EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    1/22

    Module EG-222

    ec on :

    Actions onStructures

    Dr C. Wood

    College of Engineering

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    2/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Characteristic loading

    Loads are direct actions (forces) that are applied to a structure. Loads are

    Permanent loads Imposed Loads Variable LoadsWalls

    Occupants

    Furniture

    Floor slabs

    Beams

    Stored

    materials

    Roofs

    Finishes

    partitions

    Moveable a ng

    Permanent

    machiner

    machineryWind loads

    Loads are s ecified b their characteristic values, as defined in BS EN 1990 and the

    now oa s

    National Annex.

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    3/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Characteristic weights o bui lding materials for calculation o permanent loads

    WallsColumns

    Floor slabs

    Beams

    Roofs

    Finishes

    Cladding

    Loads due to the weight of the oads due to the weight of thestructure

    continuedoverleaf

    Note: The values provided here are unit masses in kg/m2 or kg/m3. To convert this to a unitweight in N/m2 or N/m3, take the constant of gravitational acceleration, a=9.81m/s2.

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    4/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Characteristic weights o building materials continued

    Note: The values provided here are unit masses in kg/m2 or kg/m3. To convert this to aunit weight in N/m2 or N/m3, take the constant of gravitational acceleration, a=9.81m/s2.

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    5/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Imposed loads due to building use Table NA.2Occupants

    Furniture

    Stored

    materials

    Moveable partitions

    Variable actions due to imposed loads are

    Moveable machinery

    ca egor se rom o accor ng o e

    specific use and subcategorised according to

    intensity of loading arising from that use.

    a e or es:

    Residential, social, commercial and

    administration areas (A,B,C,D)

    Garages and vehicle traffic areas (F,G) Roofs (H, I, K)

    Be aware that the National Annex applies

    here:

    Refer to National Annex Table NA.2 to

    Refer to Table NA.3 to find the value of

    the imposed loadqk

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    6/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    mpose oa s ue o u ng use a e . con nue

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    7/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Imposed loads due to building use Table NA.3

    determination of general effects i.e.calculation of structural self weight.

    Point load value is intended for

    determination of local effects, such as shear

    punching.

    Further details relatin to the correct use ofthese tables must be read in your copies of

    the Eurocodes

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    8/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Variable load due to snow loading

    A significant source of imposed loading.

    ground loading due to snow is set out in

    EN1991-1-3:2003 Eurocode 1: Actions

    on structures Part1-3: General actions

    Windloads

    Snow loads (from p1-24 of Eurocodeextracts).

    Snowloads

    The third class of loading set out in the

    Extracts is wind loading. The standard is

    named in full as: EN1991-1-3:2003

    Eurocode 1: Actions on structures

    Part1-4: General actions Wind actions,

    from p1-48 of extracts.

    Calculation of wind actions is taught it

    -

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    9/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Design loads are obtained by multiplying characteristic loads by their appropriatepartial safety factors e.g. 1.35G + 1.5Q for simple beam cases.

    ar a sa e y ac ors or avoura e an un avoura e oa s

    Partial safety factors for actions allow for:

    Design assumptions and inaccuracy of calculation

    Possible unusual increases in the magnitude of the actions Unforeseen stress redistributions

    Construction inaccuracies

    In order to make a structure as safe as possible we must consider whether the load

    that is acting is having a favourable or unfavourable effect on the structure this will.

    Loads that are considered unfavourable will have a higher partial safety factor

    applied.

    Loads that are favourable will have a lower partial safety factor applied.

    Load combination k k,

    Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable Favourable

    Permanent + Imposed 1.35 1.0 1.50 0.0

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    10/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Example: Partial safety factors for favourable and unfavourable loads

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    11/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    So far you have dealt with problems onlycontainin ermanent load t icall due

    Action Combinationfactor 0

    Imposed load in buildings, categorysee EN 1991-1-1

    Load combinations

    to the self-weight of the building) and

    imposed load (due to building occupancy).Category A: domestic, residentialareas

    0.7

    Cate or B: office areas 0.7,

    variable loading is introduced e.g. wind?

    In this case you must consider one of the

    Category C: congregational areas 0.7

    Category D: shopping areas 0.7

    variable loads to be leading and the

    other accompanying.

    .

    Category F: traffic area,

    vehicle weight < 30kN

    0.7

    to be acting with full magnitude, whilst the

    accompanying variable action is reduced

    b a combination factor

    a egory : ra c area,

    30kN

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    12/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Example: Using the load combination factor0

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    13/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Favourable and unfavourable loading with load combination factor

    Factors for design of structural members

    members of a building structure at the ultimate limit state

    Type Load combinationPermanent Load Gk Imposed Load Qk,1

    Wind

    n avoura e avoura e n avoura e avoura e1 Permanent + Imposed 1.35 1.0 1.50 0.0 -

    2 Permanent + Wind 1.35 1.0 - - 1.50

    3 Permanent + Imposed(leading) + Wind (secondary)

    1.35 1.0 1.50 0.01.5 x0=1.5x0.5=

    0.75

    4 Permanent + Imposed(secondary) + Wind (leading)

    1.35 1.0 1.5 x0 0.0 1.50

    1 The unfavourable artial safet factor is a lied to an loads which tend to roduce a more criticaldesign condition at the section considered

