44
Engagement Outcomes Report Proposed rezoning of 147 Garnet Road, Kareela For Sutherland Shire Council, on behalf of Sylvanvale 26 May 2020 | 2200243

Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Engagement Outcomes Report

Proposed rezoning of

147 Garnet Road, Kareela

For Sutherland Shire Council,

on behalf of Sylvanvale

26 May 2020 | 2200243

Page 2: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

CONTACT

James Page Associate Director - Engagement [email protected] +61 423 529961

Reproduction of this document or any part thereof is not permitted without prior written permission of Ethos Urban Pty Ltd.

This document has been prepared by: This document has been reviewed by:

James Page 20 May 2020 Ira Brenner 20 May 2020

Reproduction of this document or any part thereof is not permitted without written permission of Ethos Urban Pty Ltd. Ethos Urban operates under a Quality Management System. This report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with that system. If the report is not signed, it is a preliminary draft.

VERSION NO. DATE OF ISSUE REVISION BY APPROVED BY

1 20 May 2020 James Page James Page

2 26 May 2020

Ethos Urban Pty Ltd

ABN 13 615 087 931. www.ethosurban.com

173 Sussex Street, Sydney NSW 2000 t 61 2 9956 6952

Page 3: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Contents

Ethos Urban

1.0 Introduction 2 1.1 Project Context 2

2.0 Engagement Approach 4 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5

3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents 7

4.0 Conclusion and next steps 9

Appendix A – Letter to local residents

Appendix B – Distribution area map

Appendix C – Community information webinar presentation

Page 4: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Proposed rezoning of 147 Garnet Road, Kareela | Consultation Outcomes Report | 19 May 2020

Ethos Urban | 2200243 2

1.0 Introduction

This engagement outcomes report has been prepared by Ethos Urban on behalf of Sylvanvale, to outline the key

matters raised during local community engagement in relation to the proposed rezoning of 147 Garnet Road,

Kareela. The findings of the local community engagement have been used to inform Sylvanvale’s site Subdivision

Application and the Planning Proposal (rezoning application) for part of the site.

This report includes information about the project context, the approach to local community engagement, and the

feedback received. It has been prepared for Sutherland Shire Council to provide information about community

sentiment in relation to the proposed future development of the site.

1.1 Project Context

Sylvanvale’s head office has been located at 147 Garnet Road for a number of years. The facility is now aging and

no longer fit for purpose. Sylvanvale is currently investigating the opportunity to relocate their office to a more

suitable business centre, enabling Sylvanvale to achieve higher design standards for accessibility and inclusion,

including improved access to public transport and a more suitable typography for people with a disability.

Sylvanvale own the land at 147 Garnet Road. The relocation of the office would free up some of the site for sale,

noting that existing recently constructed childcare centre will be retained under a proposed site subdivision.

The proceeds from the sale of the site would allow Sylvanvale to relocate its head office to better meet the needs of

the foundation and clients, and will support Sylvanvale in pursuing the provision of Specialist Disability

Accommodation throughout the Sutherland Shire.

Couvaras Architects have worked on an initial development proposal which includes 42 new townhouses on site.

The development of the townhouses requires a Planning Proposal (rezoning application) to be submitted to

Sutherland Shire Council (Council), to rezone part of the land to R3 under the Sutherland Shire Local Environmental

Plan 2015.

The site is currently zoned SP2 (Educational Establishment), with a height limit of 12m and no maximum FSR or

minimum landscaped area requirement.

The development would require future dwellings on site to comply with the maximum building height of 9m,

under Zone R3. This would allow the dwellings to have a good relationship with the site topography and

surrounding buildings.

Sylvanvale is committed to engaging with the Sutherland Shire community and saw value in early community

engagement in relation to the proposals on the site. Sylvanvale is committed to further engagement as part of the

Planning Proposal process, which specifies statutory periods of community consultation and feedback.

