Upload
violet-lyons
View
212
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Electric Dipole Moments, the LHC, and the Origin of Matter
M.J. Ramsey-MusolfWisconsin-MadisonQuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
http://www.physics.wisc.edu/groups/particle-theory/
NPACTheoretical Nuclear, Particle, Astrophysics & Cosmology
MIT LNS Colloquium, March 2011
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
The Origin & History of Matter
Standard Model Universe
EW Symmetry Breaking: Higgs ?
BSM Universe
QCD: n+p! nuclei
QCD: q+g! n,p…
Astro: stars, galaxies,..
How did we go from nothing to something ?
e+ + e- ! q + q !
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
The Origin & History of Matter
?
Baryogenesis: When? CPV? SUSY? Neutrinos?
EW Baryogenesis: testable w/ EDMs + colliders
Leptogenesis: less testable, look for ingredients w/ s
Can new TeV scale physics explain the abundance of matter ?
If so, how will we know ?
What are the quantitative implications of new EDM experiments & LHC searches for the Higgs and new particles for explaining the origin of YB & CDM ?
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
The Origin of Matter
?
Baryogenesis: When? CPV? SUSY? Neutrinos?
EW Baryogenesis: testable w/ EDMs + colliders
Leptogenesis: less testable, look for ingredients w/ s
Can new TeV scale physics explain the abundance of matter ?
If so, how will we know ?
What are the quantitative implications of new EDM experiments & LHC searches for the Higgs and new particles for explaining the origin of YB?
PRD 71: 075010 (2005) PRD 73: 115009 (2006) JHEP 0607:002 (2006 ) PRD 78:075009 (2008) PRL 102:061301 (2009) PLB 673: 95 (2009)
JHEP 0912:067 (2009)PRD 81:063506 (2010)JHEP 1001:002 (2010)PRD 81: 103503 (2010)JHEP 1008:062 (2010)
D. Chung WisconsinV. Cirigliano LANLB. Garbrecht AachenM. Gonzalez-Alonso WisconsinC. Lee MITY. Li BNLT. Liu UC Santa
BarbaraS. Profumo UC Santa CruzJ. Shiu IPMUS. Tulin TRIUMF
Baryogenesis & EDMs
PRD 75: 037701 (2007) JHEP 0807:010 (2007) PRD 77: 035005 (2008) PRD79: 015018 (2009)
PRD79: 055024 (2009)JHEP 1001:053 (2010)arXiv: 1101.4665 [hep-ph]
Higgs Pheno & EWPT
V. Barger WisconsinP. Fileviez Perez WisconsinM. Gonderinger WisconsinP. Langacker IASH. Lim WisconsinM. McCaskey KansasD. O’Connell IASH. Patel WisconsinS. Profumo UC Santa CruzG. Shaugnessy
ANL/NorthwesternK. Wang IPMUM. Wise Caltech
Outline
I. Baryogenesis: General Features
II. Computing YB systematically: progress & challenges (today’s theory talk by V. Cirigliano)
III. Illustrative phenomenology in MSSM: EDMs & the LHC
IV. EW Phase Transition: Higgs & New Scalars
I. Baryogenesis: General Features
Baryogenesis: Ingredients
Anomalous B-violating processes
Prevent washout by inverse processes
Sakharov Criteria
• B violation
• C & CP violation
• Nonequilibrium dynamics
Sakharov, 1967
SM Sphalerons:
SM CKM CPV:
SM EWPT:
EDMs
LHC: Scalars
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
EW Baryogenesis: Standard Model
Weak Scale Baryogenesis
• B violation
• C & CP violation
• Nonequilibrium dynamics
Sakharov, 1967
Anomalous Processes
Different vacua: (B+L)= NCS€
Aλ
Kuzmin, Rubakov, Shaposhnikov McLerran,…
Sphaleron Transitions€
W
€
W
€
JμB
€
qL
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
EW Baryogenesis: Standard Model
Weak Scale Baryogenesis
• B violation
• C & CP violation
• Nonequilibrium dynamics
Sakharov, 1967€
mt4
MW4
mb4
MW4
mc2
MW2
ms2
MW2
≈ 3 ×10−13
€
J = s12 s13 s23c12c132 c23sinδ13
= (2.88 ± 0.33) ×10−5
?
