13
Energy and Security in Border Regions Alan Sweedler San Diego State University SCERP Tucson 2006

Energy and Security in Border Regions - Amazon S3 · Energy and Security in Border Regions Alan Sweedler San Diego State University SCERP Tucson 2006

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Energy and Security in Border Regions

Alan Sweedler San Diego State University

SCERP

Tucson 2006

Some Basics

•  Secure and adequate energy resources are critical to the security and well being of every nation. Therefore:

•  Access to energy supplies is legitimately a question of national and international security.

•  Keep in mind: over 80% of the world’s energy is derived from carbon-based fuels. (oil, coal, gas)

Oil Reality •  U.S. Consumes 25% or world’s oil.

•  U.S. Imports 66% of its oil. By 2020, we will be importing close to 75%.

•  U.S. Spends $313 billion per year on imported oil. •  Two thirds of global reserves are in middle east. •  By 2030, china will import as much oil as U.S. •  U.S. spends approximately $75 billion per year to

maintain military presence in middle east (does NOT include Iraq war).

Security Issues Related to Energy •  Supply disruption.

– Political events. – Sabotage. – Accidents.

•  Long term declining reserves. •  Nuclear proliferation – spread of nuclear

weapons.

U.S.-Mexico •  For U.S.-Mexico binational region;

–  Cross-border energy trading a reality and growing. –  Currently the energy sector unites business

interests on both sides of the border. –  But, is divisive for many environmental groups,

NGO’s and some public agencies.

•  As interdependence in energy trade increases, concerns of security of supply and reliability will grow.

•  If managed properly, energy trade can be a benefit to both sides of border.

•  But, unless proper structures and policies are put in place, energy will become a area of friction and tension.

Bad Policy - Good Policy

•  Bad: U.S. should become energy independent.

–  Not feasible and not needed. •  Good: reduce oil imports.

–  This means increasing efficiency in the transportation sector. A 20% increase in efficiency would reduce oil imports by 3 million barrels per day. Would end our oil imports from Saudi Arabia.