En - Notice on the regulation of obligatory intitutionnal fees

8/4/2019 En - Notice on the regulation of obligatory intitutionnal fees

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/en-notice-on-the-regulation-of-obligatory-intitutionnal-fees 1/88

Notice on The Regulation of

Obligatory Institutional Fees



The Fédération étudiante universitaire du Québec (FEUQ) is an organization that brings

together 15 student associations with more than 125,000 students from all levels of and every

region of Quebec. Established since 1989, its main mandate has been to defend the rights and

interests of students with governments and education stakeholders. Throughout its twenty years

of existence, it has endeavored to defend a humanistic education as a societal choice. It focuses

particularly on defending its members before, during and after their passage in university by

demanding, above all, an accessible and quality education.

Fédération étudiante universitaire du Québec

210 Sainte-Catherine St. EastSuite 300Montréal (Québec)H2X 1L1Telephone: (514) 396-3380Fax: (514) 396-7140

Update Guillaume Houle, vice-president of university affairs



Summary

In order to promote accessibility to university studies, the government of Quebec hasmaintained a policy of a freeze of tuition fees from 1968-1969 to 1990-1991, then to 1995-1996 to 2006-2007. Despite everything, the financial burden of university students hasn’tstopped increasing, since universities have abundantly used their power to bill in orderto impose obligatory fees of various kinds and amounts that are unceasingly increasing.Thus, between 1994 and 2007 while the tuition fee freeze was in force, the annualaverage bill of a university student increased by nearly $450, according to the data of

Statistics Canada.In this situation, the FEUQ has numerous times demanded a law on accessibility topostsecondary studies that regulates both tuition fees and ancillary fees (or obligatoryinstitutional fees). Despite the electoral commitment of the QLP and the PQ to this effectin 2003, we had to wait until 2008 so that a regulation (and not a law) arrived to limit thepower to bill of university administrations. This regulation has allowed students frommany universities to avoid sudden hikes in obligatory fees. However, it leaves a marginof manoeuvre to institutions in such a way that an average increase of about 5% wasobserved in 2008-2009 and that a similar increase should be maintained in 2010-2011,with the more voracious universities continuing to impose the largest increases.

The regulation thus partially responds to the expectations of the FEUQ, since it preventsinstitutions from proceeding to large increases without an agreement with studentassociations. However, the door remains open to a continuous increase of fees.Moreover, we cannot expect to see the gaps between different universities shrink in theshort term. Finally, certain institutions have not hesitated to circumvent the regulation

(among others with automatic non-obligatory contributions in doubtful conditions) or to blatantly violate it (with the only consequence of reimbursing the amounts collected inexcess).



List of recommendations

1. That the MELS establish a common classification of obligatory institutional fees between different university institutions

2. That the MELS establish an exhaustive list of OIF with a clear definition of whatis an OIF

3. That the limit of increases allowed by the university be applied to the typicalstudent and not according to all students of an institution.

4. That the autonomy of decisional bodies of student associations be respected at alltimes for the approval of agreements concerning obligatory institutional fees.

5. That the documents produced by an institution in virtue of the budgetary rulesregarding obligatory institutional fees be made accessible to associationsrepresenting students of this institution.

6. That the Quebec government makes available online the positioning of each of Quebec universities on the grid framework of OIF and therefore set out themaximum increase allowed for each semester and a list of universities by OIFevery year.

7. That the MELS revise its interpretation of Article 3.3.2. of the fiscal rules that itconsiders that academic year includes fall, winter and summer semesters for theapplication of the OIF guidelines.

8. That MELS forbids any OIF that is not entirely admissible to the student financialassistance program.



components) and stipulate that such fees can only be imposed if the nature,amount, and modalities of these fees are the object of an agreement between the

institution and the student association recognized as being the representative of the students concerned. (CAU-643) Recommendations relative to studentfinancial assistance

15. That student financial assistance make public a list of tuition fees recognized asallowable expenses for each of the programs of study.

16. That the amount of allowable expenses as tuition fees in the Loans Program for

part-time studies be adjusted on a case-by-case basis to minimally cover thetuition fees, the obligatory institutional fees, student dues and the fees fordidactic material. These adjustments must ensure the maintenance or increase of the volume of assistance available for beneficiaries of the program



List of acronyms

SFA Student Financial AssistanceNOAC Non-obligatory automatic contributionCCAFE Comité consultatif sur l’accessibilité financière aux étudesCRÉPUQ Conférence des recteurs et principaux des universités du QuébecCSN Confédération des syndicats nationauxCSQ Centrale des syndicats du Québec

FTE Full-time equivalent (students)ÉNAP École nationale d’administration publiqueÉTS École de technologie supérieureFAÉCUM Fédération des associations étudiantes du campus de l’Université de

MontréalFEUQ Fédération étudiante universitaire du QuébecOIF Obligatory Institutional FeesFNEEQ-CSN Fédération nationale des enseignantes et enseignants du Québec (CSN)

FQPPU Fédération québécoise des professeures et professeurs d’universitéINRS Institut national de la recherche scientifiqueCPI Consumer Price IncreaseMELS Ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du SportMEQ Ministère de l’Éducation du QuébecQLP Quebec Liberal PartyPQ Parti québécoisUdeM Université de Montréal

UQAC Université du Québec à ChicoutimiUQAM Université du Québec à MontréalUQAR Université du Québec à RimouskiUQAT Université du Québec en Abitibi-TémiscamingueUQO U i ité d Q éb O t i



Table of contents

SUMMARY II

LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS.........................................................................................................................III

LIST OF ACRONYMS ..............................................................................................................................................V

TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................................................VI

1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 8

2 THE PROBLEM OF OBLIGATORY INSTITUTIONAL FEES ................................................................... 9

2.1 DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPT ......................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 CATEGORIZATION OF THE OIF...................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 HISTORY ......................................................................................................................................................... 10

2.3.1 “Non-regulated fees to circumvent the tuition fee freeze”......................................................10 2.3.2 Defreeze of tuition fees and the regulation of OIF..................................................................13 2.3.3 Evolution of ancillary fees in time ..........................................................................................14

2.4 STATE OF THE SITUATION FROM 2007 TO 2010 ............................................................................................. 16

3 ANALYSIS OF THE REGULATORY SUPERVISION OF OIF................................................................. 21 3.1 INTERPRETATION OF THE BUDGETARY RULE ................................................................................................. 21

3.1.1 Individual application of the limits of the increase .................... ........................ ..................... 21 3.1.2 Limit applying to the summer term........................................................................................21 3.2 ANALYSIS OF THE BUDGETARY RULE............................................................................................................. 22

3.2.1 In regard to the objectives fixed by MELS..............................................................................22 3.2.2 In regard to the preoccupations expressed by the FEUQ........................................................23

3.3 GENERAL PROBLEMS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE RULE............................................................................. 24 3.3.1 Uncertainty concerning the limit imposed on each university...............................................24 3.3.2 Non-obligatory automatic contributions (NOAC).................................................................25 3.3.3 Fees for the writing of master’s and doctoral theses ...............................................................27

3.4 PARTICULAR PROBLEMS OCCURRING IN 2008-09 ......................................................................................... 28 3.4.1 École polytechnique de Montréal ..................... ....................... ........................ .................... .... 28 3.4.2 Université de Montréal...........................................................................................................29 3.4.3 Universities without general association................................................................................29

3 5 S P 2009 2010 30



5 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................... 41

6 LIST OF SOURCES............................................................................................................................................ 42



1 Introduction

Since the implementation of the recommendations of the Parent Report, published in1966, the Quebec government has regulated the level of the tuition fees required byuniversities. In order to favor the accessibility to university studies, these fees werefrozen from 1968-1969 to 1990-1991, then from 1995-1996 to 2006-2007, thus respondingto a demand of the student movement in general, and the FEUQ in particular. Despitethe application of this policy on tuition fees, the financial burden of students has notstopped increasing because of the imposition by universities of fees of diverse kinds andof an unceasingly increasing scope. Thus, since the announcement of the last tuition fee

freeze between 1994 and 2007 while the tuition fee freeze was in force, the annual bill of the university student increased by nearly $450, according to the data of StatisticsCanada.

In 2004, the Comité consultatif sur l’accessibilité financière aux études reminded us thattuition fees and other required fees are “indivisible” and form “ a unity, namely the total bill paid to the university or the relative cost of education assumed by students”(CCAFE, 2004, p. 7). It is in this perspective that the FEUQ, since its first years, hasdemanded a regulation of these fees and has made the adoption of a law on financialaccessibility to studies one of its recurring demands.

In this notice, we will make a brief return on the history of the phenomenon of obligatory institutional fees (also called ancillary fees, supplementary fees, etc) and onthe conditions that led to the announcement, in February 2008, of the putting in place of a regulation of their evolution through rules governing grants to universities.

Secondly, we will examine the modalities of this regulation in light of the objectives and

the concerns expressed by the FEUQ throughout the years. The effectiveness of thismeasure to counter the unjustified proliferation of obligatory institutional fees will also be evaluated by taking into account the available data on their recent variations.



2 The problem of obligatory institutional fees

2.1 Definition of the concept The notions of obligatory institutional fees, ancillary fees, administrative fees,supplementary fees, etc., are often used indistinctly to designate a set of expensesimposed on students for their studies within university institutions, creating a certainconfusion regarding the exact scope of this concept. For the purposes of this discussion,it is necessary to find ourselves a unique definition of the terms we encounter. For thenotion of obligatory institutional fees OIF), we will refer to the definition, voluntarilyinclusive, given by the Ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport (MELS):

“the set of obligatory fees imposed by universities on their students, to the exclusion of tuition fees […]. The OIF encompass general fees (admission, registration, examination,internship, etc.), technological fees, student service fees, contribution to student life,copyright fees, thesis writing fees, premiums for certain obligatory insurances, fees related tosports and recreation and various other fees (transcripts, issuance of diplomas, laboratories,uniforms, etc.). Also part of OIF are fees imposed for certain recourses such as fees for therevision of marks.” (MELS, 2008c, p. 29)

Obligatory institutional fees are a sub-set of what we generally call ancillary fees, avague notion that includes, for some, student association dues, other contributions fixed by them and various penalties (ex.: lateness at the library) (CCAFE, 2008, p. 12). TheFEUQ, just as the virtual totality of student associations (see section 2.2.3), alwaysopposed the inclusion of student association dues1 in the definition of ancillary fees,since students freely consented, through the democratic bodies of their associations(FEUQ, 2007, p. 4). Unless the contrary is mentioned, the notion used for the rest of thisdocument will be that of the OIF, with the definition of the MELS.

It is to be noted that MELS included in the definition of OIF not only fees that appearedsystematically on the same bill, but also one-time fees (admission application, diplomafee) or again the use of certain services (transcripts, fees for the revision of marks, etc).Th h d i bl i it i t fl t th ll fi i l h i d h



If the application of the definition of the MELS and the decision to include or not a feegiven in the entity of the OIF targeted by the budgetary rule can give rise to disputes,

the definition in itself is generally consensual.2.2 Categorization of the OIF

Obligatory institutional fees constitute a set of rates and contributions that are extremelydiversified, notably regarding the amount, the mode of collection and the destination of the amounts collected. In order to manipulate the concept effectively, it will be useful tous to define certain categories of fees in order to be able to distinctly discuss differentrealities. In the course of their studies, FAÉCUM (2007, pp. 7-8) and Statistics Canada

(1995-2008) privilege a breakdown according to the use of amounts; other authors(Gougeon, 2003; Desrosiers, 2002) adopt a subdivision by mode of collection. Oursubdivisions will be based on the latter principle:

Automatic billing fees per term: these are all the fees that appear each term on a bill of tuition fees. They can represent a uniform amount, a different amount forfull-time students and part-time students or even an amount per credit.

One-time automatic billing fee: these are fees that appear on a bill of tuition fees

or that are paid on use, but that the student cannot avoid in the normal course of his studies. We think for example of admission application fees, diploma fees oragain of internship fees (when the latter is obligatory for the obtainment of thecoveted degree).

Fee billed on use: this category includes all the fees whose imposition results in adecision or an act taken by a student. This category includes fees for the issuanceof a transcript, for a revision of marks, a demand for equivalence, etc.

Furthermore, we will also distinguish fees according to their scope, namely the range of the group of students affected:

University scope: Fees that apply to all students of an institution or all students



published in 1963 and 1964, the government of Quebec regulates the tuition feesrequired by universities. It does this through budgetary rules that determine subsidies,

that stipulate when there is a case of billing of an amount higher to that dictated bythese same rules, the annual operating grant of an institution at fault can be “adjusted”so as to penalize it (MELS, 2008c, p. 33).

However, universities have always had the possibility of requiring contributions forauxiliary services (to finance student services, for example). Furthermore, in 1986, theminister of Education, Claude Ryan, established ancillary fees, that institutions couldimpose without seeing their subsidies amputated. By doing this, the governmentgranted a new source of income to universities, while maintaining a façade of a virtuoustuition fee freeze (FEUQ, 1996, p. 7). We now know that this freeze was in any casedestined for an imminent death, since the same Liberal government decreed beginningin 1989 substantial increases in tuition fees; these went from $547 to $1,668 per year (for30 credits), between 1989 and 1994 (CRÉPUQ, 2006, p. 67).

In 1992, the FEUQ officially positioned itself for a law regulating tuition fees and others.Two motivations are at the source of this demand. The first comes from the fact that theregulation concerning tuition fees and OIF is determined by decree, without the

obligation of holding prior consultations or a vote or discussion in the NationalAssembly. The second comes from the uniformity need of tuition fees (that then varied between $41.00 and $45.40 per credit) and writing fees (oscillating between $25 atSherbrooke and $151 at the école Polytechnique). It is also to be noted that the ministrythen authorized universities to bill up until 10% more than regulated tuition fees –which is not without reminding us of the current regulation applied to foreign students.

Introduced under diverse pretexts, fees other than tuition fees increased regularly,

attaining an average of $228 in 1995-96 (Statistics Canada, 1995-2008). In April 1996, theFEUQ submits to the attention of the Minister of Education, Pauline Marois, a noticeasking for the adoption of a “framework law on tuition fees and financial assistance tostudents,” in order to make more rigorous and transparent the process of the



Table 1 – Problematic factors applicable to the situation of non-regulated fees

Decentralization

University administrations do not have a complete and updated list of the fees that

are required from students and the decisional power over these fees is managed bynumerous and different administrative services: faculties, departments, studentservices and others.

Variety

The fees are numerous and “imaginative.” The fees required by universities are notoften the same from one university to the other, when it is not from onedepartment to the next. Various fees that were not billed were then subsequently billed since other services “imagined” these new fees, creating a sort of unhealthyemulation between services and between universities.

Incoherent

classification

The vocabulary used by administrations is not always the same from one

institution to the next and when it is, it often designates different realities.Rapid evolution

The changes in the student bill are collected from year to year, and sometimes feeschange during the academic year.

Absence deTransparency

Les décisions relatives aux frais afférents sont prises dans des circonstancesopaques et les justifications avancées à la création de ces frais sont souvent trèsSlender or derisory.

Source : (FEUQ, 2002a, p. 13)

Following the conclusions of this study, the FEUQ returned with an attack with a

demand to form a “Law on Accessibility and Success in Postsecondary Studies.” Theadoption of this law, which would affect both the modalities of student financialassistance, the tuition fee freeze for Quebec, out-of-province and international students,the regulation of automatic fees imposed by educational institutions, was one of themain demands of students for the Quebec electoral campaign of 2003 (FEUQ, 2003a).Probably with the goal of avoiding the application of a constraining regulation,university administrations, through the CRÉPUQ, then committed to respecting twoprinciples during the fixation of ancillary fees:

“the transparency of institutional policies and practices concerning them.”

