Electronic waste - hazards, management and available green ...isca.in/IJENS/Archive/v7/i5/8.ISCA-IRJEvS-2017-157.pdfElectronic waste - hazards, management and available green technologies

International Research Journal

Vol. 7(5), 57-68, May (2018)

International Science Community Association

Review Paper

Electronic waste - hazards, management and available green technologies for

School of Environment and Sustainable Development, Central University of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, 382030, India

AvailableReceived 27th December

Abstract

E-waste is generally an unusual expansion to the regularly developing dangerous waste stream. E

extensive variety of discarded electronic devices like, refrigerators televisions, computers, air conditioners, and cell phon

that contains diverse sorts of hepatotoxic materials that pose professional and ecological threats including contaminating the

surrounding environment harshly. The e-waste hazard is of worldwide anxiety attributable to the character of manufacturing

and discarding of waste. Due to its complicated nature, it is becoming tough to manage. The unsafe content of these

materials causes environmental issues as well as health threat to biodiversity including humans.

electronic waste (e-waste) are growing as they will make contributions to the discharge of tenacious venomous substances

into the surroundings. The challenge is to create advanced and proficient resolutions to clean the impure environment, to

create them innocuous for livelihood for human bei

approach is presently in practice to get rid of pollutants from the surroundings. These technologies became enticing

alternatives to the traditional clean up technologies attributable to

visual nature. Hence, these skills got to be practical to clean e

deals with e-waste configuration, classification, international and Indian e

decomposable, and unsafe constituents found within the e

retrieval processes and their ecological risks. The article additionally summarizes the uns

bioremediation technologies to get rid of it from the surroundings.

Keywords: E-waste, heavy metals, bioremediation technology, phytoremediation.

Introduction

The entire environment is beneath excessive strain owing to

development and manufacture likewise the population pressure,

suburbanization and manufacture is imposing great pressure on

the global environment. The issues are combined by forceful

changes that are going down within the fashion and habits of

individuals. One of the world’s biggest and expeditious rising

industries is the electronic industry.

Among the industrial world, the hasty growth along with the

speedy product devolution is resulting in discarded electronics

that are currently the quickest budding waste stream. Electronic

waste (e-waste) utilization has led to serious environmental

issues owing to the lethal stuff unleash throughout the disposal

activities1-3

.

Electronic waste contains end-of-life electrical merchandise like

PCs, printers, photocopy machines, television sets, and portable

phones, those created from subtle combination of plastics,

metals, and different materials. It is enhancing the set back due

to the enormous quantity produced and the amount of each

venomous and valuable material in e-waste. Aluminium, copper,

Journal of Environmental Sciences___________________________

I

Association

hazards, management and available green technologies for

remediation - a review Pankaj Kumar


[email protected]

Available online at: www.isca.in, www.isca.me December 2017, revised 16th March 2018, accepted 25th April 2018

waste is generally an unusual expansion to the regularly developing dangerous waste stream. E

extensive variety of discarded electronic devices like, refrigerators televisions, computers, air conditioners, and cell phon

ains diverse sorts of hepatotoxic materials that pose professional and ecological threats including contaminating the

waste hazard is of worldwide anxiety attributable to the character of manufacturing

of waste. Due to its complicated nature, it is becoming tough to manage. The unsafe content of these

materials causes environmental issues as well as health threat to biodiversity including humans.

g as they will make contributions to the discharge of tenacious venomous substances


create them innocuous for livelihood for human being and to defend the ecosystems that help lifestyles. Bioremediation


alternatives to the traditional clean up technologies attributable to comparatively little capital prices and their naturally

visual nature. Hence, these skills got to be practical to clean e-waste from the soil-water surroundings. This review paper

waste configuration, classification, international and Indian e-waste eventualities, scenarios of retrievable,

decomposable, and unsafe constituents found within the e-waste, the greatest obtainable practices, reprocessing, and

retrieval processes and their ecological risks. The article additionally summarizes the unsafe effects of e waste, and pioneer

bioremediation technologies to get rid of it from the surroundings.

ioremediation technology, phytoremediation.

The entire environment is beneath excessive strain owing to

likewise the population pressure,

suburbanization and manufacture is imposing great pressure on

the global environment. The issues are combined by forceful

are going down within the fashion and habits of

individuals. One of the world’s biggest and expeditious rising

Among the industrial world, the hasty growth along with the

iscarded electronics

that are currently the quickest budding waste stream. Electronic-

waste) utilization has led to serious environmental

issues owing to the lethal stuff unleash throughout the disposal

life electrical merchandise like

PCs, printers, photocopy machines, television sets, and portable

phones, those created from subtle combination of plastics,

metals, and different materials. It is enhancing the set back due

duced and the amount of each

waste. Aluminium, copper,

iron, gold and different metals in e

of the total fraction, whereas plastic constitutes the concerning

30% and also the hazardous pollutants

Sum4

described that electronic scrap consists of a quantitative

relation of roughly 30:30:40 of plastics, refractory oxides and

metal, severally. The average metal scrap consists of Cu (20%),

Fe (8%), Sn (4%), Ni (2%), Pb (2%), Zn (1%

(0.1%), and metallic element (0.005%).

The developed as well as the emerging nations are nowadays

facing a significant challenge regarding the disposal and

recycling of this new category of waste. In India, the discarding

of e-waste from established nations notably computer waste, has

created e-waste management, a nuisance for surroundings as

well as living beings. In comparison with standard municipal

wastes, the bound elements of electronic merchandise hold

noxious materials, which may cause a risk to the surroundings

as well as on human being. For example, TV set and pc displays

unremarkably are full of dangerous materials like mercury, lead

and cadmium, whereas beryllium, nickel, and zinc are typically

found in circuit panels. Owing to

materials, utilization and discarding of e

significant issue.

________________________________ ISSN 2319–1414

Int. Res. J. Environmental Sci.

