Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
[Type text]
ELT Voices – India Volume 2 Issue 2 | April 2012
ISSN 2230-9136
© Ignite (India) Publishing, Bhavnagar, Gujarat – India
www.eltvoices.in
ELT Research Paper 4
Multiple Learning Styles for Online Learners
J.L.Shalin, George Brown College Toronto
J.L.Shalin: Multiple Learning Styles for Online Learners
62 | E L T V o i c e s – I n d i a ( V o l . 2 I s s u e 2 ) | A p r i l 2 0 1 2 | I S S N 2 2 3 0 - 9 1 3 6
Abstract
I conducted a field trial of an online course as an integral part of my PhD
research. When I initiated the trial, I faced a lot of problems as a facilitator. The
participants were not participating enthusiastically. As a consequence, I had to
find some modus operandi to make the course more interactive, collaborative
and interesting. As the first and foremost strategy for this, I decided to
accommodate various learning styles of the learners. On the basis of my
extensive academic experience, I modified the content and included more
interactive and collaborative activities that can address and embrace most of the
learning styles. As a result, I was able to run the field trial successfully, and the
participants felt motivated to start and finish the course. I have tried to include
the findings and conclusions which I inferred on the basis of this practical
research experience. My findings were substantiated by academic scholar’s
views and opinions regarding multiple learning styles.
J.L.Shalin: Multiple Learning Styles for Online Learners
63 | E L T V o i c e s – I n d i a ( V o l . 2 I s s u e 2 ) | A p r i l 2 0 1 2 | I S S N 2 2 3 0 - 9 1 3 6
Introduction
The Objective of this paper is to focus on the concept how a language user (English as
a Second Language) uses his/her operative sensibility, and also to discuss how
creativity in the language user helps him/ her in developing competence and
performance in using English as a second language. Interestingly, for the Indian users
of ‘English’, it is a typical situation that – English is a foreign language (Second
language in teaching – learning context in Indian Education System) and our operative
sensibility is Indian. Although everyday use of language is essentially a creative
activity, the fact about the ‘newness’ of everyday language has largely been missed
among many English language users in India.
Introduction
The learning style is known as the composite of characteristic, cognitive, affective,
and physiological factors that serve as relatively stable indicators of how a learner
perceives, interacts with, and responds to the learning environment (Serap & Sari,
2008). It is now a known truth that students learn only 10% by reading, 20% by
hearing, 30% by seeing, 50% by seeing and hearing, 70% by saying, and 90% by
saying and doing (Active Teaching - Active Learning : Teaching Techniques and
Tools, 2005). This practically proven belief can be applied in the case of web learners
as well. The following pyramid illustrates how many percentages the learner in
general, and the web learner in particular, can learn from various activities or
participation strategies.
J.L.Shalin: Multiple Learning Styles for Online Learners
64 | E L T V o i c e s – I n d i a ( V o l . 2 I s s u e 2 ) | A p r i l 2 0 1 2 | I S S N 2 2 3 0 - 9 1 3 6
Adapted from “Multimodal Learning Through Media: What the Research Says.”
[http://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/docs/education/Multimodal-Learning-Through-
Media.pdf]. July, 2012.
Thus, students need a variety of teaching methods; a host of learning strategies;
activities which they can read, visualize, hear, say and do; instructional guidance
leading to independence; ability to work on their own with appropriate assessment
methods, appropriate tools and technology for independent and guided study (Muir,
2001) . Various learners having different learning styles adopt a variety of learning
strategies. They would like to do certain things more than others. Then, they charter
out their own plans to remember, understand, learn and know (pdsupport : Knowing
Your Students, 2011) .
Educational implications for learning styles of online learners
Carla Lane has thrown some light on how online teachers should include the activities
that are more student-centered than traditional activities, and accommodate learning-
style based instruction. The first step in implementing learning style-based instruction
is diagnosing the individual learning styles of each student. The second step is
J.L.Shalin: Multiple Learning Styles for Online Learners
65 | E L T V o i c e s – I n d i a ( V o l . 2 I s s u e 2 ) | A p r i l 2 0 1 2 | I S S N 2 2 3 0 - 9 1 3 6
profiling group preferences and weaknesses. Are most of the students visual, aural or
kinesthetic/tactile learners? The third step is assessing current instructional methods to
determine whether they are adequate or require more flexibility. (Lane, 2000)
If any modifications are to be made in the instructional methods on the basis of above
three findings, teachers can add alternative activities that could replace and
supplement the existing ones, or challenge students to develop skills in other areas by
completing assignments that utilize all learning styles. When teaching an online
group, teachers should use maximum possible learning styles in their presentations if
they are to reach maximum number of students (FELDER & BRENT, 2005).
