Environmental Monitoring Report€¦ · Attachment 4 - Ash and Sludge TCLP Certificates Attachment 5 - Certificates of Analyses Attachment 6 - Environmental Monitoring Pictures. 1

Environmental Monitoring Report

This report has been submitted to ADB by the Borrower and is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s public communications policy (2005). It does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB.

Project Number: LN2612/EI7303 4th Quarter 2011

PHI: Visayas Base-load Power Development Project

Prepared by

KEPCO SPC Power Corporation

Cebu City, Philippines

i

2 x 100 MW CEBU POWER PLANT

2012.01.29

KSPC Power Plant Construction Office

Environmental Monitoring Results (Sep.-Dec. 2011)

ii

Table of Contents

Page

I. Introduction and Operation Progress 1

II. Results of Environmental Monitoring 1 2.1 Air Environment 1 Ambient Air 1 Air Emissions 12 2.2 Water Environment 27 Ground Water 27 Marine Water 27 Water Effluents 28 2.3 Pangdan and Naalad 35 2.4 Resettlement Area 41 2.5 Solid and Hazardous Waste 43

III. Conclusion 44

Attachments

Attachment 1 - Monitoring Locations / Sampling Maps Attachment 2 - Environmental Monitoring Trending Graphs Attachment 3 - Residual Chlorine Re-sampling Certificates Attachment 4 - Ash and Sludge TCLP Certificates

Attachment 5 - Certificates of Analyses

Attachment 6 - Environmental Monitoring Pictures

1

I. INTRODUCTION AND PLANT OPERATION STATUS

This report shall cover the period September to December 2011 with sampling and testing activities done within the period. Monitoring stations are those approved in the EIS, by DENR, and in the EMP of the project. Unit 1 and Unit 2 are on full load operations within the coverage period. Below is a table showing the summary plant performance. Table 1. Cebu Power Plant Performance Status

Month Unit Net

Generated Power (MWh)

Avg. Heat Rate

(kCal/kWh)

House Load Rate

(%)

Planned Plant Outages (Days)

Forced Plant Outages (Days)

09/2011 Unit 1 35,758.22 2,522.75 10.57 15.00 -

Unit 2 55,475.38 2,509.75 10.09 - -

10/2011 Unit 1 37,514.80 2,502.00 10.76 3.00 -

Unit 2 55,312.02 2,517.90 9.79 - -

11/2011 Unit 1 42,345.69 2,524.00 10.50 - 6.94

Unit 2 45,879.40 2,517.10 9.72 8.00 -

12/2011 Unit 1 67,871.78 2,524.50 10.00 - -

Unit 2 21,999.44 2,517.70 9.17 8.60 -

Plant Average 90,539.18 5,033.92 20.15 28.15 1.74

II. RESULTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

2.1. AIR ENVIRONMENT

2.1.1 Ambient Air

Ambient air monitoring is important to ensure that the stakeholders are breathing clean air that is within the set standards. The current period is now in the Operations and Maintenance (O&M) regime thus monitoring stations covered are those specified in the ECC and in accordance to DENR’s recommendation. All sampling and analytical procedures conform to those required by the Bureau. Table 2 summarizes the monitoring activities made within the coverage period while Tables 3 to 6 summarize the data gathered and used for analysis and trending.

Ambient Air Quality Monitoring System (AAQMS) Results Results of the ambient air parameters monitored at the two (2) continuous stations defined in table 2, and using an averaging time of 24 hours, generally concludes that the levels are well within the background and standard values. At station 1, a PM-10 exceedance was observed on November 4, 2011 but the source could not be validated as there was no reading of the wind speed and directions. At station 2, exceedances were also observed on October 5 and October 12, 2011 and were validated as coming from the site indicated by the wind speed and direction readings. The source was identified as the dust generated from operating the

2

emergency ash pond. This was remedied by increasing the amount of water sprayed during unloading at the said ash pond. No exceedances were observed for the parameters NO2 and SO2. Based on the meteorological data, the prevailing wind direction for the period is blowing from the SE while a top monthly average wind speed of 3.77 m/s was monitored for both stations. Figures 1 – 2 is a summary of the meteorological conditions gathered within the coverage period while figures 3 – 6 show a summary of PM-10, NO2, and SO2 values monitored during the coverage period.

Table 2. Ambient Air Monitoring Stations and Parameters

Coverage Period Monitoring Stations Parameters Monitored

September – December 2011

Continuous Ambient Air Monitoring Stations: STN 1 – North Poblacion Area

(Aliganga’s Residence) STN 2 – Colon Area Near Barangay Hall

(Berdan’s Open Ground) Manual Ambient Air Monitoring Points: STN 3 – Barangay Tangke Basketball

Court STN 4 – Along National Road cor.

Aliganga St. STN 5 – Near the Pier Area at the Plant

Site STN 6 – In front of Mangkikis Chapel,

Sitio Mangkikis Perimeter Fence Noise Monitors: STN A – Guard House 1 STN B – Guard House 2

PM-10, SO2, NO2, Noise Total Suspended Particles (TSP), SO2, NO2, Noise Noise

Continuous Noise Monitoring Noise levels were monitored at the two (2) AAQMS stations and also at the perimeter area using the two (2) continuous perimeter noise monitoring instruments installed at the main and secondary guardhouse. Figure 7 shows a graph of the noise levels measured during the coverage period. It can be observed that only two minute exceedances occurred at guardhouse 2 on September 13, 2011 and November 29, 2011. Over-all, the values are well within the background values and the prescribed standards. Exceedances are most probably caused by external factors such as passing vehicles along the highway. Also, the provision of a 5-m buffer zone attenuates this small exceedance should the source be from inside of the power plant.

3

Table 3. AAQMS and Perimeter Noise Results (September 2011)

Date

Station 1 Station 2 Noise (dB) Averaging

Time SO2

(ppm)

NO2

(ppm)

PM-10

(mg/NCM)

Noise

(dB)

Wind Speed

(mps)

Prevailing

Wind Dir.

SO2

(ppm)

NO2

(ppm)

PM-10

(mg/NCM)

Noise

(dB)

Wind Speed

(mps)

Prevailing

Wind Dir.

Guard

house 1

Guard

house 2

9/1/2011 0.0011 0.0158 0.0280 48.30 2.99 SE 0.0020 0.0036 0.0280 48.30 1.15 SE 70.70 59.40 24 hrs

9/2/2011 0.0003 0.0239 0.0270 45.40 4.17 NE 0.0007 0.0004 0.0270 45.40 0.83 NE 70.40 NR 24 hrs

9/3/2011 0.0008 0.0154 0.0330 44.90 3.08 NE 0.0020 0.0012 0.0330 44.90 0.91 SE 69.50 NR 24 hrs

9/4/2011 0.0008 0.0065 0.0250 45.00 3.09 SE 0.0002 0.0000 0.0250 45.00 0.95 SE 69.80 NR 24 hrs

9/5/2011 0.0004 0.0165 0.0240 45.20 3.57 NE 0.0005 0.0000 0.0240 45.20 0.92 SE 71.10 NR 24 hrs

9/6/2011 0.0005 0.0173 0.0270 45.10 3.94 NE 0.0005 0.0022 0.0270 45.10 0.95 E 71.70 NR 24 hrs

9/7/2011 0.0005 0.0167 0.0300 45.10 4.38 NE 0.0002 0.0002 0.0300 45.10 0.99 SE 68.50 NR 24 hrs

9/8/2011 0.0005 0.0324 0.0320 45.10 2.70 NE 0.0005 0.0014 0.0320 45.10 0.54 NE 69.50 NR 24 hrs

9/9/2011 0.0007 0.0081 0.0570 44.70 3.25 E 0.0002 0.0017 0.0570 44.70 1.04 SE 69.80 NR 24 hrs

9/10/2011 0.0006 0.0160 0.0100 44.60 2.96 E 0.0002 0.0017 0.0100 44.60 1.09 SE 68.50 NR 24 hrs

9/11/2011 0.0007 0.0256 0.0120 44.70 3.00 SE 0.0001 0.0054 0.0120 44.70 0.72 SW 67.70 NR 24 hrs

9/12/2011 0.0018 0.0254 0.0240 43.00 2.61 SE 0.0003 0.0050 0.0240 43.00 0.85 SW 70.20 NR 24 hrs

9/13/2011 0.0010 0.0250 0.0630 43.90 4.52 SE 0.0002 0.0026 0.0630 43.90 1.16 SE 71.50 76.20 24 hrs

9/14/2011 0.0006 0.0206 0.0610 43.70 6.78 NE 0.0003 0.0000 0.0610 43.70 1.09 NE 71.80 70.60 24 hrs

9/15/2011 0.0003 0.0235 0.0320 44.00 3.94 NE 0.0004 0.0000 0.0320 44.00 1.19 SE 68.60 69.30 24 hrs

9/16/2011 0.0008 0.0302 0.0200 43.80 3.12 SE 0.0003 0.0037 0.0200 43.80 0.94 SE NR 68.90 24 hrs

9/17/2011 0.0005 0.0305 0.0350 43.00 4.28 NE 0.0004 0.0026 0.0350 43.00 0.84 SE NR 67.00 24 hrs

