Environmental Audit Report · Former AD1 Maribvrnone Facility Issued by 1871 , Lyons AD1 VALIDATION ASSESSMENT REPORT David Aynsley, AD1 Limited - Property, copies 1 & 2 Roger Parker,

INFORMATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT REPORTS August 2007

VICTORIA'S AUDIT SYSTEM An environmental audit system has operated in Victoria since 1989. The Environmenf Profecfion Acf 1970 (the Act) provides for the appointment by the Environment Protection Authority (EPA Victoria) of environmental auditors and the conduct of independent, high quality and rigorous environmental audits.

An environmental audit is an assessment of the condition of the environment, or the nature and extent of harm (or risk of harm) posed by an industrial process or activity, waste, substance or noise. Environmental audit reports are prepared by EPA- appointed environmental auditors who are highly qualified and skilled individuals.

Under the Act, the function of an environmental auditor is t o conduct environmental audits and prepare environmental audit reports. Where an environmental audit is conducted to determine the condition of a site or its suitability for certain uses, an environmental auditor may issue either a certificate or statement of environmental audit.

A certificate indicates that the auditor is of the opinion that the site is suitable for any beneficial use defined in the Act, whilst a statement indicates that there is some restriction on the use of the site.

Any individual or organisation may engage appointed environmental auditors, who generally operate within the environmental consulting sector, t o undertake environmental audits. The EPA administers the environmental audit system and ensures its ongoing integrity by assessing auditor applications and ensuring audits are independent and conducted with regard t o guidelines issued by EPA.

AUDIT FILES STRUCTURE Environmental audit reports are stored digitally by EPA in three parts: the audit report (part A), report appendices (part B) and, where applicable, the certificate or statement of environmental audit and an executive summary (part C). A report may be in colour and black-and-white formats. Generally, only black- and-white documents are text searchable.

Report executive summaries, findings and recommendations should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole, including any appendices and, where applicable, any certificate or statement of environmental audit.

AUDIT REPORT CURRENCY Audit reports are based on the conditions encountered and information reviewed at the time of preparation and do not represent any changes that may have occurred since the date of completion. As i t is not possible for an audit t o present all data that could be of interest t o all readers, consideration should be made to any appendices or referenced documentation for further information.

When information regarding the condition of a site changes from that at the time an audit report is issued, or where an administrative or computation error is identified, environmental audit reports, certificates and statements may be withdrawn or amended by an environmental auditor. Users are advised t o check EPA's website to ensure the currency of the audit document.

PDF SEARCHABILITY AND PRINTING EPA Victoria can only certify the accuracy and correctness of the audit report and appendices as presented in the hardcopy format. EPA is not responsible for any issues that arise due to problems with PDF files or printing.

Except where PDF normal format is specified, PDF files are scanned and optical character recognised by machine only. Accordingly, while the images are consistent with the scanned original, the searchable hidden text may contain uncorrected recognition errors that can reduce search reliability. Therefore, keyword searches undertaken within the document may not retrieve all references to the queried text.

This PDF has been created using the Adobe-approved method for generating Print Optimised Output. To assure proper results, proofs must be printed, rather than viewed on the screen.

This PDF is compatible with Adobe Acrobat Reader Version 4.0 or any later version which is downloadable free from Adobe's Website, www.adobe.com.

FURTHER I N FORMATION For more information on Victoria's environmental audit system, visit EPA's website or contact EPA's Environmental Audit Unit.

Web: www.epa.vic.clov.au/envaudit

Email: [email protected]

1 of 83

http://www.adobe.com

17565-1 9-B

I (I

VALIDA TION ASSESSMENT REPORT OF

SUPER LOT 3A FORMER ADIMARIBYRNONG FACILITY

2 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvrnone\vrpt3a. Doc N o . AG343. Issue 1 . October 1997

AD1 Limited Corporate Headquarters - Property Validation Assessment Report - Super Lot 3A

Former AD1 Maribvrnong Facility

VALIDATION ASSESSMENT REPORT

OF

SUPER LOT 3A Former AD1 Maribyrnong Facility

FOR

AD1 Limited Corporate Headquarters - Property

Prepared by

AD1 Limited - Major Projects Gordon Street

Footscray, Victoria 301 1 AUSTRALIA

COPY 3

Report No.: EO-0028

OCTOBER 1997

In Confidence - AD1 Limited 1997

- -~

3 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvmon~\vrt3a. issue I . October 1397


Former AD1 Maribvrnone Facility

Issued by 1871 , Lyons

AD1

VALIDATION ASSESSMENT REPORT

David Aynsley, AD1 Limited - Property, copies 1 & 2 Roger Parker, Golder Associates Pty Ltd, copies 3 & 4 AD1 Limited Major Projects Library, copy 5 AD1 Limited Major Projects Project File, copy 6

OF

SUPER LOT 3A Former AD1 Maribyrnong Facility

FOR

AD1 Limited Corporate Headquarters - Property

Prepared by:

Anissa Groves Senior bnvironmental Scientist

Dr Fouad Abo Environmental anager - Southern

Documentation Control

In Confidence - AD1 Limited 1997 Page 2

4 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvmone\vrot3a. issue I . October 1997


Former AD1 Manbvrnone Facility

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EmCUTIVE SuTuI1MmY ................................................................................................................. 5

2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 7

2.1 General ................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Regulatory Requirements ..... .. . .. . . .. ....... . ... .... .. .. . . .... . .. ...................................................................... 7 2.3 Objectives .............................................................................................................................................. 7

3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................................................... 8

3.1 Physical Description of the Site ................................ ........................................ 3.2 Adjacent land Use .................................................................................................................. 3.3 Site Geology and Soil Type ...................................................................................... 3.4 Hydrogeology ........................................................................................................................................ 9 3.5 Previous Investigations .......................................................................................................................... 9

3.5. I Site History.. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . _. . . .. . .. . . ..... . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . __ . . . . . . :. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.5.2 Original Site Investigation ... . .. .. .. .. . ... . . . . . . . . .. ... . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... ....... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . I O 3.5.3 Further Investigation ...... ... .. .. ...._........ ..................................................... 11

. .

3.5.4 Site Clean Up Works. .. . . . ........... ................ ............................... I 2

4.0 VALIDATION SCOPE OF WORKS ............................................................................................... 14

............................................ 14 4.1 Occupational Health and Safety Plan .............................................. 4.2 Sampling Program ........................................................................................... 4.3 Analysis Program ............................................................................................

5.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION .............................................................................................................,.. 15

5.1 Sampling Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 15 5.1.1 Soil Sampling Methodolo gy... ................................................................................................... I., 5.1.2 Soil Gas Survey Methodology ....................................................................................................... 13

6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL ...................................................................... 16

6.1 Field Quality Assurance Program ........................................................................................ ............ ... 16 6.2 Laboratory Analyses Q N Q C ...............................................................

___ .____ . ._ .____ . . 16 6.2.1 Laboratoly Internal QA/QC .........._...... ..................... ...................................... .

6.2.3 Data Ently and Review ...... 6.2.4 General Data Quality ............................................... .... ................... .... ._._...__._.. .. ...... ...... ...... _.. .. . ... I S

7.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIOB ........................................................................................................ 19

7.1 Validation Criteria for Analysed Samples ........................................................................................... 19 7.2 Soil Validation ..................................................................................................... ............................ 21

............................................ -- 37

8.0 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................ 24

6.2.2 Field/Blind Duplicates .... . . . ............................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.3 Statistical Analysis of Analytical Results .......................................

9.0 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................. 25

TABLES Table 1 - Summary of the Original Site Investigation Results from Super Lot 3A Table 2 - Summary of the Further Investigation Results from Super Lot 3A Table 3- Relevant Investigation Criteria for Individual Soil Samples Table 4 - Summary of the Validation Results from Super Lot 3A Table 5- Summary of Statistical Data for Super Lot 3A

1 1 12 20 21 22

In Confidence - ADI Limited 1997 Page 3 5 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvmone\vr~t3a. issue I . October I397



APPENDICES

Appendix A Title Plan Appendix B Sampling Point Map Appendix C Appendix D Tabulated Analytical Data Appendix E

Appendix F

NATA endorsed Laboratory Reports

Field Quality Assurance Program, Copies of Representative Field Logsheets, Tabulated FieldBlind Duplicates, Internal Duplicates, Spikes Backsround Sampling Point Map

ABBREVIATIONS

AC ANZECC BTEX EPAV NATA NHMRC MW OCPS PAHs CHC PCBS PID QMQc TPHs UCL CBD DHA Sb As Ba Be Cd Cr c o c u Fe

Mn Mo Ni Pb Sn Zn

Mg

Asbestos Cement Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylene Environment Protection Authority Victoria National Association of Testing Authorities National Health and Medical Research Council Melbourne Water (former Melbourne Metropolitan Board of Works) Organochlorine Pesticides Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Chlorinated hydrocarbons Polychlorinated Biphenyls Photoionisation Detector Quality Assurance/Quality Control Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Upper Confidence Limit Central Business District Defence Housing Authority Antimony Arsenic Barium B ery 11 i um Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Magnesium Manganese Molybdenum Nickel Lead Tin Zinc

In Confidence - AD1 Limited 1997 P3ge 4 6 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvrnone\vmt3a. issue I . October I997


Former AD1 Maribvmone Facility

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .

AD1 Limited - Technology Group (Environmental) has successfully completed a validation assessment of Super Lot 3A of the former AD1 Maribyrnong Facility for AD1 Corporate Headquarters - Property. The purpose of these works was to establish that the environmental quality of this site is suitable for its proposed use as public open space and commercial land with an easement over the North Western Sewer access pit and may be issued with a Statement of Environmental Audit to that effect by an EPAV approved environmental auditor.

The history of the site indicated that Super Lot 3A was used by the Ordnance Factory for storage, bicycle and car parking until 1992. From 1992 onwards MW used the site to construct part of the North Western Sewer Line until September 1997. Super Lot 3A covers an area of 2,023m2 (appendix A).

Melbourne Water (MW) contractors, Transfield cleaned up the site before vacating which involved removing all crushed rock and gave l (to a depth of 0.2m) that they brought onto the site (over their 5 year period stint) and the site levelled. In addition, all general rubbish and debris was also removed and the cyclone fence surrounding the site dismantled. Two oil stained areas were also scraped up, stockpiled and removed as low level contamination to Brooklyn Landfill and Waste Recycling Pty Ltd. The total volume of soil removed was approximately 3m3. The depth of excavation was approximately 0.3m in both cases over a 2m by 2m area.

The site was sampled in 1991 as part of the original investigation, in 1994 as part of the further investigation and in September 1997 as part of the validation program (once Transfield had vacated the site). Overall, a total of 41 samples, including 4 duplicates were collected from 15 sampling points. All the samples were analysed for a suite of analytes chosen in accordance with the historical use of the site, the site assessment and the auditor’s requirements. Moreover, a total of 5 samples (12’36) from across the area were analysed for the full EPAV organic and inorganic chemicals screen.

Analytical results received from the laboratories have been validated and then compared to the Statement criteria acceptable for open space and commercial land use. The majority of samples collected were below the Statement acceptance criteria with the exception of PAHs in the surface sample from point 3219, which appears to be an isolated area

Statistical analyses were conducted on all analytical results from Super Lot 3A and the 95% Upper Confidence Limit (UCL) average concentrations were calculated for all analytes detected on the site. As summarised in the following table, the calculated 95% UCL average concentrations were significantly below the acceptance criteria for all analytes within Super Lot 3A.

These results confirm that the soil remaining on Super Lot 3A is suitable for open space and commercial use and the site is therefore recommended for the award of a Statement of Environmental Audit to allow its proposed development.

In Confidence - AD1 Limited 1397 PaSe 5 7 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvmon~\vrpt3a, issue 1 , October 1997


Former AD1 ManbymonE Facility

- 600

Summary of Site Statistical Analyses

P b & & Q b S b k 300 3000 50 2 20 5

Maximum Mean 95%UCL

75 7 88 570 100 7.2 0.93 38.43 63.98 44.67

11.1 1.3 45.54 94.65 51.17

370 I 7.3 I 960 I 18 I 0.12 I <8 I I 53.58 I 1.9 I 142.3 I 13.9 I 0.06 79.37 I 2.4 I 199.7 I 17.3 I 0.09

2.8 0.55 4.37 0.94

Analyte Criteria ( m g k ) Minimum Maximum

&& & @ pAHs PCBs Ocps Phenols CHCs 200 10 - 100 200 1 2 1 7

<2 Q 7.6 < I <I <o. 1 0 <o. 1 <o. 1 2.5 <8 9.5 <5 510 <I <I 0.9 ~ 0 . 5

Maximum I ~ 0 . 1 I I O

Mean I 2.14 I 2.8 I 8.55 I <5 I 79.4 95%UCL I 2.76 I 4.37 I 8.7 I -4 I 178.8

Mean I ~ 0 . 0 5 I 7 95°/oucL I <0.05 I 8.2

< I 0.19 0.25 <0.5 (1 0.39 0.6 -=os

E H I E H I E H

5000 I 5000 I 5000 (C9-CI4) (ClS-C28) I /C29-C36)

I I

11.6 18.3 416 229

I n Confidence - AD1 Limited 1997 ~~

Page 6

8 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvrnone\vrt3a. issue I . October 1997



2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 General

AD1 Limited - Major Projects (Environment) has compiled this validation assessment report at the request of AD1 Corporate Headquarters - Property, in order to establish that the environmental quality of Super Lot 3A (“the site”) is suitable for its proposed use as public open space and commercial land.

This report summarises the results of a series of soil contamination and validation programs which were conducted on the site between July 1994 and October 1997.

2.2 Regulatory Requirements

Super Lot 3A forms part of the former Ordnance Factory Maribymong and is proposed to be utilised as public open space and commercial use. The assessments and validation programs carried out by AD1 Limited - Major Projects have thus been undertaken in accordance with Section 57AA of the Environment Protection Act 1970 and Ministerial Direction No. 1 1992, in order to allow the development of this former industrial estate for public open space and commercial purposes.

The general Maribymong site is currently zoned as residentialhrban under Amendment L47 of the City of Sunshine Planning Scheme. It should be noted that parts of the former City of Sunshine have recently been incorporated into the newly formed City of Marib ymong.

