22
ENFOQUE MULTIDIMENSIONAL DE LA FALLA CARDIACA EN EL ADULTO MAYOR DIANA CAROLINA MORALES BENAVIDES MEDICA INTERNISTA Y GERIATRA UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS GRUPO DE GERIATRIA Y CUIDADO PALIATIVO GERIATRICO FUNDACION SANTA FE DE BOGOTA 2016

ENFOQUE’MULTIDIMENSIONAL’DE’ … · 2020. 6. 21. · European’Journalof Heart’Failure’(2013)’15,’717–723’ Heart’failurein’ elderly’paents : disncJve ’featuresand’

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • ENFOQUE  MULTIDIMENSIONAL  DE  LA  FALLA  CARDIACA  EN  EL  ADULTO  

    MAYOR  DIANA  CAROLINA  MORALES  BENAVIDES  

    MEDICA  INTERNISTA  Y  GERIATRA  UNIVERSIDAD  DE  CALDAS  

    GRUPO  DE  GERIATRIA  Y  CUIDADO  PALIATIVO  GERIATRICO    FUNDACION  SANTA  FE  DE  BOGOTA  

    2016  

    JUEVES 19 DE MAYO DE 2016

    07:00 – 18:00 INSCRIPCIONES

    SALÓN SANTA FE 1

    CURSO 1 Metodología de investigación. Bases de datos longitudinales en el campo delenvejecimiento.

    Coordinador: Rafael Samper, BogotáHorario: 09:00 - 13:00

    Presentación del cursoRafael Samper, BogotáMetodología de investigación. Bases de datos longitudinales en el campo delenvejecimientoRebeca Wong, USAAlejandra Michaels, BogotáResultados de investigación con los estudios ELPS y ELCARafael Santos, Bogotá

    SALÓN SANTA FE 2

    CURSO 2 Papel del gerontólogo en la humanización y en los servicios de cuidado socio-sanitario en la vejez

    Coordinador: Fabián Ricardo Villacis, BogotáHorario: 09:00 - 13:00

    Presentación del cursoFabián Ricardo Villacis, BogotáPapel del gerontólogo en la humanización y los sistemas de cuidados en la vejezDerechos y participación de las personas adultas mayoresRoberto Angarita, BogotáModelo participativo de salud mental comunitaria en personas adultas mayores.Elizabeth Machado, SincelejoHogar san Vicente de Paul, un lugar de apropiación y vínculos.Diana Fernanda Bermúdez, ArmeniaCalidad y humanización en la atención socio sanitaria a las personas adultas mayoresClaudia Janeth Ladino, Armenia

    SALÓN SANTA FE 3 (AB)

    CURSO 3 Enfermedad terminal: un desafío y una oportunidad integralExpositora: Nidia Aristizabal, BogotáHorario: 09:00 - 13:00

    Enfermedad terminal: un desafío y una oportunidad integral

  • CONTENIDO    

    •  Contexto  epidemiológico:  prevalencia  de  falla  cardíaca  en  el  adulto  mayor    

    •  Cambios  fisiológicos  con  el  envejecimiento    •  Enfoque  mul>dimensional    •  Falla  cardíaca  y  grandes  síndromes  geriátricos:  fragilidad,  mul>morbilidad,  deterioro  cogni>vo    

    •  Conclusiones  

  • Falla  cardíaca:  prevalencia    •  Causal  de  59  000  muertes  

    en  2005  en  US  •  Causas  primarias.  

