Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EnovateTM (HFC-245fa) Blowing AgentSolsticeTM Liquid Blowing Agent
S l ti TM G Bl i A tz
SolsticeTM Gaseous Blowing AgentTechnical Update
Honeywell.com
Honeywell – a History of InnovationHoneywell a History of Innovation
KYOTO PROTOCOL
HCFC Phase out
CFC Phase out
F-Gas Regulation
MONTREAL PROTOCOL EU LEGISLATION
CFCs
Phase-out
Olefins
Phase-out
HCFCs HFCs
Ozone Depleting Non-Ozone Depleting Low-Global-WarmingOzone Depletingand Very High Global
Warming Potential
Non-Ozone Depleting but High Global Warming
Potential
Low-Global-Warming Potential and No Ozone
Depletion Effect
Innovating to enable industries’ compliance 22
Honeywell.com
Solstice Liquid Blowing Agent: 1233zd(E)Solstice Liquid Blowing Agent: 1233zd(E)• (E) 1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene
• (E) CHCl=CH-CF3
Physical PropertiesSolstice LBA 141b Enovate
M l W 130 117 134
HCl
• Trans or E (entgegen) isomer Mol. Wt. 130 117 134
Boiling Point, oC 19 32 15
Flame Limits, % by volume in air None 7.6-17.7 None
CC
CF3H
y
Flash Point None None NoneEnvironmental Properties
Solstice LBA 141b EnovateLBA
Atmospheric Life 26 days 9.3 yr 7.6 years
ODP ~0* 0.11 ~ 0*
GWP100 < 7 725 1030Short Life = Ultra Low Environmental
Impact
GWP100 7 725 1030
VOC, USA reg No (est.) No No
Toxicity / OEL 300ppm** 500ppm 300ppm*No impact on depletion of ozone layer and is commonly referred to as zero (0)
3
(Wuebbles , Private Communication)** Internal HON OEL
Solstice LBA: Short Lifetime in Atmosphere Ultra Low Environmental Impact
Honeywell.com
Solstice Gas Blowing Agent: 1234ze(E)Solstice Gas Blowing Agent: 1234ze(E)• (E) 1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene
• (E) CHF=CHCF3
Physical PropertiesSolstice GBA 134a
HCl
• Trans or E (entgegen) isomer Mol. Wt. 114.0 102.0
Boiling Point -19oC (-3oF) -26oC (-15oF)
Flame Limits None NoneF
CC
CF3H
Flash Point None None
Environmental PropertiesSolstice GBA 134a
Atmospheric Life 14 days 7.6 years
ODP ~0* ~ 0*
GWP100 < 6 1430
Short Life = Ultra Low Environmental Impact
VOC No (est.) No
Toxicity / OEL 1000ppm** 300ppm
*No impact on depletion of ozone layer and is commonly referred to as zero (0) (Wuebbles , Private Communication)(Wuebbles , Private Communication)
** Internal HON OEL
Solstice GBA: Short Lifetime in Atmosphere Ultra Low Environmental Impact5
Appliance Foam Evaluations
Honeywell.com
Commercial Appliance Trial ResultsCommercial Appliance Trial Results
Trial run with major global OEM and major global systems house– Commercially manufactured household refrigeratory g– 32 complete units – Conventional foam equipment, existing in the factory
• No modifications to the process or equipment
Solstice LBA processed very similarly to Enovate (245fa)– Comparable in all aspects to world scale processing parameters– Foam density: nearly identical– Minimum fill weights: nearly identical– Demold time: equal / improved – HIPS Liner compatibility excellent even after 2 years
6
Solstice LBA processes similar to Enovate in refrigerator/freezer applications
Honeywell.com
Solstice LBA PUR Cabinet Lambda DataSolstice LBA PUR Cabinet Lambda Data
EnovateEnovate EnovateEnovate
7
Solstice LBA optimized: 8% improvement over Enovate baseline
Honeywell.com
DOE Energy Performance AssessmentDOE Energy Performance Assessment• DOE Energy Test Method • Sets of 5 refrigerators: Solstice LBA and Enovate Blowing Agent baseline
Enovate Enovate
2%
29.5%
8
