81
1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM-BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA PROBATE DIVISION CASE NO: 2010CP004252XXXXSB IN RE: ESTATE OF ALLAN HAYMES, Deceased. ________________________________/ ZYLO MARSHALL Petitioner, v. LOIS M. HAYMES, as Personal Representative of the Estate of ALLAN HAYMES, and CRAIG DONOFF, as Personal Representative of the Estate of ALLAN HAYMES, Respondents. ________________________________/ RESPONDENTSNOTICE OF FILING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT OF NON-PARTY, ELLEN COHEN Respondents, LOIS M. HAYMES, as Personal Representative of the Estate of ALLAN HAYMES, and CRAIG DONOFF, as Personal Representative of the Estate of ALLAN HAYMES, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby files the videotaped deposition transcript of Non- Party, Ellen Cohen, taken March 5, 2014 in connection with this matter. Filing # 12467581 Electronically Filed 04/14/2014 01:45:06 PM

Ellen Cohen Deposition

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Depo

Citation preview

  • 1

    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH

    JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR

    PALM-BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

    PROBATE DIVISION

    CASE NO: 2010CP004252XXXXSB

    IN RE: ESTATE OF ALLAN HAYMES,

    Deceased.

    ________________________________/

    ZYLO MARSHALL

    Petitioner,

    v.

    LOIS M. HAYMES, as Personal Representative

    of the Estate of ALLAN HAYMES, and

    CRAIG DONOFF, as Personal Representative

    of the Estate of ALLAN HAYMES,

    Respondents.

    ________________________________/

    RESPONDENTS NOTICE OF FILING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION

    TRANSCRIPT OF NON-PARTY, ELLEN COHEN

    Respondents, LOIS M. HAYMES, as Personal Representative of the Estate of ALLAN

    HAYMES, and CRAIG DONOFF, as Personal Representative of the Estate of ALLAN HAYMES,

    by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby files the videotaped deposition transcript of Non-

    Party, Ellen Cohen, taken March 5, 2014 in connection with this matter.

    Filing # 12467581 Electronically Filed 04/14/2014 01:45:06 PM

  • 2

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of

    Court via the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal which will serve a notice of electronic filing upon:

    Zylo Marshall, Pro Se Plaintiff, [[email protected]], on this 14th day of April, 2014.

    SHENDELL & POLLOCK, P.L.

    Attorneys for Respondents

    2700 N. Military Trail

    Boca Raton, Florida 33431

    Phone: (561) 241-2323

    Fax: (561) 241-2330

    By: s/ Kenneth S. Pollock

    Kenneth S. Pollock, Esq.

    Florida Bar No: 69558

    Matthew A. Tornincasa, Esq.

    Florida Bar No: 57698

    w:\files\donoff re haymes estate\pleadings\plead - nof - deposition transcript of ellen cohen.docx

    mailto:[email protected]
  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    1

    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF

    THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

    IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

    PROBATE DIVISION

    CASE NO: 502010CP004252XXXXSB

    IN RE: ESTATE OF ALLAN HAYMES,

    Deceased.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

    ZYLO MARSHALL,

    Petitioner,

    v.

    LOIS M. HAYMES, as Personal Representative of the

    Estate of ALLAN HAYMES, and CRAIG DONOFF, as

    Personal Representative of the Estate of ALLAN

    HAYMES,

    Respondents.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

    VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION of ELLEN COHEN, a

    nonparty witness by Respondents, pursuant to

    Subpoena, held at the offices of US Legal

    Support, 425 Park Avenue, New York, New York

    10022, on March 5, 2014 at 9:01 a.m. before a

    Notary Public of the State of New York.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    2

    1

    2 A p p e a r a n c e s:

    3 ZYLO MARSHALL, PRO SE 912 J Street, #34

    4 Sacramento, California 95814 BY: ZYLO MARSHALL, via telephone

    5

    6

    SHENDELL & POLLOCK, PL7 Attorneys for Respondents

    2700 North Military Trail, Suite 1508 Boca Raton, Florida 33431

    BY: MATT TORNINCASA, ESQ.9

    10

    11

    ALSO PRESENT:12

    Sallean Browne, videographer13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    3

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This deposition is

    3 being held at US Legal Support in New York,

    4 425 Park Avenue on March 5, 2014, at

    5 approximately 9:15 a.m. My name is Sallean

    6 Browne from US Legal Support, and I am the

    7 video specialist. The court reporter today

    8 is Allison Fowler, also from US Legal

    9 Support.

    10 Will counsel please introduce

    11 themselves.

    12 MR. TORNINCASA: Attorney Matt

    13 Tornincasa of Shendell & Pollock, PL, on

    14 behalf of respondents Lois Haymes and Craig

    15 Donoff, as personal representatives of the

    16 estate of Allan Haymes.

    17 Mr. Marshall, please introduce yourself

    18 for the record.

    19 MR. MARSHALL: My name is Zylo

    20 Marshall. This is -- representing myself as

    21 pro se petitioner in the estate of Allan

    22 Haymes.

    23 MR. TORNINCASA: Okay.

    24 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the court

    25 reporter please swear in the witness.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    4

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 E L L E N C O H E N, the witness herein, having

    3 been first duly sworn by a Notary Public of the

    4 State of New York, was examined and testified as

    5 follows:

    6 EXAMINATION BY

    7 MR. TORNINCASA:

    8 Q. Ms. Cohen, my name is Matt Tornincasa,

    9 I'm an attorney, I represent Lois Haymes. She is

    10 the daughter of Allan Haymes. I also represent

    11 attorney, Craig Donoff, they are the personal

    12 representatives of the estate of Allan Haymes.

    13 We're here today to take your

    14 deposition for trial. We need to find out a

    15 little bit of information about the time that you

    16 spent with Allan Haymes and just kind of get some

    17 answers to some questions.

    18 We are being videographed today. We

    19 also have testimony taken by a court reporter.

    20 In order to make sure things go smoothly, I want

    21 to just give you a couple of basic guidelines.

    22 The first is, because everything that is being

    23 said is officially being taken down by a

    24 stenographer, nonverbal responses, like head

    25 shakes, or ambiguous responses such as uh-huh or

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    5

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 uh-uh, don't translate well, so I'd ask if I ask

    3 you a question, please answer with a yes or no.

    4 Do you understand that?

    5 A. I do.

    6 Q. Thank you. Also because --

    7 MR. MARSHALL: Can you turn up the

    8 volume a little bit, please?

    9 MR. TORNINCASA: What was that,

    10 Mr. Marshall?

    11 MR. MARSHALL: Can you put the volume

    12 or bring it closer to the voices so I can

    13 hear. I can't hear that well.

    14 MR. TORNINCASA: Okay.

    15 MR. MARSHALL: Thank you.

    16 MR. TORNINCASA: I'll just bring it a

    17 little closer probably because he's having

    18 trouble hearing us.

    19 Q. In addition, because the stenographer

    20 is writing everything down, I'll ask you -- in

    21 conversations where you'll know where I'm going

    22 with the question, it's very easy for you cut in

    23 with answer. That can tend to make for a very

    24 rough record, so I'd ask you to please give me a

    25 couple of moments after to make sure my question

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    6

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 is done prior to starting your answer. That

    3 would help to make a clean record.

    4 A. Okay.

    5 Q. We're here today to find out what you

    6 know. It's not a memory test, it's not an

    7 examination, it's not a quiz, so if you need to

    8 speculate or guess, just please let us know that

    9 you're speculating or you're guessing if you

    10 don't know something.

    11 A. For sure.

    12 Q. My last request is, sometimes I do ask

    13 a bad question. If for some reason you don't

    14 understand my question or need me to clarify,

    15 please let me know, and I'll be happy to restate

    16 the question. The last thing, I'll ask you the

    17 same thing is, in order to give Mr. Marshall an

    18 opportunity to interpose any objections, after I

    19 ask my question just wait maybe one or two

    20 seconds before you answer, that way if it there

    21 is an objection, he has an opportunity to get

    22 that out on the record, and that will come out

    23 cleanly and smoothly and in order.

    24 A. Okay. I understand.

    25 Q. Thank you so much.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    7

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 A. Sure.

    3 Q. Can we start with your name, please?

    4 A. Ellen Cohen.

    5 Q. And Ms. Cohen, what is your address?

    6 A. 20 West 64th Street, New York, New York

    7 10023.

    8 Q. And how long have you lived there?

    9 A. Ten years, three months.

    10 Q. Okay. And are you employed?

    11 A. Yes, I am.

    12 Q. Where are you employed, please?

    13 A. Well, I'm a partner in a CPA firm,

    14 Shedler & Cohen, LLP.

    15 Q. And where is Shedler & Cohen located?

    16 A. In Manhattan.

    17 Q. Okay. And how long have you been a

    18 partner there?

