Upload
wenji-zhou
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ORI GIN AL PA PER
Energy consumption patterns in the processof China’s urbanization
Wenji Zhou • Bing Zhu • Dingjiang Chen •
Charla Griffy-Brown • Yaoyao Ma • Weiyang Fei
Published online: 30 March 2011
� Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011
Abstract Urbanization has transformed daily lives and industrial production in
China. We investigate the effects of this process on Chinese energy consumption
patterns. Three energy-consuming sectors intricately associated with urbanization
are identified and analyzed: residential households, transportation, and the building
materials industry. Urbanization has profoundly affected each; moreover, the latter
two are high energy consumption and potentially high carbon producing. We esti-
mate energy consumption attributable to each sector to quantitatively evaluate their
impacts on societal transition. Transportation and the production of building
materials are identified as the most significant linkages from urbanization to energy
consumption. Strikingly, despite the large increase in the proportion of the popu-
lation that is urban, the share of urban energy consumption, as estimated here, in
total energy consumption has remained stable. This suggests that economic growth,
in the form of the production of goods for export and domestic consumption, is the
most important driver of energy demand in China.
Keywords Urbanization � Energy consumption � Circular economy �Low carbon economy � China
W. Zhou � B. Zhu (&) � D. Chen � Y. Ma � W. Fei
Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University,
100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China
e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
W. Zhou
e-mail: [email protected]
B. Zhu
Energy Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA),
Schlossplatz 1, 2361 Laxenburg, Austria
C. Griffy-Brown
Graziadio School of Business, Pepperdine University, Los Angeles, CA 90045, USA
123
Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220
DOI 10.1007/s11111-011-0133-5
Introduction
Urbanization is a feature and consequence of China’s economic development
process. Through this process, and as a result of associated changes in lifestyle and
improvements in the mode of production, energy consumption patterns have been
profoundly transformed.
Three types of energy usage dominate large-scale concentrations of population in
urban areas: energy conversion, indirect energy consumption in goods production
and transportation activities, and direct energy consumption in final uses (Parikh and
Shukla 1995). A number of local environmental problems have emerged as a
consequence of this urbanization-associated energy usage. According to a study by
He et al. (2003), energy consumption—in particular coal consumption—is the main
source of anthropogenic air pollution emissions in Chinese cities. Greenhouse gas
emissions, which are primarily linked to energy consumption, are also associated
with urbanization, albeit indirectly. For instance, cement production for large-scale
urban construction such as high-rise buildings and infrastructure increases
greenhouse gas emissions. The quantitative assessment of the effect of urbanization
on energy consumption patterns is thus a particularly interesting question related to
sustainable development.
Research on this topic has been carried out from various perspectives, but no
study has identified patterns of urbanization-related energy consumption across
different regions in China. Jones (1991, 2004) identified mechanisms through which
the effects of urbanization on energy consumption can be measured. He argues that
the urbanization process has both a direct and indirect influence on energy
consumption. For instance, urbanization generates economies of scale in production,
but also leads to a requirement for more transportation as a result of urban
population concentration, and passenger transport in cities is heavily weighted
toward fuel-using modes, particularly as personal incomes increase. To quantita-
tively assess the overall impact of the urbanization process, Parikh and Shukla
(1995) developed a fixed effects model of the determinants of total energy usage
based on an analysis of the nature of the relationship between increased resource use
and urbanization, as well as the impact of the development transition on levels of
resource consumption. Other researchers have focused on urban energy metabolism
by analyzing a specific city system from an energy point of view. Odum and
Peterson (1972) linked the complexity of cities to ecological principles and energy
flows. Population-level energy requirements and the energy characteristics of cities
based on fossil fuels were also examined in Odum and Odum (1981). Huang et al.
(2001) and Huang and Chen (2005) applied systems ecology concepts and principles
via theories of energy to link the driving forces of urban systems to their structure,
economy, and organization. All of these researchers examined the inherent
relationship between energy consumption and urbanization, using developing
countries as case studies. However, little attention has been paid to China’s
urbanization process and the patterns of energy consumption in this context.
The impact of the urbanization process on energy consumption patterns in China
has specific characteristics. Shen et al. (2005) explored relationships between
urbanization trends in China and the supply and demand of major energy and mineral
Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220 203
123
resources, as well as between urbanization and GDP, yet did not provide analysis of
the correlation between urbanization and the pattern of energy consumption. Liu
(2009) provided empirical evidence for the link between urbanization and energy
consumption. Liu argues that the rapid aggregation of urban population inevitably
leads to a corresponding rise in energy consumption, for instance, through the
development of city transportation and modern communication systems. However,
Liu also found that the urbanization process accounted for a much smaller share of
China’s energy demand in comparison with economic growth. Moreover, this share
was also found to be much smaller in recent years than in the past.
Much research has also focused on urban environmental problems caused by
energy consumption resulting from urbanization in China. For example, a range of
typical urban pollutants (NOX, CO, CO2, SO2, dust, etc.) were classified and their
respective emission sources identified for Beijing (He et al. 2003; Zhu et al. 2005).
