ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/EIA/31012018YBIAPO9W... · PROPOSED GREEN FIELD POL TERMINAL AT NANDUR KESARTAGI ... 6.2.6 Socio-economic

BPCL-Proposed Greenfield POL Terminal, Gulbarga, Karnataka, EIA Report Pagei

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

FOR

PROPOSED GREEN FIELD POL TERMINAL AT NANDUR KESARTAGI INDUSTRIAL AREA, 2nd PHASE, KALABURAGI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA

SUBMITTED TO

M/s. BHART PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED

PREPARED BY

M/s. ULTRA-TECH ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY AND CONSULTANCY

(Gazzeted by MoEF) Unit No. 206, 224, 225 Jai Commercial Complex, Eastern Express Highway,

Opp Cadbury Factory, Khopat, Thane (West) – 400 061 Tel: 022 2534 2776, Fax: 022 25429650, Email: [email protected]

Website: www.ultratech.in NABET/EIA/1417/RA010

BPCL-Proposed Greenfield POL Terminal, Gulbarga, Karnataka, EIA Report Pageii

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 11

1.1 Introduction of Project and Project Proponent ............................................................... 11

1.2 Brief description of Nature, Size and Location of the project ....................................... 12

1.3 Scope of the Study.......................................................................................................... 13

1.4 Applicable Environmental Regulations ......................................................................... 14

1.5 Objective and Scope of EIA Study ................................................................................ 15

1.6 Structure of EIA Report ................................................................................................. 16

CHAPTER 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................. 18

2.1 Need and Justification of the Project .............................................................................. 18

2.2 Site Details and Location ............................................................................................... 18

2.3 Size or Magnitude of Operations ................................................................................... 20

2.4 Salient Features of the Project ........................................................................................ 21

2.4.1 Process and Storage Details .................................................................................... 21

2.4.2 Truck Loading Facility (TLF) Sheds ...................................................................... 24

2.4.3 Product Pump House............................................................................................... 25

2.4.4 Fire Fighting Facilities ............................................................................................ 25

2.4.5 Dyke Wall Facility .................................................................................................. 25

2.4.6 Instrumentation and Automation ............................................................................ 26

2.5 Safety Measures ............................................................................................................. 27

2.6 Basic Requirements ........................................................................................................ 27

2.6.1 Water Requirement ................................................................................................. 27

2.6.2 Power Requirement ................................................................................................. 28

2.6.3 Utility Area ............................................................................................................ 28

2.6.4 Manpower Requirement .......................................................................................... 28

2.7 Water and Wastewater Management .............................................................................. 28

2.7.1 Water Consumption and Wastewater Generation Details ...................................... 28

2.7.2 Oil Water Separator ................................................................................................ 28

2.8 Solid and Hazardous Waste Disposal System ................................................................ 29

2.8.1 Waste Generated from Spillage and Leakages ....................................................... 30

CHAPTER 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT .................................................. 31

3.1 General ........................................................................................................................... 31

BPCL-Proposed Greenfield POL Terminal, Gulbarga, Karnataka, EIA Report Pageiii

3.2 Methodology .................................................................................................................. 31

3.3 Study Area included in Environmental Setting .............................................................. 31

3.3.1 Land Use/Land Cover of the Study Area ................................................................ 31

3.4 Meteorological Data ....................................................................................................... 36

3.5 Ambient Air Quality ....................................................................................................... 38

3.5.1 Methodology Adopted for the Study ...................................................................... 38

3.5.2 Sampling and Analytical Techniques ..................................................................... 41

3.6 Noise............................................................................................................................... 41

3.6.1 Objective ................................................................................................................. 42

3.6.2 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 42

3.6.3 Method of Monitoring and Parameters Measured .................................................. 43

3.6.4 Noise Results .......................................................................................................... 44

3.7 Water Environment ........................................................................................................ 48

3.7.1 Ground Water Hydrology ....................................................................................... 48

3.7.2 Selection of Sampling Locations ............................................................................ 48

3.7.3 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 49

3.7.4 Ground and Surface Water Quality ......................................................................... 49

3.8 Soil ................................................................................................................................. 54

3.8.1 Selection of sampling Locations ............................................................................. 54

3.8.2 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 56

3.8.3 Soil Results ............................................................................................................. 57

3.9 Biological Environment ................................................................................................ 60

3.9.1 Preamble ................................................................................................................. 60

3.9.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................... 60

3.9.3 Survey Methodology .............................................................................................. 60

3.9.4 Study Area ............................................................................................................. 60

3.9.5 Biodiversity ............................................................................................................. 61

3.10 Socio Economic .............................................................................................................. 67

3.10.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 67

10.3.2 Demographics: ........................................................................................................ 68

10.3.3 Male and Female Population .................................................................................. 70

10.3.4 SC and ST Population: ............................................................................................ 71

10.3.5 Religion wise distribution of Population ................................................................ 72

10.3.6 Educational Status:.................................................................................................. 73

BPCL-Proposed Greenfield POL Terminal, Gulbarga, Karnataka, EIA Report Pageiv

10.3.7 Economy and Workers Profile ................................................................................ 75

10.3.8 Transport and Communication ............................................................................... 76

CHAPTER 4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ................................................................................................................................ 78

4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 78

4.2 Impact Assessment ......................................................................................................... 78

4.2.1 During Construction Phase ..................................................................................... 78

4.2.2 During Operation Phase .......................................................................................... 80

4.3 Impact Mitigation Measures .......................................................................................... 81

4.3.1 During Construction Phase ..................................................................................... 81

4.3.2 During Operation Phase .......................................................................................... 83

4.4 Impact Matrix ................................................................................................................. 85

4.5 Summary of Environment Impacts and Mitigation Measures ....................................... 86

4.6 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 93

CHAPTER 5. PROJECT BENEFITS ...................................................................................... 94

5.1 Project Benefits .............................................................................................................. 94

5.2 Improvements in the Physical Infrastructure ................................................................. 94

5.3 Improvements in the Social Infrastructure ..................................................................... 94

5.4 Employment Potential .................................................................................................... 94

5.5 CSR and Socio-Economic Development ....................................................................... 95

5.6 Direct Revenue Earning to the National and State Exchequer ....................................... 95

5.7 Other Tangible Benefits ................................................................................................. 96

CHAPTER 6. ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN .............. 97

6.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 97

6.2 EMP during Construction Phase .................................................................................... 97

6.2.1 Air Environment ..................................................................................................... 97

6.2.2 Noise Environment ................................................................................................. 98

6.2.3 Water Environment ................................................................................................. 98

6.2.4 Land Environment .................................................................................................. 99

6.2.5 Biological Environment .......................................................................................... 99

6.2.6 Socio-economic Environment ................................................................................. 99

6.2.7 Health and Safety .................................................................................................... 99

6.3 EMP during Operation ................................................................................................. 100

BPCL-Proposed Greenfield POL Terminal, Gulbarga, Karnataka, EIA Report Pagev

6.3.1 Air Environment ................................................................................................... 100

6.3.2 Noise Environment ............................................................................................... 100

6.3.3 Water Environment ............................................................................................... 101

6.3.4 Land Environment ................................................................................................ 101

6.3.5 Biological Environment ........................................................................................ 102

6.3.6 Socio-economic Environment ............................................................................... 102

6.4 Environmental Monitoring Programme ....................................................................... 102

6.4.1 Ambient Air Quality ............................................................................................. 103

6.4.2 Surface Water Quality ........................................................................................... 103

6.4.3 Ground Water Quality.......................................................................................... 104

6.4.4 Soil Quality ........................................................................................................... 104

6.4.5 Noise Level ........................................................................................................... 104

6.5 Environmental Management Cell ................................................................................. 104

CHAPTER 7. ADDITIONAL STUDIES ................................................................................ 105

7.1 Public Consultation ...................................................................................................... 105

7.2 Quantitative Risk Assessment ...................................................................................... 105

CHAPTER 8. DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS ENGAGED ....................................... 150

8.1 Consultants Engaged .................................................................................................... 150

8.2 Laboratory for Analysis ............................................................................................... 151

LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1: Project and Project Proponent Description .................................................................. 11

Table 2.1: Terminal Location Overview ....................................................................................... 18

Table 2.2: Cost Breakup ............................................................................................................... 20

Table 2.3: Area Details ................................................................................................................. 21

Table 2.4: Schedule of Tanks........................................................................................................ 24

Table 2.5: Details of Fire Water Tanks ......................................................................................... 25

Table 2.6: Dyke Wall Details ........................................................................................................ 26

Table 2.7: Non Hazardous waste .................................................................................................. 29

Table 2.8: Hazardous waste .......................................................................................................... 29

BPCL-Proposed Greenfield POL Terminal, Gulbarga, Karnataka, EIA Report Pagevi

Table 3.1: LULC Statistics of Study Area .................................................................................... 33

Table 3.2: Meteorological Monitoring At Site ............................................................................. 37

Table 3.3: Meteorological Data .................................................................................................... 37

Table 3.4: Ambient Air Quality Sampling Locations of the Study Area ...................................... 39

Table 3.5: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results .................................................................... 40

Table 3.6: Techniques Used For Ambient Air Quality Monitoring .............................................. 41

Table 3.7: Noise Level Monitoring Stations in the Study Area .................................................... 43

Table 3.8: Ambient Noise Level in the Study Area ...................................................................... 45

Table 3.9: Ambient Noise Standards ............................................................................................ 47

Table 3.10: Water Quality Sampling Locations .......................................................................... 48

Table 3.11: Surface Water Characteristics .................................................................................... 50

Table 3.12: Ground Water Characteristic ..................................................................................... 51

Table 3.13A: Soil Sampling Stations in the Study Area ............................................................... 54

Table 3.13B: Soil Sampling Chart ................................................................................................ 55

Table 3.14: Chemical Characteristics of Soil in the Study Area .................................................. 57

Table 3.15: List of Dominant Flora Observed in Study Area ....................................................... 62

Table 3.16: Fauna recorded in the study area up to 10 km periphery ........................................... 63

Table 3.17: Details of sampling locations ..................................................................................... 65

Table 3.18: Enumeration of Phytoplankton at different locations ................................................ 66

Table 3.19: Phytoplankton genera observed at different locations ............................................... 66

Table 3.20: Enumeration of Zooplankton at different locations .................................................. 67

Table 3.21: Recorded Zooplankton genera in sampling stations .................................................. 67

Table 3.22: List of Villages in Study area .................................................................................... 68

Table 3.23: Male-Female Population ............................................................................................ 70

Table 3.24: SC and ST Population Distribution ........................................................................... 71

BPCL-Proposed Greenfield POL Terminal, Gulbarga, Karnataka, EIA Report Pagevii

Table 3.25: Literates and Illiterate Population Distribution ......................................................... 74

Table 3.26: Working and Non-working Population ..................................................................... 76

Table 4.1: Impact Matrix .............................................................................................................. 85

Table 4.2: Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures ........................................................... 87

Table 4.3: Overall Matrix ............................................................................................................. 93

Table 6.1: Post Study Environmental Monitoring Program ....................................................... 103

Table 7.1: Process Parameters for the pipes ............................................................................... 108

Table 7.2: Process Parameters for Storage Tanks ...................................................................... 109

Table 7.3: Consequence Result ................................................................................................... 111

Table 7.4: Total Failure Frequency ............................................................................................. 120

Table 7.5: HSE UK Risk Criteria ............................................................................................... 122

Table 7.6: Onsite Population ....................................................................................................... 141

Table 7.7 Offsite Population around 2 KM range ....................................................................... 141

Table 8.1: EIA Team ................................................................................................................... 150

Table 8.2: Functional Area Experts Involved in the EIA ........................................................... 151

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Oil Water Separator Details ............................................................................................ 6

Figure 1.1: Toposheet Map of 10 Km Study Area ........................................................................ 13

Figure 2.1: Project Location ......................................................................................................... 19

Figure 2.2: Google Image of the Study Area ................................................................................ 20

Figure 2.2: Process Flow Chart ..................................................................................................... 22

Figure 2.3: Site Layout Plan ......................................................................................................... 23

Figure 2.4: Oil Water Separator Details ....................................................................................... 29

Figure 3.1(a): Satellite Image of 10km Study Area ...................................................................... 32

Figure 3.1(b): LULC of Study Area ............................................................................................. 33

BPCL-Proposed Greenfield POL Terminal, Gulbarga, Karnataka, EIA Report Pageviii

Figure 3.1(d): Drainage Map of Study Area ................................................................................. 35

Figure 3.2: Baseline Monitoring Locations within Study Area .................................................... 36

Figure 3.3: Windrose for Study Period of September to November 2017.................................... 38

Figure 3.4: Study Area for Biological Environment ..................................................................... 61

Figure 3.5: Sampling location of phytoplankton and zooplankton ............................................... 65

Figure 3.6: Village Map for Study area ........................................................................................ 69

Figure 3.7: Male-Female Population Distribution Chart .............................................................. 70

Figure 3.8: SC and ST Population Distribution in study area ...................................................... 72

Figure 3.9: Graph showing Literates and Illiterate Population ..................................................... 75

Figure 3.10: Working and Non-Working Population ................................................................... 76

Figure 7.1: QRA Methodology ................................................................................................... 106

LIST OF ANNEXURES Annexure I: Site Plant layout

Annexure II: Public Hearing MoM of Nandur- Kesartagi Industrial Area Phase -II

BPCL-Proposed Greenfield POL Terminal, Gulbarga, Karnataka, EIA Report Page1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Introduction

Bharat Petroleum Corporation limited (BPCL), the project proponent, is one of the highest ranked Indian Public sector under taking company, under Govt. of India (Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas). In the prestigious Fortune 'Global 500' listing, BPCL is having 358th position in year 2017. BPCL is one of the Maharatna Company of India. Company is engaged in refining and marketing of petroleum products across pan India with two major Refineries i.e. Mumbai Refinery and Kochi Refinery and one joint venture Bina Refinery & one subsidiary Numaligarh refinery. BPCL is India's one of the largest commercial enterprises in Oil and Gas sector.

As per the industry estimate & as per directive of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India, different Oil companies are required to augment / construct new facilities to meet the growing demand of different markets . The projected demands of POL products in Kalaburagi are likely to increase substantially over the years to come. Hence in order to meet the future high energy demand BPCL proposed a new POL terminal at Kalaburagi. The total numbers of product storage tanks to be installed are 12 and the total capacity will be around 31,478 KL.

Project Description

The existing Raichur Depot is very old and commissioned in 1940. The depot is constructed in small area admeasuring ~2.27 ha (~5.6 acres). The existing depot at Raichur does not meet safety requirement/inter-distances in accordance with the latest OISD standards. Hence it is proposed to re-site the Raichur depot at Gulbarga. The proposed terminal will be fully automated and in line with latest OISD guidelines. Overall savings in consumption of fossil fuel for the Country, saving in logistic cost for BPCL and reduce vehicular emission & noise pollution. The project will overall cater the needs and development of the region Also since at present, the petroleum products are moved from locations outside Karnataka to the local market requirements, considerable loss is experienced to the exchequer of the State of Karnataka due to the tax regime on inter-state movements of petroleum products. The proposed terminal shall handle products like MS, HSD, SKO, Bio-Diesel & Ethanol. These products will be distributed to all BPCL Retail Outlets through Tank Lorries of different capacities. The installation is planned as per OISD 117, 118 & 244, PESO requirements, Govt. regulations & conforming to the relevant BIS/API standards. Details of product wise tankage at proposed Terminal are given in Table 1.

Table 1: Proposed Schedule of Tanks


Tank Dia. (m)

Ht. (m)

Capacity (KL)

Total Tanks

Class Type Total storage

(KL)HSD 24.04 16.00 7000 3 B CR 21,000MS 20.00 15.00 4000 2 A FR 8,000SKO 9.00 13.50 858 1 B CR 858Bio-Diesel 7.95 11.00 500 2 - CR 1,000

Ethanol 4.00 16.20 (L)

200 2 A UG 400

SKO 4.00 16.20 (L)

200 1 B UG 200

HSD 2.01 6.75 20 1 B UG 20Total 31,478

CR – Cone Roof Vertical Tank FR – Floating Roof Vertical Tank UG – Underground Horizontal Tank

Technology and Process Description

There is no manufacturing process involved in the Terminal. The Rail Fed POL Terminal shall be receiving, handling and storing various petroleum products such as Motor Sprit (MS), High Speed Diesel (HSD), Superior Kerosene Oil (SKO), Bio-Diesel and Ethanol .The brief process description is as follows:

Receiving the Product through Railway Wagons, primarily from Irugur/Manmad

Transfer of different products in their designated tanks.

Storing the product, maintaining the quality in line with IS specifications.

Loading & Dispatching quality petroleum products through Tank Lorries to Retail outlets (ROs).

The process flow chart is as shown in Figure 1.


Figure 1: Process Flow Chart

TLF Sheds

There will be 16 nos. (8 each in Phase 1 and 2) of TLF bays for loading of Tank Trucks. The loading facilities will be bottom loading for all petroleum products excluding SKO. SKO will have top loading facility.

Product Pump House

Proposed terminal will have Tank Wagon unloading Pump House, 1 TLF Pump House: and TWD Pump House of adequate size.

Fire Fighting Facilities

Fire Fighting Facilities will be provided as per prevailing safety guidelines issued by OISD 117, 118 and 244.

1. Full fledge auto-pressurized Fire Hydrant System to cover all facilities in the Terminal as per OISD-117/118/244 norms including Tank Truck Parking Area, as per latest Safety Norms.

2. Two no’s of Fire Water Storage tanks each of 50% of water storage requirement (Total Capacity 100% of requirement as per OISD standard).


3. Fire Fighting Pumps with diesel engines including stand by units. 4. Jockey Pumps. 5. Fire Hydrant network system with monitors and hydrant valves 6. Provision of Fire hydrant piping network for the new product tank farms. 7. Water Sprinkler system on A/G storage tanks in line with OISD 117/118/244. 8. Foam compound storage and delivery system. 9. Foam system on proposed for A/G storage tanks. 10. Remote operated HVLR variable flow water cum foam monitors fixed type or

portable type as per requirement, 11. Medium Expansion Foam Generators for Dyke Area. 12. Portable firefighting equipment as per OISD standards.

The Fire Water tanks have been provided as shown in Table 2. Additionally, Fire Pump House shall be provided to accommodate fire engines and jockey pumps.

Table 2: Details of Fire Water Tanks

SN Product Type of TankProposed Tanks and Capacities

Total TankageDiameter

(m) Height

(m) 1 Fire Water

Tanks Above ground vertical tanks

2 x 2300 KL 4,600 KL 14.03 15

Dyke Wall Facility

Dyke wall shall be provided surrounding the POL tanks (above ground type). The Capacity of each tank and total maximum Capacity is highlighted below in Table 3.

Table 3: Dyke Wall Details

Sr. No. Dyke Wall Containing Tanks Overall Dimension Dyke – I HSD (3x7000 PI and 1x6000PII) 120.7 m x 44.0 m x 1.8m Dyke – II MS (2x4000 PI and 1x2000 PII) 70.0 m x 40.0 m x 1.8m Dyke – III SKO (1x858) 23.0 m x 23.0 m x 1.8m Dyke – IV Bio-Diesel (2x500) 36.90 m x 23.0 m x 1.8m

Impervious Dyke wall surrounding the above ground product tanks can accommodate spilled oil. The dyke capacity is more than the maximum capacity of the largest product tank inside the dyke. Dykes are provided with adequate wall height of 1.8m as per OISD norms. Tank foundations are also provided with impervious membrane to avoid seepage of product into soil below. The tank farm flooring and dyke wall also are made impervious to prevent oil from seeping into ground /surrounding area.


Instrumentation and Automation

Automation / Instrumentation system will be as per BPCL’s latest Terminal Automation System (TAS) philosophy, which includes the following, as applicable:

Terminal Automation System, Tank farm management system including Radar Gauges, Multi-Point Temperature Sensors, Pressure Transmitters, Overspill detection and audio, visual alarm system etc.

Tank Truck loading system including Flow meters, Batch Controller, DCV etc.

Ethanol Blending and Multi-Functional Additives (MFA) dosing systems.

Other field equipment such as online density and temperature sensors, Field Automation and Integration of Sub system ROSOV’s, MOV’s, DBBV’s, Electrical sub systems, product delivery pumps, fire fighting systems.

Tank Truck Entry system, bay queue display etc.

Control Room equipment such as LRC, OIC’s, Servers, PLC’s, UPS etc. and necessary TAS software.

Position sensors for tank dyke valves etc.

Safety Shutdown System covering Automated Overfill Prevention System, ESD system.

Meters proving and Calibration facilities.

ROSOV’s, MOV’s, DBBV’s master station, Push Button Stations etc.

Necessary cabling, control panel, earthing etc.

Air Compressor/Air Dryer/Air receiver and piping for pneumatic systems.

Access control, zoning and multi zoning systems, security features like Door Frame Metal Detectors (DFMD’s), Hand Held Metal Detectors (HHMD’s) etc.

CCTV system to cover total Terminal facilities including perimeter wall.

Hydrocarbon detectors and flow sensors etc. near all potential leak sources of class ‘ A’ petroleum product,

Other automation systems and its interface of SAP system with TAS, and to ensure that engineering and design addresses the need for standardization.

Manpower

Approximately 200 No’s total manpower (Skilled/Unskilled) is estimated during the construction stage. The estimated manpower requirement for the Operation of Terminal is as follows:

CATEGORY NOS.Company Staff 14Security 8Contractual labours 40

Total 62


Water Supply

Water Consumption and Wastewater Generation Details

There will be no industrial effluent being generated from this project. Sewage generated from domestic sources will be disposed off via Septic Tank followed by Soak Pit. In case any open spillage of oil from tank shall lead to Oil Water Separator (OWS) where separated oil send back to storage tank after ensuring quality of product. The water from OWS will be reused for gardening. The capacity of OWS should be 50 m3/hr at the outlet and can be reworked as per generation of effluent.

Oil Water Separator

Under normal circumstances, there will not be any floating oil in wastewater (only domestic). However, in unlikely event of oil spillage in any of the dykes or TLF, it will be flushed with water and drained to Oil Water Separator. OWS will have baffle arrangements so that oil will come to surface and collected separately. A typical OWS is shown in figure below. The under flow water will move to other section equipped with rope oil collector to ensure oil content less than. The oil free water shall be used for landscaping/gardening purpose.

Figure 1: Oil Water Separator Details

Power Requirement

Total power requirement for operation of the POL Terminal has been worked out as 11 kV. The same shall be obtained from Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Ltd. (BESCOM) 11 kV grid and further distribution system shall be provided. Backup power arrangement by providing 1x500, 1x250, 1x25 kVA stand by capacity of DG sets shall be provided.


Description of Environment

The area around the proposed POL Terminal has been surveyed for physical features and existing environmental scenario. The field survey and baseline monitoring has been done from the period of September to November 2017. Air Environment: The ambient air quality is determined at 10 locations. The PM10 varied from 45 to 62 µg/m3, PM2.5 varied from 20 to 40 µg/m3, SO2 varied from 11 to 15 µg/m3, NOx varied from 15 to 26 µg/m3 and CO varied from 0.40 to 1.30 µg/m3. Other parameters like VOCs, Heavy metals, Benzene etc. were found Below Detectable Limit (BDL). All values are within prescribed NAAQS 2009.

Noise Environment: Noise can be defined as an unwanted sound. A total of 10 locations were identified for ambient noise monitoring in the study area. The daytime varied from 47.7 dB (A) Leq to 54.2 dB (A) Leq and night time noise varied of 43.1 dB (A) Leq to 46.2 dB (A) Leq. Both daytime noise and night time noise was within the limit except at Murtur village.

Water Environment: In order to establish the baseline water quality, 11 ground water and 3 surface water samples were collected and analyzed in the study area. The analysis result for ground water samples were within drinking water limit as per IS 10500: 2012 and were found to be within the permissible limites. The surface water was compared with CPCB classification and it was identified within limits of Class E i.e. its designated best use is Irrigation, Industrial Cooling and Controlled Waste disposal.

Soil Quality: Soil samples were collected from 11 locations in the study area and analyzed for physico-chemical characteristics. Soil quality was found to be normal. Details of analysis result are given in the EIA report.

Land Use/Land Cover of the Study Area: Land use pattern of the study area covering 10 km radius includes water bodies, agricultural land, Fallow land, Barren Land, Open Land and Built-up Land, Water Bodies Vegetation Details of land use /land cover classification are given in the EIA report.

Biological Environment: The ecological study of the area has been conducted within 10 km radius of the project site in order to understand the existing status of flora and fauna to generate baseline information. Flora: 26 plant species, 6 Species of Shurbs, 4 Species of herbs and 4 species of grasses were identified. Fauna: 7 species of mammals, 3 species of Reptiles, Avifauna: 24 spieces were identified within the Study Area.


None of the identified species within the study area are Schedule I species of the Indian Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 or listed in IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. There are no legally protected areas such as National Parks or Wildlife Sanctuaries within 10 km of the terminal

Socio-economic Environment: Analysis of the demographical statistics, based on Primary Census Abstract, 2011 reveals that the study area has a total population of 347857 in the study area. Average scheduled castes constitute about 32% of the total population of villages in the study area. Scheduled tribes constitute about 2% of the total population of villages in the study area. Average literacy rate of the study area in 2011 was 53% to total population. Villages in the study area have fairly good infrastructure facilities.

Anticipated Environment Impacts and Environment Management Plan

Impact on Air Environment: No emission is envisaged during the receipt, storage & handling of petroleum products. There would be no fugitive emission during unloading and hence, no impact is envisaged. The air environment may have minimal impact due to truck movement for receipt and dispatch.

Impact on Noise Environment: The project site is likely to have increased noise level up to 80-90 dB (A) due to the construction activity but it is likely to be insignificant, reversible and localized in nature and mainly confined to the day hours. As the proposed Terminal shall be operated in closed circuit, it is envisaged that noise environment would remain unaffected during operation of the proposed facilities.

Impact on Water Environment: Water requirement will meet from local/outside agencies. The overall impact on water environment due to construction of proposed project is likely to be temporary, short term and insignificant.

Impact on Land Environment: The project area is vacant land, there are no settlements and hence the question of rehabilitation and resettlement does not arise. As the complete system shall be closed loop, no impact is envisaged on the topography during operation phase.

Impact on Biological Environment: The probability and consequences of significant ecological impacts occurring as a result of the operation of the POL Terminal are considered to be almost negligible. The risk of any leakage is almost negligible owing to stringent leak prevention technologies.

Municipal solid waste will be disposed through local bodies. Spent lube oil from D.G. set will be sold to KSPCB Authorized recyclers. Hence no impact on flora and fauna is envisaged. Moreover there are no reserve forest and protected areas within 10 km radius. Greenbelt will be developed which will serve as ecosystem. There will be no effluent discharge in the water body. Thus there is no impact on the aquatic biota present in vicinity of proposed project.


Impact on Socio-economic Environment: The construction of the proposed project is expected to provide temporary indirect employment to a good number of skilled and unskilled workers. The project will contribute to the socio-economic development of the area at the local level in turn reducing migration for employment. Hence the proposed project will have positive impact on the socio-economic environment.

Environmental Monitoring Programme

It is imperative that BPCL should engage domain expert to collect sample data at prescribed intervals as suggested by PCB guidelines to assess the environmental health in the post period. A post study monitoring programme is important as it provides useful information on the following aspects.

It helps to verify the predictions on environmental impacts presented in this study.

It helps to indicate warnings of the development of any alarming environmental situations, and thus, provides opportunities for adopting appropriate control measures in advance.

Additional Studies

Hazard Identification and Consequence Assessment

Quantitative Risk Study has been done to determine the potential risks of major disasters having damage potential to life and property and provide a scientific basis using PHAST RISK (Version 6.7) software developed by DNV GL. Disaster Management Plan is prepared for identification of various hazards addressed qualitatively and included in onsite- emergency plan. Details of risk assessment are given in the EIA report.

Hazards we identified for release of MS, HSD, SKO, Bio-Diesel and Ethanol for scenarios of catastrophic rupture of storage tank at proposed site. Consequence analysis of all possible containment scenarios was carried out. No domino effect envisaged as all tanks are adequately spaced and heat or pressure wave is limited to dyke area.

Project Benefits

The project will improve supply of the High Speed Diesel (HSD), Motor Spirit (MS), and Superior Kerosene Oil (SKO) in Kalaburagi region and overall benefit the state of Karnataka which is vital for economic growth as well as improving the quality of life.

Capital Investment

The expected cost of the proposed project will be around Rs. 140 Crores. The cost breakup is as provided in Table 4.


Table 4: Cost Breakup

S.N Components Cost INR (in Crores) 1 Basic Engineering 6.582 Civil facilities 76.533 Railway Sliding 32.864 Electrical 8.615 Miscellaneous 1.316 Fire Fighting 8.207 Contingency 5.92

Total (Round off) 140.0

Conclusion

This impact assessment study indicates that the overall impact from the proposed project activities will be short term, reversible, localised and are not expected to contribute significantly to the surrounding environment. Also, with the implementation of the pollution control and strengthen the existing environment management measures, these anticipated impacts due to construction and operation of the proposed project will be mitigated to reduce it further.

The terminal will also ensure that the environmental performances of all the activities are monitored throughout execution of the project during both construction and operation phase. The terminal will continue to report environmental performance and monitoring reports regularly to statutory authorities.

Over the years, BPCL has developed systems and procedures for effective environmental management. These shall be extended to the terminal operations also. The effective management system coupled with monitoring of environmental components and efforts for continual improvements will result in exemplary environmental performance.


CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction of Project and Project Proponent

Bharat Petroleum Corporation limited (BPCL), the project proponent, is one of the highest ranked Indian Public sector under taking company, under Govt. Of India (Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas). In the prestigious Fortune 'Global 500' listing, BPCL is having 358th position in year 2017. BPCL is one of the Maharatna Company of India. Company is engaged in refining and marketing of petroleum products across pan India with two major Refineries i.e. Mumbai Refinery and Kochi Refinery and one joint venture Bina Refinery & one subsidiary Numaligarh refinery. BPCL is India's one of the largest commercial enterprises in oil and Gas sector. As per the industry estimate & as per directive of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India, different Oil companies are required to augment / construct new facilities to meet the growing demand of different markets . The projected demands of POL products in Kalaburagi are likely to increase substantially over the years to come. Hence in order to meet the future high energy demand BPCL proposed a new POL terminal at Kalaburagi.

The total numbers of product storage tanks to be installed are 12 and the total capacity will be around 31,478 KL.

The details of the Project and Proponents are as mentioned in Table 1.1 below.

Table 1.1: Project and Project Proponent Description

Name of Project Proposed POL Terminal with Railway Siding at Village -Nandur, Kalaburagi Karnataka

Project Proponent M/s Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited Name, contact number and address of Project Proponent

Mr. Paul Varghese Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. 1, Ranganathan Gardens, Off 11th Main Road, Annanagar West, Chennai- 600040, Tamil Nadu 044-26142182, 9447858911

Location of the Project Plot Nos. 56 to 93 Nandur Kesartagi Industrial Area, 2nd Phase, Village : Nandur Taluka : Gulbarga District: Kalaburagi State: Karnataka Geographical Coordinates : 17.262737, 76.877908

Name, contact number and Environmental Consultants:


address of Consultant M/s. Ultra-Tech Environmental Consultancy and Laboratory (An ISO 9001-2008 Company, Accredited by NABET, Lab: recognized by MOEF, GoI), Unit No. 206, 224, 225, Jai Commercial Complex, Eastern Express Highway, Opp. Cadbury Factory, Khopat, Thane (W) – 400601 Tel.: 91-22-25342776, 25380198, 25331438. Fax : 91-22-25429650 Email: [email protected], [email protected] Website : www.ultratech.in

Size of proposed project activity 22.74 ha (56.20 acres.) Terminal Overview Receiving the Product through Railway Wagons,

primarily from Irugur/Manmad Transfer of different products in their designated tanks. Storing the product, maintaining the quality in line with

IS specifications. Loading and dispatching quality petroleum products

through Tank Lorries to Retail outlets (ROs). Category of Project i.e. ‘A’ or ‘B’ 6(b), Category ‘B’ Proposed capacity/area/length/tonnage to be handled/command area/lease area/number of wells to be drilled

31,478 KL storage of finished petroleum products

1.2 Brief description of Nature, Size and Location of the project

The project activity is Proposed Petroleum Storage Terminal with a storage capacity of around 31,478 KL at Plot Nos. 56 to 93, Nandur Kesartagi Industrial Area, 2nd Phase, Village- Nandur, Tehsil– Gulbarga, Dist- Kalaburagi, Karnataka. As per the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification dated 14th September 2006 as amended, the proposed project falls under 'Type 6b - Isolated Storage & Handling of Hazardous Chemicals’ (As per threshold planning quantity indicated in column 3 of Schedule 2 & 3 of MSIHC Rules 1989 amended 2000), which requires preparation of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report. This EIA Report addresses the environmental impacts of the proposed project and proposes the mitigation measures for the same. The report is prepared, based on the Standard Terms of Reference (ToR) for EIA/EMP Report for Projects requiring Environmental Clearance (EC) for Isolated Storage and Handling of Hazardous Chemicals project by Ministry of Environment Forest & Climate Change (MoEF&CC).