    19 A. I've been a partner since 1995.

    20 Q. Okay. How long have you worked for the

    21 firm?

    22 A. Since 1993.

    23 Q. Okay, terrific. And what do you do

    24 there?

    25 A. I'm a CPA. I'm a partner, and we're

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    8

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 business partners in the entertainment industry.

    3 We handle tax and accounting issues for

    4 individuals.

    5 Q. I realize it is in the middle of the

    6 busy season for taxes --

    7 A. It is.

    8 Q. I do thank you for your time today.

    9 A. Okay.

    10 Q. Did you know the decedent in this case,

    11 Allan Haymes?

    12 A. Yes, I knew Allan Haymes.

    13 Q. When did you first meet Allan Haymes?

    14 A. I met Allan Haymes in 1977.

    15 Q. And how did you meet Allan Haymes?

    16 A. Allan Haymes -- my husband, Henry

    17 Cohen, worked with Allan Haymes -- just about

    18 began working with Allan Haymes just about the

    19 same time that we met, that I met Henry, and I

    20 guess Henry and Allan were working together for a

    21 short time when I was introduced to Allan. So it

    22 was the same -- the same -- I know 1977, because

    23 that's when I met Henry and I know that's about

    24 when Henry met Allan, and we met shortly during

    25 that, you know -- during that time period.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    9

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 Q. Okay, terrific. And you knew Allan

    3 through his entire life?

    4 A. From 1977, yes, forward.

    5 Q. How would you characterize your

    6 relationship with Allan Haymes, your family's

    7 relationship with Allan Haymes?

    8 A. Well, primarily, the relationship was

    9 through Henry, and he and Allan were partners in

    10 business together and -- but on the other hand,

    11 we were family friends, Allen and his wife,

    12 Carol, participated in our children's bar

    13 mitzvahs. They came up from Florida or they were

    14 in New York and they attended them, and we

    15 socialized with them, not on a regular basis, but

    16 every few years, for sure, we'd have a dinner

    17 out, whether it was in New York or in Florida,

    18 but not -- the relationship was mainly through

    19 Henry. Henry and Allan had a business

    20 relationship. I did not have a personal

    21 friendship relationship with him, but certainly

    22 very social and caring.

    23 Q. Okay. So would it be fair to say that

    24 there was regular contact between you and Henry

    25 and Allan Haymes over the years since 1977?

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    10

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 A. Yes.

    3 Q. And you mentioned that you had children

    4 -- Henry -- excuse me, that Allan and his wife

    5 were at your children's bar mitzvahs?

    6 A. Absolutely, very memorable. They were

    7 fabulous dancers. People still talk about their

    8 fabulous dancing.

    9 Q. Terrific. Have you ever lived in

    10 Florida?

    11 A. No.

    12 Q. Allan lived in New York. Do you know

    13 where he lived in New York?

    14 A. Yes, he lived at 210 Central Park

    15 South.

    16 Q. Okay. And do you know, was that a

    17 house or a condo?

    18 A. It was a rental apartment.

    19 Q. A rental apartment?

    20 A. Rented an apartment there, yes.

    21 Q. Okay.

    22 A. He and Carol lived there during -- up

    23 until they moved out, I think the rent

    24 stabilization laws changed or something and they

    25 had to -- they didn't stay, and they terminated

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    11

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 their lease and then moved to Florida. They also

    3 lived in Westhampton, had a small place there

    4 that was sold a long time ago.

    5 Q. When did they move to Florida?

    6 A. It was before Carol's death because

    7 when Carol died, they sat Shiva in a hotel room,

    8 so I don't really know. When they left the New

    9 York apartment, I don't know the date, but it was

    10 before Carol's death because as I say, we went to

    11 the funeral and they were sitting Shiva, he and

    12 his family, were sitting Shiva at a hotel.

    13 Q. The issue in this case was a challenge

    14 to Mr. Haymes' capacity or possible undue

    15 influence by his daughter Lois Haymes with regard

    16 to his current operative will, which was executed

    17 in January of 2009.

    18 A. Okay.

    19 Q. I'd like to kind of narrow the time

    20 frame because I know you've known Mr. Haymes for

    21 close to 30 years -- over 30 years?

    22 A. Yes.

    23 Q. In the last three or four years of his

    24 life, from about 2007 on?

    25 A. Uh-huh.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    12

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 Q. -- would you speak with Mr. Haymes or

    3 did you ever visit Mr. Haymes? Did you have

    4 contact with Mr. Haymes?

    5 A. I visited Allan when he moved into his

    6 first residence after the apartment -- when he

    7 moved out of the apartment on the ocean, I think

    8 it was a Hyatt -- my recollection, it was one of

    9 these Hyatt residences, independent/assisted

    10 living. He was probably there about year and a

    11 half or -- I'm not sure of the date.

    12 Q. Okay.

    13 A. I think he moved in '06. It was

    14 probably winter of '08, I'm not sure of the exact

    15 date though, if it was late '07 or winter of '08,

    16 Henry and I went to visit Allan, we had -- we met

    17 him in his lovely apartment that he had set up

    18 beautifully with furniture and special

    19 belongings. We -- he toured us around the

    20 facility, we had lunch in the dining room, he

    21 introduced us to some of his friends, people came

    22 over. It was a lovely visit. We were there

    23 about two or three hours, and as I say, Allan, he

    24 was introducing us to other people, he was, you

    25 know...

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    13

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 Q. Okay.

    3 A. Quite friendly.

    4 Q. So during that visit, did you observe

    5 any mental incapacity by Allan Haymes?

    6 A. Absolutely not.

    7 Q. Do you know Lois Haymes?

    8 A. Yes.

    9 Q. How do you know Lois?

    10 A. I know Lois, you know, only -- through.

    11 Q. Do you remember when you first met

    12 Lois?

    13 A. I really -- that's a tough one. Many,

    14 many years ago, on a trip to California, we -- my

    15 husband and I, we were out in California with the

    16 kids, and I'm pretty sure we visited with her for

    17 a short visit, but I can't put my -- I didn't

    18 really have any involvement with Lois until the

    19 last few years when she really stepped in to

    20 assist her father.

    21 Q. Okay. Did you ever personally observe,

    22 I guess -- let me ask this a different way.

    23 Was Lois Haymes present when you

    24 visited with Allan Haymes?

    25 A. No.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    14

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 Q. Did Lois Haymes facilitate your visit

    3 to see Allan Haymes in any way?

    4 A. Absolutely not. Henry was in contact

    5 with Allan on a regular basis at that point.

    6 Q. Did Lois attempt to interfere or

    7 prevent --

    8 A. Absolutely not.

    9 Q. Okay.

    10 A. She encouraged us to be in touch with

    11 him. Encouraged Henry, more than...

    12 Q. Did you ever discuss Lois with Allan?

    13 A. Not to a great extent, except that she

    14 was very grateful of -- for her assistance,

    15 particularly right after -- when he was alone.

    16 He realized how quickly -- you know, how much she

    17 was helping me him and supporting him and

    18 encouraging him.

    19 Q. Okay. Did Allan Haymes ever complain

    20 to you about Lois Haymes taking care of him?

    21 A. No, I never had a discussion with Allan

    22 about that at all.

    23 Q. Okay. Were you ever present for any

    24 conversations regarding Allan Haymes' estate

    25 plan?

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    15

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 A. No.

    3 Q. Do you know Zylo Marshall?

    4 A. Do I know --

    5 Q. The petitioner.

    6 A. Do I know him personally, no.

    7 Q. Do you know who he was?

    8 A. I know who he is.

    9 Q. Okay. Can you explain to me your

    10 understanding of his relationship to Allan

    11 Haymes?

    12 A. Grandson.

    13 Q. Okay. Have you ever discussed Zylo

    14 with Allan?

    15 A. No.

    16 Q. Do you have any knowledge regarding

    17 Allan and Zylo's relationship?

    18 A. Personally, no.

    19 Q. Okay.

    20 A. I never discussed -- talked to Allan

    21 about anything other than having to do with, you

    22 know, work or my own children or Carol or Henry,

    23 that was it.

    24 Q. Okay.

    25 A. Henry had much more of a regular

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    16

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 relationship on a regular basis with Allan.

    3 Q. Okay. All righty. How would you

    4 describe Allan's memory faculties and

    5 capabilities the last time you visited with him

    6 in person, this visit in winter of '08 or '07?

    7 A. I thought his -- he was healthy.

    8 Q. Okay.

    9 A. You know, his mind seemed healthy. As

    10 I say, we walked around the facility, he showed

    11 us all the, you know, what it had to offer, and

    12 we had lunch with him and he was pretty clear on

    13 the names of the people and introducing us, so I

    14 would say --

    15 Q. Okay.

    16 A. -- it was, you know.

    17 Q. So at that time, would you have

    18 concerns about Allan's ability to recognize his

    19 family?

