elev_vert

  • Upload
    pweiss

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    1/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 120 April 2010

    H F OPS

    ELEVATED VERTICALS

    byJohn White

    VA7JW

    20 April 2010Revised version of 25 March 2010 Presentation

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    2/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 220 April 2010

    VERT I CA L AN TENN A

    ! Quarter wave vertical radiator

    ! Feed point is at lower end

    ! Coax connects to the radiatorand a ground plane

    ! Ground plane can be either Earth or horizontal wires

    " assumes earth is conductive, more later

    ARRL Antenna Handbook

    Quarter Wave

    Vertical Radiator

    Feed PointGround Plane

    Wires or Earth

    Coax

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    3/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 320 April 2010

    GROUND PLA N E

    ! Vertical must operate against a ground plane

    ! Ground plane provides the missing lower quarter ofa half wave antenna

    ARRL Antenna Handbook

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    4/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 420 April 2010

    GROUN D PLA N E IM AGE

    ! Earth acts as a mirror

    creating an image

    ! Wire Radial system simulates

    earth (better)

    ! Quarter wave radiator + quarter wave image equals ahalf wave antenna

    ! Vertical assumes properties of a vertical dipole but athalf the physical height

    ARRL Antenna Handbook

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    5/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 520 April 2010

    RADIAT ION PA T T ERN

    ! Radiation is off the side" Vertical plot

    " Typical max at 25 over real ground

    " Radiation at 0 is attenuated

    ! No radiation off ends" Zero straight up (and down)

    ! Equal radiation all around" Azimuthal plot

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    6/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 620 April 2010

    V ERT ICA L PLOT

    ! Plot shows signal strength

    as a function of the vertical angle

    ! Amplitude of the wave

    indicates strength of signal

    ! Maximum at about 25

    ! Radiation at ~ 0 is nil due to absorption of signal as it

    travels over surface of earth, and direct reflected wave

    phase cancellation at low angles.

    GROUND

    MAX

    Ground

    Absorption

    No radiation of end of antenna

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    7/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 720 April 2010

    GROUND REFLECT ION

    ! When an antenna is raised above the surface of the earth,

    downward radiation from the antenna travels towards earth

    ! True for both dipoles and elevated verticals

    ! When this radiation strikes the surface it is reflected upwards

    ! The direct radiation from the antenna combines with the

    reflected ground radiation at distance (in the far field)

    ! Depending on radiation angles, the far field direct and

    reflected radiation will be in phase and ADD to produce aLOBE, (max radiation) or be 180 out of phase and CANCEL to

    produce a NULL (no radiation)

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    8/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 820 April 2010

    HORIZONTA L A NT ENN AS

    ! Dipoles are commonly horizontally mounted antennas

    ! Electric Field is Horizontally polarized

    ! Direct and reflected radiation combine in the far field toproduce familiar elevation patterns depending on

    antenna height above ground

    ! Horizontally polarized ground reflected waves undergo

    a phase shift of ~ 180

    ARRL Antenna Handbook

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    9/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 920 April 2010

    VERT I CA L A N TENNA S

    ! Vertical antennas radiate Vertically polarized Electric field

    ! Similarly, Direct and Reflected radiation also combine in thefar field to produce elevation patterns depending on theheight of the vertical above ground.

    ! Vertically polarized, ground reflected waves, above ~ 30 doNOT undergo a phase shift. Below 30, phase shift starts tochange from 0 thru to 180.

    ! The patterns are NOT the same since vertically polarizedwaves reflect differently than horizontally polarized waves

    ARRL Antenna Handbook

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    10/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 1020 April 2010

    PA TT ERN COM PAR ISONS

    ! Horizontal antenna at various heights above ground

    ! Vertical antenna at various heights above ground

    ARRL Antenna Handbook

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    11/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 1120 April 2010

    NOTA B LE D I FFERENCES

    ! Dipole has strong vertical lobe at quarter wave heights"

    Good NVIS (Near Vertical Incident Skywave) antenna" Height < ~ 0.25 to ensure a high angle of radiation to cover areas up to

    1000 km

    ! Vertical has NO vertical component at any height

    ! Not much difference if both horizontal and vertical antennasare 1 high

    ! DX antennas want to have lowest possible angle of radiationto maximize skip distance to 3000 km." Choice heights are multiples of 0.5

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    12/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 1220 April 2010

    V ERT ICAL CONSIDERAT IONS

    ! Vertical antennas have NO 90o angle of radiation

    ! Optimum low angle 10 to 20

    ! Good for DX, no good for NVIS

    ! Good for Direct Line Of Sight and Ground Wave use

    ! Omni-directional not so good for DX; directional gain is desirable

    ! Verticals are susceptible to noise.

