Upload
julia-oconnor
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
‘Electronic Theses’The RGU Project
Background to the Project Aims and Objectives
Dr. Susan Copeland
University of London LibraryUniversity of London Library
Consortium Members
Advantages of E-Theses (1)For Researchers:
Immediate access
Remote access
24/7 access
Simultaneous multi-users
Full content searches
Advantages of E-Theses (2)For Students:
Improved access
Cost effective production
Improved IT skills
Greater creativity/flexibility in expressing results
Advantages of E-Theses (3)For Libraries:
Reduced storage space
Fewer Inter-Library Loans
Staff time saved on shelving etc.
Concerns and Issues Staff Time
IT expertise Students Supervisors Examiners
IT Infrastructure
IPR, Copyright
Archiving
Central repository
The Environment
E-resources
Survey on the use of doctoral theses in British universities
International ETD developments
‘Electronic Theses’ ProjectAim and Timescale (Phase 1)
“To evaluate a wide range of existing practices of e-theses production, management and use against a set of criteria in order to produce models for use within the UK information environment”.
July 2002 – July 2004
Objectives (Phase 1)
To identify examples of relevant best practice which could be adopted throughout the UK information environment.
To evaluate a comprehensive selection of methods, which are used to create, store, organise, manage and access e-theses.
To liaise with the ‘Daedalus’ and ‘Theses Alive!’ projects.
To produce a model, or models, of e-theses production which could be recommended for converting paper-based theses into digital format.
Objectives (Phase 1) …continued
To produce a model or models, of e-theses production which could be recommended for creating born-digital theses.
To produce a set of guidelines for the storage, organisation and management of the above collections.
To produce models for access arrangements to the above, taking into account the advantages and disadvantages of centralised, federated, distributed or individual collections.
Aim and Timescale (Phase 2)
To develop e-theses in a service environment – taking account of the needs of an independent repository and a broader Virtual Research Environment (VRE).
October 2003 – September 2004
Objectives (Phase 2)
To create an e-theses archive hosted using EPrints software
To create an e-theses archive hosted using DSpace software
To demonstrate the integration of the above within institutional WebPages
To assess the difference between the capabilities of EPrints and DSpace archives from the point of view of installation, administration and usage.
To identify preferred methods of embedding audio-visual resources and interactive material within a single ETD file
To identify preferred methods of delivery of e-theses at institutional and national level
Progress
Software – DSpace and EPrints Metadata – core set Rights / Licenses Plagiarism Authentication IR – “ProfileSkim” software Culture change User Education Liaison
Daedalus and Theses Alive! NDLTD SCONUL / CIRT E-Measures Project
British Library Thesis Service developments
After Today
Feedback would be appreciated on:
The issues raised
Your knowledge and experience of ETD developments
Views on the future development of ETDs
Communication:
The RGU project website: http://www.rgu.ac.uk/library/e-theses.htm
An e-theses mailing list