9/18/2011 0.0003 0.0256 0.0640 44.70 2.86 NE 0.0003 0.0030 0.0640 44.70 0.69 SE NR 66.50 24 hrs

9/19/2011 0.0004 0.0292 0.0280 44.40 3.15 SE 0.0004 0.0013 0.0280 44.40 0.98 SE NR 67.70 24 hrs

9/20/2011 0.0006 0.0349 0.0480 44.30 2.47 SE 0.0002 0.0063 0.0480 44.30 0.81 SW NR NR 24 hrs

9/21/2011 0.0004 0.0252 0.0290 44.70 2.90 SE 0.0003 0.0020 0.0290 44.70 0.78 SE NR NR 24 hrs

9/22/2011 0.0011 0.0311 0.1060 45.20 6.14 NE 0.0005 0.0037 0.0660 45.40 0.94 S NR NR 24 hrs

9/23/2011 0.0006 0.0458 0.0620 46.80 7.95 NE 0.0034 0.0021 0.0620 46.80 0.94 SE NR 59.60 24 hrs

9/24/2011 0.0000 0.0244 0.0300 47.20 3.27 NE 0.0015 0.0051 0.0300 47.20 0.83 SE NR 59.50 24 hrs

9/25/2011 0.0000 0.0222 0.0400 47.50 2.54 NE 0.0013 0.0000 0.0400 47.50 0.43 NE NR NR 24 hrs

9/26/2011 0.0000 0.0281 0.0490 47.80 5.14 NE 0.0039 0.0017 0.0490 47.80 1.14 NE NR 60.60 24 hrs

9/27/2011 0.0000 0.0232 0.0360 48.20 4.69 NE 0.0006 0.0042 0.0360 48.20 1.01 NE NR 59.80 24 hrs

9/28/2011 0.0000 0.0233 0.0460 47.80 3.26 NE 0.0006 0.0008 0.0460 47.80 0.73 E NR 59.50 24 hrs

9/29/2011 0.0000 0.0172 0.0560 47.50 2.51 SE 0.0006 0.0034 0.0560 47.50 0.91 SE NR 59.50 24 hrs

9/30/2011 0.0000 0.0145 0.0450 47.10 4.05 SE 0.0008 0.0013 0.0450 47.10 1.31 SE NR 59.50 24 hrs

Average 0.0005 0.0234 0.0391 45.37 3.77 NE 0.0008 0.0022 0.0380 45.43 0.92 SE 69.95 64.24 month

DENR

Standards 0.0700 0.0800 0.1500 75.00

D NA NA 0.0700 0.0800 0.1500 75.00 NA NA 75.00

D 75.00

D NA

World Bank

Standards 0.0443

A 0.0987

B 0.1500

C 70.00

E NA NA 0.0443

A 0.0987

B 0.1500

C 70.00

E NA NA 70.00

E 70.00

E NA

A Interim Target 1 - 0.0443 ppm; Interim Target 2 - 0.0177 ppm; Guideline Value - 0.0071 ppm (Interim targets are provided in recognition of the need for a staged

approach to achieving the recommended guidelines) (Averaging Time: 24 hrs). B

1-hour averaging period is recommended in the WHO Ambient Air Quality Guidelines as well as in the US National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) C

Interim Target 1 - 0.1500 ppm; Interim Target 2 - 0.1000 ppm; Interim Target 3 - 0.0750 ppm; Guideline Value - 0.0500 ppm (Averaging Time: 24 hrs) D

Daytime Target (9am-6pm) - 75dB; Morning (5am-9am) and Evening (6pm-10pm) Target - 70dB; Nighttime Target (10pm-5am) - 65dB [Standards are from the Rules and Regulations of the National Pollution Control Commission (1978), Section 78, Category D - Heavy Industrial Area]

E Daytime and nighttime standards in industrial and commercial areas

BLDL - Below the Lowest Detectable Level; NR - No Reading; NA - Not Applicable

4

Table 4. AAQMS and Perimeter Noise Results (October 2011)

Date


Time SO2

(ppm)

NO2

(ppm)

PM-10

(mg/NCM)

Noise

(dB)

Wind Speed

(mps)

Prevailing

Wind Dir.

SO2

(ppm)

NO2

(ppm)

PM-10

(mg/NCM)

Noise

(dB)

Wind Speed

(mps)

Prevailing

Wind Dir.

Guardhouse

1

Guardhouse

2

10/1/2011 0.0000 0.0275 0.0560 46.70 1.02 NE 0.0063 0.0000 0.0560 46.70 1.02 NE 46.70 46.70 24 hrs

10/2/2011 0.0000 0.0039 0.0530 47.20 0.97 NE 0.0012 0.0194 0.0530 47.20 0.97 NE NR NR 24 hrs

10/3/2011 0.0000 0.0012 0.0430 46.90 1.09 SE 0.0003 0.0165 0.0430 46.90 1.09 SE NR NR 24 hrs

10/4/2011 0.0000 0.0065 0.0470 47.10 0.78 SE 0.0007 0.0200 0.0470 47.10 0.78 SE NR NR 24 hrs

10/5/2011 0.0004 0.0037 NR 49.00 0.77 SE 0.0004 0.0191 0.3460 49.00 0.77 SE NR NR 24 hrs

10/6/2011 0.0069 0.0046 NR 52.70 1.21 SE 0.0005 0.0170 NR 52.70 1.21 SE NR NR 24 hrs

10/7/2011 0.0000 0.0033 NR 52.90 0.95 SE 0.0005 0.0187 NR 52.90 0.95 SE NR NR 24 hrs

10/8/2011 0.0000 0.0028 NR 53.40 0.60 SE 0.0002 0.0271 NR 53.40 0.60 SE NR 60.20 24 hrs

10/9/2011 0.0000 0.0017 NR 53.90 0.74 SE 0.0003 0.0186 NR 53.90 0.74 SE NR 59.50 24 hrs

10/10/2011 0.0003 0.0098 NR 53.80 1.07 SE 0.0005 0.0212 NR 53.80 1.07 SE NR 59.60 24 hrs

10/11/2011 0.0000 0.0005 NR 54.30 1.10 SE 0.0003 0.0250 NR 54.30 1.10 SE NR 59.60 24 hrs

10/12/2011 0.0000 0.0000 NR 51.50 1.39 SE 0.0003 0.0092 0.4590 51.50 1.39 SE 59.80 59.60 24 hrs

10/13/2011 0.0000 0.0000 0.0630 45.20 0.96 SE 0.0003 0.0179 0.0630 45.20 0.96 SE 59.50 59.50 24 hrs

10/14/2011 0.0000 0.0000 0.0280 45.10 0.89 SE 0.0003 0.0179 0.0280 45.10 0.89 SE 59.40 59.40 24 hrs

10/15/2011 0.0000 0.0007 0.0900 44.40 1.87 NW 0.0002 0.0181 0.0900 44.40 1.87 NW 59.40 59.40 24 hrs

10/16/2011 0.0000 0.0008 0.0240 43.30 1.50 S 0.0000 0.0158 0.0240 43.30 1.50 SW 59.40 59.40 24 hrs

10/17/2011 0.0000 0.0021 0.0240 43.60 1.72 SW 0.0000 0.0169 0.0240 43.60 1.72 SW 59.40 59.40 24 hrs

10/18/2011 0.0000 0.0040 0.0370 44.00 0.91 SW 0.0000 0.0198 0.0370 44.00 0.91 SW 59.40 59.40 24 hrs

10/19/2011 0.0000 0.0036 0.0760 43.80 1.41 SW 0.0000 0.0228 0.0760 43.80 1.41 SW 59.40 59.40 24 hrs

10/20/2011 0.0016 0.0094 0.0230 43.80 1.57 SW 0.0001 0.0210 0.0230 43.80 1.57 SW 59.40 59.40 24 hrs

10/21/2011 0.0000 0.0009 0.0270 43.60 1.01 SE 0.0001 0.0193 0.0270 43.60 1.17 SW 59.40 59.40 24 hrs

10/22/2011 0.0000 0.0023 0.0730 43.00 NR NR 0.0003 0.0283 0.0730 43.00 0.74 SE 59.40 59.40 24 hrs

10/23/2011 0.0000 0.0010 0.0230 42.70 NR NR 0.0000 0.0172 0.0230 42.70 1.24 S 59.40 59.40 24 hrs

10/24/2011 0.0000 0.0013 0.0220 43.00 NR NR 0.0001 0.0171 0.0220 43.00 0.72 SW 59.40 59.40 24 hrs

10/25/2011 0.0003 0.0044 0.0320 42.70 NR NR 0.0002 0.0251 0.0320 42.70 0.85 SE 59.40 59.40 24 hrs

10/26/2011 0.0000 0.0020 0.0270 42.80 NR NR 0.0004 0.0225 0.0270 42.80 1.99 SE 59.30 59.30 24 hrs

10/27/2011 0.0000 0.0011 0.0280 43.20 NR NR 0.0002 0.0200 0.0280 43.20 0.96 SE 60.90 60.80 24 hrs

10/28/2011 0.0025 0.0039 0.0280 43.70 NR NR 0.0002 0.0186 0.0280 43.70 0.84 SE 67.70 67.70 24 hrs