Solstice LBA Refrigerators: DOE Standard minus 29.5% Energy RatingSolstice LBA Refrigerators: 4% system energy improvement over baseline Enovate
Honeywell.com
Solstice LBA versus 141bSolstice LBA versus 141bFoam performance of Solstice LBA• Polyol miscibility equal to 141b, improved compared to Enovate Blowing Agent• Similar strength properties to Enovate, improved compared to 141b at equal density• Improved k-factor than Enovate foams• Improved k-factor compared to c-pentane foams
21
22
23
/mK 6
810
Ener
gy
vs14
1b
Lambda Performance Energy Performance
Solstice LBA foam- 3% improved vs 141b- 4% improved vs 245fa
16
17
18
19
20
Enovatec-PentaneHCFC-141bLa
mbd
a, m
W/
4-2024
% C
hang
e in
C
onsu
mpt
ion 4% improved vs 245fa
- 12% improved vs cyclopentane
15
16
-20 0 20 40 60
Solstice LBA
Mean Temperature, oCSource: AHAM 3rd Gen BA study plus Hon data on Solstice LBA
-4Solstice LBA Enovate c-Pentane
Lambda and Energy Performance Superior to 141b, CP, and Enovate13
Honeywell.com
Blowing Agents ComparisonBlowing Agents ComparisonEnovate
Blowing AgentSolstice LBA
orm
ance Hydro
CarbonsHCFC141b
Energy Efficiency
Adoption Capital/ Easectiv
ePe
rfo In-Place
(mW/mK @ 24°C)• 141b 17• c-pentane 20-21• Enovate 18-
Lower Cost/Unit
Cos
t effe
c
Gl b l W i I t
19• Solstice 17-18
nviro
nmen
t
Ozone Depletion Impact
Global Warming Impact(Direct)
Volatile Organics
Flammability
Toxicity
ESa
fety
Volatile Organics
Toxicity
* Specifics will vary by energy efficiency standards and type of refrigerator
Solstice LBA: application economics, most efficient & environmentally-superior 15
Spray Foam Evaluations
Honeywell.com
Spray Trial FormulationSp ay a o u a o
Components Enovatephp
Solstice LBA phpphp php
Mannich polyether polyol 40.0 40.0Aromatic polyester polyol 60.0 60.0
Sili S f t t 2 0 2 0Silicone Surfactant 2.0 2.0Amine catalysts 2.0 2.0Metal catalysts 4.1 4.1Flame retardant 20.0 20.0
Water 2.0 2.0Enovate Blowing Agent 20 0 -Enovate Blowing Agent 20.0
Solstice LBA - Equal molarIndex 130 130
Solstice LBA used in existing generic industry formulation12
Honeywell.com
Formulation Properties - Vapor PressureFormulation Properties Vapor Pressure
180- 26%Enovate Blowing Agent
120
140
160 Lower Vapor Pressure Means:
• Less potential for bulging drums- 31%
6%Enovate Blowing Agent
Solstice LBA
60
80
100
sure
, kpa • Potential to use lower
gauge drums
59%
- 41%
0
20
40
Pres • Less potential for blowing
agent loss from system
- 59%
22 33 43 54Temperature, °C
Solstice LBA formulation has significantly lower vapour pressure at all temperatures
13
Honeywell.com
Formulation Properties - StabilityFormulation Properties Stability
30Solstice LBA Formulation Stability @ 54 °C
Enovate Blowing Agent
20
25g g
Solstice LBA
c
Solstice LBA Formulation Stability @ 23C• Solstice LBA
formulation shows acceptable gel
10
15
Gel
Tim
e, S
ec
• Solstice LBA formulation shows
p gtime variation at 54 °C
0
5
0 1 2 4
G formulation shows no gel time variation at RT
0 1 2 4Time @ 54 °C, Weeks
4 Weeks 8 WeeksTime @ 23C
0 Weeks
Solstice LBA formulation has acceptable stability14
Honeywell.com
Lambda of Foam Sprayed @ 25°C Room Temperaturep y @ p
• Initial lambda• Solstice LBA 5 to 8%30
32
Solstice LBA 5 to 8% lower than Enovate
• Aged lambda• Solstice LBA 4 to 8%
lower than Enovate26
28
22
24
Lam
bda,
mW
/mK
18
20
L
Initial Aged Initial Aged Initial Aged
164 24 33
Mean Temperature , oC245fa Initial Solstice LBA Initial
245fa 28 Day Solstice LBA 28 Day
Initial Aged
Enovate InitialEnovate 28 days
Solstice LBA produces spray with improved lambda vs Enovate15
