Upload
cory-welch
View
228
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EnterprisePeg David
AIM Technical Program ManagerNETPDTC N621
23 APRIL 2013
2
Overview
• Enterprise AIM I/AIM II & CPM eDMZ Transition • Authority to Operate (ATO) • SSC NOLA Enterprise Data Center Migration• SSC NOLA Citrix – Risk• Issues • Non-NETC Sites/Commands • AIM Content Repository Requirements• Configuration Control Board (CCB)
3
AIM Central Site Hosting at NETPDTC
• NETC N74/N6, NETPDTC & NAWCTSD Migration Plan 18 FEB – 24 APR - Completed eDMZ Migration
All NETC Learning Centers and SSP Content, databases, processing, Citrix NTSS Accounts
Benefits Simultaneous access by geographically dispersed Center and
contractor personnel for collaborative development and maintenance
Positions AIM Enterprise for SPAWAR New Orleans (NOLA) Enterprise Data Center Transition (NEDC)
Lessons Learned RADM Quinn – BZ!
4
Government CPM Hosting
• CPM in Aimereon/vendor site – Sunset 12 APR• CPM in NETPDTC eDMZ deployed – 15 APR• https://cpm.prod.aim.netc.navy.mil • Benefits
Enterprise production hosting and support vs current contractor environment with limited server configuration and bandwidth
Leverages NETC domain Sys Admin, Database Management, and Information Assurance expertise at NETPDTC and SSC NOLA
Co-located with rest of NETC enterprise IT applications; secure access from both .mil and .com domains
5
AIM ATO Status
• 3-year ATO granted by FLTCYBERCOM 26 Dec 12• Allowed us to proceed with migration of AIM I/II
Central Site instances into NMCI eDMZ and hosting CPM in eDMZ vs vendor site
• ATO POAM CAT III – deployment of CAC for Application Jun/July timeframe (T)
• Certification & Accreditation (C&A) artifacts are routinely kept updated; used for annual FISMA reviews, etc, living documents
• Migration to SPAWAR NOLA requires modified ATO to support NEDC environment
6
AIM Central Site Migration to NOLA NEDC
• Goal: Hardware/system software infrastructure in place SSC NOLA by 30 SEP 13
• Schedule for operational transition/deployment from current NETPDTC eDMZ host to NOLA host TBD Lessons Learned - Transition plan similar to recent eDMZ
migration – Application Functional Testing (AFT); Production cutover
• Management of AIM I/II/LO Module Central Sites and CPM will remain with NETPDTC; only physical hosting moves to NOLA
• NEDC Remote Access: GFE or CFE required for SPAWAR CITRIX access – discussions in progress
7
Risk ManagementNEDC Remote Access
1 2 3 4 5
Impact
Pro
bab
ilit
y 1
0
30
50
70
90
1
Low Medium High
Description: (1) For Off-site Users - GFE or CFE is required for SPAWAR CITRIX access-- Govt Furnished Equipment (GFE) = property acquired
directly by Govt and made available to contractor; and, -- Corporate Furnished Equipment (CFE) = equipment
purchased by DoD/Govt contracted company specifically in support of DoD/Govt contract; used only by personnel supporting that contract
Mitigation Plan: -- NETPDTC team provided current AIM Citrix STIG
mitigations; architecture to NOLA team-- SPAWAR NOLA team discussed separate AIM APP Citrix
instance vs shared Citrix Farm -- Technical options for AIM Users – discussions forthcoming
AIM Engineering Mtgs Apr; arrive at consensus
8
Issue:Privilege Levels
• 5 levels implemented in Central Site AIM II per CNATT request
• 3 levels implemented in Central Site AIM I per SSP request
• CPM-style role/privilege structure tasked and funded by NETC N74/NAWCTSD
9
Issue:Hosting Test Environment
• NMCI AIM users needed to test ongoing system enhancements as part of formal Govt Acceptance Testing (GAT) process
• Cannot install in-process AIM updates on local NMCI PCs or access contractor-hosted virtual server to conduct tests
• NETPDTC to establish Test Environment to support ongoing requirement
10
Issue:Blocking Word Macros
• NMCI does not allow MSWord macros to be enabled on NMCI desktop PCs once Win 7/Office 2010 is installed
• This poses crippling limitation on TG functionality for stand-alone desktop installations of AIM under NMCI; no work-around has yet been identified
• Does not affect AIM Central site instances inside eDMZ
11
Issue:Software Release Process
• All Central Site instances now migrated to Rel 5.0• CNATT requirement to maintain local NMCI AIM II
instances to support effective community-wide business process
• Discussion re NMCI certification process / schedule• Impact of NMCI certification delay / push of Rel 5.0
12
Issue: NOFORN NNPI
• Affects primarily non-SWS undersea community – NAVSEA 07TR, SLC & SLC learning sites
• Stringent data handling controls re unclassified No Foreign Dissemination Navy Nuclear Power Information (NNPI), mandated by NAVSEA 08
• NETC/NETPDTC stood up TRANET-C NNPI COI to host: SLC reference materials, e-library, IETMs, course
curriculum info, AIM content, used by SLC/DETs TRANET-C NNPI COI use/rqmts by other LCs TBD POC: Bruce Bare, NETC
13
Non-NETC Commands Implementation
• Non-NETC Commands interest in AIM Enterprise
• Prioritizing in Process NSTC (OTC/RTC) – in process Navy MedicineNAVSPECWARCEN (hosted by NAVSOC)NAVRESDANTESRegional Maintenance Centers – Norfolk / San DiegoNaval Shipyards - hosted Norfolk