10/29/2011 0.0000 0.0111 0.0300 46.40 NR NR 0.0003 0.0189 0.0300 46.40 1.50 SW 67.40 67.40 24 hrs

10/30/2011 0.0000 0.0026 0.0320 46.40 NR NR 0.0005 0.0173 0.0290 51.50 0.70 S 67.30 67.30 24 hrs

10/31/2011 0.0000 0.0060 0.0280 46.60 NR NR 0.0004 0.0160 0.0690 51.60 1.50 SE 66.90 67.30 24 hrs

Average 0.0004 0.0040 0.0397 46.67 1.12 SE 0.0005 0.0188 0.0703 46.99 1.12 SE 60.40 60.29 month

DENR

Standards 0.0700 0.0800 0.1500 75.00

D NA NA 0.0700 0.0800 0.1500 75.00

D NA NA 75.00 75.00 NA

World Bank

Standards 0.0443

A 0.0987

B 0.1500

C 70.00

E NA NA 0.0443

A 0.0987

B 0.1500

C 70.00

E NA NA 70.00 70.00 NA





Daytime Target (9am-6pm) - 75dB; Morning (5am-9am) and Evening (6pm-10pm) Target - 70dB; Nighttime Target (10pm-5am) - 65dB [Standards are from the Rules and Regulations of the National Pollution Control Commission (1978), Section 78, Category D - Heavy Industrial Area]

E Daytime and nighttime standards in industrial and commercial areas


5

Table 5. AAQMS and Perimeter Noise Results (November 2011)

Date


Time SO2

(ppm)

NO2

(ppm)

PM-10

(mg/NCM)

Noise

(dB)

Wind Speed

(mps)

Prevailing

Wind Dir.

SO2

(ppm)

NO2

(ppm)

PM-10

(mg/NCM)

Noise

(dB)

Wind Speed

(mps)

Prevailing

Wind Dir.

Guard house

1

Guard house

2

11/3/2011 0.0000 0.0033 0.0340 48.10 NR NR 0.0002 0.0161 0.0380 52.10 0.58 SW 67.70 67.70 24 hrs

11/4/2011 0.0020 0.0281 0.1880 45.50 NR NR 0.0002 0.0115 0.0440 51.80 0.90 SW 66.20 67.60 24 hrs

11/5/2011 0.0010 0.0098 0.1040 42.10 1.10 NE 0.0002 0.0175 0.0480 51.80 0.80 SE 67.10 65.80 24 hrs

11/6/2011 0.0005 0.0111 0.0270 41.80 1.10 NE 0.0001 0.0153 0.0350 51.50 0.90 SW 70.90 66.70 24 hrs

11/7/2011 0.0010 0.0076 0.0230 42.40 0.90 SE 0.0002 0.0142 0.0340 51.80 0.80 SE 66.30 65.70 24 hrs

11/8/2011 0.0004 0.0057 0.0250 42.50 1.10 SE 0.0005 0.0134 0.0360 51.80 0.70 SE 67.60 66.50 24 hrs

11/9/2011 0.0002 0.0053 0.0300 42.30 0.90 E 0.0002 0.0152 0.0410 51.80 0.80 SW 66.70 66.00 24 hrs

11/10/2011 0.0003 0.0044 0.0740 42.30 0.80 NE 0.0002 0.0140 0.0900 51.50 0.70 SW 66.20 65.70 24 hrs

11/11/2011 0.0004 0.0061 0.0420 42.60 0.70 NE 0.0004 0.0228 0.0590 51.30 0.60 SW 67.30 68.70 24 hrs

11/12/2011 0.0000 0.0029 0.0240 42.40 1.30 SE 0.0006 0.0141 0.0360 50.80 1.70 SW 67.20 69.10 24 hrs

11/13/2011 0.0000 0.0011 0.0250 42.30 1.10 SE 0.0005 0.0125 0.0300 51.00 1.40 SE 67.70 67.40 24 hrs

11/14/2011 0.0001 0.0012 0.0160 42.50 0.90 SE 0.0003 0.0173 0.0390 52.10 0.80 SE 67.40 67.40 24 hrs

11/15/2011 0.0000 0.0034 0.0140 42.50 1.00 SE 0.0004 0.0156 0.0330 52.40 0.60 SE 67.70 68.40 24 hrs

11/16/2011 0.0004 0.0083 0.0220 42.30 1.00 SE 0.0007 0.0179 0.0470 51.50 1.30 SW 67.40 68.90 24 hrs

11/17/2011 0.0000 0.0031 0.0320 42.40 1.00 SE 0.0006 0.0177 0.0430 51.00 1.20 SW 67.20 68.90 24 hrs

11/18/2011 0.0001 0.0036 0.0280 42.00 1.10 SE 0.0008 0.0211 0.0620 51.10 1.60 S 67.70 69.40 24 hrs

11/19/2011 0.0000 0.0033 0.0250 41.90 1.20 SE 0.0007 0.0162 0.0410 50.90 1.80 SW 67.90 68.40 24 hrs

11/20/2011 0.0000 0.0017 0.0280 42.20 1.20 SE 0.0007 0.0112 0.0450 50.80 1.90 SW 67.50 68.60 24 hrs

11/21/2011 0.0000 0.0022 0.0230 41.70 1.50 NE 0.0005 0.0090 0.0380 50.50 2.40 SW 66.70 69.80 24 hrs

11/22/2011 0.0000 0.0024 0.0180 42.70 1.50 SE 0.0005 0.0076 0.0290 50.60 2.10 SW 67.20 68.50 24 hrs

11/23/2011 0.0000 0.0043 0.0250 42.30 1.30 SE 0.0006 0.0170 0.0460 50.70 2.00 SW 66.20 67.80 24 hrs

11/24/2011 0.0000 0.0060 0.0360 42.40 1.10 SE 0.0005 0.0155 0.0550 50.80 1.30 SW 67.40 68.70 24 hrs

11/25/2011 0.0000 0.0057 0.0190 44.10 1.50 SE 0.0005 0.0111 0.0400 50.80 2.70 SW 67.10 68.70 24 hrs

11/26/2011 0.0000 0.0059 NR 49.60 5.20 NE 0.0006 0.0172 0.0490 50.80 2.00 SW 65.90 67.40 24 hrs

11/27/2011 0.0000 0.0043 0.0200 44.90 4.00 SE 0.0005 0.0100 0.0320 50.60 1.20 SW 65.80 67.60 24 hrs

11/28/2011 0.0000 0.0084 0.0330 46.50 1.40 NE 0.0008 0.0225 0.0870 49.90 NR SW 66.20 67.80 24 hrs

11/29/2011 0.0009 0.0075 0.0430 42.10 1.50 NE 0.0006 0.0179 0.1280 50.00 1.30 SW 69.40 75.50 24 hrs

11/30/2011 0.0008 0.0073 0.0230 41.90 1.60 E 0.0005 0.0102 0.0450 50.00 2.00 SW NR NR 24 hrs

Average 0.0003 0.0059 0.0371 43.15 1.42 SE 0.0020 0.0179 0.0517 51.78 1.34 SW 67.34 68.17 month

DENR

Standards 0.0700 0.0800 0.1500 75.00

D NA NA 0.0700 0.0800 0.1500 75.00

D NA NA 75.00

D 75.00

D NA

World Bank

Standards 0.0443

A 0.0987

B 0.1500

C 70.00

E NA NA 0.0443

A 0.0987

B 0.1500

C 70.00

E NA NA 70.00

E 70.00

E NA





Daytime Target (9am-6pm) - 75dB; Morning (5am-9am) and Evening (6pm-10pm) Target - 70dB; Nighttime Target (10pm-5am) - 65dB

[Standards are from the Rules and Regulations of the National Pollution Control Commission (1978), Section 78, Category D - Heavy Industrial Area] E Daytime and nighttime standards in industrial and commercial areas


6

Table 6. AAQMS and Perimeter Noise Results (December 2011)

Date


Time SO2

(ppm)

NO2

(ppm)

PM-10

(mg/NCM)

Noise

(dB)

Wind Speed

(mps)

Prevailing

Wind Dir.

SO2

(ppm)

NO2

(ppm)

PM-10

(mg/NCM)

Noise

(dB)

Wind Speed

(mps)

Prevailing

Wind Dir.

