Upload
vinaya
View
66
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Elimination of Schistosomiasis: Is it possible and how do we do it?. Mike French. What is elimination?. What is elimination?. What is elimination?. What is elimination?. What is elimination?. Already gone. Rinderpest (2011). Smallpox (1978). On their way. Polio (2020?). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Elimination of Schistosomiasis: Is it possible and how do we do it?
Mike French
WHO Schistosomiasis Plan: 2012-2025Vision A world free of schistosomiasis
Goals• To control morbidity of schistosomiasis by
2020 • To eliminate schistosomiasis as a public
health problem by 2025 • To interrupt transmission in AMR, EMR,
EUR, SEAR and WPR and in selected AFR countries by 2025
Objectives • To scale up control and elimination activities in all endemic countries;
• To ensure an adequate supply of praziquantel and resources to meet the demand
WHO Schistosomiasis Plan: 2012-2025Vision A world free of schistosomiasis
Goals • To control morbidity of schistosomiasis by 2020
• To eliminate schistosomiasis as a public health problem by 2025
• To interrupt transmission in the Americas, the Eastern Mediterranean, Europe, South East Asia, Western Pacific, and in selected African countries by 2025
Objectives • To ensure an adequate supply of
praziquantel and resources to meet the demand
What is elimination?
What is elimination?Category Definition Ongoing
Control?Examples
Control Reduction of disease in given area until it is no longer a major public health burden
Yes Schistosomiasis (2020)
Elimination as a Public Health Problem
Reduction in the prevalence of disease below a certain pre-set threshold (e.g. 1%)
Yes Schistosomiasis (2025)Lymphatic filariasis (2020)Trachoma (2020)
Elimination of Transmission (True Elimination)
Stopping transmission in a given geographical area
Active surveillance
Schistosomiasis – selected areas (2025)Onchocerciasis in Latin America (2015)Onchocerciasis in 21 SSA countries (2020)
Eradication Global Elimination - Worldwide removal of all infections and transmission
No Smallpox (1978), Rinderpest (2011)Guinea Worm (2015)Polio (2020)
What is elimination?Category Definition Ongoing
Control?Examples
Control Reduction of disease in given area until it is no longer a major public health burden
Yes Schistosomiasis (2020)
Elimination as a Public Health Problem
Reduction in the prevalence of disease below a certain pre-set threshold (e.g. 1%)
Yes Schistosomiasis (2025)Lymphatic filariasis (2020)Trachoma (2020)
Elimination of Transmission (True Elimination)
Stopping transmission in a given geographical area
Active surveillance
Schistosomiasis – selected areas (2025)Onchocerciasis in Latin America (2015)Onchocerciasis in 21 SSA countries (2020)
Eradication Global Elimination - Worldwide removal of all infections and transmission
No Smallpox (1978), Rinderpest (2011)Guinea Worm (2015)Polio (2020)
What is elimination?Category Definition Ongoing
Control?Examples
Control Reduction of disease in given area until it is no longer a major public health burden
Yes Schistosomiasis (2020)
Elimination as a Public Health Problem
Reduction in the prevalence of disease below a certain pre-set threshold (e.g. 1%)
Yes Schistosomiasis (2025)Lymphatic filariasis (2020)Trachoma (2020)
Elimination of Transmission (True Elimination)
Stopping transmission in a given geographical area
Active surveillance
Schistosomiasis – selected areas (2025)Onchocerciasis in Latin America (2015)Onchocerciasis in 21 SSA countries (2020)
Eradication Global Elimination - Worldwide removal of all infections and transmission
No Smallpox (1978), Rinderpest (2011)Guinea Worm (2015)Polio (2020)
What is elimination?Category Definition Ongoing
Control?Examples
Control Reduction of disease in given area until it is no longer a major public health burden
Yes Schistosomaisis (2020)
Elimination as a Public Health Problem
Reduction in the prevalence of disease below a certain pre-set threshold (e.g. 1%)
Yes Schistosomiasis (2025)Lymphatic filariasis (2020)Trachoma (2020)
Elimination of Transmission (True Elimination)
Stopping transmission in a given geographical area
Active surveillance
Schistosomiasis – selected areas (2025)Onchocerciasis in Latin America (2015)Onchocerciasis in 21 SSA countries (2020)
Eradication Global Elimination - Worldwide removal of all infections and transmission
No Smallpox (1978), Rinderpest (2011)Guinea Worm (2015)Polio (2020)
Already gone
On their waySmallpox (1978)
Rinderpest (2011)
Guinea Worm (2015?)Polio (2020?)