    CORONARIA-‐HIPERTENSIVA  •  Prevalencia:  5-‐10%  entre  

    65-‐69  años  •  18%  en  mayores  de  85  años  •  IMPACTO  NEGATIVO  para  

    lograr  envejecimiento  exitoso  

  • ENVEJECIMIENTO  Y  SISTEMA  CARDIOVASCULAR    

    European  Journal  of  Heart  Failure  (2013)  15,  717–723  Heart  failure  in  elderly  paJents:  disJncJve  features  and  unresolved  issues  

    Reducción  en  número  y  función  de  miocitos  (apoptosis)  

    ARTERIOESCLEROSIS:  aumento  de  la  poscarga  

    Alteración  en  la  regulación  del  calcio    Cambios  en  las  proteínas  contrác>les    Menor  eficacia  en  la  u>lización  de  ATP  

    PREDOMINIO  DE  FALLA  CARDIACA  DE  FRACCION  DE  EYECCION  CONSERVADA    

    ACORTAMIENTO  TELOMERICO:  presbicardia:  aumento  del  contenido  colágeno  en  inters>cio:  FIBROSIS    

    Precipitado  por:  hiperac>vación  del  eje  RAA,  ROS,  INFLAMAGING    

    TENDENCIA  A  LA  HIPERTROFIA  DEL  VI  Trastorno  de  relajación    

  • European  Journal  of  Heart  Failure  (2013)  15,  717–723  Heart  failure  in  elderly  paJents:  disJncJve  features  and  unresolved  issues  

    overall survival after HF onset has substantially improved with con-temporary therapies,9 this benefit is less evident in older agegroups.15,16 Advanced age remains a strong predictor for poor out-comes in patients with chronic17 or acute HF,11 and it is included inseveral prognostic models for mortality after hospitalization.18

    Pathophysiology of the ageingheartSeveral specific changes in cardiac structure and function are asso-ciated with cardiac ageing, and they may explain a number ofpathophysiological and phenotypic features typical of the elderly.Among these, particularly important is the greater predispositionof the elderly to develop HF, particularly HF with preserved ejec-tion fraction (HFpEF)4,12,19 (Figure 1).

    With age, there is a decrease both in number and in function ofmyocytes, which occurs even in subjects without evidence of car-diovascular disease.20 The underlying mechanisms of such changesinclude enhanced necrosis and apoptosis,21 and a reduced regen-erative capacity of cardiac progenitor cells. This prevents adequatereparation for myocyte loss either caused by ageing, or secondaryto myocardial injury and ischaemia.21 The loss of functioning

    cardiomyocytes is compensated by the hypertrophy of the remain-ing cells.20

    Alterations in the function of myocytes associated with ageinclude impaired calcium metabolism and regulation, which reflectsan alteration of processes of contraction and relaxation.22 In add-ition, contractile proteins change with age similarly to the altera-tions seen in hypertrophic hearts.23 Finally, ATP utilization is lessefficient in the ageing heart. These abnormalities may providethe substrate for worsening cardiac function in the setting of ex-acerbating conditions, even in otherwise healthy hearts.22

    Another potential mechanism associated with the higher risk of de-velopment of HF in advancing age is the shortening of telomeres,which has been suggested as a marker of biological and cellularageing and associated with development of HF.21,24

    Simultaneously with the reduced number, function, and com-pensatory hypertrophy of myocytes, the senescent myocardiumis affected by an imbalance of extracellular matrix metabolism,with a subsequent detrimental increase in myocardial collagencontent and development of fibrosis.25 Myocardial fibrosis is pro-moted by several mechanisms26 known to be up-regulated in HF atany age, and which are constitutively activated in the elderly. Theyinclude the up-regulation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosteronesystem,25 enhanced inflammatory activity,27 and oxidative stress.25

    Figure 1 Suggested pathophysiological mechanisms predisposing to the development of diastolic dysfunction and heart failure in otherwisehealthy ageing hearts.