“Prior to all changes in the matter, the consultation of student associations.“ (Excerptf l b Pi L i id f h CRÉPUQ S l i Si d i i



initiative notice published in May 2004, the Comité consultatif sur l’accessibilité financièreaux études (CCAFE) recommends the implementation of a “mechanism protecting the

student from possible sudden and significant increases of tuition fees and other obligatory fees” (CCAFE, 2004, p. 49).

To follow up on the electoral commitment of the QLP, the ministry of Education createsa tripartite committee made up of university representatives, the FEUQ and MELS.Several meetings of the committee were held during 2004 and gave way to a completeupdate of the data collated by MELS concerning the fees imposed by universities.Nevertheless, due to positions diametrically opposed to that of the CREPUQ and theFEUQ, no concrete result emerged from the work of the committee. We can also think of the political context of the year 2004-2005, marked by a major campaign of the studentmovement against the cuts to student financial assistance, which counts for something.

The electoral commitment of 2003 in favor of the framework-law will never be held, somuch so that the FEUQ must reiterate the demand for the Quebec electoral campaign of February-March 2007. This time, the QLP commits to (regulating and limiting) ancillary,accessory and technological fees, after discussions with student associations and institutions.(PLQ, 2007, p. 30).

2.3.2 Defreeze of tuition fees and the regulation of OIF

Following the reelection of the Liberal government, March 26, 2007, the Minister of Education, Recreation and Sports, Michelle Courchesne, proceeds on June 28 toannounce in three points:

The annual increase, from 2007 to 2012, of $3.33 per credit ($100 per year for astudent enrolled at 30 credits)

An improvement of student financial assistance, notably to lessen the impact of the increase in tuition fees.

The holding of consultations online aiming to elaborate a proposal for the



from the student population, while others recommend the approval of agreements(between the institution and the association representative of students) by the decisional

mode of each student association.The four labor organizations that participated in the consultation3 pronounced in favorof a closer regulation of obligatory institutional fees, three of them expresslyrecommending the adoption of a law to this effect. In their studies, the labororganizations have also made the link between financial pressures exerted onuniversities and the proliferation of ancillary fees. They insist on the necessity of preserving financial accessibility to university studies and to prove transparency in thefixing of these fees. They also oppose that these ancillary fees be required for elementsthat are already the object of public subsidies and insist on the consultation of studentassociations in the process of fixing fees.

Without surprise, the CREPUQ and the Université Laval, while reiterating theircommitments regarding transparency and the consultation of student associations, wereopposed to the putting in place of a tighter regulation, pointing out that the servicesoffered in universities must be adopted to the “particularities of the specific needs of theirclientele, that the range of services offered must be able to evolve according to needs and that it is

normal that such services are financed by institutional fees” (CRÉPUQ, 2007).

Finally, following this consultation, the Minister of Education, Recreation and Sports,Mme Michelle Courchesne, announced on February 15, 2008, the putting in place of orientations destined for the regulation of obligatory institutional fees (which will bedetailed in section 3).

2.3.3 Evolution of ancillary fees in time

When the time comes to quantitatively evaluating the evolution of ancillary fees in time,two main approaches can be used. The first consists of relating the total income collected by universities as OIF and student population in order to establish the means. Thismethod has the advantage of taking into account the fees of all the categories that we



Canadian Degree-granting Institutions , Statistics Canada proceeded thus, with the help of a questionnaire sent to each university institution (Statistique Canada, 1995-2008). In the

framework of this notice, we will use successively two methods.Evaluation according to incomes

For the regulatory supervision of the OIF, in order to classify the institutions in the grid,MELS established an average of OIF per FTE, by taking into account the income enrolledin the financial report of universities under three accounting items (MELS, 2008c, p. 30):

Student fees;

Admissions, registrations, fees, internship or supervision fees; Sales to students.

Following the same logic, it is possible to retrace, at the Quebec level, the amountscollected according to these rubrics:

Table 2 - Evolution of university revenues collected as obligatory institutional fees

97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07Admission,registration and other

fees ($M)18,8 23,2 31,8 37,5 39,1 37,2 45,4 47,3 53,2 58,9

Student fees (M$) 25,1 26,6 28,1 29,7 32,4 35,2 38,7 39,7 43,6 46,6

Sales to students(M$) 13,8 18,2 28,6 34,7 47,4 60,3 58,6 71,5 68,4 75,2

Total OIF (M$) 57,7 68 88,5 101,9 118,9 132,7 142,7 158,5 165,2 180,7

Student population 224592 224252 229527 231135 236726 246800 255853 259045 261467 262142

Total OIF / Student($) 256,91 303,23 385,58 440,87 502,27 537,68 557,74 611,86 631,82 689,32

Annual growth 18,03% 27,16% 14,34% 13,93% 7,05% 3,73% 9,70% 3,26% 9,10%

Source : (MELS, 2003-2008)



differs from that of OIF (the supplementary include the dues of student associations andexclude one-time automatic fees and fees billed on use).

Table 3 - Evolution of the Quebec average of supplementary fees (according to the definition of Statistics Canada)

93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01

Undergraduate 205 156 219 218 272 327 345 387Graduate

studies 234 192 270 260 320 339 383 444

Average 209 162 228 225 281 329 352 396

Growth -22,67% 40,62% -1,02% 24,61% 17,26% 6,83% 12,72%

01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07r 07-08r 08-09

Undergraduate 426 491 522 544 596 574 619 602Graduate

studies 475 519 549 563 620 615 653 717

Average 434 496 526 548 600 558 626 603

Growth 9,53% 14,17% 6,20% 4,00% 9,49% -7,00% 12,19% -3,67%

09-10 10-11pUndergraduate 615 633

Graduatestudies 554 573

Average 602 621

Growth -0,17% 3,16%Source : (Statistique Canada, 1995-2008)Note : les données pour 2008-09 incluent des estimés pour certaines universités dont les frais réels n’avaient pas été

fixés au moment de l’enquête. De plus, les données pour l’années 10-11 sont aussi des données préliminaires. Parailleurs, les données concernant les années 06-07 et 07-08 sont des données révisées selon une nouvelle grille decalcul. Finalement, les données 09-10 et 10-11 ont fait l’objet de changement méthodologique puisque les fraischargés pour certaines assurances ont été retirés du calcul.



Student registered at the bachelor’s full-time (15 credits in the autumn, 15 creditsin winter)

Student enrolled in graduate studies full-time (15 credits in the autumn, 15credits in winter)

Student enrolled in the status of writing a master’s or doctoral thesis (full-time)

The following three tables present the total of fees billed for a university year in eachinstitution according to three profiles” The detail of the fees considered is available inthe appendix.

In each of these tables, certain institutions present annual hikes superior to $15, $25 or$50 for these profiles of student-types. In the case where the hike is higher than the limitimposed for the university, it is necessary to see if the agreement between managementand the student association before concluding that there is an infraction of theregulation.

Table 4 – Automatic fees billed to a student enrolled full-time in the bachelor’s (30 credits / year), according to theyear of attendance and institution.

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10p

2010-2011p

Variation

(07-08 à08-09)

Variation

(08-09 à09-10)

Variation (09-10 à 10-11)

Bishop’s 761,00 $

781,40 $

938,40 $

958,30 $

20,40 $ 157,00 $ 19,90 $

Concordia

836,50 $

851,80 $

855,70 $

879,92 $

15,30 $ 3,90 $ 24,22 $

ÉNAP - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $

ETS 313,00 $

346,00 $

346,00 $

378,50 $

33,00 $ - $ 32,50 $

HEC 820,80 $

859,90 $

882,38 $

958,30 $

39,10 $ 22,48 $ 75,92 $



UQO 403,10 $

405,20 $

406,70 $

422,30 $

2,10 $ 1,50 $ 15,60 $

UQTR 346,1

0 $

356,3

8 $

358,8

2 $

359,9

6 $

10,28 $ 2,44 $ 1,14 $

Moyenne*

533,50 $

562,57 $

589,62 $

624,25 $

29,07 $ 27,05 $ 25,20 $

Croissance

5,45%

4,81%

4,56%

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10p

2010- 2011pVariati

on(07-08to 08-

09)

Variation

(08-09to 09-

10)

Variation (09-10 to10-11)

Bishop’s 761,00 $ 781,40 $ 938,40 $ 958,30 $ 20,40 $ 157,00 $ 19,90 $

Concordia 836,50 $ 851,80 $ 855,70 $ 879,92 $ 15,30 $ 3,90 $ 24,22 $

ÉNAP - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $

ETS 313,00 $ 346,00 $ 346,00 $ 378,50 $ 33,00 $ - $ 32,50 $

HEC 820,80 $ 859,90 $ 882,38 $ 958,30 $ 39,10 $ 22,48 $ 75,92 $

INRS - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $

Laval 428,10 $ 477,60 $ 499,56 $ 524,46 $ 49,50 $ 21,96 $ 24,90 $McGill 912,70 $ 956,30 $ 993,00 $ 996,00 $ 43,60 $ 36,70 $ 3,00 $

Poly 400,00 $ 420,00 $ 455,30 $ 480,30 $ 20,00 $ 35,30 $ 25,00 $

Sherbrooke 396,90 $ 404,40 $ 412,50 $ 475,08 $ 7,50 $ 8,10 $ 62,58 $

UdeM 372,30 $ 423,90 $ 482,70 $ 511,35 $ 51,60 $ 58,80 $ 28,75 $

UQAC 372,50 $ 377,98 $ 382,38 $ 383,78 $ 5,48 $ 4,40 $ 1,40 $

UQAM 384,14 $ 387,96 $ 406,90 $ 433,60 $ 3,82 $ 18,94 $ 26,70 $UQAR 330,30 $ 335,22 $ 342,23 $ 394,90 $ 4,92 $ 7,01 $ 52,67 $

UQAT 324,90 $ 329,40 $ 364,40 $ 400,00 $ 4,50 $ 35,00 $ 35,60 $



ETS 313,00 $ 346,00 $ 346,00 $ 378,50 $ 33,00 $ - $ 32,50 $

HEC 603,04 $ 624,94 $ 640,52 $ 710,84 $ 21,90 $ 15,58 $ 70,32 $

INRS 131,10 $ 131,10 $ 131,10 $ 180,00 $ - $ - $ 48,90 $Laval 428,10 $ 477,60 $ 499,56 $ 524,46 $ 49,50 $ 21,96 $ 24,90 $

McGill 912,70 $ 956,30 $ 968,00 $ 971,00 $ 43,60 $ 11,70 $ 3,00 $

Poly 400,00 $ 420,00 $ 455,30 $ 480,30 $ 20,00 $ 35,30 $ 25,00 $

Sherbrooke 396,90 $ 404,40 $ 412,50 $ 473,28 $ 7,50 $ 8,10 $ 60,78 $

UdeM 372,30 $ 423,90 $ 482,70 $ 511,35 $ 51,60 $ 58,80 $ 28,65 $

UQAC 372,50 $ 377,98 $ 382,38 $ 383,78 $ 5,48 $ 4,40 $ 1,40 $UQAM 384,14 $ 387,96 $ 406,90 $ 433,60 $ 3,82 $ 18,94 $ 26,70 $

UQAR 330,30 $ 335,22 $ 342,23 $ 394,90 $ 4,92 $ 7,01 $ 52,67 $

UQAT(Profil B)

444,90 $ 449,40 $ 484,40 $ 550,00 $ 4,50 $ 35,00 $ 65,60 $

UQO 403,70 $ 405,20 $ 406,70 $ 422,30 $ 1,50 $ 1,50 $ 15,60 $

UQTR 346,10 $ 356,38 $ 358,38 $ 359,82 $ 10,28 $ 2,00 $ 1,44 $

Moyenne * 513,94 $ 542,91 $ 564,80 $ 603,50 $ 26,70 $ 21,89 $ 29,68 $Croissance 5,64% 4,03% 5,33%

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10p 2010- 2011pVariation(07-08 to

08-09)

Variation(08-09 to

09-10)

Variation(09-10 to

10-11)Bishop’s - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $

Concordia 836,50 $ 851,80 $ 855,70 $ 879,92 $ 15,30 $ 3,90 $ 24,22 $

ÉNAP 257,60 $ 269,60 $ 281,60 $ 281,60 $ 12,00 $ 12,00 $ 0,00 $ETS 313,00 $ 346,00 $ 346,00 $ 378,50 $ 33,00 $ - $ 32,50 $

HEC 603,04 $ 624,94 $ 640,52 $ 710,84 $ 21,90 $ 15,58 $ 70,32 $



Growth 5,64% 4,03% 5,33%

HEC: les montants présentés sont ceux de la maîtrise. Les montants exigés au doctorat présentent des différences

inférieures à 1 $/année.Note : Pour les fins de calcul de la moyenne, les données ont été pondérées en fonction des effectifs de 2 e et 3 e cyclesprévus par le MELS pour chaque établissement (MELS, 2008b et CREPUQ 2010a). Les données présentées pourl’année 2009-2010 sont préliminaires. De plus, comme nous ne connaissons pas les différences d’effectifs entre lesprofil A (professionnel) et les profil B (recherche) aux cycles supérieurs à l’UQAT, nous avons choisit le profil B afinde souligner l’importante augmentation de FIO qu’ils ont subit.

Table 6 – Automatic fees billed to a student enrolled in the status of writing (full-time), according to the year ofattendance and establishment.

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10p 2010-2011pVariation(07-08 to

08-09)

Variation(08-09 to

09-10)

Variation(09-10 to

10-11)Bishop’s - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $

ConcordiaA

840,00 $ 840,00 $ 840,00 $ 850,00 $ - $ - $ 10,00 $

Concordia

B

1 240,00 $ 1 240,00 $ 1 240,00 $ 1 250,00 $ - $ - $ 10,00 $

ÉNAP N/D 695,40 $ N/D 745,40 $ N/D N/D N/D

ETS 448,00 $ 456,00 $ 456,00 $ 478,50 $ 8,00 $ 0,00 $ 22,50 $

HEC MSc 1 389,80 $ 1 410,96 $ 1 431,26 $ 1 452,72 $ 21,16 $ 20,30 $ 21,46 $

HEC PhD 1 689,80 $ 1 710,96 $ 1 731,26 $ 1 752,72 $ 21,16 $ 20,30 $ 21,46 $

INRS 421,10 $ 701,10 $ 731,10 $ 780,00 $ 280,00 $ 30,00 $ 48,90 $

Laval A 607,20 $ 651,60 $ 671,28 $ 692,16 $ 44,40 $ 19,68 $ 20,88 $

Laval B 1 059,20 $ 1 103,60 $ 1 123,28 $ 1 144,16 $ 44,40 $ 19,68 $ 20,88 $McGill 2 361,80 $ 2 483,70 $ 2 592,10 $ 2 593,10 $ 121,90 $ 108,40 $ 1,00 $

Poly 1 726,15 $ 1 821,08 $ 1 856,38 $ 1 881,38 $ 94,93 $ 35,30 $ 25,00 $



3

Analysis of the regulatory supervision of OIF February 15, 2008, the Minister of Education, Recreation and Sports, MichelleCourchesne, announced her intention to put in place a regulation of obligatoryinstitutional fees, which would be incorporated in the budgetary rules governingsubsidies to universities, for a period of three years. (from 2008-09 to 2010-11) (MELS,2008a). As set out in the Act respecting the Conseil supérieur de l’éducation , in the case of modifications made to the budgetary rules concerning tuition fees and ancillary fees, the

minister must submit her regulatory project to the attention of the Comité consultatif surl’accessibilité financière aux études (CCAFE), in order to collect the notice of thiscommittee. The notice of the CCAFE on the project of the regulation, published on April11, 2008, clarified and specified numerous aspects. We will thus often make reference toit in the next section.

