Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Environmental Hysteria and the Campaign to Regulate Our Economy. Preserving the American Dream May 17, 2008. What if your state set up a commission to study global warming?. Politics & Global Warming. Some contributing factors to consider: Media bias Who are the rent-seekers? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Environmental Hysteria and the Campaign to
Regulate Our Economy
Environmental Hysteria and the Campaign to
Regulate Our Economy
Preserving the American DreamMay 17, 2008
Preserving the American DreamMay 17, 2008
What if your state set up a commission to study global warming?
Politics & Global WarmingPolitics & Global Warming
Some contributing factors to consider:
Media bias Who are the rent-seekers? Environmental grants Big fossil fuel $ (big) vs. Big enviro-alarmist $
(bigger) Silencing of the skeptics “The debate is over” UN IPCC Summary (“consensus”) vs. actual IPCC
scientists (“not”) Organizational statements vs. rank-and-file support ‘Green’ industry subsidies
Some contributing factors to consider:
Media bias Who are the rent-seekers? Environmental grants Big fossil fuel $ (big) vs. Big enviro-alarmist $
(bigger) Silencing of the skeptics “The debate is over” UN IPCC Summary (“consensus”) vs. actual IPCC
scientists (“not”) Organizational statements vs. rank-and-file support ‘Green’ industry subsidies
Science & Global WarmingScience & Global Warming
Some contributing factors to consider:
Natural variation in temperatures in the past Solar activity Cloud cover Sea ice loss (Arctic); sea ice increase (Antarctic) Recent temperature trends (downward) CO2 trails warming, rather than leading it People, animals and plants thrive more with
warming than cooling Ocean temperatures (not warming?) Errant hurricane predictions Greenhouse gases
Some contributing factors to consider:
Natural variation in temperatures in the past Solar activity Cloud cover Sea ice loss (Arctic); sea ice increase (Antarctic) Recent temperature trends (downward) CO2 trails warming, rather than leading it People, animals and plants thrive more with
warming than cooling Ocean temperatures (not warming?) Errant hurricane predictions Greenhouse gases
What is really happening in the states?
What is really happening in the states?
One greenhouse gas: CO2
What is really happening in the states?
What is really happening in the states?
“Participants will not debate the science of climate change, the goals established in the (governor’s) executive order, or the timeline, but will instead provide leadership and a vision for how (YOUR STATE HERE) will rise to the challenges and opportunities of addressing climate change.” (Ground Rules)
Who is CCS?Who is CCS?
Pennsylvania Environmental Council(PEC)
Enterprising Environmental Solutions Inc.(EESI)
Center for Climate Strategies (CCS)
Who is the Pennsylvania Environmental Council?Who is the Pennsylvania Environmental Council?
Who is the Pennsylvania Environmental Council?Who is the Pennsylvania Environmental Council?
WEB SITE:
“No environmental issue is more pressing today than energy and climate.”
Who is EESI/CCS?Who is EESI/CCS?
Who is EESI/CCS?Who is EESI/CCS?
Who is EESI/CCS?Who is EESI/CCS?
In their own words:In their own words:
CCS Executive Director Tom Peterson:
“The idea that we have advocates for PEC working on the North Carolina project is incorrect. (EESI) does not have an advocacy mission, and it doesn’t have an advocacy history.”
Who funds CCS?Who funds CCS?
Rockefeller Bros. Fund The (Teresa) Heinz (Kerry) Endowments The (Ted) Turner Foundation Merck Family Fund Energy Foundation Sandler Family Supporting Foundation (Soros)Indirectly: William & Flora Hewlett Foundation Pew Charitable Trusts
Rockefeller Bros. Fund The (Teresa) Heinz (Kerry) Endowments The (Ted) Turner Foundation Merck Family Fund Energy Foundation Sandler Family Supporting Foundation (Soros)Indirectly: William & Flora Hewlett Foundation Pew Charitable Trusts
In their own words:In their own words:
CCS Executive Director Tom Peterson:
“We’re a service organization. We don’t accept contingent outcomes from any donor, including [from] states.”
PEC president, CCS board member Brian Hill:
"Any private funding obtained by EESI to support the work of CCS has no mandate for, or commitment to, specific policy outcomes."