Figure 1: 147 Garnet Road, Kareela

Page 5: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Proposed rezoning of 147 Garnet Road, Kareela | Consultation Outcomes Report | 19 May 2020

Ethos Urban | 2200243 3

Figure 2: Current and Proposed Zoning

Figure 3: Draft scheme, including 42 townhouses, landscaping, new driveway,

underground parking access and pedestrian walkway (Mikarie Childcare Centre shown in the foreground)

Page 6: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Proposed rezoning of 147 Garnet Road, Kareela | Consultation Outcomes Report | 19 May 2020

Ethos Urban | 2200243 4

2.0 Engagement Approach

The community engagement approach was developed in close collaboration with Sylvanvale and the project

planners, Wynne Planning. It was designed to be practical and effective in capturing valuable feedback from the

local community including immediate neighbouring organisations, immediate residents and other residents in close

proximity to the site (with 250m walk by road).

2.1 Objectives

The objectives of the consultation were to:

Introduce Sylvanvale, their vision, and hopes for the new office and Specialist Disability Accommodation.

Provide an overview of the proposed development draft scheme, including the findings of the background

studies, the possible impacts identified and mitigation strategies.

Explain the rezoning application process, including periods of community consultation.

Develop and build the relationships between Sylvanvale and the local community.

Understand and consider the views of the local community, prior to submitting the Planning Proposal to Council.

2.2 Principles

The engagement process was developed considering the following principles:

• Accessible and inclusive – people were given the opportunity to attend a meeting, call or email the project

team. Immediate neighbouring organisations and residents were able to nominate their preferred time of the

meeting. An evening session was held for other local residents, noting many of them may have other

commitments during the day.

• Engaging and appropriate – online video conference software was used to allow Sylvanvale, the project team

and local community members to ‘get to know’ each other. Project team members were available to talk about

the proposal and answer questions.

• Respectful and genuine– Sylvanvale reiterated its commitment to contributing positively to the Sutherland

Shire and working closely with the local community to ensure the best possible outcomes.

• Tailored and constructive – the communications and engagement approach was tailored to the specific needs

of individual local community members. Individual discussions with local organisations enabled an

understanding of their specific needs and interests.

2.3 Methods

The engagement period was undertaken during the COVID-19 pandemic; therefore the engagement methods were

selected to comply with physical distancing measures but ensure the opportunity for local community information

and feedback were not compromised.

2.3.1 Emails and letters to immediate neighbours

Personalised emails and letters were prepared to immediate neighbours to invite them to a one on one video

conference meeting with Sylvanvale’s Chief Executive Officer and project manager, the project planner and project

engagement representative. The emails and letters included contextual information about Sylvanvale, their

relocation plans and proposed plans for the site.

Contact included:

Four emails to neighbouring organisations – Sylvanvale Mikarie Child Care Centre (tenant), Aspect Australia

(tenant), Council (Joseph Banks Nature Plants Reserve landowner and manager); and Bates Drive School.

Three letters to neighbouring residents – 1, 3 and 4 Mikarie Place.

Page 7: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Proposed rezoning of 147 Garnet Road, Kareela | Consultation Outcomes Report | 19 May 2020

Ethos Urban | 2200243 5

2.3.2 Letterbox drop to residents

Letters were delivered to local residents on Friday 1 May 2020, to invite them to attend a community information

webinar. The letter was delivered to approximately 50 households, including properties on Mikarie Place, Manooka

Place, Albany Place and Garnet Road (between Marshall Road and Mikarie Place).

A copy of the letter is in Appendix A and the distribution area map is included in Appendix B. A guide to logging

into and using Zoom was also included with the letter.

2.3.3 Presentation

A presentation was developed to support the engagement activities. The presentation included information about:

The purpose of the meeting and agenda;

The rules of engagement and guidance on how to use Zoom during the session;

Sylvanvale’s background, vision and aspirations; and

The proposed rezoning and subdivision intent and process, the constraints and opportunities of the site, the

studies undertaken, the draft scheme and proposed landscaping and parking, and the outcomes of the parking

and traffic assessments.