2.3 Objectives

The objectives of the site validation assessments was:

0 To verify that no above acceptance criteria, odorous or leachable contamination remains in Super Lot 3A.

0 To provide objective chemical data which verifies that the soil material across Super Lot 3A is suitable for supporting its proposed potential land uses;

0 To comply with the environmental auditor’s requirements so that a Statement of Environmental Audit may be issued for the site in accordance with Section 57AA of the Environment Protection Act 1970.

I n Confidence - AD1 Limited 1997 Page 7 9 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Manbvmone\vrt3a. issue 1. October 1997

AD1 Limited Corporate Headquarters - Propem Validation Assessment Report - Super Lot 3A

Former AD1 Maribvmone Facilitv

3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION

3.1 Physical Description of the Site

Super Lot 3A encompasses 2,023 square metres (refer to site map provided as appendix A) and is located on the comer of Wests Road and Williamson Road about eight kilometres north-west of the Melbourne CBD. The site forms part of the former Ordnance Factory, Maribymong, and has been utilised by MW over the past 5 years for the construction of the North Western Sewer Line.

The property formerly housed four buildings with all structures being demolished and removed prior to 1992 with the exception of building 192 which was demolished in May 1994.

As part of the development progam Super Lot 3A comprises of a newly contoured crushed rock and gravel surface overlain with a O.Im layer of topsoil. In addition, a large pile of natural soil has been stockpiled on the comer of Wests and Williamson Roads with a number of large trees planted and a sign erected for advertising. A concrete access pit for the North Western Sewer Line is located on the property (appendix a) and will remain as an easement.

Refer to appendix B for the locations of the former building sites, sewer pit and stockpiled material.

3.2 Adjacent land Use

The areas immediately surrounding Super Lot 3A include:

Super Lot 3 to the north. This area comprises vacant remediated land and a number of buildings that remain on the area. Super Lot 3 was awarded a Certificate of Environmental Audit in September 1994 and is currently being developed for residential development.

West Road and Super Lot 1 is located to the east of the site. Super Lot 1 contains vacant remediated land and has been awarded a Certificate of Environmental Audit in December 1995.

34 to 70 Williamson Road (Defence Housing Authority (DHA)) to the west. This site again comprises vacant remediated and validated land and was issued with a Certificate of Audit in February 1997 and is currently being developed for residential development.

Williamson Road and the Maribyrnong Student Village is located to the south of the property.

In Confidence - AD1 Limited 1997 Page s 10 of 83

AD1 Limited AD1 Limited Corporate Headquarters - Property File No: E00028 Validation Assessment Report - Super Lot 3A 7 y r n o n c F er AD arib Facility

3.3 Site Geology and Soil Type

The Geological Map of Victoria, (1:1, 000,000) characterises the surface geology of the Maribyrnong area as dominated by the Quaternary aged Newer Volcanics. This suite of rocks is dominated by basalt but includes minor scoria and tuff deposits.

The basaltic material on site has generally weathered to produce compact, moderately plastic, dark brown to mottled brown montmorillonitic and kaolinitic clays, discoloured with iron and manganese oxides. Weathering boulders are also commonly present at variable depths and bedrock is evident between 0.5 to 1.0m in depth over the site.

A O.lm layer of topsoil material is present on the surface which is underlain with a thin layer (0.1 to 0.4m) of crushed rock and gavel, ash, coke, brick and concrete fra,gments which then overlies natural basaltic clay over the entire site.

3.4 Hydrogeology

The general Maribymong area falls within the Port Phillip Bay groundwater basin for Victoria (Groundwater Resources Map of Victoria, I : I , 000,UOU). The hydrogeology of the former Ordnance Factory site was investigated by AGC Woodward-Clyde Pty Ltd in 1991-92. The results of this investigation are detailed in the report ADI-IDD Suface Water and Groundwater Investigation Report, Maribymong Faciliy, Volumes I and 2, AGC Woodward-Clyde Pty Ltd, 1992. Relevant hydrogeological data from this report is summarised below.

Local groundwater recharge at the Maribymong site occurs through the weathered clay and fractured rock material of the Newer Volcanics. Percolating water through this volcanic unit is likely to be concentrated along joints and fractures, with palaeosols and weathered ash layers acting as local barriers to vertical water movement. The horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the Newer Volcanics repeatedly vanes from around 2 d d a y to about 10 &day (Preliminary assessment of groundwater resources in the Port Phillip region, Geological Survey Report No. 66, Paper No.219 Ministry for Conservation, Environment Studies Series, Melbourne, J. G. Leonard, c. 1984).

No groundwater bore is located within Super Lot 3A, however MB23 is located within 2nd Avenue in Super Lot 3 to the north west of Super Lot 3A. The water table occurs within the Brighton Group, at approximately 30 metres below the ground surface with a relatively flat hydraulic gradient of approximately 0.006. No analyte was above the Dutch C indicative value for cleaning up other than Sn with a value of 360pg/L.

3.5 Previous Investigations

3.5.1 Site History

Historical information relevant to this site has been sourced primarily from the document Site Investigation Report of Mctribyrnorrg Facility, Australiun Defence Industries Lttl, Volume 4, 1992.

In Confidence - ADI Limited 1337 P3gc 7

11 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvmone\vmt3a issue I . October 1997



Four buildings were once located within Super Lot 3A these include 68, 122, concrete air raid shelter and part of building 129.

Building 68 was an open shed used as a bicycle shelter for the entire factory in the busiest times and later on cars were parked there. Building 122 and 129 were stores for the Administration Department (design establishment). The concrete air raid shelter was empty for most of the time however, paper records were later stored in this building. The steel bin located on the map supplied in appendix B was a bin for general waste which was carted off site. These buildings were demolished prior to MW entering the site in 1992, while building 68 was demolished by Transfield once they entered the site and building 129 was demolished in May 1994 by ADI.

,

In 1989 MW approached AD1 for the use of Super Lot 3A for the construction of the Brooklyn to Moonee Ponds section of the North Western Sewer Line. MW contractors Transfield used the site over a 5 year period beginning in March 1992 and ending in September 1997. During this time a layer of crushed rock and gravel was brought onto the site, along with portable offices and toilets for the construction personnel. Construction equipment was used on the site including cranes, tunnelling machines.

The sewer in reported to be at approximately 30m in depth with a 9m diameter concrete access pit being present on the site which will remain as an easement.

3.5.2 Original Site Investigation

A site contamination investigation of the Maribyrnong Facility as a whole was conducted by AD1 Limited (then known as ADI-IDD) in 1991-92. The findings of this investigation are detailed in the report Site Investigation Report of Maribyrnong Facility, Australian Defence Industries Ltd, Volume 4, 1992 and the results relevant to Super Lot 3A are discussed below.

All surveyed locations of the original sampling points are depicted in the sampling point map provided in appendix B. Summaries of all analytical results relevant to this original site investigation are provided in appendix D.

A total of 9 samples were collected from 2 sampling points (213, 345) located within Super Lot 3A. Point 213 was located to the north of the concrete air raid shelter while point 345 was to the north of building 122. Table 1 below provides a summary of the analysis undertaken and the contamination identified in these samples. For all QC data refer to section 6 of this report.

As shown in this table, only the surface sample fiom point 213 contained Cd at 7msJkg which is slightly above the site specific Certificate criteria, most likely due to the fill located within the area. No sample fiom either point contained any of the analytes above the site specific Statement criteria.

in Confidence - .\Dl Limited 1997 Page IO 12 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribymonn\vrpt3a, issue 1, October 1997


Former AD1 Maribymong Facilitv

Sampling Analysis Point 213

345

3 pH, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Pb, Zn, 1 OC pesticides 6 As. Cd. TPHs. 1 CN

Table 1 - Summary of the Original Site Investigation Results from Super Lot 3A

Contamination Identified *

Cd at 7mg/kg at a depth of 0-0.3m

none

*Results in red are above the site specific Certificate criteria.

3.5.3 Further Investigation

Based on the findings of original site investigation of 1991, AD1 Limited conducted a further sampling program during 1994 aiming at identifying any contaminated areas including these which have not previously been investigated.

All samples were collected from a backhoe dug test pit.

All surveyed sampling point locations are provided in the map attached as appendix B. Tables summarising the further investigation analytical data are provided in appendix D.

Copies of the further investigation analytical reports received from the AD1 laboratory and ANALABS are attached as appendix C. All originals are held by AD1 Limited for file records.

A total of 19 samples were collected from 6 sampling points (3082 to 3087) located within Super Lot 3A. Point 3082 was located beneath former building 122, 3083 outside the actual Super Lot 3A boundary near Wests Road, 3085 beneath former building 68, 3087 south of the concrete air raid shelter while points 3084 and 3086 were located in the open areas. Table 2 below provides a summary of the analysis undertaken and the contamination identified in these samples. For all Q N Q C data refer to section 6 of this report.

The field investigation identified a layer of fill material (0.2 to 0.4m) within most sampling points which included gravelly clay, ash, coke, slag, brick, concrete and glass fragments with the odd piece of AC sheeting fragment also. This was then underlain with a natural brown to dark brown homogeneous clay.

I n Conhdcncs - AD1 Limited 1997 Page I I

~~

13 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028

Sn, Zn 3 As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Sn, Zn 1 pH, Be, Co, Hg, Mo, Sb, Se, OC pesticides, TPHs, BTEX, PAHs, phenols, CN, PCBs, CHCs 4 As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Sn, Zn 3 As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb,


none

none

none

H Anissa/Maribymong.\vrpt3a, issue I , October I997 Former AD1 Maribvmong Facility

Table 2 - Summary of the Further Investigation Results from Super Lot 3A

Sn, Zn 3 As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb,

impling Point 3082

none

3083#

3084

3085

3086

3087

Contamination Iden t i tied * I Analysis I

1 pH, Be, Co, Hg, Mo, Sb, Se, OC pesticides, TPHs, BTEX, PAHs, phenols, CN, PCBs, CHCs 3 As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Sn, Zn 1 pH, Be, Co, Hg, Mo, Sb, Se, OC pesticides, TPHs, BTEX, PAHs, phenols, CN, PCBs, CHCs 3 As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb,

none

Zn at 960mg/kg 0 - 0.2m Cu at 570mg/kg 0 - 0.2m

Cu at 350mg/kg, Zn at 680mgkg 0.2 - 0.4m

# Sampling point 3083 is actually outside of Super Lot 3A boundary. *Results in red are above the site specific Certificate criteria. Results in blue are above the site specific Statement and Certificate criteria’s.

As shown in this table, only the surface 0.2m in sampling point 3083 contained Cu at 570mg/kg which is slightly above the Statement criteria, most likely due to the f i l l located within the sampling point. No sample from any other point contained any of the analytes above the Statement criteria.

Cu and Zn were shown to be above the Certificate criteria in the surface 0.4m samples in sampling point 3083 with maximum values being 570 and 960mg/kg respectively.

3.5.4 Site Clean Up Works

Site clean up works were undertaken across Super Lot 3A in September 1997 after M W contractors (Transfield) had finished using the site for the construction of part of the North Western Sewer Line. All crushed rock and gravel (to a depth of 0.2m) that Transfield brought onto the site (over their 5 year works on the site) was removed and the site levelled. In addition, all general rubbish and debris was also removed and the cyclone fence surrounding the site dismantled.


14 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvmone\v~pt3a. issue I . October 1997



Two oil stained areas were also scraped up, stockpiled and removed as low level contamination to Brooklyn Landfill and Waste Recycling Pty Ltd (refer to appendix D tables for the analytical results for this excavated material). The total volume of soil removed was approximately 3m3. The depth of excavation was approximately 0.3m in both cases over a 2m by 2m area.

No other material was removed from the site, hence the fill layer of 0.1 to 0.4m remains consisting of ash, coke, brick and concrete fragments.

The entire area has now been covered with O.Im of topsoil by the landscaping contractors. In addition, a 0.5m high stockpile of soil derived from Certificate areas of the AD1 Maribyrnong Facility measuring approximately 50m by 15m has been placed on the site to support 10 large trees planted for development purposes.

In Confidence - AD1 Limited 1997 Page 1; 15 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvrnone\vrot3a. issue 1. October 1997



4.0 . VALIDATION SCOPE OF WORKS

4.1 Occupational Health and Safety Plan

All validation works camed out were undertaken in accordance with the AD1 Occupational Health and Safety Plan.

4.2 Sampling Program

A total of 13 samples, including 1 field duplicate, were collected from a total of 7 sampling points located across Super Lot 3A as part of the validation program. In accordance with the Auditor’s requirements, a minimum sampling density of two points per 2,500m2 was attained across the site, with additional sampling undertaken on specific features of the final land surface where appropriate.

The surveyed locations of all validation sampling points are shown on the map provided in appendix B.

4.3 Analysis Program

The standard analytical schedule used in the validation program included pH, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, lead, tin and zinc. Additionally, all surface samples were also analysed for PAHs, ,oiven the presence of ash material in the surface fill material. Six samples were also analysed for TPHs. Two samples were also analysed for beryllium, cobalt, mercury, selenium, antimony, molybdenum, BTEX, chlorinated hydrocarbons, total phenols and total cyanide. All these analytes were selected based on the general Maribymong site history and the auditors requirements.

Copies of the analytical reports received from WSL are attached as appendix C. All originals are held by AD1 Limited for file records.


16 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvmone\vrt3a. issue 1. October 1997


Former AD1 Maribvmone Facilitv

5.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION

5.1 Sampling Methodology

5.1.1 Soil Sampling Methodology

All further investigation and validation sampling on Super Lot 3A was camed out in accordance with the Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Contaminated Sites, 1992.

In the validation program soil samples were collected from backhoe dug test pits. One surface sample (0 - 0.3/0.4 metre) was collected from all sampling points and a second depth sample (0.3/0.4 - 0.7/1 metre) was also collected from all sampling points.

All samples collected were analysed on an individual basis.

5.1.2 Soil Gas Survey Methodology

Soil gas measurements were taken in the field using a Photovac Microtip EX-4000 Photoionisation Detector, equipped with a 10.6 electron-volt (eV) ultraviolet lamp. Measurements were taken down the side of most test pits from a 10 centimetre deep furrow, freshly dug into each defined portion of the exposed soil profile. Where samples were collected from depth, soil gas measurements were also taken from fi-esh soil material collected with an excavator or backhoe bucket. Headspace vials were collected from any soil material registering significant PID reading exhibiting any noticeable foreign odours.