Addressing learning styles of online learners
The four most common learning styles are visual, aural, reading/writing, and
kinesthetic/tactile. Most people learn through all modalities, but have certain strengths
and weaknesses in a specific modality. Some people have an equal propensity for
more than one style, which is titled as the multimodal style. Once a person's learning
style is ascertained, accommodations can be made to increase academic achievement
and creativity, as well as improve attitudes toward learning. (Ominiyi &
Y.A.Adedapo, 2012)
The visual learning style
Luu Trong Tuan has rightly said that visual learners process information most
effectively when the information is seen. These online learners think in pictures and
have vivid imaginations, so inclusions of pictures, charts, graphs, flow charts, figures,
diagrams, illustrations, hierarchies and other visual aids would certainly help them in
information processing. (Tuan, 2011)
Online visual learners like to use video clips, diagrams, images and maps as
instruction strategies. They prefer electronic white board, electronic conferencing and
chat as communication modes. They may use reference maps, diagrams, pictures,
articles as reference material to strengthen their study. If mind mapping of concepts
J.L.Shalin: Multiple Learning Styles for Online Learners
66 | E L T V o i c e s – I n d i a ( V o l . 2 I s s u e 2 ) | A p r i l 2 0 1 2 | I S S N 2 2 3 0 - 9 1 3 6
(webbing) diagramming, PowerPoint Presentations, readings are given in a form of
assignment, they can perform well. They select identification on maps, diagrams,
drawings, sketches, read and response as means of testing (Teaching Technologies,
2011) .
Therefore, online teachers can freely use some activities in online facilitation like
replacing words with symbols or initials; translating concepts into pictures and
diagrams; underlining or highlighting notes or textbooks with different colors; turning
visuals back into words; and making and displaying flashcards of key information
with words, symbols, and diagrams.
The aural learning style
Aural learners process information most effectively when spoken or heard. These
learners respond well to lectures and discussions, and are excellent listeners. They also
like to talk and enjoy music and dramas. When trying to recall information, aural
learners can often "hear" the way someone told them the information. (Multiple
Intelligences and Learning Styles, 2011)
Online auditory learners would accommodate lectures and audio clips to be used as
modes of instruction. For communication, they, of course, go for phone calls and
audio conferencing. Video or audio clips from a media collection are more suited for
them as reference materials. They wish to have some assignments in the form of
projects with audio components, interviews, seminars, reports, speeches and power
point. Sound identification and verbally administered test can be used for testing
purposes to evaluate them.
So, online teachers can productively use certain activities in web teaching like making
the e-learners attending lectures and tutorials; discussing topics with them and
inspiring them to discuss the same among the peers; summarizing notes on tape and
listening to them; motivating the learner to join a study group or have a "study
J.L.Shalin: Multiple Learning Styles for Online Learners
67 | E L T V o i c e s – I n d i a ( V o l . 2 I s s u e 2 ) | A p r i l 2 0 1 2 | I S S N 2 2 3 0 - 9 1 3 6
buddy"; tape recording and hearing lectures; and talking out loud when recalling
information or solving problems.
The kinesthetic/tactile learning style
Emily Giles, Sarah Pitre and Sara Womack (2003) have described that
kinesthetic/Tactile learners process information actively through physical means.
Kinesthetic learning refers to whole body movement while tactile learning refers
only to the sense of touch. These learners gesture when speaking, are poor listeners,
and lose interest in long speeches. Most students that do not perform well in school
are kinesthetic/tactile learners. The crux of this learning style is that the learner is
connected to real situations through field experience, "hands on" demonstration,
example, practice, or simulation. (Giles, Pitre, & Womack, 2003)
Tactile and Kinesthetic e- learners favor advance organizer, in class exercises,
asking for volunteer participation in class demos or simulations for learning/teaching
instructions. More than often, they aspire for synchronous conferencing and group
work for communication with peers and the facilitator. Virtual field trips may prove as
good reference for their learning. To keep them busy, they would like to have
assignments like self assessment quizzes, model building, presentations, and demos.
Quite often they would ask for performance of a task, multiple choice tutorial,
reports/papers, portfolio of project work.