    20 A. No.

    21 Q. Would you have any concerns about

    22 Allan's ability to appreciate the extent of his

    23 assets?

    24 A. I think he understood exactly what --

    25 what his assets were.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    17

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 Q. The topic of his assets didn't come up,

    3 though, you were just generalizing?

    4 A. Not at that date, no. Not at that time

    5 really, I didn't really talk about his assets.

    6 Q. Did you ever provide any accounting

    7 services to Allan?

    8 A. Yes, I did.

    9 Q. Okay.

    10 A. But not personal, only for property

    11 that he owned with Henry.

    12 Q. Okay. So it would be, not so much for

    13 Allan as it was for a partnership that he'd

    14 established --

    15 A. Exactly, exactly. I did not see or

    16 have any inclination or knowledge of his personal

    17 tax return. I would provide a K1 to his

    18 accountant.

    19 Q. And when would you provide those

    20 services, if you recall?

    21 A. Well, I'm still because there's one

    22 partnership. There was the same partnership that

    23 they owned, Henry and Allan owned, and I still do

    24 the tax return, I do it March of every year, and

    25 K1s go either to Allan, and now to the estate.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    18

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 Q. What's the name of this partnership?

    3 A. Elca Associates.

    4 Q. And that's E-L-C-A?

    5 A. E-L-C-A.

    6 Q. Have you ever observed Lois Haymes

    7 threatening Allan Haymes?

    8 A. No.

    9 Q. Have you ever observed Lois Haymes

    10 bully Allan Haymes in any way?

    11 A. No.

    12 Q. Have you ever observed Lois Haymes

    13 attempt to manipulate Allan Haymes in any way?

    14 A. I never observed that.

    15 Q. Based on your knowledge of Allan Haymes

    16 and his personality, did he strike you as an

    17 individual who could be manipulated or bullied?

    18 A. No.

    19 Q. Tell me a little bit more about Allan's

    20 personality.

    21 A. As I say, I really knew Allan through

    22 Henry, but Allan was a very sharp, very

    23 street-smart individual with a very good head on

    24 his shoulders for business, and, you know,

    25 dealmaking and really mentored my husband and was

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    19

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 not a guy who was ever taken advantage of, or --

    3 I can't -- I'm not saying ever because I'm not --

    4 don't know every day of his life, but I would

    5 imagine he was always in control of a situation

    6 and made things happen. He didn't wait -- you

    7 know, things didn't happen to him, he made things

    8 happen.

    9 Q. Okay. Terrific. I don't think I have

    10 anything further for you.

    11 A. Okay.

    12 MR. TORNINCASA: Mr. Marshall, you're

    13 up.

    14 EXAMINATION

    15 BY MR. MARSHALL:

    16 Q. Yes, yes. Good morning, Mrs. Cohen.

    17 A. Good morning to you.

    18 Q. My name is Zylo Marshall, representing

    19 myself as a plaintiff in the case of Zylo

    20 Marshall versus Lois Haymes and Craig Donoff in

    21 the estate of Allan Haymes. I am also asking you

    22 these questions based upon a deposition in

    23 California. I just want to inform you that the

    24 current lawsuit we are -- we started in --

    25 started in September 2010. I'll be jumping

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    20

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 around during this deposition.

    3 Do you consider yourself an honest,

    4 ethical person?

    5 A. Absolute --

    6 Q. Have you ever lied to anyone before?

    7 MR. TORNINCASA: Ms. Marshall, I just

    8 want to renew my direction to the witness.

    9 Ms. Cohen, if you could just please give me

    10 a second or two to place any objections on

    11 the record that are necessary before you

    12 answer. I know a lot of these questions,

    13 the answers are obvious, but I have to make

    14 my record.

    15 THE WITNESS: Okay. I'm sorry. I will

    16 do so.

    17 MR. TORNINCASA: Mr. Marshall, could

    18 you ask your first question again, please?

    19 Q. Do you consider yourself an honest,

    20 ethical person?

    21 MR. TORNINCASA: I have an objection to

    22 that question. I believe it improperly

    23 questions the credibility of this witness.

    24 It's not proper impeachment. It's improper

    25 bolstering.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    21

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 You're free to answer it.

    3 A. Yes, I consider myself an honest,

    4 ethical -- can you repeat your question?

    5 Q. Do you consider yourself an honest,

    6 ethical person?

    7 A. Yes.

    8 MR. TORNINCASA: Same objection.

    9 Q. Have you ever lied to anyone before?

    10 A. No.

    11 MR. TORNINCASA: I object to the

    12 question.

    13 I apologize, I just need a moment.

    14 I object to that question. It's

    15 improper character testimony you're seeking

    16 to elicit.

    17 A. No.

    18 Q. In the last 15 years, have you ever

    19 been arrested?

    20 MR. TORNINCASA: You can answer that.

    21 A. No.

    22 Q. Have you ever been deposed before?

    23 MR. TORNINCASA: You can answer.

    24 A. No.

    25 Q. Okay. Have you ever testified in court

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    22

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 before?

    3 A. No.

    4 Q. Have you ever been a plaintiff or

    5 defendant in another case?

    6 A. No.

    7 Q. Did you speak to Matt Tornincasa or Ken

    8 Pollock prior to this lawsuit -- prior to this

    9 deposition. I'm sorry, prior to this deposition?

    10 A. Yes.

    11 Q. How many times did you speak to either

    12 one of them?

    13 A. Once to Matt.

    14 Q. Okay. How long were those

    15 conversations -- how long did that conversation

    16 last?

    17 A. Ten minutes.

    18 Q. Okay. Since 2005, did you send any

    19 e-mails to Lois Haymes?

    20 A. Not that I'm aware -- not that I

    21 remember, or...

    22 Q. Okay.

    23 A. Not that I remember.

    24 Q. Okay. Since 2005, did you ever receive

    25 any e-mails from Lois Haymes?

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    23

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 A. Not that I remember.

    3 Q. Okay. Did Allan Haymes ever do

    4 anything to cause you to distrust him?

    5 MR. TORNINCASA: Can you repeat that

    6 question, please, Mr. Marshall?

    7 Q. Did Allan Haymes ever do anything that

    8 caused you to distrust him?

    9 MR. TORNINCASA: I object. That

    10 question is vague and unintelligible.

    11 You can answer, if you can.

    12 A. Repeat the question once more.

    13 Q. Do you -- did Allan Haymes ever do

    14 anything that caused you to distrust him?

    15 A. No.

    16 Q. As we sit here right now, has Lois

    17 Haymes done anything to betray your trust?

    18 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection. Beyond the

    19 scope of my direct examination. Improper

    20 character witness -- improper character

    21 testimony is being called for here without

    22 proper predicate or foundation.

    23 You can answer, if you can.

    24 A. Repeat the question.

    25 Q. Yeah. As we sit here right now, has

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    24

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 Lois Haymes done anything to betray your trust?

    3 A. No.

    4 Q. Currently, do you have any business

    5 ventures with Lois Haymes?

    6 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection. This is

    7 not a proper cross-examination, it's a

    8 leading question and beyond the scope.

    9 Ms. Cohen, you can answer, if you can.

    10 Because this is -- and Zylo, I'm just going

    11 to interrupt -- because this is for trial, I

    12 need to place my objections on the record.

    13 The court is going to have to determine

    14 whether or not those objections are valid.

    15 I just have to get them all out there.

    16 After I object, you're free to answer any

    17 question, you don't have to...

    18 THE WITNESS: Okay.

    19 A. Repeat the question.

    20 Q. Currently, do you have any business

    21 ventures with Lois Haymes?

    22 A. With Lois Haymes directly? No.

    23 Q. Yes.

    24 A. I have --

    25 Q. Did you consider doing -- go ahead.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    25

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 A. The only business venture at all with

    3 the Haymes is with the estate of Allan Haymes,

    4 which I discussed earlier, Elca Associates.

    5 Q. Okay.

    6 A. That's not --

    7 Q. Without doing any -- go ahead.

    8 A. No, it's not directly with Lois.

    9 Q. Okay. Would you consider doing any

    10 joint ventures with Lois Haymes in the future?

    11 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection,

    12 hypothetical question. Improper predicate.

    13 This is far beyond the scope of my direct

    14 examination. At this point, Mr. Marshall,

    15 I'm going to direct you to move along,

    16 please.

    17 You can answer, if you can.

    18 MR. MARSHALL: Okay.

    19 A. I can't answer that.

    20 Q. Did Zylo Marshall ever call you?

    21 A. Yes.

    22 Q. How many times?

    23 A. I don't know the exact number, but a

    24 number of times.

