Empty Chairs at Empty Tables There is a clear distinction between both versions of empty chairs at empty, that being the accents. This is consistent throughout the who production in fact. Broadway tends to have a very twangy American accent to their singing, where as the London cast are more true to the vowels and though they use diphthongs, it is not nearly as pronounced. That said, in the broadway singer has a much stronger resonance in his voice which is nice, but he doesn’t go anywhere with it. It’s the same tone for the whole song. Michael ball of the London cast starts with a very shallow sound but builds into something that has nice tone, it give the song some movement. Both versions are exceptional in their own respect and display their
Empty Chairs at Empty TablesThere is a clear distinction between
both versions of empty chairs at empty, that being the accents.
This is consistent throughout the who production in fact. Broadway
tends to have a very twangy American accent to their singing, where
as the London cast are more true to the vowels and though they use
diphthongs, it is not nearly as pronounced. That said, in the
broadway singer has a much stronger resonance in his voice which is
nice, but he doesnt go anywhere with it. Its the same tone for the
whole song. Michael ball of the London cast starts with a very
shallow sound but builds into something that has nice tone, it give
the song some movement. Both versions are exceptional in their own
respect and display their
