Environmental Site Investigation

Environmental Site Investigation

112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW 2015

29 August 2019

Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW

Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd

29 August 2019

KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Ltd is an affiliate of KPMG. KPMG is an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. The KPMG name, logo and “cutting through complexity” are registered trademarks of KPMG International.

Prepared for: Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd Level 25

420 George Street Sydney NSW 2000

Prepared by: KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Limited ABN 53 103 479 992

Tower Three, International Towers Sydney

300 Barangaroo Avenue Sydney NSW 2000 (P O Box H67 Australia Square 1215)

Phone: +61 2 9335 7000

KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Quality Assurance Auditing

KPMG SGA Project No.: 364678 Date of Investigation 12-13 August 2019

File name: 364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19

Issue Number: Date Issued: Report Status

01 23 August 2019 DRAFT

02 29 August 2019 FINAL



29 August 2019

364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19

Contents 1 Executive Summary 1

2 Object and Scope of Works 2

3 Site Characteristics 3

3.1 Site Location, Identification and Description 3 3.2 Topography and Drainage 3 3.3 Geology, Soils and Hydrogeology 3 3.4 Contaminated Land Record EPA Notices 4 3.5 Public Register of POEO Licenses 5 3.6 Review of Site History 5 3.7 Previous Environmental Investigations 7

4 Data Quality Objectives 9

5 Investigation Levels and Beneficial Uses 13

6 Conceptual Site Model and Application of Investigation Levels 14

7 Field Investigation 15

7.1 Sampling and Analysis Plan 15 7.2 Fieldwork, Soil Stratigraphy and Drilling Observations 15 7.3 Laboratory Analysis 15 7.4 Quality Assurance 16

8 Laboratory Results 17

8.1 Soil 17



29 August 2019


9 Discussion 18

10 Conclusion and Recommendations 19

11 Limitations 20

12 References 21

Appendix A Site Figures

Appendix B Guidelines

Appendix C Borehole Logs

Appendix D Laboratory Results Summary and Transcripts

Appendix E Quality Control and Assurance

Appendix F Borehole Logs

Appendix G Report Limitations



29 August 2019

364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 1

1 Executive Summary

KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Ltd (KPMG SGA) were engaged by Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd (Lend Lease c/- JLL) to undertake an Environmental Site Investigation (ESI) at 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW (the site). The purpose of the ESI was to assess for the presence and nature of chemicals of concern (COCs) in soil as a result of the tenants’ activities on the site, at the conclusion of the Lease as per the lease agreement for the site.

Based on a review of site history, the site has been historically used for industrial purposes since the 1910’s with the current site buildings comprising of warehouses and adjoining offices being constructed in the late 1970’s and used for the storage of documents and logistics purposes. A previous environmental audit investigation undertaken in 2001 by Peter J Ramsay and Associates (PJRA) (Reference 6) identified low concentrations of heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and total cyanide within soil samples collected, however the concentrations were below the relevant investigation level guidelines. Trace amounts of asbestos containing materials (ACM) were identified in the soil samples collected from the grassed areas in the east and west of the site, which were considered to be associated with the building rubble present in these areas sourced from the demolition of previous buildings on the site in the late 1970’s. PJRA considered the site suitable for continued commercial / industrial use and recommended that an additional environmental investigation should be undertaken at the conclusion of the tenant’s lease to determine if any impacts to the soil and/or groundwater had occurred as a result of the tenant’s activities on the site.

Current site activities considered to represent potential sources of COCs included general warehousing activities. Historical industrial land use and uncontrolled filling of the site during its development also represents a potential source of COCs. At the time of the investigation, the site was occupied by Iron Mountain, the majority of the internal warehouse area was undergoing make good operations and was previously used as a data and document storage facility.

The ESI included drilling of twenty three (23) soil investigation boreholes (BH01 to BH23), which were advanced using hand auger and push tube techniques across the site with soil sampling undertaken. A total of thirty eight (38) soil samples (including three (3) intra-laboratory duplicate samples) were collected and analysed with laboratory analysis undertaken for a range of COCs associated with site operations.

The concentrations of COCs within all soil samples analysed were the laboratory limit of reporting (LOR) and/or below the adopted human health assessment criteria for commercial/industrial use. The concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene and heavy metals (copper and zinc) exceed the adopted ecological assessment criteria for commercial / industrial land use at isolated locations. These criteria are not considered to be directly applicable to the investigated areas given their current condition and vegetation in areas investigated appeared to be in good health with no evidence of obvious stress. Although EILs and ESLs have been utilised during this investigation, they are not considered to be directly relevant to the soil beneath the investigated areas due to specific factors (i.e. hardstand warehouse and carp park area, lack of significant vegetation, intended land use and highly disturbed environment. Elevated concentrations of heavy metals and PAHs are likely attributed to imported fill material and no as a results of warehouse activities.

Based upon the findings of the ESI, the site is no adversely affected by COCs as a result of warehousing activities that would preclude the use of the site for continued commercial / industrial purposes.



29 August 2019


2 Object and Scope of Works

KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Ltd (KPMG SGA) was engaged by Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd (Lend Lease c/- JLL) to undertake an Environmental Site Investigation (ESI) at 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW (the site). The purpose of the ESI was to assess the presence and nature of chemicals of concern (COCs) within soil and the extent of the COC impact as a result of the tenants’ activities on the site, at the conclusion of the Lease as per the least agreement for the site.

The following scope of works was undertaken:

• review provided existing environmental documentation

• review of relevant soil, geology and groundwater information to determine potential mobility of COCs (if present)

• review of historical aerial photographs and business directories to identify former site uses and layout

• develop data quality objectives for the project with reference to the USEPA (1994) – Guidance for the Data Quality Objectives Process

• provide a sampling plan detailing the proposed drilling locations

• undertake a ‘Dial Before You Dig’ search and location of underground services using a service locator

• drilling of twenty three (23) soil investigation boreholes on a targeted basis to at least 0.5 metres into natural soil or until refusal is met with allowance for a maximum depth of 2.0 metres below ground level (mbgl)

• collection of soil samples at each borehole including from any fill, disturbed or visually impacted layers

• laboratory analysis of selected samples at a NATA accredited laboratory for COCs including heavy metals, total recoverable hydrocarbons, benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene (collectively known as BTEX), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), phenols and volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

• fieldworks and sampling were undertaken to KPMG SGA’s standard quality assurance including the collection and analysis of duplicate samples for quality purposes

• provision of this Environmental Site Investigation report detailing the findings of the field investigation and the evaluation of laboratory results.



29 August 2019


3 Site Characteristics

3.1 Site Location, Identification and Description The site is located at 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW (Figure 1). At the time of investigation undertaken by KPMG SGA on 12 and 13 August 2019, a large warehouse building was present on the site, surrounded by loading docks, a hardstand access way along the eastern boundary, a single-storey office building within the north western portion of the site and an open paved car park within the north eastern portion of the site. The warehouse was operational for the use as a data and document storage facility by Iron Mountain Pty Ltd (Iron Mountain). The site surface was sealed by concrete and/or asphalt with the exception of several small grass covered area in the north western, western and south eastern corners of the site.

The surrounding area consists predominantly of industrial (warehouse style) properties and Sydney Park to the north-west of the site and Alexandra Canal to the south-east of the site. Site details are summarised in Table 1 below and the site layout is presented in Figure 2.

Site Details Item Details

Address 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSW 2015

Land Identifier Lot 2 DP709175

Total Site Area Approximately 1.27 Ha

Local Government Authority City of Sydney

Site Location Map Figure 1

Site Feature Map Figure 2

3.2 Topography and Drainage The site is located on generally flat land with a gentle slope towards the east. The surrounding area also was generally sloping towards the east. The site is located at between approximately 17 and 20 metres Australian Height Datum (mAHD).

The nearest surface water body is Alexandra Canal located approximately 150 m to the east of the site.

The majority of surface runoff onsite appeared to be collected and drained into the municipal stormwater system. Limited unsealed areas were observed at the site and it is expected that any rainfall infiltration into the underlying soil would be minimal. Drainage grates were also observed within the outdoor parking area located within the north eastern portion of the site.

3.3 Geology, Soils and Hydrogeology The geology underlying the site, as described in the Geological Survey NSW (1977) – Sydney 1:100,000 Geological Sheet 9130 consists of Quaternary aged medium to fine grained marine sand with podsols.

The Australian Soil Resource Information System (ASRIS) describes the site soils as Podosol. Podosols are described by the Australian Soil Classification System as soils with B horizons



29 August 2019


dominated by the accumulation of compounds of organic matter, aluminium and/or iron and are generally highly sandy and acidic. ASRIS describes the site as being located in an area of low probability of occurrence of acid sulfate soils.

The soil lithology encountered during the investigation generally comprised:

• 0.0 to 1.3 mbgl – fill material consisting of brown-dark brown and light grey, fine to coarse grained silty sand with gravels and rootles and dark brown/light grey medium/coarse grained gravelly sand

• 0.6 to 1.6 mbgl – light brown-dark brown, fine grained silty sand, slightly moist to moist

• 0.5 to 2.1 mbgl – light grey-dark grey, fine grained silty sand, slightly moist to moist

• 0.4 to 2.2 mbgl – light yellow-yellow, fine grained silty sand with crushed sandstone moist to very moist

A more detailed description of lithology is presented at the borehole logs within Appendix F.

A search of the Bureau of Meteorology Australian Groundwater Explorer identified eight (8) registered groundwater bores within a 500 metre radius of the site, which were used for monitoring purposes. The nearest groundwater wells (GW114561 and GW114562) are located approximately 320 metres north east and were installed to a maximum depth of 4.0 mbgl. No water bearing zone details were provided, however as the well casing was only installed to 1.0 mbgl followed by well screening installed to 4.0 mbgl, it is expected that groundwater would have been encountered between these depths.

Based on the site elevation, location and limited soil, geology and groundwater information, the uppermost water bearing zone at the site is be expected to be encountered at relatively shall depths (less than 5 mbgl) within the upper layers of sand. Overall groundwater is expected to flow in a soothly direction with regional groundwater flow towards Alexandra Canal eventually discharging to the Cooks River. Based upon this information, the potential for migration of any COCs within this geological system is considered to be high.

3.4 Contaminated Land Record EPA Notices A search of the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) record of notices under section 58 of the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 (CLM Act) was carried out on 5 August 2019 for the suburb of Alexandria, NSW. The search has identified that the site is not:

• the subject of an order made under Part 3 of the CLM Act

• the subject of an approved voluntary management proposal under Section 17 of the CLM Act that has not been fully carried out and where the approval of the EPA has not been revoked

• the subject of a site audit statement provided to EPA under section 53B of the CLM Act that relate to significantly contaminated land

• the subject of actions taken by the EPA under section 35 or 36 of the Environmentally Hazardous Chemicals Act 1985 (EHC Act).

A search of the NSW EPA List of NSW contaminated sites notified to EPA under section 60 of the CLM Act was carried out on 5 August 2019 for the suburb of Alexandria, NSW. No listings were identified for the site, however Sydney Park located approximately 100 metres north-west (assumed to be up hydro geologically gradient) of the site was declared by the NSWP EPA to be significantly contaminated.



29 August 2019


3.5 Public Register of POEO Licenses A search of the public register of licenses issued under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (POEO) was carried out on 7 August 2019. While no listings were identified for the immediate site, a number of adjacent sites were found to have active POEO licenses. One operator, Dial A Dump Industries Pty Ltd at 76-82 Burrows Road, Alexandria, NSW, located approximately 50m south east of the site, was issued a licence variation in 2015 for Waste Storage – other types of waste including “wood waste”, “garden waste”, “building and demolition waste” and “soils” and non-thermal treatment of general waste. Given the distance from the site plus the surrounding topography, it is unlikely that any associated impacts from the operator would affect the site.

3.6 Review of Site History

Historical Aerial Photographs

A review of aerial photographs from 1930 to 2019 was undertaken as part of this assessment. Details of the photographs reviewed and the key findings of our review are listed in the following table:

Historical Aerial Photographs Review

Photo Information Site Use Offsite Use

Date: 1930 Commercial/Industrial.

The site comprised of a medium-sized rectangular shaped industrial warehouse style building and two smaller office type buildings and an unpaved outdoor parking area, which occupied the central and eastern portions of the site. A small drainage channel is located along the northern boundary, which flows to the canal to the east. The northern and western portions of the site appeared to be undeveloped and unsealed comprising vacant land.

Vacant, Residential and Commercial/Industrial.

Surrounding land comprised industrial properties to the north and east of the site. A large canal (Alexandra Canal) is located to the east of the site. Smaller industrial properties including two cylindrical structures (i.e. silos) are located to the south west and west within a large area of disturbed vacant sandy land. Residential properties occupied the areas to the north of the site.

Run: 16

Photo: 3428

Source: NSW Department of Lands


The western area of the site had undergone development, a large adjoining industrial warehouse type building had been constructed. The smaller type buildings had been demolished and replaced with a large office building within the eastern portion of the site.

Vacant, Residential, and Commercial/Industrial.

A number of large industrial storage type buildings had been constructed to the east of the site, which bordered Alexandra Canal and a large factory type building had been constructed to the south west of the site.

Run: N/A

Photo: N/A

Source: Six Maps


No discernable changes.

Vacant, Residential and Commercial/Industrial.

Areas to the east of the site had undergone significant industrial development, several large industrial depot and factory type buildings had been constructed in previously vacant land.

Run: 15

Photo: 467-29


Date: 1961 Commercial/Industrial. Residential and Commercial/Industrial.

Run: N/A



29 August 2019


Photo Information Site Use Offsite Use

Photo: N/A Areas within the northern portion of the side had been sealed with concrete pavement.

The larger vacant area to the north-west and west of the site had undergone significant earthworks and appeared to be a waste and disposal depot with the construction of several access roads and quarries.




Residential and Commercial/Industrial.

Areas to the south had undergone further commercial/industrial development and several large storage type buildings which bordered Alexandra Canal had been demolished and replaced with a large industrial distribution complex Continued earthworks and excavation had been conducted to the west of the site. Quarries north west of the site had been filled.

Run: 19

Photo: 1909-5008



All former buildings on the site had been demolished. The current warehouse building, adjacent office building, and outdoor parking area had been constructed on the site.


Shipping container facilities had been constructed to the north-west and south-west of the site. Continued earthworks and fill operations had occurred to the area west of the site.

Run: 24

Photo: 3241-115





The industrial waste or disposal depot and industrial facilities to the west of the had been demolished and appeared to be undergoing development into recreational parklands

Run: 11

Photo: 153-164



No discernable changes. Residential and Commercial/Industrial.

The construction of Sydney Park had been completed to the west of the site. Several large multi-storey office buildings had been constructed to the south of the site. Smaller industrial properties to the north-west of the site had been demolished and a large residential apartment complex had been constructed.

Run: N/A

Photo: N/A

Source: Google Earth



Several large storage warehouse type buildings south east of the site had been demolished on the eastern side of Alexandra Canal.

Run: N/A

Photo: N/A

Source: Nearmap



No significant changes. Run: N/A

Photo: N/A

Source: Nearmap



29 August 2019


Site History Summary

Based upon the above information, it would appear the site was occupied by a number of small office buildings and medium to large commercial/industrial warehouse style buildings from at least 1930 until 1970s, when the former buildings were demolished and the current warehouse building, adjacent office building and outdoor parking area was constructed between 1970 and 1982 with no significant changes noted to the site since. The surrounding areas appeared to have been comprised of commercial/industrial, residential and vacant land from at least the 1930s with various areas to the east and south undergoing significant commercial/industrial development. The industrial waste/disposal depot to the west of the site had also be redeveloped in recreational parklands (Sydney Park).

3.7 Previous Environmental Investigations The following reports have been previously prepared for the site and has been reviewed.

Document Title: Environmental Audit, 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, New South Wales

Prepared By: Peter J Ramsay & Associates (PJRA)d

Dated: 7 May 2015

Key Objective:

To assess the presence of chemicals of concern (COCs) and establish a baseline for the site contamination and waste management at the site. The report formed Exhibit 2 as part of the Lease dated 12 August 2001 between Custodian Two Pty Limited (as Lessor) and Ausdoc Information management Pty Limited (as Lessee) in relation to the property at 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW.

Key Scope of Works:

The key scope of works included:

• Review of relevant documentation provided by Project Consulting Pty Limited (Project Consulting) and Lend Lease Real Estate Investments Limited (Lend Lease).

• Review of government databases and historical information for the site which included historical aerial photographs, current and historical title deeds etc. to establish previous land uses and developments.

• Review of environmental setting for geological, hydrogeological information relating to the site.

• A site inspection conducted on 2 and 6 February 2001, which included:

o identification of underground facilities and waste disposal areas which may have resulted in COC impact to the site

o drilling of nine (9) boreholes across the site to a maximum depth of 2.2 metres below ground level (mbgl) based on the review of site history, site inspection and assessment of the geology and hydrogeology of the site

o collection of a total of fourteen (14) primary and one (1) composite soil samples

o a soil vapour survey for volatile organic compounds using a photo-ionisation detector (PID).

• Laboratory analysis of soil samples for a range of COCs including: heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (MAHs), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs), organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons (VCHs), phenols, pH, asbestos, electrical conductivity (EC), total cyanide and fluoride.

• A soil vapour survey for volatile organic compounds using a photo-ionisation detector (PID).

• Evaluation of contaminant characteristics, fate and transport, potential harm to human health and the environment, off-site impacts and exposure paths.

• A hazardous substances assessment, which included a hazardous materials survey conducted by Piers Millner & Associates (PMA) for asbestos and other building materials such as PCBs and lead in paint.

• Provision of a report present the data of the investigation with recommendations for the site in accordance with guidelines for the assessment and management of site contamination and EPA requirements.



29 August 2019


Key Findings:

The following key findings were made by PJRA:

• Review of site history and historical aerial photographs indicated that the site and surrounding areas have been used for industrial purposes since at least the 1910s.

• The site was not registered with the EPA under the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 or the Unhealthy Building Land Act 1990.

• Concentrations of heavy metals, PAHs, MAHs, TPHs, OCPs, PCBs, VCHs, phenols, total cyanide and fluoride detected within soil samples were below the relevant investigation level guidelines.

• Trace asbestos was detected in two of the four samples of fill material analysed within soil borehole 1A and 7A, collected from the grassed areas in the east and west of the site, respectively.