    25 Q. What did he call you about?

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    26

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection. Beyond the

    3 scope of my direct.

    4 Mr. Marshall, you didn't notice this

    5 for your own deposition. You need to

    6 confine your questions to the issues that

    7 are raised in the direct examination here.

    8 You're going very far field here at this

    9 point.

    10 MR. MARSHALL: Okay.

    11 Q. In what year did you first acquire your

    12 first partnership with Allan Haymes?

    13 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection. There's no

    14 factual predicate to that.

    15 Ms. Cohen has testified that she does

    16 not have any partnerships with Allan Haymes,

    17 Mr. Marshall.

    18 Q. Was it just with Elca Associates?

    19 MR. TORNINCASA: If you can answer, you

    20 can. Did you understand his question?

    21 A. What was the question?

    22 Q. Is Elca Associates the only partnership

    23 you had with Allan Haymes?

    24 A. It's the only partnership that is still

    25 in existence since Allan's death.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    27

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 Q. Okay. How many other partnerships --

    3 since 2003 --

    4 A. Since --

    5 Q. -- how many other partnerships were you

    6 involved with, with Allan Haymes?

    7 A. Since what date?

    8 Q. 2000 and -- January 2003.

    9 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection. This is

    10 far beyond the scope of my direct. This is

    11 irrelevant to any of the issues in this

    12 case. This is immaterial. This is

    13 harassing.

    14 Q. You can answer.

    15 MR. TORNINCASA: If you can.

    16 A. Just Elca Associates, since 2003.

    17 Q. Okay.

    18 A. That's my -- my recollection, I am not

    19 aware of or cannot bring to memory anything prior

    20 to -- anything other than Elca Associates since

    21 2003.

    22 Q. Okay. From January 2003 until

    23 September 2010, how many transactions were you

    24 and Allan Haymes involved with?

    25 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    28

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 Irrelevant, immaterial, far beyond the scope

    3 of the direct examination.

    4 If you and Allan Haymes were directly

    5 involved in any interest --

    6 THE WITNESS: Nothing.

    7 MR. TORNINCASA: -- I guess you can

    8 answer. If you weren't, you can answer

    9 none.

    10 Mr. Marshall, is there --

    11 A. Besides Elca?

    12 MR. TORNINCASA: Is there a point to

    13 these questions besides harassing this

    14 witness?

    15 Q. Well, once you got involved with

    16 transactions, how many were sold, transferred --

    17 A. Nothing, just Elca Associates. That's

    18 the only thing, and it was formed way before

    19 2003. It is the only -- only business

    20 relationship.

    21 Q. Right. Did you sell any property using

    22 -- buy or sell any property in 2003 using Elca

    23 Associates?

    24 A. No.

    25 Q. Okay. Do you have the Marshall

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    29

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 exhibits folder in front of you?

    3 MR. TORNINCASA: Two Fed-Ex files were

    4 received here, Mr. Marshall. Can you be a

    5 little more specific as to which one you're

    6 looking for?

    7 MR. MARSHALL: Yes. I thought they

    8 were combined. It's going to be Exhibit A.

    9 So I thought they were combined, but it's

    10 just A through Q and R through Y. Just put

    11 them together.

    12 MR. TORNINCASA: Okay. I've handed to

    13 Ms. Cohen a Fed-Ex file here, which appears

    14 to contain a series of tabs, A through Q,

    15 and a second series of tabs, R through Y.

    16 MR. MARSHALL: Yes.

    17 Q. Exhibit A is a type of venue,

    18 Department of Foreign Limited Partnership, which

    19 was formed in March 8, 1988, is that correct?

    20 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, this

    21 document's been improperly introduced.

    22 Objection, this document is not the best

    23 evidence. Objection, this document contains

    24 hearsay, which is not within any of the

    25 recognized exceptions. Objection, this

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    30

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 document is ineligible. Objection, there is

    3 no foundation. Objection, this is beyond

    4 the scope of my direct. Objection, this

    5 line of questioning is irrelevant.

    6 Objection, this exhibit is immaterial to any

    7 of the issues in the case.

    8 Q. You can answer.

    9 A. What was the question? Repeat the

    10 question.

    11 Q. Okay. Exhibit A is a type of venue,

    12 Department of State, Foreign Limited Partnership,

    13 which was formed in March 4th, 1988, is that

    14 correct?

    15 A. That is correct.

    16 MR. TORNINCASA: Same objection, and

    17 also leading.

    18 Q. Under "General Character of Business,"

    19 to acquire, own, hold, operate, maintain, lease,

    20 finance, or dispose of real property and any

    21 other act instrumental or necessary to do or set

    22 forth business and partnership agreements, is

    23 that correct?

    24 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection,

    25 Mr. Marshall is testifying. Objection,

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    31

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 leading question. Objection, this document

    3 is not the best evidence. Objection, this

    4 is irrelevant and immaterial. Objection,

    5 this document contains hearsay. Objection,

    6 the document has not been properly

    7 authenticated. Objection, this document is

    8 not the best evidence of its contents.

    9 You can answer, if you can.

    10 A. Yes, that's what this exhibit A reads.

    11 Q. Okay. Under that -- under that, you

    12 were classified as a general and limited partner,

    13 is that correct?

    14 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, leading.

    15 Objection, beyond the scope of the direct

    16 examination. Objection, irrelevant.

    17 Objection, immaterial. Objection, this

    18 document has not properly been introduced.

    19 Objection, there is no foundation.

    20 You can answer, if you can.

    21 A. I'm listed, yes.

    22 Q. Okay. This is a yes or no question

    23 only, is the legal address for Aces Associations

    24 in Pennsylvania?

    25 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, leading

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    32

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 question. Objection, the document speaks

    3 for itself. Objection, you're attempting to

    4 use Exhibit A to introduce hearsay.

    5 Objection, beyond the scope of my direct

    6 examination. Objection, irrelevant.

    7 Objection, immaterial.

    8 You can answer, if you can.

    9 A. The form does say "Application for

    10 Registration, Foreign Limited Partnership,

    11 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania." The form does say

    12 that.

    13 Q. Is the legal address in Pennsylvania?

    14 A. The legal address?

    15 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection --

    16 Q. Is the legal address for business in

    17 Pennsylvania?

    18 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, calling for

    19 hearsay. Objection, the document speaks for

    20 itself. Objection, seeking information

    21 beyond the scope of this witness's

    22 knowledge. Objection, irrelevant.

    23 Objection, immaterial. Objection, this

    24 document is not the best evidence of the

    25 information that's being requested.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    33

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 Objection, hearsay. I think I might have

    3 already said that one, sorry, and objection,

    4 beyond the scope of the direct.

    5 Q. Let's move on. Was Aces Associates,

    6 the limited partnership, in part of the sale of

    7 any property from January 3rd -- January 2003

    8 until May 2012?

    9 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, there's no

    10 factual predicate for that question.

    11 Objection, that is a leading question.

    12 Objection, that is irrelevant to the issues

    13 in this lawsuit. Objection, that question

    14 is immaterial. Objection, that question is

    15 harassing. Objection, there is no proper

    16 foundation for that question.

    17 You can answer, if you can, if you have

    18 that knowledge.

    19 A. To the best of my knowledge, Aces

    20 Associates -- Aces Associates was dissolved by --

    21 at -- in December of 1988. It never -- it never

    22 -- it was a dormant entity and never -- never

    23 pursued the -- any business.

    24 Q. So it was opened and closed in 1988, is

    25 that the right year?

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    34

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 A. Yes.

    3 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, leading

    4 question. Objection, irrelevant.

    5 Objection, immaterial.

    6 You already answered.

    7 A. To the best of my knowledge, yes.

    8 Q. Okay. Exhibit B, is a -- can we turn

    9 to Exhibit B, please?

    10 A. (Witness complies.)

    11 Q. Exhibit B is a March 29, 1988

    12 application for registration to transact business

    13 in Michigan, is that correct?

    14 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, this

    15 document was not properly authenticated.

    16 Objection, this document is not the best

    17 evidence for the information which you're

    18 seeking. Objection, this document is

    19 hearsay and contains hearsay within hearsay.

    20 Objection, this document is irrelevant.

    21 Objection, this document is immaterial to

    22 the issues in this case. Objection, this

    23 document has not been properly authenticated

    24 or introduced.

    25 You can answer, if you can.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    35

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 A. That's what the -- yes, Exhibit B,

    3 application for registration to transact business

    4 in Michigan, that's what it reads.

    5 Q. As in Exhibit A, Box 3 of Exhibit B

    6 also states as a general character of business to

    7 acquire, own, hold, operate, maintain, lease,

    8 finance, dispose of real property; is that

    9 correct?