The online teacher can transform his/her teaching to be more efficient by motivating
kinesthetic/tactile learners to sit near the instructor in classroom situations; read out
loud from textbook and notes; copy key points onto large writing surfaces (i.e.
chalkboard or easel board); copy key points using word processing software; listen to
audiotapes of notes while exercising,; take in information through field trips,
laboratories, trial and error, exhibits, collections, and hands-on examples; put real life
examples into notes summary; recall experiments and role-play; and also to use
pictures and photographs that illustrate an idea.
J.L.Shalin: Multiple Learning Styles for Online Learners
68 | E L T V o i c e s – I n d i a ( V o l . 2 I s s u e 2 ) | A p r i l 2 0 1 2 | I S S N 2 2 3 0 - 9 1 3 6
The tactile and kinesthetic e- learners are often categorized as active web-learners
because they feel quite enthusiastic for class participation as a means of instruction.
They love to have online meetings with their peers and facilitator for communications.
These learners also feel motivated for virtual field trips as their learning reference
phenomenon. Model building can serve as a good assignment for them, and projects
and reports might be designed for testing.
Contrary to them, those learners who rely more on reading and writing for learning
are named as passive learners.
The reading/writing learning style
Reading/Writing learners process information most effectively when presented in a
written language format. These learners benefit from instructors who use the
blackboard to illustrate important points and provide outlines of the lecture material.
When trying to recall information, reading/writing learners remember the information
from their "mind's eye." Many academics have a strong preference for the
reading/writing style. (Introduction to learning styles, 2011).
Passive virtual learners need class time for reflection or critical thinking for
absorbing instructions. Many online learners have agreed to the fact that they prefer
webcast as the most productive communication learning medium. They receive
reference material from observation and reading. Problem sets and journaling have
been proved as motivating assignments for them. They can be tested best through
problem solving and essays (Educating the Net Generation, 2005) .
To make the online teaching more interactive and collaborative for reading/writing
learners or passive learners, the facilitator can motivate them to write important
information again and again, read notes silently, organize any diagrams into
statements, e-write the ideas and principles in other words and create flashcards of
words and concepts that need to be memorized.
J.L.Shalin: Multiple Learning Styles for Online Learners
69 | E L T V o i c e s – I n d i a ( V o l . 2 I s s u e 2 ) | A p r i l 2 0 1 2 | I S S N 2 2 3 0 - 9 1 3 6
Sequential e-learners can be instructed through web published outlines, lists and
examples. They can accept intake and offer input ideally through discussion and
communications in small groups. They are very receptive of reference materials of a
procedural nature that can be found in scholastic journals. Assignments like creation
of steps and processes will be liked b most of them. That is why they can be tested
meaningfully through creation or re-enactment of steps and processes (Resource
Guide for Teaching EnglishLanguage Learners, 2008) .
Virtual global learners prioritise discussion of concepts, paradigms and theories the
first in the list of instructional strategies. Large discussion groups are proved the most
motivating communicative methods for them. They absorb most of the broad based
reference materials, newspaper articles, magazines and books. They certainly like
journaling, discussion, relationship construction and mapping. Their learning can be
measured and tested through essay type questions and portfolios.
The online learners who are sensory might opt for images, sounds, video, demos and
simulations as means of instruction. Any conferencing tool may prove as an ideal
communication strategy. They receive a lot of knowledge from virtual field trips using
them as reference materials. As far as assignments are concerned, they like creations
of demos, images and case studies. They would prefer to go for those tests that ask for
details, tests with accompanying images and audio.
Intuitive online learners would like the facilitator of the online course to use case
studies, hypothesis, setting and prediction to get them instructed. They choose any
type of group work for communication with the facilitator and co – learners. They
keep themselves busy with readings from various view points, and also comparing and
contrasting assignments in the form of reference material. For assignments, they like
problem solving and resolution development. To be tested many online facilitators
have agreed that this type of learners would feel motivated to take the test in the form
of essays that ask for outcome projections.
J.L.Shalin: Multiple Learning Styles for Online Learners
70 | E L T V o i c e s – I n d i a ( V o l . 2 I s s u e 2 ) | A p r i l 2 0 1 2 | I S S N 2 2 3 0 - 9 1 3 6
When inductive learners go for e – learning they would feel happy if they are
instructed through facts, formulas, demos and observations and presentation of
background information. Any type of group work will be okay for their
communication modus operandi. Sample problems and reference sheets for formulas
will be ideal reference for them. These learners will try to include problem sets,
memorization and terminologies in their commitment in assignments and homework.