    "

    noise is vertically polarized since horizontally propagated noise in theurban environment is rapidly attenuated over ground

    " omni directional hears noise from all directions

    " Buried radials couple in ground currents and contribute to noise

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    13/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 1320 April 2010

    FEED PO IN T IM PEDAN CE

    ! Quarter wave verticals have the feed point impedance of

    half wave dipoles" as antennas become shorter, feed point impedance becomes less

    ! Z = 37.5 rather than 75

    ! Feed point impedance model

    ! Losses appear in series with Radiation wire resistance,

    earth losses, loading coil resistance, etc

    ! Resistive earth losses can easily be much greater thanradiation resistance giving

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    14/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 1420 April 2010

    GROUN D v s W IRE RAD IAL S

    ! March 2010 QST An Experimental Look at Ground

    Systems for HF Verticals Rudy Severns K6LF

    ! Some results for wave radials,

    " If burying radials, need up to 120 (broadcast standards)

    " If radials lie on ground fewer needed; 32 typical

    " If radials are raised off the ground by 48, 4 are as good

    ! Efficiencies improve with radials out of the ground.

    ! Raised radials not so easy to implement

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    15/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 1520 April 2010

    EZN EC MODELS

    ! What if the Vertical antenna with Radials is raisedsignificantly above earth ground ?

    ! Example - 20 metre vertical with 4 ground plane radials

    ! Modeled at various heights above ground" 1 foot Radials not buried or laid on ground

    " 0.25 ~ 17 feet

    " 0.5 ~ 34 feet

    " 0.75 ~ 51 feet

    " 1.0 ~ 68 feet

    ! Investigate elevation plots

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    16/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 1620 April 2010

    2 0m VERT I CA L a t GROUN D

    ! EZNEC Plots

    Antenna View

    with Currents

    1 foot above ground

    SWR

    AZ

    PLOT

    EL PLOTMax low angle

    at 25

    Feed point Impedance 34 "

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    17/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 1720 April 2010

    2 0m VERT I CA L a t 0 .2 5

    ! EZNEC Plots

    SWR

    AZ PLOT

    unchanged

    EL PLOT,

    Low angle lobe

    lowered to 20

    Feed point Impedance

    Rising to 58 " due

    to sloping radials

    Antenna View,

    Raised 0.25 !

    Radials are sloped

    down 45

    Could double as guy

    wires

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    18/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 1820 April 2010

    2 0m VERT I CA L a t 0 .5

    ! EZNEC Plots

    Antenna View,

    Raised 0.5 !

    Radials are sloped

    down 45

    Feed point Impedance

    52 "

    AZ PLOT

    unchanged

    SWR

    EL PLOT,

    High angle lobe at 50

    Low angle at 15

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    19/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 1920 April 2010

    2 0m VERT I CA L a t 0 .7 5

    ! EZNEC Plots

    Antenna View,

    Raised 0.75!

    Radials are sloped

    down 45

    SWR

    Feed point Impedance

    52 "

    AZ PLOT

    unchanged

    EL PLOT,

    High angle at 35

    Lowest angle at 10

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    20/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 2020 April 2010

    2 0m VERT I CA L a t 1

    ! EZNEC Plots

    Antenna View,

    Raised 1!

    Radials are sloped

    down 45

    SWR

    Feed point Impedance

    51 "

    AZ PLOT

    unchanged

    EL PLOT,

    High angle Lobes at

    25 and 60

    Lowest angle at 10

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    21/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 2120 April 2010

    OBSERVAT IONS

    ! 4 raised radials provide a good ground plane

    ! Elevating the vertical system lowers lowest lobe and develops

    higher lobes. BONUS for wide skip coverage.

    ! Ideal for Short and Long Skip

    ! Feed Point impedance rises to meet 50 coax no tuner needed

    ! Omni directionality unchanged

    ! Not suitable for NVIS (vertical radiation suppressed all cases)

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    22/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 2220 April 2010

    MOUN T IN G CON SIDERAT ION S

    ! At 20 metres, antenna dimensions

    "

    16 feet vertical radiator" 16 foot radials, 4 wires

    ! Antenna height, ~ 34 feet to feed point

    ! 20 low lobe for DX

    " Would require 65 ft tower to achieve with yagi

    ! 50 high lobe for short skip

    ! Use radials as guy wires for support structure.

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    23/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 2320 April 2010

    META L SUPPORT

    STRUCTURE DETU N ING

    ! Insignificant. Metal support structure is isolated by

    quarter wave radials

    Antenna View,

    Raised 0.5 !

    Radials are sloped

    down 45 assumed

    acting as guy wires

    Vertical support

    conductor added

    SWR

    Feed point Impedance

    51 "

    AZ PLOT

    unchanged

    EL PLOT

    Unchanged

  • 8/11/2019 elev_vert

    24/24

    - - - - - - - - - - -

    NSARC 2420 April 2010

    CONCLUS IONS

    ! Elevated Vertical may be a good choice for 20/15/10m HFBands in restricted area city lots

    ! No too high 34 ft, not too wide, not too obtrusive

    " Rooftop mounting; lay radials on roof, guys required

    ! Good radiation angles for North America and DX

    ! Not too expensive

    ! Multi band verticals OK

    " i.e. 10m at 34 feet elevation plot would look like 1 at 20m