Engineering Vol 69 1900-01-19

  • Upload
    iannew

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/23/2019 Engineering Vol 69 1900-01-19

    1/36

    JAN. I 9 I 900.]

    THE

    WATERVl

    \ Y ~

    OF

    RU

    IA.

    By C.

    H.

    MoBERLY M. In st. C.

    E.,

    M. I. Mech. E.

    (Continued from

    1:ol

    . lxviii., page 620.)

    The

    Wat

    en vmts

    of

    Finland are very extensive, as

    the whole countl.y is covered with lakes, and steam

    navigation and trade are very a?tive. But

    it

    will

    be sufficient here to deal only with the one great

    canal route in the country, the Saima Canal from

    the Saima Lake the Gulf of Finland. The Lak

    e

    Saima is of very irregular form, and has extensive

    ramifications, and is stuJded with islands ; its area

    is aiven

    as

    17 ,600 square miles.

    I t

    discharges

    it

    s

    waters into the Ladoga. Lake by the River Vok a or

    y ouoksa which form the famou cataracts or

    Fall

    of

    Imatra. I ts importance as a water

    hiahway was recognised by the Swedes, to whom

    F ~ l a n d

    then belonged, in the 16th century,

    when they commenced a canal from miles to

    the east of Willmanstrand, towards Viborg; but

    the work

    wa

    s not persevered with. The remains

    of this work are still visible. Early in

    the 17

    th

    century they again

    started

    along

    another

    line ;

    but

    the work proved so formidable

    on

    account of

    the

    hard rocky ground, that they again abandoned it.

    At last, in 1840, when

    Finland

    wa s already in

    the

    hands of Russia, the

    matter

    was taken

    up

    again

    and

    a new scheme was worked out. Operations com

    menced in 1846, and

    the

    canal wa s finished at a cost

    of 3,000,000 roubles, and opened

    in

    1857.

    It

    runs

    from Willmanstrand on

    the

    Saima Lake

    to

    V i b o r ~

    on the Gulf of F inland, a distance of 36 miles.

    There are fifteen sets of l

    oc

    ks, of which five

    are

    in

    three steps and three

    in

    two steps, so that

    the

    total

    number of separate locks or chambers is twenty

    eiaht. The chambers are constructed to take

    v:Ssels called Ladya, 105 ft. long and 23 ft.

    br

    oad,

    carrying 250 tons on a draught of water of 5

    ft

    . 6 in.

    The Saima Lake is 256ft. above the Gulf of Finland.

    The number of such vessels passing th rough the

    canal is about 3500 annually. About 25 years ago

    the northern end of the lake was connected with

    Pieliss by a canal and the River

    Pi

    eliss, on which

    locks are constructed.

    The principal produce conveyed by the Saima

    Lake and through the Saima Canal, to Viborg for

    export consists of deals and timber in various

    forms from Kuopio,

    Y

    ouentso, and other places on

    the Saima Lake. I t amounts to about 250,000 tons

    a year.

    The total length of natural and artificial water

    wa

    ys in European

    Ru

    ssia is e

    st

    imated

    at

    53,000

    miles.

    Of

    this total 4000 miles represents the

    artificial routes,

    namely-

    canal and rivers, portions

    of which have been rendered navigable artificially;

    whilst the length of canals and canalised portions of

    rivers, i.e., those portions which have actually been

    rendered navigable artificially-is 1300 miles.

    E

    . G I N E E R I N G.

    difficulties to navigation . But

    in

    spite of these

    fa\ourable conditions, very little has as yet been

    accomplished, and most of the rivers remain

    in their

    na tural condition . The Mariinski Canal route is the

    only one which has been fairly developed. Good

    permanent work has also been done in a few por

    t ions of a good many rivers; but very little effect

    has been produced on the efficiency of the waterways

    as a whole. Expense is one of the great difficulties ;

    but a great deal of money has been and is being

    expended on railways, and

    it

    is a question, in the

    writer's opinion, whether

    it

    would not be bet ter

    for the development of the country to do more for

    the waterways and less in the way of rail way ex

    ten sion for a time.

    Mr. Horsehelman gives an in teresting Table of

    comparison between the waterways of different

    Eu ropean countries, from which the following is

    taken:

    Count

    ry.

    Length Ooo.

    ds

    Mean Annual

    of Water-

    I ca

    rn

    e

    1

    1 Length of

    Traffic

    in

    waus

    I nua y, Trip.

    Ton-Miles.

    I m Tons .

    miles.

    Imillions. ,

    < ~ s i a . . . . . I fi3 ,000 32

    Fr

    an

    ce . . . . . .

    8,000 23 I

    Ger many . . . . 6,250

    Aust

    ria-Hungary . .

    3,760

    2

    B e l ~ i u m

    . . . .

    1,380

    En

    g land .. . . . . 2,e60 36

    m lea.

    670

    85

    220

    38

    millions.

    21,500

    2 COO

    3,0l0

    3'6

    1,360

    73

    2

    draught, and by smaller-decked vessels w.ith a keel,

    carryino 32 to 65 tons of cargo on 3 It 6 In. to 4

    ft.

    draugh t.

    Sti

    ll smaller craft

    are

    us

    ed

    to take

    goods to coasting vessels during

    s u m ~ e r l o ~ w a t e r ~

    The traffic during eleven years endmg w1th 1 8 ~ ~

    was, on an average, 64,500 tons annuallr, .but m

    1892

    it

    was only 43,000 tons, and was

    d e c l i n ~ g .

    The Terek flows from the Kazbeck Mountam as a.

    torrent till

    it

    emerges on the plain of Vladikavkas

    at a height of 2370 ft. above the s e ~

    It.

    the?

    flows rapid ly down to the sandy pla1n 1n wh1ch It

    continues its winding, changing course to the

    ~ w

    of Kisliar, and falls into the Caspian Sea 70

    m 1 ~ e s

    beyond

    by

    numerous branches

    through

    a Wlde

    delta, which begins just below

    K i s l ~ a r : n

    the .last

    100 miles of its course above KIShar, the

    nver

    flows through a sandy

    ~ n d

    marshy plain, which it

    frequently inundates very extensively. pre

    serve its course training walls have been built for

    many miles on both banks aboYe Kisliar. The

    flow of

    the

    river just above this town is n?rmall.Y

    18,900 cu hie f eet per se?ond..

    T h ~

    delta

    I t s ~ l f

    very fertile,

    but

    very httle mhab1ted. K1shar IS

    the

    port

    from which considerable s

    hipments of

    Caucasian wine are made to

    Astrakhan

    and other

    places.

    The

    navigation of the river is, otherwise,

    wholly undeveloped.

    The

    R i1:er K ottra riees

    in

    a boggy depression of

    the

    mountains between the towns

    of Kars and

    Ardagan on

    the

    southern slQpe of

    the

    Caucasus ;

    The returns on which

    the

    se r e ~ u l t s

    are

    based are it is 770 miles lo

    ng and

    flows in to

    the

    Caspian Sea

    probably not very reliable;

    but

    no correction that by two principal branches ; the

    left

    one r

    et

    ains

    the

    may be necessary for accuracy can al

    ter

    the

    fact name of Koura,

    and

    the

    right

    one

    is

    ca

    lled

    that

    in

    total length of waterways, mean length of Akousha, splits

    in t

    o many branches, and falls

    into

    trips, and annual traffic

    in

    ton-miles, Russia ex- the bay of Kisil-Agatch. The delta

    thus

    formed

    ceeds all the ot

    her

    countr ies

    put

    together. There is about 30 miles long, of very irregular shape

    can be no

    doubt

    about th e vast importance to and very broad.

    The

    left branch is iihe principal

    Ru

    ssia of her waterways. one,

    and

    is 1225 ft. broad ; the

    right

    branch is

    We now come to the

    Th

    i1d Gro

    ?t

    p the

    R i e s of 740 ft. broad at the beginning of the delta.

    the

    Oa ltcasus, an d

    the C

    r s

    pian Sea. Enormous quantities of deposit

    are

    brought down

    The

    Omtcwms

    is a range of very lofty mountains, by the river, causing the delta to advance

    very

    about 750 miles long, extending from the Taman much into the sea . AB far as Tifiis-285 miles from

    peninsula- between the Black Sea and th e Sea of the source, and about 2000 ft. above the

    Caspian

    Asov at its north-west

    extr

    emity, to the Apsheron the current is exceedingly strong (the fall for some

    peninsula at Bakou on the Caspian Sea at its south- distance above Tiflis being over 13ft. per mile),

    east end. About 200 miles of the central portion and nothing but timber can be floated down. The

    is covered with perpetual snow, yialdiRg a continual mean fall from Tifiis to the sea is 4 ft. 4-f in.

    per

    supply of water for the rivers. The northern slope mile. For 285 miles below Tiflis, to a place called

    descends Yery steeply to the great plains of south- Zardob, there is no traffic whatever, on account of

    east H.ussia, and the southern slope descends less the number of snags, stony cills, and fishery weirs.

    steeply to the plains of Mingrelia, with one branch Only from Zardob to the mouth-200 miles- is

    ju

    tting out

    to

    the

    s

    outh

    towards

    Erivan and Kars.

    navigation carried

    on unin

    te

    rruptedly,

    and

    all

    the

    In consequence of this formation the rivers all year round. The vessels used are 21 ft. to

    49ft.

    begin as mountain torrents and rapidly change to long, and 5 ft. to 9ft. broad, carrying 8 to 40 tons

    streams with a very moderate and often sluggish on a draught which must n

    ot

    exceed 4 ft. There is

    current, winding their way through sandy plains, no steam naviga tion.

    whose navigation is much obstructed by sandbanks,

    The

    Rion is a short river, but the largest which

    shallows, and snags. The quantity of water brought falls in to t he Black Sea on

    the

    southern slope of

    down by

    the

    ri\ers is very great on

    the

    whole, but the Caucasas. I t rises in the snow

    mountain

    s

    varies very much and

    very

    rapidly in accordance between Elbruz and Kazbeck and enters

    the

    Black

    with the

    rainfall in the mountains, because

    the

    Sea

    at

    Poti. I t tumbles down

    very

    rapidly t o the

    mountains

    are

    generally

    barren and

    do not store

    town

    of Koutais

    throu

    gh narrow defiles. At that

    much water.

