Upload
gabriel-allen
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND ENERGY PRODUCTION: EVALUATION OF BIOCHAR APPLICATION ON TAIWANESE SET-ASIDE
LAND
Chih-Chun Kung
November 2012
Austin, Texas
Motivation
Energy insecurity of TaiwanMore than 99% of fossil fuels are imported;Taiwan is vulnerable to distortions and high
energy prices and wants to enhance energy security
Taiwan is interested in bioenergy
Limited information about bioenergy.
Research objectives
The objective of this work is to provide information on
Bioenergy on set aside land production;
Market effects and GHG offset magnitude information;
Bioenergy crop selection;
Bioenergy technique selection including consideration of electricity, conventional and cellulosic ethanol, pyrolysis/biochar
Bioenergy prospects in Taiwan using Set-Aside Land: An Economic Evaluation
Sweet potato, poplar, willow and switchgrass are bioenergy feedstock alternatives.
Sweet potato can be used to produce ethanol while poplar, willow and switchgrass can be used to produce ethanol and/or electricity.
The Taiwan Agricultural Sector Model (TASM) is extended by incorporating bioenergy production and GHG emissions.
Model bioenergy crops : get estimated yield, production costs, hauling costs and processing costs.
GHG terms: bioenergy conversion rate and GHG offset rate of each crop.
Bioenergy prospects in Taiwan using Set-Aside Land: An Economic Evaluation
Study setup
Ethanol price: NT$ 20, 30, 40, 50 per liter (gasoline price since 2005 is between NT$20 and 38) Coal price: NT$ 1.7, 3.45, 6.0 per kg (coal price since 2005 is between NT$1.7 and 4.35) CO2 price: NT$ 300, 500, 1000 per ton (CO2 price in Taiwan is zero, NT$1,100 in European \
Climate Exchange and NT$130 in Chicago Climate Exchange in 2008).
Government subsidy: NT$50,000 per ha for sweet potato, NT$45,000 for willow, poplar and switchgrass.
Economics of biochar production, utilization and GHG offsets
Feedstock cost (US$/ton)
56 75 94 112Electricity cost
(cent/kwh)
Fast pyrolysis 5.15 5.79 6.44 7.01
Slow pyrolysis 6.78 7.63 8.48 9.23
Economics of biochar production, utilization and GHG offsets
Returns and costs (US$ t-1)
Fast Slow
Feedstock cost ($105.81) ($105.81)
Pyrolysis cost (Modules I and II) ($46.82) ($46.82)
Generating cost (Module III) ($43.26) ($35.04)
Electricity value $206.00 $170.90
Net margin (electricity only) $10.11 -($16.77)
Biochar yield (t) 0.14 0.31
Biochar value $1.95 $9.55
Biochar haul cost (-$1.03) (-$2.28)
Net margin (electricity + biochar) $11.03 (-$9.5)
GHG value $8.96 $8.48
Net margin all $19.99 (-$1.02)
Environmental Impact and Energy Production Evaluation of Biochar Application on Taiwan Set-Aside Land
Biomass can provide energy by
Chemical transformation to provide liquid fuels for combustion or transportation;
Direct combustion to provide heat that can be used in electricity generation;
Pyrolysis to provide liquid fuels for fuel oil in static heating or electricity generation.
Taiwan can produce bioenergy using above technologies.
Environmental Impact and Energy Production Evaluation of Biochar Application on Taiwan Set-Aside Land
AssumptionsWillow and switchgrass generate exactly the same amount of
outputs as poplar in pyrolysis and pyrolysis output of sweet potato is the same as corn stover.
Pyrolysis plant is located in Chiayi. The average hauling distance from pyrolysis plant to rice fields is 10 km within Chiayi and an additional 25 km for adjacent counties.
Biochar is applied at a rate of 5 tons per hectare.
If biochar is used as an energy source, then no biochar can be hauled to rice fields and vice versa.
Environmental Impact and Energy Production Evaluation of Biochar Application on Taiwan Set-Aside Land
Ethanol production (1000, liters) when biochar is burned/hauled under varying GHG prices
Finding:
Ethanol production increases as ethanol price increases, but it decreases as GHG and coal price increase.
Ethanol production is higher when biochar is burned at low GHG price scenarios.
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
5 10 15 20 25 30
ET
HPR
OD
GHGPRICE
A11A12A21A22A31A32
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
5 10 15 20 25 30
ET
HP
RO
DGHGPRICE
B11B12B21B22B31B32
Environmental Impact and Energy Production Evaluation of Biochar Application on Taiwan Set-Aside Land
Electricity production when biochar is burned/hauled under varying GHG prices
Finding:
When biochar is burned, it provides up to 1.79% of electricity demand.
When biochar is hauled at low carbon and ethanol price but high coal price, fast pyrolysis dominates and generates less biochar. This switches to slow pyrolysis when GHG price increases.
500000
1e+006
1.5e+006
2e+006
2.5e+006
3e+006
3.5e+006
4e+006
5 10 15 20 25 30
EL
EC
PR
OD
GHGPRICE
A11A12A21A22A31A32
600000
800000
1e+006
1.2e+006
1.4e+006
1.6e+006
1.8e+006
2e+006
2.2e+006
2.4e+006
2.6e+006
2.8e+006
5 10 15 20 25 30
EL
EC
PR
OD
GHGPRICE
B11B12B21B22B31B32
Environmental Impact and Energy Production Evaluation of Biochar Application on Taiwan Set-Aside Land
CO2 reduction when biochar is burned/hauled under varying GHG prices
Finding:
Net GHG emission reduction is higher when biochar is used as a soil amendment.
Both biochar applications reduce GHG emissions less than 1%.
At higher GHG prices, GHG emission reduction increases.
400000
600000
800000
1e+006
1.2e+006
1.4e+006
1.6e+006
1.8e+006
2e+006
2.2e+006
5 10 15 20 25 30
CA
RB
ON
RE
D
GHGPRICE
A11A12A21A22A31A32
600000
800000
1e+006
1.2e+006
1.4e+006
1.6e+006
1.8e+006
2e+006
2.2e+006
2.4e+006
2.6e+006
5 10 15 20 25 30C
AR
BO
NR
ED
GHGPRICE
B11B12B21B22B31B32
Environmental Impact and Energy Production Evaluation of Biochar Application on Taiwan Set-Aside Land
Findings: When bioenergy is produced in Taiwan, given available
bioenergy feedstock alternatives, only sweet potato and poplar are produced.
Energy production and GHG offsets may not be maximized at the same time.
When pyrolysis is available alternative, biopower is driven out
at all cases.
As GHG price keeps rising, ethanol becomes less competitive than pyrolysis.
Conclusions
Taiwan get benefits from bioenergy in terms of energy security, farmers’ revenue and welfare.
Taiwan’s bioenergy production does not contribute much in terms of GHG offsets.
Pyrolysis can be profitable but energy price, GHG price and other factors may affect results substantially.
At a high coal price, electricity production expands and at a high ethanol price, ethanol production expands.
At low GHG and coal prices, ethanol can still compete with pyrolysis.
When GHG price increases, pyrolysis dominates ethanol and biopower.
Limitations and Future Research
Pyrolysis decomposition rate of sweet potato is assumed to be the same as corn stover, and that of willow and switchgrass is assumed to be the same as poplar.
If different location of pyrolysis plant is chosen, then the simulated result will vary.
Same rice yield increase regardless of soil and weather condition.
Fixed government subsidy.
GHG emission change due to land use change is not incorporated.