43
1 Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy 2012 2015

Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

1

Engagement, Experience and

Communications Strategy

2012 – 2015

Page 2: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

2

CONTENTS SECTION PAGE

1 Introduction 3

2 Vision and Values 3

3 Empowering patients and People: Our Approach to Engagement, Experience and Communication

3

4 Engagement, Experience and Communication Objectives

7

5 Tools and Tactics 5.1 Active involvement 5.2 External Communications 5.3 Internal Communications 5.4 Media Relations 5.5 Crisis Communications 5.6 Horizon scanning 5.7 Brand Management 1.1.1.1 5.8 Brand Positioning

9

6 Stakeholders 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix

18

7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks

21

8 Appendix A

Conclusion Delivery Plan

22 23

Appendix B SEE Patient Experience Programme Flowchart

30

Appendix C Warrington Health Forum Terms of Reference

31

Appendix D Media Protocol 34

Appendix E Key Messages 41

Approved April 2012 1

st refresh September 2012

2nd

refresh October 2012 Next refresh April 2013

Page 3: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

3

1. Introduction

The 2010 NHS White Paper ‘Liberating the NHS’ signalled a significant change for the NHS, and placed a clear focus on moving to a system built around clinical leadership. This new system would see the development of Clinical Commissioning Groups, taking over the leadership and commissioning role from PCTs. “No Decision about me without me” is a clear statement right at the very heart of the White Paper and Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) is committed to making this a reality.

Representing each of the towns 26 GP Practices, the CCG is built around well-established clinical leadership, effective partnership arrangements and has strong foundations in terms of patient and public engagement. GP members have organised themselves into four groups in order to facilitate and enable them to work collaboratively on a range of initiatives and programmes. The CCG has already developed a close working relationship and joint commissioning arrangements with the Local Authority and is a key member of the Shadow Health and Wellbeing Board, in addition to playing an active part in a range of other strategic partnership boards. As a first wave pathfinder, the CCG took the lead responsibility for commissioning the majority of health care services for the people of Warrington with effect from 1 April 2011. It has an established governance structure and a Governing Body which includes four GP members, representing the town’s 26 GP practices and is a formal subcommittee of the Cheshire, Warrington and Wirral Cluster Board, who remain the statutory accountable body until April 2013. In April 2012 Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group entered the final phase of development before becoming, subject to authorisation, the new statutory body responsible for the local health budget. Progress to date has been excellent and the CCG has already established itself as the lead with provider and partner organisations.

2. Our Vision and Values Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group has described its Vision as:

“Excellence for Warrington”

and have committed to;

work in partnership to develop the best health services for people in Warrington

contribute to a healthier Warrington for all

focus on our Patients

work in partnership with the local population

recognise external constraints whilst striving for quality This vision is underpinned by seven key values which are;

Excellence

Valuing patients and partners

Accountability

Partnership in everything

Honesty and integrity

Open and transparent

Courage

3. Our Approach to Engagement, Experience and

Communication The NHS Constitution signalled a move away from targets and central direction towards a system of rights and responsibilities relating to the quality of care; “the NHS aspires to the highest standards of excellence and professionalism in the provision of high-quality care that is safe, effective and focussed on the patient experience” (para 3, p3). This now gives patients legal rights to certain aspects of their care.

Page 4: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

4

The 2010 NHS White Paper reinforced the rights of the constitution and the need for NHS commissioners and providers to ensure that services are built around, and provided to deliver personalised patient care. The NHS Constitution also states that one of the seven key principles that guide the NHS is that it works across boundaries and in partnership with other organisations. Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group has made a firm commitment to not only fulfil the requirements of the NHS Constitution and the 2010 NHS White Paper, but to really embrace the principles and make ‘no decision about me without me’ a reality for the people of Warrington. We already have established relationships with a range of groups, which feed into the organisation; however, we are aware that many of the current groups we engage with are ‘activity specific’ such as the Older Peoples Forum and Warrington Disability Partnership. We fully recognise the importance of these relationships and the value they bring to the organisation and we are committed to continuing to build on these relationships, at the same time as seeking to widen our span of engagement. We understand that informing and engaging with the public is fundamental for the development of the CCG - effective communication and engagement is about getting the right messages to the right audiences through the most appropriate channels at the most appropriate time. It is to reach out to all sections of the community and ensure that people are supported and informed enough to engage productively and it is a two way process - informing and sharing, listening and responding to incoming communications is essential. We understand therefore that it is vital that the CCG develops its stakeholder relations, including engagement with GPs, and the way in which it seeks and

uses feedback to inform decision making and in developing health services for the people of Warrington. In terms of communication, it is recognised that engagement and communications are intrinsically linked, and that effective communication is a key enabler to support optimum engagement and involvement. Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group is committed to a culture of openness, transparency and honesty, and effective communication will be a key enabler in facilitating this.

We will ensure that our communication mechanisms are fit for purpose. We will continually look to improve our ability to communicate effectively, we will capitalise on our opportunities and will work with our partners and providers to utilise already established routes. We also recognise the importance of the media and we will continue to develop our media relationships, taking a proactive approach to dealing with the media and we will, when necessary defend the organisation and challenge mis-reporting. We will also enhance our capabilities in terms of the use of social media, investing in new technologies, which will further enhance our capabilities in terms of effective engagement and communication. We will also strive to put in place as many mechanisms as possible to actively seek the views and experiences of local people. The 2011/12 Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group Communication Plan set the foundations for how the CCG would develop in terms of engagement and communication and this strategy builds upon what the 2011/12 plan delivered.

This strategy not only reflects the requirements of the NHS constitution and the CCG’s statutory obligations which will be aligned to the legislated changes outlined in the 2012 Health and Social Care Act, but goes much further into building effective engagement into all the work of Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group.

Page 5: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

5

We have developed clear achievable engagement and communication objectives, as detailed below, which will be supported by the required resources in terms of tools and time. This strategy provides the framework for developing the engagement and communication activities during the transition period and beyond. The detailed delivery plan in Appendix A describes how the strategy will be implemented, including roles and responsibilities, a detailed action plan, and evaluation process. The successful implementation of this strategy will ensure that the CCG progresses through the authorisation process successfully and becomes a leading clinical commissioning group.

3.1 How Patient feedback informs CCG decision making The structure below illustrates the way in which we gather patient experience data via a range of routes and how this data is utilised in order to influence the CCG decision making process. The patient feedback received through the various channels is filtered to • Clinicians • Commissioning Support • Quality Committee • Governing Body This feedback is then considered and taken into account for future commissioning plans

3.2 Patient Participation Groups Patient Participation Groups (PPGs) are one of many ways in which we can increase our engagement with patients and offer a great opportunity to maximise our contact with patients and carers. We have been working with our practices to develop a PPG in every practice, promoting and utilising the National Association for Patient Participation (www.napp.org.uk) tools and guidance. Each PPG has utilised the NAPP best practice Terms of Reference as the basis for developing their own PPG. We will continue to further develop our existing mechanisms of engaging with patients and the public and have already launched a membership scheme, which although in its early stages, will go some way to support our engagement activity and provide a mechanism for wider involvement. Recognising that other key providers also have membership schemes we will seek to work co-operatively with them in our engagement processes to avoid confusion for the patients and public of Warrington. As commissioners we want to ensure that patients feel that they are included in their care and that they have a voice which can directly influence the decisions made by the CCG. We know that our providers

Page 6: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

6

are committed to providing excellent quality services and have made strategic commitments to improve the quality of their services and improving patients’ experiences of their services. Patient feedback is captured through a variety of channels one method is through Patient Participation Groups within GP Practices. Information captured through the PPG’s can either be submitted through the normal patient experience route or via the PPG representative who sits on the Warrington Health Forum (the Terms of Reference for this group are attached as an appendix). When information from the PPG is captured the patient experience flow chart is followed to ensure that it is treated in the same way as other patient experience feedback. The diagram clearly demonstrates how information captured through the various patient experience channels is fed up to the CCG. Once patient feedback is received and forwarded to the appropriate provider / commissioner, a response from the provider is produced and this is then fed back to the person / group who provided the feedback, this highlights any lessons learnt by the provider and what measures have been put in place to ensure that the issue or incident doesn’t happen again. The methods we use to feedback to the person depends on their chosen method, Email, Face to Face, Focus group, Letter etc.