14
AIM Content Repository
• Enterprise Requirements’ for Ancillary Data Storage Area• AIM Enterprise has multiple components: AIM I, AIM
II, CPM, LO and ancillary file shares• Requires configuration management; search; access by
enterprise users• Notional Plan
• Complete Functional Requirements Document • H2 assisting – collate input/requirements provided
from LCs• FY14 goal/priority
15
Configuration Control Board (CCB)
• NETC Instruction 5200.3 – established authoritative framework for effective & innovative configuration compliance for IM/IT as it relates to NETC WD Line of Business -- Each T&E App has Charter; Chairpersons: PM and TPMs
• Purpose of CCB: ensure programmatic changes (i.e., consideration of proposed cost and schedule changes) and related technical changes to information systems are processed in a visible and traceable manner
• AIM CCB membership – commands/vendors (as applicable): NETC N74 Program Manager (PM) – Michael Mosley NETC N741A Deputy Program Manager (DPM) – Leslie Desenburg NETPDTC N621 Technical Program Manager (TPM) – Peg David NETPDTC Information Assurance (IAM/IAO) – Kelley Harris or designated IAO NETPDTC System Development Team – Christopher Stark; when applicable NAWCTSD Application Technical Program Manager (TPM) – Tiffany Dombrowski NAWCTSD System Dev/Trng Team – Mike Matzko / Mike Coyle AIMEREON Application Team – Jim Ferrall and AIMEREON staff as identified; when applicable NETC Learning Centers – Representatives as identified via the AIM FRB; when applicable SSP and other Navy Commands Using Enterprise AIM – Representatives as identified via the AIM
FRB – when applicable
16
CCB (cont)
• CCB Forum Participants get together discuss (specified work/projects) which need
to be completed Responsible agents are assigned for performing agreed-upon work Decisions/assigned actions are recorded when completed Includes: providing tech support during development of decision support
documentation such as: Requests for Information Services (RIS), System Functionality Assessments (SFA), Analysis of Alternatives (AOA), Independent Cost Estimates (ICE), and Software Change Requests (SCR), etc.
• CCB shall review, adjudicate, elevate, or place on hold proposed changes for adjudication as required
• CCB shall reach a decision after a period of presentation and discussion, at which time the Chairperson may poll members for their position or recommendation
• CCB Chairperson(s) shall make all final decisions• Held ICW AIM FRB Meetings; or on more frequent basis; when applicable
17
AIM Central Site Implementation
• Points of contact: NETC N74: Mike Mosley, Leslie Desenburg NETPDTC: Peg David, Christopher Stark NAWCTSD: Tiffany Dombrowski, Mike Matzko AIMEREON: Jim Ferrall, Steve Wicinski, Mike Coyle
• NETPDTC Enterprise/Central Site specifics, narrated help videos, lessons learned - available on AIM information Web page:
http://aim.aimereon.com/aim/AIM-Central-Site-Hosting-at-NETPDTC.ashx
18
Questions?
Enterprise Training Management FrameworkContinuous Process Improvement
ETMF Status Update
Bruce Bare, NETC N62
Jon Sullivan, H2 Performance Consulting, Corp
23 April 2013
20
Topics
ETMF Phase II Goals & Deliverables Roadmap Results to Date Current Roadmapping Activities Roadmap Development Schedule
21
ETMF – Phase IIGoals Document and analyze “As-Is” state of core business processes required to
develop, manage and deliver training curricula
Identify duplication, inefficiencies, process improvement opportunities
Determine most efficient alignment of core training management systems Recommend strategies that will support NETC’s ability to continue quality &
quantity of education while controlling (reducing) costs
Deliverables
1. Inventory Management Process Recommendation – Delivered Mar 2013
2. Assessments Tool Recommendation – Planned Jun 2013 Delivery
3. NETC Enterprise Technology Roadmap – Planned Sep 2013 Delivery
22
Roadmap Results To-Date
CPPD25%
NETC N728%
NETC N7313%
NETC N7411%
NETPDTC N6124%
CNATT17%
CID22%
Responses by Group
Business / Service Workshops: COMPLETEDTechnology Workshops: COMPLETED
Participating Teams NETC N72, N73, N74 CPPD CNATT CID LAS Team NETPDTC N612 NETPDTC N621 *Data not represented
Sample Data Pool 53 Participants 328 Responses
CPPD17%
NETC N729%
NETC N7313%
NETC N7413%
NETPDTC N612
8%
CNATT15%
CID25%
Participants by Group
23
Roadmap Responses to Date
Num
ber
of
Res
pons
es
Gap Areas by Category
24
Current Roadmapping Activities
Data Gathering Remaining Technical Workshop Input
Data Validation Workshop & Focus Group Data Analysis Findings Validation Survey Analysis Gap Analysis
Results Documentation Roadmap Initiative Groupings Roadmap Initiative Worksheets
Charting Workshop Planning Customizing Roadmap Templates Identifying Industry Trends
25
Roadmap Development Schedule
Wor
ksho
ps
1 &
2
Feb March April May June July August September
Wor
ksho
p 3
Tech
nolo
gy
Wor
ksho
p 4
Char
ting
Cons
trai
nt R
evie
w
Documentation & Validation
Documentation, Validation &
Analysis
Dra
ft R
evie
w
Fina
l Del
iver
able
Validation & Draft Prep
Documentation & Validation
Charting
Progress as of 23 April 2013
26
Questions?