113
Environmental Research of the Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety - Water Economy - Research Report 200 24 233 Environmentally compatible cooling water treatment chemicals by Dipl. Geogr./Hyd. Stefan Gartiser Dipl. Hyd. Elke Urich Hydrotox GmbH, Freiburg On behalf of the Federal Environmental Agency Berlin, April 2002

Environmentally Compatible Cooling Water Treatment Chemicals 05-11-02

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Cooling water treatment chemical

Citation preview

  • Environmental Research of theFederal Ministry of the Environment,

    Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety- Water Economy -

    Research Report 200 24 233

    Environmentally compatible cooling watertreatment chemicals

    byDipl. Geogr./Hyd. Stefan Gartiser

    Dipl. Hyd. Elke Urich

    Hydrotox GmbH, Freiburg

    On behalf of theFederal Environmental Agency

    Berlin, April 2002

  • IReport Cover Sheet1. Report No.

    UBA-FB 200 24 2332.

    Water economy3.

    4. Report Title

    Environmentally compatible cooling water treatment chemicals5. Autor(s) (Family Name(s), First Name(s))

    Gartiser, Stefan; Urich, Elke6. Report Date

    7. Publication Date

    8. Performing Organisation(s) (Name, Address)

    Hydrotox GmbH9. UFOPLAN-No.

    200 24 233Boetzinger Str. 29D-79111 Freiburg

    10. No. of Pages

    106 + 91 (annex)11. No. of References

    103 + 71 (annex)12. Sponsoring Agency (Name, Address)

    German Federal Environmental Agency13. No. of Tables

    20Postfach 33 00 22, D-14191 Berlin (Germany) 14. No. of Figures

    1115. Supplementary Notes

    This project was commissioned in the form of a grant on the basis of costs as partialfinancing to the recipients (Grant Decision Z 1.6-25106/182 of 31.01.00)In Germany about 32 billion m3/a cooling water are discharged from industrial plants andthe power industry. These are conditioned in part with biocides, scaling and corrosioninhibitors. Within the research project the significance of cooling water chemicals wasevaluated, identifying the chemicals from product information, calculating their loads fromconsumption data of more than 180 cooling plants and investigating the basic characteristicdata needed for an environmental hazard assessment. Additionally, the effects of coolingwater samples and products were determined in biological test systems. Batch tests (shocktreatments) were performed under defined conditions in order to measure the inactivationof cooling water biocides.Generally the cooling water samples only showed low ecotoxicity, upon considering theinactivation of the biocides with time. With systematic backtracking, the genotoxicity of thecooling water from one company in the umu test could be attributed to one biocide withisothiazolinones and Bronopol as ingredients. Measurement of the inactivation of biocides,with the luminescent bacteria toxicity test, revealed a strong correlation with the inoculumconcentration and enabled a better estimation of the importance of the elimination factorsdegradation and adsorption. An overall balance sheet of chemical loads confirmed that theprincipal amounts came from open recirculation cooling systems, whereas only

  • II

    Contents

    0 Summary .............................................................................................. 1

    1 Introduction.......................................................................................... 5

    2 Current knowledge .............................................................................. 6

    2.1 Fundamentals ........................................................................................ 6

    2.2 Cooling water flow ................................................................................. 7

    2.3 Minimum requirements for cooling water discharges in Germany ......... 9

    2.4 General environmental hazards from cooling systems ........................ 10

    2.5 Cooling water conditioning................................................................... 12

    2.5.1 Dispersants and hardness stabilizers .................................................. 122.5.2 Scale inhibitors .................................................................................... 132.5.3 Biocides ............................................................................................... 14

    3 Goals and investigative strategy ...................................................... 18

    4 Methods .............................................................................................. 20

    4.1 Laboratory investigations ..................................................................... 20

    4.1.1 Cooling water samples ........................................................................ 204.1.2 Product investigations.......................................................................... 244.1.3 Chemical parameters........................................................................... 244.1.4 Fluorescent bacteria test according to DIN 38412-34 and

    Nr. 404 of the AbwV............................................................................. 244.1.5 Alga test according to DIN 38412-33 and Nr. 403 of the AbwV ........... 254.1.6 Daphnia test according to DIN 38412-30 and Nr. 402 of the AbwV ..... 254.1.7 Ames test in conformance with DIN 38415-4 ...................................... 254.1.8 umu test according to DIN 38415-3 and Nr. 410 of the AbwV ............. 264.1.9 Elimination of biocides ......................................................................... 27

    4.2 Drawing up an overall balance sheet................................................... 28

    4.2.1 Compilation of production information materials .................................. 28

  • III

    4.2.2 Making a balance sheet of the emissions of cooling waterchemicals............................................................................................. 29

    4.3 Literature and database-research........................................................ 33

    5 Results................................................................................................ 36

    5.1 Cooling water investigations ................................................................ 36

    5.2 Product investigations.......................................................................... 38

    5.2.1 Eco- and Genotoxicity.......................................................................... 385.2.2 Identifying the source of the genotoxicity in plant 6 ............................. 385.2.3 Decrease of the biocidal effect in the fluorescent bacteria test ........... 41

    5.3 Evaluation of the product information sheets....................................... 52

    5.4 Evaluation of the questionnnaires........................................................ 53

    5.4.1 Open recirculation cooling systems ..................................................... 545.4.2 Once-through cooling systems ............................................................ 565.4.3 Closed circulation cooling systems ...................................................... 585.4.4 Estimation of the total loads for Germany............................................ 585.4.5 Overview and comparison ................................................................... 64

    5.5 Elimination of chemicals in cooling systems and sewage plants ......... 70

    5.6 Regulatory control of cooling water discharges ................................... 70

    5.7 Literature and database research ........................................................ 71

    6 Evaluation........................................................................................... 74

    6.1 Composition of cooling water............................................................... 74

    6.2 Emission route for cooling water chemicals ......................................... 75

    6.3 Elimination behavior of cooling water biocides .................................... 75

    6.4 Choice of active substances ................................................................ 77

    6.4.1 Biocides ............................................................................................... 776.4.2 Cooling water conditioners................................................................... 82

  • IV

    7 Recommendations............................................................................. 89

    7.1 Energy conservation measures ........................................................... 89

    7.2 Technical solutions .............................................................................. 89

    7.3 Process operation................................................................................ 91

    7.4 Evaluation and selection of cooling water chemicals ........................... 93

    7.4.1 Water risk classes, the VCI-concept for open cooling systems ........... 937.4.2 "Benchmarking"-concept ..................................................................... 947.4.3 Plant specific evaluation of cooling water chemicals ........................... 957.4.4 TEGEWA-concept for indirect dischargers .......................................... 967.4.5 Outlook ................................................................................................ 96

    8 Sources............................................................................................... 98

    9 Ackknowledgements ....................................................................... 105

    List of TablesTable 1: Cooling water discharge in river basins (1995) [Mio. m3] .............................. 7Table 2: River flow volume balance for Germany in 1992 .......................................... 7Table 3: Ratio of used/discharged cooling water (1995) ............................................. 9Table 4: Charateristic data for the investigated systems .......................................... 23Table 5: Determination of the elimination of cooling water biocides ......................... 28Table 6: Summary of the wastewater investigations ................................................. 37Table 7: Results of the product investigations .......................................................... 39Table 8: Source of the genotoxicity in the cooling water from plant 6 ....................... 40Table 9: Dosing of biocides in the circulation cooling ............................................... 42Table 10: Experimental overview of the elimination curves of cooling

    water biocides ........................................................................................... 43Table 11: Elimination of BCDMH depending on the inoculum .................................. 50Table 12: Characteristic data for the cooling systems investigated .......................... 53Table 13: Total amounts of the investigated chemicals in open circulation

    cooling ...................................................................................................... 55Table 14: Consumption data in plants with flow-through cooling .............................. 57Table 15: Cooling water use for thermal power plants (1995 ) ................................. 60

  • VTable 16: Concentrations of continuously added conditioners (concentrationin the circulation water in mg/l) ................................................................. 61

    Table 17: Chemical usage in open circulation cooling systems in Germany ............ 63Table 18: Total load of cooling water chemicals in the once-through cooling

    of the foodstuffs industry........................................................................... 64Table 19: Comparison of the estimated consumption data for certain biocides

    with data from other countries (data in kg/a on a substance basis) .......... 69Table 20: Summarized evaluation of the eotoxicity and degradability of cooling

    water chemicals ........................................................................................ 73

    List of FiguresFigure 1: Investigative strategy ................................................................................. 19Figure 2: Decrease of the fluorescent bacteria inhibition with isothiazolinone .......... 44Figure 3: Decrease of the fluorescent bacteria inhibition with QAV .......................... 45Figure 4: Decrease of the fluorescent bacteria inhibition with DBNPA (10 mg/l) ...... 46Figure 5: Decrease of the fluorescent bacteria inhibition with DBNPA (48 mg/l) ...... 46Figure 6: Fluorescent bacteria inhibition with glutardialdehyde (30-160 mg/l) .......... 48Figure 7: Fluorescent bacteria inhibition with glutardialdehyde (30-1000 mg d.s./l) . 48Figure 8: Decrease of the fluorescent bacteria inhibition with Bronopol ................... 49Figure 9: Decrease of the fluorescent bacteria inhibition with BCDMH (4 mg/l) ....... 51Figure 10: Decrease of the fluorescent bacteria inhibition with BCDMH (37 mg/l) ... 51Figure 11: Proportion of biocidal active ingredients in 101 products ......................... 52