φ
?
φ
?
F
?
F
Increasing mh
1st order 2nd order
• CP-violation too weak• No EWPT
Shaposhnikov
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Electroweak Baryogenesis
Baryogenesis: When? CPV? SUSY? Neutrinos?
EW symmetric universe
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Bubbles of broken EW symmetry
EW phase transition
Baryogenesis: New Electroweak Physics
Weak Scale Baryogenesis
• B violation
• C & CP violation
• Nonequilibrium dynamics
Sakharov, 1967
?
ϕ new
?
φ(x)
Unbroken phase
Broken phaseCP Violation
Topological transitions
1st order phase transitionQuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
€
g
€
ϕ
€
g
?
?
e -?
ψnew
?
ϕ new
?
ϕ new
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
• Is it viable?• Can experiment constrain it?• How reliably can we compute it?
Theoretical Issues:Strength of phase transition (Higgs sector) Bubble dynamics (numerical)Transport at phase boundary (non-eq QFT)EDMs: many-body physics & QCD
€
Aλ
€
Aλ
II. Computing YB
Systematic Baryogenesis
Goal: Derive dependence of YB on parameters Lnew systematically (controlled approximations)
Parameters in LnewBubble & PT dynamics
CPV phases
Departure from equilibrium
• Earliest work: QM scattering & stat mech
• New developments: non-equilibrium QFT
Develop methods with Minimal Supersymmetric SM but more generally applicable
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Systematic Baryogenesis
Goal: Derive dependence of YB on parameters Lnew systematically (controlled approximations)
Parameters in LnewBubble & PT dynamics
CPV phases
Departure from equilibrium
• Earliest work: QM scattering & stat mech
• New developments: non-equilibrium QFT
Scale Hierarchy: Fast, but not too fast
Hot, but not too hot
Dense, but not too dense
d = vw (k / << 1
p = p / << 1
= / T << 1
Thermal, but not too dissipative
Plural, but not too flavored
coll = coll / << 1
osc = / T << 1
Work to lowest, non-trivial order in ’s
Error is O () ~ 0.1
Cirigliano, Lee, R-M,Tulin
Baryogenesis: CPV & Transport
Weak Scale Baryogenesis
• B violation
• C & CP violation
• Nonequilibrium dynamics
Sakharov, 1967
?
ϕ new
?
φ(x)
Unbroken phase
Broken phaseCP Violation & Transport
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Also Cirigliano, Lee, R-M, Tulin
€
∂ρB
∂t− D∇ 2ρ B = −ΓWS FWS (x) nL (x) + Rρ B[ ]
FWS (x) ->0 deep inside bubble
nL produced in wall & diffuses in front
€
W
€
W
€
JμB
€
qL
Baryogenesis: CPV & Transport
Weak Scale Baryogenesis
• B violation
• C & CP violation
• Nonequilibrium dynamics
Sakharov, 1967
?
ϕ new
?
φ(x)
Unbroken phase
Broken phaseCP Violation & Transport
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Transport: A Competition
CPV
Chem Eq
R-M et al
Diffusion
Also Cirigliano, Lee, R-M, Tulin
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Coupled set of (~30) quantum Boltzmann equations QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Thanks: B. Garbrecht
Baryogenesis: CPV & Transport
Weak Scale Baryogenesis
• B violation
• C & CP violation
• Nonequilibrium dynamics
Sakharov, 1967
?
ϕ new
?
φ(x)
Unbroken phase
Broken phaseCP Violation & Transport
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Transport: A Competition
CPV
Chem Eq
R-M et al
Diffusion
Also Cirigliano, Lee, R-M, Tulin
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Coupled set of (~30) quantum Boltzmann equations QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Thanks: B. Garbrecht
Topological transitions
MSSM: Chung, Garbrecht, R-M, Tulin ‘09
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Bubble interior
Bubble exterior
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Details of spectrum & int impt:
Chung, Garbrecht, R-M, Tulin ‘08
LH leptons
LH quarksLH fermions
Baryogenesis: CPV & Transport
Weak Scale Baryogenesis
• B violation
• C & CP violation
• Nonequilibrium dynamics
Sakharov, 1967
?