Honeywell.com
Solstice LBS Versus 141b in Spray FoamSolstice LBS Versus 141b in Spray FoamInitial Thermal Conductivity
20.0
19.4
19.6
19.8
K
18.8
19.0
19.2
Lam
bda,
mW
/mK
18.2
18.4
18.6
L
18.0141b 245fa Solstice LBAEnovate
Solstice LBA shows superior performance to 141b and Enovate Blowing Agent
16
Panel Foam Evaluations
Honeywell.com
Chinese Generic Discontinuous Panel Formulations
Polyol Blend (B-side)
Chinese Generic Discontinuous Panel Formulations
Components (php) Solstice LBA Enovate cyclopentane 141b
Polyether Polyol 65.0
Polyester Polyol 35.0y y
Catalyst 2.0
Surfactant 1.5
Flame Retardant 22 0Flame Retardant 22.0
Water 2.0
Blowing Agent 23.3 24.0 12.5 21.0
Isocyanate (A-side)
PMDI 143.6
A Blowing Agent “Drop-in” Replacement Study was Conducted
18
Honeywell.com
Comparison of Physical Properties
Cold (-29oC) 28 days
Dimensional Stability
Comparison of Physical Properties
Cold (-29 C), 28 days
Hot/Humid (70oC/95%RH), Hot (90oC), 28 days
ot/ u d ( 0 C/95% ),28 days
Cyclopentane
141b
Parallel PerpendicularCompressive Strength Solstice LBA
Enovate
Comparable Properties to Enovate, Better Properties than Cyclopentane
19
Honeywell.com
Initial Thermal ConductivityInitial Thermal Conductivity
0.16
0.17
0.18
ctiv
ityo F
)
Therm23.1
24.5
26.0
Cold Chain Applications 4%
8%
0.14
0.15
rmal
Con
duc
Btu
.in/ft
2 .h.o
mal C
onduc(m
W/m
K)
18 7
20.2
21.6
Enovate
Cyclopentane
0.11
0.12
0.13
Ther (B tivity
15.9
17.3
18.7Enovate
Solstice LBA141b
0.1120 40 60 80 100 120
Temperature (°F)
oF oF-6.7 oC 4.4 oC 15.6 oC 26.7 oC 37.8 oC 48.9 oC
Temperature
oF oF oF oF
Best Thermal Insulation Performance for Cold Chain Applications
20
Honeywell.com
28 Day Aged Thermal Conductivity28 Day Aged Thermal Conductivity
0.16
0.17
0.18
ctiv
ityo F
)
Therm23.1
24.5
26.0
6%
10%
21%
Cyclopentane
0.14
0.15
rmal
Con
duc
Btu
.in/ft
2 .h.o
mal C
onduc(m
W/m
K)
18 7
20.2
21.6Enovate
Solstice LBA
141b6%
0.11
0.12
0.13
Ther (B tivity
15.9
17.3
18.7Cold Chain Applications
0.1120 40 60 80 100 120
Temperature (°F)
oF oF-6.7 oC 4.4 oC 15.6 oC 26.7 oC 37.8 oC 48.9 oC
Temperature
oF oF oF oF
Best Thermal Insulation Retention at All Evaluated Temperatures
21
Honeywell.com
Solstice LBA in Panel FoamSolstice LBA in Panel FoamInitial Thermal Conductivity Vs Temperature
20
22
W/m
K
16
18
mbd
a, m
W
12
14
13 24
Lam
13 24Mean Temperature, oC
141b Enovate Solstice LBA
Solstice LBA shows superior performance to 141b and Enovate22
Solstice LBA / Cyclopentane Blends
Honeywell.com
Comparison of Physical PropertiesComparison of Physical Properties
Cold (-29oC) 28 days
Dimensional StabilityCold (-29 C), 28 days
Hot/Humid (70oC/95%RH), Hot (90oC), 28 days
ot/ u d ( 0 C/95% ),28 days
0/1000/ 0
Solstice LBA/Cyclopentane Mol. Ratio
Parallel PerpendicularCompressive Strength
100/075/2550/50
Solstice GBA/C-C5 Blend: Balanced Solution for Cost and Physical Properties
24
Honeywell.com
Initial Thermal Conductivity
Solstice LBA/Cyclopentane Blends
Initial Thermal Conductivity
0.16
0.17
0.18
ctiv
ityo F
)
Therm23.1
24.5
26.0
Cold Chain Applications
0.14
0.15
rmal
Con
duc
Btu
.in/ft
2 .h.o
mal C
onduct(m
W/m
K)
18 7
20.2
21.6
0/100
50/5025/75
Mol. Ratio
0.11
0.12
0.13
Ther ( tivity
15.9
17.3
18.7
100/075/2550/50
20 40 60 80 100 120Temperature (°F)
oF oF-6.7 oC 4.4 oC 15.6 oC 26.7 oC 37.8 oC 48.9 oC
Temperature
oF oF oF oF
Solstice LBA/Cyclopentane Blend: Balanced Solution of Cost and k-factors
25
Honeywell.com
28 Day Aged Thermal Conductivity28 Day Aged Thermal Conductivity
Solstice LBA/Cyclopentane Blends
0.16
