The closer a measurement is

    to the mean, the more heavily weighted it should be.

    Therefore, corrections are inversely proportional to the weights. The farther a

    measurement is from the mean, the more it will be corrected. Weights are proportional to redundancy. The more times a value is repeated, the

    stronger the weight.

    Weights are inversely proportional to measurements of a series. A level run of 4

    turns is stronger than a run using 8 turns. (All other factors being even)

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    82/119

    Weighted Adjustments

    A

    BC

    A = 432436, 2x

    B = 471234, 4x

    C = 892220, 8x

    Perform a weightedadjustment based on theabove data

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    83/119

    ANGLE No. Meas Mean Value Rel. Corr. Corrections Adjusted Value

    A 2 43 24 36 4/4 or4/7

    4/7 X 30 = 17 43 24 53

    B 4 47 12 34 2/4 or2/7

    2/7 X 30 = 09 47 12 43

    C 8 89 22 20 1/4 or1/7

    1/7 X 30 = 04 89 22 24

    TOTALS 17959 30 7/4 or 7/7 = 30 180 00 00

    The relative correction for the three angles are 1 : 2 : 4, the inverse proportion tothe number of turned angles. This is the first set of relative corrections.

    The sum of the relative corrections is 1 + 2 + 4 = 7 , This is used as thedenominator for the second set of corrections. The sum of the second set ofrelative corrections shall always equal 1. The second set is used for corrections.

    The correction to angle C should be one fourth the correction to angle A, and one

    half the correction of angle B. This ration is the relative correction factors between

    the measurements. This is the first correction factor.

    The sum of the relative factors results in the total correction factor for the figure.

    The total figure correction factor is then used to correct the measured angles.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    84/119

    Weighted Adjustments

    BM A

    Elev. = 100.0

    BM B

    Elev. = 102.0

    BM C

    Elev. = 104.0

    +6.2, 10 mi.

    +7.8, 2 mi.

    +10.0, 4 mi.

    BM NEW

    This exercise doesnt have a published solution. Instructors may include it as an

    exercise, or save time by skipping it.

    SeeMoffittfor a good example of solving this type of problem.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    85/119

    Introduction to Least SquaresAdjustment

    Simple Examples

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    86/119

    What Least Squares Is ...

    A rigorous statistical adjustment of surveydata based on the laws of probability andstatistics

    Provides simultaneous adjustment of allmeasurements

    Measurements can be individually weightedto account for different error sources andvalues

    Minimal adjustment of field measurements

    Compass rule adjustment is based on proportional adjustment of data

    Simultaneous adjustment of all measurements is the most importantbenefit of least squares. In multiple traverses, a compass adjustment mustsolve each traverse in order, and hold the results as fixed for the nexttraverse. Least squares can solve the entire network simultaneously

    Each measurement can have its own error estimate or you can globallyset the error estimate or a combination of the two

    Maintains the integrity of the field measurements, least squares tries tominimize the amount of adjustment to each measurement

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    87/119

    A Least Squares adjustment distributes random errors

    according to the principle that the Most Probable Solution

    is the one that minimizes the sums of the squares of the

    residuals.

    This method works to keep the amount of adjustment to

    the observations and, ultimately the movement of the

    coordinates to a minimum.

    What is Least Squares?

    Think of ways that other adjustment methods can skew data.

    The Compass Rule adjusts angles based on the length of the legs. But short sights

    are less accurate than long ones, so why adjust the long sight more?

    A least squares adjustment can take weighted means, redundancy, and strength offigure to adjust a network.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    88/119

    What Least Squares Isnt ...

    A way to correct a weak strength of figure

    A cure for sloppy surveying - Garbage in /Garbage out

    The only adjustment available to the landsurveyor

    >Any survey can be manipulated to pass a least squares adjustment byfreeing up data or changing error estimates

    >All adjustments must be reviewed prior to moving on to next step

    >A traverse that runs 3 miles along a straight highway is inherently weak

    >If you occupy the wrong monument, and dont perform a check shot, leastsquares wont help you

    >A survey with no redundancy will have the same results whetheradjustment is compass rule or least squares

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    89/119

    Least Squares

    Least Squares Shou ld Be Used f or

    The Adj ust ment Of: Collect ed By:

    Conventional Traverse

    Control Networks

    GPS Networks

    Level Networks

    Resections

    Theodolite & Chain

    Total Stations

    GPS Receivers

    Levels

    EDMs

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    90/119

    Least Squares

    What happens?I t erati ve Process

    Each it erati on applies adjustments to

    observations, w orking f or best solut ion

    Adjustm ents become smaller w ith each

    successive it erati on

    A B

    CD

    E

    F

    G

    Observed

    1st Iteration

    2nd Iteration

    .