Guardhouse

1

Guardhouse

2

12/2/2011 0.0019 0.0057 0.0764 45.56 NR NR 0.0005 0.0068 0.0551 49.14 0.63 SW NR NR 24 hrs

12/3/2011 0.0025 0.0057 0.0764 45.56 NR NR 0.0005 0.0048 NR 50.44 0.81 SW NR NR 24 hrs

12/4/2011 0.0036 0.0037 0.0764 45.56 NR NR 0.0004 0.0036 NR 56.77 0.44 SE NR NR 24 hrs

12/5/2011 0.0016 0.0067 0.1117 45.78 NR NR 0.0025 0.0062 NR 57.43 0.24 SE NR NR 24 hrs

12/6/2011 0.0034 0.0041 0.0455 45.22 NR NR 0.0006 0.0067 0.0666 53.88 0.62 SE NR NR 24 hrs

12/7/2011 0.0025 0.0052 0.0436 47.19 NR NR 0.0006 0.0059 0.0607 53.35 1.43 SE NR NR 24 hrs

12/8/2011 0.0002 0.0057 0.0332 45.61 NR NR 0.0079 0.0067 0.0592 53.20 0.52 SE NR 64.94 24 hrs

12/9/2011 0.0017 0.0055 0.0393 45.94 NR NR 0.0000 0.0066 0.0490 54.24 0.46 SE 68.97 57.27 24 hrs

12/10/2011 0.0014 0.0051 0.0410 46.14 NR NR 0.0000 0.0045 0.0501 54.09 0.61 SE 72.43 59.77 24 hrs

12/11/2011 0.0016 0.0054 0.0468 45.94 NR NR 0.0000 0.0048 0.0611 53.30 0.67 SW 58.31 58.97 24 hrs

12/12/2011 0.0015 0.0051 0.0457 45.73 NR NR 0.0001 0.0045 0.0520 52.82 1.28 SW 57.64 60.36 24 hrs

12/13/2011 0.0014 0.0037 0.0498 45.66 NR NR 0.0001 0.0028 0.0554 52.60 1.23 SW 58.45 62.27 24 hrs

12/14/2011 0.0016 0.0038 0.0486 45.26 NR NR 0.0000 0.0011 0.0898 51.85 0.56 SW 57.54 62.00 24 hrs

12/15/2011 0.0000 0.0000 0.0495 45.16 NR NR 0.0001 0.0068 0.0499 51.45 0.76 NW 58.65 64.12 24 hrs

12/16/2011 0.0000 0.0000 0.0400 45.41 NR NR 0.0002 0.0055 0.0660 52.65 0.76 NW 56.84 60.76 24 hrs

12/17/2011 0.0000 0.0000 0.0277 45.31 NR NR 0.0001 0.0005 0.0293 52.63 0.76 NW 61.43 70.00 24 hrs

12/18/2011 0.0000 0.0000 0.0319 45.36 NR NR 0.0002 0.0047 0.0392 52.23 0.76 NW 58.60 62.69 24 hrs

12/19/2011 0.0004 0.0000 0.0368 45.77 NR NR 0.0002 0.0061 0.0570 51.73 0.71 SE 59.56 65.05 24 hrs

12/20/2011 0.0001 0.0008 0.0467 45.33 NR NR 0.0003 0.0062 0.0986 50.46 1.86 SE 58.16 61.08 24 hrs

12/21/2011 0.0000 0.0000 0.0422 48.54 NR NR 0.0004 0.0073 0.0608 50.67 1.76 SE 57.14 60.56 24 hrs

12/22/2011 0.0000 0.0000 0.0469 48.27 NR NR 0.0007 0.0063 0.0613 49.92 1.51 SE 57.30 61.14 24 hrs

12/23/2011 0.0000 0.0000 0.0433 48.48 NR NR 0.0005 0.0030 0.0570 50.20 1.88 S 58.70 61.77 24 hrs

12/24/2011 0.0000 0.0000 NR 50.17 NR NR 0.0007 0.0053 0.0661 49.91 1.52 SW 58.67 61.54 24 hrs

12/25/2011 0.0000 0.0000 NR 54.27 NR NR 0.0007 0.0041 0.0490 50.54 1.77 SE 56.07 58.87 24 hrs

12/26/2011 0.0000 0.0000 NR 54.78 NR NR 0.0010 0.0074 0.0499 51.34 1.49 SE 55.09 58.62 24 hrs

12/27/2011 0.0000 0.0000 NR 55.21 NR NR 0.0012 0.0057 0.0508 51.28 1.36 SE 72.02 61.46 24 hrs

12/28/2011 0.0000 0.0000 NR 50.86 NR NR 0.0014 0.0051 0.0648 50.71 1.29 SE 71.71 61.16 24 hrs

12/29/2011 0.0000 0.0000 0.0374 48.70 NR NR 0.0016 0.0052 0.0588 49.62 1.94 SW 58.99 64.95 24 hrs

12/30/2011 0.0000 0.0000 0.0344 48.67 NR NR 0.0010 0.0081 0.0518 50.13 1.63 SE 60.84 63.32 24 hrs

12/31/2011 0.0000 0.0000 0.0475 48.67 NR NR 0.0011 0.0043 0.0597 50.41 1.54 SE 57.37 61.80 24 hrs

Average 0.0008 0.0022 0.0487 47.47 NR NR 0.0008 0.0052 0.0581 51.97 1.09 SE 60.46 61.85 month

DENR

Standards 0.0700 0.0800 0.1500 75.00

D NA NA 0.0700 0.0800 0.1500 75.00

D NA NA 75.00

D 75.00

D NA

World Bank

Standards 0.0443

A 0.0987

B 0.1500

C 70.00

E NA NA 0.0443

A 0.0987

B 0.1500

C 70.00

E NA NA 70.00

E 70.00

E NA





Daytime Target (9am-6pm) - 75dB; Morning (5am-9am) and Evening (6pm-10pm) Target - 70dB; Nighttime Target (10pm-5am) - 65dB

[Standards are from the Rules and Regulations of the National Pollution Control Commission (1978), Section 78, Category D - Heavy Industrial Area] E Daytime and nighttime standards in industrial and commercial areas


7

Station 1

Aliganga’s Residence

(Sept. – Dec. 2011)

SPC POWER

PLANT COMPLEX

KSPC CEBU

POWER PLANT

S

W E

N

Frequency: 1.39%

Avg. Wind Speed: 1.87 m/s

Frequency: 37.50%


Frequency: 55.55%


Frequency: 5.56%


FIGURE 1. AAQMS Station 1 location and 4-Direction Wind Rose

8

Station 2

Berdan’s Open Ground

(Sept. – Dec. 2011)

KSPC CEBU

POWER PLANT

SPC POWER

PLANT COMPLEX S

W E

N

Frequency: 4.35%


Frequency: 6.96%


Frequency: 36.52%


Frequency: 52.17%


FIGURE 2. AAQMS Station 2 location and 4-Direction Wind Rose

9

FIGURE 3. SO2 and NO2 Values at AAQMS 1

FIGURE 4. SO2 and NO2 Values at AAQMS 2

10

FIGURE 5. PM-10 Values at AAQMS 1

FIGURE 6. PM-10 Values at AAQMS 2

11

FIGURE 7. Noise Values from Continuous Monitoring Equipment

12

Manual Ambient Air and Noise Monitoring Ambient air monitoring results at the four stations indicated in Table 2 have not exceeded the reference DENR standards. On the other hand, in comparison to World Bank standards, all parameters except for noise monitored inside the plant site on December 2011 are compliant. This slight deviation from the international standard is however within the background values and is still the same from the previous monitoring period at normal operation, thus it is deemed to be within the plant noise tolerable levels. For this period, the parameter measured for dust content in ambient air is PM-10 since the potential dusts generated from the power plant are coal dust and ash particles. Based on the data, the ambient air quality on dust is acceptable compared to the standards. The high dust level observed during the sampling on December 2011 near Aliganga street is not entirely due to coal dust from the nearby coal yard since the sampling area is much nearer to the national road which is passed by numerous vehicles during daytime. Tables 7 and 8 summarize the data for the 1-hour sampling in both sampling months. Sampling location maps are provided in Attachment 1 while the manual ambient air quality trending graphs from the construction period up to the present are provided in Attachment 2.

2.1.2. Air Emissions As one of its environmental features, the power plant has a real-time Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS). Parameters for testing include the Total Suspended Particles (TSP), Sulfur Oxide emissions (SOx), Nitrogen Oxide emissions (NOx), and the Carbon Monoxide emission (CO). Results, corrected at 6% O2, indicate that emission levels are well within the national and World Bank standards. These favorable results show that the emissions control of the power plant is highly efficient. Tables 9 and 10 summarizes the daily results from Septemeber to December 2011 of both units while Figures 8 to 15 shows the trending graphs of the results in comparison to the standards.

13

Table 7. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY (1-Hour Grab-Testing, 2011 September)

Station/Location

PARAMETERS

Observations during sampling PM-10,

µg/Ncm

SO2,

µg/Ncm

NO2,

µg/Ncm

Noise,

dB

CO,

ppm

Station 3 Brgy. Tangke, Basketball

Court 47 <0.01 2.4 61.2 0

� Time: 11:05-12:05 PM (09/29/11)

� Wind Direction: NE to SW

� Sampler is inside the basketball court

approximately 300m from KSPC

Station 4 Along National Road

cor., Alinganga St., Near

Perimeter Fence of SPC Power

Corp.

