Upload
vominh
View
223
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Emergency Communications Support
Florida Governor’s Hurricane Conference
May 13, 2014 – 8:30-9:30 AM
Chris Essid
Deputy Director
Office of Emergency Communications
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
About the OEC
OEC supports and promotes communications capabilities used by
emergency responders and government officials to keep America safe,
secure, and resilient
Planning and Preparedness
CoordinationResponse
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
Who do we support?
1,900,000
Firefighters
3
900,000 Police
Officers
19,400 municipalities
Governors, Mayors,
public works, council
members
825,000 EMS
Professionals
1,000
Wireline
Carriers
Critical Infrastructure
5,700 Hospitals
6,800 Banks
7,000 Power Plants
1,200 Certified
Emergency
Managers
562 Federally
Recognized Tribal
Nations
562
Federally
Recognized
Tribal
Nations
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
How OEC Supports Public Safety
OEC has been a leader in key emergency communications advancements for
the last 7 years:
» National Emergency Communications Plan (NECP)
» Statewide Interoperability Coordinators (SWICs)
» Statewide Communications Interoperability Plans (SCIPs)
» More than 1,000 Technical Assistance workshops since 2007
» Over 5,000 COML, COMT & AuxCom trained
» Response-Level Communications Evaluation
NECP Goal 1 – 63 Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) jurisdictions
NECP Goal 2 – More than 3,000 counties
» Broadband Consultation Workshops
» More than 430,000 users of WPS, GETS, and NGN Priority Services
Public Safety (and the public they serve) is entering a period of
communications advancement at a pace never before seen in history
OEC has the responsibility to lead at this critical time
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
Update to the NECP
NECP 2008 NECP 2014
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
National Emergency Communications Plan
Released in July 2008, the NECP is the Nation’s
single dedicated strategic plan for emergency
communications nationwide.
OEC conducted assessment of key capabilities &
performance in more than 2,800 counties, focusing
on: Frequency of training, SOPs, NIMS, and use of
interoperability solutions
Maturity of governance and planning structures
Communications system quality and continuity
Title 18 requires OEC to “periodically update” the
NECP in coordination with F/S/L/T/T agencies and
the private sector.
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
NECP Update Process
Stakeholder-driven process that included more than 350
stakeholders at all levels of government and the private sector
Coordinated with all major public safety partnerships and
associations, and all public safety disciplines, emergency
management agencies, 9-1-1/PSAPs, and tribal nations
Reviewed by DHS sector coordinating councils,
including the communications and information technology
Federal coordination through One DHS and Emergency
Communications Preparedness Center (ECPC) ECPC: Federal departments and agencies involved in
emergency communications (e.g., Department of Defense
(DoD), Department of State)
DHS components: Science and Technology, Federal Emergency
Management Agency Alerts & Warning, DHS Operations,
Customs and Borer Protection
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
The Future of First Responder Communications
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
9
OEC in Action: Boston Marathon Bombing Case
Study
Before
• 2009 Statewide Communications Interoperability Plan (SCIP) workshop
• Communications assessment of the 2010 Marathon and recommendations for improvement
• Communications Unit Leaders and Communications Unit Technicians training
• Two SCIP workshops in 2012
During
• Field support from OEC Regional Coordinator
• Over 280 response and recovery calls placed via GETS with over a 99% completion rate.
• 152 expedited WPS enrollment requests. 93% of calls made with WPS were completed.
• Use of COMLs and COMTs
• Interoperable communications between jurisdictions
After
• Debrief sessions with the National Council of Statewide Interoperability Coordinators
• SAFECOM dissemination of after-action reports
• Development of a Case Study to share lessons learned
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
“In Watertown police asked residents to
remain indoors, and so-called “reverse
911” calls were made to every house
advising residents, many of whom were
just waking up, to stay put.” – The
Independent, Watertown, MA
“Immediately after the announcement, the
FBI.gov website received more traffic than
it has ever seen, an official said, as well as
a "sizable" jump in calls to their tip line.
