Upload
wingki-ari-angga
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
1/474
ENZYMES
IN
FARM
ANIMAL
NUTRITION
,2ND EDITION
This page intentionally left blank
ENZYMES
IN FARM ANIMAL
NUTRITION, 2ND EDITION
Edited by
Michael R. Bedford AB Vista Feed Ingredients
Woodstock Court MarlboroughWiltshire SN8 4ANUK
and
Gar G. !ar"rid#eanisco Ani!al Nutrition
"# Bo$ %%%Marlborough
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
2/474
Wiltshire SN8 &'NUK
$ABI i% a "radi &a'e of $AB I&"er&a"io&al
CABI Head Office CABI North American OfficeNosworthy Way 875 Massachusetts AvenueWain!ford 7th "oorO#fordshire O$%& 8'( Cam)rid!e* MA &+%,-./ .0A
1e2 344 &6%4-% 8,+%%% 1e2 3% %7 ,-5 4&5"a#2 344 &6%4-% 8,,5&8 "a#2 3% %7 ,54 875(mai2 ca)i9ca)i:or! (mai2 ca)inao9ca)i:or!We)site2 www:ca)i:or!
; CAB Internationa +&%&: A ri!hts reserved: No
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
3/474
$o&"e&"%
$o&"ri(*"or%
+ii
!reface
i
-. I&"rod*c"io& $*rre&" Mar/e" a&d E0ec"edDe+elo0'e&"%
-
A( Barletta
2. 1la&a%e% a&d $ell*la%e% a% Feed Addi"i+e%
-2M( "alohei!o) * ( "iironen and *(Veh!aan+er,
. Ma&&a&a%e, Al0ha)Galac"o%ida%e a&d !ec"i&a%e
34M(-( *ackson
4.
S"arch) a&d !ro"ei&)de#radi E&5'e%Bioche'i%"r, E&5'olo# a&d $harac"eri%"ic%Rele+a&" "o A&i'al Feed U%e
63M(F( Isaksen) A(*( Co.ieson and K(M( Kragh
3. !h"a%e% Bioche'i%"r, E&5'olo# a&d$harac"eri%"ic% Rele+a&" "o A&i'al Feed U%e
78/( 0reiner and U( Koniet1n2
8. E9ec" of Di#e%"i+e Trac" $o&di"io&%, Feed!roce%%i a&d Iredie&"% o& Re%0o&%e "oNS! E&5'e%
-27
B( S3ihus
:. !h"a"e a&d !h"a%e
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
4/474
-8;"(( Selle) V( /a3indran) A(*( Co.ieson and M(/( Bed5ord
6. De+elo0'e&"% i& E&5'e U%a#e i& R*'i&a&"%
2;8K(A( Beauche!in and 6( oltshausen
v
vi Contents
7. O"her E&5'e A00lica"io&% Rele+a&" "o "he A&i'alFeed I&d*%"r
2- A( "7ron and 0(0( "artridge
-;. Ther'o%"a(ili" of Feed E&5'e% a&d "heir !rac"icalA00lica"io& i& "he Feed Mill
247C( 0ilbert and 0( Coone2
--. A&al%i% of E&5'e%, !ri&ci0le% a&d !ro(le'%De+elo0'e&"% i& E&5'e A&al%i%
28;N( Sheehan
-2.
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
5/474
A&drea Barle""a* anisco Ani!al Nutrition) "# Bo$ %%%) Mar lborough)
Wiltshire SN8 &'N) UK(?are&
A.
Bea*che'i&*
6ethbridge
/esearch
Centre)
Agriculture
and AgriFood Canada) 6ethbridge) Alberta) Canada 9&* 4B&(
Michael R. Bedford* AB Vista Feed Ingredients) Woods
tock
Court)Marlborough) Wiltshire SN8 4AN) UK(Gre# $oo&e* anisco Ani!al Nutrition) :;;8 S( 8th Street ) St 6ouis)
M#
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
6/474
vii
viii Contributors
Alea&dre !Cro&* anisco Ani!al Nutrition) "# Bo$ %%%) Marlborough)Wiltshire SN8 &'N) UK(
@ari !iiro&e&* AB -n12!es #2) 92kki!,entie &) ;:;; /aa!,ki)
Finland(el'*r*#* Ra+i&dra&*
Institute
o5
Food)
Nutrition
and
u!an
ealth)Masse2 Uni3ersit2) "ri3ate Bag &&:::) "al!erston Nor th) Ne. ealand(
Gordo& D. Ro%e&* oloAnal2sis Ser3ices 6td()
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
7/474
1here
have
)een
considera)e
deveo
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
8/474
ix
x Preface
function and di!estive
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
9/474
$rea"i al*e "hro*#h I&&o+a"io&
"eed en?ymes he< meet consumer demand for safe* hi!h Euaity and aorda)efood: 0ince the ate %-8&s* feed en?ymes have
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
10/474
2 A. Barletta
he< )rea= down antinutritiona factors e:!: fi)re*
(n?ymes are cate!ori?ed accordin! to the su)strates they act u
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
11/474
$ar(ohdra%e%
Car)ohydrases )rea= down car)ohydrates into sim
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
12/474
accordin! to the eves of resistant starch* starch !ranue si?e* starch com
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
13/474
+ A. Barletta
it is common
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
14/474
itter was aso a common
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
15/474
has increased over time*
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
16/474
Dri+er% for De'a&d
"eed en?ymes im
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
17/474
ietnam:
Ta(le -.-. orld )eat )ar&ets )illion t$ 20002003 4A5 2001 2003b$.
20062003"ro7t
20062003"ro7t
200020032000
2008
esti)ate$ forecast$ 9$ 9$
Bovine )eat -0.0 -,.1 -+.3 -,.1 0.* 6.,Poultry )eat --.- 30.1 3*.8 3+.8 1.1 +2.2Pi# )eat 31.1 33.6 10*.3 10-.1 2.1 1-.,5vine )eat 11.+ 1+.0 1+.2 1+.2 0., 2+.-!eat 'roduction 2**.+
28+.+
262.1
26,.-
1.2
22.+total$
Introduction% Current !ar&et and Ex'ected (evelo')ents
8
Word feed voumes have risen from Gust over %& miion t
in +&&& toe#ceed 7&& miion t in +&&8: o)a out
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
18/474
Because en?ymes im
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
19/474
The Re#*la"or E&+iro&'e&" *ali", Ef=cac a&d Safe"
Most of the maGor feed mar=ets have a re!uatory a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
20/474
an estimated 7& of the mar=et: 1here are many other
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
21/474
(n?ymes can )e added to feed in one of two ways: One o
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
22/474
10 A. Barletta
+&5&: Meat
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
23/474
safey and economicay )e added to onfarm fora!e to im
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
24/474
I&"rod*c"io&
1he current !o)a feed en?yme mar=et si?e is estimated
to
)e
a)out.055&J&& miion*
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
25/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
26/474
en?ymes* thus )ein! a)e to reach the coon* where they wor= asU
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
27/474
Ceuose is the most a)undant )io
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
28/474
Fi#. 2.-. @ce)atic 'resentation of cellulose structure courtesy of te @ (e'art)ent of Ener#y "eno)e Pro#ra)s "eno)e !ana#e)ent Infor)ation @yste) "!I@$ available attt'%#eno)ics.ener#y.#ov$.