72 <0.01 <0.01 67 0

� Time: 01:10-02:10 PM (09/29/11)


� Approx. 150 m from KSPC with passing

vehicles from the nearby national road

Station 5 Near Pier Area inside

the power plant site 39 <0.01 <0.01 65.2 0

� Time: 03:51-04:51 PM (09/29/11)


� Sampler is near the water facilities and

coal area

Station 6 In front of Mangkikis

Chapel, Sitio Mangkikis 22 <0.01 <0.01 54.4 0

� Time: 02:19-03:19 PM (09/29/11)


� Sampler is in a residential area


Minimum Detection Limit 1 0.01 0.01 --- 0

DENR Standard (DAO 14, 1-hr) 200 340 260 75

(NPCC - D) 30

World Bank Standard (IFC, 1-hr) ---A 212

B 200

C 70 35

B

A Internationally-accepted standards use an averaging time of 24-hours B US-EPA National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) C WHO Ambient Air Quality Guidelines

14

Table 8. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY (1-Hour Grab-Testing, 2011 December)

Station/Location

PARAMETERS

Observations during sampling PM-10,

µg/Ncm

SO2,

µg/Ncm

NO2,

µg/Ncm

Noise,

dB

CO,

ppm

Station 3 Brgy. Tangke, Basketball

Court 10 1 4 54 0

� Time: 10:30-11:30 AM (12/21/11)

� Wind Direction: E to W

� Sampler is inside the basketball court


Station 4 Along National Road

cor., Alinganga St., Near

Perimeter Fence of SPC Power

Corp.

119 <0.01 1 61 0

� Time: 02:35-03:35 PM (12/21/11)


� A number of vehicles passed

contributing to noise and dust

Station 5 Near Pier Area inside

the power plant site 5 <0.01 5 75 0

� Time: 01:30-02:30 PM (12/21/11)


� Sampler is near the pier area

Station 6 In front of Mangkikis

Chapel, Sitio Mangkikis 9 <0.01 <0.01 57 0

� Time: 11:45-12:45 PM (12/21/11)


� Sampler is in a residential area

approximately 400m from SPC

Minimum Detection Limit 1 0.01 0.01 --- 0

DENR Standard (DAO 14, 1-hr) 200 340 260 75

(NPCC - D) 30

World Bank Standard (IFC, 1-hr) ---A 212

B 200

C 70 35

B

A Internationally-accepted standards use PM-10 and an averaging time of 24-hours B US-EPA National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) C WHO Ambient Air Quality Guidelines

15

Table 9. Unit 1 CEMS Results (September to December 2011)

UNIT 1

TSP

NOx

Date DENR-

Limit September October November December

Date

DENR-


1 150 4.90 3.70 3.05 9.35

1 487 100.21 120.55 166.55 141.82

2 150 6.63 2.93 6.27 12.80

2 487 99.47 114.18 156.86 138.85

3 150 5.30 1.80 7.71 13.70

3 487 95.12 91.78 147.89 135.54

4 150 3.82 3.87 15.27 11.47

4 487 102.33 135.57 99.30 132.30

5 150 5.49 4.37 5.22 14.56

5 487 107.13 137.38 1.73 133.74

6 150 6.30 5.20 1.20 20.72

6 487 109.60 136.15 56.06 136.03

7 150 5.77 5.88 2.70 18.62

7 487 102.95 135.69 128.81 135.20

8 150 6.66 2.28 3.43 21.10

8 487 114.28 131.07 124.76 134.31

9 150 5.95 1.79 7.71 17.03

9 487 111.54 141.72 129.35 132.32

10 150 4.91 3.29 4.09 8.23

10 487 104.91 137.60 129.27 118.66

11 150 3.89 2.13 3.76 7.14

11 487 115.32 147.05 106.86 134.63

12 150 6.58 3.20 12.62 15.36

12 487 119.77 130.21 155.06 137.10

13 150 6.35 4.49 8.19 11.68

13 487 98.82 133.39 153.75 128.72

14 150 4.93 3.31 9.96 11.05

14 487 112.48 137.29 152.99 127.33

15 150 5.49 3.25 4.42 10.84

15 487 122.70 154.51 141.80 124.75

16 150 3.39 3.77 10.92 13.10

16 487 13.15 143.69 151.83 124.83

17 150 0.96 6.60 10.35 10.62

17 487 11.64 142.58 147.26 126.32

18 150 1.08 8.00 13.74 9.27

18 487 23.27 129.29 144.97 122.70

19 150 2.78 7.48 8.47 12.01

19 487 54.93 139.43 143.14 125.23

20 150 3.77 12.61 6.51 10.94

20 487 114.81 134.40 148.46 125.06

21 150 3.84 6.17 10.09 15.15

21 487 99.20 128.02 148.25 130.62

22 150 3.60 9.19 6.94 10.30

22 487 85.43 133.71 135.88 126.44

23 150 3.13 10.59 10.44 9.43

23 487 73.11 125.45 128.84 127.01

24 150 4.72 11.09 11.93 5.07

24 487 125.35 131.42 136.56 111.94

25 150 4.38 7.28 9.81 4.22

25 487 115.41 136.10 134.37 122.00

26 150 4.51 8.27 10.46 3.69

26 487 113.83 129.27 136.77 119.85

27 150 4.39 7.08 12.75 6.54

27 487 114.21 135.06 136.07 116.65

28 150 4.42 10.83 13.63 8.73

28 487 118.57 136.93 137.86 134.40

29 150 4.90 6.29 13.10 7.78

29 487 103.64 132.01 137.04 129.05

30 150 2.70 4.21 11.69 7.65

30 487 84.84 138.83 135.24 117.78

31 150 4.89 6.66

31 487 145.63 114.01

16

Table 9 Continuation….

CO

SO2

Date DENR-


Date

DENR-


1 400 14.45 7.64 10.02 11.94

1 245 136.69 160.01 31.54 52.61

2 400 12.41 9.33 9.80 22.59

2 245 136.96 133.10 41.17 57.59

3 400 10.51 101.47 9.82 8.89

3 245 158.62 96.09 47.41 59.63

4 400 10.23 8.53 57.85 8.62

4 245 149.13 138.64 38.76 67.99

5 400 9.92 7.55 93.68 8.73

5 245 151.07 138.17 27.71 39.84

6 400 9.43 7.47 50.61 8.93

6 245 153.75 140.23 33.87 28.93

7 400 9.81 8.02 8.82 8.85

7 245 152.47 92.23 67.58 31.79

8 400 9.47 8.77 8.71 9.25

8 245 145.84 90.72 50.69 25.95

9 400 9.08 8.58 8.93 9.09

9 245 158.87 97.68 14.28 36.95

10 400 9.46 7.94 8.15 10.08

10 245 159.24 121.38 41.52 46.31

11 400 9.88 9.53 77.64 27.33

11 245 151.08 63.94 35.60 98.40

12 400 9.19 8.94 9.60 10.16

12 245 158.49 138.64 32.22 31.93

13 400 8.78 8.71 8.93 9.02

13 245 164.62 87.74 46.23 53.03

14 400 8.60 10.39 8.92 8.94

14 245 163.21 77.28 63.04 60.28

15 400 42.37 11.20 9.43 8.65

15 245 139.08 62.06 61.61 62.60

16 400 58.75 10.50 9.53 8.60

16 245 30.43 61.96 46.02 54.28

17 400 10.54 10.86 9.40 8.28

17 245 28.15 69.07 41.23 70.21

18 400 16.09 10.23 9.57 8.49

18 245 39.68 70.50 43.80 70.97

19 400 110.39 10.65 9.68 8.81

19 245 76.51 54.28 68.50 62.25

20 400 27.69 9.62 9.90 22.48

20 245 112.96 76.10 47.53 66.00

21 400 113.68 9.16 9.77 8.95

21 245 133.32 92.90 73.22 80.84

22 400 150.62 9.69 9.58 10.09

22 245 121.21 89.24 76.86 86.69

23 400 84.64 9.68 9.22 8.44

23 245 104.02 97.49 84.70 83.52

24 400 8.48 10.01 11.06 8.31

24 245 144.47 81.26 57.74 96.63

25 400 24.94 9.57 17.48 8.13

25 245 146.13 86.98 61.36 90.09

26 400 7.60 9.77 9.25 8.17

26 245 144.19 77.27 55.83 84.30

27 400 9.35 9.88 9.37 9.46

27 245 138.43 58.94 59.84 85.44

28 400 15.62 10.05 9.73 11.29

28 245 147.53 55.27 58.94 84.19

29 400 7.26 9.04 9.41 17.22

29 245 132.81 72.66 56.73 132.37

30 400 7.89 21.43 9.38 13.50

30 245 114.32 49.79 54.95 157.60

31 400 14.34 13.38

31 245 47.68 171.24

17

Table 10. Unit 2 CEMS Results (September to December 2011)