In Confidence - AD1 Limited 1997 Page 15 17 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvmone\vmt3a. issue 1 . October I997

AD1 Limited Corporate Headquarters - Property Validation Assessment Report - Super Lot 3X

Former AD1 Maribvrnone Facilitv

6.0

6.1

6.2

6.2.1

QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL

Field Quality Assurance Program

A comprehensive field quality assurance program was implemented during all stages of the initial and final site validation works. Details of this program are provided in appendix E and the results of QNQC analyses camed out are discussed in the following sections.

Laboratory Analyses QMQC

Laboratory Internal QA/QC

The majority of chemical analyses carried out during this investigation were undertaken by WSL Consultants. WSL is NATA accredited for all the analyses undertaken. ANALABS was used for the further investigation sampling analysis.

Some analyses were also conducted by the (now closed) AD1 Laboratory, formerly located at Gordon Street, Footscray. The AD1 Laboratory was operated by a qualified analytical chemist and all analytical procedures were consistent with NATA protocols. However, NATA registration was not sought by AD1 during the laboratory’s operational history. A comprehensive QNQC program was conducted by a NATA accredited laboratory on those samples analysed by the AD1 laboratory. After review of the resulting duplicate data, the Environmental Auditor confirmed that the analytical results provided by the AD1 laboratory were suitable for use in the further investigation program.

All laboratories performed internal duplicate analyses of received samples at a rate of approximately lo%, or at least one per small batch of samples (<lo). For Super Lot 3A sampling programs, internal duplicate analyses were carried out on 6 samples with the results showing excellent consistency.

Overall 87 individual analyte sample spikes were also conducted by the external laboratories to assess the extent of matrix bias or interference on recovery and sample to sample precision. Recovery percentages for the majority (90%) of the soil spikes were between 76% and 124% which fell within the range of 75% and 125% which are generally accepted as being suitable to validate a set of analytical results. The average recovery percentage was 104.37.

No equipment contamination was identified in the reported laboratory blank nin during analysis of the samples fiom Super Lot 3A.


AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvmone \vmt3a. issue I . October I997


Former AD1 M aribvrnone Facility

6.2.2 Fieldmlind Duplicates

Three field duplicates and 1 blind duplicate were collected and sent for analysis as part of standard Q N Q C procedure during the original and further investigations and validation programs. This analytical QNQC was undertaken in order to confirm the use of appropriate field sample preparation procedures and proper laboratory analytical techniques. Interpretation of the resulting QNQC data is undertaken by calculating the relative percentage difference (RPD) for each pair of analyte results obtained. The RPD values are calculated using the following formula:

RPD% = (XI - Xz)/ M* 100

Where X, , X, are duplicate results and A4 is the mean of the two duplicate results

The RPD calculation method is used to normalise each pair of results, allowing better Q N Q C data interpretation. For those RPD values which exceed a generally accepted 50% limit, correspondence of data is considered to be poor. All those duplicate samples with an RPD of between 0 and 50% are considered to have acceptable correlation.

Appendix E lists the QNQC results and indicates the RPD values calculated for each analyte pair. In summary:

0 12 duplicate analyte pairs had an RPD of -60%;

2 duplicate analyte pairs had an RPD of >50%;

0 RPD values could not be calculated for the 11 remaining duplicate pairs where one or both levels were below detection limits.

These % RPD calculations indicate that acceptable correlation was achieved between the two laboratories for the majority of samples analysed. These results verify that the quality of the analytical data supplied by the laboratories for the sampling programs is appropriate for fulfilling the aims of the validation project. The results also indicate that adequate field sample preparation procedures were utilised during the sampling progam.

6.2.3 Data Entry and Review

All reported analytical results were faxed to AD1 Limited and were entered by hand into the Super Lot 3A excel spreadsheets in the early stages of the project. In later stages, the data was prepared by the laboratories in Microsoft Excel spreadsheets which were modem-transferred directly to ADI. Final sorting and formatting was undertaken by AD1 to split the data into relevant tables for presentation in this report. Proper cross checking for the data entry was conducted.


AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvmone \vmt3a. issue I . October 1997



6.2.4 General Data Quality

In general, the laboratories have been found to utilise reliable sample preparation procedures and stable analytical conditions consistently throughout their association with AD1 Limited. The laboratories have provided good analytical services which include acceptable Q N Q C programs, accurate data confirmation and cooperative service. It is concluded that the overall data quality for this investigation is acceptable and is considered to be reliable to achieve the objectives of this assessment.

In Confidence - AD1 Limited 1997 Puge 1s

~~ ~

20 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: AnissalMaribvrnone \vmt3a, issue I . October I997


Former AD1 Ma ribvmone Facility

7.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

7.1 Validation Criteria for Analysed Samples

Investigation criteria are the guidelines for contaminant concentrations to be used for evaluating the contamination status of a site. These criteria are dependent mainly on the proposed future usage of the site in question.

The ANZECC&NHMRC guidelines (1 992) provide a set of general investigation criteria applicable to residential land use. However, this document also states that site specific criteria can be developed from an environmental and human health risk assessment carried out based on the proposed end use of the land in question.

The majority of acceptance criteria for the validation of Super Lot 3A were developed from an environmental and human health risk assessment of the open space areas of the Maribymong Facility, which was based on the proposed park land use of these sites. Details of this risk assessment are given in the report Ecological and Health Risk Assessment, hfaribymong Facility Site, Volumes 1 and 2, ADI Services, July 1994. Criteria for antimony and selenium were derived from an additional health risk assessment carried out by Golder Associates Pty Ltd, as described in the document Report on Certificate of Environmental Audit, Super Lot 6, ADI Maribyrnong Facility, Golder Associates, November 1994. All criteria used in the validation program are provided in Table 3 and pertain to individually analysed samples.

Table 3 also shows the range and typical “background” levels of the various analytes in the soils characteristic to the Maribymong area. This data was obtained from a sampling and analysis program carried out in 1994 within the Canning St Reserve, Maribyrnong. The reserve is located across the river to the west of the site (Appendix F) and is currently being utilised as park land with football sporting facilities. Council records indicate no other previous land use.

The soils in the reserve dominantly comprise heavy clays derived from the Quaternary aged Newer Volcanics basalts, and are generally similar to those found on the Maribymong site. Four sampling points were located on this reserve and the appropriate locations are depicted in the map attached-’as Appendix F. All samples collected represented in situ, natural soil material.

I n Confidence - AD1 Limited 1997 Page 19 21 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvmong\vrp13a. issue 1, October 1997


Former AD1 Maribymong Facility

Zinc Nickel

Tin Cobalt

Beryllium Selenium Mercury

Antimony

Molybdenum

Table 3- Relevant Investigation Criteria for Individual Soil Samples

3 OOOb 14 - 75 18 500b 20 - 80 18 2oob < 1 - 3 2 3 OOb <5 2 5 0’ - -

5 - - 1 OL - - 2” <0.05 3

2OL - -

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

C6 - C9 C10 - C14 C15 - C28 C29 - C36

80O6

50006

<10 < l o 6 0

3

From Ecological and Health Risk .Issessnient, Marib-vrnong Facility Site, kblunies 1 and 2, .ID1 Services, July I99J .

From Report on Certificate of Environniental .dudit, Super Lot 6, .IDI Maribyrnong Faciliy, Golder Associates, Xovember 1994.

Former Dutch B criteria. ‘ ANZECCAWMRC health criteria.

EPA Clean Fill criteria. Dutch C

1

3

5

6

- Analyte not analysed in background sampling program.

In Conlidencc: - ,4111 Limited I997 Page 20

22 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H Anissa/Maribymon~\vrpt3a, issue I , October 1997


Former AD1 Maribymong Facility

Sampling Point 3216

32 17

32 18

32 19

3220

322 1

3222

7.2 Soil Validation

Analysis Contamination Identified*

1 Be, Co: Hg, Mo, Sb, Se, OC pesticides, TPHs, BTEX, PAHs, phenols, CN, PCBs, CHCs 2 pH, Asl Cd, Cr: Cu: Ni, Pb: Sn, Zn 2 pH, As: Cd, Cr: Cu, Ni, Pb, Sn, Zn 1 TPHs, PAHs 2 pH, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb: Sn, Zn 1 PAHs 1 Bel Co, Hg, Mo, Sb, Se: OC pesticides, BTEX, phenols, CN, PCBs, CHCs 3 pH, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Sn, Zn: TPHs, PAHs 2 pH, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Sn- Zn 1 TPHs, PAHs 1 pH, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Snl Zn 1 pH, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Sn. Zn

none

none

none

1,600mgkg of TPHs C 15-C28 at 0 - 0.4m 5 10mgkg and re-analysed at 260mgkg PAHs

at 0 - 0.4m

none

~~

470nigkg Pb \vithin the stockpile

none

Validation samples were collected on 24 September 1997 once Transfield had finished on the site and once the area had been levelled. In addition, the soil stockpile had also been placed within the area before validation sampling began.

A total of 14 samples were collected from 7 validation sampling points (3216 to 3222) located across Super Lot 3A (appendix B). Sampling points 3216, 3217 to 3220 are located in the open areas while sampling point 3221 and 3222 are located within the soil stockpile. The points were excavated into the fill layer and then into the natural clayey soil to a depth of l m . Table 4 below provides a summary of the analysis undertaken and the contamination identified in these samples.

The validation sampling program identified 0.3 to 0.4m of fill material within all sampling points which included crushed rock and gravel, ash, coke, brick and concrete fragments. This was then underlain with a natural dark brown clay with basaltic rocks evident at 0.5m in most sampling points. Sampling point 3219 contained bitumen pieces within the fill material, no bitumen was identified in any other sampling point. The samples collected from the soil stockpile (3221 and 3222) consisted of brown silty clay topsoil material with the odd piece of rock, wood and plastic sheet throughout.

Table 4 - Summary of the Validation Results from Super Lot 3A

I n Conlidriice - AD1 Limited 1997 Page 2 1

23 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvmong.\vrpt3a, issue 1 , October 1997


Former AD1 Maribvmong Facility

*Results in red are above the site specific Certificate criteria. Results in blue are above the site specific Statement and Certificate criteria’s.

As shown in the above table PAHs were above the Statement criteria in the surface 0 - 0.4m within point 3219 due to bitumen pieces present within this sampling point. The initial result produced a value of SlOmg/kg, however WSL were asked to re-analyse the sample with the result now being 260mglkg. No other sampling point contained bitumen pieces and as such the contamination is considered to be in an isolated area. In addition, the depth sample from point 3219 was also analysed for PAHs producing a <lmg/kg result. PAH results in all other surface samples ranged from <1 to 5.6mglkg.

TPH fraction C15-C28 was above the Certificate criteria but well below the Statement criteria with a value of 1,60Omg/kg in the surface sample from point 3219, which is again most likely due to the bitumen pieces with the fill material.

Pb was shown to be above the Certificate criteria in 3221 from the stockpile with a result of 470mg/kg and is most likely a natural variation. This level is well below the site specific Statement criteria (table 3 ) .

7.3 Statistical Analysis of Analytical Results

All analytical results relevant to soil material remaining on Super Lot 3A have been evaluated using the SYSTAT software in order to derive the maximum, minimum and arithmetic average concentrations of all analytes in the validation program. The 95% Upper Confidence Limit (UCL) average concentrations have subsequently been calculated for all such analytes.

The relevant arithmetic average concentrations and calculated 95% UCL average concentrations were below the Statement criteria, as shown in Table 5.

Table 5- Summary of Statistical Data for Super Lot 3A

111 Conlidsnce - ,4111 Limited 1997 Page 2 2

24 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribymon~\vrpt3a, issue 1, October 1997


Former AD1 Maribvmona Facilitv

AnalvTe

Criteria 5000 5000 5000 (mgkg) 800 Minimum c0.05 4 0 4 0 <LO <LO Maximum I <0.1 I 64 860 Mean I c0.05 I 7 1 11.6 I 213 [ 115

I 95%UCL I xo.05 1 8.2 I 18.3 I 416 I 229

In Conlidence - AD1 Limited 1997 Page 23

25 of 83

.-

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: AnissdMaribvmone \vmt3a. issue I . October I397



’

8.0 CONCLUSIONS

The final validation assessment of Super Lot 3A has been successfully completed and has confirmed that the environmental quality of this site is suitable for its proposed future development as open space and commercial land with an easement over the North Western Sewer Line and access pit.

The sampling programs indicated that the majority of the sampling points are below the Statement acceptance criteria. The outcome of these programs can be summarised as follows:

The original site investigation, further investigation and validation sampling has revealed the presence of a layer of fill material (0.1 -0.4m) over the entire site and includes crushed rock and gravel, ash, coke, slag, brick and concrete f i a p e n t s . This is underlain with a natural basaltic clay.

Analytical results have indicated no chemical contamination above the Statement criteria in the surface fill layer other than PAHs in the 0 - 0.4m layer from point 3219. This sampling point contained bitumen pieces within the fill material which was not identified in any other point sampled within Super Lot 3A, therefore the area affected is very small.

No contamination was identified within the natural clay over the site.

The entire area has now been covered with O.1m of topsoil by the landscaping contractors. In addition, a stockpile of soil (approximately 50m by 15m by 0.5m) derived from Certificate areas of the AD1 Maribyrnong Facility has been placed on the site and now supports 10 large trees for development purposes. Sampling results of the stockpiled material has revealed no analyte to be above the Statement criteria.

No groundwater contamination has been identified within MB23 which is to the north west of the site.

The QNQC programs undertakei: by the contracted laboratories were adequate to validate the analytical data upon which the conclusions made in this report are based.

Based on all of the data summarised above, AD1 Limited considers the site suitable for its proposed open space and commercial development and submit this report to the Environmental Auditor for his consideration for the issuance of a Statement of Environmental Audit.

In Confidence - AD1 Limited 1997 Pagc 24 26 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Manbymone\vrt3a. issue 1 . October 1997


Former AD1 Maribvmo ne Facility

910 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS

It is inherent in any sampling program that the total mass of the site is represented by a small volume of sample collected and assessed for contamination. The validation sampling programs undertaken on Super Lot 3A at the former Ordnance Factory, Maribymong, are considered to have been adequate to hlfil the aim of assessing t h s land for parkland use.

