1

Title of Slide Goes Here

Environmental Remediationand Financial Services, LLC

Ron Adams, PE, LSRPExec VP of Remediation

904-207-2731radams@erfs.com

2150 Highway 35Suite 250

Sea Girt, NJ 08750732-974-3570

2

Title of Slide Goes Here• WHO WE ARE & WHAT WE DO

• ISCO Generational Development

• CASE STUDIES & DISCUSSION

Today’s Talk:

3

Title of Slide Goes HereBoard of Directors –Bobby Kennedy, Jr - Riverkeeper, NRDC, VantagePointMark Vigneri – CEO of ERFSDavid Wickersham, Sr. – former Director of Remediation for DuPont and Honeywell

Executives –Ron Adams, PE, LSRP – Exec. VP of RemediationPatrick Boska – Director of Field ServicesJim Rogalski – InternationalDavid Spader, PG – Regional Director

Corporate Support:Legal - William, Caliri, Miller & OtleyFinancial Modeling – Amper, Politziner & MattiaAccounting – Mills & DeFilippis

Who We Are - ERFS Management

4

Title of Slide Goes HereRemediation Company. Sole Mission is to find, design, implement, deliver soil and/ or groundwater remediation solutions at best possible cost, time, and/or ROI ratios.

ERFS most widely known for developing complex in situ technologies; and

Industry pioneer of Pay-for-Performance / Not-to-Stop / Fixed Cost Contracting since 1998.

Headquartered in Sea Girt, New Jersey, large equipment inventories in Lakewood, NJ; Jacksonville, FL; Arlington, TX; San Francisco, CA and Tokyo, Japan.

Who We Are - ERFS Overview

5

Title of Slide Goes HereLargest direct provider of in situ technologies in the United States (Pollution Engineering Magazine / BNP Media)

45% of remediation orders from consultants, 55% direct, 70% projects in teams

35 people, $10 to $20M Construction in Progress run rate operation

10% of Company work is peer review / public committee management for large cleanups in the US (Jersey City PPG Chromium, Chicago 2016, Midwest Dioxin site, and Closure Strategy for Mid-Atlantic Superfund site, etc.

What We Do - ERFS Overview

6

Title of Slide Goes HereISNetwork CertifiedFull OSHA CompliantNo Safety Incidents or Accidents – All 15 yrsHave been directly OSHA inspected – no violations / no recommendationsApproved by many H&S programs: US Army Corps of Eng, CH2M Hill, AMEC, CB&I, Parsons, Koch Industries, Hess, Honeywell, ExxonMobil, DoDInternal Training and Management Programs

ERFS Health & Safety

ISCO Generations• Generation 1 – Fenton(-like) chemistry in a

well• Generation 2 – Same as Gen I but using

pressure injection into wells with varied chemistry concentrations

• Generation 3 – Multiple, innovative delivery devices, varied chemistry throughout project, sophisticated monitoring and real-time data analysis leading to real-time field adjustments

7

First GenerationBasic / Non Recovery

• Fenton-in-a-Well, in a monitoring well or simple injection well construction.

• Contaminants in ground water will be treated by hydroxyls produced by Fenton’s Reagent

• The injected chemistry will inoculate ground water and move through saturated zone

8

9

First Generation

10

Field Data Summary – G1• 22 representative sites• 1993 to 2000• BTEX, MTBE & TCE sites• Limited soil data• Pilot focused• Ground water contaminant reductions averaged

48% per application(s)• Data averaged only 2 quarterly samples• No definitive proof of effect outside of a ten foot

radius

11

G1• Advantages

– Easy to try– Works on localized contamination– Reduces mass of high levels of contamination

in a source area quickly• Disadvantages

– No control– No physical drive– Costly to add wells– Can discharge to the surface

12

G1 Uses in 2013

• Open area• High permeability• Shallow aquifer• Simple contamination• Mass reduction• Wells or GeoProbe available• Set-up MNA

13

Second GenerationImprovement

• Use of specially constructed injectors• Variation in chemistry and concentrations• Treatment of soils via hydration• Theory

– Injection under pressure improves coverage– Better constructed chemistry lasts longer /

works better in the treatment area

14

Second Generation

15

Field Data Summary – G2

• Petroleum and Chlorinated sites• Soil data available• Ground water contaminant reductions

reported varied from 99% to 30%• Data averaged over entire projects• Radial influence over a ten foot radius, but

rarely over a twenty foot interval• Pilot dependent

16

G2• Advantages

– Improved efficiency – Less use of wells– Higher mass reductions

• Disadvantages– No control– New feature may have a negative effect– Costly to add wells– Can discharge to the surface– Safety can be a issue under pressure

17

Disadvantages – G2

18

Disadvantages – G2

19

Disadvantages – G2

20

G2 Uses in 2013

• Ideal conditions• Replication of specific remediation projects• Where cost is limited by simplest

implementation

21

Third Generation-Control

• Physical means of certain contact with the targeted volume of ground water or soil to be treated

