EPA Gas Hub Assessment Media Briefing Sheet_270612

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 EPA Gas Hub Assessment Media Briefing Sheet_270612

    1/2

    How did it all start?The Browse LNG Gas Hub Strategic Assessmentcommenced with the signing of a bi-lateralAgreement

    between the Commonwealth and WA governments in

    February 2008. The 20 page Agreement sets out the

    terms of reference by which the assessment is to be

    conducted and the criteria by which the respective

    State and Federal Environment Ministers will make their

    final decisions. One of the requirements of the

    Agreement is an assessment of gas processing options

    outside the Kimberley, including piping to the Pilbara

    or using floating LNG.

    Later in 2008 the EPA carried out a rudimentary desktop

    study (Section 16 advice) focusing on four sites in the

    Kimberley. It said Gourdon Bay south of Broome was

    preferred on environmental grounds. The newly elected

    Premier, Colin Barnett, then stepped in and

    unilaterally chose James Price Point instead.

    In the three and a half years since then, the EPA has

    been conducting an assessment of a precinct at James

    Price Point based on the documentation provided to it

    by the Premiers Department of State Development,

    and Woodside. The assessment offeasible optionsoutside the Kimberley has never seriously occurred,

    even though several of the Browse LNG Joint Venture

    Partners prefer these alternatives.

    Who makes the decision?The EPA is responsible for carrying out the assessment

    in the first instance, and making its recommendations

    to the WA Environment Minister for his decision, but

    the Commonwealth Department of Environment is also

    involved throughout and will make its own

    recommendations to the Federal Environment MinisterTony Burke. Minister Burke has the final say if he says

    the project doesnt meet Commonwealth requirements

    under the EPBC Act, it cant proceed.

    And then, even if both Ministers approve the project

    (with conditions), the 7 Joint Venture Partners

    (Woodside, Shell, BP, BHP, Chevron, Mitsubishi and

    Mitsui) will make the final decision as to whether or not

    to invest in an actual project at James Price Point. This

    decision is now not expected until the first half of next

    year, probably after the March 2013 State election.

    Who is the proponent of the gas hub?Under the Environment Protection Act, the legal

    proponent for the gas hub is the Premier of WA, Colin

    Barnett, as Minister for State Development.

    Did the proponent prepare a ScopingReport to guide its work?

    Yes. As usual, the EPA required the proponent to

    prepare ascoping reportfor endorsement by the EPA.

    The scoping report sets out all the key factors and issues

    the proponent has to address, including environmental,

    social and Indigenous cultural heritage. The scoping

    report includes a commitment to comprehensive

    scientific peer review:

    14. Peer Review Process

    Given the significant environment and the scaleand complexity of the proposal, there is required a

    high level of confidence of the technical work

    underpinning the Strategic Assessment.As such

    there is an intention to undertake ongoing reviews

    of the strategic assessment process and of all

    deliverables and outputs.Arrangements for Peer

    review, including the establishment of a Peer

    Review Panel consisting of members from

    government and non-government sectors are to

    be advised.

    However, the EPA has failed to enforce this vital peer

    review process. As a result, the scientific credibility of

    the proponents environmental, social and Indigenous

    heritage studies has been widely criticised.

    Has the assessment of environmental,

    social and cultural heritage impacts been

    conducted in accordance with the

    requirements of the Agreement and

    Scoping Report?No. In response to the 9,000 page Strategic

    Assessment Report (SAR) released by the proponent

    and EPA for public comment in December 2010,

    conservation groups, independent scientists, members

    of the Broome community and Traditional Owners have

    highlighted and documented major and fundamental

    flaws in much of the information presented by the

    proponent. This includes information in relation to:

    Heritage-listed dinosaur tracksites Endangered species including bilbies, sawfish,

    dugong and turtles

    Whales and dolphins Rare monsoon vine forests Water use impacts

    EPA James Price Point gas hub assessment

    Briefing sheetJune 2012

    http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/notices/assessments/pubs/kimberley.pdfhttp://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/notices/assessments/pubs/kimberley.pdfhttp://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/notices/assessments/pubs/kimberley.pdfhttp://www.dsd.wa.gov.au/documents/Final_Scoping_Document%281%29.pdfhttp://www.dsd.wa.gov.au/documents/Final_Scoping_Document%281%29.pdfhttp://www.dsd.wa.gov.au/documents/Final_Scoping_Document%281%29.pdfhttp://www.dsd.wa.gov.au/documents/Final_Scoping_Document%281%29.pdfhttp://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/notices/assessments/pubs/kimberley.pdf
  • 7/31/2019 EPA Gas Hub Assessment Media Briefing Sheet_270612

    2/2