    Hence

    floods

    and

    scarcity of

    water

    point-66 miles from its

    mouth-it

    emerges

    into

    a

    lternate

    very often. Most of the rivers

    are

    short, the open plain of lower Mingrelia,

    and

    from there

    and

    some of them on the

    northern

    slope are lost

    in to

    its mouth it is navigable

    by

    small craft. At

    the sandy plain

    and

    do not reach

    any

    other

    ri

    ver

    Koutais its

    greatest width is 210

    ft., and

    smallest

    or

    the sea. 126 ft. ; t

    he

    mean surface Yelocity there

    is

    7 ft.

    From what has been said in these articles,

    it

    is very clear that the prese

    nt

    condition of the

    waterways of Russia is

    not satisfactory. After

    the initiation of various works

    by Peter the

    Great,

    and the impetus given

    by

    his ene rgy,

    there

    was

    not sufficient force to keep t hings going,

    and after

    a time everything was neglected.

    In

    this century

    the question of water communications was again

    taken up,

    and

    considered

    in

    a half-hearted way,

    from time to time. But nothing was done syste

    matically till the Ministry of Ways of Communi

    cat.ion decided

    to

    undertake a study of

    the

    water

    ways in 1875. Up

    to

    that time there were no

    proper surveys of

    the river

    s

    and

    waterways in

    existence. These were

    then

    undertaken , and in

    formation was thus gradually acquired

    to

    guide

    the Government engineers

    in

    dealing with this

    important question.

    Th

    e effect of this was that

    the Administration gradua1ly awakened to the

    importance of the problems to be dealt with, and

    systematic work was at l

    ast

    commenced from 1880

    to 1885.

    I t

    was thought, when railways were first

    started, that they would supersede waterways; for

    some years past now this has been recognised as a

    great mistake. Both means of communication are

    wanted in order to develop the resources of the

    country and meet the requirements of

    tr

    ade- they

    mutually assist each other's development. Mr.

    Horschelman says nearly all the large Russian

    rivers lend themselves admirably to t he formation

    of an extensive network of waterways by connect

    ing their upper parts with canals. Often the sources

    of the rivers

    are

    separated

    by

    inconsiderable eleva

    tions of small extent. Most of t he large rivers have

    not much fall and a considerable body of water,

    conditions particularly favourable for navigation

    against stream. Very few rivers present any great

    As waterways these rivers are very unimpor tant.

    per

    second,

    and

    at high water-when

    the water

    Only four will be mentioned

    here-the Kouban

    rises 10 ft.

    to

    14f

    t.,

    it is 13 ft. per second.

    In

    and Terek on the n

    orthern

    slope,

    and the Koura

    the last 30 miles it flows

    in

    a very winding course

    and Rion on the southern slope; and of these a between low,

    but

    steep, banks,

    through

    a splendid

    very brief notice will suffice. forest, the trees of which constantly fall

    into the river

    The

    K 1tbatn

    flows from several of

    the

    glaciers of and greatly obstruct the navigation. The current

    Elbru

    z and has a

    num

    ber of tributaries on the

    her

    e varies from 1ft.

    to 12ft .

    per

    se

    cond. The

    river

    left side- all more or less mountain torrents. I t is enters the Black Sea

    in

    two branches, the northern

    550 miles long a

    nd

    flows

    by

    num erous branches one takes one- third of the wholestream,

    and

    is 490ft.

    through its delta into the Sea of Asov at Temriouk, to 630ft. broad,

    and

    8ft. to 20ft. deep .

    It

    is the

    one

    at the base of the Taman peninsula.

    Th

    is penin- principally used, and the new port of Poti, with a

    sula, with its numerous lakes

    and stre

    amlets, is the depth of water of 20 ft. to 25 ft.,

    has been

    con

    delta of the Kouban. One branch, called the structed at its mouth. Two-thirds of the stream

    Pr

    otock. goes off on the left side to the Black Sea. tlows

    by

    the so

    uthern

    branch, on which is the old

    The river is navigable by small steamers for 150 Turkish fortress

    and

    the t own of

    Poti.

    The river

    miles to the town of Ekaterinodar, 56 ft. above the brings down an enormous

    quantity

    of deposit,

    sea. At t he normal height of the river the volume which continua

    lly

    extends the bar and the whol&

    flowing past Ekaterinodar is 18,700 cubic feet

    per

    delta seawards. In the last 30 miles or more

    it

    is

    second. Above the River Protock this falls to fully navigable by small steamers, and a good

    16,300 cubic

    fe

    et . After the Protock has left it, many of these run there, with 3ft . to 4ft . draught

    the flow is 8200 cub:c feet per second, whilst t he of water. The ordinary craft used for carrying

    Protock carries off 7900 cubic feet per second, goods as far as Koutais are small, flat-bottomed

    which dwindles down to 2700 cubic feet at its mouth boats, carrying 6 to 10 tons of cargo on 2 ft. to

    showing how the watet gets absorbed by the

    n u m e ~

    2 ft. draught of water.

    rous small branches and lakes which are here formed. Th e

    Ca sp

    ian

    Sea.

    'Vith the exception of its

    Theriver is navigated by flat-bottomed decked vessels southernmost end, which is in Persia, it is sur-

    70 ft: to 105 ft. long by 12 ft. to 16 ft. broad, rounded by Russia, and

    it

    may,

    the

    refore, fairly

    carrymg 80 to 160 tons on 5 ft. 10 in. to 7 ft. be considered a Russian inland sea. This short.

  • 7/23/2019 Engineering Vol 69 1900-01-19

    2/36

    74

    E N G I N E E R I N G.

    [J

    AN.

    I

    9,

    I900.

    NEW

    PROMENADE

    NORTH

    SHORE BLACKPOOL.

    1IR. .J.

    \VOLSTENHOLME, BOROUGH

    ENGINEER.

    .

    :7.

    Fio

    8.

    - . . t

    .... ' -

    .

    :

    . :- -

    -s-; . . 't

    ( Z O, .

    STRETCHERS .

    FAC/Nv

    BLOC I< S

    ' c

    ..

    .....

    -- - ---

    .a.

    .

    ---

    - - - -

    P R O M C N A O C

    1

    R 1

    - - L O W ~ ?

    :

    PROMNAOE

    ~

    o --

    6

    ouclec

    Pp

    .---

    ------

    ----

    s

    -

    H

    1,..

    1.

    f

    I

    -----

    -- --

    ---

    /

    _

    S

    E

    A

    Fig.4 .

    FT/00

    _JiL

    FifJ.5 .

    -

    L-

    SIJO

    /OOOFUT.

    -

    QUEENS

    DRIVE

    - -*

    -1

    0

    : __

    .C

    ------- ___

    _

    '

    I

    I

    - k

    I 0

    -

    ------------------- -

    ------

    --- i

    1

    z:p;pioufiif

    9

    SECTION ON

    LINE

    A.A .

    EU\'ATION

    OFSU WALL

    SHEWIHC STEPS.

    r

    f . S I ~ D I

    notice is derived mainly from a report by Mr . V.

    E. Timonov in 1895

    on the

    format ion of

    an

    im

    proved channel for the mouth of the Volga.

    The

    Caspian

    Sea extends about

    700 miles

    fr

    om

    north to south, and has an average breadth of over

    200 miles;

    its

    area is160,000 square miles. The water

    level is continually varying,

    but there

    a

    re no data

    as

    yet

    to determine whether it is gradually falling,

    as

    is common

    ly

    supposed, or not.

    The mean

    s

    ur

    face level is 85 ft. below that of

    the

    Black Sea. It

    receives the following rivers : Emba Oural, Volga,

    Kouma Terek Koura Sefid

    Rood

    and Attrek

    besides

    sundry

    smaller ones ;

    and

    has no outlet.

    I t consists of

    two parts

    the characteristics of which

    are

    very different ; o

    ne to the

    south of a line drawn

    from Chechen

    Island at the

    mouth of

    the Terek

    to

    Toub-Karaga.n point on

    the

    opposite eastern

    shore,

    and the other to the north

    of

    this

    line (see

    the general map of Russia).* Along

    the

    line of

    separation

    the depth

    does not exceed 78 ft. any

    where,

    an

    d increases southwards till, at 50 miles'

    distance, it has attained 600

    ft.

    while north

    wards

    it

    continues fairly uniform for some distance

    and then

    diminishes more or less rapidly.

    The southern part has all the characte

    rist

    ics of a

    sea,

    and the

    water is clear, and contains from 0.01

    to 0.014 parts of salt. The greater part of the

    west

    side is bounded by

    the

    Caucasus Mountains,

    the

    south

    side

    by the Persian

    Mountains

    and the

    east

    side partly by low ground and opposite Bakou by

    the Kouba Da.g

    range of hills.

    I t

    consists of

    two basins, separated by a ridge on the bottom,

    connecting

    the

    spur of

    the

    Caucasus

    at the

    Apsheron peninsula, near Bakou, with a

    spur

    of the

    Kouba

    Dag, near Krasnovodsk, on

    the

    east side. The depth on this ridge does not exceed

    650 ft. anywhere.

    The

    greatest depth in

    the

    northern

    basin

    is 2950 ft.

    nearly

    due east of the

    town of

    Derbent

    ;

    and the

    greatest depth in

    the

    southern

    basin

    is 3610 ft.

    nearly

    east of t he

    town

    of Lenkoran.