• Real-time controls• A large array of conditional choices of

chemistry and / or biological methods, with Fenton’s Reagent only a subset of choices

22

Third GenerationTheory

• The remediation will only be as effective the ability to intercept the subsurface

• Chemical (or biological) formulations used in series - based on contaminants, reduction curves, interferences and project stages

• Model based• Pay-for-Performance contracting is the

driver for innovation

23

Title of Slide Goes HereFour Stages to the On-Contact ProcessPhysical DeliveryPreparationConversionRestoration

Tool Box have all “tools” needed as applicable at

the site to maximize field eventsPrimary, secondary, tertiary methods

for multiple tasks

ERFS G3 = On-Contact Process & Tool Box Approach

24

Physical Stage

• Propagations: Hydraulic factures to increase permeability (up to 11,000 square feet).

• Programmable Release Processorssm (PRP):Automated down hole delivery system. Provides reagents for weeks without recharging.

• RECORS: Recirculation well.

• Tension Systems:Computer controlled injections for fractured rock applications.

• Laterals: Horizontal piping of various configurations to deliver reagents over a large area in shallow applications.

• ConductivPlanzsm: High capacity vertically stacked Propagations.

Physical devices to deliver reagents to contaminants

25

Physical - On-Contact Propagations Diagram

26

Physical - PROPAGATIONSSM

27

Physical - Propagations

28

Physical - Propagations

29

Physical – Direct Push Injection

30

Physical - Recors Recirculating Wells

Up- or down-flow modesSaturated zone treatment Can be arranged in rows to create treatment zones Effective for sites with > 5 feet of vadose zone

31

Preparation and Conversion Stages

• Preparation Stage – Proprietary conditioners added to create favorable subsurface conditions.

• Conversion Stage – Does the work of converting contaminants to innocuous byproducts.– Chemical – Oxidizers & Reducing

Agents– Biological – Stimulation or

Augmentation

32

Prep & Conversion - Treatment Technologies

• Chemical Oxidation– Fenton Reagent– Permanganate– Persulfate– Hydrogen Peroxide– Calcium Peroxide– Ozone

• Chemical Reduction

• Biological Stimulation or Augmentation

• Physical and/or Chemical enhanced product recovery

All technologies are interchangeable via theOn-Contact Process®

33

Prep & Conversion - Reagent Applications

34

Prep & Conversion –CHEMISTRY APPLICATION

35

Prep & Conversion –CHEMISTRY APPLICATION

36

Prep & Conversion –CHEMISTRY APPLICATION

37

Real Time Monitoring

38

Subsurface MappingSignature

39

•Uses advanced resistivity and customized software for better site characterization and treatment monitoring;

Subsurface Mapping SiteVisionSM

40

Subsurface Mapping SiteVisionSM

41

Subsurface Mapping SiteVisionSM

BeforeInjection

DuringInjection

• SiteVisionSM can track reagent travel, perched water, water flow, fractures, etc.

Treatment Zone

42

Restoration Stage

• Restores the site to baseline conditions– Adjust pH (up or down)– Fixation

• Adjusts site conditions for natural attenuation– Increase dissolved oxygen– Nutrient additions– Inoculation with proprietary biological cultures

Title of Slide Goes HerePFP Superfund (USACE for EPA) Southern NJ – Source Area treatment

ERFS 3rd Tier Sub 10,000 sf source area from former solvent tanker washing ops – mixed CVOCFine to medium sand with silt (glauconitic = high iron), vertical interval from 10-35 ft bgsGroundwater goals exceededSoil Goals measurement adjusted due to extremely high duplicate sample incongruitiesERFS and Team met all contracted goals

ERFS Examples

Title of Slide Goes Here

ERFS ExamplesK-M Superfund Site Source Area Treatment Results

-

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

20,000

TCE

and

DC

E (u

g/L)

Baseline (ug/L) 17,539 4,946 507 15,900 Post 3rd Event (ug/L) 2,623 2,179 369 2,060

Source Area Wells Below Treatment Area Downgradient Shallow Downgradient Deep

Title of Slide Goes HereFortune 100 Aerospace Manufacturer

Project 1 –Event One Injection via trenches into bedrock

ERFS Examples

Title of Slide Goes Here

Fortune 100 Aerospace ManufacturerProject 1 –TCE results One Year after Event One