• The sub-surface soil profile comprised of fill material from approximately 0.5 mbgl to 1.3 mbgl consisting of light yellow –grey gravelly sand, light brown clayey gravel, and dark brown clayey sand and natural material from approximately 0.6 mbgl to 2.2 mbgl, consisting of light brown/dark grey silty clay and dark brown-dark grey silty sand

• Non-friable asbestos was identified/suspected in the form of vinyl floor tiles, fibre cement eaves and electrical backing boards.

• SMF containing products were visually identified as insulation on the hot water tanks and in air condition ducts and roof of the site buildings.

• No suspected PCB containing equipment or lead containing paint was identified by PMA.

• The concentrations of all soil samples analysed were below the National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure (NEPM, 1999) Health Investigation Levels for Commercial/Industrial land use.

Key Conclusions

PJRA provided the following conclusions a:

• Review of site history indicated that the site and surrounding areas had been used for industrial purposes since the 1910s.

• The current office/warehouse buildings were constructed in the late 1970s and used for the storage of documents and freight.

• No evidence of above ground and/or underground storage tanks (ASTs and/or USTs) observed on the site.

• No significant quantities of hazardous or dangerous goods, or waste were stored on the site, which presented a risk of COC impact to the soil or stormwater.

• Trace asbestos was identified in the soil samples collected from the grassed areas in the east and west of the site, it was the opinion of PJRA that the asbestos was associated with the building rubble present in these areas and likely to have arisen during the demolition of previous buildings on the site in the late 1970s

• The site was considered by PJRA suitable for commercial/industrial land use.

Key Recommendations:

PJRA provided the following conclusions and recommendations:

• A Site Management Plan should be implemented to manage any future excavation works in the grassed areas of the site.

• All asbestos containing building materials should be labelled or removed from the site by an appropriately licenced contractor.

• Should the property be purchased, an additional environmental investigation should be undertaken at the conclusion of the tenant’s lease to determine if any COC impacts to the soil and/or groundwater had occurred as a result of the tenant’s activities on the site.



29 August 2019


4 Data Quality Objectives

Development of data quality objectives (DQOs) for each project is a requirement of National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) (1999) National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 1999 (Amended 2013) (NEPM ASC) (Reference 5). This is based on a DQO process formulated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for contaminated land assessment and remediation. The method provides sound guidance for a consistent approach in understanding site assessment and remediation.

The DQO process has seven steps. Each of these steps has been given due consideration in the undertaking of this project. In brief, these steps are:

Step 1: State the problem and establish the DQO team.

Step 2: Determine the possible and probable actions that will resolve the problems.

Step 3: Identify the informational inputs to assist in the problem resolution.

Step 4: Define the boundaries of the study (geographical, temporal, etc.).

Step 5: Develop and define decision rules.

Step 6: Specify tolerable limits to reduce probability of incorrect decisions.

Step 7: Ensure the quality of the information obtained.

Step 1 State the Problem

It is understood that a lease agreement for the site is in place between Lend Lease as Lessor and Iron Mountain as Lessee. It is understood that an Environmental Site Investigation is required to assess any environmental impact as a result of the tenants’ activities on the site is present at the conclusion of the lease.

Step 2 Identify the Decision

The principal decisions to be made are:

• what are the potential sources of COCs on the site?

• what are the nominated COCs associated with the site’s operation?

• what are the suitable human health and ecological criteria for the current/proposed land use?

• what are the concentrations of these COCs within soil?

• are concentrations of the nominated COCs within soil above the site criteria when evaluated using the nominated decision rules?

Step 3 Identify the Inputs to the Decision

The study inputs comprised existing information and information collected during the site investigation. These included:

• review of site characteristics (Section 3)

• observations made during the field investigation (Section 6)

• soil laboratory results using NATA accredited methods (Section 7 and Appendix C)



29 August 2019


• consideration of laboratory results with reference to relevant guidelines (Section 9 and Appendix D).

Step 4 Define the Study Boundaries

Temporally the study is limited to site conditions at the time of the investigation. The scope of the study is limited to that described in Section 2.0. The physical boundary of the study area is defined in Section 3.1 and shown on Figures 1 and 2.

Practical constraints to the collection of data include:

• the physical constraints posed by buildings, site structures and hardstand surfaces

• constraints posed by site operations, underground services, overhead services and landscaping

• the financial budget approved by the client.

The nominated COCs for soil are based on a range of COCs potentially associated with likely chemicals used and stored at the site. The following groups of primary COCs have been derived from this information:

• petroleum hydrocarbons as reported by total recoverable hydrocarbon (TRH) analysis

• benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene (BTEX)

• polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)

• volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

• heavy metals

• phenols.

Individual sample results will be discussed in terms of site impact and directly compared to the nominated site criteria to assess if they are at concentrations suitable for commercial/industrial land use.

Step 5 Develop and Define Decision Rules

Under the DQO process, it is important to nominate action levels for decision making.

In order to make a correct decision, the input laboratory data obtained needs to be confirmed to be suitable. Acceptable limits for field data analysis (relative percent differences (RPDs) for primary and duplicate results) are less than 50 percent, however a range of up to 150% can be acceptable (depending on the origin of the sample and volatility of the chemicals present). Acceptable limits for laboratory duplicate analysis will be set based on site specific information such as background concentrations. These are summarised in as the measurement data quality indicators (MDQIs) (Table 2), which will be used to establish whether the DQOs have been met.

It should be noted that NEPM ASC references Standards Australia AS 4482.1 (Reference 1), which specifies MDQIs for precision should be ≤50% RPD. However, they also acknowledge that low concentrations and organic compounds in particular, can be acceptably outside this range. AS 4482.1 (Reference 1) suggests that ≤50% RPD be used as a ‘trigger’ and values above this level of repeatability need to be noted and explained.

Due to the small scope of this investigation, inter laboratory duplicates will not be assessed.



29 August 2019


Measurement Data Quality Indicators

Parameters Procedure Minimum Frequency

>5<10 x LOR4 >10 x LOR

Precision (Repeatability) Field Duplicates 1 in 20 (for metals and semi volatiles)

<80-100 RPD <50-80 RPD

Field Duplicates 1 in 20 (volatiles) <150 RPD <130 RPD

Lab Replicate 1 in 20 <50 RPD <30 RPD

Accuracy Reference

Material

1 in 10 60% to 140% R 80% to 120% R

Matrix spikes 1 in 10 60% to 140% R 80% to 120% R

Surrogate spikes 1 in 10 60% to 140% R 80% to 120% R

Representativeness Reagent Blanks 1 per batch No detection No detection

Holding Times Every sample

Blanks Trip Blank 1 per batch No detection No detection

Trip Spike 1 per batch No detection No detection

Rinsate Blanks 1 per batch No detection No detection

Sensitivity Limit of Reporting Every sample 2 x LOR < investigation criteria

Notes: 1. RPD – relative percentage difference 2. % R – percent recovery 3. LOR – limit of reporting 4. no limit at <5x LOR 5. the MDQI is usually specified in the standard method. If not, use the default values set out in this table

Once laboratory data for the COC has been deemed suitable for use, based on the Measurement Data Quality Indicators presented in Table 2, the following decision rules will be used to make an assessment if concentrations of COCs are acceptable levels from a human health and ecological risk perspective as suggested by Reference 5:

Proposed decision rules for soil (where there is considered to be sufficient data):

• the 95% upper confidence level of the COC must be below the nominated investigation level

• the mean concentration of the COCs must be below the nominated investigation level

• no single sample concentration can exceed 250% of the nominated investigation level

• the standard deviation of the COC population must be below 50% of the investigation level

The nominated investigation levels are discussed in Section 5.0.

As such, if statistical analysis of concentrations of individual COCs are in agreement with the decision rule then concentrations of COCs onsite will be considered to be below the investigation criteria. If the contrary occurs, then further investigation, remediation or risk assessment may be warranted.

Statistical analysis will only be warranted when elevated concentrations of COCs are detected.

Step 6 Specify Tolerable Limits on Decision Errors

There are two types of decision errors. If one assumes that the site is impacted by COCs (the null hypothesis):

a) deciding that the site is not impacted when it actually is (Type I error). The consequence of this error may be unacceptable ecological or health risk for future users of the site



29 August 2019


b) deciding that the site is impacted when it is not (Type II error). The consequence of this error is that the client or a future potential owner will pay for further investigation / remediation that is not necessary

If the null hypothesis position that the site is impacted is adopted, the estimation of a 95% UCL will reduce the occurrence of decision Error (a) errors to 5%.

Step 7 Optimise the Design

During the DQO process the sampling design was optimised through several iterations. Optimisation of the design included evaluating Steps 1-6 of the DQO process. The following are the key steps taken to optimise the sample design:

• review of site operations based on site plans including the location of site infrastructure

• revisions of intrusive investigation locations on site prior to drilling works taking into account access constraints, location of underground services, infrastructure and WHS considerations

• adjustment of sample analysis plan based on field observations and soil samples collected.

The final field program and sampling pattern is considered optimal taking into account the purpose of the investigation, access constraints, budget and temporal limitations. A detailed discussion on the sampling program is presented in Appendix E.



29 August 2019


5 Investigation Levels and Beneficial Uses

The National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 1999 (NEPM 1999) (Reference 5) is made under the National Environment Protection Council Act 1994 and was developed to establish a nationally consistent approach to the assessment of site contamination to ensure sound environmental management practices by the community which includes regulators, site assessors, environmental auditors, landowners, developers and industry. The NEPM 1999 was amended on 16 May 2013, which will be referred to as NEPM ASC, and has been officially implemented nationally.

The NEPM ASC Schedule B1 – Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater provides a framework for the use of investigation and screening levels for soil, soil gas and groundwater. The framework is based on a matrix of human health, ecological, and groundwater investigation and screening levels in conjunction with guidance for specific contaminants. The investigation levels and screening levels presented in the NEPM ASC are the concentrations of a contaminant above which further appropriate investigation and evaluation would be required.

The guidelines include:

• Ecological Investigation Levels (EILs) - for selected metals and organic substances and are applicable for assessing risk to terrestrial ecosystems – not applicable.

• Ecological Screening Levels (ESLs) - for selected petroleum hydrocarbon compounds and total recoverable hydrocarbon (TRH) fractions and are applicable for assessing risk to terrestrial ecosystems – applicable.

• Health Investigation Levels (HILs) - for a broad range of metals and organic substances. The HILs are applicable for assessing human health risk via all relevant pathways of exposure – applicable.

• Health Screening Levels (HSLs) - for selected total recoverable hydrocarbon compounds and fractions and are applicable to assessing human health risk via the inhalation and direct contact pathways – applicable.

• Petroleum Hydrocarbon Management Limits (Management Limits) - are applicable to petroleum hydrocarbon compounds only. They are applicable as screening levels following evaluation of human health and ecological risks and risks to groundwater resources. They are relevant for operating sites where significant sub-surface leakage of petroleum compounds has occurred and when decommissioning industrial and commercial sites. The Management Limits are only applied where applicable – applicable.

Application of these investigation and screening levels form the basis of a Tier 1 risk assessment.

Groundwater was not assessed as part of this investigation. Considering the site use and lack of sensitive ecological receptors at the site, it is considered that EILs and ESLs are not directly applicable for this investigation.



29 August 2019


6 Conceptual Site Model and Application of Investigation Levels

Based on the findings of the site inspection, the conceptual site model (CSM) in Appendix D has been developed. This includes a detailed summary of the CSM as well as the source-pathway-receptor analysis and application of relevant investigation levels. A summary of the applicable investigation levels of the potential source of COCs is summarised in Table 3, below

Summary of Applicable Investigation Levels Potential Source of COCs Media Applicable Investigation Level

General site sources (e.g. historical industrial land use, fill material)

Soil NEPM EILS, ESLs, HSLs, HILs & Management Limits

The levels of risk associated with these potential sources of COCs is highly dependent on site specific information such as COC constituency and concentrations, subsurface material, the permeability of local soil and rock, and depth to groundwater. These factors are assessed via a desktop study and the field investigation and considered during CSM development.

The site has been assessed for continued commercial/industrial land use suitability. The relevant land use scenario are therefore considered to be commercial / industrial criteria level guidelines presented in the relevant guidelines. It should be noted that a future change of land use may require additional investigation to determine the site’s suitability for the intended land use.



29 August 2019


7 Field Investigation

7.1 Sampling and Analysis Plan In general, borehole locations were designed to provide site coverage whilst targeting the identified areas of potential environmental impact/concern. Soil borehole locations are shown on Figure 2. The laboratory analysis schedule for samples was derived from the potential COCs associated with the industrial use of the site.

The presence of structural and tenancy walls, underground services, and tenant access permission issues influence the final investigation locations.

The rationale for sampling locations is presented in Table 4. Further information on the rationale for sampling pattern selection and density is presented in Appendix E.

Rational for Sampling Locations

Investigation Location

Sample type Targeting Justification

BH01to BH23 Soil To assess the concentrations of COCs in soil within previous historical borehole locations (PRA, 2001) and across the site to provide adequate site coverage.

7.2 Fieldwork, Soil Stratigraphy and Drilling Observations The intrusive field works were undertaken on 12 and 13 August 2019. The investigation boreholes were advanced by contractors Stratacore Drilling Pty Ltd (Stratacore) using a Geoprobe 6712DT track-mounted drill rig equipped with a push tube sampler.

Borehole locations are presented on Figure 2 and borehole logs are presented in Appendix F.

In general, the soil stratigraphy at the site can be summarised as:

• fill material/disturbed natural soil consisting of brown-dark brown and light grey, fine to coarse grained silty sand with gravels and rootlets and dark brown/light grey medium/coarse grained gravelly sand encountered to depths ranging between approximately 0.0 and 1.3 mbgl overlying

• light brown-dark brown, light grey-dark grey and yellow-light yellow, fine grained, dense to very dense silty sand.

No significant visual or olfactory indicators which would suggest soil impact by COCs were observed during the site investigation.

Each soil sample was collected with disposable nitrile gloves and placed into laboratory provided glass jars with Teflon lids and minimal headspace. Each sample container was clearly labelled with the project number, sample location and date of sample collection using a waterproof marker. Upon collection, samples were immediately placed into a chilled cooler for storage and later transport to the laboratory.

7.3 Laboratory Analysis A total of thirty eight (38) primary soil samples and three (3) intra-laboratory duplicate soil sample were collected and sent to Envirolab Services (Envirolab) in Sydney and were analysed for COCs,



29 August 2019


using NATA accredited methods. Samples were selectively analysed for TRH, BTEX, PAH, VOCs, PCBs, phenols and heavy metals. A summary of the analytical schedules are presented in Table 5.

Laboratory results are presented in Table C1 (Appendix C), where the results are compared to the investigation levels.

Soil Analytical Schedule

7.4 Quality Assurance The quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedures undertaken as part of this project are outlined in Appendix E of this report and procedures are referenced in NEPM ASC (Reference 7). Field procedures were designed to ensure the prevention/minimisation of cross-contamination, analyte loss and to ensure samples and results were representative of actual conditions.

Three (3) soil field duplicate samples were collected and analysed. The results of the duplicate samples were compared to those of the primary samples as a measure of method precision. The calculated RPDs of the duplicate samples were within acceptable ranges.

A detailed discussion on quality procedures and results for this investigation is presented in Appendix E. In general, the quality of the data set was considered to be reliable and acceptable.

Media Sample ID

Maximum sample depth (mbgl)

No. of samples COCs Locations

Primary samples per location

Total primary samples

Intralab duplicate samples

Interlab duplicate samples

Soil BH01 to BH23

2.0 to 2.1 2 to 3 38 3 0 Heavy metals, TRH, BTEX, PAHs, phenols, VOCs and PCBs

Refer to Figure 2



29 August 2019


8 Laboratory Results

A summary of the soil laboratory results are presented in Table C1 in Appendix C. A full copy of the NATA accredited laboratory reports are also presented in Appendix C.

8.1 Soil • Concentrations of COCs within all soil samples analysed were below the adopted human health

guidelines for commercial / industrial land use.

• Concentrations of COCs within soil samples analysed were below the adopted ecological guidelines for commercial / industrial land use with the exception of:

o concentrations of zinc (700 mg/kg) detected within one (1) sample BH15_0.5-0.6 which exceeded the NEPM ASC generic EILs of 360 mg/kg

o concentrations of copper (170 mg/kg) detected within one (1) sample BH20_1.0-1.1 which exceed the NEPM ASC generic EILs of 140 mg/kg

o concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene were detected within two (2) samples BH15_0.5-0.6 (2.2 mg/kg) and BH16_1.0-1.1(4.5 mg/kg) which exceeded the NEPM ASC ESLs of 1.4 mg/kg.



29 August 2019


9 Discussion

KPMG SGA were engaged by Lend Lease c/- JLL to undertake an ESI for due diligence and end of lease purposes at 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW. The purpose of the ESI was to assess for the presence and nature of COCs in soil as a result of the tenants’ activities on the site, at the conclusion of the Lease as per the lease agreement for the site.

Based on a review of site history, the site has been historically used for industrial purposes since the 1910’s with the current site buildings comprising of warehouses and adjoining offices being constructed in the late 1970’s and used for the storage of documents and logistics purposes. A previous environmental audit investigation undertaken in 2001 by Peter J Ramsay and Associates (PJRA) (Reference 6) identified low concentrations of heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and total cyanide within soil samples collected, however the concentrations were below the relevant investigation level guidelines. Trace amounts of asbestos containing materials (ACM) were identified in the soil samples collected from the grassed areas in the east and west of the site, which were considered to be associated with the building rubble present in these areas sourced from the demolition of previous buildings on the site in the late 1970’s. PJRA considered the site suitable for continued commercial / industrial use and recommended that an additional environmental investigation should be undertaken at the conclusion of the tenant’s lease to determine if any impacts to the soil and/or groundwater had occurred as a result of the tenant’s activities on the site.

Current site activities considered to represent potential sources of COCs included general warehousing activities. Historical industrial land use and uncontrolled filling of the site during its development also represents a potential source of COCs. At the time of the investigation, the site was occupied by Iron Mountain, the majority of the internal warehouse area was undergoing make good operations and was previously used as a data and document storage facility.

The ESI included drilling of twenty three (23) soil investigation boreholes (BH01 to BH23), which were advanced using hand auger and push tube techniques across the site with soil sampling undertaken. A total of thirty eight (38) soil samples (including three (3) intra-laboratory duplicate samples) were collected and analysed with laboratory analysis undertaken for a range of COCs associated with site operations.