    The

    northern part-

    north

    of

    the

    line Checken-Toub-Karagan-is

    mo

    re

    like a

    hu

    ge

    estuary

    than

    a. sea. I t receives the rivers Terek

    Kouma., Volga, Oural,

    and

    Emba whose deltas are

    so extensive that they nearly join, and which bring

    down

    an

    enormous amount of deposit which is

    gradually silting up this part of

    the

    Caspian. Corn-

    * ee G I N E E R I ~ G

    Jannary

    13th, 1899, page 38.

    paring the present depths

    with

    those of sixty years

    ago, it appears that

    the rate

    of silting up is 3 in. to

    9 in. a year. The depth in the north-east corner

    eastwards from midway

    be

    tween

    the mouths

    of

    the

    Volga and Oural, does not exceed 36

    ft.

    and the

    depth in

    th

    e remaining part for about 100 miles

    from t

    he

    months of

    the

    Volga, does

    not

    ex

    ceed 40 ft. The whole of

    the

    northern part of

    the Ca

    spian is surrounded by low ground , steppes

    and salt marshes. Towards

    the

    Sea of Asov, the

    ground rises a little more, and

    the

    lowest point on

    the rising ground

    between

    the two seas is in the

    valley of

    the

    RiYer Manitch, 118 ft . above the

    Caspian, and 33 ft. above the Black Sea.. The idea

    of forming water communication along this line,

    from the Cas

    pian

    to the Don or Sea of Asov, has

    frequently been entertained ; but though there

    are

    no difficulties

    in the

    way of carrying

    out

    such

    a scheme, the expense has been considered pro

    hibitive.

    The

    water is generally fre h for some 12

    to 13 miles from

    the

    mouths of

    the

    Volga ; then it

    generally becomes brackish, till it contains, gene

    rally, 0.0075

    parts

    of

    salt;

    it

    is alwa

    ys more or

    less muddy- never clear. A

    great

    pa1 t of it

    freezes over early in December, a

    nd

    opens about

    the

    middle of l\1:arch. There are many shoals and

    sandbanks all round this northern part especia11y

    off

    the

    mouths of

    the

    river

    s ;

    and there

    are

    no har

    bours. The anchorage

    is

    good everywhere,

    and

    vessels

    have always to anchor a long way from shore.

    But

    as

    the

    shore

    is everywhere very shallow, and the

    water level varies very much with

    the

    wind, con

    stant

    watchfulness is necessa

    ry

    when a vessel is

    at

    anchor, lest she should be left stranded by the

    falling water. This applies

    to

    all rivers. Th

    ere

    is

    deeper water and safe anchorage, where vessels can

    take

    refuge,

    und

    er shelter of the island of K oulali,

    or of

    the

    Toub-Ka.ragan point or of

    the

    island of

    Chechen.

    The prevailing winds are N. \V. and S. E. ; they

    are

    apt

    to be strong, and

    set up

    a boisterous sea

    on the southern part. There are a good many

    steamers running

    on

    the

    Caspian.

    The

    principal

    route is from Astrakhan to Petrovsk, Derbent

    Bakou, Lenkoran Enseli (for Resht), 1\:Ieshedesser,

    and A

    st

    rabad, the last three towns being in P ersia.

    Petrov

    sk is the ttlrminus of the railway from

    Rostov and Yladikavkas; and Bakou is the

    terminus of the railway from

    Poti

    and Tiflis.

    Steamers

    also run from Astrakhan to Gouriev, at

    th

    e mouth of the Oural,

    and

    to

    Fort

    Alexa.ndrovsk,

    near Toub-Ka.ra.gan; also from Petrovsk to F ort

    Alexandrovsk

    and

    Gouriev ; also from Bakou to

    Krasnovodsk

    and

    Ouzoun-Ada, termini of the

    Sa.markand Railway ; also from A.stra.bad to

    Chikishliar,

    at the

    mouth of

    th

    e

    Attrek

    and on to

    Krasnovodsk. A considerable portion of the trade

    is also carrie d on

    by

    small sailing

    Yesse

    ls. Most of

    the vessels on the Caspian have draughts of water

    not

    exceeding 9 ft., as

    there

    is

    not

    more than

    9

    ft.

    depth in any of the harbours. But there are a few

    steamers with greater draught up to

    14ft.

    ; these

    mu

    st load or unload, mainly, in the roadsteads.

    The Vo1ga forms t he main channel for the trade

    of the Caspian with Bokhara., KhiYa. and Persia,

    as well as with

    the

    greater part of

    the

    Caucasus ;

    the trade

    of Ast

    rakhan

    will, therefore, represent

    the greater part of

    the

    trade of t he Caspian. The

    last return to hand is for 1890, as follo

    ws

    :

    From A strcthhan into the Caspi(m .

    2211 steamers carried . .. 1,137,345 tons

    2301

    sailing vessels

    carried

    638,288 ,

    Total...

    4512

    ves els carried

    . . 1,775,633 ,

    A 1rivd

    in

    A st

    rakh

    an fro

    m

    the

    p i a n

    2201

    steamers carrying...

    1,137,138

    tons

    2257 sailing vessels

    carry-

    ing

    . .. .. . 632,384 ,

    Total...

    4458 ve

    els carrying

    ...

    1,769,522 ,

    The export of

    petr

    oleum and i

    ts

    products goes

    by Astrakhan and up th e Vo1ga, as well as over the

    Caucasus to Ba.toum by rail.

    T

    o lJc

    n u c d

    HORE M P R O V ~

    AT

    BLACKPOOL.

    ANYONE

    who has been at Blackpool during

    the

    la

    st

    five-and-twenty years will remember

    that at

    the north e

    nd

    is Claremont Park

    a

    district en

    closed

    within

    gates

    and

    fences,

    through

    which

    nothing

    that

    wa s objectionable ha ever been

    allowed to intrude.

    The

    dis

    trict

    was, we under

    3ta

    nd , owned privately, and was not under the juris

    diction of

    the

    Blackpool Corporation to

    the

    same

    extent as are

    the

    other streets and roads.

    Along

    with

    the

    privileges which

    re

    sulted from this state of

  • 7/23/2019 Engineering Vol 69 1900-01-19

    3/36

    there was always the responsibility of main

    the

    foreshore, which

    h e ~ e

    c o n s i ~ t s of a soft

    liff, \'ery little capable of w1thstand1ng

    the

    on

    laught

    s of

    the sea..

    As e Y e r y ~ n e kuows,

    the

    ~ a v e

    Blackpool are very much u earnest at times,

    course of

    years

    they carrted

    w ~ y

    ~ r g e por

    of the foreshore. The respons1b1hty. of r e

    these

    attacks appears to

    have been

    1n the

    s of a

    number of

    individuals, each of whom

    u\d

    his own length cf cliff to attend to, with the

    E N G I N E E R I N G.

    special

    trains

    in t

    o the town in a

    day, in

    addition

    to

    the

    ordinary

    service.

    1 hese

    figures reveal t ~ e

    characteristics of the place, and show that 1ts

    success has

    been

    aained

    by studying

    the tastes

    of

    it

    s visitors. T h ~ private inhabitants are full

    of

    enterprise,

    and a r ~

    a? ly

    seconded

    by the

    Council who ta.ke lar () e v1ews as to the future

    of

    the town and as

    0

    to the

    sec urity it

    offers

    for

    the w i s ~ expendit

    ur

    e of . o n ~ y in a.dding

    to i t ~

    attractione.

    In

    connect10n w1th the

    works

    FIG

    2. VIEW BEFOltE

    o ~ t ~ I E N E M E N T Ol" W o

    RK

    S ALONG U l,PER PROMENADE FROM

    \VARLEY-RAD, LOOKING

    NORTH.

    Fw

    3.

    VIEW

    BEFORE

    CoMMENCEMENT OF WoRKS, LOOKING SouTH FRortr THE GLYNN SLADE.

    that the sea could generally find a weak

    at w

    hi

    eh

    to make an inroad,

    a

    nd get be

    the better-contrived

    defences. Eventually

    ssity

    obliged that

    the

    old

    meth

    o

    ds should

    be

    eplaced

    by

    concurrent action founded

    as

    a com

    The Corporation of Blackpool

    the

    Park

    and obt3ine

    d an .Act of

    Parliament

    the

    constructi

    on of

    the

    nece

    s

    sary

    works. Ad

    s taken

    of the

    occasion

    to add

    further

    to

    this enterprising watering-place, and

    afford

    additional

    space

    f01 its visitors.

    Blackpool is a larg e

    town.

    In 1891

    it

    had a

    re

    si

    population of 43,000, and sleeping accommo

    250,000. In additio

    n,

    the places of amuse

    can

    accommodate 150

    ,000

    veople under s

    helter,

    the

    railways

    have been

    known

    to

    run

    11

    3

    we

    are considering, they

    have

    not

    been con

    tent merely

    to build

    a

    sea wall which

    sho

    uld

    secure

    the cliff, but have also availed themselves of the

    opportunity to construct

    a double

    promenade

    offer

    ing space for

    thousands

    to enjoy themse

    lves in a

    part

    of the town which

    is

    relatively

    quiet.

    Th

    e great

    bulk

    of the people

    who

    go

    to Blackp

    ool are

    quite

    fr ee

    from

    t

    he

    reproach of

    taking their

    pleasures sadly

    ;

    they come rather

    to

    work off their energy than to

    recup

    erate it. But there

    are,

    of course, l

    arge

    num

    bers who are

    not

    in this happy

    pos

    ition,

    and

    who

    find their

    delight

    in quiet

    enjoyment.

    Th e n or th

    shore has al

    ways

    been appreciated by such, and

    they will now

    find its

    attractions

    incre

    ased.