ϕ new
?
φ(x)
Unbroken phase
Broken phaseCP Violation & Transport
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Transport: A Competition
CPV
Chem Eq
R-M et al
Diffusion
Also Cirigliano, Lee, R-M, Tulin
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Coupled set of (~30) quantum Boltzmann equations
EDM searches:
How strong was the CPV “kick” ?
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Thanks: B. Garbrecht
Topological transitions
MSSM: Chung, Garbrecht, R-M, Tulin ‘09
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Bubble interior
Bubble exterior
CPV
LH leptons
LH quarksLH fermions
CPV Sources:
Compute finite-T Greens fns in presence of spacetime varying, complex mass matrix (CPV flavor oscillations) & thermalizing reactions
• Approx solutions
• Exact solution for time-varying, spatially homogeneous background (Cirigliano, Lee, R-M, Tulin ‘09)
• Full solution: in progress
Key Results: MSSM
Resonant Higgsino-Gaugino scattering dominates SCPV
?
ϕ new
?
φ(x)
€
q , ˜ W , ˜ B , ˜ H u,d
SCPV
CP-cons particle number changing processes
Chung,Garbrecht, R-M, Tulin: PRL 102:061301 (2009)
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Small tan negligible Yb, effects tan=20: impt Yb, effects (g-2)
Detailed information from precision tests & LHC needed
Key Results: MSSM & Beyond
III. Phenomenology: EDMs, LHC, & YB
EDMs: New CPV?
• SM “background” well below new CPV expectations
• New expts: 102 to 103 more sensitive
• CPV needed for BAU?
Mass Scale Sensitivity
€
€
e€
ψ
€
ϕ€
ϕ sinϕCP ~ 1 ! M > 5000 GeV
M < 500 GeV! sinϕCP < 10-2
3.1 x 10-29
EDMs: Complementary Searches
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
Electron
Improvements of 102 to 103
Neutron
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
Neutral Atoms
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
Deuteron€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
€
N
€
e−
QCD
QCD
QCD
€
g€
g
€
g
€
g€
g
€
g
€
g€
g
€
g
EDMs: Strongly Interacting Systems
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
Electron
Neutron
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
Neutral Atoms
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
Deuteron€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
€
N
€
e−
QCD
QCD
QCD
€
π
€
+L
€
€
n€
p
€
π−
€
π−
€
π
€
+L
P-,T-odd πNN
€
π
EDMs: Schiff Moments
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
Electron
Improvements of 102 to 103
Neutron
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
Neutral Atoms
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
Deuteron€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
€
N
€
e−
QCD
QCD
QCD
€
π
€
+L
€
€
n€
p
€
π−
€
π−
€
π
€
+L
Nuclear Schiff Moment
Nuclear EDM: Screened in atoms
Schiff Screening
Atomic effect from nuclear finite size: Schiff moment
EDMs in SUSY
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
One-loop
EDM: q, l, n… Chromo-EDM: q, n…€
π
€
+L
Dominant in nuclei & atoms
40 new CPV phases
ϕj = arg (Mjb*)
ϕA = arg (Af Mj )
Universality Assumption
ϕ ϕ
Common ϕA
One Loop EDMs & Baryogenesis
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f ?
ϕ new
?
