47
Erie Group Zimeng Li 2012-5-30 AFM real time visualization (7.01) A Fluid/Video AFM study of MMR (2.29) AFM visualization of MutS Sliding Clamp Formation in DNA Mismatch Repair (5.30) ? Observation of Protein-DNA Interactions in real time (fall) Distinguish Proteins/Protein-DNA complex/EFM study Observation of Protein- DNA interaction involved in MMR Fluorescence-AFM Hybrid Imaging Distinguish Proteins/Protein-DNA complex/FRET study Ultramicroscopy AFM visualization of MutS Sliding Clamp Formation in DNA Mismatch Repair

Erie Group Zimeng Li 2012-5-30 AFM real time visualization (7.01) A Fluid/Video AFM study of MMR (2.29) AFM visualization of MutS Sliding Clamp Formation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Erie Group Zimeng Li 2012-5-30 AFM real time visualization (7.01) A Fluid/Video AFM study of MMR (2.29) AFM visualization of MutS Sliding Clamp Formation in DNA Mismatch Repair (5.30) ? Observation of Protein-DNA Interactions in real time (fall) Distinguish Proteins/Protein-DNA complex/EFM study Observation of Protein-DNA interaction involved in MMR Fluorescence-AFM Hybrid Imaging Distinguish Proteins/Protein-DNA complex/FRET study Ultramicroscopy AFM visualization of MutS Sliding Clamp Formation in DNA Mismatch Repair
  • Slide 2
  • Contents DNA Mismatch Repair Sliding Clamp Formation AFM techniques in fluid Results Future To-dos
  • Slide 3
  • DNA Mismatch Repair
  • Slide 4
  • Sliding Clamp Formation Tessmer, et.al (2008)
  • Slide 5
  • Sliding Clamp Formation Qiu, et.al (2012)
  • Slide 6
  • Myosin V walk/Nano robot spider walk Super resolution microscopy (Yildiz(2003);Nils Walter) AFM (Kodera(2010);Nils Walter) FRET (Qiu(2012)) ? Techniques
  • Slide 7
  • Atomic Force Microscopy
  • Slide 8
  • From Force to Distance
  • Slide 9
  • AFM
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Fluid AFM techniques Difference between thermal tune and cantilever tune Substrates, special tips/treatment Atomic Force Microscopy
  • Slide 12
  • Results
  • Slide 13
  • Recall
  • Slide 14
  • DNA Sample Buffer APTES?Rinse?In Air? Image Buffer Tip
  • Slide 15
  • NiCl 2 No APTES, No Rinse, No Air Dry
  • Slide 16
  • Buffer filter (twice) Water - filter Cantilever holder Contamination RMS: 220pm RMS: 37pm
  • Slide 17
  • Substrate/Support
  • Slide 18
  • New Substrate Construct RMS: 220pm RMS: 80 pm
  • Slide 19
  • Dirty Tips? RMS: 80 pm RMS: 500 pm DNA: 600pm, Background: 400pm, Dots: 6nm
  • Slide 20
  • Finally Solved Contamination
  • Slide 21
  • WaterLoSHiSNoS DryFluidDryFluidDryFluidDryFluid Decent Image29% (6/21) 18% (2/11) 50% (1/2) 100% (1/1) Great Image38% (8/21) 18% (2/11) 13% (1/8) Total67%36%50%13%0%(1)100% Success Probability Tip consumption: ~70, 30% gets DNA, 30% gets something real, 30% bad
  • Slide 22
  • Resolution compare Fast image capability Buffer dependence Injection Evaluate operations Case Study
  • Slide 23
  • Resolution Improvement? AirWater
  • Slide 24
  • Tip is hit so easily HeightPhase
  • Slide 25
  • Fast Imaging Capability Scan speed, scan points, integral gain, scan size; most importantly, tips health 12s, 25s,50s
  • Slide 26
  • 512, 2512,4256,6 256,10256,3
  • Slide 27
  • 96,396,10200,10 200,20512,20 Conclusion: 150nm scan 10s: 100,10 20s: 200,10
  • Slide 28
  • 512,401024,20512,20 100,10 Conclusion: 300nm scan 25s: 512,20 10s:100,10
  • Slide 29
  • 512,20256,20256,40 Conclusion: 100nm scan 12s: 256,20 6s: 256,40
  • Slide 30
  • 256,5256,1096,10 512,10512/256,20 Conclusion: 1um scan 50s:512,10;256,5 25s:256,10
  • Slide 31
  • Old Tips avoid it
  • Slide 32
  • Injection
  • Slide 33
  • As time goes up, dirty things come out 10:11:33pm8:09:06pm
  • Slide 34
  • Injection of MutS Before After
  • Slide 35
  • How is DNA bound to mica? Competition between Mg 2+ and Na + Working with salt buffer
  • Slide 36
  • Hi-salt buffer Direct fluid imaging, 512,2.3
  • Slide 37
  • 512,5
  • Slide 38
  • Indirect fluid imaging (i.e. dry first) Initial: 120uL water+DNA Injection: 120uL Hi-salt ->lo-salt mixture Evaporate: 120uL water Eventually: 120uL Hi-salt+DNA Hi-salt buffer
  • Slide 39
  • Hi-salt buffer injection Before After
  • Slide 40
  • After evaporation Before After
  • Slide 41
  • After evaporation
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Lo-salt Buffer 9:45:20pm 9:55:27pm Indirect/direct fluid image: doesnt move
  • Slide 44
  • WaterLoSHiSNoS DryFluidDryFluidDryFluidDryFluid Decent Image29% (6/21) 18% (2/11) 50% (1/2) 100% (1/1) Great Image38% (8/21) 18% (2/11) 13% (1/8) Total67%36%50%13%0%(1)100% Success Probability Tip consumption: ~70, 30% gets DNA, 30% gets something real, 30% bad
  • Slide 45
  • Great imageDecent image New tips31 Old tips12 My operations wrong?
  • Slide 46
  • 15min Running a full cleaning cycle Deposition/No incubation Rinse once (Twice results in no DNA?) 15-30min/cycle Image/No Good?/Change tips/Image/ Average 2~3tips/sample Current Protocol
  • Slide 47
  • Continue working with lo-salt buffer If not working, try no-salt buffer Adding NaCl to increase DNA mobility Hi-salt using APTES treated mica to reduce mobility Does MutS work in water or no-salt buffer? To-dos