Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ELECTROCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF TISSUE ENGINEERED ELECTRONIC NERVE INTERFACES
By
SRUTHI NATT
A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF
MASTER OF SCIENCE
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
2017
© 2017 Sruthi Natt
To Aravind Krishna For his advice, love and faith
4
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Foremost, I would like to thank Dr. Jack Judy for being an enthusiastic advisor
and providing me with wonderful opportunities and invaluable lessons. I’ve been
inspired by his sense of optimism, integrity and willingness to collaborate. His
coursework in MEMS provided me with a solid foundation that was required to
understand a significant portion of this research.
I thank my committee members, Dr. Erin Patrick and Dr. Yong-Kyu Yoon for
their guidance and support. Dr. Patrick provided valuable feedback that gave a better
direction to my work. Dr. Yoon was always willing to brainstorm any research ideas.
I would also like to thank the talented group of collaborators who were
instrumental in electrode design and fabrication presented in this work. Special thanks
to the post-doc of our lab, Cary Kuliasha, for his willingness to help me fix any problems
with my electrochemistry experiments. Trying to set-up the experiment on my own
would have been frustrating. I would also like to extend many thanks to the previous
post-doc, Vidhi Desai, for encouraging to complete my thesis in a timely manner. I am
grateful to Jose Alcantara, a fellow biomedical engineering graduate student, for
assisting me with Matlab coding.
I would like to thank all my friends here in Gainesville for giving me many good
memories that I will cherish forever.
I would also like to express my deepest gratitude to my cousin, Praveen Natt, for
his steadfast support and motivation throughout my student life. Finally, I would like to
thank my parents, Sriram Natt and Sai Lakshmi, and my brother, Sudarshan Natt
Srinivas, who have been my biggest fans and a major source of moral support.
5
TABLE OF CONTENTS page
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 4
LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 7
LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 8
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................... 10
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 11
CHAPTER
1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 13
2 LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................................................................... 15
Background on the Electrode-Electrolyte Interface ................................................. 15 Capacitance Models ......................................................................................... 15
Helmholtz Model ........................................................................................ 16 Gouy-Chapman Model ............................................................................... 17 Stern Model ................................................................................................ 18
Constant-Phase Element.................................................................................. 19 Series Resistance ................................................................................................... 19
Charge-Transfer Resistance ................................................................................... 20 Randles Model ........................................................................................................ 21
Variations of Randles Model ............................................................................. 22 Polarizable Electrode Behavior ........................................................................ 22
Low-Frequency Behavior.................................................................................. 22 High-Frequency Behavior ................................................................................. 23
3 EXPERIMENTAL METHODS ................................................................................. 26
TEENI Design and Layout ...................................................................................... 26
TEENI Fabrication ............................................................................................ 27 PCB-TEENI integration ........................................................................................... 28 Experimental Set-up ............................................................................................... 30
Electrochemical Cell ......................................................................................... 30 Instrumentation ................................................................................................. 31 Data Acquisition and Analysis .......................................................................... 32
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy ............................................................. 33
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ............................................................................... 37
EIS of TEENI with 3 Threads .................................................................................. 37
6
EIS of TEENI with 4 threads ................................................................................... 38
ACA Bonded TEENI-PCB Assembly ...................................................................... 38
Equivalent Circuit Modeling .................................................................................... 39
5 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK .................................................................... 50
EIS Data and Modeling ........................................................................................... 50 Measurement Techniques ...................................................................................... 51 In-vivo Measurements............................................................................................. 52
Final Words ............................................................................................................. 54
LIST OF REFERENCES ............................................................................................... 56
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ............................................................................................ 59
7
LIST OF TABLES
Table page 4-1 Impedance magnitude and phase values of all electrodes at 1KHz, from
largest electrode to smallest ............................................................................... 48
4-2 Impedance magnitude and phase values of all electrodes at 1KHz ................... 48
4-3 Literature values of various parameters to calculate the double-layer capacitance and solution resistance ................................................................... 48
4-4 Theoretical double-layer capacitance, series resistance and fitted frequency- dependent exponent values for different electrode sizes. ................................... 49
8
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure page 2-1 Potential distribution across double layer for various models. A- Helmholtz
theory, B-Guoy Chapman theory, C- Stern theory .............................................. 23
2-2 Randles circuit model ......................................................................................... 24
2-3 Equivalent circuit to represent ideal polarizable electrode behavior ................... 24
2-4 Equivalent circuit to represent low-frequency electrode behavior ....................... 24
2-5 Equivalent circuit to represent high-frequency electrode behavior ..................... 25
3-1 TEENI design. .................................................................................................... 34
3-2 Implant regions of TEENI thread-sets with 3 threads or 4 threads. .................... 34
3-3 TEENI microfabrication process flow. ................................................................. 35
3-4 A microfabricated TEENI device with 4 threads. (Courtesy of JudyLab, UF) ...... 35
3-5 A basic circuit for a potentiostat. ......................................................................... 36
3-6 Experimental set-up for electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). (Courtesy of E.Patrick, UF) ................................................................................. 36
4-1 EIS experimental set-up to probe the contact pads of TEENI electrodes. (Courtesy of Author) ........................................................................................... 40
4-2 Impedance magnitude and phase plot for each of the electrodes found on a TEENI with three threads ................................................................................... 41
4-3 Impedance magnitude and phase plot of continuity test structure ...................... 42
4-4 Impedance magnitude and phase plot for each of the electrodes found on a TEENI with four threads ..................................................................................... 43
4-5 Comparison of impedance behavior between unbonded and ACA bonded TEENI. ................................................................................................................ 44
4-6 Experimental and simulated impedance data for blocking circuit using Helmholtz capacitance. ...................................................................................... 45
4-7 Experimental and simulated impedance data for blocking circuit using Gouy-Chapman capacitance. ....................................................................................... 46
5-1 Voltage waveform for cyclic voltammetry ........................................................... 53
9
5-2 A CV response for large platinum wire. .............................................................. 54
10
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CV Cyclic Voltammetry
EIS Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
PI Polyimide
PCB
TEENI
Printed Circuit Board
Tissue-Engineered Electronic Nerve Interface
ZIF Zero Insertion Force
11
Abstract of Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science
ELECTROCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF
TISSUE ENGINEERED ELECTRONIC NERVE INTERFACES
By
Sruthi Natt
August 2017
Chair: Jack Judy Major: Biomedical Engineering
Neural prostheses are biomedical systems that restore lost sensory and motor
function after an injury by providing a communication pathway between neural tissue
and prosthetic devices. Despite technological advancements in the field of peripheral
neural interfaces over the years, all existing methods still suffer from critical problems
that limit their performance and/or reliability, e.g., low signal-to-noise ratio, low channel
count, low selectivity, high mechanical stiffness, etc. To fully address the unmet needs
of the amputee population, a new approach is needed.
