9
+ EM&V Planning and EM&V Issues 1 Kentucky PSC 9/11/09 Schiller Consulting, Inc.

EM&V Planning and EM&V Issues

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

EM&V Planning and EM&V Issues. Planning and the Program Implementation Cycle. Evaluation in Context: The Cycle of Program Planning and Implementation. Adapted by CEE from Pierre Landry, SCE, and Demand-Side Management, Vol. 4: Commercial Markets and Programs, EPRI, 1987. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: EM&V Planning and EM&V Issues

+EM&V Planning and EM&V Issues

1Kentucky PSC 9/11/09 Schiller Consulting, Inc.

Page 2: EM&V Planning and EM&V Issues

+Planning and the Program Implementation Cycle

2

Kentucky PSC 9/11/09 Schiller Consulting, Inc.

Page 3: EM&V Planning and EM&V Issues

+ Evaluation in Context:The Cycle of Program Planning

and Implementation

Adapted by CEE from Pierre Landry, SCE, and Demand-Side Management, Vol. 4: Commercial Markets and Programs, EPRI, 1987.

3

1. Program Objectives· Policies· Operational· Load shape

4. Program Monitoring & Evaluation· Process & impact

evaluation· Feedback on objectives· Redesign of programs

3. Program Implementation· Experiments· Pilot programs· Full-scale programs· Evaluation data collection

2. Program Design & Selection; Evaluation Planning· End uses· Technologies· Marketing techniques· Customer issues· Utility issues· Benefit/cost· Logic modeling & evaluation

planning

Resource Planning

Policy Objectives

Kentucky PSC 9/11/09 Schiller Consulting, Inc.

Page 4: EM&V Planning and EM&V Issues

+Determining Gross and Net Energy Savings

4

Kentucky PSC 9/11/09 Schiller Consulting, Inc.

Page 5: EM&V Planning and EM&V Issues

+Planning Issues

Defining evaluation goals and scale, and which benefits to evaluate

Setting time frame for evaluation and reporting expectations

Establishing budget vis-à-vis expectations for quality of reported results

Defining baseline, baseline adjustments, and data collection requirements

Selecting impact evaluation approaches for gross and net savings

calculations and avoided emissions calculations

Selecting who (or which type of organization) will conduct the evaluations

Identifying and integrating stakeholders

Successful evaluations harmonize the costs of evaluation with the value of

the information received—that is, they appropriately balance risk

management, uncertainty, and cost considerations.

5

Kentucky PSC 9/11/09 Schiller Consulting, Inc.

Page 6: EM&V Planning and EM&V Issues

+How Good is Good Enough?-

Incremental certainty

Valu

e o

f in

form

ati

on

value of improved certainty cost of improved EM&V

Cost of incremental EM&V

Balance pointof diminishing

returns

Cost

value of improved certainty < cost of improved EM&V

6

Kentucky PSC 9/11/09 Schiller Consulting, Inc.

Page 7: EM&V Planning and EM&V Issues

+Precision and Bias

Kentucky PSC 9/11/09 Schiller Consulting, Inc.

7

Precise Imprecise

Biased/Inaccurate

Unbiased/Accurate

Page 8: EM&V Planning and EM&V Issues

+Technical Reference Manuals and Evaluation Protocols – EM&V Resources

In the simplest form ‘TRMs’ are databases of deemed savings values with applicability conditions

Examples of database contents are:

kWh, kW, therm savings values Measure effective lifetimes Net to gross ratios Measure cost information Local/regional utility cost

information for TRC calculations Work papers that document

basis for values

Documents with varying level of detail that define how the evaluations (and M&V) are to be conducted with a particular jurisdiction. Contents might include: Which approaches to use Sample size requirements Evaluation timing Reporting requirements

Technical Reference Manuals Evaluation Protocols

8

Kentucky PSC 9/11/09 Schiller Consulting, Inc.

Page 9: EM&V Planning and EM&V Issues

+The Documentation (EM&V) Issue and Solution

9

Kentucky PSC 9/11/09 Schiller Consulting, Inc.