3.1 Interpretation of the budgetary rule

During the course of the first year of application, certain grey zones of regulation had to

be made the object of clarifications. It seems opportune to make an assessment here todissipate all uncertainty.

3.1.1 Individual application of the limits of the increase

The preliminary version of the regulation, submitted to the examination of the CCAFE,were ambiguous on the manner of applying the limits set out for each institution. Thus,the regulation could have been understood as limiting the growth of the average feesrequired by an institution or again as an individual protection benefiting each student.

In this regard, the CCAFE obtained that this part of the regulation be clarified andmentions in its notice that it consists “of an individual guarantee certifying to each studentthat the OIF he must pay for a given year will not increase more than $15, $25 or $50 thefollowing year according to the limit imposed on the institution” (CCAFE 2008 p 7) To this



possibility of applying this increase during the autumn and winter semesters and also toapply a hike of $25 during the summer semester (always in relation to the previous

summer semester) (MELS, 2009).3.2 Analysis of the budgetary rule

In order to conduct a critical analysis of the regulatory supervision of the OIF, we willtry to respond to two fundamental questions:

Is the regulation of a nature to fulfill the objectives targeted by the MELS duringits implementation?

Is the regulation of a nature to remedy the problematic factors of the situation of ancillary fees identified by the FEUQ? (see Table 1, p. 12)

3.2.1 In regard to the objectives fixed by MELS

The first question makes reference to the objectives fixed by MELS. These are cited in anexplicit manner in the notice of the CCAFE:

“Limit the increases in obligatory institutional fees in universities;

Reduce the gaps in rate-fixing between universities in regard to obligatoryinstitutional fees;

Allow the conclusion of agreements between university institutions and studentassociations in regard to obligatory institutional fees.” (CCAFE, 2008, p. 8)

Only a quantitative analysis of changes in OIF can judge the achievement of the firstgoal. In announcing the budget framework, the MELS predicted that it would limit the

overall increase in OIF to 3.4% in 2008-09 and to 2.8% in 2009-2010 and 2.7% in 2009-2010 (MELS, 2008a), these rates are calculated from the mass of the amounts received byall institutions. The results obtained by this method of calculation are not yet known.However according to our estimates based on the amounts required the overall



the highest hikes. The trend observed is thus towards the maintenance, even theenlargement of gaps rather than their reduction.

Finally, the attainment of the latter objective can only be evaluated by observing theevolution of the number of agreements concluded and the number of students targeted by these agreements. Such an evaluation is difficult for these two reasons:

Before the implementation of this regulatory supervision, the institutions werenot required to transmit the content of these agreements to MELS, thus theinexistence of a centralized list.

Since its implementation, it is possible that the agreements concluded, at theuniversity, faculty or departmental levels, were not transmitted to MELS. Thissituation makes technically non-regulatory increases superior to the limits thatare in place. However, given the presence of this “clandestine” agreement, it isimprobable that the situation will be signaled.

Given this state of facts, we will avoid pronouncing ourselves on the attainment of thethird objective.

3.2.2 In regard to the preoccupations expressed by the FEUQIn its analysis of 2002, the FEUQ expressed its concerns in regard to five problematicfactors (see Table 1): decentralization, variety, incoherent classification, rapid evolution,absence of transparency.

By making the directors of each institution responsible for its application on all thecampus and requiring a deposit of an exhaustive list of fees required by each institutionand its components (MELS, 2008c, p. 31), the regulatory supervision partially responds

to the first preoccupation (decentralization). It nevertheless remains true thatagreements can be concluded at the faculty or departmental level introducing disparitieson the same campus, and that in the case where the directors of the institution choosenot to use the totality of their margin of manoeuvre unilateral increases remain possible



of its components” (MELS, 2008c, p. 31). In principle, the variation or the creation of newfees should no longer occur during the year, the logical consequence of this requirement being that the fees required from the student that are not part of the list submitted at the beginning of the year would be considered non-regulatory. In fact, regulation has theeffect of bringing the moment of the fixing of costs to the beginning of the universityyear.

Finally, regulatory supervision imposes more transparence in regard to the fixing of costs and the use of generated resources, but there are still grey zones. Thus, the processof negotiation of an agreement normally allows the student association to requirecomplete information on the motives of variations. However, in the case of increaseslower than limits imposed, decisions can continue to be made without clearly exposingthe motives.

3.3 General problems of the application of the rule

One year after the coming into force of regulatory supervision, certain general problemsof application appeared and merit a more in-depth reflection in order to find solutionsand allow each of the actors to find themselves.

3.3.1 Uncertainty concerning the limit imposed on each university

The first application problem concerns the necessary delay to establish the position of the institution in the supervision grid of OIF. According to the rule, the increase allowedper student for year N is determined based on the revenues collected on the basis of OIFfor year N-1 (for example, the hike allowed in 2008-09 is based on the revenues of 2007-08). Now, these data are contained in the financial statements that are only publishedseveral months after the end of the financial year in question.5 In fact, the budgetary

rules require the transmission of the annual report for September 30 following the endof the financial year (MELS, 2008c, p. 38).

For example, during the prior consultations to its notice held in February 2008, the



Table 7 – Grid framework for obligatory fees

Universityinstitutions whose

OIF *

Increase permitted bystudents per year

Increase permitted bystudents for the following

summer term

Are below 555 $/year 50,00 $ 25,00 $

Are between 555 $and 699 $/year 25,00 $ 12,50 $

Sont supérieurs à699 $/year

15,00 $ 7,50 $

MELS (2009a)

3.3.2 Non-obligatory automatic contributions (NOAC)

There exists in most institutions a certain number of non-obligatory automatic

contributions destined to finance a multitude of entities and services, establishedsometimes by student groups, sometimes by institutions. The principle is simple: theamount appears on the bill of the tuition fees of the student each semester and he mustfollow certain steps (often an online form or a paper version) to make him remove it orto obtain a reimbursement. This at first sight consists of an elegant solution, since thestudent who does not have the means to make the contribution or who doe not see itsrelevance can easily refuse to do so. By way of indication, Table presents a non-exhaustive survey of NOAC currently collected by Quebec universities:

Table 8 – Non-obligatory automatic contributions collected by universities (Autumn 2009)

Institution Type Name Amount

É



Institution Type Name Amount

UQAR Fonds de projets étudiants Fonds de soutien aux projetsétudiants 10$ / term

UQO Fondation universitaire Fondation de l'UQO 7,50$ / term

UQTR Fondation universitaire Campagne majeure FondationUQTR 10$ / term

UQTR Fondation universitaire Fondation UQTR 5$ / termSource : Sites web des universités

On the other hand, certain problems can occur in regard to the payment modalities andremoval related to contributions. Firstly, in the case where the modalities of thecontribution make it such that the student must first pay the amount, then take steps toobtain a reimbursement, there can be a problem of availability of capital if it is asubstantial amount. In fact, the student must first procure the required funds to pay, inthe first place, his contribution.

The second problem met concerns the modalities of withdrawal related to NOACs. Toreally respect the principle of a NOAC, it is imperative that the student benefit from thenecessary information to make an informed choice and that the reimbursement

modalities make this accessible. In reaction to the modifications made unilaterally by theuniversity administration to the withdrawal procedures,6 the Ombudsman of theUniversité de Montréal wrote:

“According to my point of view, essentially, a non-obligatory contribution, or a gift, in regardto the fund for the improvement of student life, must be made in a voluntary manner andwith full knowledge of the cause by those who subscribe to it. In this sense, it is up to theuniversity administration to act in a more transparent manner in regard to these students,when contributions are billed in an automatic way, by clearly announcing, which fees are

obligatory and which are voluntary. In regard to voluntary fees, it appears to me more thanessential that their abandonment modalities are effective and accessible for all students, thatthey be clearly announced, and that we give to students a sufficient timeframe to exercisetheir right of withdrawal.



incapable of proving its good faith, a ministerial intervention concerning the NOACwould have to be considered.

3.3.3 Fees for the writing of master’s and doctoral theses

The applicable budgetary rules for universities link tuition fees to the notion of the unityof courses (currently called credits), which represent a certain number of hours of participation in teaching activities. Now, the structure of master’s and doctoralprograms make it such that institutions have developed a rate-fixing that rests on thedistribution of credits of a program over a number of arbitrary semesters, designated asthe “normal duration of the program.” When the student has exceeded this limit,

habitually because he is pursuing research or writing activities related to his master’s ordoctoral thesis, he falls under a new status, that bear different names according to theinstitution: writing, research, prolongation of studies additional session, non-thesisextension, continuation, time-limit extension, etc. A definite amount according to thepolicies of the university is then charged to him, with the designation varying as well:

Tuition *

Tuition fees *

Fees for the maintenance of registration

Registration fees

Continuation Fee

Time-Limit Extension Fee

Tuition Fee *

We easily understand that the terms marked by asterisks are misleading since the budgetary rules reserve the designation “tuition fees” to rates that are defined in articles3.1, 3.4 and 3.6 (respectively tuition fees required from student residents of Quebec, non-residents of Quebec and foreigners) Up until 2007-08 the budgetary rules at article “3 3



the FEUQ. There is certainly a provision aiming to exclude the definition of fines andpenalties inflicted on students that derogate from the financial or administrative rules, but we cannot affirm that the structure of a doctoral program constitutes such a rule; itrather imposes requirements of an academic nature.

To this end, MELS has officially recognized that the interpretation of the FEUQ, in thecase of writing fees - whatever the designated name - was indeed one that would beused to interpret the regulations. By the same token, extension fees are recognized as being OIF by the MELS. (See the official document in Appendix)

3.4 Particular problems occurring in 2008-09

During 2008-09, at least two institutions imposed hikes higher than the limits imposed by the regulatory supervision of the OIF and were the object of measures on the part of MELS aiming to force the reimbursement of the amounts collected over the limit. In thetwo cases, the infractions to regulatory supervision concerned the summer semester of 2008. It is not impossible that other problems occurred during the year.

3.4.1 École polytechnique de Montréal

In the case of the École polytechnique de Montréal, the directors proceeded in 2008 tothe establishment of obligatory institutional fees required from students of the bachelor’s for the 2008 term, while none of these fees were required in the summersession of 2007. The result was an effective increase of $210 in the sense of the budgetaryregulation, while the allowable increase for the summer term was $7.50 (half of theannual increase of $15.00).

Table 9 - Evolution of the obligatory institutional fees required from students at the bachelor’s during the summersemester of the École polytechnique de Montréal (2007 and 2008)

Summer2007

Summer2008

Student services 0,00 $ 75,00 $



3.4.2 Université de Montréal

In the month of December 2007, the Université de Montréal announced an increase of

$4 / credit in the fees for student services and $2 / credit in management fees,applicable as of the semester of summer 2008. Despite the coming into force of theregulatory supervision of the OIF, which limits the allowable increase for this semesterto $25 for the Université de Montréal, the directors decided to maintain these increases(Cauchy, 2008).

Table 10 - Evolution of the obligatory institutional fees required in the summer semester at the Université deMontréal (2007 and 2008)

Undergraduate Graduate studiesSummer

2007Summer

2008Summer

2007Summer

2008

Student services 7,00 $ / cr. 11,00 $ / cr. 105,00 $ 165,00 $

Management fees 5,00 $ / cr 7,00 $ / cr. 75,00 $ 105,00 $

Copyright 0,38 $ / cr. 0,41 $ / cr. 0,38 $ / cr. 0,41 $ / cr.Total (per credit) 12,38 $ 18,41 $

Total (15 credits) 185,70 $ 276,15 $ 185,70 $ 276,15 $

Increase - 90,45 $ - 90,45 $

At the end of the summer term of 2008, the Université de Montréal was forced toreimburse the excess amounts to the students concerned (FAÉCUM, 2008).

3.4.3 Universities without general association

Universities without a general association bringing together the entirety of the students

of an accreditation pool

7

face particular problems on the application of the rule. In fact,the budgetary rules stipulates that

“[if] various associations represent students from the same group of distinct students in thef ti l 2 1 f th [A t ti th dit ti d fi i f t d t ’



3.5 Specific Problems occurring in 2009-2010

3.5.1 The case of the Faculty of dentistry at the University of Montreal

In fact, the dental school has negotiated an increase in OIF which would lead to "thepurchase or leasing of advanced technologies. The agreement spans five years, that is,an increase of OIF of $1,000 for the year 2010-2011, $ 1,500 for the year 2011-2012, $2,000 for year 2012-2013 and $2,500 for the years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. Also, theseamounts will be collected only from students of years 3 and 4 enrolled in the Bachelor of Dentistry. In return, the faculty is committed to allocating the amounts to 80% for thepurpose of purchasing or leasing equipment and 20% of monies collected for the

maintenance and repair of equipment. In addition, the faculty ($0.50) and the University($0.50) undertake to pay a dollar for each dollar collected from students.However, this agreement creates a prejudice since it was approved by MELS and thaton several points it violates regulations. For its part, MELS defended itself fromproperly applying the rule because for them, "rental equipment" is not defined as apurchase in the accounting sense. At first, it is specified in the agreement, the moneycollected will be invested for the purchase or lease of technology equipment. In thisregard, the regulation is clear: "capital spending in the accounting sense, may be subjectto a grant from a five-year university investment plan under these budget rules andshould not be funded by the OIF.” Moreover, in the academic investment plan 2008-2013, some funds are allocated to Laval University for the purchase of specializedequipment for medical, nursing and pharmacy programs. This suggests that whenpurchasing specialized equipment for the training of students, such funds may besubject to a grant from the five-year plan for university investments.

On the other hand, in the agreement reached between the association representing thestudents and the Faculty of Dentistry, it is stated in paragraph 3.1.4 that the Faculty is

committed to ensuring that the agreement will not compromise the principles of accessibility to education and perseverance to students of the Faculty. But in no case is itstated "how" the Faculty is committed to maintaining the accessibility and persistence of it t d t M h th t ill h it fi l f li ti th



administration thought it could it could act cavalierly alone in the negotiation of theagreement with the STS and, especially, it thought it could increase the OIF of studentswithout previously signing an agreement with the representative student associations.Yet, in the spirit of the rule on the regulation of obligatory institutional fees, there is thisnotion that agreements between the university institution and the representative studentassociation must be prioritized.

In autumn 2009, it is in this framework that the representative student associationslearned that the UdeS intended to increase OIF by $49.50 per term, applicable as of thewinter term of 2010. After calling their university administration to order, therepresentative student associations (FEUS, REMDUS) began negotiations concerning the

new agreement for free access of students to the services of the STS. While at the beginning of the negotiations students were closed to the idea of subsidizing a servicethat was previously offered, they reviewed their orientation and finished by accepting topay a certain amount to ensure the continuity of the service.

Then, even if the FEUS said it was saddened to have to add an already considerablefinancial burden to students, this agreement is not closed. In fact, it leaves open thepossibility for representative student associations to search for alternative financing

methods.Finally, the agreement includes increases of $15, $27 and $27 (plus the adjustment due tothe indexation set by the STS for its transportation tickets), respectively for the summerterm of 2010, autumn 2010 and beginning in winter 2011 for subsequent terms. Thisagreement is for a duration of 5 years and it can end by the simple wish of the STS or theUdeS.