UNIT 2

TSP

NOx

Date DENR-


Date

DENR-


1 150 0.97 0.85 3.05 3.33

1 487 106.46 106.54 106.27 106.28

2 150 1.06 0.78 6.27 3.32

2 487 106.42 106.50 106.28 106.30

3 150 0.78 0.76 7.71 3.07

3 487 106.44 106.53 106.29 106.29

4 150 0.73 0.79 15.27 2.90

4 487 106.44 106.57 106.30 106.28

5 150 5.41 0.74 5.22 3.21

5 487 106.49 106.51 106.33 106.28

6 150 2.02 1.20 1.20 7.24

6 487 106.44 106.46 106.35 106.31

7 150 0.78 1.56 2.70 10.69

7 487 106.48 106.45 106.35 106.33

8 150 0.78 1.45 3.43 17.89

8 487 105.28 106.44 106.35 106.31

9 150 1.13 0.68 7.71 7.87

9 487 106.47 106.45 106.31 106.31

10 150 0.78 1.02 4.09 8.46

10 487 106.46 106.34 106.28 106.26

11 150 1.26 7.17 3.76 8.37

11 487 106.46 106.24 106.28 106.28

12 150 0.79 1.09 12.62 10.32

12 487 106.48 106.26 106.31 106.28

13 150 1.44 1.08 8.19 8.80

13 487 106.52 106.26 106.30 106.29

14 150 1.02 1.66 9.96 10.01

14 487 106.54 106.26 106.30 106.33

15 150 0.69 0.90 4.42 10.83

15 487 106.51 106.34 106.33 106.40

16 150 0.78 0.78 10.92 9.88

16 487 106.54 106.35 106.31 106.36

17 150 0.96 1.54 10.35 10.36

17 487 106.56 106.34 106.27 106.40

18 150 0.11 1.62 13.74 10.14

18 487 106.56 106.31 106.28 106.40

19 150 2.25 3.85 8.47 11.08

19 487 106.49 106.27 106.30 106.39

20 150 0.89 16.17 6.51 12.70

20 487 106.47 106.25 106.28 106.38

21 150 0.69 7.21 10.09 16.84

21 487 106.47 106.26 106.29 106.39

22 150 0.80 8.15 6.94 9.60

22 487 106.48 106.27 106.31 106.36

23 150 0.69 7.17 10.44 9.17

23 487 106.51 106.28 106.35 106.35

24 150 0.81 5.80 11.93 8.22

24 487 106.56 106.23 106.32 106.40

25 150 1.04 6.45 9.81 8.62

25 487 106.52 106.29 106.29 106.39

26 150 1.27 5.94 10.46 9.45

26 487 106.47 106.32 106.33 106.39

27 150 0.82 6.93 12.75 10.05

27 487 106.50 106.26 106.35 106.39

28 150 1.19 6.43 13.63 8.97

28 487 106.51 106.29 106.34 106.38

29 150 1.54 6.23 13.10 8.05

29 487 106.53 106.30 106.31 106.37

30 150 1.02 6.14 11.69 8.46

30 487 106.53 106.29 106.29 106.36

31 150 6.38 7.57

31 487 106.29 106.36

18

Table 10 Continuation…. CO

SO2

Date DENR-


Date

DENR-


1 400 10.21 10.25 10.07 10.06

1 245 101.57 101.65 101.39 101.39

2 400 10.18 10.23 10.07 10.07

2 245 101.53 101.61 101.39 101.41

3 400 10.19 10.25 10.07 10.07

3 245 101.55 101.64 101.40 101.40

4 400 10.19 10.27 10.07 10.07

4 245 102 101.68 101.40 101.39

5 400 10.22 10.24 10.10 10.07

5 245 101.59 101.62 101.43 101.39

6 400 10.19 10.20 10.11 10.09

6 245 101.55 101.57 101.46 101.42

7 400 10.22 10.19 10.11 10.09

7 245 101.59 101.56 101.46 101.44

8 400 10.07 10.18 10.11 10.08

8 245 100.44 101.55 101.46 101.43

9 400 10.20 10.19 10.09 10.08

9 245 101.57 101.55 101.42 101.42

10 400 10.20 10.12 10.07 10.05

10 245 101.57 101.45 101.39 101.38

11 400 10.20 10.06 10.07 10.06

11 245 101.56 101.36 101.39 101.39

12 400 10.22 10.07 10.08 10.07

12 245 101.59 101.37 101.42 101.40

13 400 10.24 10.07 10.07 10.07

13 245 101.63 101.38 101.41 101.41

14 400 10.26 10.06 10.08 10.09

14 245 101.65 101.38 101.41 101.43

15 400 10.24 10.11 10.10 10.14

15 245 101.63 101.44 101.43 101.50

16 400 10 10.12 10.09 10.12

16 245 101.65 101.46 101.42 101.47

17 400 10.27 10.11 10.07 10.14

17 245 101.67 101.45 101.38 101.50

18 400 10.27 10.10 10.07 10.14

18 245 101.67 101.43 101.39 101.50

19 400 10.22 10.07 10.07 10.13

19 245 101.60 101.38 101.41 101.49

20 400 10.21 10.06 10.07 10.13

20 245 101.58 101.36 101.40 101.48

21 400 10.21 10.06 10.07 10.14

21 245 101.58 101.37 101.40 101.49

22 400 10.21 10.07 10.09 10.11

22 245 101.59 101.39 101.42 101.46

23 400 10.24 10.07 10.11 10.11

23 245 101.62 101.40 101.46 101.46

24 400 10.26 10.08 10.09 10.15

24 245 101.67 101.39 101.43 101.51

25 400 10.23 10.08 10.07 10.14

25 245 101.62 101.40 101.40 101.50

26 400 10.20 10.10 10.10 10.14

26 245 101.57 101.43 101.44 101.49

27 400 10.22 10.06 10.11 10.14

27 245 101.60 101.37 101.46 101.50

28 400 10.23 10.08 10.10 10.13

28 245 101.62 101.40 101.45 101.49

29 400 10.24 10.09 10.09 10.12

29 245 101.63 101.42 101.42 101.48

30 400 10.24 10.08 10.07 10.11

30 245 101.63 101.40 101.40 101.47

31 400 10.08 10.11

31 245 101.40 101.47

19

FIGURE 8.

20

FIGURE 9.

21

FIGURE 10.

22

FIGURE 11.

23

FIGURE 12.

24

FIGURE 13.

25

FIGURE 14.

26

FIGURE 15.

27

2.2. WATER ENVIRONMENT

2.2.1. Groundwater

Table 11 shows the groundwater monitoring results of the coverage period including that of the previous period (August 2011) while Attachment 2 contains the trending graphs (from the start of monitoring up to the present period) of the critical parameters with respective DENR standards or those that are important to the plant operations. Sampling locations are indicated in Attachment 1. Generally, the monitoring results indicate that groundwater stations tested are still within acceptable levels but are not recommended for drinking. Though some of the results are not within the standards, they are all within the background levels and trend of the baseline data from the EIS, the MMT, and previous monitoring results. It is important to consider however that the power plant does not withdraw groundwater or discharge effluents to inland surface waters. Thus, any adverse impact to the community’s groundwater is most likely due to domestic activity.

To be noted as before is the Dissolved Oxygen (DO) level of the North Poblacion Deep Well station. The monitoring result indicates that the DO level is below that of the given minimum value of DENR but consistent with the baseline data showing that no significant impact was made. For this period, the Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and the cyanide values are within acceptable levels as compared to the previous period. An alarming value is the Total Suspended Solids (TSS) of Station 3 on September 2011, however it went down again on December 2011. Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) values for Stations 1 and 3 are also not within the standard value for September and December 2011. This is probably due to domestic causes. The Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) levels are high compared to the standard which could have an effect on the taste of the ground water but the values are well within the baseline. This is again, as mentioned in the previous reports, attributable to the natural background of the area. For the chloride levels, stations 1, 2, and 4 displayed desirable results. Station 3 however has slightly exceeded the salinity requirement of the PNSDW as displayed in the previous period possibly due to salt-water intrusion as the said well is near the sea. As mentioned in the first paragraph, it is highly recommended that these deep wells be not used for drinking. 2.2.2. Marine Water

Table 12 shows the marine water monitoring results within the coverage period including that of the previous period (August 2011) while Attachment 2 contains the trending graphs of the previous results of critical parameters with respective DENR standards. Sampling locations are contained in Attachment 1. Generally, the monitoring results indicate that there have been no adverse impacts to the receiving marine environment. Most parameters fall within acceptable standards set by DAO 34 (Water Class SC). Furthermore, most of the current data falls

28

around the same range to those of the previous period’s results including that of the MMT Baseline Monitoring Activity. Only major observations and changes from the previous period include the rising of Turbidity and TSS levels at Stations 1, 2, 3, and 4. This is possibly due to intertidal effects as low tides tend to increase both of these parameters. Though there is no established standard for these parameters (TSS standard depends on the background value), the power plant operations could not have caused this rise as the values are observed at opposite sides of the coast from the power plant within an hour. With these, it is most probably naturally-occurring. However, KSPC would still recommend strict monitoring of the activities of local and foreign vessels docking in the Naga City area. 2.2.3. Water Effluents

Effluents of the power plant are from the sanitary treatment system, which processes all domestic effluents to acceptable levels before it is discharged to the sea, storm water, and cooling seawater (at a higher temperature). There are four (4) sanitary treatment systems in the power plant and 2 storm drains to the sea. Each storm drain discharges effluents from 2 sanitary treatment systems together with the rain/storm water. On the other hand, cooling water is discharged through the submerged discharge tunnel, 154 m off-shore. Generally, the effluents of the power plant are within the national and World Bank standards. Table 13 summarizes the results of these parameters in comparison to these standards. On October and November, in-house monitoring measured high pH values at Storm Drain 1 but validation by a third party laboratory in September and December proved otherwise. This third party laboratory measured high Residual Cl for September at Storm Drain 1 but this was revalidated by another 3rd Party Laboratory (FastLab, Attachment 3 for the certificate) whose measured values are very low. On December, the same laboratory measured high Residual Chlorine at Storm Drain 2. Since previous values are very low, investigation was carried out and it was found that backwashed seawater have leaked to the storm drains. Repair actions are being evaluated for the moment but there is no harmful impact as this effluent is seawater. Thermal Discharge According to the standards, the mixing zone border should not experience a temperature increase of more than 3°C. The baseline temperature shall be that of the ambient seawater while the mixing zone has a radius of 100 m from the discharge point. The water temperatures were measured four times in the morning and four times in the afternoon on September 30, 2011 and December 28, 2011 to assess the environmental performance of the power plant. Table 14 presents the results that are all within the standard. Figures 16 to 19 show maps of the submerged discharge area and the sampling points. Results show that the thermal effluents are within the national and World Bank standards.

