Upload
dotruc
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Clean Baltic Sea Shipping Seminar for Russian delegates 1
ENVIRONMENTAL PORT INDEX Port dues incentives for Clean Shipping
Dr. Chris Wooldridge, Cardiff University, UK
Gun Rudeberg, Port of Stockholm Ellen Kaasik, Port of Tallinn Andrej Vatterrott, Port of Rostock Markku Alahäme, Port of Turku Ulf Sonesson, Port of Trelleborg Liselotte Rørup, Port of Kalundborg Axel Grelland, Port of Oslo Kaarina Vuorivirta, Port of Helsinki
2
Introduction
“Environmental shipping and port indexes are of paramount importance for several large ports and there will be a unique opportunity for the Baltic Sea Region to take the lead and provide an excellent show case for other maritime regions”
(www.clean-baltic-sea-shipping.eu)
3
Environmental costs
• Only clean ports will survive” • “If you think „environment‟ is expensive – try an accident” • “When you have seen one port – you have seen one port” • CBSS can deliver OPTIONS
• Blue print
4
Port Index and the CBSS project
The Port Index should act as a catalyst and indicator of good practice in environmental management of port and shipping interests:
• Reduce ship-borne air pollution at sea, in ports and in
cities • Reduce nutrient inputs from ships at sea to a zero
level • Create a joint strategy for differentiated port dues* • Create pilot projects at full scale as best practice
examples • Create a network for collaboration between
stakeholders to achieve the goals
5
Progress to date
• Completion of literature search
• Identification of potential KPIs
• Initial Group evaluation of KPIs
• Compilation of group best practice
• Data base of BPO members’ responses
• Specification for generic index model – in progress
6
What is an index? • A particular trend or condition • A scale (of numbers) which show changes
• A numerical quantity, usually lacking units, that indicates
magnitude of….effect
• A number which, by varying around a value of (10 or 100), enables a straightforward comparison over time in the average value of a set of items
• CONFIDENTIALITY - COMPETITION - ANONIMITY • MEANINGFUL - SIGNIFICANT - FEASIBLE -PRACTICABLE -
ACCEPTABLE
7
Port of Trelleborg
CURRENT PRACTICES WITH POTENTIAL INPUT FOR PORT
INDEX * indicates repeated themes reported by several Partners
NOTES AND JUSTIFICATION
1 Is port certificated or registered for Self Diagnosis Method, PERS or ISO14001?
Scope for rating EMS standard and status. Indicates standard and competence
2 Is Environmental Policy readily available and comprehensive?
Key driver of environmental management activities, programmes and practice
3 Noise*, emissions to air* including SOx, NOx, PM2.5 and PM10
Potential EPIs. Direct link to emissions and air quality
4 CO2,* Use of energy, Waste handling*, Overall air quality*
Links with PPRISM, Waste is a high priority issue throughout sector. Measures of sustainability.
5 Differentiated port dues* – Based on emissions to air and waste
Considerations of incentive programmes. Bonus – Malus Systems
6 Storm water/rain water handling and monitoring
Influence on environmental condition and cargo storage
Group Good Practice I
8
Scope of Index
Key Performance Indicators – for BALTIC
• Port and Shipping
• Operational
• Conditional
• Managerial
• Monitoring
• Reporting List of potential KPIs
Examples of current good practice
Port of Helsinki
9
Components of Index
• Input data (Units)
• Standardization/Normalization
• Weighting to be applied?
