Upload
cebit-australia
View
743
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Project HealthDesign:Patients, Personal Health Records, Providers … & Policy
Gail Casper, R.N., Ph.D.University of Wisconsin – Madison
School of Nursing
About Project HealthDesign
Round 1: 2006-2009
•new vision for PHRs
• creating tools for patient action
Round 2: 2010 - 2012
•integrating patient data
New Vision for PHRs:
Tools for Patient Action
• user-centered design
• prototyping & testing tools
Project HealthDesign
Patient Records
After Stead et al, 2005
DATA
Personal Health Assistant
University of Rochester
PI: George Ferguson, PhD
Observations of Daily Living (ODLs)
• not in EMRs
• patient-originated, user-driven
• > clinical measures taken at home
• selectively shared
Evaluating how ODLs can be collected,
interpreted, displayed and acted upon by
both patients and clinicians
Round 2
• Embedded Assessment Seniors with arthritis and at risk of cognitive decline
• BreathEasyAdults with asthma and depression or anxiety
• InTouchTeens who are managing obesity and depression
• Crohnology MDAdults with Crohn’s Disease
• FitBabyPre-term, at-risk infants and their caregivers
Project HealthDesign: Current Project Teams
ODLs - the most important feature of the PHRs
Challenges
• Privacy
• Payment
• Practice
Questions
• How do we cross the patient-clinician gap?
• What are the most compelling privacy issues?
• How can we mitigate liability concerns?
• How can vendors’ progress be leveraged?
• What is the business model for PHRs?
Watch us as we work
www.projecthealthdesign.org
Twitter: @PrjHealthDesign
Embedded Assessment of Elder
Activities for Augmenting PHRsPrincipal Investigator:
Anind K. Dey, PhD, Carnegie Mellon University
Project HealthDesign: Current Project Teams
BreathEasy: A PHR for adults with asthma
& depression or anxiety
Principal Investigators:
Barbara L. Massoudi, MPH, PhD, RTI International
Stephen Rothemich, MD, MS, Virginia Commonwealth
University
Project HealthDesign: Current Project Teams
“With the technologies we're developing,
patients and clinicians will be able to
communicate more quickly and easily…”
iN Touch: ODLs via mobile platforms for
youth with obesity and depression
Principal Investigators:
Katherine Kim, MPH, MPA, San Francisco State
University
Christina Sabee, PhD, San Francisco State University
Project HealthDesign: Current Project Teams
“We hope to…put the control of health
decisions in the hands of the patient and
extend the support of the clinicians beyond
the clinic’s boundaries.”
Crohnology.MD: A mobile PHR for adults
with inflammatory bowel disease
Principal Investigators:
Linda Neuhauser, MPH, DrPH, University of California, Berkeley
Jonathan P. Terdiman, MD, University of California, San Francisco
Deryk Van Brunt, DrPH, Healthy Communities Foundation
Project HealthDesign: Current Project Teams
“Every aspect of this work is focused on
making patient communications of a
complex health condition easier…”
FitBaby: Using ODLs among Low Birth
Weight Infants & their Caregivers
Principal Investigators:
Gillian Hayes, PhD, University of California, Irvine
Karen Cheng, PhD, Charles Drew University
Project HealthDesign: Current Project Teams
Round 1:
Users’ ethical, legal, and social concerns
about sharing PHR information
are real, but surmountable
•A team from University of Miami Bioethics Program looked at the ethical,
legal and social issues (ELSI) associated with the grantee projects
•Top three overarching ELSI concerns
�control over access to information
�managing privacy rights
�shifting shared decision-making to the patient user
What is the Strength of Evidence for PHRs?• evidence is beginning to accumulate supporting that
PHRs do/can have a positive impact on health both at an individual and population level
– improved access to care
– improved access to targeted information
– self-management of chronic diseases
– improved patient-provider communication
– access to social networking e.g. http://www.patientslikeme.com