The concentrations of COCs within all soil samples analysed were the laboratory limit of reporting (LOR) and/or below the adopted human health assessment criteria for commercial/industrial use. The concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene and heavy metals (copper and zinc) exceed the adopted ecological assessment criteria for commercial / industrial land use at isolated locations. These criteria are not considered to be directly applicable to the investigated areas given their current condition and vegetation in areas investigated appeared to be in good health with no evidence of obvious stress. Although EILs and ESLs have been utilised during this investigation, they are not considered to be directly relevant to the soil beneath the investigated areas due to specific factors (i.e. hardstand warehouse and carp park area, lack of significant vegetation, intended land use and highly disturbed environment. Elevated concentrations of heavy metals and PAHs are likely attributed to imported fill material and no as a results of warehouse activities.



29 August 2019


10 Conclusion and Recommendations

Based upon the findings of the ESI, the site is no adversely affected by COCs as a result of warehousing activities that would preclude the use of the site for continued commercial / industrial purposes.



29 August 2019


11 Limitations

This report has been prepared by KPMG SGA in response to and subject to the following limitations:

1. The specific instructions received from Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd.

2. The Professional Services Agreement from KPMG SGA to Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd, dated 5 August 2019.

3. The report has been prepared to a specific scope of works as set out in Section 2.0 of this report.

4. May not be relied upon by any third party not named in this report for any purpose except with the prior written consent of KPMG SGA (which consent may or may not be given at the discretion of KPMG SGA).

5. This report comprises the formal report, documentation sections, tables, figures and appendices as referred to in the index to this report and must not be released to any third party or copied in part without all the material included in this report for any reason.

6. The report only relates to the site area referred to in the Section 3.1 of this report being located at 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW (“the site”) and further described in Figure 2.

7. The report relates to the site as at the date of the investigation as conditions may change thereafter due to natural processes and/or site activities.

8. No warranty or guarantee is made in regard to any other use than as specified in the scope of works.



29 August 2019


12 References

1. AS 4482.1—2005 Guide to the investigation and sampling of sites with potentially

contaminated soil, part 1: non-volatile and semi-volatile compounds, Standards Australia.

2. AS 4482.2—1999 Guide to the sampling and investigation of potentially contaminated soil, part

2: volatile substances, Standards Australia.

3. CSIRO Australia Australian Soil Resource Information System. http://www.asris.csiro.au

4. Geological Survey of New South Wales (1991) – 1:100,000 Penrith

5. National Environment Protection Council (1999) National Environment Protection (Assessment

of Site Contamination) Measure (NEPM) (Amended 2013)

6. Peter J Ramsay & Associates, Environmental Audit, 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW,

prepared for Project Consulting Pty Limited and Lend Lease real Estate Investments Limited,

dated 22 February 2001

http://www.asris.csiro.au/



29 August 2019


APPENDIX A FIGURES

KPMG SGA Property ConsultancyABN 53 103 479 992Tower 3 Phone: +61 2 9535 7000International Towers Sydney Fax: +61 2 9535 7001300 Barangaroo Avenue Email: [email protected] NSW 2000 Web: www.sgaproperty.com KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Ltd is an affiliate of KPMG. KPMG is an Australianpartnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affilated with KPMG International Cooperative (”KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.

CLIENT

PROJECT

TITLE

SCALE

DRAWN CHECKED

DATE

JOB No.

DRAWING No. ISSUE

N

Source: Google Maps

Approximate Scale (m)

0 100

A364678 - Figure 1364678A.P.BM.L.

29/08/2019NTS

Figure 1 - Site Location

Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee forAustralian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd

Environmental Site Investigation,112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW

SITE LOCATION

http://[email protected]

KPMG SGA Property ConsultancyABN 53 103 479 992Tower 3 Phone: +61 2 9535 7000International Towers Sydney Fax: +61 2 9535 7001300 Barangaroo Avenue Email: [email protected] NSW 2000 Web: www.sgaproperty.com KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Ltd is an affiliate of KPMG. KPMG is an Australianpartnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affilated with KPMG International Cooperative (”KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.

CLIENT

PROJECT

TITLE

SCALE

DRAWN CHECKED

DATE

JOB No.

DRAWING No. ISSUE

A364678A.P.BM.L.

29/08/2019NTS

Environmental Site Investigation112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW 2015

Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee forAustralian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd

Notes:Source Nearmap

364678_Figure 2

364678 - Figure 2

Approximate Scale (m)

0 50

N

Site Boundary

Burro

ws R

oad

KPMG SGA Soil Borehole Location

Historical Soil Borehole (PJRA, 2001)

Document StorageWarehouse

Receiving/DistributionWarehouse

BH03BH04

BH08

BH02

BH09

BH06

Offices

Eust

on R

oad

BH01

BH05

BH10

BH11

BH07

BH14

BH17 BH18 BH12

BH15

BH19BH20

BH23

BH13

BH22

BH21

BH16



29 August 2019


APPENDIX B GUIDELINES



29 August 2019


Table B1 Health Investigation Levels for Soil Contaminants

Chemical Health-based Investigation Levels (mg/kg)

Residential A 1 Residential B 1 Recreational C 1 Commercial / Industrial D 1

Metals and Inorganics

Arsenic 2 100 500 300 3 000

Beryllium 60 90 90 500

Boron 4500 40 000 20 000 300 000

Cadmium 20 150 90 900

Chromium (VI) 100 500 300 3600

Cobalt 100 600 300 4000

Copper 6000 30 000 17 000 240 000

Lead 3 300 1200 600 1 500

Manganese 3800 14 000 19 000 60 000

Mercury (inorganic)5 40 120 80 730

Methyl mercury4 10 30 13 180

Nickel 400 1200 1200 6 000

Selenium 200 1400 700 10 000

Zinc 7400 60 000 30 000 400 000

Cyanide (free) 250 300 240 1 500

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)

Carcinogenic PAHs (as BaP TEQ)6 3 4 3 40

Total PAHs7 300 400 300 4000

1 - HIL A - Residential with garden/accessible soil (home grown produce <10% fruit and vegetable intake (no poultry), also includes childcare centres, preschools and primary schools. - HIL B - Residential with minimal opportunities for soil access; includes dwellings with fully and permanently

paved yard space such as high-rise buildings and apartments.

- HIL C - Public open space such as parks, playgrounds, playing fields (e.g. ovals), secondary schools and

footpaths. This does not include undeveloped public open space where the potential for exposure is lower and

where a site-specific assessment may be more appropriate.

- HIL D - Commercial/industrial, includes premises such as shops, offices, factories and industrial sites.

2 Arsenic: HIL assumes 70% oral bioavailability. Site-specific bioavailability may be important and should be considered where appropriate (refer Schedule B7).

3 Lead: HIL is based on blood lead models (IEUBK for HILs A, B and C and adult lead model for HIL D where 50% oral bioavailability has been considered. Site-specific bioavailability may be important and should be considered where appropriate.

4 Methyl mercury: assessment of methyl mercury should only occur where there is evidence of its potential source. It may be associated with inorganic mercury and anaerobic microorganism activity in aquatic environments. In addition the reliability and quality of sampling/analysis should be considered.



29 August 2019


Table B2 Soil HSLs for vapour intrusion (mg/kg)

CHEMICAL 0 m to <1 m

1 m to <2 m

2 m to <4m

4 m+

0 m to <1 m

1 m to <2 m

2 m to <4 m

4 m+

0 m to <1 m

1 m to <2 m

2 m to <4 m

4 m+

Soil saturation concentration (Csat)

SAND

Toluene 160 220 310 540 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 560

Ethylbenzene 55 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 64

Xylenes 40 60 95 170 NL NL NL NL 230 NL NL NL 300

Naphthalene 3 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 9

Benzene 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 NL NL NL NL 3 3 3 3 360

F19 45 70 110 200 NL NL NL NL 260 370 630 NL 950

F210 110 240 440 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 560

SILT

Toluene 390 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 640

Ethylbenzene NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 69

Xylenes 95 210 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 330


Benzene 0.6 0.7 1 2 NL NL NL NL 4 4 6 10 440

F19 40 65 100 190 NL NL NL NL 250 360 590 NL 910

F210 230 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 570

CLAY

Toluene 480 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 630

Ethylbenzene NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 68

Xylenes 110 310 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 330


Benzene 0.7 1 2 3 NL NL NL NL 4 6 9 20 430

F19 50 90 150 290 NL NL NL NL 310 480 NL NL 850

F210 280 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 560

1 Land use settings are equivalent to those described in Table 1A(1) Footnote 1 and Schedule B7. HSLs for vapour intrusion for high density residential assume residential occupation of the ground floor. If communal car parks or commercial properties occupy the ground floor, HSL D should be used.

2 The key limitations of the HSLs should be referred to prior to application and are presented in Friebel and Nadebaum (2011b and 2011d).

3 Detailed assumptions in the derivation of the HSLs and information on how to apply the HSLs are presented in Friebel and Nadebaum (2011a and 2011b).

4 Soil HSLs for vapour inhalation incorporate an adjustment factor of 10 applied to the vapour phase partitioning to reflect the differences observed between theoretical estimates of soil vapour partitioning and field measurements. Refer Friebel & Nadebaum (2011a) for further information.

5 The soil saturation concentration (Csat) is defined as the soil concentration at which the porewater phase cannot dissolve any more of an individual chemical. The soil vapour that is in equilibrium with the porewater will be at its maximum. If the derived soil HSL exceeds Csat, a soil vapour source concentration for a petroleum mixture could not exceed a level that would result in the maximum allowable vapour risk for the given scenario. For these scenarios, no HSL is presented for these chemicals and the HSL is shown as ‘not limiting’ or ‘NL’.



29 August 2019


6 The HSLs for TPH C6-C10 in sandy soil are based on a finite source that depletes in less than seven years, and therefore consideration has been given to use of sub-chronic toxicity values. The >C8-C10 aliphatic toxicity has been adjusted to represent sub-chronic exposure, resulting in higher HSLs than if based on chronic toxicity. For further information refer to Section 8.2 and Appendix J in Friebel and Nadebaum (2011a).

7 The figures in the above table may be multiplied by a factor to account for biodegradation of vapour. A factor of 10 may apply for source depths from 2 m to <4 m or a factor of 100 for source depths of 4 m and deeper. To apply the attenuation factor for vapour degradation, a number of conditions must be satisfied. Firstly the maximum length of the shorter side of the concrete slab and surrounding pavement cannot exceed 15 m, as this would prevent oxygen penetrating to the centre of the slab. Secondly, measurement of oxygen in the subsurface is required to determine the potential for biodegradation. Oxygen must be confirmed to be present at >5% to use these factors.

8 For soil texture classification undertaken in accord with AS 1726, the classifications of sand, silt and clay may be applied as coarse, fine with liquid limit <50% and fine with liquid limit>50% respectively, as the underlying properties to develop the HSLs may reasonably be selected to be similar. Where there is uncertainty, either a conservative approach may be adopted or laboratory analysis should be carried out.

9 To obtain F1 subtract the sum of BTEX concentrations from the C6-C10 fraction.

10 To obtain F2 subtract naphthalene from the >C10-C16 fraction.



29 August 2019


Table B3 Soil-specific added contaminant limits for aged zinc in soil

Zn added contaminant limits (ACL, mg added contaminant/kg)

pH4 CEC5 (cmol/kg)

Areas of ecological significance

5 10 20 30 40 60

4.0 15 20 20 20 20 20

4.5 20 25 25 25 25 25

5.0 30 40 40 40 40 40

5.5 40 60 60 60 60 60

6.0 50 90 90 90 90 90

6.5 50 90 130 130 130 130

7.0 50 90 150 190 190 190

7.5 50 90 150 210 260 280

Urban residential/public open space1

5 10 20 30 40 60

4.0 70 85 85 85 85 85

4.5 100 120 120 120 120 120

5.0 130 180 180 180 180 180

5.5 180 270 270 270 270 270

6.0 230 400 400 400 400 400

6.5 230 400 590 590 590 590

7.0 230 400 700 880 880 880

7.5 230 400 700 960 1200 1300

Commercial/industrial

5 10 20 30 40 60

4.0 110 130 130 130 130 130

4.5 150 190 190 190 190 190

5.0 210 290 290 290 290 290

5.5 280 420 420 420 420 420

6.0 360 620 620 620 620 620

6.5 360 620 920 920 920 920

7.0 360 620 1100 1400 1400 1400

7.5 360 620 1100 1500 1900 2000

1 Urban residential/public open space is broadly equivalent to the HIL A, HIL B and HIL C land use scenarios in Table B1.

2 Aged values apply to contamination present in soil for at least two years. For fresh contamination refer to Schedule B5c.

3 The EIL is calculated from summing the ACL and the ABC. 4 pH measure using the CaCl2 method (Raymond & Higginson 1992).

5 CEC measured using the silver thiourea method (Chabra et al. 1972).



29 August 2019


Table B4 Soil-specific added contaminant limits for aged copper in soil

Cu added contaminant limits (ACL, mg added contaminant/kg)

Areas of ecological significance

CEC5 (cmol/kg) based

5 10 20 30 40 60

30 65 70 70 75 80

pH4 based

4.5 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.5 8.0

20 45 65 90 190 270



5 10 20 30 40 60

95 190 210 220 220 230

pH4 based

4.5 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.5 8.0

60 130 190 280 560 800

Commercial/industrial


5 10 20 30 40 60

140 280 300 320 330 340

pH4 based

4.5 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.5 8.0

85 190 280 400 830 1200



3 The EIL is calculated from summing the ACL and the ABC.

4 pH measure using the CaCl2 method (Raymond & Higginson 1992).




29 August 2019


Table B5 Soil-specific added contaminant limits for aged chromium III and nickel in soil

CHEMICAL

Clay content (% clay)

Added contaminant limits (mg added contaminant/kg) for various land uses

Areas of ecological

significance

Urban residential/public

open space1

Commercial and industrial

Chromium III

1 60 190 310

2.5 80 250 420

5 100 320 530

≥10 130 400 660

Nickel

CEC4 (cmol/kg)

Areas of ecological

significance


open space1


5 5 30 55

10 30 170 290

20 45 270 460

30 60 350 600

40 70 420 730

60 95 560 960







29 August 2019


Table B6 Generic added contaminant limits for lead in soils irrespective of their physiochemical properties

Pb added contaminant limits (mg added contaminant/kg) for various land uses

CHEMICAL Areas of ecological significance



Lead 470 1100 1800






29 August 2019


Table B7 Generic EIL’s for aged As, fresh DDT and fresh naphthalene in soils irrespective of their physiochemical properties

Ecological Investigation Levels (mg total contaminant/kg)

CHEMICAL Areas of ecological significance


open space1


Arsenic2 4 40 100 160

DDT3 3 180 640

Naphthalene3 4 10 170 370


2 Aged values are applicable to arsenic contamination present in soil for at least two years. For fresh contamination refer to Schedule B5c.

3 Insufficient data was available to calculate values for DDT and naphthalene, consequently the values for fresh contamination should be used.

4 Insufficient data was available to calculate ACL’s for As, DDT and naphthalene. The EIL should be taken directly from Table B7



29 August 2019


Table B8 ESLs for TPH fractions F1-F4, BTEX and benzo(a)pyrene in soil

CHEMICAL

Soil texture

ESLs (mg/kg dry soil)

Areas of ecological

significance


open space1


F1 C6 – C10 Coarse/Fine

125* 180* 215*

F2 > C10 – C16 25* 120* 170*

F3 > C16 – C34 Coarse - 300 1700

Fine - 1300 2500

F4 > C34 – C40 Coarse - 2800 3300

Fine - 5600 6600

Benzene Coarse 10 50 75

Fine 10 65 95

Toluene Coarse 10 85 135

Fine 65 105 135

Ethylbenzene Coarse 1.5 70 165

Fine 40 125 185

Xylenes Coarse 10 105 180

Fine 1.6 45 95

Benzo(a)pyrene Coarse 0.7 0.7 1.4

Fine 0.7 0.7 1.4

(1) ESLs are of low reliability except where indicated by * which indicates that the ESL is of moderate reliability.

(2) “ – “ indicates that insufficient data was available to derive a value.

(3) To obtain F1, subtract the sum of BTEX concentrations from C6 – C10 fraction and subtract naphthalene >C10 – C16 to obtain F2.



29 August 2019


Table B9 Management Limits for TPH fractions F1-F4 in soil

TPH Fraction Soil texture Management Limits1 (mg/kg dry soil)

Residential, parkland and public open

space


F12 C6 – C10

Coarse 700 700

Fine 800 800

F22 > C10 – C16 Coarse 1000 1000

Fine 1000 1000

F3 > C16 – C34 Coarse 2500 3500

Fine 3500 5000

F4 > C34 – C40 Coarse 10 000 10 000

Fine 10 000 10 000

1 Management Limits are applied after consideration of relevant ESLs and HSLs.

2 Separate management limits for BTEX and naphthalene are not available hence these should not be subtracted from the relevant fractions to obtain F1 and F2.



