1
8/19/2019 ELT J 1999 Allison 144 Genre http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/elt-j-1999-allison-144-genre 1/1 Key concepts in LT Genre 'Genre' is easier to exemplify than to define. The word traditionally serves to indicate different kinds of literary and artistic works. Language educators and linguists have extended 'genre' to identify classes of language use and communication in all areas of life. Widely discussed genres include service encounters, business letters, academic articles, lessons, editorials, sports commentaries, and many more. In school settings, broad narrative, descriptive, expository, and argumentative genres are often identified in teaching and examinations. Genre studies raise many questions and some controversies (Hyon 1996). One issue is how 'genre' relates to 'register' (see Key concepts in ELT Journal  Volume 48/3). Both concepts seek to capture aspects of variation in language use. 'Genre' is particularly linked to concerns with communicative and social purposes among user groups forming 'discourse communities' (Swales 1990). Attention to 'genre' arguably emerges from Hymes's work on 'speech events' ('activities . . . that are directly governed by rules or norms for the use of speech' (Hymes 1972: 56). 'Register', which has long been associated with Halliday's apparatus for text description, is typically defined by formal properties of grammar and lexis (e.g. Halliday  et al 1964). While some scholars work mainly with one or the other term, many treat the concepts as complementary. How genres are best defined and operationally identified, for descriptive and teaching purposes, remains a major area of enquiry. An influential view is that many genres have typical linguistic realizations that can usefully be taught, but that genres should be defined in terms of recognized social purposes. Letters of apology, for instance, must convey apology, but need not contain the expression 'We are very sorry . . .' Miller (1984) represents genres as types of rhetorical action in recurrent situations. Swales (1990) takes a genre as 'a class of communicative event, the members of which share some set of communicative purposes'. While familiarity with typical generic realisations is important, conventions are not fixed, and genres change over time and circumstances. Knowing and using relevant genres is a characteristic of professional and other communities (Berkenkotter  Huckin 1995; Bhatia 1993). Ignorance of genres can exclude people from effective social participation. Some children face difficulties because they are unfamiliar with ways of communicating that are favoured in school settings (Martin 1989). Much of the debate about whether (and if so, how) to teach spoken and written genres explicitly to learners has turned on the issue of whether genre knowledge is liberating, as it gives people more choices, or constricting, as it leads people to talk, write and act in conventionally approved ways. Genres are relevant in teaching at any level because learners also have intuitions and experiences about how some texts and events resemble or differ from others. In schools, learners' experiences and uses of language often differ across subjects. Exploring similarities and differences between communicative events is a concern that genre analysis shares with language teaching and learning. References Berkenkotter C.  and  T.N. Huckin  1995.  Genre knowledge and disciplinary communication: Cognition/Culture/Power.  Hillsdale, NJ: Law- rence Erlbaum. Bhatia, V.K. 1993. Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings.  __ London NY: Longman. Halliday M.A.K. Mclntosh A.  and  P. Strevens 1964.  The linguistic sciences and language teaching.  London: Longman. Hymes D.  1972. 'Models of the interaction of language and social life' in J.J. Gumperz, and D. Hymes (Eds.),  Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication  (35-71), NY: Holt, Rinehardt Winston. Hyon S.  1996. Genre in three traditions: Implica- tions for ESL. TESOL Quarterly 30/4: 693-722. Martin J.R.  1989.  Factual  writing Exploring and challenging social reality.  Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press. Miller C.R.  (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of  Speech 70: 151-167. Swales J.M.  1990.  Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. The author Desmond Allison  is a senior lecturer at the National University of Singapore. He teaches courses in research in language studies, language testing and programme evaluation, and genre knowledge and specialized communication. His main research areas in English for academic and educational purposes include comprehension studies, second language writing, and language programme evaluation. E-mail:<[email protected]> 144 ELT  Journal  Volume  53 2  April  1999  © Oxford  University Press 1999   b  y  g  u  e  s  t  o n  J  u  y  ,  0  3  t  t  p  :  /  /  e  t  j  .  o x  o  d  j  o  u n  a  s  .  o  g  / D  o  w n  o  a  d  e  d  o m  

ELT J 1999 Allison 144 Genre

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ELT J 1999 Allison 144 Genre

8/19/2019 ELT J 1999 Allison 144 Genre

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/elt-j-1999-allison-144-genre 1/1

Key concepts in LT

Genre

'Genre' is easier to exemplify than to define. The

word traditionally serves to indicate different

kinds of literary and artistic works. Language

educators and linguists have extended 'genre' to

identify classes of language use and

communication in all areas of life. Widely

discussed genres include service encounters,

business letters, academic articles, lessons,

editorials, sports commentaries, and many more.