One strategy to overcome all the major problems limiting the utility and long-term
performance of the neural prostheses is to combine cutting-edge approaches from the
field of MEMS and tissue engineering to develop Tissue Engineered Electronic Nerve
Interfaces (TEENI). This is achieved by integrating polymer based multielectrode
interfaces with high microelectrode density and small cross-sectional area into tissue
engineered scaffolds that facilitate natural regenerative healing process instead of
strong foreign body response evoked by conventional implantation.
With any electrode based neural interfaces, it is essential to have a firm
understanding of the electrochemical mechanisms involved during recording and
12
stimulation. Furthermore, the dependence of these mechanisms on geometry and
materials is vital for optimizing the neural interface design. The impedance of fabricated
electrodes should be managed to achieve good outcomes with both stimulation and
recording. A key challenge is to demonstrate the long-term stability and reliability of
electrodes that are tested under in-vitro conditions over long periods of time.
The objective of this work is to characterize the electrochemical properties of
TEENI electrodes at various stages of fabrication and integration using two main
evaluation techniques: impedance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry.
13
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
This thesis is part of an ongoing project to develop a novel tissue engineered
electronic nerve interface (TEENI) for upper limb amputees. The purpose of this device
is to provide reliable bi-directional interfacing between peripheral nerves and prosthetic
devices for natural sensation and movement.
Amputation is the surgical removal of all or part of a limb that is performed mainly
due to severe injuries, trauma or diabetes[1]. This procedure results in permanent
damage to the nervous system, thus greatly affecting the mobility and quality of life of
the patient. There is compelling evidence that amputees retain significant residual
connectivity and function in their nerves for many years post amputation[2]. In response,
much research has been focused on the development of advanced neural interface and
prosthetics technology, with the ultimate goal of restoring functional disabilities resulting
from limb loss. However, providing amputees with effortless and natural control of
prosthetic limbs is not a near-term solution due to significant challenges. Specifically,
bioelectronic neural interfaces are still limited by issues such as biocompatibility, low
number of independent channels for communication between motor control and sensory
feedback, decline in signal detection and recording abilities with time, relative motion
between implant and tissues and low selectivity to differentiate between nerve types.
Therefore, it is imperative to engineer a reliable neural interface that is scalable to high
channel counts while ensuring biocompatibility and longevity.
One strategy to overcome these challenges is to develop Tissue Engineered
Electrode Nerve Interfaces (TEENI) for the amputee population. The rationale behind
this novel technology is that a natural regenerative healing process can be enabled by
14
integrating flexible polymer based multi-electrode “threads” into biodegradable tissue-
engineered hydrogel scaffolds[3]–[5].
The TEENI approach would greatly benefit from advanced understanding of
electrode impedance. When aiming for the best signal-to-noise ratio with maximum
selectivity, it is desirable to record from electrodes that are small enough to be able to
record from a single nerve fiber [6]. However, small electrodes invariably suffer from
higher impedance and hence high thermal noise, ultimately deteriorating the quality of
the detected signal. Since there exists a, trade-off between signal selectivity and
sensitivity, it would be prudent to characterize the electrochemical impedance of any
newly developed electrode interface. Furthermore, recording impedance data to study
the effect of corrosion of electrode sites under accelerated in-vitro soak conditions will
aid in demonstrating their long-term stability[7]. Therefore, a well-characterized
electrode impedance is vital for optimizing its design.
In this work, a model describing the physical processes of electrode-electrolyte
interface for a nearly polarizable electrode was developed. Theoretical equations were
used to calculate the values of solution resistance and the interfacial double layer
capacitance. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was used to electrically
characterize the interface of TEENI electrodes of decreasing electrode sizes: 1600, 800,
400 and 200 µm2. The experimental results were compared to the equivalent-circuit
model, thereby confirming the validity of the equations. Since impedance is strongly
dependent on electrode area, cyclic voltammetry was used to electrochemically
determine the active area of electrodes using a ferricyanide solution [8].
15
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
This chapter conveys the necessary information for understanding the
electrochemical mechanisms of the electrode-electrolyte interface (i.e., the region of
contact between an electrode and the electrolyte solution) in biomedical implantable
devices. The concept of double layer capacitance is presented through models of
interfacial capacitance, followed by a brief discussion on the concept of constant-phase
element. Then, the resistive components of the interface are discussed. At the close of
the chapter, a detailed interpretation of Randles circuit model for the electrode-
electrolyte interface is presented with simplified model variations. The work in this
chapter builds upon a large body of literature that describes the theory and operation of
microelectrodes as bioelectric transducers[9]–[12].
Background on the Electrode-Electrolyte Interface
Mechanism of electrical conductivity in the physiological environment involves
ionic charge carriers. Electrodes function as transducers of ionic and electronic signals.
This transduction takes place by the means of non-faradaic effects, wherein there is no
net charge transfer (e.g., capacitive in nature), or by faradaic process in which charge-
transfer reactions do occur (e.g., resistive in nature) [13].
Capacitance Models
When a metal is placed in solution without the application of an external bias, the
interaction between the metal and ions creates a change in their concentration at the
interface. This localized distribution of charge creates an electric potential, called the
half-cell potential, to be established between the interface and solution bulk[11].
16
Incompatibility between charge carriers of metal (i.e., electrons) and electrolyte solution
(i.e., ions) gives rise to a double-layer capacitance.
Many theories have been developed to predict the variation of capacitance with
physical parameters, such as the potential across the interface and the concentration of
the electrolyte. The primary difference between the models is related to the assumption
for how the charges are distributed in the electrolyte.
The double-layer capacitance tends to be extremely sensitive to physical
parameters, such as electrode material, surface geometry and electrolyte composition.
These electrochemical models can serve as a theoretical reference to analyze observed
variations of electrode-electrolyte capacitance.
Helmholtz Model
The first known model of electrode-electrolyte capacitance, which was developed
by Helmholtz, assumes the space-charge layer in the electrolyte near the electrode to
be a two-dimensional double layer[14]. Specifically, the counter-ions in the solution are
assumed to bind to the electrode surface as a single molecular layer [15]. This
assumption allows it to be modeled simply as a constant parallel-plate capacitor. The
capacitance of the Helmholtz layer, denoted by 𝐶𝐻, is given as
𝐶𝐻 =𝜀𝑜𝜀𝑟𝐴
𝑑
(2-1)
with dielectric permittivity of free space 𝜀𝑜, relative permittivity of the electrolyte solution
𝜀𝑟, the area of electrode 𝐴, and the distance between the two layers 𝑑. For accurate
determination of 𝐶𝐻, one is expected to know both the relative permittivity and distance
of the double layer. Dielectric constant of a single molecular layer is influenced by the
orientation of the molecules dipole and will differ from the commonly quoted value for a
17
bulk solution. The distance between the double layers is often assumed to be the radius
of the solvated ions, but this too varies with surface phenomena (e.g., adsorption).
Roughly estimating the dielectric constant to be 80 for saline and separation distance of
0.5 to 1.0 nm, 𝐶𝐻 is about 140 μF/cm2 [10].