Despite the availability of research analyzing macroscopic factors that influence
energy consumption in the urbanization process (such as population, gross domestic
product (GDP), and level of urbanization), in-depth investigations based on sectoral-
level data have not been carried out; that is, there is a lack of research that focuses on
the administrative measures that could be implemented to decouple the urbanization
process from increasing energy consumption. Previous categorizations of energy
consumption in urbanization usually defined two types: residential energy use and
production energy use. In contrast, we select the three most relevant sectors—
residential households, transportation, and the building materials industry—to
conduct exploratory analyses of how urbanization influences energy consumption
patterns related to these three sectors in China. Further, we identify appropriate
policy tools to address specific challenges related to energy and urbanization.
This article is divided into five sections. Following the introduction, we briefly
address the basic characteristics of urbanization and energy consumption in China
and identify the key features to be examined. The third section analyzes the
dynamics of the relationship between urbanization and energy use in China through
a quantitative assessment. Section four introduces two concepts of critical
importance to energy policy planning: the ‘‘circular economy’’ and the ‘‘low
carbon economy.’’ We discuss their impacts on energy consumption patterns related
to urbanization processes in China, a critical issue, given the attention paid to these
concepts by the Chinese government in national development planning. In the
concluding section, these models are viewed in the context of the patterns, and key
features identified in this study to provide some important recommendations for
policy makers.
Characteristics of urbanization and energy consumption in China
The urbanization process in China has been long and complex because China was a
long predominantly rural society. Though cities emerged early on, the speed of
urbanization was very slow prior to the 1970s. With the initiation of the ‘‘Reform
and Opening-Up’’ policy in 1978, China entered a period of high-speed urbaniza-
tion. The agricultural reform, which is considered the beginning of the profound
204 Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220
123
transformation of Chinese society as a whole, significantly advanced rural economic
development, thus indirectly enhancing the development of a non-agricultural
economy and urbanization. Chinese economic reforms have steadily progressed
since the mid-1980s and have fostered further urbanization. The movement of
surplus agricultural workers to cities greatly accelerated the urbanization process.
According to official statistics (State Statistical Bureau, China Statistical Yearbook
2009), from 1978 to 2008 the total urban population jumped from 170 million to
607 million, the percentage of the urban population rose from 17.9 to 45.7%, and the
share of the urban workforce (percentage of urban workers relative to the total
number of workers) climbed from 23.7 to 39.0%, as shown in Table 1.
Even though both the rate and scale of China’s urbanization are unprecedented,
the role of industrialization and economic growth as drivers in this process remains
controversial. As Table 1 shows, there is no significant correlation between rising
urbanization and industrial development. That is, the level of urbanization in China
is lagging behind the industrialization process and overall economic growth. These
features distinguish China from other developing countries. Some scholars argue
that this results from the consistent underestimation of China’s level of urbanization
due to the dual structure of the urban and rural household registration system, which
has resulted in a large number of rural laborers migrating to cities without, however,
being registered as urban residents (Zhou et al. 2008). Other experts assert that
China’s level of industrialization has been overestimated because the index to
measure the development of industrialization, namely the percentage of secondary
industry in total GDP, did not reflect the actual situation (Guo 2002; Lu et al. 2005).
Urbanization in China is heterogeneous. The urban population, the size of urban
cities, and other facets of China’s urbanization vary significantly among regions. To
illustrate this disparity, we selected three provinces, Guangdong, Hubei, and Gansu,
respectively, from eastern, central, and western China and compared their levels of
urbanization (see Table 2).
The results demonstrate that the level of urbanization and the share of urban
workforce differ considerably between the eastern and western regions. This is
especially evident in eastern coastal areas such as Guangdong province, where
foreign trade and foreign investment, profiting from special economic development
policies, dramatically spurred the development of cities. In contrast, the western
regions of China are less developed, and the national strategy for the development
of western provinces still needs time to be effective.
Table 1 Urbanization and industrialization in China from 1978 to 2008
Year 1978 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2008
Urbanization level (%) 17.9 19.4 23.7 26.4 29.0 36.2 43.0 45.7
Share of urban workforce (%) 23.7 24.8 25.7 26.3 28.0 32.1 36.0 39.0
Industrialization level (%)a 47.9 48.2 42.9 41.3 47.2 45.9 47.5 48.6
Source: State Statistical Bureau, China Statistical Yearbook 2009, online version, http://www.stats.
gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2009/indexeh.htma Industrialization level here is measured by share of secondary industry of total GDP
Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220 205
123
Urbanization affects energy consumption patterns in several ways: (1) adjustment
of the industrial structure affects the production of key products such as cement and
steel; (2) optimization of energy supply changes people’s lifestyles; for example,
natural gas is more likely to be used instead of coal in urban areas—in addition, a
more diversified energy supply will alter industrial production approaches; (3)
technological improvements enable people to use energy-efficient appliances; (4)
more efficient use of resources, primarily in industry, allow by-products or waste
from a given production process to be then used or reused in another process.
Energy consumption patterns in China have substantially changed in terms of
scale and structure, especially since the 1990s. The total final energy consumed in
China increased by 94.6%, from 814.2 million tons of coal equivalent (tce) in 1991
to 1,584.7 million tce in 2005, with an annual growth rate of 5.1%. However, urban
residential energy consumption, which accounted for 6–10% of China’s total energy
consumption, increased by only 19.8% in the same period (see Table 3) because the
energy consumption of energy intensive sectors, such as heavy industries and
transport, grew far more rapidly than household energy consumption.