29 August 2019


APPENDIX C LABORATORY RESULTS SUMMARY AND TRANSCIPTS

Project Number: 364678Site: 112‐120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWClient: Lend Lease Funds Management Limited‐trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial

Table C1 ‐ Summary of Soil Results ‐ Commercial/Industrial

Inorganics Solvents Phenols

Moisture

Arsenic

Cadm

ium

Chromium (III+

VI)

Copp

er

Lead

Mercury

Nicke

l

Zinc

Benzen

e

Toluen

e

Ethy

lben

zene

Xylene

Total

Cycloh

exan

e

Phen

olics To

tal

C6‐C10

C6‐C10

(F1 minus

BTEX

)

C10‐C1

6

C10‐C1

6 (F2 minus

Nap

htha

lene

)

C16‐C3

4

C34‐C4

0

C10‐C4

0 (Sum

of

total)

% mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kgEQL 0.1 4 0.4 1 1 1 0.1 1 1 0.2 0.5 1 3 1 5 25 25 50 50 100 100 50CRC Care HSL‐D Commercial / Industrial 430 99,000 27,000 81,000 26,000 20,000 27,000 38,000NEPM 2013 Table 1B(7) Management Limits Comm / Ind, Coarse Soil 700 1,000 3,500 10,000 NEPM 2013 Table 1A(3) Comm/Ind D Soil HSL for Vapour Intrusion, Sand, 0‐1m 3 NL NL 230 260 NL 1‐2m 3 NL NL NL 370 NL 2‐4m 3 NL NL NL 630 NL NEPM 2013 Table 1B(5) Generic EIL ‐ Comm/Ind (KPMG SGA) 160 310 140 1,800 55 360 NEPM 2013 Table 1B(6) ESLs for Comm/Ind, Coarse Soil, 0‐2m 75 135 165 180 215 170 1,700 3,330NEPM 2013 Table 1A(1) HILs Comm/Ind D Soil 3,000 900 240,000 1,500 730 6,000 400,000

Field ID Date DepthBH01_0.1‐0.2 13/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2 4.2 4 <0.4 17 37 55 0.1 10 92 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <1 <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH01_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 3.0 <4 <0.4 3 10 9 <0.1 1 65 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH02_0.6‐0.7 12/08/2019 0.6 ‐ 0.7 1.2 <4 <0.4 1 <1 1 <0.1 <1 3 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH02_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 1.2 <4 <0.4 1 <1 1 <0.1 <1 2 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH03_0.6‐0.7 12/08/2019 0.6 ‐ 0.7 3.8 <4 <0.4 2 4 18 <0.1 1 95 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH04_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4 8.6 <4 <0.4 5 4 15 <0.1 3 16 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH04_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 13 4 <0.4 9 27 93 0.6 4 180 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH05_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3 5.4 <4 <0.4 7 15 19 <0.1 5 31 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <1 <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH05_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 2.7 <4 <0.4 1 4 2 <0.1 <1 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH06_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3 14 6 0.4 15 65 91 0.2 7 130 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 120 <100 120BH06_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 13 <4 <0.4 8 15 28 <0.1 4 43 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH06_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 3.7 <4 <0.4 5 17 38 <0.1 33 33 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH07_0.1‐0.2 12/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2 7.9 4 1 22 43 110 0.2 15 140 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH07_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 4.7 <4 <0.4 <1 <1 1 <0.1 <1 1 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH08_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 3.9 <4 <0.4 11 4 15 <0.1 4 20 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH09_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 4.8 <4 <0.4 3 3 2 <0.1 2 7 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH10_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4 7.6 <4 <0.4 4 4 12 <0.1 2 16 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH11_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4 5.4 <4 <0.4 2 2 10 <0.1 1 11 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <1 ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH12_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3 8.2 <4 <0.4 22 57 49 <0.1 20 130 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <1 ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH13_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3 5.0 <4 <0.4 30 58 55 <0.1 30 130 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH13_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 9.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐BH14_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 11 5 <0.4 9 60 66 0.1 6 90 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH15_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 10 8 1 110 120 120 2.1 12 700 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 240 <100 240BH16_0.1‐0.2 13/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2 5.1 8 <0.4 62 39 48 <0.1 49 66 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH16_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 4.7 <4 <0.4 5 1 2 <0.1 4 6 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 330 <100 330BH17_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 21 <4 <0.4 11 13 42 0.3 4 54 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <1 ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH18_0.3‐0.4 13/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4 7.2 <4 <0.4 4 3 13 <0.1 2 14 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH18_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 9.6 6 <0.4 4 15 44 0.1 3 77 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 280 110 390BH19_0.3‐0.4 13/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4 5.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.5 <1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐BH19_0.7‐0.8 13/08/2019 0.7 ‐ 0.8 5.0 <4 <0.4 4 3 8 <0.1 1 35 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH20_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3 7.7 <4 <0.4 4 4 12 <0.1 2 15 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH20_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 22 14 0.5 12 170 300 0.3 18 270 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 100 <100 100BH21_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3 4.2 <4 <0.4 3 14 35 <0.1 2 50 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <1 <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH21_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 7.2 <4 <0.4 4 34 24 <0.1 2 24 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 200 <100 200BH22_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3 5.9 <4 <0.4 4 10 22 <0.1 3 34 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH22_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 6.6 <4 <0.4 4 6 14 <0.1 1 14 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <1 ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH23_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3 7.7 <4 <0.4 16 50 94 <0.1 19 120 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH23_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 6.3 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.5 <1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐QC01_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 1.5 <4 <0.4 <1 <1 <1 <0.1 <1 1 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50QC02_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 3.8 <4 <0.4 <1 <1 2 <0.1 <1 1 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50QC04_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 13 <4 <0.4 5 15 73 0.3 3 67 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 190 <100 190

Environmental StandardsCRC Care, 2011, CRC Care HSL‐D Commercial / IndustrialNEPM, NEPM 2013 Table 1B(7) Management Limits Comm / Ind, Coarse Soil NEPM, 2013, NEPM 2013 Table 1B(5) Generic EIL ‐ Comm/Ind (KPMG SGA)

Metals BTEX TRH

Page 1 of 5



EQLCRC Care HSL‐D Commercial / IndustrialNEPM 2013 Table 1B(7) Management Limits Comm / Ind, Coarse Soil NEPM 2013 Table 1A(3) Comm/Ind D Soil HSL for Vapour Intrusion, Sand, 0‐1m 1‐2m 2‐4mNEPM 2013 Table 1B(5) Generic EIL ‐ Comm/Ind (KPMG SGA) NEPM 2013 Table 1B(6) ESLs for Comm/Ind, Coarse Soil, 0‐2mNEPM 2013 Table 1A(1) HILs Comm/Ind D Soil

Field ID Date DepthBH01_0.1‐0.2 13/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2BH01_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH02_0.6‐0.7 12/08/2019 0.6 ‐ 0.7BH02_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH03_0.6‐0.7 12/08/2019 0.6 ‐ 0.7BH04_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH04_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH05_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH05_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH06_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH06_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH06_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH07_0.1‐0.2 12/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2BH07_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH08_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH09_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH10_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH11_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH12_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH13_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH13_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH14_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH15_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH16_0.1‐0.2 13/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2BH16_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH17_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH18_0.3‐0.4 13/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH18_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH19_0.3‐0.4 13/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH19_0.7‐0.8 13/08/2019 0.7 ‐ 0.8BH20_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH20_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH21_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH21_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH22_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH22_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH23_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH23_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6QC01_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1QC02_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1QC04_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1


1,1,1,2‐

tetrachloroe

than

e

1,1,1‐trichloroe

than

e

1,1,2,2‐

tetrachloroe

than

e

1,1,2‐trichloroe

than

e

1,1‐dichloroetha

ne

1,1‐dichloroethe

ne

1,1‐dichloroprop

ene

1,2,3‐

trichlorop

ropa

ne

1,2‐dibrom

o‐3‐

chloroprop

ane

1,2‐dichloroetha

ne

1,2‐dichloroprop

ane

1,3‐dichloroprop

ane

2,2‐dichloroprop

ane

Brom

ochlorom

etha

ne Brom

odichlorom

etha

ne Brom

oform

Carbon

tetrachloride

Chlorodibrom

ometha

ne Chloroetha

ne

Chloroform

Chlorometha

ne

cis‐1,2‐

dichloroethe

ne

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Chlorinated Hydrocarbons

Page 2 of 5






cis‐1,3‐

dichloroprop

ene

Dibromom

etha

ne

Hexachlorob

utad

iene

Trichloroe

then

e

Tetrachloroe

then

e

tran

s‐1,2‐

dichloroethe

ne

tran

s‐1,3‐

dichloroprop

ene

Viny

l chloride

1,2,3‐

trichlorob

enzene

1,2,4‐

trichlorob

enzene

1,2‐dichlorobe

nzen

e

1,3‐dichlorobe

nzen

e

1,4‐dichlorobe

nzen

e

2‐chlorotoluen

e

4‐chlorotoluen

e

Brom

oben

zene

Chlorobe

nzen

e

1,2‐dibrom

oethan

e

Brom

ometha

ne

Dichlorod

ifluo

rometh

ane

Trichlorofluorom

etha

ne 1,2,4‐

trim

ethy

lben

zene

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Halogenated HydrocarbonsHalogenated Benzenes

Page 3 of 5






1,3,5‐

trim

ethy

lben

zene

Isop

ropy

lben

zene

n‐bu

tylben

zene

n‐prop

ylbe

nzen

e

p‐isop

ropy

ltoluen

e

sec‐bu

tylben

zene

Styren

e

tert‐butylbe

nzen

e

Benzo(b+

j+k)flu

oran

the

ne

Acen

aphthe

ne

Acen

aphthy

lene

Anthracene

Benz(a)anthracen

e

Benzo(a) pyren

e

Benzo(g,h,i)p

erylen

e

Chrysene

Diben

z(a,h)an

thracen

e Fluo

ranthe

ne

Fluo

rene

Inde

no(1,2,3‐

c,d)py

rene

Nap

htha

lene

Phen

anthrene

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

11,000

NL NL NL 370

1.4

<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.07 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.08 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1 <0.1 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.73 0.5 0.7 <0.1 1.4 <0.1 0.4 <0.1 0.7‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.7 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 <0.1 1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.4<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 0.5 <0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.4 <0.1 0.8 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.6‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 <0.1 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.63 0.4 0.7 <0.1 1.6 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 1.0‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.7 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 <0.1 0.6 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.08 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.4 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 <0.1 0.4 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.2‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 <0.1 0.2 0.4 1.2 2.2 0.6 2.1 0.1 4.0 1.4 0.5 <1 2.7‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 <0.1 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.65 0.4 0.6 <0.1 1.8 0.1 0.3 <0.1 1.6‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6.5 <0.1 0.6 0.8 3.9 4.5 3.2 3.4 0.6 6.8 0.2 2.4 0.3 2.0<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.4 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 <0.1 0.4 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.2<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.06 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.4 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.4 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.2<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 0.6 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 <0.1 0.6 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.2‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.08 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 <0.1 0.6 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.3<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.8 <0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 <0.1 0.8 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.5

MAH PAH

Page 4 of 5






Pyrene

Benzo(a)py

rene

TEQ

(LOR)

PAHs (Sum

of

positiv

es)

Arochlor 101

6

Arochlor 122

1

Arochlor 123

2

Arochlor 124

2

Arochlor 124

8

Arochlor 125

4

Arochlor 126

0

PCBs (S

um of total)

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg0.1 0.5 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

40 4,000 7

0.1 <0.5 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.1 <0.5 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.1 <0.5 0.3 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.2 <0.5 0.56 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐1.4 1.1 8.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.9 0.6 4.6 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.8 0.5 4.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐1.6 1 8.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.6 0.5 3.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.2 <0.5 0.65 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.1 <0.5 0.3 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.4 <0.5 1.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.5 <0.5 2.6 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐3.7 2.7 22 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐1.7 1 9.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.17.5 6.4 43 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.3 <0.5 1.7 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.1 <0.5 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.4 <0.5 2.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.1 <0.5 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.4 <0.5 2.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.6 0.5 3.4 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.2 <0.5 0.51 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.8 0.5 3.6 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.3 <0.5 1.4 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.8 0.6 4.9 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

PCBs

Page 5 of 5

Envirolab Services Pty Ltd

ABN 37 112 535 645

12 Ashley St Chatswood NSW 2067

ph 02 9910 6200 fax 02 9910 6201

[email protected]

www.envirolab.com.au

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 223889

Tower 3, International Towers Sydney, 300 Barangaroo Ave, Sydney, NSW, 2000Address

Martin LeongAttention

KPMG SGAClient

Client Details

14/08/2019Date completed instructions received

14/08/2019Date samples received

88 soil, 3 waterNumber of Samples

364678Your Reference

Sample Details

Please refer to the last page of this report for any comments relating to the results.

Results are reported on a dry weight basis for solids and on an as received basis for other matrices.

Samples were analysed as received from the client. Results relate specifically to the samples as received.

Please refer to the following pages for results, methodology summary and quality control data.

Analysis Details

Tests not covered by NATA are denoted with *Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 - Testing.

NATA Accreditation Number 2901. This document shall not be reproduced except in full.

This report replaces R00 created on 20/08/2019 due to: Project ID Amended (ClientRequest)

Reissue Details

20/08/2019Date of Issue

20/08/2019Date results requested by

Report Details

Nancy Zhang, Laboratory Manager

Authorised By

Steven Luong, Organics Supervisor

Jaimie Loa-Kum-Cheung, Metals Supervisor

Diego Bigolin, Team Leader, Inorganics

Results Approved By

Revision No: R01

223889Envirolab Reference: Page | 1 of 64

Client Reference: 364678

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgchlorobenzene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtetrachloroethene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2-dibromoethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgdibromochloromethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,3-dichloropropane

<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1,2-trichloroethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgcis-1,3-dichloropropene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtrans-1,3-dichloropropene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgbromodichloromethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtrichloroethene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgdibromomethane

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgcarbon tetrachloride

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgCyclohexane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1-dichloropropene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2-dichloroethane


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgchloroform

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgbromochloromethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgcis-1,2-dichloroethene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtrans-1,2-dichloroethene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgTrichlorofluoromethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgChloroethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgBromomethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgVinyl Chloride

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgChloromethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgDichlorodifluoromethane

17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted

soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample

12.08.201912.08.201913.08.201912.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.3-0.40.5-0.60.2-0.30.3-0.40.1-0.2Depth

BH11_0.3-0.4BH06_0.5-0.6BH05_0.2-0.3BH04_0.3-0.4BH01_0.1-0.2UNITSYour Reference

223889-36223889-21223889-16223889-12223889-1Our Reference

VOCs in soil

Envirolab Reference: 223889

R01Revision No:

Page | 2 of 64


10710410897100%Surrogate 4-Bromofluorobenzene

99100989998%Surrogate Toluene-d8

631067483109%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene

100101100100100%Surrogate Dibromofluorometha

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2,3-trichlorobenzene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kghexachlorobutadiene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgn-butyl benzene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2-dichlorobenzene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg4-isopropyl toluene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgsec-butyl benzene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2,4-trimethyl benzene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtert-butyl benzene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg4-chlorotoluene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgn-propyl benzene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgbromobenzene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgisopropylbenzene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2,3-trichloropropane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgo-Xylene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgstyrene

<2<2<2<2<2mg/kgm+p-xylene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgbromoform

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgEthylbenzene


12.08.201912.08.201913.08.201912.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.3-0.40.5-0.60.2-0.30.3-0.40.1-0.2Depth


223889-36223889-21223889-16223889-12223889-1Our Reference

VOCs in soil


R01Revision No:

Page | 3 of 64


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgchlorobenzene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtetrachloroethene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2-dibromoethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgdibromochloromethane


<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgcis-1,3-dichloropropene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtrans-1,3-dichloropropene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgbromodichloromethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtrichloroethene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgdibromomethane

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgcarbon tetrachloride

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgCyclohexane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1-dichloropropene




<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgchloroform

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgbromochloromethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgcis-1,2-dichloroethene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtrans-1,2-dichloroethene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgTrichlorofluoromethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgChloroethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgBromomethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgVinyl Chloride

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgChloromethane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgDichlorodifluoromethane

17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.30.3-0.40.5-0.60.5-0.60.2-0.3Depth


223889-73223889-65223889-59223889-44223889-39Our Reference

VOCs in soil


R01Revision No:

Page | 4 of 64







<1<1<1<1<1mg/kghexachlorobutadiene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgn-butyl benzene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg4-isopropyl toluene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgsec-butyl benzene



<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtert-butyl benzene




<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgn-propyl benzene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgbromobenzene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgisopropylbenzene

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2,3-trichloropropane



<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgstyrene


<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgbromoform



13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.30.3-0.40.5-0.60.5-0.60.2-0.3Depth


223889-73223889-65223889-59223889-44223889-39Our Reference

VOCs in soil


R01Revision No:

Page | 5 of 64


<1<1mg/kgchlorobenzene

<1<1mg/kg1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane

<1<1mg/kgtetrachloroethene

<1<1mg/kg1,2-dibromoethane

<1<1mg/kgdibromochloromethane

<1<1mg/kg1,3-dichloropropane

<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene

<1<1mg/kg1,1,2-trichloroethane

<1<1mg/kgcis-1,3-dichloropropene

<1<1mg/kgtrans-1,3-dichloropropene

<1<1mg/kgbromodichloromethane

<1<1mg/kgtrichloroethene


<1<1mg/kgdibromomethane

<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene

<1<1mg/kgcarbon tetrachloride

<1<1mg/kgCyclohexane

<1<1mg/kg1,1-dichloropropene

<1<1mg/kg1,1,1-trichloroethane

<1<1mg/kg1,2-dichloroethane


<1<1mg/kgchloroform

<1<1mg/kgbromochloromethane

<1<1mg/kgcis-1,2-dichloroethene

<1<1mg/kg1,1-dichloroethane

<1<1mg/kgtrans-1,2-dichloroethene

<1<1mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethene

<1<1mg/kgTrichlorofluoromethane

<1<1mg/kgChloroethane

<1<1mg/kgBromomethane

<1<1mg/kgVinyl Chloride

<1<1mg/kgChloromethane

<1<1mg/kgDichlorodifluoromethane

17/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted

soilsoilType of sample

13.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.5-0.60.5-0.6Depth

BH23_0.5-0.6BH22_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference

223889-81223889-78Our Reference

VOCs in soil


R01Revision No:

Page | 6 of 64






<1<1mg/kg1,2,3-trichlorobenzene

<1<1mg/kghexachlorobutadiene

<1<1mg/kg1,2,4-trichlorobenzene

<1<1mg/kg1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane

<1<1mg/kgn-butyl benzene

<1<1mg/kg1,2-dichlorobenzene

<1<1mg/kg4-isopropyl toluene


<1<1mg/kgsec-butyl benzene


<1<1mg/kg1,2,4-trimethyl benzene

<1<1mg/kgtert-butyl benzene

<1<1mg/kg1,3,5-trimethyl benzene

<1<1mg/kg4-chlorotoluene

<1<1mg/kg2-chlorotoluene

<1<1mg/kgn-propyl benzene

<1<1mg/kgbromobenzene

<1<1mg/kgisopropylbenzene

<1<1mg/kg1,2,3-trichloropropane

<1<1mg/kgo-Xylene

<1<1mg/kg1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane

<1<1mg/kgstyrene

<2<2mg/kgm+p-xylene

<1<1mg/kgbromoform

<1<1mg/kgEthylbenzene


13.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.5-0.60.5-0.6Depth


223889-81223889-78Our Reference

VOCs in soil


R01Revision No:

Page | 7 of 64



<3<3<3<3<3mg/kgTotal +ve Xylenes

<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgnaphthalene




<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene

<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgvTPH C6 - C10 less BTEX (F1)

