Encounter Killings Are Exposed as Murder in Assam, Yet Police Refuse to Investigate in Assam, India

8/14/2019 Encounter Killings Are Exposed as Murder in Assam, Yet Police Refuse to Investigate in Assam, India

1/7

BHRPC URGENT APPEAL EVENT NO. 10/2009 dated 29 November, 2009

URGENT APPEAL Re

Encounter killings are exposed as murder in Assam, yet police refuse to investigate inAssam, India


Barak Human Rights Protection Committee (BHRPC) forwards this URGENT

APPEAL issued byThe Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC)regarding cases

of extra-judicial killings, torture and high risk of impunity in Assam, India. Every person

believing in human rights and the rule of law are requested to take urgent actions.

Yours Sincerely

Waliullah Ahmed Laskar

Information Officer,

Barak Human Rights Protection Committee

Rongpur, Silchar-9, Cachar, Assam, India.

Email:[email protected], [email protected]

Mobile: +919401134314

ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION URGENT APPEALS PROGRAMME

Urgent Appeal Case: AHRC-UAC-163-2009

27 November 2009

---------------------------------------------------------------------

INDIA: Encounter killings are exposed as murder in Assam, yet police refuse to investigate

ISSUES: Extrajudicial execution; torture; impunity

1
http://www.bhrpc.net.googlepages.com/http://www.bhrpc.net.googlepages.com/http://www.bhrpc.net.googlepages.com/http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/support.php?ua=UAC-163-2009http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/support.php?ua=UAC-163-2009http://www.ahrchk.net/http://www.ahrchk.net/http://www.bhrpc.net.googlepages.com/mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.bhrpc.net.googlepages.com/http://www.bhrpc.net.googlepages.com/http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/support.php?ua=UAC-163-2009http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/support.php?ua=UAC-163-2009http://www.ahrchk.net/http://www.bhrpc.net.googlepages.com/mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]


2/7


---------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has received information about the extrajudicial

killing of two men by soldiers of the Kumaon Regiment, Assam. The men were reported to have

been killed in an encounter incident, but they were in custody and had left notes hidden in their

clothing that predicted their murder. The notes incriminate officers, a local lawyer and two

villagers, and point to a set up which involves corruption.

CASE DETAILS:

According to information we have received from the South

Asia Forum for Human Rights (SAFHR), a human rights

organisation working in India, Mr. Jainto Singh Gaur and Mr.Rajesh Bando had first voluntarily gone to the Kumaon

Regiment army camp at Nathkuchi after meeting with a local

lawyer, Mr. Giridhar Choudhury on 26 November 2008. Theyreturned home after about 11 days accompanied by soldiers.

Their families report that they had been encouraged to visit thelawyer by two villagers, Mr. Phulen Kalita and Mr. Nobojyoti

Das, who they believe are associated with a local underground

terror group, the Surrendered United Liberation Front of Asom(SULFA: see more in Background Information, below).

Jainto was 28 years old, owned a small shop and was a student at the Sonapur Higher Secondary

School, where he was Vice-President of the All Adviasi Students' Association of Assam. Rajesh was 30

years old and owned a photocopying shop.

During their time at the army camp the men were not detained: Jainto had visited some of his friendsand his mother, Jashoda, his uncle Golap Singh and his aunt Lakheswari visited the two men there. The

men told their families that they had been offered a deal by Choudhury: if they allowed army officers to

falsely present them as surrendering cadres from the United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA), an

ideological terror group, they would be eligible for payment and employment as part of an amnestyscheme by the state government. The two young men were told that they would receive telephone

orders to return to the camp, and they reportedly did so twice, between December 2008 and April 2009.

2


3/7


At 7am on 12 April Jainto and Rajesh left home to go to the army camp in Tihu; they had received calls

asking them to do so the evening before. After that their phones remained switched off, so on 17 April both of their families went to the camp to find them. Officers there denied knowing the men's

whereabouts and ordered the families to leave, and when they returned a few days later they were given

the same reply. On 28 April the families heard that two men had been killed during an encounter in

Haribhanga Supa, and when Jainto's uncle went to the scene, he found out that the two killed wereJainto and Rajesh.

Though villagers in Haribhanga Supa have told Jainto's uncle that they had only heard two gunshots,

the post-mortem examinations at Nalbari Civil Hospital revealed nine projectiles in Jainto's chest.

There are multiple compound fractures in the limbs of both men and ligature marks on their wrists as iftheir hands had been tied from behind. Though an advanced stage of decomposition had set in, police

claimed that they had been killed that day. Because they were decomposing the family cremated the

bodies a day later.