    2) The favourable partial safety factor is applied to any loads which tend to produce a less criticaldesi n condition at the section considered

    3) For Type 3 wind is considered to be the secondary variable load with 0= 0.5 and partial safetyfactor calculated as 1.50 x 0.5 = 0.75

    calculated as 1.50 x 0 (typically 0 = 0.7)

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    14/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Favourable and unfavourable loading with load combination factor

    Factors for checking static equilibr ium

    of a building structure at the ultimate limit state

    Permanent Load Gk Imposed Load Qk,1

    Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable Favourable1 Permanent + Imposed 1.10 0.9 1.50 0.0 -

    2 Permanent + Wind 1.10 0.9 - - 1.50

    3 Permanent + Imposed(leading) + Wind (secondary)

    1.10 0.9 1.50 0.01.5 x0=1.5x0.5=

    0.75

    4 Permanent + Imposed(secondary) + Wind (leading)

    1.10 0.9 1.5 x0 0.0 1.50

    1) The unfavourable partial safety factor is applied to any loads which tend to produce a more critical

    design condition at the section considered

    2) The favourable partial safety factor is applied to any loads which tend to produce a less criticaldesign condition at the section considered

    3) For Type 3 wind is considered to be the secondary variable load with 0= 0.5 and partial safety

    factor calculated as 1.50 x 0.5 = 0.754) For Type 4 imposed load is considered to be the secondary variable load with partial safety factorcalculated as 1.50 x 0 (typically 0 = 0.7)

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    15/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Example: Partial safety factors for load combinations

    Considering the stability of the office block for overturning about point B, calculate theminimum allowable characteristic load due to the foundation block at A recallin thatthere will be two possible load combinations of permanent, imposed and wind loading.

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    16/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Example: Partial safety factors for load combinations

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    17/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Example: Partial safety factors for load combinations

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    18/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Example: Partial safety factors for load combinations

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    19/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Loading arrangements on continuous beams

    Loading arrangements can be defined as patterns of load which are chosen to produce.

    In reinforced concrete beam or slab design we look for the loading arrangement that

    will generate:

    The worst (i.e. largest magnitude) in-span moment

    The worst (i.e. largest magnitude) support moment

    arrangements.

    Loading for maximum span moments

    To produce a maximum in-span moment, the span must carry the maximum load, the

    adjacent spans the minimum load, and the spans next to those the maximum load.

    This produces two load cases:

    Unfavourable FavourableLoad Case 1 Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable

    L d C 2

    ax mummoment

    ax mummoment

    ax mummoment

    Load Case 2Maximummoment

    Maximummoment

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    20/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    For maximum moment at a support, adjacent spans carry maximum load and thenspans alternate with maximum and minimum load. This producesn-1load cases.

    Load Case 3Maximummoment

    Unfavourable Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable Favourable

    Maximum

    Load Case 4 Unfavourable Unfavourable Favourable UnfavourableFavourable

    Load Case 5Maximummoment

    Unfavourable Unfavourable FavourableUnfavourable Favourable

    Maximummoment

    Obviousl this set of load cases could take a ver lon time to anal se for a lar e

    Load Case 6 Unfavourable UnfavourableUnfavourableFavourable Favourable

    structure, so the UK National Annex permits a simplification for the load case for

    maximum support moments shown on the next slide..

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    21/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Loading for maximum support moments UK National Annex simplif ication

    For simplicity, the UK National Annex permits the single load case of all spans loaded. , , ,

    previous slide.

    This means that all continuous beam analyses will only need to consider three load

    cases, regar ess o ow many spans ere are.

    However, the resulting support moments (except those at the supports of cantilevers)

    must be redistributed by 20% into the beam/slab span.

    This requires a procedure known as moment redistribution detailed in Section 2.

    Load Case 3 UK NAoad Case 3 UK NAUK National Annex

    load case for

    moment

    moment

    moment

    moment

    moment

    moment

    Unfavourable Unfavourable Unfavourable UnfavourableUnfavourable

    moments

    met:

    In a one-way spanning slab, the area of each bay must exceed 30m2.

    The ratio of the characteristic variable load Q to the characteristic ermanent load G mustnot exceed 1.25

    The characteristic variable load Qkmust not exceed 5kN/m2.

    S ti 1

  • 8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)

    22/22

    EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1

    Load cases for continuous beams summarised using UK National Annex

    simplification with partial safety factors for design of structural members

    Unfavourable FavourableLoad Case 1For maximum in-span Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable

    1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk 1.35Gk 1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk 1.35Gk 1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk

    moment

    moment

    moment

    Load Case 2For maximum in-span Favourable Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable Favourable

    1.35Gk 1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk 1.35Gk 1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk 1.35Gk

    momen Maximummoment

    Maximummoment

    Load Case 3 UK NAUK National Annex load 1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk 1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk 1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk1.35Gk+ 1.5Qkcase or max mum support

    moments 20% support

    moment redistribution must

    Maximum Maximum Maximum MaximumMaximum Maximum

    Unfavourable Unfavourable Unfavourable UnfavourableUnfavourable

    e app e . moment moment moment momentmoment moment