0.17
0.18
ctiv
ityo F
)
Therm23.1
24.5
26.0
0/100
25/75
0.14
0.15
rmal
Con
duc
Btu
.in/ft
2 .h.o
mal C
onduct(m
W/m
K)
18 7
20.2
21.6
100/0
50/5075/25
Mol Ratio
0.11
0.12
0.13
Ther ( tivity
15.9
17.3
18.7
Cold Chain Applications
Mol. Ratio
20 40 60 80 100 120Temperature (°F)
oF oF-6.7 oC 4.4 oC 15.6 oC 26.7 oC 37.8 oC 48.9 oC
Temperature
oF oF oF oF
Addition of Solstice LBA Enhanced Thermal Insulation Retention
26
Honeywell.com
Foam Flammability EvaluationsFoam Flammability Evaluations
DIN 4102-1:Class B2
15
20
m
Fail
10
15
Hei
ght,
cm
Pass
5
Flam
e H Pass
0100/0 75/25 50/50 25/75 0/100
Solstice LBA/Cyclopentane Blend, Mol. Ratio
Solstice LBA: Enhanced Foam Fire Retardancy
37
Gas Blowing Agent EvaluationsSolstice GBA in Panel ApplicationsSolstice GBA in Panel Applications
Honeywell.com
Comparison of Physical PropertiesComparison of Physical Properties
Dimensional StabilityCold (-29oC), 28 days
Hot/Humid (70oC/95%RH), Hot (90oC), 28 days
ot/ u d ( 0 C/95% ),28 days
Solstice GBA
134a
Compressive Strength
FlexuralStrength
Solstice GBA: Similar Physical Properties to 134a in Commercial Formulation
29
Honeywell.com
Initial Thermal ConductivityInitial Thermal Conductivity
0.16
0.17
0.18
ctiv
ityo F
)
Therm23.1
24.5
26.05%
134a
0.14
0.15
rmal
Con
duc
Btu
.in/ft
2 .h.o
mal C
onduct(m
W/m
K)
18 7
20.2
21.6
4%
Solstice GBA
0.11
0.12
0.13
Ther ( tivity
15.9
17.3
18.7
20 30 40 50 60 70 80Temperature (°F)
oF oF-6.7 oC -1.1 oC 10.0 oC
oF oF oF oF oF4.4 oC 15.6 oC 21.1 oC 26.6 oC
Temperature
Solstice GBA: 4% - 5% Better Thermal Insulation Value
41
Honeywell.com
Toxicity / Registration / Commercialization StatusToxicity / Registration / Commercialization Status
Solstice LBA• Toxicity – nearly complete
Solstice GBA• Toxicity – CompleteToxicity nearly complete
• Global Registrations– U.S.: SNAP / PMN applications filed
with U.S. EPA under review
Toxicity Complete• Global Registrations• U.S.: SNAP / PMN approvals complete –
commercial sales can commence– EU: REACH registration in-process
• Current REACH registration to 10 tonnes– Japan: Registration complete
commercial sales can commenceJ Ch i l S b C l
• EU: REACH registration process underway
– Current REACH registration to 10 tonnes• Japan: Registration complete
i l l• Japan Chemical Substances Control Law
– ROW Registrations to meet regional commercialization needs
• Solstice LBA registration complete:
commercial sales can commence– Japan Chemical Substances Control Law
• ROW Registrations to meet regional commercialization needs
– Solstice LBA registration complete: MexicoSolstice LBA registration complete: Mexico and India
• Commercialization– Semi-commercial – late 2012
C i l 2013
Solstice LBA registration complete: Mexico and India
• Commercialization– Semi-commercial - NOW
– Commercial - 2013 – Commercial - 2013Low environmental impact solutions will meet regulatory needs timing
31
Honeywell.com
ConclusionsConclusions
• A environmentally sustainable and safe productL GWP S l ti GBA i 6 S l ti LBA i 7
• In foams, both molecules perform better than third generation benchmarksS l ti GBA
• Low GWP: Solstice GBA is < 6; Solstice LBA is < 7• Both are not flammable
• Solstice GBA• 5% better thermal conductivity than 134a• Comparable physical properties
• Solstice LBA• Lowest thermal conductivity and best thermal insulation retention• Comparable dimensional stability to Enovate and better than cyclopentane
• Solstice LBA/Cyclopentane Blend• A solution for formulation flexibility, but the blowing agent blend is most likely flammable