Control of Morbidity Elimination as a public
health problem Elimination/Interruption
of transmission
PCT 100% geographical and 75% national coverage
with PCT
Adjusted PCT and complementary
interventions recommended
Intensified PCT and complementary
interventions essential
Prevalence of heavy intensity infection <5%*
Prevalence of heavy intensity infection <1%*
Reduction of incidence of infection to zero
Up to 5-10 years from joining the group
Up to 3-6 years from joining the group
Up to 5 years from joining the group
* In all sentinel sites
What do we need to get there?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Year of Implementation
Infe
ction
(e.g
Pre
vale
nce
- %)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Year of Implementation
Infe
ction
(e.g
Pre
vale
nce
- %)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Year of Implementation
Infe
ction
(e.g
Pre
vale
nce
- %)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Year of Implementation
Infe
ction
(e.g
Pre
vale
nce
- %)
Complementary Approaches
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Year of Implementation
Infe
ction
(e.g
Pre
vale
nce
- %)
Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene
Complementary Approaches
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Year of Implementation
Infe
ction
(e.g
Pre
vale
nce
- %)
Snail Control
Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene
Complementary Approaches
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Year of Implementation
Infe
ction
(e.g
Pre
vale
nce
- %)
Snail Control
Behaviour Change
Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene
Complementary Approaches
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Year of Implementation
Infe
ction
(e.g
Pre
vale
nce
- %)
Vaccine?
Snail Control
Behaviour Change
Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene
Complementary Approaches
Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH)
Jack Grimes*, Dr Michael R. Templeton*, Dr Wendy Harrison†
*Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London†Schistosomiasis Control Initiative, School of Public Health, Imperial College London
Water and sanitation, and schistosomiasis: a systematic
review and meta-analysis
WASH Definitions
WAter
Image credits: Aubrey Wade/WaterAid/Panos
Image credits: WSSCC http://www.wsscc.org/resources/resource-photo/toilets-south-africa#3
Image credits: UNICEF, UNICEFBANA2011-01020Shafiqulhttp://www.unicef.bg/en/article/On-Global-Handwashing-Day-UNICEF-says-It-s-not-complicated-but-it-s-crucial/375
HygieneSanitation
Jack Grimes, Dr Michael R. Templeton, Dr Wendy Harrison
‘Safe’ water source associated with significantly less Schistosoma infection
Overall Schistosoma and water:OR = 0.53 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.61)
Jack Grimes, Dr Michael R. Templeton, Dr Wendy Harrison
S. haematobium and water:OR = 0.57 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.71)
S. mansoni and water:OR = 0.53 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.63)
S. japonicum and water:OR = 0.37 (95% CI: 0.30, 0.46)
‘Safe’ water source associated with significantly less Schistosoma infection
Jack Grimes, Dr Michael R. Templeton, Dr Wendy Harrison
S. mansoni and sanitation:OR = 0.59 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.73)
Sanitation associated with significantly less S. mansoni infection
Jack Grimes, Dr Michael R. Templeton, Dr Wendy Harrison
S. haematobium and sanitation:OR = 0.69 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.84)
Sanitation associated with significantly less S. haematobium infection
Jack Grimes, Dr Michael R. Templeton, Dr Wendy Harrison
Other Approaches: Snail Control and Behaviour ChangeS. haematobium elimination in Zanzibar
• Elimination of Schistosomiasis on Zanzibar (ZEST trial) – Lynsey Blair– S. haematobium– Randomized Control TrialThree arms:– Arm 1: MDA Alone (Control)– Arm 2: MDA plus Snail Control– Arm 3: MDA plus Behaviour Change
– Midpoint of study
Other Approaches: Snail Control, WASH, and Enhanced TreatmentS. mansoni elimination in Burundi/Rwanda
Randomized Control Trial:To be confirmed after schistosomiasis re-assessment4 armsArm 1: Control – Standard annual TreatmentArm 2: Enhanced treatment – Twice Yearly treatmentArm 3: Snail ControlArm 4: Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene
Burundi
Rwanda
S. haematobium elimination in NigerFollowing 6 years of sentinel sites
monitoring, Niger was classified as an ‘elimination’ ICOSA country
Re-Mapping/Impact Surveys to assess local elimination and use focal treatment in areas no longer eligible for treatment
Improving case detection at health centres & routine diagnosis