The proposed Rail Fed POL Terminal is located about 9.4 km from Kalaburagi. The land area of the proposed Terminal facility is approximately 22.74 ha and currently is a vacant land. The land is provided by Govt. of Karnataka. The site is easily accessible by road. The nearest railway


station is Hirenanduru at approximately 0.4 km and airport of Sholapur Airport located at a distance of around 133 km.

Figure 1.1: Toposheet Map of 10 Km Study Area

1.3 Scope of the Study

EIA integrates the environmental concerns in the developmental activities so that it can enable the integration of environmental concerns and mitigation measures in project development. The study includes detailed characterization of existing status of environment in an area of 10 km


radius around project site. In order to get an idea about the existing state of the environment, various environmental attributes such as meteorology, air quality, water quality, soil quality, noise level, ecology and socio-economic environment are studied /monitored. Environmental baseline monitoring has been carried out during September to November, 2017 and used to identify potential significant impacts. The report is prepared as per the Standard ToR vide File No No.IA-J-11011/406/2017-IA-II (I) dated 29.09.2017.

The scope of the study broadly includes:-

To describe the project and associated works together with the requirements for carrying out the proposed development

To establish the baseline environmental and social scenario of the project site and its surroundings

To identify and describe the elements of the community and environment likely to be affected by the project

To identify, predict and evaluate environmental and social impacts during the construction and operation phase of the project

To study the existing traffic load, predict the increment in traffic due the project and to suggest the management plan for the same

Details about conservation of resources

To design and specify the monitoring and audit requirements necessary to ensure the implementation and the effectiveness of the mitigation measures adopted

To access risk during construction and operation phase and formulate the disaster management plan onsite and offsite

To evaluate proposed pollution control measures and delineate Environmental Management Plan (EMP)

To delineate post-project environmental quality monitoring program to be pursued by M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited.

1.4 Applicable Environmental Regulations

With respect to prevention and control of environmental pollution, the following Acts and Rules of Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India govern the proposed project:

Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 as amended in 1988

Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 as amended in 1987

Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 amended in 1991 and Environment (Protection) rules, 1986 and amendments thereafter

The Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000

The Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Trans boundary Movement) Rules,2009 as amended


The Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemical Rules, 1989

E-waste Management (Management and Handling) Rules, 2011

The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 and as amended

EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 as amended

1.5 Objective and Scope of EIA Study

EIA integrates the environmental concerns in the developmental activities so that it can enable the integration of environmental concerns and mitigation measures in project development. EIA can often prevent future liabilities or expensive alterations in project design.

The study included detailed characterization of existing status of environment in an area of 10 km radius around project site. In order to get an idea about the existing state of the environment, various environmental attributes such as meteorology, air quality, water quality, soil quality, noise level, ecology and socio-economic environment are studied /monitored by an accredited Functional Area Expert.

Environmental baseline monitoring has been carried out during September to November, 2017 and used to identify potential significant impacts.

The scope of the study broadly includes:-

To describe the project and associated works together with the requirements for carrying out the proposed development

To establish the baseline environmental and social scenario of the project site and its surroundings

To identify and describe the elements of the community and environment likely to be affected by the project

To identify, predict and evaluate environmental and social impacts during the construction and operation phase of the project

To study the existing traffic load, predict the increment in traffic due the project and to suggest the management plan for the same

Conservation of resources

To design and specify the monitoring and audit requirements necessary to ensure the implementation and the effectiveness of the mitigation measures adopted.

To evaluate proposed pollution control measures and delineate environmental management plan (EMP) outlining additional control measures to be adopted for mitigation of adverse impacts.

To delineate post-project environmental quality monitoring program


1.6 Structure of EIA Report

EIA report contains baseline data, project description and assessment of impacts and preparation of Environmental Management Plan and Disaster Management Plan. The report is organized in following ten chapters:

Executive Summary

This chapter gives the Executive Summary of the EIA report.

Chapter 1: Introduction

This chapter describes objectives and methodology for EIA.

Chapter 2: Project Description

This chapter gives a brief description of the location, approachability, amenities, layout and utilities of the proposed project.

Chapter 3: Description of the Environment

This chapter presents details of the baseline environmental status for microclimate, air quality, noise, traffic, water quality, soil quality, flora, fauna and socio-economic status etc.

Chapter 4: Anticipated Environmental Impact and Mitigation Measures

This chapter discusses the possible sources of pollution and environmental impacts due to the project during construction and operation phases and suggests the mitigation measures.

Chapter 5: Project Benefits

This chapter presents the benefits from this project.

Chapter 6: Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan

This chapter deals with the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the proposed Project and indicates measures proposed to minimize the likely impacts on the environment during construction and operation phases and budgetary allocation for the same.

This chapter also discusses the details about the environmental monitoring program during construction and operation phases.

Chapter 7: Additional Studies

This chapter covers Risk Assessment Studies for the construction and operation phase, the safety precautions that are taken during construction phase and the Disaster Management Plan and Emergency Preparedness Plan onsite and offsite.


Chapter 8: Disclosure of Consultants

This chapter deals with the details of consultants engaged and the NABET accreditation details of environmental consultants.


CHAPTER 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 Need and Justification of the Project

The existing Raichur Depot is very old, commissioned in the year 1940. Depot is constructed in a small plot of area admeasuring 5.7 acres and not meeting the safety requirements/inter-distance in accordance with latest OISD standards.

Hence, it is proposed to re-site the Raichur Depot at Gulbarga. The proposed new terminal shall be fully automated and OISD/MB Lal compliant.

2.2 Site Details and Location

The total plot area is 22.74 ha (56.20 Acres). The Terminal Location overview is given in the Table 2.1:

Table 2.1: Terminal Location Overview

Location of the Project Plot Nos. 56 to 93 Nandur Kesartagi Industrial Area, 2nd Phase, Village : Nandur Taluka : Gulbarga District: Kalaburagi State: Karnataka Geographical Coordinates : 17.262737, 76.877908

Size of current project activity 22.74 ha (56.20 Acres) Accessibility to site Site is well connected with nearby SH 51 - 0.7 km Nearest Railway Station Nearest Airport

Hirenanduru Railway Station – 0.4 km (aerial) Sholapur Airport – 133 km

Plot Survey Nos. Plot Nos. 56 to 93 Seismic Zone The proposed project is located in Seismic Zone II as per IS:

1893 and all designs will be as per IS Codes. General Topography Relatively flat and general elevation of the site is around 1508

msl The project location is shown in Figure 2.1 and satellite imagery of the study area showing project site is shown in Figure 2.2.


Figure 2.1: Project Location


Figure 2.2: Google Image of the Study Area

2.3 Size or Magnitude of Operations

The proposed grass root POL Terminal project of BPCL is scheduled under 6 (b) of the EIA notification, 2006. The total cost of the project is approximately 140 Crores and its breakup is provided in Table 2.2.

Table 2.2: Cost Breakup

S.N Components Cost INR (in Crores) 1 Basic Engineering 6.582 Civil facilities 76.533 Railway Sliding 32.864 Electrical 8.615 Miscellaneous 1.316 Fire Fighting 8.207 Contingency 5.92

Total (round off) 140.0


The proposed POL Storage Terminal project spreads out in an area of 56.20 Acres. The below Table 2.3 provides the break-up of the area that will be occupied by the proposed projects.

Table 2.3: Area Details

SN Land Used Approx Area, m2

1 Total Plot area 2,27,400 2 Green Belt 75,793 3 TT Parking 18,615

2.4 Salient Features of the Project

2.4.1 Process and Storage Details

There is no manufacturing process involved in the Terminal. The Rail Fed POL Terminal shall be receiving, handling and storing various petroleum products such as Motor Sprit (MS), High Speed Diesel (HSD), Superior Kerosene Oil (SKO), Bio-Diesel and Ethanol .The brief process description is as follows:

Receiving the Product through Railway Wagons, primarily from Irugur/Manmad

Transfer of different products in their designated tanks.

Storing the product, maintaining the quality in line with IS specifications.

Loading & Dispatching quality petroleum products through Tank Lorries to Retail outlets (ROs).

Typical process flow chart is attached as Figure 2.2.


Figure 2.2: Process Flow Chart


The proposed project layout is as shown in Figure 2.3 and also provided as Annexure I.

Figure 2.3: Site Layout Plan


2.4.1.1 Receipt of Petroleum Products

The petroleum products viz. Motor Spirit (MS) and High Speed Diesel (HSD) and Superior Kerosene Oil (SKO) shall be received by railway wagons primarily from Irugur/Manmad.

2.4.1.2 Storage Facilities

The total numbers of product storage tanks to be installed are 12 and the total capacity will be around 31,478 KL. Details of product wise purposed tankage are given respectively in Table 2.4.

Table 2.4: Schedule of Tanks

Tank Dia. (m)

Ht. (m)

Capacity (KL)

Total Tanks

Class Type Total storage

(KL)HSD 24.04 16.00 7000 3 B CR 21,000MS 20.00 15.00 4000 2 A FR 8,000SKO 9.00 13.50 858 1 B CR 858Bio-Diesel 7.95 11.00 500 2 - CR 1,000

Ethanol 4.00 16.20 (L)

200 2 A UG 400

SKO 4.00 16.20 (L)

200 1 B UG 200

HSD 2.01 6.75 20 1 B UG 20Total 31,478

CR – Cone Roof Vertical Tank EFR – External Floating Roof Vertical Tank UG – Underground Horizontal Tank Note: - The above tankage shall be developed in line with latest API 650 design standards and OISD regulations. Above dimensions are tentative and shall be finalized during detailed engineering after receipt of environment clearance.

2.4.1.3 Dispatch of Petroleum Products

The petroleum products shall be distributed to various Industries/Retail outlets of Kalaburagi district through tank trucks of capacity 12,000 liters to 25,000 liters. On an average 130-150 tank Lorries are anticipated to be filled on daily basis. In phase -I 8 bay TLF gantry with bottom loading facility for all petroleum products excluding SKO is proposed. SKO will have top loading facility. In Phase –II additional 8 bay TLF gantry is proposed. The loading facilities shall consist of PD metering system, batch controllers, blending facilities for Ethanol, Biodiesel, branded fuels etc. Vapour recovery system will be designed and developed for handling MS.

2.4.2 Truck Loading Facility (TLF) Sheds


There will be 16 nos. (8 each in Phase 1 and 2) of TLF bays for loading of Tank Trucks. The loading facilities will be bottom loading for all petroleum products excluding SKO. SKO will have top loading facility.

2.4.3 Product Pump House

Proposed terminal will have Tank Wagon unloading Pump House, 1 TLF Pump House: and TWD Pump House of adequate size.

2.4.4 Fire Fighting Facilities

Fire Fighting Facilities will be provided as per prevailing safety guidelines issued by OISD 117, 118 and 244.

Full fledge auto-pressurized Fire Hydrant System to cover all facilities in the Terminal as per OISD-117/118/244 norms including Tank Truck Parking Area, as per latest Safety Norms.

Two no’s of Fire Water Storage tanks each of 50% of water storage requirement (Total Capacity 100% of requirement as per OISD standard).

Fire Fighting Pumps with diesel engines including stand by units.

Jockey Pumps.

Fire Hydrant network system with monitors and hydrant valves

Provision of Fire hydrant piping network for the new product tank farms.

Water Sprinkler system on A/G storage tanks in line with OISD 117/118/244.

Foam compound storage and delivery system.

Foam system on proposed for A/G storage tanks.

Remote operated HVLR variable flow water cum foam monitors fixed type or portable type as per requirement,

Medium Expansion Foam Generators for Dyke Area.

Portable firefighting equipment as per OISD standards.

The Fire Water tanks have been provided as shown in Table 2.5 Fire water pump house will be provided of adequate size to accommodate fire engines and Jockey pumps.

Table 2.5: Details of Fire Water Tanks

SN Product Type of TankProposed Tanks and Capacities

Total TankageDiameter

(m) Height

(m) 1 Fire Water

Tanks Above ground vertical tanks

2 x 2300 KL 4,600 KL 14.03 15

2.4.5 Dyke Wall Facility


Dyke wall shall be provided surrounding the POL tanks (above ground type). The Capacity of each tank and Total maximum Capacity is highlighted below in Table 2.6.

Table 2.6: Dyke Wall Details

Sr. No. Dyke Wall Containing Tanks Overall Dimension Dyke – I HSD (3x7000 PI and 1x6000PII) 120.7 m x 44.0 m x 1.8m Dyke – II MS (2x4000 PI and 1x2000 PII) 70.0 m x 40.0 m x 1.8m Dyke – III SKO (1x858) 23.0 m x 23.0 m x 1.8m Dyke – IV Bio-Diesel (2x500) 36.90 m x 23.0 m x 1.8m

Impervious Dyke wall surrounding the above ground product tanks can accommodate spilled oil. The dyke capacity is more than the maximum capacity of the largest product tank inside the dyke. Dykes are provided with adequate wall height of 1.8m as per OISD norms. Tank foundations are also provided with impervious membrane to avoid seepage of product into soil below. The tank farm flooring and dyke wall also are made impervious to prevent oil from seeping into ground /surrounding area.

2.4.6 Instrumentation and Automation

Automation / Instrumentation system will be as per BPCL’s latest Terminal Automation System (TAS) philosophy, which includes the following, as applicable:

Terminal Automation System, Tank farm management system including Radar Gauges, Multi-Point Temperature Sensors, Pressure Transmitters, Overspill detection and audio, visual alarm system etc.

Tank Truck loading system including Flow meters, Batch Controller, DCV etc.

Ethanol Blending and Multi-Functional Additives (MFA) dosing systems.

Other field equipment such as online density and temperature sensors, Field Automation and Integration of Sub system ROSOV’s, MOV’s, DBBV’s, Electrical sub systems, product delivery pumps, fire fighting systems.

Tank Truck Entry system, bay queue display etc.

Control Room equipment such as LRC, OIC’s, Servers, PLC’s, UPS etc. and necessary TAS software.

Position sensors for tank dyke valves etc.

Safety Shutdown System covering Automated Overfill Prevention System, ESD system.

Meters proving and Calibration facilities.

ROSOV’s, MOV’s, DBBV’s master station, Push Button Stations etc.

Necessary cabling, control panel, earthing etc.

Air Compressor/Air Dryer/Air receiver and piping for pneumatic systems.

Access control, zoning and multi zoning systems, security features like Door Frame Metal Detectors (DFMD’s), Hand Held Metal Detectors (HHMD’s) etc.


CCTV system to cover total Terminal facilities including perimeter wall.

Hydrocarbon detectors and flow sensors etc. near all potential leak sources of class ‘ A’ petroleum product,

Other automation systems and its interface of SAP system with TAS, and to ensure that engineering and design addresses the need for standardization.

2.5 Safety Measures

The company shall obtain all requisite clearances from Chief Control of Explosives and other statutory authorities.

Oil Industry Safety Directorate guidelines regarding Safety against Fire, Spillage, and Pollution control etc. shall be maintained and followed.

Shall comply with the provisions made in Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules 1989, as amended in 2000 and the Public Liability Insurance Act for handling of hazardous chemicals etc. All the hazardous waste shall be properly treated and disposed in accordance with the Hazardous Waste Rules 2008 and its subsequent amendments

Adequate buffer zone around the Petroleum Oil Terminal shall be provided, as required as per OISD or other statutory requirements.

During rainy season, the storm water drains shall be connected to oil water separator.

Offsite disaster management plan shall be prepared in accordance with the District Authority and be implemented. Emergency Response Plan shall be based on the guidelines prepared by OISD.

Occupational health surveillance of worker shall be done on a regular basis and records maintained as per the Factory Act.

Green belt shall be developed to mitigate the effect of fugitive emission all around the POL Terminal.

Dedicated parking facility should be provided in the POL Terminal. Unit should develop and implement good traffic management system for their incoming and outgoing vehicles to avoid congestion on the public road.

2.6 Basic Requirements

2.6.1 Water Requirement

Water requirement for the Project will be around 15-20 m3/day for construction phase (i.e. during the major civil work) and about 25 m3/day for operational phase. The water requirement is proposed to be met from from Nandur Kesartagi Industrial Area and alternatively from proposed bore wells.


2.6.2 Power Requirement

Total power requirement for operation of the POL Terminal has been worked out as 11 kV. The same shall be obtained from Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Ltd. (BESCOM) 11 kV grid and further distribution system shall be provided. Backup power arrangement by providing 1x500, 1x250, 1x25 kVA stand by capacity of DG sets shall be provided.

2.6.3 Utility Area

The utility area will includes following;

MCC Room

D. G. Set

Transformer Room

Engineering Store

Control Room, QC Lab

Watch Tower, etc

2.6.4 Manpower Requirement

Approximately 200 Nos total manpower (Skilled/Unskilled) is estimated during the construction stage. The estimated manpower requirement for the Operation of Terminal is as follows:

CATEGORY NOS.Company Staff 14Security 8Contractual labours 40

Total 62

2.7 Water and Wastewater Management

2.7.1 Water Consumption and Wastewater Generation Details

There will be no industrial effluent being generated from this project. Sewage generated from domestic sources will be disposed off via Septic Tank followed by Soak Pit. In case any open spillage of oil from tank shall lead to Oil Water Separator (OWS) where separated oil send back to storage tank after ensuring quality of product. The water from OWS will be reused for gardening. The capacity of OWS should be 50 m3/hr at the outlet and can be reworked as per generation of effluent.

2.7.2 Oil Water Separator


Under normal circumstances, there will not be any floating oil in wastewater (only domestic). However, in unlikely event of oil spillage in any of the dykes or TLF, it will be flushed with water and drained to Oil Water Separator. OWS will have baffle arrangements so that oil will come to surface and collected separately. A typical OWS is shown in figure below. The under flow water will move to other section equipped with rope oil collector to ensure oil content less than. The oil free water shall be used for landscaping/gardening purpose.

Figure 2.4: Oil Water Separator Details

2.8 Solid and Hazardous Waste Disposal System

Details of the solid and hazardous generation with their category and its quantity, disposal system are mentioned in Table 2.7 and Table 2.8.

Table 2.7: Non Hazardous waste

SN Solid Waste Generation

Type of waste

Total (approx)

Management

1

From Domestic Activities

Dry garbage 35 Kg/day Handed over to the authorised recyclers

Wet garbage 15 Kg/day Composting off-site/manure usage to gardening

Table 2.8: Hazardous waste

Sr. No.

Schedule I Category No. Type

Qty Method of Disposal


1 Category No. 34.3 Oil Water Sludge – generated from cleaning of storage tanks once in 5 years

5MT (per 5 year basis)

CHWTSDF

2.8.1 Waste Generated from Spillage and Leakages

The installation will have the dyke wall surrounding the petroleum product storage area with proper Bricks/PCC floor and the size of dyke wall will be depend on largest storage tank capacity.

Unit will provide proper PCC/RCC flooring with drain in the tank wagon loading and unloading area with proper barricaded wall so in case of any leakage during loading / unloading it will not spread on ground.

The collection pit(s) will be provided to collect all the spilled and leaked material during loading/ unloading or any heavy leakage in storage area.

If there is any leakage during the tank wagon movement / shifting, the leaked material will be diluted and collected in drums and it will be sent to hazardous waste storage area.

All the roads and approach roads to the plant will be of PCC/RCC/Bitumen and there will be no any chemical handling or shifting on ground.


CHAPTER 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT

3.1 General

This chapter provides the description of the existing environmental status of the study area with reference to the environmental attributes like air, water, noise, soil, land use, ecology, socio economics, etc. The study area covers 10 km radius around the project site.

The existing environmental setting is considered to adjudge the baseline conditions which are described with respect to climate, atmospheric conditions, water quality, soil quality, ecology, socioeconomic profile, land use and places of archaeological importance.

3.2 Methodology

The methodology for conducting the baseline environmental survey obtained from the guidelines given in the EIA Manual of the MoEF&CC. Baseline information with respect to air, noise, water and land quality in the study area were collected by primary sampling/field studies during the period of September to November, 2017. The meteorological parameters play a vital role in transport and dispersion of pollutants in the atmosphere. The collection and analyses of meteorological data, therefore, is an essential component of environmental impact assessment studies. The long term and short term impact assessment could be made through utilization and interpretation of meteorological data collected over long and short periods. Since the meteorological parameters exhibit significant variation in time and space, meaningful interpretation can only be done through a careful analysis of reliable data collected very close to the site.

3.3 Study Area included in Environmental Setting

The study area is considered to be area within a radius of 10 km of the proposed BPCL Terminal boundary. The EIA guidelines of the MoEF mandate the study area in this manner for EIA’s.

3.3.1 Land Use/Land Cover of the Study Area

Land Use Land Cover studies are conducted using satellite imagery. The satellite image of the study area is as shown in Figure 3.1 (a). The details of satellite image are as follows: The study area is considered to be area within a radius of 10 km of the Project boundary at Gulbarga Tehsil in Karnataka. Land Use Land Cover studies are conducted using satellite imagery. The details of satellite image are as follows:


Satellite Data: Landsat 8 cloud free data has been used for Land use/land cover analysis and Aster GDEM data for analysing topographic features. Satellite Sensor – OLI_TIRS Path and Row – Path 148, Row 48 Spatial Resolution– 30 m Date of Pass: 15thApril 2017 Ancillary Data: GIS and image-processing software are used to classify the image and for delineating drainage and other features in the study area.

Objectives

Delineation of Landuse/ Landcover categories on the 1:50,000 scale for the whole study area.

Generation of digital cartographic database using secondary data sources.

Figure 3.1(a): Satellite Image of 10km Study Area

Landuse / Landcover Classes Details:

Satellite data was classified using supervised classification technique. Maximum likelihood algorithm classifier was used for the analysis. Seven land use/ land cover classes were identified


in ten sq. km area around the Project boundary. The LULC classes are identified and presented in Table 3.1 and Figure 3.1(b).

Figure 3.1(b): LULC of Study Area

Table 3.1: LULC Statistics of Study Area

Current fallows or cropped areas were dominated in the present land use, followed by vegetation. Around 16.35% lands were barren, whereas 10.05% remained as agricultural lands. The built-up

LULC Class Area (ha) Area (%) Agricultural Land 3327.39 10.05

Current Fallow Land 13500.09 40.76

Open Scrub 1247.49 3.77 Barren Land 5414.58 16.35

Vegetation 6943.68 20.96

Water bodies 84.24 0.25

Built-up Land 2606.67 7.87 Total 33124.14 100.00


or settlements were occupied with 7.87% and open scrub with 3.77%, while waterbeds have only 0.25% of the total land use. The proposed project doesn’t change any existing land use pattern within the study area.

Contour Map:

Contour lines are lines joining points of equal elevation on the surface of the ground. Contouring is the standard method of representing relief on topographic maps. For a given map the vertical distance between adjacent contour lines or the contour interval is fixed. Contour map of 10 km radius around project site predominantly shows an undulating terrain. The lowest contour line is 400 m and that of highest is 550 m. The highest elevation was 562 m and lowest was 385 m

The area shows not much of undulating topography thus it shows the dendritic drainage patterns as presented in Figure 3.1(c) for study area.

Figure 3.1(c): Contour Map of Study Area

Drainage Map:

A drainage system is the pattern formed by the streams, rivers, and lakes in a particular drainage basin. Drainage basin can be described by the order of streams within them. Streams that have no


tributaries (or streams flowing into it) are termed first order streams. When the first order streams join together, they become second order steam. Two second order streams join to form third order stream and so on for forth and further orders. However, a stream may have a tributary with a lower order without becoming a higher order stream.Strahler method of ordering was used for giving order to drainage. Drainage map of a study area shows highest order of drainage as 5th order. It is one of the tributary of Bhima River. Drainage pattern within 10 km radius around project site shows both parallel anddendritic type of drainage pattern The Contour map of the study area is as presented in Figure 3.1(d).

Figure 3.1(d): Drainage Map of Study Area


The 10 km study area inclusive of all the monitoring locations has been as shown in Figure 3.2.

Figure 3.2: Baseline Monitoring Locations within Study Area

3.4 Meteorological Data

During study, a continuous automatic weather monitoring station was established at site to record wind speed, wind direction, relative humidity and temperature. Atmospheric pressure was recorded twice a day at 08.30 and 17.30 hrs. Cumulative rainfall was monitored by rain gauge on daily basis. This station was in operation in study period. The methodology adopted for monitoring meteorological observations is as per the standard norms laid down by Bureau of Indian Standards and the India Meteorological Department (IMD). Hourly maximum, minimum and average values of wind speed, direction and temperature are recorded continuously at site. The climate of the study area is classified as warm, humid and tropical. During study period, winds were predominantly from E followed by NE, SE and ENE. Calm conditions prevailed for 11.94 % of the total time and average wind speed was 2.03 m/sec. The average minimum temperature is 15.80C and maximum is 40.40C. The humidity is highest in August at 81%.


A fully instrumented continuous recording meteorological observatory is established and operated at project site during study period The parameters are being monitored at site is given in Table 3.2.

Table 3.2: Meteorological Monitoring At Site

S.N. Parameter Instrument Frequency

1 Wind Speed Automatic Weather station (Envirotech WM 251)

Continuous Automatic 1 hourly Average 2 Wind Direction

3 Ambient Temperature

4 Max. & Min Temperature Wet & Dry Bulb Thermometer Daily at 08:30 & 17:30 IST

5 Relative Humidity Hygrometer Daily at 08:30 & 17:30 IST

6 Rainfall Rain Gauge Daily The aforesaid meteorological parameters were being observed in the field during monitoring period. The IMD observations are shown in Table 3.3. The wind rose during the study period is presented in Figure 3.3.

Table 3.3: Meteorological Data

Month Temperature Humidity Wind Speed

Wind Speed

Mean Min

Mean Max

Highest Lowest 8.30 Hrs

17.30 Hrs

KMPH d m/s

Jan 16.3 30.9 33.4 12.7 60 32 5.2 1.40 Feb 18.9 33.9 36.6 36.6 47 25 6.2 1.67 March 22.5 37.6 40.3 18.0 38 20 6.4 1.73 April 25.4 40.0 42.5 21.1 41 21 7.4 2.00 May 26.1 40.4 43.2 21.9 51 26 9.4 2.54 June 24.0 35.3 40.4 21.5 73 49 13.5 3.65 July 22.9 32.1 35.7 21.2 80 59 13.5 3.65 August 22.5 31.1 34.4 21.1 81 62 12.3 3.32 Sept 22.6 32.1 35.3 20.6 79 58 8.0 2.16 Oct 21.4 32.2 34.8 17.4 70 50 6.6 1.78 Nov 18.5 31.0 33.2 14.1 62 41 7.3 1.97 Dec 15.8 30.0 32.0 11.9 60 35 5.8 1.57


Figure 3.3: Windrose for Study Period of September to November 2017

3.5 Ambient Air Quality

The ambient air quality monitoring was carried out at 10 locations, Figure 3.2, within the 10 km radius around the site of project to know the existing background ambient air quality. The purpose of the estimation of background pollutant concentration was to assess the impact of the project on the ambient air quality within the region based on the activities of the project. The parameters chosen for assessment of air quality were PM10, PM2.5, Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx), Lead , Arsenic, Nickle,Ozone, Carbon Mono Oxide ,Hydrocarbon (Methane and Non-methane HC) and VOCs.

3.5.1 Methodology Adopted for the Study

PM10, PM2.5, Sulphur dioxide (SO2), Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx), Hydrocarbon (Methane and Non-methane HC) and VOCs were the major pollutants associated with project. The baseline status of the ambient air quality has been established through field monitoring data on PM10, PM2.5, Sulphur dioxide (SO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), Hydrocarbon (HC) Methane and Non-methane HC) and VOCs at 10 locations within the study area. The locations for air quality monitoring were scientifically selected based on the following considerations using climatologically data of Kalaburagi Observatory. Meteorological conditions on synoptic scale;


Topography of the study area; Representativeness of the region for establishing baseline status; and Representativeness with respect to likely impact areas. Ambient air quality monitoring was carried out on 24 hour basis with a frequency of twice a week at a station during the study period for 10 locations. The location of the monitoring stations with reference to the project site is given in Table 3.4.

Table 3.4: Ambient Air Quality Sampling Locations of the Study Area

SN Location Location Code

Distance, Km Direction

1 Project Site A1 -- -- 2 Kesartagi Tanda Village A2 3.12 Towards NW 3 Nandikur Tanda Village A3 6.76 Towards NW 4 Aiwani shahi Area Near Shambhognlli

Village A4

7.43 Towards NW

5 Near Shree Mouneshwara Temple ,Kusnoor Village

A5 4.59 Towards North

6 Daryanayak Tanda Near Srinivas Saradgi A6 7.39 Towards NE 7 Bobnayak Tanda , Zhapur Village A7 4.11 Towards NE 8 Hire Nandoor A8 2.0 Towards SE 9 Martur Village A9 5.37 Towards SE 10 Sirnoor Village A10 9.14 Towards SW The ambient air quality results are as summarised in Table 3.5


Table 3.5: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results

S.N. Monitoring Locations

Min./ Max.

PM10

(μg/m3) PM2.5

(μg/m3) SO2

(μg/m3)NOx

(μg/m3)CO

(mg/m3)O3

(μg/m3)C6H6

(μg/m3) BaP

ng/m3 NH3

(μg/m3)Pb

(μg/m3) As

(ng/m3) Ni

(ng/m3) HC ppm

VOC (μg/m3)

AAQ1 Project Site Min 50 21 11 18 0.8 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5 Max 56 40 15 21 1.1 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

AAQ2 Kesartagi Tanda

Min 56 25 12 15 0.9 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

Max 62 30 14 21 1.2 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

AAQ3 Nandikur Tanda

Min 52 24 11 16 0.9 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

Max 56 26 14 21 1.3 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

AAQ4 Shambhognlli Village

Min 50 22 11 18 0.8 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

Max 58 29 14 22 1.1 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

AAQ5 Kusnoor Village

Min 51 22 11 21 0.9 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

Max 55 25 14 23 1.2 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

AAQ6 Daryanayak Tanda

Min 45 22 11 15 0.8 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

Max 56 26 14 22 1.1 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

AAQ7 Zhapur Village

Min 51 21 11 21 1 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

Max 59 26 15 25 1.2 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

AAQ8 Hire Nandoor Min 48 20 11 18 0.8 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

Max 52 25 14 22 1.2 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

AAQ9 Martur Village

Min 48 21 11 20 0.4 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

Max 55 26 15 24 0.9 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

AAQ10 Sirnoor Village

Min 40 21 11 21 0.8 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

Max 48 26 15 26 1.1 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

Minimum 40 20 11 15 0.4 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

Maximum 62 40 15 26 1.3 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

98th Percentile 60.62 35.40 15.00 25.54 1.26 < 1 < 0.5 < 1 < 6 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.5

NAAQS 100 60 80 80 2 100 5 1 100 1 6 20 -- --

The PM10 varied from 45 to 62 µg/m3, PM2.5 varied from 20 to 40 µg/m3, SO2 varied from 11 to 15 µg/m3, NOx varied from 15 to 26 µg/m3 and CO varied from 0.4 to 1.3 mg/m3. Other parameters like VOCs, Heavy metals, Benzene etc. were found Below Detectable Limit (BDL). All values are within prescribed NAAQS 2009.


3.5.2 Sampling and Analytical Techniques

Respirable Dust Samplers APM-451 of Envirotech instruments were used for monitoring Respirable fraction (<10 microns) and gaseous pollutants like SO2, NOx, Methane and Non-methane (HC) & VOCs. Table 3.6 shows the techniques for sampling and analysis for these parameters.

Table 3.6: Techniques Used For Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

Parameters Technique Technical Protocol

Détectable Limit, µg/m3

PM10 Respirable Dust Sampler (Gravimetric method)

CPCB Guidelines 10.0

Sulphur Dioxide West and Gaeke IS-5182 (Part-II) 5.0 Nitrogen Oxide Jacob & Hochheiser IS-5182 (Part-VI) 5.0 Hydrocarbon (Methane and Non-Methane)

Gas Chromatograph (FID Detector)

Is-5182 (Part-XXI) 0.1 ppb

VOCs Activated Charcoal method (GC FID Detector)

EPA TO-17 1 mg/m3

Ambient air at the monitoring location is sucked through a cyclone. Coarse and non-respirable dust is separated from the air stream by centrifugal forces acting on the solid particles and these particles fall through the cyclone's conical hopper and get collected in the sampling cap placed at the bottom. The fine dust (<10 microns) forming the PM10 passes the cyclone and is retained on the filter paper. A tapping is provided on the suction side of the blower to provide suction for sampling air through a set of impingers for containing absorbing solutions for SO2 and NOx. Samples of gases are drawn at a flow rate of 0.2 litters per minute. PM10 has been estimated by gravimetric method. Modified West and Gaeke method (IS-5182 part-II, 1969) has been adopted for estimation of SO2 and Jacobs-Hochheiser method (IS-5182 part-VI, 1975) has been adopted for the estimation of NOx. Calibration charts have been prepared for all gaseous pollutants.