<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10

<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9

17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


12.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.31.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth


223889-20223889-18223889-16223889-14223889-12Our Reference

vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil







<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene


<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10

<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9

17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.6-0.71.0-1.10.6-0.71.0-1.10.1-0.2Depth


223889-9223889-7223889-6223889-3223889-1Our Reference



R01Revision No:

Page | 8 of 64








<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene


<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10

<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9

17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.30.2-0.30.3-0.40.3-0.40.5-0.6Depth


223889-43223889-39223889-36223889-34223889-31Our Reference








<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene


<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10

<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9

17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.21.0-1.10.5-0.6Depth


223889-29223889-26223889-24223889-22223889-21Our Reference



R01Revision No:

Page | 9 of 64








<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene


<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10

<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9

17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

1.0-1.10.2-0.30.7-0.81.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth


223889-71223889-69223889-66223889-63223889-61Our Reference








<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene


<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10

<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9

17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.20.5-0.60.5-0.6Depth


223889-59223889-56223889-54223889-51223889-48Our Reference



R01Revision No:

Page | 10 of 64



<3<3<3mg/kgTotal +ve Xylenes

<1<1<1mg/kgnaphthalene

<1<1<1mg/kgo-Xylene

<2<2<2mg/kgm+p-xylene

<1<1<1mg/kgEthylbenzene

<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene

<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene

<25<25<25mg/kgvTPH C6 - C10 less BTEX (F1)

<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10

<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9

17/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted

soilsoilsoilType of sample

13.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

1.0-1.11.0-1.11.0-1.1Depth

QC04_1.0-1.1QC02_1.0-1.1QC01_1.0-1.1UNITSYour Reference

223889-86223889-84223889-83Our Reference








<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene


<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10

<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9

17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.30.5-0.60.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.3Depth


223889-80223889-78223889-77223889-75223889-73Our Reference



R01Revision No:

Page | 11 of 64


8179818888%Surrogate o-Terphenyl

120<50<50<50<50mg/kgTotal +ve TRH (>C10-C40)

<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40

120<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34

<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 - C16 less Naphthalene (F2)

<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16

<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36

<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28

<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH C10 - C14

16/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


12.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.31.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth


223889-20223889-18223889-16223889-14223889-12Our Reference

svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil


<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTotal +ve TRH (>C10-C40)

<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40

<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34


<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16

<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36

<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28

<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH C10 - C14

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.6-0.71.0-1.10.6-0.71.0-1.10.1-0.2Depth


223889-9223889-7223889-6223889-3223889-1Our Reference



R01Revision No:

Page | 12 of 64




<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40

<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34


<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16

<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36

<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28

<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH C10 - C14

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.30.2-0.30.3-0.40.3-0.40.5-0.6Depth


223889-43223889-39223889-36223889-34223889-31Our Reference




<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40

<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34


<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16

<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36

<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28

<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH C10 - C14

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.21.0-1.10.5-0.6Depth


223889-29223889-26223889-24223889-22223889-21Our Reference



R01Revision No:

Page | 13 of 64



100<50<50390<50mg/kgTotal +ve TRH (>C10-C40)

<100<100<100110<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40

100<100<100280<100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34


<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16

<100<100<100180<100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36

<100<100<100140<100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28

<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH C10 - C14

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

1.0-1.10.2-0.30.7-0.81.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth


223889-71223889-69223889-66223889-63223889-61Our Reference



<50330<50240<50mg/kgTotal +ve TRH (>C10-C40)

<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40

<100330<100240<100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34


<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16

<100190<100180<100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36

<100190<100130<100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28

<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH C10 - C14

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.20.5-0.60.5-0.6Depth


223889-59223889-56223889-54223889-51223889-48Our Reference



R01Revision No:

Page | 14 of 64



190<50<50mg/kgTotal +ve TRH (>C10-C40)

<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40

190<100<100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34

<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 - C16 less Naphthalene (F2)

<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16

120<100<100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36

100<100<100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28

<50<50<50mg/kgTRH C10 - C14

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


13.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

1.0-1.11.0-1.11.0-1.1Depth


223889-86223889-84223889-83Our Reference



<50<50<50200<50mg/kgTotal +ve TRH (>C10-C40)

<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40

<100<100<100200<100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34


<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16

<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36

<100<100<100120<100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28

<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH C10 - C14

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.30.5-0.60.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.3Depth


223889-80223889-78223889-77223889-75223889-73Our Reference



R01Revision No:

Page | 15 of 64


8997999691%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14

<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL)

<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(half)

<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (zero)

0.2<0.05<0.05<0.050.3mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.050.07mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgChrysene

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene

0.1<0.1<0.1<0.10.1mg/kgPyrene

0.1<0.1<0.1<0.10.1mg/kgFluoranthene

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAnthracene

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgPhenanthrene

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgFluorene

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthene

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgNaphthalene

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.6-0.71.0-1.10.6-0.71.0-1.10.1-0.2Depth


223889-9223889-7223889-6223889-3223889-1Our Reference

PAHs in Soil


R01Revision No:

Page | 16 of 64



0.6<0.51.1<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL)

0.5<0.51.0<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(half)

<0.5<0.51<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (zero)

4.6<0.058.10.560.3mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's

0.3<0.10.5<0.1<0.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene


0.2<0.10.4<0.1<0.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

0.4<0.050.730.080.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene

0.7<0.21<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene

0.4<0.10.70.1<0.1mg/kgChrysene

0.4<0.10.7<0.1<0.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene

0.9<0.11.40.20.1mg/kgPyrene

1<0.11.40.20.1mg/kgFluoranthene

<0.1<0.10.2<0.1<0.1mg/kgAnthracene

0.4<0.10.7<0.1<0.1mg/kgPhenanthrene

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgFluorene


<0.1<0.10.2<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene


16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


12.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.31.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth


223889-20223889-18223889-16223889-14223889-12Our Reference

PAHs in Soil


R01Revision No:

Page | 17 of 64



<0.5<0.50.510.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL)

<0.5<0.5<0.50.9<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(half)

<0.5<0.5<0.50.9<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (zero)

<0.05<0.053.48.44.5mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's

<0.1<0.10.30.40.2mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene


<0.1<0.10.20.30.2mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

<0.05<0.050.30.630.3mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene

<0.2<0.20.710.5mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene

<0.1<0.10.30.70.4mg/kgChrysene

<0.1<0.10.40.80.4mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene

<0.1<0.10.61.60.8mg/kgPyrene

<0.1<0.10.61.60.8mg/kgFluoranthene

<0.1<0.1<0.10.30.2mg/kgAnthracene

<0.1<0.10.11.00.6mg/kgPhenanthrene

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgFluorene


<0.1<0.1<0.10.20.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene


16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.21.0-1.10.5-0.6Depth


223889-29223889-26223889-24223889-22223889-21Our Reference

PAHs in Soil


R01Revision No:

Page | 18 of 64






1.80.3<0.050.65<0.05mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's

0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene


<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

0.20.05<0.050.08<0.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene

0.3<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene

0.2<0.1<0.10.1<0.1mg/kgChrysene

0.2<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene

0.40.1<0.10.2<0.1mg/kgPyrene

0.40.1<0.10.2<0.1mg/kgFluoranthene


0.2<0.1<0.10.1<0.1mg/kgPhenanthrene

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgFluorene




16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.30.2-0.30.3-0.40.3-0.40.5-0.6Depth


223889-43223889-39223889-36223889-34223889-31Our Reference

PAHs in Soil


R01Revision No:

Page | 19 of 64



<0.56.412.7<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL)

<0.56.40.92.7<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(half)

<0.56.40.92.7<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (zero)

1.7439.8222.6mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's

0.23.20.40.60.2mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene

<0.10.6<0.10.1<0.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene

0.12.40.30.50.2mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

0.24.50.652.20.2mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene

0.36.5120.5mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene

0.13.40.62.10.2mg/kgChrysene

0.23.90.81.20.2mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene

0.37.51.73.70.5mg/kgPyrene

0.36.81.84.00.4mg/kgFluoranthene

<0.10.80.40.4<0.1mg/kgAnthracene

0.12.01.62.70.2mg/kgPhenanthrene

<0.10.20.11.4<0.1mg/kgFluorene


<0.10.60.30.2<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene

<0.10.3<0.11.4<0.1mg/kgNaphthalene

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.20.5-0.60.5-0.6Depth


223889-59223889-56223889-54223889-51223889-48Our Reference

PAHs in Soil


R01Revision No:

Page | 20 of 64






2.40.3<0.052.40.3mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's

0.1<0.1<0.10.2<0.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene


0.1<0.1<0.10.1<0.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

0.20.06<0.050.20.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene

0.4<0.2<0.20.4<0.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene

0.2<0.1<0.10.2<0.1mg/kgChrysene

0.2<0.1<0.10.2<0.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene

0.40.1<0.10.40.1mg/kgPyrene

0.40.1<0.10.40.1mg/kgFluoranthene


0.2<0.1<0.10.2<0.1mg/kgPhenanthrene

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgFluorene




16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

1.0-1.10.2-0.30.7-0.81.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth


223889-71223889-69223889-66223889-63223889-61Our Reference

PAHs in Soil


R01Revision No:

Page | 21 of 64



<0.5<0.50.5<0.50.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL)



1.4<0.053.60.513.4mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's

0.1<0.10.2<0.10.3mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene


<0.1<0.10.2<0.10.2mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

0.1<0.050.30.080.3mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene

0.2<0.20.5<0.20.6mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene

0.1<0.10.4<0.10.3mg/kgChrysene

0.1<0.10.3<0.10.3mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene

0.3<0.10.80.20.6mg/kgPyrene

0.3<0.10.60.20.6mg/kgFluoranthene


0.2<0.10.30.10.2mg/kgPhenanthrene

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgFluorene




16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.30.5-0.60.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.3Depth


223889-80223889-78223889-77223889-75223889-73Our Reference

PAHs in Soil


R01Revision No:

Page | 22 of 64



0.6<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL)

0.6<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(half)

0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (zero)

4.9<0.05<0.05mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's

0.3<0.1<0.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene

<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene

0.2<0.1<0.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

0.4<0.05<0.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene

0.8<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene

0.4<0.1<0.1mg/kgChrysene

0.4<0.1<0.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene

0.8<0.1<0.1mg/kgPyrene

0.8<0.1<0.1mg/kgFluoranthene

0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAnthracene

0.5<0.1<0.1mg/kgPhenanthrene

<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgFluorene

<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthene

0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene

<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgNaphthalene

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


13.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

1.0-1.11.0-1.11.0-1.1Depth


223889-86223889-84223889-83Our Reference

PAHs in Soil


R01Revision No:

Page | 23 of 64


8686868586%Surrogate TCMX

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgTotal +ve PCBs (1016-1260)

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1260

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1254

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1248

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1242

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1232

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1221

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1016

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.30.2-0.30.3-0.40.1-0.20.2-0.3Depth


223889-73223889-69223889-61223889-54223889-43Our Reference

PCBs in Soil

8686879491%Surrogate TCMX

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgTotal +ve PCBs (1016-1260)

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1260

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1254

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1248

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1242

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1232

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1221

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1016

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


12.08.201912.08.201913.08.201912.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.5-0.60.2-0.30.2-0.30.6-0.70.1-0.2Depth


223889-31223889-20223889-16223889-9223889-1Our Reference

PCBs in Soil


R01Revision No:

Page | 24 of 64


8787%Surrogate TCMX

<0.1<0.1mg/kgTotal +ve PCBs (1016-1260)

<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1260







16/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted


13.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.30.2-0.3Depth


223889-80223889-77Our Reference

PCBs in Soil


R01Revision No:

Page | 25 of 64


13043118016mg/kgZinc

7<1543mg/kgNickel

0.2<0.1<0.10.6<0.1mg/kgMercury

912199315mg/kgLead

65415274mg/kgCopper

151795mg/kgChromium

0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4mg/kgCadmium

6<4<44<4mg/kgArsenic

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


12.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.31.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth


223889-20223889-18223889-16223889-14223889-12Our Reference

Acid Extractable metals in soil

95236592mg/kgZinc

1<1<1110mg/kgNickel

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.10.1mg/kgMercury

1811955mg/kgLead

4<1<11037mg/kgCopper

211317mg/kgChromium

<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4mg/kgCadmium

<4<4<4<44mg/kgArsenic

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.6-0.71.0-1.10.6-0.71.0-1.10.1-0.2Depth


223889-9223889-7223889-6223889-3223889-1Our Reference



R01Revision No:

Page | 26 of 64



3020122mg/kgNickel

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgMercury

554910122mg/kgLead

5857243mg/kgCopper

3022243mg/kgChromium

<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4mg/kgCadmium

<4<4<4<4<4mg/kgArsenic

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.30.2-0.30.3-0.40.3-0.40.5-0.6Depth


223889-43223889-39223889-36223889-34223889-31Our Reference


2011403343mg/kgZinc

4<115334mg/kgNickel

<0.1<0.10.2<0.1<0.1mg/kgMercury

1511103828mg/kgLead

4<1431715mg/kgCopper

11<12258mg/kgChromium

<0.4<0.41<0.4<0.4mg/kgCadmium


15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.21.0-1.10.5-0.6Depth


223889-29223889-26223889-24223889-22223889-21Our Reference



R01Revision No:

Page | 27 of 64



182132mg/kgNickel

0.3<0.1<0.10.1<0.1mg/kgMercury

3001284413mg/kgLead

17043153mg/kgCopper

124444mg/kgChromium

0.5<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4mg/kgCadmium

14<4<46<4mg/kgArsenic

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

1.0-1.10.2-0.30.7-0.81.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth


223889-71223889-69223889-66223889-63223889-61Our Reference


5466670090mg/kgZinc

4449126mg/kgNickel

0.3<0.1<0.12.10.1mg/kgMercury

4224812066mg/kgLead

1313912060mg/kgCopper

115621109mg/kgChromium

<0.4<0.4<0.41<0.4mg/kgCadmium

<4<4885mg/kgArsenic

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.20.5-0.60.5-0.6Depth


223889-59223889-56223889-54223889-51223889-48Our Reference



R01Revision No:

Page | 28 of 64


766711mg/kgZinc

103<1<1mg/kgNickel

<0.10.3<0.1<0.1mg/kgMercury

46732<1mg/kgLead

3315<1<1mg/kgCopper

155<1<1mg/kgChromium

<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4mg/kgCadmium


15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared

soilsoilsoilsoilType of sample

13.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.1-0.21.0-1.11.0-1.11.0-1.1Depth

BH01_0.1-0.2 - [TRIPLICATE]


223889-92223889-86223889-84223889-83Our Reference



191322mg/kgNickel

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgMercury

9414222435mg/kgLead

506103414mg/kgCopper

164443mg/kgChromium

<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4mg/kgCadmium

<4<4<4<4<4mg/kgArsenic

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.30.5-0.60.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.3Depth


223889-80223889-78223889-77223889-75223889-73Our Reference



R01Revision No:

Page | 29 of 64


<5<5mg/kgTotal Phenolics (as Phenol)

15/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


13.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.30.2-0.3Depth


223889-80223889-77Our Reference

Misc Soil - Inorg

<5<5<5<5<5mg/kgTotal Phenolics (as Phenol)

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.30.2-0.30.3-0.40.1-0.20.2-0.3Depth


223889-73223889-69223889-61223889-54223889-43Our Reference

Misc Soil - Inorg

<5<5<5<5<5mg/kgTotal Phenolics (as Phenol)

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


12.08.201912.08.201913.08.201912.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.5-0.60.2-0.30.2-0.30.6-0.70.1-0.2Depth


223889-31223889-20223889-16223889-9223889-1Our Reference

Misc Soil - Inorg


R01Revision No:

Page | 30 of 64


5.08.25.47.64.8%Moisture

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.30.2-0.30.3-0.40.3-0.40.5-0.6Depth


223889-43223889-39223889-36223889-34223889-31Our Reference

Moisture

3.94.77.93.713%Moisture

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.21.0-1.10.5-0.6Depth


223889-29223889-26223889-24223889-22223889-21Our Reference

Moisture

142.75.4138.6%Moisture

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


12.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.31.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth


223889-20223889-18223889-16223889-14223889-12Our Reference

Moisture

3.81.21.23.04.2%Moisture

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.6-0.71.0-1.10.6-0.71.0-1.10.1-0.2Depth


223889-9223889-7223889-6223889-3223889-1Our Reference

Moisture


R01Revision No:

Page | 31 of 64


3.81.56.37.76.6%Moisture

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


12.08.201912.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

1.0-1.11.0-1.10.5-0.60.2-0.30.5-0.6Depth

QC02_1.0-1.1QC01_1.0-1.1BH23_0.5-0.6BH23_0.2-0.3BH22_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference

223889-84223889-83223889-81223889-80223889-78Our Reference

Moisture

5.97.24.2227.7%Moisture

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.3Depth


223889-77223889-75223889-73223889-71223889-69Our Reference

Moisture

5.05.59.67.221%Moisture

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

0.7-0.80.3-0.41.0-1.10.3-0.40.5-0.6Depth


223889-66223889-65223889-63223889-61223889-59Our Reference

Moisture

4.75.110119.5%Moisture

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared


13.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled

1.0-1.10.1-0.20.5-0.60.5-0.60.5-0.6Depth


223889-56223889-54223889-51223889-48223889-44Our Reference

Moisture


R01Revision No:

Page | 32 of 64


13%Moisture

16/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/2019-Date prepared

soilType of sample

13.08.2019Date Sampled

1.0-1.1Depth

QC04_1.0-1.1UNITSYour Reference

223889-86Our Reference

Moisture


R01Revision No:

Page | 33 of 64


<1µg/LChlorobenzene

<1µg/L1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane

<1µg/LTetrachloroethene

<1µg/L1,2-dibromoethane

<1µg/LDibromochloromethane

<1µg/L1,3-dichloropropane

<1µg/LToluene

<1µg/L1,1,2-trichloroethane

<1µg/Lcis-1,3-dichloropropene

<1µg/Ltrans-1,3-dichloropropene

<1µg/LBromodichloromethane

<1µg/LTrichloroethene


<1µg/LDibromomethane

<1µg/LBenzene

<1µg/LCarbon tetrachloride

<1µg/LCyclohexane

<1µg/L1,1-dichloropropene

<1µg/L1,1,1-trichloroethane

<1µg/L1,2-dichloroethane


<1µg/LChloroform

<1µg/LBromochloromethane

<1µg/LCis-1,2-dichloroethene

<1µg/L1,1-dichloroethane

<1µg/LTrans-1,2-dichloroethene

<1µg/L1,1-Dichloroethene

<10µg/LTrichlorofluoromethane

<10µg/LChloroethane

<10µg/LBromomethane

<10µg/LVinyl Chloride

<10µg/LChloromethane

<10µg/LDichlorodifluoromethane


15/08/2019-Date extracted

waterType of sample


1.0-1.1Depth

Trip BlankUNITSYour Reference


VOCs in water


R01Revision No:

Page | 34 of 64


99%Surrogate 4-BFB

96%Surrogate toluene-d8

103%Surrogate Dibromofluoromethane

<1µg/L1,2,3-trichlorobenzene

<1µg/LHexachlorobutadiene

<1µg/L1,2,4-trichlorobenzene

<1µg/L1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane

<1µg/Ln-butyl benzene

<1µg/L1,2-dichlorobenzene

<1µg/L4-isopropyl toluene


<1µg/LSec-butyl benzene


<1µg/L1,2,4-trimethyl benzene

<1µg/LTert-butyl benzene

<1µg/L1,3,5-trimethyl benzene

<1µg/L4-chlorotoluene

<1µg/L2-chlorotoluene

<1µg/Ln-propyl benzene

<1µg/LBromobenzene

<1µg/LIsopropylbenzene

<1µg/L1,2,3-trichloropropane

<1µg/Lo-xylene

<1µg/L1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane

<1µg/LStyrene

<2µg/Lm+p-xylene

<1µg/LBromoform

<1µg/LEthylbenzene

waterType of sample


1.0-1.1Depth

Trip BlankUNITSYour Reference


VOCs in water


R01Revision No:

Page | 35 of 64


9899101%Surrogate 4-BFB

999699%Surrogate toluene-d8

105103109%Surrogate Dibromofluoromethane

[NA][NA]<1µg/LNaphthalene

110%[NA]<1µg/Lo-xylene

106%[NA]<2µg/Lm+p-xylene

109%[NA]<1µg/LEthylbenzene

113%[NA]<1µg/LToluene

120%[NA]<1µg/LBenzene

[NA][NA]<10µg/LTRH C6 - C10 less BTEX (F1)

[NA]<10<10µg/LTRH C6 - C10

[NA]<10<10µg/LTRH C6 - C9

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted

waterwaterwaterType of sample

13.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled

1.0-1.11.0-1.11.0-1.1Depth

Trip SpikeTrip BlankRB01UNITSYour Reference

223889-91223889-90223889-89Our Reference

vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Water


R01Revision No:

Page | 36 of 64



<100µg/LTRH >C34 - C40

<100µg/LTRH >C16 - C34

99µg/LTRH >C10 - C16 less Naphthalene (F2)

99µg/LTRH >C10 - C16

<100µg/LTRH C29 - C36

<100µg/LTRH C15 - C28

<50µg/LTRH C10 - C14



waterType of sample


1.0-1.1Depth

RB01UNITSYour Reference


svTRH (C10-C40) in Water


R01Revision No:

Page | 37 of 64



NIL (+)VEµg/LTotal +ve PAH's

<5µg/LBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ

<1µg/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene

<1µg/LDibenzo(a,h)anthracene

<1µg/LIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

<1µg/LBenzo(a)pyrene

<2µg/LBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene

<1µg/LChrysene

<1µg/LBenzo(a)anthracene

<1µg/LPyrene

<1µg/LFluoranthene

<1µg/LAnthracene

<1µg/LPhenanthrene

<1µg/LFluorene

<1µg/LAcenaphthene

<1µg/LAcenaphthylene

<1µg/LNaphthalene



waterType of sample


1.0-1.1Depth



PAHs in Water


R01Revision No:

Page | 38 of 64


<0.02mg/LZinc - Dissolved

<0.02mg/LNickel - Dissolved

<0.0005mg/LMercury - Dissolved

<0.03mg/LLead - Dissolved

<0.01mg/LCopper - Dissolved

<0.01mg/LChromium - Dissolved

<0.01mg/LCadmium - Dissolved

<0.05mg/LArsenic - Dissolved


15/08/2019-Date digested

waterType of sample


1.0-1.1Depth



Metals in Water - Dissolved


R01Revision No:

Page | 39 of 64


Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-MS. Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater - 2013.

Org-012

Soil samples are extracted with dichloromethane/acetone and waters with dichloromethane and analysed by GC-ECD. Note, the Total +ve PCBs PQL is reflective of the lowest individual PQL and is therefore" Total +ve PCBs" is simply a sum of the positive individual PCBs.

Org-006

Soil samples are extracted with dichloromethane/acetone and waters with dichloromethane and analysed by GC-ECD.Org-006

Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-FID. F2 = (>C10-C16)-Naphthalene as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater (HSLs Tables 1A (3, 4)). Note Naphthalene is determined from the VOC analysis. Note, the Total +ve TRH PQL is reflective of the lowest individual PQL and is therefore "Total +ve TRH" is simply a sum of the positive individual TRH fractions (>C10-C40).

Org-003

Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-FID. F2 = (>C10-C16)-Naphthalene as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater (HSLs Tables 1A (3, 4)). Note Naphthalene is determined from the VOC analysis.

Org-003

Determination of Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS. Metals-021

Determination of various metals by ICP-AES. Metals-020

Total Phenolics by segmented flow analyser (in line distillation with colourimetric finish). Solids are extracted in a caustic media prior to analysis.

Inorg-031

Moisture content determined by heating at 105+/-5 °C for a minimum of 12 hours.

Inorg-008

Methodology SummaryMethod ID


R01Revision No:

Page | 40 of 64


Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS. Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS. F1 = (C6-C10)-BTEX as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater. Note, the Total +ve Xylene PQL is reflective of the lowest individual PQL and is therefore "Total +ve Xylenes" is simply a sum of the positive individual Xylenes.

Org-016

Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS. Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS. F1 = (C6-C10)-BTEX as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater.

Org-016

Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS. Org-014

Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS.Org-013

Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-MS. Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater - 2013. For soil results:- 1. ‘EQ PQL’values are assuming all contributing PAHs reported as <PQL are actually at the PQL. This is the most conservative approach and can give false positive TEQs given that PAHs that contribute to the TEQ calculation may not be present. 2. ‘EQ zero’values are assuming all contributing PAHs reported as <PQL are zero. This is the least conservative approach and is more susceptible to false negative TEQs when PAHs that contribute to the TEQ calculation are present but below PQL. 3. ‘EQ half PQL’values are assuming all contributing PAHs reported as <PQL are half the stipulated PQL. Hence a mid-point between the most and least conservative approaches above. Note, the Total +ve PAHs PQL is reflective of the lowest individual PQL and is therefore "Total +ve PAHs" is simply a sum of the positive individual PAHs.

Org-012

Methodology SummaryMethod ID


R01Revision No:

Page | 41 of 64


[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgstyrene

[NT][NT]0<2<21<2Org-0142mg/kgm+p-xylene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgbromoform

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgEthylbenzene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgchlorobenzene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane

62630<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgtetrachloroethene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dibromoethane

79800<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgdibromochloromethane

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,3-dichloropropane

[NT][NT]0<0.5<0.51<0.5Org-0140.5mg/kgToluene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,1,2-trichloroethane

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgcis-1,3-dichloropropene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgtrans-1,3-dichloropropene

74750<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgbromodichloromethane

72800<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgtrichloroethene


[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgdibromomethane

[NT][NT]0<0.2<0.21<0.2Org-0140.2mg/kgBenzene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgcarbon tetrachloride

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgCyclohexane

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,1-dichloropropene

66720<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,1,1-trichloroethane

68690<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dichloroethane


71700<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgchloroform

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgbromochloromethane

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgcis-1,2-dichloroethene

67680<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,1-dichloroethane

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgtrans-1,2-dichloroethene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgTrichlorofluoromethane

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgChloroethane

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgBromomethane

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgVinyl Chloride

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgChloromethane

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgDichlorodifluoromethane

17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019117/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date extracted

223889-44LCS-4RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description

Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: VOCs in soil


R01Revision No:

Page | 42 of 64


9510451051001105Org-014%Surrogate 4-Bromofluorobenzene

10595210098199Org-014%Surrogate Toluene-d8

779431061091108Org-014%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene

1059531031001100Org-014%Surrogate Dibromofluorometha

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2,3-trichlorobenzene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kghexachlorobutadiene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2,4-trichlorobenzene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgn-butyl benzene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dichlorobenzene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg4-isopropyl toluene


[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgsec-butyl benzene


[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2,4-trimethyl benzene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgtert-butyl benzene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,3,5-trimethyl benzene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg4-chlorotoluene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg2-chlorotoluene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgn-propyl benzene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgbromobenzene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgisopropylbenzene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2,3-trichloropropane

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgo-Xylene




R01Revision No:

Page | 43 of 64


[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgstyrene

[NT][NT]0<2<259[NT]Org-0142mg/kgm+p-xylene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgbromoform

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgEthylbenzene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgchlorobenzene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgtetrachloroethene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dibromoethane

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgdibromochloromethane

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,3-dichloropropane

[NT][NT]0<0.5<0.559[NT]Org-0140.5mg/kgToluene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,1,2-trichloroethane

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgcis-1,3-dichloropropene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgtrans-1,3-dichloropropene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgbromodichloromethane

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgtrichloroethene


[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgdibromomethane

[NT][NT]0<0.2<0.259[NT]Org-0140.2mg/kgBenzene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgcarbon tetrachloride

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgCyclohexane

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,1-dichloropropene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,1,1-trichloroethane

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dichloroethane


[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgchloroform

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgbromochloromethane

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgcis-1,2-dichloroethene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,1-dichloroethane

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgtrans-1,2-dichloroethene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgTrichlorofluoromethane

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgChloroethane

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgBromomethane

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgVinyl Chloride

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgChloromethane

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgDichlorodifluoromethane

[NT][NT]17/08/201917/08/201959[NT]-Date analysed

[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201959[NT]-Date extracted

[NT][NT]RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description



R01Revision No:

Page | 44 of 64


[NT][NT]911310359[NT]Org-014%Surrogate 4-Bromofluorobenzene

[NT][NT]19910059[NT]Org-014%Surrogate Toluene-d8

[NT][NT]516210459[NT]Org-014%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene

[NT][NT]110210359[NT]Org-014%Surrogate Dibromofluorometha

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2,3-trichlorobenzene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kghexachlorobutadiene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2,4-trichlorobenzene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgn-butyl benzene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dichlorobenzene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg4-isopropyl toluene


[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgsec-butyl benzene


[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2,4-trimethyl benzene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgtert-butyl benzene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,3,5-trimethyl benzene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg4-chlorotoluene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg2-chlorotoluene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgn-propyl benzene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgbromobenzene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgisopropylbenzene

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2,3-trichloropropane

[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgo-Xylene




R01Revision No:

Page | 45 of 64



[NT][NT]0<1<143[NT]Org-0141mg/kgnaphthalene






[NT][NT]0<25<2543[NT]Org-01625mg/kgTRH C6 - C10





Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil

7783109710720[NT]Org-016%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene


681190<1<120[NT]Org-0161mg/kgo-Xylene

68840<2<220[NT]Org-0162mg/kgm+p-xylene

69770<1<120[NT]Org-0161mg/kgEthylbenzene

75670<0.5<0.520[NT]Org-0160.5mg/kgToluene

67850<0.2<0.220[NT]Org-0160.2mg/kgBenzene

70720<25<2520[NT]Org-01625mg/kgTRH C6 - C10

70720<25<2520[NT]Org-01625mg/kgTRH C6 - C9

17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201920[NT]-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201920[NT]-Date extracted



1069431061091108Org-016%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene

[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgnaphthalene

128880<1<11<1Org-0161mg/kgo-Xylene

127880<2<21<2Org-0162mg/kgm+p-xylene

122900<1<11<1Org-0161mg/kgEthylbenzene

104760<0.5<0.51<0.5Org-0160.5mg/kgToluene

70740<0.2<0.21<0.2Org-0160.2mg/kgBenzene

110830<25<251<25Org-01625mg/kgTRH C6 - C10

110830<25<251<25Org-01625mg/kgTRH C6 - C9

17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019117/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date extracted




R01Revision No:

Page | 46 of 64
















R01Revision No:

Page | 47 of 64


[NT][NT]13809143[NT]Org-003%Surrogate o-Terphenyl

[NT][NT]0<100<10043[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40









Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil

8412611908120[NT]Org-003%Surrogate o-Terphenyl

971130<100<10020[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40

6398813012020[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34

651090<50<5020[NT]Org-00350mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16

971130<100<10020[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36

63980<100<10020[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28

651090<50<5020[NT]Org-00350mg/kgTRH C10 - C14

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201920[NT]-Date analysed




1227849389183Org-003%Surrogate o-Terphenyl

901130<100<1001<100Org-003100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40

751110<100<1001<100Org-003100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34

791220<50<501<50Org-00350mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16

901130<100<1001<100Org-003100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36

751110<100<1001<100Org-003100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28

791220<50<501<50Org-00350mg/kgTRH C10 - C14

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019116/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date extracted




R01Revision No:

Page | 48 of 64


[NT][NT]2817959[NT]Org-003%Surrogate o-Terphenyl












R01Revision No:

Page | 49 of 64


991031989720[NT]Org-012%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14

[NT][NT]400.20.320[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene

[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene

[NT][NT]00.20.220[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

#111290.30.420[NT]Org-0120.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene

[NT][NT]150.60.720[NT]Org-0120.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene

#108290.30.420[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgChrysene

[NT][NT]00.40.420[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene

#122250.70.920[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgPyrene

#116350.7120[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgFluoranthene

[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgAnthracene

#111290.30.420[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgPhenanthrene

1031160<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgFluorene

[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgAcenaphthene

[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene

1131300<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgNaphthalene

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201920[NT]-Date analysed



Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: PAHs in Soil

969839491190Org-012%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14

[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene

[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene

[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

11910533<0.050.071<0.05Org-0120.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene

[NT][NT]0<0.2<0.21<0.2Org-0120.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene

1191020<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgChrysene

[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene

1161130<0.10.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgPyrene

1121090<0.10.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgFluoranthene

[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgAnthracene

1111070<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgPhenanthrene

1051100<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgFluorene

[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgAcenaphthene

[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene

1141230<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgNaphthalene

16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019116/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date extracted




R01Revision No:

Page | 50 of 64


[NT][NT]39910259[NT]Org-012%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14

[NT][NT]00.20.259[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene


[NT][NT]00.10.159[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

[NT][NT]00.20.259[NT]Org-0120.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene

[NT][NT]500.50.359[NT]Org-0120.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene

[NT][NT]1000.30.159[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgChrysene

[NT][NT]400.30.259[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene

[NT][NT]670.60.359[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgPyrene

[NT][NT]670.60.359[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgFluoranthene


[NT][NT]1000.30.159[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgPhenanthrene

[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.159[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgFluorene



[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.159[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgNaphthalene





[NT][NT]2959743[NT]Org-012%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14

[NT][NT]0<0.10.143[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene


[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

[NT][NT]120<0.050.243[NT]Org-0120.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene

[NT][NT]40<0.20.343[NT]Org-0120.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene

[NT][NT]67<0.10.243[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgChrysene

[NT][NT]67<0.10.243[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene

[NT][NT]120<0.10.443[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgPyrene

[NT][NT]120<0.10.443[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgFluoranthene


[NT][NT]670.10.243[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgPhenanthrene

[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgFluorene



[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgNaphthalene






R01Revision No:

Page | 51 of 64


[NT][NT]1878643[NT]Org-006%Surrogate TCMX

[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1260










Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: PCBs in Soil

[NT][NT]0868620[NT]Org-006%Surrogate TCMX












968549591190Org-006%Surrogate TCMX

[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1260

1011110<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1254






16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019116/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date extracted




R01Revision No:

Page | 52 of 64


[NT][NT]1711013043[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgZinc

[NT][NT]12343043[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgNickel

[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Metals-0210.1mg/kgMercury

[NT][NT]24435543[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgLead

[NT][NT]5555843[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgCopper

[NT][NT]21373043[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgChromium

[NT][NT]0<0.4<0.443[NT]Metals-0200.4mg/kgCadmium

[NT][NT]0<4<443[NT]Metals-0204mg/kgArsenic


[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201943[NT]-Date prepared


Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Acid Extractable metals in soil

7697812013020[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgZinc

879607720[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgNickel

969100.20.220[NT]Metals-0210.1mg/kgMercury

8510191009120[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgLead

1029910596520[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgCopper

8810222121520[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgChromium

8496220.50.420[NT]Metals-0200.4mg/kgCadmium

9099157620[NT]Metals-0204mg/kgArsenic

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201920[NT]-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201920[NT]-Date prepared



7795496921<1Metals-0201mg/kgZinc

989313854101<1Metals-0201mg/kgNickel

861040<0.10.11<0.1Metals-0210.1mg/kgMercury

1159198160551<1Metals-0201mg/kgLead

109974357371<1Metals-0201mg/kgCopper

10110313893171<1Metals-0201mg/kgChromium

9593670.8<0.41<0.4Metals-0200.4mg/kgCadmium

1039822541<4Metals-0204mg/kgArsenic

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date prepared




R01Revision No:

Page | 53 of 64


[NT][NT]35385459[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgZinc

[NT][NT]293459[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgNickel

[NT][NT]400.20.359[NT]Metals-0210.1mg/kgMercury

[NT][NT]24334259[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgLead

[NT][NT]26101359[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgCopper

[NT][NT]2091159[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgChromium

[NT][NT]0<0.4<0.459[NT]Metals-0200.4mg/kgCadmium

[NT][NT]0<4<459[NT]Metals-0204mg/kgArsenic






R01Revision No:

Page | 54 of 64


[NT][NT]0<5<577[NT]Inorg-0315mg/kgTotal Phenolics (as Phenol)




Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Misc Soil - Inorg

951010<5<51<5Inorg-0315mg/kgTotal Phenolics (as Phenol)

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date prepared


Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Misc Soil - Inorg


R01Revision No:

Page | 55 of 64


[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LStyrene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<2Org-0132µg/Lm+p-xylene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LBromoform