?ylanases and Cellulases as 4eed Additives
1,
Acetobacter $2linu! is a hi!hy crystaine ceuose* whereas mode su)stratesderived from )eached commercia wood
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
29/474
used: 1his
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
30/474
1he main chain of #yan is com
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
31/474
"i!ure +:+ shows a schematic re
Ara)ino#yans and mi#edin=ed !ucans are
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
32/474
e#tensive research in many a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
33/474
sou)e in water Chesson* %--56: Aso* heat treatment* such as aminarinase (C
,:+:%:,-6hydroyses aminarin*
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
34/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
35/474
of
@ 〈68 )arre* whereas cans HB and HC have a Gey ro
structurehtt
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
36/474
famiy % entries are isted in the CAy data)ase htt
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
37/474
Ce7B and Ce45AL Haa=ana et al(* +&&46 and 9her!oascus aurantiacusCe7A* Ce5AL Hon! et al(* +&&,a*)6:
$ell*la%e%
Fungal cellulases and βglucanases
Ony imited hydroysis or reduction of viscosity* rather than com
(C,:+:%:-%6* endo!ucanases (C ,:+:%:46 and !ucosidases orceo)iases (C,:+:%:+%6L the atter are usuay incuded in the ceuase com
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
38/474
ceo)iohydroases fodin! to a sandwich with the e#tended oo
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
39/474
ur)ri!!en et al:* %--%L /arsson et al(* +&&+6L 9richoder!a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
40/474
TCC 210- @CA
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
41/474
Le@affre @afi/y) "P "L "lucanase
9( longibrachiatu! C
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
42/474
However* !enome seEuence annotation su!!ests ei!ht ceuase !enes infamiies H 5* and 7* and four !enes for e#o%*,!ucanases in famiyH 5 e et al(* +&&76:
Other fun!a ceuases used in feed incude endo!ucanases derived from
u!icola insolens* 9alaro!2ces e!ersonii and "enicilliu! 5u
niculosu!1a)e +:%6: ( insolens
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
43/474
(II6* of which (I and (II were active on aminarin and therefore weredetermined as )eon!in! to cass (C ,:+:%: McCarthy et al(* +&&,6: 1he4&:7 ='a !ucanase had o
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
44/474
on CMC /arsson et al(* +&&+6: A !ene la!&6 for a !ucanase aminarinase6of the famiy H % (C ,:+:%:6 has )een found in 9( reesei in e#
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
45/474
han! and >ynd* +&&46: Most of the characteri?ed Bacillus !ucanases)eon! to the famiy H %* and have hi!h %*,%*4!ucanase activity (C,:+:%:7,6 e#hi)itin! a strict su)strate s
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
46/474
structure of this )acteria %*,%*4!ucanase and that of the cosey reatedB( !acerans have )een soved* and they )ear some simiarity with the fun!aCe7@(I endo!ucanases /eite et al(* %--,L Hahn et al(* %--5L /eywe!tet al(* %--76:
Anaero)ic )acteria ivin! in the di!estive tract of ruminant
s
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
47/474
severa hemiceuases is needed Cou!han et al(* %--,6: 1he sidechainceavin! UaccessoryD en?ymes remove the su)stituent !rou
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
48/474
acidic as com
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
49/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
50/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
51/474
!eneticay modified strains: 1he we=nown )acteria e#
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
52/474
two commercia )a=in!
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
53/474
maGor #yanase activity in at east some of the first!eneration recom)inantfeed #yanase
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
54/474
H %% and one H 56* nine from A( 5u!igatus four H %&* three H %%and two H 76 and nine from A( or21ae !enome four H %&* four H %%and one H 76 e et al(* +&&76: ecom)inant A( niger #yanaseA reAn#A
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
55/474
fitration 'Vsterhft et al(* %--76* su!!estin! that at east two dierent#yanases are aso
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
56/474
shown to efficienty )rea= down #yan su)strates "urniss et al(* +&&56:However* the s
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
57/474
?ylanases and Cellulases as 4eed Additives
**
their activity: $yII in et al(* %---6:
E&5'e !rod*c"io&
$ell fac"orie%
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
58/474
Introduction
"eed en?ymes* i=e other industria en?ymes* are currenty
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
59/474
1en! et al(* +&&76:roduction hosts can )e divided into two cate!ories )ased mainy on
re!uatory as
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
60/474
e#
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
61/474
al(* +&&76: 1herefore* for ma#ima e#
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
62/474
detection of the si!na of the !ene of interest in )oth en?yme assays and 0'0A( anaysis: 1he use of such strain )ac=!round aso acceerates straindeveo
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
63/474
isoate Ma* as aready su!!ested )y eary =aryoty
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
64/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
65/474
s
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
66/474
et al(* +&&46:If a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
67/474
One of the maGor tar!ets for the feed a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
68/474
+0 !. Paloei)o et al(
that their s
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
69/474
Fi#. 2.8. !icrosco'ic i)a#e of endos'er)ic and aleurone 7eat cell 7alls before a$ andafter b$ treat)ent 7it a 9richoder!a xylanase#lucanase 're'aration.
?ylanases and Cellulases as 4eed Additives
+1
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
70/474
s
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
71/474
en?yme
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
72/474
[man* : and raham* H: %-876 Anaysis of tota and insou)e mi#edin=ed %,6*%46
'!ucans in )arey and oats: *ournal o5 Agricultural and Food Che!istr2 ,5*7&4J7&-:
AM"( +&&-6 >ist of en?ymes Octo)er +&&-L AM"(@&-@&8L htt
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
73/474
(#:M:*
'avies*
:P:
et
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
74/474
al( +&&&6 1he $ Uthermosta)ii?in!D domains of #yanases are car)ohydrate)indin!modues2 structure and )iochemistry of the Clostridiu! ther!ocellu! $) domain:Bioche!istr2 ,-* 5&%,J5&+%:
++ !. Paloei)o et al(
Cherry* P:: and "idantsef* A:>: +&&,6 'irected evoution of industria en?ymes2
an
u
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
75/474
#yanase en?yme com
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
76/474
as
a
feed
additive
f or
chic=ens
forfattenin!* chic=ens reared for ayin!* tur=eys for fattenin!* tur=eys reared for)reedin! and
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
77/474
>:M:
%---6
Homoo!ous
#yanases
from
Clostridiu!
ther!ocellu!2
evidence
for)ifunctiona
activity*
syner!ism
)etween
#yanase
cataytic
modues
and
the
:* 'ean* :* 'rener* 0:* 'unnCoeman*
N:0:*
+- !. Paloei)o et al(
oede!e)uur*
":*
Houfe=*
1:':*
(n!and*
:P:*
/ey*
A:0:*
Meerman*
H:P:*
Mitche*
1:*Mitchinson* C:* Oivares* H:A:* 1eunissen* :P:M:* Yao* P : and Ward* M: +&&,6
1ranscri
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
78/474
+&&86
roteomics
anaysis
of
Uova)ioS
(#ceD*
a
secreted
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
79/474
Hon!*
P:*
1ama=i*
H:*
Yamamoto*
/:
and
/uma!ai*
H:
+&&,)6
Conin!
of
a
!ene
encodin!thermosta)e ceo)iohydroase from 9her!oascus aurantiacus and its e#eeuwen*
M:P:":*
Wood*
1:M:
and
ora!en*
A::P:
%--,6urification and characteri?ation of three endo%*46#yanases and one #yosidase from
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
80/474
As+ergillus a.a!ori: *ournal o5 Biotechnolog2 +7* ,4-J,5:/uhs*
/: *
>iec=fedt*
(:*
0amues*
:P:*
/ovacs*
W:*
Meyer*
W:*
etrini*
O:
et al: %--6Moecuar
evidence
that
the
ase#ua
industria
fun!us 9richoder!a rees
ei is a conaderivative
of
the
ascomycete 2+ocrea ecorina: "roceedings o5 the Natio
nal Acade!2 o5 Sciences USA -,* 7755J77&:
/u=arni*
N:*
0hendye*
A:
and
ao*
M:
%---6
Moecuar
and
)iotechnoo!i
ca
asesa!e*
:
and
Bussey*
H:
+&&6
Ce
wa
assem)y
in Saccharo!