57

hazards, management and available green technologies for


waste is generally an unusual expansion to the regularly developing dangerous waste stream. E-waste incorporates an

extensive variety of discarded electronic devices like, refrigerators televisions, computers, air conditioners, and cell phones,

ains diverse sorts of hepatotoxic materials that pose professional and ecological threats including contaminating the

waste hazard is of worldwide anxiety attributable to the character of manufacturing

of waste. Due to its complicated nature, it is becoming tough to manage. The unsafe content of these

materials causes environmental issues as well as health threat to biodiversity including humans. Activities regarding

g as they will make contributions to the discharge of tenacious venomous substances


ng and to defend the ecosystems that help lifestyles. Bioremediation


comparatively little capital prices and their naturally

water surroundings. This review paper

waste eventualities, scenarios of retrievable,

waste, the greatest obtainable practices, reprocessing, and

afe effects of e waste, and pioneer

iron, gold and different metals in e-waste comprises over 60%

of the total fraction, whereas plastic constitutes the concerning

30% and also the hazardous pollutants include about 2.70%.

described that electronic scrap consists of a quantitative

relation of roughly 30:30:40 of plastics, refractory oxides and

The average metal scrap consists of Cu (20%),

Fe (8%), Sn (4%), Ni (2%), Pb (2%), Zn (1%), Ag (0.2%), Au

(0.1%), and metallic element (0.005%).

The developed as well as the emerging nations are nowadays

facing a significant challenge regarding the disposal and

recycling of this new category of waste. In India, the discarding

established nations notably computer waste, has

a nuisance for surroundings as

well as living beings. In comparison with standard municipal

wastes, the bound elements of electronic merchandise hold

ause a risk to the surroundings

as well as on human being. For example, TV set and pc displays

unremarkably are full of dangerous materials like mercury, lead

and cadmium, whereas beryllium, nickel, and zinc are typically

found in circuit panels. Owing to the occurrence of these

materials, utilization and discarding of e-waste becomes a very

International Research Journal of Environmental Sciences ____________________________________________ISSN 2319–1414

Vol. 7(5), 57-68, May (2018) Int. Res. J. Environmental Sci.

International Science Community Association 58

Sources of E-waste

The private and public (industrial) divisions are the primary

causes of electronic waste that records for about 70% of the

aggregate waste production. The commitment of individual

family units is nearly little at concerning 15%; the rest being

contributed by producers. However singular family units aren't

monster donors to squander produced by PCs, they devour

immense amounts of purchaser merchandise and are, in this

way, potential producers of waste. An Indian Market Research

Bureau (IMRB) overview of 'E-waste generation at Source' in

2009 found that out of the full e-squander volume in India, TVs

and desktops and additionally servers included 68% and 27%

individually. Imports and cell phones involved 2% and 1%

separately.

Configuration of E-waste

It contains over a thousand completely diverse materials, of

which several are toxicant, and can cause severe pollution upon

disposal. Most of the constituents occurred in electronic waste

are ferrous material (38%), non-ferrous material (28%), plastic

(19%), glass (4%), whereas timber, neoprene, ceramic, etc.

comprises the remaining 11%. The electronic equipments

encompass an outsized range of venturesome materials, as well

as significant metals, flame retardants (e.g., pentabromophenol,

polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), tetrabromobisphenol

A (TBBPA), and different materials. The occurrence of

components like Pb, Hg, As, Cd, Se, Cr and flame retardants

more than the acceptable amounts make e-waste dangerous. E-

waste is considered as hazardous waste, due to the presence of

these substances which, if improperly accomplished, might

cause vital social and ecological health threats. The general

composition of e-waste is shown in Figure-1.

Hazardous Components of E-Waste

Mercury: It is primarily originated from fluorescent tubes, tilt

switches, mechanical doorbells, and monitors. It causes health

issues such as; muscle weakness, memory loss, dermatitis, and

sensory impairment. Ecological effects on the faunas include

reduced fertility, demise, leisurelier progression and expansion.

Sulphur: It is largely originated from lead-acid batteries.

Healthiness issues embrace eye and throat annoyance, kidney

damage, liver harm, heart problems. Once unconfined in to the

atmosphere, it may produce sulphuric acid.

Brominated flame retardants: It can be utilized as flame

retardants in plastics in various electronics embrace PBBs,

OctaBDE, and PentaBDE. Health issues of BFRs embrace

impaired expansion of the system.

Cadmium: The different compounds of Cadmium are utilized

in the variety of electrical and electronic product5. It can be

employed in certain contacts, switches and solders linkages.

Several devices comprise reversible nickel-cadmium batteries

that encompass cadmium compound. It is an infrequent metal,

found obviously within the atmosphere in low concentrations,

generally beneath 2 mg/kg in soils6,7

. It is principally occurred

in light sensitive devices, erosion mixtures for oceanic and

aviation environments and cadmium batteries. It may percolate

into the soil and can cause hazardous effect on microorganism

and soil ecosystem if not recycled properly. Cadmium can

additionally affects the kidney and lungs.

Lead: It is typically originated from cathode-ray tube monitor

glass, lead batteries. Metallic lead used in electrical solder,

ordinarily as an alloy with tin. Lead oxide is employed within

the glass of electron beam tubes53

, and lead compounds are used

as stabilizers in PVC formulations.

Beryllium oxide: It is mainly utilized as filler in thermal

interface constituents like thermal grease used on CPUs and

power transistors, magnetrons, heat transfer fins in vacuum

tubes.

Figure-1: The Overall Composition of Electronic scrap

63




Environmental and Health Effects of Hazardous

Materials in E-waste

E-waste is far more perilous than a few other municipal

squanders in light of the fact that electronic contraptions contain

a large number of constituents made of fatal chemicals and

metals like Pb, Cr, Cd, Hg, Sb, Be, PVC, and brominated fire

retardants. The exposure of these materials harms the sensual

systems, bones, kidney, procreative and endocrine frameworks.

Most of them can cause cancer and neurotoxic disorders. E-

squander that is land stuffed produces sullied leachates that in

the long run bemire the ground-water. Acids and muck got from

dissolving PC chips, if disseminated on the ground causes

fermentation of soil, prompting to pollution of water assets. The

burning of e-squanders can transmit cyanogenetic exhaust and

gasses, along these lines dirtying the enveloping air.