Another noteworthy phenomenon is that although total energy consumption
increased, the energy consumption structure improved, i.e., the use of cleaner final
energy forms such as electricity increased along with a decline in coal use. This
trend is presented in Figs. 1 and 2. Total electricity use increased by 10.1% annually
during this period, while coal consumption remained constant, leading to substantial
Table 2 Regional disparities in urbanization (2008): the case of three provinces
Guangdong Hubei Gansu
Level of urbanization (%) 63.0 44.0 31.0
Share of urban workforce (%) 39.2 27.5 20.0
Cities with more than 1 million inhabitants 10 6 3
Source: State Statistical Bureau, China Statistical Yearbook 2009, online version, http://www.stats.
gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2009/indexeh.htm
Table 3 Total final energy consumption and urban residential energy consumption in China from 1991
to 2005
Year 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
Total final energy consumption (million tce) 814.2 850.9 884.8 936.4 981.4 1,059.3 992.3 952.7
Urban residential energy consumption
(million tce)a80.5 74.3 70.2 67.2 67.4 75.5 64.9 60.8
Year 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Total final energy consumption (million tce) 954.7 971.1 989.7 1,046.3 1,218.3 1,442.3 1,584.7
Urban residential energy consumption (million tce) 63.9 67.0 69.0 74.5 84.6 89.9 96.4
Source: State Statistical Bureau & Energy Bureau, China Energy Statistical Yearbook 1992–2006a Urban household energy use primarily includes heating and cooling, lighting, and cooking. We have
calibrated the data here and found that the energy consumed in transportation was not taken into account
in this item
206 Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220
123
alterations in energy consumption mix. This trend toward improvement is even
more striking with reference to residential energy use in urban areas. Electricity use
increased at an annual rate of 12.7%, while coal use declined considerably—by
8.8% annually—reflecting an improvement in urban residents’ day-to-day lives.
Note, however, that the China Energy Statistical Yearbook, which we used for these
Fig. 1 Structural change in final energy consumption in China (1991–2005). Electricity, heat, naturalgas, petroleum, coal, and other forms of energy (including some relatively small-scale energy forms suchas coke and refinery gas) are the six main final energy consumption types according to the China EnergyStatistical Yearbook. Despite the fact that electricity and heat are usually considered secondary energyforms that are transformed from other forms of energy, while natural gas, petroleum, and coal areconsidered primary energy, all of these forms are examined simultaneously and represent finalconsumption in the Yearbook. For example, only coal consumed for non-energy use was taken intoaccount in this calculation to avoid double counting. Source: State Statistical Bureau & Energy Bureau,China Energy Statistical Yearbook 1992–2006
Fig. 2 Structural change of residential energy consumption in urban areas (1991–2005). Source: StateStatistical Bureau & Energy Bureau, China Energy Statistical Yearbook 1992–2006
Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220 207
123
figures, reported the six main final energy consumption forms (i.e., electricity, heat,
natural gas, petroleum, coal, and others) simultaneously—these figures thus
represent only final consumption, even though electricity and heat are often
considered secondary energy forms that are transformed from primary energy. Thus,
to avoid double counting, the coal category in these figures does not include coal
consumed in the production of electricity and heat, although most electricity and
heat in China is still predominantly produced from coal. Further research accounting
for the origin of secondary energy production would be valuable.
Final energy consumption varies between China’s eastern, central, and western
provinces in parallel to regional differences in level of urbanization. Total final
energy consumption in 2006 was 28.6, 75.5, and 128.3 million tce for Gansu, Hubei,
and Guangdong provinces, respectively. Energy use in Guangdong was nearly 4.5
times higher than in Gansu, although the Guangdong population was only 3.6 times
that of Gansu. The three provinces’ energy use structures are compared in Figs. 3
and 4. The share of petroleum and electricity use was higher in Guangdong than in
Fig. 3 Total final energyconsumption structures for threeprovinces in 2006. Source: StateStatistical Bureau & EnergyBureau, China Energy StatisticalYearbook 2007
Fig. 4 Urban residential energyconsumption structures for threeprovinces in 2006. Source: StateStatistical Bureau & EnergyBureau, China Energy StatisticalYearbook 1991–2007
208 Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220
123
Hubei and Gansu. However, the difference between Hubei and Gansu was less
obvious, as industrial development is quite limited in these two provinces compared
with Guangdong. Nevertheless, a very clear decline in the share of electricity usage
from east to west is evident in the energy use structure of urban households, with
electricity accounting for 52.5% of total urban household energy consumption in
Guangdong, compared with 36.8% in Hubei and 17.7% in Gansu. In Gansu, 36.8%
of the energy consumption of urban households was attributable to heating because
Gansu is located in northwestern China where buildings are routinely heated by
central heating systems in cold weather. No energy was consumed for heating in
Hubei and Guangdong, where no such central heating systems exist owing to the
provinces’ warmer weather.
Relationship between urbanization and energy consumption in China
Conceptual framework
The relationship between urbanization and energy consumption in China is
considered from three distinct perspectives, namely energy use by residential
households, transportation, and the building materials industry, as illustrated in the
framework diagram in Fig. 5. Urbanization has had a profound impact on residential
and transportation patterns. As a result, all energy consumption activities within
these sectors have changed during the process of urbanization. For example, the
methods used for heating, cooking, lighting, and transportation significantly differ
from traditional methods used in rural areas. At the same time, extensive building in
urban areas, also a very important aspect of urbanization, has resulted in increased
use of energy to produce building materials such as cement, steel, aluminum, and
glass.