A key weakness of the Helmholtz model is in its assumption that 𝐶𝐻 has a
constant value. It is known that as applied electrode potential across the electrode-
electrolyte interfaces increases, the solvated ions pack in more closely to the metal,
thereby shrinking the double-layer thickness [9]. In order to predict the variation of
capacitance with voltage, a more sophisticated model is needed.
Gouy-Chapman Model
A more detailed and dynamic model of the capacitance of the double layer
model, which was developed by Gouy-Chapman, assumes the charge density of the
space-charge layer in the solution to be three dimensional and takes into account the
diffusion of ions near the electrode [16]. Since the ions in this model are assumed to be
point-charges, their size is neglected. The Poisson-Boltzmann equation is used to
describe the distribution of potential and charge in the double layer[15]. The “diffuse
layer” is modeled as having a thickness 𝐿𝐷 given by
𝐿𝐷 = √𝜀𝑜𝜀𝑟𝑘𝑇
2𝑁𝑖𝑧2𝑞2
(2-2)
with Boltzmann constant 𝑘, temperature 𝑇, ionic concentration of the electrolyte
𝑁𝑖, valency of the ion species 𝑧, and charge of an electron 𝑞. From equation (2-2), it is
18
evident that the double layer thickness will be greatest for the most dilute electrolyte.
Gauss’s law is used to derive the capacitance of the diffuse space-charge layer[17].
𝐶𝐺 = 𝜀𝑜𝜀𝑟𝐴
𝐿𝐷𝑐𝑜𝑠h(
𝑧𝑉𝑞
2𝑘𝑇)
(2-3)
The Gouy-Chapman model yields a value of capacitance that varies more
sharply with applied potentials than do experimental measurements. In reality, solvated
ions cannot get infinitely close to the electrode, as they will be separated by a distance
equal to their radius[11].
Stern Model
A model that combines the Helmholtz and Gouy-Chapman was developed by
Stern[18]. There is a compact plane of high electric field immediately adjacent to the
electrode that firmly holds counter-ions to the electrode. Beyond this plane is the Gouy-
Chapman diffuse layer. The electric potential decreases in an exponential fashion with
the distance from the electrode, and decays to zero in the bulk solution. The effective
double-layer is modeled as a series arrangement of the Helmholtz and Gouy-Chapman
capacitances, as given by
1
𝐶𝐷𝐿 =
1
𝐶𝐻+
1
𝐶𝐺
(2-4)
Figure 2-1 illustrates the variation of voltage across the double layer for each
model described above.
While this model, too, in reality, does not perfectly replicate the interfacial
system, it is most suitable for modeling the electrodes in biomedical systems[9].
19
Constant-Phase Element
The electrical double layer does not behave as a pure capacitor, rather, it
exhibits non-linear behavior especially at high current densities[19]. This phenomenon
is modeled by constant phase element, which can be expressed mathematically by:
𝑍𝐶𝑃𝐸 = 1
(𝑗𝜔)𝛼𝑄
(2-5)
with magnitude of 𝑍𝐶𝑃𝐸 𝑄, constant representing the surface inhomogeneities α, and
angular frequency 𝜔=2πf. The constant-phase element behavior can range from purely
resistive (α= 0) to purely capacitive (α= 1). For α= 0.5, the constant-phase element is
called a Warburg element[20][21].
The physical basis for an electrode to behave as a constant phase element is not
fully obvious and is in fact still a topic of research[19]–[21]. Some researchers attribute
the physical basis to surface roughness, while others think it is due to non-uniformities
at the atomic level.
Series Resistance
In electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, impedance is purely resistive if its
phase angle is zero. The resistive term corresponds to the real part of the circuit
impedance. In general, resistance depends on resistivity and geometric aspects of the
material. In case of metals, the electrical resistivity is very low. Therefore, the source of
series resistance is primarily the passage of current through the electrolyte.
Electrolyte spreading resistance, denoted by 𝑅𝑠, is the resistance encountered
beyond the electrode surface when there is ionic current flow in the electrolyte due to
applied electric potential. If the return electrode is far away, this resistance is dependent
20
only on the geometry of the electrode and electrical conductivity of the electrolyte
solution. Analytical expression for solution resistance for a simple planar disk electrode
was derived by Neuman [15]. The expression for the series resistance of a planar disk
electrode is given by:
𝑅𝑠 =𝜌
4 ∗ 𝑟
(2-6)
with solution resistivity 𝜌 and electrode radius 𝑟. From the above expression, it is seen
that solution resistance is inversely proportional to electrode radius and linearly
proportional to the solution resistivity.
Charge-Transfer Resistance
Electrochemical reactions allow charge transfer between electrode and
electrolyte. In the case of faradaic interfaces, electrochemical reactions take place that
result in a DC current path across the interface[22]. Any reaction that obeys Faraday’s
law, which states that the amount of reaction at the electrode surface is directly
proportional to the amount of current passing through it, is considered faradaic. The
magnitude of this current depends on reaction kinetics and diffusion of ionic reactants
towards or away from the electrode. A charge-transfer resistance can be used to model
the physical hindrance encountered by electrons when they move across the interface.
This charge-transfer resistance, in simplest case, can be derived from the equation that
best describes the kinetic relationships in an electrochemical process, (i.e., Butler
Volmer equation)[15]. It is expressed as:
𝑖 = 𝑖𝑜 exp (𝛼𝑎𝐹
𝑅𝑇𝜂) − exp (−
𝛼𝑐𝐹
𝑅𝑇𝜂)
(2-7)
21
with exchange current density 𝑖𝑜, overpotential 𝜂, coefficients for anodic 𝛼𝑎 and
cathodic reactions, 𝛼𝑐. The Butler-Volmer equation denotes that when the cell is not in
equilibrium, the net current flow is the difference of anodic and cathodic currents.
When the overpotential is small, the Butler Volmer current can be approximated
as a linear function.
If 𝛼𝑎 = 1 − 𝛼𝑐, Equation (2-7) reduces to:
𝑖 = 𝑖𝑜
𝜂𝐹
𝑅𝑇
(2-8)
In this case, the charge-transfer resistance can be expressed as:
𝑅𝑐𝑡 =𝑅𝑇
𝑖𝑜𝐹
(2-9)
Randles Model
Although there is active research on new electrode materials for fuel cells,
supercapacitors, and biomedical sciences, the physical basis of electrode models
remains relatively unchanged. In fact, models proposed in the 1900’s are still being
used to understand the mechanism of electrode-electrolyte interface. In early work,
Randles developed a simple mathematical circuit model that could predict the
impedance behavior of mercury electrodes. (Figure 2-2) [23][24]. The circuit elements of
Randles model are double layer capacitance 𝐶𝑑𝑙, charge transfer resistance 𝑅𝑐𝑡,
solution or spreading resistance 𝑅𝑠 and Warburg impedance 𝑊. All the circuit elements
were discussed in the previous section.
22
Variations of Randles Model
Although Randles model looks relatively simple, it powerfully attempts to model
capture both the chemical and mass transport behavior in the electrical domain. Each
element in the model represents a different electrode process. Under certain
experimental conditions, this model can be simplified to retain only those elements that
correspond to the dominant electrochemical phenomena.
Polarizable Electrode Behavior
An ideally polarizable electrode, which is characterized by the absence of net
charge transfer between the electrode interfacial double layer, behaves like a capacitor
[15], [22]. The solution resistance encountered by the current spreading out in the
solution is modeled as a series resistor, as described earlier in this section. All the other
elements of Randles circuit that denote faradaic current can be assumed to have no
effect on a polarizable electrode and hence can be removed from the model.
The equivalent circuit to represent polarizable electrode behavior is represented
by Figure 2-3. A constant-phase element is used in place of a pure capacitor to account
for surface inhomogeneities.
Low-Frequency Behavior
If the electrode is operated at a low frequency range, it is possible to ignore one
or more model elements. Since capacitance and frequency have an inverse
relationship; at low enough frequencies, the double-layer capacitor can be replaced by
an open circuit. The impedance of Warburg element increases with 𝜔−1/2; the inverse
square root of angular frequency, 𝜔 [8]. The equivalent circuit model for low-frequency
behavior of electrodes is illustrated in Figure 2-4.
23
High-Frequency Behavior
At high enough frequencies, mass transport will no longer be a limiting
factor[15]. As a result, the Warburg element can be ignored and replaced by a short
circuit. The equivalent circuit for this case is illustrated by Figure 2-5.
Traditionally, electrodes for biomedical applications are characterized at a
frequency of 1 KHz, since it matches the dominant frequency component of neural
action potentials [7].
Since at high frequencies, diffusing reactants do not have to move very far, the
Warburg impedance will have little to no effect on the electrode-electrolyte interface.
Under this operating condition, the effect of Warburg impedance is less pronounced and
can be neglected without losing accuracy.
Figure 2-1. Potential distribution across double layer for various models. A- Helmholtz theory, B-Guoy Chapman theory, C- Stern theory
24
Figure 2-2. Randles circuit model
Figure 2-3. Equivalent circuit to represent ideal polarizable electrode behavior
Figure 2-4. Equivalent circuit to represent low-frequency electrode behavior
25
Figure 2-5. Equivalent circuit to represent high-frequency electrode behavior
26
CHAPTER 3 EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
To optimize neural interface designs, experiments are needed to understand the
dependence of electrochemical mechanisms on geometry and materials A related
challenge is that, electrochemical measurements can be highly sensitive to ambient
experimental conditions and electrode fabrication techniques. The design and
fabrication process of the TEENI electrodes, the electrochemical instrumentation, and
the analysis techniques are discussed in this chapter.
TEENI Design and Layout
As shown in Figure 3-1, each TEENI thread-set was designed to have an implant
region consisting of the following: a set of individual polyimide threads with four metal
micro-electrodes per thread, a large polyimide wing on both ends of the implant region,
a 1-mm-diameter hole in each polyimide wing for convenience during handling, four
200-μm-diameter suture holes along the polyimide lead-body to secure thread sets in
the implanted position, a large reference electrode outside the implant region to
attenuate common EMG signals surrounding the implant, and electrode contact pads to
integrate with external PCB for data acquisition [3].
Two different implant regions were designed for TEENI. The thread-sets of the
implant region had either three or four threads in a thread set, as shown in Figure 3-2.
Each thread was 10 μm thick, 86 μm wide, and 5-mm-long with a 170-μm-wide edge-to-
edge gap between threads in a thread-set. Each thread of a thread-set had 4 recording
electrodes, each with a different surface area: 200, 400, 800, and 1,600 μm2. The
center-to-center spacing between individual electrodes was 350 μm. Thus, a 3-thread
TEENI device has 12 recording electrodes and the 4-thread-set TEENI device has 16
27
recording electrodes. To evaluate the effect of longitudinal recording surfaces in
comparison with conventional circular electrodes, the recording electrodes also varied in
shape from circular to elliptical. In addition to recording electrodes, the 3-thread TEENI
had an on-thread reference electrode and a stimulation electrode with surface areas of
16,000 μm2 and 3,200 μm2 respectively. Also, test structures were included in the 3-
thread TEENI design to evaluate the electrical continuity of the metal traces and
dielectric integrity of the polyimide layer. The metal traces from the electrodes and test
structures, which had a width of 6 μm, led to a 20-pad connector array.
TEENI Fabrication
The TEENI microfabrication process, which is illustrated in Figure 3-3, began
with a 100-mm-diameter single-crystal silicon wafer, which was used as the carrier
substrate (Fig. 3-3A). A bottom structural polyimide (PI) layer was spun onto a thickness
of 5 μm and cured in an inert atmosphere (Fig. 3-3B). A layer of photoresist (AZ5214)
was photolithographically exposed, image reversed, and developed to obtain inward-
leaning retrograde sidewall slopes (Fig 3-3C). An oxygen plasma etch was
subsequently performed to remove any residual photoresist and to roughen the top of
the first PI layer. To promote adhesion between PI film and the following metal stack, 50
nm of Ti was deposited by sputtering (Fig. 3-3D). Immediately after deposition, the
desired metal layer stack of Pt/Au/Pt (100 nm each) was deposited onto the wafer using
an electron-beam evaporator (Fig. 3-3E). The top of the metal stack was then coated
with Ti (50 nm) to promote adhesion of Pt to the upcoming second PI layer (Fig. 3-3F).
The photoresist was removed to lift-off all the layers deposited on it, leaving behind the
patterned stack of metal (Fig. 3-3G). A second PI layer of 5 μm was spun on to the
wafer to mitigate any stress variations between dissimilar layers (Fig. 3-3H). A thick
28
positive photoresist layer (AZ9260) was then patterned to define the contacts and the
connector pads (Fig. 3-3I). Reactive ion etching (RIE) was used to etch through the
exposed PI and capping Ti layer to reveal the surface of Pt (Fig. 3-3J). The thick
photoresist layer was then stripped with acetone (Fig. 3-3K). A second thick photoresist
layer was patterned to define the shape of the TEENI device. After a second REI step,
the photoresist was stripped in acetone (Fig. 3-3L) and the individual TEENI samples or
thread-sets were mechanically peeled off the wafer. An example of a TEENI device
resulting from this microfabrication process is shown in Figure 3-4.
PCB-TEENI integration
A PCB-based integration system was used to relay neural signals from the
implanted electrodes to an external instrumentation system for data processing. In
collaboration with Tucker Davis Technologies, a manufacturing process was developed
to integrate the released TEENI thread-sets onto a custom-made PCB using conductive
silver-epoxy. The TEENI-PCB assembly was attached to a zero-insertion force (ZIF)
connector via a soldered wire bundle.
Specifically, custom-designed jigs were machined to facilitate the mechanical
alignment and subsequent assembly of the TEENI device with the PCB. The PCB was
positioned using 1-mm-diameter pins on a base jig, while the wires were soldered to the
through-holes. Thereafter, conductive silver epoxy was precisely dispensed on the
circular contact pads of the PCB using a Nordon Asymtek dispensing system. The
TEENI thread-set was positioned on another jig, which was then flipped over to mate
with the base jig. The TEENI-PCB-jig assembly was cured in an oven at 150°C.
29
To facilitate in-vivo operation of the TEENI-PCB assembly with the soldered wire
bundle hub, the assembly was potted with medical grade epoxy (Dymax Corporation,
USA). Figure 3-5 shows the final TEENI-PCB assembly.
The bonding of the TEENI with the PCB was a challenging aspect of the entire
device integration process. Although the use of a flip-chip bonder allowed for precise
lateral alignment of opposing electrodes, the application of finite, spatially resolved
conductive epoxy was difficult due to the narrow lateral spacing (250 μm) between
adjacent electrodes. Electrical shorts were common due to contact between epoxied
pads leading to a low yield of 100% isolated channels. Furthermore, the use of
conductive epoxy produced trapped air pockets between bonded pads that could
commonly result in shorting after implantation due to the penetration of water. Although
underfill can be used to electrically isolate channels in such situations, we wanted a
better alternative.
Anisotropic conductive adhesive (ACA), such as that produced by Creative
Materials Inc, was studied due to its reported advantage over conductive pastes and
underfill, particularly in situations involving fine-pitch contact pads. Since ACA materials
provide superior vertical conduction, they have been used in a variety of applications
with fine-pitch contact pads (e.g., liquid-crystal display (LCD) manufacturing and
electrical attachment of surface mounted devices) [25].
Unfortunately, initial tests on ACA-bonded TEENI-PCB assemblies showed low
channel conductivity, with only about 40% of all channels shown to be electrically
conductive. Upon analysis, geometric constraints associated with TEENI, PCB, and
conductive particles within the ACA were believed to be the cause of the low functional
30
yield. Optical profilometry showed that the PCB pads were recessed by 4 to 6 μm below
the solder mask. It was observed that the conductive particles of ACA were too small
(~2.5 μm diameter) to reliably bridge the vertical gap between the recessed pads on
both the TEENI and the PCB.
A new ACA variant with larger conductive particle size (10 to 15 μm diameter)
was used to ensure reliable electrical conduction with high-channel count. To further
increase electrical reliability, the contact pads of the PCB were bumped up so that they
protrude from the surface. This was done by electroless plating nickel and gold on top of
the PCB pads to build up 18 μm of metal, which results in pads that extend > 10 μm
above the surface of the adjacent solder mask. Experimental results from the bonding
process using bumped-up contact pads are discussed in the following chapter.
Experimental Set-up
This section describes the electrochemical cells, instrumentation and
measurement equipment used for the process of data collection and interpretation.
Electrochemical Cell
Since electric potential is not an absolute quantity, the electrical behavior of the
working electrode (i.e., the electrode of interest) cannot be measured in isolation. For
electrodes in solution that interface between electronic and ionic conduction regions,
another electrode is needed to complete the electrochemical circuit through the
electrolyte. This secondary electrode is called the auxiliary or counter electrode.
Experiments with a working and counter electrode are called two-electrode cells.
Counter electrodes are designed so that they can source or sink the current
needed without causing a change in the potential at the interface. To achieve this,
counter electrodes have a large surface area to minimize the current density at their
31
surface. The counter electrode must also be corrosion resistant and inert. Platinum,
being a noble metal, is the common choice for counter electrode as it meets all the
requirements.
A three-electrode cell is formed by including a reference electrode, so that the
potential of the working electrode can be more accurately monitored. The reference
electrode has a stable and well-defined electrochemical potential that remains constant
during the measurement [15]. Reference electrodes are carefully selected so that their
equilibrium state is maintained over long time periods.
Common reference electrodes include saturated calomel electrodes, silver-silver
chloride electrodes, and normal hydrogen electrodes. Calomel electrodes are based on
the reaction between elemental Hg and Hg2Cl2. Ag/AgCl electrodes operate on
reduction reaction of silver chloride to form silver metal and chloride ion. The standard
reference for measuring redox potential is the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE).
However, due to difficulty of its operation, NHE is rarely used and hence all other
electrodes are referenced to this standard.
Instrumentation
Electrochemical measurement techniques can either be current-controlled or
voltage-controlled. In the case of current-controlled experiments, a galvanostat applies
a well-defined current waveform to the working electrode and the resulting potential is
recorded. For voltage-controlled techniques, a potentiostat applies a well-defined
potential waveform to the working electrode and the resulting current is recorded. Since
all the electrochemical measurements described in this work were done in a voltage-
controlled mode, the basic construction of potentiostat will be described next [15].
32
A potentiostat is used to control the potential between the working and the
reference electrode, while the current flow between the working and the counter
electrode is recorded. A simple potentiostat circuit is shown in Figure 3-6. There are two
operational amplifiers in this circuit: a voltage follower and an inverting amplifier. Ideally,
no current flows in and out of the inputs of an op-amp.
The first op-amp controls the current flow through the counter electrode, while
maintaining the applied potential Vbias between the reference and the working electrode.
The second op-amp converts this current to a voltage, Vout.
It is easy to build a simple potentiostat. However, a commercial instrumentation
is valuable to obtain accurate measurements.
Data Acquisition and Analysis
A Metrohm Autolab PGSTAT128N with the frequency response analysis module
(FRA32) was used for performing electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)
experiments. Impedance responses of the TEENI microelectrodes were measured with
respect to a large Pt wire as the counter electrode and a Ag/AgCl reference electrode in
0.01M phosphate buffered NaCl (Sigma) at room temperature (pH 7.4). The potentiostat
has a system limit of 10nA at low frequencies. To avoid stability issues during
measurement, the frequency scan range was limited to 10-2 to 105 Hz. The perturbation
voltage was 10mV. Simple Matlab scripts were used to plot the results such as
impedance magnitude, phase and Nyquist graphs from the experiments. Most of the
analysis was later done on Excel.
Interpreting the behavior of an electrode-electrolyte interface from the
experimental EIS data is extremely challenging without invoking the physical basis of
33
electrochemistry and making justifiable assumptions. Modeling the data will be helpful in
understanding the experimental results.
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is a technique that measures the
response of an electrode to a sinusoidal voltage or current applied at different
frequencies [26], [27]. The mathematical approach of this measurement technique is
based on the fact that-, impedance is the frequency dependent resistance to the flow of
current as a function of an applied voltage or current. A Typical experimental set-up is
as shown in Figure 3-7[22]. During the experiment, a potential is applied between the
reference and the working electrodes, while the current flow from the working electrode
to the counter electrode is measured.
For meaningful mathematical analysis of EIS results, it is important to ensure that
the perturbation signal is small enough to elicit a linear current-voltage response. Yet,
the signal must also be large enough to be detected by the instrumentation. Therefore,
the amplitude of the signal must be adjusted to achieve the best possible compromise
between signal-to-noise ratio and linearity.
The results from impedance spectroscopy are typically displayed as bode plots
and Nyquist plots. In a bode plot, the magnitude and phase of the impedance are
plotted against frequency. In a Nyquist plot or complex plane plot, the imaginary part of
the impedance is plotted against the real part. Nyquist plots often reveals the model
parameters that dominate the behavior of the electrode-electrolyte interaction.
34
Figure 3-1. TEENI design.
Figure 3-2. Implant regions of TEENI thread-sets with 3 threads or 4 threads.
35
Figure 3-3. TEENI microfabrication process flow.
Figure 3-4. A microfabricated TEENI device with 4 threads. (Courtesy of JudyLab, UF)
36
Figure 3-5. A basic circuit for a potentiostat.
Figure 3-6. Experimental set-up for electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).
(Courtesy of E.Patrick, UF)
37
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The goal of the work described in this thesis was to characterize the
microfabricated electrodes in the tissue-engineered electronic nerve interfaces and to
compare the experimental results with simple circuit models that represent the physical
basis of the electrode-electrolyte interface. Using the methods described in the Chapter
3, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data was collected from different
TEENI thread-sets at different stages of microfabrication and integration processes.
Simple models were then developed to enable meaningful interpretations of the EIS
data and to draw conclusions.
The experimental set-up used to capture the EIS data is as shown in Fgure 4-1.
The implant region of the TEENI was soaked in a phosphate-buffered saline solution
(PBS) while the connector pads of the TEENI remained well outside the solution and
dry. A micro-positioner with a tungsten probe tip was used to make sequential electrical
contact with the pads on the TEENI. Leads integrated into the TEENI device connected
each pad to a corresponding microelectrode. A potentiostat was used to probe the
TEENI connector pads and measure their impedance. The reference electrode was an
Ag/AgCl electrode and the counter electrode was a platinum wire. EIS measurements
were carried out in a faraday cage to reduce external electrical noise.
EIS of TEENI with 3 Threads
As mentioned in Chapter 3, the TEENI with three threads has a total of 12
recording electrodes, one on-thread reference electrode, one stimulation electrode a
pair of interdigitated electrodes used to evaluate the dielectric integrity, a continuity test
structure, and one large EMG reference electrode outside the implant region. All EIS
38
measurements of recording electrodes that had the same surface area were combined
to compute the mean and standard deviation of the channel impedance. Bode
magnitude and phase plot are shown in Figure 4-2, with error bars representing one
standard deviation of the mean. Table 4-1 shows impedance magnitude and phase
values of all the microelectrodes at a frequency of 1 KHz.
Since microelectrodes reach steady-state more quickly than larger electrodes,
they can be very useful for electrochemical sensing[28]. All TEENI microelectrodes
show a primarily capacitive behavior even at the highest measurement frequency
(100KHz). This result is consistent with the fact that the electrode charging time
constant, τ, is proportional to electrode radius.
The impedance spectra of the continuity test structure, which was sandwiched
between the polyimide layers, was measured and shown to be purely capacitive, as
expected (Figure 4-3) [29].
EIS of TEENI with 4 threads
TEENI with four threads have a total of 16 recording electrodes and a continuity
test structure. Results from a single device are shown in Figure 4-4. Table 4-2 lists the
impedance magnitude and phase values of all electrodes at the frequency of 1 KHz.
ACA Bonded TEENI-PCB Assembly
The TEENI connector pads were align-bonded with the pads on the PCB to
establish direct electrical connections between the electrodes and wires leading to the
outside the body. Assembled TEENI were also characterized by EIS using the same
method as described above, but the PCB vias were probed instead of the TEENI
contact pads. Figure 4-5 shows a bode plot for impedance magnitude that compares the
recording electrodes of ACA bonded TEENI vs unbonded TEENI. It can be observed
39
from the plots that the bonding process does not appreciably change the electrical
characteristics of the TEENI.
Equivalent Circuit Modeling
As mentioned in Chapter 2, it is best to start by modeling the electrochemical
results using an equivalent circuit that is conceptually simple and relevant to the
frequency range of interest. Gradually, this simple model can be improved by further
building up a more detailed circuit.
In case of TEENI recording electrodes, the Randles circuit model and its variants
is a suitable place to begin to see how the experimental data compares to the model
parameters built using theoretical equations.
Kovacs proposed that neural recording electrodes are operated in linear or small-
signal mode which involves capacitive properties, while the operation of stimulating
electrodes occurs in large-signal mode with appreciable current flow[9]. Therefore, to
characterize the platinum recording microelectrodes of TEENI in saline, the model for a
blocking system with a constant-phase element was assumed[22].
Values from literature are adopted for platinum as electrode material and
physiological saline as electrolyte as shown in Table 4-3 to calculate the theoretical
values of the double layer capacitance, 𝐶𝑑𝑙 and solution resistance, 𝑅𝑠 [8] , [10].
Theoretical values of 𝑅𝑠 and 𝐶𝑑𝑙 are calculated for circular recording electrodes of
different areas and listed in Table 4-4. Experimental results for recording electrodes of
different surface areas are compared to the corresponding theoretical results. Assuming
that the voltage across the double layer is equal to the applied voltage, Stern model
gives the best fit.
40
Figure 4-1. EIS experimental set-up to probe the contact pads of TEENI electrodes.
(Courtesy of Author)
41
Figure 4-2. Impedance magnitude and phase plot for each of the electrodes found on a TEENI with three threads
42
Figure 4-3. Impedance magnitude and phase plot of continuity test structure
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
1.E+07
1.E+08
1.E+09
1.E+10
1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05
Imp
edan
ce, O
hm
Frequency, Hz
Impedance Magnitude Plot
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05
-Ph
ase,
deg
rees
Frequency, Hz
Phase Plot
43
Figure 4-4. Impedance magnitude and phase plot for each of the electrodes found on a
TEENI with four threads
44
Figure 4-5. Comparison of impedance behavior between unbonded and ACA bonded
TEENI.
45
Figure 4-6. Experimental and simulated impedance data for blocking circuit using Helmholtz capacitance.
46
Figure 4-7. Experimental and simulated impedance data for blocking circuit using Gouy-
Chapman capacitance.
47
Figure 4-8. Experimental and simulated impedance data for blocking circuit using Stern capacitance.