This report has been prepared in accordance with the agreement between AD1 Corporate Headquarters - Property and AD1 Limited (Major Projects). The services performed by AD1 Limited have been conducted in a manner consistent with the level of quality and skill generally exercised by members of its profession and consulting practice in relation to such sites.

This report is solely for the use of AD1 Corporate Headquarters - Property in seeking to validate Super Lot 3A within the former Ordnance Factory, Maribymong. This report shall only be presented in full and may not be used to support any other objectives than those stated in this report, except where written approval with comments are provided by AD1 limited.

The information contained in this report is considered to be accurate on the date of issue in accordance with the current conditions of the site. The conditions may vary with time as a result of fixther activities that have contamination impact on the site. These possibilities should be considered if the report is to be used after any significant period from the date of the original sampling.

I n Confidence - AD1 Limited 1997 Page 7 5 27 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvmone\vrt3a. Doc No. AG343. Issue 1. October 1997


Former AD1 Maribvrnone Facilitv

APPENDIX A TITLE PLAN

Map 158/190

In Confidence - AD1 Limited 1997 28 of 83

M A R 1 B Y R N 0 N G A D I S I T E ln

Ln

w z 0 N

U f <

LOCALITY P L A N N 9 T TO SCALE

i r

SCALE 1 : 2500

METRES

TES

E A R I N G S A P E AMG GRID B E A R l h G S IS TANCES ARE SP~-CROIDAL

REFERENCE Yc. I T l T L t R E t

1 NOTES A P C H l V t HlCROSTATlON 15a/FD/19i I ____-. .

N 5 016 097.

E 313 215.90

N 5 016 059-LO

,76

AUST. SURVEYING & LAND INFORMATION GROUP - VIC

H L I G B P A R T M E Y T 9t AOYINISTPATIVF SER’iIIFS

MARIBYRNONG AD1 S ITE

A R E A B O U N D A R Y CIF IELBOURNE W A T E R E A S E M E N

PROJECT No. REG FILE SURVEY FILE ~ a 4 5 m 9 ~ i s a SURVEYED B Y

ORArlFl Br B FITZGERALD A U b 1991.

P G I A S K A J 2 2 / 8 / 9 1

I R A W I N G No. 158/190 29 of 83

AD1 Limited AD1 Limited Corporate Headquarters - Property File No: E00028 Validation Assessment Report - Super Lot 3.4 5Q F mer DI ari n Facili

APPENDIX B SAMPLING POINT MAP

Map 1.581327


30 of 83

-5816900 N

2_.

A

0

5816860 N-

PT EASTING NORTHING 213 313223.19 5816882.91 3L5 313257.29 5816862.39 3082 313247.76 5816815.52

N N M

M -

3216 3217 3218 3219 3220 3221 3222

W

0 it N M

M 7

313252.80 313230.85 313242.13 313226.03 513254.31 313260.15 313243.17

W

0

N M

M 7

W z 0 N

0 z 4

a

W

0 W N

:-. m m

313268.12 5 a i 6 8 6 9 - 8 2 !i!! 1 313248.54 1 5816896.92 I 313226.22 5816885.75

3086 313225.96 5816867.49 3087 313221.40 5816878.25

SAMPLE POINTS SURVEYED 25/7/97

PT I EASTING

5816863.5k 5816875.48 5816893.03 5816899.62 5816894.60 5816883.88 5816871.05

$ V A L I D A T I O N SAMPLE POINTS

-- . .__ . . . ... . .

31 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E0002S H: Anissa/iMartbvmone\vmt3a. issue I . October I997


Former AD1 M a r i b g o n e F acil 1 ty

APPENDIX C

NATA ENDORSED LABORATORY REPORTS

Further Investigation

ANALABS - report number 8214 AD1 - report number 153, 154

Validation

WSL - report number 34671,34829,34941,35060


._

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

AUSTRAL~AX DEFENCE INDUSTRIES - SERVICES, LABORATORY

RATORY WPORT NO:

DATE R E C F m . m w

153

LPsORATORY WSULTS;

ResuHs -ressed in rne/ke lor solids or ma/i lor liquids, dry basis lor soil^

pH: Metals: AD1 SERVlCES LAS METAOD 01, WN MCJNLY BASED ON USEPA METHODS W A N D E1104

I - - - 33 of 83

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

AUSTRALVLN DEFENCE 1NDUSTRES -SERVICES. LABORATORY

r --

ABoMToRY F S U l

?esuIb ewressed in rn@Q for solids or mg/L lor liquids, dry bask lor soils

34 of 83

,\CS 00; 5Gi 66 i .~

251 Burwood Rd. Hawihorn Vicloria 5120. Telephone: (03) 619 4326 Facsimile:[:-35:2.19 6066

9 August 1994

Industrial Decontamination Division Australian Defence Industries PO Box 22 HIGHPOINT CITY VIC 3032

Your Reference: sc17/sco9 Our Reference: 8214

Attention: Suzanne Carapina

D e a r Madam,

We received seventeen (17) soil samples on the 26th of July 1994. The samples were analysed in accordance with your instructions a n d the results are contained in this report.

Yours faithfully ANALABS

5 5 PETER DIMIS

EXRAGER, MELBOURNE FRACI C Chem

Encl.

B Sc Gr/ad Dip Anal Chem SENIOR ORGANIC CHEMIST

JOE COSTANZO B App Sc (Chem)

ASSISTANT MANAGER-MELBOURNE

Page 1 of 10

35 of 83

ANALABS REPORT NO. L Z i 5

METHODOLOGY

polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH'sL ----

~AH'S were analysed by Analabs Method MEO-030 with quantification using HPLC with Fluorescence detection.

p H (Soils)

pH measurements were made on a 1:5 dry soi1:water extract (Analabs Method MEI-001 and MEI-010).

Metals

Metals were determined by Atomic Absorption and ICP Spectrometry (Analabs Method No. MEM-001, MEM-002 and MEM-010) following preparation and digestion using Analabs Method No. MEP-001, MEP-010 and MEP-020.

Mercury

Mercury was determined by Cold Vapour Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (MEP-005) following digestion using Analabs method No. MEP-035.

Cyanide

Total Cyanides were liberated from an acidified sample by distillation and the cyanide concentration determined by a colourimetric procedure (Analabs Nethod No. MEI-043).

Total Phenolics tt

Phenols were distilled and aerivatised with 4-aminoantipyrine in the presence of potessium ferricyanide. The complex was then extracted ana measured at 460nm. (Analabs Method No. KEI-065).

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons were analysed by Analabs method No. MEO-020 with quantification by GC/FID. (NATA registration currently covers fractions C6 to C30).

Polychlorinated Biphenyls

%lychlorinated Biphenyls were analysed in accordance with -Birmlabs Method !<EO-005 w i t h quantificztion by GC-ECD.

-I: *rf ........ . - ..... - 1. - .:: .- . ;.

Paqe 2 of 10

'. / 'i

I

36 of 83

ANALllBS REPORT NO. 8ilT'

METHODOLOGY (cont.)

Monoaromatic Hydrocarbons (BTEX)

Monoaromatic Hydrocarbons (Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene and Xylenes) were analysed by Analabs Method No. MEO-018, (static headspace injection and quantification by GC/FID).

Volatile Chlorinated Hydrocarbons

Volatile Chlorinated Hydrocarbons were analysed in accordance with Analabs Method No. MEO-011, (static headspace with GC-ECD detection).

-- -

*Semi-Volatile Chlorinated Hvdrocarbons

Semi-volatile Chlorinated Hydrocarbons were analysed in accordance with Analabs Method No. MEO-010 with quantitation by GC-ECD.

Pesticides

Organochlorine Pesticides were analysed by Analabs Method MEO- 005.

Reportinq

Results are reported on a dry weight basis.

Quality Control

Good laboratory practices are followed at all times. This requires the adherence to Quality Control procedures which are an integral part of good methodology leading to quality analytical results. All analytical methods used at Analabs involve the analysis of reagent blanks, control standards (check standards), duplicates and recoveries where appropriate and providing enough sample has been supplied. Calibration stmdards are prepared to bracket the expected range of results for the batch. QC samples are run at the beginning 2nd end of each run and within a run for larger batches. Iiejection criteria are set for each QC szmgle and there is an onping analysis and review of QC sample results-

i * NATA registration pending.

i.

37 of 83

r \ u 1

PROJECT NO

0.1

0.2

<0.1

co.1

<0.1

<0.1

co.1

70

SC 17/SC09

0.7 0.8

1.6 I .6

19 21

<O.l <0.1

0.1 0.1

<0.1 <O.l

< O . l <O.l

70 70

___-

______--

,,,,,,1>11.,1, . \ L L "1,' L T " . < , L . . - r

Rcsul ls io rng/kg ( R c c o v c r y in Yo) __-

FLIJ 1 Poit l l

No.

PIIE 1 A N T I FLA 1 P Y R I D h h ACE D K P

A002 2 1/7/91 SOIL <0.1 I 0.2 I 0.2 I 0.1 <0.1

CO.1

co.1

<o.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

eo.1

Ti <0.1 co.1

21/7/94 SOIL

, <0.1

CO.1

<0.1

2 1/7/94 SOIL

u n m 2 I/7/94 SOIL <0.1

21/7/94 SOIL < O . l < o s <O.I co.1 <0.1 <O.l co.1 <0.1 1 <0.1

2 I17/91 SOIL <o.s co.1 < O . l 0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 I <0.1

nnon

n o l o

--

sou2

21/7/91 SOIL. < O . l <o.s co.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

<0.1 I ;2:

0.2

2 I17/94 SOIL C O . 1

<0.1

-. < O . l <o.s

< O S

co.1

0.3

co.1

<0.1

C O . 1

co.1 25/7/04 SOIL 0.1

3083 2Sl7I0~l SOIL CO.1 <0.5 c o . 1 'F 9.3

0.4 <O.l 0.4 I 0.8 0.6 1 <0.1 0.5 0.4

<0.1 <o.1

I2 9.7

______

___.- JDM 22/7/9*1 SOIL <0.1 < o s co.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1

1.8

< O . l

I ~ A ' I ?..517/94 SOIL <0.1 < O . l

co.1

<o.1

CO.1

9.7

<0.1

<0.1

< 0 . 1

co.1

co.1

<0.1

<o.1

C O . 1

<0.1 I <0.1 i n o n 25/7/94 SOIL

co.1 <0.1 1 <O.l <0.1 1 < O . l so I I, i- SOIL.

29/7/94

i 25/7/94 co.1 <0.1 I co.1 <0.1 I <0.1

<o.s

70

< O . l

80 -- 70 - I - 1 - 1 -

P I I E - P I I E N A N T I ~ R E N E

A N T - h N I I I R A C 1 ? N L ! CIIR - C I I R Y S E N E

B A A - D E N Z O ( r ) A N T I I R A C E N E

I'I,A - I 'I.UOIlAN1'JII!NI!

P Y R - P Y R E N E

U 111' - DE N % O ( h ) I'LU 0 IlA N T l l E NE

n KP - n E N Z O (k)PI.(J 0 R A N T I I ENE

D A P - D E N Z O ( a ) P Y R I 3 N E

D D A - D I D E N Z O ( a h ) A NTI I R A C E NE

DG P - I IENZO( g h i ) P E R Y L E NE

I P Y - I N D E N O ( . 1 . 2 . 3 - c d ) P Y R E N E

P a g e 4 of 10

N A P - N A P l l T l l A 1 , E N E

A C Y - A C I ! N h l ' l l ' l ' l l Y I , E N l !

ACI! - A C I! N h PI 1'1'1 I I! Nl!

I'1.U - P I ~ U O I ( E N C

i i I

, 38 of 83

-1--- 1-r--

AZ14-A I C36 I - I 25/7/94

A D I PROJECT NO : SCl7/SCO9

f,F f% ANALADS REPORT NO : 8214 -:, f:..,,,.::!,.

. . I ::1 ! '; ,!, I I . . . , .. L I :: . Ilcsults in rng/kg (Rccovcry in %) 4 . : : :; ,.._;.:.: . , . _ :: , ,.., ; ,..

Sariiplc p l l SI1 Cd Cr CO c 11

29 1 3 13

29 13 13

<O.S < o . s 36 23 19

<o.s <0.s

<0.5 c0.5

SOIL 9.5 < 8 I .a <0.5 <0.S 26 I2 IS

S O I L 8.7 < 8 I .o <0.5 <O.S 16 9.5 2 9

SOIL 0.6 < a s.2 <0.5 1.8 23 i a 570

5011, 9.1 < a 1.3 <o.s <o.s 20 12 2 1

SOIL 0 . 5 < D 130 c0.S 2 . 9 26 IO 10

< a I .a <0.5 <0.5 2s 9.5 12

< 0 < I <0 .5 e0.5 1 3 16 0.9

87.14 - 11 c3 7 - 2.517/9.1 0.9 e0 I .4 ~ 0 . 5 <0.5 l a <2 .5 I 4

171:c.:Ov~.ltY . - SOIL 91 82 - 8 1 76 83 92

___

-___ ._____--__

~ . _ _ _ - I-- .-

____.___ . .

1; 1 0.07 0.06 1 1: I6 0.09 < S

c 0.0 I

0.06 cs

31

12

24

20

91

2 1

24

67

30

40

22

70 100

i

k. .. I II .. 39 of 83

RcsulLs in rng/kg (Rccovcry in %)

1.A II

No.

I'olnl

Sample

R - 9004

Samplc Saniple Chloro

Vale 'rYV form

21/7/91 SOIL <o.os

21/7/94 SOIL co.05

21/7/94 SOII. <0.05

21/1/94 SOIL <o.os -___.