3.6 Noise

Noise in general is sound, which is composed of many frequency components of various loudness distributed over the audible frequency range. The most common and universally accepted scale is the A weighted scale which is measured as dB (A). This is more suitable for audible range of 20 to 20,000 Hz and has been designed to weigh various components of noise according to the response of a human ear. The environmental assessment of noise from the


industrial activity, construction activity and vehicular traffic can be undertaken by taking into consideration various factors like potential damage to hearing, physiological responses, and annoyance and general community responses.

3.6.1 Objective

The main objective of monitoring of ambient noise levels was to establish the baseline noise levels in different zones. i.e. Residential, Industrial, Commercial and Silence zones, in the surrounding areas and to assess the total noise level in the environment of the study area.

3.6.2 Methodology

Identification of Sampling Locations A preliminary reconnaissance survey was undertaken to identify the major noise sources in the area. The sampling location in the area was identified considering location of industry, commercial shopping complex activities, residential areas with various traffic activity and sensitive areas like hospital, court, temple and schools also near the railway track for railway noise. The noise monitoring was conducted at eight locations in the study area during monitoring period. 10 sampling locations were selected for the sampling of noise. The noise monitoring locations are given in Table 3.7 and shown in Figure 3.2.

Equivalent sound pressure level (Leq) The sound from noise source often fluctuates widely during a given period of time. Leq is the equivalent continuous sound level, which is equivalent to the same sound energy as the actual fluctuating sound measured in the same time period.

Instrument used for Monitoring Noise levels were measured using an Integrating sound level meter manufactured by Cygnet (Model No. 2031). It had an indicating mode of Lp and Leq. Keeping the mode in Lp for few minutes and setting the corresponding range and the weighting network in “A” weighing set the sound level meter was run for one hour time and Leq was measured at all locations. There are different types of fields for measuring the ambient noise level, e categorized as free field, near field and far field.

Free Field The free field is defined as a region where sound wave propagates without obstruction from source to the receiver. In such case, the inverse square law can be applied so that the sound pressure level decreases by 6dB (A) as the distance is doubled.


Near Field The near field is defined as that region close to the source where the inverse square law does not apply. Usually this region is located within a few wavelengths from the source.

Far Field The far field is defined as that region which is at a distance of more than 1-meter from the source.

Table 3.7: Noise Level Monitoring Stations in the Study Area

SN Location Location Code

Distance, Km Direction

1 Project Site N1 -- -- 2 Kesartagi Tanda Village N2 3.12 Towards NW 3 Nandikur Tanda Village N3 6.76 Towards NW 4 Aiwani shahi Area Near Shambhognlli

Village N4

7.43 Towards NW


N5 4.59 Towards North

6 Daryanayak Tanda Near Srinivas Saradgi N6 7.39 Towards NE 7 Bobnayak Tanda , Zhapur Village N7 4.11 Towards NE 8 Hire Nandoor N8 2.0 Towards SE 9 Martur Village N9 5.37 Towards SE 10 Sirnoor Village N10 9.14 Towards SW

3.6.3 Method of Monitoring and Parameters Measured

Noise monitoring was carried out continuously for 24-hours with one hour interval. During each hour parameters like L10, L50, L90 and Leq were directly computed by the instrument based on the sound pressure levels. Monitoring was carried out at ‘A’ weighting and in fast response mode. The important parameters to be measured are Leq, Lday, and Lnight. Leq: Latest noise monitoring equipments have the facility for measurement of Leq directly. However, Leq can also be calculated using the following equation: Leq (hrly) = L50 + (L10 - L90)

2 / 60

Where,

L10 (Ten Percentile Exceeding Level) is the level of sound exceeding 10% of the total time of measurement.


L50 (Fifty Percentile Exceeding Level) is the level of sound exceeding 50% of the total time of measurement. L90 (Ninety Percentile Exceeding Level) is the level of sound exceeding 90% of the total time of measurement. Lday: This represents Leq of daytime. Lday is calculated as Logarithmic average using the hourly Leq’s for day time hours from 6.00a.m to 10.00p.m Lnight: This represents Leq of night time. Lnight is calculated as Logarithmic average using the hourly Leq’s for nighttime hours from 10.00p.m to 6.00a.m.

3.6.4 Noise Results

The values of noise level parameters like Leq (day), and Leq (night), were monitored during study period and are presented in Table below


Table 3.8: Ambient Noise Level in the Study Area

Time Project

Site

Kesartagi Tanda Near

Panchyat Office

Nandikur Tanda Near

Panchyat Office

Aiwani shahi Area Near

Shambhognlli Village

Near Shree Mouneshwara

Temple ,Kusnoor Village

Daryanayak Tanda Near

Srinivas Saradgi

Bobnayak Tanda , Zhapur

Near Panchyat

Office

Hire Nandoor

Martur Village Near

Panchyat Office

Sirnoor Village

6:00 AM 41.3 50.1 45.6 43.2 49.2 41.2 42.9 46.8 44.5 45.1

7:00 AM 42.4 52.3 47.6 44.5 51.6 42.5 44.5 47.9 45.6 46.2

8:00 AM 43.5 53.5 48.6 45.6 52.6 43.2 45.3 48.9 47.6 47.6

9:00 AM 44.2 54.2 48.9 47.2 53.5 44.5 46.8 51.3 49.8 48.2

10:00 AM 45.1 53.6 51.6 49.6 54.8 45.2 48.9 52.4 51.6 49.2

11:00 AM 45.6 54.2 52.6 52.1 55.6 46.5 51.3 54.6 52.8 51.2

12:00 PM 46.5 54.6 54.2 53.9 56.1 48.9 52.6 55.6 54.6 52.6

1:00 PM 47.8 53.9 54.6 54.3 55.2 51.8 53.5 56.8 55.8 53.4

2:00 PM 46.6 52.6 55.2 53.6 54.3 52.5 54.2 57.6 54.3 54.2

3:00 PM 48.9 54.6 56.1 52.9 55.2 54.6 55.3 56.5 53.4 55.2

4:00 PM 50.1 55.6 55.3 53.8 54.3 53.2 54.3 54.3 52.6 54.2

5:00 PM 48.9 56.4 53.4 53.5 53.5 54.3 53.8 56.4 51.8 53.5

6:00 PM 51.2 55.2 52.6 54.2 54.3 55.3 52.7 55.3 52.6 52.4

7:00 PM 49.3 53.1 51.6 53.9 55.6 54.2 51.2 53.1 51.6 51.8

8:00 PM 50.1 52.1 50.2 52.6 55.2 53.5 49.8 52.9 52.1 50.6

9:00 PM 48.5 50.3 48.6 49.2 52.8 51.2 47.6 50.6 50.3 49.2

10:00 PM 46.2 47.6 44.6 47.1 48.9 47.5 46.5 47.6 48.6 47.2

11:00PM 44.2 46.2 45.2 46.5 47.6 46.5 45.1 46.5 46.7 46.5

12:00 AM 43.5 45.3 44.3 45.3 45.2 45.2 44.5 45.2 45.2 44.2

1:00 AM 42.6 43.5 43.4 44.2 44.2 44.2 43.6 44.5 44.3 43.2


Time Project

Site

Kesartagi Tanda Near

Panchyat Office

Nandikur Tanda Near

Panchyat Office

Aiwani shahi Area Near

Shambhognlli Village

Near Shree Mouneshwara

Temple ,Kusnoor Village

Daryanayak Tanda Near

Srinivas Saradgi

Bobnayak Tanda , Zhapur

Near Panchyat

Office

Hire Nandoor

Martur Village Near

Panchyat Office

Sirnoor Village

2:00 AM 42.1 42.1 42.6 43.2 43.2 43.5 42.5 43.1 42.1 42.2

3:00 AM 41.3 41.6 41.2 42.5 41.9 42.1 41.6 42.1 41.5 41.2

4:00 AM 41.2 40.6 41.5 41.2 41.5 41.5 40.6 41.6 40.2 41

5:00 AM 41.1 40.2 40.5 40.1 40.2 41.2 40.2 42.6 40.7 40.5

Ldn 46.7 52.3 51.1 50.6 52.8 50.2 50.2 52.7 50.8 50.4 Leq(d) 47.7 53.8 52.6 52.1 54.3 51.6 51.6 54.2 52.2 51.8

Leq(n) 43.1 44.2 43.2 44.4 45.0 44.5 43.6 44.6 44.6 43.9

L10 49.9 55.0 55.0 53.9 55.5 54.3 54.1 56.5 54.0 54.0 L50 45.4 52.5 48.8 48.2 53.2 46.5 47.2 51.0 50.1 48.7 L90 41.3 41.8 41.8 42.7 42.3 41.7 41.9 42.8 41.7 41.5

Lmax 51.2 56.4 56.1 54.3 56.1 55.3 55.3 57.6 55.8 55.2

Lmin 41.1 40.2 40.5 40.1 40.2 41.2 40.2 41.6 40.2 40.5


S. No.

Location CodeLeq

(day) Leq

(night) Remarks

1 Project Site N1 47.7 43.1 Within Limits 2 Kesartagi Tanda Village N2 53.8 44.2 Within Limits 3 Nandikur Tanda Village N3 52.6 43.2 Within Limits

4 Aiwani shahi Area Near Shambhognlli Village

N4 52.1

44.4 Within Limits

5 Near Shree Mouneshwara Temple, Kusnoor Village

N5 54.3

45.0 Within Limits

6 Daryanayak Tanda Near Srinivas Saradgi N6 51.6 44.5 Within Limits 7 Bobnayak Tanda , Zhapur Village N7 51.6 43.6 Within Limits 8 Hire Nandoor N8 54.2 44.6 Within Limits

9 Martur Village N9 52.2 46.2

Night time above Limits

10 Sirnoor Village N10 51.8 43.9 Within Limits The daytime varied from 47.7 dB (A) Leq to 54.2 dB (A) Leq and night time noise varied of 43.1 dB (A) Leq to 46.2 dB (A) Leq. Both daytime noise and night time noise was within the limit except Martur Village during night time.

Noise Standards Ambient air quality standard in respect of noise have been stipulated by Govt. of India vide Gazette notification dated. 14.2.2000. Table 3.9 describes ambient noise standards. In Respect of Noise*

Table 3.9: Ambient Noise Standards

Area Code Category of AreaLimits in dB(A), Leq

** Day time #Night time A Industrial Area 75 70 B Commercial Area 65 55 C Residential Area 55 45 D Silence Zone @ 50 40

* As per Environment protection act. ** Day Time: 6.00a.m to 10.00p.m. # Night Time: 10.00p.m to 6.00a.m. @ Silence zone is defined as an area upto 100 meters around such premises as hospitals, educational institutions and courts. The silence zones are to be declared by the competent authority; Use of horns, loudspeakers and bursting of crackers shall be banned in these zones.


3.7 Water Environment

3.7.1 Ground Water Hydrology

Hydro-geologically the weathered and fractured zones of crystalline constitute the predominant hydro-geological units. Groundwater occurs under phreatic condition in the weathered horizons. Highly weathered and jointed granitic gneisses occurring the undulating plains form the potential aquifers in the hard rock terrain. Micaschists and shales having very thick weathered residuum also sometimes form good shallow aquifers to be tapped through dug wells.

3.7.2 Selection of Sampling Locations

The assessment of present status of water quality within the study area was conducted by collecting water from ground water sources and surface water sources during Monitoring Period. The sampling locations were identified on the basis of their importance. 11 ground water samples and 3 surface water samples were collected during monitoring period. The locations of sampling stations for ground water and surface water are shown in Figure 3.2. Details of sampling locations, their distance and direction from the plant site are presented in Table 3.10.

Table 3.10: Water Quality Sampling Locations

SN Location Location Code Distance, Km Direction

1 Project site GW1 0.1 Km -- 2 Kesartagi Tanda Village Near

Panchayat Office GW2

3.20 km Towards NW

3 Nandikur Tanda Village Near Panchayat Office

GW3 6.72 Km Towards NW

4 Aiwani shahi Area Near Shambhognlli Village

GW4 7.48 Km Towards NW


GW5 4.52 Km

Towards North

6 Daryanayak Tanda Near Srinivas Saradgi

GW6 7.37 Km Towards NE

7 Bobnayak Tanda , Zhapur Village Near Panchayat Office

GW7 4.11 Km Towards NE

8 Hire Nandoor Near Panchayat Office GW8 2.09 Km Towards SE 9 Martur Village Near Panchayat

Office GW9

5.45 Km Towards SE

10 Sirnoor Village GW10 9.08 Km Towards SW


11 Khandal Village GW11 3.65 Km Towards SW

12 Pala kere SW1 7.03 Km Towards NE 13 Basaweshawa Lake SW2 7.83 Km Towards SE 14 Appana Kere SW3 9.20 Km Towards NW

3.7.3 Methodology

Water samples were collected from all the sampling locations and analyzed for relevant physical, chemical and bacteriological parameters. Collection and analysis of the samples was carried out as per established standard methods and procedures, prescribed by CPCB, relevant IS Codes and Standard Methods of Examination of Water. This report presents data for the Monitoring Period. Analyses of the parameters like temperature; pH, dissolved oxygen and alkalinity were carried out at the sampling stations immediately after collection of samples with the help of Field Analysis Kits. For analysis of other parameters, the samples were preserved and brought to laboratory. The metallic constituents like arsenic, mercury, lead, cadmium, chromium, copper, zinc, selenium, iron and manganese were analyzed with Atomic Absorption Spectroscope.

3.7.4 Ground and Surface Water Quality

The analysis data for the monitoring period is presented in Table 3.11 and Table 3.12. The physico-chemical characteristics of Ground water are confirming to permissible limits of drinking water standards, prescribed in IS: 10500 (Test Characteristics for Drinking Water) and suitable for consumption. Central Pollution Control Board Classifications of Surface Water Quality: A – Drinking water without conventional treatment but after disinfection B – Outdoor bathing (organized) C – Drinking water source with conventional treatment followed by disinfection D – Propagation of wild life, fisheries E – Irrigation, industrial, cooling, controlled waste disposal The analysis result for ground water samples were within drinking water limit as per IS 10500: 2012. The surface water was compared with CPCB classification and it was identified within limits of Class E


Table 3.11: Surface Water Characteristics

Sr. No.

Test Parameter Test Method SW1 SW2 SW3 Unit

1. Colour* IS 3025 (Part 04) : 1983 BDL[DL=5] BDL[DL=5] BDL[DL=5] Hazen 2. Odor* IS 3025 (Part 05) : 1983 Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable - 3. Temperature IS 3025 (Part 09) : 1984 27.2 27.2 26.9 0C 4. Turbidity* IS 3025 (Part 10) : 1984 1.2 1.4 1.6 NTU 5. pH IS 3025 (Part 11) :1983 8.0 8.0 8.1 - 6. Electrical Conductivity IS 3025 (Part 14) : 1984 595 748 1409 µS/cm 7. Total Dissolved Solids IS 3025 (Part 16) : 1984 394 486 916 mg/L 8. Total Hardness as CaCO3 IS 3025 (Part 21) : 2009 230 286 486 mg/L 9. Ammonical Nitrogen as NH3-N IS 3025 (Part 34) : 1988 BDL[DL=0.1] BDL[DL=0.1] BDL[DL=0.1] mg/L

10. Nitrates as NO3- -N IS 3025 (Part 34) : 1988 0.8 2.1 3.7 mg/L

11. Nitrite as NO2- -N IS 3025 (Part 34) : 1988 BDL[DL=0.001] BDL[DL=0.001] BDL[DL=0.001] mg/L

12. Phosphates as PO43- APHA 4500 P E, 22nd Ed. BDL[DL=0.03] BDL[DL=0.03] BDL[DL=0.03] mg/L

13. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (270C, 3Days)

IS 3025 (Part 44) : 1993 35 38.2 45 mg/L

14. Chemical Oxygen Demand IS 3025 (Part 58) : 2006 152 160 180 mg/L 15. Dissolved Oxygen IS 3025 (Part 38) : 1989 4.4 4.1 3.9 mg/L 16. Potassium as K* IS 3025 (Part 45) : 1993 2.5 2.0 4.1 mg/L 17. Sodium as Na* IS 3025 (Part 45) : 1993 46.8 55.4 140 mg/L 18. Calcium as Ca IS 3025 (Part 40) : 1991 46 63 116 mg/L 19. Magnesium as Mg IS 3025 (Part 46) : 1994 28 31 48 mg/L 20. Carbonates (CO3

-2) as CaCO3* IS 3025 (Part 51) : 2001 BDL[DL=1] BDL[DL=1] BDL[DL=1] mg/L 21. Bicarbonates as (HCO3

-) as CaCO3* IS 3025 (Part 51) : 2001 136 190 198 mg/L 22. Chlorides as Cl- IS 3025 (Part 32) : 1988 77 89 233 mg/L 23. Sulphates as SO4

2- APHA 4500- SO42- E, 22nd Ed. 104 114 240 mg/L

24. Fluoride as F- APHA 4500-F- B-D, 22nd Ed. 0.4 0.3 0.5 mg/L 25. Boron as B APHA 4500-B B, 22nd Ed. 0.2 0.1 0.2 mg/L 26. Iron as Fe IS 3025 (Part 53) : 2003 BDL[DL=0.06] BDL[DL=0.06] BDL[DL=0.06] mg/L 27. Zinc as Zn IS 3025 (Part 49) : 1994 BDL[DL=0.02] BDL[DL=0.02] BDL[DL=0.02] mg/L 28. Total Coliform Bacteria* IS 1622 : 1981 1600 1600 1600 MPN/100 ml 29. Fecal coliform* IS 1622 : 1981 50 23 50 MPN/100 ml 30. E. Coli* IS 1622 : 1981 Present Present Present -

DL-Detection Limit BDL-Below Detection Limit


Table 3.12: Ground Water Characteristic

SN Test Parameter Test Method GW1 GW2 GW3 GW4 GW5 Acceptable Permissible

1 Colour* IS 3025 (Part

04) : 1983 BDL[DL=5] BDL[DL=5] BDL[DL=5] BDL[DL=5] BDL[DL=5] 5 15

2 Odor* IS 3025 (Part

05) : 1983 Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable

3 pH IS 3025 (Part

11) :1983 7.6 7.4 7.3 7.4 7.2 6.5-8.5 No relaxation

4 Turbidity* IS 3025 (Part

10) : 1984 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 1 5

5 Temperature IS 3025 (Part

09) : 1984 27.1 27.0 26.9 27.3 26.7 -- --

6 Electrical

Conductivity IS 3025 (Part

14) : 1984 1043 886 1240 742 3224 -- --

7 Total Dissolved

Solids IS 3025 (Part

16) : 1984 678 576 806 482 2096 500 2000

8 Total Hardness as

CaCO3 IS 3025 (Part

21) : 2009 386 312 446 252 1060 200 600

9 Chlorides as Cl- IS 3025 (Part

32) : 1988 155 130 195 103 592 250 1000

10 Sulphates as SO42-

APHA 4500- SO4

2- E, 22nd Ed.

162 139 190 110 452 200 400

11 Nitrates as NO3- -N

IS 3025 (Part 34) : 1988

4.1 2.0 2.6 1.4 5.4 45 No relaxation

12 Carbonates (CO3

-2) as CaCO3*

IS 3025 (Part 51) : 2001

BDL[DL=1] BDL[DL=1] BDL[DL=1] BDL[DL=1] BDL[DL=1] 200 600

13 Calcium as Ca IS 3025 (Part

40) : 1991 90 70 109 55 277 75 200

14 Magnesium as Mg IS 3025 (Part

46) : 1994 39 34 42 28 90 30 100

15 Sodium as Na* IS 3025 (Part

45) : 1993 90.3 79.6 117 65.3 355 -- --

16 Potassium as K* IS 3025 (Part

45) : 1993 2.3 3.4 3.8 4.0 16.2 -- --


SN Test Parameter Test Method GW1 GW2 GW3 GW4 GW5 Acceptable Permissible

17 Fluoride as F- APHA 4500-F- B-D, 22nd Ed.

0.6 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.7 1 1.5

18 Iron as Fe IS 3025 (Part

53) : 2003 BDL[DL=0.06] BDL[DL=0.06] BDL[DL=0.06] BDL[DL=0.06] BDL[DL=0.06] 0.3 No relaxation

19 Zinc as Zn IS 3025 (Part

49) : 1994 BDL[DL=0.02] BDL[DL=0.02] BDL[DL=0.02] BDL[DL=0.02] BDL[DL=0.02] 5000 15000

20 Boron as B APHA 4500-B

B, 22nd Ed. BDL[DL=0.1] BDL[DL=0.1] BDL[DL=0.1] BDL[DL=0.1] 0.1 5000 1000

21 Total Coliform

Bacteria* IS 1622 : 1981 21 14 17 13 13 -- --

22 Fecal coliform* IS 1622 : 1981 9 BDL[DL=2] 4 BDL[DL=2] 6 -- -- 23. E. Coli* IS 1622 : 1981 Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent -- --


SN Test

Parameter Test Method GW6 GW7 GW8 GW9 GW10 GW11 Acceptable Permissible

1 Colour* IS 3025 (Part 04)

: 1983 BDL[DL=5] BDL[DL=5] BDL[DL=5] BDL[DL=5] BDL[DL=5] BDL[DL=5]

5 15

2 Odor* IS 3025 (Part 05)

: 1983 Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable

Agreeable Agreeable

3 pH IS 3025 (Part 11)

:1983 8.0 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.3 7.2

6.5-8.5 No

relaxation

4 Turbidity* IS 3025 (Part 10)

: 1984 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.2

1 5

5 Temperature IS 3025 (Part 09)

: 1984 26.8 26.7 26.6 26.8 27.0 26.9 -- --

6 Electrical Conductivity

IS 3025 (Part 14) : 1984

520 1840 1772 971 1159 1741 -- --

7 Total Dissolved Solids

IS 3025 (Part 16) : 1984

338 1196 1152 688 796 1132 500 2000

8 Total Hardness as CaCO3

IS 3025 (Part 21) : 2009

190 632 660 364 426 632 200 600


SN Test

Parameter Test Method GW6 GW7 GW8 GW9 GW10 GW11 Acceptable Permissible

9 Chlorides as Cl-

IS 3025 (Part 32) : 1988

68 302 266 148 182 269 250 1000

10 Sulphates as SO4

2- APHA 4500-

SO42- E, 22nd Ed.

98 315 284 142 176 245 200 400

11 Nitrates as NO3

- -N IS 3025 (Part 34)

: 1988 2.9 2.8 3.7 2.3 2.0 4.8 45

No relaxation

12 Carbonates (CO3

-2) as CaCO3*

IS 3025 (Part 51) : 2001

BDL[DL=1] BDL[DL=1] BDL[DL=1] BDL[DL=1] BDL[DL=1] BDL[DL=1] 200 600

13 Calcium as Ca IS 3025 (Part 40)

: 1991 56 154 133 89 106 159

75 200

14 Magnesium as Mg

IS 3025 (Part 46) : 1994

12 60 80 35 39 57 30 100

15 Sodium as Na*

IS 3025 (Part 45) : 1993

41.2 184 160 88.6 110 162 -- --

16 Potassium as K*

IS 3025 (Part 45) : 1993

1.5 3.5 7.8 2.4 7.3 6.8 -- --

17 Fluoride as F- APHA 4500-F- B-D, 22nd Ed.

0.3 0.5 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.6 1 1.5

18 Iron as Fe IS 3025 (Part 53)

: 2003 BDL[DL=0.06] BDL[DL=0.06] BDL[DL=0.06] BDL[DL=0.06] BDL[DL=0.06] BDL[DL=0.06] 0.3

No relaxation

19 Zinc as Zn IS 3025 (Part 49)

: 1994 BDL[DL=0.02] BDL[DL=0.02] BDL[DL=0.02] BDL[DL=0.02] BDL[DL=0.02] BDL[DL=0.02] 5000 15000

20 Boron as B APHA 4500-B

B, 22nd Ed. BDL[DL=0.1] 0.1 0.2 BDL[DL=0.1] BDL[DL=0.1] 0.2 5000 1000

21 Total Coliform Bacteria*

IS 1622 : 1981 12 9 11 14 22 23 -- --

22 Fecal coliform*

IS 1622 : 1981 BDL[DL=2] BDL[DL=2] BDL[DL=2] BDL[DL=2] BDL[DL=2] 4

-- --

23. E. Coli* IS 1622 : 1981 Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent

-- --



3.8 Soil

Soil is generally differentiated into two horizons of minerals and organic constituents of variable depth, which differ from the parent material below in morphology, physical properties, constituents, chemical properties, and composition and biological characteristics. The physico- chemical characteristics of soil have been determined at 6 locations during the monitoring period with respect to colour, texture, cation exchange capacity, pH, N, P, and K etc. The sampling locations have been selected to represent the study area.

3.8.1 Selection of sampling Locations

The soil sampling locations were identified primarily based on the local distribution of vegetation and the agricultural practices. The sampling locations were mainly selected from agricultural field and project site. The sampling locations are given in Table 3.13 and presented in Figure 3.2.

Table 3.13A: Soil Sampling Stations in the Study Area

Code Locations Direction Distance in (km) S1 Project Site -- --

S2 Kesartagi Tanda Village 3.09 Km Towards NW

S3 Nandikur Tanda Village 6.78 Km Towards NW

S4 Aiwani shahi Area Near Shambhognlli Village 7.50 Km Towards NW

S5 Near Shree Mouneshwara Temple ,Kusnoor Village

4.62 Km Towards North

S6 Daryanayak Tanda Near Srinivas Saradgi 7.47 Km Towards NE

S7 Bobnayak Tanda , Zhapur Village 4.07 Km Towards NE

S8 Hire Nandoor 2.21 Km Towards SE

S9 Martur Village 5.40 km Towards SE

S10 Sirnoor Village 9.02 Km Towards SW

S11 Khandal Village 3.54 Km Towards SW


Table 3.13B: Soil Sampling Chart

S.N. Soil Test Parameters Classification 1 pH <4.5 Extremely acidic

4.51-5.00 Very strongly acidic 5.00-5.50 slightly acidic 5.51-6.0 moderately acidic 6.01-6.50 slightly acidic 6.51-7.30 Neutral 7.31-7.80 slightly alkaline 7.81-8.50 moderately alkaline 8.51-9.0 strongly alkaline 9.01 very strongly alkaline

2 Salinity Electrical Conductivity (mmhos/cm) (1 ppm = 640 mhos/cm)

Upto 1.00 Average 1.01-2.00 harmful to germination 2.01-3.00 harmful to crops (sensitive to salts)

3 Organic Carbon Upto 0.2: very less 0.21-0.4: less 0.41-0.5 medium, 0.51-0.8: on an average sufficient 0.81-1.00: sufficient >1.0 more than sufficient

4 Nitrogen (kg/ha) Upto 50 very less 51-100 less 101-150 good 151-300 Better >300 sufficient

5 Phosphorus (kg/ha) Upto 15 very less 16-30 less 31-50 medium, 51-65 on an average sufficient 66-80 sufficient >80 more than sufficient

6 Potash (kg/ha) 0-120 very less 120-180 less 181-240 medium 241-300 average 301-360 better >360 more than sufficient


3.8.2 Methodology

The soil samples were collected during monitoring period. The samples collected from the all locations are homogeneous representative of each location. At random 11 sub locations were identified at each location and soil was dug from 30 cm below the surface. It was uniformly mixed before homogenizing the soil samples. The samples were filled in polythene bags, labeled in the field with number and site name and sent to laboratory for analysis.


3.8.3 Soil Results

The detailed soil results of all the monitoring locations are as shown in Table 3.14. Table 3.14: Chemical Characteristics of Soil in the Study Area

SN Test Parameter Test Method S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 Unit 1. Color* - Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown -

2. pH(1:2.5 Soil: Water)

IS 2720 (Part 26) 1987

7.7 7.8 7.8 8.0 8.1 7.8 -

3.

Electrical Conductivity (1:2 Soil: Water Extract)

IS :14767-2000 0.137 0.119 0.099 0.158 0.120 0.141 ms/cm

4. Bulk Density UT/LQMS/SOP/S03 1157 1159 1117 1156 1162 1158 kg/m3

5. Organic Matter IS 2720 (Part 22) :

1972 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.2 %

6. Total Organic Carbon

IS 2720 (Part 22) : 1972

0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 %

7. Cation Exchange Capacity

UT/LQMS/SOP/S18 35.9 32.9 29.7 51.3 28.6 40.8 meq/100

g

8. Sodium as Na (Exchangeable)

UT/LQMS/SOP/S13 3.2 3.1 4.3 7.5 0.7 4.0 meq/100

g

9. Potassium as K (Exchangeable)

UT/LQMS/SOP/S14 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 meq/100

g

10. Calcium as Ca (Exchangeable)

UT/LQMS/SOP/S15 21.6 23.6 18.5 26.7 18.5 25.7 meq/100

g

11. Magnesium as Mg (Exchangeable)

UT/LQMS/SOP/S16 9.3 4.1 4.1 13.4 6.2 9.3 meq/100

g

12. Available Phosphorus as P2O5

UT/LQMS/SOP/S28 9 BDL[DL=5] 5 6 6 7 kg/ha

13. Available Potassium as K2O

UT/LQMS/SOP/S29 223 202 202 167 237 187 kg/ha

14. Available Nitrogen as N

UT/LQMS/SOP/S30 215 237 241 165 198 150 kg/ha


SN Test Parameter Test Method S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 Unit

15. Cadmium as Cd UT/LQMS/SOP/S35

& S37 BDL[DL=2] BDL[DL=2] BDL[DL=2] BDL[DL=2] BDL[DL=2] BDL[DL=2] mg/kg

16. Chromium as Cr UT/LQMS/SOP/S35


17. Copper as Cu UT/LQMS/SOP/S35

& S37 13 12 11 14 9 13 mg/kg

18. Iron as Fe UT/LQMS/SOP/S35

& S37 48579 45989 40592 48543 40143 44352 mg/kg

19. Lead as Pb UT/LQMS/SOP/S35


20. Manganese as Mn

UT/LQMS/SOP/S35 & S37

1805 1577 1102 1501 1440 1577 mg/kg

21. Nickel as Ni UT/LQMS/SOP/S35


22. Zinc as Zn UT/LQMS/SOP/S35

& S37 98 75 101 134 121 99 mg/kg

Sr. No. Test

Parameter Test Method

S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 Unit

1. Color* - Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown -

2. pH(1:2.5 Soil: Water)

IS 2720 (Part 26) 1987

7.9 7.6 7.6 7.9 8.1 -

3.

Electrical Conductivity (1:2 Soil: Water Extract)

IS :14767-2000 0.092 0.152 0.142 0.139 0.131 ms/cm

4. Bulk Density UT/LQMS/SOP/S03 1162 1172 1171 1121 1120 kg/m3

5. Organic Matter IS 2720 (Part 22) :

1972 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.4 %

6. Total Organic Carbon

IS 2720 (Part 22) : 1972

0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 %

7. Cation Exchange Capacity

UT/LQMS/SOP/S18 23.5 52.9 40.8 37.0 31.4 meq/100g

8. Sodium as Na (Exchangeable)

UT/LQMS/SOP/S13 3.7 8.6 5.4 6.1 3.4 meq/100g

9. Potassium as K UT/LQMS/SOP/S14 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 meq/100g


Sr. No. Test

Parameter Test Method

S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 Unit

(Exchangeable)

10. Calcium as Ca (Exchangeable)

UT/LQMS/SOP/S15 14.4 28.8 25.7 25.7 19.5 meq/100g

11. Magnesium as Mg (Exchangeable)

UT/LQMS/SOP/S16 4.1 14.4 7.2 3.1 7.2 meq/100g

12. Available Phosphorus as P2O5

UT/LQMS/SOP/S28 BDL[DL=5] 8 8 7 6 kg/ha

13. Available Potassium as K2O

UT/LQMS/SOP/S29 152 218 218 192 207 kg/ha

14. Available Nitrogen as N

UT/LQMS/SOP/S30 111 152 236 229 231 kg/ha

15. Cadmium as Cd UT/LQMS/SOP/S35

& S37 BDL[DL=2] BDL[DL=2] BDL[DL=2] BDL[DL=2] BDL[DL=2] mg/kg

16. Chromium as Cr


BDL[DL=5] BDL[DL=5] BDL[DL=5] BDL[DL=5] BDL[DL=5] mg/kg

17. Copper as Cu UT/LQMS/SOP/S35

& S37 11 10 7 5 6 mg/kg

18. Iron as Fe UT/LQMS/SOP/S35

& S37 46792 39543 47612 42539 38534 mg/kg

19. Lead as Pb UT/LQMS/SOP/S35


20. Manganese as Mn


1772 1477 1325 1007 908 mg/kg

21. Nickel as Ni UT/LQMS/SOP/S35


22. Zinc as Zn UT/LQMS/SOP/S35

& S37 110 64 105 99 70 mg/kg


3.9 Biological Environment

3.9.1 Preamble

In view of the need for conservation of environmental quality and biodiversity, study of biological environment is one of the most important aspects for Environmental Impact Assessment. Ecological systems show complex inter-relationships between biotic and abiotic components viz. physical and chemical sectionsof the environment. Generally, biological communities are the indicators of climatic and edaphic factors. The biological environment includes components including dependence, competition and mutualism. Biotic components comprises of both plant and animal communities, which interact not only within and between them but mainly terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. The term “habitat” has been used in broad sense for the general land cover and physiognomy for a particular species. The informationon prevailing baselineinthe proposed project site is important because project activities might lead to loss of the ecological resources, if existing. The information will further enable to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the mitigation options that are being proposed by environmentalist and conservationist to incorporate conservation concerns in mitigating the impacts of developmentalproject.