When the victims' possessions were returned the families found several notes hidden in them, writtenon small bits of papers, army canteen vouchers, a piece of toothpaste packaging, small bits of

newspaper and a torn-off shirt collar. The notes reported that they had been detained, lured into a trap,

and that they had heard that their murders were being planned. The notes accused Captain B.R. Singh,

Phulen Kalita, Nobojyoti Das and the lawyer Giridhar Choudhary of colluding in their murder.

The families filed a complaint at the Borbori Police Station, which was first accepted by the Officer-in-Charge (OC). However after speaking with the District Superintendent of Police the officer said that

the case couldn't be filed. He gave them a false legal excuse: that a complaint had been filed by the

army against the dead men, so no other counter-complaint could be made.

The media reported the incident after the families organised a press conference. The army denied the

allegations and declared, contrary to their original report, that the two men were terrorists from theULFA 709 cadre. Amy officers in civilian clothing started to visit the families, asking them about the

hidden notes in an intimidating manner. Though the families were allegedly assured a thorough

investigation by Mr. G.P. Singh, a senior police official from Guwahati, on 15 May at Pathacharkuchi

Inspection Bungalow, no case was registered or investigation ordered in the incident.

Both families are preparing to approach the Guwahati High Court to request the direct intervention ofthe court, since their route to redress has so far been blocked. Neither the police nor the army have

officially contacted the families to explain the two young men's deaths; they have received all of their

information through press statements and community news.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

3


4/7


An enquiry commission was authorised in 2005 to investigate the many killings in Assam between

1998-2001.The report (tabled in the state legislature on 15 November 2007) reveals the active role played by the then-Chief Minister, Mr. Prafulla Kumar Mahanta, the state police and SULFA, in

extrajudicial murders. SULFA is an illegal criminal group with alleged political influence, made up of

former ULFA cadres. The report criticised the widespread corruption taking place in and around a state

scheme for the rehabilitation of surrendering ULFA militants. It also accused political parties in thestate of using surrendering militants for short-term political gain.

This scheme is extremely vulnerable to abuse. Under it the state and the armed forces are allowed to

use varying tactics, including financial incentives and amnesty, to encourage the surrender of

insurgents. Officers involved are sometimes rewarded with promotions or salary incentives. This makesit advantageous for officers to arrange for such surrenders, fake or otherwise. In this particular case

there is strong evidence that a money making racket has developed between army officers and civilians,

and that Jainto and Rajesh were murdered as a result. The lack of investigation into these cases and thelegal and social indifference to supposed 'encounter killings', makes it likely that such murders will

continue.

SUGGESTED ACTION:

Please write to the authorities named below seeking an intervention in the case.

The AHRC is also writing to the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary

executions seeking an intervention in the case.

To support this appeal please click here:

SAMPLE LETTER:

Dear _________,

INDIA: The extrajudicial execution of two men in army custody in Baksa district must be

investigated

Name of victims:

1. Mr. Jainto Singh Gaur, son of Profulla Singh; Tekelibhanga; under the jurisdiction of Palashankuchi

police station, Baksa district, Assam state.2. Mr. Rajesh Bando, son of Chomnu Bando; Tekelibhanga; under the jurisdiction of police station,

Baksa district, Assam.

4


5/7


Name of alleged perpetrators:

1. Mr. Phulen Kalita, Tekelibhanga; under the jurisdiction of Palashankuchi police station, Baksadistrict, Assam.

2. Mr. Nobojyoti Das

3. Captain B.R.Singh, Kumaon Regiment, stationed at Tihu.

4. Mr. Giridhar Choudhury, Advocate, Pathsala, Baksa district, Assam

Date of incident: Between 26 November 2008 and 28 April 2009

Place of incident: Baksa district, Assam

I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the extrajudicial execution of two men in Assam

earlier this year, and the lack of an investigation into it. I am informed that officers from the KumaonRegiment are suspected to be behind the murder, along with a local lawyer and two villagers.

According to the information I have received, the victims had visited the Nathkuchi and Tihu camp ofthe Kumaon Regiment a number of times on the advice of a local lawyer, Mr. Giridhar Choudhury,

after they were introduced to him by persons 1 and 2 named above. The victims visited the camp at

least twice at the instruction of the army officers and had returned home both times. However I hear

that officers killed the victims on 28 April 2009, and have called it an encounter killing.

I am aware that at the time of autopsy, a day after the official date of the murder, the men's bodies were

in an advanced state of decomposition. People residing near the place where the bodies were foundhave claimed that they had heard only two shots, yet the bodies had several projectiles lodged inside

them. The two men had also suffered multiple and compound fractures on limbs before their deaths,

with ligature marks on their wrists as if their hands had been tied from behind. This contradicts theofficial report, and raises strong suspicions about the use of torture, and the time and place of death.

