48
Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership WERA Conference Daniel W. Lysne

Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership. WERA Conference Daniel W. Lysne. Session Overview. Leadership Theory Eraut’s Area of Knowledge Study Design and Setting Qualitative Data Points from Study Findings. Principals Matter. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Elementary principals’ development of distributed

instructional leadership

WERA ConferenceDaniel W. Lysne

Page 2: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Session Overview

Leadership Theory

Eraut’s Area of Knowledge

Study Design and Setting

Qualitative Data Points from Study

Findings

Page 3: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Principals Matter

Measurable impact on SchoolsEnhance teacher work and collaborationSchool culture is shaped and enhancedVital to improving teacher and student learning

Page 4: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Leadership Theory

Transactional Leadership—(Burns, 1978)

Transformational Leadership—(Burns,

1978)

Distributed Leadership—(Spillane & Camburn,

2006)

Instructional Leadership—(Alvarado, Elmore &

Resnick, 2001; Darling-Hammond, Hightower, Husbands, LaFors, Young, & Christopher, 2003; Gallucci, Boatright, Lysne, & Swinnerton, 2005)

Other forms of principal leadership—Moral, Critical, Managerial, Charismatic, Top-Down, Visionary

Page 5: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Leadership Theory

Transactional Leadership—(Burns, 1978)

Transformational Leadership—(Burns, 1978)

Distributed Leadership—(Spillane & Camburn, 2006)

Instructional Leadership—(Alvarado, Elmore & Resnick, 2001; Darling-Hammond, Hightower, Husbands, LaFors, Young, & Christopher, 2003; Gallucci, Boatright, Lysne, & Swinnerton, 2005)

Other forms of principal leadership—Moral, Critical, Managerial, Charismatic, Top-Down, Visionary

Page 6: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Leadership Theory

Transactional Leadership—(Burns, 1978)

Transformational Leadership—(Burns,

1978)

Distributed Leadership—(Spillane & Camburn,

2006)

Instructional Leadership—(Alvarado, Elmore &

Resnick, 2001; Darling-Hammond, Hightower, Husbands, LaFors, Young, & Christopher, 2003; Gallucci, Boatright, Lysne, & Swinnerton, 2005)

Other forms of principal leadership—Moral, Critical, Managerial, Charismatic, Top-Down, Visionary

Page 7: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Instructional Leadership—(Alvarado, Elmore &

Resnick, 2001; Darling-Hammond, Hightower, Husbands, LaFors, Young, & Christopher, 2003; Gallucci, Boatright, Lysne, & Swinnerton, 2005)

Leithwood and Duke (1998) view instructional leadership as, “typically focused on the behaviors of teachers as they engage in activities directly affecting the growth of students” (p. 47). Portin, DeArmond, Scheider, and Gundlach (2003) identify instructional leadership as, “Assuring quality of instruction, modeling teaching practice, supervising curriculum, and assuring quality of teaching resources” (p. 18). Blase and Blase (1999) suggest that, ideally, instructional leadership initiates teacher learning of adaptable mastery of flexible alternatives rather than enforcing rigid procedures and methods. Leiberman (1995) views instructional leadership as supporting teachers in developing their teaching skills.

Page 8: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Instructional Leadership—(Alvarado, Elmore &

Resnick, 2001; Darling-Hammond, Hightower, Husbands, LaFors, Young, & Christopher, 2003; Gallucci, Boatright, Lysne, & Swinnerton, 2005)

Leithwood and Duke (1998) view instructional leadership as, “typically focused on the behaviors of teachers as they engage in activities directly affecting the growth of students” (p. 47). Portin, DeArmond, Scheider, and Gundlach (2003) identify instructional leadership as, “Assuring quality of instruction, modeling teaching practice, supervising curriculum, and assuring quality of teaching resources” (p. 18). Blase and Blase (1999) suggest that, ideally, instructional leadership initiates teacher learning of adaptable mastery of flexible alternatives rather than enforcing rigid procedures and methods. Leiberman (1995) views instructional leadership as supporting teachers in developing their teaching skills.