Carhun Trichloro Telr a clilor o Tricliloro ethane Telrachloride ethene elhene

8214-2 co.05 co.05 c0.05 c0.05

co.05 <o.os <o.os

c0.05 c 0 . 0 5 <0.05 c0.05

c0.0s co.05 c0.05 C0.05

8214-3 R - 9 0 0 5 I ROOS

8214-4 R - 9 0 0 6 1 8006

R - 9007 8007

R - 9009 8010 2117/9.( I SOIL I c0.05 <o.os I co.o.5 I <0.05 I <0.05

25/7/94 I SOIL I <0.0.5 C0.05 I co.05 I <o.os I co.05 R -5276 3082

R - 5 2 1 7 3083

n - 5 2 7 8 3085

______ I co.0s I co.05 I <o.os co.0s 2s17194 SOIL <o.os

25/7/94 SOIL <0.05

25/1/94 SOIL co.05

25/7/94 SOIL C0.05

co.05 < 0.03 C0.05 <o.os

co.05 co.o.5 < 0.03 <0.05 8214 - I I R - 5279 I 3089

A ' I 4 - I 2 R - S280 I 3090 <0.05 I co.05 I co.05 I ~ 0 . 0 5

82 I 4 - I 3 V - S 2 R I 1 3091 25/7/94

25/1/91 1 1 a:

<o.os I C0.05 I cn.05 I co.05

R 2 1 . I - 1.1 v - 5282 -1 v-5283 ::,:: <o.os I co.05 I C0.05 I C0.05

A Z I .I - I 5 25/7/91 I SOIL I <0.05 co.o.5 I co.05 I <o.os I co.05

A214 - I6 2s/7/94 I S 0 I I A I co.0s <0.0.5 I co.os I co.05 I co.0s

821.1 - I 7 25/7/94 I SOIL I co.05 co.05 co.os c0.05 c0.05 I 1 1

v - 5285 309.5

I l L h N K co.05 co.05 <o.os c0.05

a 6 91 92 a i R E C O W R Y - SOIL 91

c Pagc G of 10

40 of 83

~ .-. PROJECT N O : SCl7/SCO9

21/7/84

21/7/94

- - .. .-. . . SOII.

SOll,

-_ __

_ _ <n.s

C0.S

< o s

<o.s

< O S

< O S

c0.s

< o s

< o s

--

i 07

2.71ll9.1

2517/91

___.

--___

25/7/94 --

so11,

SOIL

.-

SOIL --

<o.s <o.s

< o s < o s

< o s < o s

< o s < o s

< o s < o s

j < o s < o s

85 06 96

R C S U I L ~ i n mg/kg ( R c c o v c r y i n %)

1.3-Dichloro I.4-Dicliloro I be n 7.e n c bc n 7.e ne

-- . !

1.2.4.5-Telrachloro Ilexnchloro Penlachloro llcxachloro \ A UI Saniple

N O .

1 .2 - Dichloro

be n 7s ne

I IIexachloro-

,3-buladienc

L A n NO.

821f l1 -2

A 2 I ,I - j

R2 I (I -.I

I'oilrl

NO. I cyclopentndiene I benzene bcnrcne bcnzctic benzene

R - 9004 < o s I <0.s < o s < o s < o s 21/7/94 1 SOIL

21/7/94 SOIL 17 - 900s < o s <o.s <o.s

I7 - 9 0 0 6 nnnh < o s < o s I < o s c o s <o.s

I< - 9007 . . .. __

i< - 9000

nn07

Anin

. <n.s <0 .5 co.5

<o.s <O.? <n.s < 0.5

A 2 I . I - R I< - 57.76 <o.s <o.s 1 <o.s <0 .5 < n . s <0.S

A L I 4 - 9

A 2 I .I - I 0

- II - s 2 7 7 i 0 . s < o s <0.S 3nns

3085 < O S < 0.5 I <0.5 <n.5 <o.s I7 - 5 2 7 8 < O S

8 2 1 4 - 1 1 I7 4 2 7 9 3089 < o s I < o s < o s I < o s ~ 0 . 5 < o s I < o s <o.s C 0 . S

R Z I 4 - 1 2 I< - 52AO < o s I <0.s <o.s < o s I <0.5 <o.s I <o.s < o s < 0 . 5

<0.S

25/7/94 SOIL -- 25/7/84 SOIL - 25/7/94 SOIL

2?17/94 SOIL

__

A 2 I .I - I 3 < 0.5 I < o s <o.s <0.s I < o s < o s

C O . 5 A 2 I .I - 1.1 v - S2RZ 3072 <o.s I < O . S <0.S < O S I < o s < o s

RL I .I - I 5 V - J Z R 3 3095 <0.S I < o s <0.s < o s 1 <o.s < o s

<0.s <o.s 821.1-16 v - 5 2 8 1 3095 <o.s I < o s <o.s <o.s I <o.s I 25/7/94 I SOIL < o s

<o.s

< O S

< O S

<0.5 < 0.5 A ? 1 4 - 1 7 < o s c0.S <0.?

. <o.s < o s <o.s 8 2 1 4 - 1 7 N v - S 2 8 S

< O S I < o s < o s IIl.ANK

06 RECOVEnY

n P a g e 7 of 10

i

'P it- .-.,

41 of 83

AD I P R O J E C T NO : SCl7/SC09

Dcnzene T o l u e n e

-

-

Ethyl Uenzene Xylcner

- -

- -

L A II

No.

R 2 1 4 - I

8214 - I R

A IJI

Sa ni ple

No.

R - 900s

R - 9003

2117194

8002 I 21/7/94

SOIL < I O e 20 I t 0

SOIL c i n < 20 62

i

J / /

J

J /

/'

J

J J

J

J'

Itcsults i n mglkg (Rccovcry i n '36) 1 ... . ::. '.:' * . . "8 .. . i. '

C 2 9 -C36

I 7 0 -

-

co.o.5

170

c20

<0.05 c 20 cO.05 c0.05 <0.15

cn.05 co.05 <n. is - cn.os c 0 . 0 5 C 0 . I S

- _ -

e 20 c0.05

8007 I 21/7/94 I SOIL I e10 I <20 c 20 <o.os

-

< 0.0s

c 20 2 1/7/94 SOIL <I O c 20 c 20

2 1/7/94 SOIL c IO c 20 c 20

3082 25/7/94 SOIL e 10 < 20 c 20

25/7/94 SOIL < 10 c20 450

___- __-_

_ _ ~ C0.05 I co.0s < 20

c 20 co.05 A Z I 4 - 8 I 1 1 - 5 2 7 6

c0.05

co.os

c0.05

<0.05 co.0s <0.15

570

c 20

100 co.o.5 I-- c 0.05

co.05 CO.05 < O . I S

<0.05 co.0s co.15

co.05 <0.05 co.1s

<o.os co.05 co.15

<0.05 <o.os co.1.5

C0.05 co.05 < O . I S

<o.os co.05 <0.15

1 9 0

c0.05

- I co.o.5

<0.05 1- - - I - I 190

<o.os

-

<0.05 <0.05

115 ' 1 1 6 116

42 of 83

LA I)

No.

---- A n1

Sarliplc

No.

821.1 - I

I 'oi i i l Sam1,le Sample Aroclor Aroclor Aroclor Aroclor Aroclor Aroclor Armlor

N O . Dale TY P C 1016 1221 1 2 3 2 1 2 4 2 1 2 4 8 1 2 5 4 1 2 6 0

8 2 I .I - I I1

I \ - 9003 8 0 0 2

R - 9003 8002

II - 9on4 mn.i

II - 9 n n 5 an05

11 - qnnci nnnlr

R - 9007 8007

IZ - gonn 8008

R - 9 o n 9 Rnin

~. _______ -____ .--.-____

__- -

-__-

8214 - 2

I '. 1 . . . . . . .

21/7 /91 SOIL co.1 <0.1 co.1 co.1 co.1 <0.1 co.1

2 1 m 9 4 SOIL cn.1 CO.l co.1 co.1 <0.1 <0.1 co.1

21/7 /94 SOIL co.1 C 0 . l a . 1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 co.1

CO.1 21 /7 /91 cn.1 co.1 co.1 c 0 . l co.1 co.1 so I L

21/7/94 SOIL cn.1 <n. i <0.1 eo . l < O . l CO.1 e0.I

2 I 17 19 4 SOIL co.1 co.1 <0.1 <O.l co.1 CO.1 e o . l

21 /7 /91 SOIL co.1 co.1 <0.1 co.1 co.1 <0.1 co.1

CO.1 21/7/94 SOIL <0.1 <0.1 co.1 co.1 <O.l <0.1

-~

_______ - - -__ i

._ . _-__-- __ ._

_ _

-

-.

8 2 1 . 1 - 3

R - 5 2 7 6 30R2 25/7/94

R - 5 2 7 1 3083 25/7/94

I\-5278 i o n 5 ?.5/7/94

II - 5 2 7 9 SlltJrJ 2 511 19 1

R - s 2 m 3 o v n 25/1 /91

- -

_-

- ._._._._I____. ___ .

. . . - - -- .

- - - -

1 - - -

______

8 2 1 1 - 1

* . ' ' . I , , :;. ' 7 r ; 1 .

/' SOIL co.1 <0.1 <0.1 <O.l <O.l <0.1 <0.1

SOIL cn.1 co.1 co.1 co.1 C 0 . l <0.1 < 0:l ,

< O . l < O . l <0.\ c0.L co.1 eo. l €0.1 SOIL

SOIL €0. I cn.1 co.1 co.1 co.1 co.1 co.1

so IL <n. i en.1 co.1 C 0 . l co.1 co.1 <0.1

SOlL co.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 C 0 . l <0.1

SOIL

__

-

- - - - - - . as I

A 2 I ,I - 5

A214 - h

R?I4 - 7

I3 L A N K

I<E CO VE R Y

- I Pagc 9 of 10

43 of 83

4ldriti Ileplaclilor Oxyclilor a - E n d o - D D E Dieldrin Endrin D - E n d o - D D D D D T Melhoxy cblor Epoxide dane Stillan Stillan

-_ co.1 C 0 . l <O.l <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 C 0 . l <0.1 <O.l CO.1 <0.1

-.

Chlor

drne

co.1 <0.1 <n.i <0.1 <O.l c0.1 cn.1 <0.1 <0.1 < O . l <0.1

<0.1

c0.i

CO.1

<0.1

<0.1

Cn.1

-.

C O . 1

cn.1

<0.1

C n . 1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1 <0.1 <O.l

< O . l <0.1 . C O . 1

CO.1. co.1 <0.1

CO.1

CO.1

CO.1

CO.1

CO.1

<o.i < n . i co.1

CO.1

C 0 . l

co.1

C 0 . l

<0.1

<0.1

CO.1

<O.l

<0.1 <0.1 C 0 . l <0.1 <n.i <0.1

<O.I ~ n . 1

<n.i <O.I

c0.1 cn.1

~~

CO.1 <n.i <n.i C n . 1

~ _ _ _ . CO.1 <0.1 <0.1 < O . l

<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

<0.1 <0.1 <0.1

<0.1 <0.1 < n . i <0.1

C O . 1 CO.1 < O . l <O.l

<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

<0.1 <n.i co.1 <0.1

e0.1 <n . i <0.1 , CO.1 <0.1

<0.1 CO.1 <O.l CO.1

<0.1 <0.1

<0.1 < O . l

c0.1 cn.1

<0.1 eo.1

co.1 CO.1

--- <O.I <n.i

1 a; 1 1 ;;:; <n.i <0.1 <0.1 co.1 Cn.1 rl <0.1 <0.1 co.1 <0.1 <0.1 <O.l

<0.1

7 2

<0.1 <0.1 < O . 1 <0.1 <0.1 C O . 1 <0.1 <0.1 <O.l CO.1

8 2 - 88 08 78 9 9 - 9 9 78 120

--I-- Saniplctl Type

r-A a No.

---- n'z I .I - I

8214 - I R

I-- -icn

<0.1 11-900.1 ROO2 --- I 21/7/94 1 SOIL - R 2 I . l - 2

8 2 1 4 - 1

~ 2 1 4 - 4

A Z I . I - . r

C O . 1 R - 9004 ROO4 -_ I <O.l C 0 . l ___-____ I

21/7/94 SOIL -__ ____ <0.1 <n.i

C O . 1 I-- --

rill.( -6 <0.1

CO.1

.__

co.1

25/7/94 SOll. co.1 11-5271, 3082 --- -- I 25/7/94 SOIL ___ I 25/7/94 1 SOIL -

25/7/34 I SOIL ____

IC-5280 3090 .--

- I-

44 of 83

WS LConsultants

Enviroscience BJL:ab

18 September, 1997

AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE GORDON STREET

VIC 3011 FOOTSC RAY

ATTENTI 0 N :

Dear Madam,

NDUSTR

MS. A. GROVES

JOB NO: AG 00

ES

Please find attached results of analysis on samples received by WSL Consultants Pty Ltd on 17 September, 1997.

The Report Number is 34671.

Yo k l y,k f ithfully W ~ ~ L T A N T S PTY LTD

B.J. LYONS DIRECTOR enc.

W S L Consultants Pry. Lrd. A.C.N. 004 752 676

2-6 Harvey Street, RJchmond, \'icroria 3171, Australia Telephone: +61 3 9429 4666 Facsimile: +61 3 9429 2294 Email: [email protected]

h NATA Accredircd Laboraron

.4n Approved Quarantine Prcrniscs h Approvcd EP.4 Auditor 6: Analyst

45 of 83

ww Jr Lurisui tan ts Enviroscicricc N:N on4 752 676

Lab

ID Sample

' 2-8 I - l i r v c y Strccr, I<icli inoiicl, Victor ia 3 12 I Tclcplioric: t 6 l 3 9429 4666 Fxcsimilc: tG1 3 9429 2294

AD1 Cd N I l'oint l'b Ln Uepth (in) PI-[ As Cr CU Hg Sample Numbcr From To (PI4

I I1 un i t ) me/k g mgncg 4% mgnce m g k 3 mgncg vJb mgke

RE: JOO N O :

ANZIKC Rr N l l M I l C Ciuidclincs Cor Soil 1)rllch C Crilcria for Soil

ATTENTION:

1 20 3 I 50 GO I 1 I GO I 300 I 200 50 20 I 800 500 I O I 500 I GOO I 3000

-~

Va I ida t i on AGO0

87009

-

. . --

I1333 3s GG

I

-,. . .J V, . . . . . U U V .

D A T E. R EC E I V ED : D A T E A N A L Y S E D :

Ms. A . Groves

RESULTS OF ANALYSIS - SOIL

I ,,"ill I I

1;;;;;;: 0y.L R.J. L Y O _- PRINCIPAL CHEMIST 18 September,l997

Email: wsIco~iOo~c~ii~i l .coin.x~i HEAVY METALS

C O M M E N T S : Results pertain to samples as received.

All results expressed as mg/kg dry weight, unless stated otherwise.