  • VI

    Abbreviations

    AbwV Wastewater OrdinanceAMPA Aminomethylenephosphonic acidAOX Adsorbable organic halogens (X = Cl, Br, I)ATMP Aminotrimethylenephosphonic acidATV Abwassertechnische Vereinigung e. V.BAT Best available techniquesBCDMH 1-Bromo-3-chloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoinBgVV Bundesinstitut fr gesundheitlichen Verbraucherschutz

    und VeterinrmedizinBIG Brandweerinformatiecentrum Gevaarlijke StoffenBUA Beratergremium fr umweltrelevante SchadstoffeCAS Chemical AbstractsCHEMIS Chemical information system of the BgVVCOD Chemical oxygen demandDBNPA DibromonitrilopropionamideDTPMP Dieethylenetriaminepentamethylenephosphonic acidDOSE Dictionary of Substances and Their EffectsECDIN Environmental Chemicals Data and Information NetworkEnviChem Data Bank of Environmental Properties of ChemicalsEC50 50% effect concentrationEDTA EthylenediaminetetraacetateEDTMP Ethylenediaminetetramethylenephosphonic acidEQS Environmental Quality StandardEC European CommunityGESTIS Gefahrstoffinformationssystem der gewerblichen

    BerufsgenossenschaftenGSBL Gemeinsame Stoffdatenbank Bund/LnderGA Lowest ineffective dilution, alga test = lowest dilution

    factor at which inhibition of algal biomass growth is below20%.

    GEA Lowest ineffective dilution, Ames test = lowest dilutionfactor at which an induction difference as compared withnegative controls of

  • VII

    GL Lowest ineffective dilution, luminescent bacteria test =lowest dilution factor at which inhibition of luminescenceis below 20%

    GD Lowest ineffective dilution, Daphnia test = lowest dilutionfactor at which 90% of Daphnia retain their mobility

    HSDB Hazardous Substances Data BankHEDP Hydroxyethanediphosphonic acid

    IR Induction rate in the Ames and umu tests

    IUCLID International Uniform Chemical Information DatabaseIUPAC International Union of Pure and Applied ChemistryIPPC directive EC-directive Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control

    KBwS Kommission zur Bewertung wassergefhrdender StoffeLAGA Lnderarbeitsgemeinschaft WasserLC50 50% lethal concentrationMW Molecular weightMQ Mean water flowNTA NitrilotriacetateOECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and

    DevelopmentOSPAR Oslo/Paris Convention for the protection of the marine

    environment of the Northeast AtlanticPBTC Phosphonobutanetricarbonic acidPEC Predicted environmental concentrationsPNEC Predicted no effect concentrationQAV Quarternary ammonium compoundsRTECS Register of Toxic Effects of Chemical SubstancesSCAS-Test Semi-continuous activated sludge testTEGEWA Verband der Textilhilfsmittel-, Lederhilfsmittel,- Gerbstoff-

    und Waschrohstoff-Industrie e.V.VCI Verband der Chemischen IndustrieVGB Technische Vereinigung der Grokraftwerksbetreiber e.V.WF Growth factor in the umu testWGK WassergefhrdungsklasseVwVwS Verwaltungsvorschrift wassergefhrdender Stoffe

  • 10 Summary

    In power plants and industrial processes non-recoverable heat released during the

    use and conversion of energy is removed from the industrial processes by cooling

    systems. Water is the most important coolant medium used. In Germany about 27

    billion. m3 cooling water (109 m3) are discharged per year from power plants mainly

    via once-through cooling systems. To this, about 5 billion m3 from industrial plants

    must be added, of which about 376 million m3 comes from plants with open

    recirculation cooling systems. The water consumption of open recirculation systems

    amounts to only 2-5% of that of open cooling systems at equal cooling capacities.

    Nevertheless, the water added to the system to compensate the loss of water due to

    evaporation or blow down ("make-up water") regularly has to be conditioned with

    biocides, scale inhibitors, dispersants and/or corrosion inhibitors, in order to prevent

    disturbances of processes by depositions (scaling), corrosion or bio-mass growth

    (fouling).

    Within the research project the input of cooling water chemicals was evaluated,

    identifying the chemicals from product information, calculating their loads from

    consumption data of more than 180 cooling plants and investigating the basic

    characteristic data needed for an environmental hazard assessment. Additionally, 12

    water samples from 7 companies and 11 products have been evaluated in biological

    test systems. The elimination of eight cooling water biocides has been determined,

    using the luminescent bacteria assay and batch tests with defined inoculum

    concentrations (30-1000 mg d.s./l).

    Generally, the cooling water samples showed only low ecotoxicity in the algae,

    Daphnia and luminescent bacteria assays if the elimination time of the biocides is

    considered. With systematic backtracking, the genotoxicity of the cooling water from

    one company in the umu-assay could be attributed to one biocide with

    isothiazolinones and Bronopol as ingredients. No effects of the water samples have

    been detected with the Ames test, although several products proved to be mutagenic

    in the Ames test. The elimination of biocides in batch tests, as measured with the

    luminescent bacteria toxicity test, showed that isothiazolinones and quarternary

    ammonium compounds were better removed with higher inoculum concentration due

  • 2to their adsorption to activated sludge. In contrast, the elimination velocity for 2,2-

    dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide (DBNPA) increased with increasing pH. For the

    oxidative biocide bromochlorodimethylhydantoin (BCDMH) only a weak dependence

    on inoculum concentration was observed, while Bronopol showed a distinct toxicity at

    low inoculum concentrations even after 8 days. Therefore, the test conditions for the

    determination of elimination curves, which determine the period the circuit must be

    closed after a shock treatment with non-oxidizing biocides according to Annex 31 of

    the German Waste Water Ordinance, must be clearly defined. Inactivation curves

    performed applying the test conditions of the VCI-working group "Biocides in cooling

    systems" with high inoculum density (activated sludge with 500 mg d.s./l) favor

    elimination by adsorption, and the test design corresponds to an inherent bio-

    degradation test. Comparable biomass concentrations normally were not found in

    cooling systems. If additional information is required, especially for directly

    discharged cooling water, results about ready bio-degradation and/or elimination

    curves at lower inoculum concentrations (i.e., 30 mg d.s./l corresponding to the test

    conditions of the OECD 301 "Ready bio-degradability" tests) should be demanded.

    The overall accounting of chemical loads in a balance sheet confirmed that the

    principal amounts came from open recirculation cooling systems, whereas only

  • 3power plant using salt water as coolant, as well as plants of the chemical and

    foodstuff industries. Of course, for foodstuffs hygiene requirements (product safety)

    are more important than the prevention of biofouling in the cooling system.

    According to the operators statements, the recirculation water of closed cooling

    systems is often discharged indirectly via municipal treatment plants and only in

    isolated cases directly into the recipient water. No luminescent bacteria test results

    were available for two thirds of the cooling systems, although 40% of them directly

    discharged the cooling water. Only in some cases did operators indicate that

    elimination curves of the biocides used have been submitted. As a rule, only the

    period of time for which the circuit must be closed after a treatment with biocides is

    documented as specified by the producers of conditioning chemicals. Concrete

    examples have also been presented in which the usage of chemicals has been

    reduced up to 90% by simple technical or organizational measures (cleaning,

    shading of cooling towers from the sun).

    Basic substance data sheets were documented for all chemicals applied, based on

    extensive literature and data bank/database researches, enabling first assessments

    of environmental relevance using several approaches of hazard assessment.

    For some chemicals (e.g., butylbenzotriazole, chlorotolyltriazole, tetraalkylphos-

    phonium chloride) considerable data gaps exist. With reference to the BREF-

    document of the EU-Commission about "the application of best available techniques

    to industrial cooling systems", different approaches regarding the selection and

    optimizing of cooling water chemicals are described. There is a clear confirmation

    that this issue cannot be examined separately from the complex thermodynamic

    processes, the water quantity available and the site specific characteristics. A

    combination of emission- and water-quality-based criteria is recommended to assess

    cooling water chemicals. The advantage of emission-based approaches based on

    the classification system of harmful water pollutants according to the European R-

    phrases of the dangerous substances directive is that, along with the aquatic

    ecotoxicity, other protection areas such as health aspects or soil conservation are

    considered. Additionally, insufficient databases were considered for the assessment,

    following the precautionary principle. However, in order to draw attention to the loads

    emitted, both the consumption amount as well as the elimination in cooling systems

  • 4and (for indirectly discharged water) municipal treatment plants should be

    emphasized, as described in the TEGEWA-concept for indirect discharges. The

    advantage of water-quality based approaches such as the "benchmarking"-concept

    based on the predicted environmental and effect concentrations is that the intrinsic

    properties of chemicals such as bio-degradability and ecotoxicity are combined and

    the site specific characteristics are considered. Nevertheless, this approach focuses

    on the environmental quality standards for surface water derived from chemical risk

    assessment, and the rule of load minimizing seems to be less important when the

    water flow capacity of the recipient water is considered to be sufficient. The

    determination of toxicity loads (=effect concentration multiplied by load) is a possible

    further development of the "benchmarking"-concept. Prequisites for the assessment

    of conditioning cooling chemicals are that chemicals can be identified unambiguously

    in product descriptions and that data gaps will be closed.

  • 51 Introduction

    In power plants and industrial processes non-recoverable heat released during the

    use and conversion of energy is removed from the processes by cooling systems.

    Due to its high heat capacity water is the most important coolant medium used. Apart

    from surface water from rivers and lakes also sea, ground or drinking water is used

    for cooling purposes.