2ces cere3isiae:Microbiolog2 and Molecular Biolog2 /e3ie.s 7&* ,%7J,4,:
>evasseur*
A:*
Asther*
M:
and
ecord*
(:
+&&56
Overin* P:* Ndovu* >:M:* 0in!h* 0: and iay* B: %---6 urification and )iochemica characteristics
of '#yanase from a thermoinder* M:B:* Mattinen* M:>:* /onttei* M:* >inde)er!* :* 0t]h)er!* P:* 'ra=en)er!* 1: et al:
%--56 Identification of functionay im
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
81/474
)y car)on sources and metas: *ournal o5 Bacteriolog2 7,* +-J+78:MZntyZ* A:>:* aoheimo* M: and 0uominen* : %--86 Industria mutants and recom)inant
strains of 9richoder!a reesei: In2 Harman* :(: and /u)ice=* C:: eds6 9richoder!a and0liocladiu!E -n12!es) Biological Control and Co!!ercial A++lications:
1ayor and"rancis* >ondon* :
and
Nevaainen*/:M:H:
%--+6
(ectroie)*
W:
+&&&6
1he
thermosta)ii?in!
domain
of
themoduar
#yanase
$ynA
of 9her!otoga !ariti!a re
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
82/474
Moers*
/: *
Ceus*
I:*
BriGs*
/:*
Courtin*
C:M:
and
'ecour*
P:A:
+&&56
(ndo#yanase
su)strateseectivity
determines
de!radation
of
wheat
watere#tracta)e
and
waterune#tracta)eara)ino#yan: Carboh2drate /esearch ,4&* %,%-J%,+7:
Moers*
/:*
Bour!ois*
1:*
om)outs*
0:*
Bein*
1:*
an
Cam:
and
1aimisto*
/:
%--46
On
the
safety
of 9richoder!a
reesei: *ournal o5 Biotechnolog2 ,7* %-,J+&&:Niehaus* ":* Bertodo* C:* /Zher* M: and Antrani=ian* : %---6 (#tremo
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
83/474
e* H:P:* de Winde* P:H: * Archer* ':B:* 'yer* :0:* Hofmann* :* 0chaa
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
84/474
0chamey*
M:*
0in!h*
A:
and
Ward*
O::
+&&46
'eveo
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
85/474
ceuosic ethano: Nature /e3ie.s 0enetics -* 4,,J44,:0toner* M::* 'ae* ':A:* uafetti* :P:* Bec=er* 1:* Mannin!* M:C:* Caruo*
P:
and
Wan!*
P :
+&&76
Codon
oeuven* Be!ium*
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
86/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
87/474
eith*
B:*
Her?)er!*
C:*
0tec=e*
0:*
"eesche*
P:*
Maurer*
/:H:*
(hrenreich*
: et al( +&&46
1he com
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
88/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
89/474
Mannans
occur
in
the
forms
of
!ucomannan*
!aactomannan* !uco!aactomannan and !ucuronomannans in nonstarch
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
90/474
the coee e#tract dry wei!ht and mannans are a)undant* ma=in! the e#tracthi!hy viscous: Addition of mannanase faciitates
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
91/474
mannan content of a ar!e num)er of soy)ean mea sam
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
92/474
a:siao et al. 200-$.
Mode of ac"io&
1he mode of action of mannanase in mono!astric animas iscom
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
93/474
demonstrated to stimuate the innate immune system* resutin! inmacro
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
94/474
raded eves of mannanase were added to mai?eJsoy)ean meaty
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
95/474
In the a)sence of !uar !um* mannanase im
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
96/474
a!annanase 7as eiter added $ or not added $ to te feed ata rate of 100 )illion units t 1.be!eans in colu)ns 7itout a co))on su'erscri't differsi#nificantly " O0.0,$.
Ta(le .4. Te effect of )annanase at #raded levels onbroiler cic& 'erfor)ance to 21 days in diets containin# 19#uar #u) fro) (as&iran et al. 200+$.
!annanase ! t 1$a B #$ 4CR # # 1$
0 *+-., 1.**-b
100 *+-.3 1.*0+c
200 *+6.1 1.231d
*00 *+,., 1.26-d
B body 7ei#tF 4CR feed conversion rate.a! N 10- en/y)e activity units.bd!eans 7itout a co))on su'erscri't differ si#nificantly" O0.0,$.
the
first
e#
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
97/474
-0 !.E. ;ac&son
Ta(le .3. Effect of infectiona )annanase en/y)eb and )edicationc on broiler cic&'erfor)ance fro) 6 to 21 days of a#e fro) ;ac&son et al. 200*a$.
Lesion score
day 1+$d
Infection En/y)e
!edication
"ain #$ 4CR # # 1$
!ortality 9$
''er
Lo7er
P ,+0e 1.++-# 0.00f 0.00# 0.00#
P P ,+6e 1.+2+# 1.86f 0.00# 0.00#
P +23 1.80+e 3.86e 1.*6e 1.,-e
P P +30# 1.,*-f *.8,ef 1.1-f 1.++e
P P ,22f 1.++8# 0.63f 1.0*f 0.66f
4CR feed conversion rate.a5rally inoculated 7it a )ixed solution 7it a''roxi)ately 80000 oocysts of -i!eria acer3ulina and12,0 oocysts of -i!eria !a$i!a 'er bird on day 8. 5n days 11 12 and 1* birds 7ere #iven brotcultures of Clostridiu! +er5ringens containin# a''roxi)ately 1., Q 106 cfu 'er bird.b!annanase 7as eiter added $ or not added $ to te feed at a rate of 100 )illion units t 1.c@alino)ycin @ALF -0 # t 1$ 'lus bacitracin )etylene disalicylate B!(F ,0 # t 1$.d''er intestine -( acer3ulinaF lo7er intestine -( !a$i!a.e!eans 7itin colu)ns not sarin# co))on su'erscri'ts are si#nificantly different " O0.0,$.
-ects on intestinal !or+holog2 and 5unction
1he eect of mannanase on intestina function and mor
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
98/474
en?yme addition: 1he authors commented that reduced !o)et ce num)ersmay )e e#
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
99/474
b!annanase 7as eiter added $ or not added $ to te feed at a rate of 100 )illion units t 1.c@alino)ycin @ALF -0 # t 1$ and bacitracin )etylene disalicylate B!(F ,0 # t 1$.d''er intestine -( acer3ulinaF lo7er intestine -( !a$i!a.ei!eans 7itin colu)ns not sarin# co))on su'erscri'ts are si#nificantly different" O0.0,$.
authors s
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
100/474
In addition* the consistency of carcasses or
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
101/474
!annanase 〈"alactosidase and Pectinase
-*
)ut at 7& days of a!e a si!nificant en?yme j soy)ean mea source interaction
was o)served: Mannanase si!nificanty increased ive wei!ht )ya
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
102/474
Ta(le
.7.
Effect of )annanase on tur&ey to) 'erfor)ancea fro) 5detalla et al . 2002$.
Body 7ei#t 4CR # # 1@B! 9 'rotein$ En/y)eb day 12-$ 012- days$
+6 1+.31 2.80++6 P 1,.0* 2.-**
++ 1+.+0 2.83+
++ P 1+.88 2.-3,
Avera#e 1+.-- 2.8+3
Avera#e P 1+.30 2.--+
" value for en/y)e 0.001 0.001" value for @B! Q en/y)e 0.068 0.2+1
@B! soybean )ealF 4CR feed conversion rate.aT7o ex'eri)ents 'ooled eac ex'eri)ent 7it 18 birds 'er 'en seven 'ens 'er treat)ent.b!annanase 7as eiter added $ or not added $ to te feed at a rate of 100 )illion units t 1.
-+ !.E. ;ac&son
with
mannanase
and
su!!est
that
these
eects
may
)e
ar!er
when
ower
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
103/474
+&&,)6 re
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
104/474
%&:57 to 7:4& " &:&&%6 at * %+ and %8 wee=s of a!e* resayin! hens are e#
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
105/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
106/474
:i# 81.+3 68.02 60.2* 8+.8,
(ifference 9$ 1.*6 0.31 0.32 0.00-n12!eb
80.8, 6-.21 83.2* 8+.00
P 80.6- 6-.31 60.*0 8,.,0
(ifference 9$ 0.11 0.80 1.08 1.,0P statistics
!E level 0.031 0.001 0.001 0.366
En/y)e 0.66, 0.008 0.001 0.001!E ⋅ en/y)e 0.+23 0.**1 0.,+0 0.,88
aLo7 !E level is 100 &cal 1 lo7er tan i# !E level.b!annanase 7as eiter added $ or not added $ to te feed at a rate of 100)illion units t 1.
