Upload
chan-kin-cheung
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
1/22
Module EG-222
ec on :
Actions onStructures
Dr C. Wood
College of Engineering
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
2/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Characteristic loading
Loads are direct actions (forces) that are applied to a structure. Loads are
Permanent loads Imposed Loads Variable LoadsWalls
Occupants
Furniture
Floor slabs
Beams
Stored
materials
Roofs
Finishes
partitions
Moveable a ng
Permanent
machiner
machineryWind loads
Loads are s ecified b their characteristic values, as defined in BS EN 1990 and the
now oa s
National Annex.
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
3/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Characteristic weights o bui lding materials for calculation o permanent loads
WallsColumns
Floor slabs
Beams
Roofs
Finishes
Cladding
Loads due to the weight of the oads due to the weight of thestructure
continuedoverleaf
Note: The values provided here are unit masses in kg/m2 or kg/m3. To convert this to a unitweight in N/m2 or N/m3, take the constant of gravitational acceleration, a=9.81m/s2.
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
4/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Characteristic weights o building materials continued
Note: The values provided here are unit masses in kg/m2 or kg/m3. To convert this to aunit weight in N/m2 or N/m3, take the constant of gravitational acceleration, a=9.81m/s2.
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
5/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Imposed loads due to building use Table NA.2Occupants
Furniture
Stored
materials
Moveable partitions
Variable actions due to imposed loads are
Moveable machinery
ca egor se rom o accor ng o e
specific use and subcategorised according to
intensity of loading arising from that use.
a e or es:
Residential, social, commercial and
administration areas (A,B,C,D)
Garages and vehicle traffic areas (F,G) Roofs (H, I, K)
Be aware that the National Annex applies
here:
Refer to National Annex Table NA.2 to
Refer to Table NA.3 to find the value of
the imposed loadqk
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
6/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
mpose oa s ue o u ng use a e . con nue
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
7/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Imposed loads due to building use Table NA.3
determination of general effects i.e.calculation of structural self weight.
Point load value is intended for
determination of local effects, such as shear
punching.
Further details relatin to the correct use ofthese tables must be read in your copies of
the Eurocodes
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
8/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Variable load due to snow loading
A significant source of imposed loading.
ground loading due to snow is set out in
EN1991-1-3:2003 Eurocode 1: Actions
on structures Part1-3: General actions
Windloads
Snow loads (from p1-24 of Eurocodeextracts).
Snowloads
The third class of loading set out in the
Extracts is wind loading. The standard is
named in full as: EN1991-1-3:2003
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures
Part1-4: General actions Wind actions,
from p1-48 of extracts.
Calculation of wind actions is taught it
-
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
9/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Design loads are obtained by multiplying characteristic loads by their appropriatepartial safety factors e.g. 1.35G + 1.5Q for simple beam cases.
ar a sa e y ac ors or avoura e an un avoura e oa s
Partial safety factors for actions allow for:
Design assumptions and inaccuracy of calculation
Possible unusual increases in the magnitude of the actions Unforeseen stress redistributions
Construction inaccuracies
In order to make a structure as safe as possible we must consider whether the load
that is acting is having a favourable or unfavourable effect on the structure this will.
Loads that are considered unfavourable will have a higher partial safety factor
applied.
Loads that are favourable will have a lower partial safety factor applied.
Load combination k k,
Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable Favourable
Permanent + Imposed 1.35 1.0 1.50 0.0
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
10/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Example: Partial safety factors for favourable and unfavourable loads
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
11/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
So far you have dealt with problems onlycontainin ermanent load t icall due
Action Combinationfactor 0
Imposed load in buildings, categorysee EN 1991-1-1
Load combinations
to the self-weight of the building) and
imposed load (due to building occupancy).Category A: domestic, residentialareas
0.7
Cate or B: office areas 0.7,
variable loading is introduced e.g. wind?
In this case you must consider one of the
Category C: congregational areas 0.7
Category D: shopping areas 0.7
variable loads to be leading and the
other accompanying.
.