Method Section: PH VIC EPA Heavy Metals WSL 023 Mercury VIC EPA

This Lahnratnry is registered by Ihc National Associalion or Testing Authorities, Australia. Thc tesl(s) rcportcd hcrc- in hnvc hccn pcrformcd i n accortlancc with i l s tcrins or rcg i s t rn t i 011. TI1 i s doc 11 111 c n I s t i n 11 11 ot hc rc p rod 11 cc ( I

39-5

39-16 exccpi in rtlii.

Page I o f 4 Dk: 11914KA

46 of 83

CLIENT: RE: JOB NO:

Lab

ID Satiiplc

ATTENTION:

A I l l Po i I1 t Oept 1 (in) Total Total Total Total Seini- 'l'otal Total Tota I Saiiiple Number From To PAI-IS Pesticides Vol. HICs VOl . H/Cs PI1 thalates PCBs Pl1enols

ID mglkg niglkg mglkg mg/kg m g h m glkg m g k

Australian Defence Industries Validation AGO0

-hN%ECC & NI-iMKC Guidelines for Soil Dutch C Criteria for Soil t 1 I

82009 TI393 <o. 1

. .

Ms. A . Groves

DATE SAMPLED: DATE RECEIVED: DATE ANALYSED:

RESULTS OF ANALYSIS - SOIL TOTAL ORGANICS

17/09/97 1::;;:;: [,k B.J. LYONS PRINCIPAL CHEMIST I 8 September,l997/LD

Method Section: Total Phenols APHA 5530C PAH's WSL 8 IO0 Pesticides WSL 8080 Volatile Halogenated HC's WSL 8 120 Phthalates WSL 032

This Lnhoratory is registered by the Natiollal Associaliii i i o f Tcsliiig Authorities, Aus(ralin. The Icsl(s) reported hcrc- in have bccn pcrformcd in accordance with i l s tcrms o f regislrarion. This docurncnl shall not bc rcproduccd except in full.

Page 2 of 4 4KA Dk: 119 PCB's WSL 8080

47 of 83

"" 3LLor1SU1ta*1tS CLIENT: Australian Defcnce Industries Eiiviroscicticc RE: Val ida t ion A(:N fln4 7 5 2 676 , JOJ%NO: AGO0

Lab Sample

ID

. ' 2-8 I- larvcy Srrcct,

R i c h i i i o i i d , V icror iA 3 I 2 1 ATTENTION: Ms. A. Groves Tclcp l io i ic : c G I 3 9429 4666 r:ncsilnilc: 4 6 1 3 9429 2294 I i i i i A i I : \ysIcoiieozcii inil.coii i .a~i

AD1 Point Depth (m) c,-c, >C,-C14 >c14-c28 >c28-c36

Sample Number From To ID mg/kg mg/kg mglkg mglkg


82009


1'1393 c20 e20 570 880

TPH FRACTIONS

I I I I

COMMENTS: Results pertain to samples as received. Report No: 34671

All results expressed as m g k g dry weight, unless stated otherwise.

Method Section: WSL 030

B.J. LYONS PRINCIPAL CHEMIST 18 September,l997/LD

This Laboratory i s registered b y the Nat ional Associal ion o f Tesliiig Authorit ies, Auslral ia. The tcst(s) reported hcrc- i t1 l iavc lieen pcrforinetl in accordance with i ts tcriiis of registration. This document shal l not he reproduced except i n full.

Page 3 of 4 Dk: . I 1914KA

48 of 83


1 .ah Sallllllc

ID

ww arLonsumnrs CI,IENT: A t i st ra I i a 11 Dc Tc 11 cc I t i d u s I r i cs

RE: Validation JOD NO: AGO0

Erivi roscicricc A C N no4 7 5 2 676

2-8 I - Iarvcy Srrccr,

I ~ i c l t m o t i t l , Victoria 3 12 I ATTENTION: Ms. A. Groves ' l 'c lcpl int ic: +GI 3 9429 46G6 Fgu i i r i i l c : t6l 3 9/12? 229'1 r!lllnll: ~ v s l c n t i ~ o ~ c t i i a i l . c o l n . ~ ~ t RESULTS OF ANALYSIS - SOIL

SEMI-VOL. HALOGENATED HC'S AI11 I'oltil I.)cpt 1 (111) I .2 Di- 1.3 1% 1,4 Di- Cliloro- I3cnzyl- IJcnzal- I-lcxa- Clexachl- t-lcxachl- I4exa- 'f'etra- 1.2,3 Tri- 1.2.4 l ' r i - I'enta-

Sample Nrinil)cr f'rom -1.0 clilnro- cliloro- chloro- toluctic chloritlc chloride chloro- oro-l,3- orocyclo- chloro- chloro- chloro- chloro- chloro- I I > bcnzciic bcnzcnc bcnzcnc benzene butadiene pentadiene ethane bcnzcne benzene benzene benzene

~ng/kg mg/kg m g k g tiiglkg inglkg m g k g m g k g tng/kg mgkg mg/kg nigkg mg/kg mg/kg mflg

PRINCIPAL CHEMIST 18 September,l997

ANZECC RC NI-IMRC Guidclincs for Soil Ditlclt C Crilcria Tor Soil

m o r ) .r I 393 <o. I 4. I <o. 1 <o. I co. I <o. 1 <o. I <o. I CO. I co. I <o. I <o. I co. 1 <o. I

Page 4 of 4 Dk: 11914KA

49 of 83

W S LConsultants

Envir o s ci ence

BJL:ab

7 October, 1997

AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE INDUSTRIES GORDON STREET FOOTSCRAY VIC 3011

ATTENTION: MS. A GROVES

Dear Madam,

JOBNO: AGO0



Yo ii s,fait fully

DIRECTOR enc

WSL Consdtanrs pry. Ltd. A.C.N. 004 752 676

2-8 Harvey Srreer, hchmond , Victoria 3121, .4usrralia Telephone: +61 3 9429 4666 Facsimile: +61 3 9429 2234 Email: [email protected]

A NATA hccrcdited Laboraroy

An Approved Quarant ine Prcmiscs

An Approved EPA Auditor & Analyst 50 of 83

ww w h k U i 1 3 U1 L i i I I q r c :

E n vi rosci e ncc JOB NO: AG 00 AC:N nn i 7 5 7 676

2-8 tfnrvcy Strcct,

Validatiori

A T T E N T I O N : Ms. A. Groves

Sarnplc 1 I)


As Ua Ue L O CU I-lg cornp frc

10 nig/kg unit) mg/kg mg/kg nig/kg niglkg nigkg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg m g k g m g k g m g k g nigkg mgkg m g k g mgkg mgkg m g k g mgfl Sainplc Nuiiihcr From T o (PI I

HEAVY METALS

AIJI I,ab

".. . u "-,I.. " O i l . L . 1 . 7 . 7 I

D A T E RECEIVED: 24.9.97 D A T E ANALYSED: 24.9.97

Cd C r Mn Mo N i I'b Sb Sc Sn L I1 I'oint Ocpt 1 ( m ) Plierlols ptl CN CF

B.J. LY* PRINCIPAL CHEMIST 7 October, 19971ab

ANZECC RC NllMRC Guidcliiics for Soil nulcli C Critcria h r Soil

20 I400* 3 so* 50 60 I 500 I 40* 60 1 300 20 I I 2oo I IO - 50 I 2000 20 300 800 500 I O - I 200 500 I 600 - ' I 300 I 3000 1 500 I O

b

82808 VS4GI 3219 0.9 8.3 9.4 <2 0.3 17 34 97 0.12 <2 58 86 <2 <2 <2 260 <5 <2 27 82809 v m 2 3219 8.6 <2 c0.2 G I 17 32 15 <2 84 82810 V54G3 3218 9.0 6.6 c0.2 28 39 66 52

8281 1 V5164 3218 8.4 <2 C0.2 61 16 44 9.8 G! 30 82812 V5465 3220 8.9 <2 <0.2 16 47 44 20 <2 77 82813 V51GG 3220 8.2 <2 <0.2 41 8.6 15 9.4 G! 18

<2 270 82814 V S 4 6 7

82815 VS468 3217 7.8 <2 C0.2 32 7.7 9.5 1 1 <2 15 82R 16 VS469 3216 a.1 8.1 <2 <2 0.6 13 29 130 <0.05 2.2 62 72 <2 <2 <2 280 <5

--____---- 86 42 3217 9.1 2.8 0.5 30 130

82817 VS470 3216 8.G <2 <0.2 51 13 20 12 <2 21 28218 V5471 3221 8.6 <2 C0.2 51 14, 33 18 <2 27 28219 VS472 322 I 7.6 14 0.5 40 120 47 470 <2 430

COMMENTS: Results pertain to samples as received

AI1 results expressed as mg/kg dry weight, riiiless stated otherwise.

Method Section: PH Heavy Metals Mercury Cyanide Phenols

VIC EPA 139-5 VIC EPA 139-13 VIC EPA 139- 16 APHA 4500-CN,E APHA 5530C

&$ Report No: 34829

This Laboratory is registered by thc National Association of Testing Arrthoritics, Australia. The lest(s) rcporlctl hcrc- iii havc hccn perfornicd i n accordnncc with i l s tcriiic of registration. This document shall not bc reproduced except iii fu l l .

Page 1 of 8 Dk: 11914kb

51 of 83

r iuai i nllaii UCICIILC Iiiuustries W S LLorisul tanGi:' "' ' a '

Erivi roscicncc JOD NO: AG 00 Validation

ht:N 004 752 676

A T T E N T I O N : Ms. A. Groves 2-8 I-Iarvcy Strcct,

Sariiplc I I )

Riclimnricl, Victor ia 3 12 I I k lcphone: +GI 3 3429 4666 Fncsiiiiilc: +6l 7 9429 2294

As Be L O Cr CU Rz SmiiIiIc Nuriibcr From To (PI-1 cornp frcc

I I> m g k g unit) niglkg mglkg mg/kg ingkg m@g mgkg mg/kg mg/kg mgkg m@g mgkg mgkg mdkg mgkg mglkg m g h m!%% nlgkg

.. ~ -, --_

13~x1 i I: wsIcoii@ozcmai I .corn. a u

AI>l

RESULTS OF ANALYSIS - SOIL HEAVY METALS

Ua Cd Mn Mo NI Pb Sb be bn Ln

1IR I I5 SAIMY'LLU: D A T E R E C E I V E D : D A T E ANALYSED:

Lab Point

. . 24.9.97 24.9.97

B.J. LYONS PRINCIPAL CHEMIST 7 October, 19971ab

I k p t h (m) I'hcnols pl-I CN CN

ANZ.I:CC: Rr NI IMRC Ciiiitlclirics for Soil

Ihlcli C Crilcria for Soil

20 400* 3 50* 50 60 1 50 2000

500 40* 60 300 20 50 200 I 50* ] IO* 300 3000 I 500 I 100 20 300 800 500 10 - 200 500 600 -

C O M M E N T S :

82820

Results pertain to samples as received,

v.5473 3222 7 9 14 0 4 46 70 59 250 <2 300

All results expressed as mgkg dry weight, unless stated otherwise.

Quality Control Data Dirpl tcnte

82808 828 I3 828 I8 82816

S p i k e

82808 ( b 80mglkg) 828 13 (+80nig/kg) 828 18 (4 8 0 m g k g )

Met hod Sect ion : P F-1 Heavy Metals Mercury Cyanide Plienols

8 7 <5 0 2 21 38 94 0 I4 <2 58 80 <2 <2 <2 240 <2 <o 2 41 9 3 15 1 1 <2 18

8 6 <2 <0 2 51 12 31 17 <2 26 <0 1

67 330 70 81 74 94 100 170 78 140 150

66 83 130 86 92 87 82 95 85 110 76 86 140 93 110 97

VIC EPA 139-5 VIC EPA 139- 13 VIC EPA 139-16 APHA 4500-CN,E APMA 5530C

&!J Report No: 34829

This Laboralory i s regislcrctl by the National Associalioii or Testing Authorities. Australia. The tcst(s) rcportctl hcrc- i n havc bccii performed in accortlaiice with i t s lcriiis or rcgistraliori. This dociimcnt shall not be reprotlucctl cxcciit in f u l l .

Page 2 of 8

Dk: 11914kb 52 of 83

WaLLonsultatits Eriviroscierice ACN nni 7 5 2 676

Lab Sample

ID

. ’ 2-8 1-Inrvcy Strcct, Richtnontl , Victor ia 3 121 Tclcplioric: +GI 3 9429 4GG6 Faairni lc: +GI 3 7429 2234 h i a i l : wsIco~iOo~.c~nai l .co~n.nu

AD1 Point Depth (rn) Benzene Toluene Ethyl Xylene

ID mglkg mglkg mglkg mglkg Sample Number From To Benzene

C L I E N T : Australian Defence Industries RE: Validation J O B N O : AGO0

ANZIICC & NI-IMKC Guiclcliiies for Soil Dutch C Criteria for Soil

82808 V5461 3219 82816 V5469 3216

D A T E S A M P L E D : D A T E R E C E I V E D : D A T E ANALYSED:

CO. 1 <o. 1 <o. 1 <o. 1 <o. 1 eo. 1 eo. 1 <o. 1

24.9.97 24.9.97

24.9.97

Quality Control Data Duplicate I

ATTENTION: Ms. A. Groves

1

RESULTS OF ANALYSIS - SOIL BTEX

82816 <o. 1 <o. 1 <o. 1 <o. 1

1 COMMENTS: Results mrtain to samples as received. Report No: 34829

Al l results expressed as nigkg dry weight, utiless stated otherwise.

Method Section: WSL3810

B.J. LYONS\-- PRINCIPAL CHEMIST 7 October, 19971ab

This Lalwratory is regislcred by tlic Nalionnl Associalioii of Testing Authorities, Australia. The lest(s) reportcd hcrc- in liavc bcen performed in accordance with its tcrinn of rcgistrnlion. This tlocumcri~ shall iiot bc rcprodiicctl cxccpt in full.