" &:&56 with the owest amino acid density tested &:7& ysine6: 1his su!!eststhat mannanase may )e instrumenta in im
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
107/474
with resuts
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
108/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
109/474
&:%6 to ,:& " &:&6* as we as a ar!e 86 im
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
110/474
A ar!e num)er of studies have )een re
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
111/474
〈aactosidase is a !ycoside hydroase en?yme that hydroyses the termina〈'!aactose moiety from !aactoside oi!osaccharides*
!yco
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
112/474
ener!y contri)ution is imited: (ary studies to determine the M( of common
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
113/474
@ucrose -6
@tacyose +,Raf finose 12
Another
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
114/474
on the a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
115/474
A series of )roier e#
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
116/474
res
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
117/474
S*''ar
A
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
118/474
are most
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
119/474
anima s
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
120/474
acid and crude
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
121/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
122/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
123/474
varyin! in cacium eves* ya et al( +&&&a6 re
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
124/474
with #yanase* !ucanase* ceuase* mannanase and !aactanase en?ymes* tono )enefit at a when
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
125/474
!annanase 〈"alactosidase and Pectinase
83
Refere&ce%
Adi)moradi* M: and Mehri* M: +&&76 (ects of mannanase on )roier:*
A=avanichan*
O:
and
Chen!*
1:/:
%--&6
(ect
of
oi!osaccharide
free
0BM
on
true
meta)oi?a)e
ener!y
and
fi)er
di!estion
in
adut
roosters:
"oultr2 Science -* 787J7-,:
Couch* P::* Ba=ashi* Y:/:* "er!uson* 1:M:* 0mith (:B: and re!er* C:: %-76 1he eect of
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
126/474
'as=iran*
M:*
1eeter*
::*
"od!e*
':
and
Hsiao*
H:.:
+&&46
An
evauation
of
endo'mannanase Hemice6 eects on )roier
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
127/474
Pac=son* M:(: and Mathis* :": +&&6 (conomics of mannanase HemiceQfeed en?yme6 in
tur=ey hens under varyin! ener!y eves: "oultr2 Science 85 0u: and Mathis* :": +&&4a6 (ects of
:
+&&4c6
(ect
of
mannanase
HemiceQ6
in
commercia
)roiers
with
two
cacium
and:
and
Mathis*
:":
+&&56
(ect
of mannanase HemiceQ6 on
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
128/474
!annanase 〈"alactosidase and Pectinase
61
Pac=son* M:(:* reenwood* M:W:* 0te: et al:
+&&%)6
〈aactosidase
en?yme
su
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
129/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
130/474
ODuinn*
::*
"under)ur=e*
':W:*
"under)ur=e*
C:>:
and
Pames*
:>:
+&&+6
InFuence
of dietary sui* ':* iao* $:* han!* >: and uo* >: +&&+6 (ect of dietary su:A:* Carter* 0:':* 0enne* B:W: and 0hriver* P:A: +&&+6 (ects of
mannanase additionto cornJsoy)ean mea diets on !rowth
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
131/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
132/474
hemiceuase: "oultr2 Science 87* 7%,J7%8: 1or=i* M: and Che!eni* A: +&&76 (vauation of dietary re:
and
0aarnio*
P:
%-576
aactomannans
in
soy)ean
hus: *
ournal o5 the A!erican Che!ical Societ2 7-* &55J&57:
Wi!!ins* H:0: %-846 Nutritiona vaue of su!ars and reated com
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
133/474
of soy)ean mea* soy
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
134/474
materias and insects: However* in order to satisfy consumer <reference forUve!etarianD anima
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
135/474
0tarch consists of two
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
136/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
137/474
even when the amount of resistant starch com
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
138/474
rotein consists of
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
139/474
1he
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
140/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
141/474
was re
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
142/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
143/474
there were dierences )etween
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
144/474
1he com
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
145/474
that the vast maGority of endo!enous nitro!en is recovered )y the terminaieum* and even more on a totatract )asis _ 8&6* athou!h the authorsconcede that nitro!en recovered in the ar!e intestine is of imitedimmediatevaue to the anima: Nevertheess* it is
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
146/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
147/474
en?ymes2 structura anaysis of the residua amyo
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
148/474
(n!yst* H:N:* /in!man* 0:M: and Cummin!s* P:H: %--+6 Cassification and measurement of
3+ !.4. Isa&sen et al(
nutritionay im
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
149/474
soy)ean mea on !rowth andmana*
W:P:M:
+&&-6
'ietary
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
150/474
Science and 9echnolog2 %++* ,&,J,+&: 1ester*
:":*
/ar=aas*
P:
and
i*
$:
+&&46
0tarch
structure
and
di!esti)iity
en?ymeJsu)strate
reationshi
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
151/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
152/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
153/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
154/474
reduced to dierent de!rees at the su)strate concentration of the assay:
1o date* ony one a=aine
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
155/474
ne!ativey char!ed ceft into a favoura)e environment for the )indin! of
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
156/474
1his en?yme does not need any cofactor for en?ymatic activity: 1he
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
157/474
the ran!e of %5& miion Haefner et al(* +&&56: (ven if
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
158/474
di!esti)iity eter and Ba=er* +&&%6* others have found im
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
159/474
1he a)iity of a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
160/474
Ac"i+i" 0ro=le a&d %"a(ili" of 0<
With the e#ce
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
161/474
lla and "ibson 1368$F yss
et al. 1333a$F "reiner etal. 2003$yss et al. 1333a$yss et al. 1333a$F Rodri#ue/ et al. 2000$
Ber&a et al. 1336$Tsen# et al. 2000$
Lassen et al. 2001$F lla and
@etu)adavan 200*$
uan etal. 2002$Ra#on etal. 2006$
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
162/474
:& reiner et al(* %--86* whereas that from A( niger %%15,A- showedma#imum
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
163/474
20
01.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
8.0
pH
Pytases
10,
(b)
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
01.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
8.0
pH
(c)
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
01.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
8.0
pH
A c t i v i t y r e l a t i v e t o p
H 5 . 5 ( % )
A c t i v i t y r e l a t i v e t o p H 3 . 5 ( %
)
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
164/474
Fi#. 3.-. a$ ': activity 'rofiles of 'ytases fro) rye $ "reiner et al( 1336$ As+ergillus niger 11T,*A3 $ "reiner et al( 2003$ and a !alaysian 7aste7ater bacteriu) $ "reiner and4arou& 2008$ usin# sodiu) 'ytate as a substrate at *8SC. Te activity at o'ti)al ': 7as ta&enas 1009. Buffers% ': 1.0*., #lycine:ClF ': *.,-.0 sodiu) acetate
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
165/474
activity
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
166/474
et al(* +&&7L reiner and "arou=* +&&7L Huan! et al(* +&&86: 1he )acteria
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
167/474
hi!her
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
168/474
fun!a or
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
169/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
170/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
171/474
terreus %%J+, ML Wyss et al(* %---a6* A( 5u!igatus %& ML asamontes et al(* %--7)L Wyss et al(* %---aL odri!ue? et al(* +&&&6* Sch.annio!2cescastellii ,8 ML 0e!ueiha et al(* +&&+6* Klebsiella aerogenes + ML 1am)e et al(* %--46* catDs tai
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
172/474
initiatin! 46 assen et al(* +&&%6:
1o )rin! some carification to )iochemica
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
173/474
to )e
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
174/474
Fi#. 3.2. Classification of 'ytases based on te carbon in te !2oinositol rin# of 'ytate at7ic de'os'orylation is initiated 'os'ate residue$.