Page 9: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Instructional Leadership—(Alvarado, Elmore &

Resnick, 2001; Darling-Hammond, Hightower, Husbands, LaFors, Young, & Christopher, 2003; Gallucci, Boatright, Lysne, & Swinnerton, 2005)

Leithwood and Duke (1998) view instructional leadership as, “typically focused on the behaviors of teachers as they engage in activities directly affecting the growth of students” (p. 47). Portin, DeArmond, Scheider, and Gundlach (2003) identify instructional leadership as, “Assuring quality of instruction, modeling teaching practice, supervising curriculum, and assuring quality of teaching resources” (p. 18). Blase and Blase (1999) suggest that, ideally, instructional leadership initiates teacher learning of adaptable mastery of flexible alternatives rather than enforcing rigid procedures and methods. Leiberman (1995) views instructional leadership as supporting teachers in developing their teaching skills.

Page 10: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Instructional Leadership—(Alvarado, Elmore &

Resnick, 2001; Darling-Hammond, Hightower, Husbands, LaFors, Young, & Christopher, 2003; Gallucci, Boatright, Lysne, & Swinnerton, 2005)

Leithwood and Duke (1998) view instructional leadership as, “typically focused on the behaviors of teachers as they engage in activities directly affecting the growth of students” (p. 47). Portin, DeArmond, Scheider, and Gundlach (2003) identify instructional leadership as, “Assuring quality of instruction, modeling teaching practice, supervising curriculum, and assuring quality of teaching resources” (p. 18). Blase and Blase (1999) suggest that, ideally, instructional leadership initiates teacher learning of adaptable mastery of flexible alternatives rather than enforcing rigid procedures and methods. Leiberman (1995) views instructional leadership as supporting teachers in developing their teaching skills.

Page 11: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Instructional Leadership—(Alvarado, Elmore &

Resnick, 2001; Darling-Hammond, Hightower, Husbands, LaFors, Young, & Christopher, 2003; Gallucci, Boatright, Lysne, & Swinnerton, 2005)

Leithwood and Duke (1998) view instructional leadership as, “typically focused on the behaviors of teachers as they engage in activities directly affecting the growth of students” (p. 47). Portin, DeArmond, Scheider, and Gundlach (2003) identify instructional leadership as, “Assuring quality of instruction, modeling teaching practice, supervising curriculum, and assuring quality of teaching resources” (p. 18). Blase and Blase (1999) suggest that, ideally, instructional leadership initiates teacher learning of adaptable mastery of flexible alternatives rather than enforcing rigid procedures and methods. Leiberman (1995) views instructional leadership as supporting teachers in developing their teaching skills.

Page 12: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Instructional Leadership in Practice

Personnel actions that illustrate instructional leadership

Are knowledgeable about instructionProvide support for teachers (For example: consultants or coaches)Provide feedback to teachersConduct classroom observationsEmphasize instruction (during meetings or evaluations)Design or deliver professional developmentReview student work and student data to make decisions about how to improve instructionHold teachers accountable for making improvements in instruction

(Source: Marsh, Kerr, Ikemoto, Darilek, Suttorp, Zimmer, and Barney, 2005)

Page 13: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Research Questions

What does distributed instructional leadership look like in practice?How does context factor into distributed instructional leadership?What key events support distributed instructional leadership?What lessons can be learned for future leaders about distributed instructional leadership?

Page 14: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Reflective Practice

Reflective practice theory offers a way to understand how individuals make sense of new ideas and new roles for themselves and others within specific contexts.

Reflective practice allows for a connection to be made by learners between the theoretical underpinnings of a profession with the day-to-day activities of a profession (Barak, 2005).

Eraut (1994) suggests that reflective practice can potentially cover five knowledge areas that shape the way leaders craft their vision for a school.