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LEthylbenzene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LChlorobenzene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane

[NT]89[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LTetrachloroethene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2-dibromoethane

[NT]87[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LDibromochloromethane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,3-dichloropropane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LToluene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,1,2-trichloroethane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/Lcis-1,3-dichloropropene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/Ltrans-1,3-dichloropropene

[NT]91[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LBromodichloromethane

[NT]97[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LTrichloroethene


[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LDibromomethane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LBenzene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LCarbon tetrachloride

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LCyclohexane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,1-dichloropropene

[NT]91[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,1,1-trichloroethane

[NT]89[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2-dichloroethane


[NT]96[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LChloroform

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LBromochloromethane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LCis-1,2-dichloroethene

[NT]91[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,1-dichloroethane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LTrans-1,2-dichloroethene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,1-Dichloroethene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Org-01310µg/LTrichlorofluoromethane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Org-01310µg/LChloroethane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Org-01310µg/LBromomethane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Org-01310µg/LVinyl Chloride

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Org-01310µg/LChloromethane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Org-01310µg/LDichlorodifluoromethane

[NT]16/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]16/08/2019-Date analysed

[NT]15/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]15/08/2019-Date extracted

[NT]LCS-W2RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description

Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: VOCs in water


R01Revision No:

Page | 56 of 64


[NT]97[NT][NT][NT][NT]103Org-013%Surrogate 4-BFB

[NT]100[NT][NT][NT][NT]100Org-013%Surrogate toluene-d8

[NT]108[NT][NT][NT][NT]104Org-013%Surrogate Dibromofluoromethane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2,3-trichlorobenzene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LHexachlorobutadiene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2,4-trichlorobenzene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/Ln-butyl benzene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2-dichlorobenzene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L4-isopropyl toluene


[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LSec-butyl benzene


[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2,4-trimethyl benzene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LTert-butyl benzene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,3,5-trimethyl benzene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L4-chlorotoluene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L2-chlorotoluene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/Ln-propyl benzene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LBromobenzene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LIsopropylbenzene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2,3-trichloropropane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/Lo-xylene


Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: VOCs in water


R01Revision No:

Page | 57 of 64


[NT]97[NT][NT][NT][NT]103Org-016%Surrogate 4-BFB

[NT]100[NT][NT][NT][NT]100Org-016%Surrogate toluene-d8

[NT]108[NT][NT][NT][NT]104Org-016%Surrogate Dibromofluoromethane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LNaphthalene

[NT]89[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0161µg/Lo-xylene

[NT]92[NT][NT][NT][NT]<2Org-0162µg/Lm+p-xylene

[NT]89[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0161µg/LEthylbenzene

[NT]92[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0161µg/LToluene

[NT]93[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0161µg/LBenzene

[NT]92[NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Org-01610µg/LTRH C6 - C10

[NT]92[NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Org-01610µg/LTRH C6 - C9




Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Water


R01Revision No:

Page | 58 of 64


10096[NT][NT][NT][NT]81Org-003%Surrogate o-Terphenyl

10074[NT][NT][NT][NT]<100Org-003100µg/LTRH >C34 - C40



10074[NT][NT][NT][NT]<100Org-003100µg/LTRH C29 - C36



15/08/201915/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]15/08/2019-Date analysed

15/08/201915/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]15/08/2019-Date extracted

223889-89LCS-W1RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description

Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: svTRH (C10-C40) in Water


R01Revision No:

Page | 59 of 64


[NT]98[NT][NT][NT][NT]84Org-012%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LDibenzo(a,h)anthracene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

[NT]82[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LBenzo(a)pyrene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<2Org-0122µg/LBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene

[NT]84[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LChrysene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LBenzo(a)anthracene

[NT]88[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LPyrene

[NT]84[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LFluoranthene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LAnthracene

[NT]84[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LPhenanthrene

[NT]98[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LFluorene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LAcenaphthene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LAcenaphthylene

[NT]116[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LNaphthalene




Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: PAHs in Water


R01Revision No:

Page | 60 of 64


[NT]108[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.02Metals-0200.02mg/LZinc - Dissolved

[NT]105[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.02Metals-0200.02mg/LNickel - Dissolved

[NT]97[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.0005Metals-0210.0005mg/LMercury - Dissolved

[NT]102[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.03Metals-0200.03mg/LLead - Dissolved

[NT]105[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.01Metals-0200.01mg/LCopper - Dissolved

[NT]105[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.01Metals-0200.01mg/LChromium - Dissolved

[NT]106[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.01Metals-0200.01mg/LCadmium - Dissolved

[NT]109[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.05Metals-0200.05mg/LArsenic - Dissolved


[NT]15/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]15/08/2019-Date digested


Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Metals in Water - Dissolved


R01Revision No:

Page | 61 of 64


Not ReportedNR

National Environmental Protection MeasureNEPM

Not specifiedNS

Laboratory Control SampleLCS

Relative Percent DifferenceRPD

Greater than>

Less than<

Practical Quantitation LimitPQL

Insufficient sample for this testINS

Test not requiredNA

Not testedNT

Result Definitions

Australian Drinking Water Guidelines recommend that Thermotolerant Coliform, Faecal Enterococci, & E.Coli levels are less than1cfu/100mL. The recommended maximums are taken from "Australian Drinking Water Guidelines", published by NHMRC & ARMC2011.

Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compounds whichare similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.

Surrogate Spike

This comprises either a standard reference material or a control matrix (such as a blank sand or water) fortifiedwith analytes representative of the analyte class. It is simply a check sample.

LCS (LaboratoryControl Sample)

A portion of the sample is spiked with a known concentration of target analyte. The purpose of the matrix spikeis to monitor the performance of the analytical method used and to determine whether matrix interferencesexist.

Matrix Spike

This is the complete duplicate analysis of a sample from the process batch. If possible, the sample selectedshould be one where the analyte concentration is easily measurable.

Duplicate

This is the component of the analytical signal which is not derived from the sample but from reagents,glassware etc, can be determined by processing solvents and reagents in exactly the same manner as forsamples.

Blank

Quality Control Definitions


R01Revision No:

Page | 62 of 64


Analysis of aqueous samples typically involves the extraction/digestion and/or analysis of the liquid phase only (i.e. NOT any settledsediment phase but inclusive of suspended particles if present), unless stipulated on the Envirolab COC and/or by correspondence.Notable exceptions include certain Physical Tests (pH/EC/BOD/COD/Apparent Colour etc.), Solids testing, total recoverable metalsand PFAS where solids are included by default.

Measurement Uncertainty estimates are available for most tests upon request.

Where sampling dates are not provided, Envirolab are not in a position to comment on the validity of the analysis whererecommended technical holding times may have been breached.

When samples are received where certain analytes are outside of recommended technical holding times (THTs), the analysis hasproceeded. Where analytes are on the verge of breaching THTs, every effort will be made to analyse within the THT or as soon aspracticable.

In circumstances where no duplicate and/or sample spike has been reported at 1 in 10 and/or 1 in 20 samples respectively, thesample volume submitted was insufficient in order to satisfy laboratory QA/QC protocols.

Matrix Spikes, LCS and Surrogate recoveries: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140% for organics (+/-50% surrogates)and 10-140% for labile SVOCs (including labile surrogates), ultra trace organics and speciated phenols is acceptable.

Duplicates: >10xPQL - RPD acceptance criteria will vary depending on the analytes and the analytical techniques but is typically inthe range 20%-50% – see ELN-P05 QA/QC tables for details; <10xPQL - RPD are higher as the results approach PQL and theestimated measurement uncertainty will statistically increase.

For VOCs in water samples, three vials are required for duplicate or spike analysis.

Spikes for Physical and Aggregate Tests are not applicable.

Filters, swabs, wipes, tubes and badges will not have duplicate data as the whole sample is generally extracted during sampleextraction.

Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequency to meetor exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batches of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrix spike recoveries forthe batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria.

Laboratory Acceptance Criteria


R01Revision No:

Page | 63 of 64


PAHs in Soil - The RPD for duplicate results is accepted due to the non homogenous nature of sample 223889-59 # Percent recovery for the matrix spike is not possible to report as the high concentration of analytes in sample 223889-48 have caused interference. Acid Extractable Metals in Soil: The laboratory RPD acceptance criteria has been exceeded for 223889-1 for Cr, Pb and Ni. Therefore a triplicate result has been issued as laboratory sample number 223889-92. TRH Water(C10-C40) NEPM - The positive result in the rinsate sample is due to a single peak with no hydrocarbon profile that is consistent with the use of plastic containers.

Report Comments


R01Revision No:

Page | 64 of 64



29 August 2019


APPENDIX D CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL ANALYSIS



29 August 2019


Sources COC Media Receptor Exposure Route Comments Investigation Level Pathway

complete

General site sources (e.g.

historical industrial land

use, fill material)

Heavy metals, TRH, BTEX, PAHs, Phenols, VOCs, and PCBs

Soil

Human

Direct contact, inhalation and

ingestion of dust, ingestion

Concentrations of COCs in all soil samples analysed were below the adopted human health and ecological criteria.

HSLs / HILs No

Ecological species and soil microbial

processes Direct Contact

Majority of COCs beneath ecological protection criteria with exception of selected heavy metals and benzo(a)pyrene in selected samples. The majority of the site is covered in hardstand cement or asphalt with minimum landscaping present, thus the exposure pathway is generally incomplete and therefore the EIL/ESLs are not entirely applicable.

ESLs Unlikely



29 August 2019


APPENDIX E QUALITY CONTROL AND ASSURANCE


112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSW Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for

Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality and Control

364678 – Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality Control

Contents Page E 1 Introduction 2

2 Data Quality Control and Quality Assurance 3

2.1 Measurement Data Quality Indicators 3 2.2 Field QA/QC 2 2.3 Laboratory QA/QC 4 2.4 QA/QC Data Evaluation 4





1 Introduction

The data quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) program is undertaken to ensure the data delivered is precise, accurate and representative of what is sampled.

QA/QC should be considered both in the field and within the laboratory. The objective is to enable evaluation and identification of the data quality objectives (DQOs), the method data quality objectives (MDQOs) and the data quality indicators (DQIs) which we use to assess whether the DQOs have been met.

Development of data quality objectives (DQOs) for each project is a requirement of the National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) (1999) National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 1999 (Amended 2013). This is based on a DQO process formulated by the USEPA for contaminated land assessment and remediation. DQOs have been developed in Section 3.0 of the report.

Data quality is typically discussed in terms of precision, accuracy, representativeness, comparability and completeness. These are referred to as the PARCC parameters. The PARCC and additional QA parameters are discussed within this report.





2 Data Quality Control and Quality Assurance

2.1 Measurement Data Quality Indicators Step 5 of the DQO process is a focus on the quality of the information by measurement, commonly referred to as the measurement data quality indicators (MDQIs). The MDQIs are described in Section 3 of the report.

All sampling procedures need to be undertaken according to a standard procedure, in particular those procedures set out in:

• Standards Australia AS4482.1 (2005) Guide to the investigation and sampling of sites with potentially contaminated soil. Part 1 Non-volatile and semi volatile compounds

• Standards Australia AS 4482.2 (1999) Guide to the sampling and investigation of potentially contaminated soil. Part 2: Volatile substances

• National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) (1999) National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure (Amended 2013)

• CRC CARE 2013, Petroleum hydrocarbon vapour intrusion assessment: Australian guidance, CRC CARE Technical Report no. 23, CRC for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment, Adelaide, Australia; and

• NSW Department of Environment Climate Change & Water (2010) Vapour Intrusion Technical Practice Note.

Measurement data quality is typically discussed in terms of Measured Parameters and Assessed Parameters. Methods of assessing measured parameters include duplicate samples for repeatability (comparability) and internal laboratory tests on accuracy and precision. Methods of analysing assessed parameters include sample documentation (completeness), representation of site conditions undertaken by development of a conceptual site model, and the comparison of results/investigation criteria to the sensitivity of analytical methods.

The laboratories used should be NATA accredited for the analytical methods undertaken. Containers, sample preservation (if necessary) and holding times should be consistent with industry practices as set out in the NEPM and as defined by ASTM.

2.1.1 Repeatability (Field Collected Intra-laboratory and Inter-laboratory Duplicates)

Field collected intra-laboratory (intralab) duplicate samples provide a check on the analytical performance of the laboratory. Soil primary and intralab duplicate samples were sent to Envirolab Services (Envirolab) for analysis.

It is recommended that at least 5 percent of samples (1 in 20) from a site should be collected in duplicate. For split samples, because of error associated with field splitting, a relative percentage difference (RPD) of between <30% and <150% (depending on the substance) will be allowed as the MDQI. Any value >50% RPD will be noted and discussed, as per Standards Australia requirements, with respect to its acceptability for inclusion in the data-set.





2.1.2 Precision

Precision is a measure of the reproducibility of results, and is assessed on the basis of agreement between a set of replicate results obtained from duplicate analyses. The precision of a duplicate determination can be measured as relative percentage difference (RPD), and is calculated from the following equation:

100

221

X2 - X1 = RPD ×

+ XX

where: X1 is the first duplicate value

X2 is the second duplicate value

The field duplicate results and calculated RPDs for soil are presented in Tables E1.





Table E1 Soil - intralab duplicate samples (mg/kg)

Analyte LOR BH02_1.0-1.1

QC01-1.0-1.1

RPD % BH07_1.0-1.1

QC02_1.0-1.1

RPD % BH18_1.0-1.1

QC04_1.0-1.1

RPD %

TRH 25, 50, 100, 100 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC

BTEX 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC

Arsenic 4 ND ND NC ND ND NC 6 ND 40

Cadmium 0.4 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC

Chromium 1 1 ND NC ND ND NC 4 5 22

Copper 1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 15 15 0

Lead 1 1 ND NC 1 2 67 44 73 50

Mercury 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.1 0.3 100

Nickel 1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 3 3 0

Zinc 1 2 1 67 1 1 0 77 67 14

Benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthene 0.2 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.4 0.8 67

Acenaphthene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC

Acenaphthylene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC

Anthracene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC

Benz(a)anthracene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.2 0.4 67

Benzo(a) pyrene 0.05 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.2 0.4 67

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.2 0.3 40

Chrysene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.2 0.4 67





Analyte LOR BH02_1.0-1.1

QC01-1.0-1.1

RPD % BH07_1.0-1.1

QC02_1.0-1.1

RPD % BH18_1.0-1.1

QC04_1.0-1.1

RPD %

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC

Fluoranthene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.4 0.8 67

Fluorene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC

Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.1 0.2 67

Naphthalene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC

Phenanthrene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.2 0.5 86

Pyrene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.4 0.8 67

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (Half) 0.5 ND ND NC ND ND NC <0.5 0.6 18

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (LOR) 0.5 ND ND NC ND ND NC <0.5 0.6 18

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (Zero) 0.5 ND ND NC ND ND NC <0.5 0.5 0

PAHs (Sum of positives) 0.05 ND ND NC ND ND NC 2.4 4.9 68

Notes to tables: 1 LOR laboratory limit of reporting 2 RPD relative percentage difference 3 N/A not analysed 4 ND not detected above the laboratory limits of reporting 5 NC RPD not calculable 6 Acceptance Criteria - no limit applies to < 5x LOR 7 Acceptance Criteria - 80-150% for low level (<10 x LOR) 8 Acceptance Criteria - 50-130% for medium to high level (>10 x LOR)

All RPDs were within the acceptable criteria (50-130% for medium to high level (>10 x LOR)).





2.1.3 Accuracy

Accuracy is a measure of the agreement between an experimental determination and the true value of the parameter being measured. The determination of accuracy can be achieved through the analysis of known reference materials or assessed by the analysis of matrix spikes. Accuracy is measured in terms of percentage recovery as defined by the following equation:

%R = SSR - SR

SA X 100

where: %R = percentage recovery of the spike

SSR = spiked sample result

SR = sample result (native)

SA = spike added

Laboratory personnel calculate percentage recoveries of spiked compounds, which are evaluated against control or acceptance limits taken from the appropriate method or the Contract Laboratory Program Statement of Work. If the spike recovery for a sample does not fall within the prescribed control limits, laboratory based corrective action is required.

Surrogate spikes consist of spiking non-target compounds into the sample prior to analysis. The spiked compounds are expected to behave during analysis in the same way as the target compounds. Every sample is spiked prior to extraction or analysis with surrogate compounds that are representative of the analysis. If surrogate spike recovery does not meet the prescribed control limits, samples should be reanalysed.

2.1.4 Representativeness

All media identified within the sampling plan was selectively sampled and analysed for relevant COCs.

2.1.5 Completeness

The following information is required to check for completeness of data sets:

• chain-of-custody forms (completed by KPMG SGA and the laboratory)

• sample receipt forms

• all requested sample results reported

• all blank data reported

• all surrogate spike data reported

• all matrix spike data reported

• NATA stamp on reports.

2.1.6 Comparability

Comparability is the evaluation of the similarity of conditions (e.g. sample depth, sample homogeneity, sampling procedures) under which separate sets of data are produced to ensure minimal common error. Data comparability should be demonstrated by the use of standardised sampling and analysis procedures. Data comparability was maintained by undertaking the TEI as follows:

• Soil samples were collected during the investigation by a trained environmental consultant using standard operating procedures





• laboratories used for analysis for all samples used NATA accredited analytical methods.

2.1.7 Sensitivity

When interferences are present in the sample, a loss of sensitivity can occur resulting in an increase in the method detection limit. In some instances (e.g. where one or more compounds have particularly high concentrations) the sample must be diluted for analysis. This increases the method detection limit by the dilution factor.

The detection limits achieved by the laboratory, when adjusted for dry weight and interferences from the presence of other chemicals within the sampled matrix, must be less than half the site criteria for all analytes tested (i.e. 2 x LOR <site criteria). This was not achieved in all sub-slab vapour samples due to the need for dilution.

2.1.8 Blanks

To meet the QC acceptance criteria, laboratory blanks should have no detectable concentrations of the target compounds. Review of laboratory blanks did not reveal concentrations of COCs above the LOR.

2.1.9 Holding Times

Sample holding times are based on a number of considerations including the integrity of the data required, field storage, laboratory storage and sample container characteristics. All samples were analysed within the required holding times.

2.1.10 Procedures for Anomalous Samples and Confirmation Checking

All results should be checked for discrepancies by the project manager, against the anticipated results and all other results, within 8 hours of receipt of the results from the laboratory.