Urbanization
Residential households
Transportation
Buildingmaterials (real
estate etc.)
Heating/Lighting/Cooking …
Private car/Public
transportation …
Iron & Steel
Cement
Aluminum
Glass
Other
Energy consumption
Other
NOX
CO
CO2
SO2
Dust
Other
Environment
Fig. 5 Conceptual framework of links between urbanization and energy consumption
Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220 209
123
Our research does not address all impacts of urbanization on energy consumption
patterns. For example, the production of chemical fertilizer will increase due to
changes in the agricultural production process caused by urbanization. This factor
was discussed by Jones (1991, 2004) in a qualitative way. We have not taken
additional factors like this into consideration, as our goal is to quantitatively
measure the impact of urbanization on energy consumption patterns, and the data
required to analyze such factors were unobtainable. Moreover, within the short time
frame of our study, which covers just one or two decades, the relationship between
the change in fertilizer production and urbanization is very subtle, that is, it is
virtually impossible to separate an increase in fertilizer production caused by
urbanization from total fertilizer output.
Residential households
Energy consumed by residential households primarily consists of energy for
heating, lighting, cooking, and working. Transportation is often considered a
subcategory of the residential sector, but in order to highlight the data boundary and
ensure consistency of data sources, transportation is separated from the residential
sector in this study. To measure the changes, the urbanization process has brought
about in the residential sector; data on five representative household appliances were
collected, namely washing machines, refrigerators, color TV sets, air conditioners,
and personal computers (Fig. 6).
The five curves clearly indicate that the number of modern household appliances
per capita increased significantly between 1990 and 2005. Yet the rate of increase
varies for each appliance. A sharp rise is evident in more advanced or relatively high
technology-content products such as personal computers and air conditioners. In
contrast, the number of traditional electronic appliances such as color TVs,
refrigerators, and washing machines remained relatively constant, while their quality,
performance, and functions improved considerably over time (Akinobu et al. 2008).
Widespread use of these appliances inevitably led to a rise in the electricity
consumption of urban households. According to the China Energy Statistical
Fig. 6 Trends in the number of household appliances in urban areas (per 100 inhabitants). Source: StateStatistical Bureau, China Statistical Yearbook 2006, online version, http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2009/indexeh.htm
210 Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220
123
Yearbook (State Statistical Bureau & Energy Bureau 1991, 2006), the annual
electricity consumption per urban household was 407 kilowatt hours (kwh) in 1990, a
figure which climbed to 1,063 kwh within 15 years. That is, electricity consumption
increased nearly three times within one and a half decades. This is, in part, a
reflection of the rising share of electricity in urban residential energy use (see Fig. 2).
Another factor is that many surplus agricultural workers have migrated to big cities.
Even though the average number of persons per household decreased, the total
number of households increased, and along with it, the number of appliances. Rising
numbers of households combined with declining average household size made for a
very rapid increase in the number of appliances per capita. Offsetting these factors,
however, has been the rising energy efficiency of household appliances.
Table 3 and Fig. 7 reveal that total and per capita (respectively) urban residential
energy consumption remained level or dropped during the first half of the study
period and increased in the second half. This result has been reported in other studies
(Chen and Yuan 2008; Liang et al. 2009). Liang et al. (2009) attributed this trend to
the balancing out of two countervailing factors, urbanization and technological
progress: urbanization has increased residential energy use, while technological
progress has decreased it. In the 1990s, according to this view, technological progress
outweighed the influence of urbanization and vice versa during this century.
However, Chen and Yuan (2008) argued that technological progress only affected
the manufacturing sector and had little impact on the residential sector. They
associated this trend with changes in urban wages and consumption behavior. There
is a lack of relevant quantitative analysis to support these assertions, and further
research needs to be conducted to clarify the role of causal factors.
When comparing urban and rural energy use patterns, it is important to understand
how residential energy consumption patterns are affected by the transition from a
rural to an urban economy. Comparative results are presented in Figs. 7 and 8.
Figure 7 illustrates the huge gap between urban and rural residential energy use
that existed in 2005, when urban residential energy consumption per capita totaled
around 257 kilograms of coal equivalent (kgce), while rural residential energy
consumption was 122 kgce per capita. Nevertheless, this gap shrank between 1991
and 2005, as urban residential energy use per capita decreased slightly (from 298 to
257 kgce), while rural residential energy use rose by approximately 47%.
Fig. 7 Urban and rural residential energy consumption (1991–2005), per capita (kgce). Data excludesome hard-to-survey traditional energy consumption forms, for example, the conventional use of firewoodin rural areas. Source: State Statistical Bureau & Energy Bureau, China Energy Statistical Yearbook1992–2006
Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220 211
123
The structures also display significant disparities. According to Fig. 8, residential
energy sources are more diverse and cleaner in urban than in rural areas. More
sophisticated energy resources, such as natural gas and coal gas, were available to
urban, but not to rural, households (Cai and Jiang 2008). Note that these figures
include commercially available residential energy sources, while excluding hard-to-
survey traditional energy forms such as the use of firewood in rural areas. Since
traditional biomass use in rural households such as direct combustion of firewood
and straw for cooking and heating is not included, the comparative analysis is only a
rough estimation.