• Commercialization Status• Solstice GBA is commercialized, Solstice LBA will be commercialized in late 2012,
Solstice LBA or GBA: The Best Choices for Panel Foams
43
Enovate™ blowing agent HFC-245fa blending solutionsz
g g g
Shanghai Lab
Honeywell.com
Technical development backgroundTechnical development background
• China updated energy efficiency standards, – China appliance OEMs to face technical limits with CP system
• 245fa/CP technology is becoming a major solution for China appliance industry
• 245fa/CP technology provides an optimal combination of performance and cost
• Honeywell is the leader in 245fa/CP blend development and has IP for 245fa/CP application
• Honeywell has comprehensive technology solution for 245fa/CP application- Strong development capability- Good relationship with system house and equipment supplier- Offers refrigerator OEMs with tailor made solution for 245fa/CP blend technology- Offers excellent serviceOffers excellent service
Honeywell is the leadership for 245fa application
Honeywell.com
Boiling point of 245fa/CP blendBoiling point of 245fa/CP blend
• 245fa/CP is an Azeotrope-like Blend
Blowing agent (wt%)Boiling point at 745mmHg (°C)
245fa CP245fa CP
100 0 14.6
95~40 5~60 11.7±1
0 100 49
• The Boiling Point of Blend is Lower than 245fa and CP
Lower boiling point, better flowability* Honeywell Patent US 5,677,358
Honeywell.com
Thermal conductivity of 245fa/CP blown foam yRelative K-factor
7 days. Foam Density ~ 32kg/m3245fa/CP
1.15
1.20
r
Solo245fa blown
blend blown
1.05
1.10
ive
K-fa
ctor
0.95
1.00Rel
at
0.95100 90 75 50 40 30 25 20 10
0 25 50 60 75 90
% 245fa in blowing agent blend
% CP i bl i t bl d10 70 80
% CP in blowing agent blend
Better K-factor as 245fa Levels Increase* Honeywell Patent US 5,677,358
Honeywell.com
Dimensional stability of 245fa/CP co-blown foamDimensional stability of 245fa/CP co blown foam
Dimensional stability, -20°C after 22 days. Foam Density ~ 2.0lb/ft3 (32kg/m3)
0 6
0.8
1
e, %
0.2
0.4
0.6
ume
Cha
nge
‐0.2
0
100 50 30 25 20 10
Volu
100 50 30 25 20 10
0 50 70 75 80 90
% 245fa in blowing agent blend
% CP in blowing agent blend
Better Dimension Stability as 245fa Portion Increases* Honeywell Patent US 5,677,358
Honeywell.com
245fa in Spray Applications245fa in Spray Applications
• Major challenges in 141b phase-out• Cost sensitive segment (Construction)
• HC and HFC 365mfc will not be an option due to safety concerns
• Water: poor thermal insulation and adhesion
• Blowing agent comparison:
--++++Foam cell
+
365mfc
-++++insulation
245fa HCFC-141b Water
++-++-price
-++++adhesion
++-+++handling
-++ ++ ++Flammable
++ ++-++ODP
Honeywell.com
Spray system developmentSpray system development
Wall system Roof system
Test Item Unit Standard Requirement 245fa foam Requirement 245fa foam
Density kg/m3 GB/T 6343 ≥35.0 37.0 ≥55.0 55.5
Thermal conductivity W/m·k GB 3399 ≤0.024 0.0208 ≤0.024 0.022
Compressive strength kPa GB/T 8813 ≥150 240 ≥300 340
Dimensional stability（-30 ，48h） % GB/T 8811 ≤1 0.8 ≤1 ≤1
Flammability cm GB/T 8624 ≤15 12 ≤15 13y
Dimensional stability（70 ，48h）
% GB/T 8811 ≤5 3.7 ≤5 3.7
Closed cell content % GB/T 10799 ≥90 93 ≥90 95Closed cell content % GB/T 10799 ≥90 93 ≥90 95
Honeywell.com
HFC 245fa advantages in spray applicationHFC 245fa advantages in spray application
- Quicker rise
- Larger application window
- Lower operating temperature
- Less shrinkage - reversion
- Easily applies on cold surfaces
- Equivalent or better yield