3.3 Patient Experience Programme (SEE) Safety Effectiveness and Experience

The CCG is committed to improving patient experience and fully recognised the importance of patient experience data. The proactive capture, analysis, triangulation and interpretation of information about the experience of patients and carers will be used to inform all planning and commissioning decisions.

We have an established patient experience programme (SEE – Safety Effectiveness and Experience), which is widely publicised and provides a means for people to provide their patient experience feedback through a variety of channels. Through this programme we actively seek patient stories and the CCG Governing Body, prior to each board

meeting, hear first-hand from a patient with their story. Appendix B details the way in which we utilised the feedback obtained through the SEE programme. We also have an established Patient Experience and Quality Group, which reports into the Quality Committee, which is a sub-committee of the CCG Governing Body. This groups reviews patient experience data on system wide basis, agrees on actions to improve patient experience and steers the development of quality improvement across the health economy. It is our intention to extend our capabilities around the collection of patient experience feedback, to ensure that the data being reviewed at the Patient Experience and Quality Group is well rounded and from a diverse range of clinical areas. One example of service change in response to patient feedback is the re-design of anti-coagulant services. Patients told us through feedback that they were not happy with the current service, specifically around the travelling time, parking issues and waiting time within the hospital for what was a very basic procedure. What we did…..The anti – coagulant team held a focus group with a number of patients to discuss how to improve the service. The patients were asked; ‘What kind of service would you like to see?’ The main emerging issues included locally based, easy access, sufficient parking, access for wheelchairs and an appointment system that worked.

A post code search of the current case load was carried out to ascertain where the service was most needed. Grappenhall and Westbrook were identified as areas where a service could be piloted; both have excellent parking facilities and easy access to the clinical areas. The success of the pilot led to the identification of other sites. The outcome….. was that as a result of this patient feedback there are now a number of anti-coagulant clinics in five geographical areas with a further two due to open shortly. The benefits of the service include;

Page 7: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

7

Patients now have local direct access to the anti-coagulant team who they can contact to discuss any concerns they may have.

The redesign of the service had no financial costs.

1600 patients now access this service locally and no longer need to travel to the hospital.

An early win demonstrating how effective care delivery can work between the acute and community sector.

Now receiving positive patient feedback for this service.

3.4 Warrington Health Forum We have established a Warrington Health Forum, with representation from each PPG, in addition to Links and others. This forum provides the CCG with great opportunities in further developing our relationships with the voluntary sector, charitable sector, local faith groups and other community forums (see Appendix C, for draft Terms of Reference). This group is the sounding board for CCG Governing Body and will be the mechanism by which the CCG engages with regards to the CCGs work programmes. A member of the CCG will be also be part of and attend LINk/HealthWatch meetings to provide regular updates and bring information and questions back to the CCG to provide two-way communications.

4. Engagement, Experience and Communication Objectives The strategy is built around four key objectives, with clear aims and

identified desired outcomes, as detailed below;

Objective One

This will be achieved by:

Ensuring the public voice influences and is directly involved in the decisions made by Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group

Actively seeking out patient experience data from a range of sources.

Ensuring that patient experience data is systematically collected and embedded into work programmes.

Using the most appropriate means of communications for the requirements of the audience

Using a wide variety of methods and innovative approaches to engagement

Working closely with hard to reach groups to ensure they have a voice

Using patient experience data and information to inform our work and to work with provider organisations to listen to patients more and act on their feedback

'Closing the loop' by reporting on the impact of public feedback on Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group decisions

Learning from good practice and tried and tested examples of engagement

Outcomes of this objective:

People in Warrington feel they have a voice in the decisions made by the CCG and will be able to identify how they have influenced local

To continue to build continuous and meaningful engagement with our public, patients and carers to influence the shaping of services and improve the health and wellbeing of people in Warrington.

Page 8: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

8

NHS services. There will be improved patient experience and a reduction in complaints and negative media attention.

Objective Two

This will be achieved by:

Protecting the reputation and promoting the Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group and NHS brand

Developing good media relations and addressing any inaccuracies to prevent misunderstanding and confusion

Ensuring internal and external audiences are aware of CCG and locality developments as well as issues facing the Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group

Providing consistent and timely messages internally and externally to various audiences

Working collaboratively with partners and other NHS organisations in and around Warrington

Outcomes of this objective:

Stakeholders are confident that the Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group is successfully taking over as the lead, with responsibility for commissioning healthcare services and is operating in the best interests of the people of Warrington.

Objective Three

This will be achieved by:

Working with member practices, providers and partners to ensure that public information is accurate and up to date.

Working collaboratively with providers and partners to ensure that messages are consistent and timely.

Working closely with our community groups, including hard to reach groups to ensure that messages and information are being received and are understood.

Continuously scoping new and innovative ways of communicating, making best use of new technologies and digital communication.

Regularly testing out the effectiveness of communications Making language meaningful for staff, public and patients in all

communications

The outcomes of this objective will be:

The people of Warrington will be well informed and will have a good understanding of services and what is available to them. People will have the information they need to help them to improve their own health and wellbeing. Reduction in inappropriate use of services, reduction in DNA’s and increased use of self-care.

Increase confidence, with patients, public, provider and partner organisations in Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group as an effective and responsive commissioning organisation

Develop and maintain effective communication channels to ensure that the people of Warrington have the information they need to enable them to access the right care at the right time, helping them to look after themselves and improve their health and wellbeing.

Page 9: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

9

Objective Four

This will be achieved by:

Developing and maintaining good media relations

Developing internal two-way communications channels with staff, practice and GP members.

Ensuring internal and external audiences are aware of services developments and successes

Ensuring internal and external audiences are able to feedback information on successes and achievements through accessible routes

Making language meaningful for staff, public and patients in all communications

The outcomes of this objective will be: The CCG will have the support they need to ensure effective relations with the media and clinicians will understand their role and what is expected of them in terms of engagement and communication. CCG member practices and staff feel they can express their opinions and judgment and they feel their contribution is valued. The public will feel valued and informed and will be aware of how they can feedback to the CCG. In order to achieve our objectives, a detailed ‘rolling’ action plan has been developed, as detailed in the Delivery Plan in Appendix A. This action plan details the planned engagement and communication activities that will be undertaken to deliver on the objectives.

It should be noted that this is working document as it is recognised that we are working in a dynamic environment which is continually changing, therefore the action plan will change and flex to meet potential changes.

5. Tools and Tactics Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group will utilise a mixture of approaches, as detailed below to actively seek out the views of our local population and we will ensure that our methods are evidence based and work for our intended audiences. We will ensure that we have the right systems and communication methods in place to ensure timely, relevant communications with each of our internal and external stakeholder groups. This will require a number of different approaches, including:

Events, including partnership engagement events, national events.

Focus groups Community forums Meetings (internal and external) Workshops strategies, plans, reports and other formal

publications Written communications Face-to-face, interpersonal communications Meeting papers and minutes Newsletters Briefings Website / intranet Online Social Media Press releases Paid media and advertising campaigns

Develop a culture within Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group that promotes open engagement and communication within and outside the organisation.

Page 10: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

10

Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group also recognises the benefits of information technology and will strive to use electronic communications, where appropriate.

Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group will also fulfil its statutory

obligations to provide information in differing formats on request (e.g.

large print, other languages, Braille or audio).

5.1 Active involvement We will proactively seek and will continue to build meaningful engagement with all our stakeholders, including patient and the public and will ensure that relationships are managed and maintained during the transition process and beyond. We have established a new Warrington Health Forum, with representation from each of the practice PPGs, in addition to other members and we will actively seek the views and support of this group in all our engagement activity. We will not only ensure that we comply with our statutory obligations but will proactively seek involvement and engagement, through both formal and informal routes. We will utilise our PPGs, Health Forum and membership scheme to collect feedback on a qualitative and quantitative basis and will expand on the traditional paper based methods, utilising new technologies to collect real time patient experience data. Working with our providers, we will embrace the opportunities which technology and social media bring and will actively collect first hand, real time patient experience feedback , for example, we will utilise vox pops as a means to ask patients about their experience, rather than rely on a set of written questions and answers. It is our ambition that wherever possible, we will be able to hear, directly from patients, in their own words what their experience was.

