Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    1/25

    Energy Audit Methodology

    JOSEPH L. HERRERA

    Fuels and Energy DivisionITDI-DOST

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    2/25

    Safety margins were added to the original calculations. Several peopleare involved in the fan/ pump buying decision and each of them is afraidof recommending a fan/ pump that proves to be too small for the job.

    It w as anticipated that a larger fan/ pump w ould be needed in the

    future, so it was purchased now to save buying the larger fan/ pumplater on.

    It w as the only fan/ pump the dealer had in stock and you needed onebadly. He might have offered you a "special deal" to take the larger size.

    You took the fan/ pump out of your spare parts inventory. Capitalequipment money is scarce so the larger fan/ pump appeared to be youronly choice.

    You purchased the same size fan/ pump as the one that came out of theapplication and that one was over sized also.

    Oversized Pumps & Fans?

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    3/25

    Just think

    19% of industrial motor electricity use is for pumpsTo lift 1 cubic meter (1,000 liters) of water to a height of 1meter in 1 second requires 9.81 kW of energy

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    4/25

    Energy Balance for a Typical Pumping System

    ELECTRICITY

    100%

    12% LOSS

    2% LOSS

    24% LOSS

    9% LOSS

    11% LOSS

    MOTOR

    COUPLING

    PUMPS

    VALVES

    PIPES

    WORK DONE ON WATER42%

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    5/25

    Pump System Components

    Pumps

    Prime Movers

    Piping

    Valves End-Use Equipment (Heat Exchanger, Tanks and Hydraulic

    Equipment)

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    6/25

    Centrifugal Pumps

    These are dynamic devices that impart kinetic energy or

    energy of motion to a liquid to the spinning motion of animpeller.

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    7/25

    Types of Centrifugal Pumps

    Radial Flow Axial Flow

    Mixed Flow

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    8/25

    Axial FlowRadial Flow

    Mixed Flow

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    9/25

    Pertinent Data: Pumps/ Motors

    Nameplate/settings:

    Brand, model and ratedparameters of installedpumps

    Pump settings

    Static water levels

    Motor data & efficiencies

    Pipeline material and

    lengths

    Measurements

    Flow rates (m3/hr) Discharge pressures (psi or

    bars)

    Flow velocities (m/s)

    Pipe sizes

    Shaft speed (rpm)

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    10/25

    Major Measuring Equipment Used in EnergyAudits

    Flow meters measure flowrates (in li/s or m3/hr) aswell as velocities of flow

    Power analyzers measureV, A, kW, KVA, KVAR, PF,frequency

    Pressure gages measure

    pressure in psi or bars Tachometers/Stroboscope

    measure motor shaft speedsin rpm

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    11/25

    Pump Operating Point

    Determined from the measured flow and the calculated

    head Ideally, the operating point is the intersection of the

    system curve and the pump curve at BEP

    Significant deviations of the actual OP from the requiredOP indicate pump performance problems

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    12/25

    System and Pump Curves

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    13/25

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    14/25

    Formulas/Conversions

    Pressure to Head

    Psi = (head (ft) x s.g.)/2.31 Bar = (head (m) x s.g.)/10.2

    Velocity Head = v2/2g

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    15/25

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    16/25

    Power Requirement & Efficiency

    Hydraulic Power (Ph):

    Q (m 3/ s) x Total head, hd hs (m) x (kg/m 3) x g (m/ s2)Ph = ---------------------------------------------------------------------

    1000

    Pump Shaft Power = Hydraulic Power/Pump Efficiency

    Electrical Power Input = Pump Shaft Power/Motor Efficiency

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    17/25

    Location of Test Points (Pressure)

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    18/25

    Pump Affinity Laws

    Flow:Flow:Q1 / Q2 = N1 / N2

    Example:100 / Q2 = 1750/3500Q2 = 200 m3/hr

    Head:Head:H1/ H2 = (N12) / (N22)

    Example:100 /H2 = 1750 2/ 3500 2

    H2 = 400 m

    Kilowatts (kW):Kilowatts (kW):kW1 / kW2 = (N13) / (N23)

    Example:

    5/kW2 = 17503

    / 35003

    kW2 = 40

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    19/25

    Particulars Design Operating

    Flow, m3/h 800 576

    Head, m WC 55 24 (after control valve)

    Power, kW 160 124

    Speed, rpm 1485 1485

    SampleProblem

    In a large paper plant, the following are the designed andmeasured parameters for a clear water pump.The pump deliveryhas been throttled to about 30% (closed) manually to get therequired flow rate. Normal required water flow rate is 500m3/h to700m3/h. Calculate the present operating efficiency and in youropinion what should be the optimum solution to get the requiredflow rate variation? And what would be the savings if the pump isdelivering the flow rate of 550m3/h. (Consider efficiency of motoras 93% and pump efficiency as 60%).