    10 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, the

    11 document speaks for itself. Objection,

    12 leading question. Objection, Mr. Marshall

    13 is testifying. Objection, irrelevant.

    14 Objection, immaterial. Objection, beyond

    15 the scope of my direct examination.

    16 A. That's what it reads in number 3.

    17 Q. Okay. All right. Page 4 of Exhibit B

    18 has a signature -- page 4 of Exhibit B has the

    19 signature of Ellen Cohen, Allan Haymes, and Alan

    20 Simons, is that correct?

    21 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, leading

    22 question. Objection, not properly

    23 authenticated. Objection, best evidence

    24 rule. Objection, no foundation. Objection,

    25 irrelevant. Objection, immaterial.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    36

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 Objection, beyond the scope of the direct

    3 examination.

    4 THE WITNESS: Am I supposed to answer?

    5 Q. Hello?

    6 A. Oh, I'm sorry. What was -- can you

    7 repeat the question?

    8 Q. Page 4 of exhibit B has signatures for

    9 Ellen Cohen, Allan Haymes and Allan Simons, is

    10 that correct?

    11 A. It does, but --

    12 Q. Okay. Does this mean the three of you

    13 were the only partners with Aces Associates:

    14 Limited Partnership?

    15 MR. TORNINCASA: First off, objection,

    16 irrelevant, immaterial, beyond the scope of

    17 the direct examination. Calling for

    18 hearsay, violating the best evidence rule.

    19 This document has not been properly

    20 introduced. This document has not been

    21 properly authenticated. This document has

    22 no -- there are no foundation for these

    23 questions.

    24 A. It appears those are the three names

    25 listed.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    37

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 Q. Do you know when Alan Simons died?

    3 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, irrelevant

    4 and material and beyond the scope.

    5 A. I do not even know Alan Simon.

    6 MR. TORNINCASA: That's all right.

    7 Q. Where are we -- isn't Alan Simon in the

    8 -- as a partner with Aces Associates?

    9 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection. Ms. Cohen

    10 just testified she doesn't know Mr. Simon,

    11 objection.

    12 MR. MARSHALL: Okay.

    13 MR. TORNINCASA: The best evidence of

    14 this would be the corporate documents.

    15 Objection, the documents lack foundation.

    16 Objection, these documents have not been

    17 properly introduced. Objection, this is

    18 irrelevant, immaterial, beyond the scope of

    19 the direct examination.

    20 Q. Okay. Let's go to Exhibit 3 -- I'm

    21 sorry, Exhibit C. Exhibit C is a comprehensive

    22 report on you through private investigator

    23 William Desmond in California, which includes

    24 both personal and professional history. Please

    25 turn to page 3 under "people at work."

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    38

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 MR. TORNINCASA: I'm going to object.

    3 This is irrelevant, immaterial, harassing,

    4 beyond the scope, and improper attack on the

    5 credibility of Ms. Cohen.

    6 THE WITNESS: This is my business.

    7 MR. TORNINCASA: This report that

    8 purports to be Exhibit C is hearsay and is

    9 hearsay on hearsay. None of the records

    10 which purport to be summarized in this

    11 report have been authenticated. They

    12 violate the best evidence rule.

    13 Q. Under "people at work," do you see a

    14 partnership called Aces Associates, Limited

    15 Partnership, under page 3?

    16 MR. TORNINCASA: Same objections.

    17 A. No.

    18 Q. What about page 4?

    19 A. I see my name, yes, at the bottom of

    20 the page, but the -- the dates are irrelevant.

    21 Q. Do you see a partnership called Aces

    22 Associates, Limited Partnership?

    23 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, irrelevant

    24 immaterial, hearsay on hearsay, best

    25 evidence rule.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    39

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 A. Yes.

    3 Q. Okay. Under "people at work," do you

    4 see a partnership called Elca Associates

    5 Partnership?

    6 MR. TORNINCASA: Same objections,

    7 irrelevant, immaterial, beyond the scope of

    8 the direct, harassing, any references to

    9 this Accurint report is hearsay on hearsay.

    10 This document has not been properly

    11 introduced. There's no foundation

    12 established for the information that's

    13 purportedly contained in this report.

    14 There's no predicate for these questions.

    15 A. No, I do not see Elca, unless, I'm -- I

    16 don't see Elca listed.

    17 Q. Let's turn to Exhibit X.

    18 MR. TORNINCASA: Which exhibit was

    19 that, Mr. Marshall?

    20 MR. MARSHALL: X.

    21 A. Okay.

    22 Q. Are you there?

    23 A. Yes.

    24 Q. Exhibit X, is a partial 2009 tax return

    25 for Allan Haymes. Under part 2, number 2, what

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    40

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 is the name of the partnership?

    3 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, this is

    4 beyond the scope of the direct examination.

    5 It's irrelevant, immaterial. This document

    6 has not been properly authenticated. This

    7 is an incomplete document. This violates

    8 the best evidence rule. This document, to

    9 the extent that you're attempting to claim

    10 any representation on it, is admissible for

    11 a truthful matter asserted therein. It is

    12 hearsay. Ms. Cohen may not be competent to

    13 testify as to this until you establish

    14 whether or not she prepared this document.

    15 To the extent that you're simply trying to

    16 read documents into the record, Mr.

    17 Marshall, you are testifying and that is

    18 objectionable as well.

    19 Q. You can answer.

    20 A. Reads Elca Associates. Is that what --

    21 Q. Okay. What is the SEIN number?

    22 MR. TORNINCASA: Same objections,

    23 hearsay, irrelevant, immaterial, beyond the

    24 scope, harassing, incomplete document, and

    25 calling for information which may be beyond

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    41

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 this witness's knowledge.

    3 A. I will read the ID number. 13-3362,

    4 it's a little blurry, but it looks like 534.

    5 Q. Okay. Let's turn to Exhibit W.

    6 A. W, yes.

    7 Q. This exhibit states that there were no

    8 results for SEIN number 13-3362534 in the United

    9 States. Did you ever file a tax return for Elca

    10 Associates Partnership?

    11 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, compound

    12 question. The exhibit that you just

    13 referenced, Exhibit W, is not best evidence.

    14 It's unauthenticated, there's no foundation,

    15 you haven't established the facts which you

    16 purport to be contained herein. It's

    17 hearsay. You are calling for Ms. Cohen to

    18 testify based on facts that are not in

    19 evidence. This is all irrelevant,

    20 immaterial, beyond the scope of the direct

    21 examination. This document violates the

    22 best evidence rule, and we object to any

    23 attempt to admit it during trial.

    24 You can answer, if you can.

    25 A. I will answer your question. I do in

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    42

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 fact file a tax return and have since Elca

    3 Associates was created. I do not --

    4 Q. Okay.

    5 A. I do not know, from the top of my head,

    6 the ID number for Elca Associates.

    7 Q. But you did file an Elca Associates

    8 Partnership tax return?

    9 A. Right. Whether it -- whether this is

    10 the number that it was filed under, I cannot

    11 answer. This could be -- they may have typed,

    12 you know, had an input error on the type -- on

    13 Allan Haymes.

    14 Q. Right.

    15 A. This is not the Elca tax return, but I

    16 definitely filed and continue to file Elca tax

    17 returns.

    18 Q. Okay. Okay. Have you ever filed --

    19 okay. Have you ever filed -- sold or leased

    20 property using Elca Associates Partnership?

    21 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection. No

    22 foundation.

    23 Mr. Marshall, you haven't established

    24 that Ms. Cohen is a member of Elca or is

    25 aware of its activities such that could

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    43

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 testify in response to that question.

    3 MR. MARSHALL: Okay.

    4 MR. TORNINCASA: This is irrelevant,

    5 immaterial, harassing. It's far beyond the

    6 scope of the direct examination, and, you

    7 know, I'm willing to tolerate this to a

    8 point, Mr. Marshall, but eventually, we're

    9 going to get the judge involved if you don't

    10 take this back to the issues in the

    11 complaint very soon.

    12 MR. MARSHALL: No, no, I am going to be

    13 asking those questions if she was a partner

    14 of Elca Associates. I am going to be asking

    15 those questions, but I'm going down this in

    16 a process, so yes, I will be asking those

    17 questions.

    18 MR. TORNINCASA: You can try to tie it

    19 up however you want, but right now, your

    20 questions are all irrelevant, immaterial and

    21 are harassing of this witness, who has

    22 graciously given us her time during her

    23 busiest time of year.

    24 MR. MARSHALL: Okay.

    25 Q. You can answer.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    44

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 A. What was the question?

    3 Q. Have you ever bought, sold or leased

    4 property using Elca Associates Partnership?