A copy of the presentation is in Appendix C.

2.4 Activities and tools

2.4.1 Meetings with local community organisations

The project team met Aspect Australia and Bates Drive School during the engagement period. Details of the

meetings are provided below.

Organisation Representatives Date and time

Bates Drive School Principal

Assistant Principal Thursday, 7 May 2020

10am to 11am

Aspect Australia Principal & Aspect Practice Specialist Thursday, 7 May 2020

11am to 12pm

A summary of the feedback received at the meetings is provided in Section 3.1.

The project team also spoke with the managers of the Sylvanvale Mikarie Child Care Centre, who were aware of the

proposal and understood it will not impact on their operations.

The project team did not receive a response from Council representatives responsible for the management of the

Joseph Banks Nature Plants Reserve during the engagement period, however previous discussions have been held

with Council regarding the proposal. A meeting with be organised as the proposal progresses.

2.4.2 Community information Webinar

The community information webinar was held on Tuesday, 12 May 2020, between 6pm and 7.30pm, using Zoom

video conference software. The purpose of this community information session was to provide local residents with

information about the proposed rezoning and subdivision applications and give them an opportunity to ask

questions prior to the submission of the Planning Proposal. Nine local residents attended the session, from five

households.

The webinar was facilitated by an independent community engagement consultant from Ethos Urban. The webinar

begun with a presentation from the project team including Sylvanvale’s Chief Executive Officer, the project planner,

architect and traffic engineer. The presentation was followed by a question and answer session.

Page 8: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Proposed rezoning of 147 Garnet Road, Kareela | Consultation Outcomes Report | 19 May 2020

Ethos Urban | 2200243 6

At the beginning of the webinar the facilitator provided information about the key features of Zoom

videoconferencing, and provided information about how these features would be used during the Webinar. A phone

number was provided for those people who needed additional supporting setting up or logging into Zoom.

A summary of the feedback received is provided in Section 3.2.

2.4.3 Email and phone feedback

The project manager’s email address and telephone number were included on communications to provide the local

community with an avenue to ask questions and provide feedback both before and after the community information

webinar.

Two feedback emails were received following the information session. The feedback received on these emails is

provided in Section 3.2

Page 9: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Proposed rezoning of 147 Garnet Road, Kareela | Consultation Outcomes Report | 19 May 2020

Ethos Urban | 2200243 7

3.0 Engagement Feedback

3.1 Community Organisations

The following feedback was received from local community organisations. All local community organisations were

supportive of the proposal.

Organisation Comments or question Response

Aspect Australia • Commented on its innovation

• Thought it was sensible and would be of great benefit to Sylvanvale and Aspect

customers

• Agrees with the site being difficult to access for people with a disability

• Liked the landscaping proposal

• Asked when construction would begin and where excavation would take place

• Mentioned local residents will be interested

in the parking strategy.

• Preliminary Landscape Design Plans have been developed for the draft scheme.

• An Access, Parking and Traffic Assessment demonstrates positive.

• Sylvanvale will continue to keep Aspect Australia up to date. Aspect Australia is due to move off the

site in 2020 so will not be directly impacted by the construction period.

Bates Drive School • Supportive of the relocation and understand how it will benefit Sylvanvale’s customers

• Requested continued access via Mikarie Place. This is currently informal; their

preference would be for this to be formalised as a secondary access point.

• Requested the removal of tress adjoining

their land due to health and safety concerns.

• Sylvanvale will investigate the formalisation of secondary access to the school via land at 2 Manooka Place and 147 Garnet Road. Primary access will remain on Bates Drive.

• Tree removal to be discussed as part of the future development application.

• Sylvanvale will continue to keep Bates Drive

School up to date.

3.2 Local residents

The section below provides a summary of the feedback received from the nine residents at the community

information session and in the two feedback emails.

16 feedback topics were raised – 12 at the community information session and four on emails. The most commonly

related to traffic and access, the details of the draft scheme and fire protection.