Transportation
China’s transportation sector has experienced rapid growth in recent years. The
number of urban motor vehicles increased 4.2 times from 6.1 million in 1991 to 31.6
million in 2005, and corresponding urban transportation energy use rose from 26.8
million tce to 139.9 million tce, as shown in Table 4. Note that these data cover only
urban road transportation. Transportation energy theoretically equals the sum of all
energy forms consumed by all types of vehicles. Since official statistical data on
energy consumption of other forms of urban transportation is not available, we
instead report the sum of related gasoline and diesel use, which should reflect total
urban energy use.
There are two categories of urban motor vehicles, commercial (profit-making)
and non-commercial (non-profit-making). The former includes public buses and
trams to transport passengers and trucks to transport goods. According to our
calculation (the data were derived from the China Statistical Yearbook and Wu et al.
2008), commercial vehicles accounted for about 23% of the total number of vehicles
in 2005, but 59% of transport energy, implying that they constituted a much higher
energy-intensive mode of transportation than non-commercial vehicles. This
probably reflects both higher individual energy consumption by commercial
vehicles, which are generally much larger than non-commercial vehicles, and the
Fig. 8 Structural comparisonof urban and rural residentialenergy consumption (2006), percapita. Data exclude some hard-to-survey traditional energyconsumption forms, forexample, the conventional use offirewood in rural areas. Source:State Statistical Bureau &Energy Bureau, China EnergyStatistical Yearbook 2007
212 Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220
123
predominance of public transport, as opposed to private motorcars, in terms of
distance traveled. Because public transport vehicles typically carry many more
individuals than non-commercial private vehicles, this does not contradict the
general acceptance that public transportation is more energy efficient than private
transportation. However, we collected vehicle fleet and energy consumption data on
China’s commercial vehicles for the years 2000 and 2005 and found that although
the fleet had increased by only 4%, energy use had risen by 72% over the five-year
period, which indicates that the energy performance of these vehicles declined (see
Table 5).
An examination of energy consumed by commercial passenger vehicles in
particular also reveals a decline in efficiency. For gasoline vehicles, the fuel
consumed to transport 100 people per kilometer was 11 l in 2000, an amount that
increased to 13 l within 5 years (see Fig. 9). Chang et al. (2010) attributed this rise to
an upgrade of gasoline vehicles. Before the year 2000, China’s public transportation
vehicles were relatively primitive and hence consumed less energy. These vehicles
were upgraded in subsequent years, for instance, through the addition of extra
features such as air conditioners or mobile digital TV and the widespread
introduction of specially configured vehicles, resulting in more comfort for
Table 4 Growing number of urban motor vehicles and corresponding transportation energy consumption
(1991–2005)
Year 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
Number of motor vehicles (million) 26.8 29.8 32.9 34.3 39.8 40.8 52.8 59.7
Transportation energy (million tce) 6.1 6.9 8.2 9.4 10.4 11.0 12.2 13.2
Year 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Number of motor vehicles (million) 70.1 78.0 80.8 87.6 101.6 124.0 139.9
Transportation energy (million tce) 14.5 16.1 18.0 20.5 23.8 26.9 31.6
Only urban road transportation is considered here; railway, water, airline, and rural vehicles have been
excluded. Transportation energy refers to fuels or electricity consumed by all types of vehicles. As no
official statistical data on energy consumption of urban transportation are available, we took the sum of
related gasoline and diesel use to reflect total urban energy. For example, electricity used by subways,
trolley buses, or trams was not taken into account, as it is assumed that the amount consumed is low (see
Wu et al. 2008)
Source: State Statistical Bureau, China Statistical Yearbook 2006, online version, http://www.stats.
gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2006/indexeh.htm, State Statistical Bureau & Energy Bureau, China Energy Statistical
Yearbook 1992–2006
Table 5 Comparison of
population and energy
consumption of profit-making
vehicles between 2000 and 2005
Source: Wu et al. (2008),
Li and Wu (2008)
Year Commercial
vehicle fleet
(million)
Energy consumption
of commercial vehicle
fleet (million tons oil
equivalent)
2000 7.01 33.4
2005 7.33 57.7
Increase (%) 104 172
Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220 213
123
passengers but also in higher energy requirements. While all agree that public rather
than private transportation needs to be further developed to mitigate environmental
impacts, the energy efficiency of public transport is itself an important variable.
The building materials industry
The expansion of energy-intensive heavy industry in China, which began in the
1990s, is related to the upsurge in urban infrastructure. Steel, aluminum, concrete,
and other basic building materials were produced and utilized to build new roads,
mass-transit systems, and substantial urban residential and commercial real estate
development projects. We present the development of the construction sector
between 1991 and 2005 as an illustrative example (Fig. 10). The floor space under
construction increased from 410.5 million square meters to 3,527.4 million square
meters, with an annual growth rate of 16.6%. New floor space completed within the
year rose from 202.6 million square meters to 1,594.1 million square meters, with an
annual growth rate of roughly 15.9%.