3.9.2 Objectives

The present study was undertaken with the following objectives: To assess the nature and distribution of vegetation in and around the project site

To evaluate the distribution of animal life spectra, including avifauna and butterflies, available in this area

To ascertain whether the proposed project will have any adverse impact on the ecology in and around project areas, and suggest mitigation measures, if needed

3.9.3 Survey Methodology

Sampling locations were identified for study on biological environment based on topography, vegetation structure, pattern and distribution. The observations were taken from different villages along agricultural field, marshy land, waste land, riverside vegetation and built up and according to the objectives delineated for environmental impact Assessment studies.

3.9.4 Study Area

The proposed project is located at village: Nandur-Kesartagi, Nandur-Kesartagi 2nd Phase Industrial Area, Taluka Gulbarga & District.- Kalaburgi, Karnataka. As per guidelines of MoEF


for Environmental Impact Assessment, the study area was restricted up to 10 km periphery of the project site. All observations were undertaken at selected sampling locations.

Gulbarga District: The geographical regionof Gulbarga district is characterized byblack cotton soil, expanses of flat treeless surface, a range of hills covering a surface of about 60 miles and same lower belts following the main rivers. The district is devoid of forest except in the hilly portion of Aland and Chincholi. The area under forest is 4.2% of the total area. The district is a draught prone area. The average rainfall is 777 mm and the normal rainy days are 46 in a year. The average temperature ranges between 420C in summer to 260C in winter. The period from December to May is the driest part of the year.

Figure 3.4: Study Area for Biological Environment

3.9.5 Biodiversity

Project site A. Terrestrial Ecology:

There are no forests in this study area. It is all covered with dry cultivation land and tillage. Further this regionis devoid of any thick vegetation except scattered thorny bushes and open scrub. Due to poor rain fall of the area, the natural vegetation is sparse and thorny.


There are small scrubs and trees in the area. The project area is totally denuded with limited presence of Neem trees (Azadirachtaindica) and sporadic presence of Prosopisjuliflora–SarkarThumma or Vilayati babul was found. B. Buffer area Dominant families of plants recorded in the study area are Mimosaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Cucurbitaceae and Papilionaceae. The area showed overall 40 plant species belong to 25 families. A list of dominant flora observed in study area is given in Table 3.15

Table 3.15: List of Dominant Flora Observed in Study Area

Sr.No. Scientific Name FamilyName CommonName

Trees

1. Acaciaauriculiformis Mimosaceae Earleaf Acacia

2. Acaciachundra Mimosaceae Chundra 3. Acaciaferruginea Mimosaceae Lakkigida 4. Acacianilotica Mimosaceae Babul 5. Ailanthusexcelsa Meliaceae Kudrebevu/Mahanimb 6. Albizzialebbeck Mimosaceae Bage 7. Annonareticulate Annonaceae Rampal 8. Anogeissuslatifolia Combretaceae Dindiga 9. *Azadirachtaindica Meliaceae Neem/Bevu 10. Buteamonosperma Fabaceae Muthuga/Palash 11. Chloroxylonswietenia Meliaceae Mashiwal 12. Citrussp. Rutaceae Nimbe 13. Dodoneaviscoa Sapindaceae Banarike 14. Emblicaofficinalis Euphorbiaceae Nelli/Amla 15. Ficusbenghalensis Moraceae Banyan, Ala 16. Ficusreligiosa Moraceae Pipal, Arali 17. Gliricidiasepium Papilionaceae GobbaraaGidda 18. Holopteliaintegrifolia Urticaceae Tapasi/Nemalinara 19. Mangiferaindica Anacardiaceae Mango 20. Phoenix dactylifera Palmae Ichalu; Khajur 21. Pongamiapinnata Fabaceae Karanj 22. *Proposisjuliflora Mimosaceae Simejali/Thumma 23. Samaneasaman Ceasalpinaceae Rain tree 24. Syzgiumcumnii Myrtaceae Jamun, Neralu 25. Tamarindusindica Cesalpinaceae Tamarind, Hunise, 26. Vitexnegundo Verbenaceae Nirgundi Shrubs 1. Calotropisgigantea Asclepidiaceae Ekkadagidda 2. Euphorbia tirucalli Euphorbiaceae Kalli


3. Cassia auriculata Casealpinaceae Matura tea tree, Thangadi

4. Lantana camara Verbenaceae Lantana 5. Opuntiadillenii Papakalli Cactaceae 6. Ziziphusjujuba Rhamnaceae Ber/Bare hannu

Herbs 1. Musa paradisiaca Musaceae Banana 2. Tridaxprocumbens Asteraceae Mexican daisy 3. Argemonemexicana Papaveraceae Mexican poppy 4. Andropogon sorghum Graminae Sorghum/Jowar

Grass

1. Cymbopogoncoloratus Poaceae Bodha grass 2. Cynodondactylon Poaceae Nut grass 3. Bambusabambos Poaceae Bamboo, Bans 4. Oryza sativa Poaceae/Graminae Rice /Paddy

b) Fauna Methodology Field observations of fauna were carried out. The commonly available mammals, avifauna, reptiles, amphibians within 10 km surroundings were enumerated. Observation Vertebrates Mammals The domestic animals in the study area mostly comprise of dog, cat,monkey and squirrel. The survey revealed that 7 species of mammals were recorded in and around the study area. Three species of reptiles were recorded. None of these animals are endangered (Schedule I) as per Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972. Avifauna Birds were studied by direct observation with the help of ‘‘Olympus 10 x 50 DPS I’’ binocular and were identified by adopting available literature (Grimmettet al. 1998). During the survey, 24 species of birds were noticed. The dominant birds were little Indian myna, house crow, Koel, Small Green Bee-eater etc. It has been observed that the majority of birds were insectivorous in habit preferring insects, worms and arachnids. None of these birds are endangered (Schedule I) as per Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972. Table 3.16

Table 3.16: Fauna recorded in the study area up to 10 km periphery

No. Common Name Scientific Name Status as per International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)

Mammals 1. Common dog Canis lupus familiaris Not enlisted


B) Aquatic: Primary data Phytoplankton and zooplankton sample was collectedfrom 03 water bodies (Pala kere, Basaweshwara kere and Appana kere) from surroundings of the project site. Samples from these water bodies were collected from surface Sampling To enumerate phytoplankton, unfiltered surface waters were collected from the water bodies. Phytoplankton samples were immediately fixed in 2% Lugol’s iodine solution so as to prevent adverse effects of light and temperature which might cause rapid decay of organisms (APHA 2005). Using Sedgwick Rafter chamber 1 ml of above concentrated sample was taken for taxonomic identification and enumeration under

2. Common cat Felissilvestriscatus Not enlisted 3. Squirrel Funambuluspalmarum Sch-IV 4. Cow Bostaurus Not enlisted 5. Bandicoot Rat Bandicotabengalensis Sch-V

6. Indian grey mongoose Herpestesedwardsii Sch – II 7. Rhesus macaque Macacamulatta Least Concern

Reptiles 1. Cobra Najanaja Sch-II 2. Rat snake Ptyasmucosus Sch-II 3. Rock lizard Psmmophilusblanfordanus Not enlisted

Avifauna 1. Bank Myna Acridotheresginginianus Sch-IV 2. Barn Owl Tyto alba Sch-IV 3. Baya weaver bird Ploceusphilippinus Sch-IV

4. Black drongo Dicrurusadsimilis Sch-IV 5. Blue-rock pigeon Columbia livia Sch-V 6. Cattle-Egret Bulbulcus ibis Sch-IV

7. Comb duck Sarkidiornismelanotos Sch-IV 8. Grey jungle Fowl Gallus sonneratii Sch-II 9. House crow Corvussplendens Sch-V

10. House sparrow Passer domesticus Sch-IV 11. House Swift Apusaffinis Sch-IV 12. Indian Jungle crow Corvusmacrorhynchos Sch-IV

13. Indian myna Acridotherestristis Sch-IV 14. Indian Roof Heron Egrettagularis Sch-IV 15. Jungle Bush Quail Perdiculaasiatica Sch-IV 16. Koel Eudynamysscolopaeca Sch-IV

17. Little Egret Egrettagarzetta Sch-IV 18. Red jungle Fowl Gallus gallus Sch-IV 19. Red-Vented bulbul Pycnonotuscafer Sch-IV

20. Rose-Ringed Parakeet Psittaculakrameri Sch-IV 21. Small blue king fisher Alcedoatthis Sch-IV 22. Small Green Bee-eater Meropsorientalis Sch-IV

23. Spotted dove Streptopeliachinensis Sch-IV 24. Spotted Munia Lonchurapunctulata Sch-IV


compound microscope. Phytoplankton were identified up to genera level using standard taxonomic keys.For zooplankton, about 40 liter water was filtered through plankton net having mesh size of 75µ to represent all the available groups. The samples were fixed immediately with 5 % buffered formalin and subsequently analysed under microscope in the laboratory with the help of Sedgwick rafter cell.

Table 3.17: Details of sampling locations

Station Location Aerial distance from project site (in km.)

Direction

1 Pala Kere 6.8 NE 2 Basaweshwara kere 7.8 SE 3 Appana kere/ Gulbarga kere 8.7 NW

Figure 3.5: Sampling location of phytoplankton and zooplankton

a) Phytoplankton Phytoplankton counts, recorded at different sampling stations, are presented in Table 3.18.Total algal population varied between 102 and 192 cells ml-1. Altogether 14 genera of phytoplankton were recorded Amongst 4 groups, Cyanophyceae and Chlorophyceae dominated in the water bodies. Chlorophyceae dominated in the Pala kere and Basaweshwara kere, whereas Cyanophyceae governed in the Appana kere. Ankistrodesmus sp. and Scenedesmus sp.were the dominant Chlorophyceae encounteredin this area. InCyanophyceae, Microcystis sp. and Spirulina sp. were the dominant species found in this water bodies.


Table 3.18: Enumeration of Phytoplankton at different locations

Phytoplankton Station Name of

sampling locations

Phyto plankton (No/ml)

Percent composition of algal groups Cyano-phyceae

Chlro- phyceae

Bacillario-phyceae

Eugleno-phyceae

1 Pala Kere 102 28 61 6 5 2 Basaweshwara

kere 192 30 55 9 6

3 Appana kere 131 52 35 4 9

Table 3.19: Phytoplankton genera observed at different locations

Sampling locations

SN Genera Pala Kere Basaweshwara kere Appana kere A Cyanophyceae 1 Anabaena sp. - + + 2 Merismopedia sp. + - + 4 Microcystissp. + ++ ++ 3 Spirulinasp. + + ++ B Chlorophyceae 1 Ankistrodesmus sp. ++ + + 2 Chlamydomonas sp. + ++ + 3 Pediastrumsp. + + - 4 Chlorococcum sp. + - - 5 Scenedesmussp. ++ ++ + 6 Chlorella sp. + + + C Bacillariophyceae 1. Naviculasp. + + + 2. Nitzschiasp. + + + 3. Pinnulariasp. - + - 4. Synedrasp. + + + D Euglenophyceae 1. Euglena sp + + ++

(b) Zooplankton

Zooplankton counts, recorded at different sampling stations, are presented in Table 3.20. Density of zooplankton varied between 117 and 285 No/m3. Only 11 genera from three different groups were recorded. Rotifera dominate in the Pale kere and Appana kere.Keratella sp. and Brachionus sp. were dominated the Rotifera population in both of these water bodies. Cladocera showed their dominance in Basaweshwara kere. In Cladocera, Daphnia sp. andMoinamicrura were major species found in this kere.Nauplius Copepod was the dominant copepod encountered in this area.


Table 3.20: Enumeration of Zooplankton at different locations

Zooplankton Sample

No. Sampling locations Zooplankton

(No/m3) Percent composition of zooplankton in

groups Rotifera Cladocera Copepoda

1 Pala Kere 117 58 27 15 2 Basaweshwara kere 285 31 51 18 3 Appana kere 168 52 35 13

Table 3.21: Recorded Zooplankton genera in sampling stations

Name of sampling locations No. Genera Pala Kere Basaweshwara kere Appana kere A Cladocera 1 Alonellasp. + + + 2 Ceriodaphnia sp. - + + 3 Daphnia sp. + ++ + 4 Moinamicrura + ++ + B Rotifera 1 Brachionussp + + ++ 2 Cephalodella sp. + - + 3 Keratellasp. ++ + ++ 4 Trichocerasp + - + C Copepoda 1 Cyclops sp. + + + 2 Diaptomus sp. + + - 3 Copepod nauplius + ++ +

3.10 Socio Economic

3.10.1 Introduction

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) has proposed to set up a new POL Terminal at Village Nandur, District Kalaburagi, Karnataka. (Location: 17°15'47.92"N 76°52'38.57"E) The project location is well connected with Gulbarga city by adjacent highway (SH 51), and nearest railway station Hirenanduru (distance 0.4 km, aerial). Project site is just 8 km away from Gulbarga city center. Gulbarga is the administrative headquarters of the Kalaburagi District and a major city of the North Karnataka region. Gulbarga is 623 km north of the state capital city of Bangalore and 220 km from Hyderabad. Previously it was the part of Hyderabad State, it was incorporated into a newly formed Mysore State (now known as Karnataka) through the States Reorganisation Act in 1956.


Gulbarga city is governed by Municipal Corporation and is in Gulbarga Urban Region.It is called one of the Sufi cities having famous religious places, like Khwaja Banda Nawaz Dargah and Ladle Mashak ,Sharana Basaveshwara Temple and Buddha Vihar. It also has a fort built during Bahmani rule. Have many domes like HafthGumbad (seven domes together) and ShorGumbad. While discusses the baseline scenario of the socio-economic environment in the 10 km radius area total 20 villages or urban areas are comes under study area. Many villages are merging in Gulbarga Municipal Council area. The detailed information on these villages is presented in the table, the information regarding the following aspects are provided:

A summary information table for all the project villages

Chart depicting demography of the project villages

Chart depicting the literacy status in the different talukas and districts.

Chart depicting Pop. of SC and ST communities

Chart depicting working and dependent class of Pop.

Chart depicting Pop. of main and marginal workers

10.3.2 Demographics:

Table 3.22: List of Villages in Study area

S. No. Name No of Households Total Population

1 Sidnur 256 13792 Gulbarga 53336 2962433 Khajikotnur 167 8434 SrinivasSaradgi 1299 75235 Kalagnoor 286 17036 Pala 411 22817 Hagargi 559 29828 Azadpur 315 18859 Kusnoor (Part) 116 63510 Naganhalli 327 161511 Nandikur 573 385812 Nandoor (K) 557 270713 Dharmapur 214 113814 Nandoor (B) 350 201015 Sirnoor 374 212816 Khandal 694 392917 ItgaKhandal 421 219318 Farhatabad 1081 569519 Mugulnagaon 377 2083


20 Martur 947 5027Total 62660 347857

Figure 3.6: Village Map for Study area


10.3.3 Male and Female Population

Table 3.23: Male-Female Population

S. No. Name Total

Population Total Male Population

Total Female Population

1 Sidnur 1379 726 6532 Gulbarga 296243 151391 1448523 Khajikotnur 843 470 3734 SrinivasSaradgi 7523 3881 36425 Kalagnoor 1703 898 8056 Pala 2281 1156 11257 Hagargi 2982 1519 14638 Azadpur 1885 920 9659 Kusnoor (Part) 635 329 30610 Naganhalli 1615 809 80611 Nandikur 3858 2296 156212 Nandoor (K) 2707 1357 135013 Dharmapur 1138 569 56914 Nandoor (B) 2010 1029 98115 Sirnoor 2128 1080 104816 Khandal 3929 1991 193817 ItgaKhandal 2193 1088 110518 Farhatabad 5695 2921 277419 Mugulnagaon 2083 1043 104020 Martur 5027 2559 2468

Total 347857 178032 169825

Figure 3.7: Male-Female Population Distribution Chart


According to recent census data (2011) Population of study area is347857 and total household is 62660. Male population is 178032and female population is 169825. Highest population in study area is inGulbarga city which is 296243. Male - Female Ratio is: 1000 Male:953 Female (Study area) Population Density in study area is: 1107 per Sq. Km. (Population Density = Number of People/Study area) The Gulbarga city is divided into 58 wards for which elections are held every 5 years. As per the Population Census 2011, there are total 62660 families residing in the Gulbarga city. The total population of Gulbarga is 296243out of which 151391are males and 144852are females thus the Average Sex Ratio of Gulbarga is 964. The population of Children of age 0-6 years in Gulbarga city is 42414which are 14% of the total population. There are 20551male children and 93506female children between the ages 0-6 years. Thus as per the Census 2011 the Child Sex Ratio of Gulbarga is 930 which is less than Average Sex Ratio (964) .

10.3.4 SC and ST Population:

Schedule Caste (SC) constitutes 32% and Schedule Tribe (ST) 2% of total population in study area.

Table 2.24: SC and ST Population Distribution

S. No. Name of Area SC

Population

SC Population

Males

SC Population

Females

ST Population

ST Population

Males

ST Population

Females 1 Sidnur 432 227 205 0 0 02 Gulbarga 93506 48036 45470 7655 3921 37343 Khajikotnur 209 119 90 0 0 04 SrinivasSaradgi 4374 2280 2094 11 7 45 Kalagnoor 1173 622 551 0 0 06 Pala 649 348 301 58 29 297 Hagargi 1113 558 555 7 1 68 Azadpur 788 370 418 79 37 429 Kusnoor (Part) 628 322 306 6 6 010 Naganhalli 681 349 332 88 42 4611 Nandikur 997 544 453 43 23 2012 Nandoor (K) 1125 583 542 2 0 213 Dharmapur 454 224 230 1 0 114 Nandoor (B) 1264 659 605 291 148 14315 Sirnoor 566 283 283 72 40 3216 Khandal 2088 1089 999 4 2 217 ItgaKhandal 792 397 395 36 20 16


S. No. Name of Area SC

Population

SC Population

Males

SC Population

Females

ST Population

ST Population

Males

ST Population

Females 18 Farhatabad 827 415 412 303 156 14719 Mugulnagaon 982 497 485 13 5 820 Martur 1467 738 729 85 47 38

Total 114115 58660 55455 8754 4484 4270

Figure 2.8: SC and ST Population Distribution in study area

10.3.5 Religion wise distribution of Population

Hinduism is majority religion in Gulbarga city with 59.62% followers. Islam is second most popular religion in city of Gulbarga with approximately 37.29 % following it. In Gulbarga city, Christinity is followed by 0.52 %, Jainism by 0.40 %, Sikhism by 0.06 % and Buddhism by 0.06 %. Around 0.01 % stated 'Other Religion’; approximately 1.88 % stated 'No Particular Religion'. (Ref. Censes data 2011)

DescriptionTotal Population

Percentage

Hindu 3,23,803 59.62% Muslims 2,02,552 37.29% Not Stated 10,197 1.88% Christian 2,835 0.52% Jain 2,181 0.40% Buddhist 1,195 0.22% Sikh 350 0.06%


Others 34 0.01%

10.3.6 Educational Status:

In education section, total literates in study area are 184380 of which 110569 are males while 73811 are females. Average literacy rate of study area is 53 percent of which male and female literacy was 60 and 40 percent. The nearest city for project location Gulbarga has four medical colleges

Mahadevappa Rampure Medical College,

KBN Institute of Medical Sciences (KBNIMS),

ESI Medical College (ESIMC)

Gulbarga Institute of Medical Sciences (GIMS). There are three dental colleges, one run by HKE Society, another by Albadar-Luqman Trust and another by the ESI Hospital. The city has several nursing schools, including Vijaykumar College of Nursing, HKE Society Nursing College, AlBadar Nursing College, Al-Kareem Nursing College, and Al-Qamar Nursing College. There are six engineering colleges in the city run by education groups, including Khaja Banda Nawaz College of Engineering, KCT College of Engineering, Appa Institute of Engineering and Technology, and PoojyaDoddappaAppa College of Engineering (PDACE) and Shetty Institute of Technology. Gulbarga has Gulbarga University, established in 1980. There are 230 colleges affiliated with this university offering graduate/diploma courses in arts, fine arts, music, social sciences, science and technology, commerce, education and law.


Study area has a number of colleges, which provide a great platform for higher education in the field of engineering, arts and social science, law, commerce, medical science, journalism etc. Major Colleges and Schools centers are:

Government First Grade College Kamalapur, Gulbarga

ShriPrabhu Arts, Science and JM Bohra Commerce College, Gulbarga

MS Irani Degree College of Arts, Science and Commerce, Gulbarga

Khaja Band Nawaz College of Engineering (KBNCOE), Gulbarga

Khaja Education Societys Bi BiRaza Degree College for Women, Gulbarga

MahadevappaRampure Medical College, Gulbarga

MatoshriManekbai Kothari College of Visual Arts, Gulbarga

Nrupatunga Arts and Commerce College, Gulbarga

Seth ShankarlalLahoti Law College, Gulbarga

Sharnbasveshwar College of Science, Gulbarga

Sharnbasweshwar College of Commerce, Gulbarga

SmtVeerammaGangasiri College for Women, Gulbarga

Womens Polytechnic, Gulbarga

District Institute of Education and Training (DIET), Gulbarga

Gulbarga University, Gulbarga

Siddharth Law College, Gulbarga

Khaja Banda Nawaz Institute of Medical Sciences, Gulbarga

Al-Badar Rural Dental College and Hospital, Gulbarga

Mahatma JyotibhaPhule Arts College, Gulbarga

Table 3.25: Literates and Illiterate Population Distribution

S. No. Name of Area Person

Literates Male

Literates Female

Literates Person

Illiterates Male

IlliteratesFemale

Illiterates

1 Sidnur 624 390 234 755 336 4192 Gulbarga 157576 94318 63258 138667 57073 815943 Khajikotnur 489 325 164 354 145 2094 SrinivasSaradgi 3399 2118 1281 4124 1763 23615 Kalagnoor 878 541 337 825 357 4686 Pala 1195 696 499 1086 460 6267 Hagargi 1647 1007 640 1335 512 8238 Azadpur 1044 573 471 841 347 4949 Kusnoor (Part) 306 198 108 329 131 19810 Naganhalli * 1088 597 491 527 212 31511 Nandikur 2198 1499 699 1660 797 86312 Nandoor (K) 1166 675 491 1541 682 85913 Dharmapur 622 394 228 516 175 341


S. No. Name of Area Person

Literates Male

Literates Female

Literates Person

Illiterates Male

IlliteratesFemale

Illiterates

14 Nandoor (B) 1071 645 426 939 384 55515 Sirnoor 1101 660 441 1027 420 60716 Khandal 2193 1336 857 1736 655 108117 ItgaKhandal 1046 624 422 1147 464 68318 Farhatabad 3034 1795 1239 2661 1126 153519 Mugulnagaon 984 587 397 1099 456 64320 Martur 2719 1591 1128 2308 968 1340

Total 184380 110569 73811 163477 67463 96014

Figure 3.9: Graph showing Literates and Illiterate Population

10.3.7 Economy and Workers Profile

In 10 km radius area from project site out of total population, 154921 were engaged in work activities. 73% of workers describe their work as Main Work (Employment or Earning more than 6 Months) while 27% were involved in Marginal activity providing livelihood for less than 6 months. Of 113495workers engaged in Main Work, 35769 were cultivators (owner or co-owner) while 41289were Agricultural labourers. Non-working population is study area is 192936 which are 55% out of total population. Out of total non-working population 44% are male population and 56% are females. This category includes below 15 years age population and not willing to any work is considered. Also after Retirement age population also include in this category.


Table 3.26: Working and Non-working Population 1. Total Worker Population 154921 2. Main Working Population 113495 3. Main Cultivator Population 35769 4. Main Agricultural Labourers Population 41289 5. Main Household Industries Population 1613 6. Main Other Workers Population 34824 7. Marginal Worker Population 41426 8. Marginal Cultivator Population 2391 9. Marginal Agriculture Labourers Population 24756 10. Marginal Household Industries Population 1602 11. Marginal Other Workers Population 12677 12. Non-Working Population 192936 13. Non-Working Population Male 84215 14. Non-Working Population Female 108721

Figure 3.10: Working and Non-Working Population

10.3.8 Transport and Communication

The project location is well connected with Gulbarga city by adjacent highway (SH 51), and nearest railway station Hirenanduru (distance 0.4 km, aerial). Project site is just 8 km away from Gulbarga city center. Gulbarga is 613 km north of Bangalore and well connected by road to Bengaluru, Mumbai, Pune, Bijapur, Hyderabad and other major cities. Gulbarga has a 55.5-kilometre (34.5 mi) long, four-laned ring road. Project site is 5 km away from Gulbarga ring road.


Local transport

Auto rickshaws are available for getting around the city at fairly reasonable rates. NEKRTC Nrupatunga city bus service city buses circulate within the city and travel to the nearby towns and villages. NrupatungaSarige Serves as the City public transport and has emerged as the popular commuting transport services within the city and surrounding suburbs of the city. Ola cabs are also available. Long-distance bus routes

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) runs a bus service to other cities and villages. There are also private bus services. The Bidar-Srirangapatna state highway makes travel easy to Bengaluru and the neighbouring states of Maharashtra and Goa. There are many private services running buses between Bangalore and Gulbarga, and between Mumbai and Gulbarga. Railways

Hirenanduru railway station is 0.5 km away from project site. Second most nearest railway station is Gulbarga railway station is 8 Km away from project site. Gulbarga railway station is served by the Solapur-Guntakal line, which is part of the Mumbai-Chennai line. It is well connected by trains to all major parts of India, such as Mumbai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Ahmedabad, Coimbatore, Thiruvananthapuram, Kanyakumari, Pune, Bhubaneswar, Bhopal, Gwalior and Agra. Gulbarga railway station comes under the Central Railway. Airport

.The nearest Airport is Solapur which is approx 133 km from the project site. The Airport is run by Airports Authority of India.


CHAPTER 4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND

MITIGATION MEASURES

4.1 Introduction

Identification of impacts and mitigation measures of the same in Environmental Impact Assessment study helps in quantification and evaluation of impacts. During baseline study several impacts can be identified but it is necessary to identify the critical impacts both positive and negative on various components of the environment that are likely due to installation of proposed storage tanks.

The environmental impacts can be categorized as either primary or secondary. Primary impacts are the ones that are caused directly due to the project activity on environmental attributes, whereas secondary impacts are indirectly induced.

The construction and operational phase of the project activity comprises various activities, each of which may have either positive or negative impact on some or other environmental attributes. The proposed project activities would impart impact on the environment in two distinct phases:

During construction phase - Temporary or short term impact

During operation phase - May have long term impact

4.2 Impact Assessment

4.2.1 During Construction Phase

Identified Impacts on Land/Soil Environment

During site preparation the topsoil will be removed from the project site and the approach road, which contains most of the nutrients and organisms that give soil productivity. This will in turn result in minor changes of topsoil structure.

Improper disposal of the excavated earth during installation of storage tanks may cause irreversible negative impacts on land environment.

Storage of construction material if not done at designated place can cause nuisance and hazards

Accidental spillage of oil may lead to soil contamination

Improper segregation and disposal of solid waste generated during construction phase by workers dwelling on site.


Identified Impacts on Air Environment

The emission anticipated during construction period will include fugitive dust due to excavation of soil, leveling of soil, use of DG sets on loss of BESCOM power only, movement of heavy construction equipments/vehicles, site clearing and other activities

This type of fugitive dust is expected to result in change in the baseline air quality specifically during the construction phase

Open burning of solid wastes can cause air pollution

Identified Impacts on Noise Environment

The proposed project will lead to emission of noise that may have significant impact on the surrounding communities in terms of increase in noise levels and associated disturbances.

Following activities would result in increase in noise level;

Noise generated from operation of pumps and blower

Noise generated from vehicular movement

Noise generated from DG Set

Nuisance to nearby areas due to noise polluting work at night

Identified Impacts on Water Environment

Increased water demand during construction phase for site preparation, dust spraying, construction activities, curing, domestic and other water requirements for labour and staff onsite

Increase in site runoff and sedimentation

Water logging may create unsanitary conditions and mosquito breeding at site

Identified Impacts on Ecological Environment

Construction may cause minor disturbance to nearby water birds habitat due to noise and vibration.

Reduction of Biodiversity

Identified Impacts on Socio-Economic Environment

The proposed project does not involve any displacement of inhabitants for the construction of Terminal.

Construction phase could lead to creation of indirect employment and procurement opportunities.


A multiplier effect will be felt on the creation of indirect employment through the local community establishing small shops like tea stalls, Hotels, supply of intermediate raw materials, repair outlets, hardware stores etc.

Self-employment options for individuals possessing vocational or technical training skills like electricians, welders, fitters etc, which are likely to be sourced locally;

There would be influx of workers during construction phase which could lead to pressure on key local infrastructure such as water, healthcare, electricity.

The construction activity could lead to increased nuisance level from air emissions and noise due to transportation of material and equipment as well as labourers.

The construction activity could also lead to water logging in mud pockets leading to breeding of mosquito and related health impacts.

4.2.2 During Operation Phase

Identified Impacts on Land/Soil Environment

Soil quality may be affected by accidental leakage and spillage of petroleum /oils

Improper segregation and disposal of solid waste generated during operation of the proposed project

Identified Impacts on Air Environment

No emission is envisaged during the storage and handling of fuel in storage tank.

No fugitive emission during loading and unloading of oil in and from storage tanks is envisaged.

Impacts on ambient air during operation phase would be due to emissions from operation of DG sets only during power outages.

Further, the air environment may have a little negative impact due to increase in storage capacity which will increase the truck movement for receipt and dispatch of oil.

Identified Impacts on Noise Environment

Impact of noise due to vehicular traffic

Occasional noise generated due to DG sets (DG sets will have acoustic enclosures)

Identified Impacts on Water Environment

Stress on existing water supply

Generation of waste water

Increased run off from site.

Identified Impacts on Ecological Environment


The project could have an adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species, sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations.

The project could conflict with any applicable policies protecting biological resources, including any tree preservation policy or ordinance.

Identified Impacts on Socio-Economic Environment

Project and associated construction of Terminal will eventually lead to permanent job opportunities in the organized and unorganized sector. There is likely to be increased demand for indirect employment such as security, canteen, need for drivers etc.

Development of physical infrastructure due to construction of the plant which could benefit the local population.

4.3 Impact Mitigation Measures

4.3.1 During Construction Phase

Impact Mitigation Measures for Land/Soil Environment

Top soil will be stored carefully and will be used again after construction/installation phase is over so as to restore the fertility of project site

Bituminous materials / shall not be allowed to leach into the soil

Methods to reuse earth material generated during excavation will be followed

Waste oil generated from D. G. sets will be handed over to authorized recyclers approved by CPCB

Usage of appropriate monitoring and control facilities for construction equipments deployed

All hazardous wastes shall be securely stored, under a shed for eventual transportation and disposal to the authorized TSDF

The solid waste generation due to workers dwelling on the site will be segregated and will be transported and disposed off to waste disposal facility

Impact Mitigation Measures for Air Environment

Checking of vehicles and construction machinery to ensure compliance to Indian Emission Standards

Transportation vehicles, DG sets and machineries to be properly and timely maintained and serviced regularly to control the emission of air pollutants in order to maintain the emissions of NOX and SOX within the limits established by CPCB

Minimize idling time for vehicles and adequate parking provision and proper traffic arrangement for smooth traffic flow


Use of good quality fuel and lubricants will be promoted. Moreover, low sulphur content diesel shall be used as fuel for DG sets to control emission of SO2

Water sprinkling shall be carried out to suppress fugitive dust during earthworks and along unpaved sections of access roads during construction phase.

