Upload
others
View
4
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Erie County Low Income Program for Sustainable
Energy (ECLIPSE): A Perspective on Community
Choice Aggregation
Eric WalkerDirector of Energy Development and Management
Department of Public Works, Erie County
Before we get started...What this presentation is NOT: • A review of CCA mechanics • A presentation of a case study
What this presentation IS:• Presenting a value
proposition• Outlining a comparative
advantage • Proposing a method for
creating evidence based practice
Community Choice Aggregation in a nutshell
At the core, CCA is just
Click to add text
Source: Independent Energy Consultants
ECLIPSE Components
• Bulk purchasing of natural gas and electricity• Economies of scale for purchasing energy for HEAP
recipients• Coordinating energy efficiency services for LMI
populations• Renewable energy adoption
• Community shared solar• Leverage county’s position as financial
intermediary• Designing and delivering value-added services
Basic approach to formation• Investigating CCA formation• Community Energy Planning• Developing an CCA implementation plan• Outreach and Marketing• Documentation and Evaluation
So, if CCA is happening and being contemplated across the state,what's unique here?
ECLIPSE has big goals beyond bulk purchasing
• Drive benefits of the CCA to vulnerable households• Simultaneously lower greenhouse gas emissions and
community energy intensity as the project matures• Foster interdepartmental and intergovernmental
collaboration• Contribute to improved the health of disparate
populations• Using the lens of the Social Determinants of Health
Bringing together unlikely partnerships
• Collaborative effort of government (Erie County) and academia (Buffalo State)
• Simultaneously lower greenhouse gas emissions and improve the health of disparate populations• Using the lens of the Social Determinants of Health
Inspired policy drives bold action• Show side-by-side of I4SE & I4SC
Big Picture – Why this matters
http://bit.ly/1R6B54I
Social vulnerability to climate change in Erie County
Big Picture – What’s the big problem
USGCRP, 2016: The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment.
Research Support
Big Picture – What’s the big problem
Big Picture – What’s the big problem
Erie County (2015)
Individual Shortfall
Number of Households
Aggregate Shortfall
Home Energy Burden
Less than 50% of FPL
$1,226 26,508 $32,491,886 23.7%
50% - 99% of FPL
$862 29,750 $25,629,818 12.6%
100% - 124% of FPL
$471 15,266 $7,194,217 8.4%
125% - 149% of FPL
$211 16,405 $3,462,956 6.9%
150% - 184% of FPL
- 22,600 - 5.7%
185% - 199% of FPL
- 8,876 - 4.9%
119,405 $68,778,877
Home Energy Affordability Gap
Fisher, Sheehan & Colton, April 2016
What makes Erie County think it's such a good fit for developing a low income centered CCA?
We're already a convenor
We have a built-in multi channel marketing apparatus
And our target demographic generally comes to us!
We're already an aggregator!• Erie County already bulk purchases natural gas and
electricity for over two dozen municipalities in Western New York • Approximately 1.6 BCF of natural gas
• Includes 678,000 MCF thru the Public Assistance Cooperative for Energy (PACE)
• 219 million kWh (calendar 2015)
So, what's your big idea?
Big Picture
Data as a way to solve problems Cumulative hardship of basic
needsMany programs and efforts to
mitigate problems Data helps us find what is
impactful
Data, Dashboards, Evaluation
• Integrated, multi-level data collection and evaluation framework• Bridge between business, government and scientific
communities• Data-driven decision-making
• Continuous quality improvement• Results-based Accountability to link program performance metrics and
aligned population-level outcomes
Data, Dashboards, Evaluation
• We can’t robustly test the outcomes• Align data to help us understand the contribution of the program’s efforts
to changing the outcomes• Make data useful!
• Prioritize disparate populations, including by geography• Identify where/with who the program can make the biggest impacts
How much did we do?
Program Performance Measures
How welldid we do it?
Is anyonebetter off?
Quantity Quality
Effe
ct
E
ffort
# %
What we get if we're lucky
Source: IBM Center for Applied Insights, 2011
Open Data
• In the data and analyses, plus the methodology• Interactive visualizations and data interface for program
metrics • Participation• Utilization and cost savings• Greenhouse gas emissions• Survey data of program participants on health and behavior• Generative information for the development of "value added-
services"
Transparency
• Beyond internal decision-making, convey economic and health impacts for:• Consumers• Policy-makers• Health professionals• Tax payers• Other stakeholders
• Changing the narrative the clean energy future• Beyond the privilege of consumptive decision making
Thank you!