1
7/17/2019 ERC Newsletter September 2015 - Impact of Starting Grants revealed http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/erc-newsletter-september-2015-impact-of-starting-grants-revealed 1/1 8 ideas #3 - September 2015 - ERC Newsletter uuu what’s new Why exactly do young researchers apply for ERC Start- ing Grants? And what advantages does the funding bring in terms of professional development? A new study, to be  published later this year, reveals the benefits the award can bring to early-career researchers. Here, we offer you a sneak peek at the findings. o draw a picture o the impact o Starting Grants, over 700 grantees (awarded unding rom 2009 to 2011) and a control group o 2,660 unsuccessul ERC applicants were invited to participate in an online panel survey. In the first round, they were asked - among other things - about their reasons to apply or ERC unding. wo and a hal years later, the respondents were approached again. Tis time, they shared their observations on what they have learnt and how their proessional careers have developed within this period. Not surprisingly, candidates’ motivation to apply was mainly driven by the generous financial conditions the grant offers - up to EUR 1.5 million or five years. Around 67% o candidates applied to set up their own research groups. Tey were also attracted by the thematic openness and reedom to set their own research priorities (62%). Slightly less relevant, but still important, was the excellent reputation o the programme. Te study showed that only a minority o submitted proposals (9%) were written without any external help. Applicants mainly consulted their more experienced colleagues as well as the service points at their institutions and the ERC National Contact Points. However, the support ocused more on adjusting the application to administrative norms, rather than on the substance o the research proposal. Te study tried to capture the scientific excellence o the applicants. As bibliometric analysis revealed, both the successul and the unsuccessul candidates showed an above-average scientific output - in terms o number o publications - beore applying or ERC unding. Ninety percent o them have published at least six articles in international journals and 75% have authored at least one highly cited paper. Tis implies that ERC candidates have a well-established sel-selection attitude. Te unding had one immediate result: the grantees were more satisfied with their working conditions. Tis especially concerns a higher level o autonomy in terms o allocation o materials, staff and lab space. Te grant also allows scientists to spend more time on genuine research: on average, the awardees dedicated 46% o working time to this task. In comparison, the rejected applicants spent only 36% o their time doing research. Te findings also suggested that receiving a Starting Grant helps researchers climb the career ladder. Within a period o three and a hal years afer the award, 70% o the grantees had obtained a proessorship or equivalent – compared to 46% o the rejected candidates. A substantial number o the grant winners were promoted soon afer receiving the unding, which may imply that promotion came as reward or the successul Starting Grant application. Generally, the grantees were also in a good situation regarding uture career prospects. One and a hal year beore finalising their Starting Grant projects, 82% o the recipients already had a permanent position in sight and 9% have secured temporary employment. Only 1.5% was not sure about their uture prospects. Helping the most promising young researchers develop is at the heart o the ERC mission. With its positive findings, the study has proven that the Starting Grant scheme is an efficient tool in building a new generation o research leaders in Europe. Next year, almost 30% o the ERC annual budget (EUR 485 million) will be distributed to 335 early-career scientists through Starting Grants. Te study, “Monitoring European Research Council’s Implementation o Excellence” (MERCI), was commissioned by the ERC as a “Coordination and Support Action” (CSA).Te ull report will be published beore the end o the year. Stay tuned! Impact of Starting Grants revealed

ERC Newsletter September 2015 - Impact of Starting Grants revealed

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ERC Newsletter September 2015 - Impact of Starting Grants revealed

7/17/2019 ERC Newsletter September 2015 - Impact of Starting Grants revealed

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/erc-newsletter-september-2015-impact-of-starting-grants-revealed 1/1

8 ideas #3 - September 2015 - ERC Newsletter

u u uwhat’s new

Why exactly do young researchers apply for ERC Start-ing Grants? And what advantages does the funding bringin terms of professional development? A new study, to be

 published later this year, reveals the benefits the awardcan bring to early-career researchers. Here, we offer you asneak peek at the findings.

o draw a picture o the impact o Starting Grants, over 700grantees (awarded unding rom 2009 to 2011) and a controlgroup o 2,660 unsuccessul ERC applicants were invitedto participate in an online panel survey. In the first round,they were asked - among other things - about their reasonsto apply or ERC unding. wo and a hal years later, therespondents were approached again. Tis time, they sharedtheir observations on what they have learnt and how theirproessional careers have developed within this period.

Not surprisingly, candidates’ motivation to apply wasmainly driven by the generous financial conditions thegrant offers - up to EUR 1.5 million or five years. Around67% o candidates applied to set up their own researchgroups. Tey were also attracted by the thematic opennessand reedom to set their own research priorities (62%).Slightly less relevant, but still important, was the excellentreputation o the programme.

Te study showed that only a minority o submitted proposals(9%) were written without any external help. Applicantsmainly consulted their more experienced colleagues aswell as the service points at their institutions and the ERC National Contact Points. However, the support ocusedmore on adjusting the application to administrative norms,rather than on the substance o the research proposal.

Te study tried to capture the scientific excellence o theapplicants. As bibliometric analysis revealed, both thesuccessul and the unsuccessul candidates showed an

above-average scientific output - in terms o number opublications - beore applying or ERC unding. Ninetypercent o them have published at least six articles ininternational journals and 75% have authored at least one

highly cited paper. Tis implies that ERC candidates have awell-established sel-selection attitude.

Te unding had one immediate result: the granteeswere more satisfied with their working conditions. Tisespecially concerns a higher level o autonomy in terms oallocation o materials, staff and lab space. Te grant alsoallows scientists to spend more time on genuine research:on average, the awardees dedicated 46% o working time tothis task. In comparison, the rejected applicants spent only36% o their time doing research.

Te findings also suggested that receiving a StartingGrant helps researchers climb the career ladder. Within aperiod o three and a hal years afer the award, 70% o thegrantees had obtained a proessorship or equivalent –compared to 46% o the rejected candidates. A substantialnumber o the grant winners were promoted soon aferreceiving the unding, which may imply that promotioncame as reward or the successul Starting Grant application.

Generally, the grantees were also in a good situationregarding uture career prospects. One and a hal yearbeore finalising their Starting Grant projects, 82% o therecipients already had a permanent position in sight and

9% have secured temporary employment. Only 1.5% wasnot sure about their uture prospects.

Helping the most promising young researchers develop isat the heart o the ERC mission. With its positive findings,the study has proven that the Starting Grant scheme isan efficient tool in building a new generation o researchleaders in Europe. Next year, almost 30% o the ERCannual budget (EUR 485 million) will be distributed to335 early-career scientists through Starting Grants.

Te study, “Monitoring European Research Council’s

Implementation o Excellence” (MERCI), wascommissioned by the ERC as a “Coordination and SupportAction” (CSA).Te ull report will be published beore theend o the year. Stay tuned!

Impact of Starting Grants revealed