We will further develop our SEE patient experience programme and will continue to work with the many groups and forums to actively seek feedback. We will also ensure that we continue to utilise and respond to feedback via PALs and complaints and will utilise this data, along with all our other patient experience date to drive and inform our commissioning decisions. Warrington CCG captures patient experience / feedback through a variety of channels which include:

SEE

Facebook

Twitter

Focus Group

1-2-1 Meetings

Patient Opinion

Patient Choices

Working on the Patient Experience Work Programme

Health Events

Meeting

Regular sessions with Vulnerable Adults

The feedback received through the channels can be both positive and negative experiences of people accessing NHS services across Warrington. A patient experience flow chart is in place which clearly highlights what happens when feedback is submitted to the CCG whether it’s negative or positive. This flow chart is in place to allow commissioners and providers to fully understand what happens when feedback is submitted and what we expect from them in regards to them investigating the issue and providing further feedback to us and then

Page 11: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

11

this feedback is then passed back to the person who provided the information.

Any feedback received positive or negative is then escalated as per the graphic on page 6, to the patient experience and quality meeting for further discussion and triangulation against other services for examples PAL, Complaints, LINks etc. the triangulation exercise is carried out to ensure trends are identified early and acted on appropriately where appropriate the feedback / experience will be escalated further to the most relevant committee for example SUI’s group serious untoward incident review group or the CCG Quality Committee. As identified within the patient experience flow chart once feedback is passed onto providers, services we have a clear process to ensure outcomes, responses from providers are passed onto those people who provided the initial feedback / experience this can be done in a number of ways via, face to face, letter, phone, email etc. The Public, Patient Engagement / Patient Experience Officer regularly spends time with Vulnerable adults for example people who have learning disability, homeless, older people etc., this is a great way of engaging with these group who would not normally come forward and engage with health services and provide their experiences of the NHS. When feedback is captured from these groups the flow patient experience flow chart is followed and follow up sessions are arranged to ensure the outcomes are passed back to the groups. The CCG is implementing a patient experience module as part of the Datix resource, this module will ensure the ‘soft data’ submitted is triangulated across PALS, Complaints, Patient Participation Group, GP Practices and via federation meetings and other providers to ensure trends are picked up and acted on accordingly. This facility will allow GPs to register issues during the patient consultation. This will provide additional real time data to the triangulation described above. In addition, GPs will actively encourage

patients to use all of the available feedback mechanisms to reinforce the value we place upon this. Warrington CCG is in the process of developing a Warrington Health Forum. This forum will be made up of representation from the CCG, Patient Participation Group and third sector organisations, this group will be used as another mechanism for ensuring information from

practice and community level are captured and fed into the CCG.

5.2 External Communications Patients and the Public General communication with the public will be facilitated via the media, public events and the attendance at the various networks and meetings. We will utilise written, face to face and e-communications and will always ensure that the mechanisms fits the requirements of the audience. In order to ensure clarity of message around what the transition means to the public we have developed a suite is key messages, which will ensure consistency of message throughout all our communication and will ensure clarity on what the reforms mean to patients and the public. We have already introduced a monthly newsletter which is issued to our members, which will be used to provide members with updates and information and as a means to encourage feedback. We will utilise the annual general meeting as a means to promote the CCG and encourage engagement in the business of the CCG. We will work collaboratively with partners and providers to have a presence at a range of events and forums.

Page 12: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

12

We will utilise the existing communication mechanisms within our partner and provider organisations, for example the LA Wire Magazine and will, where appropriate will work collaboratively with provider organisations to utilise their mechanisms in relation to their members. The CCG use a number of ways to carry out meaningful engagement with the whole community and encourage all groups across the borough to provide their experiences and feedback of using the services we commission. We have developed various resources to ensure the whole community depending on their diverse have the same chance of engaging with the CCG and providing valuable feedback. The methods provided and used by the CCG are:

SEE – Safety, Experience, Effectiveness

Patient Opinion

Patient Choices

Facebook

Twitter

Handheld Devices

Health Events

Meetings

Focus Group

Patient Participation Groups

Warrington Health Forum

Regular attendance at Vulnerable Group Meetings

Local involvement Networks

As previously discussed any information captured through the above is collated in the same process and fed back in the same way.

Partners and Providers

We will continue to utilise existing meeting and network arrangements and we will introduce a quarterly high level ‘spotlight’ brief, to highlight key successes, progress on specific programmes of work and to share general news.

Publications and literature

We will only produce new printed collateral when absolutely necessary and will utilise existing mechanisms within health, LA, provider and community publications to communicate key information. We will, where possible, only produce documents and publications in electronic format. When there is a need to produce information in relation to work streams, this is likely to be low volume and will be produced locally where possible.

Web Site Increasingly, people use the Internet to seek information about an organisation, where to obtain help and advice and how to access services. Equally, websites are being used more and more as the means for people providing feedback. We acknowledge the power of web based communications and how we can use the website to help to facilitate involvement in addition to being a means of collecting patient experience data. The CCG has an established high quality, easy to navigate website, we will ensure that as new technologies and capabilities are identified the website if further developed. We will also ensure that the website is maintained regularly and quarterly full reviews will be undertaken.

Page 13: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

13

We will continue to develop the website in conjunction with staff and other key stakeholders as appropriate. Key messages and information, news and media releases and important publications such as the statutory annual report and duty to involve report will all be published on our web site. We will ensure that the website is accessible to all and that we continually review and test out the functionality to ensure it meets the needs of the public.

E-communications

We will develop and maintain our electronic communication mechanisms - managing web content and providing content for use on partner and provider sites. We will further develop our capabilities around social media, developing the established Face book and Twitter sites. We will, where possible communicate via visual form, replacing hard copy products with video media.

Events

We will plan and deliver public events, where required in line with our statutory obligation in terms of public consultation. We will also utilise existing planned events, including events hosted by our partners and providers to communicate key messages and to take advantage of any PR opportunities.

Members of Parliament Political support for the CCG is important in raising and maintaining the CCG’s profile and creating awareness. MPs will be regularly briefed on successes and issues within their local constituency.

Face to face meetings with the CCG Accountable Officer and Chair will ensure that relationships with our MPs are maintained and that they are provided with information first hand. We will also ensure that ad hoc briefings are prepared in relation to emerging issues to ensure political support and minimise the risk of MPs being misinformed. We will also continue to ensure that we respond quickly and effectively to requests from the Ministerial Briefing Unit in relation to parliamentary questions etc. and will continue to monitor activity around local issues, PQ’s and responses. This information will be shared with board members within the weekly communication update.

Shouting about what we do We will ensure effective marketing and communication of successes, demonstrating and highlighting improvements in health outcomes as a result of commissioning activity.

5.3 Internal Communications CCG Member practices We will continue to utilise the weekly Commissioning Brief to communicate to member practices, GPs and practice staff and will look to further develop this and to continue to encourage two way communication and feedback. We will support the facilitation of events and where required will co-ordinate briefing sessions with GP members on behalf of the CCG Governing Body. We will further develop the ‘protected’ internal facing area within the CCG website to provide a means to share information with staff, practices and GP members and to enable them to share information between themselves.

Page 14: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

14

There are also a number of emerging processes to support the CCG in its engagement with GP practices. This is so that GP practice staff are aware of our decision making, as well as to support GP practice staff in their local engagement priorities to share with patients. These include:

GP practice buddying scheme

Council of Members

GP practice visits

Future leaders group

Additional communications channels

Extranet – an extranet will launch with logins for each GP practice.

The extranet will include a virtual library of relevant documents

Engagement toolkit to support practices

Warrington CCG newsletter – a bimonthly newsletter is emailed

to all GPs, practice managers and practice nurses, covering the

key issues.

E-News – an E-News update for stakeholders including GP

practices

Additional communications toolkit of poster and newsletter

templates that follow the Warrington CCG brand guidelines will

be made available so that all practices can cost effectively

produce professional materials.

CCG Staff Our staff and our member practices are our ambassadors and are well placed to promote the work that we do. It is essential that they are kept well informed and up-to-date on developments and initiatives, and are able to contribute to decision making. To be fully effective and achieve the highest success, communications throughout the organisation should be bottom up as well as top down approach. All our staff have a responsibility to promote communications and play their part in this process.

Managers will be encouraged to lead by example to ensure individuals are empowered to improve the way they communicate and share information with others. The Communications Team will ensure that all communication supports a culture of open, honest and effective two-way communications. We will continue to develop our internal communication channels and will ensure that all internal communication channels have effective feedback mechanisms. We will ensure that staff receive timely updates and, will strive to ensure that staff receive important information first hand via face to face briefings and that they are informed of any issues before they are reported in the press.