3.6 Refund of overpayments

During the early years of the application of the rule on OIF many university



3.6.2 Polytechnic

At École Polytechnique de Montréal, the sums paid in excess in OIF totalled $111,000 for

one semester of summer 2008 for undergraduates. In this respect, the recognizedstudent organization representing undergraduates, the EPA has negotiated itsagreement as follows:

1) The total and complete refund of overpayments made in two equal instalments;a. The first, upon approval of the agreement by the Department of Education b. The second, on June 1, 2010

2) In return, EPA agrees to use the money for student activities or to purchaseequipment to serve all students;

3) Moreover, EPA agrees to provide a report on the stat of amounts every month of December of the year at the Polytechnic that it can assume the good faith of the studentassociation;

4) The EPA also assumes responsibility for the negotiation process that has resulted

from this agreement and thereby liberates the Polytechnic from any responsibility incase of disagreements or disputes;

5) Finally, it is stipulated that the agreement complies with the regulations surroundingthe obligatory fees in universities, including Article 5.These are cases of overpayments that have led to agreements in good faith between thestudent unions and university administrations. Of course, it would be better for all if theuniversity administration clung to the base, to the increase limits planned for this

purpose in the regulation on obligatory fees in universities.Moreover, it is imperative that student unions are on the lookout for any increases thatmight occur on their campuses or in their department to prevent amounts beingovercharged to students By the same token the limit provided for communication of



4.1.1 Establish a common vocabulary

One of the concerns expressed by the FEUQ regarding obligatory institutional fees

concerns their incoherent classification, namely the use of different vocabulary indifferent institutions to designate the same reality, or a common term for differentrealities. For its notice, the CCAFE also mentioned that about 2,300 different wordingshad been surveyed and that evidently, many of them designate the same reality.

It thus seems that a work of uniformity of terms aiming to designate different obligatoryinstitutional fees is in order, in order to ensure the comparability of data betweendifferent institutions. This does not consist of introducing uniformity to services or

denying the cultural differences existing between institutions, but only to agree on acommon designation of different realities. In 2002, the Minister of Education carried outcategorization work of the fees required by college institutions (MELS, 2002). Similarwork concerning the university level, affecting the categorization of the classification,would certainly be more complex, but remains necessary. The FEUQ thus recommends:

Recommendation 1That the MELS establish a common classification of obligatory institutional fees betweendifferent university institutions

The current definition of OIF in the budgetary rules may suggest that there are no limitsto what can be understood as an OIF. Moreover, the "dentistry case" has shown insteadthat all avenues are possible to invent OIF. There is no doubt that the abolition of "so"atthe end of each list of examples and that the establishment of a common classificationwould clarify the limits of the definition we can give to OIF.

Recommendation 2That the MELS establish an exhaustive list of OIF with a clear definition of what is anOIF



reason that the coming into force of such a provision would have “repercussions on the governance of student associations” (CCAFE, 2008, p. 11).

From the point of view of the FEUQ, the fact of requiring the approval of the universityadministration in regard to the consultation modalities would have constituted anunacceptable interference in the functioning of student associations. Furthermore, theprocess of approval described in the first version of the regulation would have beendifficult to apply, notably in the case of the association groups recognized by virtue of article 10.2 of an Act respecting the accreditation and financing of students’ associations(Gouvernement du Québec, 2009a). Fortunately, the version of the regulation includedin the budgetary rules simply specifies that:

“To be valid, an agreement with students should have been concluded with the associationrepresentative of the students concerned in the sense of the Act respecting the accreditation and financing of students’ associations. By representative association, we mean associationsaccredited or those recognized in the sense of article 56 of this Act.” (MELS, 2008c, p. 30) 8

Given the state of fact, it is necessary to ensure that the regulation is applied as such andthe autonomy of student associations is respected at all times, both by MELS anduniversity institutions and given that this rule is intended to encourage student

participation in decision-making that would lead to an increase in OIF:

Recommendation 4That the autonomy of decisional bodies of student associations be respected at all timesfor the approval of agreements concerning obligatory institutional fees.

4.1.4 Transparence of data concerning obligatory institutional fees

The regulatory supervision plans the production and transmission to MELS of two typesof document relative to the regulation of OIF:

“an official list of all the obligatory institutional fees that are required by itself or



Recommendation 5That the documents produced by an institution in virtue of the budgetary rules

regarding obligatory institutional fees be made accessible to associations representingstudents of this institution.

Moreover, if the grid framework of OIF is available in the budgetary rules for thispurpose, the positioning of each of Quebec universities still remains non-existent. MELSmust inform the student body so it can make an informed choice about their academicinstitutions and, by extension, it should make public the position of Quebec universitieson the grid framework for OIF. So, the FEUQ recommends:

Recommendation 6That the Quebec government makes available online the positioning of each of Quebecuniversities on the grid framework of OIF and therefore set out the maximum increaseallowed for each semester and a list of universities by OIF every year.

4.1.5 Application of the limit on the summer session

The fiscal rule governing the OIF provides that the summer semester is not counted in

the calculation of the academic year. An alternative interpretation would be to considerthat the maximum allowable increase applies to the entire academic year, as it isgenerally understood - fall, winter and summer. Such an interpretation wouldeffectively limit the fee increases, and thus encourage university administrations toconclude an agreement with the student representatives. This implies that the MELSmodify the interpretation of the fiscal rule that it expressed to the member organizationsof the Monitoring Committee on OIF and would apply to universities.

Recommendation 7That the MELS revise its interpretation of Article 3.3.2. of the fiscal rules that it considersthat academic year includes fall, winter and summer semesters for the application of theOIF guidelines.



pursuit of studies for certain students. To lessen these fears, the FEUQ proposes thatagreements between student associations and university institutions are limited to threeyears. This would have the effect of protecting student associations that do not want toassume agreements of a very long duration made by their predecessors. By this veryfact, a time limit, fixed at three years, would allow the different university cohorts to notcompromise the academic perseverance of subsequent cohorts. The FEUQ thusrecommends:

Recommendation 9That MELS limit agreements between representative student associations and universityinstitutions to three years.

Moreover, during the creation of a rule, one of the goals announced was to promotegood understanding between university institutions and student associationsrepresentative of the students concerned. Thus, with the implementation of a 4 th levelcorresponding to an average of $785 of OIF collected per year in the classification of theframework grid of OIF and that would be fixed at $0 would have the effect of promotingthese agreements. By the very fact, the 3rd level would be consequently adjusted and be

established at a maximum increase of $15 per year for university institutions thatcollected OIF averaging between $699 and $785 per year. The FEUQ thus recommends:

Recommendation 10That MELS limit allowable increases by adding a 4th level of permitted increases to $0when the average OIF of university institutions are above $785.

Here is the new framework grid of OIF as proposed:

Table 8 – Framework grid of obligatory institutional fees

Increase allowed by



University administrations have shown, over time, that they can be very imaginative inthe means they take to circumvent the ministerial regulation. Throughout this notice,various troubling cases were presented and, in 2010-2011, the reimbursements made byuniversity administrations to representative student associations prove this. Now, thepenalties incurred by university institutions do not seem to discourage them in theirefforts. Thus, in the avowed goal of making university institutions comply with theministerial regulation and to protect students of a cohort facing significant increases, theFEUQ recommends:

Recommendation 11That penalties are applied in the case of non-compliance to the obligations of theuniversities in regard to adherence to the application of the rule regulating OIF.

4.1.7 Inclusion of all extension fees

Some prefer that extension fees are excluded in whole or in part from the regulations onOIF. Such an amendment would only distort the very meaning of the fiscal rule on the

OIF, which is to promote agreements between university administrations and studentassociations, and to limit fee increases. The FEUQ, moreover, has been successful inrecognizing the costs of extension in the scope of regulated OIF. Therefore, we reiterateour determination that the costs of extra time are still included in this entity.

Recommendation 12That all extension fees remain included within the reporting entity of obligatoryinstitutional fees.

4.1.8 Supervision of non-mandatory automatic contributions



then be reevaluated. This situation leaves an uncertainty lingering over the continuity of the regulation of the OIF, but also represents an opportunity to promote better solutions.

Since 1992, the FEUQ has asked for the adoption of a legislative regulation of all the feesimposed by university institutions on their students. The arguments militating in favorof this regulation of a legislative nature are multiple:

The registration of the regulation in a law ensures a greater continuity.

The modification of the parameters written in the law flow from a decision of theNational Assembly, and not simply from the Conseil des ministres , which favors

the holding of a public debate on the measures proposed. The experience of the regulatory supervision shows that institutions were able to

commit infractions in full knowledge of the facts, with the only consequence of areimbursement of the amounts collected in excess. In the event of a legislativeregulation, an institution at fault would be purely and simply in a situation of illegality.

Furthermore, the deficiencies identified by the FEUQ at the time of the announcement of the regulation modalities remain, notably the fact that universities can continue toslightly increase ancillary fees, even in the absence of agreements with studentassociations (FEUQ, 2008). Furthermore, the regulation only crystallizes a state of factsthat is in itself problematic, namely the imposition of obligatory institutional fees thatwere not established by virtue of agreements with student association representatives.Consequently, the FEUQ recommends:

Recommendation 14That the National Assembly of Quebec adopt a law regulating obligatory institutionalfees required by university educational institutions (as well as their components) andstipulate that such fees can only be imposed if the nature, amount, and modalities of these fees are the object of an agreement between the institution and the student

h h ( )



On the other hand, it is impossible for a student or for a student association to verify theconcordance between the fees required for a given program and the fees recognized bySFA. To this effect, the CCAFE notably recommends to “take the necessary provisions toinform students of the obligatory institutional fees covered by the program of Student FinancialAssistance” (CCAFE, 2008, p. 20). In order to respond to this concern for transparence,the FEUQ recommends:

Recommandation 15That student financial assistance make public a list of tuition fees recognized asallowable expenses for each of the programs of study.

4.3.2 Loan programs for part-time studiesIn contrast to the Program of Loans and Bursaries, destined for full-time students, theStudent Loans Program for part-time studies recognizes a lump sum amount for tuitionfees (art. 86 of the Règlement), without taking into account the fees really required bythe institution in which the student is enrolled (Gouvernement du Québec, 2009b). Thismanner of proceeding penalizes part-time students of institutions that require higherfees. We should remember that tuition fees serve to cover the following expenses:

Tuition fees

Other fees required by educational institutions

Dues for student associations

Didactic material

In order to illustrate this deficiency, we should compare for some institutions theamounts required from a student enrolled in 6 credits in autumn 2009 (tuition fees andautomatic fees only):

Feesd



Recommandation 16That the amount of allowable expenses as tuition fees in the Loans Program for part-time studies be adjusted on a case-by-case basis to minimally cover the tuition fees, theobligatory institutional fees, student dues and the fees for didactic material. Theseadjustments must ensure the maintenance or increase of the volume of assistanceavailable for beneficiaries of the program



5

ConclusionBy announcing the implementation of a regulation of obligatory institutional fees onFebruary 15, 2008, the Minister of Education, Michelle Courchesne, responded to a long-standing demand of the student movement. However, the context of this measure,punctuated among other things by a lifting of the tuition freeze that will by itself raisethe annual student bill by $500 (and by much more in certain cases), will have mademore than a skeptic as to the real intent of the minister to ensure the maintenance andimprovement of financial accessibility to studies.

Three years after the putting in place of this new regulation, we have to recognize thatsubstantial hikes have been avoided. For example, the Université de Montréal hadplanned, in December 2007, about $160/year of increases and had to revise its plans.However, it is already possible to plan that the average rate of increases will besignificantly higher than the Consumer Price Index. We thus have to avoid the trap of recurrent increases, which will become an automatism and that will only aim to take a bit more from the pockets of students, without being associated with the new

complementary services of the university mission and without being authorized by beneficiaries of these services, namely the students themselves!

A close follow-up of the regulatory supervision of obligatory institutional fees is thusnecessary in order to obtain the maximum protection of students against unjustifiedhikes. We have seen this in past years—the creativity of university administrations inregard to OIF is unlimited. Certain cases are currently in dispute and we are confidentthat the rule under its present form can allow a regulation in favor of students.

Furthermore, given the deficiencies found, it seems more and more necessary to put inplace a tool that is really capable of constraining university administrations to developservices in concert with students: a law on accessibility to university studies that would



6 List of sources

AELIÉS. (2007). Mémoire sur l'encadrement des frais institutionnels obligatoires imposés auxétudiants dans les universités. Québec : Association des étudiantes et des étudiantsde Laval inscrits aux études supérieures.

AEP. (2007). Frais afférents : la nécessité d'un encadrement. Montréal : Association desétudiants de Polytechnique.

AÉUM. (2007). Rétablir le véritable rôle de frais afférents : des projets ciblés de la communauté universitaire. Montréal : Association des étudiants de l'Université McGill.

AGEEPP. (2007). Les frais insitutionnels obligatoires : pour en finir avec l'arbitraire. Québec :Association générale des étudiants et étudiantes prégradués en philosophie(Université Laval).

AGEUQTR. (2007). Mémoire sur les frais afférents. Trois-Rivières : Association générale

des étudiants de l'Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières.ASSÉ. (2007). Mémoire sur la gratuité scolaire. Montréal : Association pour une solidarité

syndicale étudiante.

Banque du Canada. (2006). Feuille de calcul de l'inflation. Ottawa : Banque du Canada[http://www.banqueducanada.ca/fr/taux/inflation_calc-f.html, consulté le 6 juillet 2009]

CADEUL. (2007). Mémoire sur les frais afférents. Québec : Confédération des associationsd'étudiants de l'Université Laval.

C h C (2008) F i ffé l'Ud M i d l li i d MEQ



CRÉPUQ. (2007). Lettre de Mme Heather Monroe-Blum, présidente de la CRÉPUQ, à Mme Michelle Courchesne, ministre de l'Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport (dans le cadre de laconsultation sur les frais institutionnels obligatoires, le 5 octobre 2007). Montréal.

CSN. (2007). Mémoire présenté à la ministre de l'Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport dans le cadrede la consultation sur les frais institutionnels obligatoires dans les universités. Montréal :Confédération des syndicats nationaux.

CSQ. (2007). Le droit à l'éducation postsecondaire passe par une loi-cadre sur l'accessibilité auxétudes supérieures. Montréal : Centrale des syndicats du Québec.

Descary, P. (2009). Modalités de désistement des cotisations automatiques non obligatoires. Montréal : Bureau de l'Ombudsman (Université de Montréal).

Desrosiers, J.-Y. (2002). Étude sur les frais autres que les droits de scolarité dans les universitésquébécoises. Québec : ministère de l'Éducation du Québec.

FAÉCUM. (2008). FIO : l'UdM rentre dans les rangs! Montréal : Fédération desassociations étudiantes du campus de l'Université de Montréal

[http://www.faecum.qc.ca/main.cfm?p=00_200&ID=67, consulté le 17 juillet 2009]FAÉCUM. (2007). Mémoire sur les frais supplémentaires facturées aux étudiants par les

universités québécoises et du G13. Montréal : Fédération des associations étudiantesdu campus de l'Université de Montréal.

FAEUQEP. (2007). Les frais institutionnels obligatoires des universités dans une perspective de gratuité scolaire. Montréal : Fédération des associations étudiantes universitairesquébécoises en éducation permanente.

FECQ. (2007). Avis sur l'encadrement des frais afférents universitaires. Montréal : Fédérationétudiante collégiale du Québec.



FEUQ. (2007). Mémoire sur les frais afférents ou frais institutionnels obligatoires de toutenature. Montréal : Fédération étudiante universitaire du Québec.