    V. Lazzarini et al.718

  • Impacto  en  calidad  de  vida:  FUNCIONALIDAD  

    Impacto  en  cuidadores:  AGOBIO  

    Adherencia  al  tratamiento    Riesgo  de  hospitalización  

    Interacción  con  la  mulJmorbilidad  

    Costos  para  el  sistema        

    DIMENSION  DE  LA  FALLA  CARDIACA  EN  EL  ADULTO  MAYOR  

  • DIMENSION  DE  LA  FALLA  CARDIACA  EN  EL  ADULTO  MAYOR  

    85%  marcapasos   61%  CDI   53%  CABG  

    51%  ICP   60%  cambio  valvular  75%  

    endarterectomías  

    COSTOS.    En  los  mayores  de  65  años  se  realizan:  

  • ABORDAJE  MULTIDIMENSIONAL  DE  LA  FALLA  CARDIACA  EN  EL  ADULTO  MAYOR  

    Condición  índice:  FALLA  

    CARDIACA    

  • FRAGILIDAD  Y  FALLA  CARDIACA    

    •  Falla  cardíaca  en  el  adulto  mayor:  más  allá  del  modelo  orientado  en  la  enfermedad  

    •  Enfoque  desde  la  FRAGILIDAD    •  Ayuda  a  es>mar:    

    CliniCal  MediCine  insights:  Cardiology  2014:8(s1)  The  Biologic  Syndrome  of  Frailty  in  Heart  Failure      

    Riesgo  de  mortalidad  ,  toma  de  decisiones    

    Potencial  riesgo  de  eventos  adversos    

    Riesgo  de  hospitalizaciones  

  • COMO  MEDIR  LA  FRAGILIDAD?  ÍNDICE  DE  FRAGILIDAD  

  • EDAD  BIOLÓGICA/  EDAD  CRONOLÓGICA:    Canadian  Study  of  Health  and  Aging  “Es>mar  el  acúmulo  de  déficit  se  relaciona  con  la  edad  biológica”  

  • COMO  MEDIR  LA  FRAGILIDAD?  CUESTIONARIO  FRAIL    

    •  CUESTIONARIO  FRAIL  •  Evaluación  subje>va  de  5  puntos.    •  Ha  demostrado  correlación  con  riesgo  de  discapacidad,  baja  velocidad  de  marcha,  mortalidad  y  menor  desempeño  en  SPPB    

    •  FRAGIL  3  A  5  PUNTOS  •  PRE  FRAGIL  1  A  2  PUNTOS    •  NO  FRAGIL  0  PUNTOS.    

    •     

    A  SIMPLE  FRAILTY  QUESTIONNAIRE  (FRAIL)  PREDICTS  OUTCOMES  IN  MIDDLE  AGED  AFRICAN  AMERICANS      

    J  Nutr  Health  Aging.  2012  July  ;  16(7):  601–608.    

     

    FATIGA.  En  las  úlJmas  4  semanas  qué  tanto  se  ha  senJdo  cansado  o  faJgado?    Respuestas  1  y  2:  1  punto.      Demás  0  puntos    

    1.   Todo  el  Jempo    2.   La  mayoría  del  Jempo    3.   Algunas  veces  4.   Muy  pocas  veces    5.   Nunca    

    RESISTENCIA.  Presenta  alguna  dificultad  para  caminar  10  pasos  sin  descansar  sin  ayuda  de  disposi>vos  ni  de  otra  persona?    

    1.  Si    2.  No    

    DEAMBULACION.  Sin  uso  de  ayudas,  >ene  alguna  dificultad  para  caminar  mas  de  100  metros?  

    1.  Si    2.  No    

    Número  de  enfermedades     0  a  4:  0  puntos    5  a  11:  1  punto    

    PESO.    Cuál  es  su  peso  actual  y  cuál  era  su  peso  hace  1  año?  

    Porcentaje  de  cambio  >  5%  1  punto    Porcentaje  de  cambio  <  5%  0  puntos.    