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    91/119

    1 Creates a calculated observation for each fieldobservation by inversing between approximatecoordinates.

    2 Calculates a "best fit" solution of observations andcompares them to field observations to computeresiduals.

    3 Updates approximate coordinate values.4 Calculates the amount of movement between the

    coordinate positions prior to iteration and after

    iteration.5 Repeats steps 1 - 4 until coordinate movement is no

    greater than selected threshold.

    Least Squares

    The Iterative Process

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    92/119

    1 Errors

    2 Coordinates

    3 Observations

    4 Weights

    Least Squares

    Four component that need to be addressedprior to performing least squares adjustment

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    93/119

    Errors

    Blunder - Must be removed

    Systematic - Must be Corrected

    Random - No action needed

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    94/119

    Coordinates

    Because the Least Squares process begins bycalculating inversed observations approximatecoordinate values are needed.

    1 Dimensional Network (Level Network) - Only1 Point.

    2 Dimensional Network - All Points NeedNorthing and Easting.

    3 Dimensional Network - All Points NeedNorthing, Easting, and Elevation. (Except foradjustments of GPS baselines.)

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    95/119

    Weights Each Observation Requires an Associated Weight

    Weight = Influence of the Observation on FinalSolution

    Larger Weight - Larger Influence

    Weight = 1/2

    = Standard Deviation of the Observation

    The Smaller the Standard Deviation the Greater theWeight

    = 0.8 Weight =

    1

    /0.82 = 1.56 = 2.2 Weight = 1/2.22 = 0.21

    More

    InfluenceLessInfluence

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    96/119

    Observational Group

    Least Desirable Method

    Example: All Angles Weighted at the Accuracy of

    the Total Station

    Each Observation Individually Weighted

    Best Method

    Standard Deviation of Field Observations Used as

    the Weight of the Mean Observation

    Methods of Establishing Weights

    Good for combining

    Observations from

    different classes of

    instruments.

    Good for projects

    where standard

    deviation is calculated

    for each observation.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    97/119

    Least Squares Adjustment Is a Two Part Process

    1 - Unconstrained Adjustment

    Analyze the Observations, Observations

    Weights, and the Network

    2 - Constrained Adjustment

    Place Coordinate Values on All Points in the

    Network

    Least Squares

    If you remember nothing else about least squares today,remember this!

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    98/119

    Also Called

    Minimally Constrained Adjustment

    Free Adjustment

    Used to Evaluate

    Observations

    Observation Weights

    Relationship of All Observations

    Only fix the minimum required points

    Unconstrained Adjustment

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    99/119

    Flow Chart

    Field ObservationsSetupObservationStandard Deviation

    Field DataNeedsEditing?

    Edit Field Data Remove Blunders Correct Systematic

    Errors

    PerformUnconstrained LeastSquares Adjustment

    No

    AnalyzeAdjustmentStatistics

    StatisticsIndicate

    Problems

    Modify InputData

    Constrain FixedControl Points

    No

    PerformConstrained Least

    Squares Adjustment

    Print outUnconstrained

    Adjustment Statistics

    Print out FinalCoordinate Valuesfor All Points in

    Adjustment

    Yes

    Yes

    Least SquareAdjustment

    SoftwareDecision Step

    Performed byUser

    Start

    Finish

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    100/119

    Analyze the Statistical Results

    There are 4 main statistical areas that need to be lookedat:

    1. Standard deviation of unit weight2. Observation residuals

    3. Coordinate standard deviations and error ellipses

    4. Relative errors

    A 5th statistic that is sometimes available that should belooked at:Chi-square Test

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    101/119

    Also Called

    Standard Error of Unit Weight

    Error Total

    Network Reference Factor

    The Closer This Value Is to 1.0 the Better

    The Acceptable Range Is ? to ?

    > 1.0 - Observations Are Not As Good As Weighted

    < 1.0 - Observations Are Better Than Weighted

    Standard Deviation ofUnit Weight

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    102/119

    Observation Residuals

    Amount of adjustment applied to observation toobtain best fit

    Used to analyze each observation

    Usually flags excessive adjustments (Outliers)

    (Star*net flags observations adjusted more

    than 3 times the observations weight)

    Large residuals may indicate blunders

    This is the residual that is being minimized

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    103/119

    Observation ResidualsSite Observation Residual S Dev. Flag

    10-11-12 214 33 17.2 1.7 1.2

    11-12-13 174 16 43.8 7.2 1.9 *12-13-14 337 26 08.6 2.1 1.3

    4.00.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5-0.5-1.0-1.5-2.0-2.5-3.0-3.5-4.0

    Outlier

    0

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    104/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    105/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    106/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    107/119

    Least Squares Examples

    Arithmetic Mean

    Straight Line Best Fit

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    108/119

    Least Squares Examples

    Straight Line Best Fit

    Explain scenario (must be straight line thru points)

    This is an example of determining a best fit alignment for a prescriptiveeasement.