    Along with the organic and inorganic constituent compounds of this water, non-

    negligible amounts of air pollutants, which might cause scaling, growth of

    microorganisms and corrosion, are also washed out by cooling water due to the high

    air turnover of cooling towers. Hence, the cooling water often is conditioned with

    dispersants, corrosion inhibitors and biocides. As wastewater treatment of cooling

    water is usually not applied, these chemicals are discharged with the blow down

    into the sewer or (from directly discharging plants) into the receiving water.

    Within the project a systematic evaluation of the input of cooling water chemicals into

    German surface water was carried out. To accomplish this, the chemicals used were

    identified from product information, their loads were calculated from consumption

    data of more than 180 cooling plants, and the basic characteritic data needed for an

    environmental hazard assessment were compiled. Additionally, the effects of cooling

    water samples and products were determined in biological test systems. Batch tests

    were performed under defined conditions in order to measure the elimination of

    cooling water biocides.

  • 62 Current knowledge

    2.1 Fundamentals

    Cooling systems can be distinguished as once-through systems, as well as open and

    closed recirculation systems, and their combinations (Held and Schnell 2000,

    Anonymous 2001c). In once-through cooling systems cooling water is used without

    recirculation, i.e., the warmed water is directly discharged into the receiving water.

    Often once-through cooling is applied in combination with a cooling tower, where the

    cooling water is trickled in order to remove part of the heat via evaporation cooling.

    Once-through cooling systems demand a large water supply. For instance, power

    stations with a difference between in- and outlet temperature of 10C consume, as a

    rule, about 3.5 m3 cooling water per 100 MW installed electric capacity (Fichte et al.

    2000).

    Open recirculating cooling systems are wet cooling circuits open to the air, where the

    water used for cooling purposes is cooled down by evaporation. As a first

    approximation one can assume that in open recirculating systems 70% of the heat

    amount is removed by evaporation. The evaporation loss depends on the cooling

    capacity and the climatic conditions. As a rule of thumb it can be assumed that, per

    10C temperature elevation, 1.1% to 1.6% of the circulating water flow evaporates in

    Central Europe (Fichte et al. 2000, Sommer 1988). Additionally, droplet losses of

    about 0.1% of the circulating water flow are emitted. Hereby, cooling water

    ingredients are usually concentrated by a factor of 2-4. The concentration factor is

    adjusted via the blow down (draining of cooling water to the recipient water body or

    municipal treatment plant). The evaporation losses and the blow down are

    compensated by the make-up water. The fresh water supply of open recirculating

    systems amounts to only 2-5% of that from once-through cooling systems at equal

    cooling capacity.

    Besides the above mentioned, there are also closed circuit cooling systems (dry air-

    cooling), which are operated without wastewater emissions and are usually applied

    at high process temperature levels above 50C. Hybrid cooling systems combine the

    wet and dry cooling principles.

  • 72.2 Cooling water flow

    The discharge of cooling water into surface water has substantial significance for

    water economy. The water resource balance shows that about 40% of the

    precipitation drained off in Germany is used for cooling purposes, whereas significant

    differences in the river basins can be observed because of to regional industrial main

    areas and the varying water flow of the principal water recipients. For example, the

    proportion of cooling water from the total flow of the Elbe and Rhine Rivers is above

    60%, while the proportion from the Danube River amounts only to about 10% (Table

    1; Table 2).

    Table 1: Cooling water discharge in river basins (1995) [Mio. m3]

    Table 2: River flow volume balance for Germany in 1992

    The power plants for public supply, with 84% of all cooling water discharges, are the

    most important dischargers. Only 219 million m3 cooling water from mostly small

    companies were indirectly discharged via municipal sewage treatment plants, so the

    cooling water proportion of municipal wastewater amounts to only 2-3 % of the total

    by volume. Thus, nearly all the volume of cooling water (>99%) is discharged directly

    River basin Donau Rhein Maas Ems Weser Elbe

    coast and sea Oder sum

    Cooling water discharges of mining and industry 536,7 3.621,7 17,1 34,8 175,9 597,4 16,7 45,5 5.045,9

    direct dischargers 500,5 3.527,7 15,1 33,0 156,4 532,8 15,6 45,4 4.826,4indirect dischargers 36,3 93,9 2,0 1,8 19,6 64,6 1,2 0,1 219,4

    Cooling water discharges from power industry for public supply 1.974,6 12.603,0 n.a. 62,1 4.647,8 7.178,9 880,3 1,0 27.347,7Source: Statistisches Bundesamt Fachserie 19, Reihe 2.2, 1998Maas=sum of cooling water of the Rur, Schwalm and Niers Rivers

    River basin Donau Rhein Maas Ems Weser Elbe

    coast and sea Oder sum

    Average runoff into BRD [m3/s] 579 1225 253 n. a 2057Average runoff from BRD [m3/s] 1346 2043 32 111 347 610 201 11 4701Runoff from area of BRD [m3/s] 767 818 32 111 347 357 201 11 2644Cooling water effluents in total [m3/s] 80 514 1 3 153 247 28 1 1027Proportion of cooling water from MQ with runoff into BRD 6% 25% 40% 14% n. a 22%Proportion of cooling water from MQ from area of BRD 10% 63% 2% 3% 44% 69% 14% 13% 39%Source: Statistisches Bundesamt Fachserie 19, Umweltkonomische Gesamtrechnungen, August 1994

    Statistisches Bundesamt Fachserie 19, Reihe 2.2, 1998, changed to m3/sMQ = Average runoff in 1992 of the respective draining areas of rivers; BRD=Federal Republic of Germany

  • 8into the receiving water course. Conequently the chemicals used for cooling water

    conditioning immediately enter the receiving water, so that a particular risk potential

    might arise, unless the chemicals are inactivated in the cooling system itself.

    Considering the different industrial sectors of cooling water dischargers (cf., table 3)

    it is evident that, next to the power plants for public supply, in particular the chemical,

    mining and metal industries are the principal dischargers of cooling water. From the

    proportion of "used" and "discharged" cooling water a "utilization factor" can be

    calculated. This factor gives an indication of the importance of open recirculating

    cooling systems in the respective industrial sector. (The data on cooling water

    utilization also contain the recirculated volume and multiple-shift uses for different

    purposes.)

  • 9Table 3: Ratio of used/discharged cooling water (1995)

    2.3 Minimum requirements for cooling water discharges in Germany

    In Germany the discharge of cooling water is regulated in Annex 31 of the

    Framework regulation for wastewater. Here inter alia the following requirements are

    given:

    With the exception of phosphonates and polycarboxylates exclusively complexing

    agents which are readily bio-degradable may be used,

    The wastewater must not contain chromium, mercury or organometallic

    compounds,

    The concentrations for chlorine, AOX, COD, phosphorus and zinc are limited,

    Water used for cooling purposes

    Water used for cooling

    Discharged cooling water

    without treatmentUtilisation factor *)

    *1000 m3 *1000 m3

    Power plants for public supply 61.759.994 27.347.665 2,3

    Mining industry 5.616.335 812.998 6,9Foodstuff and tobacco industries 905.610 161.889 5,6Textile industry 176.554 145.123 1,2Leather industry 4.170 317 13,2Wood manufacturing 41.723 11.609 3,6Paper and printing industry 683.511 390.528 1,8Coking plant and petroleum processing 2.415.387 127.419 19,0Chemical industry 11.333.036 2.488.627 4,6Rubber ware production 640.606 65.111 9,8

    Glass, ceramics and stone commerce 382.479 28.497 13,4Metal products and manufacturing 5.091.455 616.186 8,3Engine construction 236.904 26.284 9,0Production of office machines, electrical engineering 393.444 59.964 6,6Vehicle construction 1.143.730 108.069 10,6

    Production of furniture etc., recycling 50.581 3.261 15,5Sum of industrial cooling systems 29.115.525 5.045.882 5,8

    Grand total of all cooling systems 90.875.519 32.393.547 2,8Reference: Statistisches Bundesamt Fachserie 19, Reihe 2.2, 1998*) The Utilisation factor here refers to the discharged cooling water and not to the make-up water!

  • 10

    For fresh water cooling systems a shock treatment with microbicidal substances

    is limited to oxidative biocides (chlorine, chlorine dioxide, hydrogen peroxide,

    ozone).

    After a shock treatment with a biocidal substance the blow down of recirculating

    cooling systems is only allowed if the luminescent bacteria toxicity does not

    exceed GL =12 (GL= Lowest ineffective dilution factor, LID).

    Annex 31 currently is being revised and will be in force in 2002 (Anonymous 2001). A

    background paper (draft of the Bund/Lnder GK 21/41 from 17.12.2001) will also be

    published in 2002.

    In the course of the implementation of the EC-directive 96/61/EC concerning

    Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC-directive) an extensive "Reference

    Document on the Application of Best Available Techniques to Industrial Cooling

    Systems" was elaborated, which is available in the internet (http://eippcb.jrc.es). The

    aim of the IPPC-directive is to optimize the operation of industrial plants, so that

    while considering energy efficiency and waste avoidance no substantial pollution of

    the environment will be generated. Hereby measures for the improvement of one

    environmental compartment (e.g., water) shall not lead to additional stress of another

    compartment (e.g., air). The reference document offers a comprehensive

    documentation for the selection of cooling systems, technical descriptions and

    potential environmental effects. It is clear that the cooling system cannot be

    considered separately from the industrial process and location. By optimizing the

    overall process substantial amounts of energy can often be saved. In addition, the

    excess energy should be used insofar as possible, for example for hydrothermal

    heating projects. Although in the reference document approaches for evaluating the

    chemical additives in cooling systems are described (cf., sect. 7.4), until now there

    has been no systematic presentation of the basic data required for this, both on the

    input side (consumption data), as well as on the material, chemical side

    (degradability, ecotoxicity, genotoxicity, bioaccumulation).