We will utilise the intranet to share key messages from the Accountable Officer, Chair and other board members. We will reintroduce the weekly face to face briefing, encouraging the senior management team to take an active part in sharing information and news. We will also utilise this to encourage staff feedback and as a means to rebut rumours. This weekly briefing will be open to staff who will be employed within the CSS but have identified roles in supporting the CCG.

We will also ensure that face briefings are arranged to engage staff

directly around plans that affect them directly.

We will utilise the global email system to share information with staff which is time critical and will publish a weekly update directly after the weekly face to face briefing to reinforce what has been briefed and to ensure that those staff not in attendance are made aware.

All communications will encourage feedback on an on-going basis from our staff and members to ensure they remain effective.

Page 15: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

15

Board Members It is crucial that the CCG Governing Body members are kept up-to-date of key developments, media coverage and issues. The Communications Team will provide CCG Board members with a weekly communications update, which will include all media activity, political issues (PQ’s etc.) and a high level brief on any emerging issues which may impact on the reputation of the CCG (SUI’s etc.).

Intranet site We have developed a new intranet site, which provides the CCG to share information with staff and GP members and will enable staff to access information including policies and protocols. The intranet will be used as a platform to support a common corporate culture, as every user will have access to the same information. The site will be used to host the communications ‘how to toolkit’ to enable staff to access templates, guidance notes etc. The site will also host all corporate information for staff, including policies, procedure etc.

5.4 Media Relations We fully recognise the power of the media and the media, if managed proactively can be one of the most effective means of engaging with the wider public. Our approach when working with the media will be proactive, securing positive coverage in a wide range of publications, local, regional and national, in addition to trade press, online and broadcast. We will hold monthly meetings with local editors and health correspondents, including members of the CCG Governing Body and other senior officers when required. We will ensure that there is weekly one to one contact with the local media and will offer local health correspondents a local induction into the CCG.

A proactive approach We recognise the power of our local newspapers and radio stations across the borough and a significant amount of effort has been made towards building and strengthening relationships with editors and local health reporters. The communications team will provide local media with weekly updates on topical issues and will ensure that one to one weekly contacts are made. We will continue to increase the level of proactive media releases to local media and where appropriate regional, national and trade press. The continued effort on the expose of positive news stories will enhance the CCGs external reputation and will go some way to reducing the impact of negative coverage.

Reacting effectively When dealing with reactive issues we will adopt the following principles when dealing with reactive media enquiries:

We will strive to be helpful when meeting media deadlines

Where possible, we will produce any required statement within their required timescales

We will not comment on individual personal details, we will only confirm facts.

We will agree responses with the key staff involved

We will not lie or intentionally mislead the media but will seek opportunities to get our message across

We will challenge inaccurate reporting.

Page 16: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

16

Media Training We have developed a robust Media Protocol (see Appendix B), which ensures the Communications Team are informed of and involved with all media contact. Media training will be vital in broadening the number of spokespeople available to the CCG who have the appropriate skills to maximise media opportunities and protect or enhance the CCGs reputation. We will develop and deliver basic media training and will, where required source specialist media training.

Media Monitoring Given the media’s influence and potential impact to the CCGs reputation, it is important that the CCG Governing Body, senior officers and GP members are kept informed of positive and negative media coverage, proactive media releases and reactive enquiries that have not resulted in negative coverage for the CCG. We have put in place mechanisms for monitoring the media and have developed a weekly media brief which will be circulated at the end of each week. Any urgent media issues will be briefed immediately by the communications lead. In order to benchmark and fully understand public perceptions, we will explore, with colleagues from other regional CCGs, opportunities to introduce a more in-depth media monitoring process.

5.5 Crisis Communications In the event of a crisis situation or major incident, effective, timely communications are critical. During transition we will continue to work to our major incident and emergency plan communications plan to meet any generic crisis and will, with the lead for emergency planning develop our communication

plans around, business continuity, major incident and pandemic and heat wave requirements. We have developed a media handling protocol which provides detailed guidelines for dealing with the media both proactively and in a crisis situation. It is important that all staff, CCG Governing Body and GP members adhere to this protocol.

5.6 Horizon scanning

We will horizon scan for forthcoming or potential negative or difficult issues and will prepare appropriate responses for any emerging problems. Anticipating how the CCG will need to deal with criticism, for example about financial pressures or contentious commissioning decisions, and ensuring that the CCG are well supported to manage any crises. We will ensure that there is a whole system overview in terms of complaints, MP letters, Parliamentary Questions, negative patient experience feedback and other non-regulatory communication in order to ensure that we are aware of potential emerging issues at the earliest opportunity.

5.7 Brand Management As leader of the local health economy, the reputation of the organisation is critical to successful relationships. Effective management of the CCGs identity and house style is an important element in protecting the organisations reputation and it is important that the CCGs identity is not used inappropriately. In line with our authorisation process the Department of Health have issued the CCG with their official NHS logo and identity – Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group and new templates have all been developed to incorporate the new logo.

Page 17: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

17

The CCG have also considered the organisations wider identity and have taken on a ‘house style’ which complements the branding and gives the CCG a local identity that links them to public health and local authority partners. The interwoven ring design also reflects the identity of the ‘It's all going on in Warrington campaign’ which was launched in 2011 to promote the rich cultural activities that Warrington has to offer. The interwoven rings have been adapted to incorporate the CCG colours and the CCG vision of Excellence for Warrington has been embedded within the circles. A full suite of templates have been developed as part of a ‘how to toolkit’ which will ensure that the branding and house style are being used in accordance with the Department of Health Brand Identity guidelines. The Communications Team will be the keepers of the CCG brand and will work with staff and teams to ensure the corporate style is implemented in an appropriate manner at all levels. Consistency of message, house style and branding will be monitored through all corporate communications.

5.8 Brand Positioning Our CCG has clearly identified its visions and aims, creating a platform that underpins all engagement and communications activity. Understanding our brand positioning helps Warrington CCG to outline the vision and aims of the clinical commissioning group, as well as identifying the key messages. Our brand identity focuses on health services led by patients, and the relationship between clinicians and patient. This basic understanding of the CCG position should be used to frame our communications messages. Understanding our brand positioning has also enabled us to develop a visual identity and brand guidelines for the CCG as well as producing a communications toolkit with templates for posters,

newsletters and other materials. This is being shared with all of our GP member practices. Brand positioning What we do? Scope: What area of activity are we in? Working with you for better health and care in Warrington Status: What status do we want to achieve? Health services led by the people Why we do it? Ambition: What is our heart-felt ambition? Healthier lives for the people of Warrington Ethos: What are the principles behind our actions? Passionate about your health Compassionate about your care How we do it? Style: How do we go about our business? Reaching out to everyone Focused on you Response: What impression do we want to create? I’m heard, I’m healthier, I’m cared for Focus: Our basis for making decisions The best results for people in Warrington

Page 18: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

18

6. Stakeholders

Understanding the organisations stakeholders is essential in ensuring that the CCG had a good understanding and can identify those which an interest in the work of the CCG. The CCG has undertaken an exercise to identify all stakeholders and has analysed and categorised the list to identify those with the greatest interest, through to more peripheral individuals or groups. The CCG has made a commitment to ensure that it engages with all stakeholders, however, more resource will be focussed on engaging with those stakeholders with the highest interest and need in order to maintain their involvement and commitment.

6.1 Stakeholder Analysis

PO

WE

R

Hig

h

Keep satisfied: but not so much that they become bored with messages:

WHHFT Members

5 BP Members

NHS North of England

Local Medical Committees

Local Pharmacy Committees

Manage Closely: these are the people to fully engage and make the greatest efforts to satisfy.

Member Practices

WHHFT – Board

5 BP Board

Bridgewater CT Board

Local Authority Exec Committee

MPs

Local Council Members

Local Overview and Scrutiny Committees

Health and Wellbeing Board

Warrington Local Involvement Networks (LINks)/Health Watch

Third sector and patient support groups (via local CVS organisations)

Media

L

ow

Monitor: do not bore with excessive communication:

Other NHS Staff (providers)

Local Social Enterprises (if and when established!)