    In a boundary problem, it might help you reject a monument, but best fitis never to be used as a boundary solution

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    109/119

    Straight Line Best Fit

    Perpendicular offsets:

    1 = (0,0)

    2 = (100,100)

    3 = (200, 400)

    This example - Perpendicular offset = 141.421

    1: r = 0, r sq. = 0

    2: r = 0, r sq. = 0

    3: r = 141.421, r sq. = 20,000

    Sum r sq. = 20,000

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    110/119

    Straight Line Best Fit

    1: r = 63.246, r2 = 4,000

    2: r = 0, r2 = 0

    3: r = 0, r2 = 0

    Sum r2 = 4000

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    111/119

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    112/119

    Straight Line Best Fit

    1, 2 & 3: r = 22, r2 = 484

    Sum r2 = 3*484 = 1452

    This has the lowest Sum r2 therefore is best result so far

    Actual best result is a skewed line that runs 19.9 feet SE of point 1 to 8.4

    feet SE of point 3.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    113/1191

    Least Squares Rules

    Redundancy of survey data strengthensadjustment

    Error Sources must be determined correctly

    Each adjustment consists of two parts:z Minimally Constrained Adjustment

    z Fully Constrained Adjustment

    Redundancy is a good thing!!

    Explain the necessity of two adjustments

    A closed traverse that is minimally constrained (one point and bearing held)

    should result in a tight closure. If it doesnt, that means that yourmeasurements were poor.

    If you have a good minimally constrained adjustment, then you run a fullyconstrain the adjustment (hold all found control monuments as fixed).

    If the results are poor, then you know that it is the control that is weak, notyour measurements.

    Then you go back to the minimally constrained adjustment, and start addingone control monument each run, until you can isolated the poor control.

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    114/1191

    Star*Net Adjustment Software

    A Tour of the Software Package

    Star*Net

    1

    3

    2

    6

    4

    5

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    115/1191

    Sample Network Adjustment

    A Simple 2D Network Adjustment

    Star*Net1

    3

    2

    6

    4

    5

    Printout from this adjustment in in appendix

    Run adjustment and review printout (unconstrained & constrained)

    add mistake to input data and run adjustment

    explain how least squares will point to potential mistake (if only one

    mistake!) If inputting data by hand, input one page then run adjustment and

    check for errors, input second page and check for errors, etc.

    If time permits, do adjustment with GPS vectors

    Show the results of traverse (linear precision) in this adjustment

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    116/1191

    Sample Network Adjustments

    A 3D Grid Adjustment using GPS andConventional Data

    0012224.299

    North Rock

    0017209.3AZDO

    0013205.450BM-9331

    0051201.018

    0052192.051SW Bridge

    0053203.046

    0018204.86

    0015188.195

    0016186.655

    Star*NetStar*Net

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    117/1191

    Beyond Control Surveys

    Other Uses for Least SquaresAdjustments / Analysis

    Thinking outside of the box!

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    118/1191

    Questions & Discussion

  • 7/29/2019 Error Analysis and Least Squares

    119/119

    Statistics Glossary

    Error the difference between a measured or computed result and the true value. In

    mathematics, errors can be systematic orrandom. See Residual.

    Systematic Errors an error that is not determined by chance but is introduced byan inaccuracy (as of observation or measurement) inherent in the system. If they are

    cumulative, such as temperature corrections for a steel tape, applying correction factors

    can compensate for the effects. If they are variable, such as error caused by a poorlyadjusted tribrach, they can be controlled by proper field procedures or calibrations.

    Random Errors Often called accidental errors. They are unpredictable errorsthat remain after mistakes and systematic errors have been eliminated. They are usually

    compensating, and follow the laws of probability. Present in all survey measurements.

    Residual (

    ) The difference between a measured value and the most probable value,which is usually the mean. Residuals are similar to errors except that residuals can be

    calculated and errors cant, because a true value is never known. All adjustmentcalculations therefore use residuals. The symbol is used because residuals are

    sometimes referred to as variations.

    Variance () The variance is a measure of the range of a set of measurements. It is a

    function of the sum of the residuals. Its square root is the standard deviation. The greater

    the range of measurements, the larger the standard deviation.

    Standard Deviation () A measurement of the precision of a set of measurements. Alsoreferred to as standard error. In a normal distribution curve, the area within one standard

    deviation is 68.27% of the total.

    Standard Deviation of the Mean (m) isa measure of accuracy. The mean is the