29

11-Aug 11-Sep 11-Dec 11-Aug 11-Sep 11-Dec 11-Aug 11-Sep 11-Dec 11-Aug 11-Sep 11-Dec

pH 7.2 7.2 7.4 7.2 7.2 7.2 6.9 7.0 7.1 8.4 7.2 7.3 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5

DO, mg/L 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 N/A 5D

BOD5, mg/L <1 2.0 <1 <1 1.0 <1 <1 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 <1 N/A 1

COD, mg/L 10F 19.0 <9 <9

F 10.0 <9 20F 10.0 10.0 39

F 38.0 <9 N/A N/A

TSS, mg/L <1 14.0 1.0 <1 <1 <1 2.0 23.0 1.0 <1 <1 1.0 N/A 25

Oil & Grease,

mg/L<1 <1 1.0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 N/A N/A

TDS, mg/L 526F 902.0 734.0 534

F 360.0 230.0 1433F 1144.0 808.0 1053

F 643.0 718.0 500 500E

Total Coliform,

MPN/100mL<1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 8.00 8.00 <1.1 8.00 2.60 1.10 8.00 2.60 <1.1 50

Cr+6

,mg/L <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 0.05 0.05E

CN, mg/L <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.07 0.05

Pb, mg/L <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 0.05E

Hg, mg/L <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.01 <0.0001 0.001 0.002E

NO3-N, mg/L 2.55F 3.86 3.79 3.84

F 3.99 3.86 3.16F 3.96 3.79 <0.01

F <0.01 0.17 50 1

Cl, mg/L 122.50 114.20 106.10 61.30 47.60 43.70 639.80 333.20 246.50 163.40 139.60 131.00 250 250

BPhilippine National Standards for Drinking Water (2007)

CDAO 90-34 Revised Water Usage and Classification/Water Quality Criteria

DMinimum Standard

EDoes not apply if natural background is higher in concentration

FStill within the natural background values

STN 4

PNSDWB

DENR

StandardC

ASTN 1 - Deepwell Brgy. Upper Colon, STN 2 - Deepwell Brgy. Tangke, STN 3 - Deepwell Brgy. Lower Colon, STN 4 - Deepwell Brgy. North Poblacion

Station/LocationA

Parameters

STN 1 STN 2 STN 3

Table 11. Ground Water Monitoring Results

30

11-Aug 11-Sep 11-Dec 11-Aug 11-Sep 11-Dec 11-Aug 11-Sep 11-Dec 11-Aug 11-Sep 11-Dec 11-Aug 11-Sep 11-Dec

pH 8.1 8.3 7.9 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 8.3 6.0-8.5

DO, mg/L 7 7 7 7 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 5C

BOD5, mg/L 2 <1 4 3 <1 2 3 <1 1 4 <1 2 4 <1 1 7(10)D

TSS, mg/L 17 18 54 19 6 51 19 18 52 17 18 54 20 6 23 G

Oil & Grease,

mg/L<1 1.3 1.1 1.1 <1 1 <1 1.3 1.5 <1 1.1 1.3 <1 <1 1.7 3

Total Coliform,

MPN/100mL<1.1 8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 8 <1.1 5000

Cr+6

,mg/L <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 0.01 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 0.1E

Turbidity, NTU 0.8 1.9 12.7 0.7 1.5 11.2 0.7 1.9 1.9 0.9 1.6 12 1 1.4 1.2 N/A

CN, mg/L <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05

SO4, mg/L 3021 3021 2597 2739 2683 2605 2802 2675 2561 2808 2640 2529 2874 2640 2588 N/A

Pb, mg/L <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.05E

Hg, mg/L <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.002E

BDAO 90-34 Revised Water Usage and Classification/Water Quality Criteria

CMinimum Standard

DValue in parentheses indicates a maximum standard

EDoes not apply if natural background is higher in concentration

FStill within the natural background values

GNot more than 30 mg/L increase of the baseline value:

STN 2 baseline - 442 mg/L

STN 1 STN 2 STN 3 STN 4 STN 5

Station/LocationA




ParametersDENR

StandardB

ASTN 1 - Front of City Hall Plaza, STN 2 - Front of KSPC Site, STN 3 - Front of Barangay North Poblacion, STN 4 - Front of Colon Elementary School (Lower Kayam), STN 5 - Front of Tuyan

Elementary School (Barangay Tuyan)


Table 12. Marine Water Monitoring Results

31

Table 13. Effluents Monitoring Results

Water Effluents Self-Monitoring

Parameters

Cooling Water Effluent Storm Drain 1A Storm Drain 2

A

DENR StandardB

World Bank

Standards (IFC)

Sep Oct Nov Dec

3rd

Party

(Sep)

3rd

Party

(Dec)

Sep Oct Nov Dec

3rd

Party

(Sep)

3rd

Party

(Dec)

Sep Oct Nov Dec

3rd

Party

(Sep)

3rd

Party

(Dec)

pH 7.59 8.54 7.97 8.14 8.2 8.1 8.08 11.72 9.01 7.92 7.5 7.8 7.05 8.63 8.24 8.09 8.3 8 6.0-9.0 6.0-9.0

COD, mg/L C

C

C

C 94 65 9.5 59.5 42.5 29.7 38 21 84.5 2 <0.1 1.69 129 31 200 N/A

Total Residual

Chlorine, mg/L 0.2 0.14 0.04 0.04 0.08E 0.2

E 0.2 0.14 0.05 0.04 0.025 <0.2 0.18 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.025 3.8

F

N/A 0.2

TSS, mg/L G

G

G

G 30 11

G

G

G

G 10 8

G

G

G

G 4 28 150 50

BOD5,mg/L G

G

G

G 17 10

G

G

G

G 15 11

G

G

G

G 23 15 100 N/A

Oil & Grease,

mg/L H

H

H

H <1 1.5

H

H

H

H 1.6 1.1

H

H

H

H <1 <1

10 10

AWhere treated effluent from the sanitary treatment system is discharged together with rain water and backwash seawater; Samples are collected from a

catch basin

BDAO 90-35 Revised Effluent Regulations of 1990

CCOD for the cooling water was not measured as it is still seawater undergoing no physical change but only increased temperature

DNS - No Sampling was made

EResidual Chlorine was measured at the seal pit which is 200 m before discharge to the sea; further Cl digestion is expected at the remaining tunnel length

FThis value is considered erroneous since the discharge point only contains rainwater, treated sanitary effluents and backwash seawater, in-house results and FastLab's result is below the World

Bank limit value

GNo in-house laboratory testing was made due to the inavailability of the instrument to be used for testing

HNo in-house laboratory testing was made since all oily wastewater is treated in the plant's wastewater treatment facility

32

Table 14. Seawater Temperature Data

Date Time Sampling Location

(Temp. in °C)

Baseline Point (Temp. in °C)

Temperature Increase (°C)

Plant Load (% Capacity)

11-Sep

M1-1110AM M2-1120AM

M2 (30.4) M1 (29.4) 1.0 Unit 1-100%, Unit 2-100%

M1-1115AM M2-1125AM

M2 (30.0) M1 (29.2) 0.8 Unit 1-100%, Unit 2-100%

M1-0310PM M2-0325PM

M2 (29.7) M1(29.5) 0.2 Unit 1-100%, Unit 2-100%

M1-0315PM M2-0330PM

M2 (29.4) M1 (28.9) 0.5 Unit 1-100%, Unit 2-100%

11-Dec

M1-1134AM M2-1138AM

M2 (29.1) M1 (27.1) 2.0 Unit 1-100%, Unit 2-100%

M1-1135AM M2-1139AM

M2 (29.1) M1 (28.9) 0.2 Unit 1-100%, Unit 2-100%

M1-0320PM M2-0313PM

M2 (30.0) M1(29.9) 0.1 Unit 1-100%, Unit 2-100%

M1-0321PM M2-0314PM

M2 (30.0) M1 (30.0) 0.0 Unit 1-100%, Unit 2-100%

DENR Standard Temp. Inc. in °C (DAO 90-35) 3.0

World Bank Standard (IFC) Based on the EIA of the project

(DENR Standard)

33

Current direction is SW.

M1 (Ambient Temp.)

M2 (Increased Temp.)

Discharge Point

FIGURE 16. 11-SEP AM SEAWATER TEMPERATURE TESTING POINTS

Current direction is NW.

M1 (Ambient Temp.)


Discharge Point

FIGURE 17. 11-SEP PM SEAWATER TEMPERATURE TESTING POINTS

Tide Direction

100-m radius

Tide Direction

100-m radius

34

Current direction is SW.

M1 (Ambient Temp.)