The FBI set up a new site,
bostonmarathontips.fbi.gov, to report
tips”– The Wall Street Journal
“Our two-way radio systems performed
well, and our communications plan saw
first responders through those chaotic
hours after the blast”
Steve Staffier (MA SWIC and Event COML)
Evolving Emergency Communications
Ecosystem – Boston Marathon Bombing
Incident Response and Coordination
Public Information Exchange
Governmental Agencies
(F/S/L/T/T)
Citizens / NGOs /
Private Sector
Citizens / NGOs /
Private Sector
Reporting &
Requests for
Assistance
Notifications,
Alerts &
Warnings
Governmental Agencies
(F/S/L/T/T)
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
2014 NECP – Strategic Framework
Stakeholders: Recognizes the increasing interconnections of responder communications and takes an expanded view of the
stakeholder community across incident response, from traditional public safety (e.g., law enforcement, fire, EMS) to the whole
community (e.g., 911/PSAPs, emergency management, industry)
Goals and Recommendations: Stresses need for updated governance, planning, standard operating procedures, training and
exercise and research and development to keep pace with new technologies and partners
Vision: Updated to include information sharing (in addition to communications) for emergency response personnel (as needed, at
all levels of government, across all disciplines)
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
Goal 1 – Governance and Leadership: Enhance decision-making, coordination, and planning
for emergency communications through strong governance structures and leadership
Goal 2 – Planning and Procedures: Update plans and procedures to improve emergency
responder communications and readiness in a dynamic operating environment
Goal 3 – Training and Exercises: Improve responders’ ability to coordinate and communicate
through training and exercise programs that use all available technologies and target gaps in
emergency communications
Goal 4 – Operational Coordination: Ensure operational effectiveness
through the coordination of communications capabilities, resources, and
personnel from across the whole community
Goal 5 – Research and Development: Coordinate research, development, testing, and
evaluation activities to develop innovative emergency communications capabilities that support
the needs of emergency responders
2014 NECP – Strategic Goals
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
Lessons Learned from Hurricane Response
SAFECOM/NCSWIC panel on Response to Hurricane
Sandy identified best practices and lessons learned that
support the NECP draft goals:
Pre-incident coordination (i.e., training, exercises,
planning) across the whole community is important
Plans need to be current and widely disseminated to
those who need to implement them
Large-scale incidents will transcend State borders – need
to identify the capabilities across the whole community
prior to an incident
Understand mutual aid processes and mechanisms to
expedite support from other States
Identify and establish relationships with POCs in
government and private industry
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
Top Priorities Among Recommendations
Continue to drive improvements in current emergency
communications, such as LMR systems
Address gaps identified during goal assessments
Continued planning for LMR systems
Enhance planning and preparing for the adoption, integration, and
use of emerging technologies, including the NPSBN
Importance of applications, cybersecurity, and the NPSBN
Increase coordination among stakeholders, processes, and planning
activities across the emergency response community
SWICs; Broadband Point of Contacts (POCs); chief information officers, chief
information security officers and chief technology officers, Statewide
Interoperability Governing Bodies 9-1-1 Boards
NPSBN, NG9-1-1, Integrated Public Alerts and Warnings (IPAWs)
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
Examples of State and Local Recommendations
Work with SWICs to identify and coordinate with positions and organizations within States that have EC responsibilities
Increase awareness of emergency communications training and exercise opportunities, including COML and Federal participation
Continue to promote NCSWIC-endorsed recognition criteria for Communications Unit training
Support States’ and territories’ ability to track and share trained Communications Unit personnel
Ensure the NECP aligns with SCIPs and State and Local Implementation Grant Program Guidance, particularly for updates for broadband
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
Implementation will be conducted in coordination with stakeholders
through OEC and other DHS programs and activities
State Planning workshops: Support updates to SCIPs for broadband and
maintaining LMR
Measurement/Assessments: Leverage processes, relationships, and
foundations established under first NECP to “re-test” the goals
Governance guidance: Update State bodies, improve coordination with
other entities (e.g., 911 Boards), ECPC coordination with FirstNet
Technical Assistance: Broadband planning support for NPSBN, NG-9-1-1
planning, dispatch operations, continuity of operations workshops
Grants: Drive implementation of NECP priorities and recommendations
through DHS grant guidance (e.g., SAFECOM)
OEC Tools and Services: CASM, PSTools database, COML tracking,
virtual training opportunities
NECP Implementation
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
Dispatch / 9-1-1 BroadbandLand Mobile Radio
Reverse 9-1-1
Text to 9-1-1
9-1-1 Coord. NG 9-1-1
NENA / APCO
CAD
Dispatcher
PSAP
Backup Centers
Tactical Dispatcher
9-1-1 Plans
AuxComm
UHF
800 MHzCOML
P25
Gateways
COMT
SWIC
TICP
Radio Cache
VHF
IECGP
SAFECOM
Smartphones PSAC
Aircards
SLIGP
Applications
Commercial Service FirstNet
SPOC
LTE
Satellite
NGN
State / Fed Funds
4GMission Critical Voice
NIMS / ICS
PSIC
Statewide Interoperability Governance Bodies
National Emergency Communications Plan
Statewide Communications Interoperability Plans
Emergency Communications Preparedness CenterStatutory Responsibility:
“Support and promote the ability of emergency response providers and relevant government
officials to continue to communicate in the event of natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other
manmade disasters”
OEC’s Role - More Critical than Ever
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
New Technologies, Same Interoperability Challenge
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
19
OEC’s involvement with FirstNet
OEC continues to focus on current mission critical services, including
land mobile radios and priority telecommunications, while working with
its stakeholders to identify the necessary building blocks for broadband
preparation and integration with FirstNet.
• Policy support and guidance to the Secretary of DHS and the Secretary’s
designee as FirstNet Board members
• Supports the Public Safety Advisory Committee meetings to ensure open
dialogue between FirstNet and the Nationwide Public Safety Broadband
Network (NPSBN) stakeholders
• Coordinates with stakeholders to help maintain current technologies and
prepare for the NPSBN and Next Generation Network 911. Assistance
includes:
• Cyber Infrastructure Risk Assessment (CIRA)
• State Planning Workshops
• Governance Guidance
• Technical Assistance
• OEC Tools and Services
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
Enhancements in emergency communications
have been made since the 2008 NECP
As the emergency communications landscape
evolves, so must the emergency communications
framework established by the NECP
Striking the right balance between addressing
gaps and requirements while integrating new
technologies is a challenge
The 2014 NECP is designed to support public
safety in meeting challenges
NECP Update – Preparing for the Future
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications
Resources
NECP
For more information on the NECP, please email:[email protected]
Or visit:http://www.dhs.gov/national-emergency-communications-plan-necp-goals
General OEC
Email [email protected] or visit WWW.DHS.GOV (keyword “OEC”)
HomelandSecurity
Office of Cybersecurity and Communications