Fig. 9 Energy efficiencyof commercial passengervehicles (liter/100 people/km).Source: Li and Wu (2008)
Fig. 10 Building construction in China from 1990 to 2005 (million m2). Source: State Statistical Bureau,China Statistical Yearbook 2009, online version, http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2009/indexeh.htm
214 Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220
123
The production of cement, steel, aluminum, and glass also increased consider-
ably, as the data in Table 6 demonstrates. The output of these industries expanded,
with annual growth rates ranging from 10.9 to 17.6%. In particular, the production
of aluminum grew at an extremely fast rate, although outputs of the other products,
especially cement, were much higher.
The rapid development of these industries inevitably resulted in an increase in
industrial energy consumption. To measure the impact of urbanization, the products
used for construction must be separated from those products used for other
purposes. Based on data surveys and experts’ estimation (Dr. Shi Lei and Dr. Chen
Weiqiang), we derived the approximate shares of building materials used for
construction in China. For cement, steel, aluminum, and glass, these were 60, 50,
30, and 15%, respectively. The percentages fluctuated from 1 year to the next, but
within relatively narrow ranges, allowing us to arrive at a rough estimation of the
construction sectors’ energy consumption.
The results are presented in Table 7. The cement and steel production industries
accounted for the largest share in total energy consumption owing to their
substantial output. Although the aluminum and glass industries were also quite
energy intensive, their scales of production were much lower. The construction
industry’s impact on energy consumption in the urbanization process can mainly be
attributed to cement and steel production.
Summary of results
In order to address the important issue raised at the beginning of this article, we
analyze energy consumption in three areas crucial for urbanization: residential
households, transportation, and the building materials industry. We calculate each
factor’s share in China’s total final energy consumption, as summarized in
Fig. 11.
Table 6 Output of cement, steel, aluminum, and glass
Year 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
Cement (million tons) 252.6 308.2 367.9 421.2 475.6 491.2 511.7 536.0
Steel (million tons) 71.0 80.9 89.6 92.6 95.4 101.2 108.9 115.6
Aluminum (million tons) 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.4
Glass (million tons) 87.1 93.6 110.9 119.3 157.3 160.7 166.3 171.9
Year 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Cement (million tons) 573.0 597.0 661.0 725.0 862.1 966.8 1,068.8
Steel (million tons) 124.3 128.5 151.6 182.4 222.3 282.9 353.2
Aluminum (million tons) 2.8 3.0 3.6 4.5 5.6 6.7 7.8
Glass (million tons) 174.2 183.5 209.6 234.5 277.0 370.3 402.1
Source: State Statistical Bureau, China Statistical Yearbook 2006, online version, http://www.stats.
gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2006/indexeh.htm
Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220 215
123
The sum of energy consumption by urban residential households, transportation,
and the building materials industry accounted for approximately 20% of total energy
consumption in China, a share that only increased slightly between 1991 and 2005.
The remaining 80% of total energy consumption was primarily attributed to heavy
industries, such as power generation, chemical and petrochemical industries, and
steel and cement production for other purposes.
The share of urban residential energy consumption relative to total urban energy
consumption continued to decrease. The increasing share of energy of the
transportation and building materials industry indicates that these sectors have
Table 7 Energy consumption for the production of four typical building materials
Year 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
Cement (million tce) 26.5 32.4 38.6 44.2 49.9 51.6 53.7 56.3
Steel (million tce) 57.2 63.7 70.5 70.3 72.4 70.5 75.8 58.3
Aluminum (million tce) 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.4
Glass (million tce) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Total (million tce) 84.4 96.9 110.2 115.8 123.9 123.6 131.3 116.5
Year 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Cement (million tce) 60.2 60.5 65.4 70.5 82.2 90.5 92.3
Steel (million tce) 62.7 59.1 66.4 74.3 85.6 107.6 130.7
Aluminum (million tce) 1.6 1.6 1.9 2.4 3.0 3.5 4.0
Glass (million tce) 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.2
Total (million tce) 125.0 121.8 134.4 147.9 171.6 202.7 228.3
Source: authors calculations, using data from (1) State Statistical Bureau, China Statistical Yearbook
2006. Online version, http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj; and (2) Personal communication with Dr. Shi Lei
and Dr. Chen Weiqiang
Fig. 11 Share of urbanization-related energy consumption in national total energy consumption. Notes:a: Residential energy consumption in this article refers to the use of energy for cooking, heating, lighting,etc. in day-to-day life, excluding energy related to transportation. b: Only urban road transportation isincluded in the transportation energy consumption calculation here—railway, water, airline, and ruralvehicles are excluded
216 Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220
123
gradually become the driving force behind the rise in energy consumption in
China’s urbanization process.
The trend of urbanization in China is expected to continue, as is total energy
consumption related to urbanization. The large-scale construction of infrastructure
and high-rise buildings will continue for decades. This implies that related materials
production will be affected. Moreover, lifestyle changes will lead to an increase in
the number and use of urban vehicles including both commercial and private motor
vehicles, as well as the amount and use of electric household appliances. As a result,
electricity consumption will increase to achieve a more comfortable living standard.
In contrast, with reference to total final energy consumption, coal seems to be on the
wane. This notwithstanding, it appears that coal will continue to play a key role in
the supply side of energy. Coal-fired plants are expected to continue to dominate
China’s power generation for the foreseeable future.
