17
1 Energy Efficiency Lighting Issues California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division June 16th, 2009

Energy Efficiency Lighting Issues

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Energy Efficiency Lighting Issues. California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division June 16th, 2009. Welcome and Introductions. Lighting Issues Workshop. Morning Session: Presentations of Options for California’s Lighting Programs in 2009 -11 Period - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

1

Energy Efficiency Lighting Issues

California Public Utilities Commission

Energy Division

June 16th, 2009

2

Welcome and Introductions

3

Lighting Issues Workshop• Morning Session: Presentations of Options for

California’s Lighting Programs in 2009 -11 Period

• Mid-Afternoon Session: Discuss Options for California’s Lighting Programs in 2009 – 11 Period– Options in Residential Programs– Options in Non-Residential Programs

• Late-Afternoon Session: Discuss how to Achieve CEESP Goals in 2009 -11 Period and Beyond– Using Statewide Lighting Transformation Program as

Vehicle for Achieving CEESP Goals– Prioritization of Technologies

4

ALJ Ruling Seeking Additional Record and Comments on Workshop Issues

• Timeline– Issued June 9, 2009 – Parties submit comments on the workshop issues by June 29, 2009.– Reply comments are due on July 10, 2009

• Question 7:– Given current saturation levels of basic Compact Fluorescent

Lamps (CFLs) in California homes and retail outlets, what is the optimal level of funding for basic CFLs and/or the number of basic CFL bulbs to be included in IOU Upstream Lighting Programs during the 2009-2011 period? In what manner and by what date should funding for basic CFLs (for the residential sector distributed via Upstream Programs) be phased out?...

5

ALJ Ruling Seeking Additional Record and Comments on Workshop Issues

• Question 7 (continued):– Please describe what other types of

specialty CFL, super CFL and other advanced lighting programs should be scaled up during this same period, including possible targets for appropriate funding and incentive levels, energy savings, and distribution channels (residential and non-residential markets)

6

Lighting in the Context of Market Transformation

• Definition of Market Transformation: “Long-lasting sustainable changes in the structure or functioning of a market achieved by reducing barriers to the adoption of energy efficiency measures to the point where further publicly-funded intervention is no longer appropriate in that specific market…” (D. 98-04-063, Appendix A, 1998; CEESP, 2008)

• “IOU plans should identify “… an ‘end game’ for each technology or practice that transforms building, purchasing, and use decisions to become either “standard practice” (sometimes referred to as “MT”), or incorporated into minimum codes and standards.” (D. 07-10-032, p. 150).

7

Recap of Market Transformation Workshop on June 3, 2009

• Workshop Goals– Outline a “process to track progress” starting with Market Sector-based

MT program– Identify an “end-game” for technologies or practices to become either

standard procedure or incorporated into Codes & Standards• Useful indicators

– Market share info, incremental cost of technology upgrade, customer acceptance

• Data sources– Impact studies, market effects studies, study on peak energy usage,

study on barriers, saturation studies• Strategies for CFL transition

– Phase down rebates for basic CFLs but continue to assist with advertising and promotion

– Establish strategy transition points (as opposed to end points)

8

California Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan (CEESP) Lighting Goals – Residential Sector

Strategy 4-1 Drive continual advances in lighting technology through research programs and design competitions.

Strategy 4-2 Create demand for improved lighting products through demonstration projects, marketing efforts and utility programs.

Strategy 4-3 Continuously strengthen standards.

Strategy 4-4 Coordinated phase-out of Utility incentives for purchase of CFLs.

Strategy 4-5 Ensure environmental safety of CFLs and other emerging lighting solutions.

Residential and Low Income Sector

Goal 4: High Performance Residential Lighting

9

CEESP Lighting Goals: Commercial Sector

Drive continual advances in lighting technology through research programs and design competitions.

Strategy 3-2 Create demand for improved lighting products through demonstration projects, marketing efforts and utility programs.

Strategy 3-3 Coordinated phase-out of Utility incentives for purchase of CFLs.