In school settings, broad narrative, descriptive,

expository, and argumentative genres are often

identified in teaching and examinations.

Genre studies raise many questions and some

controversies (Hyon 1996). One issue is how

'genre' relates to 'register' (see Key concepts in

ELT Journal Volume 48/3). Both concepts seek to

capture aspects of variation in language use.

'Genre' is particularly linked to concerns with

communicative and social purposes among user

groups forming 'discourse communities' (Swales

1990). Attention to 'genre' arguably emerges from

Hy me s's work on 'speech e ven ts' ('activities . . .

that are directly governed by rules or norms for

the use of speech' (Hymes 1972: 56). 'Register',

which has long been associated with Halliday's

apparatus for text description, is typically defined

by formal properties of grammar and lexis (e.g.

Halliday   et al 1964). While some scholars work

mainly with one or the other term, many treat the

concepts as complementary.

How genres are best defined and operationally

identified, for descriptive and teaching purposes,

remains a major area of enquiry. An influential

view is that many genres have typical linguistic

realizations that can usefully be taught, but that

genres should be defined in terms of recognized

social purposes. Letters of apology, for instance,

must convey apology, but need not contain the

expression 'We are very sorry . . .' Miller (1984)

represents genres as types of rhetorical action in

recur rent situations. Swales (1990) takes a genre as

'a class of communicative event, the members of

which share some set of communicative purposes'.

While familiarity with typical generic realisations

is impo rtant, conventions are not fixed, and genres

change over time and circumstances. Knowing

and using relevant genres is a characteristic of

professional and other communities (Berkenkotter

  Huckin 1995; Bha tia 1993).

Ignorance of genres can exclude people from

effective social participation. Some children face

difficulties because they are unfamiliar with ways

of communicating that are favoured in school

settings (Martin 1989). Much of the debate about

whether (and if so, how) to teach spoken and

written genres explicitly to learners has turned on

the issue of whether genre knowledge is

liberating, as it gives people more choices, or

constricting, as it leads people to talk, write and

act in conventionally approved ways.

Genres are relevant in teaching at any level

because learners also have intuitions and

experiences about how some texts and events

resemble or differ from others. In schools,

learners' experiences and uses of language often

differ across subjects. Exploring similarities and

differences between communicative events is a

concern that genre analysis shares with language

teaching and learning.

References

Berkenkotter C.  an d  T.N. Huckin  1995.  Genre

knowledge and disciplinary comm unication:

Cognition/Culture/Power.  Hillsdale, NJ: Law-

rence Erlbaum. Bhatia, V.K. 1993.  Analysing

genre: Language use in professional settings. __

London NY: Longman.

Halliday M.A.K. Mclntosh A.

  an d

  P. Strevens

1964.  The linguistic sciences and language

teaching.

  London: Longman.

Hymes D.

  1972. 'Models of the interaction of

language and social life' in J.J. Gu mpe rz, and D .

Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: T he

ethnography of communication

  (35-71), NY:

Holt, Rinehard t Winston.

Hyon S.

 1996. Genre in three traditions: Implica-

tions for ESL.  TESOL Quarterly 30/4: 693-722.

Martin J.R.  1989. Factual writing Exploring and

challenging social rea lity. Oxford: Oxford Uni-

versity Press.

Miller C.R.

  (1984). Genre as social action.

Quarterly

  Journal of

  Speech 70: 151-167.

Swales J.M.

  1990.

  Genre analysis: English in

academic and research settings.  Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

The author

Desmond Allison

 is a senior lecturer at the National

University of Singapore. He teaches courses in

research in language studies, language testing and

programme evaluation, and genre knowledge and

specialized communication. His main research areas

in English for academic and educational purposes

include comprehension studies, second language

writing, and language programme evaluation.

E-mail:<[email protected]>

144

ELT  Journal Volume 53 2 April 1999 © O xford University Press 1999

  b  y g u e  s  t   on J   ul   y2 4  ,2  0 1  3 

h  t   t   p :  /   /   e l   t   j   . oxf   or  d  j   o

 ur n a l   s  . or  g /  

D o wnl   o a  d  e  d f  r  om