Urbanization and energy consumption: the circular economy and the lowcarbon economy
Some basic challenges confront China’s continued development. On the one hand,
the rapid development of heavy industries such as power generation and steel and
cement production, largely driven by urbanization processes as described here, has
sharply increased China’s energy consumption and resource utilization. To cope
with ever-increasing pressures from resource shortages and environmental degra-
dation, the Chinese government has begun to focus on the concept of the ‘‘circular
economy.’’ This strategy is intended to integrate the economy with resources and
environmental factors based on the ‘‘resource-product-regenerated resource’’
material metabolism cycle. Ideally, it employs a mechanism of efficient resource
use where waste is fed back into the system, and overall material metabolism is
compatible with the healthy functioning of the ecosystem. Targets of the circular
economy would thus include the reduction in resource consumption and in pollutant
emissions. The Circular Economy Promotion Law was approved by China’s
National People’s Congress on August 29, 2008 and brought into force on January
1, 2009 (The National People’s Congress of the People Republic of China 2008;
Zhao 2011).
On the other hand, ever-greater understanding of the connection between climate
change and human activities has raised pressure on the entire international
community to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). In China, this has led to the
growing adoption in official policy of the ‘‘low carbon economy’’—an economy
with minimal emissions of GHG into the biosphere. Given its high energy
consumption and CO2 emissions, China faces an extreme challenge with respect to
greenhouse gas mitigation. The Chinese government has already assigned the
considerable priority for this issue; for instance, an ‘‘energy saving and reduction of
pollutant’’ policy have been incorporated in the 11th national five-year plan and
more rigorous requirements are expected with future national development
strategies (The Central People’s Government of the People Republic of China
2006).
Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220 217
123
Though these two economic models have different targets, it is possible to find
commonalities in their scope and requirements. Hence:
• Cascading use of energy, a key feature of the circular economy, would
substantially reduce systemic energy input and consequently reduce CO2
emissions;
• Similarly, the coupling of industries according to the precepts of industrial
ecology would offer opportunities for reusing greenhouse gases; for instance,
CO2 can be used to produce industrial chemicals;
• The promotion of carbon substitutes would reduce production of carbon
intensive products, reducing GHG emissions in an indirect way.
The complementary functioning of these two economic models (Table 8) may
facilitate the introduction of measures that reduce reliance on energy consumption
in the process of urbanization. Essentially, the implementation of a circular
economy could be viewed as a specific and indispensable approach to meet the
requirements of a low carbon society. The potential of this approach for GHG
mitigation remains a very interesting topic for further study. Regardless, there is no
question that these models will deeply influence the three aspects of urbanization
(residential characteristics, transportation, and construction) and resultant energy
consumption patterns discussed above.
Table 8 Comparison of the circular economy with the low carbon economy
Measure Circular economy Low carbon economy Impact on energy
consumed in the
process of
urbanization
Optimized
adjustment of
industrial
structure
Establish an industrial
ecological system through
adjustment of industrial
structure, to reduce resource
use in the production of goods
(???)
Save energy use and CO2
emissions through scaling-up
effects from industrial
structural adjustment (???)
Industries
Optimization of
energy supply
structure
Make energy use cleaner,
reduce pollutant emissions
(??)
Enlarge the share of renewable
energy and low carbon energy
such as natural gas and
nuclear (???)
Residential,
Industries
Technological
improvement
Implementation of highly
resource-efficient and
environmentally sound
technologies (???)
Implementation of highly
energy-efficient and low-
carbon technologies (???)
Residential,
Transport,
Industries
Comprehensive
utilization of
resources
Establish linkages among all
sectors to reuse various
resources (???)
Reuse purified CO2 or other
high-carbon-content products
(?)
Industries
Economic
management
and
regulations
Supply subsidies for advanced
technology implementation;
impose penalties on pollutant
emissions (???)
Implement, e.g., fuel taxes,
carbon funds, carbon trading
markets (???)
Transport,
industries
‘‘?’’ represents priority level with respect to either economic model
218 Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220
123
Conclusions and policy implications
This article investigates how urbanization has affected energy-consumption patterns
in China. Our basic finding is that, while urban residential energy consumption has
increased in absolute terms (declining in the 1990s and rising in the 2000s), the
main sources of growth in urban energy consumption have been urban transport and
energy consumption associated with the materials required for construction.
In the transportation sector, the focus should be on developing effective, energy-
efficient public transportation systems. For example, there is tremendous energy
saving potential in road to urban rail substitution (Chang et al. 2010). There is still
considerable room for energy conservation in road transport, which could be
achieved by promoting the purchase of energy-efficient vehicles, improving road
conditions, strengthening transportation systems management, etc. With regard to
construction, energy saving is linked to an improvement in individual industrial
sectors, namely higher quality building materials as well as technological advances
in production processes, which would have a positive influence on the energy
performance of buildings.
One of the most striking findings of this paper is that, although total urban energy
consumption has increased, the total share of Chinese energy consumption
associated with urbanization, as estimated according to our approach, has changed
little since the early 1990s. This is despite a sharp increase in the proportion of the
population urban and can only suggest that there have been significant efficiency
gains, in particular, in the residential sector. This also underscores the fact that the
main factor driving China’s energy consumption is economic growth fueled by
buoyant exports and strong domestic demand. We note that other approaches that
put more emphasis on, for example, the expansion of heavy industrial production in
connection with urbanization processes, might lead to different results.