Inappropriate reusing and recuperation ways can affect the

environment. Table-1 summarizes the health effects of bound

constituents in e-wastes. On the off chance that these electronic

things are disposed of with various domestic junk, the poisonous

substances can bring about a risk to both wellbeing and

fundamental components of the biological community. In

perspective of the precarious impacts of perilous squanders to

both environment and wellbeing, numerous nations urged the

prerequisite for a worldwide consent to deal with the issues and

difficulties uncovered by dangerous waste. Additionally, in the

late 1980s, a regulation of natural controls in developed nations

prompted to an emotional ascent in the cost of unsafe waste

transfer.

Table-1: Impacts of Hazardous Substances8.

Constituent Existence in e-waste Ecological and Health

impact

Pb CRT screens, batteries Affects the nervous

system

Li Lithium batteries Develop volatile

fumes

Ni Rechargeable NiCd-

batteries

May cause allergic

reactions

Hg Found in the fluorescent

lamps, alkaline batteries

Acutely poisonous

and injurious to health

Chloro-

fluorocarbon

Cooling element,

insulation foam

Burning of CFCs may

cause toxic emissions.

Organic

Substances

Condensers, liquid

crystal display -

Infrequent

earth

elements

Fluorescent coating Annoyseyes and skin

Gallium

arsenide Light emanating diode Harmful to healthiness

Zinc

sulphide

Used on the interior of a

CRTs Toxic when inhaled

Toner Dust Toner cartridges for

laser printers

Health risk when

inhaled

PCBs Condensers,

transformers

Cause cancer, affects

the immune system,

reproductive system,

nervous system.

Scenario of Electronic waste generation

Global Context: As estimated, more than 50 MT of e-waste is

produced comprehensively per annum out of the enormous

quantity of the municipal waste generated over the world. In

alternative words, it would fill plenty segments of a train to go

far and wide once9. Thus, with increasing consumerism and a

predictable ascent inside the offers of electronic item in the

countries encountering quick financial and modern

development, the upper extent of e-waste in municipal solid

waste is becoming an issue of incredible concern. A report of

the United Nations anticipated that by 2020, electronic waste

from old PCs would jump by 400% of 2007 levels in China and

by 500% in India. Besides e-waste from disposed cellular

phones would be increasing seven times over 2007 levels and,

in India, 18 times elevated by 202010

.

China as of now delivers concerning 2.3 million tons of e-waste

locally, second exclusively to the U.S. with concerning 3

million tons. The Europe and furthermore the United States

represents the most extreme e-squander generation all through

this present decade. According to UNEP, 2007(Inventory

Assessment Manual) evaluated that the entire e-squander

created inside the Europe is concerning 14 to 15 kg for every

capita. In nations like China and India, yearly generation per

capita is a littler sum than 1kg.

E-squander adds up to 6 million tons of solid waste every year

in Europe. The generation of e-squander in the Europe is

foreseen to rise at a pace of 3% to 5% every year. Previously, e-

squander had broadened by 16% to 28% every five years that is

3 times snappier than normal yearly municipal solid waste

generation. In the United States, e-squander represents 1% to

3% of the entire municipal waste. According to United States

Environmental Protection Agency, it produced 2.6 MT of e-

waste in 2005 that represented 1.4% of aggregate squanders.

Brazil and China are giving a stimulus to the world interest for

metals. The reused metal market has been relied upon to

develop at a normal yearly rate of development of 8.1 % in 2010

and that of reused plastics at the speed of 10.2 percent.

The Global Movement of Electronic waste: The principle

cause and destination of the e-squander exchange are

incontestable in Figure-2. E-squander usage processes have

been known in numerous areas in China as well as India, less

researched areas are in the Philippines, African country (in the

town of Lagos), Pakistan (Karachi) and Ghana (Accra)11

. All in

all, slight scale sends out go to West Africa though the bigger

and for the most part extra basically composed transports go to

South-East Asia. It is measurable that China gets the absolute

best extent of all e-squander concerning 70% and rising.

Nevertheless, there are no affirmed figures offered on however

significant these trans-limits e-squander streams are11

. Further,

inferable from the current change of laws in Asia, it is

measurable that extra e-waste can stream into West African

countries later on.




Scenario of Electronic waste generation in India

The issues related with electronic-squander in India began

egression once the essential piece of financial progression, after

1990. Because of the firm rivalry among differed Indian and

Foreign organizations, in the market of brand name, quality,

cost, and administrations offered, the electronic and customer

tough exchange developed in India. India included 113.26

million new cellular clients in 2008, in venture with Telecom

Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), with a normal 9.5

million clients included every month. The cellular market

developed from 168.11 million in 2003–2004 to 261.97 million

in 2007–2008 (TRAI 2008–09). Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh,

Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Delhi, Karnataka,

Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Punjab are the states on the top in

the list of the most elevated commitment to WEEE (Table-2).

Figure-2: Transfer of e-waste

12

Table-2: Magnitude of WEEE generations in India13

.

States WEEE (tones) States WEEE (tonnes)

Andhra Pradesh 12,780.3 Lakshadweep 7.4

Andaman and Nicobar 92.2 Madhya Pradesh 7,800.6

Assam 2,176.7 Manipur 231.7

Arunachal Pradesh 131.7 Maharashtra 20,270.6

Bihar 3,055.6 Mizoram 79.6

Chhattisgarh 2,149.9 Meghalaya 211.6

Chandigarh 359.7 Nagaland 145.1

Daman and Diu 40.8 Orissa 2,937.8

Dadra and Nagar Haveli 29.4 Punjab 6,958.5

Delhi 9,729.2 Puducherry 284.2

Gujarat 8,994.3 Rajasthan 6,326.6

Goa 427.4 Sikkim 78.1

Himachal Pradesh 1,595.1 Tripura 378.3

Haryana 4,506.9 Tamilnadu 13,486.2

Jharkhand 2,021.6 Uttarakhand 1,641.1

Jammu & Kashmir 1,521.5 Uttar Pradesh 10,381.1

Kerala 6,171.8 West Bengal 10,059.4

Karnataka 9,118.7 Total 146,180.7




Management of E-waste: Available Treatment

Technologies

Perilous substances created by e-waste are horrendously hurtful

for the earth moreover with respect to people. Subsequently, a

proficient evacuation method must be produced for tidy up of

environment. Accessible innovations for treating e-squander

epitomize reusing, burning and land filling.