Appropriate spill control measures and labeling / handling procedures shall be maintained

Attenuation of pollution/ protection of receptor through strengthening of existing greenbelt/ green cover

However, the construction activities will be for temporary period and hence, its impact on the existing ambient air quality as well as vegetation will be reversible. Dust emissions are likely to be confined within the limited area.

Impact Mitigation Measures for Noise Environment

No noise polluting work in night shifts

Acoustic enclosures for DG Sets per CPCB guidelines

Provision of ear plugs for labour in high noise area

Provision of barricades along the periphery of the site

All contractors and subcontractors involved in the construction phase should comply with the CPCB noise standard

Activities that take place near sensitive receptors to be carefully planned (restricted to daytime, taking into account weather conditions etc.)

Vehicles and generator sets to be serviced regularly and maintained properly to avoid any unwanted generation of noise or vibration from them

Use of suitable muffler systems/ enclosures/ sound proof glass paneling on heavy equipment/ pumps/ blowers

Pumps and blowers may be mounted on rubber pads or any other noise absorbing materials

In case of steady noise levels above 85 dB (A), initiation of hearing conservation measures

Strengthening of greenbelt for noise attenuation may be taken up, etc.

Impact Mitigation Measures for Water Environment

Water avoidance of wastage of curing water

Use of tanker water for construction activity.

Provision of temporary toilets for labour

Wastewater generated will be discharged into existing sewer line

Impact Mitigation Measures for Ecological Environment

There is no ecological important area (e.g. National Park, Sanctuary) in the study area so impact on that area is ruled out.


All the transportation trucks shall be leak proof and the driver of goods carriage is trained in handling the dangers posed during transport of such goods and is aware of safety rules for transportation of hazardous materials so that the chances of tanker over turning and leakage are very less.

Installation of systems to discourage nesting or perching of birds in dangerous environments

Impact Mitigation Measures for Socio-Economic Environment

Employing local people for construction work to the maximum extent possible as per skillsets.

Providing proper facilities for domestic supply, sanitation, domestic fuel, education, transportation etc. for the construction workers.

Barricades, fences and necessary personnel protective equipment such as safety helmet, shoes, goggles, safety harness etc. will be provided to the workers and employees.

Constructional and occupational safety measures to be adopted during construction phase of the industry.

The health of workers will be checked for general illness; first time upon employment and thereafter at periodic intervals, as per the local laws and regulations.

The workers will be diagnosed for respiratory functions at periodic intervals and during specific complaints etc. Health centre and ambulance facility will be provided to the worker.

Job rotation schemes will be practiced for over-exposed persons. Insignificant impact is expected on the workers health and safety during the operation phase stage

4.3.2 During Operation Phase

Impact Mitigation Measures for Land/Soil Environment

Installation of drainage ditches at project site to prevent erosion

All hazardous wastes shall be securely stored, under a shed for eventual transportation and disposal to the authorized CHWTSDF

The solid domestic waste shall be segregated and stored within the premises temporarily and then sent to waste management facility.

Impact Mitigation Measures for Air Environment

Installing an external floating roof tank to minimize evaporation losses of the product being stored

Checking of vehicles and construction machinery to ensure compliance to Indian Emission Standards1


Transportation vehicles, generators and machineries to be properly and timely maintained and serviced regularly to control the emission of air pollutants in order to maintain the emissions of NOX and SOX within the limits established by CPCB

Stack height of DG sets shall be as per norms of CPCB to allow effective dispersion of pollutants

Minimize idling time for vehicles and adequate parking provision and proper traffic arrangement for smooth traffic flow

Attenuation of pollution/ protection of receptor through strengthening of existing greenbelt/ green cover

Impact Mitigation Measures for Noise Environment

Provision of proper parking arrangement, traffic management plan for smooth flow of vehicles help to abate noise pollution due to vehicular traffic.

Green belts and landscaping shall act as noise buffer

Impact Mitigation Measures for Water Environment

Waste water will be treated in Septic Tank followed by Soak Pit

Rain water harvesting shall be promoted.

Provision of Storm water drainage system with adequate capacity and proper maintenance of storm water drainage system shall be carried out

In case any open spillage of oil from tank shall lead to Oil Water Separator (OWS) where separated oil send back to storage tank after ensuring quality of product. The water from OWS will be reused for gardening. Hence there is no adverse impact on receiving water body

Impact Mitigation Measures for Ecological Environment

The proponent has a plan of extensive green belt programme. The area, varieties of plants, density etc. have been mentioned in the report

In normal condition, no waste water shall be discharged outside the Terminal. During mock-drill (once in a month) and rainy season, the waste/rain water shall be discharged through properly designed storm water drain after passing through OWS. Hence, no impact is envisaged on aquatic ecology from the operation of facilities.

The probability and consequences of significant ecological impacts occurring as a result of the operation of the facility are considered to be almost negligible. The risk of any leakage is almost negligible owing to standard design codes and material of tank construction.

Impact Mitigation Measures for Socio-Economic Environment

Both skilled and unskilled local person should be given preference for the jobs in the operation and maintenance of the plant.


4.4 Impact Matrix

The matrix was designed for the assessment of impacts associated with almost any type of project. Its method of a checklist that incorporates qualitative information on cause-and-effect relationships but it is also useful for communicating results.

Matrix method incorporates a list of impacting activities and their likely environmental impacts, presented in a matrix format. Combining these lists as horizontal and vertical axes in the matrix allows the identification of cause effect relationships, if any, between specific activities and impacts. The impact matrix for the actions identified in Table 4.1 along with various environmental parameters. A rating scale has been devised to give severity of impacts in the following manner.

A. Beneficial (positive) impact – Long term B. Low beneficial impact – Short term C. Strong adverse (negative) impact – Long term D. Low adverse impact (localized in nature) – Short term E. No impacts on environment

Table 4.1: Impact Matrix

S.N. Activity Positive Impact Negative Impact

No Impact

Short Term

Long Term

Short Term

Long Term

Pre-Project Activity 1 Displacement and resettlement of

local people √

2 Change in land use √ 3 Trees/vegetation √ 4 Shifting of equipment, machinery

and material √

5 Indirect Employment for local people

√

Construction Phase 1 Pressure on infrastructure and

transportation system √

2 Impact on air quality including dust generation

√

3 Noise Pollution √ 4 Traffic √


5 Impact on the land/soil environment

√

6 Impact on groundwater √ 7 Stacking and disposal of

construction material √

8 Impact on water quality √ 9 Health and safety conditions of

people √

10 Social impact √ 11 Economic impact √

Operation Phase 1 Increase in air pollution and

noise levels √

2 Water harvesting and recharge √ 3 Disposal of solid waste √ 4 Infrastructure development √ 5 Quality of life √ 6 Handling operations for transfer,

charging of raw materials, final product

√

4.5 Summary of Environment Impacts and Mitigation Measures

The summary of the Impacts and Mitigation measures for the above mentioned environmental attributes are as summarized in Table 4.2.


Table 4.2: Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures

Impacting Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measures

Compliance/ Standards/ Best

Practice Guidelines Environment/

Social Attribute Source Contaminants Environment Health and Safety

Construction Phase

Camps - Workforce Arrangement

Generation of sewage, organic wastes, construction debris etc.

Possible contamination of project site and nearby water bodies

Potential risk of respiratory irritation, discomfort, or illness to workers

Local workers will be employed indirectly, as far as possible.

Proper sanitation facilities will be provided for the workers

There are no temporary shelters provided because local workers will be engaged

--

Air Emissions Dust and air emission particularly due to the excavation, construction and movement of vehicles resulting in air pollution

Rise in RSPM level at project site


Barricading sheets shall be provided

Provision of spraying water to reduce dust emission

Excavated topsoil to be preserved and reused for landscaping

Ensuring all vehicles, generators and compressors are shall be maintained and regularly serviced

CPCB - National Ambient Air Quality Standards

Noise Generation Construction noise mainly due to excavation, Moving of vehicles, operations of cranes etc.

Rise in decibel level of ambient noise

Unwanted sound can cause problems within the body. Excessive noise pollution in working areas at construction sites can influence psychological health viz. occurrence of aggressive behaviour, disturbance of sleep, constant stress, fatigue and

The vehicles used will be with the proper acoustic measures

Wherever this cannot be achieved the area will be earmarked as high noise level area requiring use of ear protection gadgets

Avoid night time work

CPCB - Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules






hypertension. Hampered sleeping pattern and may lead to irritation and uncomfortable situations.

Soil and Groundwater Contamination

Spillage of concrete mixture containing additives and plasticizers.

Spillage of construction material containing heavy metals, paints, coatings, liners, etc.

All fuel storages will be sited on an impervious base within a bund and secured place. The base and bund walls will be impermeable to the material stored and of an adequate capacity. Storage at or above roof level will be avoided

Leaking or empty drums will be handled as per environment management plan

Special care will be taken during deliveries of construction materials, especially when fuels and hazardous materials are being handled

Ensure that workers know what to do in the event of a spillage

Operation Phase

Air Emissions Release of VOC’s during operational activities (filling, withdrawal, loading/unloading, tank cleaning and degassing.)

For storage tanks, the total emission of VOC is the result of

Contamination of surface, and sub-surface water bodies during operational activities (soil and groundwater)

The greater the variations in


Potential risk of dermal contact and inhalation

Above Ground Storage Tanks (ASTs) shall have a secondary containment area that will contain spills and allow leaks to be easily detected

Secondary containment for ASTs must be impermeable to the materials being stored. Methods include berms, dikes, liners, vaults, and double-walled tanks

A manually controlled sump pump should be used to collect rain water that may

OISD-STD-112 - Safe Handling of Air Hydrocarbon Mixtures and Pyrophoric Substances American Petroleum Institute Standards






two types of losses: Breathing/ Standing Losses and Withdrawal Losses.

temperature of the fuel, the greater the potential loss and the larger the risk of contamination due to condensation.

accumulate in the containment area of storage tanks. Any discharge should be inspected for petroleum prior to being dispensed

Installation of vapour recovery systems to collect the VOC’s emitted during transfer process operations. Equipment for transferring the product into and out of storage will consist of aboveground piping, hoses/loading arms, valves, pumps, instrumentation and alarms

Installing an external floating roof tank to minimize evaporation losses of the product being stored.

Efficiencies of primary seals may be improved through the use of weather shields. Additional controls may be added through a secondary seal.

Evaporative losses from the floating roof design are limited to losses from the seal system and roof fittings (standing storage loss) and any exposed liquid on the tank walls (withdrawal loss).

Using a pressure-ventilated cap can reduce evaporation losses a further 50% Direct venting of the tank fumes is restricted until a slight pressure has built up in the tank.

Having a painted and pressure vented tank has a 75% vaporation loss reduction compared to a dark tank.

OISD-STD-112 - Safe Handling of Air Hydrocarbon Mixtures and Pyrophoric Substances






Placing a painted and pressure vented tank in the shade will further reduce the evaporation losses by over 40%. The roof also helps reduce weathering of hoses and valves.

Accumulated water in tanks should be regularly drained off and separated from the oil which is recoverable, while the water is sent for treatment.

Wastewater Process waste water arising from: Tank Bottom Draining, Tanker vehicle washing, Vapour Recovery Process, Contaminated storm water runoff, Leaks and spills, etc.

Potential damage of tanks due to increased corrosions from wastewater in tanks.

Potential risk of contamination to water bodies from wastewater runoff.

Potential risk of dermal contact and inhalation from spill sand leaks.

Oil water should be passed through appropriately selected and designed oil and grease trap. Traps are designed to remove some oils and fuels from water. They do not remove other pollutants, such as heavy fuel oils or dust.

An API oil-water separator shall also be used to separate gross amounts of oil and suspended solids from the wastewater effluents/storm water runoff.

Other treatment method such as reprocessing and emulsion breaking for treating oil and water waste types; stabilization, bio-remediation and sediment washing for oil and sediments waste types shall be considered.

Biological treatment or aerobic biological treatment (activated sludge or aerated basins) to reduce wastewater organic carbon (BOD and COD) load. Biological treatment can also remove phenolic compounds.

American Petroleum Institute Standards CPCB standards for waste water discharge - Petrochemicals (Basic and Intermediates)






Hazardous Materials, Fire and Explosion

Risk of fire and explosions due to the flammable and combustible nature of petroleum products.

Risk of leaks and accidental releases from equipment, tanks, pipes etc during loading and unloading (handling)

Potential risk of loss of life or injury due to fire

Storage equipment should meet standards for structural design and integrity. American Petroleum Institute (API) Standards are the primary industry standards by which most aboveground welded storage tanks are designed, constructed and maintained. These standards address both newly constructed and existing aboveground storage tanks used in the petroleum, petrochemical and chemical industries. The standards prescribe leak detection, leak prevention, and leak containment with emphasis on leak or spill detection and containment.

Specific changes and additions with regards to leak or spill prevention, detection or containment have been made to API standards most often used for the construction and maintenance of aboveground petroleum storage tanks. OISD-STD-117 - Fire Protection Facilities for Petroleum Terminals, Terminals, and Pipeline Installations and Lube oil installations.

Hazardous Waste Hazardous waste produced include: Tank bottom sludge composed of residual product, scale rust, Sludge from

Risk of site contamination from hazardous waste and Risk of contamination to water bodies.

Dewatering technologies can be used to significantly reduce the volume of sludge.

After a solidification process it can be transported to and disposed of at an appropriately designated landfill and incineration site.

OISD-GDN-200 - Guidelines For Preparation Of Oil Spill Response Contingency Plan OISD-STD-114 -






oil/water separations systems, Spill cleanup material

Contaminated equipment and protective clothing

Pigging waste

A Spill Response Plan shall be prepared, and the capability to implement the plan should be in place. The Spill Response Plan should address potential oil, chemical, and fuel spills from facilities, transport vehicles, loading and unloading operations, pipeline ruptures, and proximity of water bodies and other festive receptors.

Conduct a spill risk assessment for the facilities and design, drilling, process, and utility systems to reduce the risk of major uncontained spills.

Conduct a Hazard Risk Assessment using Internationally-accepted methodologies such as Hazardous Operations Analysis (HAZOP), Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and Hazard Identification (HAZID). The management actions should be included in a Hazardous Material Management Plan.

Shutdown valves shall be installed to allow early shutdown or isolation in the event of a spill; develop automatic shutdown actions through an emergency shutdown system for significant spill scenarios so that the facility may be rapidly brought into a safe condition.

Ensure adequate personnel training in oil spill, prevention, containment and response.

Safe Handling of Hazardous Chemicals

The above table can be summarized as shown in below matrix as Table 4.3.

Table 4.3: Overall Matrix

4.6 Conclusion

From the above discussion it can be concluded that proposed project activity at Village Nandur, Karnataka shall not create any significant negative impact on physical features, water, noise and air environment. The proposed project shall generate additional indirect employment and indirect service sector enhancement in the region and would help in the socio-economic up-liftmen of the local area as well as the state.


CHAPTER 5. PROJECT BENEFITS

5.1 Project Benefits

The Proposed project will have direct and indirect positive impact on surrounding area which is as mentioned below:

Terminal will be set up on barren Governement land; hence no displacement of people is required.

Substantial Socio-economic benefits.

Good Techno-commercial viability.

Around the project site semi-skilled and unskilled workmen are expected to be available from local population in these areas to meet the temporary manpower requirement during construction and Operational phase.

There will be indirect employment opportunity for local people during construction and operation phase.

Infrastructural facilities will be improved due to the project.

Critical analyses of the existing socio-economic profile of the area indicate that the impact of the Project is expected to be of varying nature. The following are the impacts predicted.

Secondary employment will be generated thereby benefiting locals.

Thus a significant benefit to the socio-economic environment is likely to be created due to the project.

5.2 Improvements in the Physical Infrastructure

The project will improve supply position of the High Speed Diesel (HSD), Motor Spirit (MS), and Superior Kerosene Oil (SKO) in Kalaburagi district, which is vital for economic growth as well as improving the quality of life of general mass. Establishment of large developmental projects improve the availability of the physical infrastructures like approach roads, drainage, communication and transportation facilities etc.

5.3 Improvements in the Social Infrastructure

BPCL POL Terminal shall take up community welfare activities under Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and also improve the social infrastructures like education and health care system etc.

5.4 Employment Potential

The project shall provide indirect employment potential under unskilled, semi-skilled and skilled categories. The indirect employment potential shall increase with the start of construction activities, reach a peak during construction phase and then reduce with completion of construction activities.


During operation phase also there will be indirect employment opportunities, mainly in service sector, although its magnitude will be little less.

The direct employment opportunities with BPCL are limited and the opportunities exist mainly with the contractors and sub-contractors. These agencies will be persuaded to provide the jobs to local persons on a preferential basis wherever feasible.

The total employment potential of terminal is arund 65 people which will include BPCL management, non management staff, contract labours and security personnels.

5.5 CSR and Socio-Economic Development

BPCL not only carries out business but also understands the obligations towards the society. The unit is aware of the obligations towards the society and to fulfill the social obligations unit will employ indirectly semi-skilled and unskilled labor from the nearby villages for the proposed project as far as possible. BPCL will also try to generate maximum indirect employment in the nearby villages by appointing local contractors for indirect jobs during construction phase as well as during operation phase. The Project Proponents will contribute reasonably as part of their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in and will carry out various activities in Tarade village.

Moreover, unit has planned to carry out various activities for the up-liftment of poor people, welfare of women and labors, education of poor students as part of CSR in the Tarade village. The various CSR activities planned at present by the unit is described below:

Development of garden/greenbelt area of terminal with shrubs/small plants as the land is hill rock hence it is difficult to grow big trees

Education aids to poor students under CSR activity.

Organize medical camp and providing support for the development of the health facilities

Financial support and assistance for the development of the infrastructure facilities under CSR activity.

Organize various types of awareness program for the community like awareness on the child labor, educational promotion etc.

The activities listed above are not limited to and BPCL will plan and perform other activities according to the need of local community in future with the help of local/ District administration.

5.6 Direct Revenue Earning to the National and State Exchequer

This project will contribute additional revenue to the Central and State exchequer in the form of GST, etc. Indirect contribution to the Central and State exchequer will be there due to Income by way of registration of trucks, payment of road tax, income tax from individual as well as taxes from associated units. Thus, the proposed project will help the Government by paying different taxes from time to time, which is a part of revenue and thus, will help in developing the area.


5.7 Other Tangible Benefits

Both tangible and non-tangible benefits will result from this activity and many of those are described above. Apart from direct employment, many other benefits will accrue like

Erosion control by nalla training, terracing and bunding

Flood control by rain-water arresting, and harvesting

Aesthetics improvement by general greening with emphasis on biodiversity

Developed economy strengthens democratic set-up.

Developed economy brings with it literacy and healthful living

Improved safety-security in surrounding with better Law and Order

Symbiosis and sustainable development will be the ultimate objective


CHAPTER 6. ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT AND

MONITORING PLAN

6.1 Introduction

The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) provides an essential link between predicted impacts and mitigation measures during implementation and operational activities. EMP outlines the mitigation, monitoring and institutional measures to be taken during project implementation and operation to avoid or mitigate adverse environmental impacts, and the actions needed to implement these measures.

The likely impacts on various components of environment due to the project during developmental activities have been identified and measures for their mitigation are suggested.

The EMP lists all the requirements to ensure effective mitigation of every potential biophysical and socio-economic impact identified in the EIA. For each attribute, or operation, which could otherwise give rise to impact, the following information is presented:

A comprehensive listing of the mitigation measures

Parameters that will be monitored to ensure effective implementation of the action

Timing for implementation of the action to ensure that the objectives of mitigation are fully met

The EMP comprises a series of components covering direct mitigation and environmental monitoring, an outline waste management plan and a project site restoration plan. Therefore, environmental management plan has been prepared for each of the above developmental activities.

6.2 EMP during Construction Phase

Environmental pollution during construction stage will be limited and for a temporary period during the construction activity. Construction should be planned in such a way that excavated material should be disposed safely. The manpower required for these activities should preferably be indirectly employed from nearby villages so that avenues of employment will be open to local people. Directly or indirectly all the environmental components get affected due to the construction activity. The following environmental protection and enhancement measures are suggested for implementation by the contractor or the authority during the construction as applicable.

6.2.1 Air Environment


During the construction phase, gaseous emissions are expected from the heavy machineries deployed for construction. All other emission sources are intermittent. Though the gaseous emissions are not expected to contribute significantly to the ambient air quality, some generic measures to reduce fugitive and gaseous pollutants emissions during construction phase from point area and line sources shall include the following:

All equipment used during construction should have valid PUC certificate.

The storage and handling of soil, sub-soils, top-soils and materials will be carefully managed to minimize the risk of wind blown material and dust

To avoid generation of air borne dust, water sprinkling should be done.

There will be no on-site burning of any waste arising from any construction activities

All vehicles delivering construction materials or removing soil will be covered to prevent escape of dust

Engines and exhaust systems of all vehicle and equipment will be maintained so that exhaust emissions do not exceed statutory limits and that all vehicles and equipment are maintained in accordance with manufactures’ manuals. Periodic monitoring of this shall be undertaken to ensure compliance

Exhausts of other equipment used for construction (e.g. generators) will be positioned at a sufficient height to ensure dispersal of exhaust emissions and meet the standards set by CPCB.

6.2.2 Noise Environment

The following environmental management measures are recommended to mitigate adverse impacts on noise environment during construction phase:

Earth movers and construction machinery with low noise levels should be used

Periodic maintenance of construction machinery and transportation vehicles should be undertaken

Onsite workers should be provided with noise protection devices such as ear plugs/ muffs wherever necessary

Periodic monitoring for the noise levels within the project site and along the outside project boundary shall be undertaken to ensure compliance per CPCB set standards

6.2.3 Water Environment

Drinking water requirements during the construction phase by the contractors should be met from proposed bore wells/external source, etc. Construction labourers should be provided with adequate quantity of drinking water of potable quality. Sufficient and appropriate sanitary facilities should be provided in order to maintain hygienic conditions in the camps of construction labourers. The wastes, such as, sanitary wastes should be treated in septic tanks followed by soak pits of appropriate size and technology.


The solid waste generated should be collected and disposed in an appropriate manner either at a landfill site or used as compost for agricultural uses. Area for maintenance of vehicles should be so located that contamination of groundwater by accidental spillage of oil can be prevented.

6.2.4 Land Environment

On completion of construction works all temporary structures, surplus materials and wastes should be completely removed. Dumping of construction waste on agricultural land should be prohibited and stockpiles should be provided with gentle slopes.

The solid wastes such as paints, lubricants, oil, diesel containers or any other non-biodegradable wastes that have leachable constituents should be disposed to authorized recyclers.

A waste management plan should be prepared or integrated with existing plan before the commissioning, implemented and monitored. In areas, where soil quality for natural vegetation is of critical concern, loosening of soil in such areas will be done to mitigate soil compaction caused due to operation of heavy machinery.

6.2.5 Biological Environment

The region does not have dense vegetation and landuse is dominated by agriculture activities. Following environmental management measures are recommended to mitigate adverse impacts on biological environment during construction phase:

Plantation of shrubs/small plants should commence once construction activity is completed. As the area is hill rock hence big trees cannot be planted and hence small plants and shrubs are recommended.

Number of trees replanted should be at least two times of trees removed

Native species must be planted

6.2.6 Socio-economic Environment

Given that the project and related developments like construction camps will not be dependent on local resources (power, water), during both construction and operations, the only likely impact on infrastructure would be on the roads, during the construction phase. Considering the high traffic emanating during construction phase an effective traffic management scheme should be developed to avoid congestion on the nearby and local roads.

6.2.7 Health and Safety

The movement of heavy equipment should be done with proper precaution to prevent any accidents on the road. Occupational risk should be minimized at the project site through implementation of a full proof safety system.


Safety training should be provided to all construction workers on operation of equipment. Security should also be extended during non-working hours to ensure there is controlled access to the machinery and equipment.

The contractors should also be vigilant to detect workers showing symptoms of communicable diseases. All contract labourers should be vaccinated if found any characteristics of communicable disease. All illness and incidents shall be reported and recorded.

6.3 EMP during Operation

In order to mitigate the impacts due to capacity expansion of facility on various environmental components, the following environmental management measures are recommended:

6.3.1 Air Environment Ambient air quality with respect to SPM, RPM, SO2, NOx, H2S, CO and HC monitoring shall be

continued at appropriate locations in the impact zone through KSPCB authorized third party as per standard intervals.

To minimize occupational exposure/hazards, the present practice of using personal protective facilities like helmets, safety (gas) mask/safety dress, shoes etc. be ensured for all workers, engaged in operation of process units within the facility complex

Stacks of adequate height (CPCB norms) for DG Sets to ensure adequate dispersal of pollutants will be provided.

Waste oil will not be incinerated and will be sold to authorised waste oil recyclers

All access roads (internal as well as external) to be used by the project authorities will be paved (either with WBM, concrete or bitumen) to suppress the dust generation along the roads

6.3.2 Noise Environment

Similar measures as proposed in the construction phase for noise making machinery, to ensure practicably low noise levels within the work environment.

The major areas of concern for noise generation will be adequately addressed by considering it during procurement of the machinery from vendors, project implementation stage. Further feedback from the monitored noise levels at sensitive locations will be taken to ensure that the impact due to high noise levels is practically minimized

Monitor job and location specific noise levels for compliance with HSE regulations by verifying acceptability of noise levels caused by the project activities and comparison with noise criteria

Conduct periodic audiometric tests for employees working close to high noise levels, such as compressors, DG sets, etc

Provision of PPE’s will be done and their proper usage will be ensured for eardrum protection of the workers as well as visitors

Acoustic barriers and silencers should be used in equipment wherever necessary

Sound proofing/ glass paneling should be provided at critical operating stations/ control rooms, etc


Monitoring of ambient noise levels should also be carried out regularly both inside the facility area as well as outside the peripheral greenbelt

6.3.3 Water Environment

Oil Water Separator (OWS) System

The capacity of 50 m3/hr at outlet will be provided to receive following streams. The capacity can be reworked based on effluent generation:

Storm water streams potentially contaminated by oil

Tank Cleaning

Waste Water generated periodically from fire drills and fire fighting in case of accident. This tank will then be connected to OWS. The oil free water should then be used for green belt development to the extent possible. There will be no disposal of untreated water on land.

6.3.4 Land Environment

Every precaution should be taken to avoid spillage of oils and other petroleum products on soils to protect groundwater and to avoid any danger to other soil microbial groups which are sensitive to oil pollution

Oil is a potential hazardous substance present in wastes generated from facility. Special care has to be taken in all oil removal operations. OWS Sludge will be sent to authorized CHWTSDF.

Greenbelt in and around the facility may be strengthened/maintained

A record w.r.t quantity, quality and treatment/management of solid/hazardous waste shall be maintained at environmental monitoring cell

Plan of green belt development

Along the periphery of the proposed Terminal Green belt will be developed. Out of the total land of approximately 33% acquired for facility and associated facilities, about 75,793 m2 has been earmarked for development of green belt. Since the area is hill rock big trees cannot be planted and hence small plants and shrubs will be planted to develop green belt area. The shrubs/small plants provided shall be non-fruit bearing and non leaf shedding types.

Water requirement in the greenbelt and horticulture area will be met from treated effluent of OWS.

Solid/Hazardous Waste Management

Oily sludge generated from the OWS system shall be disposed off to CHWTSDF.

In addition variety of wastes specially used oil containers will be generated from operations. This will be sent for recycling to the approved parties as per the approval of PCB.


6.3.5 Biological Environment

Development of green belt with carefully selected plant species is of prime importance due to their capacity to reduce noise and air pollution impacts by attenuation/assimilation and for providing food and habitat for local micro fauna.

6.3.6 Socio-economic Environment

In order to mitigate the impacts likely to arise out of the proposed project and also to maintain good will of local people, it is necessary to take steps for improving the social environment. Necessary social welfare measures by the industry shall be useful in gaining public confidence and meet local area development requirement. The following measures are suggested:

BPCL shall continue to undertake CSR programs for the betterment of the Quality of Life of villages around in collaboration with the local bodies & district administration.

With local govt. and Panchayat some basic amenities, viz. education, filters for safe drinking water to Nandur village may be taken up under CSR activity.

6.4 Environmental Monitoring Programme

Introduction

Environmental Management is nothing but resource management and environmental planning is just the same as development planning. They are just the other side of the same coin. The resource management and development planning look at the issue from narrow micro-economical point of view while environmental management views the issue from the broader prospective of long term sustained development option, which ensures that the environment is not desecrated. For the effective and consistent functioning of the project, proper environmental monitoring programme should be carried as per Govt. guidelines at the Proposed POL terminal at Kalaburagi The programme should include the following:

Environmental Monitoring

Personnel Training

Regular Environmental audits and Correction measures

Documentation–standards operation procedures Environmental Management Plan and other records

Environmental Monitoring

Work of monitoring shall be carried out at the locations to assess the environmental health in the post period. A post study monitoring programme is important as it provides useful information on the following aspects.


It helps to verify the predictions on environmental impacts presented in this study.

It helps to indicate warnings of the development of any alarming environmental situations, and thus, provides opportunities for adopting appropriate control measures in advance.

The monitoring programmes in different areas of environment, outlined in the next few sections, have been based on the findings of the impact assessment studies described in Chapter 3. Post study monitoring programme have been summed up in Table 6.1.

Table 6.1: Post Study Environmental Monitoring Program

Area of Monitoring

Number and Sampling locations

Frequency of Sampling

Parameters to be Analysed

Ambient Air Quality

1 station within premises.

Once in three months. PM10, PM2.5,SO2, NOx, HC, VOCs and other parameters as specified by KSPCB consents

Stack monitoring of DG Set

Once in three months PM, SO2, NOx, CO and other parameters as specified by KSPCB consents

Water 1 Ground water sample within the Terminal

Twice in a year Physical and Chemical parameters

Bacteriological parameters

Heavy metals and toxic constituents

Inlet and Outlet at OWS Daily when in operation

Parameters as specified in KSPCB consents

Noise Within 2 location , 1

within the premises and 1 in nearby village

Twice a year Sound Pressure Levels (Leq) during day and night times.

Solid Waste Records of generation of used drums, bags and records of their dispatch to suppliers for refilling

As and when collected for disposal

--

Records of generation of waste oils and their treatment

All such disposal records shall be maintained

--

Environmental Audit

Environmental statement under the EP (Act) 1986

Once in a year --

6.4.1 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring of ambient air quality at the Terminal site should be carried out on a regular basis to ascertain the levels of hydrocarbons in the atmosphere; ambient air quality shall be monitored as per Table 6.1.It will be done through KSPCB approved third party as per KSPCB applicable guidelines.

6.4.2 Surface Water Quality


Water quality constitutes another important area in the post study monitoring programme. There are no major streams or perennial sources of surface water in the study area. Contamination of surface water in the vicinity of Terminal area during the operation is possible only in one form. i. Contamination of rain water passing through the Terminal. Surface water near the Terminal area should be generally sampled as per the above table.

6.4.3 Ground Water Quality Ground water quality is also required to be checked periodically to detect any contamination arising out of Terminal. Ground water near the Terminal area and nearby villages should be generally sampled twice in a year and analyzed for physical, chemical and bacteriological parameters, including heavy metals and trace elements.

6.4.4 Soil Quality Soil samples close to the Terminal shall be collected as per above table. The samples should be analyzed for physical and chemical parameters as well as organic and nutrient content and heavy metals. This would help to detect any contamination or build up of harmful or toxic elements due to leachate from the pollutants.

6.4.5 Noise Level Ambient noise levels should be monitored at 2 locations inside and outside the plant in pre-monsoon and post-monsoon seasons for day time and night time Leq. 6.5 Environmental Management Cell The persons-in-charge of the Terminal with the assistance of operation and maintenance engineers at respective stations presently look after environmental management. Technical officers of the Terminal station shall regularly carry out the following as per KSPCB applicable standards through KSPCB approved third party:

Sampling and analysis of noise and water samples.

Systematic and routine housekeeping at the Terminal station.


CHAPTER 7. ADDITIONAL STUDIES

7.1 Public Consultation

The Notification no. S. O. 1533 promulgated on 14th September 2006 have covered this type of industries under its Activity 6(b). The proposed project is located within a government notified Industrial Area/Estate and as per the said notification it falls under Category ‘B’. The proposed project is coming up in the Government notified Industrial Area, namely Nandur Kesartagi Industrial Area, 2nd Phase, and as point III stage (3) sub point B of the said notification, proposed project has an exemption from public consultation (exemption from Public consultation is allowed for all projects or activities located within industrial estates or park approved by the concerned authorities, and which are not disallowed in such approvals as mentioned in the Gazette Notification of 2006).