Local Chambers of Commerce

Housing Trusts and other public sector organisations

Keep informed: and engage to ensure no major issues are arising

Patients, their carers, families and the general public

CCG Staff

Low High INTEREST

Red – High Power, High Interest – fully engage and satisfy Orange – High Power, Mod Interest – inform, seek approval and satisfy Gold – Mod Power, High Interest – inform and engage Green – Low Power, Low Interest – monitor and inform

Page 19: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

19

6.2 Stakeholder Matrix The following matrix provides the detail in terms of the stakeholder groups, focussing on communication and engagement processes for each of the stakeholder groups We capture patient experience data from the various groups, focussing particular effort on diverse and vulnerable groups as identified within the JSNA these groups include: As well as the groups identified above we also continually engage with the groups identified within the stakeholder matrix below through various mechanisms, including the SEE Patient Experience Programme, Warrington Health Forum, and specific focus groups in relation to commissioning intentions to ensure patient experience data is captured and acted on.

Stakeholder Group

Groups Identified

Engagement & Communication Priorities

All Stakeholders including Patients & Public

Reputation management and public affairs Campaigning for health priorities Managing the brand and the market Awareness of key health messages Engagement and involvement in decision-making

Access to health services messages Self-care messages

Vulnerable Groups

Homeless Population Learning Disability Groups Disability Groups Domestic Violence Older People Black Minority & Ethnic Groups Alcohol Using Population Drug Using Population Gay, Lesbian & Bisexual Population Children & Young People Carers

Through CCG’s extensive reach via its community engagement teams and tailored engagement tools, including focus groups Communication through partnerships with community organisations Use of interpretive tools – translation clarity of language etc.

Media Local Regional National Specialist

Reputation management Can-do” approach to relationships Preparation of key messages to respond to anticipated issues Clear protocols Media training for key spokespeople Assertive, including use of rebuttal

Unemployed, Obese / Overweight, Most deprived 20%, Smokers, Drug Users, BME, Mental Health, LTC, Children & Young People, Children in Need, Youth Offenders, Not in Education, employment or Training, Carers, Domestic Violence, Older People, Physical Disabilities, Learning Disabilities, Sensory Disabilities, Pregnant Women

Page 20: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

20

Key Partners Warrington &Halton Hospital Foundation Trust 5 Borough Partnership Bridgewater Community Trust Warrington Borough Council

Other Partners

Third Sector Local Involvement Networks Faith Groups Resident Groups Department of Health National Commissioning Board & LAT Neighbouring CCGS & Local Authorities

Reputation management High quality, timely information to support partnerships Effective engagement and involvement Communications to support their organisation development Communications about access to services

Influencers Local MP’s Councillors

Reputation management Timely, regular briefings – written and face to face to build awareness and support the objectives

NHS Partners

Acute & Specialist Trusts All Other

Reputation management, particularly

Providers NHS North West Department of Health

Independent Contractors

GP’s and practice staff Pharmacists Dentists Optometrics Local Professional Committees, including LMC & LDC etc.

Timely and consistent communications Effective clinical engagement to build awareness and support for strategic objectives and delivery Reputation management

Other NHS & related partners

NHS Direct Health Protection Agency Workforce Confederation Healthcare Commission NHS Alliance NICE Business Services Authority

Reputation management Awareness of key messages Effective engagement & involvement

Page 21: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

21

7. Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis Having reviewed our situational analysis, it has been identified that a number of areas which were identified as being ‘weaknesses or threats’

Strengths Weaknesses

Established Governing Body with high level of strategic expertise and a varied skill set. Skilled engagement and communication resource via CWW CSU Good clinical engagement

Continuously changing environment

Opportunities Threats

Further enhance member practice engagement Further enhance staff engagement Further enhance clinical engagement between provider and commissioner organisations. Enhance robust working arrangements with partners and providers

Resource within local media organisations – lack of ‘named’ health link. Political challenge Loss of public and clinical engagement and confidence. Loss of staff engagement and confidence, negative effect on staff morale. Diverse and competing demands on time to undertaken the necessary work.

7.2 Risks There are several risks attached to the success of the engagement and communication strategy, as detailed below. Consideration has been given to these risks and the successful implementation of the engagement and communication strategy will contribute to the mitigation of all the risks identified:

Negative media attention around the health bill, ministerial changes and potential impact on the transition and the privatisation of the NHS

Political spotlight drawing NHS finances in to the political debate locally and nationally.

Confusion due to the amount of information being communicated at any one time via provider and partner organisations.

Loss of local engagement and inability to maintain relationships during the transition period due to reduction in resource and changing roles and responsibilities.

Competing demands on media space by public sector organisations.

The impact of the transition on staff morale and staff retention.

Page 22: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

22

8. Conclusion

The ultimate aim of our communication strategy is that all of the people and patients of Warrington will feel fully informed and involved in all the activities of the organisation, understand our roles and responsibilities and how we work in partnership with our key partners and stakeholders. We will work hard to build a strong reputation for the new organisation and use this opportunity to look for new and innovative ways of connecting with our stakeholders. We are committed to keeping our staff fully engaged and creating a positive organisational culture. We recognise that our staff will be critical in enabling the organisation to meet the challenges ahead and will seek to maximise the fantastic resource that we have in them. This plan outlines the work that we will continue to do in order to ensure that we listen and understand the population’s priorities and aspirations and utilise this knowledge to responsibly and effectively commission on their behalf. The CCG will communicate in a clear, timely and meaningful manner, enabling local people to make informed decisions and take ownership of their own well-being, health and lifestyle; thus enabling us all to work to create excellence for Warrington

Page 23: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

23

Appendix A

ENGAGEMENT, EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNICATION DELIVERY PLAN Roles and responsibilities Effective engagement and communication is everyone’s responsibility and the CCG Governing Body, member practices, staff, including clinicians and practice staff all have a key role in promoting the work of Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group, the services which it commissions and in raising awareness of health campaigns and initiatives. The engagement and communication lead will ensure that all Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group members and staff are well informed and supported to do this.

Key responsibilities

The Senior Communications Lead will be responsible for:

Developing and managing delivery of the communication &

engagement strategy and action plan.

Providing the CCG Governing Body with progress reports and will also ensure that the board is made aware of any significant issues which will impact on the effectiveness of the strategy and any risk in terms of achieving the objectives.

Providing strategic input to the work of Warrington Clinical

Commissioning Group, providing strategic advice on engagement

and communication requirements.

Identifying, planning for and responding to emerging issues which

may have a detrimental impact on the reputation of the CCG and /

or the NHS brand.

Handling of all communication, including crisis communications in

relation to serious and untoward incidents.

Handling of all communication, including media activity in relation to

major incidents as part of emergency planning arrangements. (this

includes on call out of hours support)

Handling of reactive media activity, ensuring appropriate response and timely escalation of issues and where required co-ordinate responses with communication leads from partner and provider organisations.

Oversight of all proactive media activity, and, where required co-ordinate media activity with communication leads from partner and provider organisations.

Co-ordinating activity, where required with communication leads

across the partner organisations.

Having a system wide overview of all incoming communication

(formal and informal i.e. complaints, MP letters, Parliamentary

Questions) and identification and response to emerging issues.

The Public, Patient Engagement / Patient Experience Officer

will be responsible for:

Delivery of all engagement operational activity identified in the

engagement and communication work plan.

Acting as the first point of contact for community and third sector

groups in relation to public engagement activity.

Delivery of all patient experience activity identified

Provide regular update reports to Warrington Clinical

Commissioning Group Board members Quality Committee and

patient experience and quality group and any other committees and

meetings as required

Page 24: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

24

Alerting the communications lead with information around any

emerging issues in relation to engagement activity which may

impact on the organisations reputation.

Attend a variety of third sector and community group meetings and

present updates as and when required

Attend a variety public events across the borough

Development and maintenance of the membership scheme

Continually monitor the SEE Website, Patient Opinion and patient

choices

Supporting and advising commissioning leads and CCG senior

officers with practical engagement support, including the

development and implementation of engagement plans.

Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body members will be responsible for:

Taking the lead and fronting media activity when required, both in

relation to proactive and reactive issues.

Lead on the delivery of high level communication to staff, member

practices, GP members, partner and providers.

Alerting the communications lead with any emerging issues

Supporting the CCG by attendance and involvement in public

events.

Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group Clinical Leads,

Commissioning Leads and Senior Officers will be

responsible for:

Alerting the communications lead with any emerging issues.

Providing updates to the communication lead for inclusion in

briefings etc.

Leading on engagement and communication activity in relation to

specific work programmes.