Recycling: E-squander reusing includes the disassembly and

devastation of the hardware to recuperate new materials14

.

Reusing can recoup 95% of the accommodating constituents

from a portable PC and 45% of constituents from cathode ray

tube screens15

. In developed nations, for example, Japan, cutting

edge reprocessing procedures perform well with next to no

ecological effect16

.

Today’s systems can recover high-lead (high-lead) glass from

the disposed cathode-beam tube with ostensible natural effect17

.

Any natural benefits of reusing are very counterbalanced if the

squander ought to be transported long separations due to the

negative ecological impacts of fuel burning18

. The dangers that

appear all through the arrangement of e-waste are essentially

because of unsafe substances that are inadvertently released or

spilled in light of breaking of parts that uncovered aforesaid

exemplified material.

Takigami et al19

dignified the concentration of BFRs, with

TBBPA, PBDEs and hexabromocyclododecane and

polybrominated dibenzo-p-dioxins/dibenzofurans in the quality

of a Television reprocessing agency. More than foundation

levels all the chemicals were distinguished at fixation levels.

Through the destroying procedure of TV housing cabinets,

concentration of the examined brominated compounds were 1 to

2 orders of extent higher contrasted with the amount in the

destroying hall air.

Incineration: Incineration is the process of burning

inanorganized and comprehensive manner, in which the waste

item is scorched in exceptionally planned incinerators at a

temperature (900-1000ºC). Favorable position of consuming of

e-waste is the decrease of waste quantity and the usage of the

vitality substance of flammable materials. As a result of burning

some soil dangerous natural substances are recover into less

hazardous mixes.

The risks identified with the burning of electronic-waste include

the outflows of gasified and molecule certain poisons (metals

likewise as organic compounds) by means of the fumes gasses,

moreover as draining of toxins from the lingering powder.

These issues have acquired goodish consideration20,21

.

Funcke and Hemminghaus22

decided the development of

PXDDs/Fs and PBDDs/Fs so of burning of BFR-containing e-

squander. The examination encased burning of urban throw

away and co-ignition start of municipal waste with e-squander.

Land filling: The majority of the E-waste is presently land

stuffed18

. In land filling, furrows are made on the level surfaces.

Soil is unearthed from the furrows and waste is covered inside,

which is roofed by a densestratum of soil. As per the USEPA,

over 4.6 million tons of electronic-waste wound up in US

landfills in 2000.

The dangers related with setting e-squander in landfills are

because of filtering and vanishing of perilous substances. The

primary issues in this setting are the extensive assortment of

materials the EEE comprises and in addition the long period

traverses included. The dangerous mixes show in e-squander

represent an extensive variety of properties that influence their

similarity when exhibit together in landfills. Thus, it is hard to

maintain a strategic distance from dissipation and draining of all

mixes in the meantime, and it has in this way turn into a typical

learning that all landfills spill23

.

An assessment detailed by Townsend et al10

surveyed the

leachability of 36 CRTs utilizing toxic characteristic leaching

Procedure (TCLP). Twenty-one of the thirty color CRTs

surpassed the 5 mg/l of the lead restrictive limit for portrayal as

a risky waste. The most important focus of leachable lead

originated from the channel little bit of CRTs at an average lead

concentration of 75.3 mg/L. Based on the results, the authors

required incorporation of CRTs into monitoring programs that

specialize in dangerous chemicals9.

Management Approaches for E-waste

The greatest alternative for managing e-waste is to decrease the

quantity. Creators must make sure that the product is

constructed for re-utilize, renovation and in addition

upgradeability. Pressure has to be compelled to be arranged on

utilization of less dangerous, effortlessly redeemable and

reusable materials which may be saved for repair,

remanufacturing, dismantling and recycle. Reusing and recycle

of material are the subsequent level of possible alternatives to

diminish e-waste24

. Retrieval of metallic elements, plastic, glass

and other different constituents diminish the enormousness of

electronic waste. These choices will probably preserve the

vitality and save the surroundings free from deadly materials

that might somehow have been discharged. The manufactures,

customers, controllers, metropolitan consultants, governments,

and policy makers should think over it seriously. It is the

necessity of great importance to possess an "e-waste approach"

and nationwide supervisory framework for advancement of

these exercises. An e-waste strategy is finest generated by the

people who comprehend the problems. Thus it is preeminent for

business to start out strategy development altogether, but with

consumer association. Property of e-waste management

frameworks should be bonded by enhancing the adequacy of

gathering and reusing frameworks (e.g., public–private-

organizations in putting in place purchase back or drop-off

focuses) moreover, by outlining in supplementary subsidy e.g.,

propel reusing charges25

. Figure-3 is showing the various

components of the management system for electronic waste.




Advanced Treatment Technologies for treating E-

waste

As it is clear that e-squander contains greater than usual amount

of heavy metals, many research studies are accounted till date

about the extent to which these critical metals are unsafe for

nature as well as human beings. Substantial metals are used in

creating of electrical stock further as polycyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons are produced by the low temperature ignition of e-

waste. The scorching of protected wire, which for the most part

occurs in open iron barrels, creates 100 times more dioxins than

burning domestic waste20

. Different advanced treatment

technologies for treating e-waste are shown in Figure-4.

Figure-3: Elements of e-waste managing system

25.

Figure-4: Treatment Technologies for Electronic Waste

26,27.