48
Table 4-1. Impedance magnitude and phase values of all electrodes at 1KHz, from largest electrode to smallest
Electrode Area (μm2) Impedance (Ω) -Phase (degrees)
EMG Ref (160,000) 18 KΩ 57.8
On-thread Ref (16,000) 62 KΩ 63.0
Stimulation Electrode (3200) 306 KΩ 65.1
1600 575 KΩ 65.6
800 1.1 MΩ 66.6
400 2 MΩ 66.1
200 3.7 MΩ 66.6
Table 4-2. Impedance magnitude and phase values of all electrodes at 1KHz
Electrode Area (μm2) Impedance (Ω) Phase (degrees)
1600 5.59E+05 71.03
800 1.10E+06 71.79
400 2.23E+06 73.55
200 4.74E+06 76.75
EMG Ref- 160,000 7.09E+03 55.84
Table 4-3. Literature values of various parameters to calculate the double-layer capacitance and solution resistance
Parameter Notation Value
Absolute Permittivity 𝜀𝑜 8.85 p𝐹/𝑚
Relative Permittivity 𝜀𝑟 79.4
Outer Helmholtz Distance 𝑑𝑂𝐻𝑃 0.5 nm
Valency 𝑧 4
Boltzmann Constant k 1.38E-23 𝑚2𝐾𝑔𝑠−2𝐾−1
Temperature 𝑇 295 𝐾
Elementary Charge 𝑞 1.6E-19 𝐶
Ionic Concentration of Saline
𝑁𝑖 9.27E+25 𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠/𝑚3
Resistivity ρ 0.72 Ω m
49
Table 4-4. Theoretical double-layer capacitance, series resistance and fitted frequency- dependent exponent values for different electrode sizes.
Electrode Area (μm2)
Helmholtz Capacitance
(pF)
Gouy-Chapman
Capacitance (pF)
Stern Capacitance
(pF)
Solution Resistance
(kΩ)
Frequency dependent exponent
(α)
1600 22.5 76.9 17.3 8.0 0.8
800 11.2 38.4 8.69 11.2 0.8
400 5.6 19.2 4.34 15.9 0.8
200 2.8 9.6 2.17 22.5 0.8
50
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
The overall goal of this thesis was to better understand the electrochemical
behavior of microfabricated electrodes for use in upper-limb prosthetic devices. Despite
the many experimental trials, theoretical calculations and model development, there is
much to be explored. This closing chapter will discuss the implications of the results and
highlight some important experiments that could be pursued in follow-on work.
EIS Data and Modeling
As previously described, it is challenging to interpret the electrochemical
behavior of microelectrodes from experimental EIS data without a basic theoretical
background in electrochemistry. To support the design and fabrication of
microelectrodes, accurate equivalent electrical circuit models are necessary. Using an
imperfect circuit will only lead to difficulty in interpretation of model parameters. Fitting
programs are available with many electrochemical instrumentation software systems
and are simple to use. However, the resulting circuit models tend to do a poor job in
predicting the impedance parameters for various electrode sizes. The major reason for
this is the non-linear behavior of the microelectrodes. One way to overcome this
challenge is to simply limit the frequency range of analysis.
The model of blocking system with constant-phase-element behavior, which is
represented as a resistor in series with a constant-phase element, best describes the
characteristics of the recording electrodes in the TEENI device over the frequency
range of interest in most nerve-interface applications (I.e., 10 Hz to 10 KHz). Outside of
this frequency range, the observed trend in impedance could not be explained by this
model. To account for this behavior, future work will be needed to understand the cause
51
of these non-linearities and to develop new circuit elements and/or models. One
possibility is to use a simplified non-uniform model that can approximate the
inhomogeneities of the electrode.
Finite-element-modeling (FEM) techniques can be used to simulate and/or
analyze microelectrode behavior. Commercial Multiphysics FEM software packages,
such as COMSOL, can be used with relevant boundary conditions to perform qualitative
analysis of unique geometries.
Measurement Techniques
Impedance spectroscopy was the only measurement technique employed to
characterize the electrochemical behavior of TEENI recording electrodes. Another
important technique that can provide information on electrode stability would be cyclic
voltammetry (CV). Reaction rates, adsorption process, and the nature of electrode
reactions can also be studied using this technique.
In cyclic voltammetry, the potential of the working electrode with respect to the
reference electrode is swept cyclically at a constant rate between two potential limits
and the current flow between the working and the counter electrode is measured. A
typical CV voltage waveform is shown in Figure 5-1. The current resulting from the
applied CV waveform is recorded and plotted against applied potential.
A CV experiment with a platinum wire with known geometric area as the working
electrode was recorded with a scan rate of 50mV/s and using the three-electrode set up
with potassium nitrate as the electrolyte. The resulting graph, which is shown in Figure
5-2, illustrates the characteristics of a reversible redox reaction [15].
One unusual, yet highly informative application of CV is to determine the active
electrochemical surface area of the working electrode. In the case of TEENI
52
microelectrodes, the active area could be different from the as-fabricated electrode area
due several factors (e.g., surface roughness, contamination, deposition of resistive
oxide film, metal corrosion and delamination of underlying polyimide film). Therefore,
finding the true electrochemically active area of electrode can be an indication of any of
the above phenomenon. Since impedance is strongly dependent on active electrode
area, this method also could reveal reasons for any unusual electrode behavior
observed.
To determine the active electrochemical area of electrodes using CV, it is
common to use a standard ferricyanide solution of known concentration at a well-
defined scan rate [8][30].
The relationship between peak current and electrode area is given by
𝐼𝑝 = 2.69 ∗ 108𝑛3/2𝐴𝐷1/2𝐶𝑣1/2, (5-1)
With peak current 𝐼𝑝, number of electrons involved in the redox reaction 𝑛, electrode
area 𝐴, diffusion coefficient of the electrolyte solution 𝐷,concentration of the electrolyte
solution 𝐶, and scan rate 𝑣.
In-vivo Measurements
All the electrochemical measurements listed in this thesis were performed in-vitro
with 0.01M phosphate buffered saline as the electrolyte solution. In this work and on-
going work, the chronic performance of microelectrodes was characterized by
performing long-term soak tests at elevated temperatures [31].
However, in the physiological environment, the same experiment could yield
different results. To study degradation rates, microelectrodes could be tested in an
53
accelerated aging system with hydrogen peroxide, in an attempt to mimic the
aggressive response of the body on the implanted device [7]. Although creating such a
system would require a new more complex experimental set-up, it may provide
invaluable information to change the design and microfabrication process in order to
improve the robustness of the TEENI technology.
Figure 5-1. Voltage waveform for cyclic voltammetry
54
Figure 5-2. A CV response for large platinum wire.
Final Words
The ultimate goal of this project is to develop a novel nerve interface that is
scalable to high independent sensory and motor channels, which can serve the needs
of the upper-limb amputee. The focus of this thesis is on the modeling and
characterization, and improvement of tissue-engineered electronic nerve interfaces. To
design the interface and assess its performance, a detailed understanding of electrode
properties and accurate models of their behavior are needed.
The thesis progressed in three major steps. First, it compared models for
electrode behavior in an electrolyte. Based on published observations and its expected
behavior and limitations, the Randles model was chosen as an appropriate starting
point. Second, the physical basis of the electrode-electrolyte interface and its
parameters were explored and electrochemical interface theories were used to predict
the observed values. Under the assumption that the applied electrode potential is
55
approximately equal to the capacitive double layer potential, the Stern model was used
to best explain the resulting electrochemical behavior. Lastly, the electrochemical
impedance of the microfabricated electrodes were experimentally measured and
compared with theoretical values. Electrodes of various sizes were investigated (i.e.,
ranging from 200 to 160,000). Results from short-term impedance spectroscopy
experiments showed a clear and predictable dependence of impedance magnitude and
phase on microelectrode size and analysis frequency. However, accelerated long-term
soak tests demonstrate that significant changes in electrode impedance occur that are
not yet predicted by available models. Future work should examine developing more
accurate models of accelerated long-term soak tests, which can help determine the
failure mechanisms, and then ultimately leads to improvements to achieve better and
more stable long-term performance.
56
LIST OF REFERENCES
[1] I. Dudkiewicz, R. Gabrielov, I. Seiv-Ner, G. Zelig, and M. Heim, “Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees,” Disabil. Rehabil., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 60–63, Jan. 2004.
[2] G. S. Dhillon, S. M. Lawrence, D. T. Hutchinson, and K. W. Horch, “Residual
function in peripheral nerve stumps of amputees: Implications for neural control of artificial limbs,” J. Hand Surg. Am., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 605–615, 2004.
[3] V. H. Desai et al., “Design , Fabrication , and Characterization of a Scalable
Tissue-Engineered Electronic Nerve Interface.” [4] J. B. Graham et al., “Histological Evaluation of Chronically Implanted Tissue-
Engineered-Electronic-Neural-Interface ( TEENI ) Devices.” [5] E. A. Nunamaker et al., “Implantation Methodology Development for Tissue-
Engineered-Electronic-Neural-Interface ( TEENI ) Devices.” [6] M. P. Hughes, K. Bustamante, D. J. Banks, and D. J. Ewins, “Effects of electrode
size on the performance of neural recording microelectrodes,” in 1st Annual International IEEE-EMBS Special Topic Conference on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings, 2000, pp. 220–223.
[7] P. Takmakov, K. Ruda, K. Scott Phillips, I. S. Isayeva, V. Krauthamer, and C. G.
Welle, “Rapid evaluation of the durability of cortical neural implants using accelerated aging with reactive oxygen species,” J. Neural Eng., vol. 12, no. 2, p. 26003, 2015.
[8] M. Bariatto and A. Fontes, “Impedance Characterization and Modeling of
Microelectrodes for Neural Recording,” pp. 108–113. [9] G. T. . Kovacs, “Introduction to the theory, design, and modeling of thin-film
microelectrodes for neural interfaces,” in Enabling Technologies for Cultured Neural Networks, T. M. M. D.A. Stenger, Ed. London: Academic Press, 1994, pp. 121–166.
[10] W. Franks, I. Schenker, P. Schmutz, and A. Hierlemann, “Impedance
Characterization and Modelling of Electrodes for Biomedical Applications,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1295–1302, 2005.
[11] R. S. (Ed), Handbook of Physics in Medicine and Biology. CRC Press, Taylor &
Francis Group, 2010. [12] E. J. D. Bronzino, “Neuman, M. R. ‘Biopotential Electrodes.,’” 2000. [13] J. Newman and K. E. Thomas-Alyea, Electrochemical Systems. 2004.
57
[14] H. Helmholtz, “Studien über electrische Grenzschichten,” Ann. Phys., vol. 243, no. 7, pp. 337–382, 1879.
[15] A. J. Bard, L. R. Faulkner, E. Swain, and C. Robey, Fundamentals and
Applications. [16] G. Gouy, “Sur la Constitution de la Charge Electrique a la Surface d’un
Electrolyte,” Compt. Rend., vol. 149, p. 654, 1910. [17] D. L. Chapman, “LI. A contribution to the theory of electrocapillarity,” Philos. Mag.
Ser. 6, vol. 25, no. 148, pp. 475–481, 1913 [18] O. Stern, “Zur Theorie der Elektrolytischen Doppelschicht,” Zeitschrift fur
Elektrochemie, vol. 30, pp. 508–516, 1924. [19] M. Musiani, M. E. Orazem, N. Pebere, B. Tribollet, and V. Vivier, “Constant-
Phase-Element Behavior Caused by Coupled Resistivity and Permittivity Distributions in Films,” J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 158, no. 12, p. C424, 2011.
[20] T. Pajkossy, “Impedance spectroscopy at interfaces of metals and aqueous
solutions - Surface roughness, CPE and related issues,” in Solid State Ionics, 2005, vol. 176, no. 25–28, pp. 1997–2003.
[21] R. de Levie, “On the impedance of electrodes with rough interfaces,” J.
Electroanal. Chem., vol. 261, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1989. [22] E. Patrick, “Design, Fabrication, and Characterization of Microelectrodes for
Brain-Machine Interfaces,” University of Florida, 2010. [23] L. a Geddes, “Historical evolution of circuit models for the electrode-electrolyte
interface.,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 1997. [24] K. L. Roach, “Electrochemical Models for Electrode Behavior in Retinal
Prostheses,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003. [25] S. C. Kim and Y. H. Kim, “Review paper: Flip chip bonding with anisotropic
conductive film (ACF) and nonconductive adhesive (NCA),” Current Applied Physics, vol. 13, no. 4 SUPPL.2. 2013.
[26] M. E. Orazem and B. Tribollet, Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. 2008. [27] V. F. Lvovich, Impedance Spectroscopy: Applications to Electrochemical and
Dielectric Phenomena. 2012.
58
[28] A. K. Ahuja, M. R. Behrend, J. J. Whalen, M. S. Humayun, and J. D. Weiland, “The dependence of spectral impedance on disc microelectrode radius,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1457–1460, 2008.
[29] B. Rubehn, C. Bosman, R. Oostenveld, P. Fries, and T. Stieglitz, “A MEMS-based
flexible multichannel ECoG-electrode array,” J. Neural Eng., vol. 6, no. 3, p. 36003, 2009.
[30] J. J. Van Benschoten, J. Y. Lewis, W. R. Heineman, D. A. Roston, and P. T.
Kissinger, “Cyclic voltammetry experiment,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 60, no. 9, p. 772, 1983.
[31] E. Tolstosheeva, V. Biefeld, and W. Lang, “Accelerated soak performance of
BPDA-PPD polyimide for implantable MEAs,” in Procedia Engineering, 2015, vol. 120, pp. 36–40.
59
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
Sruthi Natt was born in 1994 in Chennai, India to Sriram Natt and Sai Lakshmi
Sriram. She moved to Bangalore, India and attended The Oxford Senior Secondary
School where she graduated in 2011. She was interested in engineering, and pursued a
degree in instrumentation technology while attending Visvesvaraya Technological
University in India. She graduated as the Best Outgoing Instrumentation Engineer in
May 2015. Her desire to become a Biomedical Engineer brought her to University of
Florida, Gainesville, in August 2015. She became a research assistant with the
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering in December 2016 where she
began working under Dr. Jack Judy. Sruthi was awarded her master’s degree in August
2017.