If they are to be tested, they have a particular taste for problem sets, objective answers
and multiple choice quizzes.
In virtual class the facilitator can use applications, link of the familiar to the
unfamiliar, examples and advance organizers to instruct the deductive learners.
Group projects or conferencing are good for communication among them. Case
studies can be proved as preferable reference material for them. Like some learners
mentioned above, they like model building and simulations for assignments. For the
purpose of testing them problem solving applications, scenarios and essays can serve
as good means for measuring their progress in an online course.
J.L.Shalin: Multiple Learning Styles for Online Learners
71 | E L T V o i c e s – I n d i a ( V o l . 2 I s s u e 2 ) | A p r i l 2 0 1 2 | I S S N 2 2 3 0 - 9 1 3 6
Resource Guide for Teaching EnglishLanguage Learners. ( 2008, May). Retrieved
August 17, 2012, from Chesterfield County Public Schools: https://ncps-
ellwiki.wikispaces.com/file/view/ESOLResourceGuide%5B1%5D.pdf
Active Teaching - Active Learning : Teaching Techniques and Tools. (2005,
November ). Retrieved August 01, 2012, from Oregostn State University :
Extension Service: http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/4h/4-h0259l.pdf
Educating the Net Generation. (2005). Retrieved August 15, 2012, from
http://www.educause.edu/research-and-publications/books/educating-net-
generation: http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf
Introduction to learning styles. (2011, April 29). Retrieved from http://www.gp-
training.net/training/educational_theory/reflective_learning/learning_styles/intr
oduction.htm
Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles. (2011, April 16). Retrieved from Rider
University: http://www.slideboom.com/presentations/126457/Multiple-
Intelligences-and-Learning-Styles?pk=8ad0-676f-58ab-85b4-dba6-fdae-e5a7-
1216
pdsupport : Knowing Your Students. (2011, May 02). Retrieved from
http://pdsupport.cmswiki.wikispaces.net/page/pdf/Knowing+Your+Students
Teaching Technologies. (2011, August). Retrieved August 11, 2012, from
www.cardiff.ac.uk/insrv/.../infolit/.../Chapter%205%20-%20Final.doc
FELDER, R. M., & BRENT, R. (2005, January). Understanding Student Differences.
Retrieved August 05, 2012ust, from Journal of Engineering Education, 94 (1),
57-72 (2005):
http://eprints.me.psu.ac.th/ILS/info/Understanding_Differences.pdf
Giles, E., Pitre, S., & Womack, S. (2003). Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles.
Retrieved from Multiple intelligences and learning styles. In M. Orey (Ed.),
Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology.Retrieved <insert
date>, from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt:
http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Multiple_Intelligences_and_L
earning_Styles
Lane, C. (2000). Implementing Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles in
Distributed Learning/IMS Projects. Retrieved from
http://www.tecweb.org/styles/imslsindl.pdf
J.L.Shalin: Multiple Learning Styles for Online Learners
72 | E L T V o i c e s – I n d i a ( V o l . 2 I s s u e 2 ) | A p r i l 2 0 1 2 | I S S N 2 2 3 0 - 9 1 3 6
Muir, D. J. (2001, July 25-27). Adapting Online Education to Different Learning
Styles. Retrieved July 20, 2012, from National Educational Computing
Conference, “Building on the Future”, Chicago, IL:
http://realaudio.rice.edu/ecot/ust/bied5336/session%20i/On-
Line%20Learning.pdf
Ominiyi, T., & Y.A.Adedapo. (2012). Effects of Instructional Strategies on the
Trainee Teachers' Learning Outcome in Practical Teaching Skills. Retrieved
August 09, 2012, from Journal of Education and Practice, Vol. 3, No. 8, 2012:
http://www.slideshare.net/AlexanderDecker/effects-of-instructional-strategies-
on-the-trainee-teachers-learning-outcome-in-practical-teaching-skills
Serap, E., & Sari, M. (2008). A STUDY TO DETERMINE HIGH SCHOOL
STUDENTS’ LEARNING STYLES. Retrieved from
ietc2008.home.anadolu.edu.tr/ietc2008/190.doc
Tuan, L. T. (2011, March ). Matching and Stretching Learners‟ Learning Styles.
Retrieved from Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Volume 2,
Number 2, March 2011:
http://www.academypublisher.com/jltr/vol02/no02/jltr0202.pdf