Bioremediation: Bioremediation, the chief compelling creative

innovation that utilizes organic frameworks for treatment of

contaminants. Despite the fact that, this novel and exceptional

innovation could be a multidisciplinary approach, its main

purpose relies upon natural science. Bioremediation is a

plausibility that gives the probability to obliterate or render

innocuous fluctuated contaminants utilizing common natural

action. In that capacity, it utilizes similarly reasonable

innovation that normally incorporates a high open

acknowledgment and may ordinarily be dispensed on the site28

.

Contrasted with various ways, bioremediation could be a

brighter and less costly means for cleanup up defiled soil and

water29

.

Bioleaching: Bioleaching utilizes a bent for microorganisms to

change metals exhibit inside the waste from solid to dissolve

form. There are two assortments of bioleaching: direct draining

and indirect filtering. Direct draining is the utilization of natural

acid delivered from microorganisms, to dissolve the

inexplicable cytotoxic metals, transforming them into particles

that they get to be distinctly solvent. In indirect filtering, the

metal reacting microorganisms utilized that oxidize metal

enveloping the organism. As a rule, the anion of the objective

metallic mixes is oxidized, giving out free metal particles in

fluid medium19

.

Table-3: Microbesrecognized for bioleaching of lethal metallic

elements30

.

Organism Type Toxic Metal

Acidithiobacillus thioxidans Bacteria Arsenic, Lead

Micrococcus roseus Bacteria Cadmium

Thiobacillus ferrooxidans Bacteria Arsenic, Lead

Aspergillus fumigatus Fungus Arsenic

Aspergillus niger Fungus Cadmium,

Lead

Biosorption: Biosorption refers to the concentrating and

authoritative of dissolvable pollutants to the surface of cell

structure, it doesn't waste time with dynamic assimilation; for

this situation the dissolvable contaminants are ionizing

hepatotoxic metals31

.

Table-4: Microorganisms known for biosorption of lethal

metals32-34

.


Bacillus sphaericus Bacteria Chromium

Myxococcus xanthus Bacteria Uranium

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteria Cadmium,

Uranium

Rhizopus arrhizus Fungus Uranium

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fungus Cadmium

Bioaccumulation: In bioaccumulation process, the assimilation

of contaminants among the living being, which moved to the

cell among the cell structure and centered there, this strategy,

needs dynamic metabolism34

. For organic contaminants, there

are normally synthetic responses inside the cell living substance

to change over them to various mixes; at the same time, the

metals coming into the cell living substance won't bear any

response however sequestered rather1.

Table-5: Microorganisms for bioaccumulation of metals35-38

.

Organism Noxious Metal

Bacillus circulans Chromium

Bacillus megaterium Chromium

Deinococcus radiodurans Uranium

Micrococcus luteus Uranium

Aspergillus niger Chromium, Lead

Monodictys pelagica Chromium, Lead

Biotransformation: It refers to the procedure in which a

substance is transformed from one synthetic form to an alternate

compound frame. Because of dangerous metals, the oxidation

state is adjusted by the expansion or expulsion of electrons, so

their chemical characteristics are altered34

. There are two

methods for biotransformation handle; the essential one is

immediate enzymatic diminishment, in which harmful metallic

particles are decreased by tolerating electrons from the enzymes

on outside of the cell, and the other is indirect reduction, which

will be usual curtailed and restrain destructive metallic particles

in substance and underground condition by activities of metallic

sinking or sulfate decreasing microscopic organisms39

.

Table-6: Microorganisms known for biotransformation of toxic

metals21,40

.


Anaeromyxobacter sp. Bacteria Uranium

Clostridium sphenoides Bacteria Uranium

Halomonas sp. Bacteria Uranium

Serratia sp. Bacteria Chromium

Fusarium oxysporum Fungus Cadmium

Rhizopus oryzae Fungus Chromium

Biomineralization: This technique portrays the strategy in

which harmful metal particles blend with anions or ligands

made from the microorganisms to make precipitation.




Table-7: Bacterial species for bio mineralization of lethal

metals39,41-43

.


Bacillus fusiformis Bacteria Lead

Cupriavidus metallidurans Bacteria Cadmium

Sporosarcina ginsengisoli Bacteria Arsenic

Bacillus fusiformis Bacteria Lead

Plant based remediation for treating E-waste: The

demonstration of expelling harmful elements from the

surroundings with the help of plants is named as

phytoremediation44

. There are numerous essential techniques

utilized as a part of remediation utilizing plants,

phytoextraction, phytovolatilization, phytostabilisation,

rhizofiltration, and rhizoremediation27

.

Numerous past reviews mainly have some expertise in the

dissemination of PCBs, and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins,

PBDEs, and dibenzofurans in e-squanders reusing areas,

however the deliberation appropriation and possible

transportation of those mixes from the disassembling

destinations to incorporating areas have not been satisfactorily

researched personally45

.

Plants were anticipated for in situ phytoremediation46,7

. This

turned into an attractive idea of innovative work. Plant-helped

remediation is generally characterized as the utilization of green

earthbound floras for treating with chemicals or radioactively

tainted soils.

The following are the major benefits of plant bioremediation: i.

The plants might be basically observed. ii. The probability of

the recuperation and re-utilization of significant stock. iii. It

utilizes normally living beings and conserves the common

condition of the environment. iv. The minimal effort of

phytoremediationis the principle benefit of phytoremediation.

Phytoextraction: The utilization of plants or protoctist to

dispose of impurities from soils, residue and water into

harvestable plant biomass can be known as phytoextraction. It

has been developing quickly in quality globally throughout the

previous a quarter century or less47

. Generally, this procedure

has been endeavored additional usually to extricate basic metals

than for natural mixes. The plants ingest pollutants through the

root and accumulate them inside the root biomass or potentially

transport them up into the stems as well as clears out.

Rhizofiltration: Rhizofiltration is equivalent in thought to

phytoextraction. The pollutants are either adsorbate onto the

root shallow, or consumed by the plant roots. Plants utilized for

rhizofiltration aren't planted straightforwardly in situ, however

are acquainted with the waste material first. Plants are

developed in clean water till the monstrous roots framework

created.