    The plan, Fig. 1, on page 74, shows the locu.lity of

    the

    new

    work

    ::; It takes in all

    north of

    Bailey s

    7

    :

    H

    ote

    l

    this

    is but a

    sm all portion of B l a c k ~ o o l

    which

    ~ x t e two miles to the

    south,

    and

    aspires

    extern

    a

    lly to overlap St. Anne s

    and

    Lytham

    on

    Ribhle es tuary. 'l'he for

    mer

    state of the sh

    ore

    JS

    shown by Figs. and 3, . annexed.. In

    the

    u p e ~

    view the sho

    re

    1s seen m the neig hb o

    urh

    ood o

    Warley-road, the obse rver Ioo

    king

    north.. In t h ~

    lower view

    there are dep1cted some

    ru m

    .ed

    de

    fe

    nc

    es of an

    earlier date

    ; the o b s e r v ~ r lS here

    lookino

    south

    fr

    om Glynn Slade, wlu

    ch

    IS

    marked

    on t h : extreme

    left

    of Fi g. 1, where the shore

    suddenly curve

    s.

    The

    present

    appearance

    of

    the

    shore can be lea rned from the section, Fig. 4, on

    the

    opposi

    te page,

    and the

    four views

    o l

    p a ~ e

    90.

    The Queen 's

    Drive

    (Fig. 4)

    has

    been ID

    existence

    many year

    s,

    and

    is a

    prolon

    gat

    ion of th

    e

    B l a ~ k -

    pool

    Promenade.

    I t

    stood

    at the top of _the diff

    which was

    of the irregular contour

    shown m d otted

    lines,

    and is now the

    upp

    ermos t of t h ~ e e roa:ds,

    of

    which

    the lower is a

    footpath

    15

    ft.

    w1de (F1g.

    12

    ,

    page 90), and the middle a

    m a ~ n i f i c e n t promenade

    havin Y

    a

    carriage way 5

    ft . w1de, and a

    footpath

    10

    f t ~ wide

    (Fig.

    11).

    Between

    the promen.ade

    and

    the Q

    ueen

    's

    Driv

    e is a

    grass

    s

    lope

    26ft. w1de.

    A large amount of earth filling has

    been

    necessary

    to create the new

    promen

    ades, and as this ap

    proaches more

    nearly

    to the

    sea

    than did the old

    cliff

    it has had to

    be s

    trongly protected. The toe

    of the slope h

    as been

    fi lled

    with puddled

    clay,

    covered with granite

    pi t

    ching laid at an . angle of

    2

    to

    1

    This is

    covered

    with water

    at

    h1gh-wate1,

    spring tides. Behind

    the

    pitching

    is

    a sea wall of

    cement

    concrete, carried down to the

    beach

    level,

    ~ : m d capped

    with

    moulded cement blocks. . S o ~ e of

    the

    blocks

    u

    se

    d in this wall

    are

    shown 1n F1gs. 7

    and 8, page 74. The thickness of the wall at the

    bott om s 7 ft. 6

    in.,

    and

    it

    s

    height

    26

    ft.

    Above the

    lower

    promenade

    comes a s.eco

    nd

    pi tc

    hed o p ~ ,

    over

    which

    the

    spraybreaks

    at t1mes. The toe of

    h ~ s

    slope

    is formed of moulded

    concret

    e blocks of large size,

    and

    at

    its upper

    end is a r ow of 6-in. la rch piles 5

    ft.

    apart, to preserve

    the

    angle between

    the

    slope and

    the footpath (Fig. 11). At se

    veral points

    there

    are

    fliah ts of steps (F igs. 5 and 6) giving a

    ccess to the

    b e ~ c h fr om the lower

    promenade (Fig.

    '9) . The

    extreme north en

    d

    of

    the

    new work

    s

    bend

    s

    inwards

    (Figs. 1 and 10), and here is a sl

    ade. Beyond are

    the

    clay cliffs which arc a feature of this coast

    The amount of earth req uired for filling

    up

    was

    245,000

    cubic

    yards, and

    was

    obtained within

    a

    mile of the works.

    Further,

    27,000

    cubic

    yards of

    cement concrete, and 25,000 tons of granite

    and

    Yorkshire sto

    ne were used in the construction.

    Th

    e works we re commenced in August, 1895, and

    were completed last

    year

    at a cost of 125,

    OOOl

    The whole

    work

    has been designed and superin

    tended by

    l\1r. J. Wols tenholme, C. E., the bo

    rough

    engine er, and has been ably carried

    out

    by Mr. A.

    Williaru

    son, A. M. In

    st . C. E ., as re

    si

    dent engineer,

    to whom we are in deb ted for the originals of our

    illustrations.

    Mr.

    R.

    Finnegan, of

    N orchampton,

    was the

    contractor, and

    was

    represented by Mr. F. J.

    Keyte. The work

    has been

    full

    of

    difficulties,

    but

    ,these

    have

    been successfully met, and a very impor

    tant addition

    n

    as been

    made to the

    attractions of

    the

    most

    popular

    wd.tering place on the north -west coast.

    THE STANDARDISATION OF SCREW

    THRE

    ..c

    \DS.

    N EAltLY sixty years

    ago,

    when \Vhitworth firs t

    commenced

    the elabora

    tion of

    a standard

    screw

    t

    hr

    ead, the

    importance

    of such a movement was

    promptly recognised

    in th is

    country,

    and

    the system

    gradually improved

    until 1861, by which time it

    was

    widely adopted. Then,

    and

    probably

    until

    quite recently,

    no

    doubt could

    exist

    in

    the mind

    of the average British en gineering manufacturer

    as

    t o the

    superiority of

    the

    Whitworth system above

    all

    others that could be devised, or tha t it could fail

    to

    become the universal

    standard. That

    its

    impor

    tance

    was widely recognised within a few years

    of

    its

    introduction, was

    s

    hown by the fact

    of its

    general

    adoption

    in

    Germany,

    and

    that to some

    extent it

    held

    its

    own in

    the United

    States against the Sellers

    t hr

    ead introduced

    a few

    year

    s later.

    In

    1850 this

    country

    h

    eld

    a

    practical

    mo

    nopoly

    in

    the export

    of

    machinery,

    so that

    the

    adoption of

    a standard

    thread for that portion of its trade, was a

    matt

    er

    of convenience

    and n

    ot of

    n

    ecessity

    ;

    it

    is

    worth

    noting, however, t hat

    some manufacturers

    in

    the

    early days preferred us

    ing

    their own

    threads

    both

    for

    home and foreign orders, so that

    pur

    chasers might be more bound to them. Probably

    the

    same narrow-minded

    spirit

    is

    not

    yet extinct.

  • 7/23/2019 Engineering Vol 69 1900-01-19

    4/36

    Founded

    on the inch as a unit, the Vhitwor th

    st andard held its own against metrical innovations,

    by

    reason of the fact

    that

    we then

    enjoyed

    an over

    whelming

    st

    rength as engineers.

    Iu

    t he Uni ted

    States the , ellers thread found immediate favour,

    partly because, un t il

    very

    recently, there was no

    question of exporting machin ery.

    In Germany

    : : : > w i ~ z e r l a n d

    and to a

    les3

    extent in France, the

    Whttworth standard took firm hold, desp ite

    more

    or less futile effo

    rts

    to metrici

    se

    the

    in

    co

    nvenient

    unit.

    Th

    e last few years have, however, witnessed great

    changes.

    The

    metric

    syste

    m is recogni

    sed

    as

    that

    which mu

    st be

    universally ad

    opte

    d, sooner

    or

    later;

    we

    no

    longer hold the lead so securely

    that

    we can

    force f

    eet and

    inches on o

    ur

    foreign customers, a

    nd

    still

    less force the acceptance of o

    ur uni

    ts

    on

    ma

    nu

    facturing co

    un

    tries that only recognise the more

    convenient

    metre an

    d its subdivisions. I t is indeed

    clear now th

    at

    while Sir Joseph Vhitworth

    must

    always be regarded as

    the

    origin

    ator

    of a

    standard

    thread, and

    while

    any

    fu t

    ure

    syst em

    must

    be based

    on what he gave to the world, a

    uni-v

    ersal system

    if it is ever decided o

    n, must

    be whol1y met ric,

    a

    nd

    the manufa

    ctur

    ers of thid co

    untry,

    a

    nd

    for

    the matter of that, of the U nited

    States

    also, will

    be

    obliged

    to adopt it,

    unless

    they

    prefer to reta.in

    excellent standards, based

    on what

    may in

    tim

    e

    become

    an

    obsolete uni t of measurement.

    That consummation, howeve

    r,

    is for

    the futur

    e;

    the

    e

    ff

    orts

    commenced

    60

    yeard ago,

    and

    conti

    nued

    in

    termittently

    ever since,

    to

    establish a

    st a

    nda

    rd

    thread

    for universal adoption, have not been

    successful,

    and

    have indeed resulted in some con

    fusion. Of the advantages that would

    attend the

    existence of one

    ty

    pe of thread for every dimen

    sion of screw

    or

    bolt, there is no need to insist,

    t hough there do exist applications where uniformity

    is of li ttle importance, or even of positive detri

    me

    nt. Thu

    s a

    great

    railway company, being wholly

    se

    lf.contained, ruay manufa

    ctur

    e its own types with

    out inconvenience, and, in the case of railways that

    may possibly serve the hostile

    pu

    rp oses of an

    invasion, with pos itive advantage. Again, for

    military works, special th reads, wh

    et

    her

    for t he

    blocks of guns, for

    the

    co

    nn

    ections of mountings

    a

    nd

    so for th, possess evident advantages. But for

    the general manufacturer a

    nd

    purchaser all the

    wo

    rld

    over, ~ t 1 . n d a r d i of screw threads would

    possass enor mous usefulness. '

    Ve

    shall see

    later

    on, that for minute purposes, such as watch-makin g,

    the

    Thury

    system has been widely adopteJ; but

    for l arge work so much diversity of opinion exists,

    th 1t

    the

    que

    st

    ion is be

    set

    with infinite difficulty.