It is worth noting that, the majority of local residents contacted about the community information webinar chose not

to attend, suggesting a low level of community concern about the proposal.

Topic Comments or question Response

Traffic and access (5

comments)

• Question about the assumption about the number of cars per dwelling

• Request for information on the traffic and parking assessment

• Comment that there have been

some traffic incidents outside the Childcare Centre, request for information about how this will be

reduced

• Question about whether there is appetite to provide access to the townhouses via Bates Drive

• Perception that the proposal will result in an increase in traffic on quiet residential streets

• Traffic consultants have used data provided by Roads and Maritime Services (Transport for NSW)

• An Access, Traffic and Parking Assessment been

completed and provided to Council.

• There will be a no parking zone either side of the 2 Mikarie Place driveway and the driveway will be widened by 1m to

allow for two cars to pass

• There are a number of constraints which prevent access to 147 Garnet Road via Bates Drive.

Page 10: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Proposed rezoning of 147 Garnet Road, Kareela | Consultation Outcomes Report | 19 May 2020

Ethos Urban | 2200243 8

Topic Comments or question Response

Details of the draft

scheme (3

comments)

• Question about the height of the new townhouse in the context of

visual impact for local residents

• Question about whether the draft scheme is purely hypothetical at this

stage

• Question about where Council standards on medium density in a

cul-de-sac

• An R3 Zoning would allow townhouses of up to 9m. A Visual Impact Assessment has been carried out and

shows limited visual impact, with the proposed development only being visible to a few direct neighbours.

• The R3 Zoning is considered appropriate for the site due to

the surrounding topography and mix of nearby industrial and residential uses.

• The draft scheme has been developed to demonstrate the

capability of the land under a residential zone, it is not being presented as a Development Application.

Fire protection (2

comments)

• Question about fire protection, noting the draft scheme shows one road in and out.

• Request for information about the fire buffer zone

• A Bushfire Assessment has been prepared to support the Planning Proposal. This must also be reviewed by the Rural Fire Service as part of the planning submission.

Parking (1 comment) • Comment about frustration with current number of cars parked on the street and concern that

proposed car spaces will end up being used as storage space, leading to an overspill of cars on the

streets

• The parking has been designated as per the DCP requirements and includes visitor parking.

• Parking spaces will be provided to discourage storage use,

as opposed to lock up garages

• There will be minimum storage requirements for the townhouses inside and within basements

• An Access, Traffic and Parking Assessment shows less

traffic movements and no requirement for parking overspill on the surrounding residential streets.

Road reserve at 2

Mikarie Place (1

comment)

• Question about whether Council has provided any information about the

intended future zoning of 2 Mikarie Place

• Council has not provided any indication that there will be any change to the existing zoning of 2 Mikarie Place.

Project timeline (1

comment)

• Question about the earliest possible timescale construction will take place.

• Prior to any construction commencing, Sylvanvale must gain approval for the land rezoning (via a Planning Proposal) and development (via Development Application),

and the land would need to be sold. This process is likely to take 2 – 3 years.

Childcare Centre

traffic and parking (1

comment)

• Question about the Childcare Centre staffing, customers, access and parking, and whether the proposed

zoning with change this

• The Childcare Centre drop off, access and parking requirements will remain the same. No reduction or expansion is planned.

Appropriateness of

the proposal (1

comment)

• Concerned that the land is not appropriate for medium density residential development, and townhouses would give an adverse

effect on the neighbourhood character and flora and fauna of the area

• The draft scheme has been developed considering the local topography and surrounding residential use of the local area, and is considered appropriate in the context of the surrounding land use zoning and built form.

• Opportunity and constraints analysis has been undertaken to identify issues for consideration, this guided the background technical studies which were undertaken

which demonstrate the suitability of this development.