φ(x)
€
q , ˜ W , ˜ B , ˜ H u,d
T ~ TEW
Resonant Non-resonantCirigliano, Lee, Tulin, R-M
Future de dn dA
EDM Interpretation: MSSM at 2 Loop
ϕA = arg (Af Mj )
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Li, Profumo, R-M 09
2-loop: Non-universal Phases
ϕj = arg (Mjb*)
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
Decouple in heavy sfermion regime
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
ATLAS Exclusion: mSUGRA/CMSSM
arXiv: 1102.5290
EDMs & EWB: Non-universal phases
Arg(M1b*) = Arg(M2b*) /
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Weak dependence of de , dn on Arg(M1b*)
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Res EWB not compatible with dn
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Res & non-res EWB compatible with future dn , light mA, & moderate tan
Li, Profumo, R-M: PLB 673:95 (2009)
MSSM Baryogenesis: EDMs & LHC
baryogenesis
Present de
LEP II exclQuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Prospective dn
Cirigliano, Profumo, R-M
+-driven EWB
0-driven EWB
10-28
LHC reach
EDMs: What We May Learn
Present n-EDM limit
Proposed n-EDM limit
Matter-AntimatterAsymmetry in the Universe:
Theory: How robust ? Can EDMs & LHC kill EW baryogenesis ?
“n-EDM has killed more theories than any other single experiment”
? MSSM
IV. EW Phase Transition: Higgs & New Scalars
• Was there a first order EWPT leading to bubble nucleation?
• If BSM physics (CPV + particle transfer) generated a large initial YB , did nature preserve it inside the bubbles ?
EW Phase Transition: New Scalars
?
φ
?
φ
?
F
?
F1st order 2nd orderLEP EWWG
Increasing mh
mh>114.4 GeV
or ~ 90 GeV (SUSY)
Computed ESM : mH < 70 GeV
Need
So that sphaleron is not too fast
€
ϕ
€
ϕ
VEff (T) :
€
+L
€
ϕ
€
ϕ€
ϕ
€
ϕ
€
ϕ€
ϕ
€
ϕ
+ +
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
“Strong” 1st order EWPT
Preserve YB
initial
Bubble nucleation
Baryon Number Preservation
~
F(φ)
Final baryon asymmetry
Initial baryon asymmetry
ln S ~ A(TC) e
€
Aλ
“Washout factor”
EW Phase Transition: New Scalars
?
φ
?
φ
?
F
?
F1st order 2nd orderLEP EWWG
Increasing mh
mh>114.4 GeV
or ~ 90 GeV (SUSY)
Computed ESM : mH < 70 GeV
Need
So that sphaleron is not too fast
EMSSM ~ 10 EpertSM : mH < 120 GeV€
ϕ
€
ϕ
€
˜ t
€
+LStop loops in VEff
Light RH stop w/ special
Non-doublet Higgs (w / wo SUSY)
€
S
€
ϕ
Mixing€
S
€
ϕ
€
S
Decay
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
MSSM: Color Breaking Vacua
?
φ
?
φ
?
F
?
F• Deeper minima may develop along stop direction
• Carena et al (2008): color-neutral EW vacuum is metastable for appropriate MSSM parameters
€
H 0
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Two-loop analysis of VEFF in effective theory
The Simplest Extension
Model
Independent Parameters:
v0, x0, 0, a1, a2, b3, b4
H-S MixingH1 ! H2H2
€
M 2 =μh
2 μhs2 2
μhs2 2 μ s
2
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
Mass matrix
€
h1
h2
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟=
sinθ cosθ
cosθ −sinθ
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟h
s
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
Stable S (dark matter?)
• Tree-level Z2 symmetry: a1=b3=0 to prevent s-h mixing and one-loop s hh
• x0 =0 to prevent h-s mixingxSM EWPT:
Signal Reduction Factor
Production Decay
Simplest extension of the SM scalar sector: add one real scalar S (SM singlet)
• Two Higgs mass eigenstates at “low” (LHC) energy: mixed doublet-singlet
• More flexibility pattern of symmetry breaking at high T
• Can achieve 1st order EWPT and evade LEP SM Higgs mass bounds
LHC: Signal Reduction Factor
Production Decay
sin2
€
e+
€
e−
€
Z 0
€
Z 0
€
ϕ
€
S
O’Connel, R-M, Wise:Profumo, R-M, Shaugnessy:
Barger, Langacker, McCaskey, R-M Shaugnessy:
PRD 75: 037701 (2007)
JHEP 0807:010 (2007)
PRD 77: 035005 (2008) PRD79: 015018 (2009)
Model
EWPT
LHC & DM
Finite Temperature Potential
?
φ
?
φ
?
F
?