Page 3 of 8 Dk: I1914kb

53 of 83

=w JLLuIIS'uIranrs Eriviroscicricc AC:N 004 7 5 2 676

2-8 I-larvcy Sircci, Riclirriond, Victoria 3 I 2 I 'I'clcphoric: + G I 3 3427 4666 Facsirnilc: + G I 3 7'127 2274 Em R i I : wslco n@ozcrna i 1 .corn. 411

Lab AD I Point Depth (m) c,-c, >C&4 >c I 4-c28 ''.28-c36

Sample Sample Number From To ID ID mglkg mglkg mglkg mglkg

Former Dutch B Criteria for Soil Dutch C Criteria for Soil

82808 V5461 3219 <20 <20 1600 860 82809 V5462 3219 c20 <20 <50 <50 82812 V5465 3220 <20 64 820 53 82814 V5467 3217 <20 <20 170 88 82816 V5469 3216 <20 <20 <50 ~ 5 0 82818 V5471 3221 <20 <20 <50 <50

CLIENT: Australian Deferice lndustrics JtE: Validation ,JOBNO: AGO0

A


1 ' 1 I

82808 <20 <20 1200 720

D A T E DATE SAMPLED: RECEIVED: 2::; /(JL DATE ANALYSED: 24.9.97

B.J. LYONS PRINCIPAL CHEMIST 7 October, 19971ab

RESULTS OF ANALYSIS - SOIL TPH FRACTIONS

Quality Control ,Data OuDticate I

COMMENTS: Results pertain to samples as received. Report No: 34829 This Laboratory i s rcgislercd hy thc National Association of Testing Aulhorilies, Auslralia. The tcst(s) rcportcd hcrc- in have bccn performed in accordance wilh i \ s Icrlns of rcgislration. This document shall not bc rcprotlucctl cxccpi in f u l l .


Mctliod Section: WSI, 030 Pagc 4 of 8 Dk: 11914kb

i

54 of 83

ww J L b W 11s u I L a I1 KS nvi roscicncc

A ( : N 004 7 5 2 676

I A Samplc

11)

. ' 2-8 I- larvcy Strcct, Richiiioiitl, Victor ia 3 12 I

Fncsiiiiilc: +GI 3 7427 2294 Ilma i I : wslco n@ozcmai I .coni .au

~reicllii~lilc~ + G I 3 7 m 1 4666

AD1 Point Depth (m) Napli- Aceria- Accna- Fluor- Fhenan- Antlira- Fluoran- Pyrene Benzo(a) Chrys- Benzo(h) Benzo(k) Benzo(a) lndeno Dibenzo- Benzo- Total Sainplc Nunihcr From To lhalene phtliy- plilliene enc thrcne cciie thcne anthra- ene fluoran- fluoran- pyrcne ( I 23-cd) (ah)ant- (ghi)per- Phll's

I r) lcnc ccne lhene t hem pyrene racene ylene

D A T E SAMPLED: 24.9.97 C,' I., I IC N'I': RE: Va I ida t ion DATE RECEIVED: 24.9.97

DATE ANALYSED: 24.9.97 JOD NO:

ATTENTION: Ms. A. Groves B.J. LYONS

Airstraliari Ilefeiicc Ir iduslries

AG 00

PRINCIPAL CHEMIST 7 October, 19971ab

I


niglkg rng/kg mglkg n igkg n i g k g iiiglkg riigkg nigkg ing/kg iiigkg mgkg n i g k g nig/kg m g k g nig/kg n igkg mgkg

INDIVIDUAL PAHs

I'nrmcr I>iilcli IJ Crilcria for Soil

I h l l c l i C Criicrin for Soil I I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II i

All results expressed as ingkg dry weight, unless stated otherwise.

Metliocl Section: WSL 8 100

This Laboratory i s registered by [he Naiional Associalion o f Testing Authorities. Auslralia. The tesl(s) reporled hcrc- in have been performed i n accordance with ils leriiis of rcgistraliyi. This docrimelit shall not be reproduced except i n frill.

Page 5 of 8 '

Dk: 11914kb

55 of 83

W- J LLV I 13 11 I i m ts CLIEN,r: Australian Dcrence Industries RE: Validation .JOB NO: AG 00

Etiviroscicrice A ( : N n0.i 7 5 2 676

ANZliCC PC NIIMRC Griitlclincs for Soil I ) i i lc l i C Critcrin for Soil

1

R2808 V54G I 3219 <o. I <o. I <o. 1 <o. I <o. 1 <o. I <o. I CO. 1 <o. I <o. I <o. I <o. I <O.l '<O. I

82816 VS469 3216 <o. I a. 1 <o. 1 <o. I <o. I <o. I <o. I CO. 1 <o. 1 <o. I <o. I <o. I <o. I <o. I

i

1

I I *

' 2-8 Harvey Strccr, Ricli inoiid, Victoria 3 12 I 7'clcplioiic: tGI 3 9429 4666 Facsiiiiilc: t6I 3 9429 2294 h i l a i I: wslcon@ozeina i I .corn, au

ATTENTION: Ms. A . Groves

DATE SAMPLED: DATE RECEIVED: DATE ANALYSED: 24.9.97

B.J. L NS PRINCIPAL CHEMIST 7 October, 19971ab

RESULTS OF ANALYSIS - SOIL SEMI-VOL. HALOGENATED HC'S

PageGof 8 Dk: I1914kb

56 of 83

i

Lab Sample

ID

CLIENT: Australian Defence Industries RE: Validation *JOBNO: AGO0

ww u.I~u~13ulLallLs

Erivi roscietice hC:N On4 75.7 676

' 2-8 I-Iarvcy Srrcct, Ric l imor id, Victor ia 3 121 ATTENTION: Ms. A. Groves Tclcplionc: +61 3 9429 4666 T;ncsirnilc: i6l 3 9429 2294 E r i i A i l : wzIcoii~o~crn~il.corn.au

AUI Point Uepth (m> I'CUs (Arochlor Number) Sample Number From To I016 1221 1232 1242 1248 1254 1260 'Sotal

ID PCBs mglkg mglkg mglkg mglkg mglkg mglkg mglkg mgkg

DATE SAMPLED: 24.9.97 DATE PECEIVED: 24.9.97

ANZECC & NHMRC Guidelines for Soil Dutch C Criteria for Soil

DATE ANALYSED: 24.9.97

B.J.

&


c0.1 <o. 1

RESULTS OF ANALYSIS - SOIL INDIVIDUAL PCBs

co.1 ' <o. 1 <0.1 co.1 <I eo. 1 <o. 1 eo. 1 eo. 1 e1

COMMENTS: Results pertain to samples as received



This Lahoralory i s registered by the Naliorial Association of Testing Authorities, Australia. The tcsl(s) reported hcrc- iii have been performed in accordance with i t s terms o f regislrariciri. This clociimenl shall not he reprotlricctl except in f u l l .

Page 7 of 8 Dk: 11914kb

57 of 83

' 2-8 1-Iarvcy Strcct, f<icliinoiid, Victorin 3 I 2 I 'fclcplionc: 4 6 1 3 3427 4G66 Facrirnile: +GI 3 7427 2274 Etriail : wsIcoi i0o~ci i ia i l .com.au

Lah Samplc

ID

Australian Derencc Industrics DATE SAMPLED: Validation DATE RECEIVED: AG 00 D A T E ANALYSED:

A111 Point Dcplh (m) HCT) Lindane I-lepta- Aldrin Hcpta- DDE Dieldrin Endrin DDD DDT a-Rcnz- h-Denz- Oxychl- Melli- Total Sample Nuinhcr Froin To chlor chloro- enehcxa- enehexa- ordane oxychlor Pesticides

I l l cpoxidc chloridc chloride m d k g m g k m d k g m g k mdkg m d b mg/kg mflg mgkg mg/kg m$g mdkg mdkg mflg m g k


Forrncr Ilufcli 13 Critcria for Soil Dutch C Crilcria Tor Soil

82808 V546l 3219

82816 V5469 3216

RESULTS OF ANALYSIS - SOIL INDIVIDUAL PESTICIDES

I

<o. 1 a. I CO.1 <o. 1 co.1 <o. I <O. l C0.l <O. l co.1 C0.1 <o. I <O.l C0. l < I

<O. l <0.1 10. I CO.1 C0.1 < O . l co.1 <o. I CO.1 <O. l CO.1 co.1 <O. l < O . l < I

I

24.9.97 24.9.97 24.9.97

PRINCIPAL CHEMIST

7 October, 19971ab

58 of 83

W S LConsultants

Enviroscience

BJL:ab

6 October, 1997


ATTENTION: MS. A GROVES

Dear Madam,

JOBNO: AGO0



You / i t s fai hfully I

B.J. LYONS DIRECTOR enc

WSL Consulmu P?. Lrd. A.C.N. 004 752 676

2-8 Harvey Srreer, bchmond , Victoria 3 12 I , Ausrralia Telephone: +61 3 9429 4666 Facsimile: +61 3 9429 2294 Email: ~~ l~on@o~emai I . co rn . au

A NATA Accredited Laboraron

An Approved Quaranrine Premises

An Approved EPA Auditor & Analyst 59 of 83

w ~ L L O nsuI rants Enviroscience A(:N nrri 7 5 2 676

Saniplc I I)

' 2-8 I - inrvcy Strcct, I< i c l i n io r i t l , V i c t o r i a 3 12 1 ' Ic lcphoric: +GI 3 7429 4666 Facsirnilc: e61 3 9429 2294

AD1 Point Depth (m) Naph- Acena- Acena- Fluor- Phcnan- Anthra- Fluoran- Pyrene Benzo(a) Chrys- Bcnzo(b) Benzo(k) Uenzo(a) lndeno Dibenzo- Uenzo- Total Saniple Nuiiibcr From To tlialcne phtlty- plithenc cne tlirenc ccnc thetie anthra- ene fluoran- fluoran- pyrcnc ( I 23-cd) (ah)ant- (ghi)per- PA1 1's

ID lcne cene thene thene pyrene racene ylene

1 W k g niglkg mglkg mgfig mglkg niglkg mgkg m g k g mgkg m g k g mgkg mglkg nig/kg m g k g mgkg m g k g m@kg

CLIENT: A[rstralian Defence Industries DATE SAMPLED: 24.09.97 RE: V a I i da t i on DATE RECEIVED: 30.09.97 ,100 NO: AG 00 DATE ANALYSED: 30.09.97

l h i i i c r I)ii~cli I1 Crilcria for Snit Ihilcli C Crilcria fnr Soil

83377

83378


4. I 1.2 <O. l a.1 12 7.5 43 50 21 22 19 20 28 IS 2.6 1 5 260

C0.I co.1 <0.1 co.1 co.1 c0.1 <0.1 co.1 co.1 co.1 co.1 co.1 co.1 co.1 co.1 co.1 < I

~~


RESULTS OF ANALYSIS - SOIL Em ai I: \[email protected] i I .co in ,411

INDIVIDUAL PAHs

All results exprcssecl as mg/kg dry weight, unless stated otherwise.

Method Section: WSL 8 100

This Laboratory i s registered by the Nat ional Associat ion o f Teslirig Aufhorit ies, Austral ia . The tesl(s) rcported hcrc- in have heen perfornled in accordance w i t h i t s tcrins of regiscralion. This document shal l no1 be rcprntluccd except i n fu l l .

Page 1 of I Dk: 11914kc

60 of 83

WSLConsdtants

Enviroscience

BJL:ab

13 October, 1997


ATTENTION: MS. A. GROVES

Dear Madam,

JOBNO: AGO0

Please find attached results of analysis on samples recei by WSL Consultants Pty Ltd on 24 September, 1997.

Yours faithfully WSL CONSULTANTS PTY LTD

DIRECTOR enc

WSL C O n S d t a n t S Pty. Ltd. A.C.N. 004 752 676

2-8 Harvey Street, RJchmond, Victoria 3 12 1, Australia Telephone: +61 3 3429 4666 Facsimile: +61 3 9429 2234 Ernail: [email protected]

A NATA Accredired Laborarory

A n Approved Quaranrine Premises

An Approved EPA Audiror & h d y ~ 61 of 83

w aLLonsuiIanrs CLIENT: Envirosc ience RE: ACN 004 752 676 JOB NO:

Naph- thalene

mgkg

' 2-8 Harvey Street, . . Richinond, Victoria 3 12 1 ATTENTION:

Telephone: +G 1 3 9429 4666 Facsimile: +GI 3 9429 2294 Eniaii: [email protected]

Acena- Acena- Fluor- Phenan- Anthra- Fluoran- Pyreire Benzo(a) Chrys- Benzo(b) Benzo(k) Uenzo(a) lndeno Dibenzo- Beiizo- Total phthy- phtliene ene threne cene thene anlhra- ene fluoran- tluoran- pyrene (123-cd) (&)ant- (ghi)per- PAH's

mdkg mdkg mdkg mdkg mdkg mgkg mdkg mdkg mgkg mg/kg mdkg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg. mg/kg lene cene thene thene pyrene racene ylene

Sainple Sample Number From

I-ornier Dutch I3 Criteria for Soil

Australian Defence Industries Validation AGO0

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Ms. A. Groves

Dutch C Criteria for Soil

DATE SAMPLED: DATE RECEIVED: DATE COC RECEIVED: DATE ANALYSED:

RESULTS OF ANALYSIS - SOIL INDIVIDUAL PAHs

2 410 919 7 A

24/09/97 611 0197 // & 611 0197

13 October, 1997/ab

All results expressed as mg/kg dry weight, unless stated otherwise.


This Laboratory is registered by the National Association of Testing Authorities. Australia. The test(s) reported here- in have been performed in accordance with its terms of registration. This document shall 1101 be reproduced except i n full.

Page 1 of I Dk:l I914kd

62 of 83

_-

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvrnone\vrpt3a. issue I . October 1997


Former AD1 Maribvrnone Facility,

APPENDIX D

TABULATED ANALYTICAL DA TA

--

In Confidence - AD[ Limited 1997

63 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: AnissdMaribymone \vrpt3a. issue I . October I997



APPENDIX D

-TABULA TED ANAL YTICAL DA TA


64 of 83

data

P i p e 1

65 of 83

66 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: A n i s s f l aribvrnong\vrpt3a. issue I . October 1997


Former AD1 Maribvmone F acility

APPENDIX E

FIELD QUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAM

PART 1

FIELD QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DETAILS

Field Logsheets

For each sampling point a field logsheet was completed by an AD1 Environmental Scientist. Such field logsheets include descriptions of the soil profiles, information on the sampling date, time, sampling point and sample number, depths, comments regarding the general area and any other relevant information. Representative field logsheets produced during this investigation are attached in Part 2 of this appendix.