    2.4 General environmental hazards from cooling systems

    In the operation of cooling systems a complex field of tensions between various

    usage interests and environmental conflicts arises. The water consumption is highest

  • 11

    for once-through cooling systems and for larger power plants this can exceed several

    m3/s. Depending on the mesh width of the inflow rates to the cooling system and the

    flow rate, substantial numbers of fish, especially young ones, can be sucked in and

    killed (up to 25 fish per 1000 m3; Anonymous 2000). The temperature increase in the

    surface water leads to a reduction of the oxygen solubility in the water together with

    an increase in the metabolic activity. Since this can lead to a shift in the species

    spectrum in the waters (LAWA 1991), heat load plans have been prepared for the

    waters. The EU-Guideline 78/659/EWG specifies for Salmonid and Cyprinid waters,

    among other things, the maximal permissible temperature elevations (1.5C and 3C)

    and maximal temperatures (21.5C and 28C, and, during the spawning period of

    cold-water fish, for certain waters 10C; 78/659/EWG 1978).

    For cooling towers a large part of the heat burden is released as latent heat

    (evaporation) and causes an increase of the air temperature, which can lead to

    changes in the local microclimate (VDI 3784: 1986). For large power plants natural-

    draft wet cooling towers are used, for which the construction height provides

    sufficient force to drive the air current. For ventilator cooling towers the necessary

    amounts of air are, in contrast, introduced by forced air blowers, for which electrical

    energy must be provided (corresponding to 0.5-2% of the amount of emitted heat

    energy, Anonymous 2000). For open recirculation cooling systems the water

    consumption is usually reduced by ca. 95%-98% compared to once-through cooling

    systems at equal cooling capacity. At the same time, however, the electrical energy

    needed for the pumps is increased by ca. 50% thus amounting to ca. 1.5% of the

    amount of emitted heat energy. The evaporation losses can be taken to be ca. 0.4-

    0.7 l/s per 1000 MW of output electricity (Wunderlich 1978b). This leads to an

    increase in the concentration of the constituent compounds in the water, so that

    often a purification of the water and/or a conditioning of the cooling water is

    necessary, which then requires the addition of chemicals to the receiving waters.

    The most urgent goal of the plant management of cooling systems, however, is their

    efficiency and protecting the system against depositions (scaling), corrosion and

    biomass growth (fouling). The formation of depositions on the cool water side of a

    heat exchanger or pipeline interferes with heat transfer and increases the loss of

    pressure, so that the performance is substantially reduced. Ultimately, this leads to a

  • 12

    higher water consumption and must be compensated by an increased application of

    energy. Thus, a calcium deposit 0.5 mm in thickness reduces heat transfer in

    condensers by ca. 20% (Todutza and Steinlein 1990). Corrosion processes not only

    damage the system, but also increase the risk of leaks on the production side. In

    addition, the corrosion products endanger the waters.

    A control of the biomass growth is performed with the additional goal of minimizing

    the microbiological risks arising from the cooling plant. It is known, for example, that

    thermophilic human pathogens, especially Legionella pneumophilia, which causes a

    severe pneumonia (Legionnaires disease), can be found in cooling systems (States

    et al. 1987, Kusnetsov et al. 1997, Werner and Pietsch 1991, Howland and Pope

    1983, Kusnetsov et al. 1993). Guidelines for controlling Legionella in cooling systems

    are available (Anonymous 2001a).

    2.5 Cooling water conditioning

    For the prevention of scaling in recirculation cooling systems, dispersants and

    hardness stabilizers are added. In addition, corrosion inhibitors and biocides are

    used, whereby there are overlaps between the individual groups (e.g., phosphates

    act both as hardness stabilizers and corrosion inhibitors).

    2.5.1 Dispersants and hardness stabilizers

    The precipitation of salts due to their exceeding their solubility limits is termed

    scaling. Of particular interest in cooling systems is the precipitation of calcium

    carbonate and calcium phosphate, and to a limited extent also calcium sulfate and

    silicates. The hardness of the water can also be reduced by active decalcification

    (precipitation with calcium hydroxide). The residual hardness is either removed by

    conversion of the carbonate hardness into non-carbonate with acids (primarily

    hydrochloric and sulfuric acid) or stabilized through the addition of hardness

    stabilizers such as orthophosphate, polyphosphates and phosphonic acids. The

    ready hydrolysis of polyphosphates to orthophosphate and the associated danger of

    calcium phosphate deposition led to the development of stable phosphonic acids,

    which are added in sub-stoichiometric amounts (Andres et al. 1980). The most

    important phosphonic acids used in the field of cooling water treatment are aminotri-

    methylenephosphonic acid (ATMP), hydroxyethanediphosphonic acid (HEDP) and

  • 13

    phosphonobutanetricarbonic acid (PBTC). Organic polymers based on polyacrylic

    acid, polymetacrylic acid, polymaleic acid and polyacrylamide (so-called

    polycarboxylates) also have a certain hardness stabilizing effect and are often used

    in combination with phosphonic acids.

    The calcium carbonate hardness can be stabilized with, e.g., carboxymethylcellulose.

    To a limited extent complex formers (NTA) are used; EDTA is however excluded de

    facto from use because of its poor degradability.

    Further depositions can also be caused by the precipitation of suspended organic

    and inorganic particles and iron oxides. To prevent this, dispersants based on the

    above mentioned polycarboxylates as well as low-molecular weight anionic acids

    (e.g., succinates) are added. These are to be distinguished from natural products,

    such as lignins and tannins, and from synthetic polymers of the polyacrylic,

    polymetacrylic, and polymaleic acids as well as sulfonates. The transition between

    the hardness stabilizers and the dispersants is not clear-cut.

    2.5.2 Scale inhibitors

    The corrosion of metals is enhanced by the presence of oxygen, salt content

    (especially chlorides) and a low pH, but also by deposits. During oxygen corrosion

    metal ions are dissolved at the metal surface, which acts as the anode, while in the

    cathodic reaction oxygen is reduced to hydroxide ion and a high pH is produced

    locally (Anonymous 1991). Of particular importance is microbially induced corrosion,

    which is caused by acidic metabolic products as well as the anoxic/anaerobic

    conditions within biofilms. Sulfate-reducing bacteria of the genus Desulfovibrio act

    corrosively, by reducing the sulfate while forming hydrogen sulfide. These bacteria

    are among the most important in cooling systems (Koppensteiner 1973). However,

    corrosion can also be induced by sulfur bacteria (Thiobacillus), iron bacteria

    (Ferrobacillus, Gallionella) and nitrifying bacteria (Nitrosomonas, Nitrobacter).

    Passive (anodal) corrosion inhibitors, such as phosphates, phosphonates, nitrite,

    silicates and molybdates form a passive protective layer on the metal surface. The

    use of chromate is no longer permitted. In contrast, cathodic inhibitors like zinc or

    calcium carbonate, and to a limited extent also orthophosphate, form insoluble

    deposits which protect the metal surface by reacting with the corrosive hydroxyl ions.

  • 14

    Especially for copper and copper alloys, 1,2,3-triazoles are used as inhibitors.

    Mercaptobenzthiazoles may no longer be used for this purpose according to Annex

    31 of the AbwV regulations.

    2.5.3 Biocides

    The mean temperature in water cooling systems is ca. 35C and thus lies just below

    the temperature optimum of most microorganisms (Mattila-Sandholm and Wirtanen

    1992). Biocides are used to control biologically induced deposits and corrosion

    processes. For cooling water systems algicides, fungicides and molluscicides are

    relevant.

    2.5.3.1 Biology in cooling systems

    The growth of autotrophic algae is dependent on the presence of mineral nutrients,

    carbon dioxide and light energy, while the growth of heterotrophic bacteria requires

    organic material, which is composed of dead algae and/or the existing burden of the

    water or air. In principle, bio-degradable conditioning agents can also function as a

    carbon source. Many bacteria secrete a highly hydrated slime consisting of

    polysaccharides, which leads to the formation of biofilms on surfaces (biofouling).

    Biofilms decrease heat exchange, promote corrosion and hinder control by means of

    biocides. Protozoa such as Ciliates or Ambae colonize affected cooling towers as

    consumers, as do higher organisms such as mussels and snails, which can lead to

    serious disturbances.

    In once-through cooling systems, because of the short retention time and the

    requirement for a rapid elimination, fast-acting oxidative biocides are used; and in

    open cooling systems, non-oxidative, more stable organic biocides are called for.

    2.5.3.2 Oxidative biocides

    The most commonly used oxidative biocide, owing to its effectiveness and low price,

    is chlorine or cholorine bleach (sodium hypochlorite). At the pH-values of > 8 typical

    for cooling system circulation, there is a reduction of the biocidal effect of the active

    substance, hypochlorous acid (HOCl), while hypobromous acid is still effective at pH

    9. Hypobromous acid is generally generated on site by adding sodium bromide to

    sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). The use of free halogens as biocides may, depending

  • 15

    on the water composition (e.g., DOC- and ammonium concentration), pH-value and

    contact time, lead to the formation of disinfectant by-products such as

    trihalomethanes, chloro- and bromoamines as well as absorbable organic halogen

    compounds (AOX).