Table-8: Plant species for phytoextraction of deadly

metals15,48,49

.

Plant Species Toxic Metals

Thlaspi caerulescen Strontium

Amaranthus retroflexus Arsenic

Chenopodium album Lead

Brassica juncea Cadmium, Chromium

Table-9: Plants for Rhizofiltration of deadly metals5,50,51

.


Eichornia crassipes Arsenic

Lemna minor Arsenic

Limnocharis flava Cadmium

Medicago sativa Cadmium, Lead

Pteris vittata Arsenic

Phytostabilisation: The utilization of specific plants to restrain

soil and aquatic pollutants is known as phytostabilisation.

Contaminants are assimilated and collected by roots, adsorbate

in the roots, or accelerated inside the rhizospheric zone. This

diminishes or possibly keeps the nature of the pollutants

averting relocation into the ground-water and decreases the

bioavailability of pollution, subsequently anticipating unfurl

through the organic marvel. This strategy may likewise be

utilized to re-set up a plant group on destinations that bear

inferable from the abnormal amounts of metal pollution. Once a

group of tolerant plant varieties have been built up, the potential

for wind disintegration (and in this way unfurl of the toxin) is

diminished and action of the dirt contaminants is reduced52

.

Table-10: Plants for Phytostabilisation of lethal metals53-55

.

Plant Species Metals

Alnus glutinosa Uranium

Populus canadensis Cadmium, Lead

Atriplex lentiformis Uranium

Chrysopogon zizanioides Arsenic, Lead

Mediterranean L. albus Arsenic, Cadmium

Populus alba Cadmium, Lead




Phytovolatilization: Phytovolatilization is the technique in

which, plants take-up pollutants that are dissolvable and

unharness them into the air as they emerge the water. The

defilement might get to be distinctly changed on the approach,

on the grounds that the water goes on the plant's framework

from the roots to the leaves, whereby the pollutants dissipate or

alter into the air enveloping the plant. There are variable degrees

of achievement with plants as phytovolatilizers with one review

demonstrating poplar trees to adjust up to ninety percent of the

trichloroethane56

.

Table-11: Plants for Phytovolatilization of noxious

metals49,57,58

.


Nicotiana tabacum Mercury

Arabidopsis thaliana Mercury

Triticum aestivum Mercury

Pteris vittata Arsenic

Assortments of pollutant debasing enzymes are frequently found

in plants. These grasp dioxygenases, P450 monooxygenases,

peroxidases, dehalogenases, phosphatases, laccases, nitrilases,

and nitroreductases59,60,4

. Phytoremediation depends upon the

fundamental functional mechanisms occurring in higher plants

and related microbes, similar to photosynthesis, transpiration,

metabolism, and mineral sustenance. Plants delve their

underlying foundations in soils, silt and water, and roots will

take up biological and inorganic substances; roots can settle and

tie materials on their external shells, and once they move with

microbes inside the rhizosphere61

. Uptaken elements are

likewise elated, put away, changed over, and aggregated inside

totally extraordinary cells and tissues of the plant. Finally,

ethereal portions of the plant could exchange gasses with the air

permitting take-up or release of particles.

Conclusion

E-waste could be a troublesome problem for native as well as

worldwide scales. Electronic waste issues primarily found in

established nations and currently stretch out usually to diverse

countries round the world. The development of modernization

leads to fast degeneration of the electronic gadgets, thus

generating mammoth amounts of e-waste. Electronic waste

contains an enormous scope of materials, some of them contain

a combination of deadly substances that may pollute nature, in

addition harm human wellbeing, if the finish of-life

management isn't thoroughly overseen. Electronic waste reusing

exercises are extreme frequently cause of extensive

contamination, influencing every parts of environment and

causing threat to the employees and inhabitants of electronic

waste sites. Soils are debased by varied elements, such as metals

and organic pollutants, which are transferred to the organic

phenomenon. Additionally, there's an intense deficiency of

information on the providence and noxiousness of the

contaminants. So, there is an imperative requirement of

grouping knowledge of contamination. Furthermore, efforts

should be created to endorse correct utilization for preventing

the contamination sources and to improve cleaning

technologies. There are lots of approaches out there, but for the

simplest alternative, it is important, first, to do an additional

investigation of the situations of the topsoil and also the

pollutants. As several places will have many impurities, it is

fascinating to mix certain removal technologies so as to own a

lot of effective refining method. Bioremediation yet as

phytoremediation provides a possible cheap answer to the

present problem. Remediation of such soils with plants and

microorganisms fit for debasing and redesigning pollutants

when present in soils containing various toxins is the best way

contrasted with alternative physical and chemical degrading

techniques for future environmental reclamation of defiled sites.

Bioremediation and phytoremediation ought to be overseen by

utilizing local plants and microorganisms, especially those

surviving in the sullied sites, rather than outside or hereditarily

changed organisms. A rising challenge for scientists is to

discover plant and organisms equipped for debasing various

contagions in soil. Bioremediation procedures will enhance the

condition of current treatment rehearses accessible for e-

squander. In addition, management hones for e-waste, there is a

necessity of doing a great deal of exploration of bioremediation,

therefore these methods might be utilized to treat the electronic

waste.

References

1. Hou B., Zhu K., Lu J. and Zhao Y.F. (2006). Research on

bioremediation of petroleum contaminated soils and its

perspectives. Sichuan Environment, 6(24), 131-140.

2. Mundada M.N., Kumar S. and Shekdar A.V. (2004).

E‐waste: a new challenge for waste management in India.

International Journal of Environmental Studies, 61(3), 265-

279.

3. Zhang W.H., Ying-Xin W.U. and Simonnot M.O. (2012).

Soil contamination due to e-waste disposal and recycling

activities: a review with special focus on China.

Pedosphere, 22(4), 434-455.

4. Susarla S., Medina V.F. and McCutcheon S.C. (2002).

Phytoremediation: an ecological solution to organic

chemical contamination. Ecological Engineering, 18, 647-

658.