    On one po1nt alone is there a general (though

    not

    unanimous) concensus of opinion, that if a univer

    s ~ l sydtem should ever be adopted, it will be based

    on

    the

    metrical unit. I t will be long, however,

    before such a res

    ult

    is obtained.

    ln France

    a

    standard

    t

    hr

    ead is recognised, yet

    the

    re are about

    50

    different types still in use ; in

    th i

    s country, the

    Whitworth , a

    nd

    in t he

    Un

    ited States,

    the

    Sellers,

    threads, will long cont inue to he

    the

    rec

    og

    nised

    stan

    da

    rd

    s. n Germany it is probable that the

    Whitwort.h system will

    st

    ill remain largely in use,

    ~ n d

    be gradually replaced by a modification of the

    French lnda.rd ; while Switzerland will mo

    st

    likely

    adopt

    the

    l

    atter, after

    c e r t ~ i modification s to be

    discussed

    at

    t he

    next International

    Screw

    Th rea

    d

    Congress, have been formulated. Apparently for

    certain classes of fine work,

    the Thury

    thread, now

    widely adopted, will approximate most closely to

    a univers1.l standard for many years to come.

    The pr

    oposal for a general un ification of screw

    threads

    app

    ears to be due to the engineer Delisle,

    of C ~ r l s r u h e who in

    1873

    showed, at the Vienna

    E1hibition, a series of screws, taps, and dies

    a

    cco

    rding to his system. Messrs. Ducommun and

    Steinlen, of Mulhouse, who had been working in

    the

    m

    atter

    w

    ith

    Delisle, induced t he Munich i

    s-

    trict

    Society of Ge

    rm

    an ~ n g i n e e r s to take action,

    and

    in

    1

    874

    they sent

    out. no less

    than 2000

    cir

    culars to European managers, asking their views

    on

    the

    possibility

    and

    usefulness of substituting

    a me t rical, for t he

    Whitw

    or th, system.

    The re

    s

    ult

    of this firdt effort was

    not

    encouraging ; only

    365

    replies were received,

    and

    of these

    316

    were from

    makers

    using

    th

    e

    Whitw

    o

    rth

    thread,

    and

    who pro

    posed to retain it ;

    the

    remaining

    49

    employed

    their

    own modificat ions of the same system. In

    1877,

    the Carlsruhe Eogineer

    s

    Society brought the

    question before a general meeting of the Society

    of German Engine

    er

    s, who dismissed it

    rather

    abruptly ;

    but

    the following

    ye3:r

    t heir efforts. met

    with more s u c ~ e s s

    and

    a committee was appo

    mted

    E N G I N E E R I N G.

    to

    inquire

    in

    to it.

    This may

    be regarded as the

    commencement

    of the

    In

    ternational Screw 1.'hread

    Congress, which

    h ~ s

    conferr

    ed on

    several occasions.

    The

    l

    ast

    meeting of

    this

    body, held

    at Zu

    rich

    in

    1898,

    was of considerable importance, because it

    was enabled to recomm

    end

    for general adoption

    with certa in modifications,

    the

    Sa.uvage

    standard,

    that

    during

    the last few years has been

    lar

    gely

    adopted in

    Franc

    e. These modifications were

    carefully discussed

    at

    t

    he

    m

    ee t

    ing of the Co ngress

    referred

    to

    above,

    and

    conclusions were arrived at

    which will be s

    ubmitted

    to the

    third

    me

    et

    ing of

    the In te r

    na

    t ional Congress for Railway Unification,

    to be held at

    Berne

    shortly.

    One of the

    Italian repr

    esentatives

    at

    t he Zurich

    meeting above referred t

    o,

    was Signor A. Galassini,

    mem

    her

    of t he

    Turin

    Society of Engineers

    and

    Architects ; this gentleman has presented

    to

    his

    Society so complete and in teresting an accoun t of

    the

    proceedings of

    the

    Congress, a

    nd

    also of

    the

    histo ry of t he subject, that we have not hesitated

    to summ

    ar

    ise

    the

    information

    he

    has collected,

    supplementing it here a

    nd there

    by d

    ata

    from other

    sources. We regret that we are compelled to

    abridge Signor Gala.ssini's review.

    In relating

    the

    history of screw

    thread stand

    ards,

    the au thor of

    the

    repor t dwells at considerable

    len

    gt

    h on th e successful efforts of Jose

    ph

    Whit

    wor th, continued through

    20

    years, and he then

    tu rns to t he United States, where no standard had

    existed,

    al t

    hough t

    he Whitworth

    sys

    tem

    was in use

    by

    1864.

    It was on April

    3

    1,

    1864,

    that W i l l i ~ m

    Sellers read a paper before the

    Franklin

    Institute,

    pointing out the evil resul ts a

    ri

    sing from the

    absence of a recognised system,

    ur

    ging defects in

    the \Vhitworth standard, and recommending a plan

    of his O\Vn for general adoption.

    The Franklin

    Institute, at that time a more influential body t han

    it is at present, appointed a committee to consider

    Mr. Sellers' proposition, and t his committee

    having reported favourably, t he Institute set its

    seal of approval on t he Sellers

    sta

    ndard, and re

    commended

    it

    strongly for adoption by manufac

    turers and Government construc t ion d

    epart

    ments.

    0 wing to this recommendation,

    the

    new system

    wa s rapidly adopted throughout the United States,

    an

    d in

    1868

    it was officially endorsed by t he Govern

    ment ; thus in a few years it became the

    sta

    ndard

    for the whole of North America.

    Th

    e Sellerd, like

    the

    \Vhitw o

    rth,

    system, however, being based

    on

    the English

    un

    it of measurement, it was a natural

    consequence that in those countries employing the

    metric unit (although in Germany the Whitworth

    system was largely adopted) other standards bac;ed

    on the subdivision of

    the

    metre should be evolved,

    so soon as t he advantage of a fixed type was de

    monstrated. I t was also a natural consequence

    that, as no means existed for arriving at a com

    mon under

    sta

    nding, a large number of so-called

    standards- the a

    ut h

    or of each of which naturally

    claimed preeminence for his creation -w ere pro

    duced in a very short time. So that t ile laudable

    desire of constructors to arrive at one common

    metrical system for standardisation has defeated

    its object, and rendered reali

    sa t

    ion m ore a nd more

    di

    fficu l t.

    Thus at the present time mo

    st

    rai lway companies

    on

    the

    Co

    ntinent

    nse their own special systems of

    screws

    and

    screw t

    hr

    eads,

    and

    often

    the

    same

    co mpany employs two

    or

    more different types.

    The same remark applies to Government Arsenals

    and Navy Yards ; while many private engineering

    establishments have created

    their

    own metrical

    screw th read, without any

    attempt

    to arrive at a.

    cren

    era

    l

    und

    erstanding, or due consideration of

    the

    inconvenience

    and

    con fu sion arising fl'om a multi

    plicity of t

    hr

    eads. To these numerous types in

    current use, have to be added others, elaborated

    theoretically,

    and

    recommended

    by

    scientists

    and

    by tec

    hn

    ical associations, with a view to ultimate

    unification.

    From the

    fo regoing, some idea can be

    arrived

    at

    of

    the

    confusion that exists

    at

    the

    present time in many engineering wo

    rks

    on

    the

    Continent. In a

    report

    addressed to

    the

    Societe

    d'Encouragement, and published in its Bulletin in

    1891,

    Mr.

    E.

    Sauvage described twenty-seven dif

    ferent metrical systems of screw t hreads,

    and

    it is

    probable

    that

    the

    total

    number

    of existing systems

    would exceed fifty. A selection of

    the

    more im

    portant types of

    th

    ese will be given

    later

    .

    I t

    must

    be rem em hered

    that,

    owing to

    the

    gr

    eat

    develop

    ment

    of mechanical industry, and

    the

    vast exten

    sion

    and internat

    ional character of manufacturing

    trade,

    the

    inconveniences understood by \Vhitworth

    as

    eady

    as

    1841,

    and felt keen

    ly by Se

    llers in

    1864,

    []

    AN 9, 900.

    ha

    ve increased,

    and

    are increasing enormously

    eve

    ry year

    .

    Thu

    s

    it

    is becoming more and more

    desirable to

    red

    uce existing confusion, and

    to

    decide on some unification-a t least,

    to

    a large ex

    tent-o

    f those eleme n

    tary

    pieces that mu

    st

    always

    be used in

    the

    construction of machinery, which,

    if

    exported, may become absolu tely useless because

    of the impossibility of replacing broken screws or

    bo

    lts

    made to some unknown gauge.

    Among th e various systems, most of which are in

    use to-day, t he follo

    win

    g have been selected for

    desc

    rip

    t ion

    and

    illu

    strat

    ion, as having the greatest

    practical

    or

    historical in terest. They are : .Arman

    gaud

    (1

    860); Bodmer

    (1861);

    Poulot

    (1862);

    Sellers

    (1864)

    ; the Prussian

    State

    Railways ; Thury

    (1878);

    French

    Marine

    (1875-85) ;

    Northe rn of F rance and

    Orleans Railways; We

    ste

    rn Railway of Frdnce;

    Paris-Lyons and Mediterranean Rllilway; Eastern

    Rail way of France ; ~ r d o ; Italian Artillery;

    Delisle

    (1873 ; Du

    commun and Steinlen

    (1873);

    Kreutzberger

    (1876) ; Reuleaux;

    German Engi

    neers' Association

    (1888) ;

    French Artillery

    (1891

    );

    Sauvage

    (1894) ;

    Delisle

    (1898) ;

    Swis3 Committee

    (1898) ; Turin

    Engineers and Archi tects

    (1898).

    Although so many able engineers and theorists

    have worked consecuti vely at

    the

    question of unifi

    cation for the

    pa

    st sixty years,

    the

    y have, as

    we

    have seen, so far failed in achieving their object.