  • Estrategia  clínica  de  falla  cardíaca  Fundación  Santa  Fe      

    1.  Paciente  adulto  mayor  llega  a  consulta  o  interconsulta  hospitalaria  a  clínica  de  falla  cardíaca    

    2.  Aplicación  de  cues>onario  FRAIL  por  el  servicio  de  cardiología      

    3.  Cumple  criterios  para  fragilidad  o  además  presenta:    

    •  Polifarmacia  •  Comorbilidad  

    MÉDICOS  

    •  Demencia  •  Depresión  moderada/severa  

    PSÍQUICOS   •  Discapacidad  moderada-‐severa  

    FUNCIONALES  

    •  InsJtucionalización  • Agobio  del  cuidador  

    SOCIALES  

    -‐ Valoración  Geriátrica  mulJdimensional  

  • 728 F. Cacciatore et al.

    © 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 35, 723–730

    mobility with a tendency to fall, polipharmacy, comorbidity,low social status, cognitive impairment and nutritionalimpairment [30–32]. Several attempts have been made tograde frailty [30,31], which was recently resolved accordingto the results of two tests of physical ability involving rapidwalking and standing from a sitting position: subjects ableto perform one of these tests were considered moderatelyfrail and those unable to perform either were consideredseverely frail [33]. However, that method considers onlythe physical domain. This study considers that its gradingmethod is more consistent with the complexity of frailty,which utilizes a short approach focused on selected tests ofvision, hearing, arm and leg function, urinary incontinence,mental status, instrumental and basic activities of dailyliving, environmental hazards and social support systems [13].

    Relationship between frailty and CHF in the elderly

    Newman et al. in the Cardiovascular Health Study deter-mined that persons with a history of CHF were more likelyto be frail [17]. In a prospective study of 178 patientsdependent in at least one basic activity of daily living andhospitalized with cardiovascular disease, primarily CHFand acute coronary syndromes, there was an increased riskof further functional decline after 1 year [34]. Chronic heartfailure is associated with increased health service care [35]and institutionalization [36], both of which are products offrailty. Patients with functional decline are at increased riskof hospitalization for CHF [37].

    These data demonstrate that frailty is more predictive ofmortality in elderly subjects with CHF than in those withoutCHF. None of the CHF subjects, in this study, with advancedfrailty survived after 9 years’ follow up, whereas those inNYHA class IV are still alive. Why does frailty influence themortality of elderly patients with CHF in such a way? Thereare several possible reasons for this intriguing phenomenon.In this sample the high grade of frailty, when compared withNYHA class IV, represents the highest value of comorbidity

    (5·4 vs. 5·2), of drugs used (5·1 vs. 4·9), and the lowest scoreof MMSE (18·7 vs. 22·6). More importantly, disability inADL affects 83% of frail subjects but only 25% of NYHAclass IV subjects. The use of vasodilators, such as nitrates,known to influence the prognosis of CHF, progressivelydecreases with frailty (from 42% to 11%). These findingsare particularly significant in understanding how to managethe care of frail CHF elderly patients.

    Considered singularly, each of the characteristics of frailtyis highly prevalent and is a predictor of poor prognosis inelderly patients with CHF. The Charlson comorbidity indexscore closely correlates with early hospital readmission ordeath in patients with CHF [38,39]. Rich et al. have dem-onstrated that iatrogenic CHF, i.e. CHF precipitated bymedications or excessive fluid administration, characterizesthe poor prognosis of debilitated older patients showing lesssevere premorbid cardiac disease, but more marked non-cardiac disease and longer hospital stays [40]. In this regard,the declining use of nitrates, observed in our study, mightreflect a greater risk of side-effects (hypotension leading tofalls) in the frail elderly. However, it could not be excludedthat the reduced use of nitrates could reflect the lowprevalence of ‘typical’ CHF symptoms compared with‘atypical’ presentations in the frail elderly (assuming nitrateswere primarily prescribed to treat typical CHF symptoms)[9]. The prevalence of CHF in cognitively impaired subjectsis high and the risk of developing cognitive impairmentwas 1·96-fold greater in subjects with CHF [11], and it isassociated with a fivefold increase in mortality after adjust-ing for several potential confounders [12]. A recent studyon cardiovascular diseases as determinants of disabilityshowed that the prevalence of disability was 22·6% in menand 37·3% in women with CHF. After the cerebrovasculardiseases, CHF was the most powerful predictor of disabilityin men [41]. Poor social support has also been described asa marker for patients with CHF [38]. In 292 elderly subjectswith CHF, after adjustment for demographic factors,clinical severity, comorbidity and functional status, socialties and instrumental support, the absence of emotionalsupport remained associated with a significantly higher risk