5. Olguín E.J. and Sánchez-Galván G. (2012). Heavy metal

removal in Phytofiltration and phytoremediation: the need

to differentiate between bio adsorption and

bioaccumulation. New Biotechnology, 30(1), 3-8.

6. Alloway B.J. (1990). Heavy metals in soils. John Wiley and

Sons, Inc. New York, ISBN 0470215984.




7. Salt D.E., Smith R.D. and Raskin I. (1998).

Phytoremediation. Annual review of plant biology, 49(1),

643-668.

8. Report on Assessment of Electronic Wastes in Mumbai-

Pune Area- MPCB, March 2007)

9. Sharma P., Fulekar M.H. and Pathak B. (2012). E-Waste- A

Challenge for Tomorrow. ResearchJournal of Recent

Sciences, ISSN 2277-2502, 1(3), 86-93.

10. Townsend G.T., Musson S., Jang Y.C. and Chung I.H.

(1999). Characterization of lead leachability from cathode

ray tubes using the toxicity characteristic leaching

procedure. Florida Center for Solid & Hazardous Waste

Management, Gainesville, FL.

11. OECD (2003). Technical guidance for the environmentally

sound management of specific waste streams: used and

scrap personal computers. Organization for Economic Co-

operation and Development (OECD) Working Group on

Waste Prevention and Recycling. ENV/EPOC/WGWPR

(2001) 3/FINAL.

12. Lewis A. (2011). Europe breaking electronic waste export

ban. BBC News Europe, 4.

13. IRGSSA (2005). Country Level WEEE Assessment study

by IRG Systems South Asia Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi: IRGSSA.

14. Cui J. and Zhang L. (2008). Metallurgical recovery of

metals from electronic waste: A review. Journal of

Hazardous Materials, 158, 228-256.

15. Lasat M.M. (2002). Phytoextraction of toxic metals.

Journal of Environmental Quality, 31(1), 109-120.

16. Aizawa H., Yoshida H. and Sakai S.I. (2008). Current

results and future perspectives for Japanese recycling of

home electrical appliances. Res Conserv Recycl., 52, 1399-

1410.

17. Andreola F., Barbieri L., Corradi A., Ferrari A.M.,

Lancellotti I. and Neri P. (2007). Recycling of EOL CRT

glass into ceramic glaze formulations and its environmental

impact by LCA approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess, 12(6),

448-454.

18. Barba-Gutiérrez Y., Adenso-Diaz B. and Hopp M. (2008).

An analysis of some environmental consequences of

European electrical and electronic waste regulation.

Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(3), 481-495.

19. Tichy R., Rulkens W.H., Grotenhuis J.T.C., Nydl V.,

Cuypers C. and Fajtl J. (1998). Bioleaching of metals from

soils or sediments. Water Science and Technology, 37(8),

119-127.

20. Gullett B.K., Linak W.P., Touati A., Wasson S.J., Gatica S.

and King C.J. (2007). Characterization of air emissions and

residual ash from open burning of electronic wastes during

simulated rudimentary recycling operations. J Mater Cycl

Waste Manag., 9, 69-79.

21. Lovley D.R. and Coates J.D. (1997). Bioremediation of

metal contamination. Current Opinion in Biotechnology,

8(3), 285-289.

22. Funcke W., Hemminghaus H.J., Mark F.E. and Vehlow J.

(1997). PXDF/D in flue gas from an incinerator charging

wastes containing Cl and Br and a statistical description of

the resulting PXDF/D combustion profiles. Organohalogen

Compounds, 31, 93-98.

23. Puckett J., Byster L., Westervelt S., Gutierrez R., Davis S.,

Hussain A. and Dutta M. (2002). Exporting Harm: The

High-Tech Trashing of Asia. Basel Action Network and

Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition. Toxic link India scope

green piece China, 1, 1-48.

24. Ramachandra T.V. and Saira V.K. (2004). Environmentally

sound options for waste management. Envis Journal of

Human Settlements.

25. Kurian J. (2007). Electronic waste management in India–

issues and strategies. Proceedings Sardinia, Eleventh

International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium

S. Margherita di Pula, Cagliari, Italy; 1 - 5 October 2007.

26. Mohammed A., Oyeleke S.B., Ndamitso M.M., Achife C.

E. and Badeggi U.M. (2013). The Impact of Electronic

Waste Disposal and Possible Microbial and Plant Control.

Int J Eng Sci, 2(10), 35-42.

27. Namias Jennifer (2013). The future of electronic waste

recycling in the United States. Obstacles and domestic

solutions.

28. Vidali M. (2001). Bioremediation: An overview. Pure

Applied Chemistry, 73, 1163-1172.

29. Kamaludeen S.P.B.K., Arun K.R., Avudainayagam S. and

Ramasamy K. (2003). Bioremediation of chromium

contaminated environments. Indian Journal of

Experimental Biology., 41, 972-985.

30. Stephen J.R. and Macnaughtont S.J. (1999). Developments

in terrestrial bacterial remediation of metals. Current

Opinion in Biotechnology, 10(3), 230-233.

31. Volesky B. and Holan Z.R. (1995). Biosorption of heavy

metals. Biotechnology Progress, 11(3), 235-250.

32. Hu M.Z.C., Norman J.M., Faison B.D. and Reeves M.E.

(1996). Biosorption of uranium by Pseudomonas

aeruginosa strain CSU: characterization and comparison

studies. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 51(2), 237-247.

33. Atkinson B.W., Bux F. and Kasan H.C. (1998).

Considerations for application of biosorption technology to

remediate metal-contaminated industrial effluents. Water

S.A., 24(2), 129-135.

34. Ahalya N., Ramachandra T.V. and Kanamadi R.D. (2003).

Biosorption of heavy metals. Res. J. Chem. Environ., 7(4),

71-79.




35. Demirba A. (2001). Heavy metal bioaccumulation by

mushrooms from artificially fortified soils. Food

Chemistry, 74(3), 293-301.

36. Srinath T., Verma T., Ramteke P.W. and Garg S.K. (2002).

Chromium (VI) biosorption and bioaccumulation by

chromate resistant bacteria. Chemosphere, 48(4), 427-435.