112 R. "reiner and . oniet/ny
Fi#. 3.. !aDor 'ytate de#radation 'at7ays for te four classes of 'ytase fro) :aya&a7a et al( 1330F "reiner et al( 2000a 2001a 2002 2008ab 2003F
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
175/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
176/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
177/474
)een found in nature to date: 1hus* screenin! nature for
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
178/474
intraceuar
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
179/474
we deveo
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
180/474
to im
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
181/474
of -( coli
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
182/474
sta)e in aEueous soutions at 7&`C and in feed at
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
183/474
45 of its initia activity: >ast )ut not east* the 3 ma# vaues at
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
184/474
116 R. "reiner and . oniet/ny
of a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
185/474
)ioefficacy of su
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
186/474
Andid*
1:A:*
eide*
P:
and
0and)er!*
A:0:
+&&46
Meta)oism
of
e#traceuar
inositohe#aei*
$::
and
Ba=er*
':H:
+&&,6
(fficacy
of
an -( coli
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
187/474
from Bacillus s
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
188/474
and
wheat
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
189/474
oovan* 0::* Meidin!er* ::* AGa=aiye* A:* Cottri* M:* Wieder=ehr* M::* Barney* ':P: et al:
+&&%6 i!s e#
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
190/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
191/474
nove* thermosta)e
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
192/474
tota ee* P:/:* /im* H:/:* Yu* P:H: and Oh* 1:/: %--8)6 Conin! of the
thermosta)e
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
193/474
ooch*
C:*
iarou!e*
C:*
Wyss*
M:
and
van
>oon
A:::M:+&&&6 (#chan!in! the active site )etween : et al: +&&+6
1he consensus conce
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
194/474
>indEvist*
Y:*
0chneider*
:
and
ih=o*
:
%--46
Crysta
structures
of
rat
acid
ei* $::* 0ethumadhavan* /: et al( +&&+60itedirected
muta!enesis
of As+ergillus niger N> ,%,5
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
195/474
12,
Nair* :C:* >aFamme* P: and 'uvnGa=* : %--%6 roduction of oon* A:::M:
%--7a6
Conin!
of
the
oon A:::M: %--7)6 ene conin!*
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
196/474
intestina :B:
+&&8a6
/inetics*
su)strate
s
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
197/474
asmussen* 0:/:* Pohansen* /:0: and 0rensen* M:B: +&&76 oynuceotides encodin!
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
198/474
Pytases
128
1am)e* 0:M:* /a=iG* :0:* /e=ar* 0:M: and are=h* >:P: %--46 1wo distinct moecuar forms
of eun!*
1:Y:
and
>im*
B:>:
+&&+6
Moecuar
conin!
and
the
)iochemicacharacteri?ation of two nove
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
199/474
de
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
200/474
Yan=e*
>:P:*
0ein!er*
B:>:
and
Chen!*
/:P:
%---6
hytase
activity
in
Seleno!onasru!inantiu!2 a : %--56 Com
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
201/474
8 E9ec" of Di#e%"i+e Trac"$o&di"io&%, Feed !roce%%ia&d Iredie&"% o& Re%0o&%e
"o NS!
E&5'e%
B. @=I:@
I&"rod*c"io&
Nonstarch
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
202/474
ar!e inFuence on the resuts* )ut which wi not )e deat with here:
1he to
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
203/474
al( +&&86 showed that* )etween
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
204/474
tem
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
205/474
dierent
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
206/474
Fi#. 8.-. Cu)ulative excretion rates for broiler cic&ens fed 7eat diets su''le)ented 7itoat ulls and 7itout su''le)entation. Bars indicate standard deviation n N +$. 4ro):etland and @vius 2001.$
acce
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
207/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
208/474
%--+6 showed that )irds ada
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
209/474
Fi#. 8.2.
(ry )atter 'ercenta#e #rey sMuares$ and content asteris&s$ in cro' of )ealfed20dayold broiler cic&ens at different ti)es after avin# ad access to feed for 1, )in.
0vihus et al( +&&+6* where 5& of the feed had
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
210/474
++& min )y 'Znic=e et al( %---6* whie others found retention time in the GeGunum and ieum to vary )etween %, and +& min 0hires et al(* %-87L vander /is et al(* %--&L utierre? de Aamo et al(* +&&-a*)6: 1his a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
211/474
associated with a considera)e fermentation activity dominated )y actic acid
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
212/474
res
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
213/474
re
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
214/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
215/474
1*6 B. @vius
activity of the !ucanases and #yanases added to the diet*athou!h the
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
216/474
where surviva durin!
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
217/474
retention time throu!h increased voume of the !i??ard: However* the moreacidic conditions created in the !i??ard due to increased dietary structure woudreduce the activity of the en?ymes in the !i??ard and woud aso increase theris= of their inactivation* )oth throu!h ow
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
218/474
at a constant rate* imitin! access to feed wi therefore increase !astric retentiontime: 1his is in accordance with findin!s of a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
219/474
the stomach: 1o concude* an avera!e
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
220/474
a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
221/474
It is worth notin! that Mor!avi et al( +&&%6 concuded that N0ases wereony modesty susce
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
222/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
223/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
224/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
225/474
and thus enhance de!radation activity of added en?ymes: "or
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
226/474
for a on! retention time in the cro
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
227/474
ma=in! it difficut to ascri)e eects such as an increased starch anea et al(*%---L racia et al:* +&&,6 and@or
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
228/474
has )een shown that sou)e fi)res may aso have ne!ative eects throu!hstimuation of )acteria
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
229/474
b=alues are calculated for te 7eat fraction only.cAvera#e value for all batces tested.
or e#truded diets ranGes et al(* %--L 0cott et al(* +&&,* res
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
230/474
discussed )y Cowieson et al( +&&6: Aternativey* nutritive vaue may )ecom
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
231/474
1he !enera mechanisms have )een e#tensivey reviewed )y Adams %--%6
and >udi=huy?e et al( +&&,6* and wi )e ony )rieFy outined here: Watermoecues interact with the en?yme throu!h noncovaent van derWaas )onds*and may even contri)ute to conformationa sta)iity )y formin! a
mem)rane
around
the
en?yme
Adams*
%--%6:
As
tem
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
232/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
233/474
%--46 and 0iversides and Bedford %---6 o)served reduction in en?ymeactivity when the
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
234/474
fi)res does not increase with
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
235/474
1,0 B. @vius
at 85`C: As aready discussed* however* the window of time in the di!estivetract where conditions are suita)e for en?yme activity is short: 1hus* a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
236/474
e#o!enous en?ymes* it is reasona)e to assume that even a modestim
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
237/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
238/474
Bayer*
:C:*
Hoover*
W:H:
and
Muir*
"::
%-786
'ietary
fi)er
and
mea
feedin!
inFuence
on)roier !rowth and cro< fermentation: "oultr2 Science 57* %45J%45-:
1,2 B. @vius
Bedford*
M::
+&&+6
1he
roe
of
car)ohydrases
in
feedstu
di!estion:
In2
McNa)*
P:M:
andBoorman*
/:N:
eds6 "oultr2 FeedstusE Su++l2) Co!+osition and Nut
riti3e Value:CABI u)ishin!* Wain!ford* ./*
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
239/474
of ow a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
240/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
241/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
242/474
iamide*
M:P:
+&&-a6
Wheat
starch
di!estion
rate
in
)roier
chic=ens
is
aected
)ycutivar )ut not )y wheat cro< nitro!en fertiisation: British "oultr2 Science 5&* ,4%J,4-:
utierre?
de
Aamo*
A:*
erste!en*
M:W:A:*
den
Harto!*
>:A:*
ere?