    In the purification of drinking water chlorine is replaced in part by chlorine dioxide, in

    order to minimize the formation of AOX, especially halogen methanes. Chlorine

    dioxide reacts noticably more weakly with complex organic molecules and

    ammonium, consequently forming less AOX. Chlorine dioxide is also occasionally

    used in the cooling water field, whereby it is usually generated on location through

    the reaction of chlorine gas with sodium chlorite (NaClO2). Organic chlorine and

    bromine release agents are used especially in open recirculation cooling systems.

    Here, above all, the rapidly hydrolyzing biocide 1-bromo-3-chloro-5,5-

    dimethylhydantoin (BCDMH) should be mentioned. Related compounds like 1,3-

    dichloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoin or 1,3-dichloro-5-ethyl-5-methylhydantoin are also

    occasionally used.

    Ozone is a highly effective oxidatively acting biocide. Usually, ozone is continuously

    added to the cooling water in very low concentrations of 0.1 to 0.3 mg/l (Wasel-

    Nielen and Baresel 1997, Viera et al. 1999). Production is achieved directly on

    location using high voltage, In comparison with the other oxidative biocides,

    hydrogen peroxide is only effective at higher concentrations (> 15 mg/l; cf., van Donk

    and Jenner 1996) and has a short half-life. Rarely, peracetic acid is also used as an

    organic oxygen release agent in cooling systems. Under unfavorable conditions,

    peracetic acid is corrosive. This chemical is readily bio-degradable.

    2.5.3.3 Non-oxidative biocides

    Non-oxidative biocides are used nearly exclusively in open recirculation cooling

    systems, where the contact time of the cooling water with the biocide suffices for a

    satisfactory effect. As a rule, here the biocide is added batchwise in a shock

    treatment.

    One of the most important non-oxidative cooling water biocides, a mixture consisting

    of a chemical belonging to the isothiazolinone family, 5-chlorine-2-methyl-4-

    isothiazolin-3-one, together with 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, is already effective at

  • 16

    concentrations below 1 mg/l. Isothiazolinones hydrolyze slowly (t1/2 = 7 d at 30C and

    pH 8) and are not readily bio-degradable. Quarternary ammonium compounds (QAV)

    act through their binding to the cell membrane and are also not readily bio-

    degradable. During passage through the sewage treatment plant they are largely

    eliminated by adsorption on the activated sludge. The most important representative

    in the cooling water area is alkyldimethylbenzylammonium chloride.

    The addition of dibromonitrilopropionamide (DBNPA) is also widespread in the

    treatment of cooling water. This compound hydrolyzes rapidly to the still partially

    biocidally active compounds dibromoacetonitrile, dibromoacetamide, monobromo-

    nitrilopropionamide and cyanoacetamide. Further members of the organic bromine

    compound group include 2-bromo-2-nitropropan-1,3-diol (Bronopol) and beta-bromo-

    beta-nitrostyrene.

    Glutardialdehyde is also rather frequently used in the cooling water field. The

    mechanism of action is based on the denaturation of proteins. Glutardialdehyde is

    less toxic for aquatic life forms as compared to the other biocides, and the

    concentration added is correspondingly higher. This compound is readily bio-

    degradable. Specifically for the control of algal growth additional biocides are used,

    such as copper sulfate, as well as photosynthesis inhibitors based on triazine-

    derivatives.

    To reduce the risk of the appearance of microorganisms resistant to the added

    biocides combination products containing several biocides are used.

    2.5.3.4 Elimination of the biocidal effects

    A basic requirement for cooling water biocides is that their damaging action or

    biocidal effects must diminish in a relatively short time, since otherwise there might

    be toxic effects on the surface waters, especially after the direct discharge of cooling

    water. This calls for a rapid hydrolysis and/or biological degradability of the biocides.

    For indirect emissions via municipal sewage treatment plants it has to be proven that

    the biological wastewater treatment is not inhibited and that the biocides are retained

    in the treatment plant. Preferably, the biocides should be biologically degraded.

    While elimination through adsorption on the activated sludge (cf., QAV) protects the

  • 17

    receiving water, this merely shifts the problem, when the collected sludge is spread

    on the land for agricultural or forestry use.

    The elimination of the biocidal effects can be assayed either in the laboratory or on

    site at the actual treatment plant. For the completion of such so-called elimination

    curves in the laboratory there are, however, no generally acceptable specifications

    to date. Here the manufacturers have proposed static experiments with relatively

    high concentrations of activated sludge (0.5 g d.s./l), in order to simulate the

    influence of a hypothetical biofilm in the cooling system circulation (Scheidel et al.

    1996). Other authors, on the other hand, determine an elimination curve without

    adding any inoculum (Gartiser and Scharmann 1993, Gellert and Stommel 1995,

    Baltus et al. 1999).

  • 18

    3 Goals and investigative strategy

    In accordance with the project description, the following goals have been set:

    Estimation of the emission of cooling water conditioners in flowing surface waters

    of the Federal Republic of Germany

    Determination of the introduced cooling water chemicals and investigation with

    respect to their ecotoxicity, genotoxicity, bioaccumulation and degradability

    Determination of current practices of the governmental control agencies in the

    individual Bundeslnder

    Extension of the data status on ecotoxicity, genotoxicity and biological

    degradability of the cooling water chemicals in use through measurements of our

    own

    Develop suggestions/proposals for the reduction and optimization of the addition

    of cooling water chemicals

    Develop a recommendation for the selection of cooling water chemicals based on

    the present technical state of the art

    The investigative strategy is based on three pillars (see Fig. 1):

    Literature and database research on the active ingredients/substances of the

    standard commercially used cooling water conditioners

    Drawing up of an overall accounting balance sheet of the loads and

    concentrations of cooling water conditioners in treatment systems

    Direct testing of cooling water samples, products and active ingredients with

    respect to their ecotoxicity and genotoxicity, as well as determining the rate of

    elimination of biocides (elimination curves)

  • 19

    Figure 1: Investigative strategy

    - Products- Active substances- Elimination of biocides- Ecotoxicity, Biodegradability Genotoxicity

    - Consumption data of plants- Wastewater concentration- Total volume loads in BRD- Total loads of active Subst.

    Cooling water

    Active substances/Products

    Comparision of data

    Elimination of biocides/

    Products

    Research Overall Balance

    Tests

    Practice of regulatorycontrol

    State of the art

  • 20

    4 Methods

    4.1 Laboratory investigations

    4.1.1 Cooling water samples

    Cooling water samples from 7 treatment plants in Southern and Northern Baden

    were investigated. All these plants have open recirculation cooling systems.

    Collection of the samples was as qualified test samples direct from the investigated

    cooling vessel or from the return flow of the circulation (DIN 38402 1991). The

    descriptive data of the investigated cooling water with respect to water consumption

    and the products added are presented in Table 4.

    a) Plant 1, Electroindustry

    The operation of a semi-conductor manufacturer has six cooling towers with a total

    cooling capacity of 2.5-3 MW. The cooling tower investigated has a cooling capacity

    of 1.2 MW and removes the heat produced by a refrigeration system. As a special

    feature, the concentrate of the water treatment (reverse-osmosis system with a

    capacity of 700 S/cm) is used as cooling water. For hardness stabilization and

    corrosion inhibition a product based on sodium phosphonates, sodium molybdate,

    sodium polycarboxylates and triazoles is added continuously. As a biocide,

    isothiazolinone is added in summer as needed. Through regular mechanical cleaning

    of the cooling vessel and an adequate shading of the cooling tower the amount of

    this chemical added was reduced by more than 90% compared to the previous

    years. The yearly consumption of isothiazolinones in the year 2000 was ca. 0.4 kg/a

    of active substance. At the time of sampling no biocides were being added.

    b) Plant 2, Plastics manufacturing industry

    The company manufactures molded plastic parts for the automobile industry and has

    several cooling towers with a total capacity of 6700 kW, which are fed with ground

    water. As biocide a quarternary ammonium compound is added batchwise as

    needed and then the outflow is closed for the next three days. The time of addition is

    decided upon by visual examination of the algal growth. In addition, corrosion

  • 21

    inhibitors and hardness stabilizers based on phosphonic acids, zincchloride and

    dispersants are continuously added.