37. Malik A. (2004). Metal bioremediation through growing

cells. Environment International, 30(2), 261-278.

38. Juwarkar A.A. and Yadav S.K. (2010). Bioaccumulation

and Biotransformation of Heavy Metals in Bioremediation

Technology. Springer, 266-284.

39. Tabak H.H., Lens P., van Hullebusch E.D. and Dejonghe

W. (2005). Developments in bioremediation of soils and

sediments polluted with metals andradionuclides1.

Microbial processes and mechanisms affecting

bioremediation of metal contamination and influencing

metal toxicity and transport. Reviews in Environmental

Science and Bio/Technology, 4(3), 115-156.

40. Francis A.J. (1998). Biotransformation of uranium and

other actinides in radioactive wastes. Journal of Alloys and

Compounds, 271, 78-84.

41. Benzerara K., Miot J., Morin G., OnaNguema G., Skouri-

Panet F. and Férard C. (2011). Significance, mechanisms

and environmental implications of microbial bio

mineralization. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 343(2-3),

160-167.

42. Achal V., Pan X., Fu Q. and Zhang D. (2012).

Biomineralization based remediation of As (III)

contaminated soil by Sporosarcina ginsengisoli. Journal of

Hazardous materials, 178-184.

43. Govarthanan M., Lee K.J., Cho M., Kim J.S., Kamala-

Kannan S. and Oh B.T. (2012). Significance of

autochthonous Bacillus sp. KK1 on bio mineralization of

lead in mine tailings. Chemosphere, 90(8), 2267-2272.

44. Vinita H. (2007). Phytoremediation of toxic metal from soil

and water. Journal of Environmental Biology, 28(2), 367-

376.

45. Lin C., Liu J., Liu L., Zhu T., Sheng L. and Wang D.

(2009). Soil amendment application frequency contributes

to phytoextraction of lead by sunflower at different nutrient

levels. Environ. Exp. Bot., 65(2-3), 410-416.

46. Brooks R.R. (1998). Geobotany and hyperaccumulators. In:

Brook RR Plants that hyperaccumulate heavy metals. CAB

International, Wallingford, 8, 55-94.

47. Cécile S., Gwenola G., Françoise B., Fabrice M., Abdelhak

E.A. and Ivan C. (2007). Sucrose amendment enhances

phytoaccumulation of the herbicide atrazine in

Arabidopsis thaliana. Environmental Pollution, 145(2),

507-515.

48. McGrath S.P. and Zhao F.J. (2003). Phytoextraction of

metals and metalloids from contaminated soils. Current

Opinion in Biotechnology, 14(3), 277-282.

49. Sinha R.K., Valani D., Sinha S., Singh S. and Herat S.

(2009). Bioremediation of contaminated sites: a low-cost

nature’s biotechnology for environmental clean up by

versatile microbes, plants & earthworms. Solid waste

management and environmental remediation.

50. Natarajan S., Stamps R.H., Saha U.K. and Ma L.Q. (2008).

Phytofiltration of arsenic-contaminated groundwater using

Pteris vittata L.: effect of plant density and nitrogen and

phosphorus levels. International Journal of

Phytoremediation, 10(3), 222-235.

51. Abhilash P.C., Pandey V.C., Srivastava P., Rakesh P.S.,

Chandran S. and Singh N. and Thomas A.P. (2009).

Phytofiltration of cadmium from water by Limnocharis

flava and Buchenau grown in free-floating culture system.

Journal of Hazardous Materials, 170(2-3), 791-797.

52. Meagher R.B. (2000). Phytoremediation of toxic elemental

and organic pollutants. Current opinion in plant biology,

3(2), 153-162.

53. Raskin I., Smith R.D. and Salt D.E. (1997).

Phytoremediation of metals: using plants to remove

pollutants from the environment. Current opinion in

biotechnology, 8(2), 221-226.

54. Wilde E.W., Brigmon R.L., Dunn D.L., Heitkamp M.A.

and Dagnan D.C. (2005). Phytoextraction of lead from

firing range soil by Vetiver grass. Chemosphere, 61(10),

1451-1457.

55. Pichtel J. (2007). Fundamentals of Site Remediation: For

Metal and Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soils. Government

Institutes, United States of America.

56. LeDuc D.L. and Terry N. (2005). Phytoremediation of toxic

trace elements in soil and water. Journal of Industrial

Microbiology and Biotechnology, 32(11-12), 514-520.

57. Banuelos G.S., Lin Z.Q., Wu L. and Terry N. (2002).

Phytoremediation of selenium-contaminated soils and

waters: fundamentals and future prospects. Reviews on

Environmental Health, 17(4), 291-306.

58. Liu P., Qiu G.L. and Shang L.H. (2007). Phytoremediation

of mercury contaminated soil: A review [J]. Chinese

Journal of Ecology, 6, 27.

59. Chaudhry Q., Blom-Zandstra M., Gupta S. and Joner E.J.

(2005). Utilizing the synergy between plants and

rhizosphere microorganisms to enhance breakdown of

organic pollutants in the environment. Environmental

Science Pollution Research, 12, 34-48.

60. Singer A.C., Thompson I.P. and Bailey M.J. (2004). The

tritrophic trinity: a source of pollutant-degrading enzymes

and its implications for phytoremediation. Current opinion

in microbiology, 7(3), 239-244.




61. Marmiroli N., Marmiroli M. and Maestri E. (2006).

Phytoremediation and phytotechnologies: A review for the

present and the future. Soil and water pollution monitoring,

protection and remediation, Springer, Netherland, 403-416.

62. Ongondo F.O., Williams I.D. and Cherrett T.J. (2011). How

are WEEE doing? A global review of the management of

electrical and electronic wastes. Waste management, 31(4),

714-730.

Documents

Electronic waste - hazards, management and available green ...isca.in/IJENS/Archive/v7/i5/8.ISCA-IRJEvS-2017-157.pdfElectronic waste - hazards, management and available green technologies