The families also discovered notes written by the victims' and hidden among their belongings in

detainment, which describe a trap involving a corrupt army captain and the local lawyer. The men hadoriginally told their families that they had been offered a deal that would reward them if they allowed

army officers to falsely present them as surrendering cadres from the United Liberation Front of Asom

(ULFA). Despite these incriminating circumstances being released in the media, police have refused toregister a case or start an investigation.

I am aware that the government as well as the army has claimed that the victims were killed in anencounter on 28 April and that they were the members of the 709 Battalion of the ULFA, which is

unsubstantiated. Even if a person is a terrorist, there is no law in India that legalises extrajudicial

execution.

I am aware that the families are approaching the Guwahati High Court seeking a judicial intervention in

the case. In these circumstances, I request you to intervene to ensure that:

1. A crime is registered to investigate the murder of the two men;

2. The statement of witnesses, including the members of the victims' families is recorded;

5


6/7


3. An impartial and prompt investigation is conducted;

4. The family members, if required, are provided with protection;5. The findings of the investigation are made public;

6. The Assam Bar Council looks into allegations of the involvement of Advocate Giridhar Choudhury

and acts accordingly and that;

7. The families are paid an interim compensation pending the investigation of the case.

Yours sincerely,

----------------

PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:

1. Mr. A.K. Anthony

Defence MinisterSouth Block, New Delhi

INDIA

Fax: + 91 11 23015403

Email: [email protected]

2. Mr. P Chidambaram

Union Minister of Home AffairsMinistry of Home Affairs, 104-107 North Block

New Delhi 110 001

INDIAFax: +91 11 23094221


3. Justice K. G. BalakrishnanChief Justice of India

Tilak Marg, New Delhi 110 011

INDIAFax: +91 11 23381508


4. Lieutenant General Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh PVSM, AVSM, YSM

GOC-in-C, Eastern Command

Fort WilliamsKolkata, West Bengal

INDIA

5. ChairpersonNational Human Rights Commission of India

Faridkot House, Copernicus Marg

6
https://mail.google.com/mail/h/1veezetzcdrfk/?v=b&cs=wh&[email protected]://mail.google.com/mail/h/1veezetzcdrfk/?v=b&cs=wh&[email protected]://mail.google.com/mail/h/1veezetzcdrfk/?v=b&cs=wh&[email protected]://mail.google.com/mail/h/1veezetzcdrfk/?v=b&cs=wh&[email protected]://mail.google.com/mail/h/1veezetzcdrfk/?v=b&cs=wh&[email protected]://mail.google.com/mail/h/1veezetzcdrfk/?v=b&cs=wh&[email protected]


7/7


New Delhi 110 001

INDIAFax: +91 11 23384863

6. Mr. Tarun Gogoi

Chief Minister of AssamAssam Secretariat, Dispur

Guwahati-6, Assam

INDIAFax: +91 361 2262069

7. Chief JusticeGuwhati High Court

Assam

INDIAFAX +91 361 2604122 or +91 362 2735863 (Registrar General)

E-mail:[email protected],[email protected]

8. Mr. P.C. SharmaChief Secretary

Assam Secretariat, Dispur

Guwahati-6, AssamINDIA

Fax: +91 361 2260900

Email:[email protected]

9. Mr. Sankar Barua IPSDirector General of Police

Assam, UlubariGuwahati-7, Assam

INDIA

Thank you.

Urgent Appeals Programme ,

Asian Human Rights Commission ([email protected])

7
https://mail.google.com/mail/h/1veezetzcdrfk/?v=b&cs=wh&to=E-mail%[email protected]://mail.google.com/mail/h/1veezetzcdrfk/?v=b&cs=wh&[email protected]://mail.google.com/mail/h/1veezetzcdrfk/?v=b&cs=wh&[email protected]://mail.google.com/mail/h/1veezetzcdrfk/?v=b&cs=wh&[email protected]://mail.google.com/mail/h/1veezetzcdrfk/?v=b&cs=wh&[email protected]://mail.google.com/mail/h/1veezetzcdrfk/?v=b&cs=wh&to=E-mail%[email protected]://mail.google.com/mail/h/1veezetzcdrfk/?v=b&cs=wh&[email protected]://mail.google.com/mail/h/1veezetzcdrfk/?v=b&cs=wh&[email protected]://mail.google.com/mail/h/1veezetzcdrfk/?v=b&cs=wh&[email protected]

Documents

Encounter Killings Are Exposed as Murder in Assam, Yet Police Refuse to Investigate in Assam, India