    The first sample collection on 19.07.00 took place two months after a shock

    treatment with biocides, and the second and third samples were taken either directly

    after the biocide was added and after an elimination time of three days resp. Besides

    the cooling water, the wastewater produced from the released steam, to which

    hydrazine was added, was also examined.

    c) Plant 3, Plastics manufacturing industry

    The plant manufactures PVC-foils and has a cooling tower with a capacity of 2.3-9.2

    MW. Ca. 250 m3 of completely desalted cooling water are added weekly. In the non-

    shaded cooling tower problems with algae arise. In this event, a "heterocyclic

    sulfur/nitrogen-compound" (Isothiazolinone) is added batchwise in a shock treatment

    (total load 0.8 kg/a active ingredient).

    d) Plant 4, Plastics industry

    The plant of a manufacturer of adhesive foils has four cooling towers, whose function

    is to thermally reclaim solvents from activated charcoal filters. About four times a

    year a preparation based on isothiazolinones is added batchwise (ca. 30 liters of

    product/a). After a retention time of 24 h according to statements from the operator,

    the GL-value is ascertained to be below 12. As hardness stabilizers polycarboxylates

    and phosphonocarboxylates are added continuously. At the time of the collection of

    the first sample, there was no addition of biocide, and the second sample was taken

    24 h after a biocide treatment just after the outflow was reopened.

    e) Plant 5, Plastics manufacturing industry

    The plant manufactures foamed polystyrene- and polypropylene-packaging and has

    three cooling towers. For the foaming of the plastics 10-12 t/h of desalted boiler

    feeder water (steam) is needed. The boiler feeder water is treated with a corrective

    material and the condensed steam (condensate) enters the open cooling system

    during the production process. Thereby solid materials from the production process

    are also carried over and are removed from the cooling water circulation with bag

    filters (towel filters). These filters are cleaned daily. Twice weekly 60 liters of a

  • 22

    biocidal product based on hydrogen peroxide and quarternary ammonium

    compounds are added. The cooling water sample was taken in the filter outflow 7 h

    after a batch treatment.

    f) Plant 6, Chemical industry

    The plant has two cooling water systems, which were both sampled. The plant

    cicrculation (KW1) has four forced-aeration cooling towers and is operated with a low

    compression ratio of 1.1. The second circulation (KW2) handles the central cooling

    system and is run at a high cycle of concentration of 3.0. Both circulations are

    treated continuously with the biocide 1-bromo-3-chloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoin. As

    needed, a product based on 2-bromo-2-nitropropan-1,3-diol and isothiazolinones is

    added. For corrosion inhibition phosphonic acids and tolyltriazole are continuously

    added.

    g) Plant 7, Chemical industry

    This pharmaceuticals producing operation set up a new cooling system for the

    expansion of the refrigeration plant. A portion of the drinking water needed for

    feeding this system is completely desalted by an ion-exchanger. The cooling water is

    treated twice weekly for several h with the biocide 1-bromo-3-chloro-5,5-

    dimethylhydantoin. To inhibit corrosion phosphonic acids and triazoles are added

    continuously. The sample was collected 24 h after the last biocide treatment after

    opening the outflow.

  • 23

    Table 4: Charateristic data for the investigated systemsFirm Water consumption Principle Products Active

    ingredient 1

    Active

    ingredient 2

    Active

    ingredient 3

    Active

    ingredient 4

    Branch [kW] [m3/a]

    [m3/(a*KW)]

    Concentrationratio

    Pro-ducts

    Biocide-addition

    Pro-duct[kg/a]

    Discharge

    Conc.[%]

    Load[kg]

    Conc.[%]

    Load[kg]

    Conc.[%]

    Load[kg]

    Nr. 1 2.500 14.402 5,8 RO OK Biocide 1 10 KA CMI 2,4 0,2 MI 2,4 0,2Electro- TW Product S 457 Triazoles 2,5 11,4 NaOH 2,5 11,4 Phosphonate Na.molybdateindustry Product 90 HCl 21,0 18,9 (without conc.)Nr. 2 6.700 1.761 0,3 G OK Biocide 3 S 660 KA QAVPlastics manufacturing 1,8 Product 2250 HEDP 15,1 339,8 ATMP 20,1 452,3 Polyoxy-

    carbonacid10,1 227,3 Zinc chloride

    (without conc.)Product 4145 HCl 30,0 1243,4 HEDP 9,9 1,4-Butindiol 9,9 410,3

    Nr. 3 3.000 13.000 4,3 VE OK Biocide 4 S 40 KA CMI 0,9 0,4 MI 0,9 0,4Plastics manufacturing ? PO43- 24 Ortho-

    phosphate100,0 24,0

    Nr. 4 18.710 23.579 1,3 G OK Product 900 O Poly-carbonates

    Phosphon-carbonate

    Foil production 3,0 Biocide 2 S 30 CMI/MINr. 5 4.000 2.600 TW OK Biocide 5 S 6240 KA H2O2 QAVPlastics manufacturing NaOH 3120 NaOH 25,0 780,0

    Product 1200 Polyethoxylate Non-ion.Tenside

    Nr. 6 Chemical Industry 7020 NaOH 3,5 245,7 Tolyltriazole 3,0 210,6 Phosphonicacid

    7,5 526,5

    Circulation1

    6.300 720.000 114,3

    G OK/1,1 1600 Phosphonicacids

    Biocide 6 K 644 O and BCDMH 25,1 161,6Biocide 7 S 125 KA Bronopol 9,0 11,3 MI 1,8 2,3 CMI 1,8 2,3NaOCl 2000 Sodium-

    hypochlorite13,0 260,0

    Circulation2

    43.500 120.000 G OK/3,0 Product 7350 NaOH 3,5 257,3 Tolyltriazole 3,0 220,5 Phosphonicacid

    7,5 551,3

    Product 1000 Phosphonicacids

    Biocide 6 K 2323 KA BCDMH 25,1 583,1Biocide 7 S 25 Bronopol 9,0 2,3 MI 1,8 0,5 CMI 1,8

    Nr. 7 6.000 58.000 9,7 TW OK Product Planning KA Polycarbonicacid

    17,5 Phosphonicacid

    6,3 Triazole 2,5

    Chemical Industry max. 4.0 Biocide 8 S stage BCDMH 75,0Water consumption: G=Ground water; RO=Reverse osmosis; VE=completely desalted water; TW=Drinking water; Biocide added: K= continuous; S=Batch treatment; Source: O=surface water; KA=municipal waterpurification plant; ingredients: CMI: 5-chloro-2-methyl-2H-isothiazolin-3-one; MI: 2-methyl-2H-isothiazolin-3-one; BCDMH: 1-bromo-3-chloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoin; Bronopol: 2-bromo-2-nitropropan-1,3-diol; HEDP: 1-Hydroxyethan-1,1-diphosphonic acid; ATMP: Aminotrimethylphosphonic acid

  • 24

    4.1.2 Product investigations

    Altogether five biocides and one corrosion inhibitor were tested. All of these active

    substances are used in the plants investigated. They were tested with respect to

    their mutagenicity, genotoxicity and ecotoxicity. At a later time four more products as

    well as the biocide Bronopol were investigated in the umu test, in order to to

    determine the source of the genotoxicity in the wastewater of one plant by systematic

    "backtracking". An additional emphasis was the determination of the elimination

    behavior of the most important biocides applied in the cooling water field, using the

    fluorescent bacteria test (cf., sect. 4.1.9).

    4.1.3 Chemical parameters

    pH-value: pH 196 pH-meter from WTW GmbH in Weilheim.

    Conductivity: Measuring instrument pH-LF 3001 from Neukumelektronik GmbH in

    Straubenhardt.

    CSB: Round cuvette test (Dr. Lange Co.): Two-hour oxidation with potassium

    dichromate, sulfuric acid, silver- and mercury sulfate at 148 C in conformance with

    DIN 38409 H41.

    Chlorine (free and total): Round cuvette test (Dr. Lange Co.): reaction with diphenyl-

    p-phenylendiamine (DPD) witih the formation of a colored substance; total chlorine

    determined after addition of potassium iodide.

    4.1.4 Fluorescent bacteria test according to DIN 38412-34 and Nr. 404 of theAbwV

    The toxicity of wastewater contaminants is detected on the marine bacteria of the

    species Vibrio fischeri, which show a natural light production (bioluminescence) that

    is closely coupled with their metabolic activity. The decrease of the light intensity

    provides a quantitative measure of the toxic effect on the bacteria. The test is

    performed with the LUMIS-tox system of the company Dr. Lange, Dsseldorf. The

    lyophilized bacteria of the strain Vibrio fischeri NRRL-B-11177 were obtained from

    the same company (LCK 482). The wastewater samples were tested without further

    pre-treatment after salinizing with sufficient sodium chloride to give a 2% solution

  • 25

    and adjusting the pH-value to 7.0 +/- 0.2. The test result is given as the least

    stepwise dilution (GL-value), for which the light emission is inhibited less than 20%.

    4.1.5 Alga test according to DIN 38412-33 and Nr. 403 of the AbwV

    The chronic inhibitory effect of the cooling water samples on the growth of

    Scenedesmus subspicatus, a planktonic fresh-water alga, was determined. For this

    purpose, a dilution series of the cooling water sample was made, without any further

    preparation, but adding an algal nutrient solution inoculated with a defined algae

    suspension (corresponding to 104 cells/ml) and incubating under defined light and

    temperature conditions. After 72 h, the number of cells was determined

    microscopically as a measure for the biomass. The result given is the least dilution

    step (GA-value), after which the measured inhibitory effect on biomass production is

    less than 20%.

    4.1.6 Daphnia test according to DIN 38412-30 and Nr. 402 of the AbwV

    The acute toxic effect of wastewater on Daphnia magna STRAUS (Crustacea, clone

    5 of the German Federal Health Agency) was determined. The value measured is

    the dilution factor GD beyond which no acute toxicity for Daphnia is detected within

    24 h. The GD-value corresponds to the least dilution factor by which a wastewater

    sample must be diluted in order for 90% of the Daphnia to maintain their ability to

    swim. The pH-value of the sample was adjusted with hydrochloric acid or sodium

    hydroxide solution to 7.0 7.5. No other pre-treatment was performed.