Category F: traffic area,
vehicle weight < 30kN
0.7
to be acting with full magnitude, whilst the
accompanying variable action is reduced
b a combination factor
a egory : ra c area,
30kN
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
12/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Example: Using the load combination factor0
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
13/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Favourable and unfavourable loading with load combination factor
Factors for design of structural members
members of a building structure at the ultimate limit state
Type Load combinationPermanent Load Gk Imposed Load Qk,1
Wind
n avoura e avoura e n avoura e avoura e1 Permanent + Imposed 1.35 1.0 1.50 0.0 -
2 Permanent + Wind 1.35 1.0 - - 1.50
3 Permanent + Imposed(leading) + Wind (secondary)
1.35 1.0 1.50 0.01.5 x0=1.5x0.5=
0.75
4 Permanent + Imposed(secondary) + Wind (leading)
1.35 1.0 1.5 x0 0.0 1.50
1 The unfavourable artial safet factor is a lied to an loads which tend to roduce a more criticaldesign condition at the section considered
2) The favourable partial safety factor is applied to any loads which tend to produce a less criticaldesi n condition at the section considered
3) For Type 3 wind is considered to be the secondary variable load with 0= 0.5 and partial safetyfactor calculated as 1.50 x 0.5 = 0.75
calculated as 1.50 x 0 (typically 0 = 0.7)
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
14/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Favourable and unfavourable loading with load combination factor
Factors for checking static equilibr ium
of a building structure at the ultimate limit state
Permanent Load Gk Imposed Load Qk,1
Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable Favourable1 Permanent + Imposed 1.10 0.9 1.50 0.0 -
2 Permanent + Wind 1.10 0.9 - - 1.50
3 Permanent + Imposed(leading) + Wind (secondary)
1.10 0.9 1.50 0.01.5 x0=1.5x0.5=
0.75
4 Permanent + Imposed(secondary) + Wind (leading)
1.10 0.9 1.5 x0 0.0 1.50
1) The unfavourable partial safety factor is applied to any loads which tend to produce a more critical
design condition at the section considered
2) The favourable partial safety factor is applied to any loads which tend to produce a less criticaldesign condition at the section considered
3) For Type 3 wind is considered to be the secondary variable load with 0= 0.5 and partial safety
factor calculated as 1.50 x 0.5 = 0.754) For Type 4 imposed load is considered to be the secondary variable load with partial safety factorcalculated as 1.50 x 0 (typically 0 = 0.7)
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
15/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Example: Partial safety factors for load combinations
Considering the stability of the office block for overturning about point B, calculate theminimum allowable characteristic load due to the foundation block at A recallin thatthere will be two possible load combinations of permanent, imposed and wind loading.
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
16/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Example: Partial safety factors for load combinations
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
17/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Example: Partial safety factors for load combinations
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
18/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Example: Partial safety factors for load combinations
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
19/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Loading arrangements on continuous beams
Loading arrangements can be defined as patterns of load which are chosen to produce.
In reinforced concrete beam or slab design we look for the loading arrangement that
will generate:
The worst (i.e. largest magnitude) in-span moment
The worst (i.e. largest magnitude) support moment
arrangements.
Loading for maximum span moments
To produce a maximum in-span moment, the span must carry the maximum load, the
adjacent spans the minimum load, and the spans next to those the maximum load.
This produces two load cases:
Unfavourable FavourableLoad Case 1 Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable
L d C 2
ax mummoment
ax mummoment
ax mummoment
Load Case 2Maximummoment
Maximummoment
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
20/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
For maximum moment at a support, adjacent spans carry maximum load and thenspans alternate with maximum and minimum load. This producesn-1load cases.
Load Case 3Maximummoment
Unfavourable Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable Favourable
Maximum
Load Case 4 Unfavourable Unfavourable Favourable UnfavourableFavourable
Load Case 5Maximummoment
Unfavourable Unfavourable FavourableUnfavourable Favourable
Maximummoment
Obviousl this set of load cases could take a ver lon time to anal se for a lar e
Load Case 6 Unfavourable UnfavourableUnfavourableFavourable Favourable
structure, so the UK National Annex permits a simplification for the load case for
maximum support moments shown on the next slide..
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
21/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Loading for maximum support moments UK National Annex simplif ication
For simplicity, the UK National Annex permits the single load case of all spans loaded. , , ,
previous slide.
This means that all continuous beam analyses will only need to consider three load
cases, regar ess o ow many spans ere are.
However, the resulting support moments (except those at the supports of cantilevers)
must be redistributed by 20% into the beam/slab span.
This requires a procedure known as moment redistribution detailed in Section 2.
Load Case 3 UK NAoad Case 3 UK NAUK National Annex
load case for
moment
moment
moment
moment
moment
moment
Unfavourable Unfavourable Unfavourable UnfavourableUnfavourable
moments
met:
In a one-way spanning slab, the area of each bay must exceed 30m2.
The ratio of the characteristic variable load Q to the characteristic ermanent load G mustnot exceed 1.25
The characteristic variable load Qkmust not exceed 5kN/m2.
S ti 1
8/13/2019 EG-222 Section 1 Revised(1)
22/22
EG-222 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN - Section 1
Load cases for continuous beams summarised using UK National Annex
simplification with partial safety factors for design of structural members
Unfavourable FavourableLoad Case 1For maximum in-span Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable
1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk 1.35Gk 1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk 1.35Gk 1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk
moment
moment
moment
Load Case 2For maximum in-span Favourable Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable Favourable
1.35Gk 1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk 1.35Gk 1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk 1.35Gk
momen Maximummoment
Maximummoment
Load Case 3 UK NAUK National Annex load 1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk 1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk 1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk1.35Gk+ 1.5Qkcase or max mum support
moments 20% support
moment redistribution must
Maximum Maximum Maximum MaximumMaximum Maximum
Unfavourable Unfavourable Unfavourable UnfavourableUnfavourable
e app e . moment moment moment momentmoment moment