FEUQ. (2008). Frais afférents chargés par les universités: la ministre stoppe l'hémorragie, maisdu chemin reste à faire. Montréal : Fédération étudiante universitaire du Québec[http://www.feuq.qc.ca/index.php?lang=fr&section=actualite&nid=475, consultéle 18 juillet 2009]

FEUS. (2007). Les frais afférents à la fréquentation universitaire. Sherbrooke : Fédérationétudiante de l'Université de Sherbrooke.

FNEEQ-CSN. (2007). À propos de l'encadrement des frais institutionnels obligatoires imposésdans les universités. Montréal : Fédération nationale des enseignantes et desenseignants du Québec de la Confédération des syndicats nationaux.

FQPPU. (2007). Une fausse solution locale à un problème global. Montréal : Fédérationquébécoise des professeures et professeurs d'université.

Gougeon, É. (2003). Panorama des frais afférents à l'UQAM pour l'année 2002-2003.

Montréal : Associations étudiantes facultaires de l'UQAM.Gouvernement du Québec. (2009a). Loi sur l'accréditation et le financement des associations

d'élèves ou d'étudiants (L.R.Q. A-3.01). Québec : Gouvernement du Québec[http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/dynamicSearch/telecharge.php?type=2&file=/A_3_01/A3_01.html, consulté le 18 juillet 2009]

Gouvernement du Québec. (2009b). Règlement sur l'aide financière aux études (L.R.Q. A13-3, r. 1). Québec : Gouvernement du Québec[http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/dynamicSearch/telecharge.php?type=3&file=/A_13_3/A13_3R1.HTM, consulté le 19 juillet 2009]

MELS (2002) D t d' d t l d it it t d l' ti l 24 5 d l



MELS. (2008a). Les frais institutionnels obligatoires seront dorénavant réglementés. Québec :ministère de l'Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport[http://communiques.gouv.qc.ca/gouvqc/communiques/GPQF/Fevrier2008/15/c2852.html, consulté le 15 juillet 2009]

MELS. (2008b). Prévisions de l'effectif étudiant en équivalence au temps plein dans lesuniversités du Québec pour les années 2008-2009 à 2022-2023. Québec : ministère del'Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport[http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/sections/publications/index.asp?page=previsions_univ, consulté le 14 juillet 2009]

MELS. (2008c). Règles budgétaires et calcul des subventions de fonctionnement aux universitésdu Québec pour l'année universitaire 2008-2009. Québec : ministère de l'Éducation, duLoisir et du Sport [http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/ens-sup/ftp/Regl0809.pdf,consulté le 25 juin 2009]

MELS. (2003-2008). Statistiques de l'Éducation - Éditions 2003 à 2008. Secteur del'information, des communications et de l'administration. Québec : ministère del'Éducation du Loisir et du Sport.

MELS. (2009). Hausse maximale des frais institutionnels obligatoires (FIO) au trimestre d'été etaux trimestres d'automne et d'hiver. Québec : ministère de l'Éducation, du Loisir etdu Sport, Secteur de l'enseignement supérieur.

PLQ. (2007). S'unir pour réussir le Québec de demain - Plate-forme électorale. Montréal : Partilibéral du Québec.

RÉFAEC. (2007). Avis sur la gestion des frais institutionnels obligatoires. Montréal :Regroupement étudiant des facultés d'administration de l'Est du Canada.

REMDUS. (2007). Pour l'adoption d'une loi cadre concernant les frais afférents. Sherbrooke :R d é di d î i d di lô d d d l'U i i é



Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fédération étudiante universitaire du Québec - 2011

1

Annexe I - Détail des frais automatiques par session

Pour les fins de cette compilation, les trois profils d’étudiants mentionnés à la section Erreur ! Source du renvoiintrouvable. ont été utilisés, soit :

Étudiant au baccalauréat, inscrit à 15 crédits par session, été, automne et hiver.

Étudiant aux cycles supérieurs, inscrit à 15 crédits par session, été, automne et hiver.

Étudiant inscrit en rédaction, à temps plein (aucun crédit de cours).

Seuls les frais à portée universitaire, soit ceux appliqués à l’échelle d’un campus, ont été recensés. Les variationsprésentées sont calculées sur la base de la session correspondante de l’année précédente.

1. Bishop’s

1.1. Étudiants au baccalauréat

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais

Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut.

Facturés parsession

RegistrationFee N/D 40,00 $ 40,00 $ N/D 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 30,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ N/D N/D N/D

StudentServices N/D 340,50 $ 340,50 $ N/D 340,50 $ 340,50 $ - $ 457,50 $ 457,50 $ N/D 467,00 $ 467,00 $

Facturés parcrédit

CopyrightFees N/D 0,00 $ 0,00 $ N/D 0,68 $ 0,68 $ 0,73 $ 0,78 $ 0,78 $ N/D 0,81 $ 0,81 $

Total FIO – 15crédits N/D 380,50 $ 380,50 $ N/D 390,70 $ 390,70 $ 40,95 $ 469,20 $ 469,20 $ N / D 479,15 $ 479,15 $

Variation ($) 10,20 $ 10,20 $ N/D 78,50 $ 78,50 $ N/D 9,95 $ 9,95 $

Variation (%) 2,68% 2,68% N/D 20,09% 20,09% N/D 2,12% 2,12%




2

1.2. Sources

Bishop’s University. 2010-2011 fees. [http://www.ubishops.ca/school-fees/details-list-of-fees-academic-calendar.htmlconsulté le 16 janvier 2011]

Bishop’s University. Academic Calendar 2008-2009 – Fees. [http://www.ubishops.ca/academic/cal005.html, consulté le 22

juin 2009]

Bishop’s University. 2010-2011 fees. [http://www.ubishops.ca/school-fees/details-list-of-fees-academic-calendar.htmlconsulté le 16 janvier 2011]

2. Concordia

2.1. Étudiants au baccalauréat et aux cycles supérieursListe des

frais 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011


Facturés par session

RegistrationFee 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 25,00 $ 25,00 $ 25,00 $

Facturés par crédit

AdministrativeFee 9,00 $ 9,00 $ 9,00 $ 9,00 $ 9,00 $ 9,00 $ 9,00 $ 9,00 $ 9,00 $ 9,18 $ 9,18 $ 9,18 $

StudentService Fee 9,95 $ 9,95 $ 9,95 $ 10,26 $ 10,26 $ 10,26 $ 10,26 $ 10,26 $ 10,26 $ 10,26 $ 10,26 $ 10,26 $Recreation &Athletics Fee 2,85 $ 2,85 $ 2,85 $ 2,92 $ 2,92 $ 2,92 $ 2,92 $ 2,92 $ 2,92 $ 2,92 $ 2,92 $ 2,92 $

InformationTechnologyFee

4,00 $ 4,00 $ 4,00 $ 4,08 $ 4,08 $ 4,08 $ 4,16 $ 4,16 $ 4,16 $ 4,40 $ 4,40 $ 4,40 $

Copyright Fee 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,80 $ 0,80 $ 0,80 $ 0,85 $ 0,85 $ 0,85 $ 0,88 $ 0,88 $ 0,88 $




3

Total FIO – 15 crédits 418,25 $ 418,25 $ 418,25 $ 426,00 $ 426,00 $ 426,00 $ 427,85 $ 427,85 $ 427,85 $ 439,96 $ 439,96 $ 439,96 $

Variation ($) 7,75 $ 7,75 $ 7,75 $ 1,85 $ 1,85 $ 1,85 $ 12,11 $ 12,11 $ 12,11 $

Variation (%) 1,85% 1,85% 1,85% 0,04% 0,04% 0,04% 2,83% 2,83% 2,83%

2.2. Étudiants au statut de rédaction (Continuation)

Note : à partir du 7e trimestre à la maîtrise et du 13e trimestre au doctorat (pour un étudiant à temps plein)

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



ContinuationFee 400,00 $ 400,00 $ 400,00 $ 400,00 $ 400,00 $ 400,00 $ 400,00 $ 400,00 $ 400,00 $ 400,00 $ 400,00 $ 400,00 $

Registration

Fee 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 25,00 $ 25,00 $ 25,00 $Total FIO – 15crédits 420,00 $ 420,00 $ 420,00 $ 420,00 $ 420,00 $ 420,00 $ 420,00 $ 420,00 $ 420,00 $ 425,00 $ 425,00 $ 425,00 $

Variation ($) 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 5,00 $ 5,00 $ 5,00 $

Variation (%) 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 1,19 % 1,19 % 1,19 %

2.3. Étudiants au statut de rédaction (Time-Limit Extension)





4

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



Time-LimitExtension Fee 600,00 $ 600,00 $ 600,00 $ 600,00 $ 600,00 $ 600,00 $ 600,00 $ 600,00 $ 600,00 $ 600,00 $ 600,00 $ 600,00 $

RegistrationFee 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 25,00 $ 25,00 $ 25,00 $

Total FIO – 15crédits 620,00 $ 620,00 $ 620,00 $ 620,00 $ 620,00 $ 620,00 $ 620,00 $ 620,00 $ 620,00 $ 625,00 $ 625,00 $ 625,00 $

Variation ($) 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 5,00 $ 5,00 $ 5,00 $

Variation (%) 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,81% 0,81% 0,81%

2.4. Sources

Concordia University. Financial Regulations and fees undergraduate programs.[http://tuitionandfees.concordia.ca, consulté le 16 janvier 2011]

Concordia University. Financial Regulations and fees for Master’s & PhD degree programs.[http://tuitionandfees.concordia.ca, consulté le 16 janvier 2011]




5

3. École nationale d’administration publique

3.1. Étudiants aux cycles supérieurs

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



Frais généraux N/D 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $

Facturés par crédit

Services auxétudiants N/D 3,27 $ 3,27 $ 3,27 $ 3,27 $ 3,27 $ 3,27 $ 3,27 $ 3,27 $ 3,27 $ 3,27 $ 3,27 $

Droitsd'auteur N/D 0,65 $ 0,65 $ 0,65 $ 0,65 $ 0,65 $ 0,65 $ 0,65 $ 0,65 $ 0,65 $ 0,65 $ 0,65 $

Fraistechnologiques N/D 2,00 $ 2,00 $ 2,00 $ 2,80 $ 2,00 $ 2,00 $ 2,00 $ 2,80 $ 2,80 $ 2,80 $ 2,80 $

Total FIO – 15crédits

N/D 128,80 $ 128,80 $ 128,80 $ 128,80 $ 140,80 $ 128,80 $ 128,80 $ 140,80 $ 140,80 $ 140,80 $ 140,80 $

Variation ($) N/D 12,00 $ 0,00 $ N/D 0,00 $ 12,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $

Variation (%) N/D 9,32 % 0,00% N/D 0 % 9,32 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 %

3.2. Étudiants au statut de rédaction

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



Frais de

rédaction

N/D N/D N/D N/D 250,00 $ 300,00 $ 300,00 $ 300,00 $ 300,00 $ 300,00 $ 300,00 $ 300,00 $

Services auxétudiants

N/D N/D N/D N/D 32,70 $ 32,70 $ 32,70 $ 32,70 $ 32,70 $ 32,70 $ 32,70 $ 32,70 $

Frais générauxN/D N/D N/D N/D 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $


N/D N/D N/D N/D 322,70 $ 372,70 $ 372,70 $ 372,70 $ 372,70 $ 372,70 $ 372,70 $ 372,70 $




6

Variation ($)N/D N/D 50,00 $ N/D N/D N/D 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $

Variation (%)N/D N/D 15,49% N/D N/D N/D 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%

3.3. SourcesÉNAP. Guichet étudiant > Frais d’études. [http://www.enap.uquebec.ca/enap/fr/guichet2008.aspx?sortcode=1.33.33.46,consulté le 16 juin 2009]

ÉNAP, [http:/www.enap.ca/enap/421/frais_d’etudes.enap, consulté le 16 janvier 2011]

4. École de technologie supérieure

4.1. Étudiants au baccalauréat et aux cycles supérieurs

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

Liste des frais Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut.


Frais généraux N/D 27,50 $ 27,50 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $

Services auxétudiants 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 34,00 $ 34,00 $ 34,00 $ 34,00 $ 34,00 $ 34,00 $ 34,00 $ 34,00 $ 34,00 $

Service dessports 15,00 $ 15,00 $ 15,00 $ 15,00 $ 15,00 $ 15,00 $ 15,00 $ 15,00 $ 15,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $

Facturés par

créditServices auxétudiants 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $


Droit d'auteur 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $




7

Total FIO – 15crédits N/D 156,50 $ 156,50 $ 173,00 $ 173,00 $ 173,00 $ 173,00 $ 173,00 $ 173,00 $ 189,25 $ 189,25 $ 189,25 $

Variation ($) N/D 16,50 $ 16,50 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 16,25 $ 16,25 $ 16,25 $

Variation (%) N/D 10,54% 10,54% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 9,39% 9,39% 9,39%

4.2.

Étudiants au statut de rédaction2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

Liste des fraisÉté Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut.

Facturés par session

Frais derédaction 70,00 $ 70,00 $ 70,00 $ 70,00 $ 70,00 $ 70,00 $ 70,00 $ 70,00 $ 70,00 $ 70,00 $ 70,00 $ 70,00 $

Frais généraux 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $


Facturés par créditServices auxétudiants 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $


Droit d'auteur 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $


Variation ($) N/D 4,00 $ 4,00 $ 4,00 $ - $ - $ - $ 11,25 $ 11,25 $ 11,25 $

Variation (%) 2,86% 2,86% 2,86% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 4,93% 4,93% 4,93%

4.3. Sources

ÉTS. Bureau du registraire – Coût des études. [http://www.etsmtl.ca/zone2/administration/registraire/couts.html, consultéle 16 juin 2009]

ÉTS, Futurs étudiants – Coût des études. [http://www.etsmtl.ca/Futurs-etudiants/Baccalaureat/Cout-financement/combien/Cout-etudes-trimestre#frais, consulté le 16 janvier 2011]




8

5. École des Hautes études commerciales


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



Frais généraux 36,00 $ 36,00 $ 36,00 $ 36,00 $ 36,50 $ 36,50 $ 36,94 $ 36,94 $ 36,94 $ 37,42 $ 37,42 $ 37,42 $


Fraistechnologiques 10,00 $ 10,00 $ 10,00 $ 10,00 $ 11,00 $ 11,00 $ 12,00 $ 12,00 $ 12,00 $ 13,00 $ 13,00 $ 13,00 $


Copibec 0,71 $ 0,71 $ 0,71 $ 0,71 $ 0,78 $ 0,78 $ 0,78 $ 0,78 $ 0,78 $ 0,86 $ 0,86 $ 0,86 $Feuillesmobiles 0,55 $ 0,55 $ 0,55 $ 0,55 $ 0,55 $ 0,55 $ 0,10 $ 0,10 $ 0,10 $ 0,10 $ 0,10 $ 0,10 $

Encadrementet promotion 4,00 $ 4,00 $ 4,00 $ 4,00 $ 4,06 $ 4,06 $ 4,11 $ 4,11 $ 4,11 $ 4,16 $ 4,16 $ 4,16 $


Variation ($) 19,55 $ 19,55 $ 19,55 $ 11,24 $ 11,24 $ 11,24 $ 19,38 $ 19,38 $ 19,38 $

Variation (%) 4,76% 4,76% 4,76% 2,61% 2,61% 2,61% 4,39% 4,39% 4,39%

5.2.