• Source and reliability of data
• Compilation
• Evaluation
• Reporting Port of Turku
10
Specification of Index
• Ship-borne air pollution
• Port reception facilities – sewage
• Harmonization and standardization of environmentally friendly infrastructure
• Baseline calculations of emissions in (Partner ports*)
• Availability of electricity, gas, LNG*
• Economic instruments such as differentiated port dues*
11
ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE • Compliance with legislation and regulation • Continuous environmental improvement • Control of Environmental Aspects • „Voluntary self-regulation‟ - evidence • Sustainable development and environmental
protection • Shipping* • Level playing field • Fixed goal posts
Environmental Indicators
For the Port Authority, Sector and Baltic*
Port of Stockholm
12
Environmental condition Indicators
1. Carbon Footprint
2. Amount of waste recycled
3. Total water consumption
Consolidated Environmental Management Indicators
Existence/reference to:
1. Environmental Management Programme
2. Environmental Policy
3. Reference to ESPO Code
4. Inventory of Legislation
5. Inventory of Significant Environmental Aspects
6. Objectives and Targets
7. Training
8. Monitoring Programme
9 . Environmental Report
PPRISM Proposed indicators
13
Stakeholders assessment results
EPI Condition
Clean Shipping
Project (*33)
BPA Conference
(114)
1st ESPO SD Committee
(17)
2nd ESPO SD Committee
(11)
On-line survey (114)
Overall (289)
Carbon dioxide emissions 3.9 3.4 3.7 3.7 3.67 3.7
Waste (excl. ships) 3.8 4.0 3.5 3.8 3.59 3.7
Water consumption 2.9 3.6 3.1 3.4 3.43 3.3
EPI Management
Environmental Management Programme 4.6 4.0 4.3 4.6 3.85 4.3
Environmental Policy 4.5 - - 4.3 3.98 4.3
Monitoring programme 4.4 3.9 3.7 4.0 3.98 4.0
Environmental Report 4.3 3.9 - 4.3 3.81 4.1
Objectives and Targets 4.3 - - 4.2 3.86 4.1
Environmental Training 4.1 - - 4.0 3.86 4.0
ESPO Code of Practice 3.8 - - 3.9 3.67 3.8
Inventory of Aspects 3.7 - 3.8 4.5 3.88 4.0
Inventory of Legislation 3.6 - - 4.2 3.78 3.9
*Number of respondents Results between 1 – 5 (where 1 = least and 5 = most)
14
Stakeholders assessment results
Results between 1 – 5 (where 1 = least and 5 = most)
15
Environmental Management Indicator Weighting
Environmental Management System 1
Environmental Monitoring Programme 1.25
Inventory of Significant Environmental Aspects 1.5
Environmental Policy 1.5
ESPO/National/Organizational Code of Practice 0.5
Inventory of environmental legislation 1.5
Objectives and Targets 1
Environmental Training 0.75
Environmental Report 1
16 The European Sea Ports Conference
Sopot, Poland 11th May 2012
Environmental (pprism.espo.be)
• 125 Initial EPIs
• Operational
• Management
• Condition
• 289 feedback
17
Port Sources included Percentages Years Results Comments
A Corunna (Spain)
PA vehicles PA boilers Electricity port area
4 % 7 % 89 %
2009 2008 2007 2006
1124 t CO2 1357 t CO2
1296.5 t CO2 1301 t CO2
Results reported since 2006 Reduction of 13.6 % (2006 -09) Published in Sustainability report 2009
Antwerp (Belgium)
Stationary sources Mobile sources PA buildings Electricity Business travel Commuting
19 % 51 % 10 % 13 % 1 % 6 %
2008 34700 t CO2e Calculated from 2000 – 2008 Results presented in the GreenPorts Conference 2011, Venice
Dover (UK)
Gas Oil Refrigerant Gases Owned vehicles Electricity
23 % 2 % 1 % 74 %
2009 2008
13279 t CO2 15340 t CO2
Results reported since 2008 Reduction of 13.4 % (2008 -09) Published in their Environmental Bulletin 2009
Oslo (Norway)
Direct emissions Indirect emissions Other indirect emissions
44 % 34 % 22 %
2008 2007
1346 t CO2e 704 t CO2e
Increase in 47.7% (2007 - 08) Published in the port of Oslo report: CO2 emissions for the year 2008.