7.2 Quantitative Risk Assessment

This section presents a brief description of the approach and steps followed in the QRA study. The QRA Study included the following steps: Identification of Hazards (Fire / Explosion / uncontrolled release of Hazardous materials / Flash Fire / Jet Fire / Vapor Cloud Explosion (VCE) Unconfined Vapor Cloud Explosion (UVCE), etc.) Identification of Maximum Credible Accident (MCA) scenario. Frequency Analysis using internationally accepted database and Evaluation of the likelihood of occurrence of possible events. Consequence modeling and analysis for the identified hazard covering impact on people and potential escalation by using PHAST Risk. Estimation of Individual Risk (IR) and Societal Risk (SR). Recommendations.The overall QRA methodology is shown in Figure 4and is described in more detail in the subsequent sections.


Figure 7.1: QRA Methodology

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION The hazardous scenarios considered in the QRA for the project facility will be identified based on the properties of the materials handled and the identification of the potential hazards in the pipeline systems which could lead to loss of containment events. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Class A & Class B petroleum products are received inwagons and stored in atmospheric tanks through TW Pumps later transferred in road tankers through TLF pumps.


CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS The following activities comprise the consequence analysis which is carried out for the project facility: Review of the P&ID’s to determine process streams; Identification of isolatable sections based on the location of Shutdown Valves; Review of the design basis to obtain the properties of the stream (e.g. pressure, temperature, composition and density) and Calculation of the inventory within the isolatable sections. Consequence modelling is conducted to evaluate the effect distances of the identified loss of Containment (LOC) scenarios and their impact on people. FREQUENCY ANALYSIS Once the potential release scenarios are identified, the next stage is to estimate the failure frequencies (likelihood for the event to occur) based on international standard databases. The frequency analysis will be performed as follows: Identification of the base failure frequencies applicable to the pipelines from the relevant international standard databases; The total failure frequencies will be derived from the combination of the time in use of the pipelines/tanks with the base failure frequency data. RISK ASSESSMENT Risk assessment will be undertaken to evaluate the risk associated with the Storage tanks and the associated facilities. The consequence analysis results and failure frequencies will be combined using PHAST RISK 6.7 software. The risk shall be typically presented as Location Specific Individual Risk (LSIR) contours. RISK EVALUATION The next stage of the QRA study includes the evaluation of the individual risk results against the Risk Acceptance Criteria to determine whether the risks are broadly acceptable, ALARP or unacceptable and to make some professional judgments about the significance of the risks.


CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS This section describes the approach used for the consequence analysis whereby consequence models arebuilt based on the identified LOC scenarios of the project facility. The consequences of the release ofhazardous substances by failures or catastrophes as well as the damage to the surrounding area can bedetermined by means of consequence modelling. Models help to calculate the physical effects resultingfrom a release of hazardous substances and help to translate the physical effects in terms of injury orfatality to the exposed personnel. The techniques used to model the consequences of the hazardous material releases cover the following:

Modelling of discharge rates when holes develop in pipeline systems.

Modelling of the flammable gas clouds from releases to the atmosphere.

Modelling of the heat radiation field of the releases that are ignited and burn as jet fire and flash fire.

Modelling of explosion overpressure from releases.

Table 7.1: Process Parameters for the pipes

IS No Description Scenario points

Leak Size,mm

Pipeline Dia, inch

Pressurekg/cm2

Temperature °C

Mass flow rate

m3/hr

IS 1

MS Pipeline from Rail Gantry to TWG Pump Suction

TWG BAY

25 10 3 55 350

FR 10 3 55 350

IS 2

SKO Pipeline from Rail Gantry to TWG Pump Suction

TWG BAY

25 10 3 55 350

FR 10 3 55 350

IS 3

HSD Pipeline from Rail Gantry to TWG Pump Suction

TWG BAY

30 12 3 55 500

FR 12 3 55 500

IS 4 MS Pipeline from TWG Pump Discharge to Tank

TWG PUMP

25 10 5 55 350

FR 10 5 55 350

IS 5 SKO Pipeline from TWG Pump Discharge to Tank

TWG PUMP

20 8 5 55 350

FR 8 5 55 350

IS 6 HSD Pipeline from TWG Pump

TWG PUMP

35 14 5 55 500

FR 14 5 55 500



Leak Size,mm

Pipeline Dia, inch

Pressurekg/cm2

Temperature °C

Mass flow rate

m3/hr

Discharge to Tank

IS 7 From MOV MS tank to TLF Pump suction

TLF BAY

40 16 3 55 200

FR 16 3 55 200

IS 8 From MOV SKO tank to TLF Pump suction

TLF BAY

20 8 3 55 250

FR 8 3 55 250

IS 9 From MOV HSD tank to TLF Pump suction

TLF BAY

50 24 3 55 350

FR 24 3 55 350

IS 10 TLF MS pump discharge to TLF gantry

TLF PUMP

30 12 5 55 200

FR 12 5 55 200

IS 11 TLF SKO pump discharge to TLF gantry

TLF PUMP

15 6 5 55 250

FR 6 5 55 250

IS 12 TLF HSD pump discharge to TLF gantry

TLF PUMP

40 16 5 55 350

FR 16 5 55 350

Table 7.2: Process Parameters for Storage Tanks


Leak Size,mm Pressurekg/cm2

Temperature °C

Capacity, m3

IS 13 TANK 1 HSD 10 ATM 55

7000 CR ATM 55


7000 CR ATM 55


7000 CR ATM 55

IS 16 TANK 4 MS 10 ATM 55

4000 CR ATM 55

IS 17 TANK 5 MS 10 ATM 55

4000 CR ATM 55

IS 18 TANK 6 SKO 10 ATM 55

858 CR ATM 55

IS 19 TANK 7 BIODIESEL 10 ATM 55

500 CR ATM 55



Leak Size,mm Pressurekg/cm2

Temperature °C

Capacity, m3

IS 20 TANK 8 BIODIESEL 10 ATM 55

500 CR ATM 55

IS 21 TANK 9 ETHANOL 10 ATM 55

200 CR ATM 55

IS 22 TANK 10 ETHANOL 10 ATM 55

200 CR ATM 55

Table 7.3: Consequence Result

Isolatable Section

Scenario Description

Release category

Release point

Flash Fire Effects: Radiation Effects: Jet

Fire Ellipse Radiation Effects: Pool Fire Ellipse

Overpressure 100% LFL Ellipse

Distance in meters

Radiation Levels (kW/m2)

Distance in meters


Distance in meters Overpress

ure levelbar

Distance in meters

2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D

IS-1

MS Pipeline from Rail Gantry to TWG Pump Suction

Leak 25 mm

TWG BAY

26.23 21.11 4 51.07 49.75 4 58.32 68.37 0.01 241.13 160.1212.5 39.74 37.56 12.5 27.81 27.19 0.1 66.62 52.57 37.5 32.67 30.23 37.5 NR NR 0.3 48.29 41.27

FBR TWG BAY 26.03 24.88

4 71.51 80.96 4 80.22 98.69 0.01 298.52 217.6612.5 56.02 61.84 12.5 39.20 38.82 0.1 74.76 62.55

37.5 46.25 50.39 37.5 NR NR 0.3 52.35 46.25

IS-2

SKO Pipeline from Rail Gantry to TWG Pump Suction

Leak 25 mm

TWG BAY

15.56 9.53 4 24.08 23.79 4 66.38 78.33 0.01 71.46 40.18 12.5 18.61 17.83 12.5 33.48 32.80 0.1 28.93 15.24 37.5 15.21 14.24 37.5 NR NR 0.3 24.46 12.61

FBR TWG BAY

13.16 10.14

4 25.72 29.64 4 79.85 96.20 0.01 113.69 69.26 12.5 20.10 22.60 12.5 39.78 39.66 0.1 27.99 20.28

37.5 16.54 18.37 37.5 NR NR 0.3 18.98 15.13

IS-3 HSD Pipeline from Rail

Leak 30 mm

TWG BAY

8.65 8.28 4 11.64 11.69 4 77.47 90.66 0.01 NH NH 12.5 8.89 8.66 12.5 40.72 40.25 0.1 NH NH 37.5 7.11 6.74 37.5 NR NR 0.3 NH NH


Isolatable Section


Release category

Release point




Distance in meters


Distance in meters



ure levelbar

Distance in meters

2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D

Gantry to TWG Pump Suction

FBR TWG BAY

5.48 5.24 4 11.30 12.87 4 92.83

109.53

0.01 17.28 NR

12.5 8.73 9.74 12.5 48.40 48.26 0.1 11.26 NR 37.5 7.14 7.77 37.5 NR NR 0.3 10.63 NR

IS-4

MS Pipeline from TWG Pump Discharge to Tank

Leak 25 mm

TWG PUMP

35.71 29.48 4 69.76 63.02 4 64.39 70.69 0.01 306.64 212.9012.5 54.07 47.25 12.5 32.81 30.53 0.1 86.25 69.99 37.5 44.45 37.80 37.5 NR NR 0.3 63.10 54.98

FBR TWG PUMP

26.06 24.54 4 69.93 79.61 4 91.79

112.49

0.01 330.44 223.73

12.5 54.82 60.84 12.5 45.78 45.31 0.1 82.11 63.61 37.5 45.27 49.61 37.5 NR NR 0.3 56.02 46.78

IS-5

SKO Pipeline from TWG Pump Discharge to Tank

Leak 20 mm

TWG PUMP

19.74 13.27 4 33.30 34.85 4 72.11 84.10 0.01 63.74 78.81 12.5 25.64 25.92 12.5 37.73 36.97 0.1 27.59 30.20 37.5 20.98 20.60 37.5 NR NR 0.3 23.79 25.09

FBR TWG PUMP

11.51 8.67 4 21.44 24.49 4 84.14

101.44

0.01 125.54 68.89

12.5 16.81 18.75 12.5 41.94 41.84 0.1 30.04 20.21 37.5 13.84 15.29 37.5 NR NR 0.3 20.01 15.10

IS-6 HSD Pipeline

Leak 35 mm

TWG PUMP

12.48 12.71 4.00 19.72 20.67 4.00 114.94

134.01

0.01 23.97 31.78


Isolatable Section


Release category

Release point




Distance in meters


Distance in meters



ure levelbar

Distance in meters

2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D

from TWG Pump Discharge to Tank

12.50 15.13 15.31 12.50 64.70 64.70 0.10 12.42 13.78 37.50 12.30 12.10 37.50 NR NR 0.30 11.21 11.89

FBR TWG PUMP

6.71 5.93 4.00 12.81 14.42 4.00

115.02

135.06

0.01 23.96 NR

12.50 9.92 10.91 12.50 62.33 62.12 0.10 12.42 NR 37.50 8.04 8.74 37.50 NR NR 0.30 11.21 NR

IS-7

From MOV MS tank to TLF Pump suction

Leak 40 mm

TTLF BAY

38.66 29.23 4.00 70.18 68.94 4.00 87.61

100.32

0.01 475.03 220.88

12.50 54.46 51.91 12.50 45.31 41.91 0.10 123.73 71.38 37.50 44.72 41.69 37.50 NR NR 0.30 86.81 55.67

FBR TLF BAY 30.17 27.75

4.00 80.32 91.50 4.00 102.80

125.53

0.01 335.84 267.18

12.50 62.90 69.85 12.50 52.41 51.89 0.10 79.58 79.41

37.50 51.94 56.91 37.50 NR NR 0.30 56.29 59.68

IS-8

From MOV SKO tank to TLF

Leak 20 mm

TLF BAY 14.30 8.48

4.00 20.62 20.28 4.00 64.76 76.17 0.01 31.11 40.98 12.50 15.94 15.20 12.50 32.30 31.43 0.10 13.66 15.37 37.50 13.01 12.12 37.50 NR NR 0.30 11.83 12.68

FBR TLF BAY

9.51 7.46 4.00 17.85 20.21 4.00 74.73 90.48 0.01 118.58 64.73 12.50 14.05 15.56 12.50 36.14 36.10 0.10 28.83 19.49


Isolatable Section


Release category

Release point




Distance in meters


Distance in meters



ure levelbar

Distance in meters

2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D

Pump suction

37.50 11.59 12.73 37.50 NR NR 0.30 19.40 14.74

IS-9

From MOV HSD tank to TLF Pump suction

Leak 50 mm

TLF BAY

10.95 10.48 4.00 15.66 15.94 4.00

147.48

171.15

0.01 34.68 23.21

12.50 12.03 11.87 12.50 84.77 84.24 0.10 22.55 12.29 37.50 9.74 9.38 37.50 NR NR 0.30 21.27 11.14

FBR

TLF BAY

7.69 7.02 4.00 15.58 16.78 4.00

141.40

165.18

0.01 26.52 24.47

12.50 12.09 12.72 12.50 79.63 79.41 0.10 12.87 12.51 37.50 9.86 10.24 37.50 NR NR 0.30 11.43 11.25

IS-10

TLF MS pump discharge to TLF gantry

Leak 30 mm

TLF PUMP 39.75 33.21

4 82.02 74.15 4 70.17 77.97 0.01 436.19 219.9812.5 63.48 55.52 12.5 36.51 33.72 0.1 116.99 71.22 37.5 52.15 44.38 37.5 NR NR 0.3 83.45 55.59

FBR

TLF PUMP

35.63 33.97 4.00

100.07

106.58

4.00 83.98 102.75

0.01 318.25 280.08

12.50 77.93 80.85 12.50 42.32 41.92 0.10 79.03 81.65 37.50 64.06 65.44 37.50 NR NR 0.30 56.16 60.79

IS-11 TLF SKO pump

TLF PUMP 11.33 9.53

4 28.00 29.48 4 55.51 64.49 0.01 66.10 61.33 12.5 21.58 21.95 12.5 27.36 28.27 0.1 28.00 18.90 37.5 17.66 17.45 37.5 NR NR 0.3 23.99 14.45


Isolatable Section


Release category

Release point




Distance in meters


Distance in meters



ure levelbar

Distance in meters

2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D

discharge to TLF gantry

FBR TLF PUMP 10.79 8.24

4.00 20.14 22.20 4.00 68.16 82.41 0.01 101.24 54.66 12.50 15.77 16.98 12.50 32.82 32.75 0.10 25.83 17.75 37.50 12.97 13.82 37.50 NR NR 0.30 17.90 13.87

IS-12

TLF HSD pump discharge to TLF gantry

Leak 40 mm

TLF PUMP

13.00 13.29 4 20.90 21.81 4

113.45

132.37

0.01 21.84 28.36

12.5 16.03 16.16 12.5 63.98 64.09 0.1 12.05 13.19 37.5 13.05 12.77 37.5 NR NR 0.3 11.03 11.59

FBR

TLF PUMP

8.75 8.61 4 18.04 18.86 4

105.88

124.08

0.01 NH NH

12.5 13.96 14.22 12.5 57.67 57.47 0.1 NH NH 37.5 11.38 11.41 37.5 NR NR 0.3 NH NH

IS-13 TANK 1

Leak 10 mm

HSD 4.24 3.98

4 2.21 2.08 4 45.13 51.94 0.01 NH NH 12.5 NR NR 12.5 20.27 21.49 0.1 NH NH 37.5 NR NR 37.5 NR NR 0.3 NH NH

CR

HSD

93.46 118.47

4 NA NA 4 85.08 163.62

0.01 327.98 348.17

12.5 NA NA 12.5 41.61 103.63

0.1 131.28 151.31

37.5 NA NA 37.5 NR NR 0.3 110.61 130.63IS-14 TANK 2 Leak HSD 4.24 3.98 4 2.21 2.08 4 45.13 51.94 0.01 NH NH


Isolatable Section


Release category

Release point




Distance in meters


Distance in meters



ure levelbar

Distance in meters

2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D

10 mm 12.5 NR NR 12.5 20.27 21.49 0.1 NH NH 37.5 NR NR 37.5 NR NR 0.3 NH NH

CR

HSD

93.46 118.47

4 NA NA 4 85.08 163.62

0.01 327.98 348.17

12.5 NA NA 12.5 41.61 103.63

0.1 131.28 151.31

37.5 NA NA 37.5 NR NR 0.3 110.61 130.63

IS-15 TANK 3

Leak 10 mm

HSD 4.24 3.98

4 2.21 2.08 4 45.13 51.94 0.01 NH NH 12.5 NR NR 12.5 20.27 21.49 0.1 NH NH 37.5 NR NR 37.5 NR NR 0.3 NH NH

CR

HSD

93.46 118.47

4 NA NA 4 85.08 163.62

0.01 327.98 348.17

12.5 NA NA 12.5 41.61 103.63

0.1 131.28 151.31

37.5 NA NA 37.5 NR NR 0.3 110.61 130.63

IS-16 TANK 4

Leak 10 mm

MS 11.53 5.59

4 14.00 12.64 4 40.98 44.20 0.01 48.75 NR 12.5 10.96 9.63 12.5 18.95 22.40 0.1 16.72 NR 37.5 8.96 7.72 37.5 12.58 11.40 0.3 13.36 NR

CR MS 222.9

8 202.36

4 NA NA 4 99.44 123.45

0.01 1745.58

1729.63


Isolatable Section


Release category

Release point




Distance in meters


Distance in meters



ure levelbar

Distance in meters

2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D

12.5 NA NA 12.5 48.32 48.34 0.1 507.76 451.7737.5 NA NA 37.5 NR NR 0.3 388.72 339.84

IS-17 TANK 5

Leak 10 mm

MS 11.53 5.59

4 14.00 12.64 4 40.98 44.20 0.01 48.75 NR 12.5 10.96 9.63 12.5 18.95 22.40 0.1 16.72 NR 37.5 8.96 7.72 37.5 12.58 11.40 0.3 13.36 NR

CR

MS 222.98

202.36

4 NA NA 4 99.44 123.45

0.01 1745.58

1729.63

12.5 NA NA 12.5 48.32 48.34 0.1 507.76 451.7737.5 NA NA 37.5 NR NR 0.3 388.72 339.84

IS-18 TANK 6

Leak 10 mm

SKO 6.74 3.62

4 4.92 4.44 4 43.72 50.15 0.01 NH NH 12.5 3.50 3.13 12.5 19.15 20.81 0.1 NH NH 37.5 NR NR 37.5 NR NR 0.3 NH NH

CR SKO

33.64 41.52 4 NA NA 4 54.01 66.26 0.01 221.88 240.8012.5 NA NA 12.5 22.85 23.19 0.1 63.28 74.83 37.5 NA NA 37.5 NR NR 0.3 46.62 57.39

IS-19 TANK 7 Leak 10 mm

BIODIESEL

3.60 3.31 4 NR NR 4 42.38 48.34 0.01 NH NH 12.5 NR NR 12.5 18.92 20.72 0.1 NH NH 37.5 NR NR 37.5 NR NR 0.3 NH NH

CR BIODIESE 27.47 33.58 4 NA NA 4 52.39 62.97 0.01 96.41 111.28


Isolatable Section


Release category

Release point




Distance in meters


Distance in meters



ure levelbar

Distance in meters

2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D

L 12.5 NA NA 12.5 22.48 22.85 0.1 33.25 44.10 37.5 NA NA 37.5 NR NR 0.3 26.62 37.04

IS-20 TANK 8

Leak 10 mm

BIODIESEL

3.60 3.31 4 NR NR 4 42.38 48.34 0.01 NH NH 12.5 NR NR 12.5 18.92 20.72 0.1 NH NH 37.5 NR NR 37.5 NR NR 0.3 NH NH

CR BIODIESEL

27.47 33.58 4 NA NA 4 52.39 62.97 0.01 96.41 111.2812.5 NA NA 12.5 22.48 22.85 0.1 33.25 44.10 37.5 NA NA 37.5 NR NR 0.3 26.62 37.04

IS-21 TANK 9

Leak 10 mm

ETHANOL

6.37 2.49 4 7.85 6.63 4 25.68 24.58 0.01 NH NH 12.5 7.25 5.07 12.5 16.43 17.26 0.1 NH NH 37.5 NR NR 37.5 8.79 8.18 0.3 NH NH

CR ETHANOL

46.71 43.40 4 NA NA 4 51.69 53.66 0.01 517.38 499.7812.5 NA NA 12.5 32.05 36.08 0.1 131.07 119.7537.5 NA NA 37.5 13.95 14.88 0.3 93.81 83.38

IS-22 TANK 10

Leak 10 mm

ETHANOL

6.37 2.49 4 7.85 6.63 4 24.07 23.58 0.01 NH NH 12.5 7.25 5.07 12.5 14.82 16.26 0.1 NH NH 37.5 NR NR 37.5 7.18 7.18 0.3 NH NH

CR ETHANOL

38.14 38.33 4 NA NA 4 26.88 28.14 0.01 452.37 447.5112.5 NA NA 12.5 16.25 18.86 0.1 110.69 103.57


Isolatable Section


Release category

Release point




Distance in meters


Distance in meters



ure levelbar

Distance in meters

2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D 2F 5D

37.5 NA NA 37.5 7.18 7.18 0.3 78.69 71.74 Where, NA – Not Applicable NR – Not Reached NH – No Hazard


FREQUENCY ANALYSIS This section presents a brief description of the methodology and approach adopted for the frequency analysis. To calculate the risk associated with a LOC scenario, it is necessary to estimate the failure frequency. The frequency of occurrence of such an event is based on the probability of the LOC scenario and the presence of constraints that influence the development of the event. In case of leakage in the pipeline systems, flammable substances may be released into the atmosphere. This can occur in the form of a small gasket failure in a flanged joint, a bleeding valve, inadvertently left open valves, failure of pipeline, corrosion, or any other external factors. BASE FAILURE FREQUENCY The failure frequencies of full release cases are considered since the release is consistent with flow through the defined hole, beginning at the normal operating pressure, and continuing until controlled by emergency shutdown or inventory exhaustion. TOTAL FAILURE FREQUENCY The total failure frequencies for isolatable section are calculated by combining the base failure frequency obtained from the international database and time in use factor. The details of the total failure frequencies determined for the identified LOC scenario are given below:

Table 7.4: Total Failure Frequency

Isolatable section identification

Description Leak Size, mm

Total failure frequency avg per year

IS 1 MS Pipeline from Rail Gantry to TWG Pump Suction

25 1.37E-06

FR 2.74E-07

IS 2 SKO Pipeline from Rail Gantry to TWG Pump Suction

25 1.37E-06

FR 2.74E-07

IS 3 HSD Pipeline from Rail Gantry to TWG Pump Suction

30 1.37E-06

FR 2.74E-07

IS 4 MS Pipeline from TWG Pump Discharge to Tank

25 3.42E-06

FR 6.84E-07


20 3.42E-06

FR 6.84E-07

IS 6 HSD Pipeline from TWG Pump Discharge to Tank

35 3.42E-06

FR 6.84E-07


40 2.74E-06

FR 5.47E-07


Isolatable section identification

Description Leak Size, mm

Total failure frequency avg per year

IS 8 From MOV SKO tank to TLF Pump suction

20 2.74E-06

FR 5.47E-07

IS 9 From MOV HSD tank to TLF Pump suction

50 2.74E-06

FR 5.47E-07

IS 10 TLF MS pump discharge to TLF gantry 30 2.05E-06

FR 4.11E-07

IS 11 TLF SKO pump discharge to TLF gantry 15 2.05E-06

FR 4.11E-07

IS 12 TLF HSD pump discharge to TLF gantry 40 2.05E-06

FR 4.11E-07

IS 13 TANK 1 10 9.00E-06

CR 4.50E-07

IS 14 TANK 2 10 9.00E-06

CR 4.50E-07

IS 15 TANK 3 10 9.00E-06

CR 4.50E-07

IS 16 TANK 4 10 9.00E-06

CR 4.50E-07

IS 17 TANK 5 10 9.00E-06

CR 4.50E-07

IS 18 TANK 6 10 9.00E-06

CR 4.50E-07

IS 19 TANK 7 10 9.00E-06

CR 4.50E-07

IS 20 TANK 8 10 9.00E-06

CR 4.50E-07

IS 21 TANK 9 10 9.00E-06

CR 4.50E-07

IS 22 TANK 10 10 9.00E-06

CR 4.50E-07 RISK CRITERIA The risk associated with the project facility can be seen as the probable frequency of an event in combination with its magnitude and is determined based on both consequence analysis results


and failure frequency. In order to take decisions based on these quantified risk levels, comparison with numerical risk criteria is essential. These criteria are used to determine whether the risks are unacceptable, tolerable if ALARP or broadly acceptable. In order to be able to make HSE Risk management decisions, adopted the Risk AcceptanceCriteria which are discussed in this section. RISK ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA In India, there are no defined criteria for risk acceptance. However, in IS 15656 – Code of Practice for Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis, Annexure E summarizes the risk criteria adopted in some countries. Extracts for the same is presented below,

Table 7.5: HSE UK Risk Criteria

AUTHORITY AND APPLICATION MAXIMUM TOLERABLE RISK (PER YEAR)

NEGLIGIBLE RISK (PER YEAR)

VROM, The Netherlands (New) 1.0 x10-6 1.0 x10-8

VROM, The Netherlands (existing) 1.0 x10-5 1.0 x10-8

HSE, UK (existing-hazardous industry) 1.0 x10-4 1.0 x10-6

HSE, UK (New nuclear power station) 1.0 x10-5 1.0 x10-6

HSE, UK (Substance transport) 1.0 x10-4 1.0 x10-6

HSE, UK (New housing near plants) 3*1.0 x10-6 3*1.0 x10-7

Hong Kong Government (New plants) 1.0 x10-5 Not used

LOCATION SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL RISK (LSIR) The term “Location-Specific Individual Risk (LSIR)” is used for the calculations of the risk of fatality forsomeone at a specific location, assuming that the person is always present at the location and therefore, iscontinuously exposed to the risk at that location. This makes the LSIR a measure of the geographicdistribution of risk, independent of the distribution of people at that location or in the surrounding area. TheLSIR is presented as iso-risk contours on a map of the location of interest. RISK RESULTS The risk modeling has been performed using DNV PHAST RISK 6.7 software. Thereby, the details of the input data used for the risk modeling such as, ignition probability and occupancy data are given in the QRA Assumption Register. This section focuses on the outcome of the risk results and the comparison of the risk results with risk acceptance criteria.


LOCATION SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL RISK (LSIR) RESULTS The location specific individual risk (LSIR) contour for the project facility is presented below:

INDIVIDUAL RISK PER ANNUM The LSIR values of the personnel in the GulbargaDepot are provided in the Table below. From this LSIR value, the Individual Risk Per Annum (IRPA) to the personnel based on their exposure are calculated and presented below:

S. No Location of Interest LSIR (per avg. year)

Presence Factor IRPA RISK

1 Admin Building 7.96E-07 0.304 2.42E-07 Acceptable

2 TLF Gantry 8.74E-06 0.304 2.66E-06 ALARP

3 Railway Siding 5.29E-07 0.038 2.03E-08 Acceptable

4 TLF Pump House 1.11E-05 0.304 3.38E-06 ALARP

5 TWG Pump House 2.26E-06 0.038 8.67E-08 Acceptable

6 MS Tank farm 3.01E-06 1.000 3.01E-06 ALARP

7 HSD Tank farm 1.45E-06 1.000 1.45E-06 ALARP

8 SKO Tank Farm 4.86E-06 1.000 4.86E-06 ALARP

9 ETP 1.02E-10 0.304 3.11E-11 Acceptable Note: The presence factor has been calculated as shown below (e.g. person in the TLF gantry): Total working hours in a year = 333 (days) x 8 (hours a day) = 2664 hours Number of hours in a year = 24 (hours a day) x 365 (days a year)


= 8760 hours Presence Factor = Total working hours in a year / Number of hours in a year = 2664 / 8760 = 0.3041 Comparison of the HSE UK Risk Acceptance Criteria and the Individual Risks calculated from the projectfacility shows that the estimated values of IRPA, as given in Table above lies broadly in ALARP region for all the identified locations in the Depot. SOCEITAL RISK Assessment of societal risks is even more important than assessment of individual riskbecause they involve the likelihood of multiple fatalities. Societal risk is the risk to any person or group of persons who are not connected to project facilities and are outside the facility fence line. F-N CURVE It is helpful to consider group risk in the demonstration that risks are ALARP. This allows consideration to be given to events, which, although low in frequency, may cause multiple injuries or fatalities. Group risk can be presented in the form of a plot of cumulative frequency versus number of fatalities (F-N curve). F = Frequency (experienced or predicted) N = No. of multiple fatalities. ‘N’ includes indirect deaths caused as a result of the main event occurring and can therefore be difficult to predict e.g. many people may die years after exposure to a toxic chemical.


RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations of the QRA are as follows, Ensure design and maintenance review are carried out to identify the hazards andcorresponding prevention and mitigation measures are in place. The Flash fire scenario for certain accident scenarios are found to encompass theentire facility, hence it is recommended to avoid any source of ignition in the depot. Ensure proper access/exit to all the areas of the depot in order to evacuate safelyduring emergency. Consider carrying out SIMOPS study. People movement in the TLF gantry should be maintained minimum. Ensure proper fire protection system is in place at gantry and tank farm area to avoidescalation of fire from TLF pump house. Ensure adequate grounding and earthing arrangements in the loading area are in placeto avoid static charge generation. Ensure regular monitoring in the tank farm and pump house. It is recommended to develop procedures to verify the testing and inspection recordsof the tankers at the entry gate. Ensure arrangements and procedures for periodic proof testing of storage tank overfill prevention systems are in place to minimize the likelihood of any failure that couldresult in loss of containment. LIST OF REFERENCE DOCUMENTS / STANDARDS Guideline of Quantitative Risk Assessment - PGS 3 [Purple book] Methods for the determination of possible damage – CPR 16E [Green book] DNV SAFETI manual Population density survey of pipeline www.Meteoblue.com Piping & Instrumentation diagram Layout of the Depot OISD 244 –Storage and Handling of petroleum products at depots and terminals. Safety and Environmental standards for fuel storage sites, process safety leadership group final report- HSE UK. CONSEQUENCE CONTOURS


Flash Fire IS 1 MS Pipeline from Rail Gantry to TWG Pump Suction






IS 13 TANK 1

IS 16 TANK 4


IS 18 TANK 6

IS 22 TANK 10


JET FIRE ELLIPSE IS 1 MS Pipeline from Rail Gantry to TWG Pump Suction






VAPOR CLOUD EXPLOSION IS 1 MS Pipeline from Rail Gantry to TWG Pump Suction






IS 13 TANK 1

IS 16 TANK 4


IS 18 TANK 6

IS 22 TANK 10


POOL FIRE ELLIPSE IS 1 MS Pipeline from Rail Gantry to TWG Pump Suction






IS 13 TANK 1

IS 16 TANK 4


IS 18 TANK 6

IS 22 TANK 10


ASSUMPTION REGISTER

Assumption No: 1

Subject: Risk Calculation Tool

The risk analysis within this study is conducted using DNV Software’s Phast Risk program Version 6.7, which is an industry standard method for carrying out QRA for POL terminal tanks and pipelines (chemical and petrochemical) facilities. Phast Risk allows efficient identification of major risk contributors, so that time and effort can then be directed to mitigating these highest risk activities. Phast Risk analyses complex consequences from accident scenarios, taking account of local population, land usage and weather conditions, to quantify the risk associated with the release of hazardous materials. Phast Risk incorporates the industry standard consequence modeling of Phast. Phast Risk is intended as a set of models for risk analysts to enable them to provide timely, accurate and appropriate advice on safety related issues. It models all stages of a release from outflow through a hole or from a pipe end, through atmospheric dispersion, rain-out and re-evaporation of liquid, to thermal radiation from fires, explosion overpressures and toxic lethality. Phast Risk combines recognized and validated models for the various physical phenomena, automatically selecting the appropriate model depending on the circumstances of the release. It provides an experienced risk analyst with a tool that allows them to focus their attention and experience on the real problem areas rather than the administration of large quantities of data. Reference: 1.www.dnvgl.com/services/hazard-analysis-phast-1675


Assumption No: 2

Subject: Facility Description

BPCLGULBARGA is POL terminal which distributes MS/HSD/SKO/ETHANOL to nearby districts The risk analysis is based on the onsite population and off-site population

Table 7.6: Onsite Population

Population No.

Admin 15

TLF gantry 10

TLF & TWD pump house 2

Tank farms 5

Main Gate Security cabin 5

MCC room 1

Tanker parking area 80

TW Gantry & ETP 5

Calibration shed and Fire pump house

5

Table 7.7 Offsite Population around 2 KM range

S.No Village/District Name Population

1 Gulbarga 261/km2 (Density)


Assumption No: 3

Subject: Material Composition

Composition of MS, SKO, HSD considered is given below:

Product Composition Mole %

MS N-HEPTANE 10 N-OCTANE 90


SKO

N-OCTANE 5 N-NONANE 10 n-DECANE 15 n-UNDECANE 30 n-DODECANE 15 n-TRIDECANE 20 n-TETRADECANE 5 n-PENTADECANE 5 n-HEXADECANE 3 n-HEPTADECANE 2


HSD

n-DECANE 2 n-UNDECANE 8 n-DODECANE 12 n-TRIDECANE 15 n-TETRADECANE 20 n-PENTADECANE 20 n-HEXADECANE 10 n-HEPTADECANE 8 n-OCTADECANE 5

Implication of assumption: Key influence in determining the dispersion results.