Snail surveys. Identifying schistosome hybrids and animal reservoirs
Innovative education activities such as mobile cinemas
Vaccines• Meetings convened by Gates
Foundation / National Institute of Health Meetings on the potential role of vaccines in elimination
• No vaccines currently available• Several candidates in development,
including one in Phase III trials, although several years off if at all
• Likely to be offer imperfect protection
Using Mathematical Models to Optimise the Use of Vaccines for
Schistosomiasis
Miss Arminder DeolDr Michael FrenchDr Deirdre HollingsworthDr James Truscott
:1. Modelling the impact of an actual/proposed vaccine in developmentModelling could give:Population impactCost-effectiveness
2. Using modelling to suggest the required characteristics of a vaccineModelling could give:Level of efficacy requiredWhich section of the life-cycle would be best to targetWhat proportion of the population to targetWho to target in the population
Arminder Deol et al
Using Mathematical Models to Optimise the Use of Vaccines for Schistosomiasis
New Approaches
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Year of Implementation
Infe
ction
(e.g
Pre
vale
nce
- %)
Vaccines
Snail Control
Behaviour Change
Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Year of Implementation
Infe
ction
(e.g
Pre
vale
nce
- %)
Extending Current Approaches – Closing the treatment gap
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Year of Implementation
Infe
ction
(e.g
Pre
vale
nce
- %)
Increasing treatment
Extending Current Approaches – Closing the treatment gap
Extending Current Approaches – Closing the treatment gap
How do we close the treatment gap?• Getting drugs to people – ensuring treatment
coverage is as high as possible• Expanding the target population
Closing the Treatment Gap – Doing the simple things well
NTD Supply Chain Forum• Coalition of partners engaged in the donation of NTD drugs• Aim to identify and overcome challenges related to shipping
and in-country transportation• Pharmaceutical Companies: GSK, Johnson and Johnson,
Merck & Co., Merck KGaA, Eisai, Pfizer• WHO• global logistics company DHL• NGOs Children Without Worms and International Trachoma
Initiative• Major body of work – overcoming clearance of drugs
through customs and into national warehouses
Closing the Treatment Gap – Doing the Simple things well
NTD Supply Chain Forum
Project Last Mile• If you can get Coca Cola anywhere in the world why not
life-saving medicines?• Launched in 2009• Partnership between Coca Cola, Gates’ Foundation,
Global Fund to fight Aids, Tb, and malaria• Yale’s Global Health Leadership Institute, Accenture
Development Partners, and the Global Environment and Technology Foundation
• Expanded to 10 African countries within five years
Closing the Treatment Gap – Doing the Simple things well
Project Last Mile
Closing the Treatment Gap – Doing the Simple things well
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400 Age-Profile of Infection
Baseline
Age (Years)
Inte
nsity
of i
nfec
tion
(Egg
s per
gra
m o
f fa
ces)
Closing the Treatment Gap – Young Children
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600 Age-Profile of Infection
Baseline
Age (Years)
Inte
nsity
of i
nfec
tion
(Egg
s per
gra
m o
f fa
ces)
School-aged Children Adults
Age-groups targeted for treatment
Closing the Treatment Gap – Young Children
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600 Age-Profile of Infection
Baseline
F1
Age (Years)
Inte
nsity
of i
nfec
tion
(Egg
s per
gra
m o
f fa
ces)
School-aged Children Adults
Age-groups targeted for treatment
Closing the Treatment Gap – Young Children
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600 Age-Profile of Infection
BaselineF1F2
Age (Years)
Inte
nsity
of i
nfec
tion
(Egg
s per
gra
m o
f fa
ces)
Under 6s Age-groups targeted for treatment
School-aged Children Adults
Closing the Treatment Gap – Young Children
Closing the Treatment Gap – Young Children
• Understanding the role that young children play in transmission.
• Carried out by Arminder Deol and Judy Fernandes in our team
• Full age-intensity profiles in Liberia and Uganda
• Combined with modelling work being carried out by the NTD Modelling Consortium
Closing the Treatment Gap – Young Children
Summary and way forward
All stages towards elimination suggest there is a need for complementary interventions: • Need an evidence base for which are
the most appropriate interventions in different settings and species
• Meaningful collaboration with other sectors – how is this best achieved?
• Doing the basics well (and better)
Thank you
www.imperial.ac.uk/sci@[email protected]