Rotterdam (The Netherlands)
Direct emissions Indirect emissions Other indirect emissions
31 % 15 % 54 %
2008 2007
29094 t CO2 33043 t CO2
Results reported since 2007 Reduction of 12 % (2007 - 08) Published in their Annual Report 2009
Examples of best practice in Carbon Footprint
18
Best Practices in Waste management
Source Corunna Algeciras Cartagena Castellon Catalan Dover Santander
Solid Waste
Organic 1099 t Total solid waste
1.3tonnes
196.64 t 1152 t 4120 kg
Paper 344 t 8.82 t 1.4 t 861 kg √ 5540 kg
Plastics 57 t 3.9 t 10.1 t 0.095 m3 140 kg
Non-hazardous industrial waste
Scrap metal 154 t 4873 kg √
Wood 3321 m3 165 t 1 m3
Electronic waste 460 kg 0.19 t 54 u √
Oil filters 0.14 t 4 u √
Hazardous waste
Ink cartridges 152 u 167 u 117 u 149 u
Used Oil 2400 l 1 t 10 kg 3 l √ 1.5 t
Fluorescents 1201 l 160 kg 24 kg 209 u √ 80 kg
Batteries 0.313 t 400 kg 499 kg 31.7 kg √ 43 u
19 Observatory/Dashboard
Environmental Management Components Average score: 7.4 (out of 10)
20
PORT OF KALININGRAD
• Garbage/Waste management
• Pollution
• OSR Exercise 09/10/2012
21
PORT OF SAINT - PETERSBURG
• Corporate Social Responsibility
• Ecological Partnership Association
• Environmental Policy
• Monitoring: Air, Water, Waste
22
• ISO 14001 • KPI: Air -3%, Waste -11% Water -7.5% • Dzhubga – Lazarevskoye – Sochi gas pipeline • Adler CHPS (Combined Heat and Power Station)
23
Year Waste, thous. m³
Sewage, thous. tons
Oily waters, thous. tons
2009 10.3 13.7 68.2
2010 9.9 9.3 62.8
2011 13.0 12.9 63.5
Year Waste, tons Oily waters, tons
2009 728 312
2010 523 224
2011 376 154
Information on amount of waste collected by FSUE "Rosmorport" from vessels in seaports
Waste and oily contaminants from Saint-Petersburg, Vladivostok, Vostochny and Naskhodka
Federal state unitary enterprise
ROSMORPORT
ECOLOGICAL SERVICES
• Reception/Collection
• Transportation
• Emergency
• Safety of navigation
• Surveying and nav. aids
24
BPO member‟s website survey*
1. Presence of Environmental Information on port‟s website
2. Achievement of PERS/ISO or EMAS
3. Publicly available Environmental Policy Statement
4. Publication of Environmental Report
5. Evidence of Environmental Monitoring
6. Identified EPIs to provide evidence of trends
7. Publication of data and science-based reports
8. Differentiated fees/dues – Economic Instruments
9. Examples of established good practice
25
Port Code
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
33 Yes Yes,
ISO 14001 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Solutions for sorting of waste in the ports and
fixed systems for handling waste
water, grey water and black water from the ships.
- Noise - Diesel consumption per tonne of handled goods
- Emissions to air, land and water - Diesel and energy consumption - Waste management - Cooperation projects
34 Yes
Yes, ISO 14001 in several
terminal operators
Yes No N/M N/M N/M No
The port applies an
environmentally differentiated port charge,
which means that vessels that offer
good environmental performance
receive a discount
N/M
- Onshore power supply for vessels -Rail shuttles to replace road transport - Gas recycling in conjunction with the loading and discharge of oil - The port facilitates the use of LNG as ship fuel. - Green Bunkering to reduce the risk of oil spills.
Example of BPO survey responses
5 out of 48 websites mention Differentiated fees*
26
QUESTIONS Oceania % YES
Asia % YES
Africa %
YES
North America % YES
Latin America % YES
ESPO Environmental Review 2009 (122
ports) % YES
Baltic Ports (48
ports) % YES
1 Does the port website show Environmental Information? 56 4 20 16 20 69 69
2 Does the port have an EMS? 60 20 32 28 20 48 38
3 Does the port have an Environmental Policy? 72 28 36 44 28 72 46
4 Is the Environmental Policy made available to the public? 36 8 12 24 16 62 27
5 Does the port publish an Environmental Report / Review? 56 20 20 36 16 43 27
6 Is environmental monitoring carried out in your port? 72 32 40 56 24 77 40
7
Has the port identified environmental indicators to monitor trends in environmental performance?