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    20/25

    Computations

    Q x H x g 576 x 24 x 9.81

    Present pump output = -------------------- = -------------------- = 67.51 kW3600 x p x m 3600 x 0.558

    Pump input power = 124 kW

    pump operating efficiency = (67.51/ 124) x 100 = 54.44%

    The pump operating at a poor efficiency of 54.44% due to throttling of the flow.

    Since the pump discharge requirement varies from 500m3/h to 700m3/h, the idealoption would be to operate with a VSD. According to affinity laws:

    Q1/Q2 = N1/N2; H1/H2 = (N1/N2)2; P1/P2 = (N1/N2)3

    For a flow rate 550m3/h, the reduced speed of pump would be:

    = 550/800 = N1/1485; N1 = 1021 rpmWith the reduction in speed the reduction in terms of head would be:

    = (1021/1485)2 x 5.5 = 2.6kg/cm2

    The reduction in power would be:

    = (1021/1485)3 x 124 = 40.3 kWthe reduction in power = 124 40.3 = 83.7kW

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    21/25

    Energy Efficiency Options

    Give efficiency of the pump due consideration while

    selecting a pump. Select pumps to match head flow requirements.

    Select a motor to match the load with highest efficiency.

    Optimize the piping design. Monitor all important system parameters like: motor kW,

    pump head, flow temperature.

    Use pumps in series and parallel so that mismatch insystem design or variations in operating conditions can behandled properly.

    Use variable speed drives for variations of flow due toprocess requirement.

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    22/25

    Energy Efficiency Options

    In general savings through speed control would be substantial

    in the following cases: Pumps supplying a system with large change in flow.

    Pumps which work with a bypass. These pumps are

    normally operated to deliver the maximum discharge andhence consume maximum power.

    Parallel pumps which discharge into a common pipe

    system. In such cases, each pump is generally switchedon or off depending on the flow required. Here, it issufficient to regulate the speed of only one of these

    pumps while the other pumps are operated an on/offmode.

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    23/25

    Energy Efficiency Options

    If the head flow is higher than needed by 5 to 15%, (i)

    The existing impeller should be trimmed to a smallerdiameter, (ii) or a new impeller with a smaller diameter isto be put. Replacing the impeller by a smaller one of the

    same series: Manufacturers usually supply more than oneimpeller for the same casing, thus allowing a change inhead or flow. Depending on the specific job, this can alloweither an increase or a decrease in flow or head, typically

    by 10 to 25%.

    In multistage pumps, add or remove stages to the existingpump, allowing an increase / decrease in delivered head

    of flow, if required.

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    24/25

    Analysis has revealed that except for the small scale sector,pump efficiencies have increased by 5-10% in recent years.

    SOME PROJECTIONS:

    Savings of 5 - 10% are also generally possible by derating orreplacing oversized pumps.

    Much larger saving of 15 - 20% are available on average byminimizing piping-friction loss with typical paybacks for system

    retrofit of less than three years.

    High efficiency pump often cost the same as less efficient

    pumps, and if there is a cost premium, it is modest (of theorder of 5 - 10%).

  • 8/4/2019 Energy Audit_Pumps JHerrera

    25/25

    PUMP OPTIMIZATION PROJECTIONS: Consider buying pumps based on efficiency and notpurchase price

    Portion of a pumps total cost over its life 3% for purchase cost

    74% for energy cost

    A more efficient pump also has lower maintenance anddowntime cost

    TYPICAL ENERGY SAVINGS:

    Proper matching of pump size to load 10 to 30%

    Variable Speed Drives 5 to 50%

    Knowing the system needs not pumping more flow undermore pressure than needed 5 to 20%