Sample Labelling

All soil samples were collected and logged by an experienced AD1 Elivironmental Scientist. In the field, the information entered onto the sample jar labels was checked to confirm correspondence with field logsheets and sampling point markers. Each sample jar was labelled with a special sticker which enables laboratory staff to identify and track the individual samples. Labels were filled in by the Environmental Scientist and included the following details:

Job number Sample date Site number Sampler's initials Sampling point number Sample depth Comments as required

The lid of each sample jar was also labelled with the following information:

Sampling point number Sample date Site number Sample depths

, .. .

Each sample was assigned a unique and sequential sample number which was copied onto each label and recorded for future reference.


AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H. Anissa/Maribvmone\vrt3a. Issue I . 0 ctober 1997


Former AD[ Manbvrnone Facility

Chain of Custody/Sample Transmittal Forms

Prior to packaging and dispatch of samples for analysis, a Chain of Custody or Sample Transmittal Form was prepared by AD1 staff. This form recorded information regarding the sample and point numbers, analyses required and any other relevant information. At least one Chain of Custody form was couriered to the laboratory with each box of samples collected. Representative copies of these forms are attached as Part 3 of this appendix and additional copies are retained by AD1 Services for file records.

Upon receipt of samples by the analytical laboratory all boxes were cross-checked to ensure that all the details were correct. A s iped Chain of Custody form was then faxed to AD1 to confirm acceptance by the laboratory. No discrepancies were reported by any of the laboratories.

Packaging and Transportation

Samples were packaged in a cardboard box fitted with cardboard partitions and were couriered as soon as possible with the Chain of Custody form to the relevant analytical laboratory. The Chain of Custody form was sealed into the cardboard box prior to dispatch.

Equipment Decontamination

After sample collection, all sampling and other equipment likely to have come into contact with on-site soil or water was thoroughly washed with biodegradable, phosphorous free detergent and then rinsed in clean tap water. Equipment was then dried prior to reuse. This procedure was undertaken following the collection of every sample in order to prevent cross contamination.

-_


68 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/M aribvrnone\vrpt3a. issue 1. October I997


Forme r AD1 Maribvmone Facility

PART 2

COPIES OF REPRESENTATIVE LOGSHEETS


\PROJECT CODE: AGO0 SITE: Maribymong

.-

IADI Technology G r o u p Envi ronmenta l Field Sample P o i n t Record

Surface and Surrounds Descnpbon: Crushed rock and gravel on surface.

Odours: Y / N Nil IPhotograph: Y / N I x l Yes

Comments: I

SIFICATIO

Brown

Brown

AND DESCRIPTIONS of each visible soil profile

CL Brown mottled clay very hard and dry and compact. AU natural no foreign material.

Base of investigation

delbourne R a t e r Easement

Weather Conditions: Sunnyhhld

Note This form IS tn be filled in by an AD1 Ennronmenta l Sc~enust

70 of 83

._

AD1 Technology G r o u p Envi ronmenta l Field S a m p l e P o i n t Record PROJECT CODE: AGO0 SITE: Maribyrnong SAMPLER: A Groves ERWIR0NMENTA.L SCIENTIST: AG Date: 24/0919711Time: 10.10 am k i t e No: 3A IPoin t NO: 321'

V4568 0.4 0.8 soil 0

I I I I

Surface and Surrounds Descripbon: Crushed rock and gravel, concrete cover for sewer to the north.

3dours: 1' I N Nil Photograph: Y I N x 1 Yes

SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND DESCRIPTIONS of each visible soil Drofile

1 - 0.4

1.4 . 1.0 IBrown

:omments:

L

:elbourne V

Layers of - crushed rock and larger gravel pieces - sand - crushed rock - ash - ash and coke and burnt material

Brown clay with redlbrown silt streaks throughout. -4ll natural, low plasticity.


ater Easement Area - 17alidation

!eather Condtions. Sunny AVarm

ote This form is to be fiiled in by an AD1 En\ironmenraI Scientist

71 of 83

AD1 Technology G r o u p PROJECT CODE: AGO0 SITE: Maribyrnong SAMPLER: A Groves ENVIRONMEhTAL SCIENTIST: AG

Environmenta l Field Sample Po in t Record

Surface and Surrounds Description: Crushed rock & gravel on surface

Idours: Y I N NiJ IPhotomaph: Y I N

SOIL CLASSIFICATION ANTI) DES

1 - 0.3

1.3 - 0.8

,omments:

3rown

3rown

lelbourne F

- - x l Yes

RIPTIONS of each visible soil Drofile

Crushed rock & gravel, ash, coke, large bricks also present, concrete pieces

Brown clay, becoming red/brown wlth depth, all natural, low plasticity


ater Easement Area - Validation

'eather Conhtions: Sunnyhhld

~ t e This form is to be filled ln by an AD1 Eniironmenral Scienust

72 of 83

4DI Technology Group PROJECT CODE: AGO0 SITE: Mariby-nong

Environmental Field Sample Point, Record

A Groves ENVIRONMENTAL SCIELPTIST: AG

on the surface, that has been leveled off.

Idours: Y I N Nil ]Photograph: Y I N

SOIL CLASSIFICATIO

1 - 0.4

1.4 - 1.1

Brown

Mottled brown

:omments:

:L

lelb Water

- .

x 1 Yes RIPTIONS of each visible soil profile

Crushed rock & gravel, ash & coke, small brick fragments, rusted nails in amongst mottled grey clay

Mottled brown clay, low plasticity, moist, a few roots, large water main (cast iron) a t base of pit


iasement Site - Validation s a m p h g

Veather Conditions: Sunny/Mild

OW. Ths form is to be filled in by an ALII Enilronmental Scienbsr

73 of 83

I Surface and Surrounds Description: Crushed rock & gravel in which a topsoil layer has

has been placed over the area.

Odours: Y / N Nil IPhotograph: Y / N

Comments:

SIFICATIO

Grey

Brown

x 1 Yes AND DESCRIPTIONS of each visible soil profjle

Brown clay with rusty brown silt streaks evident throughout.

Base of investigation.

delbourne F iter Easement Area - Validation

Weather Conditions: Sunnyfifild

Note: This form is to be Wed in by an AD1 Environmental Scientist

74 of 83

SITE: Maribyrnong

I Surface and Surrounds Descnphon: Topsoil stock plie tha t has been placed onto area

kom Maribyrnong site

Odours: Y / N Nd Photograph: Y I N

:omments:

Brown rock, wood and plastic sheet evident throughout.

/Base of investigation

Melbourne Water Easement Area - Validation sampling

Ieather Conditions: SunnyKarm

lie: This form IS LO be filled in by an AD1 Environrnenral Scientist

75 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa/Maribvmone\vrt3a. issue I . October 1997



PART 3

TABULATED FIELD/BLIND DUPLICATES, INTERNAL DUPLICATES AND SPIKES


76 of 83

1 AD1 Depth (m) Sample Lab PH As Cd Cr c u Ni Pb Sn Zn TPHs TPHs TPHs TPHs Average Numher From I To C6-C9 ClO-C14 ClS-C28 C29-C36 %RPD

I I 1

K5278 I 0.4 1 JANALms I .3 - 4 . 5 28 21 30 25 <5 59

V5462 1 0.G I I WSL 8.6 <2 4 . 2 G I 17 32 15 <2 27 <20 <20 <50 6 0 i ‘% I<I’l) 137.35 - 58.23 47.06 37.84 22.22 - 3.45 5 I .02

V5471 I 0.6 I [ WSL 8.G <2 -4.2 51 14 3 3 18 <2 27 <20 <20 <50 <50 i ‘!h KPI) 0.00 17.86 19.35 12.50 18.18 0.00 I 1 32

- I

l05Y 0 0 3 - 2 <5

I ( I G 0 0 7 0 x - 1 <5 I 060 0 3 0 8 - 1 <5

20000 - 200 00

I 0 00 0 00

Page 1

77 of 83

int duD

AD1 AD1

SAMPLE LAB LABID SAMPLE As Cd C:r Cu Hg Ni Pb Sn Zn Sb Mo Co Se Be pH TPH TPH TPH TPH NUMBER No. POINT

A n d a b > 1 _ _ _ ~ It9003 ANALABS 8214 8002 .:I 4 . 5 29 13 0.06 30 15 4 42 4 4 13 .(8 4 . 5 8.7 4 0 -20 I10 170 KY00.3 ANALABS 8214-1K 8002 4 . 5 29 13 0.07 29 14 <5 38 <8 =: 5 13 <8 i 0 . 5 8.7 <I0 Q0 62 170

I %KPD 0.00 0.00 15.38 3.39 6.90 10.00 0.00 0.00 55.81 0.00

C6-C9 Cl0-Cl4 C15-C28 C29-(!.36 NIJMBEK ------- -------

~ ~ ~ ~

V5285 1 ANALAHS 8214-17 3095 ~~~~~

V5285 ANALABS 82I4-I7K 3095 %I< 1'1 ) 1 . . _ I 1 - . . -

\\'SI, ('onsul1snt.s 1 .:20 Q0 1600 860 \?5461 \\'SI- X2XIIX 3219 9.4 0.3 34 97 58 86 .:2 260 .-2 .:2 17 .r2 .:2

VSJ6l I WSL I 82808 3219 8.7 0.2 38 94 58 80 Q 240 .:2 ~:2 21 -:2 <5 .:20 -2.20 1200 720

VSJ66 W S L 8281.3 3220 ..2 . .0.2 JI 8.6 I 5 9.4 ':2 I 8 \:SJ66 U'SL 82813 3220 *:2 4 . 2 41 9.3 15 I 1 Q I 8

VS.171 ' !\'SI- ' 828IS ' 3221 ,:2 -:0.2 5 1 14 33 18 .:2 27 8.6 \'5J71 WSI. 82818 3221 .:2 .:0.2 5 1 12 31 17 .:2 26 8.6

V5JG9 I WSL 82816 3216 V5169 1 WSL 82816 3216

_______________

I I %HPD 7.73 J0.00 1 1 . 1 1 3.14 0.00 7.23 8.00 21.05 28.57 17.72

~ ~ - - -- -~~ _ - - ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ ---__- ~

I I I %KPD 0.00 7.82 0.00 15.69 0.00

I I I %111'1) 0.00 15.38 6.25 5.71 3.77 0.00

I VORPD

--__ -____ ______-

~

I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 , 1 , 1

Page 1

78 of 83

A 0 1 AUI - s~51pl.K LAB I A B I U SAMPLE OC: K:Lh Phenols C l l c s NAP A C Y ACE FLU PHE ANT FLA PYR BAA CHK BBP BKP BAP DBA W:P IPY Lknlmr Tolurnr ElnylLknIrnr Xyknr A*mpl %RPU NUhlBEH No. POINT pr%lkYir -

NUMBER A n u h b , I

KY00.1 1 ASALABS a 8002 4 I ‘ 0 .1 ,:O.I ,:0.5 . : O I cO.1 0.1 .-O.I 0.2 0 2 0 1 0.1 0.1 , - O I 0.1 .:O.l ..O.l nYuw I ASALABS ~ l i 4 . 1 ~ 8002 ‘ 0 . 1 .:o I ..0.5 . : o I ‘-0.1 0.1 0.1 0 1 0.1 0 1 c o 1 ,:oI 0.1 4 1 . :oI .-O.I

V 5 X 5 I ASALALIS 8214.17 JOYS .-0.5 V1285 1 ANALABS 6214.1713 1095 .-o.s

\’(.I61 [ WSI. HZL(0H 321Y .:u. I

0.00 14.05 I “/.HPL) 0.00 66.67 66 67 0.00 0.00 I 1 -___-

I %HPU WSI. C’onsuIInnls

4 ..o I I 3 2X 12 X3 Y6 SO 42 25 36 48 38 5.9 37 V5461 I WSL E 8 0 H 3219 ~ 0 . 1 4 5 ..O.I I 6 28 8 87 100 SI 3Y 24 32 44 42 6.5 42

________- -__ -~ - 12.17 “/.Hl’I) I I 76 2U 6Y 0.00 4UUU 4.71 0.0H I 9 H 7.41 4.OH I I 7 6 H.70 I U OU Y.68 12.66 I I

~5.166 WSL e n 1 3 .IXU ______---- V5.166 WSL 82813 3220

%HPU 4 70 V1471 WSL 82818 3221 VI471 WSL 82818 3221

K K P U J.19 V546Y WSL ’ 52816 3216 .:0.1 .:0.1 ..0.1 .:0.1 .:0.1 VS46Y WSL 81816 I216 .:o.I .:0.1 i o 1 i 0 . I a 1

%HPU Avrrsgr Y. RPU 9.03

79 of 83

spikes

[Laboratory Spikes Expected Spike 1 S::iIe 1 Lab 1 LA: 1 Analyte 1 Spike 1 Result

Number Result Obtainec

Analabs (mg/kg) (mg/kg)

I

I 74.00 70.00 80.00 71.00 79.00 78.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 91.00 82.00 81.00 76.00 83.00 92.00 78.00 100.00 83.00 86.00 82.00 78.00 93.00 . 95.00 91.00 86.00 97.00 92.00 87.00 90.00 91.00 85.00 89.00 84.00 85.00 86.00 96.00 87.00 86.00 89.00 813.00 85.00 70.00 116.00 115.00 116.00

Page 1

80 of 83

spikes

I I

Spike Result Recovery

Obtained (YO) (mgkg)

- 116.00 - 85.00 - 92.00 - 94.00 - 98.00 - 106.00 - 72.00 - 82.00 - 88.00 - 88.00 - 78.00 - 99.00 - 99.00 - 78.00 - 120.00

(Average Recovery O/o 87.80 I I I

Page 2

81 of 83

AD1 Limited File No: E00028 H: Anissa /Mar ibmone\~pt3a . issue I . October 1997


Former AD1 Maribvrno ne Facility

APPENDIX F BACKGROUND SAMPLING POINT MAP


. . . . Loczt ion of Background Sampl ing po!ncs

. .:.

83 of 83

Documents

Environmental Audit Report · Former AD1 Maribvrnone Facility Issued by 1871 , Lyons AD1 VALIDATION ASSESSMENT REPORT David Aynsley, AD1 Limited - Property, copies 1 & 2 Roger Parker,