ERFS Examples

Well ID Baseline TCE ug/L

One Year Post Treatment TCE

ug/L

Reduction

BW-1 51,000 15,000BW-4 230,000 2BRW-1 23,000 7,500BRW-2 27,000 120OSW-3B 23,000 38BW-24 72,000 180H

ot

Zon

e

Avg. Hot Zone 71,000 3,807- 94.6%

BW-2 1,500 18OMW-3D 990 30BMW-3 100 3OIP-2D 160 9

Perim

eter

Zo

ne

Avg. Perimeter

688 15- 97.8%

Title of Slide Goes Here

ERFS ExamplesProject 1 –Injection Plan for Event Two

Title of Slide Goes Here

ERFS Examples

0

25,000

50,000

75,000

100,000

125,000

6/22/07

10/22/07

2/22/08

6/22/08

10/22/08

2/22/09

6/22/09

10/22/09

2/22/10

6/22/10

10/22/10

2/22/11

6/22/11

10/22/11

2/22/12

Average TC

E Co

ncen

tration (ug/L)

ISCO Treatment Event

MassDEP UCL = 50,000 ug/L

TCE Exponential Trendliney = 4E+19e‐8E‐04x

Title of Slide Goes Here

ERFS Examples

0

3,000

6,000

9,000

12,000

6/22/07

10/22/07

2/22/08

6/22/08

10/22/08

2/22/09

6/22/09

10/22/09

2/22/10

6/22/10

10/22/10

2/22/11

6/22/11

10/22/11

2/22/12

Average Cr+6

 Con

centratio

n (ug/L)

ISCR Treatment EventISCO Treatment EventMassDEP UCL = 3,000 ug/L

Title of Slide Goes HereFortune 100 Aerospace Manufacturer

Project 2 – Stalled P&TFormer waste sump – TCE in sand (>10,000 ug/L) from 40-65 ft bgsP&T for 10 yrsAddress hot spots first to reach 100 ug/L then risk assessmentDP injection of catalyzed peroxide to be followed by well installation and polishing Intense public involvementExpect first data in Spring 2011

ERFS Examples

Title of Slide Goes Here

ERFS Examples

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

MW22

MW28

MW30

MW32S

MW7

TOTAL VOC

Title of Slide Goes HereJFK International AirportThree large treatment areas – two support areas, one in high security, VIP zone, high traffic airside area“Proxi-One” contract to transform general work scope statement into actual field treatmentStrict operating requirements = very difficult logisticsMixed, handled, and injected over 300,000 gallons of reagents in 10 weeks on site without incident or conflict with other site operations.

ERFS Examples

Title of Slide Goes Here

ERFS Examples

JFK Airside

Title of Slide Goes HereMajor Insurance - PFP

Major industrial site claims (>$1.75 M – two sites) $5M portfolio of heating oil claims (ERFS special field services)Retail Gas Station claims

Major Oil Companies - PFPSource Area removals in NY, NJ, Mid –AtlanticState programs in PA, FL, TX

Utilities – ConEd, Mass ElectricSource area treatment in NYC transformer site (0.75 acre)Transformer sites in New England

ERFS Examples

55

Thank you for your time and consideration

Please call:Ron AdamsCell 904-207-2731radams@erfs.com

www.erfs.com

56

Title of Slide Goes HereDallas NAS CVOC source area - BRACNAS North Island former landfill –Comingled BTEX and CVOC one-acre source zoneWillow Grove Jet Fuel LNAPL – AFCEEFormer Andrews AFB – (3) fuel oil and gasoline plumesRedstone Arsenal BTEX plumeWatervliet Arsenal – CVOC in bedrockDESC Jacksonville – (2) LNAPL plumes

ERFS Federal DoD Projects

57

Title of Slide Goes HereK-M Superfund Site NJLCP Bridge Street Site OU2 – Part of Onondaga Lake CleanupRA Selection & Strategy Advising –Fortune 100 Chemical Company – Site in MichiganP&T Close-Out Consulting – Fortune 100 Chemical Company – Site in So. NJ Lake Ontario Ordnance Works AFP68 Site Review.

ERFS Superfund Projects

58

Title of Slide Goes Here Lockheed Martin Dow Chemical Koch Petroleum Honeywell Combustion Engineering JFK International Airport Syracuse Hancock Airport ConEd Mass Electric Insurance Claims – Chartis, AllState, USAA,

many others State Cleanup Programs – Gas Stations and Dry

Cleaners

ERFS Public / Private Sector Sites

59

Title of Slide Goes Here Initial Data Package Review – Go or No-Go, Pros-Cons of in situ approach(es), General Cost Estimate

Conceptual Approach(es) and Cost Estimate

Recommended site testing *Soil Oxidant Demand Tests *Bio-treatability Tests *Specialty Tests – bucket and jar testing

for specific items *FS/RAP/Work Plan Specific Input (text

and figures)

ERFS Pre-Design & RA Selection

60

Title of Slide Goes HereBid to a Specific Goal Remove NAPL % Reduction Numerical goals in soil and/or groundwater

Bid to a specific work scope Pricing to implement set design Prime Contactor/Owner set number of points,

how constructed, reagents to be used, etc.Both can be bid as Lump Sum Pay-for-PerformanceLump Sum By Task

ERFS Final Design & Bidding