    5 MR. TORNINCASA: Same objections.

    6 A. Elca Associates purchased one building

    7 when the property -- when the partnership was

    8 created and that is all that -- that single

    9 property is the only property and still exists in

    10 Elca Associates.

    11 Q. What is the name -- what is address of

    12 that building?

    13 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, irrelevant,

    14 immaterial, harassing, beyond the scope of

    15 the issues in this case, beyond the scope of

    16 the direct examination.

    17 If you have that knowledge, you can

    18 answer.

    19 A. I just know it's in Pennsylvania, I do

    20 not know its exact address.

    21 Q. Okay.

    22 MR. MARSHALL: Matt, can you just do an

    23 objection without having to go through the

    24 whole process so that we can go though that

    25 in the court and if you object then you can

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    45

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 explain your reason why you object so we

    3 don't have to go through every single one

    4 using different formats for objections,

    5 please?

    6 MR. TORNINCASA: If you're willing to

    7 stipulate that we have a standing objection

    8 to every one of your questions, that we can

    9 supplement for the court with a memorandum

    10 of law regarding why each and every one of

    11 your questions is objectionable --

    12 MR. MARSHALL: Yes.

    13 MR. TORNINCASA: -- from now through

    14 the end of this examination, I guess that's

    15 a reasonable accommodation.

    16 MR. MARSHALL: Okay. Thank you.

    17 MR. TORNINCASA: With regard to the

    18 documentary evidence, though, I still need

    19 to get those out on the record.

    20 MR. MARSHALL: Okay.

    21 Q. Were you a part of doing articles of

    22 incorporation or foreign partnership for Elca

    23 Associates Partnership?

    24 A. I couldn't hear the question.

    25 Q. Were you a part of doing articles of

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    46

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 incorporation or a foreign partnership for Elca

    3 Associates Partnership?

    4 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection. To the

    5 supplemented later for stipulation.

    6 A. Well, I wasn't a law -- I'm not a

    7 lawyer, I didn't form the partnership.

    8 Q. Okay. Do you have any documentation

    9 that you were a part of Elca Associates

    10 Partnership such as e-mails or letters?

    11 MR. TORNINCASA: Again, objection.

    12 A. I don't understand the question, I'm

    13 sorry.

    14 Q. Do you have any documentation that you

    15 were a part of Elca Associates, such as e-mails

    16 or letters?

    17 MR. TORNINCASA: Same objections.

    18 A. I don't -- I don't have any e-mails or

    19 letters, but I am a partner in Elca Associates.

    20 Q. Did you ever send any e-mails to

    21 anybody regarding Elca Associates Partnership?

    22 MR. TORNINCASA: Same objections.

    23 A. Not that I'm aware of. Other --

    24 Q. Okay. Let's turn back to Aces

    25 Associates. Have you ever discussed with Lois

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    47

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 Haymes on the phone or e-mail about Aces

    3 Associates, Limited Partnership?

    4 MR. TORNINCASA: My standard litany of

    5 objections.

    6 A. The only discussion we might have had

    7 would be related to the fact that Aces Associates

    8 was formed and dissolved in 1988, that it never

    9 -- never acquired, owned, held, operated,

    10 maintained, leased, financed, or disposed of any

    11 real property. It never -- it never became an

    12 active entity.

    13 Q. Okay.

    14 A. It never acquired or performed any of

    15 those acts that it had originally been

    16 established for and therefore was dissolved in

    17 the same year.

    18 Q. Okay. Let turn to Exhibit D.

    19 MR. TORNINCASA: Was that D as in

    20 Delta?

    21 MR. MARSHALL: D as in Delta.

    22 A. Okay. I've turned to Exhibit D.

    23 Q. Exhibit D is a filing endorsement

    24 through Michigan Department of Licensing and

    25 Regulatory Affairs for Aces Associates, Limited

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    48

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 Partnership. Did you close this partnership on

    3 March 5, 2012?

    4 MR. TORNINCASA: Object, best evidence

    5 rule, no foundation, irrelevant, immaterial,

    6 beyond the scope of the examination,

    7 hearsay, hearsay on hearsay.

    8 A. To the best of my knowledge, this

    9 entity was dissolved with the federal government

    10 in 2000 -- 1988. It came to the attention of the

    11 partner, I guess. It came to the attention of

    12 someone that there was an un-filed form in the

    13 state of Michigan.

    14 Q. Right.

    15 A. And therefore, in 2012, to tidy up the

    16 open record -- but the partnership itself was

    17 dissolved or was dormant and never carried on

    18 business. So it was purely --

    19 Q. You --

    20 A. An -- I would --

    21 Q. You signed and -- and you signed and

    22 closed this partnership intended with your

    23 signature, is that correct?

    24 (Reporter clarification.)

    25 Q. You signed your signature to tie up and

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    49

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 close down this entity?

    3 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, leading.

    4 Objection, improper cross. Objection,

    5 beyond the scope, irrelevant. Sorry.

    6 A. I signed the document for purposes of,

    7 as you said, just tying up loose ends. The

    8 entity was a dormant partnership and the state of

    9 Michigan required this form, and therefore --

    10 Q. Why wasn't this -- go ahead.

    11 A. And therefore, I signed it.

    12 Q. Why wasn't Aces Associates, Limited

    13 Partnership closed in 2010 when your partner

    14 Allan Haymes died?

    15 A. We were -- we were unaware that there

    16 was loose ends.

    17 Q. Okay. Exhibit E is a comprehensive

    18 business report of private investigator Frank

    19 Roman that I received on December 15, 2012, as

    20 identified in the upper left-hand corner.

    21 A. Exhibit E?

    22 Q. Page --

    23 MR. TORNINCASA: Mr. Marshall, we can't

    24 hear you.

    25 Q. Okay. Are you -- okay. Page 2 of 4

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    50

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 has a corporate filing number. Under corporate

    3 filing number 1, what is the name type?

    4 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, irrelevant,

    5 immaterial, beyond the scope. This

    6 investigative report is an improper summary.

    7 The best evidence of this information is not

    8 being presented to this witness. This is

    9 hearsay, this is hearsay on hearsay. This

    10 document is illegible, the writing on it is

    11 so faded that it's impossible to read

    12 certain parts of it. This document appears

    13 to be incomplete. We object to any use of

    14 this document. And objection, lack of

    15 foundation, no predicate.

    16 A. What was your question?

    17 Q. What is the legal address for this

    18 property -- for this partnership -- what is the

    19 legal address for this partnership?

    20 A. It doesn't.

    21 MR. TORNINCASA: Same objection.

    22 A. It doesn't read -- it doesn't read a

    23 legal address. It just -- the address is a New

    24 York address. That was the attorney.

    25 Q. Read the address.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    51

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 A. 950 Third Avenue, New York, New York

    3 10022, and it's just a law -- that's a legal

    4 address where the law firm who incorporated, who

    5 set up the activity.

    6 Q. Under the second to last section, it

    7 states, As of September 2nd, 2004. What is so

    8 particular about this address or this date?

    9 MR. TORNINCASA: Same objections.

    10 A. Not -- I'm -- offhand, I don't know.

    11 Q. Okay.

    12 A. I don't even see where this --

    13 Q. The last page, Dun & Bradstreet shows

    14 the annual sales in 2010 as $130,000 and shows a

    15 failed revision date of May 18, 2012 and shows

    16 the Aces Associates, Limited Partnership is a

    17 securely brokering dealer. Did you report any of

    18 this to Dun & Bradstreet?

    19 MR. TORNINCASA: Same objections.

    20 A. This is not --

    21 MR. TORNINCASA: Irrelevant,

    22 immaterial, harassing. Mr. Marshall, you

    23 are misreading these documents. These

    24 documents are illegible. You are attempting

    25 to lead the witness. There's no foundation.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    52

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 These documents have not been properly

    3 admitted. This document is a summary. It

    4 is an improper summary. It's hearsay on

    5 hearsay.

    6 THE WITNESS: Okay, wait...

    7 MR. TORNINCASA: It's not the best

    8 evidence of the information which you are

    9 seeking.

    10 A. To the best of my knowledge, reading

    11 this Dun & Bradstreet report, this is a different

    12 entity. This is an Aces Associates that was

    13 established in 2010. This is -- I have nothing

    14 to -- I have no relationship with this entity, to

    15 the best of my knowledge. This is -- there

    16 are --

    17 Q. Okay.

    18 A. A different company.

    19 Q. Do you know a gentleman by the name --

    20 MR. TORNINCASA: What was that,

    21 Mr. Marshall?

    22 Q. Do you know a gentleman by the name of

    23 Jeffrey Moerdler, M-O-E-R-D-L-E-R?

    24 A. Absolutely not.

    25 Q. Okay. Do you know of a gentleman by

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    53

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 the name of Levine Mintz, M-I-N-T-Z?