    The difficulty does ~ o t lie in

    the

    elaboration of

    a practically perfect system of scr

    ew

    thread

    Whitworth, Sellers,

    and

    Sauvage have long since

    demonstrated t ha t -b ut in obtaining its universal

    adoption.

    Th

    e utmost th at can be hoped for

    seems

    to be

    that Whitwo

    rth

    in Eogland, ~ e r s

    in the United States, Sauvage for metrical countries,

    and Thury for special work everywhere, may exist

    as four recognised and universally employed stan

    dards. Such a resul t \vould at least reduce

    C)

    m

    plications and prevent confusion.

    We have already seen that so long ago as

    1874,

    the

    Munich District Society of Engineers com

    menced taking active steps to shndardise a

    thread; it was the year before that Delisle, of

    Carlsruhe, opened a discussion on un ification by

    publishing a memorandum, illust rated by a series

    of m

    et

    rical taps and dies made by

    th

    e

    firm

    Ducommun and Steinlen, of Mulhouse. They

    were shown with a se

    ri

    es of screws in t he Vien

    na

    Exhibition of

    1873.

    Som

    ew

    ha

    t later, Delisle proposed

    a

    modified

    system, which he aga.in altered in

    1877.

    This

    action of Delisle aroused considerable in terest, and

    his example was followed

    by

    many other

    d e s i

    who submitted their plan to the General Associa

    tion of German E ngineers.

    In

    1888,

    after o n ~

    discussions and careful investigations, both theoreti

    cal and practical, the same association definitely

    approved, a

    nd

    recommended for general adoption,

    Delisle s t ~ e c o sy

    ste

    m of

    1877.

    At the same

    tim e, associations, representing the makers

    instruments cle precision,

    as well as electrical engi

    neers, agreed

    to

    adopt the type chosen by the

    German Engineers Association, adapting it fur

    special convenience to minute diameters. The firm

    of Reinecker, of Chemnitz, undertook to make

    standard screws, together with any series of taps

    and dies, which were to be after wa rds distributed

    among manufacturers who were s

    uffi

    ciently inte

    rested to

    undertake

    practical experiments.

    As we have already seen, the invitation to the

    German manufacturers did not meet with a favour

    able response,

    the

    opinion held being

    that

    the

    Whitworth thread was so generally employed th

    at

    any change to a metrical

    stan

    d

    ard

    would be

    advisable, unless it were universally adopted. Thts

    decision was certainly a

    prudent

    one, for if Germany

    had adopted

    th

    e Delisle, and France o t ~ e r

    system, unification would have becol?-1e, if

    not

    possible,

    at

    least a g

    reat

    deal more difficult. ?l h

    ma.tely the Association of German Engine ers e c i ~ e

    to bring the matter before a more c o m p r e h e ~ s v e

    tribunal, and this was done at an Internatwnal

    Congress held at Aix-la.-Chapelle in

    1895.

    The

    Association had sought inform

    at

    ion from

    engineering societies

    in

    England,

    ~

    e r i c a

    Ru

    ssta,

    France, Au

    st r

    ia-Hungary, I taly, Belgmm, and Swit

    zerland, on the subject of establishing

    an i o t ~ r ~ a -

    t ional standard for screw threads, and ascertarmng

    \V

    hich

    unit

    of measurement shou

    ld

    be adopted for

    such a system.

    All the

    so

    cieties applied to were favourable to

    the metric system as a basis for unification, except

    the English and American, who did not feel the

    necessity for

    any

    change.

    Among others, the Unio11 of Swiss Ivlechanics

  • 7/23/2019 Engineering Vol 69 1900-01-19

    5/36

    }AN

    19, 1900.]

    :

    and Industri als took

    up

    the

    mat

    te r with so much

    enthusiasm that the German Aesociation of En gi

    ne

    er

    s willingly ceded the direction of the move

    ment to

    th

    em. About

    th

    e same time, but inde

    pe

    nd

    ently, impo

    rtan

    t

    ch

    anges were effec,ted

    in

    France where

    th

    e Whi tworth system had never

    found adherents ; the Societe d 'En courage

    ment

    in

    Paris, took action through the well-known

    engineer Mr. E.

    u v a ~ e ,

    at

    'Yh

    ose instigation th e

    Society formed a commiss

    iOn

    In 1891

    to study

    th e

    best means for arriving at the much-desired unifica

    tion for France. In April, 1893, t

    he

    Commission

    presen ted to t ~ e So.ciety the result of its investiga

    tions em bodied

    In

    a careful

    report by

    Mr.

    S a u v ~

    the

    purpo

    rt

    of

    this

    report

    wa

    s to suggest

    a new system of screw th read, which will be re

    ferred to later.

    " This recommendat ion was approved and

    ad(lpted by many la rge works

    th r

    oughout France.

    There were, however, important disse

    nti

    ents,

    an

    d,

    in

    co

    nsequence, Mr. Sauvage decided, in 1894, to

    modify his sy

    ste

    m ; in

    this

    more

    recent

    form it

    has found very general favour, and now defini

    tive

    1y

    established in

    France under

    the name of

    lt,rench

    ay

    stem of unification (S. F. ).

    t may be mentioned, to show how rapid1y the

    S. F. system found in F r a ~ c ~ h a t it was

    recognised by

    the

    l\:1mi

    st

    ry of Marine In 1895,

    by

    the Forges et Chantiers de la Mediterann ee at

    tiavre and in

    Marseilles in 1896,

    hy

    a numher of

    railway companies,

    and

    by great private manu

    facturers, such as those of Le Creusot,

    the

    Com

    pao-nie

    des Forges of

    Chantilly

    and

    Commentry.

    t h ~ Societe de Constructions de Batignolles, the

    Sol iete des Generateurs N i c l a u s the Societe des

    Bur

    eaux et Chantiers de la Loire,

    the

    Compagnie

    Generale des

    m b i l e ~ Sautter,

    Harle,

    and

    Co.,

    Na.than Bloch,

    and

    others.

    Unfortunately, it was not considered necessary to

    submit the Sauvage standard, to th e consideration of

    the International Committee before

    thi

    s very wide

    adoption. Fo

    r,

    however efficient

    and

    well it may

    be,

    the

    chances of

    its

    uni adoption would

    have been increased, if it

    had

    received

    the

    slight

    modifications that were recently suggested

    at

    th e

    Zurich Congress, anrl which cannot be well intro

    duced now that it has been recognised as the

    Fr

    e

    nch

    standard.

    To be conti nued.

    AMERICAN COMPETITION.

    No. XVIII.*

    By SPENC

    ER

    MILLER, Engineer,

    New

    Yot k.

    BusiNESS depression in America, co

    incident with

    English prosperity, will invariably lead t? America

    receiving the overflow orders from English shops.

    This may be successful competition from

    one

    stand

    point, but it is hardly to be considered in the

    light

    of a great achievement.

    England

    is now prosperous,

    its shops are busy, and while

    in individual

    cases

    American goods have affected the

    English market,

    the English have quickly adjusted themselves to

    the situation, or found something else for their

    workmen to do, so that

    England

    as a whole can

    hardly be suffering from American competition ;

    in

    fact it is

    quite

    possible that

    England

    profits

    by

    American competition.

    E N G I N E E R I N G.

    Th

    e very hardships and climatic condi tions faced

    by the New En gland se t

    tler

    s on

    that

    coast , whetted

    th e inventive talent which pro

    du

    ced great resul ts.

    Th e wo

    rl

    d is

    pr

    ogress

    in

    g, na tions are using

    mac

    hin

    es and mechanical contrivances more

    an

    d

    more ; railroads are being built, shops are being

    constructed, mines and cana]s excavated, a

    nd

    farms

    opened all over the world at so

    rapid

    a pace

    that

    the shops of E

    ngland are

    not cap

    ab

    le of t a

    king

    care

    of th e extra volume of manufactu red goods re

    q

    uir

    ed, a

    nd

    it

    mu

    st sha re with

    Ameri

    ca a large

    amo

    unt

    of

    the

    orders for mac

    hinery

    and manu

    factured goods which such rapid development

    demands.

    Wh erever necess

    ity

    " exists in a keen enough

    degree, there will shortly follow an

    in

    vent ion of a

    machine or

    meth

    od, which will overcome

    th

    e dif.

    ficulty.

    Thi

    s is as true of En gla

    nd

    as it is of

    America. The writer believes, however,

    th a

    t

    "ambition " plays a greater

    part

    in America t han

    it does in En gland. \.Yhen th e Americans see t heir

    Pr

    esidents rising

    fr

    om th e ra

    nk

    s of labour , it

    pr

    ope

    rl

    y s timulates th eir ambition.

    American

    tariff laws have been a powerful stim

    u1

    .ant for that ho

    me

    compe tition, which has resulted,

    much to the surprise of many manufacturers, in

    finding

    th

    emselves with their produ cts so rai sed

    in

    quality m lowered in price, that they

    ar

    e able to

    co mpe

    te

    with forejgn trade. The competition be

    tween manufacture1s

    in

    America has been v

    ery

    sharp, and

    a

    ba

    t tle where

    the

    fittest only survive.

    Another powerful factor in the success of

    American sho

    ps

    is

    the

    excelle

    nc

    e

    of

    the United

    States Pa tent Laws, which are

    unqu

    es

    ti

    onably far

    in advance of

    tho

    se of

    any

    o her

    nati

    on. The

    U

    nit

    ed S

    ta t

    es patent for a de vice

    or

    contrivance,

    be

    ars upon its face what it pretends to be. The

    claims are only as broad as t

    he

    state of th e art

    warrants.

    I t is a singular fa

    ct

    , but nevert heless t rue, that

    the Uni ted States Pa tent Office, in spit e of the fact

    th at it gives

    to its sub

    jects pr

    ote

    ction as cheap as

    any

    ot her co

    untry

    , is at

    the

    same

    time

    a s

    ourc

    e of

    profit to

    the

    Government.