de
Ayaa*
:
andiamide*
M:P:
+&&-)6
Wheat
starch
di!estion
rate
in
)roier
chic=ens
is
aected
)ycutivar )ut not )y wheat cro< nitro!en fertiisation: "oultr2 Science 88* %
J%75:Hetand*
H:
and
0vihus*
B:
+&&%6
(ect
of
oat
hus
on
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
243/474
In)orr*
P:
and
Bedford*
M::
%--46
0ta)iity
of
feed
en?ymes
to
steam
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
244/474
=inetic information to ar)ier*
M:
and
Nitsan*
:
%--56
(ect
of
a!e
and
e#o!enous
amyaseand
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
245/474
Mi==esen* >:>:* Nau!hton* :P:* Hedemann* M:0: and Pensen* B:B: +&&46 (ects of :* ode* >:M:* McAister* 1:A:* Iwaasa* A:': et
al: +&&%6 esistance of feed en?ymes to
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
246/474
ersia*
M:(:*
'ehority*
B:A
and
>i)urn*
M:0:
+&&+6
1he
eects
of
en?yme
su:
and
Banave*
':
%-876
1he
di!estion
of
wheat
starch in )roier chic=ens: Australian *ournal o5 Agricultural /esearch ,8* ,-J4-:0amarasin!he*
/:*
Messi=ommer*
:
and
Wen=*
C:
+&&&6
Activity
of
su
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
247/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
248/474
hysica and nutritiona eects of
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
249/474
ranGes* M::* 0i* ': +&&56 roa?arevic* N:* (dvardsen* ':H: and 0vihus* B: +&&86(ects of fi)re
content in
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
250/474
I&"rod*c"io&
A century a!o*
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
251/474
%--6: 1his was mainy in res
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
252/474
)etter scientific understandin! of the
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
253/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
254/474
Fi#. :.-. @ce)atic dia#ra) of te !#'ytate axis as 'ro'osed by Lott et al. 2000$.
Pytate and Pytase
1-*
from nine surveys are summari?ed in 1a)e 7:%: 1he maGority of in feedstusof
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
255/474
1he e#cretion of e#cess and undi!ested )y
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
256/474
1.3- 1.6-2.20$ -1.0 *0.0!ai/e 8+, 2.-2 2.*0
2.30$1.66 1.802.20$ 81.- 1*.0
@or#u) --+ *.+2 2.81 *.60$
2.-- 1.30*.2-$ 88.6 20.0
eat -38 *.08 2.30 +.03$
2.13 1.602.63$ 81.- +3.0
Canola )eal +26 3.82 6.83 11.,0$
-.+, +.008.86$ --.+ 21.0
Cottonseed )eal
*21 10.02 -.+0 11.*-$
8.82 +.33.11$ 88.1 1.0
@oybean )eal
-63 -.+3 ,.80 -.3+$
*.66 *.,++.,*$ ,3.3 28.0
Rice bran -*8 18.62 1*.+0 28.13$
1+.18 8.30 2+.20$
83., 2,.0
eat bran -2, 10.3- 6.02 1*.81$
6.*- 8.003.-0$ 8-.* +1.0
aei#ted )eans derived fro)
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
257/474
hytate e#traction from
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
258/474
is an interestin! a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
259/474
de
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
260/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
261/474
Moreover* the
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
262/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
263/474
1he main sites of
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
264/474
e#am
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
265/474
of
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
266/474
an avera!e of +:&& ! non
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
267/474
mea* the su)seEuent eEuivaency of && "1. of an As+ergillus
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
268/474
studies: 1he i=eihood is that the Ca eEuivaence of
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
269/474
18*
Relea%e of 0ho%0hor*% a&d calci*'
0evera e#
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
270/474
standard and eevated incusion eves merit more accurate definitions:
K!ro"ei& E9ec"H of !h"a"e a&d !h"a%e
Officer and Batterham %--+a6 were
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
271/474
commercia entities for neary two decades* it is not acce
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
272/474
Pytate and Pytase
18,
increased avera!e AI' coefficients of %8 amino acids )y 4:7* from &:787 to
&:8+4*
over
%+,
o)servations
1a)e
7:,6:
Amon!
individua
amino
acids*
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
273/474
As'artic acidCystine"luta)ic acid"lycineProline@erineTyrosine!ean
88+88+88
12* total$
0.88+0.8-80.-8*0.6*60.8+-0.83+0.8,10.8630.868
0.6030.61+0.8210.68+0.8660.6*,0.60+0.6060.62+
+.,-.18.1+.*,.-,.28.12.++.8
aRavindran et al. 1333a 2000 2001 200- 2006$F Ruterfurd et al. 2002$F @elle et al. 200*b 2003b$.
18- P.:. @elle et al.
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
274/474
which ma=es the im
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
275/474
Pytate and Pytase
188
et
al:
%-8%6
investi!ated
the
eects
of
diets
containin!
watersou)e
orinsou)e soy
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
276/474
ar!ey undi!ested in the sma intestine* any increase in mucin secretion woude#acer)ate Fows of endo!enous amino acids derived from its
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
277/474
)e reduced si!nificanty throu!h the addition of increasin! eves of Na* witheves eEuivaent to those found in a &:+ Na diet )ein! sufficientto )rea= u<more than 5 of these com
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
278/474
Micro(ial 0h"a%e a'i&o acid di#e%"i(ili" a%%a% i& %i&e
Whie there is the
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
279/474
Nevertheess* in !enera micro)ia
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
280/474
trations* reative to dietary
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
281/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
282/474
It is noteworthy that chromic o#ide has )een used as the mar=er in
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
283/474
owan et al: %--+6 aso Gud!ed that there is a su)stantia microFora
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
284/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
285/474
of
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
286/474
soy)ean mea
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
287/474
increase the e#tent of
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
288/474
the
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
289/474
>eeson* %-84L >eeson* %--,6: Maty=a et al: %--&6 found that )eef taowreduced
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
290/474
re
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
291/474
others ta=e severa days to deveo
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
292/474
e#am
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
293/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
294/474
a)e to dissociate !ycininJ
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
295/474
Interestin!y* A!)ede et al: +&&-6 su)seEuenty determined the eects of "(l2cii
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
296/474
Feed 0roce%%i
In recent years increasin! attention is )ein!
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
297/474
of !i??ard function )y feedin! whoe or coarsey !round !rain in turnstimuatesthe deveo
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
298/474
this situation the ener!y matri# for #yanase shoud )e reduced )y around+&6 in the
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
299/474
done with care: In a recent study Cowieson* +&%&6* the remova of + soy oifrom a mai?e soy)ased )roier diet resuted in a si!nificantdecrease b,6 iniea amino acid di!esti)iity at day +%: Interestin!y* this eect wasnot o)served)y day 4+ chan!e from C to NC k a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
300/474
caused )y the in!estion of diets with a ow fat density does not
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
301/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
302/474
Refere&ce%
A)eson* :H: %---6 A
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
303/474
and
oyster
she*
car)onate*
citrate*
and
citratemaate
forms
of
cacium
are
eEuay)ioavaia)e( Nutrition /esearch +4* +-,J,&%:
Ba)ouris* N:* "etcher* P: and >ennardPones* P:(: %-56 (ect of dierent foodson the acidity
of the !astric contents in ohan*
O::
and
0iha!*
:0:
+&&86
(ect
of
feed
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
304/474
acids
in
untreated*
heattreated
and
thermaammoniated
hi!htannin
!rain
sor!hum:South A5rican *ournal o5 Ani!al Science +&* ++,J++8:
Bryden*
W:>:
and
Buett*
P:A:
%-86
0e
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
305/474
Covasa*
M:
and
itter*
:C:
+&&&6
Ada:*
(ec=hout*
W:
and
BoucEue*
Ch::
%--46
1he
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
306/474
activity
in
ve!eta)e
feedstus:
Netherlands
*ournal
o5
Agricultural
Science 4+*,57J,-:
'ecuy:/:* Pohnson* :B: and 0tam
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
307/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
308/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
309/474
Pohnston* 0:>:* "ru!e* (:':* Bidner* 1:': and 0outhern* >:>: +&&-6 (ect of
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
310/474
!rowin! re!ion* !rowin! season and stora!e: Australian *ournal o5 Agricultural /esearch5,* %,%J%,(
/im*
/:I:
and
Bayey*
H:0:
%-8,6
Amino
acid
o#idation
)y
youn!