    4.1.7 Ames test in conformance with DIN 38415-4

    The Ames test is a bacterial mutagenicity test with Salmonella typhimurium. The

    Salmonella-bacterial strains used are deficient mutants, which are unable to grow in

    histidine-free medium. These histidine-requiring mutants can back-mutate (reversion)

    and then are able to form colonies on minimal-agar plates. Each of the Salmonella-

    strains has a specific spontaneous mutation rate. The number of back-mutated

    bacteria (revertants) above this level provides a measure of the mutagenic potential

    of a substance or a sample. Certain mutagens in higher organisms are first activated

    by being metabolized (promutagens) or are thereby inactivated. Therefore, to the

    bacterial system the needed enzymes are added in the form of rat liver extract S9

  • 26

    (Moltox Co.). The test version used is based on a simplified version of the OECD-

    Guideline 471 with the test strains TA98 and TA100. The strain TA98 detects

    frameshift mutagens; strain TA100 in contrast is for base pair substitution mutagens

    (point mutations). The cooling water samples were sterilized over a membrane filter

    (0.45 m). Up to 1 ml of cooling water per Petri dish could be added. Because of the

    substantial effort involved, the samples were initially investigated in the Screening-

    Test at only one test concentration. A sample is then classified as mutagenic

    according to DIN 38415-4 if in one of the strains with or without S9 an induction

    difference compared to the control (solvent alone) of 80 (for TA100) or 20 revertants

    (for TA98) is induced and a dose-effect relationship is found. The GEA-value

    corresponds to the last dilution step at which the induction difference established for

    that strain is not exceeded. Since the wastewater sample in the test is diluted by a

    factor of 3 with medium/inoculum, the lowest possible GEA-value = 3 (non-

    mutagenic). The number of revertants of the negative controls should be: for TA100

    in the range of 80-180 and for TA98 in the range of 15-40 revertants per plate.

    In testing substances or products a sample was evaluated as being mutagenic in

    accordance with the relevant OECD-guideline if the induction rate (ratio of the

    number of revertants in the test plates to the negative controls) exceeded a factor of

    2 and a dose-effect relationship existed.

    4.1.8 umu test according to DIN 38415-3 and Nr. 410 of the AbwV

    The umu test is a genotoxicity test with the gene-technologically modified bacterium

    Salmonella typhimurium strain TA1535/pSK 1002. The bacteria are exposed to

    various concentrations of the cooling water. Here gene toxins induce the so-called

    umuC-gene, which belongs to the SOS-repair system of the cell and which acts to

    prevent damage to bacterial genetic material. Through the coupling of the umuC-

    gene promoter with the lacZ-gene for -galactosidase the activation of the umuC-

    gene can be indirectly measured spectrophotometrically at 420 nm through the

    formation of a colored product from the -galactosidase substrate o-nitrophenyl-

    galactopyranoside (ONPG). The induction rate (IR) corresponds to the increase of

    the extinction at 420 nm relative to the negative control. In calculating the induction

    rates one must take into account the growth factor, which is determined

    turbidometrically from the optical density at 600 nm. An inhibition of bacterial growth

  • 27

    is expressed as a reduced growth factor ("Wachstumsfaktor" or WF) compared to the

    controls. For growth factors below 0.5 (50% growth inhibition) the results are not

    evaluated. The result given is the smallest dilution step G (GEU-value), at which an

    induction rate < 1.5 is measured. If a different induction rate is seen upon addition of

    S9, the higher of the two values is taken (=GEU-value).

    4.1.9 Elimination of biocides

    Until now there have been no generally accepted specifications for a procedure to

    determine elimination curves in the laboratory. On the part of the producing

    companies there have been proposals for static experiments with a relatively high

    concentration of activated sludge (0.5 g d.s./l), in order to simulate the influence of a

    hypothetical biofilm in the cooling circulation (Scheidel et al. 1996). However, at an

    UBA-Workshop on the present project the consensus was arrived at that such high

    biomass concentrations in cooling circulation are not usual (cf., table 5, (Gartiser and

    Urich 2001).

    In order to determine the effect of the inoculum concentration on the elimination

    behavior of biocides, various inocula were introduced. As a test-system the Zahn-

    Wellens test according to DIN EN 29888 or Nr. 408 of the AbwV was

    correspondingly adapted. The tests with activated sludge were supplemented with an

    inorganic nutrient solution according to DIN EN 29888; all tests were continuously

    stirred and aerated with an aquarium pump.

  • 28

    Table 5: Determination of the elimination of cooling water biocides

    Inoculum Concentration Comments

    Activated sludge 1 g d.s./l Upper conc. Zahn-Wellens test

    " 0.5 g d.s./l Proposal by VCI AG"Microbiocides in Annex 31"

    " 0.2 g d.s.//l Lower conc. Zahn-Wellens test

    " 0.03 g d.s./l OECD 301 A, B, C and F"ready bio-degradation"

    Outflow final-clarifier

    - Model for microbiologically activeinoculum with low d.s.-content

    Tap water - predominantly abiotic hydrolysis

    The starting concentrations of the biocides were selected on the basis of various

    information provided on the effective concentrations of the active ingredients in the

    cooling water (Baltus and Berbee 1996; Anonymous 1994, Fielden and Iddon 1997)

    and in part reduced further according to updated information from the manufacturers

    (Klautke 2001) (Table 9). As the end point, after filtration through a folded paper filter

    a bacterial fluorescence toxicity test was performed at dilution step 12 (based on

    Annex 31 to the AbwV). For low toxicity, dilution step 2 was also tested.

    4.2 Drawing up an overall balance sheet

    4.2.1 Compilation of production information materials

    Letters were sent to a total of more than 100 firms in the chemical industry that also

    offer product groups used in the cooling water field (including algicides, antifouling

    agents, bactericides, corrosion inhibitors, dispersants, biocides, inhibitors, and water

    chemicals). Addresses were obtained in some cases from the relevant handbooks

    but also to a large extent through information provided by the operators of the

    cooling plants. Altogether, 49 firms replied that they were not engaged in the cooling

    water field. Product information was sent by 22 firms. These materials were of

  • 29

    varying quality (from safety data sheets with little useful information to detailed

    product descriptions with ecological evaluations). In order to learn more about the

    substances in the products investigated in the context of preparing the balance (cf.,

    sect. 4.2.2) the operators of ca. 50 cooling plants were requested to provide the

    corresponding safety data sheets. In this way information on 418 products from 35

    manufacturers was obtained and evaluated. The active substances documented in

    these materials served as the basis for our literature- and database-research (cf., sect.

    4.3).

    4.2.2 Making a balance sheet of the emissions of cooling water chemicals

    The yearly emissions of cooling-water chemicals by the firms considered in the

    cooling water sampling were determined on site. In order to extend the data base a

    questionnaire was prepared for the operators of the cooling plants, including

    questions about the cooling system used, the cooling capacity, the source of the

    water, the annual consumption of cooling water chemicals (on a product basis), the

    mode of addition of biocides and the parameters controlled. Initially, this was sent to

    all business-controlling governmental agencies in Baden-Wrttemberg and then to

    the environmental agencies in all the Bundeslnder (usually to the Environmental

    Ministry). After the questionnaires had been passed on to the local sub-authorities

    and/or the operators of the cooling plants, they were then returned to us either

    directly or through the authorities. In some cases, Hydrotox was also provided by the

    authorities with lists of addresses of operators of cooling plants, and we then

    contacted them directly. Ultimately, 182 questionnaires from 176 operators were

    evaluated. Because of incorrect or incomplete data, ca. 1/3 of the firms had to be

    contacted again by telephone or by e-mail. In most cases, we ultimately succeeded

    in obtaining consistent data sets.

    We did not ask about and consequently did not make any systematic balance sheet

    for chemicals added in treating the water (decarbonizing, flocculation, production of

    VE-water, regeneration of the ion-exchanger). Nonetheless, such consumption data

    were provided by some of the operators and were evaluated.

    Based on the annual consumption data for cooling water conditioners (on a product-

    basis) and the recipes for preparation in product information sheets, the loads of

  • 30

    defined ingredients and chemicals could be estimated. In cases where only an order

    of magnitude of the substance concentrations was documented, the following

    procedure was followed. Where less than or more than was given, the next lower

    or higher concentration after the decimal was used for the balance. Where

    concentration ranges were given, the mean was used. Example:

    Given in the production information Assumed for the balance

    < 10% 9.9%

    > 10% 10.1%

    10% - 20% 15%

    When no concentration was given, and only the product group was listed in the

    product information, typical concentrations from the literature or the available additive

    concentrations and product recipes were used. For example, for quarternary

    ammonium compounds and polycarboxylates no concentration could be obtained

    from the product information sheets.

    All data were subjected to a plausibility control. Thereby the annual water

    consumption per installed kW of cooling capacity was calculated as a basic

    parameter and the following classification was made:

    Cooling system spec. water consumption [m3/(kW*a)]

    Once-through cooling system 100 - 1000

    Open recirculation cooling system 1 - 100

    Closed cooling system 0 - 1

    Deviations from this rule of thumb classification indicated incorrect data or special

    features such as the use of hybrid cooling towers, a limited running time during the

    year or the like. In addition, the calculated concentrations of introduced substances

    in the wastewater of the individual plants were compared with the concentrations to

    be added as given in the literature (Anonymous 1994, Baltus and Berbee 1996,

    Fielden and Iddon 1997). For implausible concentrations the operators of the plants

    were contacted.

  • 31

    Estimating the annual loads for Germany:

    In order to calculate to an order of magnitude the total consumption of cooling water

    chemicals for Germany the questionnaires of the 176 plants were evaluated in

    separate categories of once-through, open recirculation, and closed cooling systems.