The communications officer will be responsible for

Delivery of all communication operational activity identified in the

engagement and communication work plan.

Acting as the first point of contact for media enquiries.

Supporting clinical leads, commissioning leads and CCG senior

officers with practical communication support, including the

development and implementation of communication plans.

Budget and resources

Much of the engagement and communication activity can be delivered

at nil additional cost through use of existing resources and channels of

engagement and communication. Activity which has been identified as

requiring additional budget has been detailed in the action plan.

Any activity in relation to specific work streams which have not yet

been identified will be fully costed and submitted to the appropriate

work stream lead for approval before any activity is commissioned.

The CCG has entered into an agreement to source communication

support with Cheshire Warrington and Wirral Commissioning Support

Unit. The CCG has employed a WTE engagement officer who is

responsible for all CCG engagement activity at a local level.

The CCG has agreed with CWW CSU that where regional or national

communication and engagement support is required in response to

issues which cross a bigger footprint than the CCG, then the CSU

Page 25: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

25

would be required to carry out this type of function on behalf of the

CCG. This activity will be costed on request. The CSU has a robust

structure for the delivery of the communication services to the CGG,

with an identified dedicated lead for Warrington.

Evaluation

It is important for us to monitor and benchmark performance of

engagement and communication activity so that we can ensure that the

activity is appropriately tailored and targeted to the relevant audiences,

messages and method. The following criteria are suggested as being

ways in which we should be able to track performance:

formal and informal feedback from stakeholders, to include;

o Patient experience feedback and patient surveys

o levels of awareness of the work of Warrington Clinical

Commissioning Group

o public perceptions of ability to get involved and influence the

future shape of these services

o high level 360 degree feedback – GP members, partner and

provider organisations.

formal and informal feedback from employees

o views sought through team meetings, staff briefings and

other engagement events

o staff survey

o intranet feedback

number of attendees at engagement and consultation events

o internal audiences

o external audiences

favourable media coverage

o media evaluation

political temperature

o positive political support vs. level of political noise (MP

letters PQ’s)

Page 26: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

26

A1 - ACTION PLAN

It should be noted that this high level action plan is supported by a detailed operational work plan which identifies the specific operational activity and timescales. The operational work plan is reviewed and monitored and updated on a monthly basis.

Action / Notes Lead / Support

Target Date for delivery

Cost / Resource

Develop Membership Newsletter VN / PS Dec 2011 Nil In House resource only

Visioning Event - Year one NA / PS Feb 2012

Develop engagement and communication operational work plan – linked to quip programmes and other commissioning work streams (plan on a page)

MA / PS April 2012 Nil In House resource only

Develop and implement Media Handling Protocol MA April 2012 Nil In House resource only

Website refresh – update

MA / VN April 2012 Nil In House resource

ACHIEVED IN PROGRESS OVERDUE / DELAYED

Page 27: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

27

only

Intranet development

MA / VN April 2012 Nil In House resource only

Brand and House style development (incl development of Marketing Kit) MA April 2012 £2000

Develop and implement the how to toolkit – including all templates VN End August 2012

Nil In House resource only

Development of the CCG authorisation materials MA / VN May – September 2012

Nil In House resource only

Develop and publish calendar of events PS May 2012 Nil In House resource only

Implement quarterly press briefings MA / VN May 2012 Nil In House resource only

Annual Marketplace event MA / VN / PS

May 2012 £500

Review commissioning bulletin – audit and refresh NA / MA May 2012 Nil In House resource only

Support the development of PPG groups within every practice PS / Practice Managers

June 2012 Nil In House resource

Page 28: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

28

only

Develop and implement a marketing programme for the Patient Experience (SEE) resource and membership scheme

VN / PS July 2012 £1000

Develop media monitoring process MA / VN July / Aug 2012

TBC

Develop and launch Warrington Health Forum MA / PS August 2012

Nil In House resource only

Develop high level engagement and communication weekly brief MA September 2012

Develop and implement quarterly stakeholder ‘spotlight brief’ NA / MA / VN

October 2012

Nil In House resource only

Produce Duty to Involve – Real Accountability Report (statutory document) MA / PS Aug 2012 Nil In House resource only

Develop and implement communication, engagement, experience awareness raising and training programme (incl E&D and dealing with the media)

MA / PS November 2012

Nil In House resource only

Review Communication, Engagement and Experience Strategy MA / PS September 2012

Nil In House resource only

Warrington Health Day MA / PS / VN

June 2013 £2000

Engagement and communication audit

MA Feb 2013 Nil In House

Page 29: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

29

resource only

Visioning Event – Year one review and Year Two NA / MA / PS / VN

Feb 2013 £2000

Review Membership scheme – audit membership PS / VN March 2013 Nil In House resource only

CCG Annual Report MA / VN April 2013 Nil In House resource only

Audit / review Patient Experience SEE programme. MA / PS / VN

July 2013 Nil In House resource only

Page 30: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

30

Appendix B

SEE Patient Experience Programme Flowchart

A patient experience survey is submitted through the various channels ‘SEE’, Patient Opinion,

Patient Choices. Facebook, Twitter and comes through to the patient experience ‘Inbox’

Yes

This is then entered onto the ‘patient experience Database.

The information is then transferred onto the Patient Experience template for the Patient

Safety Meeting

Is the Feedback Positive

An auto response is sent out to acknowledging those emails that come through ‘SEE’ and

provides further information on how to make a formal complaint.

No

This story is fed back to the lead

commissioner / Providers

This will then be raised at contract Meetings

with Providers

Patient Story is presented at the Patient engagement & quality meeting. And if needs be a paper will be presented at the Quality Committee

This is then triangulated with PALS, Complaints; SUI’s, Patient Experience to look at other similar

stories with the same providers

All information is kept on an excel spreadsheet for future cross referencing & audit

The information will then be used to inform patient

experience work plan of visits

This story is fed back to the lead

commissioner / Providers

The patient is invited to share their experience / story to the Governing

Body

A patient experience survey ‘SEE’ is submitted as a hard copy through various patient & public

events

This will then be raised at contract

Meetings with Providers

Outcome from the meeting will be sent and recorded on the

database

Has the story got potential for negative

press?

The patient is invited to share their experience / story to the Governing

Body

Is the story a potential PR opportunity?

No Yes No Yes Inform

Communications team

Inform Communications

team

Outcome from the meeting will be sent and recorded on the

database

The information will then be used to inform patient

experience work plan of visits

Page 31: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

31

Appendix C

Warrington Health Forum – Draft Terms of Reference

Title Warrington Health Forum

Accountable to Warrington Clinical Commissioning Quality Committee

How is accountability

demonstrated

Minutes and verbal reports to the Board

Membership Accountable Officers

• Warrington CCG Governing Body Member with lead for

engagement

• Lead for engagement (secretary)

• Lead for communications

• Commissioning Manager (or deputy)

Advisory Members

• CVS for 3rd Sector

• Patient Reference Group (where required)

• LINks (with the recognition of their independent role as a

“critical friend” in the process)

• Technical or clinical advisors where required

Chair of Group Warrington CCG Governing Body Member with lead for

engagement

Secretarial Support Warrington engagement lead

Quorum A minimum of 3 representatives of members will be required

to be in attendance for decisions and recommendations to be

agreed.

Aim To achieve authorisation the Group will act in an advisory

capacity to Warrington CCG Quality Committee and make

recommendations to them and take decisions to ensure that

there is an inclusive, integrated and consistent approach to

engagement and involvement of Warrington population by the

functions detailed below:

Page 32: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

32

Objectives/Functions Statutory Duties and Authorisation Requirements

Act as a resource to support the work of the CCGs in meeting

the criteria of the authorisation process relating to engagement

The Group will ensure that the Equality and Diversity

requirements are met and that there is reference and

alignment to the NHS Constitution

Monitor and advise on patient engagement, ensuring statutory

duties are met and which will build on local good practice. This

will allow the CCG assurance process requirements to be met.

Planning Engagement and Patient Experience

Taking a proactive approach to planned commissioning

processes (e.g. service changes, new service proposals,

reviews) by developing a forward plan where information is

available in advance. This would involve using the wider

networks represented for consultation and engagement

support to commissioners.