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
311/474
in
soy)eans
and
soy
aawor*
::*
>ynch*
:B:*
Carey*
:P:*
ODeiy*
P:P:
and
ODConne*
M:/:
+&&56Measurements of the acid)indin! ca:P: %-7+6 1he eect of certain dietary factors on in 3i3o
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
312/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
313/474
MitGavia* 0:* de 0aint BanEuat* : and 'erache* : %-7,6 (ect de Dacide tanniEue sur a
scrtion !astriEue che? e rat: Nutrition and Metabolis! %5* %,J%7&:Moehn* 0:* Bertoo* :"::* enchar?* :B: and Ba* :O: +&&56 'eveo
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
314/474
OD'e*
B:>:
and
de
Boand*
A:
%-76
Com
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
315/474
soy)eans:
II:
Mechanism
of
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
316/474
avindran*
:*
More*
:C:H:*
artrid!e*
::*
Hru)y*
M:
and
0ands*
P:0:
+&&6
InFuence
of an -( coliderived
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
317/474
Caavaia)iity in )roiers: 9agung Sch.eine und 0eRgelern,hrung* .niversitat Hae*ermany:
0ee*
:H:
and
avindran*
:
+&&76
Micro)ia
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
318/474
20+ P.:. @elle et al.
0mith*
1:N:*
esti*
:M:*
Ba=ai*
P:*
/i)urn*
P:
and
(dwards*
H:M:
+&&%6
1he
use
of
nearinfrared
reFectance
s
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
319/474
-scherichia coli
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
320/474
*ournal o5 Nutrition 4-* 4&%J4%&(han!*
:B:
and
/orne!ay*
(:1:
%---6
hytase
eects
on
iea
amino
acid
di!esti)iity
andnitro!en
)aance
in
finishin!
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
321/474
and o
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
322/474
)ut this is not aways the case: However* im
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
323/474
(#o!enous en?ymes have the a)iity to increase en?ymic activity within therumina environment Mor!avi et al:* +&&&)L Coom)atto et al:* +&&,c6:Increased hydroytic ca
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
324/474
+&&&6 or Waace et al( +&&%6:In addition to increasin! en?ymic activity in the rumina environment*
a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
325/474
(evelo')ents in En/y)e sa#e in Ru)inants
203
conditions of these studies have varied widey: 'ierent anima ty
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
326/474
1hus* when viewed across a s
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
327/474
Le7is et al. 1333$ )l en/y)e 'roduct 1 fora#e (!$b
Para)eter 0 0.8 1.0 1., 0 0.81.0 1., 0 1.2, 2.0, ,.0
(!I day 1$ 20.3 22.1 20.+ 22.1 20.- 21.220.8 2*.* 2+.+e 2-.2d 2-.2d 2-.-d
4C!(!I 1$c 1.21 1.** 1.+- 1.+1 1.12 1.081.1- 1.03 1.88 1.-+ 1.63 1.-2
*.,9 4 C! 2,.2d
23.,
e
23.8
e
*1.2
e
2*.1
22.-
2+.0
2,.*
+*.1e
+*.0e
+3.+d
+*.2e
day 1$!il& yield day 1$ 2-.+f 23.1# 26.8# *0.+# 2*.- 2*.0
2*.* 2,.2 *3.-e +0.6e +,.3d +1.2e
!il& fat 9$ *.-8d *.61e *.3+e *.6*e *.8, *.86*.3+ *.6- *.33d *.6*de +.00d *.8,e
!il& 'rotein 9$ *.1+d *.**e *.+2e *.*-e *.+0 *.+1*.+- *.** 2.3,d 2.68e 2.66e 2.6,e
(! dry )atterF (!I dry )atter inta&eF 4C! *.,9 fatcorrected )il&.aPolysaccaridase en/y)e 'roduct fro) 4inn4eeds Int. !arlborou# F activity units not #iven.bPolysaccaridase en/y)e 'roduct fro) 4inn4eeds Int. !arlborou# F te en/y)e 'roduct contained 1600 carboxy)etylcellulase units and 8*00xylanase units )l 1. Conditions of te en/y)e assays 7ere not #iven.c
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
328/474
Fi#. 6.-. Effects of addin# a fibrolytic en/y)e additive to alfalfa cubes fed to #ro7in# beef cattle Beauce)in et al. 133,$.
Conditions of te en/y)e assays 7ere not #iven.
Asteris&denotes treat)ent 7as different fro) control " O0.10$. (!I dry )atter inta&eF A(" avera#edaily #ain.
212 .A. Beauce)in and L. :oltsausen
finishin! catte fed hi!h!rain diets: ositive resuts have mainy)een re
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
329/474
rations* A' was increased )y - and feed conversion efficiency )y %&1a)e 8:+6: In these hi!h!rain diets* it is not cear whether the res
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
330/474
(evelo')ents in En/y)e sa#e in Ru)inants
21*
feed in the rumen is short* as is the case for animas fed ad libitu!: 1his eectis demonstrated in the study re
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
331/474
A(4 +,.3 +6.8 +3.,
(!I dry )atter inta&eF 4C! fatcorrected )il&F (! dry )atterF
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
332/474
?e ac"i+i"ie% reJ*ired i& feed e&5'e addi"i+e%
Commercia en?yme
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
333/474
cuture in 3itro
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
334/474
!ini)u) 0 0 0 0 0 *2.1
!axi)u) 1-1* 12330 2.31 6+.0 0.088 62.*
Mai1e silage!ean ++1 20+- 0.+* **.+ 0.00, 1+.*
!ini)u) 0 0 0 1.+8 0 2*.*
!axi)u) 1-1* 12330 1.38 6+.0 0.0-* -0.,
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
335/474
de!radation* for #yanase the ty
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
336/474
enhanced di!esti)iity* )ut res
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
337/474
on a 'M )asis6* N'" di!esti)iity in the tota tract increased )y +L whenadded to a hi!hfora!e diet 44:5 )arey sia!e* %:& afafa hayand ,-:5concentrate on a 'M )asis6* there was no eect on N'" di!esti)iity: >ac= of eect of the en?yme in the hi!herfora!e diet may have reFected the hi!her
concentration of )arey sia!e in the ration* as this
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
338/474
si!nificant eves of ce wahydroysin! en?ymes* and thus it can)e difficut to
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
339/474
resutin!