Acknowledgments The authors greatly appreciate the comments from anonymous reviewers and the
guest editor, who provided valuable insights and helpful information for this study. We are also grateful
to the Ministry of Science and Technology of China for its financial support (No. 2009BAC64B01).
References
Akinobu, M., Yasuhiko, K., Mu, H. L., & Zhou, W. S. (2008). Electricity demand in the Chinese urban
household-sector. Applied Energy, 85(12), 1113–1125.
Burak, G., & Karen, C. S. (2008). Environmental impacts of urban growth from an integrated dynamic
perspective: A case study of Shenzhen, South China. Global Environmental Change, 18(4),
720–735.
Cai, J., & Jiang, Z. G. (2008). Changing of energy consumption patterns from rural households to urban
households in China: An example from Shaanxi Province, China. Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews, 12(6), 1667–1680.
Chang, S. Y., Hu, X. J., Ou, X. M., & Zhang, X. L. (2010). Decomposition analysis of intercity passenger
transportation energy consumption in China (in Chinese). China Population, Resource andEnvironment, 20(3), 24–29.
Chen, X., & Yuan, H. W. (2008). An empirical study on factors influencing China’s residential energy
consumption behavior (in Chinese). Consumer Economics, 24(5), 47–50.
Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220 219
123
Guo, K. S. (2002). An economic analysis of the relationship between industrialization and urbanization
(in Chinese). Social Sciences in China, 2, 44–55.
He, K. B., Yu, X. C., Lu, Y. Q., Hao, J. M., & Fu, L. X. (2003). Characterization of urban air pollution
sources (in Chinese). Urban Environment & Urban Ecology, 16(6), 269–271.
Huang, S. L., & Chen, C. W. (2005). Theory of urban energetics and mechanisms of urban development.
Ecological Modelling, 189(1–2), 49–71.
Huang, S. L., Lai, H. Y., & Lee, C. L. (2001). Energy hierarchy and urban landscape system. LandscapeUrban Plan, 53(1–4), 145–161.
Jones, D. W. (1991). How urbanization affects energy-use in developing countries. Energy Policy, 19(7),
621–630.
Jones, D. W. (2004). Urbanization and energy. In C. J. Cleveland (Ed.), Encyclopedia of energy(pp. 329–335). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Li, L. C., & Wu, W. H. (2008). Energy efficiency and its developing trend of Chinese transport sector
(in Chinese). Comprehensive Transportation, 3, 16–20.
Liang, J. S., Hong, L. X., & Cai, J. M. (2009). The decomposition of energy consumption growth during
the process of China’s urbanization: 1985–2006 (in Chinese). Journal of Natural Resources, 24(1),
20–29.
Liu, Y. B. (2009). Exploring the relationship between urbanization and energy consumption in China
using ARDL (autoregressive distributed lag) and FDM (factor decomposition model). Energy,34(11), 1846–1854.
Lu, Z., Huang, Q. H., Lu, J., & Zhou, W. F. (2005). Process and problems of industrialization and
urbanization in China (in Chinese). China Industrial Economy, 12, 5–13.
Odum, H. T., & Odum, E. C. (1981). Energy basis for man and nature. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Odum, H. T., & Peterson, L. L. (1972). Relationship of energy and complexity. Architecture and Design,43(10), 624–629.
Parikh, V., & Shukla, J. (1995). Urbanization, energy use and greenhouse effects in economic
development: Results from a cross-national study of developing countries. Global EnvironmentalChange, 5(2), 87–103.
Shen, L., Cheng, S. K., Aaron, J., Gun, S., & Wan, H. (2005). Urbanization, sustainability and the
utilization of energy and mineral resources in China. Cities, 22(4), 287–302.
State Statistical Bureau. (1996–2009). China statistical yearbook 1996–2009. Online version, http://
www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj.
State Statistical Bureau & Energy Bureau. (1991–2007). China Energy Statistical Yearbook. Beijing:
Chinese Statistics Press.
The Central People’s Government of the People Republic of China. (2006). The compendium of the‘‘Eleventh Five-Year Plan of domestic economy and society development’’ (in Chinese). http://
theory.people.com.cn/GB/41179/41232/4210880.html.
The National People’s Congress of the People Republic of China. (2008). Circular economy promotionlaw (in Chinese). Online version, http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/zt/2008-12/25/content_1494750.htm.
Wu, W. H., Fan, H., Li, L. C., & Yang, H. N. (2008). Energy efficiency, energy saving potential and
strategy analysis of Chinese transport sector (in Chinese). Macroeconomics, 6, 28–33.
Zhao, X. B. (2011). Review on the development of the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristicsin China (in Chinese). Online version, http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/zt/qt/2011zgtsshzyfltx/2011-
02/17/content_1628639.htm.
Zhou, S. L., Wang, Y. Z., & Shen, Z. Y. (2008). Industrialization and urbanization in China (in Chinese).Beijing: Economy & Management Publishing House.
Zhu, X. L., Zhang, Y. H., Zeng, L. M., & Wang, W. (2005). Source identification of ambient PM2. 5 in
Beijing (in Chinese). Research of Environmental Sciences, 18(5), 1–5.
220 Popul Environ (2012) 33:202–220
123