    Figure 1 Cox regression adjusted survival curve in subjects with (a) CHF (n = 120) and without (b) CHF (n = 1139) chronic renal failure (CHF) stratified by frailty.

    European  Journal  of  Clinical  Inves9ga9on  (2005)  35,  723–730  Frailty  predicts  long-‐term  mortality  in  elderly  subjects  with  chronic  heart  failure      

    OBJETIVO:  rol  predic>vo  de  la  fragilidad  en  mortalidad  en  pacientes  con  ICC  N:  1139  >65  años  en  comunidad.  129  con  ICC.  Seguimiento  a  12  años    Campania,  Italia.    FRAGILIDAD:  perfil  de  Linda  Fried    MORTALIDAD:    ICC  +  FRAGILIDAD=  94.4%    ICC  sin  FRAGILIDAD=  70%    

  • •  90%  de  los  pacientes  con  falla  cardíaca  >enen  más  de  2  comorbilidades  

    •  La  ERC  y  EPOC  son  predictores  de  riesgo  de  hospitalización  y  reingresos  en  falla  cardíaca  

    •  2010.  Medicare.  27%  de  pacientes  con  falla  cardíaca  tenían  deterioro  cogni>vo    

     

    MulJmorbidity  in  Older  Adults  with  Heart  Failure      

    Clin  Geriatr  Med  32  (2016)  277–289    

    FALLA  CARDIACA  Y  MULTIMORBILIDAD  

  • EL  PROBLEMA…  contexto  clínico  

    MulJmorbidity  in  Older  Adults  with  Heart  Failure      

    Clin  Geriatr  Med  32  (2016)  277–289    exist, one can simply start by asking patients if they can do what is asked of them, andif so, at what cost?70 Their responses should be used to prioritize the conditions worthaddressing and the specific strategies used. Reducing polypharmacy is one relativelyeasy way to decrease treatment burden and may improve quality of life without otheradverse effects.72

    Enhance Care-Coordination

    Care coordination and multidisciplinary team-based care has been shown to improveoutcomes in older multimorbid patients at high risk for hospitalization. For example,Medicare demonstration projects successful in lowering preventable hospitalizationsthrough improved care coordination had the following common features: (1) frequentin-person meetings between care coordinators and patients; (2) in-person meetingsbetween care coordinators and health providers; (3) supplemental educational ses-sions for patients and caregivers; (4) medication management services; and (5) timelyand comprehensive transitional care after hospitalization.73 Similarly, reductions inreadmission after hospitalization for HF have been achieved through use of multi-pronged strategies delivered by multidisciplinary teams of physicians, nurses, socialworkers, pharmacists, physical therapists, and care managers both during and afterhospitalization.74–76 The most successful hospitals have used a large number of stra-tegies designed to integrate hospital and postacute care77 and have successfullyreduced readmissions from the full range of medical conditions to which older patientswith HF are vulnerable after hospital discharge.78

    SUMMARY

    Multimorbidity is a common feature of HF that impacts diagnosis, management,and outcomes. It is therefore critical that providers caring for older patients withHF adopt broad patient-centered perspectives rather than focus exclusively on car-diovascular conditions. Treatment strategies should be closely aligned to patients’specific health goals and well-calibrated to the workload they wish to expend. Withthis perspective, benefits of treatment can be maximized while minimizing poten-tially harmful consequences.

    REFERENCES

    1. Chamberlain AM, St Sauver JL, Gerber Y, et al. Multimorbidity in heart failure: acommunity perspective. Am J Med 2015;128:38–45.