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
340/474
the dietary
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
341/474
hi!her
concentration
of
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
342/474
dairy cows in eary actation is the )est way to assess whether an en?yme
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
343/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
344/474
com
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
345/474
is then
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
346/474
Athou!h
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
347/474
Fi#. 6.2. Effects of addin# en/y)e durin# in 3itro incubation of a total )ixed ration onde#radability 9$ of neutral deter#ent fibre
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
348/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
349/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
350/474
#yanases:
In2
Bedford*
M::
and
artrid!e*
::
eds6
-n12!es
in
Far! Ani!alNutrition( CABI u)ishin!* Wain!ford* ./*
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
351/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
352/474
varia)iity and
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
353/474
/incaid* :>:* ari=i:
Pr
+&&-6
Anevauation of e#o!enous en?ymes with amyoytic activity for dairy cows: *our nal o5 air2
Science -+* %&5&J%&5-:/nowton* /:": and Her)ein* P:H: +&&+6 hositte*
:C:+&&8a6 1he
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
354/474
%---6 (ect of directfed fi)roytic en?ymes on the actationa iEuid*
on
mi=
:* ode* >:M:* Iwaasa* A:':* Yan!*W:: et al:
+&&&a6
0yner!y
)etween
rumina
fi)roytic
en?ymes
and
en?ymes
from
9richoder!alongibrachiatu!: *ournal o5 air2 Science 8,* %,%&J%,+%:Mor!avi* '::* New)od* C:P:* Beever* ':(: and Waace* :P: +&&&)6 0ta)iity andsta)ii?ation
of :B: +&&76 'iversity of
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
355/474
NC
+&&%6 Nutrient /eJuire!ent o5 air2 Cattle* 7th edn: Nationa ese
arch
Counci*Nationa Academy ress* Washin!ton* 'C:
Nsere=o*
:>:*
Mor!avi*
'::*
Beauchemin*
/:A:
and
ode*
>:M:
+&&&a6
Inhi)ition
of ruminant feed en?yme :*
Mor!avi*
'::*
ode*
>:M:*
Beauchemin*
/:A:
and
McAister*
1:A:
+&&&)6(ects
of
fun!a
en?yme
:* irado* >:A:* 1ric^rico* P:M: and Carro* M:': +&&86(ects of ane#o!enous fi)roytic en?yme
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
356/474
+&&,6
(ect
of
method
of
a: et al:
+&&%6 (ects of an e#o!enous en?yme
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
357/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
358/474
fue sources* such as )iodiese and ethano* has created mutiand
)arey
in
(uro
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
359/474
!round !rain then !oes throu!h a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
360/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
361/474
su)strates for )ioethano
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
362/474
more
concentrated
form:
As
a
Urue
of
thum)D*
many
fractions wi )econcentrated )y a factor of three versus the startin! !rain or !rain )end iGstraand Betranena* +&&-6:
>i=e other chemica constituents* the
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
363/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
364/474
com9$FA!E% si#nificant i)'rove)ents " O0.01$at 10 days 89$ and 21 days -9$F )ai/e
or7eat (("@ used at 109 level
Endo1+xylanaseF =endrell et al. 2003$
Body7ei#t #ain% si#nificant i)'rove)ents" O0.0,$ at ,- days in Zi# ener#y diets
,9$
and Zlo7 ener#y diets 129$F fe)ur brea&stren#t% si#nificant i)'rove)ents " O0.0,$ i
nbot dietsF )ai/e (("@ used at 109 level
Endo1+xylanaseF〈a)ylaseF subtilisin'rotease$F -'ytase
PYron et al(2003$
"igletsBody7ei#t #ain% i)'rove)ents " O0.06$ in )ai/e
(("@F #ain%feed ratio% i)'rove)ents" O0.06$ in bot )ai/e and sor#u) (("@Fdry )atter di#estibility% si#nificant i)'rove)en
ts" O0.0,$ in bot )ai/e and sor#u) (("@F
)ai/e or sor#u) (("@ used at *09 level
Endo1+xylanaseF〈a)ylaseF subtilisin'rotease$F endo1*+$#lucanase
-'ytase re?
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
365/474
4eoli 2006$0ro.er8Gnisher +igsBody7ei#t #ain% no si#nificant i)'rove)entsF dry
)atter nitro#en and #ross ener#y di#estibility%si#nificant " O0.01$ i)'rove)ents in bot )ai
/eand sor#u) (("@F )ai/e or sor#u) (("@used at +09 level
Endo1+xylanaseF〈a)ylaseF subtilisin'rotease$F endo1*+$#lucanase
4eoli 2006$
Body7ei#t #ain and #ain%feed ratio% no si#nificant
i)'rove)entsF ileal and faecal di#estibility% nosi#nificant i)'rove)entsF 7eat (("@ at 2,
9or +09 level
Endo1+xylanase idyaratne et al. 2003$
Ileal 'rotein and a)ino acid di#estibility% si#nificant
" O0.0,$ i)'rove)ents +69$F faecal #rossener#y di#estibility% si#nificant " O0.0,$i)'rove)ents -9$F )ai/e (("@ used at 20
9level
Endo1+xylanaseF Plu)stead2003$
Body7ei#t #ain and #ain%feed% no si#nificanti)'rove)ents in four ex'eri)ents 7it fourdifferent co))ercial en/y)e 'roductsFex'eri)ents 1 and 2% )ai/e (("@ used at 1
,9levelF ex'eri)ent *% )ai/e (("@ used at +,
and-09 levelsF ex'eri)ent +% )ai/e (("@ used
at*09 level
1. !annanase2. "lucanase
cellulase and'rotease
*. Pro'rietary blendsno activity details$
+. Bacterial endo1+xylanase
;acela et al.2003$
Body7ei#t #ain and #ain%feed ratio% si#nificant" O0.0,$ i)'rove)ents by 6109 and 1+
1-9res'ectivelyF faecal dry )atter nitro#en andener#y di#estibility% so)e si#nificant " O0.0,$effects at + 7ee&s into te trial none at 6 7e
e&sF)ai/e (("@ used at -9 level
1. !annanase2. 1+!annanaseF〈1-#alactosidaseF 1+)annosidase
an# et al.2003$
A!E a''arent )etaboli/able ener#yF (("@ distillers dried #rains 7it solubles.
En/y)e A''lications and te Ani)al 4eed Industry
2*8
1he )enefits from the addition of e#o!enous en?ymes iustrate
d in 1a)e-:+ a
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
366/474
focus shoud therefore )e on further studies in )oth
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
367/474
4u)onisins 4u)onisins B1 B2 B* Fusariu! 3erticilloides) Fusariu! +roli5eratu!
2*6 A. PYron and ".". Partrid#e
aFato#ins and Fusariu! to#ins: 1he other !rou< contains fun!i th
at
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
368/474
order to transform mycoto#ins into ess to#ic com
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
369/474
Fusariu! mycoto#ins was investi!ated )y Chen et al: +&&6: 1he studyreveaed that the mycoto#in deactivator M'(
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
370/474
De0h"i&i5a"io& of feed%"*9%
emova of
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
371/474
su!!estin! that non
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
372/474
hi!htem
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
373/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
374/474
a)ove6:
However*
the
iterature
contains
some
more
unusua en?ymea
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
375/474
En/y)e A''lications and te Ani)al 4eed Industry
2+*
0imiary*
en?ymatic
treatment
of
feathers
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
376/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
377/474
case* scientists did not transfer a microor!anism that was
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
378/474
57* %%4J%%-:Caine*
W::*
erte!en*
M:W:A:*
0auer*
W:C:*
1ammin!a*
0:
and
0chu?e*
H:
%--86
(ect
of :
+&&56
(vauation
of
the
efficacy
of
four
feed
additivesa!ainst
the
adverse
eects
of
1+
to#in
in
!rowin!
)roier
chic=ens: *ourn
al
o5
A++lied
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
379/474
"oultr2 /esearch %4* ++J+,%:('C +&&-6 Fer!entation -thanol HIndustrial and Fuel: (n?yme 'eveo
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
380/474
Agricultural and Food Che!istr2 ,* %%8%J%%8,:He* :* Youn!* >:: and "ors)er!* C: %--+6 Micro)ia transformation of deo#ynivaeno
vomito#in6: A++lied -n3iron!ental Microbiolog2 58* ,857J,8,:Heider*
':
and
0chat?mayr*
:
+&&,6
A
new
a: P:*
owan*
1::*
reston*
M::
and
1urte*
>::
%--56
(ect
of
tota
intact!ucosinoate
inta=e
from
ra
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
381/474
+%%J+%8:Neson*
1:0:*
0hieh*
1::*
Wod?ins=i*
:P:
and
Ware*
P:H:
%-86
1he
avaia)iity
of
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
382/474
ron*
A:
and
umstead*
:
+&&-6
Com)ination
of
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
383/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
384/474
iGstra*
:1:
and
Betranena*
(:
+&&-6
aria)iity
of
Euaity
in
)iofue
co
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
385/474
Uhy!ienicD feed for ivestoc=: In res
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
386/474
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
387/474
4&& mm in diameter )y + m on!* havin! on avera!e 48
8/18/2019 Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition 2010[1]
388/474
across the die: 1his tem