23
ENG 102 Appendix Fallacies

Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

ENG 102

Appendix Fallacies

Page 2: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Fallacies of Pathos

Argument to the people (stirring symbols)

Appeal to ignorance

Bandwagon

Appeal to pity

Red herring

Page 3: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Fallacies of Ethos

Appeal to false authority

Ad hominem

Poisoning the well

Straw man

Page 4: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Fallacies of Logos

Hasty generalization

Part for the whole

Post hoc

Circular reasoning/begging the question

False Dilemma

Slippery Slope

False analogy

Son sequitur

Loaded Label/Definition

Page 5: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Slippery Slope (Logos)

Based on the fear that once we put a foot on a

slick mountainside, we are doomed to slide right

out of sight

Once we allow medical use of marijuana, we’ll

eventually legalize it for everyone, and then

cocaine and heroin will gain social acceptance.

Page 6: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Red Herring (Pathos)

Throwing an audience off-track by raising an

unrelated or irrelevant point

Debating a gas tax increase is valuable, but I

really think there should be an extra tax on SUVs.

Page 7: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Non Sequitur (Logos)

Means “it does not follow”

Any claim that doesn’t follow from its premises

or is supported by irrelevant premises

I should not receive a C in this course because I

currently have a 3.8 GPA

Page 8: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Post hoc (Logos)

Means “after this, therefore because of this”

Occurs when a sequential relationship is

mistaken for a causal relationship

Cramming for a test really helps because last

week I crammed for my psychology test and I got

an A on it.

A might have been caused by something other

than cramming, must consider all factors

Page 9: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Bandwagon (Pathos)

Appeals to popularity

Popularity of something is irrelevant to its actual

marriage

Living together before marriage is the right thing

to do because most couples are now doing it.

Page 10: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Ad hominem (Ethos)

Means “to the person”

Argument directed at the character of an

opponent rather than at the quality of the

opponent’s reasoning

Page 11: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

False Authority (Ethos)

Use famous people to testify on issues about

which these persons have no special competence

Joe Quarterback says Gooey Oil keeps his old

tractor running sharp; therefore, Gooey Oil is a

good oil.

Page 12: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Hasty Generalization (Logos)

Someone makes a broad generalization on the

basis of too little evidence

Evidence needed to support a generalization

must meet the STAR criteria (sufficiency,

typicality, accuracy, and relevance

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXLTQi7vVsI

Page 13: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Appeal to the People (Pathos)

Appeal to the fundamental beliefs, biases, and

prejudices of the audience

Sway opinion through a feeling of solidarity

among those of the group

“Support Our Troops” bumper sticker, often

including American flag, creates an initial feeling

of solidarity among almost all citizens of

goodwill

Car owner may have deeper intention of

meaning “support the war”

Page 14: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Appeal to Ignorance (Pathos)

Persuades audience to accept as true a claim that

hasn’t been proved false or vice versa

UFOs, ghosts, and the abominable snowman do

exist because science hasn’t proved that they

don’t exist.

Page 15: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Appeal to Pity (Pathos)

Arguer appeals to audience’s sympathetic

feelings in order to support a claim that should

be decided on more relevant or objective grounds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MiZ8i_Ra4M

Page 16: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Poisoning the Well (Ethos)

Close to ad hominem

Arguers discredit an opponent or an opposing

view in advance

Before I yield the floor to the next speaker, I must

remind you that those who oppose my plan do

not have the best interests of working people in

their hearts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5ywg4Zc2w4

Page 17: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Straw Man (Ethos)

Occurs by oversimplifying an opponent’s

argument to make it easier to refute or ridicule

Rather than summarize opposing view fairly and

completely, the arguer makes up the argument

they wish the opponent had made because it’s

easier to knock over

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=923UR_-pHsc

Page 18: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Part for the Whole (Logos)

Arguers pick out a part of the whole and then

claim that what is true of the part is true for the

whole

Arguer picks only the best examples to make a

case and conveniently forgets about examples

that weaken the case

http://vimeo.com/17359765

Page 19: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Circular Reasoning (Logos)

Provide a reason that simply restates the claim in

different words

That person is obese because he is too fat.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CVbku6nxhU

Page 20: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

False Dilemma (Logos)

arguer oversimplifies a complex issue so that

only two choices appear possible

One of the choices is made to seem unacceptable

It’s my way or the highway.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dln3DJEcghY

Page 21: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

False Analogy (Logos)

Has to be some similarities between objects being

compared

Has to appeal to audience’s logic

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8LydU2P7Yw

Page 22: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

WHICH FALLACY IS BEING COMMITTED?

Read each item. Identify and explain the fallacy of

each statement.

Activity

Page 23: Eng 102 Appendix Fallacies

Wednesday 4/30 Synthesis essay due Play jeopardy

Monday 5/5 Grammar Final

Wednesday 5/7 Writing final (9AM class meets 8-

10AM)

(11AM class meets 10:30AM – 12:30PM)