Page 15: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Reflective Practice

Reflective practice theory offers a way to understand how individuals make sense of new ideas and new roles for themselves and others within specific contexts.Reflective practice allows for a connection to be made by learners between the theoretical underpinnings of a profession with the day-to-day activities of a profession (Barak, 2005). Eraut (1994) suggests that reflective practice can potentially cover five knowledge areas that shape the way leaders craft their vision for a school.

Page 16: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Reflective Practice

Reflective practice theory offers a way to understand how individuals make sense of new ideas and new roles for themselves and others within specific contexts.Reflective practice allows for a connection to be made by learners between the theoretical underpinnings of a profession with the day-to-day activities of a profession (Barak, 2005). Eraut (1994) suggests that reflective practice can potentially cover five knowledge areas that shape the way leaders craft their vision for a school.

Page 17: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Reflective Practice

Reflective practice theory offers a way to understand how individuals make sense of new ideas and new roles for themselves and others within specific contexts.Reflective practice allows for a connection to be made by learners between the theoretical underpinnings of a profession with the day-to-day activities of a profession (Barak, 2005). Eraut (1994) suggests that reflective practice can potentially cover five knowledge areas that shape the way leaders craft their vision for a school.

Page 18: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Eraut’s Areas of Knowledge

Personnel

Situational

Educational Practice

Conceptual

Control

A principal understands her staff based on the

formal and informal interactions she has with them.

She sees strengths and areas of future development.

Page 19: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Eraut’s Areas of Knowledge

Personnel

Situational

Educational Practice

Conceptual

Control

Principals’ situational knowledge is shaped by where they focus their energies.

A principal responds to situations based on the experiences and knowledge she has.

Page 20: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Eraut’s Areas of Knowledge

Personnel

Situational

Educational Practice

Conceptual

Control

Knowledge of educational practice is understanding the range of possible policies

and practice available for educators to use (Eraut, 1994).

Page 21: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Eraut’s Areas of Knowledge

Personnel

Situational

Educational Practice

Conceptual

Control

Conceptual knowledge represents the ideas, theories, and concepts that a person

uses to solve problems (Eraut, 1994).

Page 22: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Eraut’s Areas of Knowledge

Personnel

Situational

Educational Practice

Conceptual

Control

Eraut (1994, p.96) notes, “More fundamental still is the knowledge of one’s strengths and

weaknesses, which guides the way one delegates and the types of task one assigns to oneself.”

Page 23: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Eraut’s Areas of Knowledge

Personnel

Situational

Educational Practice

Conceptual

Control

Page 24: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Case Study

Two sites of identified instructional leadershipInterviews, observational field notes, and document analysisUsed a conceptual framework and a semi-grounded theory approach

Page 25: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Two Cases of Instructional Leadership

Ordal ElementaryAffluent “on the hill” NeighborhoodVeteran and Highly Recognized StaffMrs. Janssen completing her second year as principal

Tingelstad ElementaryHigh Poverty “in the valley” Neighborhood“Young” staffMrs. Olson has taught and led at the school for eight years

Page 26: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Tingelstad Elementary

We don’t want to smatter our employees with a bunch of latest greatest trends, phrases, or research. We want to go deep in what we believe in and try to improve the overall quality of something…not this year we are going to study math…next year we are going study the six traits…and that typically happens in education. (Building Coach)

Page 27: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Ordal Elementary

Marcia and I met with each grade level. We said here was your goal. This is where your kids were. This is where they are now. Let’s talk about that. What is the data saying to you? Do we need to reevaluate? What are we going to do with those kids that are nowhere near meeting the goal? At that time we sat down and had that discussion. It was really interesting because the staff are very familiar with writing goals and writing out those target. (Janssen Interview #2, 5/24/07)

Page 28: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Personnel Knowledge--Tingelstad Elementary

Anita Olson was involved in the classroom whenever she was in the classroom. She was seeing how things were going and would say, ‘this is what I think and let me help you out here.’ I felt that this was a great place because you could make mistakes but you learned from them. And you weren’t afraid to make mistakes. (Quinten Interview #1, 2/13/07)

