Egypt - Existence and Non-Existence

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Egypt - Existence and Non-Existence

    1/8

    Egypt Exploration Society

    On the Structure of the Expressions Denoting Existence and Non-Existence in MiddleEgyptianAuthor(s): T. W. ThackerSource: The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol. 35 (Dec., 1949), pp. 31-37Published by: Egypt Exploration SocietyStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3855204.

    Accessed: 28/07/2013 09:10

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at.http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

    .JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of

    content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms

    of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

    .

    Egypt Exploration Societyis collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal

    of Egyptian Archaeology.

    http://www.jstor.org

    This content downloaded from 84 0 161 60 on Sun 28 Jul 2013 09:10:12 AM

    http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=eeshttp://www.jstor.org/stable/3855204?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/stable/3855204?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ees
  • 8/10/2019 Egypt - Existence and Non-Existence

    2/8

    (3I)

    ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE EXPRESSIONS

    DENOTING EXISTENCE

    AND

    NON-EXISTENCE

    IN

    MIDDLE

    EGYPTIAN

    By

    T.

    W.

    THACKER

    I.

    qS~

    and

    S A

    f-fP

    without

    conception,

    without

    birth'

    (Adm.

    5,

    I4).

    Perhaps

    the

    n

    of

    the

    construc-

    tion

    n

    sdmtf

    'he

    has/had

    not

    (yet)

    heard' is best

    explained

    in this

    way

    i.e. as

    meaning

    'there

    is/was

    not

    the fact that he

    has/had

    heard', or,

    when

    it

    occurs

    after

    a main

    clause,

    as

    it

    normally

    does,

    'there not

    being

    the fact

    that he

    has/had

    heard'.2

    Gardiner,

    op.

    cit.,

    307,

    I.

    2

    Cf.

    ibid.,

    405

    and

    Gunn,

    op.

    cit.,

    I74

    ff.

    The

    sdmtf

    form is

    perhaps

    derived

    from a relative form

    which

    bears

    the same relation

    to the Perfective

    sdmf

    form as

    the

    Imperfective

    relative

    form bears to the

    Imperfective

    gdm-f

    orm. So far as I know

    the existence of such a relative form has not been

    recognized

    by

    the

    grammarians,

    but

    I have not

    yet

    seen M. Clere's

    paper

    on a new relative form which he read

    at the

    Congress

    of

    Orientalists

    in Paris

    in

    July I948.

    This content downloaded from 84.0.161.60 on Sun, 28 Jul 201309:10:12 AM

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp