Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Electrode materials for Na-ion batteries:a new route for low-cost
energy storage.
Massaccesi Valentina
Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa
Abstract. With the imminent exhaustion of fossil fuel resources and increasing environmental
problems, a variety of renewable and clean energy sources, such as the wind and sun, are growing
rapidly . The use of these discontinuous energy source requires a large-scale energy storage system
(ESS) to shift electrical energy from peak to off-peak periods, with the aim to realize smart grid
management. Among various energy storage technologies, room-temperature stationary sodium-ion
batteries have attracted great attention particularly in large scale electric energy storage applications
for renewable energy and smart grid because of the huge abundant sodium resources and low cost1.
The research work presented in this thesis deals with the investigation of electrochemical properties
of electrode materials for this tipe of batteries, in particular NaxCoO2 as cathodic compound. In the
first part of this thesis, several synthetic routes have been studied. The active materials obtained
have been investigated by XRD and ICP-MS analysis to evaluate the correlation between
stechiometry and crystal structure. A morphological characterization was conduced using SEM. In
the second part of this thesis, matherials have been tested electrochemically by GCPL, CV and
PEIS. Finally an optimization of the system have been conduced evaluating the use of different
elecrolytes and binders.
Key words: Na-Ion Batteries, NaxCoO2 Cathode Material, X-Ray Powder Diffraction,
Electrochemical Characterization, Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy.
Introduction
Energy storage has become a growing global
concern over the past decade as a result of
increased energy demand, combined with
drastic increases in the price of refined fossil
fuels and the environmental consequences of
their use. This has increased the call for
environmentally responsible alternative
sources for both energy generation and
storage. Although wind and solar generated
electricity is becoming increasingly popular in
several industrialized countries, these sources
provide intermittent energy; thus energy
storage systems are required for load-
levelling.
Lithium-ion batteries, the most common type
of secondary cells found in almost all portable
electronic devices, are a possible solution to
these larger global concerns1. Lithium based
electrochemistry offers several appealing
attributes: lithium is the lightest metallic
element and has a very low redox potential
(E°Li+
/Li=-3.04V versus standard hydrogen
electrode), which enables cells with high
voltage and high energy density. Furthermore,
Li+ has a small ionic radius which is
beneficial for diffusion in solids. Coupled
with its long cycle life and rate capability,
these properties have enabled Li-ion
technology to capture the portable electronics
market. The demand for lithium-ion batteries
as a major power source in portable electronic
2
devices and vehicles is rapidly increasing.
With the likelihood of enormous demands on
available global lithium resources, concerns
over lithium supply, but mostly its cost, have
arisen2. Even if extensive battery recycling
programs were established, it is possible that
recycling could not prevent this resource
depletion in time. While the debate over the
feasibility and environmental impact of
lithium carbonate production continues,
sodium-based compounds are under
consideration as options for large scale energy
storage coupled to renewable energy sources,
for example.
With sodium’s high abundance, low cost and
very suitable redox potential (E°Na+
/Na=-2.71
V versus standard hydrogen electrode, only
0.3 V above that of lithium), rechargeable
electrochemical cells based on sodium
represent the most promising device for
energy storage applications3. All
characteristic of this alkali holds to make this
element strategic in innovative research of
energy storage systems4. The use of Na
instead of Li in rocking chair batteries could
mitigate the feasible shortage of lithium in an
economic way, due to the unlimited sodium
sources, the ease to recover it and its lower
price.
Figure 1:Main characteristics of Na and Li materials
Moreover, for positive electrode materials
sodium intercalation chemistry is very similar
to Li, thus making it possible to use very
similar compounds for both kinds of systems.
Furthermore, if a rechargeable sodium-ion
battery with good performance characteristics
could be developed, it could have the
advantage of using electrolyte systems of
lower decomposition potential due to the
higher half-reaction potential for sodium
relative to lithium. This low voltage operation
would make Na-ion cells cheaper, because
water-based electrolytes could be used instead
of organic ones. It must be pointed out that
electrochemical Na-ion cells will always fall
short of meeting energy densities compared to
Li-ion batteries. First, because equivalent
weight of Na is higher than Li, and second
because the size of the alkali metal is bigger.
Thus, Na-based cells will have difficulties
competing with Li based cells in terms of
energy density. However, they can be
considered for use in applications where the
weight and footprint requirement is less
drastic, such as storage of off-peak and
essentially fluctuating renewable energies,
such as wind and solar farms. In spite of these
considerations, there exists growing interest
on Na-ion technology5.
The research work presented in this thesis
deals with the investigation of
electrochemical properties of electrode
materials for this sodium-ion batteries, in
particular NaxCoO2 as cathode.
In the first part of this thesis, several synthetic
routes have been studied. The active materials
obtained have been investigated by X-ray and
Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass
Spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis to evaluate
the correlation between stoichiometry and
crystal structure. A morphological
characterization was carried out using
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). In the
second part of this thesis, materials have been
tested electrochemically by Galvanostatic
Cycling with Potential Limitation (GCPL),
Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) and
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
(EIS). Finally an optimization of the system
3
has been done evaluating the use of different
electrolytes and binders.
Experimental Section
Synthetic techniques:
NaxCoO2 has been synthetized by solid state
method, ball milling accompanied by post firing
and sol-gel method.
The first is the most common method in
which stoichiometric mixture of starting
materials is ground together and the resultant
mixture is heat–treated in furnace. In the case
of NaxCoO2, appropriate amount of starting
materials, Na2Co3 and CoO4, are thoroughly
mixed in the ratio of 1:1. Subsequently, the
mixture is ground to ensure complete
reaction. After drying, the powder is calcined
in a preheated furnace at 800° C to form the
precursor. Initially the reaction is carried out
for 12 hours. The product was again subjected
to solid state reaction for 12 hours, under
oxygen flow, after intermediate grinding .
The purity of the material depends on the
choice of the ratio of starting materials,
calcination temperature and time.
The Ball Mill and post firing method involve
the use of a particular grinder characterized
by a hollow cylindrical bowl rotating about its
axis, partially filled with balls (grinding
media). This is an alternative way to use the
classical solid state synthetic method.
Reagents are mixed together in a different
way, using a ball mill. It is used wherever the
highest degree of fineness is required and it
works on the principle of impact and attrition,
size reduction is done by impact as the balls
drop from near the top of the bowl. In this
case sodium cobalt oxide is synthesized from
Na2CO3 and CoCO3 powders in a 1:2 mol
ratio through the alternative approach, which
employs ball milling and subsequent firing.
For this, the mixture is subjected to
mechanical milling in an agate bowl with
agate balls at 200 rpm for one hour. Then the
powder is fired in a preheated furnace at
T=800°C for 12 hours in air6.
The sol-gel method can overcome some
disadvantages of conventional solid state
method thanks to its low processing
temperature, high homogeneity, possibility of
controlling size and morphology of the
particles7. Molecular precursors are converted
to nanometre-sized particles, to form a
colloidal suspension, or sol. Usually,
stoichiometric amounts of sodium acetate (
CH3COONa ) and Cobalt(II) acetate
tetrahydrate ( Co(CH3COO)2(H2O)4 ) are
dissolved in an appropriate quantity of
distilled water at room temperature. The
solution is stirred at T=50° C. Then calculated
amount of citric acid is added as a
complexing agent in the polymeric matrix, in
order to form the sol. The amount of the citric
acid and acetates is maintained at 3:1 molar
ratio. The temperature of the solution is raised
to T=100°C for about 5 hours and continued
stirring till the solution turned into high-
viscous pink gel. Subsequently, ethylene
glycol is added to the solution as gelling
agent. This solution is further heated at T=80°
C in order to get a precursor. The product
results to be crystalline and purple. It is finely
ground and calcined (at T=250° C for 10 h
and at 700° for 10 h) to obtain the final
product. Finally, the black colored calcined
product is ground, dried under vacuum and
collected.
Chemical, structural and morphological
characterization techniques:
The chemical, structural and morphological
characterization of synthesized powders has
been carried out by using several techniques,
such as X-Ray Powder Diffraction (XRD),
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and
4
Iductively Coupled Plasma Mass
Spectrometry (ICP-MS).
Figure 2: SEM images of Sample 1(Ball-Milling and
post firing) powder at different magnifications (32100
X on the left and 5060 X on the right)
Figure 3: SEM images of Sample 2 (solid state
reaction) powder at different magnifications (32840 X
on the left and 5000 X on the right).
Figure 4: SEM images of Sample 3 (sol-gel method)
powder at different magnifications (33070 X on the left
and 5000 X on the right).
The morphology of the powders was probed
by Scanning electrode microscopy (SEM).
Images were obtained with JEOL Model
JSM-5400 equipped with a Shimadzu 800HS
EDX detector. From these images, it is
possible to observe that the Sample 2 shows
the worst distribution of the particles size, it
presents irregular shaped agglomerates.
Probably, this phenomenon depends on the
fact that the powders were grounded only by a
mortar and hence with an inadequate energy.
On the contrary, Sample 3 present the best
distribution, it is characterized by uniformly
distributed particles. Probably, it is a
consequence of the synthetic method. In fact
sol-gel synthesis permit to “dissolve” the
compound in a liquid in order to bring it back
as a solid in a controlled manner.
The chemical characterization of synthesized
powders was carried out by the Inductively
Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry analysis,
using an Agilent 7500 series spectrometer,
with high frequency 3MHz quadrupole. This
analysis was conducted with the aim to
5
understand the stoichiometry of metal oxides
obtained with different synthetic routes.
Metal oxides synthetized result to be:
Sample 1 Na 0.83 CoO 2;
Sample 2 Na 0.65 CoO 2;
Sample 3 Na 0.28 CoO 2.
The structural characterization of synthesized
powders was carried out by the X-ray
diffraction technique (XRD) using a Philips
X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation.
The diffraction patterns were obtained
between 10° and 70°. In the Figure 2 we can
observe the X-Ray diffraction patterns of the
synthetized powders.
Figure 2:Comparison of XRD pattern obtained by the
three different synthesis.
Comparing these data with those of “JCPDS-
International Centre for Diffraction Data”
database, chemical impurities and phase were
identified.
Figure 6:XRD pattern of Sample 1.
In the Figure 6 we can identify the presence
of Na2CO3 reagent impurities. The pattern
correspond to the Na0.71CoO2 gamma phase
(mix phase γ + α’).
Figure 7: XRD pattern of Sample 2.
In the Figure we can identify the same
reagent impurities and diffraction pattern. On
the contrary, in this case there are different
synthetic conditions (800°C, 0.65:1=Na:Co),
that lead to pure γ phase.
Figure 8: XRD pattern of Sample 3.
In the Figure we can identify the presence of
CO3O4 impurities. The pattern correspond to
the Na0.60CoO2 beta phase.
6
Electrochemical characterization techniques
The electrochemical measurement are
performed employing T-shaped
polypropylene type cells (Figure 9) equipped
with stainless steel current collectors. Disk of
high-purity sodium foil are used as counter
and reference electrodes. A glass fiber
(Whatman GF/A) with a diameter of 14 mm
is used.
Figure 3:Schematic representation of a T-cell.
The cells are assembled into dry-box. All the
electrochemical characterizations are
performed using a Galvanostatic/potentiostat
VMP2/Z by Bio-Logic.
The electrodes based on this three type of
NaxCoO2 were prepared by using different
binders: PVdF, Na-CMC and PAA. At the
same time two different electrolyte were
tested: NaPF6 and NaClO4. Each binder
presents a different preparation technique.
Electrodes processing procedure:
Three different layer, for each powder
synthetized, were manufactured using
Polyvinylidene fluoride. These layers have
been prepared by casting a slurry of NaxCoO2
(active material), Super C65 (conductive
carbon) and PVdF (binder) in NM2P
(solvent), whose composition is shown in
Table 1.
Table 1: Percentage composition of Co01, Co02 and
Co03 layers.
A solution of PVdF 5% in NMP (0.95 ml)
.has been prepared into a vial. NaxCoO2 and
SC65 have been mixed finely in a mortar to
obtain an homogeneous powder and then they
have been poured into the same vial which
contains the solution of binder. Then, 0.25
mL of NM2P have been added in order to
obtain a suspension liquid enough. The slurry
has been stirred overnight with a magnetic
anchor. The mixture has been stratified on an
Al foil, scratched by employing sandpaper,
through Doctor Blade technique setting a
thickness of 200 µm. The obtained layers has
been dried at 50°C, under hood, in order to
remove completely the solvent. Several
circular electrodes with diameter of 9mm,
have been cut before (Co01B, Co02B and
Co03B) and after (Co01A, Co02A and
Co03A) the use of a roll press.
Three different layer, for each powder
synthetized, were manufactured using Sodium
Carboxymethyl Cellulose. These layers haves
been prepared by casting a slurry of NaxCoO2
(active material), Super C65 (conductive
carbon) and Na-CMC (binder) in ultrapure
H2O (solvent), whose composition is shown
in Table 2.
Table 2: Percentage composition of Co11, Co12 and
Co13 layers.
A solution of Na-CMC 5% in ultrapure H2O
(0.95 ml) has been prepared into a vial.
NaxCoO2 and SC65 have been mixed finely
in a mortar to obtain an homogeneous powder
and then they have been poured the same vial
which contains the solution of binder. Then,
7
0.55 mL of H2O ultrapure have been added in
order to obtain a suspension liquid enough.
The slurry has been stirred for five hours with
a magnetic anchor. The mixture has been
stratified on an Al foil, previously scratched
by employing sandpaper, through Doctor
Blade technique setting a thickness of 200
µm. The obtained layers has been dried at
room temperature, in order to remove
completely the solvent. Several circular
electrodes with diameter of 9mm, have been
cut before (Co11B, Co12B and Co13B) and
after (Co11A, Co12A and Co13A) the use of
a roll press.
Three different layer, for each powder
synthetized, were manufactured using
Polyacrylic Acid. These layers have been
prepared by casting a slurry of NaxCoO2
(active material), Super C65 (conductive
carbon) and PAA (binder) in ethanol
(solvent), whose composition is shown in
Table 3.
Table 3: Percentage composition of Co21, Co22 and
Co23 layers.
A solution of PAA 5% in Ethanol (0.4 ml)
.has been prepared into a vial. NaxCoO2 and
SC65 have been mixed finely in a mortar to
obtain an homogeneous powder and then they
have been poured the same vial which
contains the solution of binder. Then, 0.4 ml
of ethanol have been added in order to obtain
a suspension enough liquid. The slurry has
been stirred for five hours with a magnetic
stirrer. The mixture has been stratified on an
Al foil, scratched by employing sandpaper,
through Doctor Blade technique setting a
thickness of 200 µm. The obtained layers has
been dried at 60°C for two hours, in order to
remove completely the solvent. Several
circular electrodes with diameter of 9mm,
have been cut before (Co21B, Co22B and
Co23B) and after (Co21A, Co22A and
Co23A) the use of a roll press.
The capacity of each electrodes have been
computed considering a specific theoretical
capacity of:
Sample 1 (Na0.83CoO2) 235 mAh/g
Sample 2 (Na0.65CoO2)253 mAh/g
Sample 3 (Na0.28CoO2)275 mAh/g
All obtained electrodes have been dried
overnight at 120 °C, under vacuum, and then
put into dry-box. Electrochemical experiments:
A preliminary test was conducted for Co01
(PVdF) layer, in order to characterize the
material, with galvanostatic charge/discharge
cycles at different C-rates: 5 cycle at C/10, 5
cycles at C/5, 5 cycles at C/2, 5 cycle 1C and
5 cycles at 2C. Charge/discharge cycles have
been carried out within the potential window
2-3.8 V, comparing pressed and non-pressed
electrodes in NaPF6 electrolyte. All the
potentials are given vs. Na+/Na.
Figure 10: Comparison of specific capacity vs cycle
number between Co01A (pressed) and Co01B (non-
pressed).
0 10 20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Sp
ecific
Ca
pa
city(m
Ah
/g)
Cycle Number
Charge
Discharge
C/10C/5
C/2
1C
2C
80:10:10=Na0.82
CoO2:PVdF:SC65
UNCOMPRESSED
EC:DMC=1:1 NaPF6 1M
0 10 20
0
20
40
60
80
100
80:10:10=Na0.82
CoO2:PVdF:SC65
COMPRESSED
EC:DMC=1:1 NaPF6 1M
Sp
ecific
Ca
pa
city (
mA
h/g
)
Cycle Number
Charge
Discharge
C/10
C/5
C/2
1C
2C
8
The cells exhibit an Open Circuit Voltage of
2.87 V. As we can see in the galvanostatic
curves Na deintercalation/ intercalation,
cycled between 2 and 3.8 V, undergoes
complicated series of successive phase
transitions. First sodium deintercalation curve
shows four voltage plateaus and for the initial
discharge profiles eight plateaus are shown in
Figure 11. For this reason, a differential
analysis of galvanostatic cycles have been
done, in order to have a better understanding
of mechanism occurring during cycling.
Figure11: Galvanostatic curves of Co01B at different
rate.
The cells exhibit an Open Circuit Voltage of
2.87 V. As we can see in the galvanostatic
curves Na deintercalation/ intercalation,
cycled between 2 and 3.8 V, undergoes
complicated series of successive phase
transitions. First sodium deintercalation curve
shows four voltage plateaus and for the initial
discharge profiles eight plateaus are shown in
Figure 11. For this reason, a differential
analysis of galvanostatic cycles have been
done, in order to have a better understanding
of mechanism occurring during cycling.
Figure12: dQ/dE vs E curves of Co01A.
At this point an optimization of this type of
active material was conducted with three type
of binders, comparing pressing conditions,
differents potential windows and two different
electrolyte. In the following figures are depict
the rate capabilities of Co01 (PVdF/Sample1)
layers in different electrochemical
environments.
Figure 13: Comparison of specific capacity vs cycle
number between Co01A (pressed), Co01B (non-
pressed), using NaPF6 and NaClO4.
From the Figure 13 we can observe that, with
the same electrolyte, Co01 layer present better
cycling performance, when the electrodes are
pressed. In fact the pressed electrode shows a
specific capacity of 89.9 mA/h (charge C/10)
and 87 mA/h (discharge C/10), with a
capacity retention of 105.5% at C/5 rate,
characterized by an excellent reversibility.
Paying attention to capacity retention, the
high value could be due to wettability of the
electrode and to the change of active material
structure during charge/discharge cycles. A
probable capacity loss is due to the presence
of Na2CO3 impurities. We can find
comparable capacity value in literature
although the specific theoretical capacity is
much higher (235 mAh/g). We must
emphasize the fact that this type of battery is
not able to cycle at 1C rate with acceptable
capacity values. In the third experiment,
reported in Figure 13, an higher potential
window was used, observing an increase in
specific capacity value, accompanied by a
loss of reversibility.
In the Figure 14, rate capabilities of Co11
(Na-CMC/Sample 1) non pressed layers are
2,0 2,2 2,4 2,6 2,8 3,0 3,2 3,4 3,6 3,8-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
dQ
/dE
(m
Ah
/gV
)
E (V vs Na+/Na)
1st
cycle C/10
2nd
cycle C/10
3rd
cycle C/10
9
depicted. Charge/discharge cycles have been
carried out within the potential window 2-
3.8V, comparing NaPF6 and NaClO4
electrolytes. The experiment was conducted
with two different type of protocol. The
Co01B/NaPF6/Na cell has been cycled at five
different rates: 5 cycle C/10, 5 cycle C/5, 5
cycle C/2, 5 cycle 1C and 5 cycle 2C. In the
other side, the Co01B/NaClO4/Na cell has
been cycled at 5 cycle at C/10, 5 cycles at
C/5, 5 cycles at C/2, 5 cycles at 1C, 5 cycles
at 2C and then again 5 cycles at C/10, 5
cycles at C/5, 5 cycles at 1C and finally again
5 cycles at C/5. All the potentials are given
vs. Na+/Na. From both experiment it emerges
that this type of active material does not work
with Na-CMC as binder. The cells have too
low capacity, this type of binder probably
provide stronger interaction than the other,
providing insulating properties to the layers.
Figure 14: Comparison of specific capacity vs cycle
number of Co11B/NaPF6/Na and Co11B/NaClO4/Na
cells.
In the Figure 15 the rate capabilities of
Co21A (PAA/Sample1) layers in different
electrochemical environments are depicted.
Figure 15: Comparison of specific capacity vs cycle
number of Co21A/NaPF6/Na and Co21A/NaClO4/Na
cells.
Charge/discharge cycles have been carried out
within two different potential window (2-4V
and 2-4.2 V), comparing NaPF6 and NaClO4
electrolytes. The cells have been cycled with
the same protocol, at 5 cycle at C/10, 5 cycles
at C/5, 5 cycles at C/2, 5 cycles at 1C, 5
cycles at 2C and then again 5 cycles at C/10,
5 cycles at C/5, 5 cycles at 1C and finally
again 5 cycles at C/5. All the potentials are
given vs. Na+/Na. The best electrochemical
performance has been obtained for the
Co21A/NaPF6/Na cell using a 2-4V potential
window, although it present a low
reversibility. The electrode shows a specific
capacity of 128.9 mA/h (charge C/10) and
103 mA/h (discharge C/10), with a capacity
retention of 112.5% at C/5 rate. This type of
result is probably due to the electrode loading.
In fact this electrode present 1.80 mg as
weight, compared to 3.17 mg and 2.98 mg of
the others two.
Electrodes, obtained from Sample 2 powder,
have been subjected to test with different
binder, electrolyte and pressing.
Figure 16: Comparison of specific capacity vs cycle
number of Co02A/B layers with NaPF6 and NaClO4.
Galvanostatic charge/discharge cycles,
differential analysis of galvanostatic cycles,
cyclic voltammetry and Electrochemical
Impedance Spectroscopy have been
conducted. In the Figure 16 the rate
capabilities of Co02B (PVdF-Sample2) layers
in different electrochemical environment are
depicted. Charge/discharge cycles have been
carried out within the potential window 2-3.8
10
V, comparing NaPF6 and NaClO4 electrolytes,
for pressed and non-pressed electrodes. The
experiment was conducted with two different
type of protocol. The non-pressed electrodes
has been cycled at six different rates: 5 cycle
C/10, 5 cycle C/5, 5 cycle C/2, 5 cycle 1C, 5
cycle 2C and finally again C/5 for 30 cycles.
On the other side, the pressed electrodes has
been cycled at 5 cycle at C/10, 5 cycles at
C/5, 5 cycles at C/2, 5 cycles at 1C, 5 cycles
at 2C and then again 5 cycles at C/10, 5
cycles at C/5, 5 cycles at 1C and finally again
5 cycles at C/5. All the potentials are given
vs. Na+/Na. The best electrochemical
behaviour is shown by the unpressed
electrode, using NaClO4 as electrolyte, that
presents a specific capacity of 98 mA/h
(charge C/10) and 94 mA/h (discharge C/10),
with a capacity retention of 101% at C/5 rate.
In the Figure 17 the rate capabilities of Co12
(Na-CMC-Sample 2) layers in different
electrochemical environments are depicted.
Figure 17: Specific capacity vs cycle number of
Co12B/NaPF6/Na.
The experiment was conducted with two
different type of protocol. The first cell has
been cycled at five different rates: 5 cycle
C/10, 5 cycle C/5, 5 cycle C/2, 5 cycle 1C and
5 cycle 2C. In the other side, the other cell has
been cycled at 5 cycle at C/10, 5 cycles at
C/5, 5 cycles at C/2, 5 cycles at 1C, 5 cycles
at 2C and then again 5 cycles at C/10, 5
cycles at C/5, 5 cycles at 1C and finally again
5 cycles at C/5. All the potentials are given
vs. Na+/Na. Also in this case, from both
experiment it emerges that this type of active
material does not work with Na-CMC as
binder. The cells have too low capacity.
In the Figure 18 the rate capabilities of Co22
(PAA-Sample2) layers in different
electrochemical environments are depicted.
Figure 18: Comparison of specific capacity vs cycle
number of Co22A with NaPF6 and NaClO4.
Charge/discharge cycles have been carried out
within 2-4V potential window, comparing
NaPF6 and NaClO4 electrolytes. The cells
have been cycled with the same protocol, at 5
cycle at C/10, 5 cycles at C/5, 5 cycles at C/2,
5 cycles at 1C, 5 cycles at 2C and then again
5 cycles at C/10, 5 cycles at C/5, 5 cycles at
1C and finally again cycled at C/5. All the
potentials are given vs. Na+/Na. The best
electrochemical performance has been
acquired for the Co22A/NaPF6/Na cell,
although it presents a low reversibility. The
electrode shows a specific capacity of 123
mA/h (charge C/10) and 104 mA/h (discharge
C/10), with a capacity retention of 96% at C/5
rate.
Electrodes, obtained from Sample 3 powder,
have been subjected to test only with NaPF6
electrolyte, using PVdF as binder.
Galvanostatic charge/discharge cycles have
been conducted, obtaining very low specific
capacity values. In the Figure 19 the rate
capabilities of Co03 (PVdF-Sample 3) layer
are depicted. The cell has been cycled at five
different rates: 5 cycle C/10, 5 cycle C/5, 5
cycle C/2, 5 cycle 1C and 5 cycle 2C. All the
potentials are given vs. Na+/Na. Only one
11
experiment has been conducted with this
sample because it shows too low capacity
values. It could be due to the different phase
presented by this type of stoichiometry, and
by the low amount of sodium in the starting
active material of the electrode.
Figure 19: Specific capacity vs cycle number of
Co03B/NaPF6/Na cell.
Observing that non-conclusive results have
been obtained with the differential analysis,
cyclic voltammetries have been done. Cyclic
voltagram curves of Na/NaPF6/Co01B and
Na/NaPF6/Co02B cells at the scan rate of
20μV/s are shown in Figure 20 and 21.
Figure 20:Cyclic voltagram for Co01B/NaPF6/Na cell
between 2-3.8 V.
Figure 21 Cyclic voltagram for Co02B/NaPF6/Na cell
between 2-4.2 V.
During the first cycle four cathodic peaks
were found at 2.9V, 2.95V, 3.3V and 3.7V. In
the second cycle, there are eight distinct
cathodic peaks at 2.35 V, 2.43 V, 2.55 V, 2.6
V, 2.7 V , 2.9 V, 3.25 V and 3.7 V while we
can observe eight corresponding anodic
peaks. The strange shape of voltagram shown
in Figure 21, in the 4-4.2V region, could be
due to an overpotential. From further studies
about structure change conducted by J.J.Ding
et Al. Errore. Il segnalibro non è definito.
, we can
understand that sodium
intercalation/deintercalation into/from
lamellar structure should be responsible for
the changes of c-lattice parameter. The c-
lattice parameter become larger with
decreasing sodium content. It is believe that
the expansion in the c-axis direction should be
attributed to increase in electrostatic repulsion
from the negatively charged oxygen
interactions of [CoO2] layers with the removal
of sodium. It can be estimated that Na
intercalation and deintercalation leads to 4%
contraction and expansion along c- axis. The
variation of the interatomic distance is closely
related to the change in the valence state of
the transition metal. In this direction we can
ipotize a phase change during
charge/discharge cycles of cell.
To better understand the mechanism of the
processes during cycling, changing the
potential as a linear function of time, every 20
mV impedance spectra have been acquired in
the frequency region range from 101kHz to
4.9 mHz. This type of analysis has been
conducted with PVdF layers of sample 1 and
2, using NaPF6 1M in EC:DMC=1:1 as
electrolyte. For every cell the same protocol
has been used: OCV (10000s), Linear Sweep
0 5 10 15 20 25
0
10
20
30
40
50
Unpressed
80:10:10=Na0.28
CoO2:PVdF:SC65
EC:DMC=1:1 NaPF6 1M
Sp
ecific
Ca
pa
city
Cycle Number
Charge
Discharge
C/10
C/5
C/2,1C,2C
12
Voltammetry, Staircase Potentio
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
(2V4V) and Staircase Potentio
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
(4V2V);
Figure 22 and 23 shows Nyquist plots of
Co01 and Co02 layers at T=25°C. The aim of
the experiment is to know how the variations
of the electronic resistance are related to the
quantity of sodium in the lattice.
The preliminary electrochemical impedance
spectroscopy study of these samples clearly
showed a strong dependence of the shape of
their EIS response spectra upon the working
electrode potential, suggesting the existence
of a potential region in which the electronic
conductivity of the material is the limiting
factor in controlling the electrochemical
process. In the figures, it appears that the
evolution of the spectra may be described as
associated with all the physical phenomena
that typically characterize a charge transfer at
passivated cathode materials , that is:
(i) a high-frequency region (>1 kHz)
characteristic of a SEI passivating layer;
(ii) an intermediate-frequency region
(between 10 Hz and 1 kHz) characteristic of a
charge transfer process;
(iii) a low-frequency region associated
with the electronic properties of the material;
(iv) the very low frequency region of the
ionic diffusion.
The data obtained from these experiment
show different tendencies. In the high
frequency region we can recognize the
increase of resistance related to the formation
of passivation layer and the gradual
decomposition of electrolyte. In the
intermediate frequency region, there is a
semicircle related to the charge transfer
between electrode and electrolyte resistance.
Finally there is a large arc that could be
associated to two different factors. In fact, the
high electronic resistance covers the diffusive
region, preventing us to recognize it.
Figure 22: Nyquist plots of Co01A oxidation and
reduction.
13
Figure 23: Nyquist plots of Co02A oxidation and
reduction.
This phenomenon could be explained by
semi-conductor behaviour of the material, and
the change with E of the diameter of the low-
frequency arc may be ascribed to the complex
structural changes which occur in the
structure of the active material as Na is
(de)intercalated. For the ‘similar’ Li
intercalation cathodes, this behaviour has
been explained by a band electronic theory 8,
which stated that AxMX2 compounds are
divided in two categories in base on the RM-M
distance in the lattice. When RM-M is higher
than a critical value, the system assume an
insulating behaviour, or vice versa a
conductor behaviour. Increasing the RM-M,
wavefunction overlap decrease, producing
band separation and electron localization. In
the extreme case of Mott Insulators with
localized electrons, the conduction occurs
only through an hopping mechanisms of few
electrons that can jump when subjected to
thermic excitation or statistic deviation. We
can recognize this type of semi-conductor
behaviour in our Na-based samples, even if
the dependency of resistance on the changes
of potential and structure is hard to rationale
because of the complexity of phases involved
in NaxCoO2 (de)intercalation processes.
Further studies could be done by in situ X-ray
diffraction studies of the correlation between
the electronic resistance (i.e., charge
transport) and the structural properties (i.e.,
cell parameters) during the stages of sodium
deintercalation from NaCoO2, using an
electrochemical cell that permits in situ
measurements of ac-impedance dispersions
and X-ray diffraction spectra.
Conclusion and future developments
In this research work, a preliminary study of
NaxCoO2 , as cathodic material for sodium-
ion batteries , has been conducted. The
research was focused on the optimization of
the system, monitoring the effect of sodium
carboxymethyl cellulose (Na-CMC) and
Polyacrylic acid (PAA) as binder, and in the
same time the influence of different
electrolytes (NaPF6 and NaClO4).
From the data obtained, Na-CMC has shown
negative effect in all experiment. Testing
electrodes with galvanostatic
charge/discharge cycles at different C-rate,
CMC presented very low specific capacity, in
the range between 8-25 mAh/g. These values
result to be unacceptable for a battery device.
For what concern PAA as binder, it result to
be a green valid substitute of PVdF. In fact it
present good performances in particular
conditions (low values of mass loading). For
these reasons, further studies should be done
to test the effect of the layer thickness. An
optimization of electrode preparation could be
done, monitoring the capacity increase as a
function of decrease in mass loading.
On the other hand, no significant differences
were observed, using NaClO4 or NaPF6 as
the electrolyte salt. The electrochemical
performance, probably, depend on the
electrolyte solvent used. Further studies
should be done using EC:PC as electrolyte
solvent.
In regard on the active materials synthetized,
it was possible to observe a strong
dependence of charge/discharge behaviour on
the different stoichiometry obtained. This is
related to different phases assumed by the
layered oxide, influencing the
intercalation/deintercalation process and
strongly affecting the reversibility of
charge/discharge process. The Sample 1(mix
phase γ + α’) obtained by “Ball-Milling and
post firing”, result electrochemically active,
but a loss of specific capacity must be
emphasized. It is probably due by the
presence of impurities and two different
phases. Only one experiment has been
14
conducted with Sample 3 (β phase), obtained
by sol-gel method, because it shows too low
capacity values. It could be due to the not
suitable phase presented by this type of
stoichiometry, and to the low amount of
sodium in the starting active material. Further
studies could be done for the optimization of
the synthetic condition of sol gel method,
with the aim to obtain higher sodium content.
The Sample 2 (pure γ phase), obtained by
simple solid state reaction, result to be the
best choice. It present high stability,
reversibility and good specific capacities, so it
represents a good starting point for future
material and electrode optimization.
References
1. Tarascon JM, Armand M., Nature, 414
(2001) 359-367.
2. Yaksic A, Tilton JE., Resource Policy, 34
(2009);185.
3 Ellis B.L., Nazar L.F. , Science, 16 (2012)
168–169.
4 Palomares V., Casas-Cabanas M., Castillo-
Martınez E., Han M H, Rojo T., Energy
Environ. Sci., 6 (2013) 2312.
5 Palomares V., Serras P., Villaluenga I.,
Hueso K.B., Carretero-Gonzalez J., Rojo T.,
Energy Enviro, Sci.,5 (2012) 5884.
6 Amrtha Bhide, K. Hariharan, Solid State
Ionics,192(2011)369.
7 B.J. Hwang, R. Santhanam, D.G. Liu,
Journal of Power Sources,102(2001) 326.
8 J Molenda, A Stokłosa, T Ba̧k , Solid State
Ionics, 36-1/2, (1989)53-58.