- Drums used for 141b systems can be used forsystems with ~10% of 245fa
- Minimal 245fa loss during blendingC fi d b l l ti d i t ti- Confirmed by calculation and experimentation
Honeywell.com
245fa in Panel Applications245fa in Panel Applications
• Some continuous panel manufacturers switching to HC and water from 141b
• Almost all discontinuous panel manufacturers are using 141b
• Major challenges in 141b phase-out• Water: poor thermal insulation and adhesion
• HC: high capital investment; safety
•Blowing agent comparison: 245fa HCFC-141b 365mfc Cyclopentane
insulation ++ ++ + +flowability ++ ++ + +
Demouldability ++ + + +Demouldability ++ + + +Polyol compatibility ++ ++ + -
Foam cell ++ ++ - -Flammability ++ ++ - -
Handling + ++ - -Adhesion ++ + + -
Price - ++ - ++
++ best + average - worst
Honeywell.com
Panel applicationPanel application
HCFC-141b 245fa/HCFC-141b 245fa
A 100 100 100B 92 92 92
CT 22 17 27GT 67 66 73TFT 105 105 115TFT 105 105 115FRD 26.7 25.3 27.5
filling W 500 452 437 420 454CD 42.2 42.6 40.8 42.8 44.8
K factor 21.69 21.52 21.45K factor 21.69 21.52 21.45
Compressive strength 122 143 124 202 194161 186 164 244 290
30 min 10.5 9.9 3.1333min 12.1 11.76 4.51
Demoudability NANA
36min 12.43 11.57 4.4639min 12.16 11.25 4.3242min 11.95 10.96 4.18
Dimensional stability
-30 ℃ -0.90% -1.11% -1.47% -1.17%70 ℃ 1 39% 1 30% 1 63% 0 17%stability 70 ℃ 1.39% 1.30% 1.63% 0.17%
Honeywell.com
Transitioning from Blowing Agent 141bg g g
PerformanceCost-effective
• May not meet emerging t d d d
Current: Transition to: Assessment Future Impact
Cyclo-pentane
Cost-effectiveEnvironment
Safety
energy standards and may require a 2nd transition to 245fa or Solstice LBAToday
141b
PerformanceCost-effectiveEnvironment245fa &
Blends
• Solution available today• Will meet energy efficiency
standardsToday
Safety
P f
Blends• Can transition to Solstice
LBA in future to meet GWP standards
• Most energy efficient
2013+
PerformanceCost-effectiveEnvironment
Safety
Solstice LBA& Blends
• Most energy efficient blowing agent with very low GWP (7) puts you in the best position now and in the future
245fa and LBA & Blends: Low Capital and Cost Transitions
the future
Honeywell.com
Transitioning from Cyclopentaneg y p
Performance
Current: Transition to:
• While better positioned to
AssessmentFuture Impact
245fa &
Blends
Cost-effectiveEnvironment
Safety
• While better positioned to meet new energy standards, GWP may be an issue down the roadToday
Cyclo-pentanep
Performance • Most energy efficient 2013+
Solstice LBA & Blends
Cost-effectiveEnvironment
Safety
blowing agent with very low GWP (7) puts you in the best position now and in the future
245fa and LBA & Blends Offer Better Solutions Than Cyclopentane
Honeywell.com
www.honeywell.com
"Although all statements and information contained herein are believed to be accurate and reliable, they are presented without guarantee or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied. Information provided herein does not relieve the user from the responsibility of carrying out its own tests and experiments, and the user assumes all risks and liability for use of the information and results obtained. Statements or suggestions concerning the use of materials and processes are made without representationor warranty that any such use is free of patent infringement and are not recommendations to infringe on any patents. The usershould not assume that all toxicity data and safety measures are indicated herein or that other measures may not be required.”