If she has come in and observed you she also sends people to you specifically. Or if there is something she has observed that you need some help with…nicely and kindly in your observation…she’ll say I think it would be beneficial for you to go and watch so and so. (Richards Interview #1, 2/19/07)

Page 29: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Personnel Knowledge-- Ordal Elementary

My goal was to also be in their classroom at least three times a month for some sort of just informal, being able to see what they were doing. Through those, through that, really came a lot of my discussions afterwards talking about where peoples’ interest, what were they working on, what were they working on outside of school? Their classes, the things that they had been involved in. (Janssen Interview #1, 2/5/07)I try to steer away from Marcia Kline and doing anything like observations together. In the sense that people start to fear that if Marcia and I are talking about anything along those lines that somehow it is going to be in their evaluation. So I really try to keep whatever Marcia arranges to do with teachers separate. (Janssen Interview #1, 2/5/07)

Page 30: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Situational Knowledge--Tingelstad Elementary

We have stayed with Strategies That Work, it is Stephanie Harvey’s book, and we are in our fifth year. We use that with best practices, what matters most…everything is researched based” (Olson Interview #1, 2/5/07).

Having the staff hear it from an outside expert was so powerful because then they hear it from me and hear it from the outside expert. The teachers then ventured off to their classrooms and they would start hearing that same kind of talk…it’s what we do” (Olson Interview #3, 6/12/07).

Page 31: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Situational Knowledge-- Ordal Elementary

I have that trust built with people and also the questions had been asked before so I was able to come in with a quicker decision and say this is the way we are going to do it instead of waiting to hear from everybody else” (Janssen Interview #2, 5/24/07).

When she wants to get those goals sets…I then have to figure out how to make that happen at the professional development meeting” (Kline Interview #2, 5/10/07).

Nora Janssen is about moving the student achievement but getting consensus from the team to do that” (Kopervik Interview #1, 3/13/07).

Page 32: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Educational Knowledge--Tingelstad Elementary

When I came on board, we decided to do a little philosophy change. I talked to the staff about the whole child. So we talked about school relationships because we needed to do that before we could tackle academics. We talked about relationships, resources. We, as a staff, came together and we went to Love and Logic classes. We created a language. (Olson Interview #1, 2/5/07)

We feel like if we become very strong in what we have in the classrooms then math comes along, science comes along, social studies and so on. We brought in a Stephanie Harvey consultant; we couldn’t get Stephanie. (The consultant) came in and we had her come in several times. She modeled in the classrooms and the teachers were just in awe because she did our expectations and our behavior but the academics were so involved in the classrooms that there were no behavior issues at all. Kids were learning. We saw the power of that kind of really focused lesson. Then the consultant was no longer going to be available and so Bevin Patterson talked with Stephanie Harvey and said ‘oh I can do this.’ So Bevin is now a consultant for Stephanie Harvey. (Olson Interview #1, 2/5/07)

Page 33: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Educational Knowledge-- Ordal Elementary

And we had a meeting a couple of months ago where they got subs so the grade levels could sit down with Nora Janssen and Marcia Kline for an hour and talk about our goals…you are there what are you doing about it…what is your next step… (Marston Interview #1, 2/13/07)

What we’ve done is try to stay with, we have a certain theme that goes through the year, and it is differentiated instruction. And from there, that’s what we build all of our professional development on. So we can be talking about math, but we are talking about how we differentiate instruction for those low learners, those high learners, those medium learners…what are we doing for kids. And then the next session we can be talking about writing or reading. (Janssen Interview #2, 5/24/07)

Page 34: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Conceptual Knowledge--Tingelstad Elementary

At that time, Anita Olson knew that poverty was an issue and she said she sometimes didn’t feel like a principal, she felt like she was a social worker because she had to deal with so many social issues when parents would come to school drunk or inebriated or drugged. And she had to deal with those issues in a positive way so they would not impact negatively the student or the student’s relationship with the family. (Kopervik Interview #1, 3/13/07)

She sometimes will bring articles and will say, ‘Have you seen this one or have you thought of this? Or this is what another school is doing.’ After a principals’ meeting she might say, ‘Have you

thought about this?’ (Patterson Interview #1, 2/12/07).