Disagreement with

the sale of the land

(1 comment)

• Concern that the development is solely about the generation of money

• The proceeds from the sale of the site would allow Sylvanvale to relocate its head office to better meet the needs of the foundation and clients, and will support

Sylvanvale in pursuing the provision of Specialist Disability Accommodation throughout the Sutherland Shire.

• The site is not suitable for future use by Sylvanvale and the people it supports.

Page 11: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Proposed rezoning of 147 Garnet Road, Kareela | Consultation Outcomes Report | 19 May 2020

Ethos Urban | 2200243 9

4.0 Conclusion and next steps

This engagement outcomes report provides an overview of the local community engagement undertaken prior to the

submission of Sylvanvale’s Planning Proposal to request the rezoning of land at 147 Garnet Road, Kareela.

Sylvanvale, in partnership with Wynne Planning and Ethos Urban, developed and implemented an engagement

strategy to ensure local community organisations, direct neighbours and other local residents, were informed about

the proposal and given the opportunity to ask questions and provide feedback.

Local community organisations (including the Mikarie Childcare Centre, Aspect Australia and Bates Drive School)

expressed their support for the proposal. The majority of local residents chose not to attend the community

information webinar, suggesting a low level of concern.

Nine local residents attended the community information webinar (from five households) and two feedback emails

were received. Feedback asked questions about or made comments about the following issues:

Traffic and access proposals;

Details of the draft scheme;

Fire protection measures;

Parking – existing and future;

Road reserve at 2 Mikarie Place;

The project timeline;

Childcare Centre traffic and parking;

The appropriateness of the proposal; and

Expressing disagreement with the proposal (one person).

Sylvanvale addressed all of the questions and comments during the engagement period, questions and comments

were responded to at the community information webinar and emails were replied to.

A range of technical studies have been undertaken, which address many of the feedback received and demonstrate

the appropriateness of the proposed subdivision and rezoning.

Sylvanvale will continue to provide opportunities for the local community to enquire about and provide feedback on

the proposal as the Planning Proposal and subsequent Development Application progress.

Page 12: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Proposed rezoning of 147 Garnet Road, Kareela | Consultation Outcomes Report | 19 May 2020

Ethos Urban | 2200243 10

Appendix A – Letter to local residents

Page 13: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

AFFILIATED SERVICES 2 Mikarie Place Kirrawee NSW 2232 PO Box 29 Sutherland NSW 1499

PHONE 1300 244 577 sylvanvale.com.au

Sylvanvale Clinical Services | Mikarie Child Care Centre Caringbah Craft Centre | Retail Therapy Vintage & Café

Donations over $2 are tax deductible | ABN 33 502 584 264 ACN 001 346 989 | Charitable Fundraising Number CFN 11679

30 April 2020

Resident 4 Manooka Place Kareela NSW 2232

Dear Resident,

Supporting Sylvanvale’s future – Possible rezoning of land at 147 Garnet Road, Kareela

I am writing to inform you of our proposed future plans for the Sylvanvale head office site, located at 147 Garnet Road, Kareela.

Sylvanvale has been an essential community provider in the Sutherland Shire since 1947, starting life as the Handicapped Children’s Centre New South Wales. Our core was and still is – community. We are committed to providing a high quality, customer-focused service to the people we support and their families. Today, we support more than 750 children and adults with disability throughout the Sydney metropolitan area and, to this day, have a strong presence in the Sutherland Shire.

Unfortunately, our head office facility is aging and is no longer fit for purpose. The office is also difficult to access due to public transport limitations and the topography of the area. We are currently considering opportunities to relocate our office to a more suitable business centre, with higher design standards for accessibility and inclusion.

The relocation of our office is subject to the sale of the land we own at 147 Garnet Road. In addition to a new head office and associated customer facilities, the proceeds from the sale of the land would support the provision of new Specialist Disability Accommodation in the Sutherland Shire.

We are in the process of preparing a Planning Proposal (rezoning application) to request the rezoning of the land to allow for the development of new townhouses. We are expecting to submit the Planning Proposal to Sutherland Shire Council in mid-May 2020.