    3 A. Absolutely not.

    4 Q. Okay. Let's turn to Exhibit H, which

    5 is an entity information through New York

    6 Department of State, Division of Corporations for

    7 210 CPS Associates, LLC. Do you know of this

    8 LLC?

    9 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, this

    10 document is not best evidence. This

    11 document is not certified. There's no

    12 foundation. This document is hearsay

    13 without being subject to any of the

    14 exceptions. It appears to be a summary

    15 document, which would be hearsay on hearsay.

    16 It is irrelevant, immaterial, beyond the

    17 scope.

    18 Mr. Marshall, at this point you've

    19 spent close to 45 minutes harassing

    20 Ms. Cohen with irrelevant information. If

    21 you go another ten minutes, we're going to

    22 call the court this morning and we're going

    23 to bring this to his attention and allow the

    24 court to decide whether this line of

    25 questions should continue.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    54

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 MR. MARSHALL: Okay. This is about

    3 property at 210 Central Park South, Mr.

    4 Tornincasa. This is regarding the sale of

    5 property from 2005 and 2012.

    6 MR. TORNINCASA: Mr. Marshall, it's

    7 already been established that Mr. Haymes

    8 rented at 210 and didn't own any property

    9 there.

    10 MR. MARSHALL: I realize that. I

    11 realize that. Just because you rent it,

    12 that doesn't mean you could own -- the

    13 partnership for Aces Associates doesn't

    14 always talk about owning, it talks about

    15 leasing, financing, not just renting, okay.

    16 So that partnership discussed is unrelated

    17 to property other than straight ownership by

    18 an individual.

    19 MR. TORNINCASA: Mr. Marshall, you

    20 haven't established that Aces Associates

    21 owned this property. We've now, with the

    22 assistance of the witness, established

    23 there's at least two Aces Associates in the

    24 world.

    25 MR. MARSHALL: Right.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    55

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 MR. TORNINCASA: You haven't

    3 established that the proper Aces Associates

    4 own the property. If you wish to question

    5 the witness about these issues, you need to

    6 do it correctly. You need to establish the

    7 predicate facts, which you have not yet

    8 done. You've not connected any of these

    9 facts to any of the issues in this lawsuit,

    10 which is about the testamentary capacity of

    11 Allan Haymes and your allegations that Lois

    12 Haymes unduly influenced her father to

    13 change the will.

    14 MR. MARSHALL: Right, right, right.

    15 This deposition is not about Allan Haymes'

    16 testamentary capacity because this

    17 deposition -- Ellen Cohen was not involved

    18 in his abilities. This deposition is more

    19 or less about Aces Associates, Limited

    20 Partnership and Elca Associates Partnership.

    21 And you flew down -- up to New York for this

    22 reason only, okay. You didn't fly to New

    23 York regarding Allan Haymes' capacity to

    24 make his own decisions because she was never

    25 involved in that, she does not know Zylo

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    56

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 Marshall, she does not know very much about

    3 Allan Haymes' everyday situation in Florida,

    4 okay?

    5 MR. TORNINCASA: Mr. Marshall, you get

    6 --

    7 THE WITNESS: Can I repeat, though? I

    8 want to make a statement. Aces Associates

    9 never owned, and that really pretty much

    10 explains my situation. Aces Associates

    11 never owned, acquired, held, operated,

    12 maintained, leased, financed, disposed of

    13 real property or any or acts incidental or

    14 necessary to pursue onto said business and

    15 the partnership agreement. It was dormant,

    16 it was a dormant entity.

    17 MR. MARSHALL: Okay.

    18 THE WITNESS: It was never an owner,

    19 releasor, an operator or any other thing of

    20 210 Central Park South or any other

    21 property, for that matter. So I've

    22 established that.

    23 Q. Okay. Let's turn to Exhibit S, which

    24 is another report from private investigator,

    25 Frank Roman, as in exhibit -- as in -- okay. As

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    57

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 in the articles of incorporation for Aces

    3 Associates in Exhibit A and B, Exhibit S, under

    4 "associated people," Ellen Cohen, Allan Haymes,

    5 and Alan Simon are the business contacts; is that

    6 correct?

    7 MR. TORNINCASA: Same objections. This

    8 is harassing, irrelevant, immaterial, beyond

    9 the scope of the direct. This document is

    10 not best evidence of the information which

    11 you're seeking to call into the record.

    12 This is an improper summary. This purported

    13 exhibit is hearsay, it's hearsay on hearsay.

    14 It's not the official business records, it's

    15 an improper summary. There's no foundation.

    16 It's not been properly authenticated, and we

    17 object to any use of this document.

    18 A. My name is yes -- yes, my name is

    19 listed.

    20 Q. Okay.

    21 A. But it was a dormant entity. I will

    22 repeat that again to you, Zylo, it was a dormant

    23 entity. It was in existence for one year, 1988.

    24 The final tax returns were filed. It was

    25 dormant. It did not own, lease, acquire, rent,

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    58

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 anything.

    3 Q. Okay. Let's turn to number 4 on page

    4 2. Do you know of a sale on April 30, 2008?

    5 MR. TORNINCASA: Same objections,

    6 irrelevant, immaterial.

    7 THE WITNESS: What is this?

    8 MR. TORNINCASA: Harassing, beyond the

    9 scope of direct, no foundation, improper

    10 summary, hearsay, hearsay on hearsay, not

    11 the best evidence, no foundation, no

    12 predicate.

    13 A. I know -- no -- I have no privy or --

    14 no information concerning 210 Central Park South

    15 or whatever that is, 210, LLC. I have absolutely

    16 no involvement, never have, in any capacity,

    17 through any partnership or individual for 210

    18 Central Park South or 210, LLC.

    19 Q. Okay. So you don't know anything about

    20 Aces Associates, you know nothing about Aces

    21 Property and Holding, 210 --

    22 A. Excuse me? I know, Aces Associates, I

    23 do --

    24 MR. TORNINCASA: Excuse me, can I

    25 interrupt you?

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    59

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 Objection. That was a blatant

    3 mischaracterization of her testimony. Her

    4 testimony was very specific that she knows

    5 about Aces Associates, that it was organized

    6 to acquire property and it subsequently did

    7 not acquire property and it had no active

    8 operations since its organization. I resent

    9 your attempt to re-characterize that

    10 statement into a blanket statement that she

    11 has no knowledge about any aspect of Aces

    12 Associates, Mr. Marshall.

    13 MR. MARSHALL: Okay, all right. Just

    14 give me a few more seconds here, I think --

    15 she doesn't know much about any sales of any

    16 property at 210 Central Park South. Give me

    17 a second, please, so I can look at my notes

    18 and I don't have to ask the same questions

    19 over again.

    20 MR. TORNINCASA: Take as much time as

    21 you need, sir.

    22 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 10:16

    23 a.m., and we are going off the record.

    24 (Pause.)

    25 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 10:17

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    60

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 a.m., and we are back on the record.

    3 EXAMINATION CONTINUED

    4 BY MR. MARSHALL:

    5 Q. Do you know anything about Hallmark

    6 Holding Company?

    7 MR. TORNINCASA: What was that,

    8 Mr. Marshall?

    9 Q. Do you know anything about Hallmark

    10 Holding Company, Inc.?

    11 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, irrelevant,

    12 beyond the scope, immaterial.

    13 A. No, I do not.

    14 Q. Okay. Turn to Exhibit P.

    15 A. P.

    16 Q. Okay. Exhibit P is a Department of

    17 State, Division of Corporations, which state that

    18 no business entities were found for Elca

    19 Associates.

    20 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection.

    21 Q. Did you ever --

    22 MR. TORNINCASA: Sorry, finish your

    23 question first.

    24 MR. MARSHALL: Go ahead, go ahead, go

    25 ahead.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    61

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 MR. TORNINCASA: No, please finish your

    3 question so I can get all the objections out

    4 at once.

    5 Q. Did you ever communicate with Shari

    6 Cohen, an attorney for Craig Donoff -- did you

    7 ever communicate with Shari Cohen, another

    8 attorney at Craig Donoff's office regarding Elca

    9 Associates?

    10 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, that's

    11 compound. You started with an exhibit and

    12 you ended with something completely

    13 different. Objection, irrelevant,

    14 immaterial and beyond the scope of the

    15 direct. Objection, that exhibit is hearsay.

    16 It contains hearsay on hearsay without being

    17 subject to any of the exceptions. That

    18 exhibit is not the best evidence available.

    19 It has apparently been modified in addition

    20 -- I can't even tell if that's your notes or

    21 that's a printing error there, Mr. Marshall.

    22 There's no foundation for this question,

    23 it's improper predicate. This evidence has

    24 not been properly introduced. It's not of

    25 record.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    62

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 You can answer, if you can.