Page 35: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Conceptual Knowledge-- Ordal Elementary

Janssen didn’t feel the need to ‘be the principal’ and be in charge. She was able to delegate that to other people. And I think that is true leadership when she was able to do that” (Kopervik Interview #1, 3/13/07)

Conceptual knowledge: Janssen’s conceptual understanding of how teams set goals, monitor goals, and reassess goals.

Page 36: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Control Knowledge--Tingelstad Elementary

“I am the light and she is the heat” (Patterson Interview #1, 2/12/07)

What gets inspected gets respected” (Patterson Interview #1, 2/12/07).

Page 37: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Control Knowledge-- Ordal Elementary

I think it is and it should be the largest part of my job because building that capacity within teachers is…even if I covering a classroom so they can get out and go to another classroom or work with Marcia Kline. I look as that as part of my job of instructional time…so that is freeing them to go do the things they need to be able to do to build themselves up. (Janssen Interview #1, 2/5/07)

Page 38: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Instructional Leadership in Practice

Personnel actions that illustrate instructional leadershipAre knowledgeable about instructionProvide support for teachers (For example: consultants or coaches)Provide feedback to teachersConduct classroom observationsEmphasize instruction (during meetings or evaluations)Design or deliver professional developmentReview student work and student data to make decisions about how to improve instructionHold teachers accountable for making improvements in instruction

(Source: Marsh, Kerr, Ikemoto, Darilek, Suttorp, Zimmer, and Barney, 2005)

Page 39: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Distribution of Instructional Leadership

Tingelstad Elementary

Ordal Elementary

Knowledge of Instruction

CoachPrincipalTeachers

TeachersCoach

PrincipalCoachTeachers

Provide Support for Teachers

PrincipalCoach

TeachersCoachPrincipal

Conduct Classroom Observation

CoachPrincipal

Principal

Accountability

PrincipalCoachTeachers

TeachersCoachPrincipal

PrincipalTeachers

TeachersCoach

Page 40: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Distribution of Instructional Leadership

Tingelstad Elementary

Ordal Elementary

Emphasize Instruction

CoachPrincipal

Principal

Teachers

TeachersCoach

Principal

CoachTeacher

s

Design P.D.

CoachTeacher

sPrincip

al

CoachTeachers

Teachers

Principal

Review Student Work & Data

CoachPrincipalTeachers

PrincipalTeachersCoach

Page 41: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Findings

Semi-Structured SupportSchool Coaches

Organic reflective practiceConduit for ideas

Self-selected and prescribedDistrict supports were optional/variedBuildings could build contextually relevant solutions

In contrast to top-down instructional leadership examples

New York Dist #2San Diego UnifiedInstitute for Learning

Page 42: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Findings

Data as a driverData drives instruction and vision

Principals were trained in how to utilize data to focus instructionData was not the sole motivator

Success supports effortsData validates efforts

Provides urgency

Page 43: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Findings

Context of students and staffUrgency creates opportunities

Low scores and high poverty create opportunities for a specific Vision of Good Instruction

Stability allows less prescriptionWell established staffs require a unifying vision but flexibility in fulfilling the vision

Page 44: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Findings

Organic Reflective PracticeThe Coach and Principal

Distributed LeadershipReflection on instruction-based leadershipBuilt-in support

On-site supportContext-specificGrounded in practice

Page 45: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Findings

CohesionCommon language

InstructionalBest practicesDifferentiated Instruction

Goal SettingOngoingReflective in natureUsing real numbers and realistic targets

Page 46: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Limitations to Study

Small sample sizeExisting “Instructional” leadershipSpecific structure of district

School based coachesLevel of autonomy

Page 47: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Final Thoughts

Common LanguageOn-Site SupportContext-specificData-Driven

Page 48: Elementary principals’ development of distributed instructional leadership

Contact Information

Dan Lysne(253)[email protected][email protected]

5909 Myers Rd. E.Bonney Lake, WA 98391