Discuss and share any concerns raised from the patient

experience data and inform the Quality Committee who can

agree appropriate action and use data to inform commissioning

decisions

Co-ordination, Communication and Relationships

Ensure engagement networks are well co-ordinated and are

communicating with each other, minimising duplication

Identifying to design effective ways to enhance relationships

between key partner organisations from the statutory, voluntary

and faith communities, involved in patient and community

engagement across Warrington.

Support the development and work of the locality patient

participation groups. Ensuring good communication between

locality groups, and the Local Authority and CVS partners.

The group supports the planned quarterly “meet the

commissioner” activities and plays a strong role in promoting

this to their respective networks.

That the CCG engagement lead, works as a conduit to share

information to and from the local authority engagement

partners and where appropriate alignment of consultation

exercises can be undertaken.

Page 33: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

33

Have a commitment to share best practice and co-ordinate

with key partners, the public and other community engagement

activity across Warrington.

Monitoring and Reporting

Warrington Health Forum is a working group with a direct

accountability and reporting responsibilities to Warrington CCG

Quality Committee.

Keep an accurate account of all consultation and engagement

outcomes and produce an annual report to be agreed and

authorised by both CCG Quality Committee.

The Group will produce notes of each meeting and feedback

findings to CCG Quality Committee.

Frequency of Meetings Monthly

Representation It is proposed that Group is made up of representatives from

overarching engagement networks in Warrington. This will

create a network of networks and it will be supported by

relevant officers representing the clinical commissioning and

the local authority.

Review The Terms of Reference will be reviewed annually or sooner if

deemed necessary

Page 34: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

34

Appendix D

MEDIA PROTOCOL

Introduction

The NHS is constantly under intense media scrutiny, the public has a vested interest in the NHS and its performance. In addition to being a political issue, health is often an emotive one. Whether attracting commendation or controversy it consistently makes headline news. In the interests of effective media relations, both proactive and reactive, it is important that all staff directly or indirectly associated with Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group, including GP member practices adhere to the agreed guidelines set out in this protocol when dealing with the media Efforts should be made to maintain and develop the CCG’s relationship with local and regional media and to improve connections with professional and specialist publications. It should be noted that anyone likely to be linked to the CCG, including CCG staff, member practices and CWW CSS staff who expresses his or her own personal views to the media (whether through the lay press locally or an international peer review journal) should make it clear that these are personal opinions and not necessarily shared by the CCG. Information from any item of printed material could theoretically find its way into the hands of the press (who are also entitled to attend

public meetings) so it is recommended that the potential implications of any CCG communication (including correspondence with patients and staff) are carefully considered in advance. It is important to channel all media handling initially through one central point (The Communications Lead), to avoid confusing journalists and ensure messages are consistent. The CCG should be made aware of national and professional media issues, which may be localised by the Warrington press. Local newspapers, web-based media and radio and television stations should be closely monitored and cuttings or taped records kept of coverage relating to the CCG, to be made available to CCG senior officers

Proactive media Press releases will be issued as and when required to actively promote the work of the CCG in a positive light through relevant media, which is one of the most important means through which the organisation’s profile can be raised and understood. Their contents can also be re-focussed for other communications tools, such as the weekly commissioning brief or on the website www.warringtonccg.nhs.uk Press releases and other media work should always be co-ordinated through the CCGs communications lead.

It is advisable to treat all media as equals when issuing information. Showing preference to one title or organisation risks antagonising rivals, who may attempt to discredit the original story by canvassing the views of critics.

Page 35: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

35

‘Off-the-record’ briefings may be attributed or traced back to the briefer, unless the journalist is expressly told otherwise – and even then there are no guarantees that the confidence will be kept. An ‘off-the-record’ arrangement has no legal standing. Even being proactive around negative issues can often have its benefits. It should earn the respect of journalists and the public for taking an honest, open and accountable approach to a difficult or uncomfortable subject. It should also help ensure that the CCG has more control over the way in which the story first enters the public domain and reduce the need for a reactive stance. It should also be recognised that even a negative issue can contain key messages.

Reactive media / crisis management All media enquiries will be responded to in the first instance by the Communications Lead. The Communications Lead will respond immediately to all media enquiries relating to the CCG. They will take full details of the nature of the enquiry and context in which it is being set, to avoid an inappropriate response. It is important to recognise that not all enquiries are negative, however when they are, by taking a proactive approach it is possible to limit the damage caused. The communications lead will negotiate a ‘reasonable’ timescale with the media in which to respond adequately to media enquiries. However, it should be recognised that there are times when a speedy response to media enquiries is vital and that a deadline

means a deadline. The Communications Lead will ensure that the media are kept informed of progress on their enquiry at regular intervals, so that they know whether they can expect an interview or a written statement and what that is likely to contain. This may influence their handling of the story. The CCG should always exercise its ‘right to reply’ to media stories. Although the ‘right to reply’ is not legally enforceable, it is universally accepted by the media as good practice to grant individuals the opportunity to comment on issues affecting them. CCG should avoid using ‘no comment’ at any time. It is important to note that “no comment” may be regarded as a tacit admission of liability by many journalists. Refusal to comment may give journalists licence to portray the CCG in a pejorative light – as does being “unavailable for comment”. Even if a negative situation is in its early stages or inconclusive and more information is required, journalists should be given a ‘holding statement’ to that effect, to avoid pre-empting the outcome. This could, for example, refer to the CCG being “in the process of conducting an investigation, whose findings will be made public once it has been concluded.” It’s important to note that in some circumstances, i.e. if the matter involves legal action it would be prejudicial to comment further, however, a ‘no comment’ should still be avoided. If something has gone wrong, which indisputably finds the CCG at fault, it is better to admit the organisation is in the wrong, apologise if appropriate and explain what action has been taken to prevent a repeat of the situation. This should be better received than a non-

Page 36: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

36

committal response, which could be seen as the CCG not accepting its responsibility. Responses from the CCG should be accurate and timely, using plain, concise language and avoiding jargon or any points which may be open to misinterpretation. A good journalist should check anything which is unclear. The most important messages in a written statement should be contained in quotes from an appropriate, named individual, which are less likely to be edited or paraphrased. That person should make themselves available for interview if required following the issuing of the statement. The CCG should not attempt to answer to the media on behalf of other organisations, which should be given the opportunity to speak for themselves. If an item criticising the CCG is published or broadcast presenting one side of an argument or inaccurate, then the Communications Lead will seek redress in the first instance with the appropriate editor. It may also be necessary to take prompt action in informing other news organisations of the facts before they ‘lift’ the incorrect information and perpetuate it. News organisations file published or broadcast material which can be published or broadcast again at a later date as ‘an accurate record’ if it goes unchallenged. The communications lead will therefore make a request that the response from the CCG or a correction to be used in the next available bulletin or issue and given equal prominence to the original coverage.

Failure to do so should be grounds for representation to media watchdogs such as the Broadcasting Standards Commission or Press Complaints Commission on the basis that the issue has not been handled in a fair and balanced way. Long-running, high profile or multi-agency issues may require a separate, comprehensive communications strategy, including media handling arrangements.

Early Warning System The Communication Lead is responsible for and will ensure that the Accountable Officer and Chairman are kept fully informed of and updated on any issues which are potentially damaging to the CCG’s reputation. Equally, it is important that the communications lead is kept appraised of any adverse issues – whether during the working day or out of hours, whether common knowledge or confidential - in order to advise and support accordingly. Whenever a new policy or procedure with wide reaching consequences is due to be introduced, or a change in leadership is due to be announced CCG staff, practices and GP members should be notified first, before any announcements are made in the media. In the event that information concerning such a policy or procedure or announcement is leaked to the press, it is likely to be presented in a subjective and unconstructive light, which may also be mistaken. It is important, therefore to ensure that every member of

Page 37: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

37

CCG staff is given the facts as quickly and accurately as possible – preferably before publication or broadcast. It is vital that the CCG observes the Strategic Health Authorities notification mechanism for serious untoward incidents, namely the Strategic Executive Information System (StEIS.) The communications lead will also ensure that the procedure for notifying the SHA’s Director of Communications before an issue hits the press and detail the proposed action. Where appropriate, other partner organisations should also be alerted and a joint approach adopted and the communications lead will co-ordinate any joint response.

Media release approvals process All information being released to the media should always follow the agreed approvals process. Proactive media All routine, non-contentious press releases should be approved by:

the source of the information

their ‘line manager’ or equivalent if appropriate

the communications lead

Reactive / Crisis media Press statements relating to crisis management issues, which could threaten the CCG’s reputation, should always be handled at the most senior level with professional advice and approved by:

the source of the information

their ‘line manager’ or equivalent

the CCG’s communication lead

the Chief Clinical Officer or another senior manager if appropriate.