    3 A. I don't even know what the question

    4 was.

    5 Q. Okay. This means that the Department

    6 of State, Division of Corporations which states

    7 that no business entities were found for Elca

    8 Associates, are you aware of that? With this

    9 documentation, does that show that there is no --

    10 A. Well, I don't know what the -- I don't

    11 know where this -- where this was printed from,

    12 but Elca Associates owns a property in

    13 Pennsylvania, as I already --

    14 Q. Okay.

    15 A. So it's -- its source income is the

    16 state of Pennsylvania, and therefore --

    17 Q. Okay.

    18 A. -- I don't know, you know -- I don't

    19 know what this is telling -- what this is --

    20 statement is about.

    21 Q. Okay. Did you ever communicate with

    22 Shari Cohen regarding Elca Associates, an

    23 attorney in Craig Donoff's office?

    24 A. It's possible. I don't remember names,

    25 you know, her name necessarily, although I did

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    63

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 have some -- because for purposes of preparing

    3 and an Elca tax return, I might have spoken to

    4 someone at Craig Donoff's office. I'm not -- I

    5 cannot remember her name or his name.

    6 Q. Turn to Exhibit K, which is an e-mail

    7 you sent to Shari Cohen at Craig Donoff's office.

    8 A. Okay, right. Great, then that was her

    9 name, you're correct.

    10 Q. Right. Did you send this e-mail to

    11 Shari Cohen?

    12 A. Yes, I did.

    13 Q. And the balance of this partnership is

    14 $56,420.50 for Elca Associates, is that correct?

    15 A. At that date?

    16 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, calls for

    17 hearsay, the document speaks for itself.

    18 This is again irrelevant, immaterial and

    19 beyond the scope of the direct examination.

    20 A. But yes, that's what -- on that date?

    21 Q. Yes.

    22 A. Yes, that was the -- those were the --

    23 the dollar amounts in the accounts.

    24 Q. Isn't it true half of $56,420.50 is

    25 $28,210.25? Isn't it true that's half of what

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    64

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 $56,420.50 is?

    3 MR. TORNINCASA: Objection, leading,

    4 immaterial, beyond the scope. The math is

    5 self-explanatory, Mr. Marshall.

    6 A. What --

    7 MR. TORNINCASA: Is there a point to

    8 this question, sir?

    9 Q. How can $7,457.87 --

    10 A. What -- when?

    11 Q. -- incur?

    12 A. When did Allan die?

    13 Q. He died September 2010.

    14 A. So you're talking about two dates. The

    15 total balance at his death, which I didn't put

    16 the date, but it says at Allan's death, was 35 --

    17 was 35,000 and change, but as of -- as of the

    18 date of that letter, December 9th, it was 56, so

    19 it's -- you're talking two months difference.

    20 Q. Okay. How can interest of 7,457.87

    21 incur from September 2010 until December of 2010?

    22 MR. TORNINCASA: Mr. Marshall,

    23 objection, irrelevant, immaterial, beyond

    24 the scope. You're assuming facts not in

    25 evidence. There is nothing in this exhibit

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    65

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 or document which suggests any sort of

    3 interest. If you're going to represent

    4 yourself, you need to conduct yourself as

    5 close as possible to a lawyer, Mr. Marshall.

    6 MR. MARSHALL: This is the last

    7 question, Mr. Tornincasa.

    8 A. This is a rental.

    9 Q. This is the last question.

    10 A. This is a rental property.

    11 Q. Oh, what was a rental property?

    12 A. Elca Associates.

    13 MR. MARSHALL: Okay. All right.

    14 Nothing further, thank you.

    15 MR. TORNINCASA: Just a couple recross

    16 questions, Ms. Cohen.

    17 RE-EXAMINATION

    18 BY MR. TORNINCASA:

    19 Q. Do you have any special affinities or

    20 special hostility in favor of or against Lois

    21 Haymes or Zylo Marshall?

    22 A. No.

    23 Q. Just to clarify for the record, did

    24 Aces Associates ever have any formal operations?

    25 A. Not that I'm aware of.

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    66

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 MR. TORNINCASA: Okay. Nothing

    3 further. Thank you for your time today.

    4 THE WITNESS: You're welcome.

    5 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is

    6 10:24 a.m. on March 5, 2014, and this

    7 completes the videotaped deposition of

    8 Ms. Ellen Cohen.

    9

    10 -o0o-

    11

    12 (Whereupon, the deposition of ELLEN

    13 COHEN was concluded at 10:23 a.m.)

    14

    15

    16 ELLEN COHEN

    17

    18

    19 Subscribed and sworn to before me this day

    20 of , 2014

    21

    22 NOTARY PUBLIC

    23

    24

    25

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    67

    1 Ellen Cohen

    2 I N D E X

    3

    WITNESS EXAMINATION BY PAGE4

    E. Cohen Mr. Tornincasa 4-19, 655

    E. Cohen Mr. Marshall 19-656

    7 EXHIBITS

    8 (None)

    9

    REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION10

    (None)11

    12 INSERTS

    13 (None)

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    68

    1

    2 C E R T I F I C A T E

    3 I, ALLISON FOWLER, a shorthand

    4 reporter and Notary Public within and for

    5 the State of New York, do hereby certify:

    6 That the witness(es) whose

    7 testimony is hereinbefore set forth was

    8 duly sworn by me, and the foregoing

    9 transcript is a true record of the

    10 testimony given by such witness(es).

    11 I further certify that I am not

    12 related to any of the parties to this

    13 action by blood or marriage, and that I am

    14 in no way interested in the outcome of this

    15 matter.

    16

    17

    18 ALLISON FOWLER

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    69

    1 ERRATA SHEET2 PAGE/LINE CORRECTION

    _________ _____________________3 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________4 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________5 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________6 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________7 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________8 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________9 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________10 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________11 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________12 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________13 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________14 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________15 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________16 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________17 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________18 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________19 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________20 _________ _____________________

    _________ _____________________21 _________ _____________________22 _________ _____________________23 _________ _____________________24 _________ _____________________25 _________ _____________________

  • 954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    954-463-2933

    WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM

    Page 1

    A

    $130,000 51:14$28,210.25 63:25$56,420.50 63:1463:24 64:2

    $7,457.87 64:9a.m 1:22 3:5 59:2360:2 66:6,13

    abilities 55:18ability 16:18,22Absolute 20:5absolutely 10:613:6 14:4,852:24 53:3 58:15

    accommodation45:15

    accountant 17:18accounting 8:317:6

    accounts 63:23Accurint 39:9Aces 31:23 33:5,1933:20 36:13 37:838:14,21 46:2447:2,7,25 49:1251:16 52:1254:13,20,23 55:355:19 56:8,1057:2 58:20,20,2259:5,11 65:24

    acquire 26:1130:19 35:7 57:2559:6,7

    acquired 47:9,1456:11

    act 30:21action 68:13active 47:12 59:7activities 42:25activity 51:5acts 47:15 56:13addition 5:1961:19

    address 7:5 31:2332:13,14,1644:11,20 50:1750:19,23,23,2450:25 51:4,8

    admissible 40:10admit 41:23admitted 52:3advantage 19:2Affairs 47:25affinities 65:19ago 11:4 13:14agreement 56:15agreements 30:22

    ahead 24:25 25:749:10 60:24,2460:25

    Alan 35:19 37:2,537:7 57:5

    Allan 1:6,13,143:16,21 4:10,124:16 8:11,12,138:14,15,16,17,188:20,21,24 9:2,69:7,9,19,25 10:410:12 12:5,16,2313:5,24 14:3,514:12,19,21,2415:10,14,17,2016:2 17:7,13,2317:25 18:7,10,1318:15,21,2219:21 23:3,7,1325:3 26:12,16,2327:6,24 28:435:19 36:9,939:25 42:1349:14 55:11,1555:23 56:3 57:464:12

    Allan's 16:4,18,2218:19 26:2564:16

    allegations 55:11Allen 9:11Allison 3:8 68:368:18

    allow 53:23ambiguous 4:25amounts 63:23annual 51:14answer 5:3,23 6:26:20 20:12 21:221:20,23 23:1123:23 24:9,1625:17,19 26:1927:14 28:8,830:8 31:9,2032:8 33:17 34:2536:4 40:19 41:2441:25 42:1143:25 44:18 62:2

    answered 34:6answers 4:17 20:13anybody 46:21apartment 10:18,1910:20 11:9 12:612:7,17

    apologize 21:13apparently 61:19appears 29:13

    36:24 50:1253:14

    application 32:934:12 35:3

    appreciate 16:22approximately 3:5April 58:4arrested 21:19articles 45:21,2557:2

    asking 19:21 43:1343:14,16

    aspect 59:11asserted 40:11assets 16:23,