Strategy 3-1

Commercial SectorGoal 3: High Performance Commercial Lighting

10

Upcoming State and Federal Lighting Acts

• California Lighting Efficiency and Toxics Reduction Act (Huffman Bill) passed in October 2007– “Reduce average statewide electrical energy consumption by

not less than 50% from the 2007 levels for indoor residential lighting and not less than 25% from the 2007 levels for indoor commercial and outdoor lighting by 2018 ”

• Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) passed in December 2007 – Federal law adopting a wide variety of energy savings

measures and mandatory energy efficiency standards

11

Timeline: California Lighting Efficiency and Toxics Reduction Act

DATE

January 1, 2010

January 1, 2012

January 1, 2014 Specified incandescent and enhanced spectrum lamps with levels of hazardous materials pursuant to the European Union's RoHS directive are prohibited from sale; other lamps considered for sale prohibition

REQUIREMENT

General purpose lights with levels of hazardous materials pursuant to the European Union's RoHS directive are prohibited from sale High intensity discharge lamps and CFLs greater than 9 inches in length with levels of hazardous materials pursuant to the European Union's RoHS directive are prohibited from sale

12

Timeline: Timeline: California Lighting Efficiency and Toxics

Reduction Act and EISA

DATEJanuary 1, 2011 - December 31, 2013

January 1, 2014 - December 31, 2016

January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2018

January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020

California phases in Tier 2 (Bulbs that are at least 60% more efficient than 2007 levels)

Federal government phases in Tier (Bulbs that are at least 60% more efficient than 2007 levels)

California phases in Tier 1 (Bulbs that are at least 25-30% more efficient than 2007 levels)Federal government phases in Tier 1 (Bulbs that are at least 25-30% more efficient than 2007 levels)

REQUIREMENT

13

Planned Energy Savings from Lighting in 2009 – 11 EE Portfolio Applications (Submitted March 2, 2009)

MandatoryPortfolio-Level Lighting Energy Savings (kWh)

56%

53%

71%

14%

36%

9%8%

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

SCE SDG&E PG&E

kW

h (

Millio

ns

)

Other

Light Power Density -Systems Approach

Controls

Custom Lighting

Indoor Lighting SysRepl

Screw-in CFL(specialty)

CFL Fixture

Linear Fluorescents

Screw-in CFL (basic)

MandatoryPortfolio-Level Lighting Energy Savings (kWh)

61%

53%

71%

9%

4%

14%

36%

5%

13%

16%

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

SCE SDG&E PG&E

kW

h (

Millio

ns

)

All Other**

Controls

Linear Fluorescents

CFL Fixture / Pin-base CFL

Screw-in CFL (All)

14

Proposed Funding Levels from EE Portfolio Applications (Submitted March 2, 2009)

2009 - 11 Energy Efficiency Portfolio Applications: Lighting Programs

$0

$20,000,000

$40,000,000

$60,000,000

$80,000,000

$100,000,000

PG&E SCE SDG&E

Advanced ConsumerLighting Program

Residential Lighting forBasic CFLs

15

Proposed Funding Levels from EE Portfolio Applications (Submitted March 2, 2009)

2009 - 11 Energy Efficiency Portfolio Applications: Advanced Consumer Lighting Program

$0

$10,000,000

$20,000,000

$30,000,000

$40,000,000

$50,000,000

PG&E SCE SDG&E

Total Marketing andOutreach

Total Administrative Cost

Total DirectImplementation

2009 - 11 Energy Efficiency Portfolios: Residential Lighting for Basic CFLs

$0

$20,000,000

$40,000,000

$60,000,000

$80,000,000

$100,000,000

PG&E SCE SDG&E

Total Marketing andOutreach

Total Administrative Cost

Total DirectImplementation

16

Morning Session: Presentations• 9:30 AM -– Jenna Canseco, KEMA

– Status of California’s Market for CFLs

• 10:00 AM - Representatives from PG&E, SCE and SDG&E– Lighting recommendations for 2009 – 11 EE Portfolio Applications

• 10:30 AM - Noah Horowitz, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)– Lighting recommendations for 2009 – 11 EE Portfolio Applications

• 10:45 AM – Cheryl Cox, Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA)– Lighting recommendations for 2009 – 11 EE Portfolio Applications

• 11 AM - Cynthia Mitchell, The Utility Reform Network (TURN)– Lighting recommendations for 2009 – 11 EE Portfolio Applications

• 11:15 AM - Professor Kostas Papamichael – California Lighting Technology Center (CLTC)

– Lighting technologies and summary of six technology approaches

17

Questions?