    The addition of chemicals in closed cooling systems was assumed to be irrelevant

    for the wastewater since the amounts added at the time of initial filling can only with

    some reservation be assigned to any years consumption (instead usually being

    disposed of as a concentrate in the garbage when the water is changed). Because of

    fundamental differences between industrial cooling systems and power plants (cf.,

    sect. 5.4.4.1), the two categories were calculated separately. For the remaining

    cooling plants the percentage of plants that used a particular substance or a

    substance group was determined. Then the means and medians of the

    concentrations (on a substance basis rather than a product basis) were calculated

    from the annual water- and substance-consumption. Here the relationship of the

    amounts consumed to the added water volumes is a parameter which makes it

    possible to take into account the temporal components. (In principle, the substance

    consumption could also be derived from the wastewater volumes, but usually these

    were not known). For substances which were not continuously added, the calculated

    mean concentration generally lies well below the actual concentrations in practice.

    However, in individual cases, such as the shock treatment by batchwise addition of

    oxidative biocides to the circulation water, higher concentrations could also be

    calculated when the system volume is larger than the added water volume (cf., sect.

    5.4.5). The estimation of the total loads of the non-continuously added chemicals

    (biocides) for Germany was then obtained from the following formula:

    Fx = Concx * AX * Qx / 1000

    where

    Fx Substance load [kg/a]

    Concx Median of the balance concentration [mg/l]

    Ax Relative proportion of the plants that use the substance

  • 32

    (e.g., 0.01 represents 1%)

    Qx Water consumption for cooling purposes [m3/a]

    x Cooling principle (x = D for flow-through cooling and x = OK for open

    circulation cooling)

    This estimation is based on simplifying assumptions, which are briefly explained

    below:

    The classification of the plants as once-through, open recirculation, and closed

    cooling systems is not always unequivocal. There are substantial overlaps so as

    to give more of a continuum.

    The estimation of the total loads from the proportion of the plants that use this

    substance, based on the available data set provided by the operators, assumes

    that the specific consumption values are independent of the size of the cooling

    plant. This is only true to a certain extent. Thus, for example, larger plants tend to

    use oxidative and smaller plants non-oxidative biocides. However, because of the

    limited database at hand, a further sub-classification into various size classes,

    going beyond the separate consideration of industrial cooling and power plants,

    was not deemed appropriate.

    In general, it can be assumed that in the various industry branches, different

    requirements are placed on cooling water conditioning. Thus in the foodstuffs

    industry, because of hygiene requirements, a tendency to higher consumption

    amounts for biocides compared to other branches can be observed. However, the

    limited database does not permit a separate consideration of each branch.

    Although we asked the manufacturing firms to calculate the total loads on the basis

    of their product sales for cooling water conditioners in combination with the

    preparation recipes and the individual share of the market, we did not succeed in

    obtaining the desired results (Gartiser and Urich 2001).

    For continuously added conditioners (phosphonates, polycarboxylates) instead of the

    balance sheet values, the concentrations to be added in normal practice, as provided

    by industry, were used (cf., table 16). The annual loads of auxilliary additives (N-

  • 33

    methyl-2-pyrrolidone, alcohols) as well as inorganic pH-regulators and flocculation

    agents such as Fe(III)Cl3 for additional water treatment were not calculated for the

    Federal Republic of Germany, because the consumption in the plants was not

    systematically determined.

    4.3 Literature and database-research

    The cooling water chemicals for which literature- and database-research was to be

    performed were determined on the basis of the product information. We did not

    consider chemicals for water treatment (inorganic acids and bases, salts for

    regeneration of the ion-exchanger) as well as auxilliary additives, e.g., solubilizing

    aids such as alcohols, which have no specific biocidal, dispersive or corrosion

    inhibiting effect. With the help of the following data banks/collections and databases,

    research was carried out on the individual substances:

    Substance data collections and fact databases

    Roth: Wassergefhrdende Stoffe, ecomed-Verlag, Landsberg

    Verschueren: Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals, vanNostrand Reinhold (1996)

    Kommission zur Bewertung wassergefhrdender Stoffe (KBwS): Dokumentationwassergefhrdender Stoffe, Hirzel-Verlag, Stuttgart

    Merck Index 12th Ed. (1996)

    Ash: Handbook of Water Treatment Chemicals, Gower House (1996)

    Paulus: Microbicides for the Protection of Materials, Chapman & Hall (1993)

    Rossmoore: Handbook of Biocide and Preservative Use, Chapman & Hall (1995)

    Chemfinder, ECDIN and other Internet-Databases

    Dictionary of Substances and Their Effects (DOSE)

    International Uniform Chemical Information Database (IUCLID)

    Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB)

    Data Bank of Environmental Properties of Chemicals (EnviChem)

    Register of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS)

  • 34

    Gefahrstoffinformationssystem der gewerblichen Berufsgenossenschaften(GESTIS)

    PhysProp and Biolog/Biodeg (On-Line Databases of the Syracuse ResearchCooperation, SRC, http://esc.syrres.com)

    Literature databases

    Biological Abstracts

    Current Contents

    MEDLINE

    The hazard risk statements (R-Phrases) in the dangerous substance regulations

    were researched in the GESTIS database. Here, in addition to the official

    classification according to Annex I of the Guideline 67/548/EWG, are also found self-

    evaluations by the producers (http://www.hvbg.de/d/bia/fac/zesp/zesp.htm). We went

    beyond this information and performed with varied success additional internet-

    searches of the databases of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the

    U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Library of Medicine

    (including the database GENE-TOX). The available data were compared with the

    internal substance-database shared by Bund/Lnder (GSBL), which includes the

    UBA-Neustoffdatenbank for new substances, the databases of the KBwS

    (RIGOLETTO), the BgVV Chemis and BIG of the Feuerwehrinformationszentrum in

    Geel (Belgium). Additional information so obtained substantially extended our

    database.

    A preliminary listing of the results of our research was distributed to participating

    firms in preparation for the UBA-Workshop on the present project with the request

    that they fill in any gaps in the data (Gartiser and Urich 2001). As a result, the data

    pool was enlarged further. Whenever there were no citable published data available,

    the product-specific entries on the safety data sheets of the manufacturers were

    taken into account after consulting with them. The research results are presented in

    the Annex to this report. It remains to be noted that it was not the aim of this report to

    carry out a comprehensive and complete evaluation of all substances in the sense of

    a Risk Assessment in accordance with the laws on chemicals or biocide-

  • 35

    regulations. Consequently, as a standard for the selection of substance data we

    relied on the wastewater relevance of the data. In addition, we looked at the oral

    toxicity for mammals and the risk statements (R-Phrases), which are the prerequisite

    for classification in water-hazard classes (Anonymous 2000). Those organisms that

    are of importance in governmental control and are included in the list of parameters

    of the wastewater regulations were given a higher significance. Hereby it was sought

    to make a comparison possible with the practical investigations on wastewater

    sidestreams, products and active ingredients.

  • 36

    5 Results

    5.1 Cooling water investigations

    The results of the investigated wastewater samples are presented in Table 6. A total

    of 12 cooling water samples and one condensate from steam production were

    tested. The pH of the cooling water samples lay between 7.9 and 9.5; the

    conductivity was between 121 s/cm (for VE-water in plant 2) and 10,130 S/cm (for

    the concentrate of the reverse-osmosis system in plant 1).

    The ecotoxicity of the cooling water samples in the algae, fluorescent bacteria and

    Daphnia tests was in most cases low (GA/L/D -values from 1 to 3). After a shock-

    treatment with quarternary ammonium compounds (plant 2) and isothiazolinones

    (plant 6), values up to a dilution factor of GL=196 were determined. However, after

    the elimination times of 1 to 3 days typically observed in practice, the ecotoxicity in

    the cooling water of plants 4, 7 and 2 was completely eliminated. In the cooling water

    of plant 5, 7 hours after the addition of QAV and hydrogen peroxide a slightly

    elevated ecotoxicity was measured, but this can be largely attributed to the input of

    solid materials during production. Also in the case of the continuous addition of

    bromochlorodimethylhydantoin, no ecotoxicity of the cooling water was observed. In

    the Ames test (screening) there was no mutagenic effect. However, one cooling

    water sample was toxic after a shock treatment with isothiazolinones (plant 6). The

    same sample turned out to be the only one that was genotoxic in the umu test

    (GEU=6).

  • 37

    Table 6: Summary of the wastewater investigations

    Nr. 1 Nr. 2 Nr. 3 Nr. 4 Nr. 5 Nr. 6 Nr. 7

    Company No./ BranchElectro industry Plastic manufacturing

    Plastic manufacturing

    Plastic manufacturing

    Chemical industry

    KW KWKW after

    biocide shock dosage

    Blow-down after inacti-

    vation period

    Steam condensate KW KW KW KW KW 1 KW 2 KW2 KW

    Biocide (shock treatment)

    (Isothia-zolinone) (QAV) QAV

    (Isothia-zolinones)

    (Isothia-zolinones)

    24 h after shock treatment with Isothiazolinones

    H2O2/QAV

    BCDMH, (Bronopol, Isothia-zolinones), NaOCl

    BCDMH, Bronopol, shock-dosage with Isothia-zolinones

    BCDMH Isothia-zolinones

    Sampling 27.06.00 19.07.00 11.10.00 14.10.00 19.07.00 19.07.00 12.07.00 17.07.01 27.07.00 11.12.00 11.12.00 16.07.01 17.07.01

    pH pH 9,5 8,7 8,60 9,00 7,6 8,1 8,8 8,6 8,7 8,3 7,9 7,8 9,0

    Conductivity S/cm 10130 1640 2160 121 31600 130 720 831 240 735 2170 2220 1620

    COD mg/l 52 24 67 501721

    (filtered) 17 14 11302 (unfilt.)

    138 (filtered)

  • 38

    5.2 Product investigations

    5.2.1 Eco- and Genotoxicity

    The results on the mutagenicity, ge