Étudiants à la maîtrise ès Sciences de la gestion2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011



Frais généraux 36,00 $ 36,00 $ 36,00 $ 36,50 $ 36,50 $ 36,50 $ 36,94 $ 36,94 $ 36,94 $ 37,42 $ 37,42 $ 37,42 $




9




Copibec 3,73 $ 3,73 $ 3,73 $ 4,10 $ 4,10 $ 4,10 $ 4,10 $ 4,10 $ 4,10 $ 4,50 $ 4,50 $ 4,50 $

Feuillesmobiles 2,89 $ 2,89 $ 2,89 $ 2,89 $ 2,89 $ 2,89 $ 0,53 $ 0,53 $ 0,53 $ 1,50 $ 1,50 $ 1,50 $


Variation ($) 10,11 $ 10,95 $ 10,95 $ 7,08 $ 7,79 $ 7,79 $ 34,39 $ 35,16 $ 35,16 $

Variation (%) 4,16% 3,63% 3,63% 2,79% 2,49% 2,49% 13,20% 10,98% 10,98%

5.3. Étudiants au doctorat2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011



Frais généraux 36,00 $ 36,00 $ 36,00 $ 36,50 $ 36,50 $ 36,50 $ 36,94 $ 36,94 $ 36,94 $ 37,42 $ 37,42 $ 37,42 $


Services aux

étudiants58,20 $ 116,40 $ 116,40 $ 59,04 $ 118,08 $ 118,08 $ 59,75 $ 119,50 $ 119,50 $ 60,53 $ 121,05 $ 121,05 $


Copibec 3,55 $ 3,55 $ 3,55 $ 3,90 $ 3,90 $ 3,90 $ 3,90 $ 3,90 $ 3,90 $ 4,50 $ 4,50 $ 4,50 $

Feuillesmobiles 2,75 $ 2,75 $ 2,75 $ 2,75 $ 2,75 $ 2,75 $ 0,50 $ 0,50 $ 0,50 $ 0,50 $ 0,50 $ 0,50 $





10

Variation ($) 10,09 $ 10,93 $ 10,93 $ 7,19 $ 7,90 $ 7,90 $ 10,26 $ 11,03 $ 11,03 $

Variation (%) 4,15% 3,63% 3,63% 2,84% 2,53% 2,53% 3,94% 3,45% 3,45%

5.4. Étudiants au statut de rédaction (Maîtrise)

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des fraisÉté Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut.



Frais généraux 36,00 $ 36,00 $ 36,00 $ 36,50 $ 36,50 $ 36,50 $ 36,94 $ 36,94 $ 36,94 $ 37,72 $ 37,72 $ 37,72 $


Services aux

étudiants

58,20 $ 116,40 $ 116,40 $ 59,04 $ 118,08 $ 118,08 $ 59,75 $ 119,50 $ 119,50 $ 60,53 $ 121,05 $ 121,05 $


Copibec - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,30 $ 4,30 $ 4,30 $


Variation ($) 9,74 $ 10,58 $ 10,58 $ 9,44 $ 10,15 $ 10,15 $ 14,26 $ 15,03 $ 15,03 $

Variation (%) 1,53% 1,52% 1,52% 1,46% 1,44% 1,44% 2,17% 2,10% 2,10%

5.5. Étudiants au statut de rédaction (Doctorat)

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais




Frais généraux 36,00 $ 36,00 $ 36,00 $ 36,50 $ 36,50 $ 36,50 $ 36,94 $ 36,94 $ 36,94 $ 37,72 $ 37,72 $ 37,72 $




11




Copibec - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,30 $ 4,30 $ 4,30 $


Variation ($) 9,74 $ 10,58 $ 10,58 $ 9,44 $ 10,15 $ 10,15 $ 14,26 $ 15,03 $ 15,03 $

Variation (%) 1,24% 1,25% 1,25% 1,19% 1,19% 1,19% 1,77% 1,74% 1,74%

5.6. Sources

HEC Montréal. Financer sa maîtrise. [http://www.hec.ca/programmes_formations/msc/frais_bourses/index.html,

consulté le 23 juin 2009]HEC Montréal. Financer votre B.A.A. HEC Montréal.[http://www.hec.ca/programmes_formations/baa/frais_bourses/index.html, consulté le 23 juin 2009]

HEC Montréal. Ph. D. en administration – Frais de scolarité .[http://www.hec.ca/programmes_formations/phd/financer_frais_scolarite/index.html, consulté le 23 juin 2009]

HEC Montréal. Frais de scolarité. HEC Montréal. [http://www.hec.ca/etudiant_actuel/financer/frais_scolarite/index.html,consulté le 19 janvier 2011]

6. Institut national de la recherche scientifique


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais





12


Fraisgénéraux 20,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $

Servicesauxétudiants

- $ 25,55 $ 25,55 $ 25,55 $ 25,55 $ 25,55 $ 25,55 $ 25,55 $ 25,55 $ 25,55 $ 50,00 $ 50,00 $

Total FIO –15 crédits 20,00 $ 65,55 $ 65,55 $ 65,55 $ 65,55 $ 65,55 $ 65,55 $ 65,55 $ 65,55 $ 65,55 $ 90,00 $ 90,00 $

Variation ($) 45,55 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 24,45 $ 24,45 $

Variation (%) 227,75% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 37,30% 37,30%

6.2. Étudiants en rédaction

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais

Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut.Facturés parsession


Fraisgénéraux 20,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $


- $ 25,55 $ 25,55 $ 25,55 $ 25,55 $ 25,55 $ 25,55 $ 25,55 $ 25,55 $ 25,55 $ 50,00 $ 50,00 $

Total FIO –

15 crédits

90,00 $ 185,55 $ 235,55 $ 285,55 $ 335,55 $ 365,55 $ 365,55 $ 365,55 $ 365,55 $ 365,55 $ 390,00 $ 390,00 $

Variation ($) 195,55 $ 150,00 $ 130,00 $ 80,00 $ 30,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 24,45 $ 24,45 $

Variation (%) 217,28% 80,84% 55,19% 28,02% 8,94% 0,00% 0,00% 6,69% 6,69%




13

6.3. Sources

INRS. Conseil d’administration - Résolution 326A-2007-2754. [http://ceisme.inrs-emt.homelinux.net/wiki/images/3/36/Frais_INRS.pdf, consulté le 19 juin 2009]

INRS. Frais de scolarité et autres frais :

Hiver 2008 : www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-H08.pdf, consulté le 16 juin 2009.

Été 2008 : www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-E08.pdf, consulté le 16 juin 2009.

Automne 2008 : www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-A08.rtf, consulté le 16 juin 2009.

Hiver 2009 : www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-H09.rtf, consulté le 16 juin 2009.

Été 2009 : www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-E09.rtf, consulté le 16 juin 2009.

Automne 2009 : http://www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-A09.rtf, consulté le 16 juin 2009.

Hiver 2011 : www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-H11.rtf, consulté le 16 janvier 2011.

Été 2010 : www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-E10.rtf, consulté le 16 janvier 2011.

Automne 2010 : http://www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-A10.rtf, consulté le 16 janvier 2011.

7. Université Laval


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais


Frais afférents 56,76 $ 121,80 $ 121,80 $ 68,76 $ 133,80 $ 133,80 $ 68,76 $ 139,08 $ 139,08 $ 68,76 $ 141,48 $ 141,48 $


Frais degestion 2,50 $ 4,50 $ 4,50 $ 2,25 $ 4,50 $ 4,50 $ 2,25 $ 4,88 $ 4,88 $ 3,08 $ 5,55 $ 5,55 $




14


Module degestion desétudes

1,65 $ 1,65 $ 1,65 $ 1,65 $ 1,65 $ 1,65 $ 1,65 $ 1,65 $ 1,65 $


Variation ($) 21,00 $ 24,75 $ 24,75 $ 0,00 $ 10,98 $ 10,98 $ 12,45 $ 12,45 $ 12,45 $

Variation (%) 17,65% 11,56% 11,56% 0,00% 4,60% 4,60% 8,89% 4,98% 4,98%


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais


Facturés par

sessionFrais afférents 56,76 $ 121,80 $ 121,80 $ 68,76 $ 133,80 $ 133,80 $ 68,76 $ 139,08 $ 139,08 $ 68,76 $ 141,48 $ 141,48 $


Frais degestion 2,50 $ 4,50 $ 4,50 $ 2,25 $ 4,50 $ 4,50 $ 2,25 $ 4,88 $ 4,88 $ 3,08 $ 5,55 $ 5,55 $



1,65 $ 1,65 $ 1,65 $ 1,65 $ 1,65 $ 1,65 $ 1,65 $ 1,65 $ 1,65 $


Variation ($) 21,00 $ 24,75 $ 24,75 $ 0,00 $ 10,98 $ 10,98 $ 12,45 $ 12,45 $ 12,45 $

Variation (%) 17,65% 11,56% 11,56% 0,00% 4,60% 4,60% 8,89% 4,98% 4,98%




15

7.2. Étudiants au statut de rédaction aux cycles supérieurs

Note : à partir du 5e trimestre à la maîtrise et du 9e trimestre au doctorat (pour un étudiant à temps plein jusqu’à l’année2009-2010 et pour la première session de maîtrise tout comme les deux premières sessions au doctorat en 2010-2011)

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



Frais derédaction I 108,00 $ 108,00 $ 108,00 $ 108,00 $ 108,00 $ 108,00 $ 108,00 $ 108,00 $ 108,00 $ 108,00 $ 108,00 $ 108,00 $

Fraisafférents 56,76 $ 121,80 $ 121,80 $ 68,76 $ 133,80 $ 133,80 $ 68,76 $ 139,08 $ 139,08 $ 68,76 $ 141,48 $ 141,48 $

Frais degestion 30,00 $ 54,00 $ 54,00 $ 27,00 $ 54,00 $ 54,00 $ 27,00 $ 58,56 $ 58,56 $ 36,96 $ 66,60 $ 66,60 $

Frais

technologiques 19,80 $ 19,80 $ 19,80 $ 10,20 $ 10,20 $ 10,20 $ 10,20 $ 10,20 $ 10,20 $ 10,20 $ 10,20 $ 10,20 $


19,80 $ 19,80 $ 19,80 $ 19,80 $ 19,80 $ 19,80 $ 19,80 $ 19,80 $ 19,80 $


Variation ($) 19,20 $ 22,20 $ 22,20 $ 0,00 $ 9,84 $ 9,84 $ 9,96 $ 10,44 $ 10,44 $

Variation (%) 8,95% 7,31% 7,31% 0,00% 3,02% 3,02% 4,26% 3,11% 3,11%


Note : à partir du 6e trimestre à la maîtrise et du 11e trimestre au doctorat (pour un étudiant à temps plein jusqu’en 2009-2010 et pour l’ensemble des cycles supérieurs à la suite de la première session à la maîtrise et de la deuxième session audoctorat en 2010-2011)

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais






16

Frais derédaction I 334,00 $ 334,00 $ 334,00 $ 334,00 $ 334,00 $ 334,00 $ 334,00 $ 334,00 $ 334,00 $ 334,00 $ 334,00 $ 334,00 $

Frais afférents 56,76 $ 121,80 $ 121,80 $ 68,76 $ 133,80 $ 133,80 $ 68,76 $ 139,08 $ 139,08 $ 68,76 $ 141,48 $ 141,48 $

Frais degestion 30,00 $ 54,00 $ 54,00 $ 27,00 $ 54,00 $ 54,00 $ 27,00 $ 58,56 $ 58,56 $ 36,96 $ 66,60 $ 66,60 $



19,80 $ 19,80 $ 19,80 $ 19,80 $ 19,80 $ 19,80 $ 19,80 $ 19,80 $ 19,80 $


Variation ($) 19,20 $ 22,20 $ 22,20 $ 0,00 $ 9,84 $ 9,84 $ 9,96 $ 10,44 $ 10,44 $

Variation (%) 4,36% 4,19% 4,19% 0,00% 1,78% 1,78% 2,17% 1,86% 1,86%




17

7.4. Sources

Université Laval. Calcul des droits de scolarité et autres frais.[http://www.sf.ulaval.ca/droitsscolarites/calcul_des_droits.htm, consulté le 16 juin 2009]

Université Laval. Droits de scolarité Automne 2006 – Hiver 2007. [http://www.sf.ulaval.ca/pdf/scol_que_authiv_0607.pdf,

consulté le 16 juin 2009]Université Laval. Droits de scolarité Automne 2007 – Hiver 2008. [http://www.sf.ulaval.ca/pdf/scol_que_authiv_0708.pdf,consulté le 16 juin 2009]

Université Laval. Calcul des droits de scolarité et autres frais.[http://www.sf.ulaval.ca/droitsscolarites/calcul_des_droits.htm, consulté le 18 janvier 2009]

Université Laval. Calcul des droits de scolarité et autres frais.[http://www.sf.ulaval.ca/droitsscolarites/calcul_des_droits.htm, consulté le 22 janvier 2011]

8. Université McGill


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



StudentServices Fee - $ 115,50 $ 115,50 $ - $ 125,50 $ 125,50 $ - $ 133,00 $ 133,00 $ - $ 133,00 $ 133,00 $

AthleticsandRecreationFee

- $ 107,00 $ 107,00 $ - $ 114,00 $ 114,00 $ - $ 119,00 $ 119,00 $ - $ 120,50 $ 120,50 $


Registration 6,78 $ 6,90 $ 6,90 $ 6,90 $ 7,04 $ 7,04 $ 7,04 $ 7,18 $ 7,18 $ 7,18 $ 7,18 $ 7,18 $




18

InformationTechnology 6,62 $ 6,74 $ 6,74 $ 6,74 $ 6,87 $ 6,87 $ 6,87 $ 7,01 $ 7,01 $ 7,01 $ 7,01 $ 7,01 $

TranscriptandDiploma

1,20 $ 1,22 $ 1,22 $ 1,22 $ 1,25 $ 1,25 $ 1,25 $ 1,28 $ 1,28 $ 1,28 $ 1,28 $ 1,28 $

CopyrightFee 0,66 $ 0,73 $ 0,73 $ 0,73 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,83 $ 0,83 $ 0,83 $ 0,83 $ 0,83 $


228,90$ 456,35 $ 456,35 $ 233,85 $ 478,15 $ 478,15 $ 238,65

$ 496,50 $ 496,50 $ 244,50 $ 498,00 $ 498,00 $

Variation ($) 4,95 $ 21,80 $ 21,80 $ 4,80 $ 18,35 $ 18,35 $ 5,85 $ 1,50 $ 1,50 $

Variation (%) 2,16% 4,78% 4,78% 2,05% 3,84% 3,84% 2,45% 0,30% 0,30%

8.2. Étudiants aux cycles supérieurs (programmes facturés par crédit)

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



Athletics andRecreation Fee - $ 107,00 $ 107,00 $ - $ 114,00 $ 114,00 $ - $ 114,00 $ 114,00 $ - $ 115,50 $ 115,50 $


Registration 6,78 $ 6,90 $ 6,90 $ 6,90 $ 7,04 $ 7,04 $ 7,04 $ 7,18 $ 7,18 $ 7,18 $ 7,18 $ 7,18 $


Transcript andDiploma 1,20 $ 1,22 $ 1,22 $ 1,22 $ 1,25 $ 1,25 $ 1,25 $ 1,28 $ 1,28 $ 1,28 $ 1,28 $ 1,28 $

Copyright Fee 0,66 $ 0,73 $ 0,73 $ 0,73 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,83 $ 0,83 $ 0,83 $ 0,83 $ 0,83 $