F
€
H 0
€
S
• What is the pattern of symmetry breaking ?
• What are conditions on the couplings in V(H,S) so that <H0>/T > 1 at TC ?
LHC Phenomenology
Signatures
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
EWPO compatible
m2 > 2 m1
m1 > 2 m2
LHC: reduced BR(h SM)
€
h1
€
h2
€
h1€
b
€
b
€
€
Signal Reduction Factor
Production Decay
Light: all models Black: LEP allowed
Scan: EWPT-viable model parameters
LHC exotic final states: 4b-jets, + 2 b-jets…€
h2
€
h1
€
h2
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
EWPO comp w/ a1=0=b3
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
LHC: reduced BR(h SM)
Complex Singlet: LHC Discovery
Barger, Langacker, McCaskey, R-M, Shaugnessy
Traditional search: CMS
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Invisible search: ATLAS
Single component case (x0 = 0)
EWPT
€
h j
€
A
€
A
Baryon Number Preservation: Open Theory Issues
~
Final baryon asymmetry
Initial baryon asymmetry
Gauge Dep
Freq of sph unstable mode
Fluct Det ratio
Duration of EWPT
YBinit &
entropy dilution
H. Patel & MRM, arXiv: 1101.4665
Ongoing Theoretical Work
?
φ
?
φ
?
F
?
F
EWPT with scalars in higher-dim reps of SU(2)
Nuclear Schiff Moment
Nuclear EDM: Screened in atoms
Computationally tractable operator accounting for nuclear correlations (Liu, Haxton, R-M, Timmermans…)
Chung, Garbrecht, R-M, Tulin ‘09
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Bubble interior
Bubble exterior
CPV
CPV sources: resum vevs to all orders & consistently solve for non-eq Green’s functions
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Apply our tools to candidates for the “new Standard Model”
Learn what expts teach us about the origin of matter
Summary
I. Baryonic Matter & Electroweak Baryogenesis
II. Dark Matter
Can TeV scale new physics explain the abundance of matter ?
Highly interdisciplinary problem
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Precision, sensitivity…
•Precision: details of the interactions and spectrum essential
• Energy: multi-TeV mass reach may be needed
• Astro/Cosmo: relic , e+ , GW…
• Theory: Non-equilibrium & finite-T QFT, model-building, many-body & nonperturbative QCD, collider phenomenology…
Back Matter
Fast, but not too fast
Hot, but not too hot
Dense, but not too dense
d = vw (k / << 1
p = p / << 1
= / T << 1
Thermal, but not too dissipative
Plural, but not too flavored
coll = coll / << 1
osc = / T << 1
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
ATLAS Exclusion: mSUGRA/CMSSM
arXiv: 1102.5290
“Strong” 1st order EWPT
Preserve YB
initial
Preserve YB
initialBubble nucleation
The Simplest Extension
Model
Independent Parameters:
v0, x0, 0, a1, a2, b3, b4
H-S MixingH1 ! H2H2
€
M 2 =μh
2 μhs2 2
μhs2 2 μ s
2
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
Mass matrix
€
h1
h2
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟=
sinθ cosθ
cosθ −sinθ
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟h
s
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
Stable S (dark matter?)
• Tree-level Z2 symmetry: a1=b3=0 to prevent s-h mixing and one-loop s hh
• x0 =0 to prevent h-s mixingxSM EWPT:
Signal Reduction Factor
Production Decay
€
e+
€
e−
€
Z 0
€
Z 0
€
ϕ
€
S
sin2
MSSM EDMs: Leading Contributions
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
Electron
Neutron
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
Neutral Atoms
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
Deuteron€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
€
g€
g
€
g
€
g€
g
€
g
€
g€
g
€
g
q, l EDM Chromo- EDM
Weinberg 3 gluon
EDMs & Schiff Moments
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
One-loop
EDM: q, l, n… Chromo-EDM: q, n…€
π
€
+L
Dominant in nuclei & atoms
Engel & de Jesus: Enhanced isoscalar sensitivity ( QCD )
Schiff Moment in 199Hg Nuclear & hadron structure
EDMs: QCD & Many-Body Theory
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
Electron
Improvements of 102 to 103
Neutron
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
Neutral Atoms
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
Deuteron€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
€
N
€
e−
QCD
QCD
QCD
€
π
€
+L
€
€
n€
p
€
π−
€
π−
€
π
€
+L
Nuclear Schiff Moment
Nuclear EDM: Screened in atoms
Schiff Screening
Atomic effect from nuclear finite size: Schiff moment
Liu et al: New formulation of Schiff operator
+ …
Role of nuclear correlations
Non-minimal Solutions (SUSY)
Nature of DM & its interactions
Origin of the BAU
Gauge hierarchy
EWPO & mH
Origin of m
“Minimal” : 105 new parameters
Additional complications:
• Why is ~ Mweak ?
• Why little flavor & CPV ?
• Origin of params in Lsoft ?
• MSUSY < TeV (hierarchy)
• Bino-Higgsino-like LSP (DM)
• Light RH stop ( m < 125 GeV)
• M1 ~
ϕ ϕ
Minimal Solutions (non-SUSY)
Nature of DM & its interactions
Origin of the BAU
Gauge hierarchy
EWPO & mH
Origin of m
Extra Scalars Extra Fermions
EWPT & DM: New Scalars
Gauge Interactions
No Gauge Interactions
Simplest: 1 new dof
Next Simplest: 2 new dof
Focus: Key parameters for cosmo & LHC pheno
Complex Singlet (cxSM):DM, BAU, and mH / EWPO
H-S Mixing, Reduced BRs, & SI
Real Singlet (xSM):DM or BAU-mH / EWPO
BAU: H-S Mixing & Reduced BRs
DM: Reduced BRs & SI
Simplest: 3 new dof (2HDM: 4 new dof)
Real Triplet SM)DM or BAU (EWPT)
DM: Charged track & SI
BAU: or bb ; Br(H!)
LHC Phenomenology
Signatures
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
EWPO compatible
m2 > 2 m1
m1 > 2 m2
LHC: reduced BR(h SM)
€
h1
€
h2
€
h1€
b
€
b
€
€
Signal Reduction Factor
Production Decay
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
CMS 30 fb-1
SM-like
Singlet-like
SM-like
SM-like w/ H2 ->H1H1 or Singlet-like
~ EWB Viable
Light: all models Black: LEP allowed
Scan: EWPT-viable model parameters
LHC exotic final states: 4b-jets, + 2 b-jets…€
h2
€
h1
€
h2
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
EWPO comp w/ a1=0=b3
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
LHC: reduced BR(h SM)
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Probing : WBF
H ! ZZ! 4 l
H ! WW! 2j l
• Early LHC discovery possible
• Determine as low as ~ 0.5
Illustrative Study: MSSM
Neutralino Mass Matrix
M1
-
M2
-mZ cos sin W mZ cos cos W
mZ sin sin W -mZ sin sin W 0
0
0
0
-
-mZ cos sin W mZ cos cos W
mZ sin sin W -mZ sin sin WMN =
Chargino Mass Matrix
M2
MC =
cos2mW
sin2mWT << TEW : mixing
of H,W to ~ ~ ~ ~
T ~TEW : scattering
of H,W from
background field
~~
?
ϕ new
?
φ(x)
€
q , ˜ W , ˜ B , ˜ H u,d
T ~ TEW
CPV
Resonant CPV: M1,2 ~
sin ϕ Arg(M1b*) = Arg(M2b*)
Quantum Transport & Baryogenesis
Particle Propagation: Beyond familiar (Peskin) QFT
€
0IN
€
0OUT
LI
Assumptions: 1. Evolution is adiabatic2. Spectrum is non-degenerate3. Density is zero
?
ϕ new
?
φ(x)
Electroweak Baryogenesis 1. Evolution is non-adiabatic: vwall > 0 -> decoherence
2. Spectrum is degenerate: T > 0 -> Quasiparticles mix
3. Density is non-zero
€
˜ G (x,y) = Pϕ a (x)ϕ b* (y) τ ab =
G t (x,y) −G<(x,y)
G>(x, y) −G t (x,y)
⎡
⎣ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥
€
ˆ O (x) = ρ nn ' nn
∑ SI [ϕ ]T ˆ O (x) SI [ϕ ]{ } n'+-= + + …
€
˜ G
€
˜ G 0+
€
˜ G 0
€
˜ G 0
€
˜ Σ
LI
€
0IN
€
0OUT
Generalized Green F’ns • Spectral degeneracies• Non-adiabaticity
Non-equilibrium T>0 Evolution
Quantum Transport & Baryogenesis
?
ϕ new
?
φ(x)
Electroweak Baryogenesis 1. Evolution is non-adiabatic: vwall > 0 -> decoherence
2. Spectrum is degenerate: T > 0 -> Quasiparticles mix
3. Density is non-zero
Scale Hierarchy:
Fast, but not too fast
Hot, but not too hot
Dense, but not too dense
d = vw (k / << 1
p = p / << 1
= / T << 1
Work to lowest, non-trivial order in ’s
Error is O () ~ 0.1
Cirigliano, Lee, R-M
Systematically derive transport eq’s from Lnew
Competing Dynamics
CPV
Ch eq
Cirigliano, Lee,Tulin, R-M
Complex Singlet: EWB & DM?
Barger, Langacker, McCaskey, R-M Shaugnessy
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Key features for EWPT & DM: (1) Softly broken global U(1)
(2) Closes under renormalization
(3) SSB leading to two fields: S that mixes w/ h and A is stable (DM)
Controls CDM& EWPT
No domain walls DM mass
Complex Singlet: EWB & DM
Barger, Langacker, McCaskey, R-M, Shaugnessy 2 controls CDM& EWPT
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
MH1 = 120 GeV, MH2=250 GeV, x0=100 GeV
Complex Singlet: Direct Detection
Barger, Langacker, McCaskey, R-M, Shaugnessy Two component case (x0=0)
Little sensitivity of scaled SI to
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
EDMs & EWB: Universal PhasesArg(M1b*) = Arg(M2b*)
Lower panels: entropy rescaling
Present & prospective de constraints
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Cirigliano, Li, Profumo, R-M 0910.4589
+-driven EWB
0-driven EWB
EDMs in SUSY
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
One-loop
EDM: q, l, n… Chromo-EDM: q, n…€
π
€
+L
Dominant in nuclei & atoms
Two-loop
EDM only: no chromo-EDM
€
g€
g
€
g
Weinberg: small matrix el’s
Decouple in large limit
EDMs in SUSY: Full Two-Loop
Higgs Boson Masses
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Li, Profumo, R-M: PRD 78:075009 (2008)
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
WH Loops dominate for neutron & comparable to H, A for electron
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
mA=300 GeV, =300 GeV, M2=2M1=290 GeV
Key Results: MSSM & Beyond
3. Three-body interactions (typically) drive particle number transfer
4. RH b (s)quark and tau (s)lepton Yukawa interactions critical
Yb,(susy) / Yb,(sm) = tan
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Presence of light sbottoms and staus can quench YB or change its sign
our Y
previous Y
gH
tLtLtR
Chung, Garbrecht, R-M, Tulin ‘08
Key Results: MSSM & Beyond, cont.
5. Superpartners are generally in equilibrium: “superequilibrium”
Supergauge interactions
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.Chain of Yukawa interactions
No supergauge
No 3rd gen sleptons
Full results
Exact supereqChung, Garbrecht, R-M, Tulin ‘09
Illustrative Study: MSSM
Supergauge Interactions
Particle Number Changing Reactions: Yukawa Interactions
Dominant in SM
Enhanced for moderate tan
“Superequilibrium”:
Chung, Garbrecht, R-M, Tulin ‘09
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Bubble interior
Bubble exterior
CPV
Quantum Transport Equations
= + + …
€
˜ G
€
˜ G 0+
€
˜ G 0
€
˜ G 0
€
˜ Σ
Expand in d,p,
Currents
CP violating sources Links CP violation in Higgs
and baryon sectors
Chiral Relaxation
Strong sphalerons
Producing nL = 0
• SCPV
• M , H , Y , SS
€
∂Xμ jμ (X) = d3z dz0 Σ>(X,z) G<(z, X) − G>(X,z) Σ<(z, X) +L[ ]
−∞
X 0∫∫From S-D Equations:
• SCPV
• M , H , Y …
Riotto, Carena et al, R-M et al, Konstandin et al
R-M et al
Objectives:
• Determine param dep of SCPV and all s and not just that of SCPV
• Develop general methods for any model with new CPV
• Quantify theor uncertainties
Approximations
• Neglect O() terms
• Others under scrutiny
R-M, Chung, Tulin, Garbrecht, Lee, Cirigliano
• Y >> other rates? (No)
• Majorana fermions ? (densities decouple)
• Particle-sparticle eq? (usually)
• Vev resummation ?