    I t so th oroughly examines each and every appli

    cation filed, that an American inventor may learn

    more facts

    about

    similar contrivances to his own

    than would be possible in En g

    ]and by

    the

    payment

    of five times the

    cost

    of an

    American

    pa

    tent.

    Th

    e British might well learn from

    th

    e United

    Stat

    es how to amend her

    pa t

    ent laws.

    If

    England

    would place in its

    Patent

    Office a corps of examiners

    that would, as soon as a patent is tiled, notify the

    in vent or of conflicting devices, the manufacturer,

    before his capital is invested, would kn ow

    in what

    degree his prote

    ction

    was

    av

    ailable.

    While

    it is

    true that an American

    patent

    is

    fr

    equently found

    to be ineffective, a skilful p

    atent

    a w y e ~ ; who reads

    the claims granted

    by

    the American Patent Office

    can usually

    predi

    ct such cases.

    Wherever

    America has successfully compe

    ted

    with

    England, it

    ha

    s doubtless

    been

    at the expense

    of many a physical

    constitution

    wrecked, and many

    a dollar lost. The American is reckless and a

    spendthrift of his strength; he works t oo hard and

    too long. A few become rich .

    England

    needs

    no

    suggestion as to how t

    overcome American competition.

    Whenever

    the

    " .necessity "

    to

    do so real1y presents itself, England

    will

    be

    equal to

    the

    emergency. The "necessity "

    which was America's,

    th

    en

    be

    co

    mes

    England

    's.

    -

    No. XIX.

    The English locomotive

    builder

    certainly does

    not suffer from American competition,

    when with

    work to keep his shops

    busy

    for two years he finds

    a few stray orders booked in America, and, again,

    th

    e railroad

    buyin

    g the American locomctive profits

    by the

    circumstance, because of

    time

    saved,

    if for

    By W.

    J. KEEP, Sup

    e

    rintendent,

    th e

    no other reason. An American tool

    shipp

    ed to Michigan

    St

    ove Company, Detroit, Mich., U. S.A.

    England may mean a loss

    to

    one English tool maker, IN stoves, as in any oth er

    ar

    ticle

    pr

    oduced from

    but England profits

    by

    its use. With American iron or

    st

    eel in this count ry, it is a well-kn own

    shops filled with American orders, there will be fact that no

    country

    in

    the

    world

    produc

    es articles

    little disposition to compete for foreign trade. finished

    to

    such a high degree of excellence as those

    "Neces

    sity " coupled with "Ambit.ion "

    h ~ s mad

    e in the

    United State

    s.

    Th

    e

    main

    reason ~ o r

    played an

    important part

    in the development of this is th at our goods are finished by high-priced

    American industries. workm.en who tak.e a p r i d in turning out goods

    The early English settlers immigrating to America t hat

    w1ll

    be a credit to their shops, and, further

    found themselves on the coast of

    New England

    face more, the sys te

    ms

    cf inspection prevailino- in

    to face with a rigorous climate and the "necessity " American factories are so rigid that

    imp

    erfe

    ct

    ; ork

    for self-preservation.

    New England

    so

    settled

    is ra re

    ly

    allowed to pass.

    produces the largest percentage of successful in- O wi ng

    to the rapid.

    increase in population,

    the

    ventors. Had

    th

    e same people located on the coast home market for American stoves is enorn1ous and

    of

    Florida

    ther

    e would have

    been no

    s

    uch

    neces- effort

    h a ~

    been

    made

    to

    demo

    ns

    t

    ra t

    e

    to

    sity, ,

    the

    climate would have dulled their ambition. ?uts1de A;meriCa th at th ey

    ar

    e su perior to all

    ot

    .hers

    _ _ _ 1n ope

    ration,

    economy, and ap pearance.

    ee

    pages

    347,

    379,

    413,

    445, 479,

    515, 549, 583

    , 6

    17.

    O r d . e ~ s from a

    ?r

    o

    ad

    come unsolicited, and

    larg

    e

    713

    ,

    743, 777,

    and 813

    of vol.

    lxvui., and pages 12 quantities are sh1pped, showing

    that

    we can control

    40

    an

    te. th e stove trade of many countries if we make

    an

    77

    effort to do so. The explanation of this seems

    to

    be as follows : .

    American stove-ma

    king

    is a .disti.nct

    m

    and of immense proport ions. DI vers tty of

    chmat

    c,

    and the cold

    wint

    ers

    in many parts

    of th e country,

    mak

    e

    th

    e ques

    ti

    on of heating

    applianc

    es a ve

    ry

    impor tan t one.

    Th

    e

    re

    are mo

    re

    than 3 ~ 0 stove

    foundries in t he Uni ted States, of whiCh t ~ e

    Michigan Stove Co

    mpany

    is

    the

    larges

    t. Thi

    s

    company

    melt

    s about 70 tons

    of

    iron

    d a i l ~

    a'?d

    completes

    about

    350 stoves per

    day

    of th eir dif

    ferent

    varieti

    es. The ag

    gr

    eg

    ate

    of

    its

    Year's ~ l e s

    is over

    1,500,000

    dols., and is yearly 1ncreas1ng.

    New s tyles of st oves are made each year, and old

    styles

    are

    abandoned,

    making

    the annual expe

    n

    di ture for pa t terns from 3 0,000 dols . to 50,0.00 dols.

    An

    Ameri

    can ma

    nufactur

    er does

    not

    wa1t

    for

    a

    pattern

    to

    become

    anti

    qua ted,

    bu

    t

    mak

    es new

    de

    si

  • 7/23/2019 Engineering Vol 69 1900-01-19

    6/36

    -

    E N G I N E E R I N G.

    [JAN.

    I

    9, 1900.

    12-IN.

    COAST-DE:FENCE GUN

    AND

    SCH TEIDER-CANET MOUNT

    ro

    .

    design. On an average

    an

    entirely new design

    l

    appears

    about

    every

    three

    years. 'l'he castings are

    very smooth

    and

    p e r f e ~ t

    on

    account of the high

    grade

    of

    the iron and t

    he

    s uperior quality of

    mould

    ing

    sand used.

    P opulcwityof merican Stoves o a c l

    anadian

    manufacturers

    have

    contracts with manufacturer.s

    in the United

    State

    s to take duplicate

    patterns

    of

    all of their new stoves as fast as completed, to be

    used

    as

    patterns

    to ma ke stoves from ; but

    they

    have

    never

    taken a s

    ingle set of

    patterns made in

    any

    ot

    her country.

    American

    s

    to

    ves have been

    used

    as

    patterns in

    S

    co tland

    and

    in

    Germa.ny;

    but

    there has neYer been a case where a manufacturer

    in the United States has used, or has imitated, a

    stove or range made

    in

    a

    ny other

    country.

    A

    good

    thing will be imitated.

    Freight Ra tes. Under

    the

    present

    prevailing con

    ditions,

    g o o d ~ can be fr e

    ighted

    about

    as cheaply

    from New

    York,

    to

    almost any foreign market, as

    they can from

    Liverpool

    or London. From our

    lack

    of

    banking facilities, all

    American

    exporters

    are obliged to pay the English bankers a

    profit

    of

    from i to

    1

    per cent.

    Still, this

    charge does not

    cut

    much

    figure

    in

    th e general resu lt. Owing t o

    the proximity of

    coal and iron fields, and the

    vast

    supply,

    we

    are

    able to

    produce goods made

    from

    iron

    and

    stee

    l as

    cheaply,

    when

    Y

    ua.lity is taken

    into acco

    unt,

    as any na

    tion

    on the face of the globe.

    The

    hi

    gh wages we

    pay

    are off.

    se

    t

    by

    the pric

    es at

    which we can

    purchase

    our raw material,

    and

    th e

    appliances which

    we u

    se

    to

    facili

    tate pr

    od

    uct

    .i

    on.

    'Vhen one

    reflects th

    at

    we h(we been ab le to export

    to

    Great Britain anu

    Eur

    ope all

    kind

    s

    of iron

    and

    steel

    materials,

    from pig iron

    up

    to axes

    and door

    locks,

    it

    will be seen th

    at

    our

    po

    sit ion in point of

    cheap manufac turing is unsurpassed by

    that

    of any

    other manufacturing nation, and

    that

    in normal

    times we can beat the world in our prices, the

    sa

    me

    e.s

    we do in

    the

    qualit y

    and

    finish of o

    ur

    goods.

    l \ I E S S R ~ . SCH NEIDER AND CO

    1

    WORKS AT

    CREU,

    '0

    1.

    o. LX

    XV I.

    12-IN. CoAST-DEFENCE GoN

    AND

    M

    ouNT

    ING.

    THIS moun t ing is fitted on an elevator, and dis

    appears in a pit for load ing

    the

    gun. The

    di

    s

    appearing action cai?- only

    ake

    place when. t he gun

    is run in, and a speCial dev tce has been destgned to

    maintain

    it

    in that

    posit

    .ion a

    fter

    fi

    ri n

    g, a

    nd

    to

    run

    it

    out

    again

    af ter

    it ha

    s been l

    oaded

    and

    ra ised.

    The mounting (Fi gs. 688 to 696 on t he

    pr

    esen t and

    opposite

    pages) cent.ral

    with

    inclii?-ed

    slides

    and hydrauhc recOil cyhoder, the return ta.kmg

    place by

    gravity.

    The carriage is of cast steel,

    and

    is

    made

    to r r y

    the

    gun on i

    ts

    trunnions ; i t is fitted

    with forged-steel rollers, which run on th e slide.