A number of background studies have been undertaken to inform this proposal, including an assessment of bushfires, flooding, flora and fauna, traffic and parking, stormwater, landscaping and visual impact. The recently constructed childcare centre will remain open.

We are committed to ongoing community engagement as our proposal develops, as the proposal is in the early stages, this will initially involve engagement with neighbouring organisations and residents.

As a neighbouring resident, we invite you to attend a community information webinar to find out more about the proposal, our vision for Sylvanvale and to ask questions.

Details of the community information webinar are as follows.

Page 14: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

AFFILIATED SERVICES 2 Mikarie Place Kirrawee NSW 2232 PO Box 29 Sutherland NSW 1499

PHONE 1300 244 577 sylvanvale.com.au

Sylvanvale Clinical Services | Mikarie Child Care Centre Caringbah Craft Centre | Retail Therapy Vintage & Café

Donations over $2 are tax deductible | ABN 33 502 584 264 ACN 001 346 989 | Charitable Fundraising Number CFN 11679

We look forward to e-meeting you soon.

Yours sincerely

Leanne Fretten

Chief Executive Officer

Community information webinar, 147 Garnet Road rezoning

Date: Tuesday 12 May 2020

Time: 6pm to 7.30pm

Link: https://zoom.us/j/91679574586?pwd=T2NyTUJHN3k2b0N6OTdPck5zYmFKUT09

Meeting ID: 916 7957 4586

Password: 581830

Please RSVP to Stephanie Smith [email protected] to confirm your attendance.

Stephanie will be available on 8536 0115 should you have any issues logging in.

Page 15: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Proposed rezoning of 147 Garnet Road, Kareela | Consultation Outcomes Report | 19 May 2020

Ethos Urban | 2200243 12

Appendix B – Distribution area map

Page 16: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Proposed rezoning of 147 Garnet Road, Kareela | Consultation Outcomes Report | 19 May 2020

Ethos Urban | 2200243 13

Distribution of letter to local residents – residents within 250m of site (by road)

Page 17: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Proposed rezoning of 147 Garnet Road, Kareela | Consultation Outcomes Report | 19 May 2020

Ethos Urban | 2200243 14

Appendix C – Community information webinar presentation

Page 18: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Possible rezoning of 147 Garnet Road Community information webinar

12 May 2020

6pm

Page 19: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

• James Page – Facilitator, Ethos Urban

• Luca Chudleigh – Note taker, Ethos Urban

• Leanne Fretten – Chief Executive Officer, Sylvanvale

• Madeleine Gates – Project Manager, Sylvanvale

• Lyndall Wynne – Project Planner, Wynne Planning

• Peter Couvaras – Project Architect, Couvaras Architects

• Matthew Elyard– Project Traffic Engineer, McLaren Traffic Engineering

Speaker introductions

Page 20: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Agenda

Meeting format James Page

Sylvanvale’s vision and aspirations Leanne Fretten

Planning Proposal overview and Lyndall Wynne & specialists

findings of assessments

Your questions and answers All, Facilitated by James Page

Close: 7.30pm (or earlier)

Page 21: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

• Local residents' session

• No filming / recording

• Mute microphone, unless speaking

• Questions after presentations

• Respectful and patient

• Unanswered questions will be taken on notice

Meeting format

Rules of engagement

Page 22: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Zoom

Page 23: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Sylvanvale’s vision and aspirations

Leanne Fretten

https://youtu.be/S9voWgwAhxk

Page 24: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

For over 700 men and women

What does the next 70 years have in store?Reimagining Specialist Disability Homes, in the Shire and beyond..