Any result that is considered by the supervising scientist to be unusually high or at variance with other results is automatically re-analysed. A significantly different result requires immediate remedial action on the whole sample batch (retesting or using an alternative analytical method).

After appropriate checking by laboratories, all sample analysis results work-sheets, including those of duplicates and replicate analyses, should be checked by the project manager.

Once confirmation checking is completed the final laboratory report is issued.

For blind duplicates, if one sample has more than two analytes exceeding the MDQIs the sample is carefully checked. If the error is not apparent, the sample is rejected. If more than three samples are rejected all the samples collected at that time are rejected. These samples are then re-sampled and re-analysed.

2.2 Field QA/QC

2.2.1 Details of Field Investigation Team

Fieldwork was conducted by suitably qualified KPMG SGA personnel between 12 and 13 August 2019.





2.2.2 Sampling Controls

Decontamination procedures carried out between sampling events

Soil samples were collected directly from the push tubes or hand auger using disposable nitrile gloves. The push tube sampling used individual tubing and sample collection equipment, as such, decontamination of sample collection equipment was not required. The hand auger were was thoroughly washed with Decon 90 followed by deionised laboratory supplied rinsate water between sampling locations.

Sample notation details

The chemical analyses to be performed on each sample were recorded on the chain of custody documentation which also identified for each sample – the nature of the sample, collection date, analyses to be performed and sample preservation method (if any).

Duplicate sampling

Intralab duplicate samples were collected at a rate of at least one field duplicate sample for each media.

Trip Spikes

A trip spike water sample was included in the batch of soil samples within carriers used to transport samples to the laboratory to assess potential cross contamination between samples during handling and transport of samples. The MDQI for trip spike sample analysis is between 70-120% recoveries for VOCs. Review of the trip spike sample results revealed concentrations of all VOCs within acceptable ranges.

Table E7 Trip Spike samples

Analyte Trip Spike

% Recovery Accept / Fail

Benzene 120 Accept

Toluene 113 Accept

Ethylbenzene 109 Accept

M + p xylene 106 Accept

0-Xylene 110 Accept

Trip Blanks

A trip blank water sample was included in the soil sample carriers used to transport samples to the laboratory to assess potential cross contamination between samples during handling and transport of samples. The MDQI for trip blank sample analysis is non-detect for VOCs and TRH. Review of trip blank sample results revealed non-detects for all COCs and are summarised in Table E5.

Table E5 Trip blank samples

Analyte LOR Trip Blank Accept / Fail

TRH Various <LOR Accept

All VOCs Various <LOR Accept





Rinsate Samples

Rinsate samples were used to measure potential cross contamination between samples due to contamination of sampling equipment. The hand auger was washed with Decon 90 followed by laboratory supplied rinsate water between sampling locations. A representative rinsate sample was collected and analysed from each equipment. The MDQI for rinsate sample analysis is non-detect for COCs. Review of rinsate sample results revealed non-detects for all COCs and are summarised in Table E6.

Table E6 Rinsate samples

Analyte LOR RB01 Accept / Fail

TRH, PAH, BTEX & heavy metals Various <LOR Accept

2.3 Laboratory QA/QC Primary laboratory analysis for this project was completed by Envirolab in Sydney for soil samples. Envirolab is accredited by NATA for the methods used; details of this accreditation can be viewed at http://www.nata.asn.au/. Details of the samples sent to the laboratories and the analysis requested are contained in the chain of custody documentation. The collection date of samples and laboratory extraction date are also presented on the chain of custody forms and/or laboratory transcripts. All analysis was completed within the allowable holding times.

The laboratories complete laboratory control samples, laboratory blanks, sample duplicates, surrogate spikes and matrix spikes. The laboratory transcripts include details of surrogates and spikes used, percent recoveries of surrogates and spikes used, the instrument detection limits, the method detection limits, the practical quantification limits and the reference sample results.

2.4 QA/QC Data Evaluation Field and laboratory quality procedures for this project are considered to be acceptable. Holding times for samples were also considered acceptable.

The calculated RPD values for heavy metals between the duplicate and corresponding primary sample were within the acceptance limits with the exception of heavy metals (lead and mercury) and PAHs (Phenanthrene and total PAHs) in soil. The slightly raised RPD for heavy metals and PAHs is not considered to affect the integrity of the results and it should be noted that the concentrations detected were still well beneath the investigation criteria.

Based on information reviewed, the soil data sets are considered to be acceptable.



29 August 2019


APPENDIX F BOREHOLE LOGS

21/08/2019 ESlog

https://eslog.esdat.net/# 1/23

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH01_0.1-0.2

BH01_0.4-0.5

BH01_1.0-1.1

BH01_2.0-2.1

Y

Y

U

U

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, brown with rootlets &gravels, slightly moist, loose

FILL: GRAVELLY SAND, fine to coarse grained, grey/brown,angular gravels, slightly moist, loose

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light brown-brown, moist,dense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, yellow-light yellow, moist tovery moist, dense

End of borehole: 2.2 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL

No odour and/or stainingobserved

BOREHOLE LOG BH01

PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial

DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube

DRILLING DATE 13/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER

COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log

Material Description Additional Observations

Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019

Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH02_0.3-0.4

BH02_0.6-0.7

BH02_1.0-1.1

Y

Y

U

U

Concrete

FILL: GRAVELLY SAND, medium/coarse grained, dark brown/lightgrey, angular & subangular gravels, dry, very loose

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, yellow, dry, loose

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light brown with gravels,slightly moist, moderately dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH02

PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial



COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH03_0.3-0.4

BH03_0.6-0.7

BH03_1.0-1.1

BH03_2.0-2.1

Y U

Concrete

FILL: GRAVELLY SAND, medium/coarse grained, dark brown/lightgrey, angular & subangular gravels, dry, very looseConcreteNATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown, slightly moist,moderately dense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark grey, moist,moderately dense

NATURAL: SILTY CLAY, low/medium plasticity, dark grey, moist tovery moist, firm



BOREHOLE LOG BH03




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH04_0.3-0.4

BH04_0.6-0.7

BH04_1.0-1.1

BH04_2.0-2.1

Y

Y

U

U

Concrete

FILL: GRAVELLY SAND, medium/coarse grained, lightyellow/grey, angular & sub angular gravels, dry, very looseConcreteNATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown, slightly moist,loose

NATURAL: CLAYEY SAND, fine grained, dark grey, low plasticityclay, slightly moist, moderately dense

NATURAL: SILTY CLAY, medium/high plasticity, darkbrown-brown, moist, soft



BOREHOLE LOG BH04




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH05_0.2-0.3

BH05_0.5-0.6

BH05_1.0-1.1

BH05_2.0-2.1

Y

Y

U

U

Concrete

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, brown, with gravels, dry, loose

ConcreteFILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light brown, dry with gravels

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark grey/grey, dry, loose

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light grey, slightly moist,moderately dense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown, slightly moist,dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH05




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH06_0.2-0.3

BH06_0.5-0.6

BH06_1.0-1.1

BH06_1.5-1.6

Y

Y

Y

D

D

D

FILL: CLAYEY SAND, fine grained, dark brown-black, lowplasticity clay with gravels and rootlets, slightly moist to moist,looseFILL: SANDY CLAY, low plasticity, brown-dark brown, fine grainedsand, slightly moist to moist, soft

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, yellow & grey, moist,moderately dense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, brown-dark brown, moist,moderately dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH06


DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger


COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH07_0.1-0.2

BH07_0.4-0.5

BH07_1.0-1.1

BH07_2.0-2.1

Y

Y

U

U

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown with gravels, dry, veryloose

FILL: GRAVELLY SAND, fine/medium grained, brown & grey,angular & subangular gravels, dry, very looseNATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, grey, slightly moist,moderately dense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark grey, moist,moderately dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH07




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH08_0.2-0.3

BH08_0.5-0.6 Y U

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, brown with gravels, dry, veryloose

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light yellow, with crushedsandstone, dry, dense

End of borehole: 0.9 mBGL refusal in SANDSTONE


BOREHOLE LOG BH08




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH09_0.2-0.3

BH09_0.5-0.6

BH09_1.0-1.1

BH09_2.0-2.1

Y U

AsphaltFILL: GRAVELLY SAND, medium/coarse grained, light grey,angular & subangular gravels, dry, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, light brown-brown,slightly moist, moderately denseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown, slightly moist, dense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light brown, moist, dense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light brown & yellow, moist,very dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH09




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH10_0.3-0.4

BH10_0.6-0.7

Y U

Concrete

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, light grey with gravels,dry, looseNATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light yellow with crushedsandstone, slightly moist, moderately dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH10




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH11_0.3-0.4

BH11_0.6-0.7

BH11_1.0-1.1

Y U

Concrete

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, light grey with gravels,dry, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, brown-red, dry, loose

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown-grey, slightlymoist, moderately dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH11




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH12_0.2-0.3

BH12_0.5-0.6

BH12_1.0-1.1

BH12_2.0-2.1

Y U

AsphaltFILL: SILTY SAND, medium/coarse grained, dark brown withgravels, dry, loose

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, brown/light, dry, loose

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark yellow, slightly moist,moderately dense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, yellow, moist, dense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light yellow, moist, dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH12




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH13_0.2-0.3

BH13_0.5-0.6

BH13_1.0-1.1

BH13_2.0-2.1

Y

Y

U

U

AsphaltFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, brown-dark brown withgravels, dry, very looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light brown, dry, loose

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark yellow/ brown, moist,moderately dense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, yellow, moist, moderatelydense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark grey-grey, moist,dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH13




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH14_0.2-0.3

BH14_0.5-0.6

BH14_1.0-1.1

Y D

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, dark brown with gravelsand rootlets, slightly moist, loose

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, grey, moist, moderately dense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark grey, moist, dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH14




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH15_0.2-0.3

BH15_0.5-0.6

BH15_1.0-1.1

BH15_1.5-1.6

Y D

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, dark brown with gravelsand rootlets, dry, loose

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, brown/grey with gravels, slightlymoist, moderately dense

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, grey, moist, dense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light grey, moist, dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH15




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH16_0.1-0.2

BH16_0.4-0.5

BH16_1.0-1.1

BH16_2.0-2.1

Y

Y

U

U

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown with rootlets, dry,very loose

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, grey, slightly moist, loose

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, light grey with gravels,slightly moist , looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained,dark brown-brown, slightly moist,moderately dense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light yellow, moist to verymoist, dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH16




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH17_0.2-0.3

BH17_0.5-0.6

BH17_1.0-1.1

Y U

Concrete

FILL: SILTY SAND, medium/coarse grained, light grey & red withgravels, slightly moist, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, light grey, with concreterubble, slightly moist, looseFILL: CLAYEY SAND, fine grained, dark brown, low plasticity clay,slightly moist, moderately dense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown/grey, moist,dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH17




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH18_0.3-0.4

BH18_0.7-0.8

BH18_1.0-1.1

BH18_2.0-2.1

Y

Y

U

U

Concrete

FILL: SILTY SAND, medium/coarse grained, light grey withgravels, dry, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, brown/light brown withgravels, slightly moist, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, dark brown, moist,moderately dense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown/grey, moist,dense

NAUTRAL: CLAYEY SAND, fine grained, dark grey-brown, lowplasticity clay, dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH18




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH19_0.3-0.4

BH19_0.6-0.7

BH19_1.0-1.1

BH19_2.0-2.1

Y

Y

U

U

Concrete

FILL: SILTY SAND, coarse grained, light brown with gravels,moist, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, coarse grained, black, slightly moist, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, light grey, slightly moist,looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown, slightly moist, looseNATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown-grey, moist,dense

NATURAL: CLAYEY SAND, fine grained, dark grey, low plasticityclay, moist, dense



Ash material observed

BOREHOLE LOG BH19




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

21/08/2019 ESlog


0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH20_0.2-0.3

BH20_0.5-0.6

BH20_1.0-1.1

BH20_2.0-2.1

Y

Y

U

U

Concrete

FILL: SILTY SAND, medium/coarse grained, light grey withgravels, slightly moist, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, coarse grained, black, dry, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, coarse grained, light brown, dry, loose

NATURAL: CLAYEY SAND, fine grained, dark grey, low plasticityclay, moist, soft



Ash material observed

BOREHOLE LOG BH20




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH21_0.2-0.3

BH21_0.5-0.6

BH21_1.0-1.1

BH21_2.0-2.1

Y

Y

U

U

Concrete

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, brown, slightly moist,looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, grey-dark grey withgravels, slightly moist, loose

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown/grey, slightly moist,moderately dense

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark grey, moist, dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH21




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH22_0.2-0.3

BH22_0.5-0.6

BH22_1.0-1.1

Y

Y

U

U

Concrete

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, light brown with gravels,slightly moist, very looseConcreteFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, dark brown, slightlymoist, loose

NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, grey-dark grey, moist,moderately dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH22




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

BH23_0.2-0.3

BH23_0.5-0.6

BH23_1.0-1.1

Y

Y

U

U

Concrete

FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, brown, dry very loose

ConcreteFILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown/grey, dry, moderatelydense

FILL: GRAVELLY SAND, fine grained, grey-dark grey, angular &subangular gravels, dry, moderately denseNATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown, slightly moist,moderately dense



BOREHOLE LOG BH23




COMMENTS

Dep

th (m

) Samples

Ana

lyse

d

Sam

ple

Type

Gra

phic

Log



Page 1 of 1



29 August 2019


APPENDIX G REPORT LIMITATIONS

KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Ltd (KPMG SGA)Report Limitations

We advise that, unless specifically stated otherwise within the body of this document, the following Limitations apply to our Report;

• Sections within this Report may contain additional Limitations relevant to the reporting discipline concerned. These must be viewed as additional limitations that stand separately, and in addition to, the following Limitations.

• No reliance should be placed on draft reports, draft conclusions or draft advice issued by us as they may be subject to further work, revision and other factors which may mean that drafts are substantially different from any FINAL report or advice issued.

• Parts of the building built in, covered up or otherwise made inaccessible during construction, alteration or fitting out have not been inspected.

• This generally relates to ceiling voids, wall cavities and service risers. Therefore we are unable to comment as to whether such elements are free from defect or infestation.

• We have not undertaken any work of a specific engineering nature, such as engineering calculations, structural analysis, testing or measurements as the Report reflects our interpretation of the condition of the building as apparent from the inspection.

• Building services have been visually inspected where exposed to view only. No internal inspections have been undertaken of plant, equipment and machinery or where services are covered up or hidden by building structural elements or finishes. Building services have not been tested and no design calculations have been undertaken.

• The property has not been inspected specifically for termite infestation and we would only report on such if evidence of termite activity was apparent during our inspection.

• Where a variety of multiple units or tenanted areas are inspected, a random selection of each type of unit / area was inspected and used for the basis of this report.

• This Report is not a certification, a warranty or guarantee and has been scoped in accordance with the instructions given and the time allowed.

• The scope of the Report is described in the fee proposal accepted by the instructing client and disciplines not specifically mentioned are excluded from this report.

• This Report has been prepared for the benefit of the instructing client named on the cover of the document. This Report is not to be reproduced, in whole or in part, without the express written authorisation of KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Ltd.

• The findings of this Report are valid for six calendar months from the date of issue of the Draft version of the document.

• Unless specifically stated otherwise, all cost estimates provided throughout the Report are subject to the following Limitations;

• Estimates are indicative only and are provided as a guide to “order of magnitude” of the cost item. Items of work are not fully described or detailed reflecting the high level nature of the assessment, the amount of information available and the purpose for which they are prepared;

• Preliminaries, builder’s margins, overheads and contingencies are excluded;

• Professional fees, project management fees, planning and building licence fees are excluded;

• No allowance has been made for Tender Price Inflation throughout the budget terms considered;

• In providing estimates we have assumed that replacements and renewals will be on a like for like basis. Unless specifically stated otherwise we have made no allowances for improvements over and above this standard.

• We have assume that WH&S /OH&S requirements will be similar to those encountered in the present and have made no allowances for any additional measures that may be required in the future.

© 2017 KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Limited, an affiliate of KPMG. KPMG is an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International. January 2017. QLDN14967ADV.

www.sgaproperty.com

http://www.sgaproperty.com

Exceptional chartered building surveying and environmental servicesFor property investors, owners, tenants, financiers and managers

© 2017 KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Limited, an affiliate of KPMG. KPMG is an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International. January 2017. QLDN14967ADV.

www.sgaproperty.com

• Technical Due Diligence – Acquisition / Disposal

• Make Good / Dilapidations Reporting

• End of Lease Make Good / Dilapidations Negotiations

• Schedules of Condition

• Tax Depreciation

• Project & Contract Administration

• CAPEX & Maintenance Forecasting

• Defect Reporting

• Asbestos & Hazardous Materials Assessments / Registers / Remediation

• Environmental Investigations / Remediation

• NABERS & BEEC

• WHS Risk Assessments

• Disability Access Audits

• Building Code Consultancy

• Statutory Compliance

Capitalising on a global skill base, all senior KPMG SGA consultants are Chartered Building Surveyors, Engineers or Environmental Scientists, providing the company with a breadth of understanding across many specialist competencies, which is the key to our speed of assessment, service and delivery.

SydneyInternational Towers Sydney 3300 Barangaroo Avenue Sydney NSW 2000Australia+61 2 9335 [email protected]

MelbourneTower Two, Collins Square727 Collins StreetMelbourne VIC 3008Australia+61 3 9288 [email protected]

BrisbaneRiparian PlazaLevel 16, 71 Eagle StreetBrisbane Qld 4000Australia+61 7 3233 [email protected]

Perth235 St Georges TerracePerth WA 6000Australia+61 8 9263 [email protected]

Canberra20 Brindabella CircuitBrindabella Business ParkCanberra Airport ACT 2609Australia+61 2 6248 [email protected]

Adelaide151 Pirie StreetAdelaide SA 5000Australia+61 8 9263 [email protected]

Darwin18 Smith StreetDarwin NT 0800Australia+61 8 9263 [email protected]

HobartLevel 3 100 Melville StreetHobart Tas 7000Australia+61 3 9288 [email protected]

Singapore16 Raffles Quay #22-00Hong Leong BuildingSingapore 048581+65 9005 [email protected]

AucklandKPMG Centre 18 Viaduct Harbour AvePO Box 1584Auckland 1140New Zealand+64 21 [email protected]

Contact us

http://www.sgaproperty.com

mailto:[email protected]










Documents

Environmental Site Investigation