Spokespeople In certain circumstances, where an interview is required on a non-contentious matter, it may be possible for the interviewee to be the member of CCG staff, an individual from a member practice, who is closely associated with the subject matter, once briefed. For more challenging issues, with wider implications, the Accountable Officer, Chair or member of the Senior Management Team should be designated as media spokespeople for their specific areas.

Confidentiality and the use of case stories Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group is committed to preserving service user/patient/carer confidentiality and respects the privacy and dignity of individuals, to which public interest should always be secondary. However, there may be some circumstances in which media coverage would be significantly enhanced by the use of real – life ‘case histories’ – that is personal stories relating to service users/patients/carers, which normally involve a photograph or film footage. Indeed, there are many instances in which the media will not carry a story – particularly one which is heavily based on strategic issues – without a case history, however important the

Page 38: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

38

story. Such details add colour and can make an issue more relevant and accessible to the reader or viewer. Any use of case studies, whether in a press release or sourced by the CCG as a result of a press enquiry - would be based on full, informed consent of service users/patients/carers and/or their family members for them to be featured in the media. The consent form at Appendix B1 covers the use of film footage or photographs at a future date by either the media organisation or the CCG. In the event of patients or members of the public actively seeking media attention, it is important to note that they have not waived their right to confidentiality and the CCG should not discuss their case openly even if they choose to. In many cases, any discussion would be prejudicial in the context of an official complaint or legal proceedings.

Emergency Planning and Major Incident communications

The communications lead should be among the first people notified in the event of a major incident and will follow the actions required by the Major Incident Plan. The communications lead will be responsible for co-ordinating timely and accurate responses to the media in line with the Major Incident Plan – which could include important public information and appeals for off-duty staff to come into work.

Out of Hours media calls

The proliferation of media titles and the speed of modern news gathering mean that out of hours calls are increasingly becoming the norm. Bank holiday working is also routine for many titles. It should be noted that out of hours calls from the media are no longer restricted to urgent issues. Where communications support is required out of hours the On Call Manager will contact the communications lead. It should be noted that although there is no formal on call arrangements, informal arrangements are in place and the communications lead will respond in the event of an urgent media enquiry which cannot wait until the next working day or in the event of a serious untoward incident or major incident. The communications lead, via the local network of communications leads will ensure that there are ‘mutual’ aid arrangements in place.

Page 39: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

39

MEDIA PROTOCOL FLOWCHART

STEP ONE All media enquiries, either directly into Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group or via GP member practices member practice should be directed to the Communications Lead: Maria Austin – Tel Mobile 07917738659.

STEP TWO The Communications Lead will log the enquiry and will inform the Accountable Officer

Is the enquiry WCCG specific or does it impact on a provider / partner? YES NO

The communications lead will alert the relevant provider / partner communication leads and agree handling arrangements

STEP THREE The Communications Lead will liaise with the appropriate staff members to formulate the response. The response will be approved via the internal approval process. If the enquiry involves a partner / provider organisation the communications lead will co-ordinate the approval process with the appropriate communication lead/s

STEP FOUR Response will be provided to the media organisation, with if appropriate supporting information. If appropriate an interview will be offered and the communications lead will have oversight of all arrangements.

STEP FIVE The communications officer will monitor the publication. If there is an issue with the publishing of the information the Communications Lead will ensure a timely response to the media organisation and will ensure that the Accountable Officer is informed. The communications officer will include the summary in the weekly communications update for board members.

Page 40: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

40

Appendix D1

PHOTO/FILMING CONSENT FORM PLEASE TICK APPROPRIATE BOXES BELOW TO INDICATE YOUR APPROVAL.

I, the undersigned agree that my / my child photograph may be used for a range of media (for example: newspapers, newsletters, magazines, television, and websites I have been given a full explanation about possible uses of my: We will not disclose any photographs or information about you without your consent, unless we have a statutory duty to do so in preventing harm to someone else, or to protect you or to prevent or detect crime. We will only store and use information in accordance with our registration under the Data Protection Act 1998. Photograph Name (in caption) Film Footage I therefore understand that my: Photograph Name in caption Film Footage may be used for legitimate purposes i.e. (Annual Reports, website, and exhibitions to promote the work of Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group both now and in the future. I also understand that my: Photograph Name in caption Film Footage may be used by a range of media titles in press articles/TV broadcasts / websites which are seen by the general public, now and in the future. I hereby grant consent, freely given, to the use of my Photograph Name in caption Film Footage Name (Please print) …………………………………………………………….. Name of child (if applicable) Signature: ……………………………………………………………………….. Date: ……………………………………………………………………………..

Page 41: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

41

Appendix E KEY MESSAGES Overarching Key Message: The government has designed a new system around local decision making to lead to more effective outcomes for patients and more efficient use of services for the NHS. Local decision making

GPs will be working together in groups of practices called clinical commissioning groups. Each CCG will be responsible for its own commissioning and financial decisions.

GPs and other primary care staff have the most regular contact with patients and have the best overall understanding of people’s health and care needs. They already play a key role in acting as their patients’ advocate and coordinating care on their behalf.

By extending this role and giving them the freedom to decide which healthcare services to commission on their patients’ behalf, GPs will be able to use resources in the ways they believe will achieve the best and most cost-effective outcomes.

Working in partnership

GPs will not be working in isolation. Health and wellbeing boards will be set up in local authorities to provide a way to bring together GP consortia with other health and care partners.

Health and wellbeing boards will give a stronger role to local government. Councils and be able to better influence their local health services and make sure the commissioning decisions reflect local priorities and needs. They promote shared decision making between health care, public health and social care.

The NHS Commissioning Board

The system of local Clinical Commissioning Groups will be overseen by a national NHS Commissioning Board, which will sit at arm’s length from the government. It will make sure that CCGs have the capacity and capability to commission successfully and meet their financial responsibilities. The Board will also commission some services directly.

In addition, the NHS Commissioning Board will provide national leadership to improve quality for patients and make sure there is a consistent delivery of outcomes.

What does it mean for the patient?

‘No decision about me without me’ will be the principle behind the way in which patients are treated – patients will be able to make decisions in partnership with their GP about the type of treatment that is best for them. Patients will also have more control and choice over where they are treated and who they are treated by. They will be able to choose their:

- GP

- Consultant - Treatment - Hospital or other local health service.

Page 42: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

42

Patients will be able to get the information they need, such as how well a hospital carries out a particular treatment, to help them decide on the best type of care. If patients are unhappy with their local hospital, or other local services, they will be able to choose another one to treat them.

Patients will be able to rate hospitals and clinics according to the quality of care they receive, and hospitals will be required to be open about mistakes and always tell patients if something has gone wrong.

Patients will have a strong collective voice through a national body, Health Watch, and in their communities through arrangements led by local authorities.

What does it mean for the public?

The public will be able to have more influence over what kind of health services should be available locally. They will also have greater opportunities for holding to account local services that are not performing well.

They will be able to get more information about how their local health services are performing, such as how well their local hospital carries out a particular operation or treatment.

There will be more focus on preventing people from getting ill – the Public Health Service will pull together services locally to encourage people to keep fit and eat more healthily.

How will the new health and care system be run?

Local authorities will be responsible for local health care priorities, while central government will have much less control over health services.

The NHS will be measured by how successfully it treats patients – for example, whether it improves cancer survival

rates, enables more people to live independently after having a stroke or reduces hospital acquired infection rates.

An independent and accountable NHS Commissioning Board has been established to:

o lead on the achievement of health results o allocate and account for NHS resources o lead on improvements in quality o promote patient involvement and choice.

The Board will also have a duty to promote equality and tackle inequalities in access to healthcare.

Monitor will become an economic regulator to promote effective and efficient providers of health and care, encourage competition, regulate prices and safeguard the continuity of services.

The role of the Care Quality Commission will be strengthened as an effective quality inspectorate covering both health and social care. HealthWatch will represent the views of patients, carers and local communities

Page 43: Engagement, Experience and Communications Strategy Papers/ENGAG… · 6.1 Stakeholder Analysis 6.2 Stakeholder Matrix 18 7 Risk Assessment 7.1 SWOT Analysis 7.2 Risks 21 8 Appendix

43