228,90$ 456,35 $ 456,35 $ 233,85 $ 478,15 $ 478,15 $ 238,65 $ 484,00 $ 484,00 $ 244,50 $ 485,50 $ 485,50 $

Variation ($) 4,95 $ 21,80 $ 21,80 $ 4,80 $ 5,85 $ 5,85 $ 5,85 $ 1,50 $ 1,50 $




19

Variation (%) 2,16% 4,78% 4,78% 2,05% 1,22% 1,22% 2,45% 0,31% 0,31%

8.3. Étudiants aux cycles supérieurs (programmes à facturation uniforme)

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011




AthleticsandRecreationFee

- $ 107,00 $ 107,00 $ - $ 114,00 $ 114,00 $ - $ 114,00 $ 114,00 $ - $ 115,50 $ 115,50 $

Registration 101,70 $ 103,50 $ 103,50 $ 103,50 $ 105,60 $ 105,60 $ 105,60 $ 107,70 $ 107,70 $ 107,70 $ 107,70 $ 107,70 $



18,00 $ 18,30 $ 18,30 $ 18,30 $ 18,75 $ 18,75 $ 18,75 $ 19,20 $ 19,20 $ 19,20 $ 19,20 $ 19,20 $

CopyrightFee 9,90 $ 10,95 $ 10,95 $ 10,95 $ 11,25 $ 11,25 $ 11,25 $ 12,45 $ 12,45 $ 12,45 $ 12,45 $ 12,45 $


Variation ($) 4,95 $ 21,80 $ 21,80 $ 4,80 $ 5,85 $ 5,85 $ 5,85 $ 1,50 $ 1,50 $

Variation (%) 2,16% 4,78% 4,78% 2,05% 1,22% 1,22% 2,45% 0,31% 0,31%


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais






20

AdditionnalSession /Non-thesisextension

- $ 884,00 $ 884,00 $ - $ 934,00 $ 934,00 $ - $ 984,00 $ 984,00 $ - $ 984,00 $ 984,00 $


Athletics

andRecreationFee

- $ 36,00 $ 36,00 $ - $ 38,00 $ 38,00 $ - $ 38,00 $ 38,00 $ - $ 38,50 $ 38,50 $

Registration - $ 103,50 $ 103,50 $ - $ 105,60 $ 105,60 $ - $ 107,70 $ 107,70 $ - $ 107,70 $ 107,70 $

InformationTechnology - $ 101,10 $ 101,10 $ - $ 103,50 $ 103,50 $ - $ 105,15 $ 105,15 $ - $ 105,15 $ 105,15 $


- $ 18,30 $ 18,30 $ - $ 18,75 $ 18,75 $ - $ 19,20 $ 19,20 $ - $ 19,20 $ 19,20 $

Total FIO – 15crédits - $ 1 180,90 $ 1 180,90 $ - $ 1 241,85 $ 1 241,85 $ - $ 1 296,05 $ 1 296,05 $ - $ 1 296,55 $ 1 296,55 $

Variation ($) - $ 60,95 $ 60,95 $ - $ 54,20 $ 54,20 $ - $ 0,50 $ 0,50 $

Variation (%) - 5,16% 5,16% - 4,36% 4,36% - 0,04% 0,04%

8.5. Sources

McGill University. Fee Information 2007-2008. [http://www.mcgill.ca/files/student-accounts/FeeInformationBooklet2007.pdf, consulté le 15 juin 2009]

McGill University. Fee Information 2008-2009. [http://www.mcgill.ca/files/student-accounts/FeeInformationBooklet2008.pdf, consulté le 15 juin 2009]

McGill University. 2007/2008 Fee Information Booklet – Addendum. [http://www.mcgill.ca/files/student-accounts/2007addendum.pdf, consulté le 15 juin 2009]

McGill University. 2008/2009 Fee Information Booklet – Addendum. [http://www.mcgill.ca/files/student-accounts/2008addendum.pdf, consulté le 15 juin 2009]




21

McGill University. Schedule of Fees – Summer 2009. [http://www.mcgill.ca/student-accounts/summerfees/, consulté le 15 juin 2009]

McGill University. Schedule of Fees 2009-2010. [http://www.mcgill.ca/student-accounts/fees/, consulté le 15 juin 2009]

McGill University. Tuition and fees; Summer 2010. [http://www.mcgill.ca/student-accounts/summerfees/, consulté le 20 janvier 2011]

McGill University. Schedule of Fees 2010-2011. [http://www.mcgill.ca/student-accounts/fees/, consulté le 20 janvier 2011]

9. École polytechnique de Montréal


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais


Services auxétudiants - $ 75,00 $ 75,00 $ 75,00 $ 75,00 $ 75,00 $ 87,65 $ 87,65 $ 87,65 $ 95,15 $ 95,15 $ 95,15 $

Fraistechnologiques - $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $

Droitsd'auteur - $ 10,00 $ 10,00 $ 12,75 $ 12,75 $ 12,75 $ 12,75 $ 12,75 $ 12,75 $ 12,75 $ 12,75 $ 12,75 $

Frais généraux - $ 55,00 $ 55,00 $ 62,25 $ 62,25 $ 62,25 $ 67,25 $ 67,25 $ 67,25 $ 72,25 $ 72,25 $ 72,25 $

Total FIO – 15crédits - $ 200,00 $ 200,00 $ 210,00 $ 210,00 $ 210,00 $ 227,65 $ 227,65 $ 227,65 $ 240,15 $ 240,15 $ 240,15 $

Variation ($) 210,00 $ 10,00 $ 10,00 $ 17,65 $ 17,65 $ 17,65 $ 12,50 $ 12,50 $ 12,50 $

Variation (%) - 5,00% 5,00% 8,40% 8,40% 8,40% 5,49% 5,49% 5,49%




22


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



Services auxétudiants - $ 75,00 $ 75,00 $ - $ 75,00 $ 75,00 $ - $ 87,65 $ 87,65 $ - $ 95,15 $ 95,15 $

Fraistechnologiques - $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $ - $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $ - $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $ - $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $

Droitsd'auteur - $ 10,00 $ 10,00 $ - $ 12,75 $ 12,75 $ - $ 12,75 $ 12,75 $ - $ 12,75 $ 12,75 $

Frais généraux - $ 55,00 $ 55,00 $ - $ 62,25 $ 62,25 $ - $ 67,25 $ 67,25 $ - $ 72,25 $ 72,25 $

Total FIO – 15crédits - $ 200,00 $ 200,00 $ - $ 210,00 $ 210,00 $ - $ 227,65 $ 227,65 $ - $ 240,15 $ 240,15 $

Variation ($) - $ 10,00 $ 10,00 $ - $ 17,65 $ 17,65 $ - $ 12,50 $ 12,50 $Variation (%) - 5,00% 5,00% - 8,40% 8,40% - 5,49% 5,49%


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



Frais de

rédaction 663,08 $ 663,08 $ 663,08 $ 700,54 $ 700,54 $ 700,54 $ 700,54 $ 700,54 $ 700,54 $ 700,54 $ 700,54 $ 700,54 $Services auxétudiants - $ 75,00 $ 75,00 $ - $ 75,00 $ 75,00 $ - $ 87,65 $ 87,65 $ - $ 95,15 $ 95,15 $

Fraistechnologiques - $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $ - $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $ - $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $ - $ 60,00 $ 60,00 $

Droitsd'auteur - $ 10,00 $ 10,00 $ - $ 12,75 $ 12,75 $ - $ 12,75 $ 12,75 $ - $ 12,75 $ 12,75 $

Frais généraux - $ 55,00 $ 55,00 $ - $ 62,25 $ 62,25 $ - $ 67,25 $ 67,25 $ - $ 72,25 $ 72,25 $




23


Variation ($) 37,46 $ 47,46 $ 47,46 $ 0,00 $ 17,65 $ 17,65 $ 0,00 $ 12,50 $ 12,50 $

Variation (%) 5,65% 5,50% 5,50% 0,00% 1,94% 1,94% 0,00% 1,35% 1,35%

9.4. Sources

École polytechnique de Montréal. Droits de scolarité – Études au premier cycle 2009-2010.[http://www.polymtl.ca/registrariat/docweb/Baccalaureat_DROITS_DE_SCOLARITE.pdf, consulté le 20 juillet 2009]

École polytechnique de Montréal. Droits de scolarité – Études supérieures 2009-2010.[http://www.polymtl.ca/registrariat/docweb/EtudesSuperieures_DROITS_DE_SCOLARITE.pdf, consulté le 20 juillet2009]

École polytechnique de Montréal. Droits de scolarité – Études au premier cycle 2008-2009.[http://www.polymtl.ca/registrariat/docweb/Baccalaureat_DROITS_DE_SCOLARITE.pdf, consulté le 15 juillet 2009]

École polytechnique de Montréal. Droits de scolarité – Études supérieures 2008-2009.[http://www.polymtl.ca/registrariat/docweb/EtudesSuperieures_DROITS_DE_SCOLARITE.pdf, consulté le 15 juin2009]

École polytechnique de Montréal. Droits de scolarité – Études au premier cycle 2007-2008.[http://www.polymtl.ca/registrariat/docweb/Baccalaureat_DROITS_DE_SCOLARITE.pdf, consulté le 15 juin 2009]

École polytechnique de Montréal. Droits de scolarité – Études supérieures 2007-2008.[http://www.polymtl.ca/registrariat/docweb/EtudesSuperieures_DROITS_DE_SCOLARITE.pdf, consulté le 15 juin

2009]École polytechnique de Montréal. Droits de scolarité – Études supérieures 2010-2011.[http://www.polymtl.ca/registrariat/frais/es.php, consulté le 22 janvier 2011]




24

10. Université de Montréal


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais




7,00 $ 7,00 $ 7,00 $ 7,00 $ 7,00 $ 7,00 $ 8,50 $ 8,50 $ 8,50 $ 8,50 $ 8,50 $ 8,50 $

Frais degestion 5,00 $ 5,00 $ 5,00 $ 6,67 $ 6,67 $ 6,67 $ 7,08 $ 7,08 $ 7,08 $ 7,86 $ 8,22 $ 7,77 $

Droitsd'auteur 0,38 $ 0,41 $ 0,41 $ 0,41 $ 0,46 $ 0,46 $ 0,46 $ 0,51 $ 0,51 $ 0,50 $ 0,55 $ 0,55 $


Variation ($) 25,50 $ 25,80 $ 25,80 $ 29,40 $ 29,40 $ 29,40 $ 12,30 $ 17,70 $ 10,95 $Variation (%) 13,73% 13,86% 13,86% 13,92% 13,87% 13,87% 5,11% 7,33% 4,54%


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



Servicesaux

étudiants

105,00 $ 105,00 $ 105,00 $ 105,00 $ 105,00 $ 105,00 $ 127,50 $ 127,50 $ 127,50 $ 127,50 $ 127,50 $ 127,50 $

Frais degestion 75,00 $ 75,00 $ 75,00 $ 100,05 $ 100,05 $ 100,05 $ 106,20 $ 106,20 $ 106,20 $ 117,90 $ 123,30 $ 116,55 $

Droitsd'auteur 5,70 $ 6,15 $ 6,15 $ 6,15 $ 6,90 $ 6,90 $ 6,90 $ 7,65 $ 7,65 $ 7,50 $ 8,25 $ 8,25 $


Variation ($) 25,50 $ 25,80 $ 25,80 $ 29,40 $ 29,40 $ 29,40 $ 12,30 $ 17,70 $ 10,95 $




25

Variation (%) 13,73% 13,86% 13,86% 13,92% 13,87% 13,87% 5,11% 7,33% 4,54%


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste desfrais Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut.




Variation ($) 0,00 $ 25,00 $ 25,00 $ 37,50 $ 12,50 $ 12,50 $ 25,00 $ 37,50 $ 12,50 $

Variation(%) 0,00% 8,01% 8,01% 12,02% 3,71% 3,71% 7,15% 10,73% 3,58%

10.4. Sources

Université de Montréal. Payer ses études – Autres frais exigibles. [http://www.etudes.umontreal.ca/payer-etudes/frais.html, consulté le 15 juin 2009]

Université de Montréal. Règlements relatif aux droits de scolarité et autres frais exigibles des étudiants (2009-2010).[http://www.direction.umontreal.ca/secgen/pdf/reglem/francais/sec_20/regl20_1.pdf, consulté le 15 juin 2009]

Université de Montréal. Règlements relatif aux droits de scolarité et autres frais exigibles des étudiants (2008-2009).[http://www.etudes.umontreal.ca/publications/annu_pdf/2008-2009/drscol.pdf, consulté le 15 juin 2009]

Université de Montréal. Règlements relatif aux droits de scolarité et autres frais exigibles des étudiants (2007-2008).[http://www.etudes.umontreal.ca/publications/annu_pdf/2007-2008/drscol.pdf, consulté le 15 juin 2009]

Université de Montréal. Renseignements généraux (2006-2007).[http://www.etudes.umontreal.ca/publications/annu_pdf/2006-2007/fesrgl.pdf, consulté le 19 juin 2009]




26

Université de Montréal. Payer ses études – Autres frais exigibles. [http://www.etudes.umontreal.ca/payer-etudes/frais.html, consulté le 22 janvier 2011]

11. Université du Québec à Chicoutimi


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



Frais généraux 20,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,64 $ 40,64 $ 40,64 $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $ 41,74 $ 41,74 $


Services aux

étudiants 3,15 $ 5,15 $ 5,15 $ 3,15 $ 5,23 $ 5,23 $ 3,20 $ 5,23 $ 5,23 $ 3,20 $ 5,23 $ 5,23 $Droitsd’auteur 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $



Variation ($) 80,00 $ 2,74 $ 2,74 $ 2,29 $ 2,20 $ 2,20 $ 2,20 $ 0,70 $ 0,70 $

Variation (%) 104,92% 1,47% 1,47% 1,47% 1,16% 1,16% 1,39% 0,37% 0,37%


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais







27

Fraisgénéraux 20,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,64 $ 40,64 $ 40,64 $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $


Variation ($) 150,00 $ 3,84 $ 3,84 $ 3,84 $ 0,85 $ 0,85 $ 0,85 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $

Variation (%) 166,67% 1,60% 1,60% 1,60% 0,35% 0,35% 0,35% 0,00% 0,00%

11.3. Sources

UQAC. Droits de scolarité et autres frais.[http://www.uqac.ca/direction_services/registraire/adm_inscriptions/frais_scolarite.php, consulté le 16 juin 2009]

UQAC. Droits de scolarité et autres frais.[http://www.uqac.ca/direction_services/registraire/adm_inscriptions/frais_scolarite.php, consulté le 22 janvier 2011]

12. Université du Québec à Montréal


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



Frais généraux 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,88 $ 40,88 $ 40,88 $ 49,00 $ 49,00 $ 49,00 $ 49,15 $ 62,20 $ 62,20 $

Centre sportif - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ - $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ - $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $


Services à lavie étudiante 3,45 $ 3,45 $ 3,45 $ 3,45 $ 3,45 $ 3,45 $ 3,45 $ 3,45 $ 3,45 $ 3,45 $ 3,45 $ 3,45 $


Centre sportif - $ 3,36 $ 3,36 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $




28


Variation ($) 62,23 $ 1,91 $ 1,91 $ 9,47 $ 9,47 $ 9,47 $ 0,30 $ 13,35 $ 13,35 $

Variation (%) 67,83% 0,99% 0,99% 6,15% 4,88% 4,88% 0,18% 6,56% 6,56%


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais




Fraisgénéraux 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,88 $ 40,88 $ 40,88 $ 49,00 $ 49,00 $ 49,00 $ 49,15 $ 62,20 $ 62,20 $


Variation ($) 7,48 $ 7,48 $ 7,48 $ 15,17 $ 15,17 $ 15,17 $ 1,09 $ 14,14 $ 14,14 $

Variation (%) 2,20% 2,20% 2,20% 4,37% 4,37% 4,37% 0,30% 3,90% 3,90%

12.3. Sources

UQAM. Droits de scolarité et autres frais. [http://www.unites.uqam.ca/ifinance/frais.html, consulté le 17 juin 2009]

UQAM. Droits de scolarité et autres frais. [http://www.servicesfinanciers.uqam.ca/droits-de-scolarite-et-autres-frais.html,consulté le 22 janvier 2011]

UQAM. Étudiants internationaux – Droits de scolarité et connexes pour un trimestre (2009-2010). [http://www.vie-etudiante.uqam.ca/etudiantsinternationaux/Documents/infos-frais-scolarite.pdf, consulté le 17 juin 2009]

Note : en 2007-2008, les frais associés au centre sportif étaient plafonnés à 12 crédits




29

13. Université du Québec à Rimouski

Il a été impossible d’obtenir de l’UQAR les barèmes de frais institutionnels obligatoires pour 2009-2010. Afin de brosser unportrait réaliste de la situation, une projection basée sur un scénario d’indexation à l’IPC (conformément à la procédureappliquée en 2008-2009) est présentée ici (taux de 2,09%, tel qu’appliqué à l’UQAC et à l’UQTR).