Assumption No: 4

Subject: Meteorological Data

Data on the wind direction, wind speed and atmospheric stability are combined to form a set of representative weather categories in the surroundings of GULBARGA. Figure 1 show the wind rose for GULBARGA. Weather condition chosen for the study: 2 F & 5 D. Wind rose diagram of GULBARGA is considered for the study which gives the wind proportion for whole year. Wind Proportion table interpreted from the wind rose diagram of GULBARGA is given below; wind speed m/s

0 >0.3 >1.6 >3.4 >5.5 >8 >10.8 >13.9 >17.2

N 0.0003 0.0086 0.0245 0.0105 0.0043 0.0005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000NNE 0.0003 0.0088 0.0465 0.0131 0.0032 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000NE 0.0001 0.0100 0.0581 0.0183 0.0041 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ENE 0.0005 0.0161 0.0492 0.0178 0.0017 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000E 0.0000 0.0096 0.0291 0.0094 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ESE 0.0005 0.0105 0.0317 0.0086 0.0005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SE 0.0001 0.0074 0.0322 0.0256 0.0018 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SSE 0.0000 0.0056 0.0235 0.0144 0.0029 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000S 0.0008 0.0081 0.0160 0.0090 0.0019 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SSW 0.0001 0.0045 0.0086 0.0043 0.0013 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SW 0.0003 0.0051 0.0111 0.0113 0.0152 0.0023 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000WSW 0.0000 0.0040 0.0158 0.0403 0.0763 0.0193 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000W 0.0003 0.0080 0.0240 0.0373 0.0474 0.0083 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WNW 0.0001 0.0053 0.0160 0.0180 0.0112 0.0003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000NW 0.0002 0.0064 0.0152 0.0105 0.0043 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000NNW 0.0000 0.0050 0.0143 0.0086 0.0041 0.0003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Other Meteorological details are; Atmospheric Temperature : 55° C Atmospheric Pressure : 101.325 KN/m2 Relative Humidity : 81% Surface Roughness : 0.3 Solar Flux : 0.12 kW/m2 WIND ROSE


Assumption No: 4

Subject: Meteorological Data

Reference: https://www.meteoblue.com/en/weather/forecast/modelclimate/gulbarga_india_1270752 Purple book CPR 18E- Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Assessment http://www.kspcb.gov.in/PH/Thagadur_Mines_MML_EIA.pdf


Assumption No: 5

Subject: Ignition Sources & Ignition Probability

Specification: Ignition sources in the QRA study considered are of 3 types

Type Description In site Ignition Probability

Point Known specific sources such as flares, workshops, equipment’s etc.

Parking Area Canteen DG Room

0.4 0.9 0.4

M&R shed 1.0

Line Roads Railways Electrical transmission lines

As Applicable As Applicable As Applicable

As Per no. of Vehicles 0.2

Areas Population in the facility, mutual aid and surrounding village

As Applicable 0.01 Per person

Reference: 1.Purple book CPR 18E- Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Assessment


Assumption No: 6

Subject: Inventory Calculation

Specification: The inventory of a given section is defined as the isolatable mass within that section under normal operating conditions and in addition to that, the inventory released prior to the segment isolation. i.e. Total inventory= static+ Dynamic inventory Static Inventory is calculated from volume of pipe line section considered. Dynamic inventory is given by the product of flow rate and release time duration taken. Isolation time will be considered based on the type of isolation proposed for the terminal. Provide type of isolation proposed to be provided in BPCLGULBARGA

Scenario Inventory Release Duration Leak 10min Rupture 2min



Assumption No: 7

Subject: Release Sizes

Specification: To define the hazardous release events applying to each Process Accident release scenario (QRA section), representative hole sizes are modeled. The selection of the hole sizes is made based on the guidelines given in purple book. For pipelines a leak size of 10% of nominal diameter is taken. And for storage tank a leak size of 10mm is considered.



Assumption No: 8

Subject: Event Failure frequencies

Specification: The basic failure frequency data taken from the purple book for above ground pipelines are given below which are then multiplied with the length of pipes respectively along with it to give the calculated failure frequency per year.

Installation Leak Rupture Pipeline pipeline, nominal diameter < 75 mm

5 × 10-6 m-1 y-1 1 × 10-6 m-1 y-1

pipeline, 75 mm ≤ nominal diameter ≤ 150 mm

2 × 10-6 m-1 y-1 3 × 10-7 m-1 y-1

nominal diameter > 150 mm 5 × 10-7 m-1 y-1 1 × 10-7 m-1 y-1 Tank

Tank 1x10-4 y-1 5x10-6 y-1



Assumption No: 9

Subject: Damage Criteria

Specification: The damage criteria give the relation between the extents of the physical effects (exposure) and the effect of consequences. Effects due to incident radiation

Incident Radiation (Kw/m2)

Type Of Damage

4.0 Sufficient to cause pain within 20 sec. Blistering of skin (first degree burns are likely)

12.5 Minimum energy required for piloted ignition of wood, melting plastic tubing’s etc.

37.5 Sufficient to cause damage to the equipment

Damages due to over pressure effect

Peak Overpressure Damage Type Description

0.30 bar Heavy Damage Major damage to plant equipment structure

0.10 bar Moderate Damage Repairable damage to plant equipment & structure

0.03 bar Significant Damage Shattering of glass


CHAPTER 8. DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS ENGAGED

8.1 Consultants Engaged

This EIA report is prepared on behalf of the proponents, taking inputs from proponent’s office staff, Architects, Project Management Professionals etc. by Environmental Consultants M/s. Ultra-Tech, Environmental Consultancy and Laboratory, Thane.

M/s Ultra-Tech Environmental Consultancy and Laboratory:

Ultra-Tech Environmental Consultancy and Laboratory [Lab Gazetted by MoEF – Govt. of India] not only give environmental solutions for sustainable development, but make sure that they are economically feasible. With innovative ideas and impact mitigation measures offered, make them distinguished in environmental consulting business. The completion of tasks in record time is the key feature of Ultra-Tech. A team of more than hundred environmental brigadiers consists of engineers, experts, ecologists, hydrologists, geologists, socio-economic experts, solid waste and hazard waste experts apart from environmental media sampling and monitoring experts and management experts , strive hard to serve the clients with up to mark and best services.

Ultra-Tech offers environmental consultancy services to assist its clients to obtain environmental clearance for their large buildings, construction, CRZ, SEZ, high rise buildings, township projects and industries covering sugar and distilleries from respective authorities.

Ultra-Tech also provide STP/ETP /WTP project consultancy on turn-key basis apart from Operation and Maintenance of these projects on annual contract basis. Also, having MoEF approved environmental laboratory, Ultra-Tech provide laboratory services for monitoring and analysis of various environmental media like air, water, waste water, stack, noise and meteorological data to its clients all over India and abroad.

The EIA team involved for the proposed EIA Report is as mentioned in Table 8.1.

Table 8.1: EIA Team

SN Name of the expert Area of functional Expert(NABET Accredited) 1 Mr. Timir Shah EIA Coordinator

2 Mr. Timir Shah Air Pollution

2 Mr. Timir Shah Water Pollution

3 Ms. Archana Sadashiva Solid Hazardous Waste

5 Mr. Vikrant Kulkarni Ecology and Biodiversity 6 Mr. Yogesh Raskar Socio Economic

7 Mr.Ajay Patil Team Members


Functional area experts and assistance to FAE involved in the EIA study for “M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited” is as shown in Table 8.2:

Table 8.2: Functional Area Experts Involved in the EIA

S.N. NAME OF SECTOR

NAME OF PROJECT

NAME OF CLIENT

FUNCTIONAL AREA EXPERTS INVOLVED FA NAME/S

1. Schedule 6 (b) Category ‘B’

Development Of Greenfield Rail-Fed POL Terminal At Village - Nandur, District - Kalaburagi, Maharshtra

M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

AP Mr. Timir Shah

WP Mr. Timir Shah Associate: Mr.Ajay Patil

EB Mr. Vikrant Kulkarni Associate: Mr. Mintu Chowdhury

SE Mr. Yogesh Raskar

SHW Ms. Archana Sadashiva Associate: Mrs.Timir Shah

LU Mr. Yogesh Raskar

RH Mr. Subhash Bonde Associate: Mr.Ajay Patil

8.2 Laboratory for Analysis

NAME OF LABORATORY SCOPE OF SERVICES ACCREDITATION STATUS

M/s. Ultra-Tech Environmental Consultancy and Laboratory, Thane

Monitoring and Analysis of: Ambient Air Monitoring Bore Water(Analysis) Domestic and Potable Water (Analysis) Waste Water (Analysis)

Accredited by NABL Valid upto 23.04.2019

ANNEXURE-I

Site Layout Plan

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

18 M W I D E R O A D

AutoCAD SHX Text

(RESITEMENT OF RAICHUR DEPOT)

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAYOUT OF GULBARGA DEPOT

AutoCAD SHX Text

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPN.LTD.

AutoCAD SHX Text

Bharat

AutoCAD SHX Text

Petroleum

AutoCAD SHX Text

SUBJECT

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE : 14.12.2017

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRWN :

AutoCAD SHX Text

CHECKED :

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWING NO :

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE :

AutoCAD SHX Text

DGM, E&P, (SOUTH).

AutoCAD SHX Text

TANK

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

DIMENSIONS

AutoCAD SHX Text

DIAMETER

AutoCAD SHX Text

LENGTH/HEIGHT

AutoCAD SHX Text

PRODUCT /

AutoCAD SHX Text

TYPE

AutoCAD SHX Text

CAPACITY

AutoCAD SHX Text

AG / UG

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCHEDULE OF TANKS

AutoCAD SHX Text

24.04M

AutoCAD SHX Text

24.04M

AutoCAD SHX Text

16.00M

AutoCAD SHX Text

16.00M

AutoCAD SHX Text

HSD

AutoCAD SHX Text

HSD

AutoCAD SHX Text

7000KL

AutoCAD SHX Text

7000KL

AutoCAD SHX Text

24.04M

AutoCAD SHX Text

16.00M

AutoCAD SHX Text

HSD

AutoCAD SHX Text

7000KL

AutoCAD SHX Text

20.00M

AutoCAD SHX Text

15.00M

AutoCAD SHX Text

MS

AutoCAD SHX Text

4000KL

AutoCAD SHX Text

20.00M

AutoCAD SHX Text

15.00M

AutoCAD SHX Text

MS

AutoCAD SHX Text

4000KL

AutoCAD SHX Text

7.95M

AutoCAD SHX Text

11.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

BIO DIESEL

AutoCAD SHX Text

500KL

AutoCAD SHX Text

A.G FIXED.

AutoCAD SHX Text

A.G FIXED.

AutoCAD SHX Text

4.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

16.2M(L)

AutoCAD SHX Text

ETHANOL

AutoCAD SHX Text

200KL

AutoCAD SHX Text

A.G HORIZONTAL

AutoCAD SHX Text

4.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

16.2M(L)

AutoCAD SHX Text

200KL

AutoCAD SHX Text

9.00M

AutoCAD SHX Text

13.50M

AutoCAD SHX Text

SKO

AutoCAD SHX Text

858KL

AutoCAD SHX Text

A.G FIXED.

AutoCAD SHX Text

A.G EFR

AutoCAD SHX Text

A.G EFR

AutoCAD SHX Text

A.G FIXED.

AutoCAD SHX Text

A.G FIXED.

AutoCAD SHX Text

A.G FIXED.

AutoCAD SHX Text

ETHANOL

AutoCAD SHX Text

BS

AutoCAD SHX Text

22

AutoCAD SHX Text

23

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

18

AutoCAD SHX Text

25

AutoCAD SHX Text

28

AutoCAD SHX Text

27

AutoCAD SHX Text

L O R R Y P A R K I N G A R E A

AutoCAD SHX Text

19

AutoCAD SHX Text

19

AutoCAD SHX Text

GATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

4.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

16.2M(L)

AutoCAD SHX Text

SKO

AutoCAD SHX Text

200KL

AutoCAD SHX Text

U.G

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

7.95M

AutoCAD SHX Text

11.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

BIO DIESEL

AutoCAD SHX Text

500KL

AutoCAD SHX Text

A.G HORIZONTAL

AutoCAD SHX Text

FUTURE EXPANSION

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

GATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

T10

AutoCAD SHX Text

T9

AutoCAD SHX Text

T11

AutoCAD SHX Text

2.01M

AutoCAD SHX Text

6.75M

AutoCAD SHX Text

HSD

AutoCAD SHX Text

20KL

AutoCAD SHX Text

U.G(OWN USE)

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

(0,0)

AutoCAD SHX Text

94

AutoCAD SHX Text

2.20

AutoCAD SHX Text

ACRE PLOT

AutoCAD SHX Text

PARK

AutoCAD SHX Text

2.27

AutoCAD SHX Text

ACRE PLOT

AutoCAD SHX Text

1.65 ACRES

AutoCAD SHX Text

CETP/ETP

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING NANDUR 1st PHASE

AutoCAD SHX Text

INDUSTRIAL AREA

AutoCAD SHX Text

ROAD NO.5 (18.0M WIDE)

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

ROAD No.2 (18.0M WIDE)

AutoCAD SHX Text

BPCL LAND

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE PLAN

AutoCAD SHX Text

AGRICULTURE LAND

AutoCAD SHX Text

KIADB LAND

AutoCAD SHX Text

KIADB LAND

AutoCAD SHX Text

SW

AutoCAD SHX Text

SE

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

W

AutoCAD SHX Text

NW

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

NE

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

D R I V E W A Y

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

29

AutoCAD SHX Text

29

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

WICKET GATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

D R I V E W A Y

AutoCAD SHX Text

FUTURE

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

6M WIDE ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

6M WIDE ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

EMERGENCY EXIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

6M WIDE ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

LIFTING BARRIER

AutoCAD SHX Text

16

AutoCAD SHX Text

MAIN GATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

MAIN GATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

17

AutoCAD SHX Text

T12

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

14

AutoCAD SHX Text

LIFTING BARRIER

AutoCAD SHX Text

25

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA -

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA -

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA -

AutoCAD SHX Text

354.67

AutoCAD SHX Text

569.24

AutoCAD SHX Text

25.5

AutoCAD SHX Text

51.77

AutoCAD SHX Text

48.25

AutoCAD SHX Text

54.6

AutoCAD SHX Text

106.5

AutoCAD SHX Text

29.23

AutoCAD SHX Text

144.77

AutoCAD SHX Text

66.17

AutoCAD SHX Text

31.27

AutoCAD SHX Text

115.7

AutoCAD SHX Text

45.2

AutoCAD SHX Text

65.4

AutoCAD SHX Text

143.5

AutoCAD SHX Text

473.5

AutoCAD SHX Text

LIFTING BARRIER

AutoCAD SHX Text

24

AutoCAD SHX Text

25

AutoCAD SHX Text

25

AutoCAD SHX Text

25

AutoCAD SHX Text

26

AutoCAD SHX Text

26

AutoCAD SHX Text

GATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

D

AutoCAD SHX Text

B

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA -

AutoCAD SHX Text

G

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA -

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA -

AutoCAD SHX Text

C

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA -

AutoCAD SHX Text

M

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA -

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA -

AutoCAD SHX Text

H

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA -

AutoCAD SHX Text

J

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA -

AutoCAD SHX Text

K

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA -

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

DESCRIPTION

AutoCAD SHX Text

DIMENSIONS

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

22

AutoCAD SHX Text

17

AutoCAD SHX Text

19

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

14

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

16

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

18

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

24

AutoCAD SHX Text

25

AutoCAD SHX Text

23

AutoCAD SHX Text

SECURITY CABIN

AutoCAD SHX Text

8.0M X 4.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

4.0M x 4.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

PLANNING ROOM

AutoCAD SHX Text

1x2000 L &1x1000 L

AutoCAD SHX Text

CALIBRATION TOWER

AutoCAD SHX Text

D G PLATFORM

AutoCAD SHX Text

20.0M x 8.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

M C C ROOM

AutoCAD SHX Text

CONTROL ROOM

AutoCAD SHX Text

ENGG. STORE

AutoCAD SHX Text

12.0M x 8.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

INSPECTION / SEALING PLATFORM

AutoCAD SHX Text

15.0 X 4.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

35.0M x 6.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

TLF PUMP HOUSE

AutoCAD SHX Text

TLF GANTRY (8-BAYS)

AutoCAD SHX Text

6.5M x 15.0 (EACH BAY)

AutoCAD SHX Text

SPEED / HISPEED BARREL SHED

AutoCAD SHX Text

5.0M x 5.0M(2NOS)

AutoCAD SHX Text

20.0MX5.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

5.0MX5.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

27

AutoCAD SHX Text

SAMPLE RETENTION ROOM

AutoCAD SHX Text

26

AutoCAD SHX Text

29

AutoCAD SHX Text

28

AutoCAD SHX Text

TWD PUMP HOUSE

AutoCAD SHX Text

SIDING CREW BLOCK

AutoCAD SHX Text

500KL/HR

AutoCAD SHX Text

ETP

AutoCAD SHX Text

5 NOS.

AutoCAD SHX Text

HIGH MAST TOWER

AutoCAD SHX Text

RAINWATER HARVESTING PITS

AutoCAD SHX Text

20.0M X 20.0M (2NOS.)

AutoCAD SHX Text

6000 SQM.(+3000SQM-FUTURE)

AutoCAD SHX Text

PCVO SHELTER

AutoCAD SHX Text

12.0M x 8.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIRE WATER TANK (2NOS.)

AutoCAD SHX Text

14.03M DIA X 15.0M HT.(2300KL)

AutoCAD SHX Text

10.0M x 8.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

VISITORS PARKING SHED

AutoCAD SHX Text

25.0M x 10.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

ADMIN BLOCK

AutoCAD SHX Text

AMENITIES BLOCK

AutoCAD SHX Text

10.0M x 10.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

Q C LAB

AutoCAD SHX Text

20.0M x 12.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

5.0 M X 5.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

TWO POLE STRUCTURE

AutoCAD SHX Text

10.0M x 10.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

TRANSFORMER YARD

AutoCAD SHX Text

30.0M x 8.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

CAR / CYCLE SHED

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIRE WATER PUMP HOUSE

AutoCAD SHX Text

22.0M x 8.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

20.0M x 8.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

15.0M x 10.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

28.0M x 6.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

VEPOUR RECOVERY UNIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

10.0M x 5.0M

AutoCAD SHX Text

TANKLORRY PARKING

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA -

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA - A

AutoCAD SHX Text

1357

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

DESCRIPTION

AutoCAD SHX Text

AREA IN SQM

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

DETAILS OF GREEN AREA

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA - B

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA - C

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA - D

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA - E

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA - F

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA - G

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA - H

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA - I

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA - J

AutoCAD SHX Text

2900

AutoCAD SHX Text

4773

AutoCAD SHX Text

1070

AutoCAD SHX Text

1068

AutoCAD SHX Text

3004

AutoCAD SHX Text

1257

AutoCAD SHX Text

19602

AutoCAD SHX Text

16913

AutoCAD SHX Text

8313

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA - K

AutoCAD SHX Text

5889

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA - L

AutoCAD SHX Text

26050

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

GREEN AREA - M

AutoCAD SHX Text

15873

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

TOTAL

AutoCAD SHX Text

108077

AutoCAD SHX Text

IOCL DEPOT

AutoCAD SHX Text

6M WIDE ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

T1

AutoCAD SHX Text

6M WIDE ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

T2

AutoCAD SHX Text

T3

AutoCAD SHX Text

T5

AutoCAD SHX Text

T4

AutoCAD SHX Text

6M WIDE ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

6M WIDE ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

6M WIDE ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

T6

AutoCAD SHX Text

T7

AutoCAD SHX Text

T8

AutoCAD SHX Text

FUTURE

AutoCAD SHX Text

P A R K I N G A R E A

AutoCAD SHX Text

ITF,SOUTH

AutoCAD SHX Text

E&P,SOUTH

AutoCAD SHX Text

RETAIL,SOUTH

AutoCAD SHX Text

E&P,HQ

AutoCAD SHX Text

RETAIL,HQ

ANNEXURE-II

Standard and Additional TOR

No.IA-J-11011/406/2017-IA-II(I)

Goverment of India

Minister of Enviroment,Forest and Climate Change

Impact Assessment Division

***

Indira Paryavaran Bhavan,

Vayu Wing,3rd Floor,Aliganj,

Jor Bagh Road,New Delhi-110003

29 Sep 2017

To,

M/s MS BPCL

Ranganathan Gardens off to 11th Main road Annanagar west chennai,

Chennai-600040

Tamil Nadu

Tel.No.44-26216869; Email:[email protected]

Sir/Madam,

This has reference to the proposal submitted in the Ministry of Environment, Forest

and Climate Change to prescribe the Terms of Reference (TOR) for undertaking detailed EIA

study for the purpose of obtaining Environmental Clearance in accordance with the provisions of

the EIA Notification, 2006. For this purpose, the proponent had submitted online information in the

prescribed format (Form-1 ) along with a Pre-feasibility Report. The details of the proposal are

given below:

1. Proposal No.: IA/KA/IND2/67245/2017

2. Name of the Proposal:

Proposed Green Field POL Terminal at Nandur

Kesartagi Industrial Area, 2nd Phase,

Kalaburagi District, Karnataka by M/s Bharat

Petroleum Corporation Limited

3. Category of the Proposal: Industrial Projects - 2

4. Project/Activity applied for: 6(b)Isolated storage & handling of hazardous

chemicals (As per threshold planning

5. Date of submission for TOR: 05 Aug 2017

In this regard, under the provisions of the EIA Notification 2006 as amended, the Standard TOR

for the purpose of preparing environment impact assessment report and environment

management plan for obtaining prior environment clearance is prescribed with public consultation

as follows:

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FORPROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

6(b): STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONDUCTINGENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY FOR ISOLATEDSTORAGE & HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS (AS PERTHRESHOLD PLANNING QUANTITY INDICATED IN COLUMN 3OF SCHEDULE 2 & 3 OF MSIHC RULES 1989 AMENDED 2000)INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN EIA/EMP REPORT

A. STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE

1) Executive Summary

2) Introduction

i. Details of the EIA Consultant including NABET accreditation

ii. Information about the project proponent

iii. Importance and benefits of the project

3) Project Description

i. Cost of project and time of completion.

ii. Products with capacities for the proposed project.

iii. If expansion project, details of existing products with capacities and whether adequate landis available for expansion, reference of earlier EC if any.

iv. List of raw materials required and their source along with mode of transportation.

v. Other chemicals and materials required with quantities and storage capacities

vi. Details of Emission, effluents, hazardous waste generation and their management.

vii. Requirement of water, power, with source of supply, status of approval, water balance diagram,man-power requirement (regular and contract)

viii. Process description along with major equipments and machineries, process flow sheet(quantative) from raw material to products to be provided

ix. Hazard identification and details of proposed safety systems.

x. Expansion/modernization proposals:

a. Copy of all the Environmental Clearance(s) including Amendments thereto obtained forthe project from MOEF/SEIAA shall be attached as an Annexure. A certified copy of thelatest Monitoring Report of the Regional Office of the Ministry of Environment and Forestsas per circular dated 30th May, 2012 on the status of compliance of conditions stipulatedin all the existing environmental clearances including Amendments shall be provided. Inaddition, status of compliance of Consent to Operate for the ongoing Iexisting operationof the project from SPCB shall be attached with the EIA-EMP report.

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FOR PROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

b. In case the existing project has not obtained environmental clearance, reasons for nottaking EC under the provisions of the EIA Notification 1994 and/or EIA Notification2006 shall be provided. Copies of Consent to Establish/No Objection Certificate andConsent to Operate (in case of units operating prior to EIA Notification 2006, CTE andCTO of FY 2005-2006) obtained from the SPCB shall be submitted. Further, compliancereport to the conditions of consents from the SPCB shall be submitted.

4) Site Details

i. Location of the project site covering village, Taluka/Tehsil, District and State, Justificationfor selecting the site, whether other sites were considered.

ii. A toposheet of the study area of radius of 10km and site location on 1:50,000/1:25,000 scaleon an A3/A2 sheet. (including all eco-sensitive areas and environmentally sensitive places)

iii. Details w.r.t. option analysis for selection of site

iv. Co-ordinates (lat-long) of all four corners of the site.

v. Google map-Earth downloaded of the project site.

vi. Layout maps indicating existing unit as well as proposed unit indicating storage area, plantarea, greenbelt area, utilities etc. If located within an Industrial area/Estate/Complex, layoutof Industrial Area indicating location of unit within the Industrial area/Estate.

vii. Photographs of the proposed and existing (if applicable) plant site. If existing, showphotographs of plantation/greenbelt, in particular.

viii. Landuse break-up of total land of the project site (identified and acquired), government/private - agricultural, forest, wasteland, water bodies, settlements, etc shall be included. (notrequired for industrial area)

ix. A list of major industries with name and type within study area (10km radius) shall beincorporated. Land use details of the study area

x. Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area shall be included.

xi. Details of Drainage of the project upto 5km radius of study area. If the site is within 1 kmradius of any major river, peak and lean season river discharge as well as flood occurrencefrequency based on peak rainfall data of the past 30 years. Details of Flood Level of theproject site and maximum Flood Level of the river shall also be provided. (mega green fieldprojects)

xii. Status of acquisition of land. If acquisition is not complete, stage of the acquisition processand expected time of complete possession of the land.

xiii. R&R details in respect of land in line with state Government policy

5) Forest and wildlife related issues (if applicable):

i. Permission and approval for the use of forest land (forestry clearance), if any, andrecommendations of the State Forest Department. (if applicable)


ii. Landuse map based on High resolution satellite imagery (GPS) of the proposed site delineatingthe forestland (in case of projects involving forest land more than 40 ha)

iii. Status of Application submitted for obtaining the stage I forestry clearance along with lateststatus shall be submitted.

iv. The projects to be located within 10 km of the National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves,Migratory Corridors of Wild Animals, the project proponent shall submit the map dulyauthenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden showing these features vis-à-vis the project locationand the recommendations or comments of the Chief Wildlife Warden-thereon.

v. Wildlife Conservation Plan duly authenticated by the Chief Wildlife Warden of the StateGovernment for conservation of Schedule I fauna, if any exists in the study area.

vi. Copy of application submitted for clearance under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, to theStanding Committee of the National Board for Wildlife.

6) Environmental Status

i. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and directionand rainfall.

ii. AAQ data (except monsoon) at 8 locations for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOX, CO and otherparameters relevant to the project shall be collected. The monitoring stations shall be basedCPCB guidelines and take into account the pre-dominant wind direction, population zoneand sensitive receptors including reserved forests.

iii. Raw data of all AAQ measurement for 12 weeks of all stations as per frequency given in theNAQQM Notification of Nov. 2009 along with - min., max., average and 98% values foreach of the AAQ parameters from data of all AAQ stations should be provided as an annexureto the EIA Report.

iv. Surface water quality of nearby River (100m upstream and downstream of discharge point)and other surface drains at eight locations as per CPCB/MoEF&CC guidelines.

v. Whether the site falls near to polluted stretch of river identified by the CPCB/MoEF&CC, ifyes give details.

vi. Ground water monitoring at minimum at 8 locations shall be included.

vii. Noise levels monitoring at 8 locations within the study area.

viii. Soil Characteristic as per CPCB guidelines.

ix. Traffic study of the area, type of vehicles, frequency of vehicles for transportation of materials,additional traffic due to proposed project, parking arrangement etc.

x. Detailed description of flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) existing in the study areashall be given with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species. If Schedule-I fauna are found within the study area, a Wildlife Conservation Plan shall be prepared andfurnished.

xi. Socio-economic status of the study area.


7) Impact and Environment Management Plan

i. Assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based onsite-specific meteorological features. In case the project is located on a hilly terrain, theAQIP Modelling shall be done using inputs of the specific terrain characteristics fordetermining the potential impacts of the project on the AAQ. Cumulative impact of all sourcesof emissions (including transportation) on the AAQ of the area shall be assessed. Details ofthe model used and the input data used for modelling shall also be provided. The air qualitycontours shall be plotted on a location map showing the location of project site, habitationnearby, sensitive receptors, if any.

ii. Water Quality modelling - in case of discharge in water body

iii. Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding environmentshall be assessed and provided. In this regard, options for transport of raw materials andfinished products and wastes (large quantities) by rail or rail-cum road transport or conveyor-cum-rail transport shall be examined.

iv. A note on treatment of wastewater from different plant operations, extent recycled and reusedfor different purposes shall be included. Complete scheme of effluent treatment. Characteristicsof untreated and treated effluent to meet the prescribed standards of discharge under E(P)Rules.

v. Details of stack emission and action plan for control of emissions to meet standards.

vi. Measures for fugitive emission control

vii. Details of hazardous waste generation and their storage, utilization and management. Copiesof MOU regarding utilization of solid and hazardous waste in cement plant shall also beincluded. EMP shall include the concept of waste-minimization, recycle/reuse/recovertechniques, Energy conservation, and natural resource conservation.

viii. Proper utilization of fly ash shall be ensured as per Fly Ash Notification, 2009. A detailedplan of action shall be provided.

ix. Action plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area i.e. land with not less than1,500 trees per ha. Giving details of species, width of plantation, planning schedule etc. shallbe included. The green belt shall be around the project boundary and a scheme for greeningof the roads used for the project shall also be incorporated.

x. Action plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site shall be submitted to harvestrainwater from the roof tops and storm water drains to recharge the ground water and also touse for the various activities at the project site to conserve fresh water and reduce the waterrequirement from other sources.

xi. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measuresshall be included.


xii. Action plan for post-project environmental monitoring shall be submitted.

xiii. Onsite and Offsite Disaster (natural and Man-made) Preparedness and Emergency ManagementPlan including Risk Assessment and damage control. Disaster management plan should belinked with District Disaster Management Plan.

8) Occupational health

i. Plan and fund allocation to ensure the occupational health & safety of all contract and casualworkers

ii. Details of exposure specific health status evaluation of worker. If the workers' health is beingevaluated by pre designed format, chest x rays, Audiometry, Spirometry, Vision testing (Far& Near vision, colour vision and any other ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement andperiodical examinations give the details of the same. Details regarding last month analyzeddata of above mentioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of exposure and departmentwise.

iii. Details of existing Occupational & Safety Hazards. What are the exposure levels of hazardsand whether they are within Permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not within PEL,what measures the company has adopted to keep them within PEL so that health of the workerscan be preserved,

iv. Annual report of heath status of workers with special reference to Occupational Health andSafety.

9) Corporate Environment Policy

i. Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board ofDirectors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.

ii. Does the Environment Policy prescribe for standard operating process / procedures to bringinto focus any infringement / deviation / violation of the environmental or forest norms /conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA.

iii. What is the hierarchical system or Administrative order of the company to deal with theenvironmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the environmental clearanceconditions? Details of this system may be given.

iv. Does the company have system of reporting of non compliances / violations of environmentalnorms to the Board of Directors of the company and / or shareholders or stakeholders atlarge? This reporting mechanism shall be detailed in the EIA report

10) Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel, restroom etc. to be provided to thelabour force during construction as well as to the casual workers including truck drivers duringoperation phase.

11) Enterprise Social Commitment (ESC)

i. Adequate funds (at least 2.5 % of the project cost) shall be earmarked towards the EnterpriseSocial Commitment based on Public Hearing issues and item-wise details along with timebound action plan shall be included. Socio-economic development activities need to beelaborated upon.


12) Any litigation pending against the project and/or any direction/order passed by any Court of Lawagainst the project, if so, details thereof shall also be included. Has the unit received any noticeunder the Section 5 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or relevant Sections of Air and WaterActs? If so, details thereof and compliance/ATR to the notice(s) and present status of the case.

13) 'A tabular chart with index for point wise compliance of above TOR.

B. SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR EIASTUDIES FOR ISOLATEDSTORAGE & HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS (AS PERTHRESHOLD PLANNING QUANTITY INDICATED IN COLUMN 3 OFSCHEDULE 2 & 3 OF MSIHC RULES 1989 AMENDED 2000)

1. Details on list of hazardous chemicals to be stored alongwith storage quantities at the facility, theircategory (as per MSIHC Rules), MSDS.

2. Mode of receiving hazardous chemicals in isolated storages and mode of their dispatch.

3. Layout plan of the storage tanks and other associated facilities.

4. Details on types and specifications of the storage facilities including tanks, pumps, piping, valves,flanges, pumps,monitoring equipments, systems for emissions control safety controls includingrelief systems.

5. Arrangements to control loss/leakage of chemicals and management system in case of leakage.

6. Risk Assessment & Disaster Management Plan

? Identification of hazards

? Consequence Analysis

? Details of domino effect of the storage tanks and respective preventive measures including distancebetween storage units in an isolated storage facility.