Page 25: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

For over 700 men and women

What does the next 70 years have in store?A new, purpose built, accessible administration building in the heart of the Shire

Closer to Public Transport and Local Amenities,

enabling us to better service our customers, staff and

our wider community

Page 26: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Rezoning/Subdivision Overview

and Findings of Assessments Lyndell Wynne

Page 27: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

BATES DRIVE

BATES DRIVE SCHOOL

CHILDCARE CENTRE TO REMAIN

147 GARNET ROAD

JOSPEH BANKS NATIVE PLANTS RESERVE

FLYING FOX COLONY

DRAIN

AG

E C

HANNEL

ENTRY FROM MIKARIE PLACE

KAREELA GOLF COURSE OPPOSITE

boundary boundary

boundary

boundary

boundary

boun

da

ry

boundary

boundary

boundary

boundary

boun

dary

bound

ary

@ A3 Schematic plans only. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

>ARCHITECTS

North

Scale 1 : 750147 Garnet Rd, Kareela 27 Mar 2020Location Plan20020 Sheet 01

B Issued to Planner 28/04/20

C Issue for Community Consultation 04/05/20

The Existing Sylvanvale SiteNearly 1.5haComprising Sylvanvale Head Office, Aspect School and Childcare Facility

Page 28: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

RE

SE

RV

ED

RO

AD

(55

2m

²)

(11

03

m²)

LO

T 1

DP

12

55

74

7

LO

T 1

DP

22

55

81

SP2 ZONE

BATES DRIVE

POR 1141

DP 752064

BATES DRIVE PUBLIC SCHOOL

RE1 ZONE

SP2 ZONE

R2 ZONE

E2 ZONE

RE1 ZONE

4557m² (INCLUDING RIGHT OF WAY B)

RE

SE

RV

ED

RO

AD

RI G

HT

OF

WA

Y V

AR

IAB

LE

WID

TH

RIGHT OF WAY VARIABLE

W IDTH

LOT 105 LOT 104

A(5

52

m²)

B

(42

4m

²)

9 569m²

(11

03

m²)

LO

T 1

DP

12

55

74

7

C

LO

T 1

DP

22

55

81

C

C

PROPOSED R3 ZONEEXISTING SP2 ZONE

TO REMAIN

BATES DRIVE

POR 1141

DP 752064

7012

DP 1059414

BATES DRIVE PUBLIC SCHOOL

EXISTING RE1 ZONE TO

REMAIN

EXISTING SP2 ZONE TO REMAIN

EXISTING R2 ZONE TO

REMAIN

EXISTING E2 ZONE

TO REMAIN

@ A3 Schematic plans only. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

>ARCHITECTS

North

Scale 1 : 1250147 Garnet Rd, Kareela 27 Mar 2020Proposed Zoning Plan20020 Sheet 04

1. Current Zoning Plan 2. Proposed Zoning PlanScale 1 : 1250 Scale 1 : 1250

C Issue for Community Consultation 04/05/20

Rezoning from SP2 to R3 and SubdivisionSpecial Uses to Townhouses

Page 29: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

The Planning Proposal (Rezoning Application) Process

Page 30: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

• Bushfire assessment

• Flooding assessment

• Flora and fauna assessment

• Access, traffic and parking assessment

• Arboriculture assessment

• Stormwater assessment and preliminary design

• Landscape design

• Visual impact assessment

• Planning assessment

• Survey

• Architectural design.

How we got to this pointA preliminary investigation stageAssessing Opportunities and Constraints

Page 31: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

The main Opportunities

11M AS

SET PRO

TECTIO

N ZO

NE

11M ASSET PROTECTION ZONE

14M AS

SET PRO

TECTIO

N ZO

NE

6.41

EA

SE

ME

NT

FO

R T

RA

NS

MIS

SIO

N L

INE

4m SETBACK

14M

AS

SE

T P

RO

TE

CT

ION

ZO

NE

Secondary access to bates Drive School

MIKARIE PLACE

HEAVILY TREE COVERED AREA ADJOINS

BATES DRIVE

CHILDCARE CENTRE

BATES DRIVE SCHOOL

Existing driveway access from Mikarie Place

OPPORTUNITIES

Interface to Joseph Banks Reserve adjoining

Island Site - surrounded by trees & not visible from surrounding streets or dwellings