    Box 1Typical burden of an older person with heart failure and multimorbidity

    ! Has 4 other chronic conditions in addition to heart failure1

    ! Takes 10 or more medications a day47

    ! Spends about 2 hours per day on health-related activities80

    ! Attends 15 or more outpatient appointments with physicians each year81

    ! Needs assistance with at least one activity of daily living5,82

    ! Experiences hospitalizations for multiple conditions7,8

    All are best estimates based on the available published literature, but burden is likely to varywidely across individual patients.

    Data from Refs.1,5,7,8,47,80–82

    Dharmarajan & Dunlay284

  • •  90%  de  los  estudios  excluyen  pacientes  con  mul>morbilidad  

    •  1/3  de  los  estudios  fase  3:  excluyen  pacientes  con  discapacidad,  deterioro  cogni>vo,  ins>tucionalizados  o  comorbilidad  crónica    

    •  Ejemplos:  CHARM  y  PRESERVE  excluyeron  pacientes  con  expecta>va  de  vida  menor  de  3  años.    

    •  Desenlaces  primarios  en  geriatría:  mareo,  inestabilidad,  caídas,  calidad  de  vida,  descompensación  de  comorbilidad  (?)  

    EL  PROBLEMA…  nivel  de  evidencia  

    MulJmorbidity  in  Older  Adults  with  Heart  Failure      

    Clin  Geriatr  Med  32  (2016)  277–289    

  • patients’ lives by advances in heart failure management. Analysis

    of trends in comorbidities and drug use from 1988 to 2008 shows

    an increase in the proportion of octogenarians with heart failure

    (from 13.3% to 22.4%) along with an increase in the number of

    patients with five or more comorbidities (from 42% to 58%) and

    number of daily prescription medications from 4.1 to 6.4 drugs

    [5]. Comorbidities unrelated to heart failure (e.g., dementia and

    hip fracture) are more prevalent in above 86 age group [6].

    Comorbidities affect the quality of life and survival in heart failure

    patients—the more the comorbidities, the more the hospitaliza-tion and mortality. Noncardiac comorbidities are found to be more

    prevalent in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection

    fraction compared to those with heart failure with reduced ejec-

    tion fraction, leading to higher non-HF hospitalization rate. The

    impact of these comorbidities in both groups is, however, the

    same [7].

    Previous data on the presence and effect of comorbidities on

    CHF were derived from geographically limited studies of relatively

    small numbers of patients such as the Framingham cohort [8].

    More recent studies have utilized databases to examine the impact

    of comorbidity in larger groups of elderly patients with CHF.

    Utilizing data from 27,477 Scottish morbidity records listing CHF,

    Brown and Cleland [9] reported 11.8% of CHF admissions were

    associated with chronic airway obstruction, 8.3% with chronic or

    acute renal failure, and 5.3% with cerebrovascular accident. The

    National Heart Failure project, from the Centres for Medicare and

    Medicaid Services in the USA, previously reported comorbidities

    among 34,587 Medicare patients aged >65 years who were hospi-talized with a principal diagnosis of CHF [10]. About a third had

    chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 18% had a his-

    tory of stroke, and 9.2% had dementia. A retrospective cohort

    study of 1,363,977 elderly Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized

    with heart failure from 2001 to 2004 described comorbid condi-

    tions including diabetes mellitus (36.8%), renal failure (18.5%),

    and dementia or major psychiatric disorders (13.5%) [11].

    Braunstein et al. identified 122,630 individuals aged >65 yearswith CHF through a 5% random sample of all US Medicare ben-

    eficiaries. Nearly 40% of patients with CHF had >5 noncardiaccomorbidities, and this group accounted for 81% of the total

    inpatient hospital days experienced by patients with CHF. The

    risk of hospitalization and potentially preventable

    hospitalizations strongly increased with the number of chronic

    Figure 1 Interaction of noncardiac comorbidities in chronic heart failure (CHF). Solid lines toward centre: Comorbidities contributing to CHF; Solid lines

    away from centre: Sequelae of CHF; Blue boxes: Direct contributors to worsening CHF; Yellow boxes: Indirect contributors to worsening CHF; Curved

    arrows: Interaction between comorbidities.