? Onsite and offsite emergency preparedness plan.

***

ANNEXURE-III

Public Hearing MoM

of Nandur- Kesartagi Industrial Area, 2nd Phase

/

State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority-Karnataka(Constituted by MoEF, Government of India, under section 3(3) of E(P) Act, 1986)

No. SEIAA22IND 2013 Date:26-07-2016

Sub: Establishmentof Nandur- Kesartagi Industrial Area 2nd

Phaseat Nandur- KesartagiVillages,GulbargaTaluk &District by Karnataka Industrial Area DevelopmentBoard(KIADB) - Issueof EnvironmentalClearance-reg.

*****

To,

CEO& ExecutiveMemberKarnatakaIndustrial AreaDevelopmentBoard(KIADB)4th& 5thFloors,KhanijaBhavan,Eastwing, No.49,RaceCourseRoad,Bengaluru-560001

Sir,

This hasreferenceto your applicationsdated30tl~July 2013addressedtoSEIAA, Karnataka and subsequent letters addressed to SEIAAjSEAC,Karnataka seekingprior environmental clearancefor the aboveproject underthe EIA Notification, 2006.The proposal hasbeenappraisedasper prescribedprocedure in the light of provisions under the EIA Notification, 2006on thebasis of the~mandatory documents enclosedwith the application viz., theApplication in Form 1, prefeasibility report, EIA Report and the additionalclarifications furnished in response to the observations of the State ExpertAppraisal Committee (SEAC),Karnataka.SEAChasrecommendedfor issueofEnvironmentalClearancein its meetingsheld on 27th& 28tl1January2016.

2. It is, inter-alia, noted that KarnatakaIndustrial AreaDevelopmentBoard

(K~ADBj, have propose~ for establishment of Nandur- Kes~J;;'~)~ \\-.::.;~:~~~Area 2ndPhasefor establishmentof OrangeandGreencate ,1tt.\1~ J. ~~~.;~.

Total plot area of 198.36Acres(80.15Ha) [Details of t !.~s enclosed<t~:'~~\Annexure-I]. Out of 198.36Acres, 120.087Acres are~/Jt~'fbr ~~~~~ttt~larea>:~~.~t~\3.868 Acres area is for Commercial area, 18.705Ak;!~(artta'is':-:fof\ Parks, \~:.:\~6.645Acresarea is for Buffer, 9.997Acres area is f~!~~{\meriiti~s'& 'utilities, \ :~;:.\\0.515Acres area is earmarked for Strom water dratn}~9.005Acres,area-is for !S:}Parking and 29.535Acre areais ea.rmarkedfor Ro~ds'~!*t~out pla~'>isen,.~~:9sed/.::i~~las Annexure-Il]. Total water requirement for the mdU~~111~~area lS~}~J~ .'):{/

(Domestic:113KLD + Industrial: 579KLD+ Greenbelt:5'3~.:·~\Rlwill b:€:fue!, '(~:~j'Room No. 706, 7th Floor, 4th Gate, M.S. Building, Bangalore - 560 001 Phone: O~~~~fi'~p~ i22254377

Website: http://seiaa,kar.nic.in http://seiaa.karnataka.gov.in http://environmen'tCrear-8flC'e.nic.in

e-mail: [email protected]

StateLevelEnvironmentImpact·AssessmentAuthority~Karmitaka(Constituted by MoEF,Government of Indiaunder section3(3) of E(P)Acf,·1986) .

SEIAA 22 IND 2013 Establishmentof Nandur KesartagiIndustrial Areaby Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KlADB)

from Bore.well (Ground water). Total waste water generated is 481 KLD(Domesticeffluent: 96 KLD + Industrial effluent: 385 KLD). Domesticwastewater will be treatedin CommonSewageTreatmentPlant of 1 No X 150KLDand industrial effluent will be treated in CommonEffluent TreatmentPlant of2 No's X 250KLD capacity.It is proposedto install DG setof capacity1 No X250KVA for emergencypower backup. Total power requirement is IMW willbesourcedfrom GESCOM.Theprojectcostis Rs.144.52Crores.

3. The project proposal has been considered by SEAC on 6th & 7th

September2013andToRswere issuedvide letter dated28thSeptember2013forconducting Environment Impact AssessmentStudy. The EIA has beenconductedby M/ s. Ramky Enviro EngineersLimited, "Ramky House", 6-3-1089/G/16, Gulmohar Avenue, 1st Floor, Rajbhavan Road, Somajiguda,Hyderbad-500 082 who are accredited from NABET vide No.NABET/EIA/RA005 rev.01/010Dated13thJune2014.Public consultationwasheld on 10thApril 2015.The final EIA report was submitted on 29thSeptember2015.

4. Basedon the information submitted by you and presentationmadebyEnvironmental consultant, M/ s. Ramky Enviro EngineersLimited, "RamkyHouse", 6-3-1089/G/16, Gulmohar Avenue, 1st Floor, Rajbhavan Road,Somajiguda,Hyderbad-500082.The StateLevel Expert Appraisal Committee(SEAC)examinedtheproposalin themeetingheld on 11th,12th& 13thJanuary2016 and 27th& 28th January 2016 and has recommended for issue ofEnvironmentalClearance.

5. TheSEIAA Karnatakahasconsideredthe project in its meetingheld on8th February 2016 and after due consideration of the relevant documentssubmitted by the project proponent and additional clarifications furnished inresponseto its observationsand the appraisal and recommendationof theSEACand decidedto accordEnvironmentalClearancein accordancewith theprovisions of Environmental Impact AssessmentNotification-2006 and itssubsequentamendments,subject to strict complianceof the following termsandconditions- .

A- SPECIFIC CONDITIONS, .

StateLevelEnvironmentImpactAssessmentAuthority-Karnataka(Constituted by MoEF, Government of India under section 3(3) of E(P)Act, 1986)

SEIAA 22 IND 2013 Establishment of Nandur Kesartagi Industrial Areaby Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB)

from day one.Thecell alsoensuresthat the cellmanages/ maintainsallthe environmental aspects such as sewage treatment, solid wastedisposal,maintenanceof greenbelt areas,etc.

3. All required sanitaryand hygienicmeasuresshould be in placebeforestarting construction activities and to be maintained throughout theconstruction.phase.Sufficient number of toilets/bathrooms shall beprovidedwith requiredmobile toilets,mobileSTPfor constructionworkforce.

4. A First Aid Room should be provided in the Project both duringconstructionandoperationof theproject.

5. Adequatedrinking water and sanitary facilities should be provided forconstructionworkers at the site. The safedisposal of wastewaterandsolidwastesgeneratedduring theconstructionphaseshouldbeensured.

6. Provisionshallbemadefor thehousingof constructionlabourerswithinthe site with all necessaryinfrastructures.The housingmay be in theform of temporarystructuresto be removedafter the completionof theproject.Thefacilitiesshall includethecreche.

7. Provision should be made for the supply of fuel (keroseneor cookinggas); utensils such as pressurecookers etc. to the labourers duringconstructionphase.

8. All the labourersto be engagedfor constructionshould be screenedforhealthand adequatelytreatedbeforeengagingthem to work at the siteand detailed report submitted to SEIAA. Safety standards as perNationalBuilding Code(NBC)shouldbeensured.

9. Fordis-infectionof wastewaterwhich is not meantfor recyclingfor toiletflushing, use ultra violet radiation and not chlorination. For treatedwastewater meant for reuse for toilet flushing, disinfect by usingchlorination.

10.All the topsoil excavatedduring constructionactivitiesshouldbestoredfor usein horticulture / landscapedevelopmentwithin theprojectsite.

11.Disposalof muck, constructiondebrisduring constructionphaseshouldnot createany adverseeffecton the neighbouringcommunitiesand bedisposedtaking the necessaryprecautionsfor generalsafetyand healthaspectsof people,.only in approvedsiteswith theapprovalof competentauthority.

12.Soilandgroundwater samplesshouldbetestedat theprojectsiteduring.theconstructionphaseto ascertainthat thereis no threatto groundwater

. .quality by leachingof heavyme~.~~~:9.::;,other toxic contaminantsandreport submittedto SEIAA. .:;..;;:\~~\Jf>,.i..: T ASS~;~

13.Constructionspoils,inclutit~~.it~~~--rfuit~f~ and otherhazardous""~\ '" .~ "'.,,"

materi~ls,must not be !!~9yedJ~:~~~~~minate\::'.\.\~ercoursesand thedumpsitesfor suchma~l'.:la1must>1J.e;·s.ecuredSO\ t!li." t they should notI 1 ~ 1 d ~.ji {~:::! ;t;~i.i:'·F<";i<.\ • \ ':~ \\eac1~ntot le groun Wi~:~r "'\::':{~':""<" ,,' \ ':~;''::!I

14.Thedieselgener~torse,r.:~qbeused..~l.?:rIt;9\-S?,nstrur~~~f1phaseshoul?beof low sulphur dieseltYr~\~ndshoul]\RQl;,l.f8-rJIl to ,E.:(f,? Rulesprescnbed

\."...~\ . '. .''''''j'''~' , ""'''11for air andnoiseemissiolQ.:!~;;mdards.·,;,~;~,~~~, ,/.~:II

.\.,1 ~"\ . ~~. rv /. • "1

\~?,~", .., <''' /~, •••~~.~~ , 3~,;.'/;':,-.:..~,,\*<"".'\, (,"J/ "i --- ~ ".;. ~\.'\

'-'.- ::,~.~ ~{I\~{'\'I:::--;/-....::.:"_. ~>f'>\ _.-;:;---'-. :.....•;::..::!::.=·~7.:..~,..,·-

StateLevelEnvironmentImpactAssessmentAuthority-Karnataka(Constituted by MoEF,Government of India under section3(3) of E(P)Act, 1986)

SEIAA 22 IND 2013 Establishmentof Nandur KesartagiIndustrial Areaby Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB)

15.Thedieselrequiredfor operatingDGsetsshallbestoredin undergroundtanksand if required,clearancefrom Chief Controller of Explosivesshallbetaken.

16.Vehicleshired for bringing constructionmaterial to the site should be ingood condition and should conform to the applicable air and noiseemissionstandardsandshouldbeoperatedonly during non-peakhours.

17.Ambient noise levels should conform to the residential standardsbothduring day and night. Incrementalpollution loads on the ambient airand noise quality should be closely monitored during constructionphase.Adequate measuresto reduce air and noise pollution duringconstructionkeepingin mind CPCBnormsonnoiselimits.

18.Fly ashshouldbeusedasbuilding material in theconstructionasper theprovisionsof Fly AshNotification of September1999andamendedasonAugust 2003.

19.Readymixedconcretemust beusedin building construction.20.Stormwater control and its re-useasper CGWBand BISstandardsfor

variousapplications.21.Water demand during construction should be reducedby use of pre-

mixed concrete,curing agentsand other bestpracticesand only tertiarytreatedwater shallbeusedfor constructionasperG.O.No. FEE1~8ENV2003dated14.08.2003.

22.No ground water is to be drawn without permission from theCentral/StateGroundWaterAuthority.

23.Separationof grey and black water should be done by the useof dualplumbing line for separationof greyandblackwater.

24.Treatment of 100%grey water by decentralizedtreatment should bedone.

25.Theprovision of EnergyConservationBuilding code,2006shall be fullycomplied with.

26.Roof should meetprescriptive requirementasper EnergyConservationBuilding Code,2007by usingappropriatethermal insulationmaterial.

2TOpaque wall should meet prescriptive requirement as per EnergyConservationBuilding Code,2007which is proposed to be mandatoryfor all air conditionedspaceswhile it is optional for non-air conditionedspacesby use of appropriate thermal insulation material to fulfil

_.-:-requirement.,28.TheProponentshall obtain the constructionmaterial suchasstonesand

jelly ~tc: 0n:¥.<;,J1~§~~~:~proved quarries. and, oth~r.,constructionmatenals~~!(~ 1)e-pF~~~t~~m theauthonzedagencies/trad.e~s.

29.}'he pr0E.~~f sh~~,.~btama~~~Q~~1from the competentauthonti~sfors:ru~t1~~/safet~~\~f5:~~~ebUIld~tf~\,due to. earthq~a~e~adequacy of~lrefIg~~?,ge~~~~:~.t'jetc. as p~~.:tre~atIonal Building Code (NBC)mclu~~~gprotec.t~p{lmeas?resfor.11g~~tenmgetc. .

30.ThePt~~ct a.u~l~oHt,~hall"~psur~'_!~1~tno water bodiesarepolluted dueto proJ~~.~CtIVltIes.: ,t .. ",-.::..<:,:,>~_ ./ ,.~~:'/:! .:

" .\-~, - ! ~,.?'. ....... '" ' .: .

'\~'\) '\ -:»'>-,\~,~;' ~~I ".\~<;$~'-- 'i"' /~~-f',. . .~, »< e-, ,V":j' 4...~ ••••.. ' J ~-- ..---",''''''''c\.'~~/~~~,\ t//·~ ~ y. f)..\"~\~/

~":..~~~~~~;::;;':;'/

StateLevelEnvironmentImpactAssessmentAuthority-Karnataka(Constituted by MoEF, Government of India under section 3(3)of E(P)Act, 1986)

SEIAA 22 IND 2013 Establishmentof Nandur KesartagiIndustrial Areaby Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB)

31.Safetystandardsas per National Building Code (NBC), 2005should befollowed andensured.

32.The project Authorities shall ensure that the National Building Code,2005is compliedwith andadheredto.

33.Theprojectauthorities shall not useKharabland if any, for any purposeand keep available to the general public duly displaying a board aspublic property. No structure of any kind be put up in the Kharablandandshallbeafforestedandmaintainedasgreenbelt only.

34.The authorities should include the condition while issuing plots to theprospectiveindividual industries that they should develop greenbeltofat least33 % of theplot area.

35.The industrial units in the industrial area and the associatedfacilitiesshall be strictly in accordancewith the norms laid down by theKarnatakaStateGovernmentandKSPCB/CPCB.

36.The project authorities shall strictly adhere to the commitmentsmadewith regard to establishmentof CSTP1CETP,buffer zone, green belt,conditionsto be incorporatedin the leasedocumentwhile allotting plotsto individual industries,environmentsafetyaspectsetc.

37.Theproject Authorities shall ensurethe time specificationprescribedbythe Honourable High Court of Karnatakain WP. No. 1958/2011 (LB -RES- PIL) on 04.12.2012for different activities involved in constructionwork.

38.The existing water body, canalsand rajakaluveand other drainageandwater bound structuresif any shall beretainedunalteredwith duebufferzoneof 15meteralroundmaintainedunder treecover.

39.The project authorities shall leave30 mtrs buffer from the boundary oflake and 15meterson either side of the channell nala and otherwaterbodies if any and this shall be free from any permanentstructures.Thebuffer somaintainedshall be plantedwith indigenous treespeciessuchas Neem, Akash Mallige, Mahagoni, Honge, KadambaFicus,etc. andmaintainedasgreenbelt.

40.The natural sloping pattern of the project site other than the area"excavatedfor the purpose of construction of proposed building shallremainunaltered.and thenatural hydrology of the areabemaintainedasit is to ensurenatural flow of stormwater

41. Lakesand otherwater bodieswithin and/or at the vicinity of the project. . - areashallbeprotectedandconserved..42.Theprojest1\!lthority will undertakeall relevantmeasures,asindicated

du~ '-;t~eRU~~ing for impro~ing the Socio-economicconditions~_ " rounamg--a-l>~a-:.~ .

434~'pr?~f:'0;:>~~th~rit~~~ allow ?nly the Orangeand Greencategory;'~~J{lQus~les';1:\11tr)'~tnctlya'S..p~posed 111 the layout plan.

II. OB~'atiortPJ{~-$~.t;!; \ 'f.~\i;::~the proJe~tAu1:~,oritySh~tn~plement all the recommendationsmadein

• ~ ". - -" > .""-.- '.

\:.~~~~~reEnvi :.0;~t~!Imp,~!;WssessmentIEMP report and risk assessment...,r~port v... .,.. _. .'.,-,;, I -..,•...'\' ~.r. • -~ -.•~:;:~,.v- -c..•••4;•." •••.... ~••/ i

\~?':;~<."':.,;~;;.;.,s;~,::, /' '),~: }'~."...,r" cv- .>: ;i. 'j/ 5~I (\ - ---;:.I\.'>!:~~~;;.~'!~~(1/ ~ i:'J:;~p..\ ~7'

''::'..~~~~~~


SEIAA 22 IND 2013 EstablishmentofNandurKesartagiIndustrialAreaby Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB)

2. The installation of the Common SewageTreatment Plant (CSTP)/CommonEffluent TreatmentPlant (CETP)shall be got certified by anindependentexpert and a report in this regard should be submitted tothe SEIAA before the project is commissionedfor operation. Treatedeffluent emanatingfrom CSTP/ CETPshall be recycled/reused to themaximum extent possible. Treatment of 100% grey water bydecentralizedtreatment should be done. Dischargeof treated sewageshallconformto the norms& standardsof the KarnatakaStatePollutionControl Board. Treatedsewageshould be usedfor flushing, gardening,etc. as proposed.Necessarymeasuresshould be made to mitigate theodour problemfrom CSTP/ CETP.

3. Thesolid wastegeneratedshould be properly collectedand segregated.Wet garbageshouldbecompostedanddry / inert solid wasteshouldbedisposed off to the approved sites for land filling after recoveringrecyclablematerial.

4. Dieselpower generatingsetsproposedas sourceof backup power forelevatorsand commonareaillumination during operationphaseshouldbe of enclosedtype and conform to rulesmadeunder the Environment(Protection)Act, 1986.Theheight of stackof DGsetsshouldbeequaltothe height neededfor the combinedcapacityof all proposedDG sets.Uselow sulphur diesel.Thelocationof theDGsetsmaybedecidedwithin consultationwith KarnatakaStatePollutionControl Board.

5. Noise should be controlled to ensure that it does not exceed theprescribedstandards.During night time thenoiselevelsmeasuredat theboundary of the building shall be restrictedto the permissiblelevels tocomplywith theprevalentregulations.

6. Theprojectproponentshallensuredevelopmentof aminimum of 33% ofthe project area which shall include the buffer zone and green beltdeveloped by individual industries. The project Authority mayundertake compensatory green belt development through avenueplantation in the adjoining roadsand in the civic amenityareaif thereisany shortfallwithin theprojectsitein theunavoidablecircumstances.

7. Weepholesin the compoundwalls shall be provided to ensurenaturaldrainageof rain water in thecatchmentareaduring themonsoonperiod.

8. Rain water harvesting for roof runoff and surfacerun- off, as plansubmittedshouldbeimplemented.Beforerechargingthesurfacerun off,

. - ~pre-treatmentmustbedoneto removesuspendedmatter,oil and grease.. The borew~ll for .rainwaterrecharging should be kep.~.;&~

abovethehighestgroundwater table... /7\*~-··--·--·--·-.~~>t;~~~~9. Thegro~ndw~ter level and its quality shouldb: ~~.l¥~(ed,~eF._r.Jt~arlyin~~>'\

consultationWIthCentralGroundWaterAuthont/~/ «::·~.tYi~<\:i \ .10.Trafficcongestionneartheentry andexit points filjfVthe tK?~~~~~~J?ining ...\

the proposed project site must be avoided. P#t~~ngsh>Q~~4~'be<;f~lly :..' ,\internalizedandno public spaceshouldbeutilize~~\ "'~\<.>. . ....~.: .:~]!J

11. A Report on the energy conservationmeasure~~tf{)~irmingt~~:~rt~!1&~r~'-ilconservatio,nnorms finalize by Bureauof EnergY'~~~cy s~J!II-lfe .1

.~/ •••) J .----- " ,

,~.:.:,( ;.') ..., ~ 1.( "",f!:. ..,y~~:-~~~~~~.:~~=-~~~.,

StateLevelEnvironmentImpactAssessmentAuthority-Karnataka(Constituted by MoEF, Government of India under section 3(3) of E(P) Act, 1986)

SEIAA 22 IND 2013 Establishmentof Nandur KesartagiIndustrial Area

by Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB)

preparedincorporatingdetailsaboutbuilding materials& technology,R& U Factorsetc and submit to the SEIAA, Karnatakain threemonthstime.

12. Energy conservationmeasureslike installation of CFLs/TFLs for thelighting the areasoutside the building should be integral part of theprojectdesignandshouldbe in placebeforeprojectcommissioning.UseCFLsand TFLsshould be properly collectedand disposedoff/ sent forrecycling as per the prevailing guidelines/ rules of the regulatoryauthority to avoid mercury contamination.Useof solar panelsmay bedoneto theextentpossible.

13. Adequatemeasuresshould be taken to prevent odour problem fromsolidwasteprocessingplant andCSTP/CETP.

14.The building should have adequatedistancebetween them to allowmovementof freshair andpassageof natural light, air andventilation.

15.The project authorities shall strictly comply with the rules andregulations under Manufacture, Storage and Import of HazardousChemicalsRules,1989asamendedin October1994andJanuary2000.alltransportationof HazardousChemicalsshall be as per the MVA, 1989.Authorizationfrom the KSPCBshall be obtainedfor collection,treatment,storage,anddisposalof hazardouswastes.

16.The project authorities must strictly comply with the rules' andregulationswith regardto handling and disposalof hazardouswastesinaccordancewith the Hazardous and other Wastes(ManagementandTransboundaryMovement)Rules,2016.Authorization from the KSPCBmust be obtained for collection/treatment/ storage/disposal ofhazardouswastes.

17.Application of solar energyshould be incorporatedfor illumination ofcommon areas,lighting for gardensand street lighting in addition toprovision for solarwater heating. A hybrid systemor fully solarsystemfor lighting and heating should be provided. Details in this regard

-' shouldbesubmittedto theSEIAA.18.The individual industries shall take all necessaryclearancesincluding

Environmentclearancein accordancewith the law. TheprojectAuthorityshall incorporatesuchcondition in the lease/ saledeed/Agreement.

19.The:projectauthoritiesshall bifurcatethe industrial plots and residentialplots, if anywith a thick andtall vegetativebarrier greenbelt.

20.The project Authority shall incorporate a c().,~ the prospective, lease/saledeed/Agreement with indi~j~~}~<t~~-!W~~rr~t they also

,.shallabideby theconditionsof this ~~/ <-,:~, r:__'" '--<:~~~'.:'~B. GENERAL CONDITIONS: !fo~~/r,2c"?>:F~ '\.:. .

1. A separateEnvironmentManage~~~ celi:;'~1;h'q~ali£iedst~t~:·~all besetup for implementationof thest\!f>,~iatedenv'it~~erttal safe~~£#rds.

2. The project authorities sh~ll strictl~.il~\hereto t~~;i~~~~tio¥~~~l{adeby),.tJ'le KarnatakaStatePollutionContr~9~~d (KSP@1lJ;:". ./~)I

'-~::..»»: ~ r.>:~v:;/ 7"~~lt0~K' i\~-"~;~

"'-:::,::.••.\J,~ ~/--~:-.~ ..=.::::..::.~-::;.--

StateLevelEnvironmentImpactAssessmentAuthority-Karnataka(Constituted by MoEF,Goverrunent of India under section3(3) of E(P)Act, 1986)

SEIAA 22 IND 2013 Establishment of Nandur Kesartagi Industrial Areaby Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KlADB)

3. At no time, the emissionsshallexceedthe prescribedlimits. In the eventof failure of any pollution control systemadoptedby the unit, the unitshallbe immediatelyput out of operationand shallnot berestarteduntilthedesiredefficiencyhasbeenachieved.

. 4. No further expansionor modifications in the plant shall be carried outwithout prior approval of the SEIAA/Ministry of Environment andForestsas the casemay be. In caseof deviations or alterationsin theprojectproposalfrom thosesubmitted to this Authority for clearance,afreshreferenceshall bemadeto the Authority to assessthe adequacyofconditions imposed and to add additional environmental protectionmeasuresrequired,if any.

5. The project authorities shall strictly comply with the rules andregulations under Manufacture, Storage and Import of HazardousChemicalsRules,1989 as amendedin October1994 and January2000.Authorization from the KSPCB shall be obtained for collection,treatment,storage,anddisposalof hazardouswastes.

6. The project authorities must strictly comply with the rules andregulationswith regardto handling and disposalof hazardouswastesinaccordancewith the Hazardous and other Wastes(ManagementandTransboundaryMovement)Rules,2016.Authorization from the KSPCBmust be obtained for collection/treatment/ storage/disposal ofhazardouswastes.

7. Application of solar energy should be incorporatedfor illumination ofcommon areas,lighting for gardensand street lighting in addition toprovision for solarwater heating. A hybrid systemor fully solarsystemfor lighting and heating should be provided. Details in this' regardshouldbesubmittedto theSEIAA.

8. Theoverall noiselevels in and around the plant areashall bekept wellwithin -the standards (85 dBA) by providing noise control measures. including acoustichoods,silencers,enclosuresetc.on all sourcesof noisegeneration.The ambient noise levels shall conform to the standardsprescribedunder Environment (Protection)Act, Rules,1989 viz. DBA(daytime) and70dBA (night time).

9. The project proponent shall also comply with all the environmentalprotectionmeasuresandsafeguardsasper the information provided.

10~ The implementationof the projectvis-a-visenvironmentalaction- plans sIlall be monitored by MoEF, Regional Office at Bangalore/KSPCB/ -CPCBand the Department of Environment...,.~Bangalore.A sixmonthly compliancestatusreport sh~~~~~~b~t~:£~':c~monitoring agencies. .£< .;:/ "'",.4~~~,

11... Theprojectproponentshall inform the pub1J~Jhatt.\1e;~pi?JJ~cthas '\~~~\/11. -c , ( ! '.:h~· -~_~.. \ >.t I'

beenaccordedenvironmentalclearanceby the S~I:~~ anp.:·9o.l?.i§~~·9fthe \::;..,.~\cleara.nceletter are availablewith the KSPC~a~tf;~ay alS8~9~:;Seen..at ;\~\\Website of the State Ecology and Envlro~~pt depart:t*.~nt~·at j ::;J!!http:// seia~.kar.nic.in. .'" . http://:f~~~~:karna:a~~:§.gY~~:t,;,;..J/http://envlronmentclearance.mc.mThISshallbead~~r,:~I~edwlthli,j:t~eR .'$~/

;·~D}:~§i~~'?j?jf

StateLevelEnvironment ImpactAssessmentAuthority-Karnataka(Constituted by MoEF, Government of India under section3(3) of E(P) Act, 1986)

SEIAA 22 IND 2013 Establislunent of Nandur Kesartagi Industrial Areaby Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB)

days from the date of issueof the clearanceletter, at least in two localnewspapersthat arewidely circulatedin the regionof which oneshall bein the vernacular languageof the locality concernedand a copy of thesameshall be forwarded to the RegionalOffice of MoEFat Bangalore/KSPCB/ CPCB/ the Department of Ecology & Environment,Government of Karnataka, Bangalore and Regional Director(Environment),Departmentof Ecology& Environment,GovernmentofKarnataka,Kalaburgi.

12.The project authorities shall inform the Regional Office of MoEF atBangalore/ KSPCB/ CPCB/ theDepartmentof Ecology& Environment,Government of Karnataka, Bangalore and Regional Director(Environment),Departmentof Ecology& Environment,GovernmentofKarnataka,Kalaburgi, the date of financial closureand final approval ofthe project by the concernedauthorities and the date of start of theproject.

13.The SEIAA, Karnataka may revoke or suspend the clearance, ifimplementationof any of theaboveconditionsis not satisfactory.

14.The SEIAA, Karnataka reserves the right to stipulate additionalconditions, if found necessary.The company in a time bound mannerwill implement these conditions.

15.Theaboveconditionswill be enforced,inter-alia under the provisionsofthe Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, theEnvironment (Protection) Act, 1986 Hazardous and other Wastes(ManagementandTransboundaryMovement)Rules,2016and thePublicLiability InsuranceAct, 1991alongwith their amendments andrules.

16.The issue of Environment Clearancedoesn't confer any right to theproject proponent to operate / run the project without obtainingstatutoryclearances/ sanctionsform all otherconcernedAuthorities.

17.Concealing factual data or submission of false/fabricated data andfailure to comply with any of the conditionsmentionedabovemay resultin withdrawal of this clearanceandattractactionunder theprovisionsof'Environmental (Protection)Act, 1986.

18.Any appeal against this environmental clearanceshall lie with theNational Green Tribunal, if preferred, within a period of 30 days asprescribedunderSection16of theNationalGreenTribunal Act, 2010.

. ~9:-0fficialsfrom the Departmentof Environment and Ecology,Bangalore/~egional.Of~ic,~<~t,.~~~l~~:P.,~~galorewho would be monit~ring theImplementa" \\\~ve.,.Efl'V.y.'o~~~!f:talsafeguards should be gIven fullcooperatk ~'~-acl1iti~sand dONl~~ts/ data by the project proponentsduring tt~>{nsp.~l~t1~t:t'Acomp\e!~:~~etof all the documentssubmittedto MoEf(t-!SEI1\~;~1}~~~$beforwa~<!~~to theRegionalOffic,eo~MoEFatBangal~.~!I KSPC~~t\trp~~,B/ theDTg~ftmentof Ecology& Environment,Gover1l;~~t ofl~~riflt~~a, ~~~galore and Regional Director(Enviro~~rt), DepW':~':"T:~f~~fECl)l~'gy& Environment,GovernmentofKarnatak;~;~alaburg'. :;;;:,,§~ / -¥/! .

~\:;..;;"" . ~ en. /.'\:,., .. -, .-' ~I.sh\:~"...:;.:.<; ",/.;:~~ ff,<:.".( I.v I •.-.- ,------:~, h. \~ /

'~:"~~ \- _bw' • ., f\ -;;,~~'t'~~./.~ -,. -r- ~-.\•.j" •.•.~\ ~ ,.~;::?.•..."::::. ....:.::;..~::....'.-.;:::-:..:;.~-. 9


SEIAA 22 IND 2013 Establishment of Nandur Kesartagi Industrial Areaby Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB)

20. In thecaseof any change(s)in the scopeof the project,the projectwouldrequirea freshappraisalby this Authority.

21. The Authority reservesthe right to add additional safeguardmeasuressubsequently,if found necessary,and to take action including revokingof the environment clearanceunder the provisions of the Environment(Protection) Act, 1986, to ensure effective implementation of thesuggestedsafeguardmeasuresin a timebound andsatisfactorymanner.

22. All other statutory clearancessuchasthe approvalsfor storageof dieselfrom Chief Controller of Explosives,Fire Department, Civil AviationDepartment,ForestConservationAct, 1980 andWildlife (Protection)Act,1972 etc.shall be obtained,asapplicableby projectproponentsfrom thecompetentauthorities.

23.Thesestipulationswould beenforcedamongothersunder theprovisionsof water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, the Air(Prevention and Control of Pollution) act 1981, the Environment(Protection)Act, 1986, the Public Liability (Insurance)Act, 1991 and EIANotification, 2006.

24.Under the provisionsof Environment (Protection)Act, 1986, legal actionshall be initiated against the project proponent if it was found thatconstruction of the project has been started without obtainingenvironmentalclearance.

A:\.~;;~Kf~ClAS~ff;'~;,.:;; \ '\,\ --.-.- .•...,) .-.'"_ ••..• ..,..,- -.. .,. \t"'~

//A "'/ <, "'y,~i~.~

i~~~/~'~'~,'c. <11t\\ \. ;-..~ 1"•• ,:.", > _ \. ',,0" # -,;:1\ •..••~\. ~".l~_~_ i~ ::~~~_ / .~.!,~\,\.> . \ "~,:.~~:",, r:» , .).. J'.~.:/'.;~~\.. ~\{~ ...if.~.cv- - // r/I

Capy)o~_ ~., //~~~j1. 1-;'<~S,~e·~rK\{~~istry of Environment, Forestsand Climate Change,

Iria~.p¥rf~ran Bhavan,[or BaghRoad,Aliganj, New Delhi -110 003.2. The Member Secretary, Karnataka State Pollution Control Board,

Bengaluru.3. The APCCF,RegionalOffice, Ministry of Environment & Forests(SZ),.~endriY.aSadan,IV Floor, E & F wings, 17thMain Road,Koramangala. II Block,Bengaluru- 560 034.

4. Regional Director (Environment), Ecology and EnvironmentDepartment,Government of Karnataka,Timmapuri Chowk, VallabhaiPatelCircle,TempleRoadNearCourt, Kalaburgi.

5. GuardFile.

Yoursfaithfully,

(RAMACHANDRA) '2;61 ~JGMemberSecretary,SEIAA,Karnataka.

10

Documents

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/EIA/31012018YBIAPO9W... · PROPOSED GREEN FIELD POL TERMINAL AT NANDUR KESARTAGI ... 6.2.6 Socio-economic