Control process ‘Opt-out’ voting Propose all options Run meetings,
agenda ‘Stakeholder’ group Pass options Legitimized by gov’t
Control process ‘Opt-out’ voting Propose all options Run meetings,
agenda ‘Stakeholder’ group Pass options Legitimized by gov’t
Advocacy ‘Service group’ Funded by
advocacy Lobby states Attractive to states Executive orders Get hired
CCS: A to ZCCS: A to Z
Goal is to reduce GHGs, not climate:
Carbon tax and/or Cap-and-Trade (energy rationing) Renewable portfolio standards (increase) Renewable energy incentives Subsidies for “waste to energy” (burning chicken
poop) Public benefit charge (fee on electric bills) Mandatory ‘advanced (electric) metering
infrastructure’ Preservation of working lands/forest lands Biofuel subsidies
Goal is to reduce GHGs, not climate:
Carbon tax and/or Cap-and-Trade (energy rationing) Renewable portfolio standards (increase) Renewable energy incentives Subsidies for “waste to energy” (burning chicken
poop) Public benefit charge (fee on electric bills) Mandatory ‘advanced (electric) metering
infrastructure’ Preservation of working lands/forest lands Biofuel subsidies
Typical RecommendationsTypical Recommendations
Restrict parking availability to encourage transit use Pay-as-you-drive insurance Subsidies for mass transit, bike paths, pedestrian Locate all government offices downtown Tailpipe GHG emissions standards Biofuels in government fleets Transit-oriented development Compact development Require transportation integration w/ land use planning - Punishment to city/community: w/hold transp. funds
Restrict parking availability to encourage transit use Pay-as-you-drive insurance Subsidies for mass transit, bike paths, pedestrian Locate all government offices downtown Tailpipe GHG emissions standards Biofuels in government fleets Transit-oriented development Compact development Require transportation integration w/ land use planning - Punishment to city/community: w/hold transp. funds
Transportation & Land UseTransportation & Land Use
Michigan Minnesota Montana New Mexico North Carolina Pennsylvania South Carolina Vermont Washington
Michigan Minnesota Montana New Mexico North Carolina Pennsylvania South Carolina Vermont Washington
Alaska? Arkansas California Colorado Florida Iowa Kansas Maryland Michigan
Where is CCS?Where is CCS?
What’s going on in states?What’s going on in states?
CO: Gov. Ritter’s cabinet-level climate and energy advisers funded by Hewlett Found.
KS: 1st indication of $$ coming from political activists (Sandler), and not just enviro foundations
IA: Actual budget removed from version of memo posted to state web site (“fully transparent?”)
States aren’t paying anything lately (IA, KS, MI, AR) - keeps CCS beholden to funders, hide public records
CO: Gov. Ritter’s cabinet-level climate and energy advisers funded by Hewlett Found.
KS: 1st indication of $$ coming from political activists (Sandler), and not just enviro foundations
IA: Actual budget removed from version of memo posted to state web site (“fully transparent?”)
States aren’t paying anything lately (IA, KS, MI, AR) - keeps CCS beholden to funders, hide public records
In their own words:In their own words:
Edward Garvey, Minnesota Office of Energy Security, co-coordinator of MCCAG:
“I think (MCCAG) challenged CCS far more than they have been challenged in other states.” - St. Paul Pioneer Press, 1/24/08
In their own words:In their own words:
Tad Aburn, Maryland Dept. of Environment, coordinator of MD Advisory Group:
“If you asked me right now, how are you going to do it? What exactly are you going to do? The answer is, I don’t know.” - Associated Press
What does CCS say about its own proposals?
“The recommendations are projected to create net economic savings of over $2 billion for the State economy over the period 2007-2020.” (New Mexico)
“(Our) goal of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020 can be met and exceeded if all recommendations are implemented.” (Montana)
“If you do it right ... you can save money, create jobs and cut emissions.” (Tom Peterson)
What does CCS say about its own proposals?
“The recommendations are projected to create net economic savings of over $2 billion for the State economy over the period 2007-2020.” (New Mexico)
“(Our) goal of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020 can be met and exceeded if all recommendations are implemented.” (Montana)
“If you do it right ... you can save money, create jobs and cut emissions.” (Tom Peterson)
What does Beacon Hill Institute say about CCS’s proposals?
No dollar value is placed on reducing GHG emissions, making it impossible to quantify the cost savings
Net savings from recommendations do not include net costs
Failure to recognize market forces, in that consumers would already pursue savings if they could be had
Instead of identifying jobs as costs, they categorize them as benefits
“Seriously flawed,” “Fictitious analysis”
What does Beacon Hill Institute say about CCS’s proposals?
No dollar value is placed on reducing GHG emissions, making it impossible to quantify the cost savings
Net savings from recommendations do not include net costs
Failure to recognize market forces, in that consumers would already pursue savings if they could be had
Instead of identifying jobs as costs, they categorize them as benefits
“Seriously flawed,” “Fictitious analysis”
What Climate Strategies Watch is trying to do:
Reveal methodology, funding sources, FOIAs No analysis of recommendations’ impact on climate No cost-benefit analysis; economic impact Beacon Hill Institute economic analysis, peer
reviews No feasibility studies Visit states and help build coalitions Taxpayer activists, property rights, think tanks, talk
radio, bloggers, social conservatives, legislators
What Climate Strategies Watch is trying to do:
Reveal methodology, funding sources, FOIAs No analysis of recommendations’ impact on climate No cost-benefit analysis; economic impact Beacon Hill Institute economic analysis, peer
reviews No feasibility studies Visit states and help build coalitions Taxpayer activists, property rights, think tanks, talk
radio, bloggers, social conservatives, legislators
Climate Strategies Watch.com
Climate Strategies Watch.com
‘CCS in detail’ Investigative
stories Recommendations New developments How they operate Who funds them
Contact InformationContact Information
Paul Chesser200 West Morgan St.Raleigh, NC 27601(919) 828-3876
Paul Chesser200 West Morgan St.Raleigh, NC 27601(919) 828-3876