Discharge Point

FIGURE 18. 11-DEC AM SEAWATER TEMPERATURE TESTING POINTS

Current direction is NW.

M1 (Ambient Temp.)


Discharge Point

FIGURE 19. 11-DEC PM SEAWATER TEMPERATURE TESTING POINTS

Tide Direction

100-m radius

Tide Direction

100-m radius

35

2.3. PANGDAN AND NAALAD Naalad and Pangdan were the chosen areas of ash disposal by the Naga City LGU in consideration to their plan of rerouting the Pangdan river. Ash placed in the Naalad and Pangdan areas were considered industrial waste covered by RA 9003, in which the Naga City LGU was responsible for the implementation and was consulted before the disposal of the historical ash during the site grading of the project. To ensure that the river is not contaminated with heavy metal, ocular inspections and sampling of the river water (upstream and downstream) in both sites was made in the monitoring period. Monitoring was started in July 2011 and the ocular inspections indicate that minimal to no erosion occurred rendering the measures taken as effective. However, since the both areas are private lots, activities on these areas can’t be avoided. The following photos indicate the physical condition of the areas from September to December 2011.

Panoramic views of Naalad area showing vegetation growth in the area effectively covering the historical coal

ash with limestone and earth material.

SEPTEMBER 2011

DECEMBER 2011

36

Views of the slope area in Naalad showing the growth of plants/vegetation planted in the

terrace to help control the erosion and stability of the historical ash landfill.

SEPTEMBER 2011

NOVEMBER 2011

DECEMBER 2011

37

River Water Heavy Metal Content River water was tested for heavy metal content at the upstream and downstream points in both areas to check if the measures made are effective in controlling significant erosion of historical coal ash to the Pangdan river. Table 12 shows a summary of the results of the sampling and analysis made on July 28, 2011 and August 31, 2011. Figures 13 and 14 on the other hand shows maps of the sampling points and nearby quarry sites of river sand and gravel. Generally, the results show that there was no considerable change in the river water’s quality particularly in terms of its heavy metal content. This proves that the measures taken are effective in curtailing the coal ash contamination risk.

SEPTEMBER 2011

Panoramic views of Pangdan area with lush vegetation growth in the area and effective covering of the

historical coal ash with limestone and earth material.

NOVEMBER 2011

DECEMBER 2011

38

9/29/11 10/28/11 11/29/11 12/21/11 9/29/11 10/28/11 11/29/11 12/21/11

Arsenic, As <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.01

Cadmium, Cd <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 0.05

Mercury, Hg <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.002

Lead, Pb <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.05

Cyanide, CN <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 n/a

Selenium, Se <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 n/a

Strontium, Sr 1.318 1.085 1.331 1.474 1.315 1.131 1.399 1.617 n/a

Chromium, Cr+6 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.002 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.002 0.05

9/29/11 10/28/11 11/29/11 12/21/11 9/29/11 10/28/11 11/29/11 12/21/11

Arsenic, As <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.01

Cadmium, Cd <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 0.05

Mercury, Hg <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.002

Lead, Pb <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.05

Cyanide, CN <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 n/a

Selenium, Se <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 n/a

Strontium, Sr 1.092 1.327 1.045 2.232 1.116 1.313 0.996 2.254 n/a

Chromium, Cr+6 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.002 <0.01 <0.01 <0.002 0.05

DENR

Standard, mg/L

(Class D)

DENR

Standard, mg/L

(Class D)

Heavy Metal

Heavy Metal Concentration in mg/L

Pangdan Upstream Pangdan Downstream

Heavy Metal Concentration in mg/L

Heavy Metal Naalad Upstream Naalad Downstream

Table 15. River Water Heavy Metal and CN Concentration Test Results (Pangdan and Naalad)

39

- Upstream Sampling Point

- Downstream Sampling Point

- Quarry Sites

FIGURE 20. PANGDAN AREA SAMPLING POINTS AND QUARRY

SITES

40

- Upstream Sampling Point

- Downstream Sampling Point

- Quarrying Operations

FIGURE 21. NAALAD AREA SAMPLING POINTS AND QUARRY

SITES

41

2.4. RESETTLEMENT AREA Pavement and concreting works at the resettlement area near the site, including the exposed floors of some houses, have been completed last November 2011. Figure 22 below shows different pictures of the project progress. This ensures that the residents are well-insulated from the historical ash material deposited before the project was even started. As in the previous period, monitoring of the seawater was made at the same four (4) sampling points on September and November 2011 to check whether there is heavy metal contamination from historical coal ash. Figure 23 shows the sampling locations for the heavy metal content seawater testing.

FIGURE 22. RESETTLEMENT AREA PAVEMENT AND CONCRETING WORKS

42

Marine Water Heavy Metal and CN Content The test results indicate that the concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, mercury, lead, and hexavalent chromium are well within the national standards for class SC seawater. This goes to show that the historical ash used as fill material in the resettlement area does not seriously contaminate the seawater. For cyanide, the values are below the detectable levels while for selenium and strontium, the values are consistent from the previous period indicating no abnormalities. Table 16 below shows a summary of the results while Figure 24 displays the sampling pictures. Table 16. Marine Water Heavy Metal Content (Resettlement Area)

Heavy Metal

STN 1 Marissa

Mariano

STN 2 Bering

Baricuatro

STN 3 Neneth

Baricuatro

STN 4 Cora

Africano DENR

Standard

(DAO 90-

34) Sept.

2011

Nov.

2011

Sept.

2011

Nov.

2011

Sept.

2011

Nov.

2011

Sept.

2011

Nov.

2011

Arsenic, As (mg/L) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.05

Cadmium, Cd (mg/L) <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 0.01

Mercury, Hg (mg/L) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.002

Lead, Pb (mg/L) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.05

Cyanide, CN (mg/L) <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05

Selenium, Se (mg/L) <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 N/A

Strontium, Sr (mg/L) 5.332 5.172 5.341 5.081 5.456 5.404 5.383 5.302 N/A

Chromium, Cr+6

(mg/L) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.05

FIGURE 23. RESETTLEMENT AREA SAMPLING POINTS

43

2.5. SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE

Hazardous waste in the plant site includes waste oils, busted fluorescent lamps, and contaminated containers. Within the coverage period, no wastes were disposed. These are currently stored in the designated storage areas in the site. As soon as these wastes are ready for disposal to DENR-accredited treaters or buyers, KSPC will accordingly inform DENR-EMB through this report. Solid wastes in the power plant are categorized as domestic/office and industrial. For the coverage period, a total of 7,180 kg of domestic/office solid wastes were disposed of or collected by the Naga City LGU. Industrial solid wastes in the power plant are either coal ash or sludge. Sludge from the wastewater treatment plant was tested using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) to determine whether it is hazardous or not. Results indicate that these are within the limits for industrial waste (See Attachment 4). Because of its very low generation rate (below 50 MT/year), KSPC is disposing and mixing its sludge with the coal ash for possible future recycling use in a properly lined ash pond. The power plant’s coal ash was also tested using TCLP and results also classified it as solid industrial waste (See Attachment 4). Most of the ash is stored in dry form at

FIGURE 24. RESETTLEMENT AREA SEAWATER SAMPLING

44

ash ponds within the KSPC and SPC sites. Possible recycling use (in the cement and construction industries) is expected for this stored material. The remainder of the coal ash generated was recycled by Geo-Transport in their Ready-Mixed Concrete (RMC) business. Table 17 summarizes the industrial and hazardous waste quantities generated and the respective disposal methods.

III. CONCLUSION Based on the environmental monitoring for the period of September to December 2011, the 2x100 MW Cebu Power Plant Project has not caused any adverse or detrimental effect to the nearby surroundings. The availability of recycling options for the coal ash is a positive sign that more quantities if not all of the ash can be disposed of through sustainable means. The findings in this report will be discussed in KSPC’s Multi-Partite Monitoring Team (MMT) and due recommendations will be made. As of the monitoring period, the power plant is in the operations and maintenance period at full load. Certificates of analyses are in Attachment 5 while Attachment 6 contains the rest of the sampling pictures.

45

Table 17. Summary of Solid and Hazardous Waste Generation and Disposal

Coal Ash (Tons)

Wastewater

Treatment Sludge

(Tons)

Waste Oil

(L)

Contaminated

Container (Kg)

Busted Fluorescent

Lamps (Pcs)

Domestic and Office

Solid Waste (Kg)

Stored On-site (Previous) 15,469.90 0.00 874.00 14.00 0.00 0.00

Generation 16,470.00 0.59 758.00 98.50 0.00 7,180.00

Stored On-site (Current) 29,741.73 0.59 1,632.00 112.50 0.00 0.00

Disposal 2,198.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,180.00

TCLP Test Result Passed (Industrial Waste-See Att. 4)

Disposal Method RMC Recycling N/A Through local LGU

garbage collection

* RMC - Ready Mixed Concrete (production by GeoTransport)

* Coal ash is stored at the emergency ash pond within KSPC's site and at the ash ponds within SPC's site

Documents

Environmental Monitoring Report€¦ · Attachment 4 - Ash and Sludge TCLP Certificates Attachment 5 - Certificates of Analyses Attachment 6 - Environmental Monitoring Pictures. 1