EDMs: Theory
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
Electron
Improvements of 102 to 103
Neutron
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
Neutral Atoms
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
Deuteron€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
€
N
€
e−
QCD
QCD
QCD
€
π
€
+L
€
€
n€
p
€
π−
€
π−
€
π
€
+L
Nuclear Schiff Moment
Nuclear EDM: Screened in atoms
Neutron EDM from LQCD:
Two approaches:
• Expand in & average over topological sectors (Blum et al, Shintani et al)
• Compute E for spin up/down nucleon in background E field (Shintani et al)
mN=2.2 GeV
QCD SR (Pospelov et al)
Hadronic couplings
Pospelov et al:
PCAC + had models & QCD SR
ChPT for dn: van Kolck et al
Schiff Screening
Atomic effect from nuclear finite size: Schiff moment
EDMs & Schiff Moments
€
€
f
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ f
€
˜ f
€
g
€
q
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ q
€
˜ q
One-loop
EDM: q, l, n… Chromo-EDM: q, n…€
π
€
+L
Dominant in nuclei & atoms
Engel & de Jesus: Reduced isoscalar sensitivity ( QCD )
Schiff Moment in 199Hg Nuclear & hadron structure
Liu et al: New formulation of Schiff operator
+ …
New nuclear calc’s needed
Dark Matter: Future Experiments
Cirigliano, Profumo, R-M
Assumes CD
M
€
€
Z 0
€
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ χ 0
Dark Matter: Neutrinos in the Sun
SUGRA: M2 ~ 2M1 AMSB: M1 ~ 3M2
€
€
Z 0
€
€
˜ χ 0
€
˜ χ 0Neutralino-driven baryogenesis
Dark Matter: Relic Abundance
SUGRA: M2 ~ 2M1 AMSB: M1 ~ 3M2
LEP II Exclusion
€
˜ χ 10
€
˜ χ 10
€
˜ t
€
t
€
tsuppressed
01
~
01
~±ji χχ ~,~0
ZW ,
ZW , too fast
Neutralino-driven baryogenesis
Non-thermal
Phenomenology: EWPO
Electroweak Precision Observables (EWPO)
Oblique parameters
Similar for S,U…
SM: global fit favors light scalar (mh~ 85 GeV)
Phenomenology: EWPO cont’d
Electroweak Precision Observables (EWPO)
Oblique parameters
Global fit (GAPP)
• Fix mH=114 GeV & fit S,T,U
• Require
O(m1 , m2 , sin ) - OSM
to lie inside 95% CL ellipse
SUSY Baryogenesis & Colliders
Prospective dePresent dePresent de Prospective de
LHC reach
Present de Prospective de
LHC reach
ILC reach
Symmetry Breaking
Two Cases for <S>at high T:
?
φ
?
φ
?
F
?
F
€
H 0
€
S
€
ϕ
€
α
Vmin = 0
Vmin = V0 < 0
Electroweak Symmetry Breaking
Critical Temperature
LEP allowed models: TC ~ 100 GeV
|V0| / TC4 << 1
Extending the Higgs Sector
GUTs: SU(5) example
+ L soft
SUSY Beyond the MSSM
Fileviez Perez, Patel, R-M
Ando, Barger, Langacker, Profumo, R-M, Shaugnessy, Tulin