    ª 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Cardiovascular Therapeutics 33 (2015) 300–315 301

    V. H. Chong et al. Management of Comorbidities in Heart Failure

    Management  of  Noncardiac  ComorbidiJes  in  Chronic  Heart  Failure  Cardiovascular  Therapeu>cs  33  (2015)  300–315      

  • •  UK.  Clínica  de  falla  cardíaca:  74%  de  los  pacientes  con  clase  funcional  NYHA  II-‐  IV  tenían  puntajes  de  MOCA  test  entre  17-‐25  puntos  

    •  SOLVD-‐  WHAS  I:  hallazgos  similares  

    FALLA  CARDIACA  Y  DETERIORO  COGNITIVO      

    CogniJve  impairment  in  heart  failure  paJents  Journal  of  Geriatric  Cardiology  (2014)  11:  316−328    

    Atención    Velocidad  de  procesamiento  

    Síndrome  disejecuJvo   Memoria  de  trabajo  

    Recomendación  de  American  Geriatric  Society:  aplicar  tamizaje  cogniJvo  ANUAL  a  pacientes  con  ICC  

  • RECOMENDACIONES  PARA  TENER  EN  CUENTA      

    MulJmorbidity  in  Older  Adults  with  Heart  Failure      

    Clin  Geriatr  Med  32  (2016)  277–289    

    1.  ENFOQUESE  EN  LOS  DESENLACES  GLOBALES  EN  SALUD    

    IdenJfique  síntomas:  dolor,  disnea,  faJga  Evalúe  calidad  de  vida  Determine  el  estado  funcional  MEBE-‐  AVD  Procure  reducir  CUALQUIER  CAUSA  de  hospitalización  no  solo  por  falla  cardíaca  Discuta  pronósJco    

    2.  EVALUE  FORMALMENTE  COGNICION  Y  AFECTO      

    MOCA-‐  MMT-‐  Mini  Cog-‐  Yesavage-‐  PHQ2  

    3.  APLIQUE  TRATAMIENTOS  NO  FARMACOLOGICOS    

    Ac>vidad  usica-‐  rehabilitación  cardíaca    Medidas  generales  para  ortosta>smo    

    4.  MINIMIZE    EL  AGOBIO  POR  LA  ENFERMEDAD  

    Pregúntele  al  paciente  cuál  es  le  principal  síntoma  que  lo  agobia    Des-‐prescripción    Disminuya  el  número  de  citas  médicas    

    5.  COMUNIQUESE  CON  LOS  OTROS  ESPECIALISTAS  QUE  TRATAN  AL  PACIENTE    

    Plan  interdisciplinario  INTEGRADO    

  • CONCLUSIONES    •  La  transición  demográfica  lleva  a  mayor  carga  de  enfermedad  

    cardiovascular  en  el  mundo    •  Es  más  frecuente  la  ICC    de  fracción  de  eyección  preservada  en  el  

    adulto  mayor    •  Existe  alta  prevalencia  de  fragilidad  en  adultos  mayores  con  ICC  •  La  fragilidad  es  un  predictor  de  desenlaces  adversos    •  La  presencia  de  comorbilidad  genera  un  impacto  nega>vo  en  

    índices  de  pronós>co  y  calidad  de  vida  en  el  adulto  mayor  con  ICC  •  Existe  una  relación  directamente  proporcional  entre  la  severidad  

    de  ICC    y  la  presencia  de  deterioro  cogni>vo  •  Es  necesario  realizar  tamizajes  de  deterioro  cogni>vo  en  

    pacientes  con  ICC