    FIG. 688 .,

    18

    2

    I

    --

    1

    The slide

    is

    of cast

    steel,

    and consists

    of

    two

    cheeks stayed in front and st rongly bol

    ted

    on the

    bolster. Th e latter is of cast steel ; in its centre

    is t he

    pi ,

    ot-housing,

    and

    underneath is a circular

    r oller path. The

    tran

    som is also of cast

    st e

    el, pro

    vided with a piv

    ot lined

    with

    gun

    metal,

    and

    is

    made

    with

    a circular

    racer

    ; the tran

    so

    m is bolted

    on

    th e elevator

    platform. The series of

    rollers

    placed

    be

    tw

    een t

    he

    bolst er and the

    platform,

    con

    sis ts

    of

    24 forged- steel conical rollers, joined

    toge

    ther

    hy two rings. The two recoil c

    ylind

    ers

    and the cylinder for running in the gun are

    cast

    in

    o

    ne

    piece with

    t

    he

    m

    ou

    n

    ti

    ng ;

    the

    y

    are

    lin

    ed

    with gun metal. The two reco il pi

    sto

    n-rod s are

    fixed to two shou

    ld

    ers

    in the

    rear of t he cheeks ;

    the plunger for r

    unning in

    the g

    un is jo in

    ed

    to

    the

    slide s

    tay-pi

    ece . The recoil

    cylinders are

    made

    with

    constant resistance. During recoil, the liquid

    fl

    ows from t

    he

    front to the rear of t he

    pi

    s ton

    through two openings, which are partly blocked up

    by two rods fixed to both end s of the cylinder.

    The section of these rods

    at

    various parts of

    their

    length is so des igned that the free opening for the

    flowing of t

    he

    liq

    uid

    varies with t he reco il speed,

    the r

    es

    istance

    to the

    flow

    beiog

    const:

    nt (Figs. 689

    to 691). Th e volume

    of

    liquid,

    which corresponds

    to

    that of th e rods, when driven

    from

    the c

    ylinde

    rs,

    flows through two pi

    pes

    cmd a valve chest in th e

    cylinder for running in the

    gun,

    and tills

    exact

    ly

    the Yoid caused by t he withdrawal of

    the

    plunger.

    Th

    e valve ch

    est

    is arranged in such a way that the

    li

    quid

    pa

    ss

    es

    in

    t he

    runn

    ing-

    in

    cyl ind

    er

    after

    raising

    a

    va

    lve, a

    nd can

    o

    nly

    return in the reco

    il

    cylinders

    through a vent, t

    he opening

    of which is

    regulated by a rod which is

    worked

    from a handle

    placed on the side of t

    he

    mounting.

    I f

    t

    he rod

    is

    driv

    en h ome in the vent, t he gun rem

    ains

    run in,

    and it

    runs

    out quicker t he more the rod is ra ised.

    The ma n

    c e

    uvre for running in

    the

    gun is effected

    by m

    eans of a sma

    ll pump

    fitted to

    the bol

    ste

    r

    and

    work ed by two handwheels on each side of

    th e

    mountin

    g. l,he pump draws the liquid from

    t he recoil cylinders

    through a

    conduit in the rods,

    a

    nd

    delivers it in

    the

    running-in cylinder through

    a

    pass

    a

    ge in

    t

    he plunger

    .

    Ele

    vation

    ran

    ges from

    -

    7

    deg.

    to

    +

    20

    deg.

    A

    toothed sector fitted

    to the gun

    acts

    in conj unction

    with a

    pinion

    j o

    ined

    through a fri ction cone,

    to

    an

    end less

    sc

    rew ; Bell

    ev

    iJle sp

    rin

    gs allow a certain

    amount of play between the various parts to

    coun teract violent shocks. Th e handwheel fur

    giving

    the

    r

    eq

    uired

    elev

    at

    i

    on

    do

    not

    follow

    the

    re coil, and can

    act

    whatever be the position of the

    gun, by

    working a

    square

    shaf t, on which slides

    a

    conical

    pini

    on

    carried by the

    mo

    un

    ting.

    Th

    e

    gun

    is trained

    th roug

    h a

    pinion fitted

    to the

    bolste

    r , a

    nd

    which engages a

    circular

    rack fixed to the t

    ran

    som.

    The pinion is

    worked by

    a

    se

    t

    of whe

    els

    and

    an

    endless screw, the latter

    bein

    g dr iven by two cranks

    keyed on th e same shaft

    and

    placed near

    the

    han d

    wheels for elevating

    the

    gun. Cramps in the front

    a

    nd rear

    of the bolster clasp

    a

    ridge on the transom,

    and

    prev

    ent

    the raising of

    the mounting.

    THE Al\

    IERI

    CA

    E C H N I C L

    E

    OCIETY O:B,

    GINEEH,

    .

    (

    BY ouR NE'\

    Y

    oRK

    CoRRES

    PONDENT.)

    Co

    ntinue

    d from.

    page 47.)

    GASoLIN}; G

    FOR

    Bo iLER H

    EATING.

    THE

    nex

    t

    morn

    ing the session

    opened with

    a

    paper ent i tled, "Expe

    rim

    ents on Using Gasoline

    Gas for Boiler H eat ing," by H e

    rm

    an Poole. The

    results

    of

    t

    hi

    s

    arc give

    n below :

    The quantity of gasoline used was 35 gallons, costing

    10

    cents

    per

    gallon. Th is generat ed 1

    000

    l

    b.

    of steam at

    60

    lb. pressure, equivalent to 1211 l

    b.

    evaporated from,

    and at, 212 deg.

    I t

    was intended to have a fll ll time

  • 7/23/2019 Engineering Vol 69 1900-01-19

    7/36

    z

    p

    0

    z

    H

    I

    C

    '

    '

    1

    /

    IIII

    C

    O

    III

    II

    III

    I

    I

    I

    I

    ~

    -

    ~

    C

    l

    ~

    ~

    /

    '

    '

    .

    ,

    ,

    .

    ;

    '

    /

    .

    /

    ,

    /

    '

    ,

    '

    ,

    ,

    .

    ,

    ,

    '

    I

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

    -

    >

    1

    I

    o

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    ,

    I

    .

    I

    I

    .

    7

    ,

    .

    '

    I

    .

    .

    '

    '

    t

    .

    .

    I

    '

    .

    I

    '

    .

    '

    I

    .

    .

    \

    ,

    .

    .

    I

    .

    .

    .

    -

    :

    -

    I

    I

    \

    -

    _

    -

    .

    .

    -

    _

    -

    -

    L

    /

    1

    -

    -

    -

    1

    '

    'I

    1

    i

    I

    1

    1

    :0

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    1

    o

    o

    I

    I

    I

    I

    .

    \

    ,

    \

    \

    I

    \

    \

    \

    \

    .

    \

    \

    .

    .

    \

    \

    \

    \

    .

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    o

    I

    o

    I

    I

    '

    I

    I

    I

    .

    I

    o

    I

    I

    '

    o

    I

    I

    I

    .

    I

    1

    I

    1

    I

    '

    I

    I

    ,

    o

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    0

    \

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    '

    /

    I

    I

    1

    I

    I

    '

    I

    I

    I

    1

    /

    ,

    I

    I

    I

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    .

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    ..

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    .

    .

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    I

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    \

    .

    .

    _

    _

    I

    I

    I

    I

    IIIlIIIIIIIIII

    II

    IIIII

    IIII

    I

    ,

    I

    I

    \

    I

    I

    \

    ,

    '

    ;

    >

    .

    '

    .

    \

    \

    '

    .

    .

    '

    ;

    r

    '

    .

    :

    ,

    '

    1

    \

    .

    .

    \

    .

    \

    '

    \

    .

    ,

    ,

    ,

    .

    \

    ,

    _

    .

    \

    \

    ,

    ,

    \

    '

    ,

    ,

    '

    \

    \

    .

    -

    '

    \

    ,

    ,

    I

    \

    .

    \

    :

    \

    _

    .

    ,

    -

    -

    f

    o

    I

    \

    I

    o

    I

    .

    :

    .

    4

    -

    -

    .

    _

    ,

    -

    -

    1

    '

    '

    I

    -

    _

    I

    -

    .

    ,

    I

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    I

    .

    .

    .

    .

    _

    -

    011

    I

    II

    I

    I

    II

  • 7/23/2019 Engineering Vol 69 1900-01-19

    8/36

    8o

    experiment of eight to ten houra, so a s to

    obviate

    some

    of the

    many uncertainties;

    but

    this was not ca

    rr i

    ed out

    l.nd th e pa per is

    present

    ed

    as

    s

    imply

    a.

    contribution

    th

    e s.

    ubj

    ec:t,

    but

    not

    as

    one settling s.ny important

    quest1ons.

    Sumrrutry

    of

    Data

    a Yld

    Results.

    Time of trial . . ... ... About 2 houra

    Grate surface . . . . 3ft. 8 in. by 5 ft. 5 in.

    or 19.9 ft. of area.

    Water-heating surface ... . ..

    520

    sq . ft.

    Su perheating surface ... ...

    111

    ,,

    Total

    . . . .

    631

    Ratio of

    water heating

    to grate

    surface . . . . . .

    Ratio of

    minimum

    draught area

    to grate

    surface . . 1

    to

    12

    Steam pressure .. . . . . 60 lb.

    T emperature of

    air

    . .

    50

    deg.

    , boiler-room .. . 80

    ,,

    26

    to 1

    ,,

    s

    team

    . . . .

    292

    .5 ,

    , feed wa ter . None used

    Temperature of waste gases

    at

    I

    Not taken;

    esti-

    chimney f mated

    at 325

    d

    eg

    .

    Fuel used . . . . Ai r.gMoline gas

    Analysis of gas .. . . Not made

    Quantity of gas used . . . No t m

    t-as

    ur

    ed

    Quantity of oil used .. . . .

    35

    (estim ated)

    W e

    ight

    of o

    il

    . . .. . .

    227

    .5 lb.

    Calorific

    va

    lue per pound . ..

    20

    ,000 B. T.

    Total

    weight

    of

    water

    in boiler 12 G

    OO lb

    .

    W eight of water evaporated . 1000 lb.