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



Frais généraux(partie fixe) - $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ - $ 40,64 $ 40,64 $ - $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $ 23,25 $ 23,25 $ 23,25 $

Vie étudiante 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,32 $ 20,32 $ 20,32 $ 20,74 $ 20,74 $ 20,74 $ 20,75 $ 20,75 $ 20,75 $


Frais généraux(partievariable)

- $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,25 $ 2,25 $ 2,25 $



Droitsd’auteur 0,78 $ 0,78 $ 0,78 $ 0,78 $ 0,78 $ 0,78 $ 0,80 $ 0,80 $ 0,80 $ 0,78 $ 0,78 $ 0,78 $


Variation ($) 1,82 $ 2,46 $ 2,46 $ 2,65 $ 3,50 $ 3,50 $ 67,83 $ 26,34 $ 26,34 $

Variation (%) 1,45% 1,49% 1,49% 2,09% 2,09% 2,09% 52,33% 15,39% 15,39%



Liste des frais 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011




30




Frais

généraux

- $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ - $ 40,64 $ 40,64 $ - $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $ - $ 23,25 $ 23,25 $

Cotisationà la vieétudiante

- $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,00 $ 5,00 $


Variation ($) 1,12 $ 1,76 $ 1,76 $ 1,49 $ 2,34 $ 2,34 $ 0,00 $ (13,24 $) (13,24 $)

Variation (%) 1,60% 1,60% 1,60% 2,09% 2,09% 2,09% 0,00% -11,60% -11,60%



2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais




Fraisgénéraux - $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ - $ 40,64 $ 40,64 $ - $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $ - $ 23,25 $ 23,25 $

Cotisationà la vieétudiante

- $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,00 $ 5,00 $


Variation ($) 3,20 $ 3,84 $ 3,84 $ 4,25 $ 5,10 $ 5,10 $ 0,02 $ (13,22 $) (13,22 $)

Variation (%) 1,60% 1,60% 1,60% 2,09% 2,09% 2,09% 0,01% -5,31% -5,31%




31

13.2. Sources

UQAR. Service des finances : Frais de scolarité . [http://www.uqar.uquebec.ca/services/finances/fraisScolarite/index.asp,consulté le 20 juin 2009]

UQAR. Service des finances : Frais de scolarité . [http://www.uqar.uquebec.ca/services/finances/fraisScolarite/index.asp,

consulté le 22 janvier 2011]

14. Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



Fraisd’inscription 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 42,50 $ 42,50 $ 42,50 $ 45,00 $ 45,00 $ 45,00 $

Vie étudiante 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $




Droitsd’auteur 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $


Variation ($) - $ 2,25 $ 2,25 $ 19,75 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,80 $ 17,80 $ 17,80 $

Variation (%) 0,00% 1,39% 1,39% 12,16% 10,63% 10,63% 9,77% 9,77% 9,77%




32

14.2. Étudiants aux cycles supérieurs (profil professionnel)

Note : à partir de l’année 2010-2011 les profils professionnel et recherche ont été distingués par l’administration del’UQAT autant sur le plan académique que dans la facturation.

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



Vie étudiante 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $




Droitsd’auteur 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $


Variation ($) - $ 2,25 $ 2,25 $ 19,75 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ (42,20 $) (42,20 $) (42,20 $)

Variation (%) 0,00% 1,01% 1,01% 8,88% 7,79% 7,79% -17,42% -17,42% -17,42%

14.3. Étudiants aux cycles supérieurs (profil recherche)

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais




Vie étudiante 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $




33




Droitsd’auteur 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,60 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $


Variation ($) - $ 2,25 $ 2,25 $ 19,75 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 32,80 $ 32,80 $ 32,80 $

Variation (%) 0,00% 1,01% 1,01% 8,88% 7,79% 7,79% 13,54% 13,54% 13,54%



2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais




Fraisd'inscription 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 42,50 $ 42,50 $ 42,50 $ 45,00 $ 45,00 $ 45,00 $

Vie étudiante 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $


Variation ($) - $ 180,00 $ 180,00 $ 182,50 $ 2,50 $ 2,50 $ 2,50 $ 2,50 $ 2,50 $

Variation (%) 0,00% 138,46% 138,46% 140,38% 0,81% 0,81% 0,80% 0,80% 0,80%




34

14.5. Sources

UQAT. Droits de scolarité . [http://www.uqat.ca/Repertoire/fraisdescolarite.asp, consulté le 17 juin 2009]

UQAT. Guide d’inscription 2008-2009. [http://www.uqat.ca/Repertoire/Telechargements/guide_inscrip.pdf, consulté le17 juin 2009]

UQAT. Droits de scolarité . [http://www.uqat.ca/etudes/admission/?menu=frais, consulté le 22 janvier 2011]

Informations transmises directement par le service des finances de l’UQAT : grilles de calcul des frais de scolarité et autrespour les années 2007-08, 2008-09 et 2009-10.




35

15. Université du Québec en Outaouais


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des fraisÉté Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut. Été Hiv. Aut.


Frais généraux 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $

Équipementssportifs 27,00 $ 27,00 $ 27,00 $ 27,00 $ 27,00 $ 27,00 $ 27,00 $ 27,00 $ 27,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $


Services aux

étudiants 4,31 $ 4,31 $ 4,31 $ 4,31 $ 4,31 $ 4,31 $ 4,31 $ 4,31 $ 4,31 $ 4,31 $ 4,31 $ 4,31 $Fraistechnologiques 4,00 $ 4,00 $ 4,00 $ 4,00 $ 4,00 $ 4,00 $ 4,00 $ 4,00 $ 4,00 $ 4,25 $ 4,25 $ 4,25 $

Droitsd’auteur 0,64 $ 0,64 $ 0,68 $ 0,73 $ 0,73 $ 0,73 $ 0,78 $ 0,78 $ 0,78 $ 0,85 $ 0,85 $ 0,85 $


Variation ($) 1,35 $ 1,35 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 0,75 $ 7,80 $ 7,80 $ 7,80 $

Variation (%) 0,67% 0,67% 0,37% 0,37% 0,37% 0,37% 3,84% 3,84% 3,84%


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais







36



Variation ($) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $

Variation (%) 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%

15.3. Sources

UQO. Règlement relatifs aux droits de scolarité et autres frais. [http://www.uqo.ca/direction-services/secretariat-general/politiques-reglements/documents/reglementfraisetudiantsoctobre2007.pdf, consulté le 17 juin 2009]

UQO. Simulation de frais de scolarité. [http://services.uqo.ca/SimulationFraisEnLigne/, consulté le 17 juin 2009]

UQO. Simulation de frais de scolarité. [http://services.uqo.ca/SimulationFraisEnLigne/, consulté le 22 janvier 2011]

Informations transmises directement par le service des finances de l’UQO : frais autres que les droits de scolarité, années2006-07 à 2009-10.

16. Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais


Facturés parsessionSAE - Vieétudiante 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $

SAE - Sports 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $

Frais généraux 20,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,64 $ 40,64 $ 40,64 $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $ 41,61 $ 41,61 $

Assuranceaccident 2,10 $ 2,10 $ 2,10 $ 2,10 $ 2,10 $ 2,10 $ 0,22 $ 0,22 $ 0,22 $ 0,22 $ 0,22 $ 0,22 $




37


Copibec 0,73 $ 0,73 $ 0,73 $ 0,73 $ 0,97 $ 0,97 $ 0,97 $ 1,03 $ 1,03 $ 1,03 $ 1,06 $ 1,06 $



Variation ($) 80,00 $ 5,14 $ 5,14 $ 3,26 $ 1,22 $ 1,22 $ 1,75 $ 0,57 $ 0,57 $

Variation (%) 85,98% 2,97% 2,97% 1,88% 0,68% 0,68% 0,99% 0,32% 0,32%


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011



SAE - Vieétudiante 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $

SAE - Sports 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,00 $

Frais généraux 20,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,64 $ 40,64 $ 40,64 $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $ 41,61 $ 41,61 $

Assuranceaccident 2,10 $ 2,10 $ 2,10 $ 2,10 $ 2,10 $ 2,10 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $


Copibec 0,73 $ 0,73 $ 0,73 $ 0,73 $ 0,97 $ 0,97 $ 0,97 $ 1,03 $ 1,03 $ 1,03 $ 1,06 $ 1,06 $


Total FIO – 15 93,05 $ 173,05 $ 173,05 $ 173,05 $ 178,19 $ 178,19 $ 176,09 $ 179,19 $ 179,19 $ 179,19 $ 179,91 $ 179,91 $




38

crédits

Variation ($) 80,00 $ 5,14 $ 5,14 $ 3,04 $ 1,00 $ 1,00 $ 3,10 $ 0,72 $ 0,72 $

Variation (%) 85,98% 2,97% 2,97% 1,76% 0,56% 0,56% 1,76% 0,40% 0,40%


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais




SAE - Vieétudiante 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $

SAE -Sports 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $

Frais

généraux

20,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,64 $ 40,64 $ 40,64 $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $ 41,61 $ 41,61 $

Assuranceaccident 2,10 $ 2,10 $ 2,10 $ 2,10 $ 2,10 $ 2,10 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $


Variation ($) 20,00 $ 0,64 $ 0,64 $ (1,46 $) (1,25 $) (1,25 $) 0,85 $ 0,12 $ 0,12 $

Variation (%) 15,74% 0,44% 0,44% -0,99% -0,85% -0,85% 0,58% 0,08% 0,08%

16.4. Sources

AGEUQTR. (2007). Mémoire sur les frais afférents. Trois-Rivières : Association générale des étudiants de l’Université duQuébec à Trois-Rivières.

UQTR. Calcul sommaire du coût d’un trimestre. [https://oraprdnt.uqtr.uquebec.ca/pls/public/finw006 , consulté le 17 juin2009]

UQTR. Calcul sommaire du coût d’un trimestre. [https://oraprdnt.uqtr.uquebec.ca/pls/public/finw006 , consulté le 22 janvier 2011]




39

17. Université de Sherbrooke


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais




Transport encommun - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,00 $ 27,00 $ 27,39 $



Service dusport et del’A.P.

2,69 $ 2,69 $ 2,69 $ 2,74 $ 2,74 $ 2,74 $ 2,79 $ 2,79 $ 2,79 $ 2,85 $ 2,85 $ 2,85 $

Droitsd'auteur 0,69 $ 0,69 $ 0,69 $ 0,74 $ 0,74 $ 0,74 $ 0,79 $ 0,79 $ 0,79 $ 0,82 $ 0,82 $ 0,82 $

Servicesadministratifs 2,70 $ 2,70 $ 2,70 $ 2,75 $ 2,75 $ 2,75 $ 2,81 $ 2,81 $ 2,81 $ 2,87 $ 2,87 $ 2,87 $


Variation ($) 3,75 $ 3,75 $ 3,75 $ 4,05 $ 4,05 $ 4,05 $ 18,90 $ 30,90 $ 31,29 $

Variation (%) 1,89% 1,89% 1,89% 2,00% 2,00% 2,00% 9,16% 14,98% 15,17%


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais






40


Transport encommun - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,00 $ 27,00 $ 27,39 $


Services à la

vie étudiante

5,15 $ 5,15 $ 5,15 $ 5,25 $ 5,25 $ 5,25 $ 5,36 $ 5,36 $ 5,36 $ 5,47 $ 5,47 $ 5,47 $


2,69 $ 2,69 $ 2,69 $ 2,74 $ 2,74 $ 2,74 $ 2,79 $ 2,79 $ 2,79 $ 2,85 $ 2,85 $ 2,85 $

Droitsd'auteur 0,69 $ 0,69 $ 0,69 $ 0,74 $ 0,74 $ 0,74 $ 0,79 $ 0,79 $ 0,79 $ 0,82 $ 0,82 $ 0,82 $



Variation ($) 3,75 $ 3,75 $ 3,75 $ 4,05 $ 4,05 $ 4,05 $ 18,00 $ 30,00 $ 30,39 $

Variation (%) 1,89% 1,89% 1,89% 2,00% 2,00% 2,00% 8,73% 14,55% 14,73%


2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais




Services àla vieétudiante

23,93 $ 23,93 $ 23,93 $ 24,41 $ 24,41 $ 24,41 $ 24,90 $ 24,90 $ 24,90 $ - $ - $ - $

Services àla vieétudiante

- $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,00 $ 27,00 $ 27,39 $


Variation ($) 0,48 $ 0,48 $ 0,48 $ 0,49 $ 0,49 $ 0,49 $ (9,90 $) 2,10 $ 2,49 $

Variation (%) 0,15% 0,15% 0,15% 0,15% 0,15% 0,15% -3,00% 0,64% 0,75%




41

17.4. Étudiant inscrit à un stage coopératif

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Liste des frais



Fraisd'inscription - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 315,00 $ 315,00 $ 315,00 $Transport encommun - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,00 $ 27,39 $ 27,39 $




2,69 $ 2,69 $ 2,69 $ 2,74 $ 2,74 $ 2,74 $ 2,79 $ 2,79 $ 2,79 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $

Droitsd'auteur 0,69 $ 0,69 $ 0,69 $ 0,74 $ 0,74 $ 0,74 $ 0,79 $ 0,79 $ 0,79 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $



Variation ($) 3,75 $ 3,75 $ 3,75 $ 4,05 $ 4,05 $ 4,05 $ 205,80 $ 218,19 $ 218,19 $

Variation (%) 1,89% 1,89% 1,89% 2,00% 2,00% 2,00% 99,78% 105,79% 105,79%

17.5. Sources

Université de Sherbrooke. Admission : coût des études. [http://www.usherbrooke.ca/admission/cout-des-etudes/, consultéle 18 juin 2009]

Université de Sherbrooke. Bureau de la registraire – Annuaires. [http://www.usherbrooke.ca/programmes/annuaire/,consulté le 18 juin 2009]

Université de Sherbrooke. Admission : coût des études. [http://www.usherbrooke.ca/admission/cout-des-etudes/etudiantes-et-etudiants-quebecois/, consulté le 22 janvier 2011]



Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable 42

Annexe II - Lettre du MELS