Existing roadway provides safe & secure access for Childcare Centre & is suitable for Garbage Collection vehicles

Existing boundary wall acts as flood protection

Topography will potentially allow for elevated views

School playground areas along boundary are largely covered and boundary trees provide additional privacy screening

Trees and other environmental constraints areas are generally on the perimeter of the site

Flying foxes do not appear to inhabit any trees within the site

Existing Childcare centre can remain

Existing secondary/informal access to School can be retained and/or formalised

VIEW

@ A3 Schematic plans only. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

>ARCHITECTS

North

Scale 1 : 750147 Garnet Rd, Kareela 27 Mar 2020Opportunities20020 Sheet 03

B Issued to Planner 28/04/20

C Issue for Community Consultation 04/05/20

Page 32: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

The main Constraints

11M AS

SET PRO

TECTIO

N ZO

NE

11M ASSET PROTECTION ZONE

14M AS

SET PRO

TECTIO

N ZO

NE

6.41

EA

SE

ME

NT

FO

R T

RA

NS

MIS

SIO

N L

INE

4m SETBACK

14M

AS

SE

T P

RO

TE

CT

ION

ZO

NE

Secondary access to bates Drive School

MIKARIE PLACE

RIG

HT

OF

WA

Y

HEAVILY TREE COVERED AREA ADJOINS

BATES DRIVE

BATES DRIVE SCHOOL

CONSTRAINTS

Irregular Shaped Site

Bushfire risk from adjoining reserve

Powerlines cross the site

Required APZ exceeds minimum setbacks

Steep topography in some areas

Potential impacts on School for special needs & disabled children

Potential Flooding risks

Potential Noise & emissions from the road

Potential impacts on & from flying fox colony

VIEW

VIE

W

14000

@ A3 Schematic plans only. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

>ARCHITECTS

North

Scale 1 : 750147 Garnet Rd, Kareela 27 Mar 2020Constraints20020 Sheet 02

B Issued to Planner 28/04/20

C Issue for Community Consultation 04/05/20

Page 33: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Key development stats0.7:1, 9m max ht, 30% landscape42 dwellings, generally 2 storey

Page 34: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

The proposed scheme

Peter Couvaras

Page 35: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Site Plan

Page 36: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

A new vision

Mostly two storeytownhouses with basement

Nestled within the hillside, stepped down the site

Page 37: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Central courtyard area

Page 38: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Elevations

@ A3 Schematic plans only. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

>ARCHITECTS

Scale 1 : 500147 Garnet Rd, Kareela 27 Mar 2020Elevations20020 Sheet 12

Scale 1 : 500

1. West

Scale 1 : 500

2. East

Scale 1 : 500

3. South

A Consultant Issue 23/04/20

B Issued to Planner 28/04/20

C Issue for Community Consultation 04/05/20

Page 39: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Landscape

Plan

Page 40: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Parking and traffic

Matthew Elyard

Page 41: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

ParkingMore parking onsite

Existing (Sylvanvale, Pool, Aspect School, Childcare Centre, Bates Drive School)

• 72 vehicles onsite

• 42 vehicles on street.

Proposed with rezoning (Townhouses, Childcare Centre and Bates Drive School)

• Moves all parking onsite – 101 spaces provided

Page 42: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

TrafficA reduction in traffic

Proposed with rezoning (Townhouses, Childcare Centre and Bates Drive School)

• AM Peak: 92 less vehicles in and 14 less vehicles out

• PM Peak: 24 less vehicles in and 92 less vehicles out

• Improved intersection performance

• Improved safety

Page 43: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Questions and answers

Page 44: Engagement Outcomes Report€¦ · 2.1 Objectives 4 2.2 Principles 4 2.3 Methods 4 2.4 Activities and tools 5 3.0 Engagement Feedback 7 3.1 Community Organisations 7 3.2 Local residents

Thank you for attending tonight’s information webinar

Email questions to [email protected]