25
Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs Trends and Concerns

Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs Trends and Concerns

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs Trends and Concerns. ESNERR WQ Monitoring Program-Volunteer Sites Sample Monthly 1989 – Present Params by Probe (DO,Temp,Sal,pH,Turb, Chl) & Nutrients (Nitrate, Phosphate Ammoinium). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs Trends and Concerns

Page 2: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

ESNERR WQ Monitoring Program-Volunteer SitesSample Monthly 1989 – Present

Params by Probe (DO,Temp,Sal,pH,Turb, Chl) & Nutrients (Nitrate, Phosphate Ammoinium)

Page 3: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

ESNERR WQ Monitoring Program-NERR SitesSample every 15 mins; 1995 (AP & SM) – Present

Params by probe (Depth, DO,Temp,Sal,pH,Turb) & Monthly Nutrients (Nitrate, Phosphate Ammoinium)

Page 4: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

Even the mouth of the Estuary goes below the 5 mg/L target

Page 5: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

As we move up the slough DO gets worse and worse

Page 6: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

Azevedo Pond below 5 mg/L almost year round, hypoxic <2.3 mg/L summer and fall

Page 7: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

Nutrient pollution varies by region

Page 8: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

Salinas River sites Annual Average 2002-2009

Page 9: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

Nitrate concentrations mg NOx/LComparison of means of all available data by Reserve and Station, 2006–2011

OWC takes the prize highest average nitrate NERR range .02 – 2.7 mg/L

Page 10: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

Nitrate concentrations mg NOx/LComparison of means of all available data by Reserve and Station, 2006–2011

Salinas River Sites Average 22 mg/L 10X higher than Highest NERR site in Country

Page 11: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

Chl by tidal exchange in the EstuaryLow Moderate High Hyper

Page 12: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

EUTROPHICATION: anoxic sedimentA much narrower layer at the top of the mud is well oxygenated at muted vs. full tidal sites

Page 13: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

EUTROPHICATION: dissolved oxygenGreater variation with less tidal exchange

a

b

b

a

b

b

Page 14: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

Nitrate

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98

µM

Page 15: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10

JOBRKBGTMSAPGNDNARACENIW

WQBNOCKACELKGRBJACCBVSOSTJR

SFBAPAWKBCBMHUDPDBDEL

WELOWC

mg NOx L-1

How different are the NERR sites?

http://nerrs.noaa.gov

Comparison of means of all available data by Reserve and Station, 2002 – 2006/7

Page 16: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

Annual Hypoxia from two NERR stations

AVIRIS photo, John Ryan, MBARI

Azevedo Pond

South Marsh

Page 17: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns
Page 18: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

Data from Ken Johnson 2010

Page 19: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns
Page 20: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns
Page 21: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns
Page 22: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns
Page 23: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

% T

ime

Hyp

oxic

(<

28%

Sat

urat

ed D

O)

Maximum Tidal Range (m)

Bennett Slough 1

Bennett Slough 2Moss Landing Harbor

Moro Cojo Slough

Elkhorn Slough 1

Elkhorn Slough 2

ES5ES4ES3

ES @ Kirby

Figure 5. Maximum tidal exchange v. % time hypoxic

Tidal range vs % time hypoxic

Page 24: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

How different are the NERR sites?

http://nerrs.noaa.gov

Comparison of means of all available data by Reserve and Station, 2002 – 2006/7

g Chl a L-1

NARKACJOBSOSJAC

GTMRKBHUDNOCPDBGRBGNDSFBNIWSAPAPAELKTJR

CBVMARACE

WQBDEL

OWCCBMWKBWEL

0.1 1.0 10 100

Page 25: Elkhorn Slough Water quality Programs  Trends and Concerns

Summary take home messages