44 16 24 44 8 60 31
8
Does the port publish factual data by which the public can assess the trend of its environmental performance?
4 0 8 20 0 36 15
27
Role and status of Index
• Ports set an example
• Demonstrate standards and best practice
• Ports are catalysts for action
• Encourage culture of monitoring and reporting
• Integration to mutual advantage
• Baseline and benchmark
28
ISSUES & ASPECTS INDICATORS INDEX NOTES
1. Port Environmental Management
• EMS*
• Policy
• ESPO Code
• Inventory of Aspects
• Inventory of Legislation
• Objectives* & targets*
• KPIs* and Monitoring*
• Training
• Reporting
• Infrastructure
1.00*
1.50
0.50
1.50
1.50
1.00
1.25
0.75
1.00
?
Indicative of competence & standard of Port environmental programme. Data from SDM/PERS, PPRISM & Website. *Shipping aspects integrated.
2. Environmental Condition
• Air
• Water
• Soil
• Sediment
• Ecosystems/Habitats
• Water Consumption*
• Carbon Footprint (Scope 3)
?
Selected EPIs for each category (each port unique). Trend more significant than absolute value. Baseline and benchmark value.
3. Shipping Aspects* • Vessel speed reduction
• Green Ship Promotion*
• On-shore Power Supply
• (Automated Mooring)
• Exhaust gas/Auxiliary
• Waste
?
Voluntary/Virtual Arrival
Green fees/ESI/CSI
Influence of economic instruments.
CLEAN BALTIC SEA SHIPPING: PORT INDEX (Potential model)
Port: Driver – Set an example - Mitigate – Support – Encourage - Enforce
29
KPI Y/N Evidence Trend Detail
1. EMS
• i)
• ii)
• iii)
Y
Y
Y
Certificate
ppm
www.
ISO14001
Particulates
Training
2. Condition
• i)
• ii)
• iii)
Y
N
N
GHG Scope 3
3. Shipping
• i)
• ii)
• iii)
• iv)
Y
N
Y
Y
www.
Green fees
OSP
ESI
- 12%
- 13.6%
Index of Sustainability - DASHBOARD
30
Port - Shipping Aspects
1. CO2 Emissions
2. Vessel speed reduction
a) Voluntary
b) Virtual arrival
3. Green Ship Promotion
a) ESI (Environmental Ship)
b) CSI (Clean Ship)
c) EEDI (Energy Efficiency Design)
4. On-shore power supply
5. Automated mooring
6. Exhaust gas control
7. Port infrastructure
8. Reception facilities
9. Bunkering options
10. VTS
11. Own vessels
31
EPI Response Weighting
Port EMS
•
•
•
X
1.0
1.5
0.5
Environment
•
•
•
1.5
1.5
1.0
Shipping
•
•
•
X
1.5
0.5
1.0
PPRISM – SDM – ESPO - BPO
PA & Sector
• Baseline
• Benchmark
• Evidence
• Image
• 5 x E‟s
• > Risk
• Level field
• Goal posts
• Initiative*
Environment
• Aspects
• Improvement
• Sustainability
• Emissions
• Discharges
• Quay - City
• Area - Chain
DRAFT PORT INDEX
32
Pathway to completion (31st March 2013)
1. Refinement & acceptance of Index concept
2. Input data – sources and standardization
3. Weighting – Baseline - Benchmark
4. Pilot sample – evaluation and validation
5. Input from ‘Supporting Studies’* CBSS
6. Input – interpretation – use
7. Recognition
8. R&D deliverable – Practicable tool?*
33
THANKS TO THE PORT INDEX RESEARCH GROUP PILOT 5
and
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION